When reading the memo, I had the clear expression that he claims that conservative men are better programmers and engineers than women who are more communicative. These statements are both statistical false.
Why? I do not need to like Bruce Perens to read his opinion and evaluate whether I agree with him or disagree. By concept it should even be irrelevant for my evaluation how sane his previous comments were. Linus Torvalds can also be a 'dick', but still is competent regarding the topic of Linux kernel development.
First of all: what are real people? In the sense of the vocabulary, real people exist while imaginary people only exist in one's mind. The latter do not need encryption. Real people do. However, she might have meant normal people. Unfortunately, she is an upper class person and therefore does not know normal people or at least have forgotten how they think an live and what their needs are. Therefore, it is either a lie or typical upper class narcicism or both.
Normal people want to do banking or trading or legal stuff. All these things work only with encryption. They even want to send pictures to their friends and family and keep the images away from evil people who prank them who blackmail them etc.
Your argument does not counter the prrvious one. While the perilous argument points out that universities communicate the state of science, you claim companies expect it to be training for practice. Therefore, they make the same error as students who think a university us a job training center. However, as an academic you should be able to transfer science knowledge to practice by yourself.
That sounds like Mexicans are stealing jobs, but they do not. US employers do not want to pay high salaries. Therefore, they want cheap labor, which they cannot get in the US, as normal US citizens want to be in played a living wage.
while the label might indicate that you are only responsible for software and the other layers do not need to concern you, this is not true for real software engineers, as the design and selection of hardware (execution environments, networking etc.) is also part of your job description. You are often not an operator, but you need to think about operation as well. In the first year of your studies, you might learned all the stuff which is relevant for operations on a basic level. Also you are an academic. Therefore, you can learn the rest on the fly. This means you have to adapt to the various needs which are presented to you. You should have been involved in that phone system purchase.
Please note: Do not become the guy who values the smooth operation of the system higher than the utility to the users. If no one can do something useful with the provided services, they are dysfunctional regardless, you did not have a crash in years.
You are correct. Maybe my statement was a little misleading. Anyway, your IDE can understand that x spaces are one tab. However, it will mess up when you set up the conversion wrongly.
Really guys I am from Germany. I do not know where you get your history lessons from. The NSDAP was a fascist party. They were not founded by communists or socialists. They were founded in 1920. Their key points were: "Abolition of the Versailles treaty"," withdrawal of the German citizenship of Jews" and "strengthening of the Volksgemeinschaft" (engl. the German people's body, in the meaning of all Germans are just one thing with a leader at the top who knows best). The party program also propagated the union of all German, which included the fusion with Austria and the annexation of neighboring territories. They were forbidden in 1923 after they tried to gain power. Hitler was send to prison were he wrote his famous piece of rubbish called "Mein Kampf" (My Fight/Struggle). No one in Germany, beside Mrs. Erika Steinbach (who would like to have territory back from Poland), would EVER suggest that the Nazis are from the left.
Nazis did not expropriated entire industries, they stole from Jews regardless their occupation. For example, they did not nationalize banking. Instead they pushed Jews out of banks and other banks profited from that. Therefore, it did not cover the whole industry, but it covered all Jews. Furthermore, capitalism is usually associated with people, like Adam Smith, and is a Christian protestant invention. The idea of Jews being evil is a fascist view. While it is true that Stalin also hated Jews, he also stomped on socialistic values. The Russian had a very national socialism. However, do not mix Soviet Russia with Germany.
You also claim that they primarily imprisoned social democrats. They first fought communists/socialists and unions on the street. When in power they first imprisoned communists, unionists and then they tried to grab full power which work with the help of the conservatives. Then they imprisoned social democrats. At the time the voted for Hitlers "enabling act" the communists were all in prison. So only the social democrats voted against the act.
Liberal and left are two different things. You US-Americans have to learn the difference between liberalism (that is what liberals want) and socialism (that is what some left people want). Most left people in the EU want a social-market economy, which allows for capitalism where it is helpful and regulate it so all people can have a descend living. Anyway, why do you think so many scientists appear to you as left wing? Here is my explanation. In science you have to come up with an hypothesis, you have then provide a way to test it. If you are able to disprove it, it is false. If the test holds, your hypothesis is considered "not (yet) false". To build a theory, you need a set of hypotheses which do not contradict each other and are all testable and not false, or derived from other hypotheses which fulfill this requirement. Science also teaches us to question believes, because believes are subjective and cannot be used to understand the world objectively.
Believe is something relevant in religion. As it subjective it can also hold absolute truth for the believer. However, this truth is subjective. Therefore, be not surprised when other people have other believes.
Oh you are almost there or even surpassed it. Idiocracy portraits a country where everyone has something to eat and something to do. There is no hunger. True they are all stupid, but hey, somehow it works. They even have general health care (as long as you have a bar code). Present day, US does not have that. Instead it randomly threatens allies and friends and enemies. Also it insults other people and countries.
Look Dan East you claim that the term "higher education" does comprise more than colleges and universities. Nice claim. Then give at least one example what you think is high education, like Bible schools or gangs in Chicago. As long as you cannot provide substantial examples, you are saying nothing.
The Nazis named the party as national socialist party, but as you know a label does not mean it describes the contents correctly. Furthermore, they put communists and social democrats in concentration camps and did a lot of big business with corporations in Germany. There was nothing socialistic in their agenda. They even classified people in a wide range of different levels of value.
In medival times in Europe, the Islamic world had its golden age. They advanced mathematics, astronomy etc. They were real science guys. Unfortunately, some Muslim cleric came up with the idea that manipulating numbers is from the devil. This idea became widespread and killed off science. That is why they retreated. Fortunately for us, Europe went through the Renaissance and developed 'enlightenment'.
Nowadays people disregard science and people who advance science. In the US they even fight science. Looks like they want to deindustrialize the USA. This would not be an issue for the rest if the world, but the same Waco's have nuclear weapons.
It might be that US citizens do not carry money around. However, in other countries it is common to use cash. Also even if robbed, cash is not a problem when being robbed. You just hand over the money. If you have a credit card and the thief wants to know the PIN number, and you do not know it, that could be nasty.
People behave like Facebook and Twitter is only read by their family and friends. The EU is acknowledging this behavior. You imply that people are rational. The are not and we in the EU take this illogical and emotional behavior into account. And no disagreement is not a hate crime, as we also have free speech.
They did not debunk their own study. It is/. and other media outlets who report the results not as portrait in the publication. Typical bullshitting of the press.
The original publication does not suggest any causation. This is media reporting wrong on science.
The people processed long time research data. The result is that coffee does not have severe negative effects otherwise the correlation would have been different. However, THIS DOES NOT IMPLY THE OPPOSITE, which is any positive health effect from coffee. The scientists also pointed out that such effects cannot be determined by the used approach at all.
The study does that just fine. It is the fucking article "for the public" which transforms a correlation into causation. The only thing which we learn from the study is. Coffee does not shorten live significantly otherwise such effect would have been visible.
The study suggests that people who drink coffee are also people who live longer. Whether this is the effect of coffee, a socio-economic effect, or an indirect correlation, i.e., someone who drinks coffee also has a potential healthier lifestyle or even people who like coffee a in general healthier. This report on slashdot is a typical exaggeration of scientific results by media outlets, which are misleading and affect how the public see science. For example, next week another study suggests something opposite (for the same reason). Then scientists look like guessing around having no clue and that science is something, like an opinion. Everyone has one and they can be different. No one knows what is true.
Because unregulated capitalism destroys nature, social structures and ruins culture. Therefore, we apply new rules here and there until we found out a way of economics which does not have these issues and still support freedom, equality and social support.
Slashdot Mirror
When reading the memo, I had the clear expression that he claims that conservative men are better programmers and engineers than women who are more communicative. These statements are both statistical false.
They want to become a carrier of their own. Why use a carrier if you can be a monopoly in the business.
Why? I do not need to like Bruce Perens to read his opinion and evaluate whether I agree with him or disagree. By concept it should even be irrelevant for my evaluation how sane his previous comments were. Linus Torvalds can also be a 'dick', but still is competent regarding the topic of Linux kernel development.
First of all: what are real people? In the sense of the vocabulary, real people exist while imaginary people only exist in one's mind. The latter do not need encryption. Real people do. However, she might have meant normal people. Unfortunately, she is an upper class person and therefore does not know normal people or at least have forgotten how they think an live and what their needs are. Therefore, it is either a lie or typical upper class narcicism or both.
Normal people want to do banking or trading or legal stuff. All these things work only with encryption. They even want to send pictures to their friends and family and keep the images away from evil people who prank them who blackmail them etc.
Your argument does not counter the prrvious one. While the perilous argument points out that universities communicate the state of science, you claim companies expect it to be training for practice. Therefore, they make the same error as students who think a university us a job training center. However, as an academic you should be able to transfer science knowledge to practice by yourself.
That sounds like Mexicans are stealing jobs, but they do not. US employers do not want to pay high salaries. Therefore, they want cheap labor, which they cannot get in the US, as normal US citizens want to be in played a living wage.
He is. Mexicans are also Americans. Look on a map. In addition they are low skilled. They cannot take the jobs of the superior race if US Americans.
Dear Software Engineer,
while the label might indicate that you are only responsible for software and the other layers do not need to concern you, this is not true for real software engineers, as the design and selection of hardware (execution environments, networking etc.) is also part of your job description. You are often not an operator, but you need to think about operation as well. In the first year of your studies, you might learned all the stuff which is relevant for operations on a basic level. Also you are an academic. Therefore, you can learn the rest on the fly. This means you have to adapt to the various needs which are presented to you. You should have been involved in that phone system purchase.
Please note: Do not become the guy who values the smooth operation of the system higher than the utility to the users. If no one can do something useful with the provided services, they are dysfunctional regardless, you did not have a crash in years.
You are correct. Maybe my statement was a little misleading. Anyway, your IDE can understand that x spaces are one tab. However, it will mess up when you set up the conversion wrongly.
Really guys I am from Germany. I do not know where you get your history lessons from. The NSDAP was a fascist party. They were not founded by communists or socialists. They were founded in 1920. Their key points were: "Abolition of the Versailles treaty"," withdrawal of the German citizenship of Jews" and "strengthening of the Volksgemeinschaft" (engl. the German people's body, in the meaning of all Germans are just one thing with a leader at the top who knows best). The party program also propagated the union of all German, which included the fusion with Austria and the annexation of neighboring territories. They were forbidden in 1923 after they tried to gain power. Hitler was send to prison were he wrote his famous piece of rubbish called "Mein Kampf" (My Fight/Struggle). No one in Germany, beside Mrs. Erika Steinbach (who would like to have territory back from Poland), would EVER suggest that the Nazis are from the left.
Nazis did not expropriated entire industries, they stole from Jews regardless their occupation. For example, they did not nationalize banking. Instead they pushed Jews out of banks and other banks profited from that. Therefore, it did not cover the whole industry, but it covered all Jews. Furthermore, capitalism is usually associated with people, like Adam Smith, and is a Christian protestant invention. The idea of Jews being evil is a fascist view. While it is true that Stalin also hated Jews, he also stomped on socialistic values. The Russian had a very national socialism. However, do not mix Soviet Russia with Germany.
You also claim that they primarily imprisoned social democrats. They first fought communists/socialists and unions on the street. When in power they first imprisoned communists, unionists and then they tried to grab full power which work with the help of the conservatives. Then they imprisoned social democrats. At the time the voted for Hitlers "enabling act" the communists were all in prison. So only the social democrats voted against the act.
The cool thing is in modern IDEs , you press tab, but the machine uses spaces. Also this git thingy can transform that for you automatically.
Liberal and left are two different things. You US-Americans have to learn the difference between liberalism (that is what liberals want) and socialism (that is what some left people want). Most left people in the EU want a social-market economy, which allows for capitalism where it is helpful and regulate it so all people can have a descend living. Anyway, why do you think so many scientists appear to you as left wing? Here is my explanation. In science you have to come up with an hypothesis, you have then provide a way to test it. If you are able to disprove it, it is false. If the test holds, your hypothesis is considered "not (yet) false". To build a theory, you need a set of hypotheses which do not contradict each other and are all testable and not false, or derived from other hypotheses which fulfill this requirement. Science also teaches us to question believes, because believes are subjective and cannot be used to understand the world objectively.
Believe is something relevant in religion. As it subjective it can also hold absolute truth for the believer. However, this truth is subjective. Therefore, be not surprised when other people have other believes.
Oh you are almost there or even surpassed it. Idiocracy portraits a country where everyone has something to eat and something to do. There is no hunger. True they are all stupid, but hey, somehow it works. They even have general health care (as long as you have a bar code). Present day, US does not have that. Instead it randomly threatens allies and friends and enemies. Also it insults other people and countries.
Look Dan East you claim that the term "higher education" does comprise more than colleges and universities. Nice claim. Then give at least one example what you think is high education, like Bible schools or gangs in Chicago. As long as you cannot provide substantial examples, you are saying nothing.
The Nazis named the party as national socialist party, but as you know a label does not mean it describes the contents correctly. Furthermore, they put communists and social democrats in concentration camps and did a lot of big business with corporations in Germany. There was nothing socialistic in their agenda. They even classified people in a wide range of different levels of value.
In medival times in Europe, the Islamic world had its golden age. They advanced mathematics, astronomy etc. They were real science guys. Unfortunately, some Muslim cleric came up with the idea that manipulating numbers is from the devil. This idea became widespread and killed off science. That is why they retreated. Fortunately for us, Europe went through the Renaissance and developed 'enlightenment'.
Nowadays people disregard science and people who advance science. In the US they even fight science. Looks like they want to deindustrialize the USA. This would not be an issue for the rest if the world, but the same Waco's have nuclear weapons.
It might be that US citizens do not carry money around. However, in other countries it is common to use cash. Also even if robbed, cash is not a problem when being robbed. You just hand over the money. If you have a credit card and the thief wants to know the PIN number, and you do not know it, that could be nasty.
People behave like Facebook and Twitter is only read by their family and friends. The EU is acknowledging this behavior. You imply that people are rational. The are not and we in the EU take this illogical and emotional behavior into account. And no disagreement is not a hate crime, as we also have free speech.
They did not debunk their own study. It is /. and other media outlets who report the results not as portrait in the publication. Typical bullshitting of the press.
No it does not. Media to stupid to report on science correctly. Again.
The original publication does not suggest any causation. This is media reporting wrong on science.
The people processed long time research data. The result is that coffee does not have severe negative effects otherwise the correlation would have been different. However, THIS DOES NOT IMPLY THE OPPOSITE, which is any positive health effect from coffee. The scientists also pointed out that such effects cannot be determined by the used approach at all.
The study does that just fine. It is the fucking article "for the public" which transforms a correlation into causation. The only thing which we learn from the study is. Coffee does not shorten live significantly otherwise such effect would have been visible.
The study suggests that people who drink coffee are also people who live longer. Whether this is the effect of coffee, a socio-economic effect, or an indirect correlation, i.e., someone who drinks coffee also has a potential healthier lifestyle or even people who like coffee a in general healthier. This report on slashdot is a typical exaggeration of scientific results by media outlets, which are misleading and affect how the public see science. For example, next week another study suggests something opposite (for the same reason). Then scientists look like guessing around having no clue and that science is something, like an opinion. Everyone has one and they can be different. No one knows what is true.
Because unregulated capitalism destroys nature, social structures and ruins culture. Therefore, we apply new rules here and there until we found out a way of economics which does not have these issues and still support freedom, equality and social support.