I'm sorry to say that you're wrong on most accounts.
Astrophotography did exist and Bonilla took a photograph of the phenomenon. No, the telescope was not aimed by hand. And no he wasn't the only guy observing the sun at that time.
For those interested, here is a drawing of a swarm of cranes, observed on the solar disk with "slow motion": http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k209642v/f72 (this is from the same journal, L'Astronomie, which is on line on the Gallica web site)
It is reported that people suspected the earth atmosphere to be responsable for many sights of objects seen across the solar disk. In this paper, the author believed at first he was observing metors. From the size of the birds (assumed to be 1 meter), he calculated they were flying at a height of 9 km.
'You can't really prevent these [brute force] attacks: nothing prevents an attacker to just try all possible keys and look if the database decrypts. But what we can do (and KeePass does) is to make it harder: by adding a constant work factor to the key initialization, we can make them as hard as we want."
To protect its database (of passwords), the program actually performs N rounds of AES encryption, with N being a large number of your choice, chosen so that these rounds take "a lot of time", say 1 second. This way, the attacker will only test 1 password per second.
The last time I checked, the error on GPS altitude was significantly larger than the horizontal error. However here you're writing about vertical speed, which could be more accurate than the altitude. Since it is not used for measuring the descent rate, my guess is that is is not reliable enough when other instruments are available.
I remember seing a german paper record player like this one in the eighties. It was voice only and I was amazed. The sound on this one isn't that great.
There is an other design with a paper-cone.
The "3D" effect isn't binary: it can be adjusted.
It would be interesting to study how headaches change when the 3D effect is increased from zero to max by increments.
Maybe a small 3D effect can be immersive without the headaches.
On the Application for Windows Guru page, I read
"If you have any difficulties with this form, please email Jobs@mswindowsguru.com"
I didn't know that Steve worked for Microsoft.
Hilarious!
The satellite was confirmed to be in good health through telemetry data received at the Usuda station. Hmmm. The moon's doing fine ? Yes, I already know that.
I agree with the binocular advice. Since you do not say if you are interested by planetary astrophotography vs. deep sky, let met add that a Webcam turns out to be a perfect device for planetary astrophotography. Let me quote the following website (http://sctscopes.net/Photo_Basics/Webcams_for_Planets/webcams_for_planets.html) "It takes a whole bunch of frames (i.e. photos) in a row, and all that's needed is software to accumulate the photos, decide which ones are good, and stack them together to create a good planetary photograph. During the recent historical Mars opposition, many astrophotographers created amazing photographs of Mars using Webcams."
Slashdot Mirror
I'm sorry to say that you're wrong on most accounts.
Astrophotography did exist and Bonilla took a photograph of the phenomenon.
No, the telescope was not aimed by hand.
And no he wasn't the only guy observing the sun at that time.
Source: http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k2096403/f351
The 2011 paper can be read here: http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1110/1110.2798.pdf
Bonilla's 1885 paper can be read here: http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k2096403/f351
The original paper, published in 1885 in L'Astronomie can be read online here: http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k2096403
For those interested, here is a drawing of a swarm of cranes, observed on the solar disk with "slow motion": http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k209642v/f72 (this is from the same journal, L'Astronomie, which is on line on the Gallica web site) It is reported that people suspected the earth atmosphere to be responsable for many sights of objects seen across the solar disk. In this paper, the author believed at first he was observing metors. From the size of the birds (assumed to be 1 meter), he calculated they were flying at a height of 9 km.
They claim they are confident about the distance to within 20 cm.
It is claimed that the paper is on arxiv but I can't find it.
'You can't really prevent these [brute force] attacks: nothing prevents an attacker to just try all possible keys and look if the database decrypts. But what we can do (and KeePass does) is to make it harder: by adding a constant work factor to the key initialization, we can make them as hard as we want."
To protect its database (of passwords), the program actually performs N rounds of AES encryption, with N being a large number of your choice, chosen so that these rounds take "a lot of time", say 1 second. This way, the attacker will only test 1 password per second.
Does this make sense ?
The last time I checked, the error on GPS altitude was significantly larger than the horizontal error. However here you're writing about vertical speed, which could be more accurate than the altitude. Since it is not used for measuring the descent rate, my guess is that is is not reliable enough when other instruments are available.
Not at all. What matters is airspeed. GPS just doesn't provide it.
Another occurence of this type of error happened before in the Calipari Report
I remember seing a german paper record player like this one in the eighties. It was voice only and I was amazed. The sound on this one isn't that great. There is an other design with a paper-cone.
Agreed. It would work as is if the camera was detached from the display and the display rotated to always be in the normal direction.
He's not on Mercury: you can find him on asteroid B612
The "3D" effect isn't binary: it can be adjusted. It would be interesting to study how headaches change when the 3D effect is increased from zero to max by increments. Maybe a small 3D effect can be immersive without the headaches.
Personally, I'd leave it to a coackroach (http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/07/03/0426258) to park my car/bus/van.
On the Application for Windows Guru page, I read "If you have any difficulties with this form, please email Jobs@mswindowsguru.com" I didn't know that Steve worked for Microsoft. Hilarious!
So what does Roland's blog say about this ? I can't wait !
Moderate parent up, please. This is not news for nerds. And it doesn't matter the least.
Use a serial number scheme and post a non functional "crack" on p2p networks.
Point Google Earth to: 4720'53'',00530' 55'' for the emission site.
The screenshot (along with photos) is here: http://www.european-security.com/index.php?id=5669
I agree with the binocular advice.
Since you do not say if you are interested by planetary astrophotography vs. deep sky, let met add that a Webcam turns out to be a perfect device for planetary astrophotography.
Let me quote the following website (http://sctscopes.net/Photo_Basics/Webcams_for_Planets/webcams_for_planets.html)
"It takes a whole bunch of frames (i.e. photos) in a row, and all that's needed is software to accumulate the photos, decide which ones are good, and stack them together to create a good planetary photograph. During the recent historical Mars opposition, many astrophotographers created amazing photographs of Mars using Webcams."
Anyone knows how to turn off the "before" layer ? Viewing both layers at once makes the picture very dark and features are hard to figure out. Thanks.
For the rest of the world,
250 miles per gallon = 0.94 liters par 100km.
That needed to be said.