Slashdot Mirror


US Companies Sponsor Pro Gamers

Baddox writes "Professional gaming, which has for some time now been a popular venture in Asia, is finally starting to get some attention from big US companies. Teams for competitive shooters like Counter Strike are getting sponsored by large corporations like Johnson and Johnson. The article poses the question, "Is 'frags per round' going to be the batting average of the 21st century?" "

228 comments

  1. Whatever. by krymsin01 · · Score: 3, Funny

    That kid from Wizard rules over all of you.

    --
    stuff
    1. Re:Whatever. by freshman_a · · Score: 1

      No way... The kid from The Last Starfighter is the man.

    2. Re:Whatever. by decipher_saint · · Score: 0

      Forget that, Flynn from Tron pwns j00 all. He codes games, like Paranoids, Matrix Blaster, Vice Squad, a whole slew of them...

      --
      crazy dynamite monkey
    3. Re:Whatever. by hal2814 · · Score: 1

      There's no way Flynn can match the deaf, dumb blind kid who sure plays a mean pinball.

  2. Answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, frags per round will not be the batting average of the 21st century.

    1. Re:Answer by Frnknstn · · Score: 1, Funny

      I agree. 'Kills per death' will.

      --
      If it's in you sig, it's in your post.
    2. Re:Answer by SeekerDarksteel · · Score: 1, Interesting

      It depends on the style of the game. In games where victory is determined by comparing rounds won (such as CS), kills per round (or minute) is far more important than kills per death. On the other hand in a game where winning is determined by comparing kills made (most deathmatch type games) kills per death is obviously far more important.

      So as a diehard CS fan Ill have to say kills per round for the win!

      --
      The laws of probability forbid it!
    3. Re:Answer by databyss · · Score: 0

      statsme

      --
      Hmmm witty sig or funny sig? Maybe elitest techy sig!
    4. Re:Answer by Durinthal · · Score: 1

      One thing I'm curious about is why Deathmatch gets all the attention. Yes, it's the most popular by far, but it requires much less skill than, say, Capture the Flag in most games (and Onslaught in UT2004, Conquest in BF1942, etc.). There, they usually have teams that may not be composed of the best DM-type players, but have incredible synergy together.

      Maybe the solo superstar ideal is starting to drift into the gaming arena from sports as well.

    5. Re:Answer by wahsapa · · Score: 1

      duh, it will be frags per library of congress

    6. Re:Answer by Pxtl · · Score: 1

      A-freakin'-men. Sucks that Counterstrike and DM get all the attention at pro-level, as they're by far the _worst_ spectator sports. CS is crawling and slow and the action is often spread out, DM is just chaotic and there's not much to follow but the score.

      Games like CTF and ONS are much better, but the action is too spread out still - there's still too many points of combat. The ones that are best for spectators are the ones that cram most players into one space. BombRun/BoomBall (where the action focusses around the ball) works well, so does Assault (where the action is on the next objective point).

      Ultraviolent Hunt games are spectacular to watch (not crawling, stealthy Hunt games like AvsP) - by far the best Hunt-mode experience I've seen is the Quake 3 "BFG tag" mod. One player just pounding all the other players until somebody gets a lucky shot and takes the power from him. The action is incredibly tight and intense. Not as much strategy to enjoy though.

    7. Re:Answer by Durinthal · · Score: 1

      Bombing Run in UT2003 was easily my favorite gametype.. No-instagib, no-translocator games required an insane amount of teamwork (with some exceptions, such as when you could start a round with the speed combo in Anubis, then it's a matter of dodging everyone on the way to the goal).

      Unfortunately they effectively killed it in UT2004, so I went to Onslaught from there. Yes, there's multiple points to watch, but that's part of the strategy of the game. I think it still translates decently as a spectating type.

  3. Johnson and Johnson by mysqlrocks · · Score: 2, Funny

    Of course companies like Johnson and Johnson are sponsoring video game tournaments. Video game players are in the perfect demographic for most marketing efforts.

    1. Re:Johnson and Johnson by Phil246 · · Score: 1

      especially for caffeine related products :)

    2. Re:Johnson and Johnson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Excellent point! Certainly they are an untapped market for Johnson and Johnson's hygiene lines, so this offers an entry into that market.

    3. Re:Johnson and Johnson by Phil246 · · Score: 1

      other companies do however. I dont think its just limited to Johnson & Johnson

    4. Re:Johnson and Johnson by Pilatus · · Score: 1

      I don't think they are. The real gamers don't care for more than games and computers. So you would have a hard time trying to sell them a holiday.

    5. Re:Johnson and Johnson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      geeks and baby lotion? oh wait, i won't go there.

  4. Not Really by mfh · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Is 'frags per round' going to be the batting average of the 21st century?

    No. Our generation might be geeks but I think, for myself at least, the beauty of online gaming is not quantity but quality. That is pretty much the same for football for me too... it's the big plays that matter and make a game worth watching. It's awesome to watch a game where some professional gamer goes on a crazy rampage, doing all kinds of freaky/impossible moves and stuff, and that is the main draw to those events (as well as the celebrity factor), not the stats. With baseball, stats have to be the draw because the game is very slow.

    --
    The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
    1. Re:Not Really by oskard · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I agree. Its all in the player and team. Kyle Miller, aka KSharp, is on Team 3D. They have represented the United States at the WCG for about 4 consecutive times now, despite have major lineup issues this past year. Kyle performed very well this trial, and picked up one ace round. That's when one guy kills all of the 5 on the other team. It was exciting, and even though he didn't have the highest kill count at the end of the game, he was the most talked about player. This article is funny, it starts off talking about Kyle, even though he didn't have the best ratio... It kind of negates its argument.

      My point is, the hype of the player and status of the team will surpass the statistics.

      --
      Sigs are for Terrorists.
    2. Re:Not Really by DrugCheese · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Great point. Did people watch Dennis Rodman because he was going to get another rebound any second now! No they watched because of his character.

      I think the good players tend to relax a little more and let their characters out and people tend to like/dislike them on their character more then their stats. Yes at the same time these are the people pushing our favorite teams to win games which is a bonus. But Randy Moss is an asshole, I don't care how good he is, his stats rank second to his character in my book.

      (And I hate the vikings anyway, DA BEARS!)

      --
      *DrugCheese rants*
    3. Re:Not Really by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      Baseball, that rounders game ? I thought they were referring to Cricket.

    4. Re:Not Really by MyGirlFriendsBroken · · Score: 1, Funny

      I thought they were referring to Cricket.

      So did I, also I thought the new batting average was now number of continuous hours drinking afer an ashes series win.

      --
      If you read a speed reading book, does it take you less time to read the second half?
    5. Re:Not Really by ifwm · · Score: 1

      "Is 'frags per round' going to be the batting average of the 21st century?"

      I agree, but for a different reason. Some of the beauty of sports is the generational association, remebering the game as it was when you were young, watching a Yankees game with your dad, then doing the same thing 40 years later.

      The pace of technology will obsolete games so quickly that this particular appeal will be lost.

    6. Re:Not Really by Retric · · Score: 1

      I think the pace is slowing down a lot. Today's counter strike is more or less the same as when the game first showed up. Giving the game a better graphics is not going to change the game play much. And minor changes like letting people uses two pistols don't change the game that much. I expect I could watch a game of counter strike 2020 and follow the game just fine.

      Besides, if this ever catches on as much as say basketball did then there will be a lot of pressure to keep the game basically the same. After all you might move the free throw line around some but the basketball has changed little over time.

    7. Re:Not Really by Saxerman · · Score: 2, Insightful
      It's awesome to watch a game where some professional gamer goes on a crazy rampage, doing all kinds of freaky/impossible moves and stuff, and that is the main draw to those events (as well as the celebrity factor), not the stats.

      I agree, yet this is also the main limitation of 'e-sports' vs. the more conventional kind. In the really real world we don't have artificially coded limits to how fast we can run or how high we can jump. The software and hardware plays too large a part of the game for people to really admire the skill and prowess of computer gamers. Compare the finesse of a FPS player using a top-notch mouse and game pad on a high-end machine vs. Johnny Six pack with his mommy's email machine.

      This is not to say there is not skill involved in gaming or that real tournaments don't level the playing field by giving everyone the same machine to play on. My point is merely we haven't reached the level yet where gaming skill is a significant enough factor in our games yet. We're going to need to improve our game inputs to the point where people will say, "Wow, I couldn't't do that." instead of "OMG! Hax0rs! BAN THEM!"

      --

      A steaming cup of soykaf would be real wiz right now.

    8. Re:Not Really by WillerZ · · Score: 1, Funny

      That can only be measured if you stop drinking at some point.

      --
      I guess today is a passable day to die.
    9. Re:Not Really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So...you know Randy Moss was traded, right?

    10. Re:Not Really by madprogrammer · · Score: 1

      I dunno... I'm thinking you guys have never seen the complete frag. Now that's character.

      In any case, games will become more expressive because that's what people want. Ever since the first 'tag' textures in MP games people have found a way to express themselves differently from others. When virtual reality hits big, there will be even more expression in games.

      And of course there's smack talk during the game - the best smacker will get a big following for sure. Behaviour off the 'court' will be a big factor too.

      Hell, look at poker these days!

      While I don't think video games will replace sports, I'm sure they will be right there along-side.

    11. Re:Not Really by brkello · · Score: 1

      Geeks aren't the only people playing games these days. There are people who watch sports and are stats freaks. There are people who watch sports to see the amazing big plays. Stat pages for servers wouldn't be up if people didn't care about stats. Some people's stats make them celebrities. So the person with the best frags per round in the league would probably be seen as a valuable player...just as much as the person with the most receptions would be valuable in football. Sort of goes hand in hand.

      --
      Support a great indie game: http://www.abaddon360.com
    12. Re:Not Really by JFitzsimmons · · Score: 1

      While the game may implement certain restrictions on a player's avatar, there is still a wide variety of things that amatures just can't do. The computer does not have rules for how well you can aim (compared with other players), or how well you can micromanage (in terms of games like Starcraft). If you never have, I suggest finding a "VOD" of a professional South Korean Starcraft game. Then try doing it yourself. You'll see what I mean.

      --
      Beware he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master. -Anonymous
    13. Re:Not Really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK - drive in an F1 team then. Anyone can do that. Oh, wait.

      Maybe you need really good hardware as well as skill, and the hardware plays such a large role there's a constructor's championship as well, while skill remains a very important factor.

      Just because you can't do it to the same level at home, doesn't mean it isn't a sport.

    14. Re:Not Really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With baseball, stats have to be the draw because the game is very slow.

      For baseball geeks I'd agree, but for mainstream spectators homeruns are the crowd pleasing part of the game. It's no wonder when a not so talented hitter can hit many homeruns and strikeout a lot, yet is still highly paid even by pro baseball salaries. The pressure to hit more homeruns is evidenced by the reportedly wipespread steroid use as well.

    15. Re:Not Really by mconeone · · Score: 1

      Most online leagues have pretty strict rules about trash talking and other unsportsmanlike conduct. Even if it were allowed, first of all there is no way a player from one team can verbally communicate with a player from the opposing team, unless they are physically within earshot of each other. Second, typing a message to the other team stops the player from what he or she is doing while they type the message... in most cases not a very smart thing to do.

      However, in reply to the parent, visual customization of in-game characters can go a long way in creating hype. Unfortunately, most games that do allow players to customize characters are MMOs. I WOULD like to see it added in FPSes, but sadly the idea would not work out as intended. A FPS would have to have a vast array of customization options to achieve the level of player differentiation that would result in teams having unique looks. This requires a great deal of effort, and is something most FPS designers wouldn't want to spend resources on. The other option is to allow user-made content, but that generally leads to bad things like obscene characters or cheating.

    16. Re:Not Really by MoaDweeb · · Score: 1

      If you think softball is slow, try Cricket. Test matches take up to 5 days and then the game may still be a draw. http://www.cricinfo.com/

      --
      New Zealanders are well balanced with a chip on each shoulder. One represents Australia, the other the rest of the world
  5. Well, not new... by rwven · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm not trying to troll here, but this sort of thing has been going on for years. Intel and other big names have been sponsoring top clans and individual gamers for a while now. A lot of people have small computer businesses in their towns sponsoring their clans and stuff too. It's very common for internet cafe's to sponsor teams as well. I'm not sure why this is being reported as a "new thing" because it's most definately not.

    1. Re:Well, not new... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (posting anonymously because I'm late for work)

      The difference is that Intel and other computer stores have a direct connection to electronic gaming... Johnson and Johnson do not. Making that change means that cybergaming has gone from niche interest to general interest. Imagine if Nascar was only sponsored by car parts manufacturers, or if sports stars only hawked basketballs. They don't because there is broader interest there.

      Also, the slant helps the person who wrote the article to get paid by the AP to fly to New York and watch people frag eachother. More power to him... I had to pay my own way there.

    2. Re:Well, not new... by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure why this is being reported as a "new thing" because it's most definately not.

      What is new is that up until now, computer related companies have been doing the sponsoring. There's nothing computer related about Johnson and Johnson's baby rash powder (at least at the moment. Wait until the new and improved nanobot rash powder is created).

    3. Re:Well, not new... by EngineeringMarvel · · Score: 1

      It's not a common thing for large companies to sponsor players, but it is common for them to sponsor the actual LANs that the players compete at. It does happen of course, just look at Jonathan "Fata1ity" Wendell. He has had sponsorship for quite some time now.

      I'm sure it will become more common, but the poster of the article makes it seem like video games is going to explode into a major sport. I do not see this happening in the US anytime soon. People have been perdicting that it will in the US for a few years now and there are no signs of a major increase in the sport. I say this from my experience writing for Amped News for about a year. LANs are fun, but I personally do not find watching others play video games to be that exciting.

      --
      I couldn't think of anything witty to say, so...you're stuck with this.
    4. Re:Well, not new... by AviLazar · · Score: 1

      It's new when non-computer companies decide to sponser these events. It's nothing spectacular if nVidia sponsers a game - hell thats just advertisment for their product. It is something spectacular when a company that advertises itself as "baby safe" is sponsering a game that's entire purpose is to kill the opposition.

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    5. Re:Well, not new... by lonasindi · · Score: 1

      " LANs are fun, but I personally do not find watching others play video games to be that exciting. "

      This is true for most people, at least right now. Video games are boring to watch, but with the advent of some new technology, perhaps they'll get more entertaining. Holographics could really perk it up.

    6. Re:Well, not new... by acadia11 · · Score: 1

      Start using real people electronically controlled via the video game, that way when you kill someone, guess what, someone really dies, even better you know that pit of lava you just jumped into, well, guess what someone really just jumped into a pit of lava. I'd liken it to running man, but these people have no free will, you are controlling them with a joy stick!!! now, tell me that won't draw a crowd???

    7. Re:Well, not new... by lonasindi · · Score: 1

      i just hope you're joking.

    8. Re:Well, not new... by acadia11 · · Score: 1

      Look they said as a spectator sport the Pro Video Gaming league just isn't exciting enough ... I was just throwing out a suggestion, hockey had it's fights, boxing has it's ear biting, baseball has it's bats, and ... well what does the pro video gaming league, have, ... you got any better ideas I'm all ears.

    9. Re:Well, not new... by acadia11 · · Score: 1

      Look they said as a spectator sport the Pro Video Gaming league just isn't exciting enough ... I was just throwing out a suggestion, hockey had it's fights, boxing has it's ear biting, baseball has it's bats, football has T.O. and ... well what does the pro video gaming league, have, ... you got any better ideas I'm all ears.

    10. Re:Well, not new... by lonasindi · · Score: 1

      Right now? Video games are not gonna be entertaining to watch. And I feel it's gonna be like that for a while, until some whiz-bang tech like holography makes it more fun to watch. If we can simulate those people instead of actually having dudes dying, it's a similar effect. Imagine it, a whole battle being fought out in some big arena, the combatants holograms controlled by gamers. THEN it might be something worth watching.

    11. Re:Well, not new... by acadia11 · · Score: 1

      No, no, why leave it to imagination let's just have actual people die, it worked for the Romans, and the Colliseum was the largest stadium/dome ever built for more than 2000 years, come on, they were on to something.

  6. Corporate Logos by DarthBart · · Score: 5, Funny

    So now we'll see Unreal skins with "BUDWEISER" and "MARLBORO" all over them.

    And just think of the TV commercials. "Red Bull, the official drink of the 2006 Counterstrike World Championship". Or "KY Brand Lubricant - The official masturbatory lubricant of the 2006 Counterstrike World Championship".

    1. Re:Corporate Logos by kevin_conaway · · Score: 1

      Don't companies already advertise in games anyway? I thought I remember something about Half Life 2 containing advertisements on the walls. Maybe that was The Sims. Can anyone back this up?

    2. Re:Corporate Logos by Chagrin · · Score: 1

      Half-life doesn't have any advertising. It does have logos throughout the game to give it realism, but they don't represent actual products.

      --

      I/O Error G-17: Aborting Installation

    3. Re:Corporate Logos by krymsin01 · · Score: 1

      Speaking of sponsorship, the USAF should get involved in this. What the world needs now is modern day equivalent to Forrest Gump at that ping pong tournament.

      --
      stuff
    4. Re:Corporate Logos by oskard · · Score: 1

      Bawls, not Red Bull.

      --
      Sigs are for Terrorists.
    5. Re:Corporate Logos by chrisnewbie · · Score: 1

      Well
        At least the gamer will finally get dome real money.

      But cigarettes and alcohol will probaly have a hard time getting in there since it's prohibited to sell to people under the age of 18 and not all pro gamers are over that age limit.

    6. Re:Corporate Logos by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but I'd feel a bit conspicuous if Target was my sponsor.

    7. Re:Corporate Logos by pnice · · Score: 1

      It is Swat 4 you're thinking of. http://www.10-david.com/?p=news_item&id=861

  7. Two different worlds by sexyrexy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The world of Slashdot readers is populated with a high percentage of people who are actually interested in a professional gamer's KTD. The rest of the world is not.

    And it's not just because the rest of the world is still populated primarily by the sort of middle aged and old folks who still don't understand computers. Go to any high school, any college campus in the modern world and most of the students care about rugby, or football, or what have you. They will grow old continuing to care about such things, and it will not be a generational change. This will always be fringe.

    --

    Rex is 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    1. Re:Two different worlds by idontgno · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      The world of Slashdot

      WHOA! I just had the most unpleasant visual of Blizzard's new MMORPG, World of Slashdot.

      <shudder>

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    2. Re:Two different worlds by m4dm4n · · Score: 1

      You're right, the society will never change, things that are popular today will still be popular in a 100 years, no difference, no sir.

    3. Re:Two different worlds by Maian · · Score: 0
      I don't know about that. I think you're underestimating how many people are gamers. Are you forgetting the casual gamer crowd?

      While it may be true that they're more into sports, it's not like they don't care about games. Many people have played sports games and GTA, and it isn't uncommon to get together to play on the xbox or PS2. Games are losing their "geek" reputation fast.

      That's not to mention that it doesn't take much exposure to games to get them sucked in. Games are like drugs, except they're legal.

    4. Re:Two different worlds by AviLazar · · Score: 1

      I disagree. With the exception of you guys, I do not know ONE person who reads /. or similar forums - but I know MANY people who play computer games. They range from the geek to the preppy and all thats in between.

      Yes it will be about KDR's and the like. People do not talk about the "quality" of football (well not regularly) but they talk about the yards thrown of a quarterback. So it will be for gaming - though in this industry I doubt a game like CS: Source will last more then 2-3 years while football has been around for many decades.

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    5. Re:Two different worlds by databyss · · Score: 0

      I summon Flaming Troll to attack and counter your logic onslaught with my AC shield!

      --
      Hmmm witty sig or funny sig? Maybe elitest techy sig!
    6. Re:Two different worlds by WreckingCru · · Score: 1

      It's true, and it's a sad truth.

      The fact that all the people who label gamers and computer 'geeks' in general as 'geeks, nerds, losers, freaks' .... ...are the same people who could never survive without what the 'geeks' have contributed to the modern world.

      think email, instant messaging, blah blah ... ...how else would the jocks have cyber sex with their 'girlfriends'??...

      If anything, shouldn't the gamers and nerds and geeks be WORSHIPPED ??!

      (i know this is offtopic, but it had to be said"

      --
      If I have seen farther than others, it is because I was standing on the shoulders of giants.
    7. Re:Two different worlds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      most of the students care about rugby, or football, or what have you.
      things that are popular today will still be popular in a 100 years, no difference, no sir.

      You're so right, because 100 years ago people didn't play football or rugby.
    8. Re:Two different worlds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I was in college, we used to sit around our Fraternity house and play video games daily (usually with drinks), and we weren't the nerds, we were the popular fraternity with the good parties and the freshman groupies.

      The release of Halo 2, GTA:SA, and every Tiger Woods or Madden game was a big deal. We even had xboxes system linked together. Video games are no longer just for nerds.

      (Posting as AC so as not to tarnish my nerd rep with stories of greek life)

    9. Re:Two different worlds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go to your average college today. Go talk to your average male at said college. Come back and tell me how many don't play video games, since it will be a lot less then the ones that do. I started college less then eight years ago and my freshmen year we had nightly n64 games with 10-20 people crammed into our tiny dorm room, this was just people from our floor. Other floors had similar events on a regular basis.

      In the off season of various sports playing video games is still a normal saturday afternoon activity for most of my friends. Oh none of them read slashdot and I doubt any of them would know what it is.

    10. Re:Two different worlds by m4dm4n · · Score: 1

      I don't think any of those sports were professional then. They were just something that people played for fun.

      Kind of like computer games today.

  8. J&J Has a hidden agenda though... by HerculesMO · · Score: 4, Funny

    They are testing a new pill that treats epileptic seizures.

    They are hoping that enough people start watching the games they sponsor so they are start going into convulsions, then BOOYAH! J&J to the rescue!

    Profit!

    --
    The price is always right if someone else is paying.
    1. Re:J&J Has a hidden agenda though... by dw604 · · Score: 2

      Because it's true!

    2. Re:J&J Has a hidden agenda though... by davygrvy · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah.. and after wrist damage from repetative stress disorder, grab a J&J wrist brace..

      --
      -=[ place .sig here ]=-
  9. Corporate Moto by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All your frag are belong to us.

  10. Well, let's get something straight by user43 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The word sponsorship itself can mean an array of different things.

    Right now, pro gamers only get sponsored for things like travel, clothes, computer parts, food, etc. They may even get a salary, but this salary more often than not is not enough to live on.

    This of course is much better that nothing, but still, computer gaming has a ways to go before it catches up to "real" sports in terms of sponsorship money and recognition.

    1. Re:Well, let's get something straight by oskard · · Score: 1

      Angel Munoz, CEO of the Cyberathlete Professional League, has stated in a few interviews that he would like to start a franchise league in the United States. Teams representing each state, drafts, and even 'stadiums' (cyber cafes). I suspect if this is implemented, we'll see a slew of undiscovered gamers being used as marketting tools, and not only that, but gamer salaries increasing severely.

      On the other hand, its a commonly known issue that it takes more than skill to make it to the top. A lot of it has to do with who you know. Maybe this will make it more difficult for unknown gamers to emerge onto the scene.

      --
      Sigs are for Terrorists.
    2. Re:Well, let's get something straight by Mazem · · Score: 0

      Not in Korea.

    3. Re:Well, let's get something straight by user43 · · Score: 0

      Very true.

      South Korea, however, has a totally different culture. Comparing Korea with the US in terms of gaming is like comparing the US and Sweden when it comes to religiosity.

      Sure, there is a place out there where gamers run free of abuse from the general public. And sure, the US may one day be like South Korea, but this probably won't be during the next 10 years.

    4. Re:Well, let's get something straight by ifwm · · Score: 0

      "Cyberathlete"

      BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHA. *cough*cough*cough*choke*

      (pauses to catch breath)

      BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA...

    5. Re:Well, let's get something straight by ifwm · · Score: 1

      You know what's even better?

      Someone actually got offended enough to mod me down!

      BWAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

      Sorry Mr. CyberathBWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

      Sorry couldn't get it out.

    6. Re:Well, let's get something straight by casemon · · Score: 1

      They may even get a salary, but this salary more often than not is not enough to live on.

      Hey, just like the professionals who make the games!

    7. Re:Well, let's get something straight by Ced_Ex · · Score: 1

      "Cyberathlete"

      BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHA. *cough*cough*cough*choke*

      (pauses to catch breath)

      BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA...


      Your cardio could use some work. What game do you recommend to fix that?

      --
      Live forever, or die trying.
    8. Re:Well, let's get something straight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats not entirely true. There are a growing number of teams that are offering salaries for their players upwards of 40k a year. Although this number is very small, it is growing.

    9. Re:Well, let's get something straight by ediron2 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Found myself seated next to a LPGA pro a few weeks ago. Afterward, I looked her statistics up: In 12 years as a pro, she made a bit over $100k from tournaments, and she's rated just below 100th in lifetime earnings. I don't know what her endorsements made her, but they'd have to have been insanely high to get her beyond $25k a year from that low of a start.


      There's money enough for a top-ten player in lesser sports, but (outside of men's baseball, football, basketball and soccer) nearly every "real" sport has thousands of people that consider themselves lucky if they break even financially. We're already there for video gamers, from what I'm hearing.

  11. Dot-Com by ari_j · · Score: 0, Troll

    Is this a sign that the economy has recovered to the point people are being visible about which toilets they're flushing their cash surplus down?

    1. Re:Dot-Com by Nuttles1 · · Score: 1

      Is this a sign that the economy has recovered to the point people are being visible about which toilets they're flushing their cash surplus down?

      Why is this a troll? I think this is a valid thought. I think most companies would think twice before spending money on a 'fringe' thing like online gaming if they were short on cash. I would also think that /.ers would think more deeply about an issue and ponder/mull over the possibility that the sponsership of online gaming may be less about the popularity of online gaming and more to do with the amount of online cash a company has.

    2. Re:Dot-Com by ari_j · · Score: 1

      Thank you. I thought I was being optimistic about the economy recovering and regaining faith in frivolous technology after these 6 long years, but evidently the moderators today don't know what all those mod points starting with the letter I are for.

  12. Well, not new...Outside one's cliche. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about "not as widely known outside certain circles"?

    Side question what game has the best level-editor out there? Unreal Tournament 2004?

  13. Replacing traditional sports sponsorship? by Red+Flayer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    FTA: "Manufacturers keep putting out new games and game consoles, obsoleting the old."

    Someone's editor forgot to grammarize the article.

    I don't think anyone's marketing budget for traditional sports is going to be cut. Sports like basketball and football are not declining in popularity among the demographic they are trying to reach.

    Gamer sponsorship is a drop in the bucket for these companies (like Johnson & Johnson). I don't think televised gaming is going to be big in the US for a very, very long time. South Korea, however, as well as China in the near future, is a market where sponsorship could pay off quite well, especially for companies thathave low brand recognition there.

    --
    "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    1. Re:Replacing traditional sports sponsorship? by bprime · · Score: 1

      Someone's editor forgot to grammarize the article.

      "Access used to be a noun. Now it's a verb. Access got verbed."

      Verbing weirds language!

      (with respect to Bill Waterson)

    2. Re:Replacing traditional sports sponsorship? by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      I'm sure you realized that I verbed that noun in response to the author doing the same :)

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    3. Re:Replacing traditional sports sponsorship? by bprime · · Score: 1

      Of course - but I'm sure that not everyone here has read every single Calvin and Hobbes strip :)

  14. KY sponsorship by HBI · · Score: 1

    Brings a whole new meaning to the UT spooge gun.

    --
    HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
  15. On a more serious note... a question, sorry OT by HerculesMO · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Kind of off topic but nonetheless...

    I've been playing first person shooters for years now, and I have convinced myself that I'm pretty damned good at them. I read all about these gaming leagues and such, but the question is, how do I join in one to see if my skills are as good as I think they are?

    There has to be a way to 'work up the ranks' and I've found myself amazingly good (yes, I'm gloating) at games like Quake3 or Unreal Tournament 2004 -- twitch based games. I want to get online and compete in deathmatches to see how well I do, but I know a *lot* of people out there are hackers and such, so I want an arena in which I can have an even playing field.

    That said, so I don't get modded OT, J&J is just getting money into the realm of gaming -- it doesn't really matter whether or not it's online gaming now. It's just something people watch, and something J&J can use to market itself. It's business, and it always is. Intel doesn't sponsor the gaming clans out of the good of their hearts. Well, Intel does it because they know they suck compared to AMD in gaming. Oh well... money talks!

    --
    The price is always right if someone else is paying.
    1. Re:On a more serious note... a question, sorry OT by Buzz_Litebeer · · Score: 1

      Having played games at the high level, all it takes is joining and winning small sponsored tourneys until you get invitations or are able to get into the large tourneys through some kind of lower level speed tourney.

      --
      If you don't vote, you don't matter, so don't waste your time telling me your opinion
    2. Re:On a more serious note... a question, sorry OT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look for sponsered tournaments. Join some newsgroups. My understanding is that there are no real leagues (at least that's not the primary way to go professional)... just tournaments that give out cash prizes.

    3. Re:On a more serious note... a question, sorry OT by m4dm4n · · Score: 1

      Judging from your post, you have not played much competitive gaming at all. Get online and don't worry about hackers. I used to be very involved counter strike and was quite good, and if someone joined with an aim bot or something similar, I still stood a chance. Compared to the guys who got sponsorships though, I completely sucked.

      Nothing is funnier than seeing someone with cheats loaded get owned by someone with true skill.

    4. Re:On a more serious note... a question, sorry OT by HerculesMO · · Score: 1

      Where do you enter tournaments? I live in Jersey and it seems nothing fun comes here :(

      --
      The price is always right if someone else is paying.
    5. Re:On a more serious note... a question, sorry OT by HerculesMO · · Score: 1

      Counterstrike is a team based game generally, and too slow paced for me. Don't get me wrong -- I like the game and play it a lot -- and I do really well (even against hackers at times), but it's too slow.

      Hackers in Quake3 and UT2004 can railgun you while jumping off a bouncer pad and strafing.. it's impossible to block and no amount of 'skill' can fix that, unfortunately.

      I'm sure that there are tons of people better than me. I just want to see where I stack up compared to these 'pro' guys. I mean, it doesn't hurt to check, does it? I just wanted a method to be able to get into some competition class matches and see if I do well at all.

      If you have any info on that, lemme know :)

      --
      The price is always right if someone else is paying.
    6. Re:On a more serious note... a question, sorry OT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another new definition for 'hacker', joy.

      I was wondering why a 14 year old waiter in my restaurant had been calling himself a hacker, despite having never heard of a Linux box or C.

      Incidentally, his brother is a web developer who has never heard of Apache (which may indirectly indicate something about the type of people using this term for gaming).

      The last game I played was a mud. I'm really feeling my age.

    7. Re:On a more serious note... a question, sorry OT by misterbozo · · Score: 1

      How to get into the competitive side of Quake3 and UT2K4:
      - get the competition mods: OSP for Quake 3, UTComp for Unreal Tournament 2004
      - play some public games in the modes enjoy: 1v1, TDM, FFA, CTF... if you haven't played with OSP/UTComp before you've probably only played noobs, so expect to get owned here.
      - check the demos of the best players, you'll learn a lot from that.
      - find the IRC channels where pickup games are organized, even if they're not as good as clan games they're still much better than your average public game. It's a good starting point, and if you enjoy the pickup games then you can look for a clan and get more into the community.

      Some links:
      http://www.esreality.com/ - genreal e-sport news/community, some demos
      http://www.challenge-tv.com/ - Quake demos
      http://www.ggl.com/ - competition in the US
      http://www.clanbase.com/ - competition in Europe
      http://www.unrealnorth.com/ - Unreal community
      This isn't everything of course, there are many more leagues & communities.

      About cheating, in all honesty, it is not something you should care about. You shouldn't think about it: in most cases when you think someone is cheating he's probably not, and if he is, well what can you do about it? Stop caring about it, problem solved.

    8. Re:On a more serious note... a question, sorry OT by WillerZ · · Score: 1

      Hackers in Quake3 and UT2004 can railgun you while jumping off a bouncer pad and strafing.

      Hate to break it to you, but I've played clan games with people who could do that without cheating.

      Of course, most of them now have RSI so badly that all they can play is DDR...

      --
      I guess today is a passable day to die.
    9. Re:On a more serious note... a question, sorry OT by brkello · · Score: 1

      Your question confuses me a lot. Have you just been playing single player fps? It's pretty obvious if you play multiplayer there are "clans". They all wear their little tags. If you impress them, usually they will bug you to join..or you can bug them. A lot of these people play on ladders (like cal for cs). There are different levels for each ladder. You will learn who the good clans are and where they are play. So yes, you can work your way up. But if you were really that good, a clan probably would have already scooped you up, so this doesn't make sense to me.

      --
      Support a great indie game: http://www.abaddon360.com
    10. Re:On a more serious note... a question, sorry OT by MrAnnoyanceToYou · · Score: 1

      Yeah, uhm. Q3 is so old that anyone 'hacking' is just sad. 50% of the time you can beat them anyways. I suggest you get online before you call yourself 'pretty damned good' - I can kill lots and lots of bots, but when it comes down to it I'm not really that great. Despite more hours of playtime than anyone I know online or off, I'm pretty much average or slightly below until I get a good run at Rocket Arena 3, my game of choice. It's kinda sad really.

    11. Re:On a more serious note... a question, sorry OT by HD+Webdev · · Score: 1



      You might want to join irc channels and play in some pickup games to see how your skill level is.

      As far as team games, doing well on public game servers is much easier than doing well on a server where the participants are specifically chosen to play. That vs a random set of people who drop in and out constantly and don't have any incentive to work with the team (yipee, high KD ration player but his team loses most of the time!)

      irc://irc.gamesurge.net is one good place to look for challenging play.

      --
      This is not a dream, not a dream...we are transmitting from the year 1-9-9-9.
    12. Re:On a more serious note... a question, sorry OT by Alarion · · Score: 1

      For ut2k4, stop by http://www.prounreal.com/ It's part of the "competitive" community for that game, and a good way to find server info for some of the servers that a lot of these guys play on.

      If you aren't up to the skill level there, stop by http://forums.beyondunreal.com/ and find some more casual guys there.

      And let me be the first to tell you that just because you can beat the piss out of bots, doesn't mean you will be good at all online. Online players don't think like bots, don't move like bots, don't shoot like bots.

    13. Re:On a more serious note... a question, sorry OT by Antony.S · · Score: 1

      oi, you left out

      http://www.esl-europe.net/

    14. Re:On a more serious note... a question, sorry OT by HerculesMO · · Score: 1

      Bots? HAHAHAHA :)

      No, no bot fighting here.

      --
      The price is always right if someone else is paying.
    15. Re:On a more serious note... a question, sorry OT by Buzz_Litebeer · · Score: 1

      Find individual on-line competitions first, if you are good in those, then start looking to were major lan gaming events are being held and getting a plane ticket.

      If you want to see how good you are at a specific game, try joining on online league like the CPL and then see if you can get into their top tier leagues. If you cant, then you probably arent good enough to play at a major lan event where you have to invest a lot of money to play.

      --
      If you don't vote, you don't matter, so don't waste your time telling me your opinion
  16. Re:Pro Gamers by deathcloset · · Score: 3, Funny

    Shall we also send the phone sanitizers?

    What possible ill could come of that?

  17. More money for corps, less for consumers by Elrac · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've recently had my eyes opened, by this article, to the hidden costs of advertising.

    My own executive summary: Advertising makes products more expensive, because corporations that advertise their products sure as hell don't pay for the ads out of their own pockets.

    Meaning: Any money going into gaming (and advertising therein) is going to jack up the price of the advertised products. So if I buy those products, I have to pay a few elite whoring twitch wizards whether I want to or not.

    My personal conclusion: I'm buying even fewer games than before. (Gives the finger to (a small subset of) Corporate scum)

    --
    When one person suffers from a delusion, it is called insanity. When many people suffer from a delusion it is called Rel
    1. Re:More money for corps, less for consumers by nhstar · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Of course the money of advertizing comes from the money earned by selling the products being advertized... It just kind of makes sense. Each and every product out there, no matter how good they are in and of themselves, won't sell if no one knows they exist. Marketing is all about getting your product in mind of people you think will buy it, which is the whole purpose of making a product.

      Hell, research and development drive up the prices too, and rarely do I hear slashdot complain when nVidia or ATI find some new way to tweak your eye-balls.

      Oh, wait! Employees! They make the price of products go up too! Sorry, son, but we need to keep all of our costs down... here's your pink-slip...

      *sigh*

      --
      --- no sig to see here... move along.
    2. Re:More money for corps, less for consumers by Kaboom13 · · Score: 1

      If you don't want to pay for advertising, buy the generic/store brand of whatever product it is and quit bitching. Businesses wouldn't spend so much money on advertizing if it didn't work.

    3. Re:More money for corps, less for consumers by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1
      Hell, research and development drive up the prices too, and rarely do I hear slashdot complain when nVidia or ATI find some new way to tweak your eye-balls.

      No, but you do hear them complaining that systems from Sun and Apple cost more than systems from Dell, and that Itanium was a waste of money. Slashdot seems to have quite a negative attitude to R&D.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    4. Re:More money for corps, less for consumers by JBHarris · · Score: 1

      If I understand your executive summary correctly, then you should stop buying from J&J.
      J&J isn't advertising Unreal Tournament 'Sunscreen Edition'.

      Brad

    5. Re:More money for corps, less for consumers by nhstar · · Score: 1

      Granted, it does happen in certain circumstances. But I do not see any of us firing up our 8088/2MHz or Apple ][e, hooking up the acoustic couplers, and banging away at slashdot at 300baud. You know, out of basic priciples...

      --
      --- no sig to see here... move along.
    6. Re:More money for corps, less for consumers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very interesting article. Thanks for the link.

    7. Re:More money for corps, less for consumers by Keichann · · Score: 1

      Of course that's true, but these companies (for the most part) that are doing the sponsoring, aren't the same ones that are selling the products. Sure, the price of J&J products may would rise from the cost incurred - but what the hell would most gamers care about soap?

      There are plenty of articles on Slashdot about how game prices are rising anyway, but that's unrelated to sponsorship.

    8. Re:More money for corps, less for consumers by Elrac · · Score: 1

      Your reply is silly, for the following reason:

      R&D makes a product better. Employees put the product together. Advertising doesn't create product, nor does it make it better - it just drives the price up.

      Thus, my complaint about the unnecessary price bloat due to advertising cannot logically be extended to apply to R&D and other aspects of product creation.

      --
      When one person suffers from a delusion, it is called insanity. When many people suffer from a delusion it is called Rel
    9. Re:More money for corps, less for consumers by Elrac · · Score: 1
      Sorry about Yet Another Response, but it just occurred to me that I object to another part of your post as well:
      Each and every product out there, no matter how good they are in and of themselves, won't sell if no one knows they exist.

      Perhaps I'm not a typical consumer, but my buying style works pretty well without marketing. I put together my own PCs once in a while, and for other people too. I never study ads for things like graphics cards, and rarely reviews. Occasionally I'll listen to word-of-mouth recommendations by friends. I've discovered that very often the product I found in a review or ad is not available from my local hardware junk shop. So I go in there and say something like,
      "I'd like a reasonably cheap graphics card with 32M and minimal acceleration but with a DVI output. What have you got?"

      I may refuse ATI cards because I have had some bad experience with the intrusive and overblown driver and utility installation. nVidia software seems to install more smoothly for me, and I usually manage to integrate their (closed source) drivers into Linux as well.

      In summary: As far as I'm concerned, and regarding graphics cards and other hardware, advertisement is completely wasted. Yet I'm still forced to pay for it.
      --
      When one person suffers from a delusion, it is called insanity. When many people suffer from a delusion it is called Rel
    10. Re:More money for corps, less for consumers by nhstar · · Score: 1

      In effect, almost all of what you state here has been about marketing in one form or another, all of which does have cost to the whole. Most, not all but most, of the product reviewers out there receive their testing hardware from the manufacturers of the products. This is normally done without cost to the people/companies doing reviews, and usually on a loaner basis. This by itself is a form of advertizing that costs the manufacturers money. When you go into your local PC shop (as I do as often as my S.O. will allow me to), they're aware of which products to stock and sell based on materials that are provided by a marketing budget. Television manufacturers (as an example) purchase floorspace and visibility from your favorite local box stores in order to get the shoppers to be able to see them before they see the other guys' products. This also comes from marketing. When bringing a new product to market, especially one that isn't just an upgrade to ol'faithful, there is a need to broadcast it to the masses in order to get the n% of people who are really interested in such a widget to take notice enough to ask the questions that you ask your local retailers about.

      Marketing drives sales which brings in money which pays for R&D and employees which brings down production costs which allows for mass-production, distribution, and brand recognition.

      I can't help but think of the (begin flamability here) OS/2 life and cycle. The software company I was working for at the time was one of the "insiders" that received bundles to be able to develope our DTP package for. We dumped untold cash-resources for a few years to build a product that would run on an OS that was ~way~ ahead of its time. After a time, we noticed a distinct lack of marketing from the IBMers for this product, but saw the tidal-wave of Windows advertisement. Eventually, it became something of a money-pit for us to continue to develope for a product that just wasn't making it self visible. It could correctly be argued that we spent a bunch of marketing dollars on the "Works on OS/2" phrases that gave us no return and killed a development drive in that arena. But this is a tangent.

      I remember when I first went from ATI to nVidia, I saw their stats and test-results on a sales-display in one of the local PC Shops (Showtime PC blatent plug for a good shop!). That was a display that was paid for by nVidia in order to do exactly what it did: Catch my eye and make me ask questions. I'm curious, when you first asked "What have you got?" to your seller, what kind of informational material was he able to provide you?

      --
      --- no sig to see here... move along.
  18. Re:Pro Gamers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Man screw that, send them to the moon! Zero gravity BMX wrestling. Yeah sure occasionally a skateboarder might reach escape velocity, but hey it's all part of the fun!

  19. Professional Gamers by Daveznet · · Score: 1

    Professional gaming has been going on for a long time even in North America, but the gamers are usually sponsored by Computer companies like ATI or NVidia, not a non industry related company, Like Johnson and Johnson. In Korea its absolutley crazy, especially with Starcraft ive seen some video streams of these guys wearing fifa gear while playing Starcraft. South Korea's economy is pretty much based on Starcraft, ive seen Starcraft chips and drinks.

    --
    GL HF!
  20. Good! There'll finally be something worth watching by deathcloset · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Perhaps I am in a minority, but I actually enjoy watching a well played frag fest.

    Seriously, sometimes I've made myself a nice, warm bowl of soup and maybe a muffin or a crepe and I can't be bothered to actually play the game. So I'll just log into a large server and spectate the match.

    I've actually often wished that there was a fragcaster who would fly the free-cam around to catch the better action from above.

    I know it's common amoungst my friends for more people to be watching the computer screen than the Television. I mean, these online games are the only thing that I can throw around jargon with the boys about. American Football I like occasionally, basketball a bit less and baseball and I had a serious falling-out after the strikes.

    This is wunderbar! I see these future "cyberatheletes" as something of a fusion between athelete and actor - maybe the better word is "performer". After all, what's more fun that watching someone get pwned (that means "owned")? I'll tell you, watching someone whine whilst recieving the pwnage - that's what :D

  21. Pro gamers by kid_oliva · · Score: 1

    Amazing on how you can make money by sitting at a computer screen playing games and getting fat. Am I jealous... hell yeah. Cush job playing video games, at least athletes have to work out and stay in shape and pop roids(not all athletes pop roids, just the one that have biceps the size of my leg) I can go tell my parents they were wrong, I can too make money playing video games.

    It would be intersting to do a study on the overall health condition of pro gamers vs. normal 9-5ers.

    --
    I eat Karma for breakfast, lunch, and dinner. That's why I don't have any.
  22. I could use a sponser... by Radix37 · · Score: 1

    Any companies out there willing to sponser the first live speed running tornament? Considering the dedication some people put into making their runs top-notch, I think they'd definitely qualify as "pro" gamers.

    --
    Speed Demos Archive - Lots of speed runs!
  23. I dunno... by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1
    Stuff like this seems so trivial. Seems like a good racket if you can get into it, but... I dunno. It's just seems... stupid. It just expands the list of Things People Get Paid To Do Strictly Because We Have A Dippy Culture. It's like there's too many people and we're just making up jobs to employ them.

    You can trust my wise ponderings on this. I'm on the Internets.

  24. Johnson and Johnson *are* gaming related. by reality-bytes · · Score: 2, Insightful


    There's nothing computer related about Johnson and Johnson's baby rash powder


    I'll have you know that Johnson and Johnson's baby rash powder is required equipment when you're sitting on your backside for an 10 hour gaming tournament.
    --
    Ripping an new rectum in the fabric of spacetime.
    1. Re:Johnson and Johnson *are* gaming related. by ZeeExSixAre · · Score: 1

      I wonder what kind of doping and steroid allegations we'll see...

    2. Re:Johnson and Johnson *are* gaming related. by BridgeBum · · Score: 1

      There was a World Bridge Tournament where a player was stripped of their medal due to pain killers.

      Check out the last paragraph here:


      http://football.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,975 3,1062486,00.html

      --
      My UID is the product of 2 primes.
  25. Re:Pro Gamers by Mazem · · Score: 1

    So... would you prefer that they go about a mundane life working at McWallMart 9-5 and watching TV sitcoms and monday night football on their time off?

    I have a lot of respect for people who have the guts to take anything something they love, and dedicate their life to it until they become really damn good at it. Pro skateboards, and BMX'ers are amazing athletes who are pushing the boundaries of what is humanly possible. Their stunts are physically elegant and incredibly difficult, requiring precise balance, coordination, and timing. High level game playing is similar.

    Who are you to tell them what they should do with their life.

  26. Sweet by LinuxPoultergist · · Score: 0, Redundant

    1. Get awesome at game X
    2. Find big company to sponsor you.
    3. ?????
    4. Profit!

  27. Welcome to ABC Monday Night Foosball by PetoskeyGuy · · Score: 1

    Video Games are fun, but hopefully with Poker and other games starting to get more air time I'll be able to watch my Monday Night Foosball, join a Fantasy Foosball League and watch the first riots when one University Team beats another one.

    Until then I guess I'll have to be happy with The Ocho.

  28. Re:Pro Gamers by jahudabudy · · Score: 1

    I realize you are a troll, but while I wait for our load process to run, I got nothing better to do...

    It is true that some people allow obsession w/ sports to dominate their time and minds, essentially "sucking intelligence" out of them. However, I think it is a mistake to say that people that push the boundaries of human endeavor (yes, including skateboarding) contribute nothing to society. This spirit of adventure is a crucial ingredient to the success of our species. I forget who said it, but a Sci-Fi author I once read said something to the effect that many of mankinds most notable achievements have come long after reason should have convinced us to give up.

    So, while there might not be any use to society in skateboarding, I think that in the long run, encouraging the sort of person that decides jumping the Great Wall on a skateboard is doable will benefit society in the long run.

    --
    ...sometimes, in order to hurt someone very badly, you have to tell that person terrible lies. - PA
  29. Re:Pro Gamers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like Pro skateboarders, BMX riders, and wrestlers should all be put on a spaceship and sent to the sun. They are an unecessary drain on our society, sucking intelligence out of our citizens and getting paid for it. Include lawyers and patent officers and our world will be a better place to live.

    Better yet, have Bush finish off his National Guard service by piloting the space ship. Now that would make the world a better place.

  30. Re:Pro Gamers by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

    "Their stunts are physically elegant and incredibly difficult, requiring precise balance, coordination, and timing. High level game playing is similar."

    OK, somebody owes me a new LCD now!

  31. Re:Pro Gamers by Gulthek · · Score: 1

    What would you say about Shaolin Monks?

    No lawyers and patent officers? I guess your world is dominated by the whims of powerful corporations. Whee.

  32. I'm impressed... by CaptMonkeyDLuffy · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    You took the high road. Around here I would have expected jokes involving their petroleum jelly or hand moisturizer products...

    1. Re:I'm impressed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We don't make petroleum jelly. However, we do make K-Y brand personal lubricants and sponsor National Date Night.

  33. "[SCO]DarlMc stole my kill!" by dwalsh · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... too many CounterStrike jokes ...

    "[Microsoft]BillG (Terrorist): HAX! We can't handle that."

    "[Halliburton]VPCheney (Counter Terroris): Why are the Ts killing hostages? Admin kick them!"

    "Hey [Warner]EltonJohn is camping again!"

    "[USA]Dubya has been kicked for having a high ping."
    (he's slow)

    --
    ${YEAR+1} is going to be the year of Linux on the desktop!
    1. Re:"[SCO]DarlMc stole my kill!" by rspaceman22 · · Score: 1

      lol i loved that. im an admin on a cs server and i would kick him.

  34. Gaming will never take over by Metaldsa · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Simply from the fact that our society praises the biggest, strongest, and most beautiful. Just because bowling is popular doesn't mean we recognise the best. I think gaming will be the same where it will have a following but never such fame as football, baseball, basketball, or hockey. I highly doubt computer gaming will ever have a Brett Favre, Michael Jordon, and Barry Bonds that commentators talk about 24/7.

    1. Re:Gaming will never take over by Infonaut · · Score: 1
      Simply from the fact that our society praises the biggest, strongest, and most beautiful.

      I think it's a bit more nuanced than that. People enjoy watching other humans do incredible things with their bodies. Even people who aren't sports nuts enjoy watching the Olympics simply because it's amazing to see someone run that fast, or be that graceful. There is an element in athletics of pushing beyond normal human boundaries, and in a half-human, half-machine endeavor like computer gaming there just isn't the same purity.

      You could say that gamers are somehow using their brains more than athletes, but I don't buy that one. Any athlete at the top eschelon of a sport can tell you that they are making many important decisions each second.

      Chess, which is heralded in Western society as the most pure expression of brain-on-brain combat, is popular specifically because of its purity. There is no chance, and nothing stands between you and your opponent.

      So while traditional athletic events are pure expressions of physical prowess and thinking on your feet, and chess is a pure expression of raw brain power, computer gaming seems to occupy a fuzzier area. That's not to say that truly skilled gamers aren't extremely talented, but I don't think it generates the same level of raw human connection as athletics or head-to-head brain games like chess.

      --
      Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
    2. Re:Gaming will never take over by Mister+Phister · · Score: 1

      While I agree with the majority of your post, I will have to point out that there already IS a Michael Jordan of gaming. His name is John "Fatl1ty" Wendel.

    3. Re:Gaming will never take over by jred · · Score: 1

      I'll have to disagree. I'm not a sports fan, but I know Jordan played basketball, I think for Chicago. He also played baseball for a little bit, minor league?

      I have no clue who John Wendel is.

      Google was not used in the creation of this post.

      --

      jred
      I'm not a mechanic but I play one in my garage...
  35. Re:Pro Gamers by theFool · · Score: 1

    We'll tell them the planet is about to be eaten by a space goat.

    --
    LINK : LNK6004: Sig not found or not built by the last incremental link; performing full link
  36. Uh huh... by rlbond86 · · Score: 1

    "Is 'frags per round' going to be the batting average of the 21st century?" No. Computer games aren't a spectator sport.

    1. Re:Uh huh... by Calcion · · Score: 1

      Around 3,000 people watched the recent WGC Counter-strike finals, thats a good audience if I ever saw one.

      -Calcion.

    2. Re:Uh huh... by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Meanwhile, real sports bring in literally millions every week.

  37. Re:Pro Gamers by toad3k · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Yeah, and if we didn't have these guys, who would dip our fries?

  38. Gaming... the Next Baseball by ruben.gutierrez · · Score: 2, Funny
    Expect things like:

    • Gaming Coaches - Those who can, do. Those who can't, teach.
    • Gamer cards - Who has the right to be on them? The gamers or their alter egos (e.g., Mario, Max Payne, Duke, etc.)? Or their alter egos' creators?
    • Microsoft Stadium - Oh, wait, there is an MS Stadium!
    • Video Games - Games of gamers gaming.
  39. I hope not by ranton · · Score: 1

    I sure hope that frags per second never gets the familiarity of batting averages. The last thing we need to do is glamorize computer games over actual excersize. While I am not saying that there isnt real skill in these games, kids should still be encouraged to put down FIFA soccer and actually buy a soccer ball. Kids are already too out of shape, the last thing we should ever do is glamorize your average out of shape computer gamer.

    --
    -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    1. Re:I hope not by ruben.gutierrez · · Score: 1

      So, are you saying if we, as a society, glamorized health and beauty, people would be less sedentary? Hasn't society always promoted health and beauty? Most stars on T.V. are beautiful by society's standards. And, do we still have obesity problems? Then, I doubt glamorizing video games will worsen the problem.

    2. Re:I hope not by ranton · · Score: 0

      Yes, we definetly still have obesity problems even though we already glamorize health and beauty. But the rise in obesity isnt because of this, it is because of the easier access to food and expecially unhealthy food. That just shows that whenever you make something unhealthy mainstream, such as fast food, the society becomes less healthy.

      This can directly be applied to glamorizing video games on the same level as sports. If you make playing games more mainstream, more people will choose it over doing something active. So basically that shows it is very reasonable to believe that the spread of gaming will make our children more unhealthy.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    3. Re:I hope not by east+coast · · Score: 1

      it is because of the easier access to food and expecially unhealthy food.

      I will say that is part of the problem but I also see the problem as being too much entertainment...

      I'm currently 32 and I recall when I was a kid (as I wave my cane in the air) that I had about ten channels on the cable. Any given summer afternoon it was hard to find much beyond soaps and cooking shows so out the door we went. Today, I have about 150 channels and it's actually hard to find a time of day when something that is entertaining isn't on the TV.

      We didn't get our first VCR until I was about 13, today children mostly have their own TV and DVD players in their own bedroom. Given this and the Internet and you find me good reason to go out. Kids don't appreciate that good health today will form their future, they think it's just something to deal with and move along.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    4. Re:I hope not by Murderotica · · Score: 1

      When I was a kid, I was limited to .5 hours of gaming a day. When I finished this after school or whenever, though, I didn't go play sports... I read. The physical activity came when the night came and all the neighborhood kids who had spent the day inside came out and played manhunt, which was a much bigger draw then video games. Absence of electronics doesn't always lead to physical activity, and access to electronics doesn't always lead to unhealthy kids.

    5. Re:I hope not by ruben.gutierrez · · Score: 1

      I agree. I didn't grow up with much, at all. That is, except for other kids in the neighborhood. We had about two or three channels we could see clearly. As I get older, I find myself searching for reasons not to watch T.V. because I know that when I have my own children, they'll follow (more/less) what I do. If I'm more active, and include them in that activity, they'll be more likely to adhere to that lifestyle, as well. That will be my responsibility as a parent. And, that's where the root of the problem lies.

    6. Re:I hope not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but we're talking about batting averages. You know, baseball. The "sport" where you can sit on your ass 80% of the time.

  40. Internet enabled by Danathar · · Score: 2, Informative

    What many people don't realize is that the internet effectively allows a small group of people that are worldwide to be effectively communicated to by an advertizer.

    So...even though the world of multiplayer gaming may be a niche population, the net effectively increases it's value to advertizers because it's easier to reach them through common connections between consumers...in this case the common connection the game they all play.

    The same population in the 80's playing a game would not be viable because of how spread out the players are over the world and how disconnected they are from each other.

  41. Out with the old... by burtdub · · Score: 1

    No more "On Base Percentage"... the only important stat is "All Your Base Percentage"

    1. Re:Out with the old... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't that be your stolen base percentage?

  42. Sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The article poses the question, "Is 'frags per round' going to be the batting average of the 21st century?" "

    If so, we are going to be one fat, pale country. This is one step removed from watching people fish.

    Go outside. Playing FPS games is not a sport. Watching people do it is negative exercise. Big Pharma is interested because these are the people that are going to be so unhealthy as to be the largest comsumers of cholesterol reducing drugs.

  43. Re:Pro gamers by ifwm · · Score: 1

    "I can too make money playing video games."

    No you can't. A group of 50 or so savant-equivalent individuals who devote their lives to gaming can.

  44. I don't see good coming from this. by jellomizer · · Score: 1

    First it will increase the people who want to be professional game players. So they will let more kids to slide on their homework with the excuse that they could make a living playing video games. Secondly these people will play online with handles so newbe player or person playing for fun won't have a chance to win against a person who's skills are specialized for playing that game. Unlink playing normal sports because of location, and lack of anonymity you rarely play against a professional baseball player. Third you get a larger amount of people with the illusion that they can be the next player waist so much time in it.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    1. Re:I don't see good coming from this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So basically, it'll be just like everything else. The football player who wants to go pro, or the soprano who thinks she's the next Mariah Carey. It's called taking your hobbies and skills and aspiring to use them to make your living.

      Is that a bad thing? Should we all instead resign ourselves to a life of boring, repetitive 9-5 drudgery? Kudos to these people for taking something they enjoy and finding a way to live off of it. We should all be so lucky...

      Btw:
      "So they will let more kids to slide on their homework with the excuse that they could make a living playing video games"

      Who exactly is "they" ?? If "they" are the teachers, I highly doubt the teachers are gonna cut a gamer any slack. If "they" are the parents, then it's time for them to be parents and NOT let their gamer kid slide on their homework.

  45. "Pro Gaming" by dannyitc · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Here's my theory as to why the idea of "pro gamers" will never catch on. In today's society, sports stars are pretty much celebrities. Technical skill helps, sure, but nowadays the average joe watches sports usually because of either team/city loyalty (sports have a leg up of about a century in this respect) or they enjoy watching a certain athlete perform. One of the biggest reasons that people are drawn to elite athletes are their ability to perform at a level that is pretty much untouchable. No one sitting at home ever seriously thinks they could have gotten a couple more yards than Vick did on a scramble, for instance. This is really not the case with "pro-gaming." Being a semi-competitive CS player for a couple of years, you really get the sense that if you were still in high school or did not have a fruitful real life job (as is the case with the vast majority of "pro gamers") and could afford to spend 8+ hours in front of a monitor playing games you could do just as well as the "elite" players. Having seen players rise to the absolute cream of the crop of gaming in a matter of months justifies this. Another thing is the personality, maturity, and charisma these "pro gamers" exhibit, which is pretty much none. Real sports are a great way to build social skills at an early age, and most elite athletes have a personality (for better or worse) that is at least interesting, can make conversation and feed the media, are athletically fit, and in general project an image that is marketable, above all else. The environment of the pro-gamer seems to work against all of these qualities. All in all, sports succeed because they are marketable, and they are marketable because people can either relate to or are impressed by them. I think any sort of professional gaming has severe defecits in these areas and will not be seeing any sort of mainstream penetrance anytime soon.

    1. Re:"Pro Gaming" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think your grammar has severe "defecits" as well. Maybe you should take up online gaming to make your living.

      I don't think it's an issue of mainstream "penetrance". It's an issue of reaching the niche group. That niche group IS interested. The badass players ARE near-celebrities in THAT community - the community which the advertisers/sponsors are trying to reach.

      btw, I don't think "penetrance" means what you think it does. I think you're looking for "penetration".

      penetrance - The frequency, under given environmental conditions, with which a specific phenotype is expressed by those individuals with a specific genotype.

      penetration - The degree to which a commodity, for example, is sold or recognized in a particular market.

    2. Re:"Pro Gaming" by AutopsyReport · · Score: 1

      I also think you need to uninstall life.

      --

      For he today that sheds his blood with me shall be my brother.

    3. Re:"Pro Gaming" by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Yeah, people go to watch sports because they're loyal to the team. Who would be loyal to some made-up team with no history, no geographical location and a stupid name like 'Sup3r Meg4 Fr4gsters 3'?

      And then there's the players. Fans worship the players as heroes, but who wants to worship a bunch of pixels? It'd be like watching a cartoon. Even wrestling has real people. You may as well have professional laser quest.

      People go and watch their team play sports every week, I can't see many people wanting to spend their Saturday afternoon sat in some darkened room watching their 'team' play computer games. Especially as it's so easy to play yourself.

    4. Re:"Pro Gaming" by dannyitc · · Score: 1

      Actually, graduating with a BS in Biology last may and taking a graduate course on the genetic basis of evolution, I actually have a pretty good understanding of what that term means. I assumed the term had a meaning somewhat similar when applied to everyday life. Many times those involved in the sciences use words that originally describe scientific phenomena and apply them to everyday things.

  46. It's the type of companies that's "new" by ntxb229 · · Score: 1

    It's not that companies sponsoring teams that is new, it's the type of companies. Johnson and Johnson has nothing to do with gaming. The thinking is that a lot of non-gaming related companies are going to start to sponsor gaming teams. For example burger king sponsors teams in Europe. This article is saying that we'll start to see sponsorships like that here in the U.S.

  47. Nintendogs will clean FPS clock by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Look, I've probably fired more rounds than many people, having qual'd as a sharpshooter on three weapons in the Army, but I think IMHO that frags-per-round is just a temporary thing, in that gaming is already showing signs of getting bored with the preponderance of FPS.

    My guess is pets per hour, or here-boys-per-hour, in Nintendogs is likely to be a more useful stat over the next few years, as gaming - again, as it always does - moves on to the next best thing.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  48. Re:Pro Gamers by JudicatorX · · Score: 1

    You forgot the telemarketers

    --
    "It is a good divine that follows his own instructions" - Portia, The Merchant of Venice
  49. Not yet... by metomynon · · Score: 1

    Is 'frags per round' going to be the batting average of the 21st century?

    Not until somebody figures out a good way to televise Counter Strike to millions of viewers.

    1. Re:Not yet... by 2008 · · Score: 1

      I've watched Counter Strike games on TV. It's getting people to care that would need to happen.

      --
      I quit!
  50. Re:Pro Gamers by Jane_Dozey · · Score: 1

    But they DO give something useful back to society. They get some kids out into the open air doing something physical. Skateboarding (at a decient level) tends to require an amount of physical fitness, meaning kids doing it are less likely to be lounging around getting really fat and watching TV the whole time.

    "I think that in the long run, encouraging the sort of person that decides jumping the Great Wall on a skateboard is doable will benefit society in the long run." :-)

    --
    Silly rabbit
  51. Fine.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    ...but for heavens sake, stop naming every motherboard, video card and mouse "fatal1ty"

    It's just l4me

  52. Re:Pro gamers by kid_oliva · · Score: 0

    If William Hung can put out cd's and make money on them... I can rule the world!!!

                            Bow to me! I own you!

    --
    I eat Karma for breakfast, lunch, and dinner. That's why I don't have any.
  53. Re:Pro Gamers by jahudabudy · · Score: 1

    But they DO give something useful back to society. They get some kids out into the open air doing something physical.

    True, that's a good point.

    "I think that in the long run, encouraging the sort of person that decides jumping the Great Wall on a skateboard is doable will benefit society in the long run."

    yeah, I noticed that after I hit submit. I should learn to type the whole sentence, then go back and cut/paste the URL into the tag, breaking a train of thought in the middle is a good way to make silly mistakes.
    Or maybe, this was my subconscious way of saying in the really, really long run :)

    --
    ...sometimes, in order to hurt someone very badly, you have to tell that person terrible lies. - PA
  54. true gamers by 101percent · · Score: 1

    The only gamer I respect are those who have ascended nethack in normal mode (not exploring), or the guys who have gotten a gazillion points in the game, although thats not really hard to be honest.

    Seriously though isn't there just something pointless in moving a mouse pointer over moving three-dimensional objects and clicking on them? I used to play counterstrike until I realized its nothing more than an overly patronized "Shoot the Duck" flash game.

    I still play bzflag now and a little freeciv, but I gave away my Steam account to a foolish friend a while back.

  55. Spectator sports = physical action by Andrew+Lenahan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Simply put, for a competitive activity to catch on as a spectator sport, it must be physical and have a good deal of action. There are orgainsed competitions for all sorts of things, from chess to tiddlywinks to rock-paper-scissors, but people won't tune in unless there's action. Even golf and bowling have more action than watching someone peck at a keyboard or twiddle a joystick.

    There's also the issue of charisma and looks. Athletes are successful only partly because of a certain celebrity appeal caused by physical good looks. Most of the "pro" gamers I've seen photos of have ranged from totally disgusting-looking to drab and average... I've yet to see one who could give, say, Anna Kournikova a run for her money. It could be because the practice involved with being a pro gamer prevents them from paying attention to their looks, or it could be that hardcore gaming just attracts a certain "type". I won't speculate because I genuinely don't know, but let's just say that I won't expect a "Girls of Pro Gaming Swimsuit Edition" at the newsstand anytime soon.

    Finally, (and please note that I'm a moderate-to-hardcore gamer myself), competitive/pro gaming just isn't something that most gamers care about. I get most of the mainstream gaming mags (EGM, Game Informer, PSM, etc.) and gaming tournaments and such aren't given much coverage. Most gamers would rather read about hot new games coming out than some dude in Peoria getting such a high score in Pac-Man that the motherboard melted. Pro gaming attracts a certain crowd, and probably won't go away anytime soon, but will never find an audience as a mainstream spectator sport.

    --
    Andrew Lenahan http://www.starblind.com/
  56. Spectate online, no. Combat, yes. by monkeyGrease · · Score: 1

    I have no interest in watching online sports of any kind, but there is a sport I'd like to watch an organized competitive version of.

    Paintball.

    Most sports are combat/war derivative anyway, so now that we have a very direct squad analog, it could be a spectator sport.

    Imagine watching trained squads from the armed services go up against some corporate or region sponsored teams. I'd watch that. Nike vs. Army in the Krylon Bowl.

  57. Re:Pro gamers by kukyfrope · · Score: 1

    Don't act so elitist, kid_oliva.

    ALL of us here on /. spend time behind a computer sometime during the day (you are reading this, probably on a computer screen), and a large percentage of us work at computers 9-5 in IT or related field and get up only to go to the bathroom, the water cooler, or lunch break.

    A lot of pro gamers (or at least those that aspire to be) hold regular part or full-time jobs from 9-5 or a normal 8hr shift, then play games from the time they get home, say 6 or 7pm, until 1am or later. A very small percentage of the already small percentage of 'pro gamers' play hardcore 12+hrs a day. If they do, it's usually preparing for tournaments where they know they will be taking home some prize money (Fatality, vo0 to name two).

    While some people play games that long and don't aspire to be anything (see some WoW and Starcraft players) without jobs living in their mom's basement, the Counter-Strike and Painkiller tournaments do pay out SOME money, although anything below 16th place (out of 128 usually) at one of the world's largest and most prestigious tournaments, The CPL, will only get you enough to pay for your trip down there if you're not sponsored--whereas others coming from overseas must place even higher to meet expenses.

    The percentage of gamers who actually come away in the black on what they put into pro gaming (travel, computer, money lost not working) is about as small as almost any other professional sport. Should they be treated equal? Debatable.

  58. Now I have a GOAL to reach for! by GecKo213 · · Score: 2, Funny
    Mumbles...and everybody told me that I'd never amount to anything playing video games.

    Screaming from the highest Mountain Top: "Look at me now! I am the Champion of the UNIVERSE! I've got my own gamer clothing line, (No need for washing, play 24 hours a day and smell fresh as a rose!) my Own Cologne and Perfume, (No need for showering, smell fresh as a rose all hours of the day)" and my own line of shoes! (Nike and Reebook are still trying to work on the fresh as a rose thing here! First one there gets to have me sponsor it!)

    I can't wait until I can get my next pair of cross trainer shoes sponsored by little Tommy Frag Master of the Online World 2006!

    --
    Generation Trance: What generation are you?
  59. Gamers Take Themselves Too Seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Come on people. These are video games. Personally, I am a gamer and have been since I was a little orc geekin out on the Atari 2600. Games are fun, LAN parties are more fun, online gaming is (IMHO) the most fun (WoW, BFME, BF2)...but watching pimply nerds on a frag fest == 5 minutes of WOW and then total bore (time to go home and try these rehearsed tactics myself).

    There is nothing worse than waiting your turn to jump into the competition. I can honestly care less about these hotshots and their exclusive hardware (note that hardware is a HUGE part in having the resources to win). Anyone can geek out on a game, memorize the maps/advantage points and weapons of advantage and dominate.

    RANT

  60. Not Frags per round. Here's something better by ramdac · · Score: 0

    "Is 'frags per round' going to be the batting average of the 21st century?"

    I think not. I think what's more important than frags per round is one's "Kill/Death" ratio. (ie, how many times you kill before being killed)

  61. Re:Good! There'll finally be something worth watch by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 1

    Hmm, I can't see the excitement. Certainly there are some cool fps videos, but I mean, I'm pretty good at fp shooters, but I'm not good at say, running and catching things, and I'd rather watch things I can't do myself like football then watch things I could be doing myself, like moving a mouse and fragging people.

    Moreover, to be a champion at UT doesn't mean you are naturally any good at, say, Battlefield 2 because the timing and movement is slightly different, wherein someone who's fast would be welcomed in most athletic sports, so I think fps masters are just less impressive humans than athletes.

    I've played in fps tournaments before, and they are quite thrilling to be in, but I think our spectators got off on the thrill of actually watching over our backs and hearing our 'shits', and 'aw, fucker's, which is slightly better than just watching a screen of someone playing.

    So I guess watching fps in my opinion just will never be better or easier than playing an fps yourself.

    --
    "I only speak the truth"
    Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
  62. Games vs Sports by brkello · · Score: 1

    It will be tough for games to ever be taken seriously as sports. Sports are something we are all taught in PE. You are guaranteed to learn the basic rules of football, baseball, and soccer. And square dancing, but I seriously think that is just a form of punishment...or at the very least something the teachers make us do to laugh at us. There is no class that teaches the rules of Quake, Counter Strike, or UT. So the general public is not introduced to gaming at the scale that sports is.

    Another difference is that games are constantly coming out and changing. Sports on the other hand, except for a few minor rule changes, stays fairly static.

    FPS's are also very hard to watch...particularly live. Because action is happening all over the place. Maybe if someone edited all the video and showed all the action it would be fairly interesting...but you can't see the whole playing field like in sports.

    I'd see televised Madden 2005 tournaments drawing a larger audience because of these reasons. You can see the whole game/field. A large popluation of people play these games (compared to FPS's). And even if you don't play the game, you are familiar with the rules.

    But to me, games are more fun to play than watch...but then again, I am pretty good at them.

    --
    Support a great indie game: http://www.abaddon360.com
  63. Brought to you by Johnson and Johnson by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 3, Funny


    "I use Q-Tip brand cotton swabs by Johnson and Johnson because they dig out 34% more earwax* than store brand swabs. My game has improved since switching to Q-Tips as I can now more clearly hear the CTs sneaking up to rescue the hosties."

    "Ever since we equipped our BF2 Medics with Band-aid brand bandages from Johnson and Johnson, our team recovers more quickly compared to when he would just lick the wounds."

    * - Q-tips should only be used in the outer ear to prevent impaction of wax or damage to the eardrum.

    In researching this post I learned that Q-tips were originally called "Baby Gays". It's true! Check for yourself...

  64. Re:Pro Gamers by NumberOneFan · · Score: 1

    ...
    Who are you to tell them what they should do with their life


    God

  65. Oh yeah? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, when I was a kid we didn't have video games, or even a TV. We had a cracked etch-a-sketch, and liked it just fine. Only one kid in town had a nintendo, so we all played tetris by mail on his machine. It took six months to clear a level, but we played anyway. I was always in shape, too, because I walked 14 miles each way to school every day through neck-deep snow! After I got back from spenging 12 hours learning quantum physics and advanced multivariable calculus (in third grade!) I got to milk 1100 cows, feed them, and clean out the barn all by myself for a nickle a month!

    Honestly! Spoiled kids today and their video games... Pah!

  66. total bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about NASCAR, you think all those ppl grew up racing? Ppl watch circling advertisements and listen to country music because that's just what gets stuffed down their throat.
    Football, etc. are just as fucking stupid.

  67. Re:Good! There'll finally be something worth watch by Antony.S · · Score: 1

    Um, there have been shoutcasters in gaming for years, seen http://www.radioitg.com/ and http://www.tsncentral.com/

  68. I can't wait! by Landshark17 · · Score: 1

    I've signed a contract with Walmart. They're going to sponser me in a Doom 3 tournament :-)

    --
    This sig is false.
  69. Re:Spectate online, no. Combat, yes. by FhnuZoag · · Score: 1

    There was an UK television series on paintball. Crossfire, I believe, it was called. That's or some silly thing like Xrossfire, or Xfire, or something.

    It was fairly good. Essentially teams of people going up against a number of scenarios. (mostly 'get to X, do Y and escape to Z', but also VIP missions, and stuff like that) Teams acquired points during their missions, and spent it on resurrecting fallen team members or buying extra equipment. (like shields, grenades, and rapid fire paint guns) The top ranking team got a prize.

    It was fairly good. But only caught a niche interest, I guess.

  70. Re:Spectate online, no. Combat, yes. by Molochi · · Score: 1

    Years back they came up with speedball, an arena version of paintball designed for spectators. It used to be on tv lots (espn and oln type networks) but its been 3-4 years since I saw it on the tube.

    --
    "The Adobe Updater must update itself before it can check for updates. Would you like to update the Adobe Updater now?"
  71. Re:Pro Gamers by deathcloset · · Score: 1

    I got modded "troll" and "overratted" for a perfectly valid HHGTG reference? on Slashdot!?

    The times they are a changin', eh?

  72. Looking for a Sponsor .. by sundru · · Score: 1

    Hell Yeah Am Game .

    Any company out there looking to sponsor a crackshot Battletech mechwarrior pilot ? ...

    Guaranteed to core out enemy mechs before you can say, "Hes gotta be hacking" .. :) Sundru

  73. doh by Radix37 · · Score: 1

    lol i just noticed I linked to '.hml' instead of .html. At least apache mod_spell fixes it.
    And I mispelled sponsor too.
    Can you tell I got 5 hours of sleep last night?

    --
    Speed Demos Archive - Lots of speed runs!
  74. You mean this is real, it's not a joke?? by grimharvest · · Score: 1

    Why in the hell would a corporation sponsor some dorky kid to play videogames? The advertising couldn't be worth the money. Professional gamer?? The stupidest thing I've ever heard.

  75. K:D by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    obviously its going to be kill to death ratio... not frags per round.

  76. I will watch televised video gaming when... by east+coast · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They need to change a few things and I will be interested:

    1. Have new maps that players are not familure with, it goes from running a pattern to "thinking on your feet". Now that's exciting.

    2. Have the players feel pain. Hell yeah, hook up a few electrodes and when they get shot/bashed they feel some pain. This is what made paintball exciting to me; knowing that bad play leads to more then just "Oh shucks, I got hit".

    3. Overhead map views for the spectator. It makes it less confussing as to the tactics of a well balanced team.

    4. Base some stats on the real life player. Have them run and see how fast they go, make the online player do the same. Test for accuracy and how accurate a guy is with a glock when doing a full out run away from a target or better yet see how well they aim their 15 pound H&K G-3 after running a quarter mile while wearing full gear including a vest.

    5. This applies more twords all FPS games and not just tourney play; have weapons fail. Granted it doesn't happen too often IRL with decently maintained firearms but it's adds an element of surprise as your brand new P90 stovepipes in the middle of a 3 on 1 firefight.

    --
    Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    1. Re:I will watch televised video gaming when... by JPyun · · Score: 1

      3, 4, and 5 are some of the dumbest things I've ever heard.

    2. Re:I will watch televised video gaming when... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2 is rather sadistic, and then again when paintballing you could wear some padding/armour so your point is moot. Plus a real FPS would have very close to a one shot kill scheme, with a lot of slowing down/loss of accuracy, speed etc when you get hit in the arm or leg ( I think its alot more frustrating to know you have to get out of a situation but can't move fast enough)

      4 is a pretty dumb ideas, the point is to have everyone physically at their max and all of them being equal, it becomes more about tactics and strategy and not brute force.

      1,3,5 are all very good suggestions, and personally I've been dreaming of maps that are real time generated for a match, maybe from some basic building layouts that is then custimized by the server. This would like you say eliminate most of the "oh i can sit here and enemies will come to me". It would make the game about tactics, skill, and maybe luck and NOT about memorizing the map and all its lines of fire.

      5 has already been done by Americas Army, and you would not belive how often a your M4/M16 will jam just when you need it to defend yourself.

    3. Re:I will watch televised video gaming when... by east+coast · · Score: 1

      when paintballing you could wear some padding/armour so your point is moot.

      Not on the fields I play. That kinda shit will get you thrown out as "padding" effects the paint's breakage.

      it becomes more about tactics and strategy and not brute force

      Tactics are easy, propper implementation of the tactics is what seperates the haves from the have nots.

      you would not belive how often a your M4/M16 will jam just when you need it to defend yourself.

      Heh. I hear it's like that IRL too... Seriously, I haven't played it yet, I may check it out.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
  77. Sponsored by "Campers Gear" by RedLaggedTeut · · Score: 1

    The Campers Cup is brought to you by "Campers Gear".

    T0ny is one of the expert campers sponsored by "Campers Gear", hiding under a staircase and outfitted with "Campers Gear"s "outdoor style" collection.

    --
    I'm still trying to figure out what people mean by 'social skills' here.
  78. Lunatics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How can you even compare batting averages to 'frags per round'. One requires physical adptness not least some bravery to face a heavy ball travelling at your body at over 90mph. The over involves some socially dysfunctional individual trying to claim gaming is a sport. Get over it!! Sport involves physical exercise, hence the reason darts is not a sport.

  79. Sadly... by Auraiken · · Score: 1

    There are things like this... Well, besides the Game cards. Coaching is seen more along games with guilds or clans who obsessive players start creating practice times and strategies to use in tournament games. As you stated microsoft does have a stadium... and yeh, you can even check google for videos of gamers gaming as well as replays. Sometimes in the form of sick and twisted photo album type memories that they'll show their children ( if they get that far ) ;P

    1. Re:Sadly... by ruben.gutierrez · · Score: 1

      That's very interesting. Although, I'd like to point out that I said "Video Games" not "Video". I think a game where you have to play a video game in the game to save the world would be the next line of games for gamers if video games were the next baseball.

  80. Q-Tips are not J&J products... by rah1420 · · Score: 1

    J&J sells cotton swabs, but Q-Tip brand cotton swabs are made by Cheeseborough-Ponds which was acquired by Unilever in 1987.

    Which could be found on the same web site you posted.

    Another funny post falls to pedantry.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens.
    1. Re:Q-Tips are not J&J products... by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 1

      In the future I'm describing, J&J purchased C-P.

      Oooh! Headshot! Didn't see that coming, did you? Didn't think so, pedant. w00t!


      p.s. I didn't post any web sites. I posted a *link* to a web site.

      Yes! Multi-kill! En fuego tonight, baby!

  81. Re:Spectate online, no. Combat, yes. by Omnieiunium · · Score: 1

    I remember seeing something like that on TV (OLN if you are interested) and it was pretty dull. I mean it just showed two teams firing at each other. You couldn't see the balls flying through the air and it was pretty boring. No first-person cams or anything.

  82. hm... by Auraiken · · Score: 1

    Haven't they started something that like with The Sims line of games? Watching your sim watch [variable]?

    1. Re:hm... by ruben.gutierrez · · Score: 1

      I don't know. I don't play video games.

  83. Purepwnage... by Lodragandraoidh · · Score: 1

    PurePwnage has a documentary of the new 'pro gamers' - pwning noobs, and getting headshots online near you....

    --

    Lodragan Draoidh
    The more you explain it, the more I don't understand it. - Mark Twain
  84. Lots of people like competitive gaming by Venim · · Score: 1

    this is actually a quite popular thing in the world. The owner of the professional counter-strike team "Complexity" said it right though when he said that games like counter-strike will not appeal to older generations. I'd assume that many members of /. fall into that category. But this is becoming increasingly popular among newer generations, including myself. For all we know in the next 20-60 years evolutions of counter-strike and starcraft will replace traditional sports such as Football and Baseball. Although i doubt that they will, they may definately become more popular. A testiment to this would be the fact that each year the tournaments such as WCG, CPL, ESWC etc. have had larger and larger numbers of spectators. Its only the beginning.

  85. ok, so it's ot now.. by rah1420 · · Score: 1

    p.s. I didn't post any web sites. I posted a *link* to a web site.

    Question now becomes: Does your pedantry trump my pedantry?

    Only the mods can say.

    Oooh! Rimshot! Didn't see that coming, did you?

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens.