Slashdot Mirror


The New Face Lift

RiotXIX writes to tell us that US surgeons plan on moving forward with their newest experimental medical practice, a face transplant. Doctors have already succeeded in making this practice a reality with cadavers donated for medical research and will soon begin interviewing a shortlist of patients to determine who, if anyone, will be first up for this procedure. From the article: 'The chance it will work is around 50% and experts have expressed safety and ethical concerns about the procedure. The recipient would have to take powerful anti-rejection drugs for life, which carry considerable long-term health risks, says the Royal College of Surgeons of England, which formed a working party to look at the issue earlier this year.'

306 comments

  1. Ugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Face/Off was about the worst movie ever. What makes people think the reality will be any better?

    1. Re:Ugh by Jubalicious · · Score: 5, Funny

      Castor Troy: It's like looking in a mirror. Only... not.

    2. Re:Ugh by Eric+Giguere · · Score: 5, Funny

      The chance it will work is around 50%

      I'm not sure anymore, are we talking about face transplants or John Travolta's recent movie work?

      Eric
      Sample chapter from my latest book
    3. Re:Ugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      or John Travolta's recent movie work?

      John Travolta's recent work sucks because he's infested with Body Thetans. He knows the secrets of Xenu but can't seem to shake them. (see xenu.net if ya don't know what I mean.

    4. Re:Ugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought John was a "clear"? That means he has gotten rid of his thetans and now those thetans are going after someone else. No, no, get away you pesky thetan. If only Xenu were here!

    5. Re:Ugh by utnow · · Score: 1

      did you not see Get Shorty or Be Cool? common the guy's got style ;)

    6. Re:Ugh by hostyle · · Score: 0

      Common is right. I've seen stuff in my fridge take on more life when you point a spotlight at it.

      --
      Caesar si viveret, ad remum dareris.
    7. Re:Ugh by phxbadash · · Score: 1

      Wow...Be Cool has to be one of the worst movies I've ever seen in my whole life. Vince Vaughn was decent and Uma Thurmin is hot but god damn that movie was a waste of 2 hours.

      and yes I realize you were being sarcastic.

  2. Face Off 2: Electric Bugaloo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I can see it now...

  3. so by blinder · · Score: 0, Redundant

    is john travolta and nicholas cage going to be the first two to have this done?

    hmmm... sorry... bad joke.

  4. Woo by grub · · Score: 4, Funny


    I want Cowboy Neal's face, there's room to grow into it.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  5. Movie about this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I saw a movie about this once where one guy takes his face/off and changes it with another guy who also takes his face/off. Anyway, they end up chasing each other around for a while and eventually face/off to fight.

    I think it was called "Two Guys that Traded Faces".

    1. Re:Movie about this? by someguy456 · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's like Speed 2, except this time it's a bus instead of a boat!

    2. Re:Movie about this? by inkdesign · · Score: 1

      If you liked that one, try the sequal.

    3. Re:Movie about this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      *whoosh*

      (the sound of that joke going over your head)

    4. Re:Movie about this? by dnhughes · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think you are thinking about the new Discovery Health reality show called "Trading Faces"

      Sorry, couldn't resist.

      --
      "When I die, I want to go quietly, like my grandfather, in his sleep... not screaming, like the passengers in his car."
    5. Re:Movie about this? by soupdevil · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sequel -- Face On?

    6. Re:Movie about this? by Piranhaa · · Score: 4, Funny

      And it's only the faces that have changed... You'd think the wife would have noticed other things about the other guy that looked a little bit different than her "real husband"

    7. Re:Movie about this? by Fishstick · · Score: 1

      heh - Travolta and Cage yawn-fest called Face Off

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

    8. Re:Movie about this? by Fishstick · · Score: 1

      There was a Tom Berenger flick like that, only the wife had been having an affair with her husband's business partner, and after they killed him and hid the body they got into a crash where Berenger's character needed complete facial reconstruction (went through the windsheild).

      Doctors in the hospital thought this was her husband and so reconstructed according to dead husband's photo. Berenger wakes up with amnesia and doesn't remember that he's the other guy. Wife has to go along with it and pretend that this guy is her husband and it is the business partner (her lover) that has disappeared.

      Good flick, gruesome ending.

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

    9. Re:Movie about this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    10. Re:Movie about this? by sharkey · · Score: 2, Funny

      If you read less than 55 words per minute, this book'll explode!!

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    11. Re:Movie about this? by ImTheDarkcyde · · Score: 2, Insightful

      jeez am i the only one who loved that movie for is stunning action choriography? though i whole heartedly agree the story sucks :-P (but its an action movie all the way)

    12. Re:Movie about this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are a dolt.

    13. Re:Movie about this? by ScrewMaster · · Score: 3, Funny

      No ... Offace Space.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    14. Re:Movie about this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Didn't Mr. Miyagi say something along these lines?

      Face ON... Face OFF... Face ON... Face OFF... you do now...

    15. Re:Movie about this? by Hosiah · · Score: 2, Funny
      Hee hee, you forgot to expand on the part where they jump in cars and chase each other until they crash and then jump onto jet skis and chase each other until *they* crash, and then switch to helicopters, and skateboards, and submarines, and choppers, and hang-gliders, and the Mellineum Falcon and a Klingon warbird, and then pogo-sticks....

      Relieved to find out I wasn't the only one dragged into a movie theater by my SO to see it. My main complaint about the movie was that I couldn't get a good seat; they all faced foreward.

    16. Re:Movie about this? by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      You'd think that....unless you were married.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    17. Re:Movie about this? by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Nah, it was a Mel Brooks' vehicle called "Faceballs." Or maybe it was "Face Venturi, Pet Defective". Wasn't there a B&W classic called "Arsenic and Old Face"? And let's not forget Graham Hamer's famous "Paperface".

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  6. Anyone know... by TheOtherAgentM · · Score: 5, Funny

    if Brad Pitt is a donor? I could really use the sex.

    1. Re:Anyone know... by saskboy · · Score: 0, Redundant

      "I could really use 'the sex'".

      'The Sex' is attainable, but not if you have a desire to cut your face up to look "better". The first step is to get in shape naturally by eating right and moving more than just fingers and eyeballs. Next you need to shore up your self esteem, because you can get just as much action in the type of crowd you desire if you have the right level of self confidence and practice. You don't get practice by sitting on Slashdot unless you're trying to score with a 40 year old male virgin.

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    2. Re:Anyone know... by sirmalloc · · Score: 1

      so, what you are really saying is by sitting here on Slashdot i have a better chance of scoring with Steve Carell?

    3. Re:Anyone know... by FinchWorld · · Score: 1

      Hmmmm, Angelina Jolie.

      --
      "I may be full of crap about this game, and I may be wrong, and that's fine." -Jack Thompson
    4. Re:Anyone know... by Buck2 · · Score: 1

      Have you ever heard of the term, "pearls before swine"?

      --

      As my father lik@(munch munch)... ....
    5. Re:Anyone know... by Avery18 · · Score: 2, Informative

      If he is, give me a call. I'll be sure to help ya out on your needs. ;)

      --
      "Respect the Emperor, Expel the Foreign Barbarians." - Japanese National Motto during Meiji Period
    6. Re:Anyone know... by Johnboi+Waltune · · Score: 5, Funny

      I don't think Brad Pitt would be very interested in having sex with you. So, your best bet is to wait until he has passed out from the anesthesia.

      Good luck!

      --
      "The advanced societies of the future will be driven by competing systems of psychopathology." -JG Ballard
    7. Re:Anyone know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the only two choices you'll have are Nicholas Cage or John Travola.

      Wheeee, what a predicament!

    8. Re:Anyone know... by zaphod_es · · Score: 1

      This is a personal disaster, guys like you are going to be hunting me down and trying to steal my face.

    9. Re:Anyone know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well being Zaphod, you have two don't you? Surely you can spare one of 'em ;)

    10. Re:Anyone know... by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      Forget about the transplant operation, just take the anti-rejection drugs.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    11. Re:Anyone know... by Seumas · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think this is pretty cool, as long as it isn't used for cosmetic reasons (reconstructive is another thing altogether).

      Actually, let me clarify - I don't have a problem with cosmetic surgery whatsoever - as long as people who have cosmetic (non-reconstructive) surgery don't have children.

      Nobody wants to be with an ugly person. It's a biological and evolutionary thing. It's wrong to take an ugly person and cosmetically make them beautiful so that someone will procreate with them in the long run, continuing to propagate bad genetic material in the species. It's dishonest and dangerous to society.

      I don't have anything against ugly people. I'm a very ugly person myself. It's not like I think we should be executed or anything. I just don't think we should breed.

    12. Re:Anyone know... by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      Brad Pitt's face on a pasty-white 300 lb geek still won't get you any. You'd probably be better off with an ass transplant.

    13. Re:Anyone know... by woah · · Score: 1

      er.. you mean liposuction

    14. Re:Anyone know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My face is not a particularly beautiful one, and it's certainly been called ugly several times before.

      But my kids haven't inherited the ugly genes, they're all beautiful.

    15. Re:Anyone know... by uncqual · · Score: 1
      But perhaps many of the evolutionary reasons for uglies not breeding are gone.

      Before medical science had advanced, one had to make a judgement about the capability of their breeding partners (do they have leprosy, are they defective, etc) and a simple way to do this was to wire our brains (along with some cultural conditioning) with an "ideal" look - and making any deviation from this undesirable (even if the deviation didn't affect the odds of healthy offspring) decreased the odds of breeding with a damaged mate.

      Now, we are better able to determine if an individual is a medically suitable partner. We should care more about brains since a smart unattractive person will probably do better in life than an attractive dumb one.

      Of course, none of this matters because the firmware in our brains is hard to flash...

      (Actually, breeding uglies are probably much less dangerous to our gene pool than all the people we "save" with medical care - but I doubt that most people will refuse medical care in order to improve the gene pool, so why shouldn't uglies breed?)

      --
      Why is there an "insightful" mod and why isn't it "-1"? If I wanted insight, I wouldn't be reading /.
    16. Re:Anyone know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ROFL

    17. Re:Anyone know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope you don't mind, but I think your opinion might be slightly biased.

    18. Re:Anyone know... by danimrich · · Score: 1

      The notion of "bad" and "good" genetic material and the proposal that people with bad genetic material should not be allowed to breed seems reminiscent of the policies of the Third Reich. People who were seen as unworthy to live were put into concentration camps, abused in dubious medical experiments, sterilized and eventually killed.
      I dearly hope that you don't want this to happen in modern societies and that you might eventually realize that the notion of "good" and "bad" genetic material is fundamentally flawed.

      --
      where's all that Karma?
    19. Re:Anyone know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And have you heard of 'Dung before the shovel'

    20. Re:Anyone know... by Seumas · · Score: 1

      Of course I don't think that. I just think that ugly people should be responsible enough to breed. Rather than cosmetically hiding their ugliness so that they can sucker a partner into procreating with them and continuing the chain of ugly people.

      Frankly, why would you want to produce ugly children in a world where it's as detrimental to be ugly as it is to have any other serious affliction, disability or malady?

    21. Re:Anyone know... by Seumas · · Score: 1

      Responsible enough not to breed, that is.

  7. let me be the first to say by mrfibbi · · Score: 5, Interesting

    WHAT THE HELL? Then I thought "oh, okay, it's april fools." Then I remembered that no, it wasn't, and it was just National Talk-Like-A-Pirate-Day. I'd be a little weirded out if someone started walking around with my dead wife's face. But that's just me.

    1. Re:let me be the first to say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WHAT THE HELL? Then I thought "oh, okay, it's april fools." Then I remembered that no, it wasn't, and it was just National Talk-Like-A-Pirate-Day.

      International Talk-like-a-pirate-day, ye insensitive landlubber!

    2. Re:let me be the first to say by gwydion04 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well, actually it's quite unlikely that the face would look like your wife's at all. The typical appearance of a face is produced by the bones and musculature beneath the skin. At most, the coloration and hair distribution of the donor's face would be preserved.

      (sorry to hear about your wife, btw... unless you were speaking hypothetically)

    3. Re:let me be the first to say by CoffeeJedi · · Score: 4, Interesting

      without the same bone structure and musculature, i don't think that the recipient would have an exact copy of your dead wife's face

      --
      May you be touched by His Noodly Appendage. RAmen.
    4. Re:let me be the first to say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      "I'd be a little weirded out if someone started walking around with my dead wife's face"

      me too, especially as I thought it was still buried under the patio.

    5. Re:let me be the first to say by oliana · · Score: 1

      Of course, the person who receives the transplant will not have the same bone structure, so it would likely not look the same.

      And it makes no mention to replacing nose cartilage. Would that come too? Would the person be able to alter the nose while he/she's at it?

      Do you think your wife would be okay with someone who had basically no face using hers?

      --
      In Soviet Russia, asses suck this joke.
    6. Re:let me be the first to say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You bury yours there, too?

      Shit, I thought I was being clever. Time to find a new hiding spot.

    7. Re:let me be the first to say by Arivia · · Score: 1

      Those can be changed, too...look up "facial feminization surgery".

      --
      The role of the writer is not to say what we can all say, but what we are unable to say. -Anais Nin
    8. Re:let me be the first to say by msuzio · · Score: 1

      Right. For that, you want a full head transplant.

    9. Re:let me be the first to say by Golias · · Score: 1

      Avast! Lash that scalliwag 'cross the keel, and hoist the main sail 'gainst a fair wind, me hearties! 'Tis the only medicine for such scullduggery. Gyarr!

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    10. Re:let me be the first to say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mmmmmm, getting head....

    11. Re:let me be the first to say by m50d · · Score: 1

      International, not national, ye scurvy customs officer.

      --
      I am trolling
    12. Re:let me be the first to say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why? Under his patio, next to his wife, is still a great spot! Even if they find her, they will pin both murders on him.

    13. Re:let me be the first to say by markass530 · · Score: 1

      Well, if Like an ex girlfriend or something of mine died, then I saw some chick walking around with her face, I'd be thinking like sweet, round two, maybe this time she won't turn out to be a bitch, and I'd try to hump the face transplante, but if I saw someone with my dead sisters face, yea that would piss me off. Maybe they would have to make sure dead person/face transplante live in different area's or something to that effect.

    14. Re:let me be the first to say by Surt · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think that's just making things worse. Now we have to picture some guy walking around with a sloppy imperfect copy of his dead wife's face.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    15. Re:let me be the first to say by temojen · · Score: 4, Insightful

      WHAT THE HELL? Who would trade burn scars for 50% chance of death, likelyhood of chronic pain, likelyhood of further disfigurement, and no immune system for the rest of their lives?

      Self-sourced grafts and reconstructive surgery sound like a much better idea to me, but then I'm not even an orderly, let alone a reconstructive plastic surgeon.

    16. Re:let me be the first to say by Frumious+Wombat · · Score: 1

      Since nobody else has brought this up (maybe his readership has dropped to zero since the 80s), does this remind anyone else of Larry Niven's early Know Space stories where transplantation is easy, so the sources of 'donors' have become easy as well?

      I'd worry less about seeing your late wife's face on someone else than I would, say, Jeffrey Dahmer's. After all, it's not like he wasn't a danger to society, committed unspeakable crimes, and should now 'give' something back (voluntarily or not). The chinese are already rumored to be using vital organs from executed prisoners, so this makes one wonder how much longer before we start down the same path.

      --
      the more accurate the calculations became, the more the concepts tended to vanish into thin air. R. S. Mulliken
    17. Re:let me be the first to say by phaggood · · Score: 1

      > Who would trade burn scars for 50% chance

      Screw that, man. I want replacement
      parts, including hopefully my own damn face if I should ever need a spare.

    18. Re:let me be the first to say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As opposed to having grafted skin constantly splitting, needing constant cleansing, having you vision restricted by skin flaps, the pain of not having eyelids?

      Maybe Jacqueline Saburido might disagree with you (Detailed story).

    19. Re:let me be the first to say by Titanium+Angel · · Score: 1

      You're right. There was a show on the Discovery channel a few months ago about this procedure. They took photos of the faces from cadavers before and after the transplantation and presented them to a panel of experts, who concluded that the face on a different person only slightly resembles the donor. Even if you knew the donor, you most probably wouldn't recognize his face on the recipient, unless someone told you to take a good look.

      As to who would want such a transplant, one possible patient, who was also featured in the show, is this girl. She was burned alive one night while she was going home when a drunk driver hit her car and it caught fire. 60% of her body was burned, she lost her nose, ears, fingers and most of her vision.

    20. Re:let me be the first to say by suitepotato · · Score: 1

      No need for a face transplant.

      Jeff Dunham: "Walter, if you were to get a tattoo what would it be?"
      Walter: "A pretty woman's face."
      Jeff Dunham: "And where would you get that tattoo?"
      Walter: "On my wife's face."

      Loosely quoting...

      --
      If my grammar and spelling are off, I am [distracted/tired/careless] (take your pick)
    21. Re:let me be the first to say by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "Self-sourced grafts and reconstructive surgery sound like a much better idea to me,"

      Assuming you have enough skin left to graft?

    22. Re:let me be the first to say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      would that look like when someone doesn't know how to map a face to a model and it ends up all wrapped?

    23. Re:let me be the first to say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They don't say 50% chance of death, they say 50% chance it will work. Don't exaggerate.

    24. Re:let me be the first to say by temojen · · Score: 1

      Keeping in mind that they have to remove your face to do it, what happens if it fails?

    25. Re:let me be the first to say by Ba3r · · Score: 1

      nothing a little grinding, some plastic, and some creative use of tissue grafts can't fix.

      of course, noting that it is talk-like-a-pirate-day, the recipient will probably look like some animatronic pirate. Now if only we could get the recipient to sing 'Its a small world after all'...

    26. Re:let me be the first to say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then... prepare thy arse for grafting!

    27. Re:let me be the first to say by sydres · · Score: 1

      we already do except in lethal injections which destroys the tissues usability

    28. Re:let me be the first to say by CoffeeJedi · · Score: 1

      don't you mean "Yo Ho, Yo Ho, A pirate's life for me!"?

      Although, i'd imagine that switching the audio tracks for "Pirates of the Carribean" and "It's a Small World" would make for an interesting day at Disneyland.

      --
      May you be touched by His Noodly Appendage. RAmen.
    29. Re:let me be the first to say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Worried you wouldn't get away with killing her again?

  8. Finally... by mrRay720 · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...science useful for the slashdot masses.

    What? You know you guys are ugly as sin, admit it!

    (hey it's a joke!)

    1. Re:Finally... by smallfries · · Score: 1

      So who is it useful for, or rather, who is on the 'shortlist that is being drawn up' of candidates?

      I'm guessing..

      - The Rich
      - The Criminally Insane
      - The Rich & Criminally Insane
      - The Rich & Criminally Insane with long criminal records and a need to disappear

      Great for their needs thoughs. You transplant a face from person A to person B and the success (cough, survival) rate is 50%...

      --
      Slashdot: where don knuth is an idiot because he cant grasp the awesome power of php
    2. Re:Finally... by Fenresulven · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Personally I'd guess burn victims, but hey, that's just me.

    3. Re:Finally... by Chaotic+Spyder · · Score: 1

      you guys hrmm?

      --
      Losers whine about their best, Winners go home to fuck the prom queen
    4. Re:Finally... by flyingsquid · · Score: 1
      Well, as for rich and criminal, there was that one Mexican drug lord who tried to create a new identity by getting plastic surgery and massive liposuction... and there were a few complications with the surgery. Truly a great loss to humanity.

      Anyone know whatever happened to his plastic surgeon?

    5. Re:Finally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      while (promptYN("Are you female?")) { cout "Will you have sex with me?"; }

    6. Re:Finally... by PeeCee · · Score: 1
      that one Mexican drug lord who tried to create a new identity by getting plastic surgery and massive liposuction... and there were a few complications with the surgery. Truly a great loss to humanity.

      That'd be Amado Carrillo, aka the "Lord of the Skies" ("El señor de los Cielos"). To this day, however, it remains kind of uncertain, surrounded by mysterious circumstances, and there are many who believe it was all staged to allow him to disappear.

      Anyone know whatever happened to his plastic surgeon?

      Hollywood and conspiracy fans rejoice: they were found dead along a highway, stuffed in oil drums.

    7. Re:Finally... by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

      What? You know you guys are ugly as sin, admit it!

      That's not true, Dr. Sin had some charm after all!

  9. Now THAT'S a side effect... by KingSkippus · · Score: 4, Informative

    The summary doesn't make this clear, but this procedure is intended only for severely disfigured people due to burn scars and such.

    The possible side effects are pretty scary, though. My favorite quote is from the CNN Article:

    "[Critics] paint the frighteningly surreal image of a worst-case scenario: a transplanted face being rejected and sloughing away, leaving the patient worse off than before."

    And I used to think that anal leakage was a scary side effect, that's nothing comparing to a soughing face! Thank god I'm not in a position for now where I have to make a decision like that, but it sure is a high price to pay for looking "normal" again.

    1. Re:Now THAT'S a side effect... by Monkey-Man2000 · · Score: 2, Informative

      This sounds a lot like what happened to the girl in Eyes Without a Face. The theme of the movie is very similar to the theme of the article.

      --
      This post was generated by a Cadre of Uber Monkeys for Monkey-Man2000 (603495).
    2. Re:Now THAT'S a side effect... by dr_dank · · Score: 2, Funny

      The possible side effects are pretty scary, though. My favorite quote is from the CNN Article:

              "[Critics] paint the frighteningly surreal image of a worst-case scenario: a transplanted face being rejected and sloughing away, leaving the patient worse off than before."

      And I used to think that anal leakage was a scary side effect, that's nothing comparing to a soughing face! Thank god I'm not in a position for now where I have to make a decision like that, but it sure is a high price to pay for looking "normal" again.


      Now, that would be completely unprecedented.

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    3. Re:Now THAT'S a side effect... by Have+Blue · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and breast enlargment was intended only for cancer survivors who had mastectomies.

    4. Re:Now THAT'S a side effect... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't know how recent this news was, but according to her web site, Jacqueline Saburido, the young Texan who was hit by a drunk driver (Graphic Content) is considering a transplant.

    5. Re:Now THAT'S a side effect... by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1
      "[Critics] paint the frighteningly surreal image of a worst-case scenario: a transplanted face being rejected and sloughing away, leaving the patient worse off than before."

      You thought Michael Jackson jury duty was awful before? God bless those poor souls during the next round.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    6. Re:Now THAT'S a side effect... by sharkdba · · Score: 1

      The summary doesn't make this clear, but this procedure is intended only for severely disfigured people due to burn scars and such.

      Yes, but something tells me rich criminals who need to disappear will be the most popular customers...

      --
      The purpose of life is to find the purpose of life.
    7. Re:Now THAT'S a side effect... by toddhunter · · Score: 1

      thank GOD for the safe=active you added there

  10. Source of the face? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't get it, where does the face come from? Corpses? Poor people who are beautiful but need cash? Why would I want to look like a corpse?

    1. Re:Source of the face? by Stud1y · · Score: 1

      thats what i was left wondering too. if they're interviewing men and women to be faced, i would assume an endless supply of faces coming from somewhere?

    2. Re:Source of the face? by Arctic+Dragon · · Score: 1

      "Why would I want to look like a corpse?"

      Keith Richards seems OK with it.

    3. Re:Source of the face? by dr_dank · · Score: 1

      Why would I want to look like a corpse?

      You never know when Marilyn Manson will tour again.

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    4. Re:Source of the face? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      cadavers

  11. Finally...here is my chance! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe one day I can get a date with a real girl! Thank you science!

  12. Been done before... by jnadke · · Score: 5, Funny

    Michael Jackson had this done years ago.

    1. Re:Been done before... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean the dead white monkey...

    2. Re:Been done before... by Jeff+Hornby · · Score: 4, Funny

      But next time they're hoping for a success

      --
      Why doesn't Slashdot ever get slashdotted?
    3. Re:Been done before... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reminds me of a great line from the Conan O'Brien show when Triumph the Insult Comic Dog was interviewing the riff raff outside the MJ Trial.

      Triumph (interviewing a female British Reporter): On a scale of one to ten, how old do you think Michael's boyfriend is?

    4. Re:Been done before... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ho! That was the first time in a LONG time I've actually laughed out-loud from something on \.

      Nicely done!

    5. Re:Been done before... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      Michael Jackson had this done years ago.

      Looks like the face rejected him.

  13. Anti-Rejection drugs? by Create+an+Account · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I have the feeling that someone that has had a large part of their face burned off in a bad fire isn't going to be too worried about having to take drugs for the rest of their lives. Ethical? Ask the people who need this kind of surgery if THEY think it's ethical.

    1. Re:Anti-Rejection drugs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny
      > I have the feeling that someone that has had a large part of their face burned off in a bad fire isn't going to be too worried about having to take drugs for the rest of their lives.

      Why bother with the drugs? You'd think they'd already be used to rejection.

      /one ticket, aisle seating please

    2. Re:Anti-Rejection drugs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The big question is, how can you make the treatment so that anti-rejection drugs aren't needed. Certainly that would what would be important. Why exactly would skin if it matched tissue-wise be subject to rejection anyway?

    3. Re:Anti-Rejection drugs? by j-cloth · · Score: 5, Informative

      Anti rejection drugs aren't just a little pill you pop like your morning Prozak. They are taken to stop your immune system from doing what it's supposed to do (i.e. treat the transplanted flesh as an infection and attack it). Good if you don't want to lose your newly trasplanted face or organ, not so good if you want to be able to fight off a cold or whatever bug your kid brings home from school. Anti rejection drugs are getting better, but they are not trivial.
      If the dilema is between the above and a heart or kidney that will keep you alive, then I think it's pretty simple for most people. If it's between this and a new face, I think there is more deliberation to be done than what you suggest.

    4. Re:Anti-Rejection drugs? by ArsonSmith · · Score: 2, Funny

      How dare you inject logic and reason into this blantly anti-plastic surgery rant.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    5. Re:Anti-Rejection drugs? by Skye16 · · Score: 1

      I guess it's a question of "quality of life". If you can't show your face in public without women fainting or men puking (or vice versa), then this is probably worth while. And if they end up dying from it - so what? If they're willing to make that choice, then more power to them. At least they're trying to get a normal life back.

      And then, of course, it becomes a question of degree. When is it appropriate to risk your life to look better? Only when you're Elephant-Man hideous? Or when you have a pimple? Legally, I say "do whatever the fuck you want", but my personal opinion is that this should only be used in extreme circumstances.

      Then again, it's not my face, or my life.

    6. Re:Anti-Rejection drugs? by Brain_Recall · · Score: 2, Informative
      People with large burns such as this would greatly benefit a surgery such as this, not just form an ethical point of view.

      Scar tissue from the burns constantly contracts. It can become such a problem that people can have slurred speech (since their ability to move their lips has been greatly reduced by the tightening of the skin). There are traditional methods attempt to fix this (use under-skin saline balloons to grow new skin in some part of the body, and then graft that skin onto the burned areas), but they are not permanent since remaining scar tissue will continue to contract. It's a horrible cycle, and I bet some people would be willing to take such a risk as that.

      This is a detailed medical article on the skin grafting procedure with burn victims: Tissue expansion in The Treatment of Burn Scars

    7. Re:Anti-Rejection drugs? by Shoten · · Score: 1

      I think we need to consider the drugs we're really talking about here, and what the risks are. This isn't like having to take asprin every morning to limit one's risk of heart attack. These are anti-rejection drugs...also known as immunosuppressants. When your body rejects a transplant, it's your immune system at work, seeing the organ (or in this case, face) as an invading organism. So the drugs that help prevent rejection do so by impeding your immune response.

      Not to make it sound too dramatic, but imagine spending the rest of your life with a compromised immune system. Kind of like 50% of having AIDS, to simplify it. This is no minor thing. A common cold can hospitalize you; the flu would very possibly kill you. And you've got little option but to keep on them, no matter what, since cessation of the therapy could result in rejection of your new face, which would be catastrophic as well. The tissue would be attacked, would become necrotic, and you'd get the fun and joy of having your face succumb to gangrene before they sliced it all off just to save your life.

      --

      For your security, this post has been encrypted with ROT-13, twice.
    8. Re:Anti-Rejection drugs? by SilverspurG · · Score: 5, Informative
      I have the feeling that someone that has had a large part of their face burned off in a bad fire isn't going to be too worried about having to take drugs for the rest of their lives
      Speaking as someone who does have 3rd degree burns over 40% of his body, including 1/2 of the face and the full neck, I really have to say...

      NOT A FSCKING CHANCE IN HELL would I ever go for a transplant from a cadaver. Traditional techniques have been available, and improving, for 30 years which can do a much nicer job without having to take immune blockers for the rest of my life and which use my own skin. There's also just the creepy bit about wearing a cadaver's face... Kinda like Slayer's old tune,"Dead Skin Mask".

      The only reason why anyone may volunteer for this is that the doctors involved are (unethically, I might add) attempting to bait patients in by offering the first few operations free of charge. This is such a lowlife technique. How about, instead, we fix the medical and insurance obstacles for people who would like to have genuine reconstructive surgery?

      For example, in my case, I can't afford to go for reconstructive surgery even though I actually NEED it. The scar tissue doesn't stretch as I grow, and the mobility of my arms, hands, and neck is severely limited. My waist is the same way. Imagine wearing an ultra-tight girdle 24/7/365 with no chance to take it off, ever. Do you know what that does to digestion after any meal larger than a Triscuit? Can you imagine what it's like to put on weight and not be able to adjust the girdle size? The waist size for my scar-tissue girdle is about a 32-34 (180 lbs). My current waist size is 36 @ 210 lbs. I'm 6'1", I'm not overweight... but I cannot convey to you that daily life is, at best, uncomfortable.

      Why don't I go in for surgery? Who will pay my bills for the 30 days that I'm completely incapacitated and the 4 months to relatively complete recovery? Donor sites for skin grafts are EXTREMELY painful and take a long time to heal. My insurance company won't... this is a "preexisting condition" which, according to them, doesn't directly affect my Quality of Life or my ability to do my job.

      The problem is not reconstructive technology. The problem is money-grubbing insurance agencies and the predominant wage-slave status of anyone making less than $100k/year.
      --
      fast as fast can be. you'll never catch me.
    9. Re:Anti-Rejection drugs? by God'sDuck · · Score: 1

      My insurance company won't... this is a "preexisting condition" which, according to them, doesn't directly affect my Quality of Life or my ability to do my job.

      IANAhealthcareemployee, but just out of curiosity...isn't there usually a statute of limitations on preexisting conditions? i.e., they become covered again after about a year?

      if that isn't the case with your insurance, it might be worth changing plans; if you've been previously covered, the new insurance wouldn't exercise the preexisting clause at all. of course, getting coverage when you know about this condition could be quite tough...but probably worth the legwork...

    10. Re:Anti-Rejection drugs? by SilverspurG · · Score: 1
      it might be worth changing plans
      You know, this might just be an option if I were a member of the priveleged self-employed class in society. As it is, I'm a member of the wage-slave class who has no choice but the company provided HMO. I think everyone knows just how eager HMOs are to "help" patients.

      Cue the meat market assembly line music... :)
      --
      fast as fast can be. you'll never catch me.
    11. Re:Anti-Rejection drugs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just a thought.. but if you have no other options and saving a years worth of money is long beyond the horizon, maybe you might consider moving countries, the UK has free healthcare and while you'll probably need to jump through a year or two of hoops to become a native, you'll then gain the benefits and have the chance to improve your quality of life.

    12. Re:Anti-Rejection drugs? by Icculus · · Score: 1

      ..isn't there usually a statute of limitations on preexisting conditions?

      Not a statute of limitations per se (although it may vary from state to state), but most plans have pre-ex exclusions for anywhere from 3-12 months depending on what your employer decided when negotiating the plan with your insurance company. In many (most) cases your employer is the one calling the shots on what is covered and not covered. It would not be a waste of time to speak to the benefits administrator in your HR department to explain your condition and if there's anything they can do.

      The best way to handle it if you are changing jobs or are unable to work and are let go is to investigate a COBRA option for your existing coverage until your pre-ex limitation from your new employer's plan expires. COBRA plans can be quite expensive, but they are likely less expensive than paying for treatment outright especially if your condition is as severe as you described. But in your case your window to purchase a COBRA plan is probably expired and you'll simply have to ride out the pre-ex period. There are tons of rules and most of them are not really there to help you out as I'm sure you've found out. I hope you are able to get the treatment you need covered soon.

    13. Re:Anti-Rejection drugs? by Ingolfke · · Score: 1

      NOT A FSCKING CHANCE IN HELL would I ever go for a transplant from a cadaver.

      I totally agree with you... human life is far to cheap these days to have to resort to cadavers.

    14. Re:Anti-Rejection drugs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember hearing about this type of procedure a while ago. In addition to burn victims, there are lots of accidents which might damage your face so much that there isn't enough left to reconstruct. Think falling face-first into a wheat thresher (ewwww!). A transplant may be your only choice in this case.

    15. Re:Anti-Rejection drugs? by maird · · Score: 1

      As I understand it, US law now prohibits the limiting of insurance on pre-existing conditions where the insuree has had at least twelve months of coverage in the past 12 months. IOW, you can change jobs and not lose coverage but you have to wait a year after a period of unemployment. Obviously this is (AFAIK) the minimum legal requirement. The NPR News story I learned it from pointed out that many employers have better than minimums plans. However, none of that helps the GP poster if his plan has life maximums (as many do), or if you can describe a treatment as cosmetic. I joked with a doctor friend that an insurance company would pay for anti-depressants for life but not for the limited duration treatment for the acne that is making me depressed because the latter is "cosmetic". He said that this is exactly what would (does) happen.

    16. Re:Anti-Rejection drugs? by Digital+Pizza · · Score: 1
      It's too bad that this may be necessary, but maybe you can contact some local news people and become the subject of a "human interest" story: "Big Bad Insurance Company Won't Help Burn Victim".

      People are often very kind about donating to such a cause; it might also shame your insurance company into helping you out.

      --
      We apologize for the inconvenience.
    17. Re:Anti-Rejection drugs? by SilverspurG · · Score: 1
      maybe you can contact some local news people and become the subject of
      I'm not much of one to quote hip-hop, but after as much crap as I've put up with from society over these scars, this applies: "I'll suffocate for respect before I breathe to collect the check."

      I will not be a poster boy. Either someone wants to quietly help me on my way to a better life or they don't. I'll not help any bleeding heart liberal in their self-promotion quest. I don't say this with derision or scorn, I say this matter-of-fact with a wry smile. I know how it turns out for poster children. Frankly, I don't want the side-effects of public exposure.

      Think... even if I could get my scars erased, but did so through a poster-child public campaign, any woman that I would eventually date would have to suffer the jibes of,"You're dating the former burned fellow out of pity." Whether or not her motives are true, she would hear this from someone at some point. I just don't need the hassle.

      If this gets done, it gets done quietly, discreetly, and I end up moving someplace where no one really knows much about what was before I arrived.
      --
      fast as fast can be. you'll never catch me.
    18. Re:Anti-Rejection drugs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They put you on 'roids too. Keeps you alive and well for the most part but ruins your bones in time. Also some of the anti-rejection meds have bad side-effects and are rough on the kidneys (requiring you to have a kidney transplant later in life).

    19. Re:Anti-Rejection drugs? by ModernGeek · · Score: 1

      I think you just took it too far ... what if your kids and wife had burned off faces? What about that black guy on ladder 49?

      --
      Sig: I stole this sig.
    20. Re:Anti-Rejection drugs? by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      The problem is not reconstructive technology. The problem is money-grubbing insurance agencies and the predominant wage-slave status of anyone making less than $100k/year.
      No, the problem is the people who think they have a right to a perfect life - and that someone else should bear the costs.
    21. Re:Anti-Rejection drugs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your chances of getting plastic reconstruction on the NHS or even the Canadian helth system are close to zero. These types of operations take tens of hours in the OR (at >$1000/hour) and weeks of recovery (at >$1000 per day). They also require significant clinical follow-up, often years.

      If he can feed himself and breathe without a tube, he is essentially "functional." An intact skin/scar which keeps infections out is another bonus. Government health systems are about making people functional, not perfect. The fact that he can hold down a job is both a testament to his strength of will and the functional reconstruction he has already recieved.

      to obtain funds for further surgery, I think he might have a better chance suing whoever caused his burn for the medical costs of the reconstructive surgery.

    22. Re:Anti-Rejection drugs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the problem is the people who think they have a right to a perfect life - and that someone else should bear the costs.

      prick

    23. Re:Anti-Rejection drugs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If his wife and kids had burned off faces, I would laugh. :-D

    24. Re:Anti-Rejection drugs? by SilverspurG · · Score: 2
      and that someone else should bear the costs.
      I usually refrain from participating in gratuitous insults, but in your case I'll make an exception.

      I pay taxes too, you insensitive clod!
      --
      fast as fast can be. you'll never catch me.
    25. Re:Anti-Rejection drugs? by SilverspurG · · Score: 1

      As tasteless as this is, even I can laugh at it. :)))

      --
      fast as fast can be. you'll never catch me.
    26. Re:Anti-Rejection drugs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> My current waist size is 36 @ 210 lbs. I'm 6'1", I'm not overweight.

      If you're 210 pounds and 6'1", medical science calls you fat.

    27. Re:Anti-Rejection drugs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BMI's a fucking joke. By it's determination pretty much any person with an above-average amount of muscle on their frame is obese.

    28. Re:Anti-Rejection drugs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have the feeling that someone that has had a large part of their face burned off in a bad fire isn't going to be too worried about having to take drugs for the rest of their lives. Ethical? Ask the people who need this kind of surgery if THEY think it's ethical.

      I have the feeling that someone that has traded their eternal soul for a bag of crack rocks and a $1 handjob isn't going to be too worried about having to eat aborted human fetuses for the rest of their lives. Ethical? Ask the people who need to eat fetuses if THEY think it's ethical.

      Heh... sorry, I actually agree with you, but couldn't pass up the chance :)

    29. Re:Anti-Rejection drugs? by rkww · · Score: 1
      As reported in The Guardian

      Many critics also question whether a person already traumatised by facial disfigurement would be equipped to cope. [The] Cleveland Clinic tells prospective recipients ... that the risks are so unknown it does not think informed consent is possible.

  14. Ugly faces only? by TheConfusedOne · · Score: 4, Funny
    The recipient would have to take powerful anti-rejection drugs for life


    That sounds a bit cruel, maybe they just need to drink a lot instead.
    --
    --- I wish I could hear the soundtrack to my life. That way I'd know when to duck.
    1. Re:Ugly faces only? by Gonzo73 · · Score: 1

      ROFL!!! Hate to seem insensitve, but I wish I had mod points. Morbid humor - love it, thanks for the laugh.

    2. Re:Ugly faces only? by Ingolfke · · Score: 1

      ROFWIPVOMAMHDFYICAM - Rolling on the floor wrything in pain vomiting on myself and my hideously disfigured face you insensitive clod, argghh matey

      Saw that on IRC the other day. How fortuitous.

  15. Children, Behave by SpottedKuh · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Suzy: My little brother is so stupid!

    Johnny: Well, yeah, you're so ugly that you need a fa...oh, wait...

  16. Butterface! by RUFFyamahaRYDER · · Score: 0

    Hehe... I love that term! But seriously, people should just live with what they've got. We all eventually get old; we all eventually pass on. Wear what you've got with a smile and you'll do just fine.

    If everyone got this face-off thing done we'd all start looking the same and get bored of each other!

    1. Re:Butterface! by General+Alcazar · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I believe that the demand for this is for people who have seriously disfigured, malformed, or mutilated faces. If half of your face had been eaten away by some kind of bacteria or disease, I think you might think twice about getting this procedure.

      It is probably difficult to comprehend the impact major facial disfigurement can have on a person.

    2. Re:Butterface! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why don't you live with what you've got and keep the preaching to yourself. Try wearing a smile and doing just fine after being in a horrible, disfiguring car accident caused by a drunk driver.

      This isn't some procedure designed for the slightly goofy looking, but you would know that if you had read the fucking article.

    3. Re:Butterface! by RUFFyamahaRYDER · · Score: 1

      I did read the article, and think it would be woderful to retore someone's face who had been in an accident or had some other problem that ruined the way they looked.

      But do you actually want me to believe this won't be used by people out there to look the way they want? Please... People would pay tons of money for this who haven't been hurt in an accident or anything like that. Sad but true.

    4. Re:Butterface! by Average_Joe_Sixpack · · Score: 1

      But seriously, people should just live with what they've got. We all eventually get old; we all eventually pass on. Wear what you've got with a smile and you'll do just fine.

      Yes, those are nice platitudes but being physically repulsive in our "style vs substance" economy can be limiting to one's career. Sales, management, consulting ... anything that requires "face time" with a customer will automatically put you at a disadvantage with your attractive coworkers.

      ... and even if you are providing a 100% greater service than anyone else on-site, that same client will still the snide comments about your appearance behind your back and then go invite your coworkers for happy hour while you toil away to make a deadline.

      (speaking from experience of course)

    5. Re:Butterface! by Vary+Krishna · · Score: 1

      I don't think there's any real danger of that, at least until someone works out how to stop rejection of transplanted organs and body parts without using drugs. Also, it's not going to make the recipient look exactly like the donor - to do that, as has been noted, you'd need to replace the bone and muscles as well, not just the skin. This is a serious medical procedure, not something that is going to be handed out to anyone who asks for one.

      Well, okay, maybe in Paraguay.

    6. Re:Butterface! by Dirtside · · Score: 1
      If half of your face had been eaten away by some kind of bacteria or disease, I think you might think twice about getting this procedure.
      Yeah. The better solution is to cover your disfigurement with some kind of futuristic alloy mask that can shoot lasers, and then rename yourself "Doctor Destruction" or "Commander Chaos" or some other bit of alliteratively villainous nomenclature.
      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
  17. ID Theft? by matth · · Score: 3, Funny

    How does this go with ID-Theft? Yup.. that's me.. see I look like me in this ID.... eeek!

    1. Re:ID Theft? by pseudorand · · Score: 1

      No, it would work the other way.

      "Hey, give me my ID back. I know it doesn't look like me, but that's because I had my face transplanted. I swear it's not a fake."

  18. Didn't by airship · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Didn't Eddie Murphy and Dan Akroyd do this in the movie "Trading Faces"? :)

    --
    Serving your airship needs since 1995.
    1. Re:Didn't by Widowwolf · · Score: 1

      that was trasding places i believe and no they did not do this, what they did was take a rich guy and turn him poor and desperate, and a poor and desperate black guy and turn him into a rich guy...

      --
      ~~"Of course, that's just my opinion. I could be wrong." ~~Dennis Miller
    2. Re:Didn't by Jambon · · Score: 1
      Didn't Eddie Murphy and Dan Akroyd do this in the movie "Trading Faces"?

      Actually I think that's going to be a new show on TLC.

    3. Re:Didn't by net_oholic · · Score: 1

      I'll bet you one dollar that the transplant doesn't work.

    4. Re:Didn't by Omnieiunium · · Score: 1

      Finally something that isn't crap on TLC. Oh wait...

  19. Obvious Questions by rlp · · Score: 2, Funny

    When will Michael Jackson sign up for this? And what will he look like next?

    --
    [Insert pithy quote here]
    1. Re:Obvious Questions by fair_n_hite_451 · · Score: 1

      Umm, Pee-Wee Herman?

      --
      Reason why there is hope for the future generation #364:
      "I wish my grass was emo so it could cut itself."
    2. Re:Obvious Questions by Conspiracy_Of_Doves · · Score: 2, Funny

      His trading partner would be Bubbles.

      Personally, I think Bubbles would be getting the raw end of the deal.

    3. Re:Obvious Questions by xs650 · · Score: 1

      After his bad experiance participating in the beta program, he isn't going to take another chance at it.

    4. Re:Obvious Questions by sharkey · · Score: 1

      According to computer simulation, this is a possible outcome.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    5. Re:Obvious Questions by droleary · · Score: 1

      When will Michael Jackson sign up for this? And what will he look like next?

      Since it's a radical new experimental surgery, he may shockingly end up looking like a black man!

  20. Not so fast... by Teppy · · Score: 4, Funny

    I think that it would be more responsible to first try this procedure on animals, like monkeys or pigs. For instance, maybe they could transplant a pig's face to a monkey. They might even market these to insane rich people as "exotic pets."
    Another idea I had that would have a similar market is cosmetic surgery for dogs.

    Update: Just on a whim I googled "cosmetic surgery for dogs" and found this. I'm gonna go throw up now.

    1. Re:Not so fast... by ShentarZ31 · · Score: 1

      Something like that video for "Where's Your Head at" by BasementJaxx?

    2. Re:Not so fast... by Hosiah · · Score: 1
      maybe they could transplant a pig's face to a monkey.

      Gee, thanks for putting *that* picture in my head. Like this discussion wasn't creepy enough already...

  21. Who's a good candidate for this? by Matey-O · · Score: 4, Funny
    The recipient would have to take powerful anti-rejection drugs for life
    As opposed to, say, death by loss of face.


    Arrrrr!
    --
    "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
    1. Re:Who's a good candidate for this? by macemoneta · · Score: 3, Interesting
      The recipient would have to take powerful anti-rejection drugs for life

      Where "for life" is defined as being "until medical science can figure out a way around the problem". Chimeras have distinct DNA in parts of their body, yet somehow their immune systems have recognized the tissue as not requiring an immune response. Eventually medical science will figure out how to "introduce" new tissue to the body to prevent rejection.

      --

      Can You Say Linux? I Knew That You Could.

    2. Re:Who's a good candidate for this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For god's sake the parent is using mythological beings as an example of a creature coping with foreign body parts.

      Mod as troll ffs.

    3. Re:Who's a good candidate for this? by Daota · · Score: 1
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chimera_(animal)

      Just in case someone with mod points doesn't recognize the real troll.

    4. Re:Who's a good candidate for this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chimeras have distinct DNA in parts of their body, yet somehow their immune systems have recognized the tissue as not requiring an immune response.

      I don't think that chimeras are real...

    5. Re:Who's a good candidate for this? by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1
      D&D chimeras aren't real.

      There are chimeras such as the chimeric mice that we create and use in the laboratory on a regular basis.

      The basics of how chimeras are made

    6. Re:Who's a good candidate for this? by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      You'd rather give them false hope by telling them that we'd have a workaround just as soon as we cure cancer, develop viable fusion and all start driving flying cars?

    7. Re:Who's a good candidate for this? by macemoneta · · Score: 1

      False hope means that there is no reasonable chance of success; that's not the case. Stop reading Slashdot and start reading EurekAlert for a while; it's likely not as far off as you think.

      --

      Can You Say Linux? I Knew That You Could.

  22. Good for burn victims by MrJynxx · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I suspect this procedure would be great for people who have had extreme burns to their face.

    One thing to note are the anti-rejection drugs. My uncle whose kidneys both failed, had to get one from my father in the early 90's (91 i think) and had to take anti-rejection drugs. Well, the drugs eventually gave him colon cancer (approx. 10 years of heavy use) and passed away 2 years ago. But, without the kidney transplant he would have never made it past 1992.

    It will be a trade off for these people.. potential to live a long life disfigured or a shorted life bearing a new face. Tough call?

    MrJynx

  23. anti-rejection drugs by Tachikoma · · Score: 4, Funny

    . . . So can I take those and get laid every time I hit on a girl?

    --
    i don't care
    1. Re:anti-rejection drugs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As it said - this only changes the skin and looks not personality and character, so I think most of the /.'s are still SOL.

    2. Re:anti-rejection drugs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      >. . . So can I take those and get laid every time I hit on a girl?

      No, I think you're supposed to get her to take them.

    3. Re:anti-rejection drugs by Pneuma+ROCKS · · Score: 0

      Arrrrr!!!!

      Um, that's all I got, actually.

      I'm gonnna go now.

      Avast ye mateys!

      OK, I'm done.

      --
      Favorite quote: "
  24. Hah by Sheepdot · · Score: 1, Funny

    Dr Siemionow told Associated Press: "You want to choose patients who are really disfigured, not someone who has a little scar."

    I nominate this guy.

  25. Yet another tool for terrorists.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wonder how long it takes to heal to the point that the person could be mistaken for the donor..

    Kind of makes passports obsolete no?

  26. Face/Off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just like the horrible movie, I am sure nothing good will come of this.

    I suppose if it works, beautiful people will be murdered for their sexah looks. Not sure if that will be a good (for the recipiant) or bad (for the donor) thing.

    1. Re:Face/Off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only on /. will somebody "randomly" post a 2^n - 1 number.

      And I guess only on /. will it be caught.

  27. Face/Off by Tokerat · · Score: 0, Redundant


    Spew of 65,535 Nicholas Cage/John Travolta jokes in 5...4...3...2...

    --
    CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
  28. Hence... by Phil+John · · Score: 1

    ...why biometrics are being woven into the protective blanket that is the passport.

    --
    I am NaN
    1. Re:Hence... by compro01 · · Score: 1

      then the terrorists will have finger transplants with the face transplants!

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
  29. I See Dead People by FrankDrebin · · Score: 5, Funny

    Doctors have already succeeded in making this practice a reality with cadavers

    Let me get this straight. Doctors have "succeeded" in attaching one dead guys face to another dead guys skull. No problems with rejection, I take it. And the recipient hardly looked any worse than before the transplant, I mean, considering the bastards were dead, I'm guessing the failure rate was not very low.

    --
    Anybody want a peanut?
  30. Answer: Cloning by rfc1394 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Someone once pointed out that if we can ever develop cloning successfully we can forget the use of anti-rejection drugs, blood type checks, and other such things. If you get a transplant from your own clone, everything you're getting is yours, the blood type and every bit of dna is a perfect match, the rest of your body will not know the difference and thus "will welcome our new clone masters."

    A really Brave New World.

    --
    The lessons of history teach us - if they teach us anything - that nobody learns the lessons that history teaches us.
    1. Re:Answer: Cloning by Stud1y · · Score: 1

      minus the cost of having to feed and house our clone, and then the clone's own desire to bump uglies etc. Perhaps organ harvesting isn't the best idea... unless we clone hotties... then i'm okay with it, provided they have no free will etc etc.

    2. Re:Answer: Cloning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The question to ask yourself then is would you want to be a spare-part clone? If they took your face and gave it to your parent(?), would you live without a face?

    3. Re:Answer: Cloning by CoffeeJedi · · Score: 1

      no no, that's "The Island", a completely different movie. this article should only contain jokes about "face/off".

      Thanks :)

      --
      May you be touched by His Noodly Appendage. RAmen.
    4. Re:Answer: Cloning by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      And "The Island" is ripped off an earlier (and much, much worse) movie named Parts: The Clonus Horror. It's a lot more make-fun-able... I actually found The Island slightly entertaining, while Parts is definitely a piece of crap.

      The MST3K version is good, though.

    5. Re:Answer: Cloning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The clones would obviously be kept in a medically induced coma for the entire span of their "lives".

      Duh....

    6. Re:Answer: Cloning by MarkoNo5 · · Score: 1

      Not completely. My immune system rejects my own kidneys (Berger's disease).

    7. Re:Answer: Cloning by Fear+the+Clam · · Score: 1

      And my kidneys develop cysts inside them as I get into my 30s (Medullary Cystic Kidney Disease).

  31. a face transplant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This would most likely be far cheaper and time consuming than what my (ex) wife spent on cosmetics. If you're going to sell this to chicks they're gonna have to be able to hot swap out 4 or 5 of these a day.

  32. Organ Sales and Forced Removal of Organs by ultraworld · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Is already a BIG problem.. China sells the organs of condemmed prisoners - a LOT of innocent people I am sure suffer this.. It could happen here as well if jobs keep disappearing.. If anyone tells you otherwise, they don't know much about power and the powerless.. and how frequently the powerless lose anything of value they have to the rich and powerful..

  33. Longer article here: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
    http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM .20050914.wface0914/BNStory/specialScienceandHealt h/

    The "consent form" says that this surgery is so novel and its risks so unknown that doctors don't think informed consent is even possible.
  34. Pre-transplant therapy... by Grayden · · Score: 5, Funny

    It puts the lotion on its skin...

    1. Re:Pre-transplant therapy... by bar-agent · · Score: 1

      From Joe Dirt, for those who didn't catch the reference.

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
    2. Re:Pre-transplant therapy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh no, that was from Silence of the Lambs. Dumbass.

    3. Re:Pre-transplant therapy... by bar-agent · · Score: 1

      It can be from both...

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
  35. How about... by slobber · · Score: 3, Funny

    The recipient would have to take powerful anti-rejection drugs

    As far as rejection goes, I've heard there have been a good progress with transplanting pig's organs instead, so why don't we... Oops, never mind

    bad joke, bad joke

    --
    "You mortals are so obtuse." -Q
    1. Re:How about... by sharkey · · Score: 1

      Says a lot about you, if that's an "upgrade" for you. Girth-wise, anyway.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  36. Alternative Plan... by jnadke · · Score: 1

    Here's a more cost-effective plan:

    1. Save $50,000 and deal with your ugly self.
    2. Give her the anti-rejection drugs.

  37. per Wired by moviepig.com · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Wired quotes a release-form the recipient must sign:

    Your face will be removed and replaced with one donated from a cadaver, matched for tissue type, age, sex and skin color. Surgery should last 8 to 10 hours; the hospital stay, 10 to 14 days. Complications could include infections that turn your new face black and require a second transplant or reconstruction with skin grafts. Drugs to prevent rejection will be needed lifelong, and they raise the risk of kidney damage and cancer. After the transplant you might feel remorse, disappointment, or grief or guilt toward the donor. The clinic will try to shield your identity, but the press likely will discover it.

    No free lunch...

    --
    Seeing bad movies only encourages them. Watch responsibly
    1. Re:per Wired by MirrororriM · · Score: 1
      Complications could include infections that turn your new face black

      Ok, cancel the Michael Jackson jokes...he wouldn't be interested.

      Oh come on, laugh!

      --
      Content Management System: A pretentious way of saying "text editor."
  38. Relatively new application of old ideas by erroneus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Transplanting organs and even external body parts has been an ongoing practice for quite some time. Clearly, they are making small improvements as time goes by and a variety of details have been added as well. But I have to hope there isn't too much research being done into this.

    In my mind (which is a weird place to be at times) I think the future of medical technology is ultimately in regeneration of damaged or missing tissue. In previous medical articles mentioned here, stem cell research has already enabled paralyzed people to walk again and other improvements are just around the corner I'm sure. In addition to that, the research where genetic manipulation of rats have resulted in entire body parts regenerating after having them removed.

    Ultimately, this is advanced forms of healing which is where almost everything in the way of research should be directed, in my opinion, since healing is what the medical practice is all about.

    (And yes, I recognize the need for disease and cancer research as well ... it goes without saying. And I also recognize the fundamental expansion of knowledge of human anatomy and how it works is also a worthy benefit of the activities discussed in face transplant technologies.)

    And on an asside, replacing a face will not make one person look like another. For that, you'd have to manipulate the bones under the skin and muscle to really make modifications that make a difference.

  39. In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    TLC anounces a bold new reality TV show...Trading Faces.

  40. Reconstruction already exists by hellfire · · Score: 1

    Skin grafting already exists for these types of cases, which takes skin from one part of your body and puts it on another. And if the skin comes from you, it shouldn't be rejected. If most plastic surgeons can reconstruct most faces I don't see why face transplantation is all that interesting for anyone who needs it for burns.

    Now, if you are burned over a significant portion of your body I could understand that, but if you have 3 degree burns over more than 50% of your body you have a lot of more things to worry about before you get that face transplant.

    --

    "All great wisdom is contained in .signature files"

  41. Why this? by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

    I understand that disfigurement, even cosmetic, can be debilitating physically and psychologically.

    While loss of facial skin is disfiguring, it can be treated by transplants from the patient's own body, which is much safer.

    I think the "face transplant" they are referring to involves also replacing ligature and muscles, which would be of great use -- imagine not being able to chew, create facial expressions, or speak. I am curious, however, if the costs and risks are truly worth it. I think there are plenty of ways that this research money could have been used that would be of greater benefit.

    --
    "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    1. Re:Why this? by ibpooks · · Score: 1

      While loss of facial skin is disfiguring, it can be treated by transplants from the patient's own body, which is much safer.

      It is actually suspected that the transplant procedure may be safer in the long run due to the incredible number of surgeries that traditional facial reconstruction requires. For example, a person with severe facial mutilation may need 20 surgical procedures or more to completely graft his own buttock skin onto the damaged areas. Each surgery carries its own risk of infection, complications, and rehabilition time. The transplant procedure could reduce this process to one or two surgeries thereby sparing the patient years of constant surgery and rehabilitation.

    2. Re:Why this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another post from someone who has no idea what they're talking about.

      20 surgeries for facial skin graft? Where do you people get this bunk?

    3. Re:Why this? by ibpooks · · Score: 2, Informative

      Extensive facial disfigurement cannot be corrected by one skin graft. It must be done in many small pieces with current technology. Do you have any idea how severely an automobile collision or a fire can damage a person's tissue?

      Paragraphs 32, 33

      Please note the risks, complications, and expected recovery times for each full skin graft.

      Although this article clearly opposes facial transplants, it supports the assertation that current grafting methodologies are slow, painful, and dangerous; and new procedures are needed to reconstruct facial tissue in larger pieces with fewer surgeries. Dr Thomas Stevenson, president of the Plastic Surgery Educational Foundation and a member of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, said:

      The difficulty with previous techniques was harvesting a thick, uniform piece of skin and closing the wound where the incision was made, to minimise scarring. Through this combination of surgical techniques, a burn patient has only one operation rather than multiple procedures, reducing pain and recovery time.
    4. Re:Why this? by SilverspurG · · Score: 1

      I've been having skin grafts to treat burn scar contractures over 40% of the front of my body--my full stomach, my full chest, the mutilation of two fingers on my right hand, and about 80% of the area of both arms, 1/2 the face, the complete loss of my left ear, and my full neck, since I was 3.

      I'm just as qualified as any doctor pitching their practice. Please don't preach to me with web-links. I've been on the table. I've taken care of my own donor sites. I've taken care of my own skin graft sites.

      I've consulted with both the Shriner's and private practitioners about advanced reconstructive surgery. Even including the complete reconstruction of my left ear, this is a procedure which was estimated at less than 5 visits.

      --
      fast as fast can be. you'll never catch me.
    5. Re:Why this? by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      And, of course, they get to be on anti-rejection drugs for the rest of their lives. This is a major motivation for the medical industry, since the pharmaceuticals industry just LOVES people who are on maintenance prescriptions.

      /rant off

      I'm sure the researchers have the patient's best interests in mind, but that may not be their primary motivation. I just feel that researching transplants, in this case, may not be as beneficial as researching cultured skin, or skin growth stimulant methods.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    6. Re:Why this? by Forbman · · Score: 3, Informative

      Have you ever known a burn victim?

      Skin grafts do not do very much. I think that what they do is provide enough temporary covering to allow scar tissue to grow in place anyways. And, besides, the scar tissue that does grow is not all that flexible at all, either.

      The "face transplant" only involves taking off the dermal layers of the face, no facial muscles (dermis, epidermis and subcutaneous layer).

      They are looking for recipients that have not suffered too much muscle or nerve damage, and still have a good amount of the blood supply available (obviously). Did you not read the article?

      If there ever was a legitimate cosmetic surgery, this is one.

    7. Re:Why this? by SilverspurG · · Score: 1

      I appreciate your sentiment but this is not a legitimate cosmetic surgery. There are a few reasons why this cadaver grafting is being investigated, and none of them are very good:

      1) The tissue engineering field, however well advanced, is hampered by lack of funding due to Wall Street concerns over federal restrictions on stem cell research and potential future prohibitions and moratoriums which could complete sink any investment they may want to make in the field. Only the most speculative of investors puts money into tissue engineering technologies.
      2) Grafting and transplant techniques are still eligible for federal funding.
      3) The doctors involved are not tissue engineering doctors. Rather than staying ethically in the field of grafting and transplantation, they've decided to pioneer a new technique for the purpose of career recognition. If they had an ounce of ethics, they would reject cadaver facial grafts and push for the more advanced and less hazardous methods using artificial skin tissue scaffolds.

      There are many companies based in Research Triangle Parks around the nation (most notably in Texas, but I forget specifically where) which have worked on artificial skin and artificial scaffolding to encourage the ingrowth of endogenous skin cells for over a decade. Due to the insurance companies' refusal to fund necessary research (with the straw man fear of funding purely cosmetic pursuits--which could be easily differentiated by any competent doctor) the proper method of solving the facial disfiguration problem is being sorely ignored.

      --
      fast as fast can be. you'll never catch me.
  42. The Cleveland Clinic- by Alex+P+Keaton+in+da · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is done by Dr. Robert White. He has done a lot of experiments where he transplanted animal heads, and they stayed alive for a while (hours).
    I know this story sounds like cosmetic surgery, but it isn't. (Yes, I would like a more handsome face)It is for people who need it medically, at least for now...
    Dr White's son, Mr. White was my Eighth grade Latin teacher at Shaker Heights Middle School, I kid you not.

    --
    And All I Ask is a Tall Ship And a Star to Steer Her By
  43. Good for research by jandrese · · Score: 1

    I guess this is a good time to test the old saying:

    Beauty is only skin deep, but ugly goes right to the core.

    Still, you have to be pretty desperate to say "sure, give me some random dead person's face, mine sucks".

    --

    I read the internet for the articles.
    1. Re:Good for research by Forbman · · Score: 1

      You mean, like Michael Jackson has been doing?

  44. And some genetic disorders by WormholeFiend · · Score: 2, Informative

    I remember a news story about a girl born without a face.

    I don't remember the medical name of the condition, where basically the bone structure of the face fails to develop during pregnancy, but such a procedure might help such people after the underlying bone grafts are complete.

  45. New definition by Carnage+Pants · · Score: 3, Funny

    I guess the word "faceplant" no longer solely refers to me tripping while going upstairs/while going downstairs/walking outside/walking around in my dorm room.

    1. Re:New definition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless when you fall, your new face gets stuck to some old gum and peels off when you go to get up.

  46. Re:Ugh-worst part of the movie was.. by ecumenical_40oz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The most disgusting seen was when the bad guy was hanging out with no face, just this pizza-with-the-cheese-pulled-off kind of look. And imagine, if the surgery goes wrong that could be you! I'd stick with the scars. An ugly face is better than no face.

  47. Something of a mistake by mustafap · · Score: 1

    From the reporting by the BBC, this is appearing as a cosmetic procedure rather than life saving.

    As one seriously disfigured guy said: "Why should I change my appearance to better meet your desire to see a perfect face?"

    Who exactly is this procedure for, eh?

    --
    Open Source Drum Kit, LPLC deve board - mjhdesigns.com
  48. Will scientists every learn from Hollywood? by TheSkepticalOptimist · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think some of these guys should take some time off and watch some movies, then they would realize that building Skynet, virtual reality, and face transplants almost never end happily, just usually in bad sequels!

    --
    I haven't thought of anything clever to put here, but then again most of you haven't either.
  49. Re:Is this technology really just now in its infan by Widowwolf · · Score: 1

    yes yes yes it was faceoff and it was john travolta and nicholas cage...but also remember we seem phaser weapons and we dont really have them yet...

    --
    ~~"Of course, that's just my opinion. I could be wrong." ~~Dennis Miller
  50. "Reconstruction" should be in quotes by Create+an+Account · · Score: 4, Informative

    I worked (very briefly) with a guy that had had "reconstruction" over 100% of his face from 3rd degree burns. In his case:

    successful "reconstruction" = "no longer oozing."

    He had no lips, and only kind of had eyelids, he had to constantly roll his eyes to keep them lubed. No nose, just one deformed hole in the front of his head. He was, in a word, hideous. Not his fault. He was a good guy. But his quality of life was in the toilet. This was in the late 1990s, so maybe they're a little better now, but if they can do a complete replacement - more power to them. I would be happy to be a donor once I'm gone. They already get my liver, heart, and eyes. If someone can use this ugly mug, they're welcome to it.

  51. Re:50% Success by cp.tar · · Score: 1

    Only if it fails critically.

    --
    Ignore this signature. By order.
  52. Downside? by Innova · · Score: 1

    The chance it will work is around 50% and experts have expressed safety and ethical concerns about the procedure. The recipient would have to take powerful anti-rejection drugs for life, which carry considerable long-term health risks...

    So what's the downside?

  53. I for one ... by Agarax · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... welcome our new face swapping overlords.

    --
    Remember folks, slashdot doesn't have a -1 "disagree" moderation!
  54. Coke by Chaotic+Spyder · · Score: 1

    There is a regular who comes into a place where I work every day who likes to chat. He apparently was one of the first people within Canada to get a heart transplant. He told me that one of the drugs that they gave him to weaken his system (anti rejection) was based on the dye that Coke uses in their soft drinks..

    I'm not to sure how accurate this is.. Although he seems very informative and accurate on everything else we talk about.. I'd like to know if anybody else has some knowledge on this.

    --
    Losers whine about their best, Winners go home to fuck the prom queen
    1. Re:Coke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Coke uses caramel for color.

    2. Re:Coke by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1
      He told me that one of the drugs that they gave him to weaken his system (anti rejection) was based on the dye that Coke uses in their soft drinks..

      Oooh, and a glass of Coke can dissolve a nail. Eek! In other news, table salt is made of a metal that explodes in water plus a poisonous gas.

      Seriously, there are quite a few chemicals in colas. I'm sure that some of them are structurally similar to other chemicals that have good or bad biological effects, but I'm not sure why that would be interesting.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    3. Re:Coke by Forbman · · Score: 1

      Dye, what dye? Do you mean caramel color?

  55. Thank God for Bioethics! by brian0918 · · Score: 1

    From where else could we be given arbitrary unfounded reasons for setting back progress for decades to come?

    Bioethics: Making mongers of monkeys since Roe v. Wade.®

  56. The chance it will work is around 50% by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What does 'work' mean?

  57. Horror movie about a hand transplant? by GecKo213 · · Score: 1

    Wasn't there a horror movie about a guy that receives a convicted serial killers have after he's executed by the death penalty or something? If my memory serves me correctly, this guys hand starts to take over this receivers soul and he then starts killing people on a mad rampage. Just imagine what would happen if the same thing happens to the face!?!?!

    Scary!
    --
    Generation Trance: What generation are you?
    1. Re:Horror movie about a hand transplant? by rlp · · Score: 1

      A character in the Buffy spin-off "Angel" had "evil-hand issues".

      --
      [Insert pithy quote here]
  58. Believe it or not... by Black-Man · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I once knew this hottie who was actually turned on by this guy who's face was disfigured by 3rd degree burns and the numerous skin grafs associated.

    BTW, he was burned while commiting arson. Go figure....

    1. Re:Believe it or not... by robertjw · · Score: 1

      BTW, he was burned while commiting arson. Go figure....

      Chicks always dig the bad boys.

    2. Re:Believe it or not... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Chicks always dig the bad boys.

      Did i just imagine the bitterness ?

    3. Re:Believe it or not... by robertjw · · Score: 1

      Did i just imagine the bitterness ?

      Must have, I was just pointing out the facts.

  59. OOOhh! I know this one... by TiggertheMad · · Score: 1

    ...It was called 'Trading Faces'. It starred Eddie Murphy, Right?

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
  60. the new rejection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The recipient would have to take powerful anti-rejection drugs for life

    [insensitive] Great, in addition to people rejecting your face your face can do it now too.[/insensitive]

  61. Burn Victoms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I work next to a Shriner's Burns hospital, and let me tell you, a face transplant would be a miracle for some of these poor, disfigured souls. Believe me when I tell you that it wouldn't be for vanity; it would be for quality of life.

    1. Re:Burn Victoms by SilverspurG · · Score: 1

      I would love to have you testify to that at a hearing with my insurance company when I ask for the benefits of long-term disability and bill coverage to have reconstructive surgery. Or with the Labor board when I tried to ask for protection from (and compensation for past) workplace harassment. Sadly, people who are physically disfigured by tragic injury just don't seem to be covered by the same laws that shield other minorities from derision and harassment. The only prayer is to be disfigured in a situation where an insurance policy can be held liable for a claim. Which, most often, isn't the case.

      People who are physically disfigured suffer from the "fat and ugly" syndrome. People who are not physically disfigured automatically put them on a lesser social level. It's the ages old fight of who's on top. No "normal" person ever wants to cede even a minute amount of power in a relationship with someone who's physically disfigured.

      Sometimes life just irks me. Seeing articles like this, where some Quack Doctor is trying a get-famous-quick scheme by exploiting people who have suffered tragic injuries, makes me sick.

      --
      fast as fast can be. you'll never catch me.
  62. More rejection! by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 1

    Great: now we can reject our own faces, rather than letting other people do it.

    --
    Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
  63. This raises the bar by quarkscat · · Score: 2, Interesting

    for the US Marshall Service Witness Protection Program. As this medical procedure becomes more commonplace, it will not be only paper identity, occupation, and location of witnesses in Federal criminal cases that are changed.

    In spite of the inherent risks involved in any surgery, as well as the need to take anti-rejection drugs for the remainder of the patient's life, I can see that this will become popular even as elective surgery. I can also see that face transplants will become an abused procedure, for concealing the identity of terrorists, mobsters, mass murderers, embezzlers, and politicians/dictators that have fallen out of favor.

  64. And the woinner of the "Losing Face" award is... by Roadkills-R-Us · · Score: 1

    [Since we're talking about ``a transplanted face being rejected and sloughing away''] ...Michael Jackson!

    Soon his nose will be on his bellybutton.

  65. penis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can they do this with penises? Or, could they? I don't think it's been done yet.

    However, there are many people living with disfigured penises because of disease, birth defects, botched circumcisions, accidents, and other reasons. I can't imagine having to live with a lopped off penis, and I would suspect that the suicide rates of such people is extremely high.

    Of course, this definitely has the potential for "abuse" in some less restrictive countries. Pay someone a bunch of money, and they'll hook you with a giant tool.

  66. More Spam! by Evil+Butters · · Score: 1

    Great! Just what we need, another reason for even more spam. I guess if enlarging your p***s wasn't enough, now you can transplant someone's face as well.

    --
    Homer no function beer well without.
  67. Now if only... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They could work out how to transplant Paris Hilton's body onto my wife we'd be all set!

  68. Flying high? by Linker3000 · · Score: 1

    Hey, if they combined this face 'lift' with the Space 'Elevator' you could really walk around with your head in the clouds.

    Thank you, I'm here 'til Friday.

    --
    AT&ROFLMAO
  69. rejection, hand & arm transplants by theProf · · Score: 1

    A few years ago it was declared that problems with rejection of skin had been overcome. That led to a few people receiving hand grafts. These were actually forearm and hand.

    The recipients had problems with these. One went so far (and he had difficulties in persuading surgeons to do this) as to have it removed. Others were happier.

    One of the obvious problems on the footage I saw was the damage to the skin of the grafted limbs. It was in a state of semi-rejection, puffy and scaly. Not very good. For a face replacement, this is obviously going to be a major issue. The tissue is always under attack by the immune system, the drugs only suppress this. Over time, the skin and muscle will degrade due to this.

    Rejection is always a problem with transplants. The drugs have considerable side effects and are really only used because the alternate is death or severe disability to the patient. The transplant route is not taken lightly. You will note that it is used only where the alternates are worse.

    Given the above, I would personally question why they want to do this. A cosmetic issue is not life threatening. It might lead to a poor quality of life for the patient, but it is not going to kill them. The transplant itself may (through drug effects) lead to a much worse one.

    See http://www.handtransplant.com/ for information on the procedure and risks.

    1. Re:rejection, hand & arm transplants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      A cosmetic issue is not life threatening. It might lead to a poor quality of life for the patient, but it is not going to kill them
      Until you've been the target of inside jokes, underhanded jokes, pranks, and faraway laughter, not to mention the ad hominem dismissal of any intellectual thought that you've had ("Oh. That's just the burned guy") for decades on end...

      Until you've been the subject of pointed, but cleverly disguised (no one wants to get caught ridiculing the burned guy... but it sure is fun for them to do it), derision and ridicule...

      Until you've had people use you to bolster their own self-esteem and career (eg. Try having a novel idea as "the burned guy". Everyone has a blast running you circles by poking fun and holes at your idea... and they have even more fun when you get worked up because someone else took your idea and used to it to bolster their case for a promotion)...

      Until you realize that 99.999% of every relationship you're in, every contact you make throughout your entire life, will, by default, care less for you than they care for their goldfish...

      Until you know the feeling that your physical disfigurement makes you a third class citizen, behind even illegal immigrants...

      Until you realize that physical disfigurement, by default, makes you the (socially acceptable) whipping post for anyone who's having a bad day...

      You will NEVER, EVER, EVER understand the true meaning of "poor quality of life".
  70. Jeez, develop real tech like stem cells etc.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why bother, what we need is advanced biotech that can use stem cells and eventually, nanotech based biotech where we can create custom cells and instruct them to grow into any type of face, from your original version, to a version that happens to look like somebody famous or somebody not famous, whetever.....this concept of facial transplants is so 1950's type of thinking, when we get full digital programmable control of future bio/nano machines (in our cells) and we make sure to keep mr microsoft out of the (new-tech repair/upgrade) picture, we will be fine thank you.

  71. Indications for this surgery(who qualifies) by spineboy · · Score: 1

    I actually worked with a plastic surgeon who had gone thru some of the training for this procedure. Let me state that this is not for the routine type of face life. This is for people who have had significant burns (>40-50%), massive injury/scaring, or disease (infection/treated tumor). This surgery only!! transplants the overlying skin and main sensory nerves and blood supply to the skin. People will look very different than the donor, due to the underlying bone and muscular structure, and will look closer to themselves. Yes they will need anti-rejection drugs, just like people who have had kidney transplants, but this is a small price to pay for people to rejoin society - as many of the people who have the qualifying conditions, feel shunned/ self conscious. This is an extrememly reasonable thing to do to improve a persons quality of life.

    --
    ..........FULL STOP.
  72. Are we goin g to see this... by Patchw0rk+F0g · · Score: 1

    On Awful Plastic Surgery from now on? Between Michael and Liza, Lindsay and all them other teeny-boppers (not to mention Brittany... hell, she'll go thru a face a week!) we may never again know who to blame for the awful performance we just put up with.

    Maybe they'll just trade faces back and forth, like some cheesy Hollywood masque. That's really screw up the critics!

    --
    When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro. ~~ Hunter S. Thompson
  73. Why can't we just stick w/ what works... by Ingolfke · · Score: 1

    ominous masks and hiding in the shadows? It's worked for all these years... no need to change now.

    1. Re:Why can't we just stick w/ what works... by borgheron · · Score: 1

      With the sole exception of DarkMan, isn't there a requirement to become evil if you have to wear an ominous mask?

      Case in point: Darth Vader. :)

      GJC

      --
      Gregory Casamento
      ## Chief Maintainer for GNUstep
  74. that'd be "The Hand" by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1
    Starring Michael Caine.

    Kinda fun film.

    --
    Man, you really need that seminar!
  75. Probably good for some burn victims. by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

    Long term they might combine it with cloning and avoid the drugs.

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  76. Discovery Health Documentary by flabbergasted · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Apparently, I am the only person here that watches the Discovery Health channel. Some time ago, DH ran a documentary on face transplants that profiled an event 10 years ago when an Indian girl had her face and scalp amputated by a grass cutting machine. The doctors in India were able to reattach her face. The success gave other doctors the incentive to begin researching the possibility of transplanting faces for the severely disfigured.

    I offer no judgements about whether the procedure is a good idea or not. I just know that I wouldn't deny a well informed individual the right to the surgery.

  77. To restore employability by tepples · · Score: 1

    Who exactly is this procedure for, eh?

    Gross facial disfigurement generally makes people unemployable in customer-facing jobs and even in some non-customer-facing jobs. Work is better than welfare, right?

  78. No need for the clone by snowwrestler · · Score: 1

    If scientists can crack the cell differentiation mystery, they may be able to take some of your DNA from any cell and grow whatever organ you need.

    --
    Build a man a fire, he's warm for one night. Set him on fire, and he's warm for the rest of his life.
  79. Jacqueline Saburido by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Who exactly is this procedure for, eh?


    Burn victims like Jacqueline Saburido http://www.helpjacqui.com/home.htm

    I saw her on the Discovery Health Channel, but didn't know who she was. (Another "Anonymous Coward" posted this link in an earlier reply entitled "Re:let me be the first to say".)

    It's really a sad story. Even if one subscribes to the fact the "beauty comes from the inside of a person", she was a stunningly beautiful girl on the outside before the accident.

    But I'm sure there are others like her who prefer to remain uneen. I saw the BBC's articles against face transplants, including the one about disfigured guy who speaks out against face transplants, but I don't think his face disfigurement is as severe (he has a congential birth defect, not a face burn).

    Knowing about Saburido's story makes all of the Slashdot "funny" posts seem quite lame, insensitive, immature, and just not funny at all.

  80. Why a transplant? by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Who would trade burn scars for 50% chance of death, likelyhood of chronic pain, likelyhood of further disfigurement, and no immune system for the rest of their lives?

    Actually an impaired immune system - the drugs just suppress part of it. Still no fun though. (That part goes after cancers and virus-infested-but-functioning tissues, too, among other things...)

    What I don't see is why they're replacing the whole skin. Why not take off the scar tissue and replace it with a collagen mask seeded with skin cells? This is done with many burn victims (along with at least one person who lost her whole dermis due to a rare drug reaction).

    Perhaps it's because the damage is too deep and they need to replace the nerves, blood vessels, muscles, and other plumbing?

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  81. 50% chance it'll work... by nihilatron · · Score: 1

    50% chance you'll look like Dr. Phibes...!

  82. "Quack doctor"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Seeing articles like this, where some Quack Doctor is trying a get-famous-quick scheme by exploiting people who have suffered tragic injuries, makes me sick.


    You're claiming that Maria Siemionow and that Cleveland Clinic are quacks?

    What's your proof?
    1. Re:"Quack doctor"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With current advances in tissue engineering, cell culturing and growth, and reconstructive surgery techniques, they must be quack doctors to still be devoting time and resources to a technique as barbaric as grafting a face from a cadaver. They're obviously on a get-famous-quick kick and have little to no concern for applying the best available technologies to helping the patients.

      What's wrong with taking a small sample of viable tissue from the intended recipient, culturing it, and using the progenitor cells from the culture to seed a matrix of collagen and fibrin molded to the shape of the recipients face? Artificial skins which do not suffer graft vs host rejection have been available since the mid-90s and have only gotten better since.

      But you didn't think of that, because you don't follow the field of tissue engineering. Your loss.

    2. Re:"Quack doctor"? by SilverspurG · · Score: 1
      What's wrong with taking a small sample of viable tissue from the intended recipient, culturing it, and using the progenitor cells from the culture to seed a matrix of collagen and fibrin molded to the shape of the recipients face?
      Oh! Oh! Mr. Cotter! I can answer this one.

      Because you can't get federal grants for "stem-cell" (progenitor cell) related research but you can get federal money for research in transplant and grafting techniques, no matter how ill-suited the application is. To make it worse, since the Federal Gov't has this annoying habit of soaking up all available monies, people can't "vote with their wallet" and fund these endeavors on their own because the Federal Gov't has already sucked them dry. Without Federal backing or support, the Wall Street zombies won't dare invest any more heavily in tissue engineering research than they do in pacifiers.

      It's not that it can't be done, it's that all the know-it-alls in Washington DC have decided to deep-six that entire industry.
      --
      fast as fast can be. you'll never catch me.
    3. Re:"Quack doctor"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      But you didn't think of that, because you don't follow the field of tissue engineering. Your loss.


      Nonsense, you are not the expert in tissue engineering that you pretend to be. The current status of the research you are proposing isn't ready yet. Note that

      (1) the sheet of cells produced must not only be epithelial, they need to have hair follicles, pores, and the delicate variation in consistency that constitute normal human faces. In other words, it needs to stretch and behave properly like a human face. Currently researchers are unable to fine tune the differentiation of the cells to match these criteria.

      (2) the human mind is sensitive to the "uncanny valley" (elucidated by Masahiro Mori), i.e. the mind is quick to notice that subtle differences between authentic faces and not-quite-there faces. Utlimately the goal of tissue engineering and facial transplants is to try to restore the face to social normalcy, which means that both camps must overcome the "uncanny valley".

      [they]... have little to no concern for applying the best available technologies to helping the patients.


      Well, that goes without saying, doesn't it? Clearly the current state-of-the-art is inadequate, otherwise there wouldn't even be the need for the debate, whether in the United Kindom, France, the Netherlands, or the United States. If these international doctors were really "quacks", they would be in jail, not debating the ethics and merits in public.

      Just because a technology is "available" shouldn't prevent others from seeking a better solution. Would we be better off using candles than electric light bulbs?


      They're obviously on a get-famous-quick kick



      You remind me of the deaf parents of a child was also deaf. The daughter's deafness could be cured with a cochlear implant. But using all sorts of excuses about the "importance" of "deaf culture" and the signing community, the father prevented his child from getting the implant. Nice guy.

      they must be quack doctors to still be devoting time and resources to a technique as barbaric as grafting a face from a cadaver.


      If you really knew anything about tissue engineering, you would already know that allografts are taken from cadavers anyway and applied to burn victims.

      I guess transplanting organs from a cadaver is "barbaric" to you too. That doesn't mean the doctors are quacks, it just means you have a personal dislike of these kinds of procedures.

      Your loss.

    4. Re:"Quack doctor"? by SilverspurG · · Score: 1
      Currently researchers are unable to fine tune the differentiation of the cells to match these criteria</i>
      On the contrary, pores and follicles can be well preserved by deep skin grafts. We are talking about artificial tissue, though, so I'll grant you a moment's glory while I say: I don't think anyone with a severely burned face is worried about their ability to grow a beard.
      the mind is quick to notice that subtle differences between authentic faces and not-quite-there faces
      Again, it's still a vast improvement over a disfigured face. At the same time it's very probable that, using this same line of logic, people will be able to sense "something wrong" with a grafted cadaver face. Hollywood can do marvels with skin surfaces. A little bit of properly applied makeup and even a week old artificial skin can be made to look just as good as any actor in a movie.
      Clearly the current state-of-the-art is inadequate
      State of the art is completely adequate to leave cadaver grafting in the stone age. The only thing standing in the way are federal limitations on research which involve using stem cells and the relatively cheap price of a cadaver's face.
      If these international doctors were really "quacks", they would be in jail, not debating the ethics and merits in public
      Hahahaha! Have you ever listened to the sales pitch that these doctors give? How about political campaigns? Ethics and merits are so completely separated from jail it's sad that you would even try this argument.
      If you really knew anything about tissue engineering, you would already know that allografts are taken from cadavers anyway and applied to burn victims.
      Only true in older technologies, and only true 50% of the time. Most allografts are fashioned from foreskins of circumcized males. Others were fashioned from, primarily, motorcycle accident victims. In newer technology, though, allografts are not even necessary. As I stated originally, we now have the technology to construct a fibrin/collagen matrix into which existing endogenous cells will be attracted to grow into. Once the endogenous cells have grown into the matrix they will continue to remodel it. Estimations are that it would take the natural body about 4 years to completely remodel a 4x4" section of flesh. Sure beats the hell out of the immunosuppressant (with side-effects) therapy for the rest of life.
      Your loss
      You know what? As a troll, you're succeeding. I feel harassed by an imbecile and my ire is up. Piss off.

      Technology has advanced sufficiently to make cadaver grafting obsolete and barbaric. Existing technologies include "farming" endogenous cells into neutral fibrin/collagen matrices.

      Take your AC condescending BS elsewhere. You're 8 years behind the times--and I'm not even bleeding edge on this topic.
      --
      fast as fast can be. you'll never catch me.
    5. Re:"Quack doctor"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'll grant you a moment's glory while I say: I don't think anyone with a severely burned face is worried about their ability to grow a beard.


      I'll grant you a moment's glory while I say: I do think anyone with a severely burned face would be delighted to grow eyebrows and eyelashes. Funny how the small things in life count. And the "uncanny valley" is based on small things. But again, it's not just hair follicles.

      Again, it's still a vast improvement over a disfigured face.


      But not good enough. If people say "There's room for improvement", then others will want to improve it...and should.

      At the same time it's very probable that, using this same line of logic, people will be able to sense "something wrong" with a grafted cadaver face.


      Then by your own admission, you can only use words like "probable". Nobody will know for certain until the procedure is actually performed.

      The only thing standing in the way are federal limitations on research which involve using stem cells and the relatively cheap price of a cadaver's face


      Federal limitations on stem cells only apply to federal-funding of fetal stem cells, not adult stem cells. Private funding for research on fetal stem cells is not restricted; for example, the Hughes Medical Corporation provides funding grants for fetal stem cell research. Unless patients saved pieces of their own fetal embryonic cells, patients would still possibly have to use the immunosuppressive drugs if they were to accept fetal stem cells from others. The potential therapy isn't ready yet.

      Hollywood can do marvels with skin surfaces. A little bit of properly applied makeup and even a week old artificial skin can be made to look just as good as any actor in a movie.


      Makeup would be inadequate for rectifiying the elastic properties of the face. It's not just the appearance in a still photo, it's how it moves over time during a face-to-face conversation. In the case of a Hollywood movie, the makeup is being applied to normal skin tissue with the proper elasticity.

      Estimations are that it would take the natural body about 4 years to completely remodel a 4x4" section of flesh


      Thus by your own admission, only "estimates", not data, are available. So the state-of-the-art is "I don't know".

      I feel harassed by an imbecile and my ire is up. Piss off.


      You can stick your head like an ostrich in the sand. You can tell people to piss off. You can insult them, call them "imbeciles", "arrogant", or "quacks." You can post a thousand times to Slashdot. You can pose as an Anonymous Coward and then reply to your own post, as you have done tonight.

      But no matter what you do, it won't change the fact that research will proceed ahead without you. Mistakes will be made, knowledge will be gained, and all you can do is shake your fist be obnoxious to others, and delude yourself into thinking that you're making a positive difference in this world.

      Your loss.
    6. Re:"Quack doctor"? by SilverspurG · · Score: 1
      Private funding for research on fetal stem cells is not restricted
      Of course you disregard my post where I note that Federal subsidy for their preferred industries saps the life out out of private funding for superior technology such as artificial skin.
      You can stick your head like an ostrich in the sand.
      Your loss
      Tell you what, dickhead. I anticipated your trollish response, so I've prepared a few little pictures of a bonified burn victim who has an education from a premier private engineering school from which some of the original inventors of the most successful heart valve and also premier members in the field of tissue engineering currently teach or are former faculty members. Most of whom I studied under.

      So you can continue to argue on at your leisure. I'll let you know up front that, due to my ACTUAL EXPERIENCE (which you have none of) and my education (which you're lacking), I'll watch this thread for weeks and you can kiss my ass.

      Barbaric cadaver grafting for facial reconstruction should be boycotted in favor of more delicate and acceptable techniques.
      --
      fast as fast can be. you'll never catch me.
    7. Re:"Quack doctor"? by SilverspurG · · Score: 1

      See? You're such a hopeless 'tard that you've gotten me agitated to the point where I make mistakes on the links.

      Pictures available at:

      Here

      Here

      Here

      You fsckin' trolling twit.

      --
      fast as fast can be. you'll never catch me.
  83. They already did. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    I think that it would be more responsible to first try this procedure on animals, like monkeys or pigs. For instance, maybe they could transplant a pig's face to a monkey.

    Read The Fine Article.

    They already did: Transplanted chunks of brown rats' faces onto white rats, giving them an appearance described as somewhat like a negative of a photograph of a raccoon.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  84. Regeneration by Tekoneiric · · Score: 1

    Why do this when regeneration is so close. Their already able to do regeneration in mice and transfering the ability to other mice.

    --
    *It's not what you can do for the Dark Side but what the Dark Side can do for you!*
  85. Re:That would be incredibly stupid plus rtfa by technoextreme · · Score: 1
    The summary doesn't make this clear, but this procedure is intended only for severely disfigured people due to burn scars and such.

    Yes, but something tells me rich criminals who need to disappear will be the most popular customers...

    Uggg.. Read the article. That will not happen. The person will still have the same structure of the face so he will still resemble the person. Worst case scenario is a freakish mix of the dead person andhimself. Plus this scenario is garunteed to shorten your life span because you are taking some freakishly powerful drugs. It would be the same scenario for a kidney transplant.
    --
    Ooo man the floppy drive is broken. No wait. The computer is just upside down.
  86. But maybe it's the wrong evolutionary goal? by way2trivial · · Score: 1

    Think about it, to amass the wealth necassary to get the surgery -- requires a different set of skills/abilities, which perhaps are more suited/better genetic materials to pass on down the line than those that provide 'natural beauty'...

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  87. Celebrity face auction on ebay? by relaxrelax · · Score: 1

    So now people might put "no" in an organ donor card just so no one steals their face and cause ID confusion to loved ones you left behind? What if they want to donate the other organs??

    Plus, celebrities might auction their faces on ebay - and some geeky fans will buy, no doubt. Yuuuuuuck!

    --
    Microsoft is pure dog-ma. FreeBSD is pure cat-ma.
  88. Revolutionizing the movie industry by Shoggoth+of+Maul · · Score: 1

    Now movies will contain the disclaimer;

    "Any resemblance to living persons is purely coincidental. Resemblance to dead persons is possibly the result of a surgical proceedure."

  89. But... by No+Such+Agency · · Score: 1

    Breast augmentation does not require a donor cadaver. I imagine that would restrict this surgery to "therapeutic" uses - i.e. where the patient really *needed* a facial graft due to severe disfigurement. I doubt that donor tissue is permitted to be used for elective cosmetic procedures.

    --
    Freedom: "I won't!"
    1. Re:But... by SilverspurG · · Score: 1
      I doubt that donor tissue is permitted to be used for elective cosmetic procedures.
      Unfortunately, due to the money-grubbing nature of insurance companies, you're wrong. Most health insurance providers won't cover reconstructive surgery so the vast majority of scientifically developed artifical skins end up being sold to the people who already have the money--primarily they go for lip augmentations for Hollywood actresses.
      --
      fast as fast can be. you'll never catch me.
  90. The Asshole-Libertarian comes out to play by No+Such+Agency · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No, the problem is the people who think they have a right to a perfect life - and that someone else should bear the costs.

    That's a hell of a thing to say to someone who has burns on 40% of his body. He doesn't want a "perfect life", he wants to not live in pain and discomfort. Who are you to criticize him for that, as you enjoy a life free of these problems? Try compassion some time, instead of clutching your wallet, fearful you might ever have to help somebody else.

    --
    Freedom: "I won't!"
  91. Re:Is this technology really just now in its infan by Vexar · · Score: 1

    Glad someone caught the movie reference. Good on you!

  92. Political Prisoners by man2525 · · Score: 1

    I hope that the faces aren't all from Chinese political prisoners killed during torture. Unlike internal organs, which you don't see, a new face is pretty darn obvious. Would the recipient have a permanent grimace or terrified expression like a Halloween mask? Young-looking skin, though.

  93. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  94. MICHAEL JACKSON CAN BE SAVED! by Presence2 · · Score: 1

    This could be his big break. Now if only they could invent women who look like 7 year old boys he could restart his career and be normal.

  95. Polish surgeon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just for information: it is Polish surgeon Maria Siemionow that is to perform face transplant in US.

  96. Anthropic principle by Nicolas+MONNET · · Score: 1

    Most chimeras probably die at an early stage, from that very immune problem. Those who get through are just "lucky."