Slashdot Mirror


Top 50 Science Fiction TV Shows

pbaumgar writes "Boston.com is running an article discussing their top 50 Sci-Fi TV shows of all-time. What are some of your favorites?" From the article: "Number 10 -'Sliders. 'Sliders' should have been a widespread hit, but it was ahead of its time. The show was about a wiz-kid genius Quinn Mallory, played by Jerry O'Connell, and his band of three companions who slide among Earth's alternate realities. Toward the end of the series, the show quickly slid in quality as three of its stars - O'Connell, Sabrina Lloyd and John Rhys-Davies - departed and were replaced by others. A tragic demise to a fine show." They don't even give a nod to greatest-trek-of-all-time DS9, so I don't know about this list.

684 comments

  1. DS9??? by thc69 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    DS9 wasn't a sci-fi show. It was a soap opera, except for the first couple seasons...

    --
    Procrastination -- because good things come to those who wait.
    1. Re:DS9??? by Slashdot_Gandhi · · Score: 0, Offtopic


      Haha...You wouldn't consider WWE wrestling as athletics then?

    2. Re:DS9??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly! It was like watching a bunch of hicks livin' in a trailer park occassionally going out on their dirt bike to get in trouble.

      Boring - AND no hot aliens anywhere to be seen! Where's 6-of-9 when you need her?

    3. Re:DS9??? by Ismilar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But have you seen the list?
      A lot of those shows aren't Science Fiction.

    4. Re:DS9??? by westyvw · · Score: 1

      I agree with that completely. Snooze fest revolving around interpersonal problems of rather boring beings.

    5. Re:DS9??? by Dachannien · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I don't see why a sci-fi series shouldn't have a soap-operatic quality to it. Babylon 5 (and, on its heels, DS9) showed other sci-fi writers that a long-term, overarching plot is well-received by many sci-fi fans. Witness Voyager, on the other hand, where the only thing tying the shows together was this "Oh Noes, We're A Bazillion Light Years From Home" thing, while five minutes before the end of every episode they pushed the Magic Reset Button to solve their problem and restore the plot to the way it was when the episode started.

      These days, every episode of Stargate SG-1/Atlantis and Battlestar Galactica (some of the most popular current sci-fi) is based on the entire series up until that point (in fact, the first line in most episodes of SG-1 these days is Chris Judge saying, "Previously, on Stargate SG-1...").

      Besides, the soap operatic plot of most sci-fi shows holds up to scrutiny a lot better than most actual soap operas: "I love you, but.... I have amnesia!"

    6. Re:DS9??? by pete-classic · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Clearly pro wrestling is an athletic pursuit. On the other hand it most certainly isn't a sport.

      -Peter

    7. Re:DS9??? by hobbesmaster · · Score: 1

      BSG2005, their number 2 pick, certainly has more "soap opera" elements than DS9 had. And DS9 is of much much higher quality in writing and acting than Star Trek Voyager which is about 15 on the list... I don't like the list - some of the stuff on the list isn't even really scifi!

    8. Re:DS9??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, it seems that they certainly don't really distinguish between fantasy and SF, which are very different imho.

    9. Re:DS9??? by murdocj · · Score: 1

      Maybe you don't have to rate DS/9 as the best of the Treks (though I think it was ). It was certainly infinitely better than the "lost in space meets Star Trek" that was ST: Voyager. To not even list it in the top 50 just blows my mind, especially when you consider some of the shows that did make the list. You can argue as to whether DS/9 should be high or low on the list, but if you are going to list the original Battlestar: Galactica (which was awful) you better list DS/9.

    10. Re:DS9??? by BRUTICUS · · Score: 1

      Agreed, i've always thought DS9 was the lamest Star Trek, it was all about the drama. Weak. Not what i'm looking for in a sci-fi show.

    11. Re:DS9??? by thc69 · · Score: 1

      I agree that plot continuity, and even a little bit of soap operation, can work well in sci-fi, but DS9 entirely lost any sci-fi interest, and was entirely 100% soap opera, just in a sci-fi setting.

      --
      Procrastination -- because good things come to those who wait.
    12. Re:DS9??? by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "DS9 wasn't a sci-fi show. It was a soap opera, except for the first couple seasons..."

      You have to ignore an awful lot of episodes to claim DS9 wasn't a soap opera.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    13. Re:DS9??? by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      I meant to say 'sci fi', not soap opera. (Haven't had my coffee yet.) I guess either statement is true. :)

      DS9 was a good blend of the two. One of my favorite episodes was about Ben Sisko getting 'trapped' in time. His son spent the rest of his life trying to figure out how to retrieve him. It was a wonderful episode because it used a sci-fi event to bring out something very near and dear for characters that fans of the show cared about. I remember a lot of chatter about that episode shortly after it aired.

      There have been some comments to the tune of "it was just a soap oprea!". Ooo kay. Maybe if you focused in on Odo's pursuit of Kira and filtered out a lot of the events that couldn't have happened to a regular soap opera you could say that. It would be like me taking a handful of things about Babylon 5 that I simply couldn't stand and saying the show was utter shit. I'd sound stupid to somebody who enjoyed the show.

      DS9 was a great show. It was quite satisfying to a large group of fans. Some people didn't like it. Whoop-de-fuck. I didn't like Farscape and there are people that agree with me. Was the show bad, or is it simply a matter of "to each is own"?

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    14. Re:DS9??? by dgatwood · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Worse than soap opera, it was a political soap opera. Hours and ours of policital posturing, the Dominion, the painfully boring politics of Bajor.... That's the only Star Trek series that was so bad that I stopped watching it.

      Don't get me wrong, Enterprise jumped the shark on occasion (alien Nazis), but at least Enterprise had a little humor, characters with personality, and story arcs about characters you actually cared about. They were just occasionally a little too far-fetched.

      DS9, by contrast, when it wasn't devolving into wormhole fantasy and pseudo-spiritual Bajoran mythos crap, could just as easily have happened in 20th century Earth if you substitute the Chunnel for the wormhole and convince the military to fly jets through it. There was nothing futuristic about it. It was just a protracted war with an enemy who was basically evil by design rather than actually a war over something tangible like territory. It's basically the war on terror, only with an even less well-defined objective.

      The characters were wooden, the story lines boring, and the whole Dax changeover ranks right up there with the whole baby switching thing. The whole series read like gratuitous verbal masturbation by Berman and Friends. If DS9 is the best Trek has to offer, the franchise should just die now and for all time.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    15. Re:DS9??? by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I always called Voyager "Lost In Trek" for exactly that reason. (And get a load of the comment a thread or two back, about their "magic reset button"! Dead on.) DS9 was the only one of the STs that didn't revolve around the Planet of the Week, which frankly had got old back in the 1970s.

      I remember the original BG. Lordy, was that painful. Yeah, it got a bit better toward the end, but I'd still use it to anchor a "50 worst" list rather than a "50 best" list.

      But this list was about visitor impressions and advertising dollars, not about SF. The list was clearly whatever several mundanes could recall off the top of their heads, somewhat tempered by their idea of which shows were the most popular, or which ones they remembered from their childhoods.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    16. Re:DS9??? by MurphyZero · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Absoultely. DS-9 started off weak, but once the long plot lines were developed (more than one) the show became a great ones. Not only that, the magic reset button can totally ruin a show (mucking about with time for example to reset for example. SG-1, for example, has done this at least twice, and both times they did not fit well with the rest of the plot.

      In a book, that's what can make a great book, is a well-defined plot line that goes from start to end. We should expect that of a series (any, not just sci-fi), not just the individual shows that make up a series.

      Sliders was a show that had a magic reset button (the slide at the end) but tried to develop a long plot line (besides the slide home) , but didn't quite succeed. I have heard that network executives also got involved to be able to switch the order of the shows, which is why after the first couple shows you never saw the lead-in to the next show. You instead, possibly got a tease starter or ender: hints about what happened on the previous planet, but wasn't an episode or hints about the next planet, also not an episode. That plus the main characters leaving were a sure demise.

      Stargate and Stargate Atlantis don't focus on that underlying plot line, but it is there. Not necessarily linking every show, but it does provide some development of the characters. Case in point, the 'two hour season finales' for both the past two weeks. Two one-hour shows, the second of which was a finale. Little linking, between them.

      Battlestar Galactica focuses on it, where nearly every show depends heavily on the previous one. Makes you need to see each episode when it runs.

      So true about actual soaps' reset buttons. At least the sci-fi resets are a little more plausible (though I still hate most of the time travel ones).

      --
      Our founding fathers removed the guys in charge. Be American. Vote incumbents out.
    17. Re:DS9??? by clifffton · · Score: 0, Troll

      Deep Stain 9. Geez guys. It started out as a theft of B5 and it was a pale copy at best. DS9 deserves no place in the top 50, B5 is right where it belongs.

    18. Re:DS9??? by llefler · · Score: 1

      DS9 is the Star Trek with the most unrealized potential. The concept worked, just look at B5. Unforntunately, after the first season or two the only thing it excelled in is working faster than Ambien.

      Voyager wins the prize for being lamest. That's why they brought in 7of9, the show needed something to make it interesting. (and yes, I hated Janeway)

      --
      It is amazing what you can accomplish if you do not care who gets the credit. -- Harry Truman
    19. Re:DS9??? by abandonment · · Score: 1

      since when are super hero's considered 'sci fi'?

      looks like they had to pad the entries to try and come up with 50 that were worth describing...

    20. Re:DS9??? by vsprintf · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A lot of those shows aren't Science Fiction.

      Agreed. I can't believe Farscape didn't make the list while shows like Wild Wild West, the Man from UNCLE, and the Avengers did. The Prisoner was far more SciFi than the Avengers, and that didn't make the list either. While I liked the other shows, they were not science fiction. While the original Star Trek probably deserves the top spot, the only other show that had fans actively protesting and trying to reverse its cancellation was Farscape.

    21. Re:DS9??? by zerojoker · · Score: 2

      The first Star Trek series where the Federation wasn't the only superpower in the galaxy, where there's no black and white and you can't force others to do the "right thing", but instead have to deal and negotiate with others and sometimes accept other cultures and different behaviour that you don't like

      I understand that this isn't very popular in the US ;-)

    22. Re:DS9??? by hobo+sapiens · · Score: 1, Troll

      If they have Stargate SG1 on there, and left off DS9, then yeah, something is outta whack. I wouldn't say DS9 was totally the best ever, but at least it did Next Generation proud.

      Now, I gotta jump on SG1 with both feet:
      every episode of Stargate SG-1/Atlantis and Battlestar Galactica (some of the most popular current sci-fi) is based on the entire series up until that point

      Is THAT what's wrong with SG-1? I watched a few episodes of that show, and MAN did it suck! So I guess I had to be in from the beginning to like it? I doubt that would matter. I loved the movie, but Richard Dean Anderson should have quit acting after McGuyver. I know this doesn't add anything intelligent to the discussion, but it HAD to be said: At least IMHO, Stargate SG-1 is the cheesiest, hokiest, most poorly put together SCI-FI show ever. Yet there it is, number eight or six or whatever it got. What a stoopid list!

      --
      blah blah blah
    23. Re:DS9??? by samkass · · Score: 1

      >

      *cough*Firefly*cough*

      --
      E pluribus unum
    24. Re:DS9??? by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1

      And yet they left off Farscape and Blake's 7. Crazy.

    25. Re:DS9??? by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      Oops, sorry. Was there some complaint about Firefly's demise that I never heard about? Have I managed to offend some other minor, unappreciated SciFi community akin to Farscape fans? :)

    26. Re:DS9??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DS9 wasn't a sci-fi show. It was a soap opera, except for the first couple seasons...

      You missed the first couple seasons then. DS9 was the product of weekend binge-drinking. The writers slapped themselves on the foreheads the next day after learning they based the whole thing on a frickin' stationary space station, and included Bajorans- the biggest whiners in the universe.

      DS9 sucked. There. I've said it.

      No mention was made of Space: Above and Beyond. One frickin' season and it was cancelled, and it had more je ne sais quois than DS9.

    27. Re:DS9??? by VagaStorm · · Score: 1

      I realy missed some:
      Space: Above and Beyond VR5
      Angel = Hey! If xena is on that list....

    28. Re:DS9??? by VagaStorm · · Score: 1

      I realy missed some:
      Space: Above and Beyond
      VR5; Not sure if this one realy where any god.. so long ago

      Angel; Hey! If xena is on that list.... BTW making arowns dosnt work in posts :(

    29. Re:DS9??? by Crayon+Kid · · Score: 1

      They left out SeaQuest too. I can't quite believe that SeaQuest wouldn't make a top50 of SciFi series.

      --
      i ate crayons when i was a kid and now i have two braincells and the blue ones taste nicer
    30. Re:DS9??? by Crayon+Kid · · Score: 1

      Stargate SG1 had a lot of fans screaming for Michael Shanks to be brought back on the show. I know, not quite the same, but the point is that there have been other shows about which fans have been very vocal.

      --
      i ate crayons when i was a kid and now i have two braincells and the blue ones taste nicer
    31. Re:DS9??? by thc69 · · Score: 1

      The parent did not deserve to be modded troll. He was correct -- the politics, the fact that the exact same storyline could happen on earth now, the religious crud, and the wooden characters all made it a soap opera that dragged on slowly rather than an exciting vision of the future. The only troll-ish part of his post was the final two sentences.

      --
      Procrastination -- because good things come to those who wait.
    32. Re:DS9??? by Crayon+Kid · · Score: 1

      Why has the parent been modded Troll? It makes some damn valid points. Perhaps I don't agree with all of them, but DS9 damn sure was BORING. It had a static setting and didn't do anything to change it.

      --
      i ate crayons when i was a kid and now i have two braincells and the blue ones taste nicer
    33. Re:DS9??? by neongrey · · Score: 0

      The crime here is not that DS9 was left off the list-- as there are plenty of valid arguments, which have been made already--, but that Voyager was on it at all.

    34. Re:DS9??? by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      I bid one site.

    35. Re:DS9??? by ericdano · · Score: 1
      Oh my god, I forgot Farscape as well. Ok, revised list.
      1. Star Trek (Original Series)
      2. Battlestar Galactica
      3. Farscape

      --
      It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
      I moderate therefore I rule!
      --
    36. Re:DS9??? by ericdano · · Score: 1
      Oh yeah, SeaQuest. And the Prisoner.

      There is a lot of stuff they left out that could have bumped some of these other guys off....

      --
      It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
      I moderate therefore I rule!
      --
    37. Re:DS9??? by DavidTC · · Score: 1
      Ha, don't laugh at us. Farscape fans got it a miniseries.

      Us Firefly fans got a feature film. That's, like, Star Trek level success. ;)

      (Not that I have anything against Farscape. That show rocked.)

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    38. Re:DS9??? by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Sad thing is it was the best of new Trek. About the only shows I watch again are original Trek. Yeah, they're goofy and cheesy in some spots but there were some really good stories from time to time.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    39. Re:DS9??? by Velox_SwiftFox · · Score: 2, Informative

      Star Trek TOS did the alien Nazis first. Remember Spock giving McCoy the scientific method of putting on his overtight boots - "point your toe and push"? For that matter,they did 1920's gangsters, the Cooms vs. the Yangs, and Ancient Rome never fallen too. TOS wore that theme out, even using the unlikely "parallel evolution" multiple times.

    40. Re:DS9??? by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      They could have used a Cary Grant to their Katharine Hepburn in Voyager. Sorta' Star Trek meets Philadelphia Story.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    41. Re:DS9??? by DavidTC · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Stargate SG-1 has only had like four time travel episodes. 1969, 2010, Window of Opertunity, and the Season 9 closing double, Moebius. Stargate Atlantis has had one.

      1969 was a 'stranded in time, need to get back.'. No reset button.

      In 2010, we entered in 2010, and the plot was 'send something back to 'the present' to change history. Arguably that's a reset button, but that was rather the plot.

      WoO was a classic 'time loop' episode. You could argue there were a very large number of reset buttons in it, but I think that's rather required in a time loop episode. (And sci-fi shows are required by law to do time loop episodes.)

      In the Atlantis episode, we learn that this is the second timeline, and what happened in the first time. No reset button.

      In the SG-1 season ender, we have SG-1 go back in time and screw up the timeline so bad that the the Stargate program doesn't even exist, leaving only a video recording of themselves.

      So the team members that should have been in SG-1, who get shown the video, go back and screw up the timeline even more, so much that not only does the original timeline come back, but altered in such a way that SG-1 doesn't have to go back in the first place. (Hence the title 'Moebius'.)

      So, in eight and a half seasons of SG-1, and one and half seasons of Atlantis, let's see..

      If by 'reset button' you mean 'altering the timeline and then altering it back where no one remembers it', we've had...one. Although, technically, the original SG-1 still died in the past, as did later did their replacements. The new SG-1 doesn't remember because they didn't do it, although they do have a tape recording to tell them what happened.

      If by 'reset button', you mean 'events got out of control and the solution was to alter the past', the only episode that did that was 2010, and that was rather obviously the solution in the first place, as skipping 10 years of history would be a silly way to continue the show.

      I don't really know which reset buttons you are talking about thtat didn't fit with the theme.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    42. Re:DS9??? by dgatwood · · Score: 1
      I thought the way TOS did the gangsters was pretty brilliant. It was one of the events that lead to the prime directive, I think. Somebody interfered in a primitive culture by leaving behind a book about Chicago in the 1920s and they took it as sort of a Bible of how things should be. Kind of cool, really.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    43. Re:DS9??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And a shitty one at that. Also, Quinn is a girls' name.

    44. Re:DS9??? by magarity · · Score: 1

      since when are super hero's considered 'sci fi'?
       
      You're kidding, right? Which part of Kal-el's parents sending him to Earth on a spaceship and growing up to fight Lex Luthor's legions of James Bond-esque gadgets isn't Sci-fi? And Batman's gadgets versus the Joker's gadgets? The only one I'd argue is Wonder Woman unless you want to count the CIA's talking supercomputer made from Christmas lights as Sci-fi.

    45. Re:DS9??? by usrusr · · Score: 1

      WoO was a classic 'time loop' episode. You could argue there were a very large number of reset buttons in it, but I think that's rather required in a time loop episode. (And sci-fi shows are required by law to do time loop episodes.)

      I am amazed that there are people like you who don't call those episodes "time loop" instead of "Groundhog Day". But the groundhog day episode was certainly one of the best of sg-1, if you want to find out what is so good about sg-1 compare their groundhog day episode to those of other series.

      PS: i definitely prefer a series where each episode the makers just try to tell the most interesting story they can think of, from beginning to end and don't care much for a bigger plot. i think st:tng got the balance right, they had a few great episodes with a bigger plot but the majority of episodes just tried to be good in itself, even taking a rather liberal view on established canon. if you can't tell your best story because it does not fit the setting/bigger plot then you have sacrificed a good story for a plot that only a fraction of the viewers will follow. (remember: the hardcore "have to watch all episodes" viewers are only the tip of the iceberg of the viewer market, they just happen to be much more vocal about their desires than the masses)

      --
      [i have an opinion and i am not afraid to use it]
    46. Re:DS9??? by Dachannien · · Score: 1

      The magic reset button I had mentioned in my earlier post is where events occur in an episode, but at the end some miraculous solution occurs, and afterwards, the events of that episode never again have sway over future plot (and any attempt to write those events into later plot would seem incredibly contrived). (Who shot J.R.? Who cares! *bzzt*)

      As for SG-1 (and Atlantis to some degree), the writers have actually surprised me by the frequency with which they will make references to past events, including ones that at the time seemed like standalone episodes of little importance. And I'm not talking clip shows here, either, where the mention of past events is token so that they can insert a clip of the earlier episode (though they have had several clip shows... ugh) - even obscure past events crop up every now and then in dialogue or even in an event which furthers an important current plot. For example (spoiler warning!), the episode where Osiris is captured by SG-1 seemed to close a plot thread, until one of the writers realized, hey, wait, her ship is still cloaked in orbit. It became the vessel (pun intended) for another entire plot thread involving rogue NID elements on Earth.

      But as far as the time travel episodes go, yes, only Moebius really pulled a magic reset button on us. Maybe they'll surprise me and make those events important again sometime later. 1969 and 2010 were both interesting perspectives on the past and the potential future of the Stargate program and the heroes of the story (and even of Earth in general). 2010 wasn't a magic reset button episode because the whole point was to deliver the note into the past to warn the SGC about the Aschen - a plot point that came back later in a great episode where the suspense was built around the fact that we, the viewer, knew the events in 2010 and the Aschen's nefarious plans, while the main characters didn't.

      And Window of Opportunity is a fan favorite, not because of the magic reset button, but because it gave a chance for some great character development by giving the viewers the opportunity to see their humorous side. It told us something important about the Ancients - namely, that they were fallible, and though they were incredibly advanced, they weren't gods any more than the Goa'uld were. And while it borrowed heavily from Groundhog Day, the difference was that instead of looking at a man given the unique opportunity to make so much more of himself, it looked at the plight of a man who created a time loop because he was afraid to let go of the past. Probably some of RDA's best acting, especially in the scene at the end where he convinces that man to deactivate the loop.

    47. Re:DS9??? by Nutria · · Score: 1

      If you think that DS9 is the first Star Trek series where the Federation wasn't the only superpower in the galaxy, where there's no black and white and you can't force others to do the "right thing", you really need to go back and watch TOS, TNG & ST:E.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    48. Re:DS9??? by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      Are => you <- sure?

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    49. Re:DS9??? by Wontsomebodypleaseth · · Score: 0

      Biggest N00B of the Day DS9 Rocks,Its actual got plot

      --
      If You can read this sig you are on the internet
    50. Re:DS9??? by synaptik · · Score: 1

      While I hold everything you just stated as fact, somehow I found myself enjoying DS9 more than its other ST contemporaries.

      Although I'm sure I didn't realize it at the time DS9 was still in active production, I've come to believe that-- for my tastes-- science fiction is best used as merely a static canvas upon which to paint a story. If you bring the SF content too close to the foreground, making the audience suffer through technobabble and dubious explanations, then you've lost me as an audience. Suspension of my disbelief is easiest when the SF content retains an element of mysticism, and is left reasonably unexplained. But as soon as the writers start trying to explain their pseudoscience in rational terms, cognitive dissonance sets in and my disbelief-suppression field collapses...

      (The introduction of 'midichlorians' into the Star Wars mythos is a perfect example of what I'm talking about.)

      Anyway, I always viewed DS9 as the Berman response to B5. Based on what little I watched, B5's science-fiction was relegated to precisely the role I've described above as ideal: Plot was carried mostly by intrigue and believably-flawed actors, and the SF was just context. Alas, I didn't watch it regularly, so I found it hard to get into it when I didn't know the backstory.

      Perhaps Berman & Co saw B5 as a threat to their franchise and tried to adapt. I initially scoffed at the "to boldly stay where no one has stayed before" idea, but I definitely wish that some of DS9's continuity and plot development had crossed over more into the other ST shows.

      For me, the franchise became "Star Drek" about the time Voyager ended. I never bothered with Enterprise.

      --
      HSJ$$*&#^!#+++ATH0
      NO CARRIER
    51. Re:DS9??? by Kelson · · Score: 1

      While the original Star Trek probably deserves the top spot, the only other show that had fans actively protesting and trying to reverse its cancellation was Farscape.

      The only other show? Hardly. These days, any genre show that has fans gets at least a letter-writing campaign when it gets cancelled, unless there's a sense that it's time has come (i.e. Babylon 5 completing its 5-year story arc, or Buffy the Vampire Slayer completing seven years with its spin-off still going.) Unfortunately this means that studios pay less attention to the letters, because they figure it's just something that happens when you cancel a show.

      Admittedly, the only shows I can think of in the last decade or so that had successful campaigns are Farscape and Firefly. With Farscape it was mainly a matter of keeping the interest visible while studio politics worked things out. (A big issue was that the Jim Henson company was owned by some media conglomerate that didn't want to pay up for a fifth season, but then the Henson family bought the company back. And another copmany entirely put up the funding based on the fans' visibility. Sci-Fi Channel just bought the broadcast rights after the whole thing was done.) With Firefly, the big thing that landed the movie deal wasn't a diret result of a campaign -- it was that the DVD set sold phenomenally well. (This of course, came from fans introducing the show to friends, who would then go out and buy their own copies, show them to other friends, etc.)

      It's never just the letter-writing.

    52. Re:DS9??? by DavidTC · · Score: 1
      But as far as the time travel episodes go, yes, only Moebius really pulled a magic reset button on us. Maybe they'll surprise me and make those events important again sometime later.

      Ah, but they are important. Because of SG-1 and then non-SG-1's meddling in the past, Ra left the ZPM on earth. Non-SG-1 and the original Dr. Jackson recovered it and buried it, along with a record of what happened, where it was dug up in present day, causing much confusion to SG-1, who were about to go into the past to get it, only to discover they'd already done so twice.

      That ZPM is currently powering Atlantis.

      They have not addressed the fact that the entire team of SG-1 died 10,000 years in the past, or the fact that non-SG-1 died 9,995 years in the past.

      And because of their meddling, they now have three time machines laying around on earth, the original, which actually came from another planet, the copy that's been sitting around for 10,000 years, and the copy of that which was also left 10,000 years in the past, again.

      What's an even weird possibility is if non-SG-1 got a time machine working (either one) and took off with it. They could arrive any day now.

      In any other show, I would assume those time machines had vanished. Not this one.

      And, yes, it's nice how Stargate has amazing continity. You get the feeling they grab new writers and stick them in front of seasons 1-8 DVDs before their pen hits the paper.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    53. Re:DS9??? by Dachannien · · Score: 1

      Ah, yes, the ZPM. I forgot all about that. And the time machines - maybe I should reassess my take on that episode. Somehow it left me feeling unfulfilled, but perhaps that was because of the whirlwind timeline munging and the sheer confusion that created :)

      And, yes, it's nice how Stargate has amazing continity. You get the feeling they grab new writers and stick them in front of seasons 1-8 DVDs before their pen hits the paper.

      Part of it is that Martin Wood and Peter DeLuise (among other writer/director/creative consultants) pay such amazing attention to detail. They're just a couple of the people who really go above-and-beyond on the show. They know the fans would catch all sorts of things if they weren't so careful, because they're fans of the show, too.

    54. Re:DS9??? by bynary · · Score: 1

      Amen! DS9 has got to be the most boring sci-fi I have ever witnessed. Go ahead, Trekkies, mod me down.

      --
      http://www.bynarystudio.com
    55. Re:DS9??? by bynary · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Star Trek got the top spot because it's old. That's about it. Frankly, I think the show sucks. Granted, it's good in the way Elvis is good: it isn't but everyone says it is because it's old and genre-defining. Also, anyone remember Starman? I'm not saying it should be in the top 50, but since everyone's listing other sci-fi shows that didn't make the list I figured I'd better do it too.

      Also, the editors/writers of that piece need to go back to genre school. Xena is Fantasy. Superheroes are just that. Buffy is in the Horror-Comedy genre. Dark Angel is fiction. That's it.

      --
      http://www.bynarystudio.com
    56. Re:DS9??? by sartin · · Score: 1

      DS9 had one (that I can remember) saving grace - Trials & Tribblations - perhaps the single funniest fen shows ever aired. They had the DS9 crew time travel back to the "Trouble with Tribbles" episode of the TOS. They even had great fun with the "why Klingons look different" problem.

    57. Re:DS9??? by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      I never said the original Star Trek was great. But after all this time it still has a bunch of crazed fans, and as you said, it was genre-defining. That's why it deserves the top spot as much as any other SciFi show.

  2. Sliders by El_Muerte_TDS · · Score: 1

    I completely agree with Sliders. I really loved the series. But at the time Prof. Arthuro died it went downhill, fast. At a certain point it was only about those "aliens". A real shame.

    1. Re:Sliders by glh · · Score: 1

      SAme here, sliders was an excellent series. I thought it had a ton of potential. I even remember one episode that had a matrix like theme where people were walking around with these VR goggles but living in an alternate reality. There were several episodes like that, that eventually ended up being used in later movies. The chick in it was really hot, too (don't remember her name). Maybe they will remake that one some day though the idea isn't as fresh as it once was.

    2. Re:Sliders by JamesD_UK · · Score: 5, Informative
      I've heard John Rhys-Davies in person speak about his leaving sliders. It was several years ago and so I'd probably not even try and quote what he actually said whilst I was present, the gist of it was that he left because although he loved the concept of the series he saw it already going downhill before he decided to leave. I think he's been quite public about this and I managed to find this quote.

      "I like SF. I love intelligent SF," Rhys-Davies says in his deep basso voice. "When you come across good writing, and I think 'Scorpion' was finely written, it's a wonderful thing. I had just come through a period where the contractual nature of my job obliged me to take scripts that frankly wouldn't get past Writing 101. We had the most wonderful series concept with Sliders, but we did everything that had been done before and we did it every damned episode. We did Species. We did Tremors. We did Twister. We did War of the Worlds. We did The Island of Dr. Moreau. It was out of control, just out of control.

      "I think Tracy did a nice job early on. We had our differences and we fought occasionally. In the end, Sliders wasn't the worst experience I ever had. I was just disappointed. Again, I love SF. I'm a passionate believer in Sliders. The series could have been great. The public always understood the of Sliders. The public understood that you could go anywhere in the galaxy. The writers, though, would try to graft a Law and Order story, or something they had done or seen before, onto Sliders and just make the characters work around it."

    3. Re:Sliders by TheWanderingHermit · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Sliders was a poorly written, ill-conceived rip-off of an original idea by George R. R. Martin. The characters were less than real, and sometimes I felt almost like a characture.

      But, then again, once I learned to read well enough to understand Shakespeare and other classic writers who could really develop a story and characters, I've had higher standards than what most SF shows can meet.

      Sliders was a show for the masses who didn't want to deal with real sf that could actually make one think, like "The Prisoner" or 2001: ASO.

      It's pap for those who don't have the refined taste for the caviar of sf.

    4. Re:Sliders by Seumas · · Score: 2, Informative

      It was already going hill and that's why John Rhys Davies left. He wanted Sliders to continue to be good science fiction and venture into more solid, hard science fiction whereas the rest of the powers that be wanted the show to be more light and fluffy and typical crap that qualifies, these days, as scifi. So, he left.

      I've always liked him, but after that decision, I gained a lot of respect for him as a professional. And the fact that they couldn't keep a solid cast stringed together afterward just shows how important he actually was to the series. I mean, every week it was a different person out of the cast and another in. Including the two O'Connell brothers.

      But at least the show had the super hot military chick. Yum.

    5. Re:Sliders by twiffy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Holy crap, that's the most pretentious sounding post I've ever read on /. Good job on cramming "Shakespeare", "classic writers", "refined", and "caviar" into a posting about Sci Fi. The basic concept for Sliders was around before George R. R. Martin. And while it's true that Sliders failed in some basic ways, the unfortunate fact is that most SF shows fail in at least one basic way, a way that leaves most of us thinking on some level that we could have done better. Sliders has its stagnation, DS9 has an overly soap-opera bent to its episodes (and has Sisko doing a faint Captain Kirk impression for every 2 out of 5 episodes). Although it wasn't the audio-visual equivalent of Dune or Ender's Game / Shadow or Song of Ice and Fire, as far as SF TV goes, especially for its day, Sliders was awesome.

    6. Re:Sliders by TheWanderingHermit · · Score: 1

      I'm just stating the facts.

      One reason I don't watch much sf anymore because I have high standards. I want to be able to watch a show with good writing and good acting. I'll be more than happy to let the quality of the sets or effects be a little lower if the show has artistic merit. Maybe I am a snob, or maybe I've just learned to enjoy something at least a little better than the drivel tha often passes as sf now days. I started reading sf as a kid because it made me think and stretched my mind a little with every book I read. That's why I started watching Star Trek, as well. That's why I liked many of the episodes of TNG, didn't care much for Voyager or Enterprise, and liked DS9. I noticed you didn't like DS9. I've seen that a lot with fans who are more interested in explosions, tight body suits, and effects instead of solid writing that actually elevates a show above others. The number of negative reactions toward DS9 are what, long ago, convinced me that many sf fans are not nearly has smart as they think they are. By literary standards, it is a well made, well written, and well produced show. The fact that so many Trekkies and fans can write it off as soap opera is just proof that what many people are looking for in sf is not quality, but drivel, sex, explosions, and violence to passively occupy their minds, instead of giving them a chance to follow a more adult storyline with more adult characters that are involved in more than romance or battles.

      I don't expect every series to be as good as Dune or MacBeth. But I do recognize the difference between quality writing and crap. If you don't, well that doesn't mean those that do are "pretentious". It just means we'd rather see the genre live UP to standards, instead of DOWN to the least common denominators.

    7. Re:Sliders by Babbster · · Score: 1
      The chick in it was really hot, too (don't remember her name).

      That "chick" would be Sabrina Lloyd. If you'd like to see another fantastic (cancelled too soon) show she was on, pick up "Sports Night: The Complete Series" on DVD.

    8. Re:Sliders by sessamoid · · Score: 1
      The chick in it was really hot, too (don't remember her name).

      You're thinking of Sabrina Lloyd, I think. She was adorable in Sliders. She was later a regular on Sports Night for a while.

      --
      "No, no, no. Don't tug on that. You never know what it might be attached to."
    9. Re:Sliders by Ignominious+Cow+Herd · · Score: 1

      All due respect to Sabrina Lloyd, but he probably meant Kari Wuhrer. Not original cast, but almost enough to save the show.

      --
      Lump lingered last in line for brains, and the ones she got were sorta rotten and insane.
    10. Re:Sliders by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      And is currently on Numb3rs.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    11. Re:Sliders by Babbster · · Score: 1

      Perhaps. Kari Wuhrer is lovely but completely useless as an actor. I mean, really. This is a woman who is now BACK on a daytime soap - most actors start there and leave it behind...

    12. Re:Sliders by deaddrunk · · Score: 1

      2001: ASO was a pile of pretentious crap created by a man so far up his own backside he could smell his bad breath.

      --
      Does a Christian soccer team even need a goalkeeper?
    13. Re:Sliders by glh · · Score: 1

      You're right, I was thinking of Kari Wuhrer... :)

    14. Re:Sliders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I guess if I couldn't understand it, I'd say the same thing as you.

    15. Re:Sliders by Silicon+Jedi · · Score: 1

      Ender's Game is an overrated piece of crap. Hideously predictable plot, caricatruish cast... *shudder*

    16. Re:Sliders by twiffy · · Score: 1

      That's like saying "Good Night, Moon" is amateurish and boring. Maybe if you read Ender's Game when you're 18 it'll come across like that, but it's a kids book, and it's phenomenal for that. The characters are also fairly accurate for what you might expect from VERY YOUNG KIDS who may be smart but haven't had time to develop much of a complex personality, either experientially or neurologically. The plot is very predictable, but that's not particularly relevant. The "badass" factor in Ender's Game, and more so in Ender's Shadow, is something that can be very appealing, and is done quite well.

  3. Star Trek DS9 Was truly superior by RLiegh · · Score: 0

    to Star Trek Enterprise

    1. Re:Star Trek DS9 Was truly superior by n3bulous · · Score: 1

      Surely you meant Voyager? What a load of crap that show was. Just because 7of9 was a hottie in tights... Oh wait, that's one of the reasons Buck Rodgers made the list...

      ST:E wasn't bad, though it took me a few attempts to get into it because the characters/actors were so sterile the first season.

      --
      "The area of penetration will no doubt be sensitive." ~ Spock
    2. Re:Star Trek DS9 Was truly superior by Seumas · · Score: 2, Funny

      The only good Star Trek was TNG - and that's only in comparison to the other Star Trek spinoffs. Otherwise, comparing Star Trek series is like comparing the color of different shits. Yes, there are slight differences, but they're all still steaming turds.

    3. Re:Star Trek DS9 Was truly superior by Jeff85 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      DS9 was superior to all of the Treks. You can't beat the Dominion War arc that spanned the last 3 seasons. All the characters were great, though I was disappointed they killed off Jadzia and replaced her with Ezri. Though I'll admit maybe they overdid it with Vic's sometimes, the one where they have to put the jack-in-the-box away was pretty good. Ronald Moore writes great storylines.

      Voyager was pretty bad, I thought. I can't believe they put that in the top 50 and not DS9. Too many episodes about the doctor or how holograms have taken over their ship. I mean, how many times did Voyager get captured by aliens in the delta quadrant? I remember one episode in particular about how they had an opportunity to return to the alpha quadrant via a wormhole, but a couple of Ferengi in an inferior ship outsmarted the Voyager crew and they ended up not being able to return home themselves. And don't even get me started on that one episode where Paris mutates into a frog and impregnates Janeway...

      --
      Fetch Text URL - Firefox Extension
    4. Re:Star Trek DS9 Was truly superior by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      ST:DS9 was fucking "Neighbours" in space. It was boring as shit crap about characters and love-lives, might as well have been set in the caribbean gulf, with the wormhole a canal built by proud and mystical Inca or whatever linking to the pacific.

      ST:TNG was the last decent Star Trek that was actually SCIENCE FICTION, instead of soap opera with a "future" theme.

      Red Dwarf (the original british version) was the best science fiction TV series. Yes, it wasn't a "serious" series. But it was also mostly hard science fiction. Doctor Who comes a close second, followed by futurama, not a serious series either but full of hard science fiction.

      Now, if only someone talented would make Banks' "Use of Weapons" or "Consider Phlebas" into a series. Of course, the chances of someone in america making a series about godlike commies from space who are the good (or at least slightly less bad) guys is perhaps slim, but you can't deny that Consider Phlebas would make good watching. Even if the horror of "Use of Weapons" and what exactly it was that the Chairmaker did might be a bit harder to translate to screen, I reckon it could be done (just so long as they don't resort to a sucky "BladeRunner"-style narrative to pound it into viewers skulls)

    5. Re:Star Trek DS9 Was truly superior by falcon5768 · · Score: 1

      While i dont agree about TNG (I too think Enterprise while slow in its first two seasons, managed to come to its own the last two even if the beebs fucked the pooch with the ending.) I do aree about DS9. It was anything but Star Trek.

      --

      "Slashdot, where telling the truth is overrated but lying is insightful."

    6. Re:Star Trek DS9 Was truly superior by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Intriguing analogy.

    7. Re:Star Trek DS9 Was truly superior by orkysoft · · Score: 1

      'Star Trek Voyager' started off slow but ended as one of the better 'Star Trek' spinoffs.

      I thought it was the consensus here that it was the other way round? I'm not sure, since I never saw the last couple of seasons; when they began routinely defeating the Borg, I quit watching. I saw the final episode because I was curious as to how they'd get back, and it really was on par with an average Enterprise episode. I mean, Voyager got in the top 50 and DS9 did not?

      And Futurama on 41? What are they smoking? I'd really like to know, so I can avoid it myself. Not that I smoke, but just on general principles.

      --

      I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
    8. Re:Star Trek DS9 Was truly superior by STrinity · · Score: 1

      Yes, TNG, with its whiney Mary Sue Crusher, didatic dialogue, reliance upon technobabble to create and solve problems, and increasingly toothless villains, is clearly better than DS9.

      --
      Les Miserables Volume 1 now up with my reading of
    9. Re:Star Trek DS9 Was truly superior by STrinity · · Score: 1

      Not to mention every other Star Trek spin-off. Having caught a couple early reruns of TNG recently, I have to wonder how bad SF television was in 1987 to make us think this was the good stuff.

      --
      Les Miserables Volume 1 now up with my reading of
    10. Re:Star Trek DS9 Was truly superior by n3bulous · · Score: 1

      For some really stupid reason I said ST:E. I had meant to say ST:TNG wasn't bad, though slow to start. There was something irking me about my post all through the preview process...

      What's funny is that the same comment can be applied to all of the treks, though I think DS9 was a bit more accessible due to Worf and Colm Meany carrying over from TNG.

      Anyway, I didn't want posterity recording that I liked ST:E.

      --
      "The area of penetration will no doubt be sensitive." ~ Spock
  4. Not only is DS9 not on the list... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But Voyager is... AT #14! What the hell? This list is also heavily dominated by fantasy rather than sci-fi, and if its to include fantasy, there were a lot of better shows not on it.

    1. Re:Not only is DS9 not on the list... by Oracle+of+Bandwidth · · Score: 1

      Putting Voyager on that list, is like putting N'sync on a list of the best opera.

    2. Re:Not only is DS9 not on the list... by TFGeditor · · Score: 1

      I refuse to succomb to the view-more-ads format required to click through all 50 entries, so do not know if the UFO (Harlington-Straker, etc.) series or the original The Outer Limits are on the list. If not, they should be.

      --
      Ignorance is curable, stupid is forever.
    3. Re:Not only is DS9 not on the list... by notthe9 · · Score: 1

      The Outer Limits was. I do not think UFO was.

    4. Re:Not only is DS9 not on the list... by TFGeditor · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Pity. UFO was pretty cool for its time. Intriguing story line, more or less plausible technology, believable aliens. The special effects were grade "B" and the characters sorta thin, but good entertainment nonetheless.

      And some pretty hot babes, too! Sorry, couldn't resist.

      --
      Ignorance is curable, stupid is forever.
  5. Top 50? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have there even been 50 Science Fiction television series on TV?

  6. Flamebait Squared by jpardey · · Score: 5, Funny

    Slashdot is not a place for a reasonable discussion of Sci-Fi shows. This might hurt someone's karma...

    --
    I have freaks! I did something right...
    1. Re:Flamebait Squared by nmb3000 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Flamebait? No, no. Slashdot is the perfect place to post this. In fact, I'd be surprised if the folks at Boston didn't submit it themselves. After all:

      3. Get 50 ad-ridden pages semi-related to scifi posted to a tech site with almost a million readers.
      2. ???
      1. Profit!

      --
      "What do you despise? By this are you truly known." --Princess Irulan, Manual of Muad'Dib
      /)
    2. Re:Flamebait Squared by jangobongo · · Score: 1
      Or not...
      Register for free access to Boston.com
      You now have to register to gain complete, uninterrupted access to Boston.com and our features...
      Guess they didn't want a million readers looking at their ad-free pages. Good thing there still is mirrordot!
      --

      Sig cancelled due to lack of interest
    3. Re:Flamebait Squared by cmacb · · Score: 1

      " Or not...

              Register for free access to Boston.com
              You now have to register to gain complete, uninterrupted access to Boston.com and our features...

      Guess they didn't want a million readers looking at their ad-free pages. Good thing there still is mirrordot! [mirrordot.org]"


      Interesting thing though... I viewed that page several times to double check things and did not get asked for the registration. Only after the third or fourth time. So there is a bit of a bait and switch going on here as I'm sure some of us would have skipped the /. story completely if we knew it pointed to a registration page.

  7. ranking by hungrygrue · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Dr Who was relegated to number 8 while Stargate got number 6?! Something is very wrong with this list.

    1. Re:ranking by justsomebody · · Score: 1

      That's just what I was thinking. SG-1 was good until Season5 after that it only went downhill.

      --
      Signature Pro version 1.13.2-3 release 83.5 beta3try7 after-breakfast edition
    2. Re:ranking by EvilMonkeySlayer · · Score: 3, Informative

      Also, oddly they say it ran from 1963 to 1989...

      Hmmm, you know... I could swear I saw something on BBC 1 called Dr. something a short while back.. I wonder what it could be.

      Also, as a strange side note.. some of the shows they listed can hardly be described as "Sci-Fi", I'd say they thought: "Let's make a top 50 list of the greatest sci-fi shows ever!" and then kinda got bored half-way through and just started adding shows they liked as kids regardless whether they be sci-fi or not.

    3. Re:ranking by ikkonoishi · · Score: 1

      Its just another of those lists that say "Best X of all time." where somehow everything in category X came from some time in the last decade.

      The list should be called "Our favorite X that we can remember seeing clearly", but that is just too long.

    4. Re:ranking by Shivetya · · Score: 1

      Actually the ranking of the new BSG is more telling.

      BSG has proven to be interesting but the writers are stuck on the idea that changing the sex of known characters constitutes "unique" changes. After the premier that "stunt" loses all meaning.

      Frankly Stargate SG:1 is good science fiction, perhaps the best adaptation of any movie to the small screen. Still I would put Dr. Who in the top 3 with Star Trek. Who else to put up there I am not sure, as in there are many candidates for #2. Personal preference and I would put Babylon 5.

      Some of the shows are most definitely not science fiction at all, and they left out a good show that proceeded Space 1999, UFO.

      Also missing, but borderline, is Project Bluebook.

      --
      * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
    5. Re:ranking by Jarlsberg · · Score: 1
      So what? This list doesn't mean anything.

      Dr. Who, Stargate SG-1, Stargate Atlantis and Battlestar Galactica are the finest sci fi shows currently running. That's what matters. Not all those has been-shows from the 40s to the 90s.

    6. Re:ranking by Rew190 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      BSG has proven to be interesting but the writers are stuck on the idea that changing the sex of known characters constitutes "unique" changes. After the premier that "stunt" loses all meaning.

      There is also the possibility that the series is highly rated because it's simply a good show and not because it is completely "unique" from the original.

      The fact that Starbuck used to be a guy doesn't have any impact on that unless you're stuck on the original series. Starbuck being a woman has created some interesting plot points, and the "stunt" you were referring to has only been made a big deal by detractors, not the producers. It has never been a major selling point to watch the show.

      BSG is doing well because it's simply a good, entertaining, and thoughtful show. The end.

    7. Re:ranking by MsGeek · · Score: 4, Insightful

      My complaint is that The Twilight Zone (Original Rod Serling version) was way down the list. That was easily the greatest Speculative Fiction series ever made for TV. Easily. Star Trek: The Original Series and Star Trek: TNG were good series, true, but not as good as Twilight Zone. Some of the greatest SF/Fantasy writers ever wrote for it, and I most emphatically include Rod Serling among their number.

      The Twilight Zone will stand the test of time. It already has since it's a creature of the late 1950s to early 1960s. While so much of what is on the list will be forgotten, it will remain a classic.

      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
    8. Re:ranking by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      I would have to agree with that. More like Dr. Who should have been number 2, with the new BSG and SG-1 farther down the list. I would have kept SG-1 in the top 10 still. It has had it moments and has been on a long time. While the new BSG has had some incredible moments it hasn't been on long enough to rank number 2. Some of that crap isn't even SF ether. Xena? Come on, that isn't SF. Earth the Final Conflict? If it come to making the list the top 49 and keep that crap off of it, it would do it.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    9. Re:ranking by bigbigbison · · Score: 1

      I think the fact that the picture they used for Dr. Who was from the failed Millenium movie and not any of the other doctors says a lot about how much they know about Dr. Who. That was probably the first press picture they found and didn't bother looking for one a little more representative of the series.

      --
      http://www.popularculturegaming.com -- my blog about the culture of videogame players
    10. Re:ranking by Shivetya · · Score: 2, Interesting

      you didn't read closely.

      When Starbuck was presented as a woman that indeed was unique and a good change to make. After listening to the podcast for Pegasus the writers seem to think that it still is original to recast male characters are female characters. The whole story of multiple Boomers, who used to be a male character, also is a great touch because they did something with the character other than changing the sex. The problem that currently exist with the Starbuck character is that it is very little different from the first Starbuck other than sex. It would be nice to see some creativity in regards to the character.

      Strong female characters are needed in Science Fiction. Too often we get bouncing boobs on horses or what boils down to girls on trampolines. BSG comes close to these violations much more this second season as compared to the first.

      Some good strong female characters from science fiction shows.

      Samantha Carter : Stargate SG-1
      Delenn : B5
      Susan Ivanova : B5
      Ensign Ro : ST:DS9
      Captain Janeway : Star Trek Voyager

      --
      * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
    11. Re:ranking by PapayaSF · · Score: 1

      Dr Who was relegated to number 8 while Stargate got number 6?! Something is very wrong with this list.

      My evidence that this list is totally wacky: The Bionic Woman was a better science fiction show than Futurama? In what universe does this writer reside?

      --
      Q: What does the "B." in Benoit B. Mandelbrot stand for? A: Benoit B. Mandelbrot
    12. Re:ranking by Ubergrendle · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That was painful to see, but when Battlestar Galactica (new) after ONE SEASON ranked higher than both is ridiculous in the extreme.

      I loved the old Dr Who, but I can see reasons why you'd give Star Trek or Twilight Zone a leg up. Unfortunately most of what passes for "Sci Fi" nowadays is Space Opera w/ Wild On chicks given scientist roles. IMHO the last decent sci-fi series was the first half of the X-Files... nothing in the past 5+ years has much to do with science at all... is space-fantasy at best.

      Keep in mind this list also includes "Lost", and "Xena Warrior Princess"... not very sci-fi IMHO.

      PS Where's "Max Headroom"? "Probe"? There's _lots_ of short-lived TV series that had more legitimate SF themes.

      --
      John Maynard Keynes: "When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do?"
    13. Re:ranking by XFilesFMDS1013 · · Score: 1

      It has never been a major selling point to watch the show.

      Right....because seeing Starbuck in her sports bar didn't have an effect on anyone. :)

    14. Re:ranking by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1
      seeing Starbuck in her sports bar didn't have an effect on anyone. :)

      Sure. Hey, would you risk asking a gal like that out if you met her in a bar?

      Oh, that's not what you meant...

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    15. Re:ranking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. The Twilight Zone made Sci-Fi TV what it is.

      On an unrelated note: There is no reason on earth to include Dark Angel in this list. It was a horrible, contrived, badly-filmed pile of dog droppings. The only thing that saved it was the makeup. And Andromeda doesn't deserve to be in there at all. Maybe if it gets a bigger budget in the future to cover set design, costumes, makeup, and WRITERS, it will eventually shine.

    16. Re:ranking by DDLKermit007 · · Score: 1

      Andromeda is done...the show is over. The last season just finished. It was a good series though.

    17. Re:ranking by M.+Baranczak · · Score: 1

      Another tip-off: they completely ignore the recent revival of "Dr. Who". Hell, if they didn't like the new series as much, that would have been one thing, but I suspect they'd just never even heard of it. If it's not shown in the US, it doesn't exist.

      Then again, you'd be crazy to expect too much from this sort of 'aticle'. It was probably put together at the last minute by some overworked intern.

    18. Re:ranking by zaax · · Score: 2, Funny

      Exactly it shouldn't be in the list at all.

    19. Re:ranking by rodoke3 · · Score: 1
      That was probably the first press picture they found and didn't bother looking for one a little more representative of the series.
      Of course that's what they did, have you seen the picture they used for Xena: Why Should Anime Nerds have all the Yuri Fun?
      --
      There's nothing like a good gunfight to uplift the spirit--Calvin
    20. Re:ranking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      okay. lost is mystical.
      but all that mysticism is about to be pulled form under their feet.

      it's almost a good a show as x-files.

    21. Re:ranking by Rew190 · · Score: 1

      The problem that currently exist with the Starbuck character is that it is very little different from the first Starbuck other than sex. It would be nice to see some creativity in regards to the character.

      Once again, Starbuck being a guy and having some of the same general traits of the original is only a "problem" if you can't let go of the original series. This has ZERO negative impact on the enjoyability of the new series to someone who never saw or cared that much about the original that something as small as Starbuck could ruin an excellent series such as this.

    22. Re:ranking by aztracker1 · · Score: 1

      Was thinking the same thing in seeing "Lost".. Xena has a bit more cred, but ... Lost is nowhere near scifi..

      --
      Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
  8. That's a lot of series! by Boss+Sauce · · Score: 1

    Seriously-- there can't be 50!?! I'd be impressed if that many were ever made, even with the Sci-Fi channel... maybe non-English ones should be counted? Who can list that many? Pilots don't count... and neither does Mork & Mindy.

    1. Re:That's a lot of series! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh they found 50. You can definitely tell that they were scraping the bottom of the barrel near the end though... Earth Final Conflict? just the thought makes me ill.

    2. Re:That's a lot of series! by gmuslera · · Score: 1
      Probably most of them have as science fiction some extrange device was used, so "must be science fiction", so you have there The Avengers, Batman, Buffy (!), Tales from the crypt (!!!) and a lot more. Not sure if Dick tracy had a serie, but if had, just for the clock ("hey, look! have a tv on the clock!") they would count that as science fiction (wonder why they didnt put Hulk there too)

      For me all Star trek series should had count (i would even put a bit higher Voyager, specially since they started to mess with the Borgs), i think there was a new edition of Twilight zone that they didnt counted neither, and remove series that were clearly fantasy (xena?), terror (buffy), spies (man from uncle, even wild wild west), comedy (3rd rock from the sun, or the not named there mork&mindy or alf), and probably all the superhero kind of series they put there would be apart... science fiction for me is something that is central to the plot and not an excuse to do something extrange.

  9. No Max Headroom? by jdunlevy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Wah??

    1. Re:No Max Headroom? by StarvingSE · · Score: 1

      No kidding... talk about a show that was definately ahead of its time...

      --
      I got nothin'
    2. Re:No Max Headroom? by sTalking_Goat · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Max Headroom would have defenitely gotten my vote. But this list is shit anyway. Voyager is 12 but Firefly is 17? Blasphemey.

      --

      My days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle...

    3. Re:No Max Headroom? by Smallpond · · Score: 1

      Also missing: "The Prisoner"

    4. Re:No Max Headroom? by murdocj · · Score: 1

      Too true... STV shouldn't even make the list (although given that Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea made the list, I guess they weren't too picky), and Firefly has GOT to be in the top 10.

    5. Re:No Max Headroom? by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      > Wah??

      At first I was going to say that Max Headroom only lived for 13 episodes... technicaly two seasons. "Greatest American Hero" while crap at least made it to 40 episodes before being cancled. But going through the list we have things like "That was Then" something that seems similar to "Goodnight Sweetheart" a BBC production where a man in present day finds a doorway to WWII england and is torn between two loves. However "That was Then" only aired two episodes. Logan's Run only aired 14 Episodes from what I read... which is franky a series I was totally unaware of.

      So I can't think of any good reason why Max Headroom was left off this list. If they permited short lived series such as "Logan's Run" and "That was Then" then by every right Max Headroom should be on that list somewhere. Not to speak of Blake's 7.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    6. Re:No Max Headroom? by ettlz · · Score: 1
      I can't think of any good reason why Max Headroom was left off this list.

      Maybe because he now presents BBC World's Click Online ? (Technically sci-fi, but certainly not one of the top fifty.)

    7. Re:No Max Headroom? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even twenty minutes into the future people misspell "definitely" with an "a"?

    8. Re:No Max Headroom? by LWATCDR · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yea That is a crime. They also left out.
      Red Dwarf.
      Blake's Seven.
      Star Cops. I really liked that one from the BBC.
      Both series called Probe. Probe from the 80s was written by Asimov no less. I didn't remember Probe from the 70s until I looked up the one from the 80s. It could be redone today.
      You also had Time Tunnel from the 60s
      I dream of Jeanne! Think about it. It had fantasy, the guy was an Astronaut. It was as much science fiction as say Buffy, or Third Rock. It was also very popular.
      And the almost forgotten Planet of the Apes TV series.
      And of course a HUGE Hit show that seems to be totaly forgotten from the list... Mork and Mindy!

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    9. Re:No Max Headroom? by jonom · · Score: 1

      Not to mention UFO and Kolchak: The Night Stalker!

    10. Re:No Max Headroom? by kevcol · · Score: 1

      They leave out The Prisoner but put in a show clearly inspired from it, Nowhere Man.

      I liked NM, but it wasn't as entertaining as The Prisoner.

    11. Re:No Max Headroom? by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      > And of course a HUGE Hit show that seems to be totaly forgotten from the list... Mork and
      > Mindy!

      Mork and Mindy IIRC uses some a scene from Logan's Run... the futeristic city except adding egg transport. Nano Nano. (-1 point for remembering this detail)

      I would rank M&M as more a sitcom than sci-fi. Technicaly a spin off from Happy Days only because Mork was a character that made an appearance from time to time.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    12. Re:No Max Headroom? by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1

      I don't know about Star Cops. That's one amazingly boring show. I'll give it points for a certain amount of realism, jumpsuits aside, but it's really dull.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    13. Re:No Max Headroom? by captjc · · Score: 1

      Buffy, I can understand as Sci-Fi; but all the Superhero shows on the list, really shouldn't count as Scifi. Personally I think that superhero shows are their own genre (yes, even though some involve Scifi elements). Max Headroom should have been on the list. Greatest American Hero and Logans Run (the Series) both sucked.

      --
      Slow Down Cowboy! It's been 1 hour, 47 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment
    14. Re:No Max Headroom? by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      ANY top Scifi list that puts Voyager ahead of DS9 is suspect, especially when DS9 isn't even on the list. 7 years, solid ratings, consistant cast throughout, and they quit instead of being cancelled. They even put Voyager ahead of Lost in Space (campy or not, it was a great show!)

      I have read about half the list, and already figured its a hack list by someone who is reading someone elses notes, and hasn't actually watched a lot of scifi.

      And they ranked Futurama 41, behind all kinds of crap. Jeez.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    15. Re:No Max Headroom? by AttillaTheNun · · Score: 1

      What about Alf? At least as relevant as 3rd Rock. I hated both shows, so it makes no difference to me.
      I do agree, however, that Battlestar Galactica (new season) contains some of the best writing of any genre on TV.

    16. Re:No Max Headroom? by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      And 3rd Rock was not a sitcom? Can you not have a Sci-Fi Sitcomm?
      BTW Happy Days was technicaly a spin off of Love American Style:)

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    17. Re:No Max Headroom? by redanzl · · Score: 1

      Speaking of characters who make occasional appearances, what about the Great Gazoo on The Flintstones?

      As long as we're including My Favorite Martian in the list...

      --
      I'm gonna do what I want and I'm gonna get paid -- Tom Waits
    18. Re:No Max Headroom? by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 1

      "You also had Time Tunnel from the 60s"

      Time Tunnel sucked....just as the *update* from the SciFi Channel next season will also suck. And when I say *update* I mean "hey, us SciFi Channel executives are too cheap to bring the good Doctor Who to the States so let's resurrect a turkey product sitting on the Universal shelves and see if we can jump on the time travel bandwagon amongst scifi fans!"

      I was happy with Doctor Who's high ranking - albeit without mentioning the current season - but some of those shows on that list have no business being on it. And I mean Andromeda, Stargate SG-1, Stargate Atlantis, and Earth: Final Conflict. And to have the X-Files on the list but exclude Kolchak the Night Stalker is beyond wrong.

      --
      "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
    19. Re:No Max Headroom? by wlvdc · · Score: 1
      Shock

      But this is a limited list based on tv and web marketing in the US. Non-english series never shown in the US are ofcourse missing, such as SPACE PATROL - The fantastic adventures of the starship ORION. The german series (14) Raumpatrouille. Die phantastische Abenteuer des Raumschiffes ORION first broadcasted in 1966, but were never shown in the US or the UK. I guess it was too soon after WWII...

      After the Thunderbirds, this was the second scifi tv series one could watch in the Netherlands. Would be great to see a more international list with entries from East-Europe, Japan?

      --
      -- Neminem laede, immo omnes, quantum potes, iuva.
    20. Re:No Max Headroom? by Cybrex · · Score: 1

      I completely agree with you on all counts! Max certainly deserves to be on the list, and probably in the top 25.

      I can accept their rationale at putting the original Star Trek at the #1 spot by virtue of its impact on everything that came after it, but in my book Firefly and the new Battlestar Galactica would be pretty much evenly matched for the #2 spot.

      --
      Boundless Expansion, Self-Transformation, Dynamic Optimism, Intelligent Technology, Spontaneous Order- BEST DO IT SO!
    21. Re:No Max Headroom? by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Doctor Who is an unfunny joke. Mugging is not acting.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  10. Moore's still up there. by feyhunde · · Score: 2, Insightful
    They do screw up by leaving out DS9. However BSG is #2 and they comment along the lines that it would be #1 if it wasn't new.

    Moore's better baby did pretty damn well.

    --
    I'd say more, but my guild is raiding.
    1. Re:Moore's still up there. by Viper+Daimao · · Score: 1

      Speaking of new BSG, did you see last nights episode? My god it was disturbing. That one is gonna be with me for awhile.

      Somewhat offtopic I know, but damn, thats how much it disturbed me.

      --
      "In the game of life, someone always has to lose. To me, if life were fair, that someone would always be Oklahoma." -DKR
  11. Um, hello by scolby · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There are better sci fi shows than Farscape, but there aren't 50 sci fi shows better than Farscape. What a horrible omission from that list.

    1. Re:Um, hello by Klivian · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Totally agree, Farscape are a definite top ten. The list is plainly flawed, lacking both Farscape and Red Dwarf.

    2. Re:Um, hello by motorhead · · Score: 0

      Exactly correct. Even LEXX was better than some of those listed.

      --
      Employee Of the Month - Cyberdyne Systems Corporation - September 1997
    3. Re:Um, hello by pcgamez · · Score: 1

      "Exactly correct. Even LEXX was better than some of those listed."

      Wow, that's harsh!

    4. Re:Um, hello by GroovyChk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No doubt! I kept expecting to see Farscape - then I got to the top five and thought wow - they gave it proper credit - then boom - no Farscape. WTF?

      --
      Ginny Keller
    5. Re:Um, hello by Braedley · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Didn't even notice that. Farscape deffinately should be there. And whats with the fantasy and super hero shows? If they're gonna include them, they should say so.

    6. Re:Um, hello by pinkocommie · · Score: 1

      And including Xena? wtf? whats scientific about it?

    7. Re:Um, hello by blagger99 · · Score: 1

      Wrong! There are no better sci-fi shows than Farscape. Farscape rules.

    8. Re:Um, hello by Jahndar · · Score: 1

      yeah, I raised an eyebrow when I got to Xeno. I consider that more fantasy than sci-fi, but I understand some people don't see a distinction.

    9. Re:Um, hello by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That, and Blake's 7. But the Jetson's show up at 25, so clearly somebody knows science-fiction TV better than us. :)

    10. Re:Um, hello by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get f**king real! Farscape!?!?!? hat piece of s**t should never have been made - it was done better the first time when it was called MUPPETS IN SPACE.

      Farscape is one show they were absolutely 100% correct in omitting... same for DS9 (by FAR the worst "Trek" show ever made, though it's pretty much an insult to Trek to call it so).

      The big question... why was Firefly so far down the list at #17!?!?!?

  12. I'm not sure of the list either. by DarkBlackFox · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Come on, they put the Thunderbirds in front of Futurama... That's just wrong.

    1. Re:I'm not sure of the list either. by Elad+Alon · · Score: 1

      You're right - compared to Star Trek and the other shows, Thunder Cats and Futurama are just way too realistic to be considered sci-fi.

      --
      News for merdes. Shit that matters.
      Ask me about my sig.
    2. Re:I'm not sure of the list either. by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      Earth: final conflict at 50?

      It deserved better than that... well the first series did. Let's forget about the later series shall we...

    3. Re:I'm not sure of the list either. by nath_de · · Score: 1

      And then they tell that it centers around Boone while they show a picture of Liam...

    4. Re:I'm not sure of the list either. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Earth Final Conflict had a much stronger plot then a lot of shows. There were many episodes that built on previous ones, however many were complete stories. It seemed to tell a very intriguing story as to what might happen if a group of technologically superior aliens came to earth for their own purposes. The first season to me was the best, but even the second and third were okay. The fourth was a bit iffy and I thought the fifth stunk. But some people worshipping the aliens, the Talons appearing to solve earth's problems but using their "solutions" for their own purposes. And the aliens who seem godlike having their own problems. The show to me seemed to have a much better plot than many other scifi shows on that list. Personally, I liked it better than Star Trek any day.

      It was a very accurate portrayal at first of what would happen. Most people wouldn't care at having all of their problems solved. A few would form a resistance, not trusting anyone. And everyone has their own motives, alien, human, etc.

    5. Re:I'm not sure of the list either. by CheshireCatCO · · Score: 1

      Crud, they put The Jetson's in front of Futurama. That cartoon is as much SciFi as The Flinstones is historical fiction. And it certainly NOT a better show (on any grounds: humor, sci-fi, story-telling, art, whatever) than Futurama.

  13. Space Above and Beyond by vspazv · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It only lasted a single season but I really liked Space, Above and Beyond.

    1. Re:Space Above and Beyond by Ikn · · Score: 1

      Yes! Finally another fan! I thought I was the only person alive that even remember that show, I really loved it. A while ago I was lucky enough to track down a torrent with good-quality rips of the whole season.

      --
      I know nothing
    2. Re:Space Above and Beyond by BigDork1001 · · Score: 1
      Well good news for all S:AaB fans. It's coming out on DVD November 8th! I had been surprised for a long time that in the rust to put every series known to man out on DVD this one hadn't hit the store shelves yet but I guess I can now pick it up.

      http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/B000 BCCAEQ/qid=1127591698/sr=8-1/ref=pd_bbs_1/103-9849 798-1419844?v=glance&s=dvd&n=507846

      --
      "Armed forces abroad are of little value unless there is prudent counsel at home" - Cicero
    3. Re:Space Above and Beyond by Monkelectric · · Score: 1

      Coming out on DVD nov 8th? Best buy has had it for over a month. Maybe it was a special promo ...

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    4. Re:Space Above and Beyond by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, and it's not even on the list.

      This list is stupid anyway. Andromeda?! Earth Final Conflict?! LOL, those should not even be on a top 100 list. Xena??!! "Lost"?? WTF... who made this list?

      The only thing I agree with on this list is the new Battlestar Galactica should definitely go down as one of the best ever. Oh and Farscape is not on the list which is OK with me (although I guess it would be in the 50 list somewhere; hell I didn't even know 50 sci-fi shows had even been on TV).

    5. Re:Space Above and Beyond by BigDork1001 · · Score: 1

      I'm stationed overseas, I haven't set foot in a BestBuy in over 3 years. I do all my shopping over the Internet.

      --
      "Armed forces abroad are of little value unless there is prudent counsel at home" - Cicero
    6. Re:Space Above and Beyond by Shelled · · Score: 1

      It had the misfortune of appearing in that period when the airwaves were being Chris Carter-ed to death and slipped away unnoticed. Too bad, had a lot of promise: tightly written scripts, young cast of decent talent, no cheap and lazy 'holodeck' plot contrivances.

    7. Re:Space Above and Beyond by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      "no cheap and lazy 'holodeck' plot contrivances"
      Well you had space ships with wings that banked like airplanes, I do not remember how they solved that whole FTL thing. And if I remember right they often had the fighter jocks land there space planes and become ground pounders.
      It may have been enjoyable but no cheap and lazy contrivances???

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    8. Re:Space Above and Beyond by rabel · · Score: 1

      I really liked that show too, until they went all "faith" and Christian in their "River of Stars" episode with that comet. They lost me with that one.

    9. Re:Space Above and Beyond by Coryoth · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I have to agree. As someone else said of Farscape, there are better SF shows, but there certainly aren't 50 of them! How it could be left off (along with Farscape and Red Dwarf apparently) is a mystery to me. Sure, it started poorly, but the last 2/3rds of the season were great. It had a lot more darkness and grit than many SF shows.

      Also a little cnfusing is that while they managed to pick up Nowhere Man (which was a surprisingly good show all things considered) they somehow neglected The Prisoner (to which Nowhere Man owes a great deal).

      And how exactly does Firefly finish behind Voyager and Xena?

      Seems like a real slap dash hodge podge to me.

      Jedidiah.

    10. Re:Space Above and Beyond by tqft · · Score: 1

      Best link I have found for SAAB

      http://web-worthy.com/saab/

      If it isn't there - it there the msgboard and links will answer your question

      --
      The Singularity is closer than you think
      Quant
    11. Re:Space Above and Beyond by ParadoxicalPostulate · · Score: 2, Interesting

      SAAB was definitely one of the more promising Sci-Fi shows around.

      It was mature in that there were no ridiculous alien species and warfare was very much a serious business - there was less reliance on rely on flashy special effects and cool guns or technobabble and more focus on conflict and tragic destruction. I remember vaguely the episode "Abandon All Hope" where

      It was human in that the main characters were flawed in ways that were fundamental and related to their scarred past. It wasn't the sort of cheap comical character flaws (Roddney McKay in SG:A) which provide for briefly interesting/amusing plot elements but ultimately fail to make up a significant and serious part of the character. In SAAB, these people were struggling with inner demons on a daily (or episodic) basis, and they often made mistakes. The human race as a whole made many mistakes (the AIs, In-Vitros, Season 1 finale) which made viewers question themselves as human beings.

      Space: Above and Beyond was mature, it was human, and it was classic in its grittiness. It reminds me of my favorite show of all time, the new Battlestar Galactica, which is at the moment enjoying immense success. Honestly, now that I think about it, I'm led to wonder why SAAB didn't get the same reception. Sure, BSG is far removed in quality from anything we've ever seen before - but SAAB almost shares a cousin-like resemblence to it, at least to my mind.

    12. Re:Space Above and Beyond by ilyaaohell · · Score: 2, Informative

      Wrong. This is the best SAAB website: http://www.cyberpursuits.com/heckifiknow/saab/defa ult.asp They have one of the finest Multimedia sections I've ever seen for any show. Full downloads of the entire soundtrack, a HUNDRED video clips... this is just a motherload of content. This show is everything that the new Battlestar Galactica is (#2 on their list). SAAB was truly ahead of it's time with it's long story arc, outstanding characters you really cared for, fantastic special effects, a realistic, gritty feel, and so many of the episodes were written like award-winning sci-fi short stories. Great, great show.

      --
      UNIX: A computer user is defined as a programmer. WINDOWS: A computer user is defined as a consumer.
    13. Re:Space Above and Beyond by Shelled · · Score: 1

      You missed the word "plot" between "lazy" and "contrivances". To rephrase it: Worf and his kid in cowboy duds.

    14. Re:Space Above and Beyond by JackRuby43 · · Score: 1

      Best Buy had dibs on a special limited release prior to November 8th. I've had it for a week and I'm about halfway through the series....damn shame it got cancelled.

    15. Re:Space Above and Beyond by khallow · · Score: 1
      had the fighter jocks land there space planes and become ground pounders.

      In a sense, this was even worse than the science violations (we'll beating a horse that died sometime around 1950 here). But I forgive them.

    16. Re:Space Above and Beyond by Coryoth · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "no cheap and lazy 'holodeck' plot contrivances"
      Well you had space ships with wings that banked like airplanes, I do not remember how they solved that whole FTL thing. And if I remember right they often had the fighter jocks land there space planes and become ground pounders.
      It may have been enjoyable but no cheap and lazy contrivances?


      Less than a lot of shows. It compares pretty well to the new BSG actually. The ships actually had control jets front and back (similar to BSG) and while they did have a tendency to do too much airplane style maneuvering, they did at least have some acknowledgement of the sorts of control systems required. They solved the whole FTL thing the same way everyone else does - they cheated and had some sort of hyperspace "jump". Find me an SF TV show that has some careful considered and well explained FTL system. And as for the last point - they were supposed to be "marines" thus mixing space and land combat - it's not an entirely unreasonable suggestion and, for instance, BSG does much the same thing: the pilots often find themselves acting and land troops.

      Which is not to say it wasn't without plot contrivances, but they weren't of the "cheap lazy" form that all the holodeck and alternate dimension adn so on episodes of Trek.

      Jedidiah.

    17. Re:Space Above and Beyond by SpacePunk · · Score: 1

      "And how exactly does Firefly finish behind Voyager and Xena?"

      How exactly does Firefly finish at all? It's just a western.

    18. Re:Space Above and Beyond by NoMaster · · Score: 1

      OK, so even assuming it's just a western, you'd have to admit it's a good western. Much deeper than the average 40's-70's western. More "Pale Rider" than anything starring Randolph Scott or the Duke.

      But if you want to ignore that level of things, try explaining why BSG isn't just a souped-up version of "The Fugitive", or any of the 100's of other "running away, nearly caught, then escape just in time for the end of the episode" plotlines. Just substitute the 13th Colony / Earth for a one-armed man...

      Beyond that, you're getting into "hard" vs "soft" SciFi territory. And, lets face it, hard SciFi where the technology is the point of the story just doesn't work in the visual medium - it needs to be read, so your mind and imagination can digest, discover, and consider the implications. It just doesn't work when it's 42 minutes @ 25fps, or even 120 minutes @ 24fps...

      --
      What part of "a well regulated militia" do you not understand?
    19. Re:Space Above and Beyond by GileadGreene · · Score: 1

      "The Wild Wild West" made the list...

    20. Re:Space Above and Beyond by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      "And as for the last point - they were supposed to be "marines" thus mixing space and land combat - it's not an entirely unreasonable suggestion and, for instance, BSG does much the same thing: the pilots often find themselves acting and land troops."
      You see i disagree. I do have some issues with BSG using pilots as snipers ands such. It can be explained away in a few ways. 1. They are kind of all the military that is left. And they are not from this planet. Frankly Space Above and Beyond was what I considered more or less typical space war thing 90's style. The enemy was misunderstood the government was under handed and sneaky.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    21. Re:Space Above and Beyond by SpacePunk · · Score: 1

      "Beyond that, you're getting into "hard" vs "soft" SciFi territory. And, lets face it, hard SciFi where the technology is the point of the story just doesn't work in the visual medium - it needs to be read, so your mind and imagination can digest, discover, and consider the implications. It just doesn't work when it's 42 minutes @ 25fps, or even 120 minutes @ 24fps..."

      Hard sci-fi isn't particularly about technology, but yeah, it would be hard to get a deep person/event/things into 42 minutes.

      but, just because someone takes Gunsmoke, and throws some spaceships into the show doesn't necessarily make it sci-fi.

      But, the list is full of shit like Xena (fantasy), Dark Angel (detective/police/fugitive), etc... In most that aren't pure sci-fi, there is just the smallest, most tenuous, link to science fiction.

    22. Re:Space Above and Beyond by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's Xena doing there at all?

      Much of the data on the shows is faulty and as for the list itself, well its from Boston, what else is there to say.

    23. Re:Space Above and Beyond by Tatarize · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Agreed, that was a little stupid. They had a few other references that were just out of the way. As a general rule of sci-fi, you don't make any references to religion (unless it's an alien religion). But, SAAB was a good show, in fact, I think episode 17 "Sugar Dirt" was the best episode of any scifi show ever.

      --

      It is no longer uncommon to be uncommon.
    24. Re:Space Above and Beyond by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 1

      "Also a little cnfusing is that while they managed to pick up Nowhere Man (which was a surprisingly good show all things considered) they somehow neglected The Prisoner (to which Nowhere Man owes a great deal)."

      Just as they hoisted Firefly onto the list without its inspirations known as Blake's 7 and Cowboy Bebop. Or the X-Files without Kolchak the Night Stalker.

      --
      "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
    25. Re:Space Above and Beyond by wakdjunkaga · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Yes, it does seem odd that Space Above and Beyond (or Star Trek:Deep Space 9, for that matter) aren't on The Boston Globe's reviewer's radars, yet shows which have no to little Sci-Fi content (Buffy, Xena, Tales from the Crypt ... mostly fantasy, horror, and occult themes) are.

      Sci-Fi, after all, means Science Fiction - a genre considering the implications of science (both by extending known physical laws, and speculating what would happen under a different set of physical laws) upon individuals and society at large.

      Space Above and Beyond closely matches, to my mind at least, a vision of Science Fiction compatible to that posited by masters of the 'golden age' - Asimov, Heinlein, A.C. Clarke, Bradbury, et al., and did a good job of exploring that realm. Too bad it was produced for only one season.

      It is interesting to note that ten percent of the listed series (five of fifty) have strong linkage back to Gene Roddenbury's vision - the three Star Trek series, as well as Earth Final Conflict and Andromeda.

    26. Re:Space Above and Beyond by Kelson · · Score: 1

      just because someone takes Gunsmoke, and throws some spaceships into the show doesn't necessarily make it sci-fi.

      Hmm, did Gunsmoke have a secret government plot in which people were experimenting on human subjects' brains in order to create a telepath and/or telekinetic?

    27. Re:Space Above and Beyond by william_w_bush · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Wow, food for thought indeed.

      I see that resemblence, but in a way BSG has more hope, there is more room for "gee what if". SAAB had a relatively confined, military story, just soldiers trying to get through the war. BSG (not counting pegasus) was dark, but every episode tried to give you hope that, even though your race was killed in a horrific nuclear holocaust, and you were running from an inplacable foe with little or no resources, things were kinda looking up.

      That said I still love SAAB more than any series till BSG, but they were short on plot points and heavy on character development, which is great, but not exactly what people tune into sci-fi for (laser guns going
      "pyoo-pyoo!", big explosions, fast ships, and klingon boobs?)

      It was a bit too real, and seriously depressing, but a great show, sigh.

      --
      The first rule of USENET is you do not talk about USENET.
  14. The sad truth is, by Elad+Alon · · Score: 1

    I don't think I could name 50 sci-fi TV shows I'd call "good". Sure, there are some I'd call great, but 50 good ones? Most of them are an inch from green monsters from Mars and space-whores. I'll let you guys guess an inch in which direction that is.

    --
    News for merdes. Shit that matters.
    Ask me about my sig.
  15. I call shenanigans... by negative3 · · Score: 0

    They don't even have "Kolchak the Night Stalker"? "Xena" rates higher than the original "The Outer Limits" (among numerous others)? They don't even include the new "Battlestar Galactica"?

    --
    "Physics is to math what sex is to masturbation." - Richard Feynman
    1. Re:I call shenanigans... by bryce1012 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Um, they ranked the new BSG #2.

    2. Re:I call shenanigans... by republican+gourd · · Score: 1

      New Battlestar is #2, second only to Star Trek: TOS.

    3. Re:I call shenanigans... by SlayerDave · · Score: 1
      They don't even include the new "Battlestar Galactica"?

      RTFA. The new Battlestar Galactica came in #2, behind only the original Star Trek.

    4. Re:I call shenanigans... by Rialtus · · Score: 1

      The new BSG is at #2.

    5. Re:I call shenanigans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They do include the new BSG. It's ranked #2.

    6. Re:I call shenanigans... by anethema · · Score: 1

      Hey, any idea when the next season is coming out ?

      --


      It's easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.
    7. Re:I call shenanigans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      January

    8. Re:I call shenanigans... by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Um, they ranked the new #2 at BSG.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    9. Re:I call shenanigans... by sydres · · Score: 1

      next season

  16. MST 3K! by pin_gween · · Score: 1

    Doesn't get much better than a show with smart ass comments about others.

    Exactly what we all do in life

    Hell, now I have to log onto /. to get my fill

    --
    Ignorance is not a crime; neither should it be a way of life

    Congress control $ = inmates run the asylum
    1. Re:MST 3K! by ikkonoishi · · Score: 1

      Except, I never did understand how they mangaged to eat and breathe.

      I guess its just a show, and I should really just relax.

    2. Re:MST 3K! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm personally still wondering about the "other science facts."

  17. Hmm not my top 50 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where was Space: Above and Beyond?

  18. Science Fiction? by Dionysus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They have a pretty weird definition of science fiction. I mean, The Man from U.N.C.L.E.? Mystery Science Theater 3000? Tales from the Crypt? Avengers? Batman? Buffy? Why not Friends while you're at it? I mean, a New York without any colored people?

    --
    Je ne parle pas francais.
    1. Re:Science Fiction? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I mean, a New York without any colored people?

      What color where you expecting?

    2. Re:Science Fiction? by unapersson · · Score: 2, Informative

      Unless you have a particularly narrow definition of Science Fiction, most of those fit. For example, The Avengers had invading plants from space, killer robots etc. How can you not call it Science Fiction?

    3. Re:Science Fiction? by Red+Flayer · · Score: 4, Informative

      " They have a pretty weird definition of science fiction"

      The media industry, in deciding what genre a show is, can't slice the pie too fine, or the definitions become useless. They are more likely to define the genres according to audience, since that's what advertisers want to see. So, no Horror-fantasy, Horror, High Fantasy, or Historical Fantasy genre labels for us.

      Given that the media industry has so much influence on public perception of things, is it surprising that people slowly change how they label things to fit the media labels?

      From http://encyclopedia.laborlawtalk.com/Science_ficti on_on_television:

      "There is some ambiguity as to what exactly "science fiction" covers in terms of television. In recent years, the term has come to cover any programme that deals in the fantastical or even merely the horrific, such as Buffy the Vampire Slayer, Charmed or Angel. More accurately these programmes are not science fiction as they don't involve any real scientific element, and are perhaps more comfortably covered under the generic term "telefantasy"."

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
  19. Buffy? by oxymor00n · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Buffy the vampire (s)layer a sci-fi-show? I suspect they pulled this list out of their ass..

    1. Re:Buffy? by oxymor00n · · Score: 1

      And while I'm at it, they also "forgot" ReGenesis, a great show IMHO.

    2. Re:Buffy? by Slow+Smurf · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Did you miss Xena? I didn't read the entire list.

      Though in their defense, Xena had at least one episode about cloning in modern times. On a similar note, Buffy had the occasional episode that could qualify equally well as science fiction(Robot buffy, the Internet using robot in season 1, etc). Neither were.

  20. Science Fiction?!! by nebaz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm sorry, and I'm sure this is beating a dead horse, but Superman, Batman, Buffy the Vampire Slayer, et als. are not SCIENCE FICTION. Granted, there may be a correlation between the viewership of said shows, but these shows don't even pretend to be futuristic, or contain a science element at all. Batman, maybe, but I hate it when people lump these things all under the "sci fi" umbrella. This is why we have all this horror shlock on the Sci-Fi channel and things like Farscape get cancelled.

    --
    Rhymes that keep their secrets will unfold behind the clouds.There upon the rainbow is the answer to a neverending story
    1. Re:Science Fiction?!! by starling · · Score: 1

      Yes they bloody well are science-fiction. They might not be your preferred type of science fiction but that's neither here nor there.

      Let's see: Superman has aliens; Batman relies on high tech gadgets; Buffy is edging out to using magic, but then "any significantly advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic".

      There's more to science fiction than just space opera.

    2. Re:Science Fiction?!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Using your magic == significantly advanced technology analogy, we can go a bit further and say technology == magic == supernatural. This is why, one one poll, the top rated "sci fi" show at one time was "Touched By an Angel". Is that sci fi?

    3. Re:Science Fiction?!! by Raul654 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sorry, but when you are talking about blood sucking vampires (Buffy et al), you've left the realm of Science Fiction and entered fantasy.

      --


      To make laws that man cannot, and will not obey, serves to bring all law into contempt.
      --E.C. Stanton
    4. Re:Science Fiction?!! by Kohath · · Score: 1

      This is why we have all this horror shlock on the Sci-Fi channel

      Tonight, I think they're showing an original movie about a giant animal attacking people. I think it's a giant killer squirrel this time.

    5. Re:Science Fiction?!! by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Aliens don't make science fiction.

      Science fiction needs two elements - *science* and *fiction*. Everything else is just fluff.

      Superman and Buffy have no science elements. They are merely fiction.

    6. Re:Science Fiction?!! by mcelrath · · Score: 1
      Speaking of Farscape, WHERE THE HELL IS FARSCAPE?!?!? IMHO possibly the best science fiction ever made, and it's not even in the list. I think it's better than Babylon 5 (number 5), comparable to the new Battlestar Galactica (number 2 -- good show BTW that show is excellent -- yesterday's episode was fantastic).

      Another glaring omission is The Prisoner. But Stargate Atlantis and Star Trek Voyager need to be dropped off the bottom of the list. Just about everything below it is better than them.

      -- Bob (IMHO)

      --
      1^2=1; (-1)^2=1; 1^2=(-1)^2; 1=-1; 1=0.
    7. Re:Science Fiction?!! by Shelled · · Score: 1
      "Batman relies on high tech gadgets.."

      So do James Bond and Maxwell Smart.

    8. Re:Science Fiction?!! by po8 · · Score: 1

      What exactly are you saying about the science-fiction content of #9, Mystery Science Theater 3000? How could it have robots and not be a Sci-Fi show? I'm not getting it; was there more to it than that?

      At least Dr. Who is...wait for it...#8. Obviously neither of these shows rises to the all time caliber of our #2 winner...the new Battlestar Galactica series. (They say they almost picked it #1 over original Trek. Not that it's not a great show, but really...)

      Recipe for a media troll: Collect a list of some vaguely homogenous and beloved kind, and assign some kind of vague ratings to each item. Then shuffle weighted-randomly, throw the ratings away, and publish as the definitive rank-ordered list. Hilarity ensues.

    9. Re:Science Fiction?!! by Boing · · Score: 1
      I can't attest for the comic book shows, but Buffy incorporated Sci-Fi storylines. I don't know if you would count that as making it a "sci-fi show", but as you may have noticed they're not using your definition anyway.

      ***SPOILERS***

      There was the season when human, demon, and robot components were being used to make a cyborg supersoldier who went Frankenstein-monster on the town. There was the lifelike android of Buffy that took her place after she died, to fool the demon world into thinking they were still threatened by a slayer. There was also a John Ritterbot that tried to put the moves on Buffy's mom. There was a team of nerds who tried to become supervillians using a combination of science and the occult throughout the sixth season.

      Basically, seasons four and six were fantasy/sci-fi with about an equal emphasis, whereas all the other seasons were fantasy with an occasional garnish of sci-fi.

    10. Re:Science Fiction?!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Startrek doesn't feature any science either.

    11. Re:Science Fiction?!! by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Strange but Superman often had some "science" plot devices. Buffy I will have to give you as Fantasy

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    12. Re:Science Fiction?!! by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      Startrek doesn't feature any science either.

      Kirk: Scotty we need power now
      Scotty: I'm givin' her all she's got captain
      Kirk: Damn it that's got good enough
      Scotty: Aye... I'll reverse the polarity. Give me an hour
      Kirk: We don't have an hour we have 5 minutes
      Scotty: You can't change the laws of physics
      Kirk: Scotty, reverse the polarity!
      Scotty: Aye sir.
      Ship: Bing bang buzz beep zoom
      Kirty: Scotty your a miracle worker
      Scotty: Aye sir... the stupid sod doesn't know I always increase my estimates by a factor of 10
      Kirk: What was that?
      Scotty: Nothing sir... Scotty out.

      Standard epiloge where spock shakes his head and walks away.
      Credits

      (font lost in space)Next week... Scotty reverses the polarity... with wacky consequences. Spock shakes his head and walks away.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    13. Re:Science Fiction?!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the evil nerds where great !
      Quoting Star Wars, Trek, Dragonball Z, ....

      So funny.

    14. Re:Science Fiction?!! by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Science fiction needs two elements - *science* and *fiction*. Everything else is just fluff."

      Are we really going to be this nitpicky about TV Shows made for mass audiences? I wouldn't mind if we were talking about novels, but TV is such a different animal. All a show has to do is have space ships in it and that'll dramatically affect what types of people watch it. It doesn't matter if those ships are simply a setting that could easily be replaced with modern airplanes, it won't make a difference to those watching it. I cannot, for example, get my gf to watch BSG2005. She can't get me to watch Big Brother. Why? Niether of us feels comfortable with the settings of those shows. Is it shallow? Perhaps. But it's true.

      This is why I've always been annoyed at the "Star Wars isn't scifi!" argument. It's not because I'm defending those movies (actually, I despised the prequals), it's because it's scifi setting is what is attracting and repelling audiences. Sure, you could translate the stories into modern day settings and they wouldn't be any better, but at least they'd have a different audience giving it another shot.

      It just seems so pointless to fling karma around for getting into the minutia over what to categorize shows/movies we don't like.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    15. Re:Science Fiction?!! by starling · · Score: 1

      Oh come off it. Superman was sent to earth on a spaceship from a doomed planet - sounds like science fiction to me.

    16. Re:Science Fiction?!! by starling · · Score: 1

      Yep. They're getting into science fiction territory too - as is Mission Impossible.

    17. Re:Science Fiction?!! by starling · · Score: 1

      I can't take the credit for the analogy. It's one of Arthur C. Clarke's, and I reckon he's as good an authority as any when it comes to discussing science fiction.

    18. Re:Science Fiction?!! by Savantissimo · · Score: 1

      It was about cheap puppets making sarcastic comments about bad movies, thus selling ad time for movies that ordinarily would have required the Clockwork Orange conditioning chair to get people to watch. Calling them robots had nothing to do with the show's brilliant idea of flogging crap by making fun of old crap.

      --
      "Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?" - Patrick Henry
    19. Re:Science Fiction?!! by Gigs · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, and I'm sure this is beating a dead horse, but Superman, Batman, Buffy the Vampire Slayer, et als. are not SCIENCE FICTION.

      "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."
      Arthur C. Clarke, "Profiles of The Future", 1961 (Clarke's third law)

    20. Re:Science Fiction?!! by po8 · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I guess I should have used a sarcasm tag in my first paragraph. Thanks, though, for the summary!

    21. Re:Science Fiction?!! by Kafir · · Score: 1

      You obviously haven't read Richard Matheson's I Am Legend --excellent book about a plague that causes symptoms much like traditional vampirism. Basically a horror novel with an SF background, but certainly no less plausible than the average Star Trek episode.

      No argument about Buffy, though.

    22. Re:Science Fiction?!! by dvk · · Score: 1

      > This is why we have all this horror shlock on the Sci-Fi channel and things like Farscape get cancelled.

      Uhm... NO.

      You get the above outcome because:
      1) Sci-Fi channel, like ALL other non-premium channels, is in the business of selling ad space to advertisers.
      2) For whatever reason, there's either a fact or perception that "all this horror shlock" - or my pet peeve, "monster movies" - provide better return on investment to advertisers (due to amount of people who watch them and/or due to the way the viewers respond to ads and/or other reasons).
      3) Therefore, the shows which advertisers pay more to place ads on will win (e.g. Sci-Fi-channellesque crap), and shows like FireFly lose.

      It's all very simple economics, stupid, to paraphrase that cheating jerk.

      And if YOU don't like it, go produce better shows yourself, and market them to people like you. Worked for some people (Kevin Smith).

      --
      "The right to figure things out for yourself is the only true freedom everyone shares. Go use it"-R.A.Heinlein
    23. Re:Science Fiction?!! by tricorn · · Score: 1

      Science fiction and fantasy blend into each other quite a ways. For me, SF is based on taking a premise and following it out to see the results. The premise can be based on current science and future technology, or can be based on alternate science. Buffy did a pretty good job of making, then following, rules for vampires and demons and magic. For that matter, so did (does) Charmed. I don't see how postulating the existence of, say, telepathy and pyscho-kinesis and teleportation (whether with transporters or quantum leaps), is any more "sciencey" than going with the existence of vampires and demons and magic and hell mouths and such. Why would Q be "science fiction" and Angel be "fantasy"?

    24. Re:Science Fiction?!! by mrbooze · · Score: 1

      It's worth noting that the actual article is labelled as the top *Sci-Fi* shows of all time, not the top "Science Fiction". Sci-Fi is long established industry shorthand for "Science Fiction and Fantasy".

  21. No Lexx? by satanami69 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The top ten of this list I can agree with. Lost isn't even close to sci-fi, but man, how do you leave off Lexx from this list? Nothing grabbed my attention(and made me cover myself with a pillow) more than that show did.

    --
    I really hate Dan Patrick.
    1. Re:No Lexx? by ettlz · · Score: 1
      Nothing ... (... made me cover myself with a pillow) more than [Lexx] did.

      Er... which part of yourself — no, never mind.

    2. Re:No Lexx? by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1
      (and made me cover myself with a pillow) more than that show did.

      And just what were you trying to hide?

      --
      "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    3. Re:No Lexx? by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      I'll never look at a carrot the same way again after watching that.

      And it wouldn't be my head I'd be covering with a pillow either...

    4. Re:No Lexx? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I entirely agree. While the subsequent seasons were somewhat repetitive (and low-budget) the first mini-series was terrifying and insanely awesome.

    5. Re:No Lexx? by Freexe · · Score: 1

      I loved Lexx, it kept me going (along with V) during my insomnia period (they used to show Lexx at 4am on Channel 5 [uk]).

      --
      "In a time of universal deceit - telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell
    6. Re:No Lexx? by anticypher · · Score: 2, Informative

      If they just hadn't made that fourth season, Lexx might have made the list. The first season's four movies were great, showing the result of the four creators fleshing out their story, characters, CGI artwork, and background details for over a decade. Every idea they had went into crafting that universe, and it showed. The movies were good enough to get the series picked up for at least two more seasons, but by then they were out of ideas, and the 2nd and 3rd seasons were abyssimal.

      To get the series funded they were forced to bring in an investment group from Germany. There was too much interference by their German investors, who insisted on making the characters more into extreme cariactures, putting lots of T&A into every scene, and attempting to be a german star trek rip-off. The Stanley character became too annoying and lost any depth that was present during the movies.

      The fourth season was unwatchable, I've only been able to stomach about three of the episodes, and have relied on friend's opinions to keep me well away from the rest. Its what happens when a series has jumped the shark so far they know they have nothing left to lose and just shamelessly stole every movie cliche but forgot to add anything to the process.

      the AC

      --
      Hemos is like...sci-fi fans;he thinks technology is cool, but he hasn't bothered to understand the science it's based on
  22. They forgot the #1 Sci-Fi show! by dada21 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I watched it once, it was too alien to me.

    Synapsis: This head alien interrogates others like it regarding its numerous abuses by Man. Freaky episodes about the aliens' fashion, body morphing in their latter life stage, even discussions about how they can get their alien race to win the Presidency.

    Eerie.

    1. Re:They forgot the #1 Sci-Fi show! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You owe me a new monitor - I spilled coke all over mine and its not coming off easily.

    2. Re:They forgot the #1 Sci-Fi show! by fireboy1919 · · Score: 1

      That was the wrong article to show. It doesn't show the seedy underbelly of it all.

      Here's the real skinny.

      --
      Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
  23. overrated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Star Trek is the most overrated pap I've ever seen on television. Just because nerds have no sense of taste doesn't mean the show belongs in the top 50 list.

    MST3K4LIFE!!!!!11

    1. Re:overrated by MassacrE · · Score: 1

      Oh come on,

      "Star Trek was the first science fiction show to ever envisioin there would be black people in the future"

      (from Whoopi Goldberg, on why she was on STTNG)

  24. Max Headroom by Desert+Raven · · Score: 1

    Talk about a show before it's time. Max Headroom's one of the few shows from many years ago I can watch today without it feeling extremely dated.

    Yeah, I liked the original Star Trek, but truthfully, I can't watch it anymore. It just seems so... well, old.

  25. The Prisoner by ettlz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Greatest 50, my arse! Where's The Prisoner?

    1. Re:The Prisoner by Oracle+of+Bandwidth · · Score: 2, Funny

      Who is number one? Exatly!

    2. Re:The Prisoner by cowboy_small · · Score: 1

      I emphatically second that. A list compiled by people who have a limited understanding of what science fiction is methinks. Populated mostly with the ephemeral, the forgettable, the unstimulating, with of course one or two notable exceptions. I wonder have they even seen The Prisoner, or read the works of, say, Philip K. Dick for example...

      The Prisoner is arguably one of the greatest shows, let alone science fiction shows, of all time and my own personal favourite. It's omission renders the list an irrelevance.

      Also, where was Millennium?

      J.K.

    3. Re:The Prisoner by pauljlucas · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The Prisoner (despite Netflix's incorrect synopsis) isn't science fiction. It's a cold-war-era spy story.

      --
      If you reply, do so only to what I explicitly wrote. If I didn't write it, don't assume or infer it.
    4. Re:The Prisoner by pauljlucas · · Score: 1
      The Prisoner is arguably one of the greatest shows, let alone science fiction shows, of all time...
      From Wikipedia:
      Science fiction is a form of speculative fiction principally dealing with the impact of imagined science and technology upon society and persons as individuals.
      What little science and technology there was in The Prisoner wasn't really imagined: it was mostly contemporary actual science. No. 2, et al, pretty much tried to drug, brainwash, and generally mind-f*ck No. 6 into saying why he resigned. What "imagined science and technology" was there? The automatic, sliding doors?

      Additionally, the scope of No. 2, et al, was also limited (pretty much) to the Village and had little effect on society at large.

      --
      If you reply, do so only to what I explicitly wrote. If I didn't write it, don't assume or infer it.
    5. Re:The Prisoner by ettlz · · Score: 1
      The Prisoner (despite Netflix's incorrect synopsis) isn't science fiction. It's a cold-war-era spy story.

      Science fiction isn't just about starships, time-travel and parallel universes. The Prisoner deals with more psychological sci-fi (things like mind transfers, mental programming, controlled/simulated realities, etc.). It is primarly spy-fy, but it's also no less sci-fi than The Man from U.N.C.L.E. or The Avengers, both of which feature in the list.

    6. Re:The Prisoner by autophile · · Score: 1
      It's pretty obvious that they're not going for classics. After all, the *new* Battlestar Galactica made number 2, and how long has that been out for?

      --Rob

      --
      Towards the Singularity.
    7. Re:The Prisoner by mikekreein · · Score: 1

      Questions are a burden to others. Answers are prison for oneself... But I agree, "The Prisoner" should have been number six...

    8. Re:The Prisoner by pauljlucas · · Score: 1
      Science fiction isn't just about starships, time-travel and parallel universes.
      I never said it was.
      The Prisoner deals with more psychological sci-fi (things like mind transfers, mental programming, controlled/simulated realities, etc.).
      I guess I still don't consider than sci-fi because it makes no broad implications on how science and technology affect society. The Twilight Zone is far more sci-fi than The Prisoner.
      --
      If you reply, do so only to what I explicitly wrote. If I didn't write it, don't assume or infer it.
    9. Re:The Prisoner by jspoon · · Score: 1
      What little science and technology there was in The Prisoner wasn't really imagined: it was mostly contemporary actual science. No. 2, et al, pretty much tried to drug, brainwash, and generally mind-f*ck No. 6 into saying why he resigned. What "imagined science and technology" was there? The automatic, sliding doors?

      The 'Rover' device that chases him down when he tries to escape. It looks like a weather balloon. Also many of the psychological ploys they try on him seem to me beyond current (and certainly 1960s era) abilities and theories.

    10. Re:The Prisoner by grahammm · · Score: 1

      Neither for that matter was The Avengers

    11. Re:The Prisoner by cowboy_small · · Score: 2, Informative
      I guess I just saw The Prisoner in the same tradition as Philip K. Dick's masterpieces (who, as I'm sure you've gathered, happens to be one of my favourite authors). I was specifically thinking of the theme of the individual who finds himself captive in a fake reality...

      Also from Wikipedia;


      "In 2002 the series won the Prometheus Hall of Fame Award. In 2005, readers of SFX magazine awarded the series fifth place in a poll of fantasy television programmes"


      So it seems I'm not alone in regarding it as science fiction.

      J.K.
    12. Re:The Prisoner by ezthrust · · Score: 1
      The 'Rover' device that chases him down when he tries to escape. It looks like a weather balloon.

      That is because it WAS a weather balloon.

    13. Re:The Prisoner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because SHUT UP, that's why!

    14. Re:The Prisoner by rodoke3 · · Score: 1

      Don't get me wrong, The Prisoner was a damn good show, but science fiction? Maybe I'm biased with presentism, but besides the Rovers, I can't really think of any scientific elements in that show.

      --
      There's nothing like a good gunfight to uplift the spirit--Calvin
    15. Re:The Prisoner by peterjhill2002 · · Score: 1

      How about the mind control elements... there were definitely "science" based plot elements that fed into the "fiction" of the narrative... I could go through the episodes and try to pick out things... The Prisoner was not "Man from U.N.C.L.E."

      But as always... YMMV :-)

    16. Re:The Prisoner by rodoke3 · · Score: 1

      Yeah... I pretty much realize I had forgotten those parts (especially the lobotomy and the western episodes) as soon as I made that comment. I was thinking more of how the Village and London were set up from #6's perspecitve than the methods his keepers used on him.

      --
      There's nothing like a good gunfight to uplift the spirit--Calvin
  26. Too bad... by outsourced · · Score: 1

    the amount of science in these "sci-fi" shows is about .00000001 per cent.

    1. Re:Too bad... by Kohath · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah. Don't the writers know that TV is about pure, accurate depictions of science? You'd think they were trying to entertain us or something! Stupid unenlightened TV writers!

      That's why I only watch PBS and listen to NPR -- so I can be safe from entertainment and news about regular people.

  27. List is utter rubbish by JudgeFurious · · Score: 1

    How else do you explain Buffy the Vampire Slayer coming in lower than Wonder Woman? Ok, granted Linda Carter's breasts were bigger than all of the combined breasts of every female Buffy cast member but I don't think that should be the deciding factor.

    --
    Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    1. Re:List is utter rubbish by Seumas · · Score: 1

      Well, the difference is that it's possible to sit through an episode of Vampire Slayer. It's not possible to sit through and episode of Wonder Woman, Batman, Superman, Hulk, etc.

      I mean, seriously, have you ever *tried* to watch a whole episode? It's as painful as trying to watch an episode of Night Rider. Bad acting, bad sets, bad special effects, bad costumes, bad plot and ugly people. Just incredibly lame. It's like until some time in the late 1970s, people didn't really even know how to act unless they were overly dramatic and uninteresting.

  28. Best sf show by MsWillow · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Hands down, Farscape. Well-thought-out, well-scripted, believable aliens, and an interesting ship. 'S a crying shame that the SciFi channel pulled the plug. I really miss it. It made cable tv worth the money - that, and F1 racing.

    Next best is an oldie: The Prisoner. If you're under 40, you likely missed it. :( #6 just refused to cave in, and he won... or did he?

    --

    Lemon curry?
    1. Re:Best sf show by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is an episode of The Simpsons where Homer operates a website as "Mr. X". After posting a rumor that turns out to be true, he is drugged and put on an island where everyone has a number. They refer to each other by number. It is obvious that this is a reference to some TV show or movie.

      Is it The Prisoner that they are referring to?

    2. Re:Best sf show by MsWillow · · Score: 1

      Yes. It's on dvd - if you've never seen it, check it out. When done watching them all, in sequence, tell me this: Is he really free, or not?

      Be seeing you ;)

      --

      Lemon curry?
    3. Re:Best sf show by Coryoth · · Score: 1

      Next best is an oldie: The Prisoner.

      Indeed, how that went missing is a bit of a puzzle. Strangely they managed to pick up Nowhere Man which was an interesting series with huge debts to The Prisoner, yet completely missed the superior source material.

      Jedidiah.

    4. Re:Best sf show by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Prisoner. If you're under 40, you likely missed it.

      I'm only 24 and I remember that sucker being on one of the local PBS channels at least twice. (Actually, I think they ran it multiple times on each occasion...) Many years ago, they also used to play Dr. Who every night as well. Nothing so good these days. (except Red Dwarf, but I've seen it all)

    5. Re:Best sf show by MsWillow · · Score: 1

      There's a new series (or two) of Dr. Who. It's been on CBC, from Canada. The new stuff is light-decades ahead of the older stuff.

      If you see it, beware of the bad wolf!

      --

      Lemon curry?
    6. Re:Best sf show by MsWillow · · Score: 1

      I'd read that McGoohan designed it for "n" episodes, and when it really caught on, made just a few more, then it was over. It's sf at its finest, forcing you to actually think about what went on, and discuss it with friends. Far more enjoyable, to me, than blasters, rayguns and scantily-clad cgi aliens.

      --

      Lemon curry?
  29. Idiotic List by Seumas · · Score: 1

    Greatest American Hero, Lois & Clark, Batman, Adventures of Superman, Buffy the Vampire Slayer, Wonder Woman, Tales from the Crypt, Xena, Lost and Twilight Zone have nothing to do with science fiction. Not even in the most remote and lax sense of the word or genre. Since when is adventure, horror or comedy science fiction? Vampires are not scifi. Superheros in tights are not scifi. Xena and Hercules are not scifi characters or stories. Shows with a unique twist at the end (Twilight Zone, Crypt) are not scifi - hell, we usually call things that have unexpected twists at the end MYSTERIES.

    And how is 3rd rock from the Sun or My Favorite Martian a scifi show? They're comedies that just happen to have an alien there. The alien/scifi part is almost entirely non-existant. ALF is more scifi than either of those two.

    And considering the crap they have on here (Wonderwoman, but no Hulk?!) they couldn't at least be bothered to include Farscape, Lexx or First Wave?!

    And yes, it also pisses me off when the Sci-Fi channel has Chucky or Wishmaster on. What do those have to do with sci-fi? Those are horror flicks. And bad ones at that.

    1. Re:Idiotic List by LithiumX · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Shows like The Outer Limits and The Twilight Zone were not always sci-fi, but when they were, they were usually the absolute best. Cutting out these shows would be like cutting Led Zeppelin, The Beatles, and others from a list of the best rock music, because some of their music wasn't rock.

      I have never understood why so many people seem to believe that "sci-fi" must include aliens or space ships to be sci-fi. Sci-fi often becomes confused with fantasy.

      If we were to make a list of "best" sci-fi, and strictly adhered to them being actual sci-fi, I do not believe you could get a list of 50 if you limited yourself to television. In order to have a list with any meaning, you would have to seperate the truly great from shows that either failed entirely, or were never able to garner more than a niche audience. And because of the non-linear nature of the best specimens of sci-fi (Twilight Zone, Outer Limits, etc - shows that were not dedicated to sci-fi-only), you would be forced to either include these sometimes-sci-fi shows, or admit that your list just lost it's heaviest hitters.

      In such a list, I get the feeling that Farscape MIGHT only stand a chance of getting in. As for Lexx, First Wave, this new BSG, and many of the other shows experiencing a brief period of popularity or who have a dedicated and vocal but small audience... they wouldn't stand a chance.

      As for Stargate, I never personally got into the show, but it would most likely make it into such a list intact. It's probably the only currently running show that would.

      And dammit Star Trek SHOULD be at the top of the list. No one can say another sci-fi show has had a greater impact. Twilight Zone would be next in line, then probably Lost In Space (another show I never loved, but has stood the test of time).

      --
      Do not confuse "Freedom of Choice" with "Free Will".
    2. Re:Idiotic List by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My Favorite Martian was years ahead of its time. It was 50's code. Two guys living together. One passes as straight. The other one has to hide who he is all the time. But you're right, it wasn't sci-fi.

    3. Re:Idiotic List by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1

      Shows like The Outer Limits and The Twilight Zone were not always sci-fi, but when they were, they were usually the absolute best.

      I don't know about The Outer Limits... its one and only theme (that technology is evil, mmmkay) got kind of tiring after the hundredth episode.

    4. Re:Idiotic List by LithiumX · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Outer Limits never portrayed technology as evil, it just used technology to show the darker side of humanity.

      That's a good indicator of what sci-fi is when at it's best... not stories about cool futuristic technologies, but stories about how technology affects the way we think and interact with eachother.

      --
      Do not confuse "Freedom of Choice" with "Free Will".
    5. Re:Idiotic List by Dr_LHA · · Score: 1
      In such a list, I get the feeling that Farscape MIGHT only stand a chance of getting in. As for Lexx, First Wave, this new BSG, and many of the other shows experiencing a brief period of popularity or who have a dedicated and vocal but small audience... they wouldn't stand a chance.

      Have you watched the new BSG? The fact that you lump it in with Lexx and the frankly crap First Wave would make me think you haven't. Even if it was cancelled after the first season it would still go down as one of the best science fiction series of all time, its that good. I'm no expert on Farscape, so can't comment on how good that is, but you can't dismiss the new BSG as just in the list due to it "experiencing a brief period of popularity" (whatever that means - the show has only really been on for a brief period).

    6. Re:Idiotic List by hayden · · Score: 2, Insightful
      And dammit Star Trek SHOULD be at the top of the list. No one can say another sci-fi show has had a greater impact.
      I'll agree that Star Trek had a big impact but that doesn't make it any good. I saw an article or essay once that suggested that the only reason Star Trek was so popular was because it was the first time that the general populace had been exposed to sci-fi. Sci-fi writing had moved on from the "go places and do stuff" type of stories thirty years before Star Trek came out.

      The acting is ordinary and the characters two dimensional. The plots are simplistic with only the vaguest linking between shows. And, most importantly, the world isn't internally consistant. It always amazed me that the ship's science/engineering officer was always able to come up with the solution to a age old problem just in the nick of time. Strangly the thousands of scientists not working on ships can't do the same.

      Compared with the current crop of good sci-fi (Firefly, Farscape, B5 and the new BSG), most of the Star Treks are B grade. Especially the original and TNG.

      --
      Nerd: Derogatory term typically directed at anybody with a lower Slashdot ID than you.
    7. Re:Idiotic List by NoMaster · · Score: 1

      No, he's saying that it wouldn't make a list that's dedicated to real SciFi. And I tend to agree, though I'd probably include it if I was stuck to come up with anything else after the first 49. Because really, the only real SciFi aspect of it is that "robots" have developed a "religion" - and it fails to make much of that because their religion is so close to human religious beliefs.

      Apart from that, as I've commented elsewhere it's really just "The Fugitive" - or one of 100's of other "chase, capture, escape in the nick of times" stories - with technologically sophisticated getaway vehicles. One could even make a fair argument that it shares more in common with "The Dukes Of Hazzard" than actual SciFi ;-)

      --
      What part of "a well regulated militia" do you not understand?
    8. Re:Idiotic List by porges · · Score: 1

      And have you seen the stuff "Uncle" Martin wears in the third season, which is in eye-popping 1960's TV color? That is one gay Martian.

    9. Re:Idiotic List by Dr_LHA · · Score: 1
      Yes, clearly a show set on a spaceship, where plot involves a constantl battle for survival with robots intent on their destruction after nuking their home planets, is not Science Fiction!

      Dukes of Hazzard! Slashdot trolls used to be of much higher quality... ;)

    10. Re:Idiotic List by LithiumX · · Score: 1

      Entertainment value is just as important to good sci-fi as critical and technical analysis. Virtually everyone likes Star Trek in one form or another. They might not watch it much, and only a minority become utterly and totally obsessed with it, but it has the largest audience of any other sci-fi (in terms of recognition and willingness to sit down for it). In that respect, Stargate is probably the single greatest competitor to it in terms of raw popularity. But... SG1 hasn't entered pop culture in the way Star Trek has, not yet at least. I point out SG1 because it's one of the few major sci-fi shows out today that few people will say they do not like, and that most people will at least be willing to watch (and I'm a crochety old 31 year old who doesn't like watching newfangled tv shows unless I have to). Also... it may not be a good idea to list any sci-fis until they've been around for at least 4-5 years, or have completed their initial run. Imagine how different any list would be if you only judged the first season or two of each sci-fi. Suddenly shows like Farscape and Sliders would leap out into better placement, the Star Treks, Babylon 5, and other biggies would suffer greatly.

      --
      Do not confuse "Freedom of Choice" with "Free Will".
    11. Re:Idiotic List by Kelson · · Score: 1
      The plots are simplistic with only the vaguest linking between shows. And, most importantly, the world isn't internally consistant.


      Kind of like The Simpsons, or South Park, or most sitcoms.

      There's nothing wrong with the episodic format, and when you're dealing with, essentially, an antholigy, continuity between shows isn't the be-all and end-all. (Continuity within an episode, of course, is critical for suspension of disbelief.)

      Of course, a continuing story is much more rewarding than something you can sit down and watch once in a while -- but it takes more effort to get involved.
  30. Remove Brain and Make Top 50 List by VarmintCong · · Score: 1
    Heh, I think it's safe to say this list is full of shit, since ST: Voyager is rated higher then Firefly. But then again, he did rate Voyager lower then Xena, which seems to be pretty spot on since we all know what a bastion of quality science fiction Xena was.

    Oh, and "'Star Trek Voyager' started off slow but ended as one of the better 'Star Trek' spinoffs" is not necessarily a compliment.

  31. firefly? by cavetroll · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I can't believe no one seems to have mentioned this yet, slashdot is not normally short of firefly fanboys. Not that it actually deserves top spot, that should belong to Babylon 5, with Blake's 7 in second, but IMO firefly should still have made top 10

    1. Re:firefly? by Dr_LHA · · Score: 1

      I'm a huge B5 fan and a Firefly fan, but Battlestar Galactica (new) is a better show than both of those. Agreed about Blake's 7 though, should be in at least the top 20, but I don't know if it ever got shown on US TV.

    2. Re:firefly? by extrasolar · · Score: 1

      I tried watching an episode of FireFly once, I honestly couldn't get into it. I see what Joss was trying to do, and it has the hallmark character-centric story arcs of Buffy and Angel, but that isn't the way science fiction is supposed to work, IMHO. The best science fiction shows are about the big picture, like Star Trek: TNG and The Twilight Zone. Even Star Wars has the massive scale to it. Even in Joss's trademark shows, while we have some excellect characters and some interesting plotlines and symbolism, the "world" is missing. Characters (or lets say, plot devices) just jump in and out unexpectedly. The supervillian of the season just shows up for a brief span of time, and then disappears completely.

    3. Re:firefly? by Mercano · · Score: 1

      Yeah, not sure how Voyager came ahead of it. Not see what Voyager is doing on the list at all if DS9 is left out, other then the one comment about it in the B5 writeup.

      --
      #include <signature.h>
    4. Re:firefly? by Jubetas · · Score: 1

      Find a friend that owns the series, or rent the first disc from your local video store, and watch the first episode. From what it sounds like, you probably just got thrust right into the middle of the entire thing, and it's a series that really requires being viewed in order. That's actually a huge part of why it was cancelled, Fox, in all of their wisdom, decided to air the second episode first. From what I've been told, it's because the first episode was "too long." Seriously though, Firefly is well worth watching, and my friends still pester me to borrow my discs when they find someone that hasn't seen the entire series yet. I strongly doubt you will be disappointed, and if Firefly had been allowed to run for its entirety, it could have easily been in the top five, if not the top spot. Now find a brown coat and start watching those episodes!

    5. Re:firefly? by evlgt85 · · Score: 1

      Blake's 7 made it around in syndication here and there. When I was a kid in St. Louis, it was on our PBS station. I don't know what percentage of PBS stations around the country picked it up, but I think that's where it stood the greatest chance of being aired. I absolutely loved the show and...yes...went to a Dr. Who/Blake's 7 convention once... :) If these folks could list one-season-wonders, they really should have known about Blake's 7.

    6. Re:firefly? by Kelson · · Score: 1

      A Los-Angeles area PBS station ran the show several times in the late 1980s/early 1990s.

      Now that's a show that could use season-by-season DVD boxed sets!

      (AFAIK, it's only out in Region 2)

  32. Glaring omission... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Red Dwarf

    I don't think I saw Blake's 7 or H2G2 in their either, so it's more a top 50 US Sci-Fi, rather than a general top 50.

  33. list as high quality as navigation by fermion · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Well, this list is clearly just a cheap method to generate ad revenue, but if we give the paper the benifit of the doubt, I think the list is a bit daft.

    Xena, though a fine show, is hardly a science fiction. It has none of the technology, exploration of current social problems, or even exploration of various cultures. Pretty much it just a medeival cop show.

    Sliders was not ahead of it's time. It was just another huckleberry finn, star trek, docotor who knockoff with none of the redeeming factors. It is quite suitable for the adolecent maile, with a good role model, a pretty girl into geeks, and trivial story line. However, there are no layers that might make it interesting to an adult. The writing was woodden, even by scifi standards.

    One contemporary scifi show that is seldom mentioned is 'The Cape'. Based on reality, good exploration life, and how we might move forward. Much more interesting than anything I saw on that list, though the show only works if you ignore current reality, as is true for most scifi.

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    1. Re:list as high quality as navigation by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      Sliders was not ahead of it's time. It was just another huckleberry finn, star trek, docotor who knockoff with none of the redeeming factors. It is quite suitable for the adolecent maile, with a good role model, a pretty girl into geeks, and trivial story line. However, there are no layers that might make it interesting to an adult. The writing was woodden, even by scifi standards.

      My digital cable preview described sliders as "4 people jump into a hole each week with wacky consequences". That is by far the most accurate description of the show I've seen.

      It was more sit-com than sci-fi... where basicly they are using the idea of parallel universes as a vehicel for social commentary. In the early episodes it showed some promise... slide to a new world with a what if scenero... feel a moral obligation to impose your values on other people, and escape to another world avoiding all accountablity. But they then had to try for something resembling a plot rather then just a vehicel and introduced the Cromags, the quest for the lost brother and cast the real life brother, intoduced an evil villian, basicly trying to transform fluff into substance, which didn't work.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    2. Re:list as high quality as navigation by jmelloy · · Score: 1

      Hey! I was an adolescent boy when Sliders was on, and as a result of watching it, want to bone Sabrina Lloyd.

  34. "The Invaders" is not on it? by Derling+Whirvish · · Score: 1

    Seriously. Where is "The Invaders"?

    1. Re:"The Invaders" is not on it? by Reziac · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Great, now I feel old.... (I remember The Invaders first-run) .... The Invaders was one of the very first SF series to achieve mainstream acceptance and commercial success, as it generated an audience among folk who normally only watched soaps and dramas.

      I agree with someone above who said that this article was for the purpose of generating traffic, and the list was pretty much pulled out of their ass. That is, it's whatever shows they could remember offhand, with no research whatsoever, and probably by a mainstream TV type rather than a viewer who gravitates toward SF as such.

      And mind you, I'm not a purist who says it has to have Science and Social Issues and can't have Fantasy or Whatever -- to me, "Science Fiction" is a broad enough umbrella to cover all these and many more, including a lot of fringe subgenres (yes, folks, The Original Wild Wild West was SF, despite initial appearances. Actually, there have been several SF series set in a Western environment.)

      Side thought: one reason some SF series are dull is because they ARE "purist SF" and contain nothing but science and the future, without any concern for who *lives* there.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    2. Re:"The Invaders" is not on it? by FurryFeet · · Score: 1

      Great, now I feel old.... (I remember The Invaders first-run)

      Dude... you ARE old.

      What?

      Oh, I'm sorry.... you're old, Mister Dude.

    3. Re:"The Invaders" is not on it? by Reziac · · Score: 1


      [brandishing cane] That's right, sonny!

      And I even remember the sound of the "A Quinn Martin Production" voiceover during the lead credits!

      Crap, now I feel so old, I think I'm probably dead!

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  35. Maybe this list is worth a look by kentrel · · Score: 1
    They don't even give a nod to greatest-trek-of-all-time DS9, so I don't know about this list.

    Funny how one geek's trash is another geeks treasure..

  36. Full Listing by scovetta · · Score: 5, Informative

    From scovetta.blogspot.com:

    50. 'Earth - Final Conflict'
    49. 'The Wild Wild West'
    48. '3rd Rock From The Sun'
    47. 'Buck Rogers in the 25th Century'
    46. 'That Was Then'
    45. 'The Greatest American Hero'
    44. 'Lois & Clark: The New Adventures of Superman'
    43. 'Nowhere Man'
    42. 'Science Fiction Theatre'
    41. 'Futurama'
    40. 'The Thunderbirds'
    39. 'The Man from U.N.C.L.E.'
    38. 'Batman'
    37. 'Space 1999'
    36. 'The Bionic Woman'
    35. 'Battlestar Galactica' (Original)
    34. 'The Avengers'
    33. 'Lost In Space'
    32. 'My Favorite Martian'
    31. 'Alien Nation'
    30. 'Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea'
    29. 'The Six Million Dollar Man'
    28. 'Adventures of Superman'
    27. 'Buffy the Vampire Slayer'
    26. 'Stargate Atlantis'
    25. 'The Jetsons'
    24. 'Wonder Woman'
    23. 'Tales from the Crypt'
    22. 'Andromeda'
    21. 'Quantum Leap'
    20. 'The Hitchhiker'
    19. 'Dark Angel'
    18. 'V'
    17. 'Firefly'
    16. 'Flash Gordon'
    15. 'Logan's Run'
    14. 'Star Trek Voyager'
    13. 'The Outer Limits'
    12. 'Xena: Warrior Princess'
    11. 'Lost'
    10. 'Sliders'
    9. 'Mystery Science Theater 3000'
    8. 'Dr. Who'
    7. 'The Twilight Zone'
    6. 'Stargate SG-1'
    5. 'Babylon 5'
    4. 'The X-Files'
    3. 'Star Trek: The Next Generation'
    2. 'Battlestar Galactica' (New)
    1. 'Star Trek' (Original)

    --
    Wer mit Ungeheuern kämpft, mag zusehn, dass er nicht dabei zum Ungeheuer wird. --Nietzsche
    1. Re:Full Listing by Aphrika · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Top 10 missing ones:

      Red Dwarf
      Blake's 7
      Battle of the Planets (C'mon, Futurama's in there!)
      Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy
      DS9
      Lexx
      The Prisoner
      Seaquest DSV
      Stingray
      Captain Scarlett

      Seems someone's got selective-memoryitis...

    2. Re:Full Listing by jwachter · · Score: 1

      Notice how they cleverly put each listing on a separate ad-laden page? It's amazing they didn't give us the top 100 sci fi shows at all time.

    3. Re:Full Listing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How on Earth did Xena get on there, but not Briscoe County Jr.? Xena isn't even Sci-Fi. It seems the article is just another example of the nonsense generated by those with absolutely no understanding of the subject at hand.

    4. Re:Full Listing by shades66 · · Score: 1

      yay Captain Scarlett !

      anyone seen the new ones currently being shown on saturday mornings on ITV's (UK Television) program MOM ? (+ one of the presenters isn't too bad looking ;) )

      --
      ---- There are 10 types of people in the world. Those that understand binary and those that don't
    5. Re:Full Listing by kevmo · · Score: 1

      Many ad companies only count 1 visit a day from each unique IP address. This means even if someone visits 50 pages on a site, they will only get counted once per day. Its possible they are using multiple ad agencies to distribute their advertisements, but I don't know how happy each ad company would be about that.

    6. Re:Full Listing by adolfojp · · Score: 1

      Seaquest DVS was a great show. I was more than surprised to see it missing from the list.

    7. Re:Full Listing by Anomalous+Communard · · Score: 1

      It's impossible to come up with a top 50 list without having someone say "Why didn't X make it to the list?". Still I can't help wonder why Xena and Buffy make it even though they're not really sci-fi and yet real gems like Time Tunnel and UFO miss out.

    8. Re:Full Listing by untaken_name · · Score: 1

      How on Earth did 3rd rock not beat out Dark Angel? That's unpossible.
      This list is obviously shit. Great job, whoever wrote this list. You don't know a fucking thing about sci-fi. You're shit.

    9. Re:Full Listing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Space, Above and Beyond

      and some people would say Farscape even though it sucked ass. It's still better than Andromeda or other retarded crap in that list.

      plus countless others better than "Lost" or that stupid comedy shit.

    10. Re:Full Listing by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 1

      Posted for nostalgia purposes, others which may or may not have been left off the list, but are worth recalling anyway...

      Land of the Lost

      U.F.O.

      Fantastic Voyage (or was it Fantastic Journey?) Bunch of people lost in Bermuda Triangle.

      I don't remember the name, but it was a live-action show about a scientist and his family(?) travelling in a high-tech RV-type vehicle in a post-apocalyptic world (years later it reminded me a lot of "The Morrow Project" RPG).

    11. Re:Full Listing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Lost" ?? Science Fiction ???

      This list obviously has
      1) Been compiled by someone who had limited viewing exposure (witness lack of DS9, Farscape)
      2) Didnt know what the show was about (read the description of Stargate:Atlantis)
      3) is extremely american-centric (btw Dr Who is back on BBC)
      4) contains non-sci-fi shows, and fantasy shows.

      All in all, a poor list

    12. Re:Full Listing by Paul+Slocum · · Score: 1

      Dude, you totally forgot Out of This World!

    13. Re:Full Listing by BobCousy · · Score: 1

      The new Battlestar Galactica is number 2? It isn't even as good as the original.

    14. Re:Full Listing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about this, the greatest sci-fi series ever and it only ran for one series :-(

    15. Re:Full Listing by nutshell42 · · Score: 1
      Seeing how Futurama made the list I don't see why Cowboy Bebop and Ghost in the Shell - Stand Alone Complex shouldn't.

      Like everyone I also miss DS9 (my favorite Trek) and I don't even want to start about the order (what's Voyager doing up there?!)

      --
      Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage
    16. Re:Full Listing by AeiwiMaster · · Score: 1

      Don't forget
      7 days

    17. Re:Full Listing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know anime has not made to this list but some of the best sci-fi is in that medium. Let's see... Ghost in the Shell, GITS: Stand Alone Complex I/II,
      Serial Experiments Lain, Key the Metal Idol, Armitage III, Martian Successor Nadesico, Infinite Ryvius etc.

    18. Re:Full Listing by Nimrangul · · Score: 1
      The original Lexx miniseries may have been worth mentioning, but the complete and utter bullocks produced in the spin-off series made everything unbearably bad.

      The acting was never good in either, but at least the concept for the miniseries had been alright.

      Seaquest was not worth being made, the concept was wretched and the execution worse.

      Farscape was much better than either.

      I don't think Star Trek: Deep Space Nine can really be considered because people that watched it were split, some liked it, some loathed it. I loathed the show, for despite some interesting work in it, it was not a compelling or particularly interesting story nor characters.

      I don't think Star Trek: Voyager should have been on that list, because of their constant goofing around with time travel and nanobots. It was just too bothersome the way they would pull one, the other or both out at the drop of the hat to fix anything.

      --
      I'm sick of following my dreams - I'm just going to ask them where they're going and hook up with them later.
    19. Re:Full Listing by serutan · · Score: 1

      Wow, until now I didn't even know there WERE 50 sci-fi tv shows. I would have guessed more like 20. Like any such list this one is just somebody's opinion, in this case the entertainment staff of the Boston Globe, so who cares about the rankings. I was just interested to read about the shows and see some of the graphics.

    20. Re:Full Listing by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1
      I don't remember the name, but it was a live-action show about a scientist and his family(?) travelling in a high-tech RV-type vehicle in a post-apocalyptic world (years later it reminded me a lot of "The Morrow Project" RPG).

      Damn, I forgot all about that one. It was interesting and did remind me a lot of the Morrow Project.

      Argh, now I'm going to be trying to recall the name of that show all night now. I hate you. ;P

    21. Re:Full Listing by Degrees · · Score: 1
      --
      "The most sensible request of government we make is not, "Do something!" But "Quit it!"
    22. Re:Full Listing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kolchak: The Night Stalker
      while it did mostly mystery type stories, it did have a few scifi based ones.
      I see it as a pre-Xfiles type anthology scifi series.

    23. Re:Full Listing by STrinity · · Score: 1

      50. 'Earth - Final Conflict'

      Only the first season.

      47. 'Buck Rogers in the 25th Century'

      This doesn't even belong on a Top 1000 list.

      41. 'Futurama'

      A top ten series.

      37. 'Space 1999'

      Worse than Buck Rogers.

      26. 'Stargate Atlantis'

      I'm just curious, is there anyone out there who actually likes this pile of crap?

      25. 'The Jetsons'

      It was just The Flintstones in Space, and the Flintstones was just The Honeymooners in the Paleolithic.

      17. 'Firefly'

      Should be in the top five.

      16. 'Flash Gordon'

      Apart from an extremely bad and shortlived Saturday morning cartoon, when was Flash Gordon a TV show? Maybe they meant The Flash, the sadly overlooked comic adaptation from the early '90s.

      14. 'Star Trek Voyager'

      Any credibility they had is hereby blown. STV is quite easily the worst SF show in history.

      10. 'Sliders'

      Enjoyable in the same spirit as Irwin Allen series, but not a Top 10 series.

      4. 'The X-Files'

      The most over-rated, perhaps.

      3. 'Star Trek: The Next Generation'

      TNG had about two good seasons, but even those weren't Top 10 material -- and certainly don't deserve to be on the list when DS9 isn't.

      --
      Les Miserables Volume 1 now up with my reading of
    24. Re:Full Listing by coaxial · · Score: 1

      Battle of the Planets (C'mon, Futurama's in there!)

      "And using his birdarang, the bad guys are meerly knocked out. That's why we showed the glint from it's razor sharp edges!"

      My favorite scene is from the episode airliners are being captured by a giant robotic centepede. This bad guy makes a veiled thread about the life of this little boy, all the while stroking a brown gun shaped blob.

      God I hate 70s Hanna-Barbera.

    25. Re:Full Listing by AttillaTheNun · · Score: 1

      50. 'Earth - Final Conflict' Never saw it. Please, who's the goof in the leopard shirt - is that supposed to by sci-fi? How about Mr. Hollywood, with his MTV futuristic hair hilights. Or Ms. Spandex - how many times that that been overdone to attract the 13yr old pimply fan? Show me tits or get off my tv.

      49. 'The Wild Wild West' Before my time. I assume lots of stupid cold war bullshit (i feel sorry that that generation - more details to follow). That's that Jaws guy from Bond, right - he should have had his own tV show. He probably inspired that dude with the clock in Public Enemy. 48. '3rd Rock From The Sun' John Lithgow (stupid name) always bugged me. And Jane Curtin is about as funny as Dan Akroyd - and that's coming from a Canuck. That big blonde chick always kinda turned me on - something tells me she's a sexual deviant. I hated the show and only watched it when the big blonde chick was on the screen - guess I was hoping for something kinky to happen.

      47. 'Buck Rogers in the 25th Century' I fuckin loved this show when I was 9 yrs old. Good thing I grew up. Oh, and fuck Erin Grey - the bad chick was hotter. If I were Buck, I'd sell out Earth to go down on her.

      46. 'That Was Then' Whatever... never heard of it. I was probably too busy watching Automan or something.

      45. 'The Greatest American Hero' I fucking hated this show. The whole premise of the show was that maybe this week he'd find the instructions to his suit so something cool would actually happen. No luck - another hour of him flying into a tree/building/window/car/outhouse. Why was this show an hour long? It felt like a decade.

      44. 'Lois & Clark: The New Adventures of Superman' Superman is a wimp. Now they turn it into a chick-flick. Of course, no lookie at Terri Hatcher's tits. Next...

      43. 'Nowhere Man'
      Good Beatles song. Why is this on here?

      42. 'Science Fiction Theatre' I spent my Saturday mornings/afternoons watching one of four things - Hanna Barbara Laugh A Lympics, Some local station's (channel 20 in Detroit) Kung Fu Theatre (or whatever it was called), UltraMan, or Creature Feature. This is high-brow television. None of these are on this list, so fuck off with this bullshit Sci-Fi theatre - it had no chance of competing.

      41. 'Futurama' I like it - no idea why I never watch it. I have no idea when it's on, but I only watch Battlestar Galactica torrents or Hockey Night in Canada (once hockey starts up again) these days.

      40. 'The Thunderbirds' Hated it. Pinocchio (how the fuck do you spell that?) in spaceships. No thanks. They look fucking creepy to me. More cold war bullshit, too. I feel sorry for the generation that was raised on howdy doody and this shit. How fucking miserable a childhood could you have? That, and ovaltine. Pretty much explains why these people are so fucked up.

      39. 'The Man from U.N.C.L.E.' I never watched this, probably because I thought the name was so stupid. Any it didn't have bionics, spaceships, light sabers or titties. How can a guy be from Uncle? That's a person, not a place. And you don't have to spell it out to me, I can fucking read, ok?

      38. 'Batman' This isn't "camp". It's gay, ok? Fucking gay-ass tights, some guy named Robbin and a bunch of stupid "utility belt" gadgets don't make up for this garbage of a show. oh, yeah, he's the "dark" superhero. I'm scared.

      37. 'Space 1999' Why don't these spaceships sound as cool as in Star Wars? I can't hear anything? For some reason, I never watched it much - I think all the sideburns and mascara scared me away.

      36. 'The Bionic Woman' I'd watch the bionic hamster (btw, where is Hammy Hamster on this list - I fucking loved that show!), so woman/dog/robot/librarian/rock/toothpick - it doesn't matter, if it's bionic, I watched it.

      35. 'Battlestar Galactica' (Original) not bad - except for that meddling kid and his robot dog. Lorne Green is Canadian - we fucking love him up here because he got to be on tv and little house on the prairie

    26. Re:Full Listing by srmalloy · · Score: 1

      If we've got Thunderbirds, Captain Scarlet, and Stingray, then we should also have Fireball XL5 and Supercar, too.

    27. Re:Full Listing by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 1

      "Battle of the Planets (C'mon, Futurama's in there!)"

      And Starblazers!

      I'm sure someone else will chime in about Robotech. I'm all for Cowboy Bebop too.

      --
      "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
    28. Re:Full Listing by tricorn · · Score: 1

      Are you referring to Ark II?

      Other series that I haven't seen yet that are better than at least some of the ones that were on "the list": The 4400, ALF, Earth 2, VR.5, Harsh Realm, Roswell. I've also just been told to add in The Adventures of Briscoe County Jr. If we're going to have super-heroes and sitcoms, then My Hero should also be there. If Lois & Clark are on there, what about Smallville?

      Threshold seems to be working up to be a good entry, but it is a bit too early to have made that list.

      What about Highlander? Or Millennium? Or Charmed? Land of the Giants? The Pretender? Strange Luck? The Kindred? Wolf Lake? You can argue about their "Science Fiction" status, but they all are as close as some on the list (and most are arguably better than some as well). Oh yeah, Point Pleasant as well.

      If you're going to have Man from U.N.C.L.E, Alias and La Femme Nikita qualify as well. I don't think I saw Get Smart listed, either.

      Already mentioned, but I'd have to vote for Farscape and Blake's 7 as the two most prominent missing series, followed closely by The Prisoner. I also have a soft spot in my heart for Search (1972-73, I think some people were referring to it as "Probe" (not the Asimov one), which I don't think it was ever called; Probe was the name of the organization).

      I don't even want to get into all the anime that maybe ought to be on there as well, e.g. Astroboy.

    29. Re:Full Listing by tricorn · · Score: 1

      At least you're not afraid to show your ignorance and bad taste!

    30. Re:Full Listing by tricorn · · Score: 1

      A couple I missed: Dark Skies, Witchblade, Salvage. One that is Science Fiction but DOESN'T deserve to be on the list is Jake 2.0!

    31. Re:Full Listing by vitalyb · · Score: 1

      Jetsons before Futurama??? What kind of a wicked joke is it? =\

    32. Re:Full Listing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ad-laden? You're not using Adblock then? I looked through the whole crappy list without even realising there were any ads till I saw your remark and checked for what was being blocked...

      */ads/* in the blocklist is what you need.

    33. Re:Full Listing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did forget and incredibly important one:

      The Tripods.

      Absolutely awesome for it's time.

    34. Re:Full Listing by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 1

      Yes! Ark II is the name of the show. Thank you.

  37. Batman was WAY SCI FI by tempest69 · · Score: 1
    Batman owned a 20,000 decibel bat-belt. Now I'm not sure the writers had a clue as to how dangerous something of that magnitude would be. But batman has a weapon that it above and beyond 99% of all Sci-fi weapons... A Death Starhas nothing on that bad boy.

    If 20,000 decibels doesnt sound like much, you havent heard it :)

    Storm

    1. Re:Batman was WAY SCI FI by ikkonoishi · · Score: 1

      Yeah thats like, 2,000 bels of sound!

  38. Ahead of their time by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1
    It comments on how some shows were ahead of their time. Well, all SciFi shows are ahead of their time, aren't they? [G] That's what reruns and DVD collections are for.

    ST:TOS deserves to be #1, because that's what has brought more people into SciFi than anything else.

    And while I liked the Man from U.N.C.L.E., I hardly consider it SciFi, even if he did have a communicator the size of a pack of cigarettes (later built into a pen).

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    1. Re:Ahead of their time by Seumas · · Score: 1

      Star Trek: Terms of Service?!

    2. Re:Ahead of their time by Reziac · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The Man from U.N.C.L.E. was SF in the same way that The Wild Wild West was (in fact they were very similar series, just set in different environments) -- in that both frequently had "futuristic" (with respect to the era the show is set in) villains, and futuristic villains' gadgetry.

      So yeah, these shows are borderline by any standard, and don't fit the purist definition of SF. But under the broad definition of SF as any sort of non-mundane fiction ("we know it when we see it"), they both fit.

      At the time I didn't see this, but in retrospect, I do. Perspective is a wonderful thing. :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  39. The Hitch Hiker's Guide to the Galaxy by Celsius+233 · · Score: 1

    ...does that count?

    --
    Denham's Dentrifice, Denham's Dentrifice, Denham's Dandy Dental Dentrifice, Denham's Dentrifice Dentrifice Dentrifice.
  40. huh? by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

    I didn't realize there WERE 50 science fiction shows. Star Trek, Space 1999, Battlestar Galactica - can't be more than a few more than that,

    1. Re:huh? by Elad+Alon · · Score: 1

      If the show must have a military man saying "reverse the polarity" for you to acknowledge it as sci-fi, you'll find you're in no short supply of shows, and in no danger of quality.

      --
      News for merdes. Shit that matters.
      Ask me about my sig.
    2. Re:huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The issue with Space 1999 is that it clearly portrays humans with bad, hair-helmet do's. This is not a fascinating thing, its something that will have to be diverted, like a catastrophic asteroid.

    3. Re:huh? by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      The issue with Space 1999 is that it clearly portrays humans with bad, hair-helmet do's. This is not a fascinating thing, its something that will have to be diverted, like a catastrophic asteroid.

      You're too late; it's already six years in the past.

      Ah, those late-1990s helmet haircuts. I get so nostalgic for them..... I also miss the moon.

      Anyhow, list was garbage. Pick the first fifty (mainly American) sci-fi or fantasy series you can think of (or anything that features something vaguely electronic somewhere), throw the list up in the air, fix any obvious mistakes ("Star Trek not #1? Move it NOW!") and there you go.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  41. Funniest Wikipedia article ever by Elad+Alon · · Score: 1

    Funniest Wikipedia article ever. The image there should have been labeled more along the lines of "We THINK this is a woman, but are unable to confirm."

    --
    News for merdes. Shit that matters.
    Ask me about my sig.
  42. holy sham, batman by sdnoob · · Score: 1

    some on the list, i wouldn't have considered 'pure' scifi...

    3rd rock yes, ok, but no mork & mindy then? come on!!

    how about dark angel? mst3k? knight rider? earth^2? seaquest? dark shadows? (my ex's favorite), and no ds9..

    and if "v" was there (a miniseries), why not wild palms http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0106175/
    and with their stretching the definition of scifi a bit, why not the 10th kingdom? http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0207275/

    sheesh.. me thinks this was just some ploy cooked up by the globe to get /.'d and get all the geeks and nerds in the world to hit 50 page views each with NINE advertisements on it.....

    1. Re:holy sham, batman by Chrispy1000000+the+2 · · Score: 1

      mst3k was there silly wabbit.

      --
      Sig
    2. Re:holy sham, batman by stevey · · Score: 1

      Dark Angel was listed as #19 which I thought was a reasonable enough placement given the other rankings present. That was a show I loved, it was a shame it was cancelled and didn't really complete the story...

      Like many I thought the list was bogus, and gave too many high ratings to "current" shows, eg. BSG / Atlantis.

      Still it was a fun reminder of series I used to watch. Funnily enough I was only watching a rip of Thundercats last night!

  43. Re:ranking - I agree by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1
    Dr Who was relegated to number 8 while Stargate got number 6?! Something is very wrong with this list.

    I agree, Stargate is much better than that.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  44. The question is..... by SecularG · · Score: 1

    What is the question? What are our 50 favorite Sci-Fi shows? Honestly.

    1. Re:The question is..... by Oracle+of+Bandwidth · · Score: 1

      The question is "who is number one"?

  45. Why? by jswalter9 · · Score: 1

    Why are lists like this compiled? I'm sure some people like to watse time in that way, but when you put together a geek list, just don't publish it.

    And, for the record, Sabrina Lloyd was the reason to watch Sliders. :)

    --
    Retired from software... maybe. Sort of.
    1. Re:Why? by kentrel · · Score: 1
      To create exactly this reaction. People will always argue over "Best of" lists, no matter how irrelevant and pointless they are. And geeks like us will argue with a vengeance.

      Beware of the angry geek, and FEAR the angry Trekkie (they've got l33t letter writing skills)

  46. SG and Xena???? by inmate · · Score: 1

    XENA better than futurama and firefly? you must be joking?

    and under the mountain is not even on the list!

    oh well, if nothing else it will make for some great discussion here on slashdot! :D

    --
    --- blackironprison, where ignorance is bliss....
  47. Ill Throw my 2 cents in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  48. New BSG is #2? WTF? by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    I don't know why I even look at these sorts of "rankings" stories - the author may as well be posting a definitive ranking the "50 greatest ice cream flavors of the 20th century" - but I detect a weird, incomprehensible trend: there are people who find the new Battlestar Galactica to be a watchable show. Now I've tried it. Thanks to some of these people, I've watched MANY episodes of it, and I understand it less each time. How can even average-smart people put up with such terrible writing? Such stupid plots and stupider plot holes? Such transparent and flacid attempts to be edgy and gritty? Such... lack of immagination?

    I admit that I might be spoiled by Firefly, which actually did well all those things BSG tries but miserably fails at, minus that mystical crap about fulfilled prophecies, which just couldn't work and wasn't worth trying. But I've got to think that even without Firefly, I would see BSG for the vacuous soap opera that it is.

    Anyway, if they didn't want me flaming on slashdot, they shouldn't have baited me by giving that vomit the second ranking in all-time sci-fi.

    1. Re:New BSG is #2? WTF? by t0xic@ · · Score: 1

      Man go Troll somewhere else. Me thinks you couldnt spot quality from a parsec away. If you can't follow the story and see the interweaving plots, etc..then its YOUR imagination and comprehension that are at question.

    2. Re:New BSG is #2? WTF? by Oracle+of+Bandwidth · · Score: 2

      I kinda enjoyed the old BSG, but I have to agree, I find the new one fairly unwatchable.

    3. Re:New BSG is #2? WTF? by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      Heh you'll get modded down for that.. going against the groupthink.

      I forced my self to watch 4 or 5 episodes then gave up... it was painful. The old series was much better.

    4. Re:New BSG is #2? WTF? by Compholio · · Score: 1

      I kinda enjoyed the old BSG, but I have to agree, I find the new one fairly unwatchable.

      I've never seen the old one but I totally agree about the new one. How do ANY of these shows except the X-Files beat out SG-1? They're the two longest running (currently tied for length) so how do any of the others even compare?

    5. Re:New BSG is #2? WTF? by zakezuke · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Now I've tried it(Battlestar Galactica). Thanks to some of these people, I've watched MANY episodes of it, and I understand it less each time. How can even average-smart people put up with such terrible writing? Such stupid plots and stupider plot holes? Such transparent and flacid attempts to be edgy and gritty? Such... lack of immagination?
      (edit mine)

      In contrast to the origional series aka Wagon Train in Space staring Lorne Greene? A boy and his mechanical dog? And evil inverse video goat man? Making it a point to create perfectly reflective robots without regard to lighting resulting in having to use colored filters so you couldn't see the crew? Recycled special effects from the movie which employed recycled special effects. Not to speak of Galactica 1980 who had a group of kids farm with their super strength or play baseball and win to avoid detection from the goverment. Or worse yet "You're pregnant? How is this possible? Must have been devine intervention!" Can you say a transparent attempt to prevent kids from finding out where babies come from?

      I know there are fans of the old series who might be offended, but let's face it BSG 1979 had some awful moments and the new series in many regards is an improvement. I agree it shouldn't get a #2 spot. It's too new and hasn't had long enough to prove itself.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    6. Re:New BSG is #2? WTF? by eclectro · · Score: 1

      I think that it has been quite a while since we had this quality of sci-fi on the tube. In my opinion (and a few others) I entirely think it is worthy of a number two spot. As an "ensemble' type cast, it can't be beat for scifi on television. I have lost interest in pretty much other TV shows because of galactica.

      Also, I think that it is better than the Star Wars prequel movies made by George Lucas.

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    7. Re:New BSG is #2? WTF? by iLogiK · · Score: 1

      don't get me wrong....i loved SG-1...it was great...
      but the last few seasons weren't really what it used to be...let's face it, RDA was one of the reasons it was a great show....i love Farscape, and Ben Browder, but he doesn't seem to fit RDA's shoes...
      Atlantis, after a season and a half hasn't proven to be a great show...i'm still waiting...
      but BSG....i mean...come on.....the directing, the plot, the characters....i just love everything about it...i watch an episode of BSG, and then one of SG-1 and compare them....usually i can guess how an episode of SG-1 will end after the first act (maybe two)
      and the hole story is just repetitive: new enemy...try and kill him...he get's more powerfull...plot twist/new weapen....enemy get's killed, another one, more powerfull appears
      BSG on the other hand surprises me every time (not only each episode, but the show's plot as a hole, too)

    8. Re:New BSG is #2? WTF? by arthurh3535 · · Score: 1
      And probably should have made #1.

      It's really that good. This is no hokey 1970's drama that turns into an episodic and then silly claptrap.

      It just finished it's second season with an incredibly riviting story, some of the best acting I've seen recently and drama so intense you can cut it with a knife.

      It's hard hitting enough that it's had warning about mature and violent content... and they were damn right to warn people of it. As a metaphor for today's society and culture, the new Battlestar:Galactica is heads and shoulders above the crowd.

      It makes you think.

      Your entire species is on the threat of anhilation and you've captured some of the enemy toasters. They are, for all intents and purposes, human. And their military treats their prisoners like that? And you all of a sudden wonder if the Colonials are the bad guys.

      Seriously, watch the last episode of this season. It will knock your socks off at ten paces.

      --
      No! It's a *SIG*. Keep the Special Interest Groups away! (Con joke!)
    9. Re:New BSG is #2? WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The season is not over yet. It's on half-season break until january.

    10. Re:New BSG is #2? WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How can even average-smart people put up with such terrible writing? Such stupid plots and stupider plot holes? Such transparent and flacid attempts to be edgy and gritty? Such... lack of immagination?

      I am surrounded by hundreds of beautiful, scantily clad women. They are flexible and bring me pizza and beer whenever I want.....DANG! Just saying something doesn't make it true after all!

      Do you have any examples, or do you just like saying "stupid"? Do you realize that it's ok to enjoy both Firefly and BSG?

    11. Re:New BSG is #2? WTF? by Evil+Pete · · Score: 1

      Took the words right out of my mouth. BSG 79 was total crap. BSG Millenium Edition is the exact opposite, total mind warp associating both these series with the same name. Can't wait for continuing eps of the new BSG.

      My personal preferences would include in the top 10 (no particular order cos I can't decide between some of them): Outer Limits (original), Twilight Zone, B5, Blake's 7, X-Files (yeah I know, but I reckon it's SF), SG-1, Dr Who, Battlestar Galactica (new). OK too hard now, too many I want add. I'll call it quits with some blank spots.

      --
      Bitter and proud of it.
  49. serious problems by NOLAChief · · Score: 1
    was good to see B5, the new Battlestar Galactica and two incarnations of Star Trek in the top ten, but Voyager beating Firefly??? And they clearly had to have cut DS9 to make room for the injustice they did in honoring Atlantis at all.

    Hey, Boston.com, there's more to good SciFi than Jeri Ryan's boobs. (Like Kaylee....:-D)

    1. Re:serious problems by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      Second series of Atlantis is quite good IMO... the characters have some depth at last.

      Just as SG1 has taken a bit of a nosedive.. (I don't 'get' these priors at all.. why would *anyone* take them seriously? Especially the jaffa, who have only just got rid of one set of false gods...)

  50. Not scifi by kentrel · · Score: 1

    Batman, Wonderwoman and Xena Warrior Princes in a sci fi list? They're fantasy, not sci-fi.

  51. ad revenue by boarder · · Score: 4, Funny

    1. Post list of top 50 things a geek cares about.
        1a. doesn't matter how accurate or well researched the list is

    2. Make list available one item per time on a page heavy with ads

    3. Post link to /.

    4. There is no ..., just straight profit from the geeks clicking through 50 pages of ads.

    --
    IANAL, but I play one on /.
  52. There's Something Really Scary About This ... by Lemurmania · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You do realize that arguing about this list makes you sound like the Comic Book Guy on the Simpsons, right? I'm serious. Just read some of the threads in his voice, and it sounds like a custom-made script, a soliloquy of unrequited geek passion.

    1. Re:There's Something Really Scary About This ... by Oracle+of+Bandwidth · · Score: 1

      Worst.list.evar.

  53. "Top 50 Ad Impressions" by Laconian · · Score: 1

    These lists are just an excuse to cram 50*4 ads in front of the user as he clicks "next" "next" "next" "next"

    OMG ST:A GOT 4TH NOT 1ST.. BLOOD!

  54. Where's the question by post_toastie · · Score: 1

    Ok, why is this in Ask Slashdot? There's no question being asked, unless its the implied: "Yet another bogus 'best of list' has been posted. How shall we flame it?"
    And to avoid being modded off topic, this list was pretty lame. They can't even get the name of the main character in Space: 1999 correct. Hint: John Koenig was the name of the fictional commander on Moonbase Alpha, Walter Koenig is an actor.

  55. Sci-Fi? Nah, Fantasy.. by WarwickRyan · · Score: 4, Funny

    ..and they missed the best fantasy show of them all.

  56. Who is number one? by Oracle+of+Bandwidth · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Where is The Prisioner? I mean it's not exatly Sci-fi, but neither is this list, and at least it was innovative.

    1. Re:Who is number one? by interstellar_donkey · · Score: 1

      I really have to wonder how they define "sci-fi". The Prisoner was a unique and very neat show, and calling it "sci-fi" is far less a stretch then applying that label to "Wild Wild West" or "The Avengers" (perhaps the writers were confusing the television programs with the movies?)

      Also, the list seems to confuse "fantasy" with sci-fi. Xena??!!?? Come on now.

      I always thought the term "science fiction" was used exclusively to describe stories which involved, you know, science. Things like space exploration, robots, time travel and the like. On the other hand, stories which deal with magic, ghosts or mythology would have the descriptor of "fantasy" attached to them.

      Granted, sci-fi and fantasy are often linked together (for example, in the video shop you'll regularly find sci-fi/fantasy movies share the same shelf space) because in general people who enjoy one will enjoy the other.

      --
      The Internet is generally stupid
    2. Re:Who is number one? by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      Where is The Prisioner? I mean it's not exatly Sci-fi, but neither is this list, and at least it was innovative.

      They had Man from U.N.C.L.E. so by every right they should have The Prisioner. Gawd they have Batman the live action series. If the big box labeled "bat computer" could be ranked as sci-fi then clearly an autonomous bubble could qualify as well.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
  57. The list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I missed #50 since the login stopped working for me:
    50
    49 The Wild Wild West
    48 3rd Rock from the Sun
    47 Buck Rogers in the 25th Century
    46 That was Then
    45 The Greatest American hero
    44 Lois & Clark: The New Adventures of Superman
    43 Nowhere Man
    42 Science Fiction Theater
    41 Futurama
    40 The Thunderbirds
    39 The Man from U.N.C.L.E.
    38 Batman
    37 Space 1999
    36 The Bionic Woman
    35 Battlestar Galactica (original)
    34 The Avengers
    33 Lost in Space
    32 My Favorite Martian
    31 Alien Nation
    30 Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea
    29 The Six Dollar Man
    28 Adventures of Superman
    27 Buffy the Vampire Slayer
    26 Stargate Atlantis
    25 The Jetsons
    24 Wonder Woman
    23 Tales from the Crypt
    22 Andromeda
    21 Quantum Leap
    20 The Hitchiker
    19 Dark Angel
    18 V
    17 Firefly
    16 Flash Gordon
    15 Logan's Run
    14 Star Trek Voyager
    13 The Outer Limits
    12 Xena: Warrior Princess
    11 Lost
    10 Sliders
    09 Mystery Science Theater 3000
    08 Dr. Who
    07 The Twilight Zone
    06 Stargate SG-1
    05 Babylon 5
    04 The X-Files
    03 Star Trek: The Next Generation
    02 Battlestar Galatica (New)
    01 Star Trek

    The new Battlestar Galatica is ok, but not better than B5. :|

  58. The Whole List by Derling+Whirvish · · Score: 1, Informative

    50. 'Earth - Final Conflict'
    49. 'The Wild Wild West'
    48. '3rd Rock From The Sun'
    47. 'Buck Rogers in the 25th Century'
    46. 'That Was Then'
    45. 'The Greatest American Hero'
    44. 'Lois & Clark: The New Adventures of Superman'
    43. 'Nowhere Man'
    42. 'Science Fiction Theatre'
    41. 'Futurama'
    40. 'The Thunderbirds'
    39. 'The Man from U.N.C.L.E.'
    38. 'Batman'
    37. 'Space 1999'
    36. 'The Bionic Woman'
    35. 'Battlestar Galactica' (Original)
    34. 'The Avengers'
    33. 'Lost In Space'
    32. 'My Favorite Martian'
    31. 'Alien Nation'
    30. 'Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea'
    29. 'The Six Million Dollar Man'
    28. 'Adventures of Superman'
    27. 'Buffy the Vampire Slayer'
    26. 'Stargate Atlantis'
    25. 'The Jetsons'
    24. 'Wonder Woman'
    23. 'Tales from the Crypt'
    22. 'Andromeda'
    21. 'Quantum Leap'
    20. 'The Hitchhiker'
    19. 'Dark Angel'
    18. 'V'
    17. 'Firefly'
    16. 'Flash Gordon'
    15. 'Logan's Run'
    14. 'Star Trek Voyager'
    13. 'The Outer Limits'
    12. 'Xena: Warrior Princess'
    11. 'Lost'
    10. 'Sliders'
    9. 'Mystery Science Theater 3000'
    8. 'Dr. Who'
    7. 'The Twilight Zone'
    6. 'Stargate SG-1'
    5. 'Babylon 5'
    4. 'The X-Files'
    3. 'Star Trek: The Next Generation'
    2. 'Battlestar Galactica' (New)
    1. 'Star Trek' (Original)

    1. Re:The Whole List by Odd+John · · Score: 1

      They've forgotten some cheese:
      Planet of the Apes, the series
      Time Tunnel
      Land of the Giants
      ALF

  59. Any list that doesn't have 1-5 in this order... by fzammett · · Score: 1

    #5 Battlestar: Galactica (new)
    #4 The Outer Limits (original)
    #3 Star Trek TOS
    #2 Stargate SG-1
    #1 Babylon 5 ...is not worth reading any further IMO. The only arguable point in my mind is whether BSG should actually be ahead of The Outer Limits. My feeling is it probably will be, and could even beat out ST:TOS in the end, but for now it's where it should be.

    And don't bother disagreeing, you are wrong :)

    --
    If a pion (n-) collides with a proton in the woods & noone is there to hear it, does lamdba decay into the source pa
    1. Re:Any list that doesn't have 1-5 in this order... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about Knigh-Rider. Come on....David Hasselhoff.

    2. Re:Any list that doesn't have 1-5 in this order... by fzammett · · Score: 1

      Good point... besides, KITT's voice was always very soothing :)

      --
      If a pion (n-) collides with a proton in the woods & noone is there to hear it, does lamdba decay into the source pa
  60. Bite my shiny metal ass! by w3weasel · · Score: 1
    Futurama outranked by the Thunderbirds?

    Futurama 41st greatest of all time?!?!?!

    When the Humanoid-Carrot revolution of 2120 comes, you'll understand how far ahead of its time this fantastic show really was.
    --

    Just as irrigation is the lifeblood of the Southwest, lifeblood is the soup of cannibals. -- Jack Handy

  61. Doctor Who: 1963-2007 (at least) by pauljlucas · · Score: 5, Informative
    Also, oddly they say it ran from 1963 to 1989... Hmmm, you know... I could swear I saw something on BBC 1 called Dr. something a short while back.. I wonder what it could be.
    Doctor Who was resurrected in 2005; 2006 is in production, and has been green-lighted through 2007.
    --
    If you reply, do so only to what I explicitly wrote. If I didn't write it, don't assume or infer it.
    1. Re:Doctor Who: 1963-2007 (at least) by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Doctor Who was resurrected in 2005; 2006 is in production, and has been green-lighted through 2007."

      Not only that, but the resurrection also brought in a munch needed jump in the quality of the show. The filming is better, the writing is better, and the effects don't look like MST3K anymore. Hehe.

      I'm starting to realize that a lot of complaints about these shows are by people who haven't invested in them. I didn't like Farscape or B5, but man, I honestly can't say I've seen more than 5 eps of either. So who am I to make declaritive comments about either? (Sorry, this isn't in reply to your comment, I've just seen a flood of bickering over all of the shows sucking.)

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    2. Re:Doctor Who: 1963-2007 (at least) by Arathrael · · Score: 1
      ...the writing is better...
      Yes. A plot that revolves around an alien, disguised as an overweight farting human with a zip in their head, planning to blow up Earth and surf to their own planet. That's a sure sign of quality writing if ever I saw one.
    3. Re:Doctor Who: 1963-2007 (at least) by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Yes. A plot that revolves around an alien, disguised as an overweight farting human with a zip in their head, planning to blow up Earth and surf to their own planet. That's a sure sign of quality writing if ever I saw one."

      You're kidding, right? That episode wasn't about her plans to destroy the planet, it was about her capture. She said a lot of that shed the Doctor into a really dark light. In turn, it created a conflict for him about what to do with her. Does he take her to her planet where she'll be executed, or does he let her go an the off-chance that she might be telling the truth about wanting to change. Does, in performing either action, make him a monster. Does he even have the right? Are they really alike? That episode featured some of the best dialogue in the whole season.

      Did you actually watch the episode? When I say watch, I don't mean have it on in the background while you're listening to your iPod. I mean, did you actually pay attention and listen to what was said? I wouldn't mind, but you picked probably the worst episode to make your point. More amusingly, I could take *any* series you like and come up with a grossly over-simplified description to make it sound foolish. "Farscape is Sesame Street in Space. Tee hee giggle snort."

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    4. Re:Doctor Who: 1963-2007 (at least) by EvilMonkeySlayer · · Score: 1

      Dude, it's Doctor Who. Do you honestly think they're going to try and be all serious complete with "oh it must be serious, they've got shaky cameras!" Battlestar Galactica syndrome (not a knock of BSG, I like the new BSG).

      You can't bring back Dr. Who without making a few injokes and making sure not to take things too seriously.

    5. Re:Doctor Who: 1963-2007 (at least) by Arathrael · · Score: 1

      Of course I watched it. I always RTFA too. ;-)

      The conflict was trite and simplistic. The writers didn't even address the issue of whether she was telling the truth about being sentenced to execution in the first place. Unless I missed it, although the extent to which the main characters go into dialogue to spell out the plot, multiple times, makes me think that unlikely. Having said that, my perception was probably coloured by the dire state of some of the acting. And the direction. And the background music.

      And yes, I realise that Dr Who is often tongue-in-cheek. That's fine - good actually - so long as everything else is there. In my opinion it wasn't.

      I do realise opinions differ, but the writing of the last series was not top notch. Too many plot holes and unresolved/totally ignored issues, too many cheap devices to establish and further the plot. In my opinion.

    6. Re:Doctor Who: 1963-2007 (at least) by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      Before I start, I'd like to apologize for my harsh words. I appreciate you keeping your cool.

      " The writers didn't even address the issue of whether she was telling the truth about being sentenced to execution in the first place."

      They really didn't need to. Here's the problem: If she made good on it, we'd basically have to follow the rest of her life to know if it was true or not. If she didn't make good on it, they could easily depict that, but then where would we be? The Doctor made a really good point about that question. "So, you occasionally let one go in order to justify yourself." That was where they got into the bit about why they're not so different. (err I'm trying to avoid spoilers here, sorry for being vague.)

      But, ya know, they did resolve it. A solution came up that satisfied both parties. It was an intriguing solution which, btw, led to a rather interesting finale for this season. Remember what happened? More interestingly, it opened a door that we may very well get to step through down the road.

      "I do realise opinions differ, but the writing of the last series was not top notch. Too many plot holes and unresolved/totally ignored issues, too many cheap devices to establish and further the plot. In my opinion."

      I really can't argue with an opinion like that. I mean, I could try, but the problem is I've had the same opinion of other well loved movies. I have similar criticisms of the Matrix. A lot of people saw some big illustration to an enlightening philosophy or some such, but all I saw was a contrived attempt at making a live action movie look like anime. How can I say I'm right about the Matrix and that you're wrong about Doctor Who? Seems better just to understand where you're coming from.

      Have a good weekend, man. Again, thanks for keeping cool.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    7. Re:Doctor Who: 1963-2007 (at least) by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      I didn't like Farscape or B5 . . .

      As you've said repeatedly. People who want to have their SciFi spoon-fed to them with a predictable Star Trek space opera format will not like Farscape. Something original is out of many viewers' comfort zone, but it's too bad that it resulted in the cancellation of a show that appealed to fans of real science fiction.

    8. Re:Doctor Who: 1963-2007 (at least) by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "As you've said repeatedly. People who want to have their SciFi spoon-fed to them with a predictable Star Trek space opera format will not like Farscape. Something original is out of many viewers' comfort zone, but it's too bad that it resulted in the cancellation of a show that appealed to fans of real science fiction."

      Oh brother. First, Farscape died because it was too dependent on cathing every single episode. Second, enough of the elitist bullshit. I can't believe how obnoxious the Farscape fans I've talked to are. I'm sorry that a show you loved died, I truely am. It really sucks when a good show (Futurama, Miracles, Firefly, Quantum Leap, etc) has its life tragically cut shot. But to act as though you're opearting on some higher level is irritating. You may have made the time to watch and fully appreciate Farscape, but not everybody can. Star Trek was more accessible, that's why it was successful. TV is a luxury. Tastes are wildly diverse. If you catch a bizarre show and you have no fucking clue what's going on, it's not because you're simple. It's hard for a show to work if it demands that you stick to its schedule.

      In any event, these are fortunate times for sci-fi. Lots of people have DVRs and entire seasons of TV shows are selling well on DVD. It's difficult to imagine a show like BSG making it 10 years ago. Just this week I finally talked a friend of mine into catching an episode of it. He was really really confused. He didn't understand who the Cylons were. (it worked a lot better on the original series where the Cylons were all big toasters.) He didn't understand what the conflict was about. Well I could keep going. But at the very least he has a DVR. Maybe when the show runs its course again he can catch it and fully appreciate it. It would be awful, though, to judge him harshly for not being in his 'comfort zone'. It's not his fault. Fortunately, BSG stands to succeed.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    9. Re:Doctor Who: 1963-2007 (at least) by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      Oh brother. First, Farscape died because it was too dependent on cathing every single episode. Second, enough of the elitist bullshit. I can't believe how obnoxious the Farscape fans I've talked to are.

      :) I guess the personal attacks mean I touched a hot button. What is elitist about liking an improvement in the stagnant old TV SciFi format? Why should I waste 15 minutes of a one-hour show getting up to speed on an ongoing story when I could get an additional 15 minutes of story?

      You may have made the time to watch and fully appreciate Farscape, but not everybody can. Star Trek was more accessible, that's why it was successful.

      I was a major (original) Star Trek fan, and I made time to watch it. There were no VCRs then. Watching Farscape was no problem with the neat gadgets we have today.

      If you catch a bizarre show and you have no fucking clue what's going on, it's not because you're simple. It's hard for a show to work if it demands that you stick to its schedule.

      Drag yourself into the late 20th century, guy. We have neat little time-shifting devices with names like VCR and Myth TV. Places like amazon.com and Best Buy are also selling reduced-cost DVD versions of the first two seasons for the technologically challenged. The (misnomered) SciFi Channel had a major rerun of the series last year, so it wouldn't have been too hard for even a busy guy with a VCR to check it out. You really just like your SciFi bland and easily palatable, while real science fiction should give you mental indigestion (IMHO, of course).

    10. Re:Doctor Who: 1963-2007 (at least) by Omnieiunium · · Score: 1

      Are you saying there is something wrong with the graphics? I prefer the older Daleks to the newer ones. The new series Daleks just look too fake. Blah. (goes back to watching some Peter Davidson)

    11. Re:Doctor Who: 1963-2007 (at least) by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      ":) I guess the personal attacks mean I touched a hot button. What is elitist about liking an improvement in the stagnant old TV SciFi format?"

      There's nothing elitist about liking an improvement in the format, but that's not what I was replying to.

      "Drag yourself into the late 20th century, guy. We have neat little time-shifting devices with names like VCR and Myth TV..."

      Reread the paragraph from the line you quoted.

      "You really just like your SciFi bland and easily palatable, while real science fiction should give you mental indigestion (IMHO, of course)."

      Um, no and no. Actually my complaint wasn't so much about the sci-fi'ness of the show. I'm not sure it's worth going into, though, since it's pretty clear from that last bit that you didn't pay a lot of attention to what I said. You know damn good and well what I was replying to. Being defensively deflective isn't getting us anywhere.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    12. Re:Doctor Who: 1963-2007 (at least) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry to harsh your "geekier than thou" trip, but it's actually Peter Davison.

    13. Re:Doctor Who: 1963-2007 (at least) by Omnieiunium · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Haha! So it is. Thanks for that.

  62. top 4 by i+chose+another · · Score: 1

    Battlestar Galactica (original)
    The Prisoner
    V
    star trek (original)

  63. Darwin Loves Lucas by Skraut · · Score: 1

    Just kind of surprised Seaquest DSV didn't make the list. It had it's flaws, but at a time when every other Sci-Fi show seemed to be about Outer Space, it made exploring the Earth exciting.

    --
    Introducing Microsoft Vacuum 1.0 The first Microsoft product that doesn't suck.
  64. What about Farscape? by jacoplane · · Score: 1

    My no. 1 show, Farscape , isn't even on the list. And Futurama at no. 41? Um, ok. I'd also have included some anime, such as Ghost in the Shell: Stand Alone Complex and Neon Genesis Evangelion. I guess this list if only for American programs, with Farscape being an Australian production.

    1. Re:What about Farscape? by Oracle+of+Bandwidth · · Score: 1

      I don't think Japanese Sci-Fi is truly appreciated, at least on American television. GitS:SAC could be the best cyberpunk show to hit the air (at least that I'm aware of), but it gets no coverage. It'd be really cool if someone did something like that on TV.

      I'm looking at you Sci-Fi channel.

    2. Re:What about Farscape? by Eggman27 · · Score: 1

      The original Avengers and Doctor Who were/are both British shows, but they still made the list. As I read through the list, I expected Farscape to be towards the top, but to not see it at ALL? I mean, with Lost, the new Battlestar Galactica, and Stargate Atlantis on there, you'd expect a finished series with more than one or two seasons under its belt would have made the list ahead of them... Go figure.

    3. Re:What about Farscape? by cooperaaaron · · Score: 1

      Why don't they have an Amime channel in the US ????

  65. Futurama rules, Sliders drools by linzeal · · Score: 1

    Futurama would of been higher up if they hadn't cancelled it. I mean with community sites like "Can't Get Enough Futurama" organizing signature drives in the 10k's and sales of the DVD compilations setting records for sales it would be madness not to do something more with the franchise than comic books. The rumored direct to DVD movie coming out in 2007 will hopefully see a return of the series if it sells well enough.

    1. Re:Futurama rules, Sliders drools by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      I never understood why they cancelled futurama when it had so much mileage in it.

      These are the same people that cancelled Enterprise just after the got good writers on it, though, so you can see the mentality we're dealing with.

    2. Re:Futurama rules, Sliders drools by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      I never understood why they cancelled futurama when it had so much mileage in it.

      We're talking Fox here. You know, the network that if it was a person would have a few too many chromosomes, a drinking problem, no teeth, and be married to his sister. 'Nuff said.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
  66. No MacGuyver either... by n3bulous · · Score: 1

    Lexx, Farscape, and MacGuyver. I mean, MacGuyver is not strictly SF, but it did define science geek gone cool. Other than flimsy plot devices, Sliders, Quantum Leap and a few others had little to no science in their fiction.

    What I found odd was SG:Atlantis making the list so high. Almost smacks of paid advertising. It's a good show, but fairly cookie cutter w/ some interesting ideas.

    --
    "The area of penetration will no doubt be sensitive." ~ Spock
    1. Re:No MacGuyver either... by Oracle+of+Bandwidth · · Score: 1

      I like how on SG:A we learn valuble lessons, like most quait human-like societies are harboring a terrible secret.

    2. Re:No MacGuyver either... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >I like how on SG:A we learn valuble lessons, like most quait human-like societies are harboring a terrible secret.

      And how things would be better if you just kept your secret underground hatches locked.

    3. Re:No MacGuyver either... by drewz · · Score: 1

      I was raised on MacGyver, KnightRidder, Mission Impossible'88 - i am sad

  67. Can we mod an entire *News Article* as Flamebait? by Vthornheart · · Score: 5, Funny
    "They don't even give a nod to greatest-trek-of-all-time DS9"

    Flamebait (-1)

    --
    -Vendal Thornheart
  68. Sacrilege... by Kaihaku · · Score: 1

    I'm pleased that classics such as Dr. Who and Babylon 5 were on the list but...whoever compiled it definately needs a reminder as to what sci-fi is... If they did a sci-fi movie list, I wouldn't be suprised to see Charlie and the Chocolate Factory and Lord of the Rings up there with Dark City and Wing Commander. As for DS9, they did mention it in the Babylon 5 segment as a cheap rip-off. *shrugs*

  69. What the frell by Oracle+of+Bandwidth · · Score: 1

    Farscape was brilliant.
    I'm not sure how buffy counts as sci-fi, and yet farscape does not.

  70. wiz-kid genius? by joey_knisch · · Score: 0

    For all of his genius Quinn Mallory couldn't slide into a reality where his show wasn't going to get canceled. Pfft... some genius.

  71. What manner of scoring was used? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How were these shows scored and ranked??

    Futurama is 41 and Tales from the Crypt is 23?

    Nonsense.

  72. Star Trek?? by digital-madman · · Score: 1

    Oh WOW! Star Trek is number 1... didn't see that coming.

    But seriuosly.... Voyager was 14 and Xena 12...thats some serious BS!!
    Voyager had its slow moments, but season 3 and on was awesome scifi. NextGen doesn't hold a candle to it. I've never seen Dr. Cursher on the level of Holo-Doc trying to retake a stolen fedration ship from romulans (so funny). (It's ironiclly the only time I found andy dick funny too.)Plus, Picard is wuss captian, solves most all his problems by sending worf, riker and data to deal with it. Whilst he sits and attempts to have witty conversation with Crusher. But Janeway drove her ship into the temporal time ship to end a temporal loop, Picard causes them left and right.

    Next Gen was pathetic in its presentation. Picard mostly was the problem. Spineless captain, with no "fight it out" ability. He was no Kirk... but I give Next Gen some things, Data, Q, and the borg. Only redeeming parts of the show.

    (Go ahead you next gen zealots... mod me a troll... but secertly you know right!)

    --
    A bullet sounds the same in every language. So stick a fucking sock in it...
    1. Re:Star Trek?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Other than the fact that Data, Q, and the so-not-scary-that-it's-pathetic Borg are in fact the worst parts of the show, rather than redeeming qualities, you are exactly correct. I wish I had mod points. Captain Baldy and his First Officer's chin were the worst.

      What shocks and shames me is that I actually agreed with otherwise-an-absolute-idiot Zonk about something: DS9 isn't on this list? And THE JETSONS is? I mean, come on.

  73. Saturday Afternoon by Derling+Whirvish · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well we (you and me too) are all here on a Saturday afternoon reading (and replying to) Slashdot, ya know. That's already pretty nerdy and kinda implies we don't have too much of a life to begin with.

    1. Re:Saturday Afternoon by Holi · · Score: 1

      Well you maybe, but me I am at work on a Saturday and thus posting to slashdot is one of my benefits.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    2. Re:Saturday Afternoon by Breetai · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm here reading at a quarter past midnight. I've just taken a weekend vacation from my normal life.

    3. Re:Saturday Afternoon by Arathrael · · Score: 1

      Hey! I'll have you know it's Saturday night here!

      Oh wait. That's worse. Much worse.

  74. Why not Spongebob? by gaanagaa · · Score: 1

    If Superman and Buffy are categorised as science fiction, I don't see a single reason why Spongebob Squarepants should be left out.

  75. Im actually suprised nobody mentioned this...shame by HardSide · · Score: 1

    I use to watch this as a kid...all my geek friends were always which was better, Lost in Space or....http://www.thetimetunnel.com/The Time Tunnel

  76. Criteria by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

    The article is nice and all, but how can we even dispute the ranking of shows without knowing what criteria were used to decide?

    How important is, say, originality, compared to character depth?

    Is each show measured against its peers of that era in TV? Or is the ranking independent of time?

    Sure, it's a qualitative ranking, but give us slashdotters something to work with!

    --
    "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
  77. Not on the list by unapersson · · Score: 1

    Well, this is slashdot, so how about some lists of ones that should have been on there but weren't. I've seen a few good ones mentioned already, but I'd like to know if I've missed any classics. There are quite a few I'd swop out to replace with any of these:

    Planet of the Apes (TV Series)
    Survivors (BBC 80s series)
    The Invaders

  78. Transformers by BRUTICUS · · Score: 1

    The Transformers should definitely be in this list. Even if it was a toy commercial in the form of a cartoon. Transformers was about machines that overthrew their organic masters. Became sentient. Learned to Transform into vehicles. The storyline goes as far back 9 million years where we first see Orion Pax become Optimus Prime.

    Come to think of it Robotech should have been in there too.

  79. Jilted Again by Burz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When will these Sci-Fi "critics" finally live up to their lofty edifice and recognize Lost Saucer as one of the greats?

    Someday, Ruth Buzzy and Jim Neighbors will get their due.

  80. Twin Peaks by dTaylorSingletary · · Score: 1

    I am just amazed that Twin Peaks isn't on this list.

    Does eat oates and little lambs eat ivy.

    --
    d. Taylor Singletary,
    reality technician techra.el
    1. Re:Twin Peaks by drewz · · Score: 1

      The owls are just not what they appear, my friend! Omitting Twin Peaks is a serious crime

  81. What About Dr Who (2005) ? by wolverine1999 · · Score: 1

    Apparently they missed the new show with Christopher Eccleston - they just mentioned the old one.
    The new show got tremendous ratings, so it surely should have been in the top 10.

  82. Mistake in Space 1999 Characters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.boston.com/ae/tv/gallery/topscifishows? pg=14

    Martin Landau played Commander John Koenig, not Walter Koenig. Walter Koenig is the actor for Paval Chekov in the original Star Trek series.

    Nice work, eh.

    Space: 1999 at IMDB: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0072564/
    Walter Koenig at Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walter_Koenig

    1. Re:Mistake in Space 1999 Characters by Oracle+of+Bandwidth · · Score: 1

      Maybe all those nuclear wessels made them put the wrong name?

  83. It works both ways by interstellar_donkey · · Score: 1

    and it sounds like a custom-made script, a soliloquy of unrequited geek passion.

    Reading your post while imagining the Comicbook Guy's voice is even more fun.

    --
    The Internet is generally stupid
  84. Futurama got screwed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    How in the crap can the Jetsons beat Futurama? Futurama should have been in the top twenty at least.

  85. smallville by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Smallville is better than lois and clark

  86. Dark Skies by n54 · · Score: 1

    Considering that the list is full of the usual shit I as a fan consider it an honour that Dark Skies isn't on it :)

    Dark Skies - for those who think The X Files is way too shallow and incoherent.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_Skies

    --
    this comment is provided "as is" and without any express or implied legibility or congruity [...]
    1. Re:Dark Skies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everybody remembers Dark Skies. If everybody knew TR2070 was the best sci-fi series ever screened, it would have ran for more than one season. Please be more obscure.

  87. Time Trax by caseih · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't necessarily put it in the top 50, but I really enjoyed Time Trax for the year or two that it was on Sci Fi. Not a terribly original plot, but the stories were pretty good and overall quite entertaining.

    1. Re:Time Trax by MrPerfekt · · Score: 1

      I remember Time Trax when it was the show preceding... Babylon 5! Back when there were still "independent" TV stations. If I remember correctly, it went something like:

      7PM Time Trax
      8PM Babylon 5
      9PM Kung-fu: The legend continues

      They even had the "PTEN" logo before the programming block. I think it was a failed attempt to make a UPN-like "netlet". Thankfully, Babylon 5 made it out of that debacle in-tact for the most part.

      --
      I just wasted your mod points! HA!
  88. Re:Soap Opera, DS9, B5, BSG by DickBreath · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I won't complain about the possibility of a Sci Fi being a soap opera.

    Babylon 5 was not a soap opera. Babylon 5 was a story. It has a beginning, a middle and an end. Towards the end of B5 you can definitely see all of the pieces being moved off of the board one by one.

    A soap opera is not going anywhere. Things just keep happening. You can keep it up for as long as you want. Characters can come and go. The basic direction can change. This is very different than a novel, or Babylon 5.

    DS 9 might be a soap opera. (I quit watching after 2nd season due to liking B5 better and had insufficient time for both DS9 and B5.) I don't know if DS9 was a soap opera. Was the story working its way towards any overall conclusion?

    This brings me to the new Battlestar Galactica. I wonder if it is like B5 in that there is a distinct conclusion that they are heading towards? Maybe so, but maybe they don't have a plan for getting there? Will they drive off into the ditch along the way and never get to the conclusion. I sure hope not. I would be very disappointed in investing time to watch it.

    --

    I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
  89. consider the source by Shoggoth+of+Maul · · Score: 1

    A casual glance reveals two types of shows; popular hits and "gems." I'd assume these results were glarked from respondants to a survey, who likely were either writing in to sound off like the rest of the herd or champion their pet one-season, brilliant-but-cancelled show. They obviously didn't bother to choose a definition of what "science fiction" meant, but instead relied upon the respondent's personal definition, casually moderated by the compilers of this list.

    Lord, deliver us from politicians, pop-psychobabblers and other users of imprecise terms in their "research."

    Or not, as you seem to be on vacation this time of the eon.

    To the public, possibly because of the Sci-Fi channel, perhaps because of willful ignorance, and most likely a brilliant (sarcasm) combination of both, anything that is not straight slice-'o-life in content is "scifi."

    As to clearly delineating what science fiction is and isn't, I read one helpful definition, dependant on the prescence and quality of Suspension of Disbelief. While mainstream literature doesn't need it, and Fantasy demands it, Science Fiction sets itself apart from other brands of imaginative literature in attempting to create it, foster it and encourage it.

    But until a sufficently clear definition, like the above, is adopted, "science fiction" will remain a label for marketing and advertising, unworthy of the enterprise it describes.

  90. fracking web editors by llZENll · · Score: 1

    ok lets put one show per page, how fracking stupid can they be, just show us the lamo list you retards!

    1. Re:fracking web editors by Oracle+of+Bandwidth · · Score: 1

      If we provided the information in a resaonable way, our pageviews would be far lower wouldn't they?

  91. My problem with Babylon 5 by pauljlucas · · Score: 1
    I didn't like Farscape or B5...
    I didn't like B5 either because, despite being on board a space station populated by aliens, the story lines were pretty much the same old, tired human sqabbles. It was basically the United Nations in space.
    --
    If you reply, do so only to what I explicitly wrote. If I didn't write it, don't assume or infer it.
    1. Re:My problem with Babylon 5 by tbannist · · Score: 1

      Any you were expecting what?

      Seriously, you've just said in not so many words that any show set on a space station is boring, regardless of acting, content or plot.

      --
      Fanatically anti-fanatical
    2. Re:My problem with Babylon 5 by pauljlucas · · Score: 1

      I wans't expecting anything. I have no interest in it whatsoever.

      --
      If you reply, do so only to what I explicitly wrote. If I didn't write it, don't assume or infer it.
    3. Re:My problem with Babylon 5 by tbannist · · Score: 1

      How enlightened. Please continue to share you ignorance with the rest of us.

      --
      Fanatically anti-fanatical
  92. Giving Star Trek #1 by SillySnake · · Score: 1

    Giving Star Trek #1 is like giving Smells like Teen Spirit number one on any music countdown. It's not the best song ever written, nor is it really anyone's favorite. It's only there because it was a standard..

  93. Top N == media hype by nothings · · Score: 1
    "Top N" lists are always just media hype, since they're always just someones' opinions. (Even a poll is just a bunch of someone's opinions, but at least with a large enough sample size you can say something about aggregate taste. Similar logic applies to things like the Academy Awards.)

    If every "N Greatest Whatevers" list instead said "N Great Whatevers", it would be way more honest, way more accurate, and would generate way less controversy. (People would still say "I can't believe X isn't on the list", but it would have more the tenor of "how weird that these people don't like X that much" rather than "this list is totally not authoratative since it doesn't have X". Yes, the list isn't authoratative. It's just an opinion. Stop posting to slashdot telling us it's not authoratative because it doesn't have X.)

    This is true even when N=1, say Time's Man of the Year (or of the Century, and s/man/person/ as preferred). It's the opinion of Time's editor. I once participated in a conversation where people were debating who should be the Person of the Century. That's totally fine, and it's great if they can marshall arguments about why somebody was more important than someone else. But, guess what, when Time finally announces their choice, that doesn't make you right. That just means that a bunch of opinionated S.O.B.s happened to have the same opinion as you. Accurately predicting Time's choice is way less interesting than having actual knowledge and opinions about the nominees.

    1. Re:Top N == media hype by nothings · · Score: 1

      (don't flame my apostrophes--I edited s/someone's/someones'/ intentionally, but I accidentally edited the wrong one)

  94. Sorry, but this list is hopeless by rklrkl · · Score: 1
    This list is poorly constructed - surely any show that isn't a science fiction show must be disqualified. So that's "The Man From U.N.C.L.E." (spy comedy), "Batman" (camp action), "The Avengers" (action), "Buffy The Vampire Slayer" (comedy/horror), "Tales From The Crypt" (comedy/horror) and "Xena: Warrior Princess" (fantasy action) all removed from the list.

    Then you've got omissions like "Farscape", "Blake's 7", "Hitchhiker's Guide To The Galaxy", "Star Cops", "The Tomorrow People", "Smallville", "UFO", "Crusade", "Captain Scarlet" (old or new version), "The Incredible Hulk", "The Invaders", "Lexx", "Red Dwarf" amd "VR.5". Are seriously telling me that "Batman", "Lost In Space", "The Jetsons" and "Logan's Run" are better than all of those?

    It's a pathetic list if you think about it - cooked up by someone with no knowledge of TV science-fiction (woefully lacking in non-US shows as well - I count only 3, yes three, from the UK). Even the most novice list compiler would check another list on another site as a reference point - for example, why didn't they go to tv.com's large alphabetical list of "all science-fiction shows" (no, it's not all of them, but it's a reasonable starting point)

  95. Firefly underrated and smallville missing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's my opinion - I definitely prefer Firely over Star Trek.

    Also for me Smallville was a great show and it did not get on the list ...

  96. Can I get a HELL YEAH! by Lordleppard · · Score: 2, Insightful
    WTF.. no Farscape? Certainly should have made the top 50.. perhaps even edging in on the top 10.

    It's MUCH better than Xena which ranked 12.

    1. Re:Can I get a HELL YEAH! by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      WTF.. no Farscape? Certainly should have made the top 50.. perhaps even edging in on the top 10.

      After seeing Wild Wild West and the Man from UNCLE on the list, I'd expect to see Get Smart and Johnny Quest before Farscape. Whatever the list was about, it wasn't SciFi.

  97. Re:Full Listing - Flawed - Star Wars by canuck57 · · Score: 1

    Now this list is seriously flawed if not for:

    • Might Mouse
    • Road Runner (Beep-beep)
    • Get Smart (If U.N.C.L.E this is fair)
    • Fireball XL5
    • Sting Ray
    • Seaquest and DSV 2000
    • UFO
    • Invasion (The old one, not the new one)
    • LEXX
    • DS9
    • Tripping the Rift
    • Mutant X

    More subjective, the order is warped and not from this planet.

  98. Earth 2 by fishmasta · · Score: 1

    Where's Earth 2?!? Shame it didn't last longer... This list needs some work.

  99. Eh... by DaltonRS · · Score: 1

    Someone should perhaps tell them the differences between sci-fi, fantasy, comedy, and drama. Seriously, Xena? While a decent fantasy show, it hardly qualifies as science fiction by any stretch of the imagination. Just the fact that the author(s) seemed to have no idea what constitutes science fiction is enough to invalidate the entire thing for me. Better luck next time.

  100. Blake's 7 4TW! by Attaturk · · Score: 2, Informative

    Us Brits were just lucky I guess. Blake's 7 was the ultimate anti-Star Trek. Here Blake and his dubious crew of criminals and freedom fighters/terrorists took on the all-powerful Big-Brother-esque Federation.

    In the first episode our hero is set up as a post mind-wipe former rabble rouser that witnesses the mass murder of a secret meeting of dissidents. The authorities have him set up as a child molester, destroy him and his reputation and then ship him off to a penal colony (after having his lawyer and the lawyer's wife killed off because they were getting in the way).

    Dark enough for you? That's just the first episode. Written by Terry Nation, mind behind the better Doctor Who stories amongst many other things, this series has all the depth and tension that you could possibly hope for. Of course the special effects look very dated and they seemed to find every last disused quarrry and scrap of wasteland left in England to film in.

    Even if you're not much of a sci-fi fan, I highly recommend it.

    1. Re:Blake's 7 4TW! by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1

      Yep. You were lucky. I wish they would replay them on this side of the pond. I saw a few episodes on PBS about 15 years ago. Good stuff.

    2. Re:Blake's 7 4TW! by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1
      and they seemed to find every last disused quarrry and scrap of wasteland left in England to film in.

      I thought the BBC owned that quarry. It seemed to pop up just about everywhere.

    3. Re:Blake's 7 4TW! by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      I wish they would replay them on this side of the pond.

      I've been buying them from that side of the pond and playing them back on a DVD player switched to Region 2 here in the states. Amazon.co.uk will ship DVDs to the US.

      The original The Tomorrow People was an early influence on me. I watched it during Nickelodeon's early years. The full series is out in the UK on region-free disks and is being released now on Region 1 disks in the US.

      As for Star Trek: Voyager being on the list, all I can say to that is, "Warp particles!"

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  101. Fantasy/Science Fiction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When "fantasy" and "science" are both used to blob together a whole genre, it's no wonder people think ID and evolution have equal merits and should be taught together.

  102. I Agree With Most of the List... by eno2001 · · Score: 1

    ...but I think Babylon 5 should have been left off. I'm sick and tired of "tough guy/girl" scifi. If the future is populated by assholes who would rather "kick ass" than apply intellect to solving a problem, then I really would rather hope all sentient beings nuke themselves before then. We should all be striving for intellectual perfection and the abandonment of all violence, selfishness and greed. That's why the best of the Star Trek series (TOS, TNG and Voyager) are happily on the list. The one abberation is DS9. Too much strife and war. And "tough guy/gal" antics. I can't stand that shit. The world isn't made of people who "kick ass".

    --
    -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
    1. Re:I Agree With Most of the List... by Steve+B · · Score: 1
      We should all be striving for intellectual perfection and the abandonment of all violence, selfishness and greed.

      The difference between SF and fantasy is that the latter is expected to retain an element of realism amidst the speculations.

      --
      /. If the government wants us to respect the law, it should set a better example.
  103. What about Mork and Mindy? by Mashdar · · Score: 1

    Come on! Hehe
    Old men in baby carraiges? The birth of "shazbot"? Travelling through space in a giant egg?
    You all know you watched it. And enjoyed it. And think fondly back upon it. Sure beats the hell out of Buffy.
    Glad to see Quantum Leap in the mix, though :)

  104. Secret Agent Man & The Prisoner! by spidey3 · · Score: 1

    What happened to these two, starring Patrick McGoohan?

  105. Charlie Jade by stooker76 · · Score: 1

    Maybe this show is too new, but Chalie Jade is great and must be included in this to 50.

    It's a Canada/South Africa production.

    Preview : http://www.charliejade.com/multimedia/video/CJtrai ler.mov

    Web site : http://www.charliejade.com/

    Take a look.

  106. they did a lot of things wrong on this list... by jimfinity · · Score: 1

    no DS9...futurama in 41st place....voyager all the way up to 14... but luckily they did some things right too... no farscape. the reason they didn't include farscape? probably that episode where john imagines he is going "insane" and sees everybody as cartoon characters (read: lame)

  107. Red Dwarf by MeWhOeLsE · · Score: 1

    it may have not been american but it sure as hell was better than some on that list!!! I loved red dwarf

  108. It;s really "50 greatest ads" by Animats · · Score: 1

    With one show listed per page, and surrounded by ads, this is a click troll. Somewhere, somebody is getting pay per click payments for this turkey.

  109. Superman.... by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 1

    ...is Sci-Fi.

    An alien from an advanced civilization who's planet (Krypton) was destroyed comes to earth as a child and exibits extrodinary strength and superhuman powers.

    He grows up to become a hero, and a guardian of truth and justice...saving the earth and it's people many times over both from themselves and from other superhuman and outworldly enemies.

    In some versions of the story, Superman has some of Krypton's tech to rely on....see the Fortress of Solitude.

    Sounds like pretty reasonable Sci-Fi to me.

    If you think of Batman's story, it starts off as more of a drama..really a sad story but it quickly incorporates Sc-Fi elements. I'd definitly consider it to be Sci-Fi on it's own...more so that Batman often crosses over with Superman.

    wbs.

    --
    Huh?
  110. Firefly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    17? 17? Aw crap. More people need to see this show. And even more people need to go see Serenity http://serenitymovie.com/

  111. Not a TV show, but I have to mention by ModernGeek · · Score: 1

    Fritz Lang's 1927 Metropolis. Probably the best science fiction movie in history.

    --
    Sig: I stole this sig.
    1. Re:Not a TV show, but I have to mention by The_Dougster · · Score: 1

      Fritz Lang's 1927 Metropolis. Probably the best science fiction movie in history. That is an incredibly cool movie. I was lucky enough to see it a sci-fi film festival with a live piano player there performing the score. Definately a steam-tech wonder.

      --
      Clickety Click ...
  112. Call it by HunterZ · · Score: 0

    10:25PM GMT: TFA has been declared "a joke" by unanimous consensus of the /. community.

    Nothing to see here, folks... Move along, move along...

    --
    Arguing about vi versus Emacs is like arguing whether it's better to make fire by rubbing sticks or banging rocks.
  113. Outrageous by swerk · · Score: 1

    Red Dwarf wasn't even mentioned! Whoever came up with this list is a complete and utter smeghead.

    1. Re:Outrageous by Savantissimo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Agreed. Red Dwarf belongs near the top.

      --
      "Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?" - Patrick Henry
    2. Re:Outrageous by ericdano · · Score: 1

      Probably has the last name of RIMMER. Probably has visited Rimmerworld and liked it. Yikes!

      --
      It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
      I moderate therefore I rule!
      --
  114. Zim! Spaced! by Mindslinger · · Score: 1

    Invader Zim!!! It features a hostile alien force trying to destroy our planet, but get this, he's the star!! And we're meant to identify with him! It may just be a cartoon, but it explores more areas of science fiction that half of that list combined. Oh and Spaced, while technically not a real science-fiction series, again more seriously discusses the human condition in an imaginitive context than, well, again half of what's on Boston.com's list.

  115. Sliders not the same without Quinn Mallory by zhenga · · Score: 1

    I just loved Sliders, but after a few seasons alot of characters got replaced or died.
    Eventually Quin Mallory himself got replaced or died (I forgot, sorry), and the show just went on without him... After that the show just wasnt as good as before :(

    What I hate the most is when an already introduced character just gets replaced with a different actor without any reason, I mean do you really think the viewers wont notice!? I'm not sure if it was the case with Sliders, but ive seen it in alot of TV shows.

  116. You insensitive clod by tqft · · Score: 1


    Missing option:

    Space Above and Beyond - there is a thread up higher

    --
    The Singularity is closer than you think
    Quant
  117. firefly T_T by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    firefly deserved at least 2 or 3 places higher :( nonetheless, it's still quite impressive, considering how short-lived it was... =0

  118. WTF??? by sconeu · · Score: 1

    "The Jetsons" makes the list, but DS9 doesn't? What kind of crack did these guys buy from CowboyNeal?

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  119. MST3K! by Deacon_Yermouf · · Score: 1

    Let me just say how happy I am that "Mystery Science Theater 3000" made the top 10. It was, and still is, my favorite TV show of all time, and I've felt that it's always been underappreciated. I always thought it was brilliant. Hopefully though, thanks to efforts like the MST3K Digital Archive Project, it will have some life for some time. Also, there's quite a few torrents available.

    1. Re:MST3K! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you downloading MST3K episodes instead of buying them?!

      The master would not approve... ...DWEE...doo..doo..doo...DWEEE...doo..doo.doo

  120. Exosquad! by JANYAtty. · · Score: 1

    Its a fav of mine. Seriously, looking at this list, dont they realize how badly all of the earlier show hold up? I mean they are embarrasingly bad. Buck Rodgers? Hey, I was as big a fan of Erin Gray in a tight jumpsuit as anyone, but they play it late on Scifi and it is bad. really really bad. Here's my list of 'you will be in pain watching these': 47. 'Buck Rogers in the 25th Century' (makes comic books look well written- oh and 'Hawk!') 40. 'The Thunderbirds' (does not hold up well) 38. 'Batman' (okay as a comedy) 36. 'The Bionic Woman' (actuallly thought this was better the 6M$Man) 35. 'Battlestar Galactica' (Original) (saw the 'beings of light' episodes recently- w/patrick mckneeewww) 33. 'Lost In Space' 29. 'The Six Million Dollar Man' (answered the immortal question: whats up with bigfoot?) 24. 'Wonder Woman' (really really embarresing) 16. 'Flash Gordon' 15. 'Logan's Run'

    --
    I dont do meaning of life questions.
  121. Superman is Sci-Fi! by arthurh3535 · · Score: 1
    Almost the entire run of Lois and Clark: The New Adventures of Superman has an alien dealing with weird science, alien plots and such. Mind controlling pheromones, ELO asteroids, alien invasions and all.

    It also happened to be a bit comedic and sappy at times! ;)

    --
    No! It's a *SIG*. Keep the Special Interest Groups away! (Con joke!)
  122. Nowhere Man was way down at number 43... by jbarr · · Score: 1

    ...but at least it made the cut. That was one of our favorite shows. Too bad only a few others on the planet appreciated it too.

    Two glaring omissions: Blake's 7, and DS9--two classics that certainly merit recogintion.

    --
    My mom always said, "Jim, you're 1 in a million." Given the current population, there are 7000 of me. God help us all!
  123. You suck, Boston.com by falloutboy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This isn't really a story; its just a bunch of blurbs about show plots with actually no commentary whatsoever. I clicked through fifty pages of that nonsense hoping to find some meat to it, but I hath been led down a path of ad impressions and wasted time. From now on I'm boycotting all thigns Boston, except when the Sox play the Yankees, and then only to root for the Yankees. Thats right Boston.com, I said go Yankees.

    On a slightly more relevent note, I just marathoned like seven episodes of the new Battlestar Galactica on my DVR, and I think it might actually be the best show on TV, including those edgy shows on cable where they show boobies. Its that good.

  124. What? by webrunner · · Score: 1

    Andromeda at 22? Someone actually expects us to beleive Andromeda is better than Earth Final Conflict, Buffy, Angel, or Futurama?

    --
    ADVENTURERS! - ANTIHERO FOR HIRE - CARDMASTER CONFLICT
    1. Re:What? by phillymjs · · Score: 1

      Sliders was a fantastic show, until Tracy Torme, the show's creator, left. Then they ran out of good 'alternate earth' ideas that wouldn't be over the head of Joe Sixpack, and started ripping off sci-fi movie plots (and doing a piss-poor job of it).

      ~Philly

  125. What about "The 4400"? by thrash_ · · Score: 1

    They put Batman and Superman in, but miss "The 4400"?

    Bleh.

  126. What, and nothing about Ray Bradbury's Theater ??? by obarthelemy · · Score: 1

    This list just got totally discredited...

    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0088591/

    --
    The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
  127. excuse me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what tard decided this flamebait deserved a +4 insightful for fuck's sake??!?!?

  128. Just a few off the top of my head ... by tdelaney · · Score: 1

    The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy
    Blakes 7
    The Time Machine
    Farscape
    Space: Above and Beyond

  129. Six Million Dollar Man by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This show, more than anything else, caused me to pursue a career in engineering. The whole idea that science and engineering could restore a man who lost two legs, an arm and an eye to full function convinced me that the way for me to make a difference in the world was to learn how to design electronics and robotics. I'll admit that 30 years later, we still haven't created technology equal to that depicted on the show, but that doesn't change my opinion that the only way to improve the human condition is through intelligent application of engineering.

    --
    I am not a crackpot.
  130. Re:Can we mod an entire *News Article* as Flamebai by RonnyJ · · Score: 1
    I'm not sure how serious you are, but to see Voyager ranked up at number 14, and DS9 not in the 50, definitely makes me (and likely many others) doubt this list - so I consider it to be a relevant comment to make.

    Generally, Voyager seems to be unfavourably compared to DS9, and rightly so in my opinion. I realise that opinions differ, but to have Voyager at 14th, and DS9 judged not good enough for the top 50, is a travesty.

  131. No Farscape? by tuxlove · · Score: 1

    Farscape should have been in the top 10, but it wasn't even in the top 50. What idiot made this list? DS9 has no place in the list whatsoever, so they at least got that right. It was a total ripoff of B5, and a pale shadow of B5 at that. (In fact, JMS pitched B5 to Paramount originally. They said "not interested", then put out DS9 on their own.) Voyager barely belongs on the list. A lot of the crap on the list is pure camp or not even sci-fi. Given some of the garbage they've included, I have to wonder why they skipped Mork From Ork?

    Oh yeah, where's Blakes 7?

  132. Obvious omissions: by AmicoToni · · Score: 1

    Deep Space 9 and Farscape, but also The Prisoner and Sapphire and Steel.

    Also, I suppose it was unavoidable to have a list focuse on English-language productions, but I would NEVER leave out Raumpatrouille, a superb German series from the sixties.

    I would also remember Star Maidens, although I might not put it among the best 50... :)

  133. Lame, Lame, Lame by DavidBrown · · Score: 1

    The list doesn't make sense, because it includes fantasies such as Xena, and spy dramas such as The Avengers and The Man from UNCLE, neither of which can by any stretch of the imagination be categorized as science fiction. Even including the X-Files is pushing it. Buffy (great show) doesn't belong on the list either. Right now, I've got to go to work, so I don't have time to pick apart this list. But, since that would be a waste of time anyway, I'm better off.

    Make your own list. It doesn't have to be good enough, for anyone else but you.

    Besides, B5 is better than Star Trek.

    --
    144l. ph34r my 133t l3g4l 5k1lz!
  134. The Inevitable Gripes by Zobeid · · Score: 1

    A lot of this will be echoing the comments of others, but here are my gripes. . .

    I don't see how some of these shows even remotely qualify as science fiction. I mean. . . Xena? Superman, Batman and Wonder Woman? Buffy? Tales from the Crypt? Weeding these out, even if it meant reducing the list to a top-30 list, would have given us something more focused.

    I would also weed out "anthology" shows just on principle, like The Twilight Zone, The Outer Limits, and even Mystery Science Theater 3000 (cool tho it was).

    For another thing, I don't understand what the criteria for ranking the shows could be. As somebody else said. . . Farscape may not be the best SF show ever, but it definitely belongs somewhere in the list. I would even put Planet of the Apes above some that are on the list. At times they seem to be picking out good-but-overlooked shows (i.e. Sliders, Logan's Run), but other times they seem to be following the guideline of mass popularity.

    Futurama should definitely be ranked WAY higher than 41.

    Looking at this, I'm reminded of just what a science fiction wasteland TV is. It's very hard to bring science fiction to TV successfully for a number of reasons. The economics are against it, for one thing, due to the cost of sets, props, special effects. It's much cheaper to produce another cop show, or another sitcom, or another reality show.

    Another problem is that most TV SF is produced by TV people who aren't really into science or science fiction, aren't familiar with SF literature, and they are reaching for a mass market who largely share those same traits. It's not made by SF fans and it's not aimed at SF fans.

    Add to that, TV is not a medium well suited to getting across complicated explanations. Time is constrained, extended dialog is often considered tiresome, and you can't afford to lose a bunch of viewers just because they missed an episode or two. Therefore most TV shows have to stick with the familiar (and tired) concepts that their viewers already understand.

    And the result is, a list of SF movies would produce far more gold than a list of TV series, and a list of great SF novels would have even more potential than a list of movies.

  135. Re:ranking - I agree by Savantissimo · · Score: 1

    Absolutely - but who in their wrong mind could rank The Outer Limits # 13, behind even such garbage as Xena and Flash Gordon? TOL was almost the only real SF on the whole list besides the Twilight Zone! Space operas and open-ended "series" are ALL crap if you plug in your frontal lobes. Mere entertainment, sometimes with belabored pretentions to serious thought - but that's all.

    --
    "Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?" - Patrick Henry
  136. article? by whathappenedtomonday · · Score: 1

    no thanks. torrents, please.

    --
    I hope I didn't brain my damage.
  137. Holy Shit by superspaz · · Score: 1

    Why nerds have yet to take over the world:
    They were too busy arguing over what sci-fi. Especially Star Trek.

  138. Re:New BSG is #2? Why not #1? by silphium · · Score: 1

    One thing about BSG is the effortless casting of women in numerous powerful roles. President Ross is a middle aged woman with terminal breast cancer. The toughest good guy is Kara Thrace, a female. The toughest bad guy is #6, a female Cylon. The traitorous Boomer is female Cylon. Katy Sakhoff (Kara Thrace, callsign Starbuck) is simply an amazing. Imho.

  139. Futurama number 41?!?! by jzarling · · Score: 1

    Fry got the shaft - no way 'The Thunderbirds', and BSG TOS should be rated higher than Futurama

    --
    It is better to be the hammer than the anvil.
  140. John Doe? by InfinitePudding · · Score: 0

    A man wakes up on an island with total amnesia, but with an encyclopedic knowledge of everything else. He uses his abilities to solve crimes... while he tries to discover who he is. It was on FOX at the same as Firefly.... ran one season... and was cancelled AFTER a really intriguing 1st season cliffhanger. It was a real shame as it was a great show. It would have been nice to have some sort of closure...

    --
    My first post was marked Troll by a thoughtless mod. Instant Bad Karma.
  141. The New Adventures Of Flash Gordon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A lot of what Filmation made sucked, but The New Adventures Of Flash Gordon (first season) was the best sci-fi they ever made.

  142. Babylon 5 below Galactica?! by Travoltus · · Score: 1

    There was more story line in the opening sentence of episode 1 of Babylon 5 than all of the new Galactica combined.

    SG-1 and Babylon 5 are the two best sci-fi series EVER. Oh well, at least they placed in the top ten...

    --
    --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
  143. Can I get a hit off of that? by rickwood · · Score: 1

    They must have some really good shit up there in Boston. No Farscape? No DS9? And the new BSG better than TNG. Not to mention all the non-sf shows in their best sf shows of all time list.

    Now, I'm not trying to start a flame-war here, but I have a serious question: What is it about the new BSG that everybody loves so much? I don't mean critics, I mean regular eight-sided-die-owning, j. random geeks. Seriously, I really want to know. I really want to like it, but I just can't get into it.

    Maybe it's just that it's shot in Zapruder-Vison. I understand the reasoning for the hand-held camera look, I just don't like it. Especially in the space battle scenes.

    So please, somebody out there, one of "us", explain the new BSG to me.

    P.S. God help me, but I'm gonna burn my karma here in the hopes that I'll get a real answer.

  144. WTF? by khasim · · Score: 1
    I guess I still don't consider than sci-fi because it makes no broad implications on how science and technology affect society.
    Did you miss the intro to most of the shows?

    Does the name "The Village" mean anything to you?

    Maybe you should take some time and re-watch "The Chimes of Big Ben".

    EVERYTHING in that series was tied back to society and how many of the people in charge were directly tied to the people running The Village.

    You should also re-watch the first episode so you can listen for the phrase "serve my new masters".

    In that series, society was shaped by the people who used the technology to convert/control other people who then moved into positions of authority in regular society.
    1. Re:WTF? by pauljlucas · · Score: 1
      EVERYTHING in that series was tied back to society and how many of the people in charge were directly tied to the people running The Village.
      And what effect did this have on the average man on the street? Answer: none. The few episodes where they did film outside of the Village, e.g., in London, showed then contemporary London, not some Orwellian society. Those in charge operated very much in the shadows. Hence, I stand by my original statement that The Prisoner had no broad implications on how science and technology affected society. A cold-war-era spy/political/psychological series, yes; science/technology/sci-fi, no.
      --
      If you reply, do so only to what I explicitly wrote. If I didn't write it, don't assume or infer it.
    2. Re:WTF? by kevcol · · Score: 1

      Sorry, you're wrong.

      Numbers rule this argument, and you're the lone voice in the wilderness.

    3. Re:WTF? by STrinity · · Score: 1

      And what effect did this have on the average man on the street? Answer: none. The few episodes where they did film outside of the Village, e.g., in London, showed then contemporary London, not some Orwellian society.

      One of the last scenes of the series shows the Prisoner returning to his London home and the door opening automatically with the same hum as the doors in the village. The intended implication is clear -- the world is the village.

      The series is an allegory, and everything in it is about society at large.

      --
      Les Miserables Volume 1 now up with my reading of
  145. well, that just can't be right by BenFaremo · · Score: 0

    Number 37
    'Space 1999'
    When the moon gets pulled out of orbit in 1999, astronauts on Moon Base Alpha are pulled into space with it. Led by the valiant Commander Walter Koenig (played by Martin Landau)....

  146. pointless list by Belseth · · Score: 1

    It was just a cross section of genre shows a good share were either a stretch to call scifi or were outright fantasy. Alot of actual good shows were ignored where as some of the worst shows ever made it well up into the list. The list order also seemed random other than maybe the top ten and even then some ranked higher than they should have. Very bad, like I say pointless, list.

  147. WTF? by dtfinch · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Number 27: 'Buffy the Vampire Slayer'

    Number 12: 'Xena: Warrior Princess'

    Xena better than Buffy? Both sci-fi?

  148. DS-9 (Revisited) by pilsner.urquell · · Score: 1
    The story says:

    They don't even give a nod to greatest-trek-of-all-time DS9, so I don't know about this list

    the article says:

    Number 5 'Babylon 5' 'Babylon 5' is arguably one of the best sci-fi shows ever made. Some may compare it to 'Star Trek DS-9' but with a better plot and cast - you be the judge. In the meantime, we'll give 'Babylon 5'; a thumbs up showing in the No. 5 spot.

    That could be a nod and maybe a nod & a wink.

  149. Broad implications by antizeus · · Score: 1
    it makes no broad implications on how science and technology affect society.
    Progress in surveillance technology allows the state to more easiliy monitor and control the citizens. Recall when Leo McKern as Number Two (I think it was) informs Number Six that The Village is a prototype for how the rest of the world will become. Also recall "The General" with its rapid "education" that renders its students superbly capable of reciting facts, but does nothing about the ability to process those facts. Consider what effect that would have if the entire education system were converted to that sort of model.

    This is just stuff off the top of my head. I'm sure others can come up with other examples.

    --
    -- $SIGNATURE
  150. Same complaint, different top 50 list by east+coast · · Score: 1

    MST3K in the top 10? Please, do not get me wrong on this. I love Crow and Tom like they are my own children, I watched religiously, I have shirts, posters, laser discs and DVDs.... But in the top 10? It's not even sci-fi but we may as well skip that concept altogether or we would be looking at the top 20 list if we discounted all the crap in there.

    And to have Twilight Zone at a (imho) lowly 7. If anything Zone should have been #2 at least, I can give merit to the social implications of ST:TOS but Zone is where it's at. While not always sci-fi based it had tons of great sci-episodes and it gave writers that would have gained little more than a "pulp" standing a mainstream outlet.

    Speaking of TZ, where the fuck is Night Gallery? If Xena is more sci-fi than NG I'll bite my own ass not to mention that again NG was also another great outlet for fringe writers to make it to the TVs and minds of the viewing public.

    I don't even want to mention stuff like Lexx, Seaquest, Red Dwarf... these people need to pull their heads out of their asses.

    I would even go as far as to mention Cosmos since Sagan had conjecture about scenerios involving life beyond this planet. Certainly more sci-fi than the fucking Jetsons.

    --
    Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
  151. Re:Soap Opera, DS9, B5, BSG by toggles · · Score: 0

    > Will they drive off into the ditch along
    > the way and never get to the conclusion

    They are already driving into the ditch, this started off as one of the best remakes I've ever seen, but the new episodes are dropping so much bollocks on the veiwer it's not funny anymore. Take the last episode I saw, you can't tell who's a cylon, they x-ray etc the same way humans do, but the viewer is expected to belive that Sharon can cut herself, poke a fibre optic cable up her arm, and read and write data down it and save the fleet? c'mon, i'm about done with it, thanks to the hubub made on /. recently I've finally found some decent sci-fi in Firefly.

  152. Harsh Realms by iamcadaver · · Score: 1

    Only aired two episodes, but they were good. Google search for Harsh Realms

    --
    Before I part with'em: two pennies weigh ~4.996+/-0.014g, have a zinc core, and the face of Lincoln. You can keep 'em.
  153. Perfect timing by ghost. · · Score: 1

    Like most of the intended audience for this article and subsequent discussion, I thought I wasn't going to have anything to do tonight (Saturday).

    Slashdot and Boston.com to the rescue!

    --
    Bush is a cylon.
  154. Looking for opinions... by east+coast · · Score: 1

    I already raved once, I know. I'm looking more for how people feel about a fine show but I'm cautious to call it sci-fi....

    That show is, of course, In Search Of. Spock was kicking out the old campfire yarns about every unexplained event ever. To even hear the theme music today would send a chill down my spine. But is it sci-fi? I'd just like to hear some thoughts since the show hasn't been mentioned (I think).

    --
    Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
  155. Ghost in the Shell: Stand Alone Complex by X86Daddy · · Score: 1

    That show could possibly be my favorite sci-fi series yet, even better than the new Battlestar... Did anyone watch it through? It had some of the deepest content about real dilemnas that would be faced by a society with futuristic technology that I've ever seen. Admittedly, I haven't seen many anime series, but that one really struck me as amazing. They had Futurama, Thunderbirds, and several mini-series, so I'm not sure why anime would be ruled out, either.

    1. Re:Ghost in the Shell: Stand Alone Complex by TomHandy · · Score: 1

      Maybe they aren't counting it since it's Japanese? A shame if so; there is some amazing sci-fi anime out there.......... aside from GitS: SAC, there's a ton of other stuff. I was going to write out a list, but damn if there's a whole bunch of stuff I'd want to mention, and I'd hate to leave something out.

  156. What?! No Farscape! by spamster · · Score: 1

    They must be outta they're frelling heads...Farscape is one of the most original, well written sci-fi shows of the last decade. It was waaaay ahead of "Voyager" and its "temporal anomaly of the week" storylines and I would go so far as to say its as good as or even better than DS9. As for the new BSG being #2 on the list, that seems pretty fair, although I think a few years from now, we'll remember it as being number one.

  157. Sliders was garbage by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
    Sliders' should have been a widespread hit, but it was ahead of its time. The show was about a wiz-kid genius Quinn Mallory, played by Jerry O'Connell, and his band of three companions who slide among Earth's alternate realities.

    WTF? The show was trash. More than half the time the "alternate earths" were so implausible as to shetter suspension of disbelief within the first 10 minutes. Sample plot synopsis: "a parallel earth where all is the same as now...only there's no medicines". That's right, identical except for lack of antibiotics and such. I wanted to suggest reading Connections by James Burke to the genius who wrote that episode (plus smack him in the head). Good science fiction it wasn't.

    --
    If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  158. No Sapphire & Steel? by meehawl · · Score: 1

    No Sapphire & Steel? This list sucks.

    --

    Da Blog
  159. Ro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ensign Ro Laren was from TNG, not DS9. Apparently she was considered for DS9, but the actress turned it down so the producers modified the role and turned it into Kira Nerys, another strong female sci-fi character.

  160. Farscape.. by bezgin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    a list without Farscape and the 4400 where even Xena came in.. forget it.

    --
    exit();
  161. Prisoner Not Sci-Fi? by Thedalek · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Episode 1 introduces the balloon-like Rover, guardian of the Village. No technology like it existed then or now. Later in the episode, #6 is given an "electropass" which, by inferrance, amounts to a low range wireless transmitter, which emits a "key" signal to Rover, telling it to ignore the bearer. This is not dissimilar to current technologies which didn't exist in 1967 (such as bluetooth or WiFi).

    Episode 3 (A B & C) features "dream viewing" technology, something far beyond the grasp of even current technology.

    Episode 5 (The Schizoid Man) mentions and Episode 6 (The General) features an advanced AI in charge of predicting complex social patterns and forming brainwashing strategies. It is presented as being capable of answering any question, with the exception of one, insoluble by man nor machine.

    Episode 6 also features a concept called "speed-learn," a process by which a person can quickly absorb large amounts of information via a television broadcast. It is presented as giving a full 9-week class in the space of 30 seconds.

    Episode 12 (A Change of Mind) fatures a non-invasive form of neurosurgery, using highly focused soundwaves. Although the device is not used on #6, its functionality is demonstrated. Technology such as this did not exist in 1967, and likely does not exist now.

    Episode 14 (Living in Harmony) features a combination of hallucinogenic drugs and audio stimuli which produces an impossible effect with any known drugs.

    Many elements within the series are used frequently, including implied mind-control rays/beams/lights/sounds which induce instant paralysis, the precise location of The Village, and the unknown function of the teeter-totter device.

    And if the final episode (Fall Out) takes place in this universe, I want to know how.

    --
    Happiness is relative, Based upon the way we live.
    1. Re:Prisoner Not Sci-Fi? by TastelessGarbage · · Score: 1
      In addition, "Do Not Forsake Me Oh My Darling" involves actual mind transference, and provides perhaps the most compelling clues as to why Carl did resign.

      ...As well as the only reference to his real name throughout the series, provided by his fiancee. Leaving The Prisoner off of this type of list makes an utter joke of the exercise.

      --
      That ain't liver; that's beef kidney!
    2. Re:Prisoner Not Sci-Fi? by AstroSurf · · Score: 1

      Excellent post!

      The Prisoner. Best TV show ever!

      What's this Nowhere Man people are posting about?

      --
      Astro
  162. Psychedelicious Space 1999! by DrEasy · · Score: 1

    Space 1999 is the second most psychedelic TV series I've ever seen, (#1 being the Prisoner of course). Planets were typically orange, green, yellow, or pink, and the worst the aliens could do was make the crew have some bad hallucinatory trip. Way cool!

    --
    "In our tactical decisions, we are operating contrary to our strategic interest."
  163. "The Time Tunnel" by Derling+Whirvish · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What about "The Time Tunnel"? The list has "Quantum Leap" and QL is simply an updated TTT. Both were pretty much the same thing except QL overlayed a social commentary on the time jumps that TTT didn't.

  164. Martin Landau as Walter Koenig? by HatofPig · · Score: 2, Informative

    Uh, try John Koenig. And Andromeda as 22! These guys must be on crack!

    --
    Silicon & Charybdis McLuhan Kildall Papert Kay
  165. They also missed . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The list also missed "One Step Beyond",
    a late 1950's series with new Sci-Fi stories
    each week. Predated the 1st "The Outer Limits"
    with many, but not all, shows as good as the best from that series.

  166. Salvage 1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A lot of the shows on the list aren't science fiction. I'm glad to see Star Trek as the number one show though.

    Here's one they missed. It was far ahead of its time, and a lot of people still remember it, even though they never reran it!

    Salvage One - Its about a salvage company that launched rockets into space to salvage old satelightes, and they always broke into NASA computers with a modem before launch to get the data they needed - which may be the first depiction of online hacking - security cracking on TV. It starred Andy Griffith and was made in the late 70s.

    http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Launchpad/9 782/salvage1.html

  167. Bigots. by Rickler · · Score: 1

    How the hell does babylon5 beat sg1? BS. Stargate is the top 9th most searched word in isohunt.

    --

    The human race is artificial intelligence created using object orientated programming.
  168. The Starlost by uberdave · · Score: 1

    Let me throw The Starlost onto your list. Earthship Ark has got to be the largest vessel built by humans on any TV show.

    1. Re:The Starlost by srmalloy · · Score: 1
      Let me throw The Starlost onto your list. Earthship Ark has got to be the largest vessel built by humans on any TV show.

      Yes, and if you read Harlan Ellison's original screenplay, or the novelization he did with Edward Bryant, Phoenix Without Ashes, the size of the ship as described at that website grossly overstates what the series actually described. In Ellison's original screenplay, the domes were supposed to be 50 miles across; in the series, they were five miles across. When Ellison visited the production studio, he found them building the bridge set -- which wouldn't be needed until the final episode (their rationale? "He still has to find the back-up bridge"). Ellison got so fed up with the idiocies of the production that he divorced himself from it and made them use one of his pen names, 'Cordwainer Bird', as the author of the screenplay (his way of 'giving the bird' to them). The Starlost could not, in my opinion, even approach the top 50.

    2. Re:The Starlost by uberdave · · Score: 1

      I don't recall the five miles across figure. I remember a three days to walk across figure. Of course, it has been a long while since I've seen an episode. True Ellison did get screwed over. Still, despite how bad it was, it's much better SF than Tales From the Crypt.

    3. Re:The Starlost by srmalloy · · Score: 1

      Under the "We're going to call a show SF if it incorporates anything that could not happen in the normal, mundane, day-to-day world, and then we're going to pick fifty shows from that definition according to our prejudices toward normal, mundane character dramas" premise, then I suppose that Tales from the Crypt would be ranked higher. Of course, that premise is roughly equivalent to generating a '50 Best Dog Breeds' list by defining dogs as any domesticated four-legged mammal that slobbers, and picking winners on the basis of providing hair for weaving -- we shouldn't be surprised that we get camels, llamas, alpacas, and the like in with the occasional St. Bernard, Great Dane, and bulldog.

  169. Stargate: Atlantis by bclark · · Score: 1

    The list isn't terrible, there are some great shows in there that I'd forgotten about: Sliders, at least the first few seasons of it, Alien Nation, Babylon 5, MST3K), but Stargate: Atlantis? I liked the original series basically only because of Richard Dean Anderson, but Atlantis has just got nothing. It's like comparing CSI and CSI:Miami, the former has great characters in fairly improbable situations, the latter has a bunch of dull characters in poorly-written, completely improbably situations. They also kill a lot more people in both Atlantis and CSI:Miami, I guess that's supposed to make the show more exciting. Also Farscape missing is a crime.

  170. Dr Who! by unlabeledchick · · Score: 1

    Dr Who is only a number 8? This list, needs to be bombed and the person who wrote it needs to be tortured- the worst punishment is watching 24 hours, back-to-back episodes of the Simple Life...

  171. Re:Can we mod an entire *News Article* as Flamebai by soliptic · · Score: 1

    Funnily enough, I think that's the first think Zonk has said or done which I wholeheartedly applaud ;)

  172. UFO by pipingguy · · Score: 1


    I've always liked UFO although it hasn't been broadcast recently.

    It'd probably suck if I were to watch it today (much like Get Smart and Quark.

    Those of you who are less than 30 years old have been spoiled.

  173. Most Controversial Thread on Slashdot Ever by geoffrobinson · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    It's good to be a geek and to be able to argue about this.

    --
    Except for ending slavery, the Nazis, communism, & securing American independence, war has never solved anything.
  174. They are farbot! by Jahndar · · Score: 1

    Farscape should have been in the top 10, AT LEAST. On *my* list it would be number one. I am glad to see MST3K, Twilight Zone, and ST:TOS made the list.

  175. missing ones by serutan · · Score: 1

    While we're remembering British shows, let's not forget UFO, a short-lived show that aired about the time of Space 1999. Pretty decent sci-fi. I believe there are still people trying to revive it.

    1. Re:missing ones by rossdee · · Score: 1

      " let's not forget UFO, a short-lived show that aired about the time of Space 1999."

      UFO was made in 1970, Spacw 1888 was made in 1975

      Both were created by Gerry and Sylvia Anderson of Thunderbirds.

      S

  176. X-Files?! by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 1

    You forgot to mention X-Files, which they ranked above Babylon 5, even, in the number four spot. That was fantasy, damn it. You can call it post-modern fantasy if you want, but it doesn't change the fact that Carter et al. had no gorram clue what The Truth actually was, so that the mytharc turned to shit by season six.

    (Daren Morgan, however, was still fuckin' brilliant.)

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
  177. Crap list... by psykocrime · · Score: 4, Informative

    Whaaa-waaaa--wwwwaaattt?????

    no Salvage, Blue Thunder, Airwolf, Knight Rider, Automan, Max Headroom or The Prisoner????

    --
    // TODO: Insert Cool Sig
    1. Re:Crap list... by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      no Salvage, Blue Thunder, Airwolf, Knight Rider, Automan, Max Headroom or The Prisoner????

        Red Dawn
      +Blue Thunder
      --------------
      Purple Rain

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
  178. missing shows, and sucky ones on the list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about Now and Again?

    Xena is not sci-fi.

    Stargate Atlantis is okay, but every other episode is a "look we're in the jungle and have no technology" episode

  179. Goddam right by heinousjay · · Score: 1

    I don't know who these people think they are, trying to make money. They should get with the new times and give everything away.

    --
    Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
    1. Re:Goddam right by Laconian · · Score: 1

      You know, if there were fifty worthwhile pages of text, that'd be one thing.

      But they have you tapping Next for every two sentences of BS. They're just milking you for ad impressions.

  180. Where the hell is Millenium by Laz7 · · Score: 1

    Chris Carter's Millenium ranks in my top 10 list of best Sci-Fi shows that I have seen. Lance Henriksen does an incredible job and the show had some of most powerful moments I have ever seen on any type of screen (the plague scene where Lance takes his daughter and his wife up to a cabin in the woods to wait it out - still send shivers down my body). so basically, WTF!

  181. Lexx, Lexx, Lexx, Lexx by Dolphinzilla · · Score: 3, Interesting

    where the hell is Lexx? it makes my top 50 easily so does
    Time Tunnel, Land of The Giants and The Invaders

    There are a bunch of good SciFi series out there that far outranks some of the ones that made the top 50 -

    I love Linda Carter as Wonder Woman, but give me a break as SciFi it does not even rate a number IMHO !

    1. Re:Lexx, Lexx, Lexx, Lexx by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      where the hell is Lexx? it makes my top 50 easily so does

      I haven't caught lexx enough to judge. I thought it was another one of those cases where sci-fi was being used a a vehicel for sex, i.e. "get some lexx" or whatever the advert was. I guess it is better than "Eve in outer space". Eve is from my understanding one of the longest living soft porn series that you have the misfortune of watching if you fall asleep watching a movie on showtime. Eve travels around the world, has the ability to transform her self into a perfect woman.. handy as you can cast anyone as the lead... and eve in outer space shows us how aliens in a flying sauser learn about human sexuality by monitoring eve's encounters... and masturbating. Lexx is Shakespear in contrast, but it's no top 50.

  182. it's wikipedia by way2trivial · · Score: 1

    gimme a momment, I'll fix that definition to suit ME!

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  183. Re:Soap Opera, DS9, B5, BSG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Babylon 5 was not a soap opera. Babylon 5 was a story.

    It was also called Babble on 5. Blah, Blah, Blah........

  184. What about Kochak? by Kent+Brewster · · Score: 1

    Dood ... they missed one of the very best skiffy shows EVAR, Kolchak: The Night Stalker . X-Files creator Chris Carter cites Kolchak as key inspiration ... run down the five-DVD set, turn off the lights, and prepare to be creeped out, starting with the scariest theme song in the history of TV.

    1. Re:What about Kochak? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Dood ... they missed one of the very best skiffy
      > shows EVAR, Kolchak: The Night Stalker .

      Yeah, I was wondering why that wasn't on the list too.

  185. Thank God by pookemon · · Score: 1

    I clicked through the whole 50 just to make sure that Lexx wasn't in the list.

    --
    dnuof eruc rof aixelsid
  186. Sherman and Peabody by Derling+Whirvish · · Score: 1

    I guess that makes Peabody's Improbable History also sci fi.

  187. Sliders: so much potential by gad_zuki! · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I never saw the allure of sliders. Sure, it had a good premise but the execution was terrible. It was, lets face it, poorly acted, poorly shot, and consisted of cheap sets. Either the characters weren't fleshed out or the actors couldnt pull it off. I remember thinking this show could breakthrough to the mainstream if it had more drama and was simply better made. Instead of improving on the first two seasons Fox and Scifi pretty much gave it a slow and ugly death.

    I wouldnt mind seeing a better production team try the "elseworld" game. Perhaps with more allegory.

    1. Re:Sliders: so much potential by Guiness17 · · Score: 1

      I really like the concept, and watched the first season religiously.

      After that, it just wore thin. Then when it became a 'put chicks in tank tops, and keep them running' show, my viewing tapered off. If I wanna see that, I'll watch the 590's...(DTV, doncha know)

      --
      Imagine for a moment a world without hypothetical situations...
    2. Re:Sliders: so much potential by DavidTC · · Score: 1
      Sliders had some great episodes. For example, the episode where the arrow of time ran backwards and cause kept preceeding effect. (How do you get out of jail? Plead guilty!)

      It was marred by several things:

      Getting home is a nice premise. But do not screw with us. (If you watched Sliders, you know what I'm talking about. Creaky gate, anyone?)

      Blatant ripping off of other shows and movies.

      Attempting to continue without the damn actors.

      Some good things:

      The mix of 'sci-fi' worlds and 'normal' ones. Some worlds had some weird technological advance, some had normal science and weird social structures (The one with no America, where illegal Canadians got smuggled through the Mexican border.), and some were near identical to ours.

      What I would do:

      Longer on some worlds. Four or five episodes sometimes. Or even repeat worlds.

      'Systems' of worlds. One magic world? One world with ESP? One world where humanity evolved differently? One world where time ran slower and it was still 1980? Come on. The great thing about Sliders is that we can have a premise, and explore it in one direction, and then explore it in a completely different direction.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  188. It's time to play the music... by pookemon · · Score: 1

    Yes - lets put the Muppets in there...

    --
    dnuof eruc rof aixelsid
  189. How can they miss Blakes 7? by ericdano · · Score: 1
    Blake's 7 guys. Classic Sci-fi. Star Trek Next Generation as #3???

    Totally agree that Battle Star Galatica is on track to being #1. It is an incredible show. A lot of powerful episodes, especially when they recombined the fleet. That was some great stuff there. Looking forward to what happens with the Pegasus.

    --
    It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
    I moderate therefore I rule!
    --
    1. Re:How can they miss Blakes 7? by khelms · · Score: 1

      I'd be willing to bet these guys never even heard of Blake's 7. After all, it was an English import that generally was only seen on PBS stations. At least give them credit for knowing about Dr. Who and ranking it fairly high.

    2. Re:How can they miss Blakes 7? by ericdano · · Score: 1

      Knowing Dr. Who, then missing Blake's 7. Ok. But to also miss Farscape? No excuse there. These guys do not know scifi.

      --
      It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
      I moderate therefore I rule!
      --
  190. WTF? No Farscape? by fatboy · · Score: 1

    Come on! Wonder Woman, Batman and Two Supermen (None are Sci-Fi AFAIAC) but no Incredible Hulk?

    This is completely wack! This person needs their nerd credentials revoked.

    --
    --fatboy
  191. Enterprise? by geekee · · Score: 1

    Enterprise and Star Trek TOS were the only shows in the genre where people acted like real people instead of one-dimensional politically correct cardboard cutouts. Battlestar Galactica belongs at number 1, but the fact that it actually made it to number 2 on this list was surprising, given the crap that got high rankings.

    --
    Vote for Pedro
  192. Sci-Fi on Radio by serutan · · Score: 1

    Science fiction made its broadcast debut long before television. Hundreds of shows have been preserved, largely by the fan community, which thrives now more than ever thanks to mp3s and the Internet. Many shows were scripted by the classic sci-fi authors of the day, or were dramatizations of their published stories. Some are way better than TV.

    Related article on sci-fi.com

    A few of the many sci-fi/weirdness shows:

    2000 Plus
    2000 X
    Atom Man
    Beyond Our Ken
    Beyond Midnight
    Beyond Tomorrow
    Buck Rogers
    Ceiling Unlimited
    Dark Fantasy
    Dimension X
    Exploring Tomorrow
    The Fifth Horseman
    Hall of Fantasy
    Inner Sanctum
    Journey Into Space
    Orbit One Zero
    Planet Man
    Space Patrol
    The Strange Dr. Weird
    Superman
    Tom Corbett, Space Cadet
    The Unexpected
    Weird Circle
    Witch's Tale

  193. An' youse guys calls yourselfs programmers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1. Star Trek (Original) ["too few characters per line"]
    2. Battlestar Galactica (New) ["too few characters per line"]
    3. Star Trek: The Next Generation ["too few characters per line"]
    4. The X-Files ["too few characters per line"]
    5. Babylon 5 ["too few characters per line"]
    6. Stargate SG-1 ["too few characters per line"]
    7. The Twilight Zone ["too few characters per line"]
    8. Dr. Who ["too few characters per line"]
    9. Mystery Science Theater 3000 ["too few characters per line"]
    10. Sliders ["too few characters per line"]
    11. Lost ["too few characters per line"]
    12. Xena: Warrior Princess ["too few characters per line"]
    13. The Outer Limits ["too few characters per line"]
    14. Star Trek Voyager ["too few characters per line"]
    15. Logan's Run ["too few characters per line"]
    16. Flash Gordon ["too few characters per line"]
    17. Firefly ["too few characters per line"]
    18. V ["too few characters per line"]
    19. Dark Angel ["too few characters per line"]
    20. The Hitchhiker ["too few characters per line"]
    21. Quantum Leap ["too few characters per line"]
    22. Andromeda ["too few characters per line"]
    23. Tales from the Crypt ["too few characters per line"]
    24. Wonder Woman ["too few characters per line"]
    25. The Jetsons ["too few characters per line"]
    26. Stargate Atlantis ["too few characters per line"]
    27. Buffy the Vampire Slayer ["too few characters per line"]
    28. Adventures of Superman ["too few characters per line"]
    29. The Six Million Dollar Man ["too few characters per line"]
    30. Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea ["too few characters per line"]
    31. Alien Nation ["too few characters per line"]
    32. My Favorite Martian ["too few characters per line"]
    33. Lost In Space ["too few characters per line"]
    34. The Avengers ["too few characters per line"]
    35. Battlestar Galactica (Original) ["too few characters per line"]
    36. The Bionic Woman ["too few characters per line"]
    37. Space 1999 ["too few characters per line"]
    38. Batman ["too few characters per line"]
    39. The Man from U.N.C.L.E. ["too few characters per line"]
    40. The Thunderbirds ["too few characters per line"]
    41. Futurama ["too few characters per line"]
    42. Science Fiction Theatre ["too few characters per line"]
    43. Nowhere Man ["too few characters per line"]
    44. Lois & Clark: The New Adventures of Superman ["too few characters per line"]
    45. The Greatest American Hero ["too few characters per line"]
    46. That Was Then ["too few characters per line"]
    47. Buck Rogers in the 25th Century ["too few characters per line"]
    48. 3rd Rock From The Sun ["too few characters per line"]
    49. The Wild Wild West ["too few characters per line"]
    50. Earth - Final Conflict ["too few characters per line"]
  194. Gripe by TurboStar · · Score: 1

    You can't get to #1 without hitting 11 pages. Nice ad impressions there. Better if you hit all 50 pages. Just wanted to hear myself complain out loud. I'm feeling mighty bitchy today and this article just irritated me.

  195. Xena is sci-fi? by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1

    What in the world are they thinking? It's closer to soft-porn than sci-fi.

  196. Re:Sci-Fi? Nah, Fantasy.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1) Bash Bush, Fox News, or anything even remotely related to conservatism on slashdot,
    2) Get modded +5
    3) Profit!

  197. Been said before, but I still feel the need by JawzX · · Score: 1

    to rant about the ones they left out! I mostly agree with the order, except for a few places...but where are these in the list?

    in no particular order:

    Red Dwarf: Comic genious, in SPAAACE! The Cat alone deserves to make the list!

    Farscape: Better than BSG(new) IMHO, Not #1, but it shoulda been there SOMEWHERE, and higher than BSG(new).

    ST: DS9: My LEAST favorite trek series, but still deserves to be on the list. MMMmmmm... Dax.

    The Prisoner: I've only seen one episode and it was good enough to make me belive it ought to be on the list.

    SeaQuest DSV: Campy writing, but cool SFX and fun to watch. Definately better than Flash Gordon, but not better than The Thunder Birds.

    Logan's Run: Oh, wait! They included it, cool!

    UFO: Space 1999, The ThunderBirds, but no UFO? balls.

    Thats My 2 cents.

  198. RED DWARF!!! by brian0918 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Nuff said.

  199. Re:DS9, SeaQuest, The Prisoner, It's About Time... by Velox_SwiftFox · · Score: 1

    And where's The Starlost???

  200. The Prisoner by peterjhill2002 · · Score: 1

    I cannot believe that they missed the prisoner... How many of these shows have their own society that meets where the series was filmed... How many series can still blow your mind the way that #6 and his fellow prisoners did...

    oh well

  201. CSI by CodeMunch · · Score: 1

    I'd put CSI up there - all their evidence gathering & sleuthing uses science & some form of logic reasoning. Add in the fictional characters and plots & you get Science Fiction. Oh, and it is entertaining - a big plus!

    1. Re:CSI by flabbergast · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but "normal" people watch CSI (and its derivatives) but "normal" people don't watch Sci-Fi. So obviously they couldn't put CSI on the list.

    2. Re:CSI by CodeMunch · · Score: 1

      ah crap....does this mean my official nerd badge has been revoked? I hate it when I stray into the realm of "normal" mortals.

  202. huh? by ezdude · · Score: 1

    Since when are comic book adaptations considered sci-fi? Superman, Batman, Lois and Clark, and Wonder Woman? If any comic book adaptations made the list, it should have been the animated X-men series or The Incredible Hulk. At least, David Banner was a scientist. Also, where the heck is Quantum Leap? Another show with a scientist. I also echo the outcry about omitting Red Dwarf (should have made top ten) and Blake 7. Also, the more recent version of The Outer Limits was actually better in many ways than the original. Overall, the list is pretty lame.

  203. Ugh, *VOYAGER* was on the LIST? I take it back... by Vthornheart · · Score: 1
    The author was right and just to question the authenticity of this list. I hereby modify my mod from "Flamebait (-1)" to "Just, but failed to rally a call for the author's death (+ 1/2)". I'll leave it to someone else to mod him "Replace 'DS9' With 'TNG' (-1)".

    Or maybe it was a typo: we all make mistakes when it's been a long day. His fingers reached for TNG, but some strange cosmic force changed it to DS9. Obviously this was in error. Can an admin go up and fix that please?

    --
    -Vendal Thornheart
  204. Re:Sci-Fi? Nah, Fantasy.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..and they missed the best fantasy show of them all.

    ...or clueless slashdot readers who are politically brainwashed.

  205. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  206. Strong female leads by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

    I agree there's no particular reason for the strong characters to be male in sci-fi, but there are plenty of examples of strong female characters in recent shows. I'd extend your list somewhat:

    Babylon 5 Ivanova (possibly the best female character in sci-fi ever) Delenn Elizabeth Lochley Star Trek + spin-offs Kira Nerys Kathryn Janeway Firefly Pretty much the whole female cast SG-1 + Atlantis Sam Carter Elizabeth Weir BSG (the new one) Starbuck Dr Who Rose Tyler

    Those are the first few that come to mind, all of them not just strong female characters, but main fixtures of the biggest sci-fi series in recent years.

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    1. Re:Strong female leads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ivanova is always right.
      I will listen to Ivanova.
      I will not ignore Ivanova's recommendations.
      Ivanova is god.

    2. Re:Strong female leads by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      Yep, she had several great quotes...

      Sheridan: "You have a face people can trust."
      Ivanova: "I would rather have a face people would fear."

      Ivanova: "I know, I know. It's a Russian thing. When we're about to do something stupid, we like to catalog the full extent of our stupidity, for future reference"

      Draal: "I like you. You're trouble!"
      Ivanova: "Thank you. Nicest thing anyone's said about me in days."

      Ivanova: "Good luck, Captain. I think you're about to go where everyone's gone before!"

      And of course her defining moment for the entire series:

      Ivanova: "Who am I? I am Susan Ivanova, Commander, daughter of Andrei and Sophie Ivanov. I am the right hand of vengeance, and the boot that is going to kick your sorry ass all the way back to Earth... I am death incarnate, and the last living thing that you are ever going to see. God sent me."

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    3. Re:Strong female leads by Kuros_overkill · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the classic Seanon 1 quips: Confirmed Survey 1. Upon arrival you will report for debriefing. And just one more thing, on your trip back I want you to take the time to learn the Babylon 5 mantra. Ivanova is always right. I will listen to Ivanova. I will not ignore Ivanova's recommendations. Ivanova is God. And if this ever happens again Ivanova will personally rip your lungs out! Babylon control out. Civilians. Just kidding about that God part. No offense. and my all time personal Favorite(s): (sorry, only ment to quote the first one, but the others fit in so nicely with the theme) Susan Ivanova: No boom today... boom tomorrow. There's always a boom tomorrow. Look Sombody has to keep some damn perspective around here... Sooner or later BOOM! Susan Ivanova: Ambassador, do you really want to know what's going on down there? Ambassador Londo Mollari: Yes, absolutely! Susan Ivanova: Boom. Boom boom boom. Boom boom. Boom! Have a nice day! Susan Ivanova: So the next time we find out where the Shadows plan to strike, we can mine the area, and as soon as they come out of hyperspace... Citizen G'Kar: Then, as you so concisely say, Boom!

    4. Re:Strong female leads by Kuros_overkill · · Score: 1

      Note to self: remember to format... format... format...

  207. Who are these idiots? by thelizman · · Score: 1

    So, it's a list about Sci-Fi, and they put "Wild Wild Wild West" and "Xena: Warrior Princess". Sorry guys, those aren't Sci-fi. Ones a western. The other's fantasy. And "Lost"... that's a drama. Likewise, "Hitchiker" was horror, as was "Tales from the Crypt." "Buffy the Vampire Slayer," was... well... crap, but it too is horror/creature feature. I'll give you pass on "The Man from U.N.C.L.E." for its science elements, but "Nowhere Man" belongs nowhere on this list.

    Meanwhile, no "Farscape", no "Lexx". "ST:DS9" and "ST:Enterprise" get punked. Where's "Space: Above and Beyond"? "Seaquest DSV"?

    This is what happens when journalists, armed with not a clue but an uncanny ability to search the IMDB, try to write an article.

    1. Re:Who are these idiots? by eskayp · · Score: 1

      I am not a media expert, but...

      wouldn't 'The Prisoner' qualify as SciFi?

      Lots of high-tech futuristic gadgets and conspiracies.

      On the other hand, maybe it was just more Double-Oh Seven.

      --
      I didn't desert Windows; Windows deserted me: BSOD
  208. Stuntmen. by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I think of pro wrestlers as live-action stuntmen.

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
  209. No Great Space Coaster? by Ziggurat+Dan · · Score: 0

    Gary Gnu would be sad at that.

    --
    I'm pro-accordion and I vote
  210. NO ALF?! by leko · · Score: 1

    The authors of that list had better keep a close eye on their cats.

  211. Some other great British shows missing by BigBadaboom · · Score: 1

    eg.
    The Tomorrow People
    Sapphire and Steel

  212. shocked, I tell you by dabblah · · Score: 1

    I was completely shocked by that list when I got up to number 2, obviously Star Trek was going to be 1, and they left The Prisoner off. Allowing for varying tastes, that should be top five on any SF fan's list (I figured it for one or two). Also, echoing what has been said elsewhere, I'll take DS9 over voyager, and both over some of what is in 25-50 (though both the Bionic Woman and Six Million Dollar Man are a little underrated). Max Hedroom, Blakes 7, Red Dwarf and Mork and Mindi should also edge some of that stuff out (at 15ish, 40ish, 4, 20ish for my personal rankings of those). Dr Who being 7 was also disappointing. Should be top five, expecially given what was...

    There was another BBC comedy, that would float in the 45-50 range of my personal top fifty, that had the lady that played Mrs Slocumb accidentally (?) launched into space that was somewhat funny. Anyone recognise it from that? Takeoff on an children's novel that also escapes me where some woman goes to mars (Mrs Pickrell or something like that?).

  213. You'll never get concensus on a list like this by btempleton · · Score: 1

    Because everybody has their different tastes. However, there are some things that are perhaps a bit more possible to make objective, and that's worth getting even voted opinions on.

    In particular, it's often clear with SF/Fantasy shows that sometimes we have a show that "gets" the genre, and sometimes we have a show that is hollywood people doing SF. In both cases you can have better and worse. After all there are good non-SF hollywood people and they can make good SF from time to time, but sometimes they will just throw in something that is plain stupid, and shows that they don't understand SF.

    Shows that get the genre can also vary in quality, but in this case it will be more a question of the usual variations of quality. And when they are excellent, they will be the best.

    To make a top 50 list, a show should have few episodes that make you turn away in disgust, and also have many excellent shows. There are shows on this list (and shows I have seen people claim as favourites) that don't make this cut, and thus we will argue.

    --
    Has it been over a year since you last donated to the Electronic Frontier Foundation
  214. What? by dswensen · · Score: 1

    Sliders?

    List invalidated.

  215. Wild Wild West was Sci-Fi by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 1

    And its spiritual follower, "Adventures of Brisco County, Jr." was even more so.

    I do agree Xena isn't. It's clearly fantasy, not Sci-Fi, not that that means much really.

    Lost is a borderline case. There is dramatic Sci-Fi, and if you read the stuff on the next of what people have figured out (I recommend you don't, BTW, it spoils it), it's probably Sci-Fi.

    Lexx sucked. Not sure why people keep calling for that. Hell, "Cleopatra 2525" was better than Lexx and I wouldn't put it on the list either.

    Dark Angel sucked too, how that made the list, I dunno.

    What a mess this list is.

    --
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
  216. Ads? by uncoolcentral · · Score: 1

    My good ole Mozilla extensions must be blocking that tripe well.
    Nothing but content on my LCD, baby.

  217. pointless list by frovingslosh · · Score: 1

    They stuck in a lot of shows that are hard to justify as true sci-fi, or are hard to explain other members of the franchise if they are (Xena at 12 but Hercules nowhere on the list at all, when several members of the Trek franchise made the list, showing it's not about only one to a franchise). A show like That Was Then makes the list of 50 best, but they left out so many others, including Time Tunnel, Land of Giants, Men in Space, even the obvious classic The Invaders. Nowhere Man made the list but Menenium did not, nor did Harsh Realm, but I keep coming back to see that That Was Then is in the list, and not even in the bottom 10. It wouldn't take long to come up with a couple dozen other shows that much more deserve to be on this list than many of the choices that they came up with. It would have been better titled "50 Sci-fi shows I can list without much thinking and write a small blurb on each to get a paycheck", the intent sure wasn't to really come up with a list of the 50 best sci-fi shows by any standard.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
  218. more so than The Man from Uncle by frovingslosh · · Score: 1

    I think the point is that by the standards of the list itself the Prisoner would have to be on the list long before (and much higher rated) than The Man From Uncle or Wild Wild West. Personally I wouldn't include any of these shows in a Sci-fi list, but to include the ones they did and leave out The Prisoner makes no sense at all.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
  219. Max Headroom by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 1

    I didn't think of it, someone else on here did.

    But it's clearly worthy. Go back and watch it. Some episodes did suck a bit, but overall, the show was incredibly foresightful about the growth of the news media and television in general.

    Edison Carter: "Since when is news entertainment?"
    his editor: "Since the beginning."

    And definitely "The Time Tunnel" would have to be mentioned before you even think of "Sliders".

    If "Man from U.N.C.L.E", "The Avengers" and "The Prisoner" make it because of gadgets, then "Get Smart" should be there too. It had way more gadgets.

    --
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
  220. It's hard to take this list seriously... by wahmuk · · Score: 1

    ... when there are that many spelling and grammar mistakes, and when their research was so very, very lacking.

    Honestly, was it too hard for them to check IMdB for the little details?

    FTFA: Space: 1999 - Led by the valiant Commander Walter [sic] Koenig (played by Martin Landau).

    I mean, really... I suppose I'm expecting too much from modern "journalists".

    --
    You can't take the sky from me!
  221. Dark Skies by cooperaaaron · · Score: 1

    was a good show, and I think Star Trek, TNG, X Files, and B5 are at the top of MY list....

  222. B.S. List by HooliganIntellectual · · Score: 1

    This list is a joke designed to get people to eyeball ads on Boston.com.

    I like the new Battlestar Galactica, but there is now way that it is in the same leagues as Babylon 5 and the original Trek.

    The top five should read:
    1) Star Trek: Original Series
    2) Babylon 5
    3) Star Trek: The Next Generation
    4) Farscape
    5) The X Files

    Deep Space Nine belong in the top 15--it really got better toward the end when they started using story arcs. If Buffy counts as SF, it should be moved up, along with Futurama. It's downright bizarre that The Prisoner is left off the list. It belongs in the top ten too.

    People will always come up with different lists, but the folks who created this list have a shallow familiarity with science fiction.

  223. sliders wasn't that bad by Cylix · · Score: 1

    The main problem with sliders happened towards the end.

    When sci-fi picked it up it suddenly had to have a solid and specific enemy. So they made goofy looking nazi's to hate.

    I always liked the idea that anyone could die in the series and be replaced with another one of themselves from a slightly alternate reality.

    --
    "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
  224. Re:Can we mod an entire *News Article* as Flamebai by SmellsLike · · Score: 1

    I actually agree that the article is flame-bait. Take the description from Babylon-5. Babylon-5 is #5, the article states that it can be compared to DS9 and 'arguably' with better plot/characters. That being the case DS9 should be there somewhere. Disclaimer: Love B5, didn't think much of any Trek. Personally I think if those guys had seen the new Dr. Who then that would be a few places higher.

  225. Great missing cartoon series: Star Blazer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...both the one where they went to Gamelon (sp?) and battled the Comet Empire. It was Babylon: Crusade before Crusade! ;)

  226. Chimes of Big Ben by dexter+riley · · Score: 1

    I set my VCR to record this episode last night, but for some reason it aired an hour earlier than usual.
    Be seeing you!

  227. DS9 not only not on list - it's dissed! by msjacoby · · Score: 1

    From the Babylon 5 entry: "Some may compare it to 'Star Trek DS-9' but with a better plot and cast - you be the judge." I am no fan of DS9, but I would never compare even my worst enemy unfavorably to Babylon 5! Bleh!

  228. Don't forget about the Tomorrow People by magpi3 · · Score: 1

    This was a great British show that was syndicated on Nickelodeon when I was a kid... ok, maybe it really sucked and I am really just remember it was childish nostalgia. I don't know, but at the very least I thought that someone should bring it up.

  229. Stupid, Incomplete and Inconsistent! by ElectroBot · · Score: 1

    Nevermind the fact that they left off a lot of really good shows (Farscape, DS9, etc.) and put some really good shows behind other crappy ones (Xena?), it's their OPINION of the 50 best Sci-Fi shows yet.

    What they really did wrong though, is that over half of the entries were missing air dates, another couple only had the beginning air date. For Doctor Who they didn't even mention that there's a really great new season that just aired. They didn't point out that for e.g. in Earth Final Conflict, William Boone was replaced in the second season and the replacement played for 4 seasons. Some summaries were utterly short (Futurama for one) and others were almost full blown reviews.

    [Nitpicking] How much trouble would have been involved in porviding links to the shows' home pages in www.epguides.com or the (evil) www.tv.com. Besides the author could've have gotten most of the information above form those sites really easily. [/Nitpicking]

    I'm willing to bet that the author decided to create a list of his top 20-25 Sci-Fi shows and added a few more to not have everybody mad at him for exluding their favourite show. Then he realised that this would take him more than 2 or 3 hours so he decided not to research anything at all, but just o everything from memory.

  230. The Complete List by Tatarize · · Score: 2, Informative

    In case you folks haven't I'll Karma-whore the whole list out.

    1) Star Trek (TOS)
    2) Battlestar Galactica (new)
    3) Star Trek (TNG)
    4) X-Files
    5) Babylon 5
    6) Stargate SG-1
    7) The Twilight Zone
    8) Dr. Who
    9) Mystery Science Theater 3000
    10) Sliders
    11) Lost
    12) Xena: Warrior Pincess
    13) The Outer Limits
    14) Star Trek (VOY)
    15) Logan's Run
    16) Flash Gordon
    17) Firefly
    18) V
    19) Dark Angel
    20) The Hitchhiker
    21) Quantum Leap
    22) Andromeda
    23) Tales from the Crypt
    24) Wonder Woman
    25) The Jetsons
    26) Stargate Atlantis
    27) Buffy the Vampire Slayer
    28) Adventures of Superman
    29) The Six Million Dollar Man
    30) Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea
    31) Alien Nation
    32) My Favorite Martian
    33) Lost in Space
    34) The Avengers
    35) Battlestar Galactica (Original)
    36) The Bionic Woman
    37) Space 1999
    38) Batman
    39) The man from U.N.C.L.E
    40) The Thunderbirds
    41) Futurama
    42) Science Fiction Theater
    43) Nowhere Man
    44) Lois & Clark: The New Adventures of Superman
    45) The Greatest American Hero
    46) That Was Then
    47) Buck Rogers in the 25th Century
    48) 3rd Rock From the Sun
    49) Wild Wild West
    50) Earth: Final Conflict

    DS9, Earth 2, First Wave, Space Above and Beyond, Crusade, Enterprise, Max Headroom, Farscape they missed some major ones, and included some totally non-scifi ones.

    --

    It is no longer uncommon to be uncommon.
    1. Re:The Complete List by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      Thanks, any sufficiently long article without an index is indistinguishable from a pay-per-click scam.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    2. Re:The Complete List by solitas · · Score: 1

      I think I'd rather see a list of the top-50 non-spaceship-related television shows.

      --
      "It's time to take life by the cans." ~ Bender ("Bendin' in the Wind", ep. 3-13)
    3. Re:The Complete List by colbyucb · · Score: 1

      No Red Dwarf?

  231. WTF is Alf? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and Mork and Mindy?

    "Shuzzbut!"

  232. This list is just wrong. by eadint · · Score: 1

    Anybody that thinks star trek and any derivative of it is decent science fiction needs to be shot. Star trek inc was the worst scifi ever made it put a bad light on science fiction and its only recently been shaken. The show was blatently unrealistic, took no account of reality and was the most horrible travesty ever to be broadcasted. The fact that therre are allot of people who are so stupid that they actually liked it is shamefull. Anyone who likes star trek is a moron with no concept of reality and they should be sterilised to ensure that they don't reproduce and polute the gene pool.
    Here is my list of the top 10
    1) Xfiles
    2) milenium
    3) space above and beyond
    4) Battlestar galactica
    5) Farscape
    6) Stargate SG1
    7) Babylon 5
    Im to tired to remember any other shows.

  233. Which Dr. Who? Which Who? by LeRoco · · Score: 1

    First the person that wrote this list needs to step away from the bong or stop having 6 martini lunchs. For one there is way too many, what I would call "fantasy" or "comic book" titles among the 50. Secondly to miss out on DS9 or Red Dwarf or well the titles have been covered.

    But here's an interesting twist. I couldn't help but notice that Battlestar Galactica took 2 spots (#35 & 2), the Bionic Man and Woman each got a place (#36 & 29), Star Trek comes in with 3 shows in the top 50 (#14, #3 & #1..no DS9?????)

    And then we see number 8, Dr Who. Which they say it ran from 1963 to 1989. The list totally dissed the new Dr Who (Christopher Eccleston).

    But, here's the twist, if Star Trek and the other shows can take multiple spots in the list, (same name, different cast) then Dr. Who should also take multiple spots. Who wouldn't agree that Dr Who (Tom Baker)deserves a top 10 spot on the list. But would you honestly put Dr Who (Peter Davison) in the top 10? Probably not. But I have to remember that this writer included Xena in the top 15. Oh bother!

    Boston.com wouldn't know Sci Fi if it beamed into thier tighty whities and gave them a wedgie.

  234. Millennium should be #1 by One+Salient+Oversigh · · Score: 1

    The show was definitely ahead of its time. The writing was brilliant. The acting was brilliant. The story arcs were compelling. It also rewarded the viewer who kept his brain in gear - such as the plague scene you mention. We all see Frank's wife leave the cabin - and that's it. We do not need to see her die because we know she has died. Brilliant directing.

    http://one-salient-oversight.blogspot.com/

    1. Re:Millennium should be #1 by Laz7 · · Score: 1

      Exactly ! ... I was very disappointed when that show died before it could wrap itself up.

  235. Top 50 Overrated Sci-Fi Shows by PietjeJantje · · Score: 1

    This just screams out for a list of Top 50 Overrated Sci-Fi Shows. Number one on this list will be Babylon 5. It includes all the essentials ingredients to make it really, really bad: 1) "Intricate plot" is nothing more than the usual space opera crap you once liked in HIGHSCHOOL 2) Bad actors. The biggest problem with most sci-fi shows. They are designed to run say 5 seasons. So you need to sign actors on 5 year contracts. Actors which can, say, act, or actors who have the X-factor like Shatner (note the mutual exclusive here), don't sign these contracts. They want to be available for stuff like movies. Babylon sports a parade of totally bland actors. I don't remember any of them except for blandless. All the new Star Trek etc. series have the same problem. Picard is the only one I remember. I don't wanna watch these bland people each week. 3) Telepaths. Sometime, somewhere, someone decided if you think up a future in a sci-fi series, it surely much sport telepaths. What?? I left highschool long, long ago, take your sorcery and magic elsewhere! This is ridiculous. 4) Cheesiness all over. Cheesy clothing. Cheesy animations. Need I go on? Still it goes on and on here on Slashdot what a great series it is. This is not surprising looking at the horrible crap on this list. Number two on my list, for instance, must be Stargate SG-1. Again, bad, real BAD actors. Boy they're glad they can support the family with their 5 year contracts. But look at this series. It's based on a movie. This movie was a B movie. It was pulp. Good fun, but pulp. It had two good actors, one pulp actor (Russel) but he has the X-factor you'll never see in a sci-fi television series. (This is the first and last time I hail the actor Russel). It's a movie where you can almost hear the moronic Universal (or whatever) producer tell the scriptwriter: "Hmm nice concept, but what about throwing in some Egyptian stuff, duuuude?" So on this crap, they base a tv-series. Which on it's turn gets in the top 10 of all time sci-fi series. So everything under that, must be even worse utter crap? So it's fair to conclude that everything under the original Star Trek is crap. And you know what the original Star Trek is... Look, I was a huge sci-fi fan as a kid and still am, but most stuff is just utter crap, and I can't believe the crap people keep seeing, and even more surprising, hailing, just because they're sci-fi fans? (Movie wise is not much better, just look at the Matrix for instance, which is essentially a stolen mix of Neuromancer vs tech singularity concepts gone bad by cheesy scriptwriting. I can't believe no one ever tells these Matrix fans with their crap ever that the concept of a computer fighting a human by generating characters and have game like fights within computer generated environments and if the human wins, the computer is, like, defeated duuude! is a really, REALLY stupendous concept.)

    1. Re:Top 50 Overrated Sci-Fi Shows by coraxo · · Score: 1

      you dude are a complete moron, i can see cheesy and crap is your favorite word, no wonder if your head is full of it. how many superb actors have you seen in a 2, 3, 4, 6, or 10 year contract for tv series??? are you fuckin nuts??? what do you want? maybe you might want to share your favorite sci-fi show so everyone can laugh at you (and no, red dwarf doesn't count, everyone agrees it's the best).

      --
      Strc prst skrz krk and vomit! Can help.
  236. Comedy and Horror is considered Sci-Fi? by MadMonkD · · Score: 1
    Ok, can some one tell me why they included: Lois and Clark, 3rd Rock from the Sun, My Favorite Martian, Tales from the Crypt, The Hitchhiker, Xena, and Buffy the Vampire Slayer?

    I have nothing against these shows and there is nothing wrong with them, but from what I could see, these were not Sci-fi, at least to me. These are more categorized as Comedy, Action, Drama, Horror, or Fantasy. Granted, Sci-fi to some extent has these elements in it. But Tales from the Crypt doesnt exactly scream Sci-fi to me.

    Now, shows that should of been included: Red Dwarf, Farscape, Lexx, and SeaQuest DSV.

    --
    When in doubt mumble, when in trouble delegate -Murphy's Law-
  237. One season wonder?! by Godwin+O'Hitler · · Score: 1

    http://www.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Contrib/SciFi/Blakes7/e pisodes.html

    I believe actor Gareth Thomas (Blake himself) went AWOL for (at least) the second series due to Royal Shakesperae Company commitments.

    And Jacqueline Pearce as Servelan has to be the horniest Sci-Fi woman in the whole of SF TV and cinema history!

    --
    No, your children are not the special ones. Nor are your pets.
    1. Re:One season wonder?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe actor Gareth Thomas (Blake himself) went AWOL for (at least) the second series due to Royal Shakesperae Company commitments.

      Actually, he was still around for all of series 2, not appearing in series 3 beyond a cameo, as an hallucination of himself. He appeared in series 4 as Blake, on the condition that they killed him off, so Blake couldn't come back. (A book, written by Shelagh Wells, who worked on the series, said that he kept saying "A little more blood... a little more..." to the effects people. The director was reputedly worried that the censors would delete Blake's final exit.) But what a finale it was!!

      And there you have it.

  238. Biggest 50 *US* Sci Fi shows - and not even that. by Qbertino · · Score: 1

    How is 'Lost' a Sci-Fi Show? ... nevermind. That list is just a Web-Columnist on a budget at work I guess.
    And Raumpatrouille isn't even mentioned.
    Raumpatrouille! Yeah!
    RÜCKSTURZ ZUR ERDE, baby! , Alphaorder, "Starlight Casino", ... you know the drill. There's nothing like it. When this german TV show ran in the early sixties the street were empty.
    No, there's no doubt: 'Raumpatrouille' is the original. Everything else is just a rippoff. ;-)

    Curiously original ST is at position 1 and it's arguably strongly influenced by Raumpatrouille.

    Signed
    Tamara Jagolowsk
    Galaktischer Sicherheitsdienst

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  239. Well, at least #1 was the original Trek, and not some crap like Andromeda or Firefly or Babylon 5 or Battlestar Galactica (new), which I don't watch.

    Ok, I can see them wanting to punish "Enterprise", but was it really worse than Logan's Run: The TV Show"? I actually watched that show every week until it went off the air. And even if so, was DS9 as well? Once the Quark-n-Kira circus act got going it wasn't too bad.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  240. How could they omit Galaxy Quest? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm dejected that the Galaxy Quest TV show is not even on the list.

    How could they? Commander Peter Quincy Taggart is one of the most memorable starship captains in television! Us questoids strongly object to this piece of hack journalism.

  241. Re:Sci-Fi? Nah, Fantasy.. by WarwickRyan · · Score: 1

    It's not the policital stance of Fox News I'm parodying, it's their level of reporting. You know, the way they dumb everything down, and what isn't dumbed down is either factually incorrect or just plain made up.

    Fox aren't the only ones (all US news networks we get here in the UK are bad), but they're the worst offenders.

    Maybe I'm just being spoilt by the BBC.

  242. Firefly/Futurama/BSG by Galley_SimRacer · · Score: 0

    Firefly should be top five, Futurama in the top ten, and the original Battlestar Galactica in the top 15.

    --
    "I'm not a cool person in real life, but I play one on the Internet". Galley
  243. It occurs to me by lloannna · · Score: 1

    That they simply asked an intern to draw up a list of every scifi show s/he could think of, then they went down the list, grabbing ones they'd heard were cool and throwing in the ones they were sure they'd get yelled at for not including (Dr. Who, Firefly, Star Trek, Buffy, and Xena may have made it on that way -- not saying they are or aren't good, but that they'd have the "yelling" factor.)

    I mean, it doesn't look like any devoted scifi fans were asked, and it seems clear that some stuff was thrown on there just because they couldn't think of something better. I mean, to include The Bionic Woman and The Six Million Dollar Man, to include Buffy but not Angel, to include Firefly but not Farscape, to include The Greatest American Hero but not Mork and Mindy, to forget The Prisoner, Space Above and Beyond AND Earth 2 but remember Atlantis and Voyager? Heck, to put in Voyager, TNG, and the original Star Trek but not DS9 -- that shows nothing more than sloppiness. I blame Arts/Entertainment editors who just wanted something that'd get Slashdotted.

    (also, it looks like some of their comments were written by "someone who cares a lot about this show" and others were written by "the guy who's in charge of writing 45 words about every TV show ever written")

  244. "outer limits" (classic) should be in top ten by peter303 · · Score: 1

    It was a watershed in both special effects at its time and in the exploration of deeper philosophical ideas.

  245. Surgery using focused sound by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Episode 12 (A Change of Mind) f[e]atures a non-invasive form of neurosurgery, using highly
    > focused soundwaves. [...]
    > Technology such as this did not exist in 1967, and likely does not exist now.

    The basic technology for it exists now and has FDA approval for its first clinical application (treatment of uterine fibroids). See http://www.insightec.com/

  246. Red Dwarf by Frantactical+Fruke · · Score: 1

    Red Dwarf was lovely. But then it never aired in the US, so it didn't really exist, right?

    The Hitchhiker's Guide appears to be missing as well.

    And if they count Buffy, Batman and Xena as science fiction, they might as well count Grim & Evil, too. Completely useless flab, the whole list. They obviously just put their thumbs in their mouths and drooled until they could think of 50 shows to put in. Not worth the hits they collect.

  247. Re:Full Listing - Space Yawn 1999 by Frantactical+Fruke · · Score: 1

    37. 'Space 1999'

    I remember vaguely liking this as a kid.
    Watching recent reruns, I started to suspect that my parents kept me heavily sedated throughout my childhood...snooze city! Severely bored actors standing around waiting for their next gruesome line of dialogue to come along ever so slowly.

  248. BSG isn't just a copy with gimick changes! by Cybrex · · Score: 1

    After the premier that "stunt" loses all meaning.
    Have you seen the new BSG? As a kid I was a huge fan of the original series, and as one of maybe 5 people on the planet that thought that the Sci-Fi Channel version of Dune was an utter abomination I had serious concerns that they were going to turn a beloved part of my childhood into a polished turd.

    I've never been so happy to be wrong. The changes made from the original series were clearly not a gimmick, but were done both to open up new avenues and plot possibilities. To claim otherwise is to unfairly marginalize the new series as a simple copy of the original.

    It's an absolute masterpiece, and as much as I adored the original I seldom give it a thought when watching the new version. The two shows have the same basic premise, but tone of the show and the plot lines and character development that are explored are so different that it's impossible to have a meaningful comparison between the two. The creators, IMHO, are respectful of the genesis of their show, but don't generally have the original in mind when writing it. Their focus is on making their show the best they can, and I think that what they're turning out is a jaw-dropping success.

    Frankly Stargate SG:1 is good science fiction, perhaps the best adaptation of any movie to the small screen.
    You may be right, but I think that Buffy the Vampire Slayer would be a strong contender for that title.

    Also missing, but borderline, is Project Bluebook.
    Thanks for the flashback! I'd completely forgotten about that show! It was possibly the first sci-fi I'd ever been exposed to.

    --
    Boundless Expansion, Self-Transformation, Dynamic Optimism, Intelligent Technology, Spontaneous Order- BEST DO IT SO!
  249. Then lets see you justify 'Xena" by Antos700 · · Score: 1

    As the topic says, how the hell is a myth based episodic series set in the era of ancient Greece qualify as Sci-fi?

  250. You may as well link directly to Wikipedia by gadfium · · Score: 1

    See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science_fiction_on_te levision.

    There's nothing wrong with mirrors of Wikipedia content, and laborlawtalk acknowledges Wikipedia as the source of the material so it is compliant with the GFDL, but people here might want to add to the article, and they can only do that at Wikipedia and not at a mirror.

  251. The Real Rankings from a real Sci-Fi Viewer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I reviewed the list from Boston.com and revised it after conducting an informal survey of the
    sci-fi viewers in my large family:

    Real Science Fiction

    Number 1 'Star Trek: The Next Generation' was #3
    Number 2 'Stargate SG-1' was #6
    Number 3 'Star Trek Deep Space 9....not in original list.probably cuz it had no faggots
    Number 4 'Star Trek Voyager' was #14
    Number 5 'Stargate Atlantis' 2004-? was #26
    Number 6 'SeaQuest DSV...not on original list..deep sea exploration 1993-96
    Number 7 'The X-Files' was #4
    Number 8 'Star Trek Enterprise' 4 seasons 2001-2005 not on original list
    Number 9 'Battlestar Galactica' (Original) was #35
    Number 10 'Battlestar Galactica' (New) was #2
    Number 11 'Star Trek' (Original )was #1
    Number 12 'FarScape' ..not on original list..sci-fi channel pgm wormholes..space travel..good actresses
    Number 13 'Sliders' was #10
    Number 14 'Babylon 5' was #5
    Number 15 'Earth - Final Conflict' Rodenberry's final series. 97-02 too ethereal. Aliens effeminate was #50
    Number 16 'The Twilight Zone' was #7
    Number 17 'The Outer Limits' was #13
    Number 18 'Andromeda' series on sci-fi channel was #22
    Number 19 'Buck Rogers in the 25th Century' new from 79-81, many reruns in 80's was #47
    Number 20 'Dark Angel' lasted three years was #19
    Number 21 'Quantum Leap' was #21
    Number 22 'Lost' abc was #11
    Number 23 'Tremors' not on original list 3 seasons on Sci-Fi channel
    Number 24 'Space 1999' when the moon flew in hyperspace..from 1975-77 was #37
    Number 25 'V' mini series that came back as a short lived series in 1983-84 was #18
    Number 26 'Firefly' 1 season on sci-fi channel was #17
    Number 27 'Logan's Run' 1 season only was #15
    Number 28 'Flash Gordon' 1950's series was #16
    Number 29 'Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea' 64-68 was #30

    Anthologies of Science Fiction

    Number 30 'Science Fiction Theatre' from 55-57...an early Twilight Zone was #42
    Number 31 'Mystery Science Theater 3000' was #9

    The Following are not Science Fiction per se and do not belong here:

    Not really Science Fiction....more drama

    Number x60 'The Wild Wild West' James Bond rip-off as a western in 70's was #49
    Number x61 'The Avengers' British James Bondish imitator. Honor Blackman WAS Bond girl was #34
    Number x62 'The Six Million Dollar Man' 73-79? was #29
    Number x63 'The Bionic Woman' from 76-78 was #36
    Number x64 'The Hitchhiker' on cable 83-91 was #20
    Number x65 'The Man from U.N.C.L.E.' James Bond rip off on tv from 64-68 was #39
    Number x66 'Nowhere Man' based on genre of The Fugitive..so bad it was cancelled late in 1st season #43

    Comedy Programs

    Number x67 '3rd Rock From The Sun' soap ope

  252. BG OTOH by peterjhill2002 · · Score: 1

    I am totally pleased with Battlestar Galactica in number 2.. the new one that is.. It is more than the Next Gen of the BG universe... The story lines are great.. If you have not had a chance, check out the podcasts... I just listen to them on the bus after I have seen the show.. it is great insight...

    1. Re:BG OTOH by rodoke3 · · Score: 1

      Actually, some of the glowing praise of BG on this thread piqued my interest, so I'm downloading Season 1 right now.

      --
      There's nothing like a good gunfight to uplift the spirit--Calvin
  253. Freaks! by Sylven_1969 · · Score: 1

    Ok, it's obvious some freak and not some geek wrote this! Anyone that puts Lost in Space at number 33, includes WonderWoman at all and forgets the original Battlestar Galactica completely obviously doesn't know there ass from a "Red Dwarf"!

    --
    Jay Dale "If you're not living on the edge then you're taking up too much space!"
  254. fucktards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The Man From U.N.C.L.E. was not a sci-fi show.

    Alien Nation was NOT better than Buck Rogers/B. Galactica (orig.)/Batman (orig.)

    Buffy was fantasy, it is science fiction to think that it belongs in this category.

    Tales from the Crypt?!?!?! for Christ sakes..

    Xena?!?!? again is'nt that fantasy..?

    Lost!!?!?!?!? okay it is at this point that the list officaially gives the Globe the "FUCKTARD" title. it's a year old yet they claim it to be better than all the others?!

    after a phone call or two it turns out that this "article" was written by an intern at the Globe.

  255. SG-1 at six? by BenjyD · · Score: 1

    Are they insane? Stargate SG-1 at six? That programme is terrible: they took a bad film, added even hammier acting and produced an even worse series.

  256. Old Saws on Old Shows by virg_mattes · · Score: 1

    Your mention of the magic reset button reminded me of something that we figured out throughout all of the Star Trek shows. It was something like this:

    Original Series: "Don't worry cap'n, the writers'll get us outta this one too!"

    The Next Generation: "Don't worry, captain, I'll just reconfigure something!"

    Deep Space Nine: "Don't worry, commander, the particle du jour is just what we need!"

    Voyager: "Not to worry, captain, pluck and Borg technology will get us out of this one!"

    Enterprise: "Oh, crap! Run!"


    Now as to the original Battlestar Galactica, I don't think it was bad, given its era. It was very cheesy due to budget, and it had a lot of the same flaws as every show written in the '70s, but overall it was a very good idea, done as well as possible given its limits. Like all shows that ran too many seasons, the story fell apart at the end, but all in all, it stands that it belongs on a best 50 list, or at least a top 100. Besides, who could resist raster-scan monitors full of little triangles?

    The new BSG deserves its slot because it's what BSG would have been if TV back in the '70s would have allowed it. I always thought that the biggest problem with the original show was that it was way too lighthearted, that Starbuck was not nearly mentally damaged enough to have the reputation he had, and that everything looked a little too neat, clean and friendly for a "ragtag, fugitive fleet" that was always running low on food and fuel. Darker colors and darker plots have won me over, even if there are plot holes, because realistically how many sci-fi films or shows are perfect as regards continuity?

    Virg

    1. Re:Old Saws on Old Shows by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Haha! yep, the good old one-line ST escape hatch. And of course there's always "Please, not the red shirt! Anything but the red shirt!!"

      As to BG .... I saw the premiere with a college group a few years younger than myself, and even in that ancient time, the uniform reaction from the audience was -- squirming in pain. We really WANTED to like it, but... It was stiff, contrived, predictable, looked plastic even to eyes not yet trained by 21st century SFX, and overall compared poorly to ST:TOS at its worst. Worst of all, it was BORING. But at the time, for SF fans it was the only TV available. -- A great deal of the initial ratings-making viewers were Lorne Greene groupies (he had a HUGE following among older adults), and I think those folks are largely what kept it on the air as long as it was.

      Glen Larson (who is in the same ward as a friend here) got into trouble with the Mormon church over "revealing secrets", and has admitted that he really WAS trying to retell the Mormon mythos. And forcibly contriving people and plots to fit that mold can't have helped. A quick overview and links to other articles: http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0OBW/is _1_44/ai_114478917

      I could have lived with continuity no worse than say, ST:TOS (as you say, a lot of series -- and not just SF -- retrofit or outright ignore continuity as needed to fit the plot of the week), but that was a minor problem given the rest of BG.

      Getting SF wrong isn't news with Larson, either (he does much better with mundane series, and one suspects, with leaving the people on the set more to their own devices). Remember Manimal? it had its good points, and the character was much more "human" than the plastic BG people, but it too was often painful to watch.

      I haven't seen the remade BG, but one would hope it's better than the original if only because TV in general has become less simplistic.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  257. Taken miniseries! by objekt · · Score: 1

    I won an Emmy for Best Miniseries, for cripes sake.

    --
    -- Boycott Shell
  258. What about "Odyssey 5"? by KatchooNJ · · Score: 1

    I'm guessing the only reason Odyssey 5 (from Showtime) was left off of the list because most nobody ever heard of it! I noticed that nobody mentioned it yet on this board. Maybe I am the only one that enjoyed it?

    Anyway, for those of you who don't know what I am talking about... it was a series starring Peter Weller that ran for two seasons on Showtime a couple of years ago. Here is the plot summary that I snatched from imdb:

    "The astronaut crew of a space shuttle looks on in horror as they witness the violent destruction of the Earth. However, they are given a chance to change humanity's fate when a sympathetic alien sends them five years into the past. Their mission--find out who's responsible for the plot to destroy the planet. Can they deal with their own pasts while saving the world from the mysterious organism known only as 'Leviathan?'"

    The show was fantastic and was easily boosted by the fact that it was on pay-cable television; it added to the gritty quality of the dialog and the more mature subject matter that could only make it on cable. ;) So... am I truly alone in remembering and admiring this short-lived sci-fi show? I really hope this show makes it to DVD someday; I just wish it lasted longer. :(

    ~Kat ^_^

    --
    "Never give up, for that is just the time and place when the tide will change." -Harriet Beecher Stowe ^_^
  259. Babylon5 over Farscape? by pkbarbiedoll · · Score: 1

    I'm shocked that Farscape didn't make the top 10 much less top 20. Nice to see Battlestar Galactica receive such high praise. It is deserved!

  260. Ultraman, Automan by pkbarbiedoll · · Score: 1

    In addition to other neglected shows I also noticed two others worth mentioning, Ultraman and Automan. I love Lucy Lawless but what did Xena have to do with Science Fiction?

  261. Re:What about "Odyssey 5"? TWO Seasons? by BraceletWinner · · Score: 1
    Were there two seasons of this show? Or are you counting the last six episodes of the first season (that they didn't show for a couple of years) as the second season?

    I watched the show in its entirety (unless this phantom second season exists somewhere) three times. Great show - it's too bad it never took off.

  262. 3rd Rock BUT NO RED DWARF?? THE PRISONER????? by pappy97 · · Score: 1

    First off, there is 3rd rock, BUT NO RED DWARF????!?!!!!?!!?

    Not only should 3rd rock not be on this list, but Red Dwarf should be the first in terms of sci-fi comedies. It's a trajedy this was left off.

    Another thing is that pure CRAP like Firefly made this list, but Patrick McGoohan's GREAT series, THE PRISONER, is nowhere to be found. Another PATHETIC omission.

    This lists sucks, and isn't even worthy of Ask DumbDots, let alone Ask Slashdot. NEXT!!!

  263. Nowhere Man? by Tom+Veil · · Score: 1

    What's that?

    --

    There's nothing you have that they can't take away: Absolute zero, Gentle Jack, bottom line.

  264. Re:What about "Odyssey 5"? TWO Seasons? by KatchooNJ · · Score: 1

    Hmmm... Well, maybe it is actually one season that was spread out over two years, then. You may be right. imdb shows it as being on from 2002-2004, so that may have thrown me. I also simply remember Showtime airing new shows about a year after the first batch, so I may have been confused and thought it was a second season.

    Another interesting thing about this show that I noticed... it has two entries on imdb. Weirdness!

    Anyway, it's nice to see that I wasn't the only person on the planet that watched and enjoyed this show. :)

    ~Kat ^_^

    --
    "Never give up, for that is just the time and place when the tide will change." -Harriet Beecher Stowe ^_^
  265. Blake's 7 by yuri+benjamin · · Score: 1

    That was a classic.
    The first show that came to mind when I saw the headline. Out of 50 SF shows I'm sure B7 would rate well above some of the ones they included.

    Maybe the list was compiled by an american.

    --
    You make the mistake of thinking you can educate the fundamental stupidity out of people. You can't.
  266. What the hell? by lazarus2004 · · Score: 1

    This list is total crap. I mean seriously, in a list of the top 50 SCI-FI shows of all time, what the hell is Batman doing on the list? Not to mention Superman and Xena? And how the hell did Alien Nation get on the list while DS9 and Farscape didn't? I mean, seriously...did ANYONE like Alien Nation? I thought it was complete crap....and I thought Time Trax was decent back in the day, proving that my standards aren't all too high. V makes number 18 on the list, outranking Lois and Clark, Superman, Wonder Woman, Andromeda, Stargate Atlantis, just to name a few of the 32 shows it was apparantly better than. The only show I'd rate lower than V on this list is Alien Nation. TOS takes the top slot, the new BSG takes second, and TNG takes third. Reverse that order and you'd be much closer to the truth. Finally, Six Million Dollar Man, Bionic Woman, and Man From UNCLE all made the list. Get Smart didn't. And I doubt anyone who has ever seen Get Smart would rank it below the likes of Tales from the Crypt or Xena. I think Boston.Com just wanted to anger the whole sci-fi community with this completely bullshit list. The only good thing about it is that it gives Sliders some measure of respect - the first two seasons were brilliant and awesome. After that it jumped the shark and bad.

  267. hmmm 'Mystery Science Theater 3000' by spx · · Score: 1

    While Im happy that Quantum Leap somehow made it, since so many others did not (we have an almost all Sci-Fi request in our house), it bothers me that a non-sci-fi fool made this list. Maybe we should find him and send him to a far far away mean mean place....

  268. Quark by NYDirk · · Score: 1

    Captain Adam Quark http://www.snowcrest.net/fox/quark/ and the UGSP are available to haul this list away AS garbage.