or you could just say that the big bang and evolution are the means that God used in creationism. if i create a program to find the nth digit of a pattern, have i found the nth digit or created a program that would create the answer? both
and teaching that evolution proves that God does not exist has no bearing in a science class either. i'm pretty sure that's why a lot of people hate evolution--so many other people try to use it as proof that religion is wrong.
it's like someone yelling, "linux sucks it has no driver support" and then everyone else going, "shut the fuck up n00b, M$ is teh sux, we don't need drivers we plug periphials directly into our brains"
newer generations might see this as "wow i should hate driver support" same thing with evolution, people resent it because others have used it as flamebait
i agree if a population is a percent then that race should be shown in the setting in that percent if the story is going for any kind of credibility and realism.
and the future thing... i merely meant compared to the past such as in norse mythology
haha retard. i was merely pointing out a logical reason for lack of heroic warriors that are black. geez. if a game set in the future then ok i expect to see some black people and white people and a couple of asians but you can't just go changing something to make people feel more included. if some game was about warfare in africa i wouldn't expect malaysian guys to be running around with tomahawks and boys and arrows dressed in samurai outfits, you see?
they messed up the fucking triforce! how hard is it to draw a pixelated triangle? ok pretty hard and he probably had his skin stretched a little but still, he had it traced so the lines should've matched up a lot better than they did.
LMAO you just clumped American Indian culture into one big category. that's pretty, ya know, whatever and stuff. i forgot the rest of my post but something about the only way to show someone is of a certain background is to play into a stereotype or else it's just a white guy with slighlty off-color skin. and in that case he would be considered too white and therefor that would be racist because the developers would try to be saying that everyone should act white.
i was thinking more along the lines of someone 'playfully' punching someone else harder than they actually realize due to the force not being something that would hurt him
second: you said "Quit spelling things wrong." which is hilarious because wrong is not an adverb, and since you are telling how things are being spelled you should've used "incorrectly".
but the rest of your post i agree with, except for bryen because that's just a cool way of spelling it
how is there not anything that is "genuinely free"? i've received lots of free things in my life, including most of the lunches i've ever eaten throughout my entire life
or you could just say that the big bang and evolution are the means that God used in creationism. if i create a program to find the nth digit of a pattern, have i found the nth digit or created a program that would create the answer? both
and teaching that evolution proves that God does not exist has no bearing in a science class either. i'm pretty sure that's why a lot of people hate evolution--so many other people try to use it as proof that religion is wrong.
it's like someone yelling, "linux sucks it has no driver support"
and then everyone else going, "shut the fuck up n00b, M$ is teh sux, we don't need drivers we plug periphials directly into our brains"
newer generations might see this as "wow i should hate driver support"
same thing with evolution, people resent it because others have used it as flamebait
w00t awesome.
though hollywood is such a piece of shit, how can they say no to microsoft? what a bunch of newbies
i agree if a population is a percent then that race should be shown in the setting in that percent if the story is going for any kind of credibility and realism.
and the future thing... i merely meant compared to the past such as in norse mythology
haha retard. i was merely pointing out a logical reason for lack of heroic warriors that are black. geez. if a game set in the future then ok i expect to see some black people and white people and a couple of asians but you can't just go changing something to make people feel more included. if some game was about warfare in africa i wouldn't expect malaysian guys to be running around with tomahawks and boys and arrows dressed in samurai outfits, you see?
they messed up the fucking triforce! how hard is it to draw a pixelated triangle? ok pretty hard and he probably had his skin stretched a little but still, he had it traced so the lines should've matched up a lot better than they did.
LMAO you just clumped American Indian culture into one big category. that's pretty, ya know, whatever and stuff. i forgot the rest of my post but something about the only way to show someone is of a certain background is to play into a stereotype or else it's just a white guy with slighlty off-color skin. and in that case he would be considered too white and therefor that would be racist because the developers would try to be saying that everyone should act white.
yeh there're so many black people in norse mythology
haha you did fail it!!
but won't email give cancer to peaceful iraqi rioters?
and what's wrong with that? you intolerant clod!
using gps to track the sun? way to go!
p.s. won't this give cancer to peacful iraqi rioters?
the boondock saints
but won't the printers give cancer to peaceful iraqi rioters??
i was thinking more along the lines of someone 'playfully' punching someone else harder than they actually realize due to the force not being something that would hurt him
it also desensitizes very strong people to pain, which is always a good idea right?
but will it give cancer to peaceful iraqi rioters??
but won't it cause cancer in peaceful iraqi rioters??!
as donnie darko already explained, smurfs wouldn't have genitalia since they're asexual
first: he already corrected him
second: you said "Quit spelling things wrong." which is hilarious because wrong is not an adverb, and since you are telling how things are being spelled you should've used "incorrectly".
but the rest of your post i agree with, except for bryen because that's just a cool way of spelling it
will this cause cancer in peaceful iraqi rioters?
yes but will the hot coffee mod cause cancer in peaceful iraqi rioters?
a la this
how is there not anything that is "genuinely free"? i've received lots of free things in my life, including most of the lunches i've ever eaten throughout my entire life
actually if the quotation marks are used for a word or phrase and not a quote then the punctuation goes outside, right?
you stupid fucking cocksucking douche