Yeah, this is the case with basically and hard disk. My 20 GB iPod is around 18 GB, IIRC. My computer's 40 GB hard disk really is a few shy of that. On the iPod box somewhere, as with most other devices, there's probably a disclaimer saying "actual formatted capacity less."
Unless I'm mistaken, this has been supported since version 10.1. I successfully hooked my G4 and a Performa 630 (OS 8.1) up to the same network and they saw each other in the Connect to Server window and the Chooser.
Actually Art Bell can be heard on at lest one free streaming station. If you're on a Mac it's somewhere in the Talk section of the iTunes radio tuner. I'm not at home to check the exact station but it's there. I'll post it later unless someone beats me to it...
I also wish that more "real" radio stations were available online. There's a radio station from a city a couple hours from here that I would love to be able to listen too, but it's not online.
It would even be useful for getting a more flawless "signal" from local stations.
I agree -- the simpler the name, the easier it is to recognize. Apple is another example: iPhoto, iMovie, iTunes, iDVD, etc. All of the names are variations on common works, and as a result I'm sure they are easier to remember for the average customer.
Not trying to troll here, just giving my honest opinions/thoughts...
I use Mac OS X, and have had lots of experience with the "old" Mac OS and a bit with Linux. I like having the Terminal and *nix tools available but don't know a whole lot about them, so I think it's nice to have the Mac GUI on top of it when I don't feel like dealing with those things. The impression that I get from your post is that this means I am not a 'real' computer user.
Please correct me if I'm wrong, but it looks like you're saying there are essentially two sides to the computer world: AOL/MS Office users and Linux geeks. Anyone who doesn't live in the Linux command line, compile thier own kernel, or know every detail about the inner working of a *nix OS, gets thrown in the pile with the clueless AOL users.
Also, you say that there's no point in having a non X11 GUI on *nix. I don't get it... why do you say this? To me that sounds like the equivalent of saying there's no point in running anything other than Windows if you're going to have x86 hardware.
Can't we all just use what we like without being so critical of other people's preferences, knowledge, or whatever else?
If you want to use an Apple Studio Display or Apple Cinema Display on a computer with DVI but not ADC, you can get a "DVIator" cable: http://www.drbott.com/prod/DVIator.html
Why would someone try to do this? Perhaps it's explained on the page, but I can't get through to it right now. Anyway, I would love to have one of these, and I'd much rather see it given to someone who wants it than have it destroyed.
IMO, the proprietary OS will go the way way of the dinosaur when you don't have to download custom drivers and use unofficial client software for services like AIM and ICQ, and so on. Don't get me wrong, Linux and BSD are nice, but I don't think that closed and commercial software will be going anywhere soon.
I know I'll sound like a troll but I would NEVER spend money on another sound card. I don't know how to express how much I don't care that my iMac can't take a third party sound card. The built-in one sounds great and I can't understand why someone would bother to get one unless they are a professional who deals with audio things.
Re:Software for Mac - 3 Button Mice - Design
on
Apple Dumps the Cube
·
· Score: 2
>Also the reason for one button, is because most commands
>will only need one button, and if you want more options,
>you have to hold down the cntrl, option, or apple key, or
>any combination of them while you click.
Agreed, the number of mouse buttons is a non-issue. A scroll wheel wouldn't hurt but it is not necessary. And actually, most home PC users I've met don't even know what the second mouse button is for.
I enjoyed all Star Trek series, though TNG was definitely my favorite. That's not the topic of my post, however.
I completely agree, Stargate is an excellent show. The stories are always good, and it equals Star Trek as far as its level of quality, fun, etc. If I ever have to miss it at the regular time, I always record it. It's great.
Yes, Earth: Final Conflict and Andromeda are disappointing. Blah.
Slashdot Mirror
Yeah, this is the case with basically and hard disk. My 20 GB iPod is around 18 GB, IIRC. My computer's 40 GB hard disk really is a few shy of that. On the iPod box somewhere, as with most other devices, there's probably a disclaimer saying "actual formatted capacity less."
I use Linux because it has one of the best games ever: Frozen Bubble.
:-D
(OK, so that's only part of the reason, but it's a good one.)
:-p
first post!!!!
RealPlayer for Linux/other including Linux for PPC.
Unless I'm mistaken, this has been supported since version 10.1. I successfully hooked my G4 and a Performa 630 (OS 8.1) up to the same network and they saw each other in the Connect to Server window and the Chooser.
Actually Art Bell can be heard on at lest one free streaming station. If you're on a Mac it's somewhere in the Talk section of the iTunes radio tuner. I'm not at home to check the exact station but it's there. I'll post it later unless someone beats me to it...
Make that OmniWeb... now don't I look silly making a mistake in a post about spelling? :-D
All they need to do is switch to OS X and use OmniWe. Right? Right? ;-)
Mac OS, 20+ years and still binary compatible. ;-)
(If this is not entirely accurate, I apologize...not trying to troll.)
Xfree86 is great -- I'm using (occasionally) it on Mac OS X.
I meant I would like to be able to listen *to*, not too. I know the difference. :)
I also wish that more "real" radio stations were available online. There's a radio station from a city a couple hours from here that I would love to be able to listen too, but it's not online.
It would even be useful for getting a more flawless "signal" from local stations.
I agree -- the simpler the name, the easier it is to recognize. Apple is another example: iPhoto, iMovie, iTunes, iDVD, etc. All of the names are variations on common works, and as a result I'm sure they are easier to remember for the average customer.
Not trying to troll here, just giving my honest opinions/thoughts...
I use Mac OS X, and have had lots of experience with the "old" Mac OS and a bit with Linux. I like having the Terminal and *nix tools available but don't know a whole lot about them, so I think it's nice to have the Mac GUI on top of it when I don't feel like dealing with those things. The impression that I get from your post is that this means I am not a 'real' computer user.
Please correct me if I'm wrong, but it looks like you're saying there are essentially two sides to the computer world: AOL/MS Office users and Linux geeks. Anyone who doesn't live in the Linux command line, compile thier own kernel, or know every detail about the inner working of a *nix OS, gets thrown in the pile with the clueless AOL users.
Also, you say that there's no point in having a non X11 GUI on *nix. I don't get it... why do you say this? To me that sounds like the equivalent of saying there's no point in running anything other than Windows if you're going to have x86 hardware.
Can't we all just use what we like without being so critical of other people's preferences, knowledge, or whatever else?
If you want to use an Apple Studio Display or Apple Cinema Display on a computer with DVI but not ADC, you can get a "DVIator" cable:
http://www.drbott.com/prod/DVIator.html
Why would someone try to do this? Perhaps it's explained on the page, but I can't get through to it right now. Anyway, I would love to have one of these, and I'd much rather see it given to someone who wants it than have it destroyed.
IMO, the proprietary OS will go the way way of the dinosaur when you don't have to download custom drivers and use unofficial client software for services like AIM and ICQ, and so on. Don't get me wrong, Linux and BSD are nice, but I don't think that closed and commercial software will be going anywhere soon.
I know I'll sound like a troll but I would NEVER spend money on another sound card. I don't know how to express how much I don't care that my iMac can't take a third party sound card. The built-in one sounds great and I can't understand why someone would bother to get one unless they are a professional who deals with audio things.
>Also the reason for one button, is because most commands
>will only need one button, and if you want more options,
>you have to hold down the cntrl, option, or apple key, or
>any combination of them while you click.
Agreed, the number of mouse buttons is a non-issue. A scroll wheel wouldn't hurt but it is not necessary. And actually, most home PC users I've met don't even know what the second mouse button is for.
Where did you get the idea that the Cube is chrome? It's white.
That was my first thought too... It looks more like the Gnome panel than the Mac OS X Dock.
Don't forget that Netscape 6 has an online installer that downloads only the components you select, if you opt for a custom install.
I enjoyed all Star Trek series, though TNG was definitely my favorite. That's not the topic of my post, however.
I completely agree, Stargate is an excellent show. The stories are always good, and it equals Star Trek as far as its level of quality, fun, etc. If I ever have to miss it at the regular time, I always record it. It's great.
Yes, Earth: Final Conflict and Andromeda are disappointing. Blah.
> I would think so, at least wrt OS X (classic is a completely different story).
That's fine with me... I've barely used OS 9 since March 24th, except use my scanner/CD-RW or play an occasional game.
I don't know much about Qt, etc., but does this basically mean that it will all a greater number or programs to be ported pretty easily to Mac OS X?