Yep. I initially parsed it like Cash-Poor (adj) Sharp (adj) Mortgages (plural noun) Display (verb) Factories (plural noun) and was thoroughly confused. English is not my mother tongue though.
1) Ignoring the current regimes that claim to be Islamic (adherent Islamic government died at the end of WWI and was replaced with UK/US backed tinpot puppet regimes like the Saudis), in the history of Islamic governments that actually adhered to the rules, there have been less than 10 recorded cases of authorities actually carrying out hand-chopping. That's less than 10 in 1,300 years of dilligently recorded history.
What is the current situation with multitrack audio and MIDI recording for Android? Is it feasible? What about latency problems? Share your experience.
When you don't have all those files on your HD, you avoid getting caught for copyright infringement in certain scenarios. Where I live, you are much more likely to get caught for posessing infringing files on your PC than for streaming them from somewhere (in fact, I haven't heard about any cases of the latter).
The best non-free one is Softmaker Office. Multi-platform support, low price, almost perfect compatibility and good old menu-based UI. What you don't get with it is macro recorder - you have to write macros yourself in a VBA-like language called BasicMaker. And BasicMaker is Windows-only.
Depends on the kind of the economic theory. I guess you're, as usual in such cases, imputing to me some assumptions about perfect blah-blah-blah which I never made.
The number of sellers on a market at a specific moment of time is irrelevant. There may even be only one seller, and that is not a problem, as long as this seller does not prevent others from competing by coercion. Any non-coercive "monopoly" or "oligopoly" stays as long as the consumers allow it by voting with their wallets. Any so-called "anti-competitive" economic measures taken by a seller necessarily bring some direct or indirect benefit to a certain group of consumers (though maybe not always on the same market), and if the potential newcomers cannot offer something better, that's their problem.
Without the possibility of big bucks buying regulations (the blame for which lies mostly on the design of the government), the "tilt" you mention is not a problem since it is basically of the same nature as say the "tilt" in favor of strong and handsome men on the "sex market". You should not automatically be entitled for a specific warranty period, but should be informed of it, and the businesses should have the opportunity to also compete on this factor. As far as misinformation goes, that should be taken care of by reputation mechanisms.
In a meaningless sense - akin to "there is no society without theft" - free market indeed doesn't exist. However, this doesn't mean that we shouldn't make the existing market more free than it is now (or combat theft, by the analogy used here).
But then I think most people intend to profit from their education - if what courts agree with that notion? I admit I'm completely ignorant as to the actual legal meaning of "nonprofit educational purposes".
Yep. I initially parsed it like Cash-Poor (adj) Sharp (adj) Mortgages (plural noun) Display (verb) Factories (plural noun) and was thoroughly confused. English is not my mother tongue though.
Regarding "must": http://speakspeak.com/resources/english-grammar-rules/modal-verbs/must-have-to
Yes, it's just my opinion, and I'm definitely no system designer, just a consumer. So I welcome your correction.
As for my signature, it's not about economics but about ethics.
It seems to me that this must increase stress on the lid-to-base joint leading to earlier failures.
It looks like this laptop rests on the protruding lid edge when the lid is open instead of lying flat on the base. Not sure I like that design.
1) Ignoring the current regimes that claim to be Islamic (adherent Islamic government died at the end of WWI and was replaced with UK/US backed tinpot puppet regimes like the Saudis), in the history of Islamic governments that actually adhered to the rules, there have been less than 10 recorded cases of authorities actually carrying out hand-chopping. That's less than 10 in 1,300 years of dilligently recorded history.
"No True Scotsman"
But see, they're writers, not readers!
Now add to that a typo of mine. Patronymic, not "patronimic".
Should be Olegovich and Viktorovich.
No, it's a simple syllable transposition "Putin - (k)hui" (Russian for "Putin is a dick") -> "(K)Hutin - pui".
What is the current situation with multitrack audio and MIDI recording for Android? Is it feasible? What about latency problems? Share your experience.
It's strictly non-commercial use, no?
When you don't have all those files on your HD, you avoid getting caught for copyright infringement in certain scenarios. Where I live, you are much more likely to get caught for posessing infringing files on your PC than for streaming them from somewhere (in fact, I haven't heard about any cases of the latter).
Cool, I will consider it.
Wait, your Sony laptop runs 12-15 hours on a charge with every peripheral connected wirelessly? Which model would that be?
"Russia, a land free of job killing market strangling regulation"
You clearly have no clue about Russia.
The best non-free one is Softmaker Office. Multi-platform support, low price, almost perfect compatibility and good old menu-based UI. What you don't get with it is macro recorder - you have to write macros yourself in a VBA-like language called BasicMaker. And BasicMaker is Windows-only.
There's none, I'm afraid.
Depends on the kind of the economic theory. I guess you're, as usual in such cases, imputing to me some assumptions about perfect blah-blah-blah which I never made.
You now have an opportunity to show how great at chess you are.
The number of sellers on a market at a specific moment of time is irrelevant. There may even be only one seller, and that is not a problem, as long as this seller does not prevent others from competing by coercion. Any non-coercive "monopoly" or "oligopoly" stays as long as the consumers allow it by voting with their wallets. Any so-called "anti-competitive" economic measures taken by a seller necessarily bring some direct or indirect benefit to a certain group of consumers (though maybe not always on the same market), and if the potential newcomers cannot offer something better, that's their problem.
Without the possibility of big bucks buying regulations (the blame for which lies mostly on the design of the government), the "tilt" you mention is not a problem since it is basically of the same nature as say the "tilt" in favor of strong and handsome men on the "sex market". You should not automatically be entitled for a specific warranty period, but should be informed of it, and the businesses should have the opportunity to also compete on this factor. As far as misinformation goes, that should be taken care of by reputation mechanisms.
That does NOT exist.
In a meaningless sense - akin to "there is no society without theft" - free market indeed doesn't exist. However, this doesn't mean that we shouldn't make the existing market more free than it is now (or combat theft, by the analogy used here).
Recently, the Swiss successfully voted on not increasing the number of vacation days and not regulating book prices.
But then I think most people intend to profit from their education - if what courts agree with that notion? I admit I'm completely ignorant as to the actual legal meaning of "nonprofit educational purposes".
grow a pair and us them
Us them, or they will them us!