not really, any UFO documents could just be a bunch of fake stuff to distract hackers so they don't actually find anything important. seriously why would you have UFO files connected to a network (assuming you would have any digital data in the first place rather than just paper and ink) unless as misinformation?
yeh because if someone gets shot, don't worry about bringing them to the hospital. first get them a lawyer and sue the person that shot them, and then go to the hospital.
just because someone is doing more than you are to clean up the environment doesn't mean you have to get jealous
so you read taking off glasses and contact lenses as they might somehow focus microwave beams? i read it as the fact that the contact lenses have a possibility that they might get hot enough to melt to your eyeballs which is certainly not worth it for volunteers. and as for glasses they might heat up and crack or shatter for whatever reason, again the possibility not worth it for test volunteers.
what does uneducated have to do with idiot? from everything i've heard, most women especially don't have an education especially one involving basic physics
are you that big of a troll not to see that NOT killing people is exactly the choice these types of weapons present to armed individuals faced with a large mob of angry people? non-lethal weapons should be tested for safety and ADS has so i don't see anyone's problem with it. and i seriously cannot make the leap from directional microwave bursts to a taser. please in your great wisdom explain how they are so similar.
yes tazers are bad blah blah. i asked for scientific proof or even some kind of scientifically grounded worries about the subject at hand, you know, the active denial system
could you please state these so called 'problems of its own'?
and please, don't just spout off crazy, unwarranted and highly unscientific "zOMG if they point at teh antz, they willz gr0w really big like 10 feaat high and eet everyonezz!!!@!" and other such drivel(such as cancer)
going blind? not likely. metal burning you? nah but metal does retain heat longer which would suck for volunteers. effecting pacemakers? hardly, this doesn't penetrate skin. the beams do not keep on going. also i don't think that most iraqi citizens will be able to associate a little burning pain with a miscarriage or anything else since they probably don't even know about radiation and therefore can't make the gross leap from microwave to x-ray/gamma(or even UV).
no, i think non-violently resolving a situation has more benefits than all these imagined downsides mentioned in all the posts on slashdot
like this piece about a kosovo riot in a story about non lethal weapons where high-density foam was shot to disperse a crowd http://www.popsci.com/popsci/science/article/0,209 67,448832-1,00.html "The nonlethal rounds achieved a tremendous effect: Everyone backed up immediately and settled down," Brown recalls. "By the rules of engagement, my soldiers could have chosen to shoot people. We would have had a very bloody day, and it would have had a terrible effect on everyone in Kosovo."
dubs suck. (and don't give me that crap about how even the original is dubbed blah blah it's understood that dub used as a noun means something thats been redubbed)
this has nothing to do with anime, dubs just suck. have you seen the french dub of batman? it sucks because it's a dub. when something is translated from language x to language y, suckification happens. when a voice seems unnatural becuase it's trying sync up with lips, suckification happens. this is a fact that you cannot argue.
now add to that crappy voice actors and editing of content and you might be able to understand why people so fervently hate anime dubs
Good to hear that some people get satisfaction out of a job well done. Who needs a conscience when you have the stone tools, bronze tools, iron tools, steel tools, gunpowder, dynamite, microbiology, etc.? There is no excuse for trying to belittle scientific achievement just because you think that somehow you would have acted in some great righteous way that would have created world peace and unicorns jumping over rainbows.
i thought flexible organic LEDs were going to be the great bendable color screens of the future. so is this somehow better than foLED? anyone care to make a quick comparison of pro's and con's?
so say someone creates a new dog crap scooper and names it the 'crap picker upper' at first. the inventor doesn't like ford vehicles very much and generally thinks they are crap. then the inventor names it the 'ford picker upper'; and then for laughs officially names it the ford pick-up. ford (the auto company) has no way of stopping that? wow, sweet!
Slashdot Mirror
Or beating masochists?
not really, any UFO documents could just be a bunch of fake stuff to distract hackers so they don't actually find anything important. seriously why would you have UFO files connected to a network (assuming you would have any digital data in the first place rather than just paper and ink) unless as misinformation?
yeh because if someone gets shot, don't worry about bringing them to the hospital. first get them a lawyer and sue the person that shot them, and then go to the hospital.
just because someone is doing more than you are to clean up the environment doesn't mean you have to get jealous
seriously wtf?
so you read taking off glasses and contact lenses as they might somehow focus microwave beams? i read it as the fact that the contact lenses have a possibility that they might get hot enough to melt to your eyeballs which is certainly not worth it for volunteers. and as for glasses they might heat up and crack or shatter for whatever reason, again the possibility not worth it for test volunteers.
what does uneducated have to do with idiot? from everything i've heard, most women especially don't have an education especially one involving basic physics
only if their culture has been pervaded by the sci-fi movies of the 50s. like giant ants and mutants and all that "caused" by radiation
are you that big of a troll not to see that NOT killing people is exactly the choice these types of weapons present to armed individuals faced with a large mob of angry people? non-lethal weapons should be tested for safety and ADS has so i don't see anyone's problem with it. and i seriously cannot make the leap from directional microwave bursts to a taser. please in your great wisdom explain how they are so similar.
yes tazers are bad blah blah. i asked for scientific proof or even some kind of scientifically grounded worries about the subject at hand, you know, the active denial system
oogely boogely!!!
offtopic? No way, I'm being productive!
American businesses lose
-OR-
American business loses
could you please state these so called 'problems of its own'?
and please, don't just spout off crazy, unwarranted and highly unscientific "zOMG if they point at teh antz, they willz gr0w really big like 10 feaat high and eet everyonezz!!!@!" and other such drivel(such as cancer)
going blind? not likely. metal burning you? nah but metal does retain heat longer which would suck for volunteers. effecting pacemakers? hardly, this doesn't penetrate skin. the beams do not keep on going. also i don't think that most iraqi citizens will be able to associate a little burning pain with a miscarriage or anything else since they probably don't even know about radiation and therefore can't make the gross leap from microwave to x-ray/gamma(or even UV).
9 67,448832-1,00.html
no, i think non-violently resolving a situation has more benefits than all these imagined downsides mentioned in all the posts on slashdot
like this piece about a kosovo riot in a story about non lethal weapons where high-density foam was shot to disperse a crowd http://www.popsci.com/popsci/science/article/0,20
"The nonlethal rounds achieved a tremendous effect: Everyone backed up immediately and settled down," Brown recalls. "By the rules of engagement, my soldiers could have chosen to shoot people. We would have had a very bloody day, and it would have had a terrible effect on everyone in Kosovo."
a reporter for popular science in a may2003 article
burning you from the inside? no. i think you've heard the tanning salon myth too many times
so the government has created a sunburn gun and people are complaining about it. i guess they'd reather that they shoot the crowds with live ammo?
hahahahaha
bullshit.
dubs suck. (and don't give me that crap about how even the original is dubbed blah blah it's understood that dub used as a noun means something thats been redubbed)
this has nothing to do with anime, dubs just suck. have you seen the french dub of batman? it sucks because it's a dub. when something is translated from language x to language y, suckification happens. when a voice seems unnatural becuase it's trying sync up with lips, suckification happens. this is a fact that you cannot argue.
now add to that crappy voice actors and editing of content and you might be able to understand why people so fervently hate anime dubs
yeh http://www.netstate.com/states/links/la_links.htm LA is for postal and La is traditional abbreviation.
church vans can use public roads, right?
Good to hear that some people get satisfaction out of a job well done. Who needs a conscience when you have the stone tools, bronze tools, iron tools, steel tools, gunpowder, dynamite, microbiology, etc.? There is no excuse for trying to belittle scientific achievement just because you think that somehow you would have acted in some great righteous way that would have created world peace and unicorns jumping over rainbows.
unfortunate and unexpected are two totally different things
i thought flexible organic LEDs were going to be the great bendable color screens of the future. so is this somehow better than foLED? anyone care to make a quick comparison of pro's and con's?
are you talking about something similar to this popular science article?
http://kontraband.com/show/show.asp?ID=1344 need quicktime tho...
so say someone creates a new dog crap scooper and names it the 'crap picker upper' at first. the inventor doesn't like ford vehicles very much and generally thinks they are crap. then the inventor names it the 'ford picker upper'; and then for laughs officially names it the ford pick-up. ford (the auto company) has no way of stopping that? wow, sweet!