Slashdot Mirror


User: farker+haiku

farker+haiku's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
347
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 347

  1. Thanks for the tip on Effective C++, Third Edition · · Score: 1

    This is exactly the type of book I've been looking for. It seems that when you walk into Borders, every book on the shelves is something for the absolute n00b or is only a desk reference. Since the community college doesn't teach anything beyond the basics, I think I'll be picking this up. Nicely written review too :)

  2. Re:It's all about the measuring stick on Study Links Genetic Diseases to Intelligence · · Score: 1

    End result? I aced it. Finished with time to spare. No problem at all. And my peers all reported the same thing.


    Or, as a morale boosting excersize, the military told you all that you had done better.

  3. Re:what about tabs? on Spoofing Flaw Resurfaces in Mozilla Browsers · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I use the tabbed browsing extension that disables all of that bullcrap. Find it. Love it. /too lazy to google it for you.

  4. what about tabs? on Spoofing Flaw Resurfaces in Mozilla Browsers · · Score: 5, Interesting

    from TFA:
    For a spoofing attempt to work, a surfer would need to have both the attacker's Web site and a trusted Web site open in different windows.

    So, uh, what about tabs? 'Cause I never have 2 windows open at the same time.

  5. Re:The Tony Awards were on Sunday... on Monty Python's SPAMalot Wins 5, no 3 Tony Awards · · Score: 1

    It takes a while to come up with a quality headline like that. And with headlines like this, who needs fark?

  6. I think it's a great idea on Anonymous Library Cards An Option? · · Score: 1

    Frankly, I think that libraries are grossly underfunded, and while $.16 on $20 isn't a big loss for a single borrower, it's a huge gain when you think about the thousands of people who are likely to use this anonymous feature. I'm ok with giving the library some additional funding for them to protect my right to privacy.

  7. people in my neighborhood on Coming Soon, Roadcasting · · Score: 1

    already broadcast their music in a several mile radius through good old fashioned volume control

  8. slippage on Mars Rover Opportunity Working Free · · Score: 1
    On Opportunity's first three drives to get out of the sand trap, the rover has advanced a total of 7.4 centimeters (2.9 inches) in getting off the dune. Each of the first two drives -- one on sol 463 and one on sol 465 -- turned the wheels about two and a half rotations, enough to drive two meters (7 feet) if there were no slippage.The team was encouraged by the results, and decided go ahead with a 4-meter (13-foot) commanded drive for sol 466.


    So we can expect Opportunity to move approximately 5.8 inches next? Talk about baby steps.
  9. Re:Wrong idea! on Exporting Knowledge Via Students · · Score: 1
    Nearly all the information you can obtain in higher education can be now found on the Internet. Why bother even trying to restrict it?


    While it's nearly all now, in a few years MIT will have put all of their course references and syllibi on the internet(for free). Hopefully this will cause a few other prestigious schools to follow suit. Education should be free... the paper that proves you know your stuff should not. /yeah yeah, off topic.
  10. Re:My rights? on RFID Bracelets to Track Inmates in L.A. County · · Score: 1

    http://www.law.uga.edu/academics/profiles/dwilkes_ more/30convicting.html

    Actually, the percentage of wrongly incarcerated prisoners is increasing. Yearly. And that's in death penalty cases alone, which stand the highest amount of scrutiny in our legal system. Approximately 1 in 75 people on death row are found to be innocent. That may be a small enough ratio for you but it's not small enough for me. With approximately 6k people executed a year in the US, that means that 80 people are executed wrongly. This number is rising, not falling. Don't go off on a tangent about something you know nothing about - it's a problem when people propogandize the internet with no knowledge of what they speak. Go sit down with a public defender, buy him or her a beer and learn something new. It'll be a horrifying experience.

  11. Re:LPI's policy page (as referenced in the review) on LPIC 1 Exam Cram 2 · · Score: 1

    Thanks :)
    I'm a little too used to fark.

  12. Re:LPI's policy page (as referenced in the review) on LPIC 1 Exam Cram 2 · · Score: 1

    Oh dear god, I did it again. Why does slashdot require breaks in order to insert a carriage return?

    And, uh, I'll try and start using the preview button :)

  13. LPI's policy page (as referenced in the review) on LPIC 1 Exam Cram 2 · · Score: 1

    Since it was already (very) slow... 1: PC Architecture (8-Feb-1999) The LPI program will attempt to be architecture-neutral when possible. When architecture-specific knowledge is deemed important for the purposes of the program, Intel "PC" architectures will be used for reference. Other architectures may be optionally included for testing as demand warrants. 2: Start with exam 1 (8-Feb-1999) We require the candidates to pass all exams from #1 up to the required level. Motivation: At the higher levels, we can only guarantee the necessary background and a complete and consistent program if the candidates actually pass the initial exams. 3: Bounding the Certification Program (8-Feb-1999) The Linux Certification Program will test technical skills and knowledge of Linux system administration. The emphasis will be on understanding rather than memorization. We will not test other requisites for successful system administration like general intelligence, social and managerial skills, knowledge of legislation, financial awareness etc. 4: Jargon (7-Jul-1999) The Linux Professional Institute will not explicitly test on knowledge of jargon or acronyms. The examinees are expected to be familiar with concepts that have a commonly used acronym for a name (e.g. TCP/IP). However, we will not require knowledge of the actual meaning of the letters. There will be a list of preferred terms and deprecated synonyms. Acronyms which are not explicitly listed as "preferred", should not be used. This list will also contain definitions of the terms within a certain context where this appears necessary. The list will be updated while successive tests are being developed by LPI, and the tests will be made consistent with this list. Note: The list is currently available on LPI's Glossary Page. 5: Exam Renewal (4-Oct-1999) LPI will review the contents of its test objectives and exams and revise them as deemed necessary in order to provide for new material, test validity, security, and to incorporate feedback. Test objectives and exams will be reviewed at least once in two years. 6: Recertification (Revised 19-Apr-2004) LPI strongly encourages certificate holders to recertify minimally within a ten-year period from the date the first exam of the level was passed. Ten years from the date the first exam of the level was passed, a designation's status will change from "ACTIVE" to "INACTIVE" in the LPI database, unless the certificate holder recertifies. LPI will provide to third parties, at the certificate holder's request, information pertaining to the history of certifications(s) passed, the date the certification(s) were passed, the revision date/level(s) of the completed certification(s), as well as the designation status (ACTIVE or INACTIVE). In providing this information, LPI reserves the right to indicate the current revision level of any or all of the certification(s) passed by the certificate holder and to issue public advisories concerning changes in the content or objectives of the certification(s). It is LPI's position that the purpose of recertification is to measure continued competence. Currently, the methods of recertification include: Retaking and passing all current form examinations required for initial certification. After successfully passing all the required up-to-date examinations, the designation status will be updated to ACTIVE for a period of ten years from the date the first exam of the level was passed. Earning a higher-level LPI certification designation. When a higher level certification designation is earned, the status of all lower level designations are considered ACTIVE for ten years from the date the first exam of the higher level was passed. LPI is currently considering the development of a single "refresher" recertification exam that encompasses the content of all examinations for a particular designation, with a focus on newer developments in the field. Although LPI strongly encourages certificate holders to recertify minimally within a ten-year period, possible major revisions of Linux or recommendat

  14. What steps? on Effects of China's Software Policy on World Economy? · · Score: 1

    Stop allowing the import of manufactured goods to the US. Or the export of food to China. Harsh? Don't mess with our economy.

  15. Re:Why? on Xbox 360 Gets Backwards Compatible, Final Fantasy · · Score: 1

    Because I *STILL* own a copy of Castlevania, symphony of the night even though I don't even own a game console. Once you've written a walkthrough for a game, it's kind of hard to let it go... long after your wife has destroyed the hardware.

  16. Re:Controller on PlayStation 3 Unveiled · · Score: 1

    Yeah, that controller looks downright awkward. What are we supposed to do, use it like a divining rod? Looks like all your digits are going to be used to hold it.

  17. Re:Disable Greasemonkey on Hacking the Web with Greasemonkey · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hell, if I want to print it out and use it as toilet paper, I will.

    Now I know a good use for Anncoulter.com

  18. Re:No, wait! on Internet Explorer's Share Dips Below 90% · · Score: 1

    Sorry, my information came from wikipedia's entry on Standard Oil found via answers.com

  19. Re:No, wait! on Internet Explorer's Share Dips Below 90% · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Standard's market share of refining was 64% in competition with over 100 other refiners at the time of the trial that resulted in the government-forced breakup).
    I'd say that 93% is greater than 64%, which was enough to force the federal government to breakup of Standard Oil via the Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890. I could be wrong though.

  20. Re:Monopoly no more! - Well, not really.. on Internet Explorer's Share Dips Below 90% · · Score: 1

    Next release of IE? How many years are we talking about here?

  21. Re:Funny, Yes, but not funny for Google. on Google Acquires Dodgeball · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You fail to understand the power of marketting. These conversations happen using AIM on their Verizon phones. Teeny bopper 1 to Teeny bopper 2: Meet me at the mall after school, k? Teeny bopper 2 to Teeny bopper 1: Alright! Teeny bopper 1 to mom: Can you pick us up at the mall at 8? mom to Teeny bopper 1: Which entrance? Teeny bopper 1 to mom: Use dodgeball silly...

  22. people search on Google Acquires Dodgeball · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Wait, so now google helps you search a crowd for a friend of yours? I can dig it.