actually the car i drive is one of the first to have a unibody with crumple zones.. i'm sure it would not to as well as the most modern cars, but i doubt i would be taken away in a body bag.
the trick is that the car is only 1700lbs - and yes it is a lot louder, but hey to each's own..
exactly - and to top it off according to Apache.. Oracle has put the fix in a timeline to be released on Java 7 update 2.. so something that should never have gone out the door isn't going to be fixed for this or the next update.. that's just stupid.
where you pump electrical power into water to split the H & O.. problem is.. it isn't very efficient. best being 50-80% of electricy into potiental Hydrogen chimical potiental energy.. then you have to use a fuel cell or other method to later turn that back into electrical power - ICE's are ~50% max (~25% actual) and actual Fuel Cells are ~60% max (~45% actual) for cars
put it together and you have
1000kwh *.5-.8 = 500-800kwh
500-800kwh *.25-.5 = 125kwh-400kwh (both worst - both best) for ICE's so total 12.5%-40%
500-800kwh *.45-.6 = 225kwh-480kwh (both worst - both best) for EV Fuel Cells's so total 22.5%-48%
put that on top of the extremely low energy density of Hydrogen storage - It does not make sense to try to make Hydrogen fueled cars and power them from Hydrogen generated from water & electricity.
personally i take the stance of there is no single car to fit all uses.. there for i have more than one so i can fit my needs.
i'm one of the f150 guys with a clean liner.. but the ball on the back is quite warn.. (gets used purely for long distance heavy towing 302 gets 17mpg highway)
then i have a small (very small) 35+mpg car for daily commute.. both old and both where used and together don't cost a lot.
i find it sad the fuel economy of current cars - considering my car is over 30 years old and the radio is the most advanced tech in it.. there is zero reason why i get better mileage than my wife's civic.
be careful when you write "$ per Megawatt" that can be taken two ways.. "cost per Megawatt" which is what you meant and is efficiency related to consumer and "profit per Megawatt" which is not what you meant and rather is efficiency related to cartels.
to be fair.. building a rail system for all of Britain is equivalent to building it for a 1-2 states here in the US..
you have a small area with high population density
we have a large area with low population density
the money is where the people are - if left up to private companies they would only ever build a rail where there was a concentration of people and not bother making long haul runs as they aren't short term profitable - and if they are profitable they are not as profitable as other short runs.
the US government subsidized the long hauls with the intent of hoping to grow the country and population into areas that where disconnected. ( i have no idea what Britain got involved in theirs except that it is politician's nature to meddle )
well if you look at it's orbit it is orbiting the L4 in way that is out or our orbit plane.. so while it's stable it's also not exactly just sitting there.
Per transaction cost % (discount rates) Per transaction cost % (qualified/non-qualified)
And that is just what is listed on the summary page on my statement in front of me. We move enough volume that this is cheaper - but personally i am happy with Paypal for accepting CC's on my own as i don't have to deal with the head aches listed above.. and to be fair.. while for work it is cheaper and even 1% can be thousands of dollars. personally that is cents and random and rare.. it just doesn't make any sense to maintain a merchant account if you are non consistent low volume.
sadly the US public as a whole wouldn't handle having a President (even W) in Jail. hell we can't even get senators in Jail when it is completely and bloody obvious to everyone what happened (Ted K.)
well simply.. the standard was made as a group and reference.. and the profile specs where decided on and put into the spec..
then they for some reason ran off and made all the implementation stacks the responsibly of the vendor.. AND didn't require the vendors to support all the profiles in the spec..
this is why we have a crapy mix of consistency.. and simply put the more you pay for your blue tooth adapter the better the device support is.
Slashdot Mirror
actually the car i drive is one of the first to have a unibody with crumple zones.. i'm sure it would not to as well as the most modern cars, but i doubt i would be taken away in a body bag.
the trick is that the car is only 1700lbs - and yes it is a lot louder, but hey to each's own..
exactly - and to top it off according to Apache.. Oracle has put the fix in a timeline to be released on Java 7 update 2.. so something that should never have gone out the door isn't going to be fixed for this or the next update.. that's just stupid.
if you are getting hydrogen from water you are doing it via electrolysis
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrolysis_of_water
where you pump electrical power into water to split the H & O.. problem is.. it isn't very efficient. best being 50-80% of electricy into potiental Hydrogen chimical potiental energy.. then you have to use a fuel cell or other method to later turn that back into electrical power - ICE's are ~50% max (~25% actual) and actual Fuel Cells are ~60% max (~45% actual) for cars
put it together and you have
1000kwh *.5-.8 = 500-800kwh
500-800kwh * .25-.5 = 125kwh-400kwh (both worst - both best) for ICE's so total 12.5%-40%
500-800kwh * .45-.6 = 225kwh-480kwh (both worst - both best) for EV Fuel Cells's so total 22.5%-48%
put that on top of the extremely low energy density of Hydrogen storage - It does not make sense to try to make Hydrogen fueled cars and power them from Hydrogen generated from water & electricity.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c6/Energy_density.svg
Compare Hydrogen to Gas.. Gas is the target - reality just doesn't let it work.
personally i take the stance of there is no single car to fit all uses.. there for i have more than one so i can fit my needs.
i'm one of the f150 guys with a clean liner.. but the ball on the back is quite warn.. (gets used purely for long distance heavy towing 302 gets 17mpg highway)
then i have a small (very small) 35+mpg car for daily commute.. both old and both where used and together don't cost a lot.
i find it sad the fuel economy of current cars - considering my car is over 30 years old and the radio is the most advanced tech in it.. there is zero reason why i get better mileage than my wife's civic.
PS. you replaced your SSDs with a pair or HDDs in RAID 0 format. Beggers belief.
and on top of that because the SSD failed and they lost data .. makes me wonder if they even have a clue what they are doing.
Rotel + B&W = lovely..
add this to northstar - where remotely they can turn the engine on and off - then it gets interesting.
good catch.. me not thinking - no coffee today.
technically 96/100 is the same as 48/50 as 24/25.
fractions are fun.
be careful when you write "$ per Megawatt" that can be taken two ways.. "cost per Megawatt" which is what you meant and is efficiency related to consumer and "profit per Megawatt" which is not what you meant and rather is efficiency related to cartels.
to be fair .. building a rail system for all of Britain is equivalent to building it for a 1-2 states here in the US..
you have a small area with high population density
we have a large area with low population density
the money is where the people are - if left up to private companies they would only ever build a rail where there was a concentration of people and not bother making long haul runs as they aren't short term profitable - and if they are profitable they are not as profitable as other short runs.
the US government subsidized the long hauls with the intent of hoping to grow the country and population into areas that where disconnected. ( i have no idea what Britain got involved in theirs except that it is politician's nature to meddle )
I would say the hidden catch here is that they now know more about your site traffic than they did be fore.
that is a very impressive example.. although i did laugh that on mine it had the guy running though cars..
well if you look at it's orbit it is orbiting the L4 in way that is out or our orbit plane.. so while it's stable it's also not exactly just sitting there.
A merchant account has more than just a % cost.
There are:
Monthly access fees
Monthly PCIDSS fees
Monthly interchange access fees (per card network)
Monthly interchange volume fees (per card network)
Per transaction cost fixed
Per batch cost fixed
Per transaction cost % (discount rates)
Per transaction cost % (qualified/non-qualified)
And that is just what is listed on the summary page on my statement in front of me. We move enough volume that this is cheaper - but personally i am happy with Paypal for accepting CC's on my own as i don't have to deal with the head aches listed above.. and to be fair.. while for work it is cheaper and even 1% can be thousands of dollars. personally that is cents and random and rare.. it just doesn't make any sense to maintain a merchant account if you are non consistent low volume.
sadly the US public as a whole wouldn't handle having a President (even W) in Jail. hell we can't even get senators in Jail when it is completely and bloody obvious to everyone what happened (Ted K.)
so put the guy in a suit and launch..
for that you need musical artists not "singers"/"vocalists" who actually care about their music more than trying to make as much money as they can.
it's funny i actually take notice now when i hear a singer that ISN'T using autotune, funny how i'd rather listen to someone with talent.
i was about to say - this is not your normal Judge in my eyes.. they really lucked out.
to be fair with the Microsoft java suit - it hinged on MS calling it Java..
I don't remember Google ever labeling it Java
except the interest they give you is no where near the inflation rate or anywhere near the value of it.
well simply .. the standard was made as a group and reference.. and the profile specs where decided on and put into the spec..
then they for some reason ran off and made all the implementation stacks the responsibly of the vendor.. AND didn't require the vendors to support all the profiles in the spec..
this is why we have a crapy mix of consistency.. and simply put the more you pay for your blue tooth adapter the better the device support is.
opps - read the thing and missed the one off price on the line item - thanks for pointing that out.
5k just for the case? or is that everything sans drives?