You are a dangerous idiot. If you can't back up what you say, stupid people may believe you. I hope one day you don't have to fight of a multi million dollar law suit because some feeble minded women didn't brush her babies teeth because of you.
As for your 'research', where is it? Don't give me internet sources, no serious scholar would accept those. I'm talking journals and texts.
Now this actually reminds me a little of my grandme, whose gums chew everything. That is, everything that doesn't escape from her mouth. Funnily. she's from Soviet Russia.
My sister spins the same crap as this. As yet I've not found anyone in the anti-flouride community who are able to give me proper references to this information. I'm not talking internet sources here but journals (of the calibre of Lancet).
Unlike the crap about MMR which she still insists on spinning, I might believe this one... if there was proof.
I work at a university. The other day I had a student hand in a paper which referenced Wikipedia. WIKIPEDIA?! Come on. I tell my students I expect four references per page (minimum!) and about 5 sources per 750 words. For your post, handed in as a tuorial paper, I would expect 8 references, sourcing from both journals and texts. That's at undergraduate level.
Whilst I appreciate this is Slashdot, you're doing more than commenting on an article and making some very bol claims, and potentially dangerous ones at that. At least computer nerds are generally to contrarian too take these things on Slashdot authority.
As an actual tinfoil hat wearer (testing it out to see it it works) this illustrates the reason people need to do serious research into this area. I wish I had access to their setup, that way I could tell if the mes I've incorporated is having a positive effect.
If you don't want to read RTFA then here's something interesting I noticed. One of the competitions is for a 5x5 cube, or a Professors cube. I know it would personallt ake me about 5 years to do this.
I wouldn't mind knowing the ages of all these people. Rubiks are old (to me) so are these fresh blood? Are they still popular? As far as I'm concerned they'd have to be middle aged in order to be that good.
Maybe he meant 'listen to.' It's easy enough to study available material, writings of the day, and so on, and discover whether it was meant to be allegorical or not.
People don't just throw out one computer to buy another. I recently bought an iBook, but I still have my PC. I use each as much as the other. At home I have my mac set up as dual head and run a remote desktop connectio to my windows box. You can't play games over that, but it's good for those apps you just can't get on windows.
Games are a PC muct have simply because of cost efficiency - I can upgrade my PC much more cheaply, and with more grunt, and there are more games.
However, a Mac is a better onraod vehicle. Their versions of Office is still waiting for windows to catch up, and Photoshop and Indesign are made for it. Plus there is Keynote. Oh God!! KEYNOTE!!!!
I don't think peple are changing so much as becoming continental. People will change later. Now they are testing the water, ipods, cheap minis and so on. We'll see I guess.
And you sir, are an hypocrite. At last measure, the correct method of writing is using no apostrophes. I would actually rewrite your post to read, 'If you cannot (one word) find the grammatical error in your sentence, you should not be allowed an online degree.' Notice also the eradication of the bang. That is an exclamation mark if you are American. Now, as a penal exercise, I suggest you correct every spelling and grammatical error made on Slashdot in the past year. Too much? Perhaps then just today's news? I wouldn't bother even starting this trend on Slashdot, it is not worth your sanity.
It's very gratifying, if not egocenric, to see you acknoweldge that your red wine is the greatest in the world. Might I make a suggestion. Perhaps, you make the wine but don't actually own the restaurant. Perhaps you've not noticed it and you frend actually owns the restaurant. And here's an idea - now that another guy has an even bigger restaurant, you've n oppotunity to sell your wine there instead, cashing in on a bigger market. You could choose that instead.
We should remember also that most people cannot mke there own wine, they are forced to buy it from someone else.
So the analogy falls apart. You don't pay for an operating syste everytime you ueit, only once. For the majority of people, Windows forces people to choose an architecture, as much as Apple has,though not with such an official relationship. The only common OS is linux, and to an extent Solaris.
FTA - After creating the interface, objects can be linked using mouse operations. Also Gorm features interactive testing of interfaces.
This sounds very much like what Apple has had for a very long time with its XCode tools. Whilst its great that apple has had this for a long time, it will provide something very new for KDE and Gnome users. Perhaps it will provide some serious competition for these.
This article seems a little 'flamable.' What is needed is a system whereby as you submit a response, you can choose whether you agree with the choice of the article. Once there are say, 300 responses, and >50% are negative, it is removed from the front page. This would make for a boring April 1st, but there'd be no more Dvorak articles (not to mention I actually like the guy).
Perhaps they should ask scientists. Last time I checked there were division within the science community itself. Take for example the responses to or even existence of the greenhouse effect. Think of physics, relativity vs everything else. There is more to these arguements. And as I stated earlier there is more to life than science. If you had it your way it would seem scientist would rule the world. I wouldn't like to think of someone like Doctor Mengola in charge...
But honestly, it BECAUSE radioactive waste is important that more than the scientists decisions needs to be taken to account. If the scientists don't like that they should think about how everyone else would feel if the scientists made the decisions without consulting them.
Have you actually tried the Acid2? I updated last night and my Safari Version is 2.0.2 (416.12) and it will not work. Has anyone else had this problem? Has my update not worled properly?
Actually, if that is what it takes to win 'the war' Apple got there first. Omnigraffle has had this feature for a long, long time.
Rather than flame you with a list of all the firefox perks, I'll gve the most important two, which should encapsulate all the others.
1) An extensible, non-monolithic architecture.
2) Multiplatform app.
I love firefox, I really do. But the lack of easy tab switching has kept me in Safari. I downloaded Pithhelmet but it is not the same as customising Firefox. I owe you a debt of thanks, and so does any OS X user who does not know what you have illucidated.
Firstly, you obviously didn't understand the analogy, or how it links rhetoric. And you have failed to see my point. My point is that an 'expert' is not necessarily someone with a science degree. YOUR rhetoric about the media controlling what people think is a pub arguement. One of you sentences doesn't even make sense, which may be hindering my understanding of you're point. But... if you are really sincere about following that line, I would suggest Jean Baudrillard. He posits that constructed reality is as much as or more real than the 'objective' world. Think heisenburg.
Slashdot Mirror
no wait, imagine a PowerMac with a dual processor setup. Why, that would be... practically a super compooder.
I would have modded you up.
You are a dangerous idiot. If you can't back up what you say, stupid people may believe you. I hope one day you don't have to fight of a multi million dollar law suit because some feeble minded women didn't brush her babies teeth because of you.
As for your 'research', where is it? Don't give me internet sources, no serious scholar would accept those. I'm talking journals and texts.
Now this actually reminds me a little of my grandme, whose gums chew everything. That is, everything that doesn't escape from her mouth. Funnily. she's from Soviet Russia.
My sister spins the same crap as this. As yet I've not found anyone in the anti-flouride community who are able to give me proper references to this information. I'm not talking internet sources here but journals (of the calibre of Lancet).
Unlike the crap about MMR which she still insists on spinning, I might believe this one... if there was proof.
I work at a university. The other day I had a student hand in a paper which referenced Wikipedia. WIKIPEDIA?! Come on. I tell my students I expect four references per page (minimum!) and about 5 sources per 750 words. For your post, handed in as a tuorial paper, I would expect 8 references, sourcing from both journals and texts. That's at undergraduate level.
Whilst I appreciate this is Slashdot, you're doing more than commenting on an article and making some very bol claims, and potentially dangerous ones at that. At least computer nerds are generally to contrarian too take these things on Slashdot authority.
Yeah, and the sysadmins at IBM just noticed a proliferation of sex sites in the proxy logs,
As an actual tinfoil hat wearer (testing it out to see it it works) this illustrates the reason people need to do serious research into this area. I wish I had access to their setup, that way I could tell if the mes I've incorporated is having a positive effect.
If you don't want to read RTFA then here's something interesting I noticed. One of the competitions is for a 5x5 cube, or a Professors cube. I know it would personallt ake me about 5 years to do this.
I wouldn't mind knowing the ages of all these people. Rubiks are old (to me) so are these fresh blood? Are they still popular? As far as I'm concerned they'd have to be middle aged in order to be that good.
So, which government declared this illegal?
Maybe he meant 'listen to.' It's easy enough to study available material, writings of the day, and so on, and discover whether it was meant to be allegorical or not.
Yeah, heaps better than FreeBSD, NetBSD and the other BSD, all of which run on their existing hardware.
People don't just throw out one computer to buy another. I recently bought an iBook, but I still have my PC. I use each as much as the other. At home I have my mac set up as dual head and run a remote desktop connectio to my windows box. You can't play games over that, but it's good for those apps you just can't get on windows.
Games are a PC muct have simply because of cost efficiency - I can upgrade my PC much more cheaply, and with more grunt, and there are more games.
However, a Mac is a better onraod vehicle. Their versions of Office is still waiting for windows to catch up, and Photoshop and Indesign are made for it. Plus there is Keynote. Oh God!! KEYNOTE!!!!
I don't think peple are changing so much as becoming continental. People will change later. Now they are testing the water, ipods, cheap minis and so on. We'll see I guess.
And you sir, are an hypocrite. At last measure, the correct method of writing is using no apostrophes. I would actually rewrite your post to read, 'If you cannot (one word) find the grammatical error in your sentence, you should not be allowed an online degree.' Notice also the eradication of the bang. That is an exclamation mark if you are American. Now, as a penal exercise, I suggest you correct every spelling and grammatical error made on Slashdot in the past year. Too much? Perhaps then just today's news? I wouldn't bother even starting this trend on Slashdot, it is not worth your sanity.
It's very gratifying, if not egocenric, to see you acknoweldge that your red wine is the greatest in the world. Might I make a suggestion. Perhaps, you make the wine but don't actually own the restaurant. Perhaps you've not noticed it and you frend actually owns the restaurant. And here's an idea - now that another guy has an even bigger restaurant, you've n oppotunity to sell your wine there instead, cashing in on a bigger market. You could choose that instead.
We should remember also that most people cannot mke there own wine, they are forced to buy it from someone else.
So the analogy falls apart. You don't pay for an operating syste everytime you ueit, only once. For the majority of people, Windows forces people to choose an architecture, as much as Apple has,though not with such an official relationship. The only common OS is linux, and to an extent Solaris.
Sure, but what about, caffeine free. I see no de-cafe beer being produced by nestle.
So much for 'free as in beer.'
Ignoring the solid relationship to apple:
FTA - After creating the interface, objects can be linked using mouse operations. Also Gorm features interactive testing of interfaces.
This sounds very much like what Apple has had for a very long time with its XCode tools. Whilst its great that apple has had this for a long time, it will provide something very new for KDE and Gnome users. Perhaps it will provide some serious competition for these.
This article seems a little 'flamable.' What is needed is a system whereby as you submit a response, you can choose whether you agree with the choice of the article. Once there are say, 300 responses, and >50% are negative, it is removed from the front page. This would make for a boring April 1st, but there'd be no more Dvorak articles (not to mention I actually like the guy).
Actually, it may not be BS. Time will tell that. It isn't so much 'patently false.' so much as 'unsubstantiated.'
And actually it is very similar to microsoft claims. Think of times they made claims about there killer software which had not even been released yet!
Perhaps they should ask scientists. Last time I checked there were division within the science community itself. Take for example the responses to or even existence of the greenhouse effect. Think of physics, relativity vs everything else. There is more to these arguements. And as I stated earlier there is more to life than science. If you had it your way it would seem scientist would rule the world. I wouldn't like to think of someone like Doctor Mengola in charge...
But honestly, it BECAUSE radioactive waste is important that more than the scientists decisions needs to be taken to account. If the scientists don't like that they should think about how everyone else would feel if the scientists made the decisions without consulting them.
Have you actually tried the Acid2? I updated last night and my Safari Version is 2.0.2 (416.12) and it will not work. Has anyone else had this problem? Has my update not worled properly?
Actually, if that is what it takes to win 'the war' Apple got there first. Omnigraffle has had this feature for a long, long time. Rather than flame you with a list of all the firefox perks, I'll gve the most important two, which should encapsulate all the others. 1) An extensible, non-monolithic architecture. 2) Multiplatform app.
I love firefox, I really do. But the lack of easy tab switching has kept me in Safari. I downloaded Pithhelmet but it is not the same as customising Firefox. I owe you a debt of thanks, and so does any OS X user who does not know what you have illucidated.
Firstly, you obviously didn't understand the analogy, or how it links rhetoric. And you have failed to see my point. My point is that an 'expert' is not necessarily someone with a science degree. YOUR rhetoric about the media controlling what people think is a pub arguement. One of you sentences doesn't even make sense, which may be hindering my understanding of you're point. But... if you are really sincere about following that line, I would suggest Jean Baudrillard. He posits that constructed reality is as much as or more real than the 'objective' world. Think heisenburg.