Slashdot Mirror


Russia's Biggest Spammer Brutally Murdered

Karellen !-P writes "Vardan Kushnir, a notorious russian spammer who headed the English learning centers, the Center for American English, the New York English Centre and the Centre for Spoken English, was found dead in his Moscow apartment on Sunday, Interfax reported Monday. He died after suffering repeated blows to the head."

1,035 comments

  1. That shouldn't happen. by FFFish · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's terrible that something like that would happen. It isn't legal and it isn't moral.

    On the other hand, this message is about all the empathy and concern I can work myself up to. Good riddance to bad trash.

    --

    --
    Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    1. Re:That shouldn't happen. by AnObfuscator · · Score: 5, Funny
      It's terrible that something like that would happen. It isn't legal

      It should be!

      Sic semper spammeris!

      ^_^

      --
      multifariam.net -- yet another nerd blog
    2. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haa-ha!

    3. Re:That shouldn't happen. by AKAImBatman · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I have a feeling that this has less to do with his spamming efforts and more to do with the mafia. From what I understand, a lot of spammers, script kiddies, and crackers in Russia have connections to the mob. The reason for this is that the mafia tends to use cyber-warfare (such as DDOSes) for blackmail, and spam for revenue generation. Apparently the spam networks are quite sophisticated, with one person finding and validating addresses then selling them to the highest bidder.

      In other words, things may be more complex then they seem...

    4. Re:That shouldn't happen. by william_w_bush · · Score: 2, Insightful

      yeah I'm there too, torn between poor guy and hooray.

      so i suppose my comment on this is:

      huh.

      --
      The first rule of USENET is you do not talk about USENET.
    5. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some spammer must have been modding down this comment.

    6. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm sorry...it's all my fault. I sneaked in and stenciled "Click here to unsubscribe" on his forehead.

      I guess people just did as instructed...albeit with a 30lb 'mouse' ;-)


    7. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Frumious+Wombat · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Another day on the froniers of capitalism.

      About 10 years ago (and if it's a lot better there now, sorry for outdated information), the NY Times had two articles summing up the new Russia.

      One was on business practices, with the comment, "to enforce a contract, you often have to take out a contract".

      The other was on a clinic doing heroin detox. The basic system was thugs would patrol the streets, find people doing heroin, club them into submission, drag them to the clinic and chain them to a bed, and then let them dry out cold turkey. The Doctor in charge said, "of course this is not the optimal treatment, but here ... ".

      Looks like our spammer's fate falls under one of those two categories of "solutions". As others have said, it probably wasn't the spam, it was, "just business".

      --
      the more accurate the calculations became, the more the concepts tended to vanish into thin air. R. S. Mulliken
    8. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 3, Funny

      I was thinking mafia too, but more along the lines that some godfather who was having problems with his winkie recieved a viagra ad...

      --
      It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
    9. Re:That shouldn't happen. by pete6677 · · Score: 1

      Kind of like when that Chicago tow truck driver was killed a couple of years ago while attempting to wrongfully tow someone's car. I'm feeling about the same level of outrage now as I did then, which is to say none at all. Sure, I don't think this type of thing should be legal, but that doesn't mean I regret to hear about it.

    10. Re:That shouldn't happen. by ucahg · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Are you joking?

      Has human life lost all sanctity, that you think it is justifiable to end a man's life because he sends you unwanted email?

      Is spam that much of an annoyance to you that you are filled with satisfaction when a man is bludgeoned to death, only because that man was a spammer?

      I'm at a loss for words, and I'm ashamed of the morality of the age I live in. You make me sick.

    11. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Golias · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Russia is currently one of the most "bent" countries in the world. Pretty much nobody does business there of any sort, let alone shady stuff like hacking and spamming, without having connections to the mob.

      Keep that in mind next time somebody tells you what a great deal allofmp3.com is. The cost is actually a few pennies a song plus some poor sap's kneecaps somewhere.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    12. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Jamu · · Score: 1

      It's ironic that it was multiple blows to the head that killed him.

      --
      Who ordered that?
    13. Re:That shouldn't happen. by w0lver · · Score: 2, Funny

      See I'm surprised they bludgeoned him in the head... I would have figured it would have taken a stake to the heart...

    14. Re:That shouldn't happen. by AKAImBatman · · Score: 5, Informative

      Pretty much nobody does business there of any sort, let alone shady stuff like hacking and spamming, without having connections to the mob.

      That's not quite true. The Russian culture is certainly full of corruption given that the KGB effectively became the Mafia, but Moscow has become a booming city ripe with economic opportunity. New freeways, inexpensive cars, waterparks, big businesses (Sun's Russian HQ is right across the street from my father-in-law!), and Aerospace technologies are just a few areas where Moscow has been booming. Another big area is restaurant chains. There are now more international food chains in Russia than ever before!

      Russia is something of a third world country that's pulling itself back up into an economic power. Along the way there will be TONS of greed and corruption, but don't confuse that with the honest growth that is occurring. :-)

    15. Re:That shouldn't happen. by the_mad_poster · · Score: 0

      So you're theory here is that a tow-truck driver's life is worth less than a vehicle he's towing? Because, you know, a normal human being would have sued the guy or called the police, not murdered him.

      --
      Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
    16. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Zediker · · Score: 0

      excelent, everything is working according to plan.... yesss......

      --
      I love to slaughter the english language.
    17. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reason for this is that the mafia tends to use cyber-warfare (such as DDOSes) for blackmail, and spam for revenue generation.

      Shouldn't that be blackemail?

    18. Re:That shouldn't happen. by spiffy_dude · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Despite the levels of annoyance that people like this engender, celebrating a death is not ok. On the one hand you have a low level of constant annoyance (spam) and on the other hand you have someone's well-being (his DEATH). I think some priorities need to be examined.

    19. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1
      There are now more international food chains in Russia than ever before!

      That's not really saying much, is it? Considering that there were probably zero international food chains under the Soviet regime.
      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    20. Re:That shouldn't happen. by pete6677 · · Score: 1

      Yes, the guy who killed him was psycho. No, I would not do it if I were in that situation, even if I were sure I would not get caught. I agree that it is wrong, and that it is rightfully illegal to kill someone over a car. However, it did not exactly bring a tear to my eye to read that story. It's called Karma, and like they say it can be a bitch sometimes.

    21. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Is spam that much of an annoyance to you that you are filled with satisfaction when a man is bludgeoned to death, only because that man was a spammer?
      This person has made a living by harming other people. He has done so for a long time. He would have been delighted to continue harming people for the rest of his life. Murder is clearly a disproportional response but you shouldn't be surprised when people are happy to see a sociopath take it worse than he was giving out.
      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    22. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Horray!

    23. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Markus_UW · · Score: 1

      The key difference lies in who the levels of annoyance pertain to. The spam, while less annoying than death, annoys me, and therefore is worth the price of someone else's annoyance (in this case, death) in order for it to be eliminated. The me vs. someone else perspective shift warps all measures of "fairness" and "equality".

    24. Re:That shouldn't happen. by mranchovy · · Score: 5, Funny

      On the one hand, this kind of thing shouldn't happen in a civilized society.

      On the other hand, I'm having a hard time resisting the urge to make a crack about how the repeated blows to the head came from an enlarged penis.

      --
      I am so smart!
      I am so smart!
      S-M-R-T!
      I mean S-M-A-R-T!
    25. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Mister+Transistor · · Score: 1

      Yeah, with each ever-so-slightly different...

      --
      -- You are in a maze of little, twisty passages, all different... --
    26. Re:That shouldn't happen. by gothfox · · Score: 5, Funny

      Please, don't spoil everything. As a fellow russian, I find this +5 informative posts about white bear mobs walking around here drinking vodka, making botnets from Comcast customers and firing AKA-47's at one another highly amusing.

      Anyway, how about making Jul 25 an international anti-spam day? It just writes itself in the calendar, really it does...

    27. Re:That shouldn't happen. by lgw · · Score: 1

      He needed killin. Seems morally fine to me. He didn't hurt any one person very badly, he attempted to defraud a hundred million people, and was often successful.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    28. Re:That shouldn't happen. by AJWM · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Last (okay, only) time I was in the Soviet Union (not long before the end), there was at least McDonalds, Baskin-Robbins, and Pizza Gut (there's no letter 'H' in Cyrillic).

      --
      -- Alastair
    29. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Golias · · Score: 1

      Glasnost brought with it Pepsi and McDonald's, so there were even some American food chains in Moscow before the fall of the Soviet Union.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    30. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Kelbear · · Score: 1

      First the people will have to feel that humans have intrinsic value in and of themselves.

      The result of their existance is all that matters when a human becomes not much more than a statistic. The result of this man's e-mailing someone is a small amount of inconvenience, and a small amount of money in humanity having to develop anti-spam techniques to battle him. Then multiply this small problem to the scale he employs his spam and you have a massive problem. A recent post on slashdot entailed justification for the death sentence for malicious virus writers. His inconvenience and cost to humanity would outstrip a murderer's pretty quickly when the value of a human life is unaccounted for.

      Which isn't to say that I think human life is worthless. If I had to be judged on a similar standard, I wouldn't be worth much at all. I'd just say that it's a bummer to kill someone, but at the same time I recognize that people will feel the benefit of his death far more than the benefit of his life.

    31. Re:That shouldn't happen. by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      That's not really saying much, is it? Considering that there were probably zero international food chains under the Soviet regime.

      IIRC, the first McDonalds was founded just prior to the fall of communism. Now there are McDonalds on every street corner, Pizza Huts (!), Taco Bell, KFC, and others. Even Starbucks is now in the game!

    32. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Daniel_Staal · · Score: 4, Informative

      Um, Russia should be the *definition* of a second world country... First world was (roughly) the NATO group, Second world was (roughly) Warsaw Pact, Third world was everybody else.

      Just being unbearably pendantic.

      --
      'Sensible' is a curse word.
    33. Re:That shouldn't happen. by ucahg · · Score: 1, Interesting
      Murder is clearly a disproportional response but you shouldn't be surprised when people are happy to see a sociopath take it worse than he was giving out.


      Can I still be disgusted?
    34. Re:That shouldn't happen. by chris_mahan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      let me put human death in perspective:
      6 billion people here. There will be 6 billion deaths in the next 60 years (check avg life expectancy.
      That runs to 100 million per year.
      that mean roughly 275,000 deaths per day.

      Now, if this guy was a mafioso, involved in spamming people all over the world, costing the global economy billions annually in lost productivity...

      Don't feel so bad for him.

      Yesterday, did you think of those 275,000 deaths? Are you going to think about the 275,000 deaths tomorrow? Then don't cry too much over this one.

      --

      "Piter, too, is dead."

    35. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Alex+P+Keaton+in+da · · Score: 1

      Ummm... Someone has to say it-
      In Democratic Russia, Spam kills you!
      In all seriousness, there is not an obnoxious behavior that in human history, has not led to at least one brutal murder. I am sure somewhere, someone has killed someone whom they sat next to for eating a sandwich while breathing through their nose and making a whistling noise....

      --
      And All I Ask is a Tall Ship And a Star to Steer Her By
    36. Re:That shouldn't happen. by AJWM · · Score: 1

      Unwanted email steals my time, even if it's just the time to delete it. Stealing my time is taking part of my life. We're not just talking about one email here, we're talking about a major spammer.

      Sounds like self defense to me.

      --
      -- Alastair
    37. Re:That shouldn't happen. by jafac · · Score: 1

      Along the way there will be TONS of greed and corruption, but don't confuse that with the honest growth that is occurring.

      Same goes for the US!

      Honest!

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    38. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's ok. The RIAA is evil. Everyone says so. So it's justified to break any and all laws that might get in the way of the cheapest possible download, just to punish those **AA bastards.

    39. Re:That shouldn't happen. by compass46 · · Score: 1

      Welcome to /., where if it can't be reduced to 1's and 0's it doesn't mean crap. Seriously, people get their panties in a bunch about spam instead of just using a fucking filter and getting a fucking life about it.

    40. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is spam that much of an annoyance to you that you are filled with satisfaction when a man is bludgeoned to death, only because that man was a spammer?


      Yes.

    41. Re:That shouldn't happen. by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      As a fellow russian, I find this +5 informative posts about white bear mobs walking around here drinking vodka, making botnets from Comcast customers and firing AKA-47's at one another highly amusing.

      Eh?

      1. I'm not Russian. My wife is. :-)

      2. That's a bit more extreme than I was trying to communicate. Mafia corruption usually happens behind the scenes, where no one can put their finger on it. While the Russian Mafia has been uncharacteristically bold in the past (What were all those American Businessman killings about?), they still don't want to place themselves in the public eye. It's much easier to work from the shadows where cops can be bought off and ties can be made to certain political entities.

      Besides, what other country allows its Presidential candidates to be kidnapped? (Or perhaps allows it's candidates to spin believable stories about kidnapping. You decide.) ;-)

    42. Re:That shouldn't happen. by koreaman · · Score: 0

      why not just do ?

    43. Re:That shouldn't happen. by qwijibo · · Score: 1

      Yes, human life has lost all sanctity. He would do far worse to you without so noble of a reason. It would be nice if we lived in a world where everyone could treat each other with courtesy and respect. Unfortunately, there are a lot of people who won't hesitate to kill you for little to no reason. Maybe I'm biased, but I'm inclined to think that this guy was probably not the courtesy and respect type.

      I'm tired of all of the faux concern for humanity that gives sociopathic predators endless opportunities to victimize the kind of people who don't do this kind of stuff.

    44. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "It's terrible that something like that would happen. It isn't legal and it isn't moral."
      At least someone murdered him...
    45. Re:That shouldn't happen. by theefer · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Why is it modded funny? I also went to a Subway in Saint-Petersburg on Nevsky Prospect; there are definitely a lot of american fastfoods in Russia nowadays. One of the few places where some of the cashiers speak english actually -- which made us prefer the aventure of typical russian restaurants with no ways to communicate with the waitress.

      --
      theefer
    46. Re:That shouldn't happen. by elseedy · · Score: 0

      My bad. :(

    47. Re:That shouldn't happen. by minus_273 · · Score: 1

      I guess someone got one too many offers for generic viagra ...

      --
      The war with islam is a war on the beast
      The war on terror is a war for peace
    48. Re:That shouldn't happen. by koreaman · · Score: 0

      Sorry, /. filtered out the cyrillic in my post,

      Why not just do "pizza khut"?

    49. Re:That shouldn't happen. by BluedemonX · · Score: 1

      No dude, it's pest control.

      --

      --- Jump!! Fire!! Bullet time!! - Lego version of the Matrix
    50. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If only the all spammers could face such "justice".

    51. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Kadin2048 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, this is Slashdot, where chances are the people who actually have to write and fine-tune and otherwise spend their day dealing with those filters hang out.

      Sure, the majority of people here probably could just turn their filters on, but don't act like the technology to block annoying behavior like the spammers' just falls from the sky. Someone has to make it, and that's their time that the spammer is taking up.

      There are a lot of people with legitimate grievances about unwanted bulk email, some greater than others. But when you get a lot of people together who each have a small grievance...it's probably not enough to cause any of them to actually go out and kill the person responsible, but don't expect them to act all sad about it when somebody else (assumedly for their own, probably nefarious reasons) does.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    52. Re:That shouldn't happen. by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      Sorry, reading your post again, I think I misunderstood. Yes, the posts that make Russia sound like something out of a gangster movie are pretty funny. :-)

    53. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Russia can't be third world; it's Cold War terminology. First world was US + friends, second world was Russia + friends, third world was everyone else.

    54. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Golias · · Score: 1

      That's ok. The RIAA is evil. Everyone says so. So it's justified to break any and all laws that might get in the way of the cheapest possible download, just to punish those **AA bastards.

      lol!

      I just got bitchslapped right down the list of posts in my user profile, probably by somebody who thinks exactly along those lines. :)

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    55. Re:That shouldn't happen. by drdewm · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Except that they actively work around my filters knowingly and aggresively with the mispellings, fake descriptions and ip spoofing nonsense. Anyone who knowingly pesters people on the milions and millions scale has forfeited any sympathy from me.

    56. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Monokeros · · Score: 1

      Has human life lost all sanctity, that you think it is justifiable to end a man's life because he sends you unwanted email?

      Is spam that much of an annoyance to you that you are filled with satisfaction when a man is bludgeoned to death, only because that man was a spammer?


      Yes.
      --
      The Statue of Liberty is America's lawn jockey.
    57. Re:That shouldn't happen. by ilyaaohell · · Score: 5, Informative

      Wrong. The cyrillic letter for 'H' is 'X'. In any case, how is this a measure of wealth for a country to have foreign chain stores? I LIVED in the Soviet Union. I remember when the first McDonald's was built. A hamburger cost a month's salary, and the only reason there was a long line several hundred people in length is because the Russian people were so supressed that they desperately earned to try something they only read about or seen on TV. Coincidentally, I bet you'd find it "progress" if I told you that the cost of the hamburger since then has gone down from a month's sallary to a week's sallary. Sure, there are a handful of millionaires here and there, the vast majority of whom earned their wealth by "stealing" the property and industries that the government abandoned after instituting a more free market. But for the VAST majority of Russians, which I'm assuming is something like 98% of the population, none of these "cheap" chain stores are any more affordable to them than a night at the Opera is to you.

      --
      UNIX: A computer user is defined as a programmer. WINDOWS: A computer user is defined as a consumer.
    58. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Redwin · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's terrible that something like that would happen. It isn't legal

      It should be!

      Sic semper spammeris!
      It is

      The question is, who gets the $5000? Hehehe

      --
      Warning, comments may not have been passed by the sanity department of my brain.
    59. Re:That shouldn't happen. by chillmost · · Score: 1
      Has human life lost all sanctity, that you think it is justifiable to end a man's life because he sends you unwanted email?

      You're new here, aren't you?

    60. Re:That shouldn't happen. by arivanov · · Score: 1

      Well...

      As someone who actually understands what "Zhizn cena kopeika" means, I can only say that this was expected to happen.

      Counterfeit software, phishing and the like can deliver the margin to hire the thick necks to protect your arse. Spamming about language courses does not.

      Also, this will not make Russian originated SPAM go away, it will just shift it even further into black market territory.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    61. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so i suppose my comment on this is:

      huh.


      "Let's see what a man like you would
      kill for."

      *Opens box*

      "Huh."

      God scifi murdered that episode for broadcasting.. horribly.

    62. Re:That shouldn't happen. by mkirsten · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It isn't legal and it isn't moral. Neither is spamming.

    63. Re:That shouldn't happen. by TGK · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Yea, pretty much. But my wife's a poly sci student and I get yelled at a lot about this - so you're going to get it too.

      The 1st, 2nd, and 3rd world nomenclature isn't used anymore, at least not in PolySci (historians use it, but then, that's not the present we're talking about is it?)

      Today we call them:
      Developed Countries
      Developing Countries
      and Highly Indebted Poor Counties

      I maintain that the 1st 2nd 3rd system is easier on everyone involved, but it doesn't get me anywhere.

      So, there you are. Technicaly Russia falls into the "Developing Countries" area, but only just.

      --
      Killfile(TGK)
      No trees were killed in the creation of this post. However, many electrons were inconvenienced.
    64. Re:That shouldn't happen. by dasdrewid · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it might a booming city ripe with economic opportunity, but you gotta ask the mob first.

      A few years ago, 3 or 4 I think, my brother spent a year in Russia as a student. Firstly, his rooming situation, though done through his University at home, was actually controlled through the mob (as in his checks went to a mob boss who then paid the landlady and the authorities). He bought of a cop on red square. And by bought off, the cop told him the fine was $20 there or $50 back at the station...

      About the same time, a businessman came to speak at our school. He'd just been over in Russia helping his company expand to advantage of the wonderful, booming economy. His first lesson upon arrival was what happened to his counterpart at Coke. They built a plant (I think just outside of Moscow), but decided that they were big enough to skip over the Mafia. A few days after it opened, someone attacked it with an RPG (didn't kill anyone, as the mafia had made sure everyone was too scared to work there in the first place).

      Yeah, there's plenty of honest growth that's occuring. But if there's not mafia backing behind it, then there's explicitly granted mafia permission to keep it up.

      --
      No trespassing. Violators will be shot. Survivors will be shot again.
    65. Re:That shouldn't happen. by AJWM · · Score: 1

      Well, the Cyrillic letter for the sound 'H' may well be 'X' (although I thought that was more of a soft fricative 'ch'), but the Pizza Hut (a few blocks from the McDonalds if I remember right, near the Baskin-Robbins) used the Cyrillic for 'G' (like a Greek gamma) in its name. Maybe whoever did the translation had a sense of humor.

      --
      -- Alastair
    66. Re:That shouldn't happen. by narsiman · · Score: 1

      So you saw branch offices of three Mafia families - So what ? We have them in every city in the US !!

    67. Re:That shouldn't happen. by dasdrewid · · Score: 1

      I think my brother went there. Twice. Once when it was still Subway (right after it opened), and once when it was the mafia version (I can't remember the name, but it was something close enough that they just re-stitched all of the logo shirts and painted a little on the signs). I seem to remember it taking less than a month to convert...

      --
      No trespassing. Violators will be shot. Survivors will be shot again.
    68. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      There is no character for the 'H' in Russian but other languages that use Cyrillic make use of the 'H' and its Cyrillic representation

    69. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sun's Russian HQ is right across the street from my father-in-law!

      Really? Your father-in-law lives in Russia? Wow, I didn't know those Russian mail-order bride things really worked!

    70. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The term "developed countries" is particularly obnoxious. sounds like we've stopped developing ?!

      Perhaps we have, with honest work being replaced by I"P" lawyer parasites and what not, but I'd like to think we're still developing. I find 1st/2nd/3rd much less offensive.

    71. Re:That shouldn't happen. by macdaddy357 · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't happen? No, this is exatly what should happen to public menaces like spammers. Let it serve as an example to all other spammers!

      --
      How ya like dat?
    72. Re:That shouldn't happen. by fimbulvetr · · Score: 1

      What do you think you're doing, using pragmatism on /.? For gods sake man, think of fanbois!

    73. Re:That shouldn't happen. by bhtooefr · · Score: 3, Informative

      Just for those of you who are seriously considering this, read this from that page:

      The Specious Report ~

      Spreading Rumors, Half-Truths & Misinformation Since 1789


      Don't take it seriously. It's quite funny, but it's not our fault if you kill a spammer and get convicted of murder.

      (Not that it shouldn't be done, of course ;-))

    74. Re:That shouldn't happen. by AJWM · · Score: 1

      I think it was modded funny for the "Pizza Gut" reference. I thought that was pretty funny myself at the time.

      There sure wasn't a Subway in Saint Petersburg when I was there -- indeed it was still Leningrad; they voted on the name change a few days later.

      --
      -- Alastair
    75. Re:That shouldn't happen. by sfjoe · · Score: 1

      First world was (roughly) the NATO group, Second world was (roughly) Warsaw Pact, Third world was everybody else.


      That should come as surprising news to the dozens of countries in the Middle East and Asia.

      --
      It's simple: I demand prosecution for torture.
    76. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Not that you're going to listen to an AC or anything, but the English sound represented by the letter 'H' is different from the Russian sound represented by the Cyrillic character ''. The Russian sound is a voiceless glottal fricative. Typical dialects of English have no such sound, with the exception of words like "loch" or names like "Bach." The English 'H' sound is just a breathy expulsion without a particular point of articulation to provide frication.

      When transliterating from English writing to Russian, it became customary some time ago (the 19th century?) to transliterate the English 'H' as the Russian 'G'. That's why Harvard University is called "Garvard." The Greek deity we call "Hermes" starts with a 'G' sound in Russian. This provided for some amusement at Peterhof (note the spelling of that name, too), as there was a sign there describing some statues and naming one of them "Germes."

      So... Russian doesn't have the English 'H' sound, but it has one that is very close to it. For some reason, the mapping of sounds between the two languages calls for the English 'H' sound to be represented by a voiced velar stop (also known as 'G').

    77. Re:That shouldn't happen. by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The cyrillic letter for 'H' is 'X'.

      That's actually a "Khah" sound (e.g. loch ness), not a hard 'H' sound.

      A hamburger cost a month's salary, and the only reason there was a long line several hundred people in length is because the Russian people were so supressed that they desperately [y]earned to try something they only read about or seen on TV.

      Ehh... that's somewhat true. McDonalds was simply something new and cool at the time. A bit like when the Apple Store opened here in Chicago. Were people lined up at the Apple Store because they were oppressed? Me thinks it had more to do with the Apple Store being new and cool.

      It was the same thing with McDonalds. After it existed for a while, it became a much more normal part of Russian life.

      I bet you'd find it "progress" if I told you that the cost of the hamburger since then has gone down from a month's sallary to a week's sallary.

      I think you're a little behind on the times. Several years ago, the Russian government reissued new currency that has a much better parity when compared to the Dollar. Eating at McDonalds isn't cheap, but it doesn't cost a weeks salary, either.

      Sure, there are a handful of millionaires here and there, the vast majority of whom earned their wealth by "stealing" the property and industries that the government abandoned after instituting a more free market.

      1. These are generally called "New Russians".

      2. Many New Russians obtained their wealth through perfectly honest means. For example, a friend of my wife's family made a killing by starting a door repair/replacement business. Not something you'd think would be a big money-maker, but apparently he became quite weathly from it. Which just goes to show how important property is to Russians now that it's private instead of public.

    78. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no he wasnt just a spammer, he was a criminal.

      and what the hell are you talking about? human life and sanctity?

      show me a period in history where life ever had that?

      seriously, this guy was a criminal that scammed people, eventually someone got pissed off and took him down. should i shed a tear for him or what?
      light a candle and hope that he can have a good afterlife even though he was a bad person?

      a criminal was murdered, big deal.

      the guy that cut me off this morning i would feel bad if he were killed. but this scammer asshole that steals from people to make a living, sorry while i just dont care.

      he can rot because he has shown he cant live in a moral society.
      he proved that by stealing from others.

    79. Re:That shouldn't happen. by doofusclam · · Score: 1
      Keep that in mind next time somebody tells you what a great deal allofmp3.com is. The cost is actually a few pennies a song plus some poor sap's kneecaps somewhere.


      Insightful, this? You moderators are having a laugh. Name your sources instead of letting this hypothetical crap fester on the internet. As if the RIAA need any more 'empirical data' like this to portray anyone who downloads a tune as a criminal.

      Where exactly is your evidence that me downloading and paying for tunes from allofmp3 aids people being kneecapped?
    80. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      About the only problem I have with this is that I am still getting spam mail :(

      While vigilante approaches are not exactly the best and that yes, not putting him through the legal system means the system won't learn, they do tend to send out a fairly potent message.

      Now lets just hope that it was actually because of his spamming that he was knocked off, maybe it will frighten a few others into quitting.

      On a side note, the current quote at the bottom of the page is "It takes both a weapon, and two people, to commit a murder."

    81. Re:That shouldn't happen. by badmammajamma · · Score: 2, Funny

      So, using cyrillic characters, how would the following dialog go?

      King Arthur: [about the inscription on the rock] What does it say, Brother Maynard?
      Brother Maynard: It reads, "Here may be found the last words of Joseph of Aramathia. He who is valiant and pure of spirit may find the holy grail in the Castle of Aaauuuggghhh..."
      King Arthur: What?
      Brother Maynard: "The Castle of Aaaauuuggghhhh"
      Sir Bedevere: What is that?
      Brother Maynard: He must have died while carving it.
      King Arthur: Oh come on!
      Brother Maynard: Well, that's what it says.
      King Arthur: Look, if he was dying, he wouldn't have bothered to carve 'Aaaauuuggghhhh'. He'd just say it.
      Sir Galahad: Maybe he was dictating it.
      King Arthur: Oh shut up!
      Sir Robin: Well does it say anything else?
      Brother Maynard: No, just "Aaaaauuuugggghhh".
      [knights making groaning sounds]
      Sir Bedevere: Do you think he could have mean, 'Camaaaauuuuggghhhh'?
      Sir Galahad: Where's that?
      Sir Bedevere: France, I think.
      Sir Lancelot: Isn't there a Saint "Aaaaavvvveeeesss" in Cornwall?
      King Arthur: No that's Saint "Ives".
      Sir Lancelot: Oh, yes. "Iiiiiivvvveeessss"!
      [All knights saying, "Iiiiiivvvveeessss"]
      Sir Bedevere: Whooooouuuuaaa!
      Sir Lancelot: No no no, it's "Aaaaauuuugggghhhh" from the back of the throat.
      Sir Bedevere: No I mean, "Whoooouuuuaaa!" as in surprise and alarm.
      Sir Lancelot: Oh, you mean like, "AAAHH!"
      Sir Bedevere: Yes, that's it. "AAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!"

      --
      Any man who afflicts the human race with ideas must be prepared to see them misunderstood. -- H. L. Mencken
    82. Re:That shouldn't happen. by dpilot · · Score: 1

      So where does that put the US?
      Where will it put the US in 20 years?

      The US is developed, but with large amounts of obsolete, neglected, crumbling infrastructure.
      The US is heavily indebted.
      The wealth disparity in the US is growing, and current trends indicate that this will continue. Perhaps (or perhaps not) today the poor in the US are well-off compared to the average in other countries, but which way are things headed?

      My brother contends that the US is doing all it can (by intent or by accident?) to turn into a third-world country, so there can be a cheap domestic labor pool, again.

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    83. Re:That shouldn't happen. by caeled · · Score: 1

      Pretty much agreeing here. I'm not sure I can find a single piece of me that says "aaaa too bad" Spammers have made what should be one of the most useful parts of the net, crap, difficult and given me a need to mostly not pay attention to my e-mail.

    84. Re:That shouldn't happen. by almostmanda · · Score: 1

      Keep that in mind next time somebody tells you what a great deal allofmp3.com is. The cost is actually a few pennies a song plus some poor sap's kneecaps somewhere.

      If I buy songs from American services, I'm just paying more money to a different mob. At least the Russian mafia isn't gonna sue my friends.

    85. Re:That shouldn't happen. by lonesome+phreak · · Score: 1

      Everytime I think of Russia I think of all the Russian prostitution sites on the net...like http://nuderussianamateurgirls.com/ and such...

      --
      Maybe we DID take the blue pill. You wouldn't remember anyway.
    86. Re:That shouldn't happen. by andersbergh · · Score: 1

      Wrong. Spamming is legal in Russia, although, one can question if it's moral...

    87. Re:That shouldn't happen. by cynicdave · · Score: 1

      Actually, there's a lot of competing theories going around, and some political scientists still call them 1st, 2nd, and 3rd world nations. There is a "core-periphery" division of nations. - Core (US, Japan) - Peripheral (Congo, Etc) - Semi-Peripheral (Brazil)

    88. Re:That shouldn't happen. by JehCt · · Score: 0

      The Russian mafia would never kill a valuable asset for fun, vindictiveness or competition. The only logical reason for killing is to keep somebody quiet. Punishments can be devised that are much worse than death. The right question to ask in this situation is, "What did this bloke know, and why did somebody need to keep him quiet?"

    89. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Darby · · Score: 1

      On the one hand you have a low level of constant annoyance (spam) and on the other hand you have someone's well-being (his DEATH). I think some priorities need to be examined.

      Well, you do have a constant low level annoyance, however it is multiplied by hundreds of millions which makes it a far bigger problem. Add in the cost to the networks, and add in the fact that email has become practically useless to a great number of people. When you actually add it up, it is far far more than merely a low level annoyance.

      Say for example that dealing with spam takes 1 second per day for each person who is forced to deal with this spammers inability to act like a decent member of society.
      Assuming that there are 300 Million people on the internet this is 9.5 years of human life that this person has destroyed *per day*

      In a month, he has wasted well over one complete human lifetime.

      Now, I am not arguing that it was "right" to kill this sociopathic shitbag, but you did suggest that priorities be examined and so I have done that.

      There seems to be some sort of attitude that robbing one person is bad, but robbing everybody gets no attention. If I bounce a check, then that can be a pretty major offense even though there is only one single victim. Yet when members of congress bounced checks and that was the same crime multiplied 300 million times yet it's blown off completely.

      So what I'm saying with this is I disagree to a point with what I think you're getting at which is that one person receiving a spam is not anywhere the same league as receiving a blunt object to the back of the head resulting in your death. That fact I agree with, but when you look at the sheer volume then you are no longer comparing one to one. You have literally billions of minor annoyances to one death. While I am not arguing that that is necessarilly the "correct" translation factor to use, I will say that reasonably there is a correct factor.

      If not, then really, I think you are conceding the future to sociopaths (not like they aren't the vast majority of political leaders anyhow, but that's another topic).

    90. Re:That shouldn't happen. by S.O.B. · · Score: 1

      He's saving up for the Russian mail-order father-in-law. One day he hopes to have the whole set.

      --
      Some of what I say is fact, some is conjecture, the rest I'm just blowing out my ass...you guess.
    91. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and Pizza Gut...

      In Russia? For many Slashdotters, a Pizza Gut is always within arms reach.

    92. Re:That shouldn't happen. by caluml · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I also went to a Subway in Saint-Petersburg on Nevsky Prospect; there are definitely a lot of american fastfoods in Russia nowadays. One of the few places where some of the cashiers speak english actually -- which made us prefer the aventure of typical russian restaurants with no ways to communicate with the waitress.

      Why? Why go to the same food places as you go to in your home country? Why talk in the same language? Try and learn a few words of Russian before you go. I don't understand people that want to go abroad, and yet be at home.

    93. Re:That shouldn't happen. by xmorg · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There is no more helpless a fealing than an email user who cant reply to an automated spam message, to tell the sender to get a life, or stop sending the message.

      How many times have I wanted to find the guy who does this, and (At the very least) flood his inbox(s) with all the mail he has ever sent me. Killing is wrong yes, but you can't expect to tick off millions of people all over the world, and not suffer some retibution if discovered ... in short spamming could be hazerdous to your health!

    94. Re:That shouldn't happen. by srmalloy · · Score: 1
      I also went to a Subway in Saint-Petersburg on Nevsky Prospect; there are definitely a lot of american fastfoods in Russia nowadays. One of the few places where some of the cashiers speak english actually -- which made us prefer the aventure of typical russian restaurants with no ways to communicate with the waitress.

      Or, you could take the advice of Robert Heinlein, from when he and his wife visited the Soviet Union, and rely on a single-word question to find the best food -- "boof-yet?" (and yes, it does mean what it sounds like, you're asking about the buffet. If you get 'nyet' in response, go to another restaurant).

    95. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Is spam that much of an annoyance to you that you are filled with satisfaction when a man is bludgeoned to death, only because that man was a spammer?

      Yes. It is that much of an annoyance. And I suggest that you take your Miss-Goody-Two-Shoes attitude and stow it before something happens to you as well.

    96. Re:That shouldn't happen. by anaesthetica · · Score: 1

      The problem is that in Russia, Moscow is the only place with actual economic opportunity. The wealth inequality of Moscow compared to the rest of Russia is something like 50:1 compared to 17:1 average for cities in the rest of the country. St. Petersburg is the only other place with any kind of economic potential. Everything flows through Moscow, and that is a major flaw in such a large country. Without economic decentralization (opportunity and growth outside of Moscow) the country will continue its precipitous decline.

    97. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Welcome to /., where if it can't be reduced to 1's and 0's it doesn't mean crap.

      This scumbags life bit just got set to 0. It still doesn't mean crap.

      Should I shed a tear for a boil on the collective ass of the world? Not likely.

      You want to be a SPAMMER/TELEMARKETER/EVANGELIST or any other asswipe who makes a living bugging the hell out of thousands of people, to make a single sale, go right ahead. But the day your number is called, no matter how horrific it might be, I will still say "Tough shit, that scumbag got what he deserved". Karma really is a bitch.

      So from your filter comment, who do you spam for again?

    98. Re:That shouldn't happen. by SirSlud · · Score: 2, Funny

      BWUAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

      Here's to hoping you can land a job in Hell's tech support department once you get there. I'll be the guy in the cubicle next to you.

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    99. Re:That shouldn't happen. by srmalloy · · Score: 3, Funny

      Does it really matter what the restaurant is? All the signs look like 'KAOPECTATE', anyway...

      (Seriously, though, for many years restaurants weren't allowed to put up anything other than 'PECTOPAH' for signage.)

    100. Re:That shouldn't happen. by The-Perl-CD-Bookshel · · Score: 1
      Um, Russia should be the *definition* of a second world country...

      Apparently I'm too PC, but the terms are now underdeveloped, developing and developed countries.

      Should we not let the World Bank/IMF/U.N. come up with new language is another question all together...

      --
      I don't keep a lid on my coffee so when I walk around I look busy -me
    101. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a ltter H in Cyrillic, it looks like this: X ;) Many words with slavic roots that call for the H sound (kh) miraculously become G in Russian.

      From a Bulgarian speaker. And yes, we use the same alphabet...

    102. Re:That shouldn't happen. by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      The problem is that in Russia, Moscow is the only place with actual economic opportunity.

      Correct. In fact, that's the reason that Russia lost the cold war. Moscow is pretty much the entire economic base of the country. Go to the far east sometime, and you easily come to areas where you're lucky if you can find running water and electricity. Compare that to America where our economic structure is spread throughout the country with no single choke-point. Key centers like New York and San Francisco are important, but not so important that'd we'd lose all economic power and industrial base if they were lost.

    103. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Captain+Scurvy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Er, well, you're right that Russians tend to turn the Western "H" into their equivalent of a "G", but they don't do this with the Cyrillic transliteration of Pizza Hut, which is "Pitsa Khat". Although, in Russian, Harry Potter's first name is "Gari."

    104. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, its highly indebted poor country as another posted pointed out. I have a MS Polsci with JD (georgetown joint degree program).

    105. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      If you're going to be pedantic, you should get it right.

      Old World: Europe, Asia, and a little bit of North Africa;

      New World: North and South America;

      Third World: Everywhere else.

      The meanings and connotations have been re-arranged a lot since those terms were first coined, but the true pedant should be holding out for the original terminology.

    106. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      " Yea, pretty much. But my wife's a poly sci student and I get yelled at a lot about this - so you're going to get it too."

      At least she's not yelling at you for spelling "poli" wrong. Or is she really studyin multiple sciences?

    107. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They made angry a lot of people there, in Russia, which can be seen there (Russian):

      http://antialc.narod.ru/
      http://ricn.ru/kvd/material/5916/

      The spammers even made this request (carefully with your irony detectors)
      (translation from Russian is mine, source: http://ricn.ru/job/material/6039/ ):

      The Center of Spoken English [ALC] needs a system administrator with an
      experience of working in deflection of Internet hackers' attacks. Personally
      I have that spam from them pilling up, it's about 50% of all my mail. I
      really am fed up with it [used the censored translation mode]).

      Title: System administrator.
      City: Moscow.
      Gender: Doesn't matter.
      Experience: 3 years.
      Occupation: Any.
      The Center of Spoken English [ALC] needs a system administrator with an
      experience of working in deflection of Internet hackers' attacks.
      Contact person: American Language Center
      Phone: 238-33-86 / 778-9894 / 411-0232
      Vacation ID: 2016813

      According to what I've read on those Russian pages, it most possibly was
      spam-related. Those spammers were harassed over the phone, e-mail. Their
      phone was published in cheap sex, drug dealers requests, etc.

      Interesting piece from the article at http://ricn.ru/kvd/material/5916/ :

      "dimkin offered to visit addresses with baseball bats. Effective, but
      for that there should be a concentration of offended in the geographical
      territory borders, close to the spammer."

      Every spammer deserves that.

    108. Re:That shouldn't happen. by pmancini · · Score: 1

      When I was in Ukraine I went to visit the WWII Museum and Afgan War Museum, both in Kiev and pretty close to a McDonalds. There was a school field trip there and one rambunctious boy went swinging off a tank barrel and cried out, "I want McDonalds, not stupid, boring tanks!"

      So, it seems McDonalds is pretty popular there as it is in most places. I didn't eat there, but I did eat at one in Italy and if you are an American, you have to try it out - in my opinion the burgers are 10x better than here at home.

      Also, check out those museums I mentioned in Kiev, they are great if you love history.

      All the equipment is cold war era but the museums have lots of interesting pictures and personal equipment.

      I agree that while there is a lot of corruption there is also a lot of opportunity.

    109. Re:That shouldn't happen. by unborn · · Score: 1

      No,

      It's just a Russian thing (not even in all cyrillic languages). For example bread is hleb, but Hamburg is Gamburg, Henry is Genry. That's the typical thing that happens to foreign words.

    110. Re:That shouldn't happen. by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1
      While I agree with your post in general, it can be quite interesting to try non-native food in a foreign country. In general, it is quite different from that food in its native country, and you can learn a lot about a culture's cuisine from what they do to non-native dishes since you have a control to compare it against. One of the most interesting meals I ate was at an Italian restaurant in Japan. I was served with a `mushroom pizza' that was a base of Japanese bread, a layer of shiitake in a soy-based sauce with an egg in the middle. This was eaten with a pizza wheel and chopsticks.

      Sometimes the things that you expect to be the same can be the most enlightening differences.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    111. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Diesel+Dave · · Score: 1

      Sic semper spammeris!

      One of my finer sigs... and no atribution... JEEZ!

    112. Re:That shouldn't happen. by unborn · · Score: 1

      MOD PARENT UP. Extremely funny (ref: matrioshki)

    113. Re:That shouldn't happen. by CommieOverlord · · Score: 1

      How so?

      The original use of the first/second/third world terminology had nothing to do with wealth/poverty, but politics.

    114. Re:That shouldn't happen. by chris_mahan · · Score: 1

      Coincidentally, when I think of the fanbois, I think about death too...

      Even more coincidentally, the "repeated bludgeoning to the head" kind of death...

      Ok, I'll stop now.

      --

      "Piter, too, is dead."

    115. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I thought (pedantically speaking) that it was Old World (Europe), New World (Americas), and Third World.

    116. Re:That shouldn't happen. by kokoloko · · Score: 1

      Get a grip. Spam is annoying, but not harmful. And sending it is hardly sufficient to qualify you as sociopathic.

    117. Re:That shouldn't happen. by huge+colin · · Score: 1

      It's terrible that something like that would happen. ... it isn't moral.

      Disagree.

    118. Re:That shouldn't happen. by operagost · · Score: 1

      The difference is that the US may be highly indebted, but only to its own citizens. Poor countries are indebted to other countries.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    119. Re:That shouldn't happen. by fredrated · · Score: 0

      'Get a grip. Spam is annoying, but not harmful.'

      I suppose stealing thousands of man-years of other peoples time isn't harmful?

      Stupidity: it's a renewable resource!

    120. Re:That shouldn't happen. by lightspawn · · Score: 1

      This person has made a living by harming other people. He has done so for a long time. He would have been delighted to continue harming people for the rest of his life. Murder is clearly a disproportional response...

      Is it really?

      Every day, he was responsible for several days (weeks?) worth of wasted time.

      Unless his time (on earth) was far more important than the victims', the world is better off with him gone.

      What do you think should be the appropriate punishment for, say, several billion counts of fraud (email headers?) never mind even the unsolicited aspect and the fact the mail was probably sent from either unknowing relays or zombie machines. Let's add a few million counts of whatever the legal term for that is - tell me, what would be fitting for the crime? A fine, maybe?

    121. Re:That shouldn't happen. by AJWM · · Score: 1

      I'm going by what the sign on the restaurant said. It was definitely "Gut", with an upside-down "L", which I thought was funny as hell. Somewhere I have a photo of it.

      Maybe some manager has since realized the joke and changed it.

      --
      -- Alastair
    122. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Pantero+Blanco · · Score: 1

      If someone's stealing something of value from me and they won't surrender it when I produce a gun, they're going to get shot (and the court will almost definitely decide in my favor, at least here). If possible, I might've tried to take his leg out instead of killing him, but I wouldn't lose sleep at night if I did. I guess I'm not normal.

    123. Re:That shouldn't happen. by cribdasig · · Score: 1

      What the hell are you smoking? The standard wage in Soviet times was 130 Rubles, +/- 20 Rubles adjustment for ease or hazzard of the job. A meal at the first McDonald's was around 10 Rubles a person, which is pricy, considering a loaf of bread was .29, but still nowhere near the figures you mention. And this is for a fancy restaurant in the capital city, located in a two-story glass building with paintings on the walls and miniatures of the world's landmarks in the corners. My family could afford to go there once a year in spring, to celebrate my birthday and my parents anniversary (the two dates are a year off, you people!). Now do the math. Once a year per 10 million Moscow residents makes for about 2700 visitors a day, all there for some sort of a special occasion. I would imagine an average family living in New York would do something similar to break the routine. There are plenty restaurants there with $200 entrees and $500 bottles of wine.

    124. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      You miss the fact that there are no more morons sitting in home on dial up and sending spams to everywhere.

      It became big business. Big business as drug selling.

      So you know what happens if you are into Mafia, exact same thing happened to him.

      If there is, a guy out there thinking he will get all the money spam boss promises etc. he should remember this.

      It is not a pure tech, lameness thing anymore.

    125. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah! But you must admit how effective such spam filter is!

    126. Re:That shouldn't happen. by phliar · · Score: 1
      Sic semper spammeris!

      (People called Romanes they go the house?)

      sic -- thus; semper -- always; "So there will always be spam."

      Semper ubi sub ubi -- Always wear under wear.

      --
      Unlimited growth == Cancer.
    127. Re:That shouldn't happen. by the_mad_poster · · Score: 0

      I think the only gun laws that should exist, should exist to keep guns out of the hands of people like you. The fact that you value inanimate objects over human life is evidence enough that you're too immature to hold one.

      --
      Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
    128. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Cromac · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Killing is wrong yes, but you can't expect to tick off millions of people all over the world, and not suffer some retibution if discovered

      If only the spammers would read that and realize the truth of it. I'm sure many of them think what they're doing is harmless and no one could possibly be bothered by it, but as you pointed out when you irritate millions of people chances are at least a few of them we be complete raving psychos.

    129. Re:That shouldn't happen. by blueskies · · Score: 1

      Come on, stick up for yourself, Randy Waterhouse.

    130. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      The poor in the US are getting richer. They may not be getting richer as fast as the rich are gettng richer, but they are getting richer. We have WON the war on poverty, which is why the bureaucracies dependent on its existance keep defining poverty upwards.

      I remember growing up with barrios in California made of cast off plywood. They don't exist anymore. We still have "poor" in that we still have 10% of the population that is the lower 10% (duh), but they are no longer destitute.

      If you want to see poverty, drive south to Tijuana Mexico. It's sobering. The reason the US has an illegal imigrant problem is because the poor in Mexico would much rather be poor in the US. We pay illegals so much here that there's a thriving money-order industry just to send their excess wages back to their family in Mexico.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    131. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the other hand, I'm having a hard time resisting the urge to make a crack about how the repeated blows to the head came from an enlarged penis.

      More like with an *un*enlarged penis, that thing doesn't work. And thus the *repeated* blow jo...blows, I mean, blows.

    132. Re:That shouldn't happen. by kraada · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Now you will receive us.
      We do not ask for your poor, or your hungry.
      We do not want your tired and sick.
      It is your corrupt we claim.
      It is your evil that will be sought by us.
      With every breath, we shall hunt them down.
      Each day we will spill their blood, 'til it rains down from the skies.
      Do not kill. Do not rape. Do not steal. These are principles which every man of every faith can embrace.
      These are not polite suggestions, these are codes of behavior, and those of you that ignore them will pay the dearest cost.
      There are varying degrees of evil. We urge you lesser forms of filth, not to push the bounds and cross over, in to true corruption, into our domain.
      For if you do, one day you will look behind you and you will see we three, and on that day you will reap it.
      And we will send you to whatever god you wish.

      [/obligitory quote]

    133. Re:That shouldn't happen. by DrMowinckel · · Score: 1, Funny

      Okay - I just NEED to do this one: "In Soviet Russia, Pizza guts YOU!".

      --
      In soviet Russia, Raymond loves Everybody, including, but not limited to, YOU!
    134. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Proof by Ideology

      Murder is Wrong.
      Spamming is Wrong.
      Two Wrongs do not make a Right.
      Three Lefts make a Right.
      Some Spammers are Russian.
      Most Russians are Leftists.
      Therefore, murdering two more Leftist, Russian Spammers will make it Right.

    135. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Russia is something of a third world country that's
      >pulling itself back up into an economic power.

      Shouldn't that say "SECOND world country" ?

    136. Re:That shouldn't happen. by gothfox · · Score: 5, Insightful

      1. I'm not Russian. My wife is. :-)

      Well, it's the same in my book, so I more or less guessed right. ;-)

      2. That's a bit more extreme than I was trying to communicate.

      I know. I commented on grandparent poster's take on my country's internal affairs which usually gets modded up to eleven by same thinking moderators. I read a lot of this post-apocalyptic nonsence here, basically in every thread about Russia, cracks me up every time.

      Besides, what other country allows its Presidential candidates to be kidnapped? (Or perhaps allows it's candidates to spin believable stories about kidnapping. You decide.) ;-)

      Heh. And what country allows its military-industrial complex to buy out the president elections and generally pwn the public as it pleases?

      I think, it's the same shit everywhere, only the level of general, um, civility differs. We lag for about fifty-sixty years, so our bandits are more rough. Bandits of "first world" countries are more civilized, but the principle stays the same.

    137. Re:That shouldn't happen. by gothfox · · Score: 1

      Yep, that's exactly what I was saying. :-)

    138. Re:That shouldn't happen. by PakProtector · · Score: 1

      Legal? No. I would hazard to guess it isn't. Moral? That's an entirely different question.

      I live next to a 'party house' in a college town. Two to three times a week the people who live next to me get very drunk and scream and shout and break things in the street till about 5 AM.

      Now, once or twice a week, one of the guys who lives there will begin to verbally abuse his girlfriend (I assume it's his girlfriend) in a way I wouldn't talk to my worst enemies.

      While it is not legal, I would consider it entirely moral if I (or someone else) went downstairs with a baseball bat (or sword, which I have several of) and proceeded to give him a lesson in what is and is not acceptable in a polite society.

      Now, it certainly isn't legal for me to go beat the crap out of him for calling his girlfriend whore and slut and all other sorts of names at 3AM in the middle of a street until she's crying. However, apparently he never learned simple rules during his childhood that the rest of us (most of us) did, and some people only seem to learn when they have their minds opened (with a baseball bat.)

      However, since it isn't legal (though it should be legal to beat the crap out of someone who acts like that), I'm simply waiting till I hear the sound of a smack, and then I'll be downstairs with the longsword and a dagger, both of which are very, very sharp, both of which I have alot of practice with.

      --

      Edward@Tomato - /home/Edward/ man woman
      man: no entry for woman in the manual.
      "Qua!?"

    139. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Pantero+Blanco · · Score: 1

      >>The fact that you value inanimate objects over human life

      Yes, I value not having to go through all sorts of crap and lose what I've earned because of a criminal more than I value that criminal's well-being. Your statement's an unrealistic sweeping generalization equating that with caring more about objects than people on the whole. People like you just end up encouraging criminals by giving them good targets.

    140. Re:That shouldn't happen. by John+Newman · · Score: 1
      The difference is that the US may be highly indebted, but only to its own citizens. Poor countries are indebted to other countries.
      Erm, we're highly indebted to the central banks of China and Japan. Americans are wallowing in oceans of consumer debt, and our savings rate is net negative - how would we be able to finance our government's debt?
    141. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1
      Dunno what you're talking about. Spam costs billions of dollars. That's harm.

      You're right: sending spam is hardly sufficient to qualify you as a sociopath. But that isn't what I said, is it. I only said that this guy was a sociopath, and it was an exaggeration. Only mildly so:
      "Someone whose social behavior is extremely abnormal. Sociopaths are interested only in their personal needs and desires, without concern for the effects of their behavior on others."
      No, I'll admit that he didn't necessarily have clinical antisocial personality disorder.
      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    142. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      If that's how you would like to evaluate the worth of human life, then you are correct. Your method isn't provably more correct than someone who believes human life to be sacred. Your method also isn't provably more correct than someone who is a pacifist for other reasons.

      Anyway, fine. I take it back. Murder is only clearly a disproportional response if you believe in an inherent value to human life. Your position is exactly the one that grandparent was disgusted by. I was trying to point out that there are other reasons for wanting the guy dead.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    143. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, to hell with him. I am glad he is dead. I wish he had died earlier. I wish he had died at birth. I regret his parents did not abort him. I regret his parents did not die in a horrible accident before he was born.

      To hell with him, and to hell with all other spammers. They took something pure and beautiful and useful and corrupted it and turned it ugly and filled with poison.

      To hell with him.

    144. Re:That shouldn't happen. by coflow · · Score: 1

      So let me get this straight, on Slashdot, a broadband provider cuts off access to a website, and there's an outrage and accusations of vigilante-justice. But someone kills a spammer, and it's "good riddance to bad rubbish"?

      I hate to point this out, but this man was brutally murdered, and people just think that because it's a spammer it's okay to be a vigilante? I hate spam as much as the next guy, but cold blooded killing is not the answer to something as trivial as pressing a delete button and installing a spam filter.

    145. Re:That shouldn't happen. by the_mad_poster · · Score: 0

      I don't think so. See, I'm smart enough to recognize that shooting somebody for taking your watch and shooting somebody for pulling a gun on you are two different things. Your equation of theft and threat of bodily harm betrays your ignorance. I suspect you'll shoot yourself in the eye cleaning your gun before you shoot anyone else who deserves it, but since people like you who deserve it never seem to get it, I may be wrong.

      You are an irresponsible person, and you shouldn't be allowed to own a firearm. I only hope that if you shoot anyone, it's yourself or a family member, because it's far more likely you'll shoot someone else's loved ones than an actual criminal given your pathetic attitude.

      --
      Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
    146. Re:That shouldn't happen. by mattdm · · Score: 1

      The meanings and connotations have been re-arranged a lot since those terms were first coined, but the true pedant should be holding out for the original terminology.

      Well, okay. In fact, the term was coined in reference to the Cold War to mean exactly what the original poster said -- not your New/Old/Third thing. (Which sounds mostly like a logical but incorrect guess.)

    147. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I'll be the guy in the cubicle next to you.

      That IS hell!

    148. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the cost of the hamburger since then has gone down from a month's sallary to a week's sallary

      So much for the dollar menu being a great deal.

    149. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      Sure, man. There are people who are disgusted by violence even in cases of self-defense, and of course they have every right to their morals also.

      But this kind of schadenfreude doesn't mean that human life has lost all sanctity or that "it is justifiable to end a man's life because he sends you unwanted email". Hence all kinds of objection.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    150. Re:That shouldn't happen. by BethLogic · · Score: 1
      Wrong. The cyrillic letter for 'H' is 'X'.

      Actually, it's both. It depends on the word which one is used. To transliterate "hop" you use the g, but the word for good is pronounced "harasho" (xopowo) and is spelled with the X. I think the origin of the word (russian vs. non-russian) is part of it.

    151. Re:That shouldn't happen. by John+Newman · · Score: 1
      If you're going to be pedantic, you should get it right.
      Old World: Europe, Asia, and a little bit of North Africa;
      New World: North and South America;
      Third World: Everywhere else.
      The meanings and connotations have been re-arranged a lot since those terms were first coined, but the true pedant should be holding out for the original terminology.
      Bzzt. Pedants don't make shit up just so they can sound snarky. There's no indication that "Third World" was ever used in connection with Old and New (which would make no sense on a number of levels, anyway), and no record of its use before the mid-20th century. The OED lists its first recorded use as:
      [1956 G. BALANDIER Tiers Monde 369 La conférence tenue à Bandoeng en avril 1955, par les délégués de vingt-neuf nations asiatiques et africaines..manifeste l'accès, au premier plan de la scène politique internationale, de ces peuples qui constituent un 'Tiers Monde' entre les deux 'blocs', selon l'expression d'A. Sauvy.]
    152. Re:That shouldn't happen. by jrockway · · Score: 1

      > It's terrible that something like that would happen. It isn't legal and it isn't moral.

      Spoken like a true spammer. :)

      --
      My other car is first.
    153. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell your wife she's wrong. First World is United States-aligned countries, Second World is Soviet Union-aligned countries, and Third World is non-aligned/weakly-aligned countries. The reason why it is no longer in use has to do with the collapse of the Soviet Union and the resulting disappearance of the entire Second World as the countries formerly labelled such became either Third- or First-Worlders.

      State of development, economy, etc. has nothing to do with it.

    154. Re:That shouldn't happen. by HungWeiWeiHai · · Score: 1

      Was it "murder" or was it "tenderizing", albeit a little bit on the soft, undercooked side?

      Or, was it Reverse, CONver, or INverse or PERverse discrimination? Extreme Prejudice (against SPAM and against spam)? I guess his spam was deCONgealed.

      I think it was Reagan who didn't want to call the "Gas Chamber" the "Gas Chamber", and some satirical cartoonist drew a pic of Reagan proclaiming the apparatus a "Reincarnation Acceleration Chamber".

      Haven't we all at one point wanted to KILL (if we were dieties and able to do it and get away with it) some bastard or bitch who set upon our systems, cost us time, resources, access, and esteem?

      I am not for KILLING someone unless it's clearly the case of irreparable bodily damage or harm about to befall me, but I imagine if his fate is widely publicised, his death won't have been meaningless. Either it was his spamming activities, or his failure to pay up, or he slept with someone's "property", yaddy yaddy yah (you fill in the blanks).

      OTOH, his death could be for real reasons unknown, and the media are just chewing the fat over his spam. I can just see it now: "SPAMMER ATTACKED!" "Spam Counter-Attacked"...

      But, don't worry, he's only been reincarnated. He'll be back with a less disastrous-ended, but profiteering plan. It'll be Spam 2.0 (beta).

    155. Re:That shouldn't happen. by hb0mb · · Score: 1

      People need to keep in mind the Russians aren't the only ones who use the Cyrillic alphabet. I can't speak for all slavic nations, but I know in Ukrainian we have a an "H" sounding letter "huh", as well as a "X" "khah" and the "G" "guh". Many times where there is an "H" in Ukrainian speech the Russians use a "G". Like the word speak, "hovoryt" in Ukrainian and "govoryut" in Russian.

    156. Re:That shouldn't happen. by sokoban · · Score: 1

      First, Second, and Third world designations are actually derived from the First, Second, and Third Estates that were present in France during the ancien régime and the revolution. This was the Estates-General in france and it gave 3 groups nearly equal parliamentary powers in frane. Those groups were the First Estate of the clergy, the Second Estate of the Nobility, and the Third Estate of everyone else. During the Cold war, The First World was the United states and similarly aligned countries, the Second World was the Soviet Union, and the Third World was the remaining countries. Thus, a country's status was determined by politics, not economics. True, most first and second world countries were better developed, but those distinctions really don't mean too much anymore. Without a cold war, the first, second, and third world designations are mostly meaningless.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 is the magic number.
    157. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Glonoinha · · Score: 4, Funny

      And what country allows its military-industrial complex to buy out the president elections and generally pwn the public as it pleases?

      I'll take 'What is The United States?' for $400, Alex.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    158. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is she an extremely beautiful young lady that worships her husband and washes his socks for him?

    159. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, all he had to do was opt-out of the first punch... right?

    160. Re:That shouldn't happen. by diesel25 · · Score: 1

      i am glad that he got beaten to death... i wish i could beat the shit out of all the spammers who email me..

    161. Re:That shouldn't happen. by PurPaBOO · · Score: 1

      quote "That's actually a "Khah" sound (e.g. loch ness), not a hard 'H' sound."

      Dude, not the best example. I can just hearing the twanging yanks now ... "Lak Ness"

      eeeep.

      --
      If it weren't for the rocks in its bed, the stream would have no songs.
    162. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about Australia?

      Ok we're a 3rd world economy but we have 1st world living standards...

    163. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, there is no 'H' in Russian.
      English 'H' is a voiceless glottal fricative. Russian doesn't have a voiceless glottal fricative.
      Russian 'X' is a voiceless velar fricative. English doesn't have a voiceless velar fricative.
      In transliteration from English to Russian, 'H' is approximated either by 'X' (hobbit, Hemingway, Halloween, Hillary) or by 'G' (hospital, Harvard, Hannibal, Harry). There is no rule about it, it's just done one way or the other and then sticks.

    164. Re:That shouldn't happen. by robertjw · · Score: 1

      New freeways, inexpensive cars, waterparks, big businesses

      Waterparks in Moscow? Now that sounds like a moneymaker. Enjoy that sunshine for what, 3 weeks a year or so?

    165. Re:That shouldn't happen. by wirelessbuzzers · · Score: 1

      Many New Russians obtained their wealth through perfectly honest means. For example, a friend of my wife's family made a killing by starting a door repair/replacement business. Not something you'd think would be a big money-maker, but apparently he became quite weathly from it.

      <accent locale=Chicago>
      Wow, tough luck there, I see your door's busted up for the second time this week... luckily I gotta repair truck sittin' just across the street...

      These repairs are gettin' kina expensive... maybe yous wanna buy a soivice plan, so if somebody busts up your door again, I'll repair it for free.
      </accent>

      --
      I hereby place the above post in the public domain.
    166. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's sad. What's sadder is that some people, including myself on various occasions, think it justifyable. Death is such a final, absolute pronouncement, it should be restricted to special cases - perhaps not used at all. The promise of death or the threat of death penetrates and pollutes victim and advocate alike. It is a non-solution without compassion or reason.

    167. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      meh. he deserved it. pitty the murder wasn't more brutal and painful for him.

      it's amazing what you can do with a spoon and a blowtorch.

    168. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Malleus+Dei · · Score: 1

      Given the damage as he did to other people's lives this world is better off without him.

      --
      Slashdot Moderation Guidelines: Leftist viewpoint (+4), Conservative viewpoint (-4, Troll)
    169. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By the way, Kushnir stated in an interview two years ago that he found mass-emailing to be quite an ethical and legal practice: "It is just the thing what the Internet is invented for - to send out emails".

      Another thing: Russian police investigation does believe he may have been murdered by a loosely formed anti-spam gang.

    170. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Brings a whole new meaning to spamassassin...

      --
      Man ist was er isst...

    171. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great flick, but I think parent was referring to all the spam regarding enlarging your penis.

      I myself realized massive gains in just a few short weeks... ;)

    172. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Frenchman113 · · Score: 1

      Are we even sure he was murdered for being a spammer?

    173. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you've mistaken "spammer" with "banker".

    174. Re:That shouldn't happen. by c4miles · · Score: 1

      Because you're tired from a gruelling travel itinerary, its late at night and you're just happy to see a sign you recognise?

      Come on. Travel can be difficult, and the parent poster admits they ended up preferring the local alternatives. Your horse really isn't that high.

    175. Re:That shouldn't happen. by wilgaa · · Score: 0

      And now we Welcome our new Spam-Throwing, Tongue-Twisting, Screw-You Overlords!!!

    176. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and those of us who have had to deal with hijacked machines or open relays which get DOSed by spammers.

      and those of us who have had to change email addresses because the H/S ratio has become too small for the filters to work anymore.

    177. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is amazing how little has almost everything told about Russia in common with reality. I might understand that journalists have to make up those fairy tales just to be able to sell them to their target audience. But why do the emigrants do this as well?

      "supressed", "desperately"... Come on, it was not so bad. Ok, at that time for most people things like Levi's and McDonald's were expensive. It was also considered very fashionable. But it was not impossible. And the general public just had no idea what is Versace, Bentley and things like that. Perhaps because of that nobody actualy felt desperate.

      As for now the avearge salary in Russia is something like $ 200 per month. Sure this is much less than in USA. But it is also somewhat more than 1 hamburger a week.

    178. Re:That shouldn't happen. by lightspawn · · Score: 1

      Murder is only clearly a disproportional response if you believe in an inherent value to human life... I was trying to point out that there are other reasons for wanting the guy dead.

      I'm sure the he wasn't such a great guy overall, and there were quite a few people who wanted him dead for one reason or another.

      However, I do believe in an inherent value to human life - but that goes for the victims too. How would you justify not killing somebody who you knew for a fact was going to murder - an innocent, mind you - again? I don't see why this person should be treated any better, just because his evil is spread thinly over millions of victims instead of focusing on one.

    179. Re:That shouldn't happen. by pete6677 · · Score: 1

      Yes, wouldn't it be better to outlaw guns, thus ensuring that only criminals and cops have them. I will never understand the anti-self-defense crowd. Why would you give a flying fuck about some thug's rights when he's getting shot during a failed robbery attempt. If thugs want to avoid getting shot, here's a very simple way for them to do it: stop fucking robbing people! How hard is that? I along with most Americans do not feel sorry for criminals when their victim strikes back, even if they get it worse than their victim would have gotten it.

    180. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      chances are at least a few of them we be complete raving psychos.

      What would Freud say?

    181. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I just imagined his skull being crushed by "hot stoaks" or "micr-craps".

    182. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1
      How would you justify not killing somebody who you knew for a fact was going to murder - an innocent, mind you - again?
      Plenty people do. Not my thing. Ask a pacifist. I'm just some asshole on the internet.
      I don't see why this person should be treated any better, just because his evil is spread thinly over millions of victims instead of focusing on one.
      Because you think that killing and not killing are sufficiently different. You aren't saying anything new here and neither am I.
      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    183. Re:That shouldn't happen. by the_mad_poster · · Score: 0

      I'm going to put this in the simplest way possible in the hopes that your tiny, underdeveloped brain can manage it:

      You. Are. An. Idiot.

      Now, dance for me dancing monkey, and try to make a case that I'm against gun ownership. Maybe you could start here and work your way back through the numerous "anti-gun-ownership" comments I've made, including several in which I've indicated an interest in purchasing various firearms and training classes.

      And, here's the thing about "striking back". Unless you're an inbred fucktard, like yourself and the other poster, you're probably smart enough to understand the concept of a measured response.

      Try upgrading your maturity level a few points before you get some innocent bystander killed with your faux machismo while you're waving your gun around the general direction of some guy who stole your pocket change. Irresponsible cockblockers like you are the ones that create the image of some bucktoothed "gun nut" and give the rest of us a bad name.

      --
      Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
    184. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Diesel+Dave · · Score: 2, Informative

      "So there will always be spam."
      The translation is "Thus Always to Spammers" which of course means "Spammers will always get what they deserve" or more loosely "Death to Spammers".

    185. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Yep. This act is a perfect illustration of the old saying, "what comes around, goes around". Turning yourself into one of the most hated people in the world simply isn't good karma.

    186. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For some of you who didnt RTFA, spamming is *legal* in Russia. So I wouldnt vilify this person right away. Russian "victims" of spam (apparently a lobby of millions) should have it outlawed rather than resort to lynching.

    187. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Has human life lost all sanctity, that you think it is justifiable to end a man's life because he sends you unwanted email?

      No but I would be happy to see him get a single punch for each email he sent out. Unfortunately, it appears that he died before they could pay him back for more than an hour or so of spamming.

      To put another slant on it, one guy who kept track received 100,000 spam messages over 1 year. I suspect I am pretty close. I have to either risk losing valuable emails or spend time sorting through that cruft. In practice, I choose to lose the valuable emails because a******s like the dead guy can afford to send spam much faster than I can read it. If I did not choose that route I would have to spend at least 1sec/email or 27 hours/year processing that email. Multiply 1 day/yr by 10M victims, and this guy was stealing people's time to the tune of 34 lives/year. From where I stand, the death of one scumbag is a cheap price to save those 34 lives.

    188. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      According to figures I've seen, spam costs businesses hundreds of billions of dollars per year. Those hundreds of billions of dollars could be spent instead on productive things, providing jobs for more people, and improving the economy as a whole. Starving people could be gainfully employed. Money could be sent to starving people as aid.

      So the way I see it, spam is actually killing people. Beating a spammer to death could potentially save lives.

    189. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Where do you live? Can't be anywhere in the USA.

    190. Re:That shouldn't happen. by pete6677 · · Score: 1

      Wow. You bring an all-new meaning to the phrase "waste of oxygen". There isn't anything to refute in your post since you failed to make any kind of coherent point. But I am glad to hear that you don't plan to carry a gun for self-defense, since you're as likely to shoot an innocent bystander as you are to blow your own balls off (if you had any to begin with).

    191. Re:That shouldn't happen. by thegrassyknowl · · Score: 1

      In related news, Russian police sent 1 billion emails asking the killer to

      "Cl1ck h3r3 2 turn urs3lf 1n", hoping that the murderer would turn themself in,

      --
      I drink to make other people interesting!
    192. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      My typcial response to a telemarket call...

      Remember your mother telling you that you need to pay attention in school or you wouldn't amount to anything? Do you believe her now? Click...

    193. Re:That shouldn't happen. by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      Uh, no. He's not that type of guy. :-)

    194. Re:That shouldn't happen. by SamSim · · Score: 1

      How about making every day international anti-spam day?

    195. Re:That shouldn't happen. by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      Believe it or not, it operates year round. It's an indoor waterpark. ;-)

    196. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe all of us in the /. community are reading way too much into this being retribution. . . maybe he just called the wrong guy a bad name and got followed home. Someone, somewhere is watching the news in Russia thinking 'THATS who that was???'

    197. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Put it in H!"

    198. Re:That shouldn't happen. by eskr · · Score: 1

      Hamburger is a week's salary? Is it a joke? I'm Russian, I live in Russia and I can assure you that hamburger now is somewhere about 1,3 dollars. Average reported monthly salary is somewhere about 200 dollars. Important thing is about 'reported' salary because often people get paid unofficially and it didn't get into stats - so not to pay taxes. So real average salary should be higher and anyway by great margin it is NOT one burger = week's pay. Cheap chain stores ARE indeed cheap (well I think 4 bucks per t-shirt is cheap enough for us).

    199. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Craig_P92669 · · Score: 0

      I dunno, GW is still breathing smog.

      --
      http://xs4.xs.to/pics/04481/p556222.gif
    200. Re:That shouldn't happen. by pkhuong · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but, iirc, that Tiers Monde thing was pun-ish too, since the poorer strata of Parisian society were also called the tiers monde (yeah, the US isn't the only one with World-envy ;).

      --
      Try Corewar @ www.koth.org - rec.games.corewar
    201. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, these were exactly my thoughts on 9/11...

    202. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I'm no Dubya fun, but there's a big difference here. Dubya has lots of fans: here in the US, according to the election results, there's about as many people who like him as people who don't. More importantly, there's lots of people who protect him on a daily basis (secret service).

      Spammers, OTOH, don't have anyone who like them, and most probably no bodyguards either. When a spammer dies, does anyone grieve for him? It's very unlikely.

    203. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      There seems to be some sort of attitude that robbing one person is bad, but robbing everybody gets no attention.
      "A single death is a tragedy; a million deaths is a statistic." -- Joseph Stalin
    204. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Lillesvin · · Score: 1

      Avtomat Kalashnikov (spelling?), I believe...

      --
      "Live free or don't."
    205. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Dzerzhinski · · Score: 1

      The person you quoted, in the quotation, claims to have visited one US franchise and various Russian restaurants; I think you can give him a break on that. As for the language, "learning a few words" doesn't cut it. My girlfriend is Korean, but speaks English quite well. She studied it for years in school (as is mandatory in Korea) and did fairly well on her TOEFL when she applied to a US university. The first time she ordered fast food here in the US, however, she was totally derailed by the question "For here or to go?" It just doesn't parse; its an idiom that we are accustomed to even though it is only a sentence fragment. Caught off guard, there were five minutes of confusion before the cashier made an arbitrary decision on her behalf. So, give the guy a break, man. Sometimes you are in a hurry and you don't want to play the "I have limited understanding of your language but I am trying to fake it anyways" game.

      --
      Never trust a physicist further than his DeBroglie wavelength.
    206. Re:That shouldn't happen. by shurdeek · · Score: 1

      Cyrillic 'X' is certainly similar to latin 'H', but they are different. In many other slavic languages, you have both characters/sounds.

    207. Re:That shouldn't happen. by burbilog · · Score: 1
      Coincidentally, I bet you'd find it "progress" if I told you that the cost of the hamburger since then has gone down from a month's sallary to a week's sallary. Sure, there are a handful of millionaires here and there, the vast majority of whom earned their wealth by "stealing" the property and industries that the government abandoned after instituting a more free market. But for the VAST majority of Russians, which I'm assuming is something like 98% of the population, none of these "cheap" chain stores are any more affordable to them than a night at the Opera is to you.

      It looks like you left Russia long, long ago. Your statement is just false today. I lived in the Soviet Union too and live in Russia now and I see the changes. Today anybody can afford going to McDonalds. It would cost about 200 roubles (about $7) on average. For example, monthly salary of Moscow subway cashier (VERY underpaid staff) is 9000 roubles (roughly $300) per month. Today nobody is going to work in Moscow for less than $400/month. Average secretary earns this amount. Average sysadmin salary is about $1k/month. CCIE earns about $3k/month.

      Things changed. Really.

    208. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Craig_P92669 · · Score: 0

      The advertisers that pay them.

      --
      http://xs4.xs.to/pics/04481/p556222.gif
    209. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Bob+Gelumph · · Score: 1

      Dude, that's pretty vague.
      If it is a quote, you should probably attribute it to someone, otherwise it could just be your quote, and nobody is interested in that.

      --
      I'm gonna need a spec.
    210. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Dread_ed · · Score: 1

      It really is quite simple. He accidentally harvested his own email address and, in a fit of rage and frustration at the massive amount of spam he had to deal with, beat himself to death his own keyboard.

      --
      When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
    211. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in soviet russia, penises beat YOU!

    212. Re:That shouldn't happen. by IceAgeComing · · Score: 1

      The reason the US has an illegal imigrant problem is because the poor in Mexico would much rather be poor in the US. We pay illegals so much here that there's a thriving money-order industry just to send their excess wages back to their family in Mexico.

      Reminds me of a hike I did around where I grew up in Oregon (agricultural area with Mexican farm workers). I came across a sleeping bag in the woods next to a bag of dog food. It made me pause and consider why.

    213. Re:That shouldn't happen. by robertjw · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I assumed that was the case - just thought a waterpark in Moscow sounded funny.

    214. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess he should have taken that guy off the "send to list", I wish I could feel bad but I just don't.

    215. Re:That shouldn't happen. by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      Not as funny as you might think. The largest waterpark in the U.S. (Noah's Ark) is located in Wisconsin Dells, Wisconsin. Wisconsin has been nicknamed "The Frozen Tundra" by football fans who are used to Packers games in the rain and snow. Yet millions of tourists visit the Dells each summer to go to Noah's Ark. Just as many visit in the winter to go to the indoor Kalahari.

      You'd be amazed at the things you find far north. ;-)

    216. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I will second this. Setting details aside, my dad befriended an illegal immigrant girl from Mexico.

      She was uneducated, but resourceful and hardworking. She managed to send back $1000/month to her family back in Mexico doing odd jobs like housecleaning, selling ice cream from those little carts, etc. She finally stopped when she realized they were just taking advantage of her and berating her for not sending MORE money to them.

      She is now happily married to a citizen, with 2 kids, and still living and working productively in the U.S. I welcome more "illegal immigrants" like her.

    217. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All the signs look like 'KAOPECTATE', anyway..

      Ali G ? Is that you ?

    218. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Boris_SDC · · Score: 1


      That's actually a "Khah" sound (e.g. loch ness), not a hard 'H' sound.

      Sorry, but you are wrong there. It is only pronounced 'khah' when read out from the alphabet (just like the 'F' letter is pronounced 'eff') An example would be the Russian word for "bread". This is pronounced as 'hlyeb'. The 'h' sound is the same as in the English word 'Hut'

      HTH

    219. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny how its the people who grew up in poverty who say the problem has gotten better.

      Whereas the people who grew up in posh middle-to-upper class neighborhoods constantly whine about the "rising" poverty "epidemic" in the U.S.

      I agree 100% -- of course the rich are going to benefit more from a growing economy than the poor, they're the ones with investments! The "gap" doesn't matter one whit. What matters is if the poor have become better off.

    220. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Buskaatt · · Score: 1

      "There is no more helpless a fealing than an email user who cant reply to an automated spam message, to tell the sender to get a life, or stop sending the message."

      Oh I dunno ... I think struggling vainly as somebody is bashing your brains out on the floor would engender a slightly more helpless feeling than not being able to reply to an automated spam message.

    221. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ...the NY Times...
      LOL
    222. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      helpless a fealing

      "feeling".

      who cant reply

      "can't".

      could be hazerdous

      "hazardous".

      And I know how you feel. I wish that some ACs who post useless messages here would get a life snd stop posting their garbage. (For the record, correcting spelling/grammar errors is useful, and so the preceding comment does not apply to me.)

    223. Re:That shouldn't happen. by LPetrazickis · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, I'm having a hard time resisting the urge to make a crack about how the repeated blows to the head came from an enlarged penis.

      You misspelled the term. It's actually an ENRArGED P3NiS.;)

      --
      Is this a sigs-optional kind of place? 'Cause I am totally down with that if you know what I mean.
    224. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      It made me pause and consider why.

      Because of evil capitalism there are hordes of illegal Mexican immigrants living out of sleeping bags in the woods and eating dog food! Won't something think of the children?

      </sarcasm>

      Seriously, one tiny anecdote doesn't disprove the trend. Utopia is not an option. Let me repeat that for those who read too fast: Utopia is not an option. I know that homeless people exist. I know that illegal immigrants sometimes reach destitution level. But the existance of imperfections does not invalidate the rule. Before you toss out a capitalist economy because it isn't perfect, you need to provide evidence of the perfection of its replacement. The world isn't a giant test tube where you can just experiment willy nilly on the poor to see what works best. We know that works very very well, so don't destroy it just because it isn't perfect!

      Most homeless people are homeless because they're substance dependent or mentally ill. Many immigrants are destitute because they're *illegal* immigrants. These aren't economic problems, they're social and legal problems.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    225. Re:That shouldn't happen. by IceAgeComing · · Score: 1


      Are you paranoid, perhaps? You seem to have pretty strong ideas about what I think, and you've missed my point entirely. I was suggesting that if you were starving, and your family in Mexico was starving, you might also choose to eat dog food and send the huge wealth of money left over to your family.

      That's actually kind of rational. Be glad you're not in that situation.

    226. Re:That shouldn't happen. by lilmouse · · Score: 1
      It was the same thing with McDonalds. After it existed for a while, it became a much more normal part of Russian life.
      Errr..I was in Moscow in '99. McD's was still a super-popular restaurant.

      Go figure.

      --LWM
    227. Re:That shouldn't happen. by lilmouse · · Score: 1

      Heh.

      Someone I knew in Moscow (in 1999) was partial owner of a donut store. He was having problems with his ahh..."business partners." Sure, you can do stuff in Russia w/o the mob being involved. But you can't make money while doing it! As soon as you do, the mafia is going to move in. I wouldn't visit Russia a rich man!

      --LWM

    228. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Vlad_the_Inhaler · · Score: 1

      Slashdot ran a story on this guy almost exactly 2 years ago. When it comes to being obnoxious, he was up there with the big ones.

      --
      Mielipiteet omiani - Opinions personal, facts suspect.
    229. Re:That shouldn't happen. by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      Are you paranoid, perhaps?

      It's kept me alive this long, so don't knock it! :-)

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    230. Re:That shouldn't happen. by mink · · Score: 1

      You sure that was Pizza and not Okonomiyaki?
      IT could be described as Pizza, but AFAIK it's it's own unique thing, but sometimes shares ingredients with Pizza.

      Here is a bit of description I found on the web:
      "Okonomiyaki is usually made from flour, water, eggs and cabbage. The cabbage is chopped and mixed with the eggs, water and flour. To this is added pretty much anything you want. Common things to add would be thinly sliced chopped pork, thinly sliced chopped beef, chopped onions, octopus, squid, mushrooms. Note, like pizza you'd usually pick one or two things to add. You mix it together to make a batter and then you pour it on a grill and let it cook like a pancake. When one side is done you flip it over and cook the other side. When it's finished you turn off the heat or put it on a plate then you put okonomiyaki sauce on top and usually katsuobushi (dried bonito flakes) and mayonnaise. The katsuobushi is so thin that it waves in the heat coming off the freshly cooked okonomiyaki and so it looks like the top of your meal is crawling."

      The part about cooking it only applies to restaurants that have the grill as part of the table.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
    231. Re:That shouldn't happen. by John+Newman · · Score: 1
      What about Australia?
      You know, the only way Old/New/Third could make any sense is if the Old World is the old world; the New World is the Americas; and the Third World, that which is neither Old nor New, includes Australia, NZ, and Antarctica. :)
    232. Re:That shouldn't happen. by shokk · · Score: 1

      I was wondering why I got 10% less spam lately!

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
    233. Re:That shouldn't happen. by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      No, I ate okonomiyaki at a different restaurant. Okonomiyaki is more similar to an omelette, and has everything mixed together rather than presented in separate layers. This was definitely billed as a pizza, in something that claimed to be an Italian restaurant, and had a bread base, not an egg one. The two dishes are not very similar - the `like pizza' in your quote was referring to the ability to add toppings, rather than to the form of the dish.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    234. Re:That shouldn't happen. by mink · · Score: 1

      To me Okonomiyaki is more of a bread base then egg, but I guess it depends on where you get it and the cook.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
    235. Re:That shouldn't happen. by danila · · Score: 1

      The difference in civility is more a difference of perception. The media in the US has a distinctive style of coverage for Russia. Drunk people, babushkas, mobsters, etc. The average American believes what he is shown on TV. You won't find many stories about American mob in the US news (only in TV-shows like Soprano), but it doesn't mean the crime kingpins are less powerful there.

      It's an image problem to a very large extent. But, if GTA is any indicator, American criminals are as vicious as their Russian friends.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    236. Re:That shouldn't happen. by danila · · Score: 1

      Stop spreading misinformation, OK? The month's salary was on the level of 100$ if you convert directly and much higher (at least 500$) if you had used PPP. Hamburgers in McDonalds cost 1-2$.

      Gullible people are always lead to believe that something rare must be valuable. That's why Fanta was such a valable drink in my family (you could only buy it in Moscow), even though you could get an equally good bottle of Pepsi in any store. Today nobody gives shit about hamburgers, McDonalds is almost universally derided as it is elsewhere in the world and the most popular and fastest growing fast food chain in my city sells Russian pancakes and salads.

      Today, my little lying friend, the average salary in Russia is 200$/month, again, using direct conversion. So please take your lies about hamburgers elsewhere, ok?

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    237. Re:That shouldn't happen. by JonoAustin · · Score: 1

      Except these days they are probably calling from India, and they have two PHd's in engineering subjects you could possibly never attain.

  2. When geeks. . . . by Leroy_Brown242 · · Score: 0

    When geeks go bad! Probably someone who got spammed one time too many.

    1. Re:When geeks. . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think so. Just think about it. Whomever controls Spam wins the Apocalypse.

      Scenario 1:

      "Bored of fluffy wings ? Your halo too thin ? We've got THESE wonderful wing enlargers and reddeners, along with the DuallyDirectional HaloPointer (tm). Get'em now, and own your own soul. Currently owned by we know Whom."

      Scenario 2:

      "Entrails taste the same after the first eight millenia ? Do not despair. With the BluePill (tm) here you can get back to the OriginalParadise (tm), and live epochs upon epochs of happyhappyjoyjoyfluffystuff. Remember, this offer is every 10,000 only, stop getting bossed around by His Hornishness and join us, the few, the happy few."

      Think about it. Wtf do angels or demons know about spam ? They'll be easy targets without previous exposure.

    2. Re:When geeks. . . . by indifferent+children · · Score: 3, Funny

      The spammer was beaten to death with an artifically enlarged and artifically erect body part.

      --
      Censorship is telling a man he can't have a steak just because a baby can't chew it. --Mark Twain
    3. Re:When geeks. . . . by oldwolf13 · · Score: 1

      ...coming from a guy whose sig is spam.

      --
      If I can't smoke and swear I'm fucked.
    4. Re:When geeks. . . . by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      Eh, but not really. You can at least turn sigs off.

    5. Re:When geeks. . . . by oldwolf13 · · Score: 1

      Eh, and I can block spam too, and use pop-up blockers, and that ad killer thing for firefox too.

      I consider any unwanted ad (or unagreed upon, anyways, please don't throw me the TV arguement) to be spam.

      I like reading the sigs, and shouldn't have to turn it off because of someone elses greed.

      --
      If I can't smoke and swear I'm fucked.
  3. Unbelievable! by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I can't believe he's the only one.

    --
    Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    1. Re:Unbelievable! by yotto · · Score: 1

      He was the only one. There can only be one "biggest spammer" (I'm assuming here that he was the biggest one, taking the article on faith there).

      Now that he's gone, of course, there is another "biggest spammer"

      You know what you need to do, Elektra.

    2. Re:Unbelievable! by arivanov · · Score: 1

      He was the only one stupid enough to be in the public eye and make a point that he can SPAM as much as he likes including a public pissing matches with major people from the judiciary, Putin administration and the new business elite.

      He was asking for it.

      And he got it.

      There are plenty of others who run phishing rings and counterfeit software rings. If you trace the web sites selling "OEM software" or fake bank sites they nearly universally end up with their strings pulled from somewhere in the middle of nowhere in Russia. At least every single email I have bothered to analyse properly and trace in the last 1 year was in this category. You will never see these guys in the public.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
  4. Remind me to shed a single tear by BlackCobra43 · · Score: 1

    While I mourn the loss of thousands of potential messages inciting me to enlarge my member and make it stay engorged for hours at a time. Is there an "anti-R.I.P."?

    --
    I never spellcheck and I freely admit it. Save your karma for more worthwhile "lol erorrs" replies
    1. Re:Remind me to shed a single tear by rbarreira · · Score: 1

      The perfect anti-R.I.P. is, surprisingly R.I.P. - Rest in Pieces.

      --

      The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
    2. Re:Remind me to shed a single tear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anti-R.I.P.? Well, as with many questions in life, let's think about how Duke Nukem might have answered this:

      "I'm going to rip off your head and shit down your neck." -- Duke Nukem

      That'd do it, I think. Either that or kick the headstone over.

    3. Re:Remind me to shed a single tear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, its called NRISH - No Rest In Spam Hell.

      I think I just may have coined the next online buzz acronym.... :)

    4. Re:Remind me to shed a single tear by CrazyTiger · · Score: 1

      You could do Don't Rest In Peace.DRIP.You could also put that on the grave of a leaky faucet.

  5. Three Cheers! by Oz0ne · · Score: 2, Informative

    Someone removed a person who makes their living by harassing (and possibly defrauding) people?

    I'd say that's justice!

    1. Re:Three Cheers! by goldspider · · Score: 5, Funny

      If I find your post sufficiently objectionable, should I be permitted to kill you too?

      Seriously, I expected to see a bit more tempered response from a reasonably sensible user community.

      --
      "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    2. Re:Three Cheers! by Toby+The+Economist · · Score: 1

      Punishment must be appropriate to the crime.

      If it's not, then the punishment is a crime.

      --
      Toby

    3. Re:Three Cheers! by drakaan · · Score: 3, Funny
      Mod parent up +1 Funny!

      Seriously, I expected to see a bit more tempered response from a reasonably sensible user community.

      Damn, you almost made me cry, I was laughing so hard!

      --
      "Murphy was an optimist" - O'Toole's commentary on Murphy's Law
    4. Re:Three Cheers! by .sig · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, your problem is in assuming that this is a 'reasonably sensible user community.' IMO that's not really the case here.

      --
      -Space for rent
    5. Re:Three Cheers! by Oz0ne · · Score: 1

      If I were to post it tens of thousands of times over years--constantly harassing you, giving you no means of escape from it...

      then yeah, I think you'd be justified in offing me.

    6. Re:Three Cheers! by ptomblin · · Score: 1

      You seem to have mistaken Slashdot for a "reasonably sensible user community". Are you sure you didn't switch your "My Little Pony Fanfic" tab and your Slashdot tab by mistake?

      --
      The next Cmdr Taco duplicate will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and see it early!
    7. Re:Three Cheers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You must be new here

    8. Re:Three Cheers! by shambalagoon · · Score: 1

      It's justice in a way.

      If you added up all the time he wasted in other people's lives and subtracted it from his own, he'd probably have expired long ago.

    9. Re:Three Cheers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No means of escape? Dude, if you cant bring yourself to move away from your computer you have more problems than just the spam

    10. Re:Three Cheers! by Swamii · · Score: 4, Funny

      I expected to see a bit more tempered response from a reasonably sensible user community.

      You're new here, aren't you?

      --
      Tech, life, family, faith: Give me a visit
    11. Re:Three Cheers! by utuk99 · · Score: 1

      I agree the punishment must be appropriate, but I have a feeling that you don't think spam=death is appropriate. I think lots of things should be punishable by death. Like car pool violations, or going anything less than the speed limit in the fast lane.

    12. Re:Three Cheers! by outsider007 · · Score: 1

      You're right. A fitting punishment would be to make the guy perform good deeds to atone for his actions. Like becoming a living organ donor or something. A couple kidneys should've done it.

      --
      If you mod me down the terrorists will have won
    13. Re:Three Cheers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      reasonably sensible user community

      You must be new here!

    14. Re:Three Cheers! by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      That's fine, and I respect your opinion.

      Luckily for me, a career car-pool-lane violator (no not really, but for the purposes of argument), not too many people think so either. However if for some reason an overwhelming majority of the populace thought that car-pool-lane violators should hang, I'd be pretty stupid to expect anything different, wouldn't I?

      Punishments reflect our society's feelings as to appropriate recompense for crimes, or at least that's the theory. You can argue whether the system works all you want. But the point is that very few people think that driving too slowly ought to be punishable by death, while at least a significant number of people in this discussion think that writing malicious viruses should be.

      Your opinion, by itself, is irrelevant. However find yourself a few million like-minded friends, and maybe things will start to turn your way.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    15. Re:Three Cheers! by Oz0ne · · Score: 1

      Being as I work with computers for a living, I can't avoid spam during work hours.

      I don't have a problem with it at home. Stuff still sneaks through and I see it, but it's not like the torrential outpouring I deal with professionally.

    16. Re:Three Cheers! by anonicon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "If I find your post sufficiently objectionable, should I be permitted to kill you too?"

      Hmmm, a single post to Slashdot being compared to some professional asshat who spammed millions of people and mail servers around the world. Now THAT'S Slashdot for you.

      As for the spammer, I gave you this abridged Clerks retort:
      Blue-Collar Man: Excuse me. I don't mean to interrupt, but what were you talking about?
      Randal: The ending of Return of the Jedi.
      Dante: My friend is trying to convince me that any contractors working on the uncompleted Death Star were innocent victims when the space station was destroyed by the rebels.
      Blue-Collar Man: Well, I'm a contractor myself. I'm a roofer... (digs into pocket and produces business card) Dunn and Reddy Home Improvements. And speaking as a roofer, I can say that a roofer's personal politics come heavily into play when choosing jobs.
      Randal: Like when?
      Blue-Collar Man: Three months ago I was offered a job up in the hills. A beautiful house with tons of property. It was a simple reshingling job, but I was told that if it was finished within a day, my price would be doubled. Then I realized whose house it was.
      Dante: Whose house was it?
      Blue-Collar Man: Dominick Bambino's.
      Randal: "Babyface" Bambino? The gangster?
      Blue-Collar Man: The same. The money was right, but the risk was too big. I knew who he was, and based on that, I passed the job on to a friend of mine.
      Dante: Based on personal politics.
      Blue-Collar Man: Right. And that week, the Foresci family put a hit on Babyface's house. My friend was shot and killed. He wasn't even finished shingling.
      Randal: No way!
      Blue-Collar Man: (paying for coffee) I'm alive because I knew there were risks involved taking on that particular client. My friend wasn't so lucky. (pauses to reflect) You know, any contractor willing to work on that Death Star knew the risks. If they were killed, it was their own fault. A roofer listens to this... (taps his heart) not his wallet.

      The spammer should have listened to the roofer.

    17. Re:Three Cheers! by ddimas · · Score: 1

      OK. How about he recieves one paper cut for each spam e-mail he sent. That should work out to...YUCK!

    18. Re:Three Cheers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know if this is ironic, but I left my job at a defense contractor because, even though it was just designing communications systems, I felt that what I was doing just wasn't right.

      You see, the ultimate goal of military technology is to be able to wipe out the "bad guy," at will, with no losses to any of the "good guys" or "innocent civilians."

      I don't have a problem with trying to make things more accurate so that "innocent civilians" are missed (and right now, no one does that better than the USA). I do have a problem with being able to wipe out anyone without suffering any losses. If you can do that successfully, what's to prevent you from making war at will? If you can kill anyone you want with little or no risk to yourself, what would keep you from doing it? The temptation will always be there. The time when you invade someone, not because you have a reason to, but simply because you can, becomes too great. (Some would say that this has already happened.)

      I'd only been there four months before I realized I wasn't even able to look at myself in the mirror. I quit, and haven't looked back. Even when I support military action, I don't think I can ever go back.

      This guy was in the business of pissing people off, he pissed them off, he knew he was pissing them off, and he continued to do it. If you go up to everyone you see and do things to piss them off, it's not right for them to kill you, but you're stupid if you think that what's legal and what isn't won't get you eventually. (Some people who know me well would be astounded to hear me say that.) This fucker had it coming to him, legal or not. And so does every spammer, and every person, and every organization that thinks that civility and/or legality will protect them, allow them to be assholes forever.

      Maybe it ain't right, but it'll happen.

    19. Re:Three Cheers! by fbartho · · Score: 1

      psh he's older than you ... lol

      --
      Gravity Sucks
    20. Re:Three Cheers! by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      Let me ask you a question: do you think that the fact that he was a spammer makes his death acceptable?

    21. Re:Three Cheers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck yeah.

      I'm just sorry he wasn't slowly tortured first and the video placed online as a warning to the others.

      No sympathy here.

    22. Re:Three Cheers! by Rakarra · · Score: 1
      Let me ask you a question: do you think that the fact that he was a spammer makes his death acceptable?

      I wouldn't think so. But the guy's job was to piss people off and get around any defenses the spamees might have put up. Eventually if you start indiscriminantly annoying the hell out of people, you'll tick someone off who won't put up with it.

      He should have found another line of work. I don't think he deserved being clubbed to death, but when you cast a wide net like that, you're going to piss off the wrong guy.

    23. Re:Three Cheers! by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      The problem with things like driving too slowly in the fast lane, or spamming, is that they both annoy people greatly, and aren't curtailed by law enforcement.

      Theoretically, the reason we have laws and law enforcement is so that we don't have anarchy, where people just kill anyone that pisses them off. When lots of people are annoyed or harmed by a practice, the government passes a law against it, and the police and court system punish people who break that law.

      With spamming and bad driving, we have examples of cases where laws and law enforcement simply aren't working correctly, so people are being harmed (or at least annoyed) but those who we the people have empowered with protecting us are not doing their jobs. I won't go into the possible places where the breakdown in the system has occurred.

      If law enforcement was working correctly and slow drivers were routinely pulled over and given citations, 1) slow drivers would quickly learn to stay in the rightmost lanes instead of blocking traffic, and 2) people annoyed by slow drivers would no longer be annoyed by them on a regular basis. At this time, you could ask around and find very few people wanting to punish slow drivers with anything drastic, because there would already be a working system for punishing their behavior. The fast drivers would just want the police to continue to enforce the law.

      I think the same is true for spammers. If spam were 1) illegal, and 2) effectively policed, spam would no longer be a large problem, so most people wouldn't be terribly annoyed by it any more. If I only got one spam per month, instead of 80% of my email being spam, it wouldn't be a big deal to me either. At that time, you probably would find that the popular opinion of just spammer penalties would be different: instead of people cheering at spammers being brutally bludgeoned, they would think a 5-year jail term would be sufficient. But because almost nothing is currently done to stop spammers, and they seem to mostly get away with their nefarious deeds completely unpunished and in fact greatly rewarded monetarily, we all can't help but cheer when one of them finally gets their just deserts.

    24. Re:Three Cheers! by Paul+Crowley · · Score: 1

      I am always amused by this sort of completely zero-brain moral relativist moral absolutism. "You think that mass murder should carry a prison sentence? If I don't like the shirt you're wearing, should you go to prison?"

      Please try thinking - it's more productive than you might imagine.

    25. Re:Three Cheers! by Muchsake · · Score: 2

      say 3,155,000 e-mails per day at 10 sec each to handle is a man year a day lost.
      even with 90% effective spam filters he is destroying a lifetime every 2-3 years. perhaps a death penalty is not innapropriate.

  6. Re:And... by Sinus0idal · · Score: 2, Funny

    hmmm anti spam packages for sneaker net. Maybe slapping the postman each time he posts a spam letter. He'd soon learn to sort out the spam first..

  7. In modern Russia... by KDR_11k · · Score: 4, Funny

    Vladimir Putin unsubscribes the way we all want to.

    --
    Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    1. Re:In modern Russia... by Linus+Torvaalds · · Score: 4, Funny

      He died after suffering repeated blows to the head.

      Sounds like he finally got the bounces that were coming to him.

    2. Re:In modern Russia... by comicnerd · · Score: 1
      Sounds like he finally got the bounces that were coming to him.

      Indeed. A bit chilling that he was beaten to death. The murderer could simply have used a gun, but instead took the time and effort to club the guy to death. If that's not a warning to others, I don't know what is.

    3. Re:In modern Russia... by TopShelf · · Score: 1

      Poetic justice... i.e. getting spammed upside the head with a club.

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    4. Re:In modern Russia... by phenopticon · · Score: 1

      Someone's big penis pills didn't work...

    5. Re:In modern Russia... by TopShelf · · Score: 1

      Or maybe they worked too well - was the murder weapon found?

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
  8. You know what they say... by Linus+Torvaalds · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Karma's a bitch.

    I'm sure there will be plenty of people thinking that somebody got a little too pissed off with spam, but try and remember that these types of spammers associate with organised crime (e.g. by hiring virus writers to get them bot nets).

    1. Re:You know what they say... by Darkman,+Walkin+Dude · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Knowing Russia and Russians, and I do, he probably got his head bashed in after a drunken argument over someones wife, all generally misinterpreted, with the "injured party" sneaking back afterwards with his friends to do the deed. Russia is a squalid, rotten, barbarous country, where extraordinary levels of physical violence are the accepted norm, and you had better know Russian if you go there, tavaresh, because random passers by will beat you if you don't.

      The spamming was probably just incidental.

    2. Re:You know what they say... by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah. Read "Gorky Park" for an accurate description of run-of-the-mill Russian homicides (not the ones the book is mostly about, but is some discussion of "typical" Russian murders as well).

      --
      "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    3. Re:You know what they say... by ear1grey · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Karma's a bitch.

      This is retribution and murder, not justice: it has no place in the society that most spam recipients want to enjoy and has fuck all to do with Karma.

      This is one less person that can have his day in court, so there will be no legal precidents formed by judgements on any of his actions. The slow legal process against spammers was just hindered, not helped.

    4. Re:You know what they say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sounds like LA, Windy City or The City of Lights...

    5. Re:You know what they say... by Darkman,+Walkin+Dude · · Score: 1

      Having lived in Moscow for a while, and speaking more than a smattering of the language, I do believe firsthand experience trumps it there... ;-) I'll check it out though. And whoever modded me flamebait above, they surely weren't Russian, as any Russian would agree with me.

    6. Re:You know what they say... by Linus+Torvaalds · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This is retribution and murder

      Retribution? Do you know something that the authorities don't?

      has fuck all to do with Karma

      Karma: According to the Vedas, if we sow goodness, we will reap goodness; if we sow evil, we will reap evil.

      If you add up all the hours people spend deleting spam, filtering spam, missing important emails because of spam filters etc, then that's a hell of a lot of time this spammer has taken away from people. You take away somebody's time, you are taking away part of their life. I'd say that's sowing evil, wouldn't you?

      This is one less person that can have his day in court

      Spamming is legal in Russia.

    7. Re:You know what they say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't that ``Karma's a bitch and then you die again.''

    8. Re:You know what they say... by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1

      The book follows a Russian homicides detective who is drawn into a sensational set of murders involving sables. However, on the fringes of the story, he also discusses "normal" homicides as well. There are other little bits and pieces of regular Russian society as well. The book was written in the 80's, and is well regarded.

      --
      "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    9. Re:You know what they say... by CaymanIslandCarpedie · · Score: 1

      This is retribution and murder, not justice: it has no place in the society that most spam recipients want to enjoy and has fuck all to do with Karma.

      Karma has fuck all to do with justice (at least in the legal meaning you are talking about). Karma simply says the sum of your actions during your life (and previous lives in its true meaning) will directly determine your present and future experiences.

      That could well mean if you were a child molester in a previous life than you may be gang raped as a child in a latter life. Now this certainly wouldn't be seen as fair, or good, or probably just but that IS karma. Karma isn't about bringing people to "justice" and it doesn't have to be good or fair. It simply means if you do shitty stuff in your life (of previous) then you should expect shitty stuff to happen to you.

      --
      "reality has a well-known liberal bias" - Steven Colbert
    10. Re:You know what they say... by qwijibo · · Score: 1

      The legal system has failed to respond time and time again. Someone else responded using another system. The legal process is just one of the available systems. I believe it's the one with the least interest in those it claims to protect and most resistant to change. I've seen first hand its indifference to violent crimes, so I understand how little that system helps anyone.

      I could not vote to convict someone for this type of crime in good conscience. I believe spamming is a sociopathic behavior with an impact on a large segment of society. I've had to maintain systems that get targeted by spammers. The mantra "just hit delete" may work for people who get one or two here or there, but it's very different for people who get several thousand a day and maintain servers that these criminals attack. Spamming is a behavior that should be discouraged. I have a hard time condemning someone doing something about it. Most spammers are into things far worse than spam, so there's probably something more serious than spam that caused this outcome.

      These people are predators. There is nothing they won't do to make relatively little money. For a short time I worked for a company who did this stuff and word on the street was they had people killed for interfering with their business.

      You put your faith in a system that does not work for everyone. Hopefully you'll never need to see how poorly it works in the real world.

    11. Re:You know what they say... by yroJJory · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but karma would have been if he'd electrocuted himself while plugging in his cable modem.

      --
      Jory
    12. Re:You know what they say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you read the post to which are responding, you should find that the ``karma'' to which he was referring was that the guy was probably dealing with organized crime. That is, he was dealing with killers for profit and by doing so, he got himself killed. Gosh, do you really need it spelled out that far?

      Hey moderator, an inability to properly read a post before responding passes as ``insightful''? Good work...

    13. Re:You know what they say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LA is known as The City Of Angels...

    14. Re:You know what they say... by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      This is one less person that can have his day in court, so there will be no legal precidents formed by judgements on any of his actions.

      On the other hand, if I were considering a career in spamming, "I might get my head bashed in" would probably be a more effective deterrent than "I might have to go to court"...

    15. Re:You know what they say... by NotoriousQ · · Score: 4, Funny

      I also know Russians...and I agree with a lot of your comment except this

      you had better know Russian if you go there, tavaresh, because random passers by will beat you if you don't

      No they will not (at least in Moscow). If you do not speak Russian, most people will think you are either a rich tourist or someone in politics. In either case you may be too important to get into a fight with. However, they will steal your wallet.

      --
      badness 10000
    16. Re:You know what they say... by Ubergrendle · · Score: 1

      "...he probably got his head bashed in after a drunken argument over someones wife, all generally misinterpreted, with the "injured party" sneaking back afterwards with his friends to do the deed."

      http://www.lireland.com/


      Yeah, those damn Irish potato eating drunkards! They don't call it a paddy wagon for nothin! I think we should all round them up and...

      Oh, you were talking about russia. Oops.

      While I'm sure life in Russia is not a life of peace and happiness and sunny days, I doubt its as corrupt, violent, and ceaselessly oppressive as you sugest. Personally my gut feel is you just had a bad experience.

      Because lets face it...you don't know psychology, Tom Cruise does (just like we don't know Russia, but you do).

      --
      John Maynard Keynes: "When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do?"
    17. Re:You know what they say... by Infonaut · · Score: 1
      These people are predators. There is nothing they won't do to make relatively little money. For a short time I worked for a company who did this stuff and word on the street was they had people killed for interfering with their business.

      So by your own logic, if someone had whacked you while you were employed by a spamming operation, your killers would have been justified?

      --
      Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
    18. Re:You know what they say... by Darkman,+Walkin+Dude · · Score: 3, Funny

      Much as I hate to feed trolls, I just can't resist...

      Yeah, those damn Irish potato eating drunkards!

      Ireland's economy since the forced eviction of the british has been growing at a phenomenal rate, and is now seen as the light of Europe. Google for "celtic tiger". Amazing how a brutal, rapacious occupying force can drive you to drink, eh?

      They don't call it a paddy wagon for nothin!

      They called it a paddy wagon because it was mostly Irish that were the police.

      I doubt its as corrupt, violent, and ceaselessly oppressive as you sugest

      Oh, its not wall to wall beady eyes and white knuckles, you can in fact walk down the street, as long as you are white.

      I doubt its as corrupt, violent, and ceaselessly oppressive as you sugest

      I "sugest" you try living there, learning the language, and meeting the people, living as a Russian, and if you make it back to the civilised world more or less in one piece, then we can talk. And for the record, no Russian has ever raised his hand against me, although I would be lying to say that I was never threatened. I honestly like Russians, and the feeling so far has been mutual.

      just like we don't know Russia, but you do

      Autsausi menya, phonetically. Never said I could write it well ;-) For a translation, say it to a Russian. I suggest a large, burly one, they do tend to be the best translators...

    19. Re:You know what they say... by nortcele · · Score: 2, Funny

      We need more murder details to determine motive...

      If:
      strangled with underwear or nylons - wife/sex related
      beat to death with high heel shoe - wife/sex related
      strangled with mouse cable - spam related
      beat to death with keyboard - spam related
      beat to death with baseball bat - mafia related
      shot 8 times in the head - terrorist related (007)
      body disappears - Gulag related

    20. Re:You know what they say... by qwijibo · · Score: 1

      I had not been involved with the spamming, so "justified" would be a stretch. However, I was well aware that everyone in the building would be collateral damage if attacked. They made a point of not having any identifying information on the building and emphasizing that the glass was bulletproof and all doors must be closed at all times. Apparently this had previously been a problem at some point. I left because they harshed my chi.

      The important thing to realize is that "justified" means nothing. If you're dead, you're dead, and that's that. You don't get a do-over if you didn't earn it.

    21. Re:You know what they say... by nikolajsheller · · Score: 1

      As opposed to the States where extraordinary levels of physical violence isn't the accepted norm? E.g. killing for a pair of shoes?

    22. Re:You know what they say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Russia is a squalid, rotten, barbarous country, where extraordinary levels of physical violence are the accepted norm, and you had better know Russian if you go there

      Sounds like it's catching up to America real fast.

    23. Re:You know what they say... by FileJunkie · · Score: 1

      Yes, yes, you can also tell me that I'm a such rotten barbarious man.. There are lots of idiots all over the world, you know. Not only Russia. Such murders happen with lower-class people. I don't think that happened with him.

      --
      Legalize firearms!
    24. Re:You know what they say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always heard 'Yobtvoyu Matsch' was the best thing to say...

      (Sorry for the horrible phonetic mangling - I only learned to say it, never to spell it especially in cyrillic)

    25. Re:You know what they say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I second this. I am not Russian, but my wife is. Her father is still in Russia and has a fairly successful business. My wifes brother was working with his father and doing well for himself. That is until one day he was found hung in his apartment by a belt. Nobody saw a thing, no note, nothing. Friends don't know anything. We have no idea what happened and the police don't really care either. This is reality in Russia.

    26. Re:You know what they say... by finkployd · · Score: 1

      killing for a pair of shoes?

      The early 90's called, they want their crime back.

      Now we beat people for their Ipods.

      Finkployd

    27. Re:You know what they say... by Z00L00K · · Score: 1
      Doesn't surprise me... A lot of adventurous vikings went east, while the more sensible ones stayed home. Only the extremophiles went west over the atlantic.

      The name Russia is based on the name Rus, which were the name the locals gave the vikings when they went in from the west. (I may be slightly wrong here). In finland, Sweden is called Routsi, which also gives you a clue...

      Todays swedes are the the descendants of the less adventurous vikings mixed with some other european blood. (French, Dutch and German through history, all depending on the times gone by). Today there are additions from several other countries as well.

      Well, that's one spammer down, maybe more will follow... >:->, or maybe Anticimex may be able to help?

      ---
      Flygande Bäckasiner söka hvila på mjuka tuwor xqz 0123456789. (String used to test the swedish character set in some systems)

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    28. Re:You know what they say... by Darkman,+Walkin+Dude · · Score: 1

      However, they will steal your wallet.

      Not that I was there, but if by steal your wallet you mean drive you into a tent and try to set it on fire, you are absoloutely right...

    29. Re:You know what they say... by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      That is until one day he was found hung in his apartment by a belt. Nobody saw a thing, no note, nothing. Friends don't know anything.

      Sounds like your average suicide then. Of course, it's easier to blame others I suppose.

    30. Re:You know what they say... by NotoriousQ · · Score: 1

      Oh, but this was an incident involving soccer fans versus other soccer fans. In that culture it is you versus them, with at least three bottles of vodka in you, no international relations barred. These guys would do it to their own mothers if they were cheering for the other team.

      I was talking about normal people in normal circumstances.

      --
      badness 10000
    31. Re:You know what they say... by Darkman,+Walkin+Dude · · Score: 1

      From the article I linked to, which by the way emphasises that Irish soccer fans are well known for their good behaviour, and have in fact been praised for it by a wide variety of governments...

      "A mob of over 100 Russian people set upon 20 Irish fans, throwing bottles, chairs, firebombs and tables at them. The vicious mob even had blades inserted in their shoes, which they wielded indiscriminately at the Irish fans. This is made more horrific by the fact that it was not spontaneous; it was well organised. The Irish fans had to scramble up trees and over fences as they ran for their lives. One fan was severely beaten when he fell and was attacked by the group. The victims believe that the aim of the attack was to trap the Irish fans in their tent and set fire to it while they were inside."

      And it gets better...

      "...when the supporters turned to the local police for assistance, the police did nothing for them and even asked them for money. When the ambulance service arrived, the crews laughed at the victims, even though they had been badly beaten."

      Would you consider ambulance service crew to be normal people?

    32. Re:You know what they say... by NotoriousQ · · Score: 1

      I am not talking about Irish soccer fans. I am talking about raging drunk russian soccer fans. They are not very different from any other country's drunk raging soccer fans, except more drunk. The outcome of the game is reason enough for them to attack. In fact, there have been cases when there was so much rage, that the fans turned against each other to vent it. Apparently they could not figure out which player to blame for loss.... ...when the supporters turned to the local police for assistance, the police did nothing for them and even asked them for money.
      This is not any different from how they treat locals.

      When the ambulance service arrived, the crews laughed at the victims, even though they had been badly beaten.
      If the police did not help, the ambulance crew is certainly not going to interfere during the fight. And it did not say that the ambulance crew was not helping them, just the fact that they were laughing at them. I am certainly hoping that they were at least doing their job, even if they were laughing at them while doing it.

      I had the pleasure of taking the russian ambulance once (I lived there, and I am a native speaker of russian). The article did not say when the ambulance arrived, which makes me think that it did not arrive that late. When I called for an ambulance, it took them 4 hours to get to me, because they either had a long queue of people, or were taking a smoke break. They could not decide which reason to use.

      I am not going to counteract your claim that Russia is full of violence, and in general a crappy disorganized country. It is. The police are not much different from the criminals they arrest. They certainly do not feel like helping foreigners either, unless they know that heads will roll if they do not.

      My only point is that if you do not speak Russian, and you are on the street talking to your buddy in whatever language, that will not cause anyone to randomly attack you.

      --
      badness 10000
    33. Re:You know what they say... by sik+puppy · · Score: 1

      Yub tvi mut?

      for those not knowing, it is an invitation to have carnal relations with your mother. It is taken VERY offensively - ie if you want a fight just say that to someone.

      --
      The first thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers. Shakespeare, Henry VI, Part 2, Act 4, Scene 2
    34. Re:You know what they say... by NotoriousQ · · Score: 1

      Oh, its not wall to wall beady eyes and white knuckles, you can in fact walk down the street, as long as you are white.

      Unless you look Georgian, or that general area people will not bear immediate animosity. So a black person walking on the streat will be looked on with extreme curioisty. Kinda like children stare at red-assed baboons at the zoo. (no, I am not implying anything about black people, damn PC types that always look for meaning when it is not there). You know the dumbfounded, as russians would say "ovca okolo novyh vorot" (sheep at the new gate) look. Some may look down on people who look different.

      Immediate violence -- no. (all bets are off in a crowd of drunks)

      And I know that you want to make the claim that if you are not one of them, they will ignore you or worse, fight or make fun of you. Guess what, I have received the same treatment in western europe. Do not know the language? They ignore you, refuse to help you, etc. I have had people tell me they do not speak English, only to turn around and speak english to someone else. I have heard one waiter mock me when I said something in english. And then when it was obvious that I was going to be ignored, I said the same thing in really bad Italian.

      I am not suggesting that your experiences were wrong. I am saying that russia is full of the same people that inhabit the place where you live, except in russia no one protects you but yourself, and hence you felt more threatened there.

      The amount of hatred is the same no matter where you end up looking different. It is only what the people can do about it that changes.

      --
      badness 10000
    35. Re:You know what they say... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I am not going to counteract your claim that Russia is full of violence, and in general a crappy disorganized country. It is. The police are not much different from the criminals they arrest. They certainly do not feel like helping foreigners either, unless they know that heads will roll if they do not.

      Sounds exactly like Mexico...

    36. Re:You know what they say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes.

    37. Re:You know what they say... by dcam · · Score: 1

      You have to learn Russian to get by in Mexico? You learn something new every day.

      --
      meh
    38. Re:You know what they say... by hawk · · Score: 1
      In this case, it was a blunt object, possibly the little blue can, about 5x10x10cm, with funny english-style lettering, and some strange pink thing portrayed on the front . . .

      :)

      hawk

    39. Re:You know what they say... by Darkman,+Walkin+Dude · · Score: 1

      My only point is that if you do not speak Russian, and you are on the street talking to your buddy in whatever language, that will not cause anyone to randomly attack you

      If your point is that walking down the street speaking French will not result in a beating 100% of the time, well duh. Are your chances exponentially higher of being attacked because you are not a native than potentially any place on earth? Yes. Despite your extremely narrow focus on a very literal interpretation of my words, your point is not unlike saying "well you don't have a 100% chance of being hit by a car if you walk across the freeway." So stop trying to make out Moscow is like anywhere else just colder, because baby, it aint.

    40. Re:You know what they say... by Darkman,+Walkin+Dude · · Score: 1

      So a black person walking on the streat will be looked on with extreme curioisty. Kinda like children stare at red-assed baboons at the zoo.

      Oops. Err, guess what, PC or not, that still very offensive. Kind of letting the undershirt show there, I think. I'll tell you what, why don't you share with the rest of us what the Russian slang for black people is, in English?

      Immediate violence -- no. (all bets are off in a crowd of drunks)

      Ah he's off again. Okay, since you have problems comprehending concepts like this, I am going to spell it out for you. There are no guarantees that you will be attacked, the very same as there are no guarantees you will be hit by a car walking across the freeway. However, I do think we will both agree that it is a very bad idea to be both black and in Russia. Simple enough for you?

      They ignore you, refuse to help you, etc

      Yes, but how many times did they get into a muttered conference and then mug you? Tourists are the easiest pickings in Moscow, since they have no friends, no family, and no police to defend them. Therefore, to get home the point that you just can't seem to lay your finger on, its a Bad Idea to be a tourist in Moscow. I've been in places as bad as Moscow and worse, including Manila in the Philippines, but nowhere else has that distinct and unique local flavour for casual violence.

      It is only what the people can do about it that changes.

      So you are saying that without being watched over like noisy children all day every day, mankind degenerates into a brawling fist fight? Bzzzt, news flash here, the civilised world doesn't need to have police on every street corner. Thats why they call it civilised. Unlike Russia, apparently.

    41. Re:You know what they say... by NotoriousQ · · Score: 1

      I do not know how to read this less narrowly.

      and you had better know Russian if you go there, tavaresh, because random passers by will beat you if you don't.

      As far as I see you are claiming that it is very likely random people will beat you up for speaking foreign language.

      So stop trying to make out Moscow is like anywhere else

      I am not saying it is like anywhere else. All I am saying is that being a foreigner there is not a provocation to a fight on its own. The chances of getting in a fight in moscow are exponentially higher than most other places with high education levels, whether you are a local or a foreigner.

      --
      badness 10000
    42. Re:You know what they say... by NotoriousQ · · Score: 1


      Oops. Err, guess what, PC or not, that still very offensive. Kind of letting the undershirt show there, I think. I'll tell you what, why don't you share with the rest of us what the Russian slang for black people is, in English?


      Nope. I am not a racist. I have absolutely no problem with black people. I am not sure which slang you are talking about: most Russians will use the word "chernyy", which literally means black. Newcomers will use the word "negr", which is exactly "negro" translated. The ones that are racist, or trying to demean them will use "shokoladka" or "obezyana", meaning chocolate and monkey. Is that the slang you have heard. I do not know all the Russian communities in US, perhaps another slang is used in Brighton, West Hollywood, or Chicago. I am not familiar with those large communities.

      A lot of Russians are racist, I am not. However, I am very direct with my words. If I think that that was the best analogy, I will use it. And I do not care if you try to interpret my words. I have been misinterpreted before, without meaning wrong. I am not careful with the words, and I know for sure that using the wrong ones will get you into a fight.

      However, I do think we will both agree that it is a very bad idea to be both black and in Russia.
      I absolutely agree that it is a bad idea. However, I doubt that the problem will be in the physical violence. The real problem will be in the verbal abuse, and ignorance that you will encounter. You are not going to be attacked on the street. You will however be looked on with extreme curiosity and some fear (as most people there will stereotype you as a savage if you go there).

      Yes, but how many times did they get into a muttered conference and then mug you? Tourists are the easiest pickings in Moscow, since they have no friends, no family, and no police to defend them. Therefore, to get home the point that you just can't seem to lay your finger on, its a Bad Idea to be a tourist in Moscow. I've been in places as bad as Moscow and worse, including Manila in the Philippines, but nowhere else has that distinct and unique local flavour for casual violence.

      It is a bad idea to be a tourist anywhere. The wallet is a prime target. And the police does not have the time to help you. New York, London, Paris, Rome...same problem. The police will simply ignore you, and if you do not speak the language, they will end up mocking you as well. (Happened to me in Paris and Rome). I still have no clue what you mean by "unique local flavour for casual violence" though. If you are not looking for a fight, you will not get a fight.

      So you are saying that without being watched over like noisy children all day every day, mankind degenerates into a brawling fist fight? Bzzzt, news flash here, the civilised world doesn't need to have police on every street corner. Thats why they call it civilised. Unlike Russia, apparently.

      If I go to any city on earth where people think that police is helpless, or not going to bother with them, and then I start using the local equivalent of "otsosi", I am going to get in the fight pretty quickly do not you think. And in places where the police works, I am likely to just get insults back. Sure you do not need the police in every corner, but you need people to know that crime has a punishment. Most places in the world know this, Russia does not. That's the difference, but the people are the same.

      It is also clear that this discussion is not going to go anywhere from this point, so I recommend ending it.

      --
      badness 10000
    43. Re:You know what they say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Russia is a squalid, rotten, barbarous country, where extraordinary levels of physical violence are the accepted norm, and you had better know Russian if you go there, tavaresh, because random passers by will beat you if you don't.


      Translation: you're a pussy who doesn't know how to handle himself in an urban environment. More than likely you're about 1.5m tall, 55kg soaking wet, pasty white, and have a short penis.
    44. Re:You know what they say... by Darkman,+Walkin+Dude · · Score: 1

      The real problem will be in the verbal abuse, and ignorance that you will encounter.

      So its okay to be black in Russia, as long as you don't talk to anyone and hide in your room? Wonderful.

      It is a bad idea to be a tourist anywhere.

      What, even in Thailand, where there is an entire police force dedicated to tourists? Or to any of those many countries whose economies are largely dependant upon tourism? Believe it or not, there are many, many places where it is a very good idea to be a tourist. Those who go into places like Paris and London with an attitude will get the reception they deserve.

      And in places where the police works, I am likely to just get insults back.

      Again, if you go a foreign country and start acting like you own the place, hurling insults, you will definetely get whats coming to you. Russia on the other hand, you don't even need to hurl insults to get beaten up, just be a little different, or a foreigner. All of which simply proves my original point.

    45. Re:You know what they say... by Darkman,+Walkin+Dude · · Score: 1

      The chances of getting in a fight in moscow are exponentially higher than most other places with high education levels, whether you are a local or a foreigner.

      And on what criteria do people choose to pick fights? On the basis that foreigners are different, probably alone at that moment, have no friends or family nearby, and above all else, are not Russian, they are selected as easy targets faster than anyone else. With foreigners you don't need to have a grudge, just a half an hour of free time. Because they pick the easiest targets. No provocation required.

  9. Because of spamming? by Tal+Cohen · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The post (and the first few replies) seem to assume that he was murdered since he was a spammer. Somehow, I doubt that.

    --
    - Tal Cohen
    1. Re:Because of spamming? by Martin+Blank · · Score: 5, Insightful

      My first thought was that he might have been killed because he was a spammer not sharing his profits with the right people. The various Russian mobs are very powerful, very greedy, and very territorial.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    2. Re:Because of spamming? by Vlad_the_Inhaler · · Score: 1

      Having read the article, I am not so sure. He appears to have been seriously pissing people off with his spamming which appears to have been purely within Russia.

      He was probably the biggest spammer of Russian e-mail addresses, not the biggest Russian spammer. Whatever.

      I found another article on that website interesting, a judge who did not rule the way Putin wants - this is about the Yukos Oil company - has just been sacked. One man, one vote. Putin is the man with the vote.

      --
      Mielipiteet omiani - Opinions personal, facts suspect.
    3. Re:Because of spamming? by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1
      He was probably the biggest spammer of Russian e-mail addresses, not the biggest Russian spammer. Whatever.

      He was very rotund, plump as a Pirozhki...

      --
      "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    4. Re:Because of spamming? by fedork · · Score: 1

      If that was the case, He would probably have been shot.

      --
      ...remember good 'ol times when IP used to mean Internet Protocol....
    5. Re:Because of spamming? by Biogenesis · · Score: 1

      We don't care! We'll all just use his death as an example and threat to other spammers anyway. I can see someone else using this as an excuse to kill some other spammer too.

    6. Re: Because of spamming? by gidds · · Score: 1
      Agreed. For one thing, with all the anti-US sentiment about these days, surely his being head of the New York Centre for English or whatever it was might be more relevant?

      --

      Ceterum censeo subscriptionem esse delendam.

  10. Going soft? by Valiss · · Score: 1

    Just when I thought they were going soft, we get this.

    --

    -Valiss
    1. Re:Going soft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Going soft? How could a spammer ever go soft? Aren't they sitting on top of a major cache of \/1AGRA?

  11. Makes you wonder by ShatteredDream · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now that his head has been bashed into 50% its original size, do those penis enlargments work on the "big head?"

    1. Re:Makes you wonder by orthogonal · · Score: 2, Funny

      'Now that his head has been bashed into 50% its original size, do those penis enlargements work on the "big head?"'

      I thought we all assumed his head was bashed with an enlarged penis. (You can get low low rates on enlarged penises! Refinance at only 1.5% Click here!)

    2. Re:Makes you wonder by Norfair · · Score: 1

      This comment is simultaneously disgraceful and hilarious. Well done.

    3. Re:Makes you wonder by FileJunkie · · Score: 1

      I think that his head was not bashed but collapsed because of lots of vacuum and no brains in his skull.

      --
      Legalize firearms!
    4. Re:Makes you wonder by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      my first thought upon reading about his condition was his spam must have been true, it promised that after taking special herbs girls would line up to give repeated blows to the head

  12. A man can only... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    have his penis size mocked one too many times before he snaps.

  13. Why must we be animals? by mind21_98 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Violence against anyone is wrong, unless it's in self-defense. I don't think he was killed because he was a spammer--he was probably killed in a robbery or confrontation over some other reason. We'll have to wait until the police find out more about what happened.

    1. Re:Why must we be animals? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We'll have to wait until the police find out more about what happened.

      Given that these are the Russian police, we may be waiting quite a while.

    2. Re:Why must we be animals? by rbarreira · · Score: 5, Funny

      Why must we be animals?

      Ummm... because we are?

      --

      The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
    3. Re:Why must we be animals? by Evil+Adrian · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Violence against anyone is wrong, unless it's in self-defense.

      Is it OK to use violence to defend someone else? Like if you see a rape being committed?

      How about in a sanctioned boxing match?

      --
      evil adrian
    4. Re:Why must we be animals? by The+Ultimate+Fartkno · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Considering the tight connection between spammers, hackers, and the notoriously violent Russian crime gangs, I don't think this was a robbery. He wasn't killed for spamming, but his spamming is how he met whoever killed him.

    5. Re:Why must we be animals? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Violence against anyone is wrong, unless it's in self-defense. I don't think he was killed because he was a spammer--he was probably killed in a robbery or confrontation over some other reason. We'll have to wait until the police find out more about what happened.

      Speculation, spectulation, speculation!

      I love comments like "as everyone knows these people were likely invoved with organized crime." -- who in Russia isn't -- dumbass.

      "let's not hurt anyone over anything." -- he was nothing but a worthless drain on society -- Darwin Wins!

      Like seriously, who fucking cares? Russia is basically lawless anyway. Shit goes on in the underground all the time. He could have been a closet heroin dragon chaser that pissed off the wrong dude. Perhaps he took some of those penis enlargement pills and his eat exploded.

      Who knows, STFU.

    6. Re:Why must we be animals? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      unless it's in self-defense

      Your honour, it was self defence - he attacked me with millions of spams. I responded by pounding him with a few tins of spam!

    7. Re:Why must we be animals? by revscat · · Score: 1

      Violence against anyone is wrong, unless it's in self-defense.

      Or you can drum up support for your violent cause using jingoistic cliches, fear-mongering, and a vast propaganda network.

    8. Re:Why must we be animals? by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      How about in a sanctioned boxing match?

      Or killing dangerous or tasty animals?

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    9. Re:Why must we be animals? by sowellfan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm all for stopping the people that send spam, and spread spyware, trojans, viruses, etc., through legal means.

      Unfortunately, legal means aren't doing much to solve the problem that we're facing (increasing identify theft, credit card fraud, computers that have to be re-imaged to start working again, etc.). In fact, even while more and more people work on security issues from the defense side, the epidemic spread of malicious programs continues. When the people that do this stuff operate in the U.S., they're hard to catch, and hard to prosecute. When they're operating in places like Russia, where the law is not in our favor, they are nearly impossible to prosecute effectively through legal means.

      If legal means are completely ineffective at creating a deterrent, as they seem to be, then vigilante action becomes a more viable option, IMHO. Granted, the corpse in this story appears to have been a spammer, not an organized-crime trojan writer. As such, I think murder was not warranted. But for the people who *are* writing and spreading trojans, defrauding people, etc., I think that the only true deterrent would be the murder of a significant number of them (enough to get their attention and make them re-think their career choice).

      If you think I'm going far here, just think about this: How many man-hours are spent here in the U.S. each year dealing with security issues caused by scum like this? Millions, I'm sure. Each hour spent dealing with these problems is an hour that is effectively stolen from the person who has to deal with that problem - if the problem didn't exist, then they could be doing something of their own choice. So the people that perpetrate this stuff rob us of millions of hours of our lives, while they enjoy all of the hours of their lives. In the big balance sheet of life, we come out ahead if the perps are deceased.

    10. Re:Why must we be animals? by Monkelectric · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Shut your PC liberal trap please. I am a liberal, but not a pc liberal. And you are the kind of liberal that gives us liberals a bad name.

      Violence is absolutely necessary. The fact that there is *NO* violence in our society is whats wrong with our society. In the hundreds of thousands of years before police, societies policed themselves. They did this with: violence. Anyone who did something wrong, would be beaten or killed by everyone else. There were direct consequences for your actions. Did people get beat up/killed for the wrong reasons? Sometimes yes. But on the whole things were safer.

      In our society where the police have a monopoly on "justice", criminals are free to commit crimes that police don't have time to investigate: Burglaries, theft, etc etc. My house was broken into, a purse and car stolen, there was survaliance video of the theifs trying to use the stolen CC's in two places. We also know about where they live... yet the police didn't investigate, meanwhile these guys are causing a wave of burglaries in my area. And we know about where they live.

      Yet, if a few homeowners and I were to go and kill them, we'd goto jail, because the police would investigate that crime.

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    11. Re:Why must we be animals? by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      Come on, say what you mean... "Why must other people be animals?" Because you clearly don't consider this behavior you'd personally do, right? I'm always a little perplexed when someone makes a judgement about someone else's behavior, and then says "we" when talking about it. If you're sure of your convictions, don't pussy-foot around with this "we" stuff. It's "them" of which you disapprove, and you should say so.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    12. Re:Why must we be animals? by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      Are you saying that self-defense is morally wrong? Or only that violence in self-defense is wrong?

    13. Re:Why must we be animals? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Violence is wrong. If you can separate off violence from self-defense, I guess the latter would be okay, but I don't see how that segregation would be possible. (I also haven't thought about it though.)

    14. Re:Why must we be animals? by Peyna · · Score: 3, Funny

      Why must we be animals?

      I offer the following alternatives, please choose any category you feel fits better:

      - Plant
      - Fungi
      - Protist
      - Bacteria
      - Archaea

      --
      What?
    15. Re:Why must we be animals? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      How about in a sanctioned boxing match?

      Or killing dangerous or tasty animals?


      Or killing annoying insects?

    16. Re:Why must we be animals? by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      Noo, he meant "animals" in a deragatory sense, like "evil beasts"!

      You know, like we all know how all bunnies are killer bunnies with +5 Vorpal Teeth.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    17. Re:Why must we be animals? by Peyna · · Score: 1

      The fact that there is *NO* violence in our society is whats wrong with our society.

      Where the hell do you live?

      The rest of your comment also contradicts this statement. Care to elaborate?

      --
      What?
    18. Re:Why must we be animals? by IWantMoreSpamPlease · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >>Violence against anyone is wrong...

      No, it's not.

      --
      So rise up, all ye lost ones, as one, we'll claw the clouds.
    19. Re:Why must we be animals? by stereo_Barryo · · Score: 1

      Yes, tell us where you live. If those were the police for MY district I would want to know and would complain loudly about the lack of protection. Also, it sounds like the kind of thing that newspapers would be happy to get into. Unless, of course, if the story isn't QUITE how you told it...

    20. Re:Why must we be animals? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your character development seems to have stopped a damned short sight from a damned kid. It may preclude your understanding of the necessary level of reason to comprehend what follows but it is more against those who have advocated your position, while still being primarily for those who stumble upon your ramblings. The price that must be paid in order for civilization to exist (for your credit cards to have any value, for any currency to have any value, for your personal work to have any value-so far as otherwise its products can be appropriated by the stronger without any pretext of return to you or your descendants in any form whatsoever) and for the massively improved quality of life that it produces to occur is that mobs of violent fools are controlled by a central store of force guided by those principles held in common amongst civilised people. On a base level you may understand while you may kill for the equivalent of the threat of debt others may simple kill you and everyone you have ever known for any reason at the same time.

    21. Re:Why must we be animals? by Wog · · Score: 1

      But unless we have a police officer escorting every civilian, the law will never be enough to stop every crime. The cops are there as a deterrent and to clean up the messes that result in their not getting there in time.

      Imagine: I'm about to get into my car at Target, when two guys walk up and politely "ask" for some money. They split and circle around me. One of them starts to dig his hands in his pocket.

      If I don't have any means of self-defense, I basically take whatever punishment they're about to dish out, and hope they don't decide to kill me before they run off.

      If I had, say, a pistol, I could draw it. If they back off, everyone goes home. If they draw a weapon or advance further, I defend myself.

      How is that wrong? I don't *want* to hurt anyone, but I've got a wife at home who needs me around a bit longer, and I didn't start this.

      By the way, it *did* happen, three weeks ago. As soon as my hand went to my belt, exposing the handle of my legally carried handgun, they backed off and peeled out in their car. I called the police with their tags and went home for supper.

    22. Re:Why must we be animals? by lgw · · Score: 1

      But on the whole things were safer.

      Not to disagree with your basic point, but this is just a myth. Violent crime was quite common in pre-police societies, at least to judge from accounts from stone-age tribes contacted last century, written records from the early middle ages, and basically all historical evidence. Without the "police monopoly on violence", civil disputes have a strong tendency to get settled violently, and there's no check on domestic violence.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    23. Re:Why must we be animals? by black_rock · · Score: 1

      The problem is that if we allow you to perform your act of justice we must also let everyone perform *their* vision of justice and soon you'll have a mob. Therefore we have only a small force who are *trained* to execute justice. Because the force is small they can't possibly take care of everything but it's preferrable to everyone running around whacking people who violated their sense of 'justice'.

    24. Re:Why must we be animals? by Mahou · · Score: 1

      Or beating masochists?

      --
      if i'm not immortal, what's the point of living?
      ...te?
    25. Re:Why must we be animals? by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      I agree.

      All the humanitarian-liberal whiners will disagree, but there comes a time when you have to put a value on human life. When someone has effectively made it their purpose to lie, steal, cheat, rob, and destroy (as virus and trojan writers effectively have), and do it on a scale that's unprecedented, I think we're well within our rights to contemplate taking their lives.

      With the increased reliance on computers for essential services, releasing a virus onto the internet becomes a crime more and more like arson. When you set fire to some curtains in a crowded tenement, you might not be meaning to kill anyone, but you also have no idea what the force that you're unleashing--the fire--is going to do. It might just fizzle out, while it might rage and consume people and property. Similarly, when someone releases a virus, it might just get caught and blocked early, but it might also shut down huge sections of the network, and possibly interrupt essential services to many people.

      Where I live, arson is one of the few crimes where, as a civilian, you can legally shoot someone if you see them attempting it. The thought being, I think, that once someone has shown themselves willing to set a fire and let it go, without caring about the consequences, their life is pretty much forfeit if killing them will stop the release. Similarly, people who release computer viruses have also demonstrated a lack of concern for the ultimate--and unknown--consequences of their actions.

      As our world becomes more heavily dependent on technology and infrastructure, it becomes more appropriate to reevaluate how we treat people who attack that infrastructure, without consideration of the many people it will affect.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    26. Re:Why must we be animals? by Adelbert · · Score: 1

      Yeah. Like, before we invented fire, we went for hundreds of thousands of years eating raw food, and were far better off that way.

      The fact that we eat *NO* raw food today is what's wrong with our society. I'm not going to explain how raw food is necessary, just say that cooked food has a monopoly on the food we eat, and this is *BAD*.

      Seriously, though, do you really think, in the 21st centuary, we should maintain the "eye for an eye" mentality. I'd rather live in a world where justice was served some of the time than have perpeptual vigilantism. After all, if I go out and kill a burglar, wouldn't his relatives want to kill me?

    27. Re:Why must we be animals? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "Why must we be animals?" - mind21_98

      "Ummm... because we are?" - rbarreira

      "Weaseling out of things is important to learn. It's what separates us from the animals! ... except the weasels." - Homer, 1F06

    28. Re:Why must we be animals? by Evil+Adrian · · Score: 1

      So if someone is trying to kick your ass, it is wrong to try to stop them with violence?

      That is clown shoes.

      --
      evil adrian
    29. Re:Why must we be animals? by The+Good+Reverend · · Score: 1

      While you might think you're a great person to take part in vigilante justice, I may very well have a different opinion. And I certainly wouldn't trust most people to "take the law into their own hands".

      There are almost never enough police "when you need them". That's a fact of life. That doesn't justify, however, the rest of us fighting crime on our own terms. If you were to go out and kill your thiefs, you would rightly be guilty of murder.

      Simply put, I don't think the world would be a safer or better place if people were allowed to "take care of" people they consider to be criminals. Certainly the police can't get everything done, but that doesn't mean it's a good idea that YOU do it.

    30. Re:Why must we be animals? by ampathee · · Score: 1

      How the hell did that get +5 insightful? If I post "Yes, it is." do I also get my +5?
      How about some actual *reasoning*?

      I'm disappointed in you, Slashdot.

    31. Re:Why must we be animals? by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 1

      Oh yea? Wanna fight about it?

      --
      "I only speak the truth"
      Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
    32. Re:Why must we be animals? by protoshoggoth · · Score: 1
      I don't think he was killed because he was a spammer--he was probably killed in a robbery or confrontation over some other reason.

      Yes, probably. But we can dream, can't we?

    33. Re:Why must we be animals? by professionalfurryele · · Score: 1

      Violence, wrong? According to you perhaps, but fortunately you are not judge, jury and executioner. Violence is from my perspective unfortunate, but sometimes necessary. Was it necessary here? Not in my opinion. Is the consequence beneficial to society, probably.
      I'd say we have no idea what the cause is, but it smells like a mob killing to me. Has all the markings of a "don't pay up and this happens" message.
      At the end of the day some human beings are a drain on the rest of us and if we as a species are going to get by, we have to accomodate them or deal with them. In this case, a drain on society was dealt with for us. If the method with which he was dealt with is so unpalletable perhaps we should have found another way to cope with the situation.
      All humans might be created equal, but we don't all end up equal, and I for one have no dosire to support societies paracites or lose much sleep when one of them ceases to waste my time.

    34. Re:Why must we be animals? by Halthar · · Score: 1

      What? No breast option? No Cowboy Neal option?

      What the hell kind of poll is this?

    35. Re:Why must we be animals? by randyest · · Score: 1

      Karmic balance. The great-grandparent post claimed "violence against anyone is wrong, unless it's in self-defense" with zero supporting arguments, and the grand-parent post disagreed with equal logical support.

      The clueful will instantly note that whether or not violence is ever right is a debate akin to religion versus athiesm and, no matter how hotly contested by either side, arguments will unavoidably reduce to "well, that's what I believe."

      The clueless will be "disappointed in Slashdot."

      --
      everything in moderation
    36. Re:Why must we be animals? by bfizzle · · Score: 1

      I have problems with killing "dangerous" animals as people's definitions of dangerous vary greatly... but tasty animals there is nothing like an elk burger or fresh roasted rabbit.

    37. Re:Why must we be animals? by jacksonj04 · · Score: 1

      Depends on the person witnessing the rape. I have very, very well defined views on rape and should I witness it then may the God of your choice have mercy on the offender.

      On the other hand, there are those who will go "Not my problem" and walk on.

      I say violence is alright up to the point where it is no longer needed, ie use all the violence you want to make sure the person committing the crime (in this case, for example, rape) is no longer a threat to you, the victim or anybody else and *then* try using some of the more pacifist means. If that means hitting them with a length of 2x4 then so be it.

      Once they're down (as in unconscious or unable to move) if you keep hitting them, you've gone too far. But again, if they're down and getting back up there's no advantage in being a gentleman - give them a solid whack to make it clear they should stay down.

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
    38. Re:Why must we be animals? by 1800maxim · · Score: 1

      Please, please... Let's not insult the animals, they have nothing to do with it.

    39. Re:Why must we be animals? by Sentry21 · · Score: 2, Funny

      You forgot a few:

      - Republican
      - Lawyer
      - SCO executive

    40. Re:Why must we be animals? by Cally · · Score: 1
      > >>Violence against anyone is wrong...
      >
      >No, it's not.

      Yes, it is. You can beat me to death if you like (though I'd much rather you didn't), but you'll still be wrong.

      As someone I have an awful lot of respect for once said: "Resist the cycle of violence and hate." (Google is your friend, if you care who.) I believe someone was nailed to a tree somewhere for saying something similar... as did Buddha, though he apparently died fat, old and happy ;)

      --
      "None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free." -- Goethe
    41. Re:Why must we be animals? by Photar · · Score: 1

      Yeah huh.

      --
      He who knows not and knows he knows not is a wise man. He who knows not and knows not he knows not is a fool.
    42. Re:Why must we be animals? by iONiUM · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      - Jehova Witness - Scientologist - Christian

    43. Re:Why must we be animals? by rbarreira · · Score: 2, Insightful

      At least he could have quoted the whole sentence instead of eliminating an important part of it...

      --

      The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
    44. Re:Why must we be animals? by Dare+nMc · · Score: 1

      >Violence against anyone is wrong,
      does that statement include most sports?

      violence in football, soccer, rugby, nascar, volleyball, waterpolo, hockey, boxing, etc, etc

    45. Re:Why must we be animals? by Jackmn · · Score: 1

      Provide logic and reasoning to defend why it is wrong.

    46. Re:Why must we be animals? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Violence against anyone is wrong, unless it's in self-defense. I don't think he was killed because he was a spammer--he was probably killed in a robbery or confrontation over some other reason. We'll have to wait until the police find out more about what happened.

      Methinks he doth protest too much. I think we've found the murderer. And now that we've found you out... Thanks! Well done! :-)

    47. Re:Why must we be animals? by cosinezero · · Score: 1

      Interestingly enough, it was the buddhists who developed many forms of martial arts... violence is often necessary.

    48. Re:Why must we be animals? by Dare+nMc · · Score: 1

      >>Violence against anyone is wrong, unless it's in self-defense.
      >It's wrong then, too

      Guess you don't define morality by the bible either.
      >a thing is legal, that doesn't make it morally right.
      needed to add the oposite, just because a act is illegal doesn`t make it immoral.

      actually it is not possible to always obey the law, their are many situations where contradicting laws make it impossible to not break one.

    49. Re:Why must we be animals? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read as:
      He got his just rewards

    50. Re:Why must we be animals? by pentalive · · Score: 1

      You forgot "Mineral" , but I think you clipped "vegetable"

    51. Re:Why must we be animals? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, he certainly wasn't a fungi.

    52. Re:Why must we be animals? by professionalfurryele · · Score: 1

      The problem there is that the family of the burgalar would not be benefitting society if they eliminated you. You are not a problem or a drain on society, or at least I presume you are not. A burglar who is not dealt with is such a drain. Society needs a way to deal with these people but all the methods arrived at so far either psychologically damage a person in the wrong way or worse train them at art of getting something for nothing by means society has deemed immoral. I don't think killing a burgalar is the solution, but I do think we waste our time when we go after productive citizens in the name of "justice" and don't stop to address those who drain societies resources. A builder who kills a guy who tries to Rob him is not producing anything in jail, is an expense and could be making the world a better place by plying his trade. The optimal solution would be for the builder to get away with his 'crime'. We should concerntrate on providing justice for those who provide for a better future, and make those who engage in what is widely percieved as immoral acts a secondary concern. We should also make punishments about correcting the way a person behaves and thinks. Not retribution, not serving a debt to society, not deterring other criminals. Correction alone. We have become so obsessed with 'justice' that we haved stopped doing what is in our best interests.

    53. Re:Why must we be animals? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hear, hear!

      I could not have said it better, and agree completely!

    54. Re:Why must we be animals? by Adelbert · · Score: 1

      At the moment, if you kill someone in self-defence, you are not prosecuted. Its only if you commit preventable murder (or manslaughter) that you can be jailed.

      I think this is the fairer system. The punishment fits the crime, and the law does not encourage anyone to commit retribution killings. If you come to my house and steal my TV, I can only kill you if you pose an immediate threat to me or my family (or don't mind gaol time).

      As for the idea of deterence, it is important, but should not be the be-all and end-all. If we want to deter cold-blooded killers, we should hang, draw and quarter any we catch. Or burn them at the steak. Maybe immitate mob-like killings, say by casing the criminals' feet in concrete and dropping them in a river. What better deterent?

      Justice, as an ideal, is not merely some fantasy. It is a means by which society can assign proportional punishment to law-breakers. It is partly a deterrant, partly a rehab system, but mainly a way of keeping the serious criminals away from society.

      If your builder says he was being robbed, how do we know that's true? If he has no defence wounds, and no witness of the incident, he could get away with murder. Unless he is subjected to state-ordered punishment.

    55. Re:Why must we be animals? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stretching definitions beyond breaking point does not help understanding.

    56. Re:Why must we be animals? by ctr2sprt · · Score: 1
      Well, since I got modded into oblivion, I guess I may as well reply as myself.

      I'm not saying you shouldn't defend yourself. In your situation, I would've done exactly the same thing. What I am saying is that if you had to shoot someone, you probably would've felt pretty lousy. I know I would've. And that's a good thing, because it means that, while you may be forced into doing violence at times, you don't want to do it. And in such a clear-cut case of self-defense, if you still felt bad, it probably means you'd go out of your way to avoid violence. Which is exactly the right thing to be feeling (in, as always, my opinion).

      That was my point. Even if you're acting in self-defense, you are probably not going to be entirely comfortable with it. This is your recognition that violence is just wrong. In some cases, the alternatives are even worse (family, etc), and so you may be forced to go with the lesser of several evils. But I don't think we should ever mistake the lesser evil as being good or even merely neutral.

      So by all means, defend yourself if you have to. I guess I just wanted to underscore that it should always be a last resort, at least in your mind.

    57. Re:Why must we be animals? by Cally · · Score: 1

      really?! I'm not saying it's not so, but I'd be interested to see a reference ;)

      --
      "None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free." -- Goethe
    58. Re:Why must we be animals? by professionalfurryele · · Score: 1

      I will address some minor issues first.

      If you are in my house, and stealing my TV the only way I can guarentee that you will cease to be a threat to myself or the people I care about is to incapacitate you (if you run, you might come back, if you surrender, you might be bluffing). As such I feel it is acceptable to use extreme force to incapacitate you. No I'm no expert in combat, nor do I know how to knock a person out. I feel it is acceptable that the law reflect the fact that if I'm being attacked my best and reasonable defence might well be for my attacker to end up dead. Is it a nice end? No. Is it what we want? Not really. Is it what I would do. Doubt it. Is it reasonable defence when under attack. Yes.

      My point is that we should consider in these matters the value that the people involved contribute to society. My builder could be a well love, employed, hard working family guy who normally wouldn't hurt a fly. His robber, a run away who never did a days work in his life and who has been a constant drain economically, socially and culturally. All I'm saying is the law should take that into account.

      I simply feel deterrence is pointless. Most criminals are repeat offenders and these criminals are principally concerned with getting caught not what happens afterwards. If I had my way serious criminals would be imprisoned in isolation from other prisoners, and would not be released until they had undergone corrective training for thier behaviour (if need be by breaking down thier existing personality and rebuilding them from scratch). They would then be required to proove thier capacity to generate an income upon release and been given the okay by psychologists.

      Justice is pointless. We should do what benefits society most, not uphold some ideal that doesn't give the ends everyone desires.

      Ask yourself this. Which is worse, my builder gets away with murder against a person of zero or near zero value to humanity, or my builder goes to jail for protecting himself, wasting a person with value whoes taxes pay my medical bills and to whom I am eternally greatful to?

    59. Re:Why must we be animals? by Cally · · Score: 1
      *sigh* well I'm not going to convince you & I'm tired & it's late so this is a crap list OTTOMH.

      Pragmatically: game theory (prisoner's dilemma) suggests that optimum strategy for maximising benefits is proactive co-operation. A somewhat concrete example - most persons have living friends and/or relatives who are likely to be more, not less, likely to resort to violence, destructive actions etc if their f/f are dead than not. This is why occupying armies generally try not to kill civilians unless they're deliberately trying to ruthlessly subjugate the occupied population. It doesn't work: look at the history of the resistance in occupied Europe during WW2 for instance.

      Strategically: if you are a member of a group facing the risk of death (be it burglars in a 'gun-rich' society, or bank robbers, or uniformed armed forces on active service) one rational response to the threat is to get your retaliation in first. The same applies to the opponent and you end up with a death-spiral arms race.

      Rather than me having to find reasons why it's NOT ok to kill people, how about you finding reasons why it IS OK?

      Morally - 'do unto others as you would be done to' is a good (efficient, pragmatic) ethical policy.

      Religious reasons... I'm an athiest myself, so I don't believe there's any specifically religious reasons why killing people is bad. But insofar as I am capable of empathy (that is to say, I can put myself in other's positions and try to imagine the subjective experience), I suspect that most people who get killed would prefer, if given the option, *not* to be killed. I personally don't want to be responsible for ending another... er (gotta pick my word carefully here!) consciousness? sentient being?

      If I'm prepared to do it to others, I lose the right to be surprised or upset if other people are prepared to do it to me. (Other people are prepared to do it to me at the moment, along with lots of other Londoners. I'm not surprised, but I *am* upset about it and I am pissed off about it. I was also pissed off that UK soldiers are participating in what I think is an illegal and immoral war on behalf of George Bush and the oil industry. If I think it's OK for bombs _I_ have helped to pay for (with my taxes) to incinerate, eviscerate, maim and mutilate civilians in Iraq, what right do I have to be pissed off that other people are trying to do it to me? (I don't really want to bring bloody politics into it, and yes I realise I'm in pretty small minority in thinking this way.)

      I'm sure there's something on wikipedia or somewhere summing up all the arguments on both sides of this debate anyway.

      --
      "None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free." -- Goethe
    60. Re:Why must we be animals? by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      Hey, man. In the age of global terror, any animal could be packing a few ounces of plastique. Left to his own devices, Bambi might take out a subway station.

      That's dangerous enough for me.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    61. Re:Why must we be animals? by Adelbert · · Score: 1
      Are you suggesting that someone without a job is more worthy of death than someone with a job?

      The jobless aren't often in that position out of choice. Here in the UK, unemployment benefits are only payed to those who can prove that they are looking for a job. And plenty of people are on "Workseeker's Allowance". Now, some of these people may not be able to feed their family with the pittance the government pays them. So, seeing my nice, middle class house, they decide to steal some money to feed their kids.

      I'm sure you see where this is going. I don't know this man. I don't like him coming into my house. So I kill him. Are you suggesting that (because I was raised in a more affluent area, and hence was given a greater chance for a job than this man) I should be given a minimal sentence, despite the fact that he's just payed with his life for stealing a bit of cash?

    62. Re:Why must we be animals? by cosinezero · · Score: 1

      A significant portion of the chinese, korean, japanese, and indian arts came from the buddhist monasteries, of which the Shaolin sects are the most widely known. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shaolin

    63. Re:Why must we be animals? by Culture · · Score: 1

      I think that "self defense" doesn't mean what you think it does.

      --
      ----- There are two kinds of people in this world, my friend; those with loaded guns, and those who dig.
    64. Re:Why must we be animals? by Dolda2000 · · Score: 1

      Whoever modded this funny? I know many have questionable opinions about Slashdot moderators, but I didn't know they were fundamentalists.

    65. Re:Why must we be animals? by Inthewire · · Score: 0

      In the US the Supreme Court has consistently held that the police owe a duty to the public as a group, not to any specific individual.
      The general sentiment is "protect yourself."

      --


      Writers imply. Readers infer.
    66. Re:Why must we be animals? by Inthewire · · Score: 0

      I believe someone was nailed to a tree somewhere for saying something similar...

      Was that the same guy who said he that hath no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one?

      --


      Writers imply. Readers infer.
    67. Re:Why must we be animals? by darqchild · · Score: 1

      Police? In russia? Heh. You funny.

      If the police weren't hired to take the hit on this guy, then at least they've been paid to make this go away.

      You know, the coroner will decide that he "Slipped" and "bumped his head".

      --
      What? Me? Worry?
    68. Re:Why must we be animals? by Jackmn · · Score: 1

      Yes.

      The individual in question is nothing more than a social parasite.

      The individual being robbed is most likely a taxpaying citizen, and it is unlikely he is commiting any crimes significant enough to classify him as a social parasite. This individual cannot pay taxes in prison.

    69. Re:Why must we be animals? by Jackmn · · Score: 1

      The spammers in question are responsible for millions upon millions in damages.

      The most cost effective way to eliminate such a threat is to simply kill it.

      It is unlikely that a spammer will be able to inflict more damage than he already is even if he decides to resort to retaliate. He would have to kill hundreds of people before the damages incurred by violence exceeds the damages he already inflicts through spam.

    70. Re:Why must we be animals? by isorox · · Score: 1

      Given the ratings for shows like Celebrity Wrestling, I'd argue a lot of people are Vegetables.

    71. Re:Why must we be animals? by edunbar93 · · Score: 1

      he was probably killed in a robbery or confrontation over some other reason.

      Or because he owed money to the wrong people.

      Or because he stole from the wrong people.

      Or because he otherwise pissed off the wrong guy.

      Spammers are scum. Russian spammers tend to associate with people who make money by robbing, stealing, loansharking, and pimping. To find one beaten to death in his home is of so little surprise that I wonder why it doesn't happen more often.

      --
      "No problem. I have the capacity to do infinite work so long as you don't mind that my quality approaches zero."-Dilbert
    72. Re:Why must we be animals? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Simplistic social models that assume only certain effects as the products of specific actions are inadequate. More factors are against your idealised version of the idea than can exist for it. At present the spectre of universal enforcement remains to give hope to the economic poor effectively isolated in slums by that equality before the law with all citizens. If that hope is taken away a disturbing unbalancing factor is unleashed in the absolute desolation that the group would then be subjected to-desperation is a prime drive for mass support of a revolution. It reduce the image of Law that exists as reason for a citizen to attempt to obey the morass that is law. One holding a job then is pardoned of all crime and that causes formation of a class system with the unsurmountable wealthy class, and the effectively subhuman. You have failed to actually consider anything that differs from your optimistic fantasies in this regard that dooms your dysfunctional proposal as much as its flimsy basis rests on the shadows of social Darwinism in vain efforts to ingore certainties of political backlash and reality itself.

    73. Re:Why must we be animals? by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      But then, why is violence wrong? Or are you treating it as an axiom of ethics?

    74. Re:Why must we be animals? by professionalfurryele · · Score: 1

      Only if one does not use an even hand with such actions. You assume that economic contribution is that which will be used as a judge. There are many social parasites who are of the upper and middle classes.
      If we took someones social worth into account then the CEO of Enron would not have got away with his crime as he had because I'm certain any reasonable individual recognises him as a social paracite.
      Do not be so quick to assume a degree of meritocracy in the legal system would not go some way to benefitting the hard working poor.

    75. Re:Why must we be animals? by Murasaki+Skies · · Score: 1

      I'm a mineral.

      --
      Waiiii!!!!!! I have bad karma!
    76. Re:Why must we be animals? by professionalfurryele · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I was simplifying for the purposes of arguement. I was in no way suggesting having a job made one an inherently more valuable human being. It does however add value to a human being.
      I choose two extremes to illustrate my case, the hard working manual labourer and the career criminal.
      As for not being able to feed oneself on Jobseekers allowance. When I was a littlen' My family did just that. So I know a thing or two about the opertunity of those less fortunate. Now it was very hard to got by on the dole, especially with us children about. But you can still eat. You cant have fun and your kids will be wearing crap clothes but you can survive.
      As for this guy breaking into your house and you having the right to kill him for it. No you don't have the right to kill him. But if as a consequence of you protecting yourself and you family he dies should you have to face criminal proceedings? Unless you happen to be able to know just by looking at someone the force needed to knock them out without damage and can predict precisely how long it will take the police to arrive I think you are entitled to the benefit of the doubt.
      In addition as a side note I don't know what the employment prospects of our criminal are but if he is so regularly unemployed that he cannot feed his family without turning to crime he shouldn't have kids.
      Self defence should extend to intent not consequences. We cant all be expert in unarmed combat so that means sometimes the result of necessary physical engagement are unfortunate. But these acts should not be crimes.

    77. Re:Why must we be animals? by IWantMoreSpamPlease · · Score: 1

      >>...how about you finding reasons why it IS OK?

      Defending yourself, or others in harm's way, for starters.

      --
      So rise up, all ye lost ones, as one, we'll claw the clouds.
    78. Re:Why must we be animals? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess you've never killed anyone before. You've probably never even felt the need to. You've never felt it'd save your life, nor that of anybody you love.

      Maybe I'm a psychopath, but I believe a lot of people just feign the "oh, it's a tragedy, I had to kill him to stop him from ___________."

      Sometimes you really are justified, at least in your own mind, and quite often even in our anti-violence laws.

      We all know the majority of rapists don't kill their victims afterwords, but I'd happily kill any man I caught raping my wife, especially if he had a knife to her throat. I'd use any brutal means available, and I'd be less susceptible to legal action for killing him than I would be for an assault or mutilation charge/al

      Now why would I feel bad about it? Sure, I know this rapist's mother would probably feel bad about her lovely son dying. Sure, his crackwhore girlfriend is probably going to be upset for a while. But me? No regret at all.

      This is no different from killing a small animal so you have food to survive. Actually, it is quite different. This is like killing a small animal that is trying its damnedest to kill you, and has a chance of succeeding.

      It's not the fact that we DON'T commit violence that sets us apart from the other animals. It's not the fact that we do. It's that we've established a simple system in which most people don't engage in unprovoked violence, nor do they need to. When people opt-out of this system we have setup, or attempt to find loopholes, they're poking holes in the raft, and thereby acknowledging that we don't have to let them stay in the raft. There's nothing inherently wrong or immoral about this. Sure, I'd rather the person not screw with the raft. Someone creative enough to consistantly outsmart the best coders and network engineers in the world would have served a much better purpose in life than to poke holes in rafts. We need to focus our energies on ensuring people find better uses for their talents. We need to create jobs that properly reward people for that kind of work. We need better screening processes such that more intelligent and productive people can be found to fill those positions. What we don't need to do is sit here and feel bad about one more problem being removed.

      Just to add a small personal story, a friend of m ine used to teach self-defense classes for women. One of the techniques he taught was eye-gouging. A rapist attempted to rape one of the women who had attended his class, and she employed this technique. Sadly, she was only taught to gouge one eye. He used the other to ID her in court and win a civil action against her. My friend was actually forced to testify for the plaintiff because they needed a witness that she was trained in martial arts and knew what she was doing. After the trial she made a few comments suggesting that her only regret was not getting the other eye, and losing her house was still better than being raped, but she still lost everything. And, due to bad laws, a rapist was allowed to use his failed attempt at crime to enable him to commit a second crime in court. Proper levels of force, employed more effectively, would have eliminated one more scourge of society. We would be a better place because of it. Make no doubt about that.

    79. Re:Why must we be animals? by Cally · · Score: 1

      "I've learned something today" cheers for that m8

      --
      "None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free." -- Goethe
    80. Re:Why must we be animals? by Cally · · Score: 1

      No idea, why, who said that? Whoever he was it's not what he's famous for, is it. Outside of Texas, anyway.

      --
      "None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free." -- Goethe
    81. Re:Why must we be animals? by Wog · · Score: 1

      Oh, I'm glad we agree then.

      Maybe a better way of putting it is that violence is *unnatural* for us.

      I went to the range a few weeks ago, and practiced up-close (kissing range) drawing and firing unsighted at a target. I was at an outdoor, private range, so I practiced by shouting "STOP! GET BACK!" etc. I found that after I had shot my "attacker" I felt really, really weird.

      If I'd had to kill those young men, I would have lost some sleep. Anyone who wouldn't is a sociopath. But at least I'd be losing said sleep next to my wife.

    82. Re:Why must we be animals? by Inthewire · · Score: 0

      Keen is your blade - UK is as defamatory in my world as Texas is in yours.
      And when the wolves bite, y'all let the sheepdogs loose, yes?

      No idea?
      Spend fourteen seconds on google and you may sniff a hint.

      --


      Writers imply. Readers infer.
    83. Re:Why must we be animals? by Cally · · Score: 1
      Actually, strictly speaking neither are 'defamatory' as neither word 'damage(s) the reputation, character' of the subject. Either, however, may be used as a term of opprobium. (One of the few advantages of being English is knowing how to speak and write the language correctly ;p )

      That said, you've succeeded in makign me realise that using 'texan' as a term of abuse is as dodgy as if it were 'pakistani' (or 'chetnick' or 'shipka' or 'forester' as it may be.) I don't even remember if that WAS how I used it, but if so, sorry, and I'll try to remember to not do that in future.

      Sorry to say I have no clue what the rest means; I googled for 'keen is your blade' and 'when the wolves...loose' with no results (none, zero)... so cluestick away...

      --
      "None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free." -- Goethe
  14. Wouldn't it be funny.. by kdark1701 · · Score: 5, Funny

    if he was beaten with a can of spam?

    1. Re:Wouldn't it be funny.. by JonyEpsilon · · Score: 1

      Not really, to be honest.

    2. Re:Wouldn't it be funny.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No.

    3. Re:Wouldn't it be funny.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It will be hilarious until Patriot Act-empowered federal agents bust your door down!

    4. Re:Wouldn't it be funny.. by drakaan · · Score: 1
      Yes...yes it would.

      Funnier still if John Cleese did the deed.

      --
      "Murphy was an optimist" - O'Toole's commentary on Murphy's Law
    5. Re:Wouldn't it be funny.. by Jamu · · Score: 1

      if he was beaten to death by a spam victim's 31 inch long penis?

      --
      Who ordered that?
    6. Re:Wouldn't it be funny.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But isn't that what happens in Soviet Russia?

    7. Re:Wouldn't it be funny.. by funkyfreshcoderdude · · Score: 1

      Mmmmmm...Communist Spam

    8. Re:Wouldn't it be funny.. by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      I don't think that person could honestly be called a "Victim"...

    9. Re:Wouldn't it be funny.. by StikyPad · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hey, it's Soviet Russia... where spam cans you.

  15. Spam mob? by tgrimley · · Score: 1

    Any chance there's some sort of Russian Spam mob going on? If these guys are in "business" it's probably lucrative enough for them to be so hated. Perhaps one spam boss wanted all the business?

    It seems ridiculous, but it's the first thing that came into my head.

    1. Re:Spam mob? by ScentCone · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Any chance there's some sort of Russian Spam mob going on?

      There's zero chance that there's not a relationship between Russian-based spam and their thriving organized crime culture. Those guys are completely in bed with each other, which also means that when you make a mis-step, you get your skull beaten with whatever is the Russian equivalent of a baseball bat. Do they play cricket, there, or what? Probably a hockey stick.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    2. Re:Spam mob? by op12 · · Score: 1

      Any chance there's some sort of Russian Spam mob going on?

      Yes, I hear they make delicious sandwiches.

    3. Re:Spam mob? by prostoalex · · Score: 1

      There's zero chance that there's not a relationship between Russian-based spam and their thriving organized crime culture.

      This is ridiculous. Russia's e-commerce volume is so low that anyone peddling penis enlargement pills is likely to retire with a fortune of 10 dollars US after few years of hard work.

      I doubt oil tycoons and gas traders with multi-billion dollar government contracts and mob connections would ever see it on their radar. A kiosk selling cigarettes in Russian province is bringing more revenues than the spammer's Internet-based Web shops.

    4. Re:Spam mob? by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      This is ridiculous. Russia's e-commerce volume is so low that anyone peddling penis enlargement pills is likely to retire with a fortune of 10 dollars US after few years of hard work.

      But the spammers aren't spamming on behalf of Russian merchants. They're working mostly through affiliate marketing programs, directing suckers to vendors that give them a cut for steering in the traffic. Those merchants might be in the US, but are often overseas, too. Many, many of the merchants are setting up shop in places like Costa Rica. Online casinos, etc., do a booming business from there, but the spam that attracts at least some of their clientele originates from all over the place - and mostly from places where law enforcement isn't up to shutting them down when they break the rules. Eastern Europe, Russia, and some spots in Asia (Korea and China, mostly) are notorious. But none of them would make a dime without someone paying them commission on the click-throughs. Those are the guys to go after. They'll pay $10-$50 for the right sort of delivered casino customer. You do that 20+ times a day, and you're making OK cash if you live in Russia.

      Regardless, they couldn't make it all happen without armies of spam-bots, and those have to be acquired mostly through trojans, and most of those are placed on machines as people open questionable mail, or surf to highly, um, irregular web sites (often run out of Russia, for example, containing content, er, intimately tied to the local organized crime world).

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    5. Re:Spam mob? by arbitraryaardvark · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The ALC website soon became a favorite target for hackers, and Russian Internet service providers frequently closed down his sites when users complained about the spamming practices.

      Among those complaints came death threats; it is speculated that while many were from angered users, some may have come from the sort of loosely-organized anti-spam gangs described in the 2004 book Spam Kings.

      And possibly, one followed through on the many deadly promises made over the years to Mr. Kushnir, in his Moscow apartment over the weekend.

      I'm not up on moscow law. Is it legal to kill spammers there?
      I'm not up on all US law. Is it legal to mail photos of Kushnir's body to US-based spammers?

    6. Re:Spam mob? by dasdrewid · · Score: 1

      The correct response was: What is a tire iron? Yes, that's right, tire iron...

      --
      No trespassing. Violators will be shot. Survivors will be shot again.
    7. Re:Spam mob? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, they dance around in tight pants with their twinkle toes. My guess is they used their penis.

    8. Re:Spam mob? by prostoalex · · Score: 1

      I guess you have a point, but at the same time Russia's low credit card penetration rate combined with low Internet penetration rate doesn't make them large Internet spenders. They won't sign up for Netflix, get a new accessory for their iPod or buy a favorite book at Amazon. Maybe some will, but most won't.

      Most of the Russian spam I get is highly industrial, like tractor components and Ukrainian tax law seminars.

      Which makes me thing that most of the spammers there make living by charging others to send out spam. The buyer of this "advertising campaign" is just told that this is the most cost-effective way to reach 1 million people for $50 to sell your tires for Belarus tractors.

    9. Re:Spam mob? by jpop32 · · Score: 1

      This is ridiculous. Russia's e-commerce volume is so low that anyone peddling penis enlargement pills is likely to retire with a fortune of 10 dollars US after few years of hard work.

      You may have failed to notice this, but e-mail can be sent from every country with an internet connection to every other country with an internet connection. Even from countries without any e-commerce to speak of.

      Furthermore, I believe you also failed to notice that the spammers themselves are not selling anything. They provide a service for bussinesses that sell something. Bussinesses that may be in countries that have huge e-commerce volumes.

      Getting the picture?

  16. 1st 3 comments by lilmouse · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The first three comments:

    1. Shouldn't kill even spammers.
    2. This happened b/c he was spamming.
    3. Yeah! Kill the bastards!

    That about sums up the comments...

    FWIW, he was probably offed by a business partner who wanted a bigger cut of the profits, or by the mob, because he wasn't paying them off. This is Russia we're talking about here.

    --LWM

    1. Re:1st 3 comments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Russia, the mafia pays off YOU!

    2. Re:1st 3 comments by reclusivemonkey · · Score: 1
      FWIW, he was probably offed by a business partner who wanted a bigger cut of the profits, or by the mob, because he wasn't paying them off. This is Russia we're talking about here.
      I was wondering why there weren't any more details...

      I agree its mostly likely to be his money that was the motivating factor here. I think most people would take a hammer to their computer before another human being from "spam rage". Or at least their modem...
    3. Re:1st 3 comments by Nimey · · Score: 3, Funny

      You forgot:

      4. Summarizing the usual comments, in the futile hope of making the conversation more intelligent.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    4. Re:1st 3 comments by hakejam · · Score: 1

      I agree with you that he probably wasn't killed because he was a spammer.

      However, why is this story on slashdot? Are we supposed to be happy that some guy was brutaly murdered? This story is -1 Troll. While I hate spammers, I am not going to take the "Ding dong the witch is dead" kind of style about it.

      One dead man is not going to stop spam altogether.

    5. Re:1st 3 comments by qwijibo · · Score: 1

      One will not have an impact. A few thousand might send a message.

      I'm sure there are plenty of people here who find this to be a fitting end. It's good to see that karma works.

    6. Re:1st 3 comments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and you forgot

      5. In Modern Russia jokes
      5. ???
      6. profit!

      sorry, i will go now

    7. Re:1st 3 comments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Somehow, there are are four different types of comments in the first three comments. ......*head explodes*

    8. Re:1st 3 comments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You rock! LMAO

    9. Re:1st 3 comments by stwrtpj · · Score: 1
      The first three comments:

      1. Shouldn't kill even spammers.
      2. This happened b/c he was spamming.
      3. Yeah! Kill the bastards!

      Followed by:

      4. I, for one, welcome our brutal spammer murdering overlords.

      --
      Karma: Frotzed (mostly due to the Frobozz Magic Karma Company)
  17. Good riddance? by Varka · · Score: 1

    You can only generate so much ill will before the karma wheel falls off the axle and crushes your ass. Varka

  18. This is why its a bad ideas to piss off psychos. by elucido · · Score: 0

    New rule, it is always a bad idea to piss off psychopaths, they will can beat you to death with smile on their face.

    Spamming should just be outlawed and we wont have to worry about this violence.

  19. Ch.ea.p Vi.agra by jmrobinson · · Score: 2, Funny

    visit www.cheapviagra.net for the loaweig'aoiwgo'awhigkljabwekrjba;sogh;abhsdbgasdgf kajbkjssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss sssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss... I thought the spam I got this morning was a little off...

    1. Re:Ch.ea.p Vi.agra by renderhead · · Score: 1

      Hmm. Based on that, all of the spammers who have sent me anything in the last few months were brutally murdered in the act. Your example is more intelligible than most of them.

      --
      I wish that my inferiority complex were as good as yours.

      -RenderHead

  20. Should have opted out. by Tackhead · · Score: 5, Funny
    > He died after suffering repeated blows to the head.

    From a hidden microphone at the scene of the murder:

    "You are receiving *WHAM* this blow to the head *WHAM* because you are part of a *WHAM* specially-selected list of *WHAM* people who agreed to receive *WHAM* blows to the head *WHAM*.

    To stop *WHAM* receiving these *WHAM* blows to the head, please *WHAM* email us at no-more-please@optout.blowtothehead. com and *WHAM* we will remove you from our list of *WHAM* blow-to-the-head-club members *WHAM* (heh, we said "club"!) *WHAM* within 24 to 48 hours."

    1. Re:Should have opted out. by morningstar8 · · Score: 1

      Aaah, where are the mod points when you need 'em? Mods, please mod this up.

    2. Re:Should have opted out. by winse · · Score: 1

      This is pretty good, but I think slashdot can do better. I mean the fact that a spammer was beat to death in (not so soviet) russia...I just read the head line and jumped into the comments expecting the culmination of all Slashdot exists for. We've got to do better than this. I wish I was funny.

      --
      this sig is deprecated
    3. Re:Should have opted out. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMG that's funny!!!!

    4. Re:Should have opted out. by bumptehjambox · · Score: 1
      Buuuurrrnnn. Class A Zinger! Now that is comedy! If someone were to kill him in that manner, i'd say it were appropriate.

      Not because killing a man is ever 'right' but I think its a funny enough joke.

    5. Re:Should have opted out. by fyngyrz · · Score: 1
      You have just received the "Best Slashdot Comment, Ever" award.

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    6. Re:Should have opted out. by mankey+wanker · · Score: 1

      That's fucking epic. It gets my vote!

    7. Re:Should have opted out. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is why I love Slashdot... I was having the worst day I have had in a long time, and this post had me laughing hysterically. I know it is evil, but I can't help myself...

    8. Re:Should have opted out. by Kelbear · · Score: 1

      Oh dear God I can't stop laughing!!! I'm at work! Gotta keep a poker face...

    9. Re:Should have opted out. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      >This is pretty good, but I think slashdot can do better. I mean the fact that a spammer was beat to death in (not so soviet) russia...I just read the head line and jumped into the comments expecting the culmination of all Slashdot exists for. We've got to do better than this. I wish I was funny. "OK, ok, I opt out!"

      "Nyet, Comrade! In Soviet Russia, you opt out of blows to the head. In post-Soviet Russia, blows to the head opt you out!"

    10. Re:Should have opted out. by GypC · · Score: 1

      Funniest Slashdot post of the year...

    11. Re:Should have opted out. by haggar · · Score: 1

      Some posts deserve to be modded higher than 5. This was funny AND strangely closure-bringing. Thank you.

      --
      Sigged!
    12. Re:Should have opted out. by srmalloy · · Score: 1

      Apparently J. Michael Straczynski is now contracting out the Narn Bat Squad...

    13. Re:Should have opted out. by dr_dank · · Score: 1

      Your theory is intriguing to me. I had no idea that the song stylings of George Michael and Andrew Ridgeley could be fatal in such doses.

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    14. Re:Should have opted out. by nikolajsheller · · Score: 1

      Don't forget to credit the source of your post: Dougls Adams.

    15. Re:Should have opted out. by up2ng · · Score: 0

      I wonder if he could have used "Pharmaceuticals to your door V1cod1n, 0xyc0nt1n and others for cheep!" emails I always get, It would have taken the edge off a bit at least.

      I know it's what everyone thinks daily(man I would love to find the fuckers who sent this.....), but for the most part as a society we don't go primal on a whim.
      An eye for an eye would have been fun at least, making him sit and read spam all day with a webcam trained on him 24/7.

      --
      Success is not the result of spontaneous combustion, you must set yourself on fire.
    16. Re:Should have opted out. by louzerr · · Score: 1

      I'm glad I searched for "opt" before making my post, and looking unoriginal!

      My compliments to the poster!

      And while I am not one to endorse violence as a solution, I guess the world really owes this guy a great deal of thanks. Since we don't know his e-mail address, how about we just start e-mailing thanks to everyone ...

      --
      "The large print giveth, and the small print taketh away" -- "Step Right Up", Tom Waits
    17. Re:Should have opted out. by mad.frog · · Score: 1

      Damn... we need a "Best-of-Slashdot" section (like best-of-craigslist) to archive posts like this one :-)

  21. I'm sure it's related to his activities.. by winkydink · · Score: 1

    but probably not an irate spam recipient. More likely the Mafiya, either because he tried to screw them, or they want his turf.

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

  22. but why?! by parcel · · Score: 1

    Is it known if the murder was related to spamming? (The article makes the implication, but doesn't go out and say it. Probably sensationalism) My guess would be that spammers tend to also be involved in other less-than-savory business practices, which could have led to a murder.

  23. Lesson by alex4u2nv · · Score: 1

    And let this be a lesson to all spammers out there!!! if (login()) logout();

  24. Woot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In mother russia, spam kills you.

  25. In Soviet Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Spam stops you.

  26. well... by atheist666 · · Score: 3, Funny

    best... spam-blocker... EVER!

    1. Re:well... by scatters · · Score: 2, Funny

      Probably the latest version of spam assassin :) Harsh, but fair!

      --
      A One that isn't cold, is scarcely a One at all.
    2. Re:well... by Alexis+Boulva · · Score: 1

      ...what if he setup an automated spambot on a remote shell? it's still running, we can't.

  27. Spam Blocker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Soviet Russia spam blocks you.

  28. When natural male enhancement goes wrong.... by ShatteredDream · · Score: 1

    Looks like someone had a little bit of competition on the "natural male enhancer" front...

  29. Horrible by dialsoft · · Score: 1

    I dont think I can say that I would kill a spammer but one thing i did notice is that it didn't help any spam problems cause Im still quarantining 27000 emails a day!

  30. The jokes write themselves by jgaynor · · Score: 4, Funny

    -He's using that big open relay in the sky now . . .

    -In New Jersey, killing a spamlord is only a class B misedemeanor . . .

    -Whatta you call a spammer with a crushed skull lying in a pool of his own blood?

    A good start!

    Seriously though that's pretty f*cked up. Spammer or not, no one deserves that.

    1. Re:The jokes write themselves by boinger · · Score: 1
      I was with you until the last sentence.

      I can think of plenty of people who deserve that, or worse.

      • rapists
      • child molesters
      • people who ruin others' lives on a mass scale (Enron execs, for instance)
      • spammers, virus-writers and the like
      • Jon Burge
      • etc...anyone want to pile some more on?
      --
      Send your friends messages of love at fuck-you.org
    2. Re:The jokes write themselves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about Joe Arpaio?

  31. All those Punch the Monkey solicitations... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...finally come back to haunt you.

    1. Re:All those Punch the Monkey solicitations... by MynockGuano · · Score: 5, Funny

      ...finally come back to haunt you.

      In Soviet Russia, monkey punches you?

    2. Re:All those Punch the Monkey solicitations... by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 1

      This discussion has been severely lacking Soviet Russia jokes, so I'm going to try to rectify that...

      In Soviet Russia, home refinances YOU!

      In Soviet Russia, you enlarge pills!

      In Soviet Russia, the mob blacklists YOU!

  32. blunt object by UESMark · · Score: 5, Funny

    The fact that the murder weapon appear to have been a copy of O'Reilly's "Postfix: The Definitive Guide" is condidered a relevant clue at this point.

    1. Re:blunt object by Trick · · Score: 1

      Well, there you go. Obviously the job of professionals.

      If they'd been amateurs, they would have used something bigger and more cumbersome, like a Sendmail config.

    2. Re:blunt object by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He should consider himself lucky. They could have shoved the bat book up his ass.

  33. Obligatory... by dr7greenthumb · · Score: 1

    In Soviet Russia, spam deletes you.

  34. bin Laden's sisters ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When this happens to Osama Binladen's sisters, the terrorism will stop.

  35. incredible by JVert · · Score: 5, Funny

    He died after suffering repeated blows to the head

    Whoever did it must have some strong lungs.

    1. Re:incredible by geekster · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'll huff... and I'll puff... and I'l blooooooow your head appart!

    2. Re:incredible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or very bad breath

  36. Perfect Flamebait story by rbarreira · · Score: 1

    I think slashdot has found the perfect Flamebait story... Start your flamers in 5, 4, 3, 2, 1 ....

    Anyway, do you guys think that this may make other spammers stop and think about their activity?

    Now for a question - is there an easy way of getting some statistics (in the next few days) which show if this happening has any impact on the quantity of spam?

    --

    The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
    1. Re:Perfect Flamebait story by thundergeek · · Score: 1

      "Anyway, do you guys think that this may make other spammers stop and think about their activity?"

      Only in Russia!

    2. Re:Perfect Flamebait story by joejoejoejoe · · Score: 1

      Ok I'll bite. I can send you tons of stuff if you provide an email address...
      _
      |_| Check here to receive updates from me
      _
      |_| Check here to receive updates from our affiliates
      _
      |_| Check here to receive updates from everyone else.
      _
      |_| Check here to confirm that you are not not signed up for our customer focus news letter.

      -J

      --
      Silly Rabbit: tricks are for kids.
  37. give me a break by trybywrench · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    give me a farking break. a life is more important then your stupid email. Murder is terrible regardless of who the victim is.

    --
    I came to the datacenter drunk with a fake ID, don't you want to be just like me?
    1. Re:give me a break by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      give me a farking break. a life is more important then your stupid email. Murder is terrible regardless of who the victim is.

      Not really.
      Here's some news for you: you, and everyone else,
      is going to die.

      This just an instance of 'good timing'.

    2. Re:give me a break by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and won't you please think of the children while you're at it. Sure, pretend that you care.

    3. Re:give me a break by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless the victim is a spammer.

    4. Re:give me a break by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However, the awfulness of a murder does vary depending on the circumstances. If the victim is a serial killer or a child molester, it's hard to work up nearly as much sympathy as one might for a murdered humanitarian worker.

      Spam is an irredeemably antisocial business. Spammers profit by wasting the time and resources of others. The products themselves are usually crap, if not blatant scams in their own right. They often break into other peoples' computers in order to use them. Finally, a great many of them are willing to use all sorts of illegal tactics against those who try to limit the damage they cause.

      Spamming has done as much as any activity to make people afraid of their own computers, much the way muggings make people afraid to walk the streets.

      So my feelings here: This guy's murder was a horrible, tragic act, and I feel lucky that it didn't happen to someone worth caring about.

    5. Re:give me a break by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      This is a person who managed to cause great annoyance and frustration to millions. He had no empathy and just took advantage of the goodwill of everyone else for self enrichment.

      While murder is never a good thing, its remarkably difficult to feel sad about someone who is defined by being an unpleasant person.

    6. Re:give me a break by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Murder of Hitler would have been terrible? Stalin? Pol Pot? Anonymous fucking spammer?

  38. I thought this guy was a spammer! by mankey+wanker · · Score: 1

    "He died after suffering repeated blows to the head."

    That's a sad and horrifying way to die - less like spam and more of a pâté though...

    I thought this guy was a spammer!

  39. Such a tragic waste... by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 5, Funny

    That SpamAssassin really takes its job seriously, yo.

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    1. Re:Such a tragic waste... by Norfair · · Score: 1

      Damn, that was a good one. Still have creases around my mouth.

    2. Re:Such a tragic waste... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You know, I've actually considered doing this.

      It'd take a couple years training, but then I'd go on an insane killing spree of the worst scum in the world - mobsters, pedophiles, spammers, corrupt religious and political figures, lawyers that defend these people...

      I figure if I worked hard I could take a few hundred out before I was finally gunned down.

    3. Re:Such a tragic waste... by Kenshin · · Score: 1

      Ya, Marvel's already done that.

      It's called "The Punisher".

      --

      Does it make you happy you're so strange?

  40. Re:And... by lowrydr310 · · Score: 1
    Just take all your junk at the end of the week, write "RETURN TO SENDER" on the letter, then drop it off in your local mailbox.

    I've been doing this for weeks now. The junk mail hasn't stopped, but at least I don't have to throw it away.

  41. Open and shut case by J23SE · · Score: 1

    Seems to me like someone was mad their wee-wee didn't... erm... respond to therapy.

  42. Implications... by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 1

    What isn't said in the article is why he was killed. Was he killed by someone he knew in one of those violent fits that happen from time to time, or was it something else. I doubt he was beaten to death for sending e-mails, but considering the reputation the Russian Mob has, it does make one wonder. Could traditional Organized Crime groups be trying to bully their way into electronic fraud and such? Or has it already happened and they're eliminating the competition?

    --
    If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    1. Re:Implications... by sugarmotor · · Score: 1

      Yes, the article is very weak: obvious questions are not covered.

      --
      http://stephan.sugarmotor.org
    2. Re:Implications... by randyest · · Score: 1

      ">What isn't said in the article is why he was killed. "

      ">>Yes, the article is very weak: obvious questions are not covered. "

      Yes; terrible reporting indeed. Everyone knows killers always leave detailed notes at the scene of the crime describing their motives so that those wondering "why?" may have their answers in complete detail.

      It's positively criminal for those journalists to not share with thier readers the juicy details of the murderer's motivation that we all know they have access to.

      --
      everything in moderation
    3. Re:Implications... by rbarreira · · Score: 1

      Priceless :)

      --

      The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
    4. Re:Implications... by swb · · Score: 1

      Reporters sometimes do this thing called investigating where they ask people questions and stuff and can sometimes come up with theories about why something happened without having the specific people on hand to answer the obvious direct questions.

      But I guess blaming the reporters for not doing a coherent job of reoprting is just...unfair.

    5. Re:Implications... by randyest · · Score: 1

      Reporters who investigate and solve crimes? Like Superman?!

      --
      everything in moderation
    6. Re:Implications... by swb · · Score: 1

      You made the leap to "solve crimes", not I.

  43. Dying in tiny slices by TapestryDude · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I remember reading about how Steve Jobs motivated the original Mac team to speed up the boot. "Millions of people will boot their Macs every day; if you can shave 30 seconds off that boot time, it's the equivalent of three human lives every day". If that concept is true (debatable, but stick with me) then spammers, in the aggregate, are killing dozens or even hundreds of people a day ... a few seconds here and a few seconds there. So, in this respect, what goes around comes around.

    --
    Howard M. Lewis Ship -- Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java Consultant -- Creator, Apache Tapestry and HiveMind
    1. Re:Dying in tiny slices by mr_zorg · · Score: 1
      "Millions of people will boot their Macs every day; if you can shave 30 seconds off that boot time, it's the equivalent of three human lives every day". If that concept is true...
      It's not. I usually (re)boot my Mac about once a week, at most. Besides, some quick math shows about 84 million mac users would need to be booting (and saving 30 seconds) every day just to equal a single human life time...
    2. Re:Dying in tiny slices by mkcmkc · · Score: 1
      If that concept is true (debatable, but stick with me)

      Sounds pretty good to me. What would be the argument against this?

      --
      "Not an actor, but he plays one on TV."
    3. Re:Dying in tiny slices by hostyle · · Score: 1

      I have to wonder what the time spent to think about and construct coherent post versus actual karma gained ratio was for your post ... hope it was worth it dude!

      --
      Caesar si viveret, ad remum dareris.
    4. Re:Dying in tiny slices by TapestryDude · · Score: 1

      This was Steve Jobs in 1982 - 83, so it doesn't reflect how computers are used today ... and he was motivating people (by fudging the numbers a bit).

      --
      Howard M. Lewis Ship -- Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java Consultant -- Creator, Apache Tapestry and HiveMind
    5. Re:Dying in tiny slices by krasmussen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, no matter what, this can't in any way justify this crime (I'm not sure if that's what you're trying to do?). It would still not do anything good in any way. As Mahatma Gandhi once said; "An eye for an eye will only make the whole world blind"

    6. Re:Dying in tiny slices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Sounds pretty good to me. What would be the argument against this?

      Are you serious? There's a BILLION arguments against it.

      Suppose you blow a tire on the freeway and cause a traffic jam which traps 10,000 people on the road for 3 hours. Does that mean you should go to jail for 3.5 years to pay that time back?

      Say you're a disabled person who requires several minutes to get on/off an elevator. There are 20 people in the elevator. That means you waste hundreds of "people minutes" per day. I mean, we should be accomodating, but COME ON, that's hours of wasted time!

      Just because the person in question is a "bad dude" doesn't make the logic any less ridiculous. Time can't be tallied up that way.

    7. Re:Dying in tiny slices by Grishnakh · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      It sounds clever, but it doesn't work for spammers. Spammers are very few in number, yet cause enormous economic damage. Killing a handful of spammers would relieve the world of almost all spam, saving hundreds of billions of dollars per year. That certainly sounds "good" to me.

      Do you think that serial killers should not be apprehended? What about corporate fraudsters who wipe out the savings and retirement funds for thousands of people? It doesn't sound like you do.

      If society doesn't protect itself from those who cause it damage, the society will be destroyed.

    8. Re:Dying in tiny slices by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      These are ridiculous strawman arguments. Blowing a tire on the freeway does not cause 10,000 car traffic jams. If it happens, you pull over onto the shoulder and everyone drives by. If you stop in the middle of the freeway, causing a dangerous condition, the police will arrest you for that, as they should.

      Disabled people don't take "several minutes" to get onto elevators. If anything, it should quite easy to roll a wheelchair on and off of an elevator. Even if this were the case, people would simply take another elevator, or the stairs.

      Do you have any realistic examples?

    9. Re:Dying in tiny slices by krasmussen · · Score: 1

      There's just one problem: It's immoral. If we can kill people, then what's wrong with everyone else killing people.

      Besides, what's wrong with putting these people into jail?

    10. Re:Dying in tiny slices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with equating wasted time to human lives is, like many utilitarian arguments, it is so difficult to compare two concepts of "happiness".

      How does one's increase of quality of life after a decrease in spam compare to the happiness lost by the spammer, now deceased? Is there some sort of factor you can fudge in there? When accumulating lost hours, do they start to have less of an "effect" after x hours? As you can see, trying to justify a utilitarian argument based on mathematics involves too many variables to be worth much.

      There are also other examples of people causing "mass wasted time": programmers at Microsoft, beauracratic governments, Slashdot etc. They've all wasted time: although they provide useful services, by *not* doing certain things they've somehow managed to (by your arguments) kill thousands.

      And remember, if your goal in life is to minimise pain, the ultimate thing to do would be to end all sentient life. After all, when there's no-one around, there is no pain, or annoyance, or spam.

    11. Re:Dying in tiny slices by krasmussen · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up!

    12. Re:Dying in tiny slices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, no matter what, this can't in any way justify this crime (I'm not sure if that's what you're trying to do?). It would still not do anything good in any way. As Mahatma Gandhi once said; "An eye for an eye will only make the whole world blind"

      In this aspect, Gandhi was an idiot.

      Try a simple experiment with a friend. First, you poke out his right eye. He, in turn, pokes out your right eye. You respond by poking out his left eye. He misses your left eye entirely, and falls on the floor screaming "I'M BLIND, I'M BLIND!!".

    13. Re:Dying in tiny slices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your sense of morals is all sorts of jacked up. Which of the two is more natural: dying (killed by a group of people trying to defend themselves), or being locked in a cage with other psychopaths for the rest of your life?

      Seriously, man. You probably think it'd be moral to travel back in time and kill Hitler in order to save millions from the holocaust. How is this different? Sure, he hasn't ordered any executions (that you know of), but he has significantly shortened the lifespan of many people, tricked people out of their money, significantly reduced the number of hours in a day, and generally just made life hell for a ton of people.

      What's inherently wrong with a society trying to cleanse itself of things which serve no positive purpose, and are actively trying to destroy them?

      It still costs a lot of money to house people in jails. Then you have to worry about them harming prison guards, fellow inmates, or themselves. The last two are only issues if they shouldn't be dead already anyways. There is no natural reason why a society would want to keep people like this alive. We shouldn't be required to support him, nor required to tolerate him, simply to make you feel better about yourself.

      While you're at it, why don't you just explain why the whole world can stop eating meat right now, because it's feasible in the US?

    14. Re:Dying in tiny slices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      zorg dude, we're talking the 1980's. Macs didn't even come with a screen saver back then, much less sleep mode and decent garbage collection. we geezers shutdown and rebooted every day if not multiple times per day.

    15. Re:Dying in tiny slices by mkcmkc · · Score: 1
      You're conflating two things here. One is the question of whether or not it makes sense to account for lost time even when it's diluted across many people (for example). The second is whether that lost time should somehow be used as the basis for some kind of punishment or retribution against whatever parties may have inadvertently, negligently or intentionally caused the loss.

      I'm really asking about the first question here. The original author seemed to be questioning whether or not it made sense to think about it this way. To me, intuitively, it does seem to make sense. But I'd be interested in hearing the counterargument.

      To address the second question, which seems to be the basis for your concern, I'd say that we as a compassionate society agree to do many things not because they make perfect economic sense, but rather because we think they're the right things to do.

      Mike

      --
      "Not an actor, but he plays one on TV."
  44. In Soviet Russia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...spam assasinates YOU!

  45. Couldn't have been anyone in IT... by ScentCone · · Score: 1

    ... since most have, in a Faustian bargain allowing them to be certified in router programming, have sacrificed all upper body strength. If there was a way to kill someone with those thumb muscles you use to hit the space bar, then maybe.

    More likely it was as Russian mafia relationship gone bad. When you hang in those circles, doing illegal things all day, you're bound to strike up some questionable business connections. That, or some mobster finally had seen enough viagra ads in his own inbox, and decided to go all Bayesian on his ass.

    --
    Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
  46. Obligatory jokes... by Tsar · · Score: 1, Funny
    1. In Soviet Russia... The spam filter kills YOU!
    2. Imagine a beowulf cluster of these murders!
    3. The weapon was most likely a clue bat.
    Any others equally bad?
    1. Re:Obligatory jokes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the dog is on fire!

    2. Re:Obligatory jokes... by jcdill · · Score: 1
      The weapon was most likely a clue bat.


      No, no, no. It was a clue-by-four!

      jc
      --
      "I'd much rather be mistaken as a lesbian by a bigot than be mistaken as a bigot by a lesbian."
  47. *shrug* by twigles · · Score: 1

    Bad things happen to better people than this guy all the time, so while I don't support murdering spammers (no indication on whether this was even spam-related) I'm pretty ambivalent about it.

  48. I'm confused about people... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are so many on Slashdot who whine and whine about the 100+ spam emails they get every day and how their lives are oh so difficult. I just don't ever see that much spam! I don't understand! My email addresses (work, professional, and personal) all receive very very little spam email every day. (Typically no more than a couple to any one account) Yes, my company and the services I use do attempt to filter the majority of spam which can easily be caught by Bayesian filters, but it seems the rest of the world of email users are magnets for junk mail I never see.

    My email addresses exists on others computers and on respectable websites where I've purchased something or posted a comment, and I STILL don't see that much spam. And snail-mail spam? Who gets that much snail-mail spam? If you would all stop applying for free crap (which is usually just that: crap!) then I don't think this would be a problem. I don't apply for crap and I'm happily mostly spam free!

    1. Re:I'm confused about people... by KD5YPT · · Score: 1

      Generally people who're more active on internet get a lot of spam. Since inadvertently some e-mail info got out, and some spammer with bots crawled onto it.

      --
      In US, you can easily buy enough major firearms to wipe out your neighbourhood but a few little fireworks are banned.
    2. Re:I'm confused about people... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, why not post it here then Mr. AC and I'll personally use it for every USENET post, pr0n site signup and software registration for the next five years. You are just lucky so far, believe me.

  49. Everyone has their own beliefs by Gettinglucky · · Score: 1

    Vardan Kushnir remained sure of his right to spam, saying it was what e-mails were for. The guys who bashed his head stated, "I have every right to smash people's skulls, it is what they where made for!"

  50. In Russia... by xAXISx · · Score: 0

    ...spam kills you. -1 Redundant.

  51. Outing a problem? by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 1
    Given this, many spammers will now claim that when they are outed (sp?), the person outing them is now a criminal -- as it exposing them to danger.

    Far fetched? George Moore aka Dr. Fatburn tried this approach by filing criminal charges.

  52. The important thing is ... by khasim · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... that we're all available to support each other's alibis.

    1. Re:The important thing is ... by ErikTheRed · · Score: 1
      [The important thing is] ... that we're all available to support each other's alibis.
      Alibis? I'm just upset that somebody beat me to it (can I get a rim-shot, please)! If I did it, I'd be bragging non-stop. I mean the chances of being extradited for that are somewhere between 'none' and 'none' - I can see it now, Department of Justice (or State or whoever handles this): "Gee, sorry, the request must have been accidentally deleted because it was buried in all of my fucking spam!"

      And to all of the 'sanctity of life' types - he's a spammer in Russia. This is the only way he'll ever stop spamming. Ever. Under any circumstances. Yes each spam is just a small annoyance, but someone who sends out millions of small annoyances around the world every day deserves this, at least from a Karmic perspective. The only thing I'm sad about is that I'm on the other side of the world and unable to go over and piss on his grave. Although a friend of mine is in Moscow on business....
      --

      Help save the critically endangered Blue Iguana
    2. Re:The important thing is ... by billimad · · Score: 1

      Well I was here all day. Like what a shock!

    3. Re:The important thing is ... by Black+Copter+Control · · Score: 1
      "No, officer. I was at my computer the whole time."

      "... And you have a PHD in robotics."

      "I take it they found tire tracks at the crime scene?"

      --
      OS Software is like love: The best way to make it grow is to give it away.
    4. Re:The important thing is ... by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 1

      Funniest shit I've read all month. Thank you.

  53. It has begun... by cfsmp3 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Don't know if it's true, but honestly, I can't believe it took so long.

    The very same probability laws spammers use to find people stupid enough to buy from them, apply here as well: If you annoy millions every day, sooner or later you'll find someone crazy enough to go kill you.

    --
    I would buy karma from ebay but I'm not sure I can trust the seller.
  54. Spam? by ch-chuck · · Score: 1

    Maybe they just hate English.

    --
    try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
  55. Was there a Sun logo on his head? by rob_squared · · Score: 2, Funny

    DaFuror> ok
    DaFuror> that about sucked
    phac> what now daf?
    DaFuror> I went out to my car to get my U1 about an hour ago
    g3nocide> U1 ?
    DaFuror> Sun Ultra 1 server
    DaFuror> well, anyway
    DaFuror> these three drunk kid come outta nowhere and one of them tried to jump me
    g3nocide> LOL
    DaFuror> I cracked his skull open with the U1
    DaFuror> just got done dealing with the fine upper arlington police dept
    g3nocide> lol you hit him with a sun ultra one server
    DaFuror> I can
    g3nocide> LOL
    DaFuror> t
    g3nocide> omfg
    DaFuror> wait to see the police report
    g3nocide> you know you are a geek when, you protect yourself with server hardware

    --
    I don't get it.
  56. Was it opt-in? by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Maybe he shouldn't have let his server receive that opt-out contract on his life.

    Consequences.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  57. On topic Soviet Russia joke? by Alcimedes · · Score: 5, Funny

    In Soviet Russia, SPAM unsubscribes YOU!

  58. Of course it isnt moral. by elucido · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The majority of people don't care about morals and do not have empathy. We live in a morally insane world, wake up. It's simple, if you piss off a lot of people, carry a gun at all times, hire security, get a vest. If you want a job like "spammer" you can expect to attract a lot of violent people. I think the risks of that job were predictable, I feel sorry for the guy who was killed because I have empathy, but I will not assume the person who killed him did. So the fact is, hes been killed, the person who did it got away with it, and this cannot be allowed, they must be caught to save the spamming industry. The last thing you want is for murder to be logical enough that people can get away with murdering spammers, or anyone. Murder should mean life sentence. Instead of filling the jails with marijuana drug dealers we should be putting the violent rapists and murderers in jail, but I guess selling drugs is a bigger concern, we wouldnt want kids smoking marijuana.

    1. Re:Of course it isnt moral. by DanielNS84 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I completely agree...my sister's boyfriend is in jail for 10 years because he got caught with some marijuana...meanwhile his cousin got like 4 years for hitting some guy drunk and killing him. Seems a little off.

    2. Re:Of course it isnt moral. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some?

      10 years isn't given for just "some" pot.

    3. Re:Of course it isnt moral. by DanielNS84 · · Score: 1

      He was a pot dealer ;) obviously you're correct in saying 10 years isn't just for posession.

    4. Re:Of course it isnt moral. by dotgain · · Score: 1
      So you assume he was carrying about 2-and-a-half murders worth of pot? You're right, for that sentence he probably had a kilogram or two. I dunno how your law is, that's about how long I'd spend inside in New Zeland for that much pot.

      While grandparent probably understated things a bit, you can still see his point, even if he had a truckload of weed.

    5. Re:Of course it isnt moral. by Baorc · · Score: 2, Funny

      I would have been given a fine and a tap on the back. I'm Canadian.

    6. Re:Of course it isnt moral. by vivek7006 · · Score: 1

      my sister's boyfriend is in jail for 10 years because he got caught with some marijuana...meanwhile his cousin got like 4 years for hitting some guy drunk and killing him

      That is one great family you have got there. Thanks-giving dinner must be really fun for you guys

    7. Re:Of course it isnt moral. by Herschel+Cohen · · Score: 1

      People were sent away for 20 years in Chicago for extremely modest amounts in the early 70's.

      Moreover, why is Grand Theft ... (version 2) so much worse with its gratutous, ultra violence due to a few sex scenes? Where is the proportionality of the guardians of the publics outrage?

    8. Re:Of course it isnt moral. by DanielNS84 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My sister hasn't attended thanksgiving since she got hooked on meth 2 years ago, but I'm sure thanksgiving would be better with her there even if she brought her horrible boyfriend and his family.

    9. Re:Of course it isnt moral. by DanielNS84 · · Score: 1

      I don't believe I mentioned marriage at all in any of my posts...and I think I explained 20 minutes ago that he's in Jail and she's hopelessly addicted to meth. So there's no family interaction going on.

    10. Re:Of course it isnt moral. by jxs2151 · · Score: 1
      Well said. I respect you for having your priorities in the right place. You obviously love your sister and support her despite life choices that you disagree with.

      Good for you man.

    11. Re:Of course it isnt moral. by Thaelon · · Score: 1

      "some" marijuana could be 4 metric tons for all we know.

      --

      Question everything

  59. It's relevant now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Soviet Russia, spam deletes you! :)

  60. Bummer. by Captain+Sarcastic · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry he's dead. I don't think he was killed by someone who got one spam too many, though. Spam may make people angry, even veins-bulging-over-reddened-forehead angry, perhaps even grab-handy-blunt-instrument-and-smash-computer-scr een angry, but I can't see it making someone angry enough for long enough to go into his apartment and beat him to death.

    I think he was killed either by a business rival or by some random wacko.

    --
    Strike while the irony is hot! -- The Freethinker
  61. Time for the obligatory reference: by Sol+Rosinberg · · Score: 1

    This definitely redefines "boot to the head". Face it, that's what we want to give all spammers, a nice swift boot to the head. Apparently someone got a little overzealous, however.

  62. Opt-out by wowbagger · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It sounds to me like he simply failed to opt-out of the "Beat your head in" club.

    They must have purchased a list with his name on it, and he failed to opt-out, so they had every right to offer their product to him.

    After all, we wouldn't want to deny those people who WANT to have their heads beaten in the opportunity, just because some whiny anti-battery types want such lists to be double opt in.

    He should have taken more care with his head - kept it in a metal helmet, only showing it to his friends, changing it periodically. Instead, he had his head out in the open where anybody who wanted to could beat it in.

    It's all his fault, and the DMA (Dastardly Murder Association) bears no responsibility for this incident.

    1. Re:Opt-out by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      sorry, i already posted that - under DRM since you posted that after i applied for the SuperDooper Patent, All Your Base Are Belong To Me.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    2. Re:Opt-out by uhlume · · Score: 1

      Sorry, don't you mean the "Beat Your Head In With A" club?

      --
      SIERRA TANGO FOXTROT UNIFORM
  63. unfortunately... by tont0r · · Score: 0

    his legend will live on because no one will turn on his spam bots running on 238472983 boxes across the world.

  64. Playing With Fire by Newt-dog · · Score: 0

    Maybe this will send a message to other spammers - If you play with fire, you might get burned.
    I'm sure the Russian Mob has it's fingers in anything profitable, including spam originating from Russia.

  65. And You Thought It Was Bad a Few Days Ago by rk_cr · · Score: 1

    Well, this is certainly a lost worst than the article I submitted a few days ago.

  66. Clearly, that guy... by gcnaddict · · Score: 1

    1) got owned, and 2) ticked someone off big time. If he didnt spam people, he probably wouldve been fine.

    --
    Viable Slashdot alternatives: https://pipedot.org/ and http://soylentnews.org/
  67. oh no... by bad_outlook · · Score: 1

    /me braces himself for tasteless "In Soviet Russia..." jokes.

  68. Spam by william_w_bush · · Score: 4, Insightful

    how... sad...ish

    my take on this is that we shouldn't blame spammers for spam, we should blame the MOTHER-FUCKING BRAIN-DEAD IDIOTS who actually BUY from them, giving them an economic incentive to fuck the rest of us over.

    Honestly, if you know anyone who buys that shit, please kick his ass for us, they support spammers, and are more to blame than 100 whatever-this-guys-name-was.

    --
    The first rule of USENET is you do not talk about USENET.
    1. Re:Spam by imsoclever · · Score: 2, Funny

      The mother-fucking brain-dead idiots with huuuuuge dicks!

    2. Re:Spam by william_w_bush · · Score: 2, Funny

      oh... really? well i guess it couldn't hurt to just try it out then? (dashes off to check email)

      we are such easily controlled animals.

      --
      The first rule of USENET is you do not talk about USENET.
    3. Re:Spam by kalislashdot · · Score: 1

      Treu just like blaming drug dealers for drug use, As long as there is a demand they will be people supplying. I think most people who respond to spam is those buying conterfit software or viagra and the sorts. Shady operations, done by dumb fucks that affect us all. Good call.

    4. Re:Spam by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 1

      my take on this is that we shouldn't blame spammers for spam, we should blame the MOTHER-FUCKING BRAIN-DEAD IDIOTS who actually BUY from them, giving them an economic incentive to fuck the rest of us over.

      Yes, and we shouldn't blame thiefs, we should blame the people that leave their possessions unprotected/unlocked, thereby encouraging more thievery.

      Right?

      No, we should blame the spammers and educate the morons. Even better would be to redirect all the spam to those that buy from spammers.

      --
      Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
    5. Re:Spam by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 0
      we shouldn't blame spammers for spam, we should blame the [...] IDIOTS who actually BUY from them

      First, yes, we should blame spammers for spam. You blame pickpockets for stealing wallets that aren't attached to their owners with titanium chains, don't you? The fact that spammers (possibly) get responses from gullible folk doesn't lessen their responsibility.

      Second, I've not seen any proof that selling products via spam is profitable. One of a friend's customers was approached by a spammer who offered to "advertise" their business. Now, whether that customer ever saw a single penny of revenue (let alone enough to offset the losses from their annoyed customers), the spammers would have made their money. In this case, at least, the spammers couldn't care less whether a single person bought the advertised product, as long as they got paid to send the emails.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    6. Re:Spam by hkb · · Score: 1

      Uhm, who buys WHAT from spammers who send long messages entirely composed of 5 digit strings with random characters in it?

      --
      /* Moderating all non-anonymous trolls up since 2004 */
    7. Re:Spam by Tim+C · · Score: 4, Insightful

      how... sad...ish

      The unnecessary death of a human being? Yeah, I'd say it's sad.

    8. Re:Spam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was the only way to get him to stop spamming. If they chopped both his hands off he would have probably died anyway and if he lived he could still send spam with his feet.

    9. Re:Spam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hold the front page! People die needlessly every day! That x-thousand innocents die of starvation in Niger and this parasite gets the sympathy is the sad thing.

    10. Re:Spam by the+pickle · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Unnecessary?

      You presume his life was necessary in the first place. I'm gonna go with no. The overwhelmingly vast majority of people are utterly, indescribably insignificant in the grand scheme of things.

      This guy was no different.

      As another poster so adroitly pointed out, there are something like a quarter of a million people who die every single day in this world. Put in a time-averaged perspective, that's about three people every single second of the day. In the time it takes me to compose a sentence in this post, 30 or 40 people have died.

      And you're going to try to say you feel sadness for each and every one of these people?

      Bullshit.

      I feel sadness for innocent people who die in terrorist attacks. I feel sadness for people who die after long bouts with cancer whilst their loved ones watch them waste away. I feel sorry for people who are murdered because they wore the wrong colour shirt in the wrong part of town.

      I sure as shit do not feel one whit of sympathy or sadness for some professional asshat whose goal in life was to annoy the holy hell out of everyone on the Internet. Do you know how much Russian-language spam I've gotten this year? I don't speak or read a word of Russian, but I have to deal with this guy's drivel every goddamn day, and you want me to feel fucking sad because someone beat his worthless ass to death in his apartment?

      How about I start shitting on your porch -- and the porch of everyone in your neighbourhood, village, town, city, and state -- every day for the next 10 years? When you and your 10 million friends get done cleaning it off after the 3650th day, and someone fucking snaps and beats me to death, I utterly DEMAND you feel remorse for my unnecessary death.

      Never mind that my sole purpose and goal in life at that point was to piss you off. You had goddamn better feel remorse that you're not going to get your porch shit on tomorrow.

      People like you are the reason people like him are allowed to continue existing.

      And that, my friend, is truly sad.

      p

  69. Mod parent up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hilarious. You sir, have just made my day.

  70. Spammed everyone in Russia with an email address! by banglogic · · Score: 1

    From the article...

    Vardan Kushnir, notorious for sending spam to each and every citizen of Russia who appeared to have an e-mail, was found dead in his Moscow apartment on Sunday, Interfax reported Monday.

    Holy crap! I wonder who our best spammer is. Maybe they can start having Spam Olympics or something.

    That said, I'm not real big on the idea of killing off the spammers. Amputate their hands or break their spines, maybe. How many spams can then send typing with their feet or using one of those quadriplegic typing sticks? (clearing the way for the Spam Special Olympics).

    Okay, I'll stop now.

    --
    Bang Logic - Serious Small Business Services
  71. Maybe and maybe not, but... by Weaselmancer · · Score: 1

    I'd hate to be part of the police department that has to handle this one. There is a list of suspects that probably numbers in the hundreds of millions.

    And while we're at it, maybe the murderer thought of that too. How the hell do you sort through that many suspects to find the real one?

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
    1. Re:Maybe and maybe not, but... by sheldon · · Score: 1

      You're right. That's hard work.

      Easier just to write up a police report as a suicide.

  72. Tae Kwon Leap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let us pause and meditate on the lesson of Ed Gruberman.

  73. To all those that think killing spmmers is great by DrSkwid · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If you posted on /. that spammers should die, I guess you can now consider yourself a suspect.

    And if you are a UK resident you can thank your lucky stars that the Extradition Act 2003 means that the Russian Police don't even need to build a strong case :

    In Category 2 cases the court may need to be satisfied that there is sufficient evidence produced to show a prima facie case. However, many territories, including the US, Russia and Israel, have been designated so that they do not need to provide evidence, but instead only have to give information. It is significant that when the UK requests extradition from the US it is still required to show 'probable cause' - a diplomatic struggle the UK appears to have lost. The basis for this change of status of the US is the extradition treaty signed in March 2003. This generated a large amount of controversy as the treaty was signed without any Parliamentary scrutiny and the text was not even made public until two months after the signing.

    Need your ISP's logs, no problem :

    The police have acquired additional powers ancillary to extradition requests enabling them to obtain search-and-seizure warrants and production orders. Either of these measures could be used to secure material from third parties including corporations.

    http://www.legal500.com/devs/uk/fr/ukfr_018.htm

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  74. Re:And... by 91degrees · · Score: 1

    but my home mail box is full of crap every day!!

    If they have a prepaid envelope I reply. I usually talk about the poor use of English, or point out why their offer is bad.

    If they have a free number, I ring it and be weird at them.

    We all need a hobby.

  75. The problem is - - by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    - - this guy was probbaly whacked by a business rival - IN THE SPAM BUSINESS. So for all you sick fucks gloating over this, it's probbaly not going to make one bit of difference in the amount of spam you get.

  76. so my email isn't broken then... by madshot · · Score: 1

    I was starting to wonder if my internet connection was broken. I've had a lot less spam today, now I know why.

    --
    Obama = Socialism.
  77. More importantly.. by BlackCobra43 · · Score: 1

    ..would it be irony or poetic justice?

    --
    I never spellcheck and I freely admit it. Save your karma for more worthwhile "lol erorrs" replies
  78. That's not Karma by zardo · · Score: 1

    Karma? That wouldn't be Karma, Only if his spam killed people would it be Karma.

  79. hmmm by pizza_milkshake · · Score: 4, Funny

    Your post advocates a

    ( ) technical ( ) legislative ( ) market-based (x) vigilante

    approach to fighting spam. Your idea will not work. Here is why it won't work. (One or more of the following may apply to your particular idea, and it may have other flaws which used to vary from state to state before a bad federal law was passed.)

    ( ) Spammers can easily use it to harvest email addresses
    ( ) Mailing lists and other legitimate email uses would be affected
    ( ) No one will be able to find the guy or collect the money
    ( ) It is defenseless against brute force attacks
    ( ) It will stop spam for two weeks and then we'll be stuck with it
    ( ) Users of email will not put up with it
    ( ) Microsoft will not put up with it
    (x) The police will not put up with it
    ( ) Requires too much cooperation from spammers
    ( ) Requires immediate total cooperation from everybody at once
    ( ) Many email users cannot afford to lose business or alienate potential employers
    ( ) Spammers don't care about invalid addresses in their lists
    ( ) Anyone could anonymously destroy anyone else's career or business


    Specifically, your plan fails to account for

    (x) Laws expressly prohibiting it
    ( ) Lack of centrally controlling authority for email
    ( ) Open relays in foreign countries
    ( ) Ease of searching tiny alphanumeric address space of all email addresses
    ( ) Asshats
    ( ) Jurisdictional problems
    ( ) Unpopularity of weird new taxes
    ( ) Public reluctance to accept weird new forms of money
    ( ) Huge existing software investment in SMTP
    ( ) Susceptibility of protocols other than SMTP to attack
    ( ) Willingness of users to install OS patches received by email
    ( ) Armies of worm riddled broadband-connected Windows boxes
    ( ) Eternal arms race involved in all filtering approaches
    ( ) Extreme profitability of spam
    ( ) Joe jobs and/or identity theft
    ( ) Technically illiterate politicians
    ( ) Extreme stupidity on the part of people who do business with spammers
    ( ) Dishonesty on the part of spammers themselves
    ( ) Bandwidth costs that are unaffected by client filtering
    ( ) Outlook

    and the following philosophical objections may also apply:

    ( ) Ideas similar to yours are easy to come up with, yet none have ever been shown practical
    ( ) Any scheme based on opt-out is unacceptable
    ( ) SMTP headers should not be the subject of legislation
    ( ) Blacklists suck
    ( ) Whitelists suck
    ( ) We should be able to talk about Viagra without being censored
    ( ) Countermeasures should not involve wire fraud or credit card fraud
    ( ) Countermeasures should not involve sabotage of public networks
    ( ) Countermeasures must work if phased in gradually
    ( ) Sending email should be free
    ( ) Why should we have to trust you and your servers?
    ( ) Incompatiblity with open source or open source licenses
    ( ) Feel-good measures do nothing to solve the problem
    ( ) Temporary/one-time email addresses are cumbersome
    ( ) I don't want the government reading my email
    (x) Killing them that way is not slow and painful enough

    Furthermore, this is what I think about you:

    ( ) Sorry dude, but I don't think it would work.
    ( ) This is a stupid idea, and you're a stupid person for suggesting it.
    ( ) Nice try, assh0le! I'm going to find out where you live and burn your house down!
    (x) Wow, this might work!

    1. Re:hmmm by PetoskeyGuy · · Score: 1

      Actually I would be very interested to see if this works. How much will the absense of this one guy affect the total amount of spam out there?

      I hope someone tracks it for a few weeks.

    2. Re:hmmm by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 1

      You forgot,

      (x) Anyone could anonymously destroy anyone else's career or business
      (x) Ideas similar to yours are easy to come up with, yet none have ever been shown practical
      (x) Eternal arms race involved in all "filtering" approaches
      (x) No one will be able to find the guy [to kill him] ....
      (x) [He was] defenseless against brute force attacks

      and most importantly,

      (x) Feel-good measures do nothing to solve the problem

  80. Why would it be the mafia? by elucido · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The mafia wouldnt beat a person to death, they'd simple make the person vanish off the face of the earth. You'd think the mafia would do a professional hit. Yes there is a russian mafia, but if this is the most profitable spammer in russia its simply illogical for them to kill their cashcow.

    So yes you could be right, it could be someone in the spam network, but it could just as likely be someone who got tired of recieving the spam.

    1. Re:Why would it be the mafia? by Golias · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The mafia wouldnt beat a person to death, they'd simple make the person vanish off the face of the earth. You'd think the mafia would do a professional hit.

      People are beat to death by mafia goons all the time.

      The "single pistol shot through the eyeball" execution is the stuff of movies. Mob thugs are no better at crime than regular thugs, they just have infrastructure in place to make it easier.

      Yes there is a russian mafia, but if this is the most profitable spammer in russia its simply illogical for them to kill their cashcow.

      Now it's my turn to get all Hollywood:

      "You're only as good as your last brown envelope."

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    2. Re:Why would it be the mafia? by mikkom · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The mafia wouldnt beat a person to death, they'd simple make the person vanish off the face of the earth.
      Really? I read about mafia killings in Russia quite often from newspapers and very often they are just people who have been shot to their home doors.

      Where did you get the idea that mafia, especially russian mafia, only kills people after kidnapping them?
    3. Re:Why would it be the mafia? by ManoMarks · · Score: 1

      I'll second what someone else said, mob thugs aren't necessarily better at crime, they just have more infrastructure. And I'll add, maybe they were trying to send a message. Ironic, I know, but trying to scare anyone else who cheated them, for instance?

      --

      That's gotta fit into your schema somewhere

    4. Re:Why would it be the mafia? by Artfldgr · · Score: 3, Interesting

      russian mob is not the same as the italian or other mobs... first of all its top heavy with phd's!!! engineers, programmers, chemists, etc... what the hell do you think happens when you have a disenfranchised highly intelligent group? duh.. its one thign to disenfranchise the poor and stupid.. antoher to do it to the people that are smart... no they would beat the shit out of him and leave him as a message... no reason to hide it, or anythign... its out in the open.. and the person who was to get the message surely got it.. probably lack of pay off, or threat of cooperation... done deal after that

    5. Re:Why would it be the mafia? by H0p313ss · · Score: 2, Funny

      Mob thugs are no better at crime than regular thugs, they just have infrastructure in place to make it easier.

      Kind of like big software companies and bad software.

      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
    6. Re:Why would it be the mafia? by jimbolauski · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Not to mention that the probablity of getting arrested in Russia is far less then in the United States or elsewhere so there's no reason to send in "The Wolf" to clean up the mess. If the spam is still flowing after a couple of weeks we'll know he was made an offer and refused it. If the spam stops I think the baseball bat might be the latest is antispam protection.

      --
      Knowledge = Power
      P= W/t
      t=Money
      Money = Work/Knowledge so the less you know the more you make
    7. Re:Why would it be the mafia? by Illix · · Score: 1
      People are beat to death by mafia goons all the time.


      You're absolutely right, but for a different reason: the point of a Mafia hit is usually twofold. One, the annoying person is taken care of, and two, everyone else gets the message. Simply making someone disappear doesn't send the kind of shock like seeing someone else's brutally mangled body and knowing that that could be you if you decide to screw around with the perpetrator.

    8. Re:Why would it be the mafia? by LizardKing · · Score: 1

      Mob thugs are no better at crime than regular thugs, they just have infrastructure in place to make it easier.

      The small time "mafia" are brutal, messy and get lurid writeups. The really organised criminal only makes the headlines on rare occasions. The big money is in kickbacks from otherwise legal contracts - the criminal doesn't make the cheapest bid, but greases the right palms. Perhaps Kushnir was involved in things far more unsavoury than just span, upset one of the big boys and got made an example of.

    9. Re:Why would it be the mafia? by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      The small time "mafia" are brutal, messy and get lurid writeups. The really organised criminal only makes the headlines on rare occasions.

      Shrek: The mafia is like an Onion.

      Donkey: You mean they stink?

      Shrek: NO! They have layers, Donkey, LAYERS!

      Organized crime often uses far more petty criminals to do its dirty work. That way it's the 15 year old kid who takes the hit when the law catches up, while the mob bosses sit back and drink champaign.

    10. Re:Why would it be the mafia? by ocbwilg · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The mafia wouldnt beat a person to death, they'd simple make the person vanish off the face of the earth. You'd think the mafia would do a professional hit.

      No they wouldn't. When organized crime wants to send a message, they don't do it quietly. Who knows what this guy was into, but if he was Russia's most profitable spammer then he was either heavily involved in organized crime or competing with organized crime. Either way, it would be awfully easy to piss off someone who might decide to make an example out of you.

      What I find far more interesting is that he was Russia's most successful spammer and he still lived in an apartment.

    11. Re:Why would it be the mafia? by droptone · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Simply making someone disappear doesn't send the kind of shock like seeing someone else's brutally mangled body and knowing that that could be you if you decide to screw around with the perpetrator.
      Depends on if this was done by the actual, and extremely organized, Russian mafia or just some thugs. I have to say the thought that people who annoy an organization just disappearing is frightening. Gulags anyone? The more organized sort of Mafia's do not have to make a spectical to show people their power. It's only the up-and-coming groups that try to be extremely brutal. Once a group has control they want as little publicity as possible.
      --
      Every post I make begins with the assumption P=~P.
    12. Re:Why would it be the mafia? by Luigi30 · · Score: 1

      The Yakuza learned that a long time ago. They try to avoid media attention to keep public interest in their activities down.

      --
      503 Sig Unavailable

      The Signature could not be accessed. Please try again later or contact the administrator
    13. Re:Why would it be the mafia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The mafia wouldnt beat a person to death, they'd simple make the person vanish off the face of the earth.

      You watch too many movies. The russian mafia beats people to death all the time. They shoot up restaraunts, partake in drive-by shootings and in general are just really sloppy thugs.

    14. Re:Why would it be the mafia? by Keichann · · Score: 1

      In that case, I wonder how many read Slashdot? Posters beware ;)

    15. Re:Why would it be the mafia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The mafia wouldnt beat a person to death, they'd simple make the person vanish off the face of the earth. You'd think the mafia would do a professional hit.

      A few whacks with a lead pipe is cheaper even than a bullet.

    16. Re:Why would it be the mafia? by unclocked · · Score: 1

      Apparently he sent too much spam to mob too.

    17. Re:Why would it be the mafia? by Glonoinha · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Once upon a time I had connections in the Russian mafia.
      They don't generally make people mysteriously disappear.
      They do, however, make examples of people by messing them up in a most brutal and bloody fasion.

      I'm not saying this was a mob hit, but I will assure you that it isn't surely 'not a mob hit' (if that makes sense.)

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    18. Re:Why would it be the mafia? by Glonoinha · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yea, but what if the Yakuza did something really, really great and wonderful and beautiful (like whacking the world's biggest spammer)?

      Maybe the Russian Mob is working on developing a positive image, and this was the first step.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    19. Re:Why would it be the mafia? by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      What I find far more interesting is that he was Russia's most successful spammer and he still lived in an apartment. - :) sir, you are so funny. In Russian cities very very very few people live in houses. Apartments have always been more prestigious. Russian cities are not at all like cities in the USA. There is no downtown and suburbs. There are only downtown like structures everywhere. That's because during communism the people were poor and mostly could not afford their own cars, which means the cities grew up, not sideways.

    20. Re:Why would it be the mafia? by fingerfucker · · Score: 2, Funny

      Once upon a time I had connections in the Russian mafia.

      In other news, the bullshit rating of Slashdot was raised to red, after a poster declared that he used to have connections in the Russian mafia.

    21. Re:Why would it be the mafia? by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

      For all I know he was just a big beef eatin', thick necked Russian thug that had more money than I did, could get us a table at a nice resturant without reservations, and made his living providing insurance to local businesses to insure they didn't get firebombed.

      He didn't come out and say it, but if I had to guess that is pretty much a text-book definition of ~mafia~ I will admit, he didn't have a name tag that said 'Hi, my name is Igor and I am in the mafia.'

      You might be suprised - there is a pretty neat world out there. Go outside (that's the big room with the blue ceiling) and experience some of it - it isn't all 'train to zone' and hoping for a named rare to pop, or wall-hackers and complaining about lag.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    22. Re:Why would it be the mafia? by fingerfucker · · Score: 1

      There is a huge difference between a common thug who blackmails small businesses with offers of "protection" and mafia. Mafia are circles that you can't get out of no matter how hard you try.

    23. Re:Why would it be the mafia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "A few whacks with a lead pipe is cheaper even than a bullet."

      Actually, probably not. You'd be surprised how inexpensive Russian military surplus ammo is. 9x18mm Makarov (handgun) rounds can be had for about 10 cents a round in the US, so it's gotta be even cheaper in Russia. And 7.62x39 (rifle) ammo is even cheaper than that. You'd have to beat a lot of spammers to death to get a better Return On Investment on your lead pipe there.

    24. Re:Why would it be the mafia? by ocbwilg · · Score: 1

      See, I told you that it was far more interesting (from an American who is used to the suburbs point of view).

  81. Dirty deeds by WickedClean · · Score: 1

    The fact that he was a major spammer shows that he does dirty business. People like that often end up in dealings with dangerous folks and that's most likely what happened.

    --
    ...All I can say is that my life is pretty strange...
    1. Re:Dirty deeds by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Please. Spam pisses me off too, but on the scale of illegal activities, it just doesn't rate. There are very few places where a spammer runs the risk of getting beaten to death. Russia is one of them, because it's practically ruled by the mob. But when you have a mobocracy, it isn't what you do, it's who you do it to. There are places in the U.S. where it's worth your life to steal a bicycle -- if it's the wrong bicycle.

    2. Re:Dirty deeds by WickedClean · · Score: 1

      I'm not saying he got killed for being a spammer. I'm saying he was the kind of sleazy businessman who would send out spam. People like that tend to get involved with some bad stuff. Most spammers are con artists, in my opinion. Somebody willing to be a part of the spamming problem may have other dirty dealings going on.

      --
      ...All I can say is that my life is pretty strange...
    3. Re:Dirty deeds by fm6 · · Score: 1
      I'm saying he was the kind of sleazy businessman who would send out spam.
      And I'm saying that as slease goes, Spam is not very important. How many U.S. spammers have been rubbed out lately?
    4. Re:Dirty deeds by Ryan+Amos · · Score: 1

      I think you're missing the point.

      Basically, the OP is saying that this guy is probably the kind of guy who sits around at a strip club all day doing blow off some chick's ass. Do that to the wrong guy's girlfriend and you're liable to get your head beaten in. Which is probably closer to the truth than a real-life SpamAssassin.

    5. Re:Dirty deeds by sik+puppy · · Score: 1

      "How many U.S. spammers have been rubbed out lately?"

      NOT ENOUGH

      I'd love to be a fly on the wall in Alan Ralsky's place when he hears about this, along with the other major spammers.

      Too bad its illegal to solve spam that way in the US.

      --
      The first thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers. Shakespeare, Henry VI, Part 2, Act 4, Scene 2
    6. Re:Dirty deeds by fm6 · · Score: 1

      And what does any of that have to do with him being a spammer?

  82. Murder weapon by breon.halling · · Score: 4, Funny
    --
    "Yeah, well, Dracula called and he's coming over tonight for you and I said okay."
  83. Your post advocates a... by rbarreira · · Score: 2, Funny

    Your action advocates a

    ( ) technical ( ) legislative ( ) market-based (x) vigilante

    approach to fighting spam. Your idea will not work. Here is why it won't work. (One or more of the following may apply to your particular idea, and it may have other flaws which used to vary from state to state before a bad federal law was passed.)

    ( ) Spammers can easily use it to harvest email addresses
    ( ) Mailing lists and other legitimate email uses would be affected
    (x) No one will be able to find the guy or collect the money
    ( ) It is defenseless against brute force attacks
    (x) It will stop spam for two weeks and then we'll be stuck with it
    ( ) Users of email will not put up with it
    ( ) Microsoft will not put up with it
    (x) The police will not put up with it
    (x) Requires too much cooperation from spammers
    ( ) Requires immediate total cooperation from everybody at once
    ( ) Many email users cannot afford to lose business or alienate potential employers
    ( ) Spammers don't care about invalid addresses in their lists
    (x) Anyone could anonymously destroy anyone else's career or business

    Specifically, your plan fails to account for

    (x) Laws expressly prohibiting it
    ( ) Lack of centrally controlling authority for email
    (x) Open relays in foreign countries
    ( ) Ease of searching tiny alphanumeric address space of all email addresses
    (x) Asshats
    (x) Jurisdictional problems
    ( ) Unpopularity of weird new taxes
    ( ) Public reluctance to accept weird new forms of money
    ( ) Huge existing software investment in SMTP
    ( ) Susceptibility of protocols other than SMTP to attack
    ( ) Willingness of users to install OS patches received by email
    ( ) Armies of worm riddled broadband-connected Windows boxes
    ( ) Eternal arms race involved in all filtering approaches
    ( ) Extreme profitability of spam
    (x) Joe jobs and/or identity theft
    (x) Technically illiterate politicians
    ( ) Extreme stupidity on the part of people who do business with spammers
    ( ) Dishonesty on the part of spammers themselves
    ( ) Bandwidth costs that are unaffected by client filtering
    ( ) Outlook

    and the following philosophical objections may also apply:

    (x) Ideas similar to yours are easy to come up with, yet none have ever been shown practical
    ( ) Any scheme based on opt-out is unacceptable
    ( ) SMTP headers should not be the subject of legislation
    ( ) Blacklists suck
    ( ) Whitelists suck
    ( ) We should be able to talk about Viagra without being censored
    ( ) Countermeasures should not involve wire fraud or credit card fraud
    ( ) Countermeasures should not involve sabotage of public networks
    ( ) Countermeasures must work if phased in gradually
    ( ) Sending email should be free
    ( ) Why should we have to trust you and your servers?
    ( ) Incompatiblity with open source or open source licenses
    (x) Feel-good measures do nothing to solve the problem
    ( ) Temporary/one-time email addresses are cumbersome
    ( ) I don't want the government reading my email
    (x) Killing them that way is not slow and painful enough

    Furthermore, this is what I think about you:

    ( ) Sorry dude, but I don't think it would work.
    ( ) This is a stupid idea, and you're a stupid person for suggesting it.
    (x) Nice try, assh0le! I'm going to find out where you live and burn your house down!

    --

    The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
    1. Re:Your post advocates a... by British · · Score: 1

      (x) Feel-good measures do nothing to solve the problem

      I assume you mean it feels good to administer the punishment to the spammer, not the feelings said(dead) spammer received?

      Heck, I'm wondering how this is going to turn out. If other spammers are now fearing for their lives in places such as Russia. Hmm...

    2. Re:Your post advocates a... by Sneakabout · · Score: 0

      Your post advocates a

      ( ) technical (x) legislative ( ) market-based ( ) vigilante

      approach to fighting people bashing in the heads of spammers. Your idea will not work. Here is why it won't work. (One or more of the following may apply to your particular idea, and it may have other flaws which used to vary from state to state before a bad federal law was passed.)

      ( ) Spammers can easily use it to harvest email addresses
      ( ) Mailing lists and other legitimate email uses would be affected
      ( ) No one will be able to find the guy or collect the money
      (x) It is defenseless against brute force attacks
      ( ) It will stop spam for two weeks and then we'll be stuck with it
      ( ) Users of email will not put up with it
      ( ) Microsoft will not put up with it
      ( ) The police will not put up with it
      ( ) Requires too much cooperation from spammers
      ( ) Requires immediate total cooperation from everybody at once
      ( ) Many email users cannot afford to lose business or alienate potential employers
      ( ) Spammers don't care about invalid addresses in their lists
      ( ) Anyone could anonymously destroy anyone else's career or business

      Specifically, your plan fails to account for

      ( ) Laws expressly prohibiting it
      ( ) Lack of centrally controlling authority for email
      ( ) Open relays in foreign countries
      ( ) Ease of searching tiny alphanumeric address space of all email addresses
      (x) Asshats
      (x) Jurisdictional problems
      ( ) Unpopularity of weird new taxes
      ( ) Public reluctance to accept weird new forms of money
      ( ) Huge existing software investment in SMTP
      ( ) Susceptibility of protocols other than SMTP to attack
      ( ) Willingness of users to install OS patches received by email
      ( ) Armies of worm riddled broadband-connected Windows boxes
      ( ) Eternal arms race involved in all filtering approaches
      ( ) Extreme profitability of spam
      ( ) Joe jobs and/or identity theft
      ( ) Technically illiterate politicians
      ( ) Extreme stupidity on the part of people who do business with spammers
      ( ) Dishonesty on the part of spammers themselves
      ( ) Bandwidth costs that are unaffected by client filtering
      ( ) Outlook

      and the following philosophical objections may also apply:

      ( ) Ideas similar to yours are easy to come up with, yet none have ever been shown practical
      ( ) Any scheme based on opt-out is unacceptable
      ( ) SMTP headers should not be the subject of legislation
      ( ) Blacklists suck
      ( ) Whitelists suck
      ( ) We should be able to talk about Viagra without being censored
      ( ) Countermeasures should not involve wire fraud or credit card fraud
      ( ) Countermeasures should not involve sabotage of public networks
      ( ) Countermeasures must work if phased in gradually
      ( ) Sending email should be free
      ( ) Why should we have to trust you and your servers?
      ( ) Incompatiblity with open source or open source licenses
      (x) Feel-good measures do nothing to solve the problem
      ( ) Temporary/one-time email addresses are cumbersome
      ( ) I don't want the government reading my email
      ( ) Killing them that way is not slow and painful enough

      Furthermore, this is what I think about you:

      ( ) Sorry dude, but I don't think it would work.
      ( ) This is a stupid idea, and you're a stupid person for suggesting it.
      (x) Nice try, assh0le! I'm going to find out where you live and bash your head in!
      ( ) Wow, this might work!

      --
      Sneakabout is a mysterious figure, having done too much mathematics.
  84. And I should be upset because? by BawbBitchen · · Score: 1

    I am so having a hard time with caring about this. Heck, there is part of me that wants to jump up and down going "yes!!!, one down, only 1000 or so more to go..."

  85. When Russian police reports blows to the head by prostoalex · · Score: 1

    They mean baseball bats.

    For a country where baseball virtually doesn't exist as a sport, they sure import lots of those fine American sports products.

    Paradoxically, baseball gloves are poor sellers.

    1. Re:When Russian police reports blows to the head by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      They mean baseball bats.

      Baseball bats, you say...?

      So that's what this poster meant with that we shouldn't act like animals.

      I hope I'll never have to face a baseball bat!

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  86. Gene Pool Cleaner by Marko+DeBeeste · · Score: 1

    Add no ingredients, beat thoroughly. Let stand, or hang from web-cam monitored lamp-post. Repeat as needed.

    --
    Faith: n. -- That human impulse that drives them to steal appliances when the power goes out
  87. Not funny, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ironic

  88. Hmmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have they found out who the killer was and what his motivation was? Was it really some crazy who had enough of spam?

  89. No, I swear it's true by charlesbakerharris · · Score: 1

    I was out of town...

  90. I can't believe nobody has said this yet by ColdZero · · Score: 0

    In soviet russia spam kill YOU!

  91. Here it comes... by paranode · · Score: 5, Funny

    In Soviet Russia, spam assasinates YOU.

    1. Re:Here it comes... by warrior · · Score: 1

      Hats off to you, best... "In Soviet Russia" joke... ever ;)

      --
      Intel transfer the difficult from Hadware to software, for get more power, programmer need more technology. -- chinaitn
    2. Re:Here it comes... by johnthorensen · · Score: 1

      Brilliant. Absolutely Brilliant! :D

    3. Re:Here it comes... by barcodeplane · · Score: 1

      I liked this one...

      "In Soviet Russia we don't laugh, we communally snicker."

  92. Mod way the heck up by BlackCobra43 · · Score: 1

    I haven't laughed this hard in ages

    --
    I never spellcheck and I freely admit it. Save your karma for more worthwhile "lol erorrs" replies
  93. Suicide? by blueskies · · Score: 1

    I think this page explains it all.

  94. Isn't this what you wanted? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've seen in the past from some of the more radical members here that Spammers should be killed and then spam would stop because the cowardly spammers would perceive a physical danger. Well, here you are! Now what?

  95. Click here to be removed from our mailing list... by SpecBear · · Score: 1


    I guess someone finally figured out a surefire way of opting out of future mailings.

  96. Enter "Karma Theory"... by presarioD · · Score: 1

    Bad Karma gets you one way or the other. The greeks called it Erynies for a reason.

    It's not that the murderer was a disgruntled web-surfer but probably the victim's agressive pursue of wealth led to shady dealings with people you only want to see on movies...

    ... so *cachiiiiing* here is your karma paycheck! In your next life you will be a firewall router...

    --
    Yam, yam, uga booga, yam, yam, yade, yade, uga booga, yam, yam, yade, yade
    1. Re:Enter "Karma Theory"... by blueZhift · · Score: 1

      When I first saw this story, I couldn't help but think Karmic Retribution myself. It's always sad when someone's life ends that way, but it is perhaps sadder still that many will only remember this guy, albeit briefly, for the annoying spam he had a hand in sending out. That's not a legacy one wants to leave behind.

  97. Completely shocked. by ltm · · Score: 1

    I'm just totally surprised it took this long for a spammer to be murdered. To be frank, though, I'm totally surprised tons of people haven't been hunted down and killed, in this day and age. There are so many villains out there, from social, political, and even the realm of sports, who arise such hatred .. it just boggles my mind there isn't one nut job who gets so fed up they go out and hunt them down.

    I just don't have THAT much faith in humanity to do the right thing -- all the time.

  98. SPEWS supports love this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am sure that SPEWS supporters will be dancing happily around the bonfire tonight, that their dream of having a spammer brutally tortured and murdered has come to fruition.

  99. Oh The Irony... by Noxx · · Score: 1

    ahaha In Soviet Russia spam...ahahaha...kills...ahaha

    I can't even get the joke out!

    --
    Study everything, you'll find something you can use - Jason Bourne
  100. yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, talk about SpamAssassin...

  101. Re:And... by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

    Not a good idea in the US. Interfering with mail delivery is a serious offense.

  102. tisk tisk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's what he gets for deleting the email before forwarding to 10 friends...

  103. Bill Gates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    You're next!

  104. Russian Law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Under Russian law, spamming is not considered illegal, although lawmakers are working on legal projects that could protect Russian Internet users like they do in Europe and the U.S.


    Was this one of them? Nice.

  105. I sur ehope... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...this is the work of a serial killer.

  106. Gives me the shivers... by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I both pity the guy (and pray thate he will reach purgatory at least) and at the same time, am afraid of the people behind the murder. I mean, if someone we consider a villain was murdered, then it means he was only a pawn of a much greater power :-S

    As they say, you never know who you work for.

    1. Re:Gives me the shivers... by randyest · · Score: 1

      Wait, what? You're praying that this guy gets a good (or at least not the worst) deal in the afterlife? Why?

      I'd always assumed that neither penis enlargement nor v1agr4 were necessary in heaven. So what do you know that I don't? Or are you so under-equipped in this life that you fear even a heavenly boost won't be enough improvement?

      --
      everything in moderation
  107. I CALL BULLSHIT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let it be known that he died not from the spam but the effects of spam!

  108. He knew it was coming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I told him, "Look out or you'll be killed" and he said "No" and now look

    I told him so

  109. Office space by Exstatica · · Score: 1

    This just reminds me of milton from office space, he could only take so much before burning the building down :)

  110. I don't know how I feel about this. by TWX · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I mean, I've wanted to see Spammers get their just desserts; I've dreamed about spammers being arrested and locked up in a cell with three guys who bought their Viagra and Enlargement Pills, but I've never really considered that something could really happen. I kind of feel like Vir, when his "I'd like to see your head up on a pike, so I can wave at it like this" moment. It's an anti-cathartic moment that I'll have to savor in its most violent decadence, yet sweet at the same time.

    Just. Wow.

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    1. Re:I don't know how I feel about this. by kryptkpr · · Score: 1

      Rest assured, this guy was more then a spammer, he was a criminal. How much money do you think was involved with all that spam sending? In Russia, where there's monney, the mafia is sure to follow. And if you fuck them, they will just kill you.

      --
      DJ kRYPT's Free MP3s!
  111. Oh, that explains it... by uhlume · · Score: 1

    I thought my inbox looked a little sparse this morning.

    --
    SIERRA TANGO FOXTROT UNIFORM
  112. Well... by abb3w · · Score: 3, Insightful
    ..would it be irony or poetic justice?

    Judging by the way my ceremonial can-o-Spam reacts to a magnet, I would say Irony.

    --
    //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.
  113. GodFather of Email? by Spacepup · · Score: 1

    This reminds me of the beginning of the 'God Father' when the young Don kills the local landlord for being such a crook bringing a sense of safty and peace back to the neighborhood.

    Sometimes the way to peace is violent.

    Disclaimer: I in no way condone murder, just making observations.

  114. FWIW? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fall Will I Wobble?
    Frank Wurst In Western?
    Four Wars I World?
    Can't even figure something useful out.

    CNNBCBS!

    1. Re:FWIW? by lilmouse · · Score: 1

      Yes dear.

      For What It's Worth.

      --LWM

  115. not gonna solve the problem by Glog · · Score: 1

    Most likely he was offed because he was hogging all the viagra, or he failed to consolidate all that debt...

    Fear not, someone else is going to be taking over the operation now.

  116. In Russia... by 1024r · · Score: 1

    In America, You want to kill Spam. In Soviet Russia, Spam wants to kill you.

  117. Sic Semper Spammis! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    serves him right

  118. Spam Blocker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So that's what my newest spam blocker does!

  119. Into the chili he goes! by draziw · · Score: 1

    Feed it to his kids now...

  120. As Mitch would say.... by Himring · · Score: 2, Funny

    Russians take shit too far. Roulette is fun and all, but no, those russians had to take it one step further. How do you come up with a game like that anyways? Whatever they do, they do it with intensity. Who was in space first? I rest my case. -Mitch Hedberg

    http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Mitch_Hedberg

    Rest in peace Mitch.

    --
    "All great things are simple & expressed in a single word: freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope." --Churchill
  121. In Soviet Russia... by Dread+Pirate+Shanks · · Score: 1

    Spam brutally murders you! Sorry, but as soon as I saw the headline, I realized I had no choice.

  122. spam assassin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    This gives a whole new meaning to SpamAssassin.

  123. Re:Spammed everyone in Russia with an email addres by Digz · · Score: 1
    How many spams can then send typing with their feet or using one of those quadriplegic typing sticks?
    I don't know about you, but the spams I usually get look like they already do that.
    --
    SYS 64738
  124. Re:That shouldn't happen. Likely just new owners by Herschel+Cohen · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's a game played by many "businesses", let someone develop the market then take it over by any means.

    Your new spam might read like: "Read This, Buy or Die!" Where every word is meant to be taken in the literal sense.

  125. Baaaaah! by modecx · · Score: 2, Funny

    I daresay... Moooo! Jolly Good, wot!? Eh, Tally ho! Back to chewing my cud, pip pip and all of that, old bean. Smashing. *chewing*

    --
    Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
  126. Re:Spammed everyone in Russia with an email addres by Linus+Torvaalds · · Score: 1

    Maybe they can start having Spam Olympics or something.

    Something tells me the athletes would have to wear protective headgear like the boxers.

  127. Sue 'em. by MAXOMENOS · · Score: 1

    Since the police won't deal with the problem, you might want to get together with your neighbors and file a class-action suit against the burglars. Make sure they get cease-and-desist orders, too. Be sure you have a shotgun when you do this. These burglars will surely get very cranky with you and yours once you do this.

  128. Based off a Chris Rock, OJ Simpson sketch... by jtpalinmajere · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm not saying they shoulda killed the bastard...

    ... but I understand.

    My feelings... he was working for the mob... and one of their addresses somehow got on his list. 1000 emails later, the originator was beaten to death by 1000 blows to the head with one of the advertised dildos in his spam mails.

    1. Re:Based off a Chris Rock, OJ Simpson sketch... by DarkHelmet · · Score: 1
      the originator was beaten to death by 1000 blows to the head with one of the advertised dildos in his spam mails.

      I guess the mob also likes San Andreas quite a bit.

      --
      /^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$/i
  129. I can identify by overshoot · · Score: 3, Funny
    /me opens inbox.

    /me reaches for hammer. Resists.

    /me goes to wall. Remebers last drywall repair bill. Resists.

    I can see how in a moment of weakness it could happen.
    --
    Lacking <sarcasm> tags, /. substitutes moderation as "Troll."
  130. I'm sure not brutally enough. by base3 · · Score: 1

    Blows to the head sounds pretty gentle compared to the way he should have been killed. If he was to get what he deserved, they'd still be in the process.

    --
    One CPU cycle wasted on digital restrictions management is ONE TOO MANY.
  131. He died after suffering repeated blows to the head by Ed+Almos · · Score: 2, Funny

    OK, one down but countless many left.

    Who's next for the clue bat?

    Ed Almos
    Budapest, Hungary

    --
    The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws. - Tacitus, 56-120 A.D.
  132. Looks more like a robbery by ingo23 · · Score: 1
    First he was not the one who sent spam. He had a business that was promoted through spam. Not that it makes it less annoying.

    Second, looking at the circumstances, it is likely that he just fell victim of a robbery not specifically targeted at his business, and very unlikely caused by his use of spammers.

  133. And there was much rejoicing. (yay) by slorge · · Score: 1

    And there was much rejoicing. (yay)

    --
    Some people are like slinkys. They're useless, but it puts a smile on your face to push them down the stairs.
  134. Re:And... by lgw · · Score: 1

    Doesn't work for 4th class "occupant" mail - it's just a hassle for the post office, not the sender. Most of the physical spam I get that's actually addressed to me is credit card applications, and I could opt out of those if I weren't so lazy.

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  135. Magical Thinking at Work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can do it! I can really do it!

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magical_thinking

  136. Maybe a little harsh by kid_oliva · · Score: 1

    Wow... a guy that sends spam gets the ultimate remove my name from your list. May seem a little harsh, but I doubt anyone is giving him much sympathy. It interesting that a society could despise something so much that when a human life is extinguished, they say good riddance.

    --
    I eat Karma for breakfast, lunch, and dinner. That's why I don't have any.
  137. Mob by Vile+Slime · · Score: 1

    Sounds,

    Like the Russian Mob wanted a piece of his spam.

    Tasty!

    --
    ---- Go ahead, mod me down, I'll just post it again and you lose your mod points.
  138. 9th century Icelandic law (Outlawry) by crovira · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The problem is that you're assuming you'll get caught. "Doing what, officer? We've been here playing cards all evening"

    The question is: Can you live with the consequences?

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
    1. Re:9th century Icelandic law (Outlawry) by Monkelectric · · Score: 1
      The question is: Can you live with the consequences?

      Maybe, maybe not. But should I have to live with the consequences of someone elses risk of ruin calculation when they decide if they should burglarize my house?

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    2. Re:9th century Icelandic law (Outlawry) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      As you misunderstand the social exchange involved I must simply state that yes, you must accept it. Your alternative advocates widespread vigilante murder; robbery, extortion, blackmail, and every other crime follow inexorably once murder becomes common and prosecution for it is reduced as a bit of murder can obstruct any investigations into any crime.

  139. I can see it coming now... by Teppy · · Score: 4, Funny

    I bet he's made a lot of money with all that spam. And as any Russian will tell you, don't fuck with the Mob. If only there were some way for his relatives to inherit the money without attracting attention...

    Hey, I have an idea!

    DEAR SIR,

    ALLOW ME TO INTRODUCE MYSELF. I AM MR. VLADIMIR NATREVSKY, COUNCIL TO ONE MR. VARDAN
    KUSHNIR. I HAVE IN MY POSESSION FOURTY-TWO MILLION US DOLLARS ($42,000,000.00) IN VARIOUS
    BANK ACCOUNTS, FROM MR. KUSHNIR'S ASSORTED BUSINESSES. Due to the violent nature of Mr. Kushiner's
    death, his reletives do not wish to attract attention to themselves by claiming the money. they
    have enlisted my aid in finding someone outside of russia to help them. the money will be deposited into
    a bank account of your choosing in the unites states. once this has been accomplished, and with great
    sadness, Mr. Kushiner's family will flee the russia that they love to start a new life. the money,
    less your commission, will them be transferred to them in their new homeland.

    FOR YOUR HELP, YOU WILL RECEIVE 30% OF THEIR FORTUNE ($12,600,000), AND 10% ($4,200,000) WILL BE SET ASIDE FOR
    EXPENSES.

    YOURS FAITHFULLY,
    Mr. VLADIMIR NATREVSKY

  140. Terrible by Emerl · · Score: 1

    I doubt this had anything to do with the spam, but if it did, in no way was the punishment proportionate to the crime. Sure, I get tired of e-mails asking me if I feel my manhood is inadequate, but who would kill someone for it?

  141. obligatory by AUsBandit · · Score: 1

    In Russia you don't unsubscribe from the list, the list unsubscribes from you!

  142. The Last Thing He Heard by Steve+B · · Score: 2

    Now [WHAM!!!] will you [WHAM!!!] remove my name [WHAM!!!] from [WHAM!!!] your [WHAM!!!] list ?!?

    --
    /. If the government wants us to respect the law, it should set a better example.
  143. Sure there is... by sheldon · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's just that the letter H sounds like N. :-)

    1. Re:Sure there is... by AKAImBatman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Except that the letter "H" is not the letter "H". It's the letter "En". (Letter names in Cyrillic are phonetic, except for the "silent" modifiers like E-Kratkoy.)

      My personal favorite transliteration is the conversion of "J" (which exists neither as a sound or a similar character) to the letter "Zsa". I always loved how my wife said my name, right up to the point where she developed an American accent. :-)

    2. Re:Sure there is... by Strange_Attractor · · Score: 1

      Nothing beats the lunch buffet at Pizza Nut!

      --

      ----
      WWJD...For a Klondike Bar?
    3. Re:Sure there is... by NotoriousQ · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I do not know what people are talking about. Russian most certainly has an h. The letter is 'ha' and is written like 'X'. And it is not as strong as people claim it is. Most certainly does not warrant a KH spelling. I do not know how "pizza hut" is spelled in russia, but I will guess that they do not spell it like "picca gat", as the the second word would sound too close to a russian equivalent of "asshole" (person, not actual object).

      A good transliteration of j would be 'd''zh' (stupid slashdot does not allow cyrillic easily), and is actually a good approximation of the sound.

      Your "zsa" would most likely be transliterated 'zh'. So if your name is something like Jean, your wife was probably pronouncing it like you would pronounce djinn.

      And if you want more fun things about cyrillic, how about the difference between 'sh' and 'shch', completely undetectable to most english speakers.
      Or the letter 'y', which apparently takes much practice for most english speakers, who just can not figure out how to make that sound lengthy (they can manage it if it is incredibly short).

      Sigh. On the other hand, I know too many russians who can not make out the 'th' sound, even though they spoke english for 10+ years. Sigh. "Srifty Srursday" instead of "thrifty thursday" at gas stations. *shudder*

      --
      badness 10000
    4. Re:Sure there is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think he was referring to the fact that many things that start with the letter H here, get converted to a hard G there, examples would be hollywood and Hitler (Gollyvood and Gitler)

    5. Re:Sure there is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, we as English speakers pronounce J a little funny ourselves.

      J isn't from the original Roman alphabet. It was invented to express the letter I, when surrounded by vowels, and acting as a consonant.

      Thus, the Latin iustitia, iuven, iocare, melior, mulier are spelled as justicia, joven, jugar, mejor, mujer in Spanish.

      The J was originally pronounced as we would a Y. I know that there are Eastern European languages that use the J and pronounce it the "right" way.

      Spanish doesn't pronounce it the "right" way, but some of the words with what would have been Js are now Ys, retaining original pronunciation. For example maior and adiudare are now mayor and ayudar. In some accents, the pronunciation of Y and Ll have undergone similar changes that English and French took for the letter J.

      AFAIK Italian tends to use gi and i where other languages would use J. Which might be a slightly ironic, because I believe the letter J was invented by Italians. Anyone out there know: Italy is a linguistically diverse place, are there dialects of Italian that use the letter J?

    6. Re:Sure there is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      great effin sig man...ROFL

    7. Re:Sure there is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      D'zh is how we get "Godzilla" from "Gojira", although that's a Japanese transliteration. The "ll" comes from the soft "r".

    8. Re:Sure there is... by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      The letter is 'ha' and is written like 'X'. And it is not as strong as people claim it is. Most certainly does not warrant a KH spelling.

      The KH is just a representation to get as close to the sound as we can. For example, I tried learning Russian from a book. You wouldn't believe how confusing the "SH" vs. "SHCH" sounds were.

      'X' is a much more gutteral sound. If you were to spell it with an 'X', you'd sound like you're hocking up a spitwad every time you said it. (Ok, not really. If you're fluent, the difference is mostly inpercetable. Still...)

      Simply put, Russian has no 'H' sound as you'd find it in "Hut". So they took up the convention of transliterating the 'H' to a 'G'. (Which I can't properly type because Slashdot refuses to support international characters. GRRRRR...) IMHO, they'd do much better to either leave the name alone (Russians are infatuated with American culture) or fully translate the name into 'XaTa Picca' (Where the P is actually a double vertical line with a line across the top. The letter 'P' is like the English 'R', just in case anyone is wondering.)

      A good transliteration of j would be 'd''zh' (stupid slashdot does not allow cyrillic easily), and is actually a good approximation of the sound.

      "dZh", "Zsa", and "zh" are all the same letter, depending on who's book you're reading. The actual letter looks like an X with a vertical line through the middle. It's a reasonably correct translation, and sounds very cute when spoken. :-)

    9. Re:Sure there is... by wobblie · · Score: 1

      so you answered one of those russian ads huh?

    10. Re:Sure there is... by MadDog+Bob-2 · · Score: 1
      I do not know what people are talking about. Russian most certainly has an h. The letter is 'ha' and is written like 'X'. And it is not as strong as people claim it is. Most certainly does not warrant a KH spelling. I do not know how "pizza hut" is spelled in russia, but I will guess that they do not spell it like "picca gat", as the the second word would sound too close to a russian equivalent of "asshole" (person, not actual object).

      No. As others have pointed out, Cyrillic 'X' is not used as an equivalent to English 'H'. Trying to pronounce it as 'H' is probably the single most obvious sign of a native English speaker with bad pronuciation. The 'G' sound is routinely used in place of 'H' in foreign words.

      Like the Greek hero Gerkules.

      No, really. Look it up.

      So, yeah, it comes out sounding funny, but transliteration is a mess anyway, and the sort of marketing types who get wigged out about branding and name recognition and such deserve to be made to look silly from time to time. Like the ultra-plural Dunkin Donuts ended up with because they weren't willing to drop the 's'...

    11. Re:Sure there is... by NotoriousQ · · Score: 1

      I still think that a 'X' sound closer to 'H' that 'G' does.

      And no, russian H is not gutteral. No hacking up involved. There are some speakers who make it gutteral, most of them are from the yiddish-speaking backgrounds. This is not how most people pronounce it. In fact gutteral 'H' will sound extremely funky to most russians.

      I know that a lot of 'h' become transliterated to G's. I actually believe that is mostly due to the words that come from German, where 'h' is also more pronounced.

      And yes, I agree, they should have just made it "Hata piccy", which is the translation of pizza hut.

      --
      badness 10000
    12. Re:Sure there is... by koreaman · · Score: 0

      Supposedly the best way to learn how to pronounce a yeri is to put a pen in your mouth, stick your tounge to it, and try to say "eeee."

      Anyway, "th" is supposedly nearly impossible to get right unless you've lived in an english-speaking country before the age of 18.

    13. Re:Sure there is... by NotoriousQ · · Score: 1

      I know it does. It does not mean that it makes complete sense. Modern russian 'X' is close enough to english 'H' that I still think it is a better approximation that 'G' is.

      Also, 'G' was used often when transliterating from German. I believe that 'h' in german sounds a lot more like russian 'g' than english 'h'.

      --
      badness 10000
    14. Re:Sure there is... by NotoriousQ · · Score: 1

      Supposedly the best way to learn how to pronounce a yeri is to put a pen in your mouth, stick your tounge to it, and try to say "eeee."

      Excellent tip.

      Anyway, "th" is supposedly nearly impossible to get right unless you've lived in an english-speaking country before the age of 18.

      I think it is possible, but only if someone constantly corrects you and makes you pronounce it correctly every time.

      --
      badness 10000
    15. Re:Sure there is... by Panaflex · · Score: 1

      Egads! Why all the chummy arguing over a simple fact? Why not just look up some pictures of pizza hut in Moscow?

      Here ya go

      -Pan

      --
      I said no... but I missed and it came out yes.
    16. Re:Sure there is... by koreaman · · Score: 0

      Looks like they use the 'X' after all.

    17. Re:Sure there is... by rasqual · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's more like their "N" has the appearance of an "H". ;-)

    18. Re:Sure there is... by NotoriousQ · · Score: 1

      You closed the wrong argument. We are now talking about whether 'g' or 'x' is a better approximation of 'h'.

      You know it is kinda like a usenet argument that starts out as a debate about religion and then a year later the same thread is debating whether the paper in which McDonald's is wrapping their burgers comes from recycled material.

      --
      badness 10000
  144. Will they build a urinal on top of his grave ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... or will people have to piss on the ground?

  145. Forget spammers telemarketers are worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's one thing to check your email and have to click delete and another to get out of your chair when eating dinner and answer a phone only to have to hang up. Telemarketers suck much more than spammers and yet because it's D.I.G.I.T.A.L. spammers get more attention.

  146. Dear Sir... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Dear Sir,

    This letter may come to you as a surprise but I really prayed to God to help me choose somebody that will be my true partner.

    My name is Mr. Vyacheslav Kushnir. I am the first son of Mr. Vardan Kushnir, the greatest e-mail marketing businessman in Russia. May be you know that my father was killed recently in Russia by the mafia.

    Two weeks before he died (May be he knows he will die), he called me and showed me a box containing US$20 million...

    You know the rest :)
  147. Re:That shouldn't happen. Likely just new owners by rnturn · · Score: 1

    ``... let someone develop the market then take it over by any means.''

    When I first saw this article I thought ``Well, perhaps, I'll be getting less spam with a Cyrillic character set than I've been getting.'' But more and more I'm thinking I'll be getting the same as before, if not more. The difference will be that someone else on the transmitting end will be getting paid for sending it.

    --
    CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
  148. About a few of the points. by ciroknight · · Score: 1

    I feel this definitely constitutes a brute force approach, and it might not always work, and there may be a few jurisdictional problems ;)

    --
    "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
  149. You missed one... by makomk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    (x) Feel-good measures do nothing to solve the problem

  150. Re:Will they build a urinal on top of his grave .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you should have logged in for that one, hah!

  151. Just get rid of it altogether by sillybilly · · Score: 1

    In a justice system where whoever comes up with the most money to pay off the judge, or whoever has to greatest influence over the judge, even the courts don't function well. That doesn't mean vigilantism is the answer. The US dealt with the mafia by establishing an FBI, that could police your police for corruption. Maybe Russia needs a brand new KGB, to police their old KGB that converted into the mafia.

  152. very nice of them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .. not to burn the bastard alive.

  153. Your sig is a dreamhost ad. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 2, Informative


    See the sig above: $16, $0 Domain, 7.6GB Disk, 192GB pipe, MySQL, RoR, IMAP, [alderflats.com] ("alderflats.com" links to Dreamhost.com.)

    (I know this is off-topic, but it is on-topic in that sigs are allowed, and sometimes we need to comment on sigs.)

    Now I understand the Dreamhost ads we see in people's sigs, including that in the parent comment:

    "Earn $97 CASH for each account you refer! Introducing DreamHost Rewards - the most flexible affiliate program of the web hosting world! You can choose to receive substantial one-time credits for each of your referrals, or recurring credits for every payment that your referrals EVER make to DreamHost! Credits can be paid out via PayPal or check, or applied to a hosting bill with DreamHost.com. You don't even need to host with us yourself! "

    We've had problems with Dreamhost in the past. That was 3 years ago. Maybe they've changed. Anyone have any experience with the present Dreamhost?

    How does Dreamhost compare with Powweb, for example? They both seem to have abusive marketing ideas; that raises a red flag for me; if someone abuses other people, they will certainly abuse me, I think.

    All those advertisements of huge bandwidth allotments are just sneaky marketing, for Powweb, anyway. Powweb limits the number of hits customers can get each day, so that no customer could possibly use all the bandwidth.

    Sigs that are ads create conflict of interest. The commentor may make a useless comment just so the ad will be seen. That decreases the utility of discussions for everyone.

    1. Re:Your sig is a dreamhost ad. by Leroy_Brown242 · · Score: 1

      I host 9 domains with them. They are top notch these days. Not the dreamhost of the past, for sure.

      I only advertise them because I like them so much. Especially after some disasterous deallings with hosters in the past.

  154. Re:Sure there is... [OT] by cmstremi · · Score: 1
    My personal favorite transliteration is the conversion of "J" (which exists neither as a sound or a similar character) to the letter "Zsa". I always loved how my wife said my name, right up to the point where she developed an American accent. :-)

    Huh. So your wife doesn't refer to you by your ./ user name? That's odd...
  155. Russia doesn't care! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe Russia doesn't care. They have enough problems to deal with. If spam brings their country money then they won't do anything about it.

  156. Eh...? Why here? by szaz · · Score: 1

    Did you have to publish this? Given that the average member of the slashdot crowd appears to have very little knowledge of most things beyond the borders of the US, let alone Russia - this seems like an invitation to talk bulls**t. Like the mafia stuff - I mean, come on... who here has a clue about the links between Russian mafia and spamming. Its all guesswork. There's nothing wrong with guesswork - but most of the clowns here pass it off as fact.

  157. In Soviet Russia... by bzarhandz · · Score: 1

    ...spam trashes you!

    --
    I made a post on the Internet!
  158. Re:And... by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

    well if 4th class mail becomes more difficult that means the price will go up and it'll be less of an incentive to use it.

    --
    Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
  159. So, how big was he? by whitehatlurker · · Score: 1
    After the comments on this previous story, my question on reading the current story was "were they able to remove him from the room without widening the door?"

    Of course the body part enlargement jokes could be invoked ... "Well, of course he's the biggest, he's been taking those damn pills for, like, ever."

    --
    .. paranoid crackpot leftover from the days of Amiga.
  160. By the same logic... by Lifewish · · Score: 1

    I remember trying to use the same logic to demonstrate that a 20-minute registration period at the start of class was too fucking long. The math went something like:

    15 (you probably do need 5 mins) / 60 (mins in hour) * 1500 (people in school) * 200 (approx) school days in year * 7 (years in school) * 2 (morning and afternoon reg)
    = 350,000 hours
    = 15000 days (approx)
    = 40 years of someone's life - a fairly decent lifespan til comparatively recently

    Sadly my teachers didn't buy it and I still got detention for turning up late to registration.

    --
    For the love of God, please learn to spell "ridiculous"!!!
    1. Re:By the same logic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Sadly my teachers didn't buy it and I still got detention for turning up late to registration."

      let me guess, you were late because you were doing these calculations?

  161. Vigilantes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And that's about what it's going to take in the United States, as well.

    Isn't it sad? Just like the Illumaniti and royality of France, our Congress is so removed from people and beholden to the power of corporations which fund their re-election advertising. It's sad when vigilantes have to do the job which the "government" cannot.

    I fear it is going to work the same way with Microsoft, one of these days...

  162. not a reason to celebrate by unk1911 · · Score: 1

    as much as i hate spam, i find a problem with the people that are gleefully cheering the guy's death.

    sure his actions are annoying and put additional unnecessary burden on society... still, that is no reason to celebrate his death. autistic children are a burden on the system too, you know..

    --
    http://unk1911.blogspot.com/

  163. Police Report by Gollum2001 · · Score: 1

    100 million suspects.

    --
    "Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former" - Albert Einstein.
  164. Re:That shouldn't happen. Likely just new owners by Scaba · · Score: 5, Funny

    It was Bill Gates. He couldn't figure out what CompuGlobalHyperMegaNet did, so he "bought them out" to avoid competing with them.

  165. It has to happen. by Secrity · · Score: 3, Funny

    Are you joking?

    No

    Has human life lost all sanctity...

    No

    that you think it is justifiable to end a man's life because he sends you unwanted email?...

    In the quantities that he sent, yes

    Is spam that much of an annoyance to you that you are filled with satisfaction when a man is bludgeoned to death, only because that man was a spammer?...

    Yes

    1. Re:It has to happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is this moderated "funny"?

      This is insightful.

      Yes, some times when an individual is so morally corrupt that they think nothing of breaking the social contract in a million little annoying ways, it is appropriate to think of that individual as no different than the criminal slime which break it in one big way (e.g. murder).

      Fuck you, spammer. Die, spammer, die.

    2. Re:It has to happen. by Bandraginus · · Score: 1
      I'm amazed at the Slashdot populace. I really am.

      You're dancing around this man's corpse like some sub-plot from the Lord of the Flies! The fury that spammers have whipped up has twisted people's sense of normality.

      Sure, spammers cost billions in damage. Get over it! They're no different from any other class of criminal (or purveyor of immoral acts). Are we to rejoice in the slaying of every single immoral person?

      In the words of John Donne: No man is an island, entire of itself; every man is a piece of the continent, a part of the main; if a clod be washed away by the sea, Europe is the less...any man's death diminishes me, because I am involved in mankind...

      You should all be ashamed of yourselves.

    3. Re:It has to happen. by ring-eldest · · Score: 1

      Is spam that much of an annoyance to you that you are filled with satisfaction when a man is bludgeoned to death, only because that man was a spammer?...

      Yes


      I agree. This guy has robbed the world-wide work-force of who-knows-how-much workplace productivity, despite laws passed to prevent it and the best efforts of people like slashdotters. If I blow up the transit system of a major metropolitan area, without killing anyone but damaging the economy to the same extent, I'd be justifiably dead too.

    4. Re:It has to happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You're dancing around this man's corpse like some sub-plot from the Lord of the Flies! The fury that spammers have whipped up has twisted people's sense of normality.

      No, it is you who has twisted sense of normality. In this world it's normal to kill people. There's killing everywhere every day, in middle east, in russia, in far east, in us, in europe, etc.

      Face it, it's normal to kill and die.

    5. Re:It has to happen. by 10Ghz · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Sure, spammers cost billions in damage. Get over it! They're no different from any other class of criminal (or purveyor of immoral acts). Are we to rejoice in the slaying of every single immoral person?


      Maybe we should. Seriously: this person demonstrated that he doesn't give a flying fuck about other people. His life was dedicated to harassing others. If he treats me (and others) like a dogshit he stepped on, why exactly should I weep when he meets his not-so-nice fate? If he wants to have (well, too late for that now!) my respect and sympathy, he must earn it. But if he spends his time harassing me through my inbox, don't be surprised if I don't have any sympathy for him.

      He's dead. And good riddance. His positive contributions to the society and others were overshadowed by his selfish and harmful acts. The world is a better place now that he's gone. Yes, there are people on this planet who are nothing but waste of space and oxygen. And this man was one of them.

      You should all be ashamed of yourselves.


      I'm not, and I'm proud of it. And if you can't live with that fact, maybe you should take your holier-than-thou attitude and stick it up your ass.
      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    6. Re:It has to happen. by droleary · · Score: 1

      any man's death diminishes me, because I am involved in mankind

      Of course, this fails to account for the case where a man's life diminishes mankind. I'll grant you that death for spamming is a pretty harsh sentence, but if you look at it from a "death by 1000 cuts" way, it really isn't surprising the long-term result of his behavior would be such trouble.

      You should all be ashamed of yourselves.

      Survival of the fittest, my friend. Given the choice, I'll take the label killer over corpse any day.

    7. Re:It has to happen. by Bandraginus · · Score: 1
      So why is the US on a crusade to catch the perpetrators of 9/11? After all, it's entirely normal to kill. They should be given a medal, shouldn't they? I mean, they killed for *their* own moral cause, so what's wrong with that?

      Face it, it's *not* normal to kill people. How many times do you walk down the street and slay somebody?

      Civilisation has made it decidedly abnormal to kill people (ie, more people die of natural causes, including old age, than by human hand). You're living in a country that was built on these principals. That's why we get so pissed off when things like 9/11 happen.

      Or to put it another way: Should the police pursue the slayer of this spammer? If you answer yes, then you are acknowledging that the slaying of this guy was wrong. If you answer no, then I pray that I never meet you in the street, for you fall into the clinical definition of "psychopathic".

      To a person outside of IT (which is most of the world's population) killing somebody over email is akin to the reaction *I* have when I hear a young african american killing another for their Nikes.

      Is *that* acceptable to society?

    8. Re:It has to happen. by Murasaki+Skies · · Score: 1

      How many times do you walk down the street and slay somebody?

      I'm a hitgirl, you insensitive clod!!!

      --
      Waiiii!!!!!! I have bad karma!
    9. Re:It has to happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or to put it another way: Should the police pursue the slayer of this spammer? If you answer yes, then you are acknowledging that the slaying of this guy was wrong. If you answer no, then I pray that I never meet you in the street, for you fall into the clinical definition of "psychopathic".

      And I pray I never run into you in a dictionary. It's fine if you want to spout your bullshit ideology on slashdot, I mean, that's what everyone does, right? But don't misrepresent a Hollywood Fact as a real one.

      As a psychopath, let me give you some information so you know who you're dealing with:

      "Psychologists estimate that one in every 100 people is unfeeling enough to qualify as a psychopath"

      You probably run into a psychopath every day on the street.

      "...the psychopath finds it difficult to process, handle, or use emotional material in the same way the rest of us do," said Robert D. Hare, professor emeritus of psychology at the University of British Columbia and widely considered the world's foremost authority on psychopaths.

      Most psychopaths are nonviolent. They are this way because it won't benefit them, or they just don't want to for whatever reason.

      Psychopaths pretty much "just don't give a damn." They don't feel terribly upset when they see someone else suffering. They don't feel terribly upset over pretty much anything. They're kind of cold, and very insensitive. They learn to mimic the socially acceptable reactions to certain stimuli.

      "Even their murders tend to be dispassionate: A study of 125 Canadian murderers found that among those with high psychopath scores on the PCL-R, 93 percent of their killings were ''instrumental,'' practical, rather than crimes committed in the heat of high emotion. That cold-blooded quality makes them particularly dangerous, experts say."

      Murders such as this are unlikely to be the result of a psychopath. Although psychopaths are more dangerous than many violent criminals, you have to keep in mind that a psychopath is not going to attempt to use violence to "teach somebody a lesson". He's not going to use violence in these ways. He's going to cut somebody open because he wants to see what they look like on the inside. He's going to wear their face as a mask because it feels good. In that way it's more disturbing because you, as a non-psychopath, are incapable of identifying with it. You don't understand what it is like not to have empathy any more than the average psychopath understands what it is like to have it.

      I think what I'm trying to explain to you is that you're probably better off avoiding psychopaths, but what you're describing is not a psychopath. You're describing someone who is so emotionally worked up about something that they feel justified in getting retribution by killing someone or having them killed.

      What you're describing is actually the antithesis of the psychopath. What you're describing is the emotionalist.

      You're also describing the rationalist who feels society is better off without someone attempting to leech off of it, although this requires a certain objectivity which would be WELL below subclinical psychopathy.

      You're also describing the clinical psychologist who feels that the perpetrator of this "crime" was the true victim in that he was continually harassed for years on end and forced to commit this crime, and hence should be protected from various forms of unfair prosecution for his actions.

      Come to think if it, what you're describing is pretty much any person who doesn't agree with your view on this matter. So, really, you're just incapable of seeing anyone else's point of view. Doesn't seem like you're too far off from joining the ranks of psychopaths. You might already be there.

      Please quit abusing psychological lables and dragging our names through the mud just because you want to make your point sound stronger. It really doesn't help convince

  166. Good riddance! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Okay, I'm noticing a lot of people saying this isn't the right approach.

    Personally - I'll just say "FUCK THAT!". He was a spammer. He was among the slime of the earth. Among the bastards making me work long nights to clena out far too fucking long mail queues with absolutely no content. He was among the tards that makes me have more work to do. More work, while I already have too much to do. I work regular 50 hour weeks, and sometimes I put in 70 hours. And I'll have to deal with scum like himm?

    I applaud the great people that offed this asshole. If I ever get to know who they are - I'll offer to buy them some beer. They've gotten rid of one of the spammer bastards which makes me have to work more.

    I'll applaud the killer of all and every spammer. I'll applaud them - and offer to buy them beer if I ever get to know what they've done.
    I'll never report a spammerkiller to any authorities. They're good guys.

    If they were the mob - then hey! Thanks mob!
    If they were people that had been spammed by this asshole: JOLLY GOOD WORK!
    If it was a random killing - then hey! Thanks guys!

    If anyone wonders - yes - I truly hate spammers. I hate their guts so badly that I cannot wish a bad enough death to them. Preferrably there should be a large degree of violence involved, and the suffering SHOULD be prolonged over as much time as possible.

    In any case: "THANKS!" to the people that offed these assholes!

  167. To those who murdered... by Shads · · Score: 1

    ... him, for whatever reason. I don't agree that murder is always the best solution, because eventually it gets hard to hide the bodies... however in cases like this it's the only real option, and from those of us who do spam admin and blocking-- we thank you (even if you were part of the russian mafia who spam us with viruses all the damn time... one less spammer is one less spammer.)

    --
    Shadus
  168. Sweet by roman_mir · · Score: 1

    I say the Mafia boss (tov. Putin) got tired of those 'Enlarge your penis now' emails.

    But seriously folks, this is just too funny. BTW., he was not spamming about penises, AFAIK he was spamming about teaching English!

    Yes, teaching English can be deadly like that ;)

  169. physical spam by wk633 · · Score: 1

    I hate spam as much as anyone, but how come we don't complain so bitterly over every other form of unsolicited advertising? What about all those fucking CDs AOL keeps sending? What about the credit card offers that keep pouring in? The catalogs?

    The waste of rescources is obscene!

  170. russian bungholes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look at the piles of dog feces that come to the US from Russia and former states of the USSR.

    These are the piles that cut in line in the supermarket, and then turn around and yell at anyone who says something to them about it (and that's when you can tell from their accent where they're from).

    Piles and piles of dog feces is all they are and ever will be. Good ridens to one -- good start.

  171. Re:That shouldn't happen. Likely just new owners by JackCroww · · Score: 2, Funny

    CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M

    Talk about arrested development... Shouldn't he be a bit bigger by now?

    Or should I say:

    OOLKAY ITAY?

    --
    "Ayn Rand is a bloody socialist compared to me." - Robert A. Heinlein
  172. "Pendantic"? by sczimme · · Score: 2, Funny


    Just being unbearably pendantic.

    Just being unbearably what now?

    --
    I want to drag this out as long as possible. Bring me my protractor.
    1. Re:"Pendantic"? by gcatullus · · Score: 1

      Of course "pendantic" just means that he is hanging like a pendulum over his every word??

  173. Less Spam? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does this mean we'll all be getting less spam?

  174. Can I get his mailing lists? by MrRoarkeLovesTattoo · · Score: 0

    What, it's not like he's going to need them anymore and somebody has to keep all of you informed about the lastest in English education as well as penis enlargement, Cialis, Suzie XXX, etc, etc, etc.

  175. Thank god for the Russian Mafia! by VonGuard · · Score: 1

    Way to go Yuri! Your mob has successfully beaten out gray listing and Baraccuda Networks as the best possible solution to this problem! Is there a Paypal donate button that allows me to give money to the Russian mafia to encourage their continued campaign against spammers? Oh, wait... here's that button, within the body of this email from admin@paypal.com

    How convenient!

    --
    Don't Crease the Weasel!
  176. Motivation? by erroneus · · Score: 1

    This isn't a story until we know what the motive was really. We can all make guesses though.

    If the motivation was the spamming activity then what I have to say is "I'm surprised it took THIS long before it actually happened." For all other motives, I have nothing to say about it really... just another day in Russia I suppose.

  177. Oh what a joyful... by BytePusher · · Score: 1

    I believe there is something wrong when any large group of people take murder so lightly. People of Slashdot! What is wrong with you? This man was murdered. It's not right. It's not funny. Who cares what he did. This reminds me a lot of this article:
    http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/07/12/134 259&tid=172
    In which slashdotters also seemed to take the idea of killing hackers lightly. Should there be punnishment? Yes, but it should fit the crime.

    1. Re:Oh what a joyful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course condoning murder is not right, and I doubt anyone is doing so. I hope the murdering scum who did it get thrown in jail for the rest of their lives (they are probably mafia or something anyway - it's not going to be an irate user with a full mailbox now is it). Having said that, the guy made money from making email usage by millions of people a misery. I doubt he had any remorse for the anguish, frustration and cost that he visited on the users and businesses he vicitmised. So, in conclusion I find it hard to be sad for him. He got all those millions of little pieces of bad karma he sent out every day back all at once in big, fuck-off bunch. He will not be missed.

    2. Re:Oh what a joyful... by scatters · · Score: 1

      I don't really think that it's a case of /.ers taking death or murder lightly. It's more that of a bunch of people who are negatively affected by the victim's activities who take a degree of satisfaction in karmic justice. I just happens to be expressed as a form of gallows-humour.

      --
      A One that isn't cold, is scarcely a One at all.
  178. Re:This is why its a bad ideas to piss off psychos by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 2, Informative

    Spamming should just be outlawed and we wont have to worry about this violence.

    Right, because making something illegal immediately stops it from happening. What kind of crack are you smoking?

    --
    Like what I said? You might like my music
  179. Just a question... by s-orbital · · Score: 1

    I am a student who is going to be in Moscow for a while next year. I have been warned about how so many women will pursue American men. I'm not planning on getting invovled anyone, but thought I'd be smart to ask advice of someone who married a Russian women. Was the cross cultural marrige experience difficult? Did things work out alright, etc? Just thought I'd ask before being faced with that situation...

    --
    Patent: from Latin patere, to be open
    1. Re:Just a question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're just like American women. Except Russian women can take a punch, so you have to hit harder when they step out of line.

    2. Re:Just a question... by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      1. My wife was in the U.S. when I met her.

      2. Many Russians are obsessed with American culture, so the differences are not usually a problem. Most of the problems relate to getting used to the slop they call food (thank God my wife is a good cook and doesn't make me eat a lot of the stuff she likes), and not offending your spouse in discussions about the Russian economy. ;-)

      3. It's important to understand that my wife was and is highly committed to our marriage, as am I. Because of that, there aren't really many differences between us. Loose marriages are a world-wide problem and end the same everywhere.

      4. If you want my advice, just don't get involved with a Russian girl if it can be helped. Love happens on its own time (and usually by accident), so make sure you are getting into a relationship for love, and that you're both truly committed. If you're truly committed, then it doesn't matter what country your wife is from. Otherwise, you'll have LOTS of fun with the INS. (Bloodsucking, #$#$@#$, rasta frasta, ...)

      5. We have two children. I think it worked out. ;-)

    3. Re:Just a question... by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      I almost forgot:

      6. You have to put up with the stupid "Mail order bride" jokes. (Just get over it people! The mail-order brides are con games! Yeesh.)

    4. Re:Just a question... by LizardKing · · Score: 1

      I have been warned about how so many women will pursue American men.

      Let me guess, warned by people who have never been to Russia but have seen some crap on HBO where a lonely bloke gets hitched to a mail order bride who is only after a passport. Despite the small minded, insular beliefs of many Westerners, Russian cities like Moscow and St. Petersburg are thriving business centres. So much so that finding a decent apartment at an affordable price is tricky, but finding a bar where a beer will empty your wallet isn't.

    5. Re:Just a question... by yuri+benjamin · · Score: 1

      getting used to the slop they call food

      What's that soup called that contains lotsa beetroot? I love beetroot.

      --
      You make the mistake of thinking you can educate the fundamental stupidity out of people. You can't.
    6. Re:Just a question... by cribdasig · · Score: 1

      That would be Borsh. Made from beef, cabbage and beets. Served hot with a touch of sour cream. Has a tendency to taste like crap at "Russian" restaurants in the US, so finding an actual Russian (or a Ukranian) to cook it properly is highly recommended.

    7. Re:Just a question... by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      Borstch. (Pronounced Bore-SH)

      Recipe

      Borstch isn't bad, but stuff like walnut jam and Russian Meatloaf will send you screaming in terror. (Unless you're the type to like that stuff.) However, they do have a few tasty pastries. :-)

    8. Re:Just a question... by sheldon · · Score: 2, Informative

      My girlfriend is Russian, and we've been dating over a year now. She's introduced me to a variety of Russian foods.

      Here's the thing... Russia was/is a very poor country. When the US/Europe was(and the parts that still are) poor, you tend to eat what is available rather than what necessarily tasted the best. And you get used to it in time and kind of like it.

      So some of the things my girlfriend will eat, I frankly won't touch. I'm not a big fan of dried fish, or pigs feet, gizzards, parts of a cow I'd never heard of, things like that. She is.

      On the other hand... There's some really good food. Obviously the well known ones like Chicken Kiev, or Stroganoff(both of which when done well do not much resemble what is sold in the frozen food section at the grocery store by Stoufers).

      Pirozhki is good. They also make wonderful crepes, like Blintze which can come with meat, cheese, caviar... etc. My girlfriend makes a dish with pork ribs and sour cabbage(sort of like sauerkraut but you don't let it ferment so it's not as pungent).

      One of her favorite things is Pelmeni, which are like ravioli... pasta stuffed with meat. For a sauce you use vinegar and sour cream, though.

    9. Re:Just a question... by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      Here's the thing... Russia was/is a very poor country. When the US/Europe was(and the parts that still are) poor, you tend to eat what is available rather than what necessarily tasted the best. And you get used to it in time and kind of like it.

      Oh, I understand completely. It just always amazes me how Russians continue to prefer it even after moving here. *shrug* It's all about what you're used to I guess.

      My girlfriend makes a dish with pork ribs and sour cabbage(sort of like sauerkraut but you don't let it ferment so it's not as pungent).

      See, here's the thing. I don't like cooked cabbage, and pork is something I take in small quantities. That doesn't leave a whole lot left that I'd actually like. And trust me, I have to suffer through the cooking of relatives quite often.

      Pirozhki is good.

      The little pastries designed to look like peaches? Yum. My wife and her friend made a bunch of it a few weeks ago. I think I gained a few pounds in process. ;-)

    10. Re:Just a question... by s-orbital · · Score: 1

      No, actually I have friends that have taught English over there, and they have said many good things of Russia. They have also mentioned that there indeed are a lot of very beautiful women that are much more frinedly than their stuckup American counterparts. One even wished he had done more dating while there.

      --
      Patent: from Latin patere, to be open
    11. Re:Just a question... by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      a spam king killed, and now we have a dinner discussion. Excellent! A dinner and a show. And justice ;)

    12. Re:Just a question... by murukusu · · Score: 1

      It's called Borsch or something like that.

  180. Well, that explains... by Another+AC · · Score: 1

    the thirty emails I got today with the subject

    "HELP! I'm being beaten to death!! Anyone?!! PLEASE HURRY! almonsted nocks"

  181. LOL YUO BOUGHT UR WIFE FROM SOVIET RUSSIA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


  182. The tool is called "lom" by 1800maxim · · Score: 1

    And it's an iron crowbar.

  183. I wish someone would kill the spammers at Vendare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wish someone would kill the spammers at www.vendaregroup.com. They are responsible for the harrisondm.com spam, and much of the other spam that comes from MCI and above.net recently.

  184. Suspects? by vonnegutian · · Score: 1

    My best guess is that he was beaten down by someone's enormous penis after taking all those pills he advertised.

    Either that, or he got beaten down by UMERO MUMBA, PRINCE REGENT OF NIGERIA after ripping him off.

    Regardless, I consider it karmic debt paid in full.

  185. Repeated Blows? Head? by greg1104 · · Score: 1

    Obviously Hot Russian Teens need to be at the top of the suspect list.

  186. OT: Russian Economy (Re:That shouldn't happen.) by mi · · Score: 1
    Moscow has become a booming city ripe with economic opportunity
    When/if the oil price drops again, Russian economy will be in big trouble again -- as it was in Brezhnev's times once, and again in 1998.

    Russia may be treating its oil/gas wealth better than some countries (like Venezuella or some of the Gulf states), but certainly is nowhere near Norway's resilience to the prices' fluctuations.

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  187. Re:That shouldn't happen. Likely just new owners by rnturn · · Score: 1

    ``Or should I say:

    OOLKAY ITAY?''

    Yes!

    (I find it's a .sig that ferrets out old-timers. I'll bet I just found another one. :-D )

    --
    CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
  188. wtf by EvilStein · · Score: 1

    Only 3 good "In Soviet Russia.." jokes in the whole thread?!

    I thought there would be at least 20 by now. Man, you guys are disappointing. :P

  189. Don't know who killed him.. by haggar · · Score: 1

    ...but regardless of this particular case, I often wonder how come the more notorious spammers don't get in trouble more often? Just think about it: these people are annoying MILLIONS of people, hundreds of millions, in fact. Of all those, you'd think there are good odds to find one unbalanced, motivated and aggravated enough to take the problem in his/(her?) own hands, and by that I don't mean software solutions.

    Again, we're talking hundreds of millions of individuals...

    --
    Sigged!
    1. Re:Don't know who killed him.. by wk633 · · Score: 1

      I suspect that most of the people that are that unbalanced don't have what it takes to actually find the spammer.

      If said spammer lived next door, and they knew it, it might be a different story.

    2. Re:Don't know who killed him.. by haggar · · Score: 1

      I totally agree that most of those irrational enough are also clueless enough... but again, think about it: hundreds of millions of people. And mad people are relatively common, believe you me :o)

      BTW, I am trying to emphatyze with the SOB, but somehow it's difficult: dealing with spam has taken a few weeks of my life, and that's something I find very hard to forgive.

      --
      Sigged!
    3. Re:Don't know who killed him.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wasn't Alan Ralsky's address posted here a couple years back?

    4. Re:Don't know who killed him.. by wk633 · · Score: 1

      Probably, but how many slashdotters would seriously consider actually murdering him?

      Sure we talk about it, but we're not murderers.

  190. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 0

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  191. Completely Disagree with Anti-Spam Opinions here by Democritus2 · · Score: 0

    I for one, have decided that my favorite Emails are SPAM. What would I rather get, mindless people emailing me requests that make me have to work; or hearing about How Crazy Asians chicks want me, NOW!. I am setting up my emails to filter the work emails into trash and keeping SPAM. SPAM lifts me up and makes me feel better about my existence

    --

    no god is good

  192. Karma by KanSer · · Score: 1

    Karma is karma. It is not good. It is not bad.

    Karma is karma.

    Repeated blows to the head may have been the instrument of his karma, but that does not make karma good or bad. It doesn't need justification, it is nothing and everything.

    --
    • MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward Wednesday April 20, @4:20
    1. Re:Karma by mrs+dogbreath · · Score: 1

      I was going to say "There is no such thing as good or evil" but you beat me to it

      A man who seeks justice must ford a river of blood

  193. What the hell are you talking about by robogun · · Score: 1

    In 1992, there was more foreign investment in Russia than China. Today, China is within 5 years of surpassing the United States in GDP, while Russia continues to sink into third world status.

    How did this happen? Quite simply, the corruption at every level of government AND civil society in Russia makes it impossible to set up business there. If you do, be prepared to pay taxes to the syndicates that may very well keep you on the edge of bankruptcy.

    On the other hand, China makes every conceivable concession to foreign investment and extremely low taxes - whether the taxes paid to government or crime syndicates. I think it is a huge mistake for the Western economies

    Do not confuse foreign restaurants and a clean tourist area with national renaissance. You can go to downtown Manila, an area called Makati and you'd think you're in Century City, with massive high rises and world class shops, but it's still the Philippines, one of the most corrupt and poor countries in the world.

    Don't think I hate Russia, I love Russians and want to see a strong Russia again. But this can never take place as long as the mob controls the country's economy.

  194. Are they really? by Blitzenn · · Score: 1

    "autistic children are a burden on the system too, you know."

    Are they? Or is that the other way around?

    I think you have choosen a group that you do not know much about, based on your bias and sterotypes to make an analogy. I take offense to that. Please let me know your skin color, IQ and sexual preference so that I may use you in a similarly (in)appropriate analogy please.

    1. Re:Are they really? by unk1911 · · Score: 1

      i am sorry if you find the reference inapropriate. you can repalce 'autistic children' with 'old people' without changing what i am trying to say here. the point i was making was, just because you are spammer does not mean you deserve to die a terrible death is all...

      --
      http://unk1911.blogspot.com/

  195. Re:That shouldn't happen. Likely just new owners by Directrix1 · · Score: 1

    You have to love that episode, if you're a nerd I mean.

    --
    Occam's razor is the blind faith in the natural selection of least resistance and in universal oversimplification. -- EF
  196. Hopefully, Bill Gates will be next. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I truly and sincerely hope that the same thing happens to Bill Gates someday. He's caused the computer world much more harm than some Russian spammer ever could. I hope it happens soon.

    1. Re:Hopefully, Bill Gates will be next. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks to the Patriot Act, we now have authorization to track you down and prosecute you for making threatening statements such as this. The FBI isn't the one to worry about, but Bill's thugs don't need no Patriot Act to bash your loser head in. Good luck getting to sleep tonight.

  197. Sung to the tune of: Maxwell's Silver Hammer by sagneta · · Score: 1

    If only that were playing non-stop on the Sterio of that fella's apartment.

  198. Actually, I do business there. by Sialagogue · · Score: 1

    ...and at least one or two others, like Frito Lay, Coke, Nickelodeon, MTV, etc...

    Russia, like any country with its history and economy has its requisite share of the thug culture, but it's like a schoolyard, if you truly have no desire to play with those kids then you'll probably only see them on the street as they're pulling other people out of their car. Many, *many* of the people who have been victims of the organized crime subculture have been involved with them in some way, whether in direct business or financial transactions, partying at their clubs, or through buying the drugs/women they offer. Same recipe for getting whacked as anywhere else in the world.

    Is it reasonable then to say that I'm not doing business with organized crime? Certainly not. I know they're in the supply chains we use, I know they're controlling the import/export clearing and shipping process, but Donald Trump knows that about his supply chains too even though neither one of us has any contact with them. It's built into the business and just like Las Vegas, when legitimate money comes in they'll be displaced to new areas.

    I'm not saying it's rosy over there, Russia has a very high crime rate and a high murder rate, especially if you're more conspicuous than the average Russian (which every American is) so you have to keep your wits about you, but that's because it's a culture trying to right itself, not specifically because of organized crime.

    So the recipe for staying away from organized crime in Russia is the same as anywhere else -- don't screw prostitutes, don't buy drugs, don't run up gambling debts, don't borrow money, and don't think that you can "grab a little advantage" through a small business relationship with someone involved with OC and think you can slip away.

    You handle your business in an ethical way to everyone, OC or not, even if it costs you a little in the short term, they will look for easier marks.

    --
    The only acceptable defense of scientific results is to say that they were the product of the Scientific Method.
  199. mixed thoughts by Atilla · · Score: 1

    first thought:

    ENLARGE *thud* THIS *thud* YOU *thud* FUCKER!! ...*flop*

    but seriously, he could've gotten killed for any number of reasons - debts, threats, crossing someone, etc.. He could've been holding something back (one russian news site said his apartment looked like someone rummaged through it), or someone he knew robbed him.

    also, it looks like the majority of spam coming from this guy was for his own business - "American Language Center" which is pretty notorious for ICQ and email spamming.

    coincidentally, there is a lot of computer-related organized crime in russia. i lived there until i was 15 and even then (back in the early 90's) pirated software and hacking tools were a big market. everyone knew everyone....

    --
    --- sig moved for great justice.
  200. At the Bottom of Slashdot... by Poeir · · Score: 1

    The randomly-selected line at the bottom of Slashdot right now is, "It takes both a weapon, and two people, to commit a murder." Eerily appropriate.

    --
    Sigs are like bumper stickers.
    1. Re:At the Bottom of Slashdot... by rbarreira · · Score: 1

      Noticed it too, seems I was not the only one :)

      --

      The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
  201. Left out the important info! by Blitzenn · · Score: 1

    Come on! They left out the important info from the article. I want to know what Anti-Spam Application got him. I want a copy for my home machine. It's obviously effective. hmm, I wonder if it works on a subscription model?

  202. still think it was not business-related? by Atilla · · Score: 1

    here's an interesting wikipedia article that explains exactly why Kushnir's skull abruptly changed shape.

    --
    --- sig moved for great justice.
  203. Bad things happens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to bad guys when they do illegal things.

    John Schmidt
    johnschmidt.dk

  204. Dead spammer? by WheelDweller · · Score: 1

    Well how about that? He opted-out.

    --
    --- For a good time mail uce@ftc.gov
  205. Ok,someone has to ask... by Ragnarok21 · · Score: 1

    ...was the "blunt object" a mallet? :-)

  206. I guess someone........ by BaconFatJello · · Score: 0

    ........took the term LART to heart.

  207. Re:That shouldn't happen. Likely just new owners by Scaba · · Score: 4, Funny

    And who among us is not a nerd? Let him be cast out.

  208. Opt-out *can* work! by merc · · Score: 1

    Usually I don't believe in the opt-out mechanism, but in this case I think it just might work.

    --
    It's true no man is an island, but if you take a bunch of dead guys and tie 'em together, they make a good raft.
  209. Re:Sanctity of human life? by morethanapapercert · · Score: 1

    I don't recall the exact words George Carlin used, but here's the gist of it:
    Sanctity of Life is BS, plain and simple. People like to believe that life is somehow sacred. Why? 'cause we're alive! We have a vested interest in maintaining the notion that our status is somehow special. For life to be sacred, that implies that there is a God who favours us because of we are alive. Yet if you look at history, God is the leading cause of death. Q: Do you believe in God? A: no dead. Q: do you believe in *my* God? A: no Millions of dead motherfuckers, all because they gave the wrong answer to the god question, so don't preach to me about the sanctity of life...

    In essence, life is not inherently sacred. The very concept of holding an abstract ideal like sanctity requires life, more then that, sentient life in order to exist. The meaning of life is simple, to exist. If you believe that human life is sacred, you must by logical extension, believe that *all* life is somehow special. If that is the case, then you must refuse vaccinations, hold still to let mosquitos feed, and be opposed to most forms of birth control, the death penalty, war, eating meat, wearing leather or real linen etc etc because all of those involve the death of one life form to benefit another life form.

    --
    I need a wheelchair van for my son. Help me get the word out. https://www.gofundme.com/wheelchair-van-for-jj
  210. Re:To all those that think killing spmmers is grea by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

    I'll bet money the only reason Russia is included in that list is because the original language of the law says "Soviet Union."

  211. Call me an insensitive clod... by Tonik,+the · · Score: 1

    Call me an insensitive clod or anything, but I laughed long and hard when I read TFA. You really should've received all that American English Center spam to understand how much people hate them.

    When legislation and technology is incapable of stopping spam, there are old and simple methods to shut up the spammer. Dead simple.

    Of course this murder doesn't really have to be related to the spammer's activities, but I got my satisfaction nevertheless.

  212. Re:That shouldn't happen. Likely just new owners by Kiralan · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    You mean someone (besides me) has read,'The Adolesence of P-1' ?. I actually still have a copy!

    --
    V for Vendetta: People should not be afraid of their governments. Governments should be afraid of their people.
  213. hmmm.. by Agent_OO7 · · Score: 1

    vlad spams email.. his attackers spam his head.. spamming at different levels.. they are all illegal..

  214. Moscow is not Russia by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 2, Interesting

    While Moscow is booming, a little slowed because of the Asian Economic problems and over all cool down in the World Economy, Russia isn't booming.

    So the region is becoming what it was 600 years ago, City-States and the hinterlands they "control".

    Moscow exerts control over oil, gas, aerospace technology and timber outside of Moscow while they are stimied in Chechnya by a small, small force which is costing them thousands of soldiers and alot of equipment.

    Russia, I've heard as a whole is about 100 years behind Europe and the Americas.

  215. Oops.. by immortal · · Score: 1

    I left my look of shock and simpathy at home.

    Ok now everyone start humming the Queen hit...

    "Another one bites the dust"

    --
    "Your having a bad day when the voices in your head put you on hold"
  216. spam vigilantes watch out by peter303 · · Score: 1

    While I admire that chutzpah of the people tracking down spammers and trying to put them out of business, its only a matter of time they cross the path of some business fronting for organized crime, e.g. gambling, porn, prescriptions, spam, etc.

    The same thing with the college kid & church groups aiding Mexican border crossers during this terrible heat wave. They are going to get wacked by mules or drug couriers sooner or later.

  217. Now there's progress! by ShoobieRat · · Score: 1

    Don't waste time with expensive court trials and negative propoganda. Just grab 'em and stuff'em in the river.

    Nice to see someone has the same level of patience I have for these people.

  218. And this is a bad thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...because?

  219. Unbeliavable scope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Of Spamassassin, for sure him got max HIT count.

  220. No Letter 'H' in Cyrillic? by vanka · · Score: 1

    Uhhhhh. . . Yes there is. The Russian letter 'X' is the equivalent of the English letter 'H'. And as someone has already posted, in Cyrillic the symbol 'H' is in fact the equivalent of the English letter 'N'.

    1. Re:No Letter 'H' in Cyrillic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no exact equivalent for 'H' in Russian. Russian 'X' isn't the same sound as English 'H' (albeit close) and when transliterating from Russian into English, 'X' usually becomes 'KH,' since English doesn't have an exact equivalent for it, either. When transliterating from English into Russian, 'H' may become either 'X' [KH, or German CH] or (more often) the Cyrillic equivalent of 'G.' For example, Robin Hood becomes Robin Good, but Sherlock Holmes becomes Sherlok Kholms.

  221. (footnote) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    PECTOPAH ~ 'restoran', for the non-Cyrillic /. population. /non-native //three semesters years and years ago /// REM Stolen From Fark

  222. Certainly gives new meaning to ... by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

    Certainly gives new meaning to putting someone in your "kill" file!

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  223. unsatisfied customer? by Macgyver7017 · · Score: 1

    I guess that mob boss didn't "grow his manhood" as much as was advertised.

  224. Nigerian Scammers cheer at this news by yourfavoritetroll · · Score: 1

    Dear Friend,
    A business partner of mine has sadly passed away leaving $5 million in a russian bank account. Im trusting that you will be able to help us withdraw the funds, because of your support of our problem we will reward you with $10,000 all we ask of you is to help us withdraw the funds.

    please send us your banking details so we can proceed in this matter,
    thank you for your time

    v1gra, xxx, cilasis, wawd3r2, sdsergon, teen

  225. Keeps you in business by dereference · · Score: 1
    Except that they actively work around my filters knowingly and aggresively with the mispellings, fake descriptions and ip spoofing nonsense. Anyone who knowingly pesters people on the milions and millions scale has forfeited any sympathy from me.

    I don't mean to lash out at you in particular, but I can't believe what I'm reading in this thread. We cheer at Y2K and Daylight Saving Time mods, claiming "it keeps us in business" while meanwhile murdered spammers elicit barely any sympathy because of all the "harm" they have done. Don't any of you IT folks realize that if there weren't any "bad guys" that many of you wouldn't have jobs writing filters, updating virus definitions, and so forth?

    Right, this is /. home of the insane moderators, so I feel I must explain that no, I am not trolling, and yes, I hate spam just as much as anybody else. I simply don't understand the hostility here, especially given the (apparently unacknowledged) co-dependencies involved.

    1. Re:Keeps you in business by drdewm · · Score: 1

      So police officers need to be thankful to criminals because it keeps them employed? Prison guards should revere and/or have sympathy for inmates? I realize that there is scale and "punishment fitting the crime" issues here but it's hard to empathize or sympathize with people who don't mind bothering millions of people to make a buck meanwhile costing massive amounts of wasted time and money. I feel the same for excessively loud cars be it from the radios or the exhaust systems designed to irritate people. If windows get smashed or brake lines cut then so be it.

  226. Investigation Update by UESMark · · Score: 1

    Witnesses have also reported a man leaving the building crying out "Spambuster, Bitch!". Dave Chappelle is apparently being sought for questioning.

  227. good by Keaster · · Score: 1

    I am neither happy nor sad, I just know that there will be a little drop in Spam traffic, and that makes it a good day.

  228. You forgot... by Winterblink · · Score: 1

    - Vegetable
    - Mineral

    --
    "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
    -Hoban Washburn
  229. Russian has nothing to do with it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like all wives, she cost him everything.

  230. The wonderful anger of spam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...inspires things like this, best computer smash I've seen since that one with the guy in his office a few years ago. Ad agencies are finally getting it right. :)

  231. Stuffing Inboxes by otisg · · Score: 1

    He must have filled up somebody's Inbox pretty badly.

    --
    Simpy
  232. Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I must admit, even if it sounds brutal of me, that i smiled when i read that.
    Maybe things like this could scare off other spammers. What they do is one of the greatest evils of the internet, right next to vira and hackers.

    Thousands of innocent people die every day and we don't care. There's no reason to feel sorry for a person like this.

    I'm glad he's dead.

  233. Re:And... by lgw · · Score: 1

    Except, of course, that all my personal mail is greatly subsidized by that 4th class mail. The physical spam I discard cuts the price of a stamp in half. Unlike email, it's not obvious that less physical spam works out better for me.

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  234. Justice... by benjamindees · · Score: 1

    This is retribution and murder, not justice

    Retribution and justice are not so different. Most generally held definitions of justice have long since absorbed the concept of retribution. While the word 'justice' may have originally meant something like 'goodness', the two departed thousands of years ago.

    Even in the most enlightened societies, killing is generally held to be murder only when unjustified. Self-defense and capital punishment are both widely-accepted exceptions. Many would even add reasonable police action as an exception to murder. I doubt we'll ever see the bobbies who killed that person the other day on trial for murder.

    In short, I'm not disagreeing with your assessment. But the dichotomy you assume between justice and retribution is demonstrably false. 'Justice' is yet another in a long list of words that have been hijacked and expanded by the doublespeak of the ages.

    --
    "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
    1. Re:Justice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You pretentious dumbfuck. Get a life.

      Justice holds a positive connotation that retribution does not.

    2. Re:Justice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      pretentious dumbfuck

      Clearly your grasp of connotation defies all attempts to decipher your rhetoric through the application of logic.

    3. Re:Justice... by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

      Some Folks walk the streets only be cause 1 normal folks don't want to do the time 2 Police/Gov folks don't want to do the paperwork And sometimes JUSTICE IS RETRIBUTION

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
  235. I, J and Y by yuri+benjamin · · Score: 1

    'i', 'j' and 'y' (prev 'ij' or 'ÿ') all come via Latin from the greek 'iota' which comes from the semitic 'yod'.

    I think. I might be mistaken.

    --
    You make the mistake of thinking you can educate the fundamental stupidity out of people. You can't.
    1. Re:I, J and Y by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, as I said, j comes from Latin i. It was first used by Italians in the 4th century. In classical Latin the letter J does not exist.

      Now, that said, Latin i definitely comes from Greek iota.

      I think Y comes from a different Greek letter though. (I don't really know any Greek, so I could be wrong.) It might ultimately come from the same semitic root though.

      Interestingly: In Spanish, J is called jota, which, in the classical Latin spelling, would be iota. Look familiar?

  236. RTFA! by schon · · Score: 1

    You can only generate so much ill will before the karma wheel falls off the axle and crushes your ass.

    I guess you didn't RTFA, but it wasn't his ass that was crushed. :o)

  237. We need a "Do Not Blugeon To Death" List by Distan · · Score: 1

    n?T

  238. Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While I'm not happy that another human-being is dead, I am quite happy that a Internet low-life scum known as a SPAMMER shall trouble us no more...

    That said - I wonder if it was the fact that he pissed someone off for something other than Spamming and they took him out for it, or if it was the fact that he was a spammer - spammed the wrong guy (or gal) who went over the deep end, and whacked him...

    Personally I think that the latter reason would stand to act as somewhat more of a deterrent and warning to other spammers. When you're blasting out 10 million messages a day - what's the percentage of nutjobs that you're pissing off? How many of them live in your country, city, or neighborhood? How many of them will seek deadly revenge?

    Might not be enough to give pause to that schmuck Ralsky (who has his house cordioned off with mail bags), but some of the smaller spammers might go and flip burgers instead of pestering us...

    It'd be interesting to see what impact this has, if any, on the levels of spam so long as it's in the news...

  239. Regardless... by rfernand79 · · Score: 1

    Regardless of his spamming activities, he was still a human being, murdered in a brutal way. I'm sure he had loved ones who will miss him.
    I understand the tongue in cheek attitude ("Spam assassin! the writing was on the e-Wall! No mor russian spam!") but please don't lose perspective: another life taken.
    Murder is never good.

    1. Re:Regardless... by mabu · · Score: 1

      I take it you're a vegetarian?

  240. Re:To all those that think killing spmmers is grea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's why I'm glad I posted AC! See, it's not just for GNAA first posts; it has other legitimate uses!

  241. Re: Charles Booher Defense Fund by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > The spamming was probably just incidental.

    Yeah, that's the ticket. I^H Spam-haters had nothing to do with this. The police shouldn't even investigate that angle, and should find a suspect with no connection to spam. And if, perish the thought, any more spammers are found dead under mysterious circumstances, the police shouldn't investigate spam-haters then either.
    But just in case any spam-haters do get unjustly charged, the Charles Booher Defense Fund will, of course, ensure that they get the best, and most expensive, defense the law allows.

  242. Good idea by FileJunkie · · Score: 1

    Someone in some Russian forum offered to print some of his spam and put it on his grave. It's bad I don't live in Moscow, because I could do it.

    --
    Legalize firearms!
  243. A month salary... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



    How can this blunt bs be modded informative? A weeks salary for a hamburger! Even as a beggar you do earn way more in moscow.

    okay, mod me down. I have loads of AC-Karma to burn...

  244. hmmmm Spam..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The murderer could have at least been a bit more original, perhaps boiling the spammer's flesh and making spam out of it and sending it to the spamees as a peace offering, only trouble is they might get pissed off getting spammed by spammer spam. ;-)

  245. Re:To all those that think killing spmmers is grea by huge+colin · · Score: 1

    If you posted on /. that spammers should die, I guess you can now consider yourself a suspect.

    Yes, in the same sort of way that everyone who owns a car is a suspect in a hit-and-run.

  246. Tough case for the Russian police.. by Fantasio · · Score: 1

    ....Millions of suspects !

  247. Re:Why must we be animals? Do this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to make sure they investigate, AND to piss the cops off by making them do their job. I had a couple of lawn chairs in the yard, and they got stolen, so the cops are not interested - too small a crime. BUT, I had taped a $50.00 bill inside the leg of the chair, so now, it's a FELONY, and they have to investigate! And when they catch the guy, is he in for a surprise! Thinks it's a misdemeanor, but oh no!! and Big Bad Butch is his new cellmate!!

  248. Finally... by xushi · · Score: 1

    Now that's what i'm talking about .... its the only way these bastards will learn.. We've tried it the "USA Gov and their 'laws'" way.. and it didn't work. Lets see what impact this will have :p Its a shame though.. they should have just amputated his legs from the knee below and maby a finger or two.. and kept him alive so others can be put off by the misery he has to live in ... Cruel? Yes.. very..

  249. That explains everything. by megarich · · Score: 1

    For a short while there I had a reduction in spam!!!! But then I guess the russian equivilant to fat tony took over for mr dead spammer and now there is no change in the # of spams :\

  250. What goes around comes around by gone.fishing · · Score: 1

    Ever notice how rare it is for an upstanding member of the community to be murdered? It happens and it happens more than we would like but when you compare it to the percentage of scum-bags (like drug dealers) the percentages are pretty slim.

    I don't know if it was the result of his spamming or his ties with the mafia (did he have any?) or if it was something else but, I'd guess his odds of getting killed were greater, much greater than yours or mine.

    A part of me figures he got what was coming to him.

  251. What happens when authorities don't do anything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's unfortunate that this happened. But that's what goes on when law enforcement doesn't do their job. People take things into their own hands.

    This guy was a sleazebag. He wasn't even Russian. He engaged in tax fraud. He was sued in the Unites States for stock fraud. He was a grade A, first class, scumbag, whose latest scam was spamming the crap out of people to promote his American Language Center. I would routinely get his annoying e-mails, in Russian, multiple copies, suggesting I needed to learn English by attending his school.. unfortunately since I couldn't read Russian, the wisdom of his bone-headed indiscriminate solicitations became apparent.

    With all due respect, this couldn't have happened to a nicer guy. There's a lot of death in this world, and that's horrible, but in this case, perhaps this guy's death means that I will fianlly stop getting those stupid Russian-language spam in my inbox, and that's a good thing.

    However, realistically, it's very unlikely his murder was due to his spamming. It's a lot more likely he screwed somebody over in a business or drug deal and he got paid what he was owed. In either case, I will enjoy, if only for a moment, the thought that there might be one less major spammer operating, and that maybe authorities will recognize how much people despise this activity and do something to control it. If they don't, then they can expect many more people to not be terribly sympathetic over the untimely demise of people of this nature.

  252. Numbers, and points to ponder by Thaelon · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I seriously doubt this guy was killed just for spamming, but let's assume he was for discussion. While on the surface it may seem that the punishment (death) far exceeds the crime (spamming) let's do a little math.

    Say I spend 10 seconds managing my spam every 2-3 days. That's 28 seconds a week. No big deal right?

    Say I've been doing it for the last 5 years and will continue to for the next 55.

    (5 + 55) * 52 weeks * 28 seconds a week = 87,360 seconds (24.266~ hours). Still not that bad, just one day.

    Someone who lives 80 years only gets 700,800 hours to live.

    That means spammers only have to annoy 28,879 people ( 700,800 / 24.266~ = 28,879 ) before they've wasted an entire (long) human lifetime worth of time. Now I know it's a bit of a stretch to equate a human lifetime worth of time to the life of an actual human being, but I begin to wonder. My time is very valuable to me and I'd rather not waste a single second of it deleting unwanted advertisements from my inbox.

    But let's take it a little further. According to this there are 6,454,864,470 people on earth at the time of this writing. Say spammers only annoy 5% of them (a low estimate I would guess) for their entire lives. That's still 322,743,223 people who lost a day's time to spam.

    24.266 hours per person * 322,743,223 people = 7831902223.6 hours wasted.

    That's 11,175.66 human lifetimes!

    If you want to equate those to actual deaths here are some comparisons:

    "British Medial Journal indicating that passive smoking kills over 11,000 people in UK." (http://www.sdlp.ie/pr2march2005.shtm).

    "To take prostate cancer as an example, although it kills over 11,000 men a year..." (http://www.icr.ac.uk/press/releases/cancerchip.ht ml)

    "Gun violence kills over 11,000 Americans every year..." (http://www.dailyprincetonian.com/archives/2002/11 /08/opinion/6293.shtml)

    These were extremely low estimates, the world's population is growing, and the amount of spam is growing.

    Still think the punishment didn't fit the crime? I'm not sure anymore myself.

    --

    Question everything

    1. Re:Numbers, and points to ponder by dazlari · · Score: 1
      By that measure Bill Gates deserves to die for all the time I (and the rest) lost due to BSOD.

      But wait! he's on the philanthropic bandwagon, buying his time/life back?? phew, maybe we'll call it even if I don't pay any more money to charity, Bills paying for me.

      Bills paying for me?

  253. A Plan for Spam by myke113 · · Score: 1

    Finally.. a plan for Spam that works!

    --

    -Myke
    myke@compassionatecoalition.org
    http://www.compassionatecoalition.org
  254. Mod the troll down please by Tonik,+the · · Score: 1

    Thanks.

  255. Re:That shouldn't happen. Likely just new owners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    oh oh im not! im not! please cast me out so that i cant flame or troll anymore!! please please please!!!

  256. Someone Needs to Make a Video Game About This by LazloToth · · Score: 1


    . . . . and then they can make a movie from the video game.

    Let's see, how about . . . . "The Spaminator"? The mechanoid (or some such thing - - I don't watch much Sci-Fi) comes back from, ummm, having just been in 1982, where he sees that the spammers will destroy the Internet. So then, he jumps to 2005 and . . .. Well, hell, I have no imagination, but you get the idea.

    --


    It's only funny until someone gets hurt. Then, it's hilarious.
  257. While it would be nice to think... by ByrneArena · · Score: 1

    that he was whacked for spamming. It is more likely he was part of a mob hit that had to do with money rather than his line of business.

  258. Or by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "where extraordinary levels of physical violence are the accepted norm, "

    Guess you haven't been to Irvington, NJ where knowing the native language won't do you much good.
    http://www.cityrating.com/citycrime.asp?city=Irvin gton&state=NJ

  259. The Only Bad News... by eno2001 · · Score: 1

    ...I wasn't there to see him buy it. I really would seriously love to see the death penalty world wide for spam. Kill every rat bastard spammer on the planet. That should send a strong message about just how little I care about the lives of reprehensible spammers.

    --
    -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
  260. Re:To all those that think killing spmmers is grea by crabpeople · · Score: 1
    spammers should die.

    --
    I'll just use my special getting high powers one more time...
  261. unnefective treatment?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i guess someone did not got satisfied with its new penis size :-/

  262. Proportional, really. by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 1

    If you figure a hundredth of the people he annoyed probably wanted to, at the very least, punch him in the face, then this is totally proportional---he just got what was coming to him, all at once.

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
  263. Unfortunately, this won't curtail spam at all. by mmell · · Score: 1
    It'll just give the Russian people a new spamster to deal with.

    And I agree with the analyses present elsewhere in this thread which conclude that this gentleman wasn't slain by some irate spam recipient, but rather by the powerful and dangerous criminals in Russia who are finding the current the current political and social state of their country amenable to abuse.

    That said, I will admit that I find it difficult to feel any great unhappiness at the fate this man has met.

  264. I know who did it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SpamAssassin did it.

  265. Someone sent the murderer a russian email scam. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone sent out 1,000,000 spams that offered a FREE subscription to 15 different magazines of your choice to the first person to bring back skull fragments.

  266. Good by mike3k · · Score: 1

    I'd like to see more spammers get killed. Spamming should be punishable by death.

  267. Theory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe this news story is fake, and was posted to garner attention to a web site full of click through ad's?

  268. problem with the story title by alizard · · Score: 1
    "Murdered" seems a bit excessive. I don't think it is possible to "murder" a spammer, the killing of one might be. . . justifiable germicide, maybe.

    As for appropriate reactions... a toast to the person(s) responsible, and maybe we should think of raising a legal defense fund.

  269. Good. Who else can we kill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about some asshat corporate DRM-pushing motherfuckers?

  270. And this effects me how? by tilleyrw · · Score: 1

    . . This is filler. . .

    --
    This post encoded with ROT26. If you can read it, you've violated the DMCA. Handcuffs please, sergeant.
  271. In Soviet Russia by HangingChad · · Score: 1

    Spam unsubscribes you!

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
  272. Next big spam-wave by maggern · · Score: 1

    Is this murder going to trigger a wave of "you-need-protection-and-security"-spam? Buy it now before you get popped!

    ----------
    Spamming reduces company profits, which reduces tax income, which reduces social spendings, which reduce quality of life for the poor.

  273. Re:That shouldn't happen. What? Spam shouldn't by HungWeiWeiHai · · Score: 2, Funny

    be canned?

    I guess he'd have been better off if they read the instructions:

    "We want his spam CANED"

    Well, was he brutally murdered, or was his spam "tenderized"?

    Apparently, they set out to CAN his spam... and went a little ballistic on the Batman "BAMMM" "POWWW" "SPAMMM"

  274. humans are violent creatures by happyemoticon · · Score: 1

    Evolution has, through most of the time before the advent of agriculture (and for a good part of our existence thereafter) selected us to be avaricious, violent, xenophobic, lustful, and short-sighted. Only fairly recently have things like charity, pacificism, inclusiveness, monogamy, and meticulous planning resulted in anything but 1) death at the hands of a more vicious human 2) failure to reproduce or 3) perishing to the elements/starvation.

    Anyway, don't be surprised when people act like this. It just represents the failure of the society to adequately shape people into moderns, by providing incentives and punishing disobedience. For example, if I have a competitor who is using dirty tactics against me, I am not as successful as my twin in another universe who knifes his competitor in an alley, unless he is subsequently hunted down by the cops.

  275. To all you stereotypical slashdotters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You wankers need lives... need a clue... need a lesson in humanity... need to understand punishment should fit the crime... (when someone who steals $1M can get a longer sentence than a murderer then our system AND OUR SOCIETY need a clue)

    While I enjoy spam about as much as the next person I would never find it acceptable to murder a spammer forsending spam. I can't believe so many of you no daylight exposure wankers think this is OK or he deserved to be murdered. Imprisoned, maybe. Fined and profits taken, definitely. Murdered? No.

  276. Re:To all those that think killing spmmers is grea by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

    I'd be interested to hear how they can avoid it !

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  277. Re:That shouldn't happen. Semantics? by HungWeiWeiHai · · Score: 1

    Was it "murder" or was it "tenderizing", albeit a little bit on the soft, undercooked side?

    Haven't we all at one point wanted to KILL (if we were dieties and able to do it and get away with it) some bastard or bitch who set upon our systems, cost us time, resources, access, and esteem?

    I am not for KILLING someone unless it's clearly the case of irreparable bodily damage or harm about to befall me, but I imagine if his fate is widely publicised, his death won't have been meaningless. Either it was his spamming activities, or his failure to pay up, or he slept with someone's "property", yaddy yaddy yah (you fill in the blanks).

    OTOH, his death could be for real reasons unknown, and the media are just chewing the fat over his spam.

  278. Good. That's one down... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One down, far too many to go. *sigh*

  279. Somewhere his mother is probably sobbing. by Bahumat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Fine, he was a spammer.

    Somewhere he probably has a mother, still alive, who is sobbing over his grave. To her, he was her boy, her son, a part of her flesh and blood.

    What would you tell her? "Tough shit, grandma. Your boy got offed over some spam."

    Shame.

    --
    "To pass through the jungle; silence, courtesy, ferocity, as the occasion demands." -- Kamau, "Proper Passage"
    1. Re:Somewhere his mother is probably sobbing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What would I tell her?

      I'd tell her that his life, from start to end, was completely her fault.

    2. Re:Somewhere his mother is probably sobbing. by Steve+B · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Somewhere he probably has a mother, still alive, who is sobbing over his grave.

      Why? Why didn't I do a better job? Why didn't I raise him to be a decent human being instead of a... a... SPAMMER?!?

      --
      /. If the government wants us to respect the law, it should set a better example.
    3. Re:Somewhere his mother is probably sobbing. by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Are you worried about Hitler's mom, Saddam's mom, and Dahmer's mom too?

      Everyone has a mother, even serial killers and genocidal maniacs. That doesn't mean they or their mothers deserve any sympathy.

  280. it could have little to do with spamming by alexfromspace · · Score: 1

    People get murdered in Russia all the time. It might be that a crime boss got annoyed with his spam, or that the spammer simply "forgot" to pay for "protection", because he was "too important". Either way, I would really prefer not to find out.

  281. FIlter? by OverflowingBitBucket · · Score: 1

    Okay, who turned their spam filter up to 11? Out with it.

    (Aisle seat, please)

  282. Burning's too good for him. by HornWumpus · · Score: 1
    Being beaten to death was too good for him.

    He deserved to be paper cut to death.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  283. What if it was a government? by Kamiza+Ikioi · · Score: 1

    What worries me is that with the new Piracy Czar, and talk about new digital terrorism laws, that spam will be declared terrorism. I utterly despise spam as much if not more than the next guy. But I would be extremely uncomfortable thinking that in the future, CIA hits on spammers would be painted as mafia or vigilante violence... and that because of the apparent support of this (everyone here, and myself a little, doesn't feel quite bad about this, considering how many grandmothers probably lost money to this guy, just because they wanted to e-mail little Johnny across the country), if something like that happened, and the press did find out about it, there would be little opposition.

    Spy cloak and dagger may have gone digital, but the remedies of old for eliminating enemies won't only take the form of cyber-attacks. I'm not saying this is a conspiracy... unless we hear about other high tech "bad guys" coming to an early demise. The effect on privacy could cause an extreme chilling effect, and is why I hope this case gets a thorough investigation to find the murderer.

    --
    I8-D
    1. Re:What if it was a government? by Steve+B · · Score: 1
      Actually, given that spam is a perfect medium for clandestine terrorist communications (traffic analysis is useless, as there's no way to tell which of the millions of recipients is translating a certain string of "random filter-defeating gibberish" into a strike action order), it would be irresponsible for government security agencies not to crack down on it.

      At least that's something useful they can do without trampling civil liberties (spamming is about as public as it gets already, and in clear violation of existing theft-of-service, fraud, etc laws).

      --
      /. If the government wants us to respect the law, it should set a better example.
  284. which victim by timmarhy · · Score: 1

    one of the millions of people he bombarded with spam must have found him.

    --
    If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
  285. Will he listen to advice by penguinoid · · Score: 1

    I wonder how many people told him to go get a life?

    --
    Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
  286. Oh man! by XSforMe · · Score: 1

    I am not sure if I am reading Slashdot, News for Nerds or Twinbarrel Shotgun, News for Psychopaths. This piece of news along with the comments are turning to be the funniest read I have had in the last month.

    --
    My other OS is the MCP!
  287. Re:That shouldn't happen. Likely just new owners by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1

    CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M ...Find Gregory.

    --
    Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
  288. It wasn't me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Honest.

  289. He was still a member of the human race. by Arimus · · Score: 1

    Regardless of his spam crimes on the grand scale of crime spamming is way down on the list of crimes (try child abuse, murder, rape, being pissed behind the wheel and killing someone etc) and so the comments along the lines of good he's dead etc are out of line.

    The odds are this wasn't some overspammed individual taking revenge or the Russian Gov't (they tend not to worry about leaving bullet holes in their targets) but is more likely to be Russina Maffia related or some other such organized crime... but equally could have been a crack head who had broken into his apartment.

    --
    --- Users are like bacteria -> Each one causing a thousand tiny crises until the host finally gives up and dies.
  290. A great new trend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about the next spammers convention in Las Vegas?

    I'm thinking carbombs but if anyone has other ideas ...

  291. Is it wrong to find these posts funny? by swerk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Man, I feel bad that I don't feel worse. Here we have someone who's died a violent death, and we're having quite a bit of fun joking about it.

    Now obviously I don't think someone who spends his time choking thousands of servers and annoying millions of people should be given a medal, but I hope nobody here honestly believes that beating him to death would really be justified.

    All the same, I'm finding all these morbid jokes to be pretty amusing. Perhaps I'm just a sick bastard. Or maybe those darn violent videogames have warped my mind and I can't tell fact from fiction anymore. What's that, violence doesn't matter anymore, it's sex in games that ruins people? Guess I'm behind the times. Probably though, it's just part of the human condition: it's not in our face, we know nothing redeeming and something damning about this person, and as a result we're far enough away that we can even joke about it.

    I'm sure there's a good one to be made about him coming back as a "zombie" and continuing to spam, but I'm not sure how to put it together.

  292. Good riddance by Vadim+Makarov · · Score: 1
    I'm Russian, and somehow I completely fail to have any pittance for this particular man. It's just a gut reaction. Can't do anything with it.

    Let me check my junk folder... there have come two new messages while I've been reading this discussion. One message is about a one-day business course, and another pitches a small printing house in Moscow. They are representative of the kind of advertising that dominates Russian spam right now. Worse yet, Russian spammers are probably the best in the world at their, umm, job, and these are messages that seep through my rather well tuned spam filter (SA + Bayes + RBLs). No matter what I do they keep wasting my time, on average ten to fifteen minutes every day as I estimate, including the time I have to spend every now and then to keep up with the latest anti-spam solutions.

    --
    17779 eligible voters in a district, 17779 'vote' as one. This is Russia.
  293. Reading comprehension. by antizeus · · Score: 1

    The grandparent states a preference for typical Russian restaurants because of the adventure which comes from the language barrier. The parent then criticizes the grandparent for doing just the opposite.

    --
    -- $SIGNATURE
  294. Then he can learn by terminal.dk · · Score: 1

    First the british showed what happens if you try to use the Metro without ticket.

    Now the Russians shows what happens if you send annoying mails.

    Do you see the pattern ? A new learning process has taken form. The ultimate punishment is the only way to stop crime.

  295. Serves the cunt right, and I hope his family... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    get hit by a meteorite storm too.
    Seriously, the cunt got what he deserved.

  296. Re:This is why its a bad ideas to piss off psychos by John+Nowak · · Score: 1

    How could he be smoking crack? It's illegal stupid.

  297. What? You expect me to cry??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you expect me to cry? No way Dude, my question is-- what the heck are you standing around for? There's plenty more to go. Spammers you better change your evil ways!

  298. I didn't do it!!! by shanen · · Score: 1
    Yeah, I know I have the motive because I really do hate the spammers, but I have a rock solid alibi! You see I was in this castle with a bunch of nuns who absolutely insisted on being punished for their sins. It took HOURS to suitably deal with all of them! It's a long story, but believe me, it's a much better alibi than Karl Rove's. Not only don't I know any of their names, Wilson's wife wasn't anywhere in the nunnery! I checked everywhere! And then some!

    On a more serious note, it makes me wonder about the honor among thieves. I don't approve of murder, but any professional spammer is high on the list of deserving candidates. If someone has to be murdered, I'm glad they took the spammer first. My own guess would be that anti-spam pressures were squeezing his income, and some of his "business associates" were somehow unwilling to reschedule his "loan" repayment installments.

    --
    Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
    1. Re:I didn't do it!!! by sik+puppy · · Score: 1

      and there was much rejoicing..

      sorry i guess thats a different part of the alibi

      --
      The first thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers. Shakespeare, Henry VI, Part 2, Act 4, Scene 2
    2. Re:I didn't do it!!! by rubycodez · · Score: 1


      your alibi reminds me of the Monty Python Holy Grail:
      DINGO: Oh, wicked, bad, naughty, evil Zoot! Oh, she is a naughty person, and she must pay the penalty -- and here in Castle Anthrax, we have but one punishment for setting alight the grail-shaped beacon. You must tie her down on a bed and spank her!
      GIRLS: A spanking! A spanking!
      Dingo: You must spank her well, and after you are done with her, you may deal with her as you like... and then... spank me!
      Girls: And me! And me too! And me!
      Dingo: Yes! Yes, you must give us all a good spanking!
      Dingo: And after the spanking, the Oral Sex!
      Girls: Oral sex! Oral sex!
      Galahad: Well I could stay a bit longer...

  299. Analogy Fails It by antizeus · · Score: 1
    Yes, and we shouldn't blame thiefs, we should blame the people that leave their possessions unprotected/unlocked, thereby encouraging more thievery.
    The proper people to blame in the theft analogy are the fences -- those who buy the stolen goods. Oh, by the way, it's "thieves".
    --
    -- $SIGNATURE
    1. Re:Analogy Fails It by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 1

      The proper people to blame in the theft analogy are the fences

      The fences are buying stolen property. The thieves are stealing it. Both are crimes.

      Are you suggesting it should be illegal to buy legal products that are advertised in an annoying way? I hate spam as much as the next person, I have to deal with its implications at work, too, but I feel that is going too far.

      Oh, by the way, it's "thieves".

      As a fellow spelling/grammar nazi, I must say thank you for correcting me, and in kind, point out that the period should come before the closing quotation mark, unless you are not an American. YMMV. ;)

      --
      Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
    2. Re:Analogy Fails It by antizeus · · Score: 1
      Are you suggesting it should be illegal to buy legal products that are advertised in an annoying way?
      I am suggesting that the analogy sucks.

      And regarding the rule about punctuation being inside quote marks when it's not part of a quote, that rule sucks. Modern typographical equipment renders it obsolete. I look forward to its death.

      --
      -- $SIGNATURE
  300. Will everyone wanting to claim responsibility... by RyatNrrd · · Score: 1

    ...please form an orderly queue?

  301. Russian defenses by Pseudonymus+Bosch · · Score: 1

    Do they play cricket, there, or what?

    Chess. Probably a big rook.

    --
    __
    Men with no respect for life must never be allowed to control the ultimate instruments of death.
    GW Bu
    1. Re:Russian defenses by Murasaki+Skies · · Score: 1

      It's Russia, so they probably use pawns.

      --
      Waiiii!!!!!! I have bad karma!
  302. Ungood by Pseudonymus+Bosch · · Score: 1

    The in-vogue usage is North and South.

    --
    __
    Men with no respect for life must never be allowed to control the ultimate instruments of death.
    GW Bu
  303. Not not a mob hit? by Poromenos1 · · Score: 1

    Wait, doesn't not "not a mob hit" mean "a mob hit"? It's not like there are other hits in the space except "mob" and "not mob". P(mob) + P(not mob) = 1 and other mathematical nonsense.

    --
    Send email from the afterlife! Write your e-will at Dead Man's Switch.
    1. Re:Not not a mob hit? by shobadobs · · Score: 1

      Well, since none of us observed the crime, it was both a mob hit and not a mob hit at the same time.

    2. Re:Not not a mob hit? by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

      What I meant to say was that I can't assure you that it was a mob hit, but there is nothing that obviously rules it out as a mob hit.

      Besides - it was a good thing, almost worthy of holy worship. They off'ed a SuperSpammer - that's the Internet equiv of killing Osama.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    3. Re:Not not a mob hit? by Principal+Skinner · · Score: 1

      But at least we are certain no cats were killed in the process.

      --
      one hundred twenty
      is just enough characters
      to write a haiku
  304. Re:That shouldn't happen. Likely just new owners by Directrix1 · · Score: 1

    I don't know, your band didn't look very nerdy. Hmmmmm.

    --
    Occam's razor is the blind faith in the natural selection of least resistance and in universal oversimplification. -- EF
  305. Cool by osgeek · · Score: 2, Funny

    Is there like a PayPal account we can donate money to in support of the killers?

    There's a spam I might click on... "Donate here to see other spammers killed". If we could just have all the others wiped out and only have to deal with the one 'toughest' spammer, mabye the Internet landscape would be nicer.

    Did I say all that out loud? Oops...

  306. Netcraft confirms it ... Vardan Kushni, dead at 54 by isorox · · Score: 1

    I just heard some sad news on talk radio - notorious spammer Vardan Kushni was found dead in his Moscow home this morning. There weren't any more details. I'm sure everyone in the Slashdot community will miss him - even if you didn't enjoy his work, there's no denying his contributions to popular culture. Truly an American icon.

  307. Yes, death is a little drastic... by meburke · · Score: 1

    I would have settled for just blinding him.

    --
    "The mind works quicker than you think!"
  308. Class... by AceCaseOR · · Score: 1

    this is why you keep your, *ahem*, "insurance" up to date. (Since, after all, you know the guy had to have ties to organized crime in one form or another).

    --
    Zagreus sits inside your head, Zagreus lives among the dead, Zagreus sees you in your bed and eats you in your sleep.
  309. Lots of people can't pronounce "th"s from English by billstewart · · Score: 1
    It's not just Russians - there are lots of languages that don't have a sound like the Engish voiced and unvoiced "th" sounds, and native speakers of those languages often have trouble. I've got a friend whose first two languages are Hungarian and German, and while she did learn to make those sounds, she complains that it was really hard to get it right. Irish speakers also traditionally had trouble with it, though that's probably less of a problem now that most of Ireland speaks English rather than Gaelic.

    Think about the classic New York / New Joisey accents with phrases like "Toity-Toid Street"...

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  310. can we find the killer.. by JustNiz · · Score: 1

    ..and send him some money?

  311. Russian Spammer murders in New Jersey by billstewart · · Score: 3, Informative

    A few years ago, a couple of Russian immigrants were found murdered in New Jersey. They were apparently spammers involved in a pump&dump stock scam. I don't think the crime was ever solved, but it was generally believed to be a Mafia deal (not sure if Russian Mafia or New York Traditional Mafia) by some investors who got burned.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:Russian Spammer murders in New Jersey by Winkhorst · · Score: 1

      Yes, unfortunately this is most probably evidence that even worse characters are trying to take over the spam industry from the currently only moderately evil ones. That said, I too have imagined just such an event, even down to the hammer. What else would we expect from the folks with the black helicopters from the Lumber Cartel? Like Hell TINLC!

      --
      "Is this Winkhorst a nova criminal?" "No just a technical sergeant wanted for interrogation."
    2. Re:Russian Spammer murders in New Jersey by Sniperca · · Score: 1

      Theres another reason it might have happened. If this guy was the biggest spammer in Russia. I bet his house was worth breaking into. And who wants to make bets on the first thing he did was pull a gun? Or fight in some way. So You are breaking into the house of a rich as***le. Are you going to go alone or with 2 or 3 buddies with bats?

  312. More detail here by Rizzer · · Score: 1

    The Moscow Times presents a far better article. It's more likely related to shady business practices than his spamming practices.

    http://www.moscowtimes.ru/stories/2005/07/26/003.h tml

  313. Re:That shouldn't happen. Likely just new owners by mikeabbotthome · · Score: 1

    I'm curious about the heinlein quote, google doesn't find it. where is it from?

  314. we be complete raving psychos? by RiffRafff · · Score: 1

    ...we be complete raving psychos.

    And what, exactly, were YOU doing last Sunday night???

    --
    "I might have made a tactical error in not going to a physician for 20 years." -- Warren Zevon
  315. Can we mass mail this article to ... by Archimboldo · · Score: 1

    Dennis Ralsky et al?

  316. We'll know this has really gained acceptance when by slappyjack · · Score: 1

    ...the death penalty has been instituted for people that wear "Big Johnson" and "Free moustache Rides" (or the more recent "SEX LESSONS: First lesson Free" updated version) t-shirts.

  317. What about hacking? by Poromenos1 · · Score: 1

    What about hacking? People feel that hackers that hack into companies' computers and steal/destroy data should be dealt with harsh penalties (there was an article about the death penalty), and everyone argued about how it was too much. I think that neither one deserves to die, but I am a bit bugged by the hypocrisy. Actually, I don't think it's hypocrisy, it's probably just the different point of view. A spammer would certainly have the opposite opinions.

    --
    Send email from the afterlife! Write your e-will at Dead Man's Switch.
    1. Re:What about hacking? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Can you point to any specific examples? What kind of "hacking" are you talking about anyway? The kind where someone breaks into a network and steals credit card numbers, or the kind where someone breaks into a network and sends the administrator an email telling him where a problem is in his network?

      Personally, if a hacker steals so much information (CC#s, etc) that it costs the economy hundreds of billions of dollars, and he makes it so that credit cards or some other useful tool are now almost useless for the entire population, then yes, I believe a brutal death penalty is warranted.

      However, if the hacker is just some kid trying to see if he can get into something he's not supposed to, and doesn't actually cause any real harm (no, pointing out that your system isn't as secure as you thought it was, and making you look bad somehow, is not "harm"), then no, I don't think there should be any penalty other than maybe a slap on the wrist.

      In the end, what's important about a crime is its effect on society, and penalties for crimes should be formulated according to this. One person who alone causes an enormous amount of economic damage to society through his abuse of a communication system most certainly deserves to be permanently removed from society.

  318. Anti-Spam by EliteTEK · · Score: 1

    Now that is what I call a Anti-Spam solutions. :)

    --
    o
  319. In Soviet Russia, they KNOW how to CAN SPAM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    .

    In Soviet Russia, they KNOW how to CAN SPAM. Gotta hand it to them ruskies. No pussy-footing around.

    .

  320. Confess.. by shadowmas · · Score: 1

    Ok. go on confess. which one of you slashdotters did it?

    any "in russia" jokes?

    1. Re:Confess.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Russia, Spam kills Spammer!

    2. Re:Confess.. by shawb · · Score: 1

      In Soviet Russia... e-mail users send unsolicited message to spammers???

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
  321. Was is spam by tacocat · · Score: 1

    Was he murdered because of his Spam or for some other reason?

    Good riddence to Bad Trash.

  322. slashdotting.. by shadowmas · · Score: 1

    nobody killed him. it was just a extreme case of slashdotting.... physically.

  323. I'll be damned... by Hosiah · · Score: 1

    A real-life LARTing! If you happen upon a sysadmin in an un-naturally good mood, that's probably the perpetrator.

  324. They just don't care by Tweak232 · · Score: 1

    I doubt it has anything to do with being crazy. It is more to do with the money & simply not knowing what morality is. The simple fact is, THEY DON'T CARE about how much they harm the internet. They are just out there to make money. Same with telemarketers.

    With this in mind: perhaps it would prove more effective if it was the morons that actually buy from these people that got brutally murdered.

    1. Re:They just don't care by plover · · Score: 1
      I don't even think it's a lack of caring. I think some of them truly believe they are causing no damage at all, and that they're being unfairly persecuted. They convince themselves that they're not evil, or they look at themselves simply a provider of a salable service to their customers.

      Of course, they're really ignorant, hick, syphillitic, sister-fscking morons with the morals of Rush Limbaugh faced with an oxycontin-laced chocolate cake and no witnesses, but still ...

      --
      John
  325. In honor of the departed by XStylus · · Score: 1

    I'll eat a can of spam in his honor. Consequentially, I'll then spend an hour on the shitter in his honor.

  326. Oh, alright by Craig_P92669 · · Score: 0

    In Soviet Russia, spammer kills you!

    --
    http://xs4.xs.to/pics/04481/p556222.gif
  327. Who does the fuckin' judging here??? by MrVelvet · · Score: 1

    Why does this rate a '0' and some bullshit replies that may be clever but offer little else rate mutch better??

  328. that's what TOEFL does to you! by damicha · · Score: 0

    `Englidh as a foreign language has, for a long time, been suspected to be lethal to law abiding people of their country of origin!

    I bet he had a 100$ TOEFL in all 4 sections!
    This is calling for a lobotomy!

    Get Engfish off the curricula!

    1. Re:that's what TOEFL does to you! by damicha · · Score: 0

      yes, I meant 100%, not 100#.....

      a TOEFL 100% pass is 15$ at the airport Hallmark store......

  329. 'Zat why I stopped getting spammed?? NMI by tudobem7051 · · Score: 1

    NMI

  330. An apt ending... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... for such an individual would be a severe bludgeoning to death by giant penises.

  331. War on Spam by ozTravman · · Score: 1

    I was thinking about the parallels between the war on terror and the war on spam. Since spamming has come a long we have had to introduce new email securities that were otherwise not required. They have created a culture where people are suspicious when their inbox says "169 Unread Messages" and now any email from a bank is looked at with suspicious eyes. Spammers have changed the face of the email world through their attacks.

  332. Great news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good, fuck him, fuck them all

  333. That should happen every time. by Ray+Alloc · · Score: 0

    For every spam that sucker has ever sent, one stab, one bullet, one blow, one spit, or whatever. Should be reduced in fermentating compost after that. Smelling turd. Good riddance. Ho, by the way, I'm already maintained at "bad karma" by someone who'd better stay unknown of me, so I don't care about being modded down, that's why I can express myself frankly. ahahah.

  334. 3 broken by Scott+Swezey · · Score: 1

    I for one am heartbroken over this... We were always in touch, some days I even got 2 messages from him. I don't know what my inbox will be like now...

    --
    Scott Swezey
    1. Re:3 broken by Scott+Swezey · · Score: 1

      My bad, title was meant to read "3 broken"

      Seems the filteres stripped my open bracket.

      --
      Scott Swezey
  335. One word by JudgeFurious · · Score: 1

    "Good"

    I'm sorry, that's just exactly how I feel about spammers. Spammers leave the world not one penny poorer for their passing.

    --
    Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
  336. It Couldn't Happen To a Nicer Guy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    He was a loving father and devoted to his customers, a spammer par excellence. I used him for years to market fake herbal viagra-like compounds. He made me millions and saved the marriages of thousands of feeble-minded spam-clicking foolbots that lurk on the Internet.

    We will miss him dearly, especially when we file our tax returns.

  337. Re:That shouldn't happen. Likely just new owners by plover · · Score: 1
    This is slashdot. That book was required reading for geeks in high school in the 1970s. Unfortunately my copy went missing years ago, likely during a move. Sigh. I enjoyed reading it even though the writing was pretty much hack.

    What I liked most about it is how it predated all current ideas about machine worms and viruses by several years. (I'm sure some researcher at MIT thought of this stuff in the 1960s, but hey, they didn't write the book now, did they?) I often wondered if Morris read the book before writing his infamous worm. Even news of Richard Skrenta's original Apple virus didn't get published until the early 1980s.

    --
    John
  338. Sometimes it's nice by maxrate · · Score: 1
    Sometimes it's nice when problems vanish.


    Russia, Fuck Yeah!

  339. No Russian SPAM this morning! by Timo_UK · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wow, thank you! I wonder if this is why?

    --
    Timo's Audio Software http://www.esseraudio.com
  340. Yes! by Vo0k · · Score: 1

    Yes! Yes! Yes! Yes! Yes! Yes!
    Go Murderers!

    --
    Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
  341. Russ Key by s-orbital · · Score: 1

    Is Russ Key your invention? I must say I love that thing. Thanks. You are now a friend.

    --
    Patent: from Latin patere, to be open
    1. Re:Russ Key by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      You are welcome.
      Enjoy.

  342. Not quite pedantic enough ;) by Generalisimo+Zang · · Score: 1

    The Warsaw Pact is no longer in effect.

    Especially since several of the signatory nations no longer even exist. (Soviet Union, Czechoslovakia, East Germany).

    So, if the definition of "Second World" is membership in the Warsaw Pact, then there are no longer any countries that fit that definition.

  343. Suspects identified by Mondor · · Score: 1

    Russian investigators identified about ten million suspects, including russian programmer Eugene Kaspersky.

  344. Only in Russia? by sjdude · · Score: 1
    "From what I understand, a lot of spammers, script kiddies, and crackers in Russia have connections to the mob."
    Who says that only Russian spammers, crackers, script kiddies, etc. have mob connections?
  345. Re:Good ... yes but we must set an example by chawly · · Score: 1

    A fair and public trial first. Then hang the twerp immediately afterwards - still in public; so that we can see that justice has been done. Garroting could be an alternative for major offenders, since this can be performed at different speeds - not only would the punishment fit the crime, but it could be modified to fit the quantity of crime committed.

    --
    How many beans make five, anyhow ? ... Charles Walmsley
  346. Re:We need a "Do Not Blugeon To Death" List by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 1

    The only problem with this idea is that if you sign up to this list you're likely to receive more bludgeoning, and the list will probably be on-sold so you'll get pummelings, beatings and poundings as well.

    --
    Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
  347. Re:This is why its a bad ideas to piss off psychos by ben_rh · · Score: 1

    Why not just outlaw killing? Solve the problem directly.

    Oh, hang on.

  348. He was just robbed by dallaylaen · · Score: 1

    He was just robbed, no connection to spam or mafia, as CNews Russia reports.

    The police says that he was dating three girls, and they opened the door to robbers. The man tried to defend himself and got killed.

    They (the police) have also found some women's clothes in the apartment. His money and credit cards were stolen. One of the girls is currently arrested (well, they arrested *some* girl and suspect she has something to do with the incident).

    The most ironic part is that the Center of American English reports that they'll "continue our daily operations". Don't they care for their carma? Sounds as funny as something homicide-related can be...

    P.S. Very rough translation and poor English, but I'm writing this in a hurry -- I must return to work now :))

    --
    WYSIWIG, but what you see might not be what you need
  349. Completely wrong... by antek9 · · Score: 1

    It should rather be:
    In Soviet Russia, SPAM deletes YOU!

    Hopefully the only In Soviet Russia... post I'll ever do.

    --
    A World in a Grain of Sand / Heaven in a Wild Flower,
    Infinity in the Palm of your Hand / And Eternity in an Hour.
  350. So What? by saudadelinux · · Score: 1

    Please demonstrate how the world is a better place with such people in it.

    --
    I didn't think the house band in Hell would play this badly.
  351. I believe the word is "eager", not "rough" by Pac · · Score: 1

    In the richest Western countries, the most important criminals now come from families with centuries of criminal tradition. A long time ago their grand-grand parents started out-sourcing the less savory edges of the business and buying themselves large mansions, country club memberships and table manners lessons. So now, many generations afterwards, if you don't pay attention, what you see looking at them are ordinary run-of-the-mill lawyers, CEOs and MPs/Congresspeople. They necessarily lost much of their past eagerness, they look less greedy and more civilised - the past crimes leading to their fortunes are all but forgotten and hidden in a mist of heroic capitalist legend.

    But one shouldn't be fooled by appearences - anytime their position, their money or their ambitions are somehow at stake the old blood speaks louder and the "rough" edges show - albeilt, again, safely out-sourced down the food chain.

    I think it is the same in every "developing" country (I write from Brazil). The mandatory "primordial capitalist accumulation" (as Marx would put it, more or less) must be fed with oceans of blood and tears, until we get to the point where the criminals rich enough to re-write History as fairy-tale.

  352. When you live beyond the reach of the law ... by willtsmith · · Score: 1

    Ya know those AOL anti-spammer commercials really piss me off. Because what should REALLY happen to that guy bothering people is two big security guards should come out and beat the SOB within an inch of his life.

    When you live beyond the reach of the law, don't be surprised if the law doesn't protect you.

    Good bye and good riddens. This is a cathartic experience.

    --
    -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
  353. Update from the Russian Police by Vadim+Makarov · · Score: 2, Informative
    Well, the killing turned out to be an ordinary bulgrary gone awry. Here is a preliminary information from the police (in Russian). Sorry for disappointing those who hoped it's a revenge for spam, and also those who thought it's the dreaded Russian mafia. It is neither.

    According to the police, he acquinted three women in a night club and invited them to his flat. The women mixed in a strong dormitive medication into wine ("Clofeline", traditionally ised in such scenarios by the crime) and, when the Mr. Kushnir went asleep, opened the door to accomplices. Unfurtunately, the dose of dormitive was not sufficient. Mr. Kushnir woke up and a fight ensued, during which he was beaten to death. A laptop, money and credit cards are missing from his flat. Also an underdress were left by one of the women in hurry. This is the only version the Police is considering now.

    The article also says his company exists since 2000 and has had an anuual turnaround of mere $100,000-120,000. Its spamming activity was so visible that it got under investigation by the government, but no action was made against it due to the lack of aplicable laws. To avoid being charged in Russia, the company sent all its spams via an offshore company located (guess where!!!) in the USA. It also says the quality of language education the company has offered is reported to be quite low, with a high turnover of teachers (because they stop paying salary to everyone after a couple first months of employment) and no coherent education program. It only stayed afloat because of endless spamming.

    --
    17779 eligible voters in a district, 17779 'vote' as one. This is Russia.
  354. Good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    May this happen to all the scumbags who pollute my inbox.

  355. Who cares about Russians? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Boo hoo. Russians are basically the Mexicans of Europe: lazy, corrupt, drunk, violent asshole mobsters. And in immigrant form too, may I add! Fuck Russia.

    So yes, an e-mail lost to the clutter of spam is equal to the lives of 358,550,772,500 Russians. Since there are only 143,420,309 raccoon-hat-wearing-fuckers, so who gives a shit about Russia? I want to read my farking e-mail, dammit >_<

  356. Re:That shouldn't happen. Likely just new owners by mink · · Score: 1

    Lots of us have. Some more recently then others. I first read it back in the early 90's when I found a dog eared water dammaged paperback edition.

    I rank it up there with "Code of the Lifemaker" in top list.

    --
    Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  357. Re:That shouldn't happen. Likely just new owners by JackCroww · · Score: 1

    Well, how old-timer is 38? I'm certainly not as much an old-timer as you are here. ;) I just re-read Adolescence about two months ago, and then went searching in vain for anything else by the author (Thomas J. Ryan, I beleive). Sadly, nothing else.

    --
    "Ayn Rand is a bloody socialist compared to me." - Robert A. Heinlein
  358. thank god by brinkzor · · Score: 1

    am i the only one who felt genuine joy from hearing this? let this be a trend that continues,

  359. Re:That shouldn't happen. Likely just new owners by JackCroww · · Score: 1

    I must have remembered it wrong:

    Here

    It really was:
    "Ayn Rand is a bloody socialist compared to me."

    Much better.

    --
    "Ayn Rand is a bloody socialist compared to me." - Robert A. Heinlein
  360. Re:And... - simple 'meatspace' junkmail solution by iamcf13 · · Score: 1

    Sinus0idal: hmmm anti spam packages for sneaker net. Maybe slapping the postman each time he posts a spam letter. He'd soon learn to sort out the spam first..

    colinrichardday: Not a good idea in the US. Interfering with mail delivery is a serious offense.

    No need to attack the mailman for junk postal mail, just have a trashcan/paper recycling bin next to the maildrop. When you get your mail, drop the 'Occupant', 'To Our Friends At' - style paper mail into the trash/recycle bin.

    Too bad the postman can't do that before they deliver your mail -- that'd be tampering with the mail as well.

    P.S. for an added bonus, if they had a industrial strength document shredder handy, those annoying credit card solicitations could be destroyed on the spot instead of taken home and destroyed there....

  361. Re:And... - simple 'meatspace' junkmail solution by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

    My apartment complex has such a receptacle, and I use it.