Slashdot Mirror


Google Acquires Dodgeball

kalki writes "Dodgeball.com, a service that uses mobile phones to help people meet up with friends who are in the same location, said on its website on Wednesday that it has been bought by Web search leader Google Inc. Also available on the official site is a Q&A about the deal." From the article: "As a two-person team, Alex and I have taken dodgeball about a far as we can alone. Since we finished grad school, we've been trying to figure out how to grow dodgeball and make it a better service along the way. We talked to a lot of different angel investors and venture capitalists, but no one really 'got' what we were doing - that is until we met Google."

253 comments

  1. So... by daveschroeder · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ...how rich will these guys be now?

    1. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...how rich will these guys be now?

      richer than you

    2. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      i don't see what good could possibly come of all of these acquisitions.

      boo, i say. boo to you, google. boo.

    3. Re:So... by cuzality · · Score: 3, Funny


      ...how rich will these guys be now?

      Maybe we'll find out when they're interviewed on ESPN "The Ocho". My guess is they'll have to carry all that money home in a pirate's chest.

    4. Re:So... by M.C.+Hampster · · Score: 1

      They'll probably become googleaires.

      --
      Forget the whales - save the babies.
    5. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      They'll probably become googleaires.

      Conceptually funny punch-line, but needs a bit of polish. Might I suggest:

      They'll probably become Googillionaires.

    6. Re:So... by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      My guess is they'll have to carry all that money home in a pirate's chest.

      Now if only Britney would become a pirate. Yarr!

  2. people search by farker+haiku · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Wait, so now google helps you search a crowd for a friend of yours? I can dig it.

    --
    Your sig(k) has been stolen. There is a puff of smoke!
    1. Re:people search by grub · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I bet you'll see a google map (or satellite photo if that area is covered) with an overlay of where your friends are. It wouldn't be that hard.

      (hey, Google could get into the cell business and triangulate you from its towers. Now that IS getting evil.)

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    2. Re:people search by 0x461FAB0BD7D2 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Searching in a crowd? This is going to ruin "Where's Wally" for generations to come.

      Do no evil my ass.

    3. Re:people search by youknowmewell · · Score: 1

      I've never had trouble finding Wally, it's Waldo that's a pain.

    4. Re:people search by Peldor · · Score: 5, Funny

      I've read your message a dozen times and still can't find Waldo.

    5. Re:people search by 0x461FAB0BD7D2 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      It's Where's Wally in UK, NZ and other places, and Where's Waldo in the US. Don't ask me why.

    6. Re:people search by Zone-MR · · Score: 0

      Dammit... I'm evil.

    7. Re:people search by Vacindak · · Score: 1

      I bet you'll see a google map (or satellite photo if that area is covered) with an overlay of where your friends are. It wouldn't be that hard. No, it's not that hard. I've already written code that does it. The tricky part is getting the GPS coordinates for the people, which, thus far, I haven't found a good seamless way of doing. I'm just using geocoder.us at the moment. Doing it via cellphones would be a lot nicer, but I don't really have that capability.

    8. Re:people search by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>Do no evil my ass.

      I would also prefer your ass do no evil. So if you were thinking of going to Taco Bell for lunch, please reconsider that decision.

    9. Re:people search by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That reminded me of the cell phone location thing for 911 calls that people thought was so evil. Can users tap into that service directly to send google their location with just a few button presses? Is that how dodgeball works?

    10. Re:people search by says · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Dodgeball's tech/software doesn't do gps search.

      Dodgeball updates your position based on sms.
      Two features make it better than just texting your friends:
      1. You can alert friends of friends, and end up meeting people in your extended network who happen to be at the same bar.
      2. Your updates can be read online.

      That second feature has some overlap with mobile blogging, something Google just got into...
      But Dodgeball has all the dating tools of a singles site, too.

    11. Re:people search by Feyr · · Score: 1

      isn't waldo the dog, or maybe the evil guy?

      the main one is called charlie here (canada)

    12. Re:people search by double-oh+three · · Score: 1

      Now that IS getting evil.

      Not if you opt in and have control over access lists.

      --
      "For years, I struggled with reality... but I'm happy to say I finally won out over it." -- Elwood P. Dowd
    13. Re:people search by Ansonmont · · Score: 1

      The anti-Waldo is Odlaw (think backwards), at least here in the US. Apparently the localize the books.

      -A

    14. Re:people search by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it just helps advertisers find you when you are close to their stores.

      Text message to mobile: "Hey Steve, you're just ten steps away from stupendous values at Radio Shack!"

    15. Re:people search by B3ryllium · · Score: 1

      You're not evil, you're just good looking.

    16. Re:people search by caluml · · Score: 1
      (hey, Google could get into the cell business and triangulate you from its towers. Now that IS getting evil.)

      Like I do already. Where is Calum?

    17. Re:people search by Atraxen · · Score: 1

      The US stopped playing 'Where's Charlie" sometime in 1973.

      --
      Be careful of your thoughts; they could become words at any minute...
    18. Re:people search by reidbold · · Score: 1

      I've always seen it as Waldo in canada.

      --
      -Reid
    19. Re:people search by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AFAIK, It's Waldo in English speaking Canada, and Charlie in French. I say this because in elementary school, they showed a French video called "Ou est Charlie?"

    20. Re:people search by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm now convinced beyond a shadow of a doubt that Google is in fact a front for the NSA.

    21. Re:people search by jargoone · · Score: 1

      Dick. Come over here and clean taco salad I just spit out upon reading your comment. (No, it's not from Taco Bell.)

    22. Re:people search by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Hey! What's my wife doing over at my single neighbor's house?!!

    23. Re:people search by nocomment · · Score: 1

      Actually I think this will be for that long-awaited "toothing" thing. ;)

      --
      /* oops I accidentally made a comment, sorry */
      /* http://allyourbasearebelongto.us */
    24. Re:people search by Woody77 · · Score: 1

      If the networks enable it, then yes. All the current CDMA phones know where they are, using both GPS and the CDMA network to provide differential GPS capabilities (as each tower knows EXACTLY where it is).

      The problem is that while the API exists in most phones, the carriers haven't "turned it on", and so apps downloaded to the phone don't have acccess to the data. The 911 mode is "special", and allowed acccess.

      It's bunk, because I'd love my phone to tell me exactly where I am.

    25. Re:people search by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > or maybe the evil guy?

      No, that's Osama.

  3. Borg?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The next microsoft??

    1. Re:Borg?? by DarthVain · · Score: 1

      Borgle!

    2. Re:Borg?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course they're the next Micro$oft. We're going to call them the evil empire in a few years, although some people are already calling them that.

    3. Re:Borg?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you better believe it

  4. Dodgeball? by Koiu+Lpoi · · Score: 5, Funny

    "It's time for you to put your mouth where our balls are!"

    1. Re:Dodgeball? by asliarun · · Score: 0

      "It's time for you to put your mouth where our balls are!"

      Presumably, a lot of dodging also happens in this process.

    2. Re:Dodgeball? by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 2, Funny

      If I could do that, I wouldn't be wasting my time on /.

    3. Re: Dodgeball? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      "If you can dodge a wrench, you can dodge a ball!"

  5. The cynic in me... by grub · · Score: 5, Insightful


    We talked to a lot of different angel investors and venture capitalists, but no one really 'got' what we were doing - that is until we met Google."

    I think what he's really saying is "We begged but no one offered us any money... until we met Google."

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:The cynic in me... by grazzy · · Score: 1

      It's always a good sign when people doesnt "get" your ideas :-)

      By the way, why the hell is this posted under "hardware.slashdot.org"?

    2. Re:The cynic in me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is absolutely not true. I have met these guys, and friends of mine have helped Dens and Alex in certain ways through this process, and they were definitely offered plenty of money from other sources.

    3. Re:The cynic in me... by dawnread · · Score: 0

      Insightful my ass - the cynic in *me* says the big green monster is taking over your personality.

  6. Google the next Microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Anyone else think Google may be the next Microsoft? With the way they are buying every company under the sun they seem to be taking a page out of Microsoft's handbook. Luckily it seems they skipped the chaper on being a spawn of Satan and everything.

    1. Re:Google the next Microsoft? by The+Nipponese · · Score: 1
      That's a big negative, sir.

      Google only buys technologies that have some element of 'search/organization' involved with them, or at least, ones that help to futher these functions.

      Microsoft buys all technologies.... and lots of them.

  7. Finally figured out... by daveschroeder · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...what the "???" is in

    1.
    2. ???
    3. Profit!


    It's "Get purchased by Google!"

    1. Re:Finally figured out... by PatrickThomson · · Score: 1

      Coming soon to a store near you, Gunderpants!

      --
      I am one of many. My idea is not unique, nor do I expect my voice alone to sway you. I speak in a chorus of opinion.
    2. Re:Finally figured out... by fm6 · · Score: 1
      Or some other big company with a lot of cash they need to spend. But that doesn't lead to profits, at least in the traditional sense. Indeed, big companies that acquire little ones very often run them into the ground. But the people who own a piece of the acquired company profit quite nicely...

      Many people dream of getting pre-IPO options in some hugely successful startup and retiring at 30. I usually get rather irritated when I see this actually happen, because it almost always means they've conned somebody with deep pockets and no brains into acquiring some utterly worthless enterprise. Either the idea was bad to begin with, or the founders did a very bad job of bringing it to market. That's not technological innovation or entrepeneurship -- that's just a con game.

    3. Re:Finally figured out... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh dear, let me be the first to say this to you: Welcome to Planet Earth!! Feel free to try your best at grabbing all you can with your smarts and good charm but please don't get jealous when others get what you don't have. It's not very becoming to the other humans.

  8. Mind Clash by Dreamwalkerofyore · · Score: 0

    Uh oh, my small fanboy-brain cant handle this. There is a small civil war going on in my brain. To the left, there's the "Yay for google, they are teh bestest!" camp, and to the right, there is the "OMG TEH BIG BROTHER IS GONNA GET YOUSE!" camp.....I just hope my brain doesnt explode....

    --
    I am a viral sig. Please copy me and help me spread. Thank you.
    1. Re:Mind Clash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Isn't that "asplode?"

      And, sorry friend, I think it's too late. Those bits you see lying around you are the remnants of your once pathe^H^H^H^H^H great mind.

    2. Re:Mind Clash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My fanboy-brain has no such problems. On the left, there's the "Yay for google, they are teh bestest!" camp, and to the right, there is the "OMG TEH BIG BROTHER IS GONNA GET YOUSE! and BIG BROTHER IS GOOD and BIG BROTHER will take good care of you, you are in safe hands" camp.

    3. Re:Mind Clash by CoffeeJedi · · Score: 1

      its an easy solution really; you just need to remove your common sense particle first, then you can have Google and no-Google

      --
      May you be touched by His Noodly Appendage. RAmen.
  9. Still... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Google is an impressive investor... I wish they'd invest in my program ideas!

    Well... that is if I had any...

  10. What's next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Google is in a lot of things that seem really cool.

    I am concerned, however, about the infrastructure of society being in the hands of a company.

    That is exactly what Microsoft wants, in my opinion, and in that respect, Google and MS are identical.

    That is why MS is watching Google so closely.

    1. Re:What's next? by garcia · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I am concerned, however, about the infrastructure of society being in the hands of a company.

      That is exactly what Microsoft wants, in my opinion, and in that respect, Google and MS are identical.


      That's exactly what every company wants but they want to do it in a way where their customers pay out the ass for it. People support Google because it's "free" (free as in I gave out my personal habbits to the lowest bidder so I could see maps for free).

    2. Re:What's next? by chrisnewbie · · Score: 1

      One of them will probably buy the other at some point!

    3. Re:What's next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well, I'm not sure that is what 'every' company wants.

      Selling a product or service is different than being the one who owns the roads/phonelines/infrastructure used to sell/buy those products/services.

      I wouldn't be impressed if there was a 'company' that owned the streets in the city I live in...even if they let me used them for 'free'.

    4. Re:What's next? by Vacindak · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That is exactly what Microsoft wants, in my opinion, and in that respect, Google and MS are identical.

      That is why MS is watching Google so closely.

      No it's not. MS is watching Google so closely because they threaten to make the OS/platform you use to do your work irrelevant in a way that things like Java never could.

    5. Re:What's next? by Chaos1 · · Score: 1

      Microsoft is only watching Google so they call an anti-trust hearing on them. Then while the Attorney General is pre-occupied, they will hatch their evil plan for world domination.

      It's simple really.

      --
      I only need the Preview button when I haven't used the Preview button.
  11. I know it's unreasonable at the time being... by fat+man+with+a+monke · · Score: 4, Interesting

    but, could there be a possibility of integrating this feature with google maps or google local eventually? Google local search of "what bar are my friends hanging out at tonight?" drop down some phone numbers, get a google map to where they are.

    1. Re:I know it's unreasonable at the time being... by 0x461FAB0BD7D2 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If you're searching Google to find out where your friends are hanging out, perhaps technological integration isn't exactly your biggest problem.

    2. Re:I know it's unreasonable at the time being... by JFMulder · · Score: 4, Funny

      Or, "Where is my ex so I can stalk her?"

    3. Re:I know it's unreasonable at the time being... by youknowmewell · · Score: 1

      Yea, I like that idea.

      I heard the CIA has lots of "friends" that it wants to find. Now all they need to do is google them!

    4. Re:I know it's unreasonable at the time being... by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Google local search of "what bar are my friends hanging out at tonight?" drop down some phone numbers, get a google map to where they are.

      Or, change that to "what bar is my soon-to-be exwife hanging out in tonight?"

      If it can be used by your friends, it can be used by people who don't like you. There's always a flip side.

    5. Re:I know it's unreasonable at the time being... by garcia · · Score: 1

      While I see both of your points it would be easier than having to setup a UPOC SMS group, or have AIM group chat, or gasp -- have to call people...

      I don't like making phone calls. I have GPRS and SMS to talk w/people. Phone calls make me drop GPRS and they take too long and require my undivided attention.

      Quick SMS or IMs are much easier. If a webapp could tell you where your friends currently are (opt-in of course) then that would own.

      I don't know if I'd like to have a single company be doing that (especially the way Google has been heading as of late).

    6. Re:I know it's unreasonable at the time being... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With the Internet and all of this transfer of information, what makes you think we^H^Hthe CIA doesn't know where you are?

    7. Re:I know it's unreasonable at the time being... by FLEB · · Score: 1

      "Sitting in front of the computer, reading Slashdot"

      Big stretch, CIA.

      --
      Information wants to be free.
      Entertainment wants to be paid.
      You just want to be cheap.
    8. Re:I know it's unreasonable at the time being... by rsd-17 · · Score: 1

      drop down some phone numbers, get a google map to where they are. Or maybe you could call one of those phone numbers...I believe that's what they're for.

    9. Re:I know it's unreasonable at the time being... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ive seen a few responses here along the lines of "there is no need to find out where your friends are, because if they are your friends, you know." And this is entirely untrue if you have a decent social life and/or live in a reasonably populated area. I don't call every single person in my phonebook on a friday night to see where they are or where they are going to be. Furthermore, drunk people rarely stay at the same bar for a period of time. I would easily say that the #1 use of my cell phone is finding out where people are and what they are doing so I can meet up with them and then talk to them in person.

      With technology like this though... I could run a query and see "who is out on the upper east side tonight?" get the results, and then call them up to hang out. It saves me the annoyance of having to call everyone up and see whats going on. A non party-type example: "Oh I see that Mike is working at his LI office today. I'll call him up to see if he wants to get some lunch." Think about this for a bit, and you can see that there are many scenario's where this application would be useful.

      Humans LOVE to socialize and exchange information. Solitary confinement is considered the harshest form of punishment in the US prison system. There is gold to be found in any technology that can allow us to interact with each other more.

    10. Re:I know it's unreasonable at the time being... by Timmy · · Score: 1

      Dodgeball allows you to keep specific other people from receiving your location updates, even if they're in your "friends" circle. They refer to it as the "ex-girlfriend" bug.

    11. Re:I know it's unreasonable at the time being... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what if they don't know where they are... i'm at this bar i found walking around town

    12. Re:I know it's unreasonable at the time being... by danila · · Score: 1

      What is especially interesting is that when we can use the technology to deal with the boring aspects of socialisation we can give more attention to more advanced things. For example, I don't need to spend hours wandering around my city block looking for people who may be interesting in discussing social aspects of some innovative mobile applications. I just click on a link, read the story^H^H^H^H^Hblurb, read the comments and post what I think.

      Similarly, may be if people don't feel like they need to spend time just keeping track of what everyone is doing on Friday evening, and who goes where and who is taking whom with them, and instead concentrate on having good time, when one feels like it, working more on interpersonal relationships and stuff.

      Personally I think that socialisation is for idiots. Due to some personality traits (which are probably a mild form of some mental illness, as things always are), I don't care much about socialising and the pleasure of talking or hanging out with someone are proportional to the content of our communications. I don't care whom I am talking with, as long as the topic and ideas are interesting, and conversely I don't care that these people are my friends, if they engage in idle pointless banter, I will be soon bored to death.

      I can't wait until I can ask my phone to look for interesting people around me (filtering for interests and other stuff), so that I don't waste my time getting to know the boring 99%.

      P.S. I have no problem communicating whatsoever and the vast majority of people who meet me like me, I just don't care about them and can't be bothered to go to bars, parties, birthdays and other such black holes.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    13. Re:I know it's unreasonable at the time being... by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

      And the ex-girlfriends friends? You know...the hottie mutual friend who you may be interested in. Where do her loyalities lie?

    14. Re:I know it's unreasonable at the time being... by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

      Would it be too hard to ask the bartender the name of his establishment?

    15. Re:I know it's unreasonable at the time being... by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Look, what self-respecting stalker doesn't already know where their ex is? Frankly, if you have to rely on someone broadcasting their location to find them, you don't really qualify as a stalker in my book.

      Pfft.. amateurs.

    16. Re:I know it's unreasonable at the time being... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, you see that knob on your front door? Good. Now turn it, open, and walk out.

    17. Re:I know it's unreasonable at the time being... by danila · · Score: 1

      Can't be bothered, sorry. I'll wait for Nokia or Microsoft to take care of it for me.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    18. Re:I know it's unreasonable at the time being... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would say kill yourself now but you'd probably come back with "sure, has IBM automated the process?" I guess my advice for the pathologically hopeless is to just keep on staying as beautiful as you are. It sounds like you don't need any outside help with that.

  12. Where it fits in for Google by romit_icarus · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I wonder if this acquisition is somehow related to the Google Ride Finder (http://labs.google.com/ridefinder).

    It's New York City, it's location based, and it's more than GPS...

  13. Acquisition Trifecta in play! by bunburyist · · Score: 0

    But seriously,

    Too bad their server couldn't 'dodge' a slashdotting!

  14. The acquisition race... by coupland · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Crap, do Sun and IBM know about this? They'll have to make a couple more purchases just to keep up with Google. Wake me up when there's only one fish left in the pond...

    1. Re:The acquisition race... by TrappedByMyself · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Wake me up when there's only one fish left in the pond...

      Did you know that diets are deadly? Health 'professionals' recommed that a 'safe' rate of loss is a pound a week. But they don't tell you that at that rate you will weigh ZERO pounds in a few years. You will be DEAD!

      Gross generalization, check. Random links??? Darn, no random links, no karma for me.

      --

      Help me take back Slashdot. When did 'News for Nerds' become 'FUD and Conspiracy Theories for Extremist Nutjobs'?
    2. Re:The acquisition race... by Dr.+Cody · · Score: 1

      Wake me up when there's only one fish left in the pond...

      Think of anti-trust legislation as a "wafer-thin mint."

  15. Great plan Bart by Underholdning · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Great idea. Google has had tremendous success with it's prior engagement in social sites. Just look at Orkut.com
    Yes, I was being sarcastic. I'm still trying to figure out why they made this move. It doesn't seem to fit into the "organizing the world" mantra?

    1. Re:Great plan Bart by Zoidmann · · Score: 1

      Orkut is actually quite popular, at least in one country: Brazil.

      I'm from Denmark, and looking at your name and webpage, I guess you are Danish too. No, I would probably never have started using Orkut if I wasn't in Brazil, but over here it's actually usefull!

      On a sidenote, Orkut can be a pain to use, since it pretty unstable a lot of the time. Bad server, no donut for you.

      In other words, YMMV and so on...

  16. Hmmm... by sznupi · · Score: 1

    Great, to the list we can add "Google knows where you are" ;P

    --
    One that hath name thou can not otter
    1. Re:Hmmm... by mustafap · · Score: 1

      Kind of "Google You"

      --
      Open Source Drum Kit, LPLC deve board - mjhdesigns.com
  17. Info about the technology. by PxM · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I'm guessing they use the same tech which lets cellphone towers figure out your location for 911 calls. Is there anyway to access this locational information without having to pay the cell companies for the technology?

    1. Re:Info about the technology. by JaF893 · · Score: 4, Informative

      They don't use that technology at all. They know where you are because you have to text them to let them know where you are.

    2. Re:Info about the technology. by ravenwing_np · · Score: 1

      Actually, they are using the same tech that allows preteens to send snide remarks to each other during class. No, not the folded up note, but the SMS feature of every damn cell phone. User A sends a message to the server with the location you are at "@joe's bar". The server knows where that is and keeps track of you. Don't want to be in the system? Don't send an update. Nifty idea.

    3. Re:Info about the technology. by ChicagoBiker · · Score: 2, Informative
      No, they use the technology of the end user telling them where they are, there's no GPS or secret tech way of finding people. You text message Dodgeball.com that I'm at "Club Suds". It then sends out a text message to all of your friends on your list who have signed up that you're at "Club Suds". If they don't know where that is they'll have to ask you by replying to the text message and then you can text them back with directions.

      The service will however comb it's database and find complete strangers who have also text'd their friends saying "I'm at Club Suds" too, so then you can find other people who have reported being at the same bar you're at.

      But no, they (Dodgeball) have no way of actually determining where you are.

    4. Re:Info about the technology. by PxM · · Score: 1

      That's only part of the tech. Their friend-of-friend feature informs people who are near you. This isn't possible if you just give them a text string to work with.

    5. Re:Info about the technology. by Vintermann · · Score: 1

      Which is a good thing, privacy-wise.

      It's a simple concept really, no suprising technology. What I'm suprised at is that this is an american company. Generally, Europe and Asia are a couple of years ahead in SMS based services, but if there is a company that supplies this service here in Norway, I don't know about it. Whether that means they are brilliant and original or just are better at PR than the others (I suppose being bought by google is a PR move in itself), Dodgeball deserves credit. (no pun intended)

      --
      xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
    6. Re:Info about the technology. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But no, they (Dodgeball) have no way of actually determining where you are.

      but this guy does and probably deserves to be modded up.
      I like the idea of your phone knowing where you are and associating different locations with scriptable actions - you could do home automation or other interesting things.

      And your phone does need to really know "where" you are, it can just be programmed so that:
      if near towers t1 and t2 - do home stuff
      if near t413 and t452 do work thing
      if near unknown tower, allow for annotation of location for later use.

    7. Re:Info about the technology. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The information pinpointed by the cell phone towers is essentially illegal to use for reporting except by law enforcement. Companies cannot use this information because it is illegal, and so yall cannot either.

    8. Re:Info about the technology. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This sounds a lot like Netcom Buddy. Buddy is/was a service where you could invite your friends to your friends list, and if they accepted you would be able to get information about their exact position through SMS or even on a map. Location information was gathered automatically.

      This service was announced 2-3 years ago, but I don't think it's in much use now. People are reluctant to be stalked for some reason.

      Only info I could find now:
      https://netcom.no/sokhjelp/veiledninger/veiledning buddy.html

  18. Like them or not, Goolge has some great offerings by PenguinBoyDave · · Score: 1

    When you look at all the services Google has that they offer for free, and some of their paid services, Google really has filled a needed market. Go to one place for everything. It will be interesting to see what effect Google has on YAHOO over the next year. I like Yahoo's main page, but Google simply rocks.

    --
    I'm not a troll, but I play one on Slashdot.
  19. Dodgeball Looks Pretty Cool by Mean_Nishka · · Score: 4, Interesting
    This Dodgeball thing looks pretty cool. It would be even better if it worked using location based GPS vs. SMS messaging.

    One thing to watch is the post acquisition. Google's really didn't do much for Orkut. While Friendster continually builds a user base and adds features, Orkut remains slow and bug ridden.

    1. Re:Dodgeball Looks Pretty Cool by cpeterso · · Score: 1


      Google developed Orkut internally, while Dodgeball was developed by dedicated outside company. Did Orkut's developer(s) work on it full-time? Or was it one of Google's "20%" projects?

    2. Re:Dodgeball Looks Pretty Cool by Vacindak · · Score: 1

      It was a 20% project.

  20. In other news... by Alkonaut · · Score: 0

    "Grad students aquire small nation"

  21. Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "but no one really 'got' what we were doing - that is until we met Google.",.

    Anyone get the movie file of these two soulmates running down a beach in slow motion into each others arms?

  22. Recess by elmarkitse · · Score: 3, Funny

    Guess Google got tired of getting beaned all the time at recess so they just bought the whole darned game. EK

  23. Does this mean.. by hass · · Score: 2, Interesting

    that Google will know where I am, too?

    1. Re:Does this mean.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup. Just wait until they send out their Gninja's to implant a Gchip in all of our asses. Then we're all instantly trackable.

    2. Re:Does this mean.. by dripool · · Score: 1

      Bet they add your location dynamically to Google Maps... Geek opens up google maps, and looks for baloons noting their friend's locations now.... Kinda like their taxi map service. neat.

  24. New Trend by mattmentecky · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I predict a new trend to start emerging: Think of a unique/different way in which 'searching' is in anyway involved and create a startup with full intentions of being bought by Google.

    1. Re:New Trend by CHESTER+COPPERPOT · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I believe it was stated on John Battelle's weblog that search is the center of gravity for the computer industry .

  25. Interesting direction google is taking. by the_mutha · · Score: 5, Interesting
    If I'm not mistaken, the first service that google launched that was able to help you keep track of your friends was Orkut. Orkut has been hugely successfull here in Brazil. So much so, to the point where a lot of people have closed their accounts because of security concerns.

    I remember reading a cartoon one of these days where basically before a job interview, the interviewer starts to mention all this "nasty" stuff about the interviewee because he checked the interviewee's Orkut and found all the groups where he belongs to, etc. I've also heard about people getting dumped because of Orkut. Many people have already closed their accounts because of this. If you are evil, you can find out A LOT about the person's life and do them harm.

    Obviously dodgeball does not fall into this category, but it makes me think about all the services Google has planned. Obviously that overall they do more good than harm, but I can't help but think that some of this will be abused and used by organized crime, identity theft etc.

    Think about it.
    • Orkut
    • Google maps
    • Dodgeball


    Now mix those three together. I wonder how far Google will go in integrating these services, and how much care they will take in preventing abuse. We'll just have to wait and see.
    1. Re:Interesting direction google is taking. by stienman · · Score: 1

      I remember reading a cartoon one of these days where basically before a job interview, the interviewer starts to mention all this "nasty" stuff about the interviewee because he checked the interviewee's Orkut and found all the groups where he belongs to, etc. I've also heard about people getting dumped because of Orkut. Many people have already closed their accounts because of this. If you are evil, you can find out A LOT about the person's life and do them harm.

      I fail to see how that's different than a google search of someone.

      You don't control a lot of information that is online about you, but the stuff on Orkut and most other websites you do have control over. I'm fairly certian that my current employer "googled" me before hiring me.

      In the end, if you don't want people to know certain things about you, don't put them online. If you're involved in activities that you don't want others to know about and that information goes online despite your wishes, then it's your fault for participating. The simple fact is that if you can't be proud of your affiliations, then either you need to change your affiliations or yourself.

      -Adam

    2. Re:Interesting direction google is taking. by lamasquerade · · Score: 1

      That's why you don't connect your online persona(e) to your real identity - at least if you think you might say something that some idiot somewhere might find offensive or controversial - i.e. anything interesting.

      Of course my email address is linked pretty well to my real identity, but then I give that out to real people I know. If I were to post something on, oh, I don't know, slashdot, I use some alias which no one who knows me personally could connect to me. Some with usenet etc.

      I'm not saying this is a great or easy thing - certainly it would be nice not to worry about this stuff, but yeah, I don't want every potential employer to be able to look up my name in Google and get a bunch of my opinions on things like religion and abortion and government. Unfortunately there are people who will use opinions agains you as OP said, and so you have to divorce your online-freethinking/speaking self from your reality-polite-kowtowing-non-offending self.

      What I wouldn't give for a society of freethinkers...

      --

      // It had been Fat's delusion for years that he could help people. --Philip K. Dick, Valis

    3. Re:Interesting direction google is taking. by Vacindak · · Score: 1

      I've been working on writing a similar social networking service (mostly for fun), and that right there is probably one of my biggest concerns. Trying to come up with a system that allows varying granularity in privacy control, while also managing to be easy to use and simple to set up. So far, I don't think anyone's even come close to creating a really good solution for this. thefacebook.com, for example, has so many privacy controls that it's really intimidating to the user when you open them up and try to set them.

    4. Re:Interesting direction google is taking. by lamasquerade · · Score: 1
      I don't think it's as simple as that last sentance. See my previous post - but basically there are people in positions of power, the majority of those in such positions in fact, who control your destiny and who will use your affiliations against you.

      If I have an opinion that I would defend happily in an argument with someone who can think and who isn't offended by his or her ideas being challenged, but I know this same opinion *would* offend 90% of people, I certainly wouldn't want this opinion to be able to be connected to me by just anyone.

      So your conclusion should read: ...if most people wouldn't be proud of your affiliations, then either you need to change your affiliations or hide them (see my previous post) OR change yourself.

      Which of these choices you make depends on the validity of "most people"'s problem with the affiliation. If they are grounded and logical, then change yourself. If they are baseless and irrational then hide the affiliation. This is the sad necessity in our mob-rule/group-think society.

      For a case in practice of someone who refused to compromise his opinions or hide them see Bertrand_Russell. About halfway down that page you can see how Russell was disallowed from a teaching position at New York City College in the 40s because of a "public outcry" over his opinions. He didn't comprimise and ended up teaching at Harvard instead:) Of course Russell had such a magnificent reputation as a philosopher and freethinker that he didn't need to worry what a bunch of idiots thought of him, even if they did control the Mayor of New York and the state judiciary. However, I am not so fortunate:)

      --

      // It had been Fat's delusion for years that he could help people. --Philip K. Dick, Valis

  26. Wait for it! by Xarius · · Score: 1

    Cue the "Google has gone evil" conspiracists!

    --
    C17H21NO4
    1. Re:Wait for it! by zwei2stein · · Score: 1


      i always though that real googles motto always was
      "Whatever you do, look good, but be evil"

      anyway - as junior conspiratist, i think that google has fallen from grace at precise moment when they disabled results for xenu.net, and they are no longer better company than ... Intel, Amd or IBM

      --
      -- Technology for the sake of technology is as pathetic as eschewing technology because it's technology.
    2. Re:Wait for it! by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      You're too late, man... they're already here, they're EVERYWHERE! (the conspiracists, that is).

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
  27. Big Bro by TheSeventh · · Score: 1

    Well, there are already many rumors and speculations that the government can use cell phones as tracking devices. But you take Cell Phones, Google Maps, and Google's new beta feature which lets you track taxis and limousines as they move down the street, and you have a homing device which displays your current location on a scrolling map for people to track where you are and what you are doing.

    Given that a few of Google's recent advancements have had much potential for abuse, does anyone think they might actually use this service? Wouldn't you be worried that people will be able to track you, when you would rather not have them know where you are? What about the loss of the ability to tell your boss you are at home sick from your cell phone as you're waiting in line for the next new roller coaster at Cedar Point?

    --
    Just because you're paranoid, it doesn't mean that they're not out to get you.
    1. Re:Big Bro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know how viable cell phone tracking devices would be, especially in urban environments. I'm no electrical engineer but wouldn't the terrain mess with the propagation and therefore give off a bad signal?

    2. Re:Big Bro by Peldor · · Score: 0

      The FBI didn't give up on Carnivore or TIA, they've just outsourced it to Google. Looks like development is going quite well!

    3. Re:Big Bro by myukew · · Score: 1

      I can simply turn my cellphone off

  28. Tracking real-life location and places visited by msbmsb · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Google already knows your computer usage...might as well track your location and places you go in real life also. Think of how much advertisers would pay for that info in addition to everything else Google tracks about you (email, searches, local drive searches, internet usage).

  29. It fits into the advertisement mantra by msbmsb · · Score: 0

    Now, in conjunction with their maps system, they can follow which stores/restaurants/etc you go to. Tracking web activity and real-life activity means big sells to advertisers, maybe.

  30. centralized social networks will never work by j1mmy · · Score: 1

    how many do you have to sign up with? friendster? orkut? dodgeball? myspace? social networking software won't really take off until you manage your own connections and spider-like software crawls it to offer whatever services it can.

    1. Re:centralized social networks will never work by Monoman · · Score: 1, Funny

      Quick somebody make a Trillian for social networks! Google may come knocking.

      --
      Keep the Classic Slashdot.
    2. Re:centralized social networks will never work by natrius · · Score: 1

      social networking software won't really take off until you manage your own connections and spider-like software crawls it to offer whatever services it can.

      That's what FOAF is for.

    3. Re:centralized social networks will never work by Vacindak · · Score: 1

      Foaf has a lot of problems of its own. I'm inclined to believe that Foaf won't matter until there's Google-quality search just for Foaf, as well as a better way of displaying it than the Foaf Explorer (preferably integrated into the search page itself). But, hey... what do you know, that's centralization. :-P

  31. Funny, Yes, but not funny for Google. by mfh · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Yes, you made a funny statement. But this acquisition is not funny for Google. This is, perhaps, the first of many egregious errors on the part of Google. The technology behind Dodgeball.com is stupid.

    Here's why...

    If you don't know where your friends are -- they aren't your friends. So losers will use the service because they have no friends. They will use the service to find out where cool people are, but since no cool people are using the service, for obvious reasons, this service will turn into a real geekfest. Hence, the post, on Slashdot, about it.

    On the other hand, if you want to know places you should avoid, perhaps using this service is not so bad, as long as you don't key in your location.

    --
    The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
    1. Re:Funny, Yes, but not funny for Google. by millwall · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If you don't know where your friends are -- they aren't your friends.

      I'd say, if you've got so few friends you know where all of them are at any given moment, THEN you are a geek.

    2. Re:Funny, Yes, but not funny for Google. by farker+haiku · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You fail to understand the power of marketting. These conversations happen using AIM on their Verizon phones. Teeny bopper 1 to Teeny bopper 2: Meet me at the mall after school, k? Teeny bopper 2 to Teeny bopper 1: Alright! Teeny bopper 1 to mom: Can you pick us up at the mall at 8? mom to Teeny bopper 1: Which entrance? Teeny bopper 1 to mom: Use dodgeball silly...

      --
      Your sig(k) has been stolen. There is a puff of smoke!
    3. Re:Funny, Yes, but not funny for Google. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd say, if you've got so few friends you know where all of them are at any given moment, THEN you are a geek.

      Nobody has more than 3 true friends. Everyone else is an acquaintence. Personally I would rather not knowing where the rabit is hiding. I like good surprises. This technology seems to spoil the fun.

      Also, use this technology and your bookie/loan shark will know where to find you. Better get some more health insurrance.

    4. Re:Funny, Yes, but not funny for Google. by mattspammail · · Score: 5, Insightful
      "egregious error"

      Strong words for an old-timer like you. You should know better. Did you buy that ID on eBay?

      This is far from an egregious error. If it fails, it fails. If it succeeds, they reap the rewards. What are the chances of a business model such as this one failing? At this point, much lower than before. Apparently there were other idiots already using the service, but as soon as Google ties this system into their existing Hello, Picassa, and (possibly) future IM client, I believe potential is just oozing. There is no bigger gadget money-maker out there than cell phones. iPods are a distant second. And the high school/young college market is teeming with kids willing to pay for an inexpensive, unneeded service just like this. If it's free though, and it keeps them using Google services and so forth, how can this lose?

      --
      Now accepting PayPal donations!
    5. Re:Funny, Yes, but not funny for Google. by LittLe3Lue · · Score: 1

      Lets further the confusion:

      All cool people get this service to avoid all the uncool people using it, thus, increasing both the number of non-noncool people, as well as increasing the number of people avoiding non-cool areas.

      So, we have cool people moving away from nerds. cool.

      But this then increases the concentration of non-non-cool areas, to which non-cool users will start to flock.

      Cool people will once again have to migrate away, or run, from the non-cool users.

      The process cycles.

      The only true conclusion is that cool people will have flocks of nerds on their tail and will be forced to abandon the service, and the nerds will grow tired of running, and will also abandon the service.

      Thus, I agree with the parent: this service is stupid.

      Of course, the above theory is completely rediculous because of one fact:

      Google does everything right, Dodgeball sounds awsome, and it will probably be very interesting.
      Sure you know where your friends are, but to anyone who has spent time in europe and knows what its like to walk outside and just 'find' your friends thanks to dense population and much smaller distances of things, this service might very well help suburban areas or urban areas alike at times when you dont want to track your friends down before meeting them.

    6. Re:Funny, Yes, but not funny for Google. by Sin+Nombre · · Score: 0

      But all my friends are geeks...

      --
      "Im such a nonconformist I'm going to not conform to the rest of you!"
      "Dude I think we just got goth-served"
    7. Re:Funny, Yes, but not funny for Google. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the nerds will grow tired of running, and will also abandon the service.

      We all know how much geeks hate running!

      Sure you know where your friends are, but to anyone who has spent time in europe and knows what its like to walk outside and just 'find' your friends

      Hmmm. Not sure that will help. You have to msg your location. How often are you going to remember to do that? People will go to location A to find you, but you'll be at location B.

      There is going to be room for improvement. But that said... do you really want people to know where you are? Most of the people looking for me want money!

      I'm going to pay for a service that hides where I am, instead!!

    8. Re:Funny, Yes, but not funny for Google. by enrico_suave · · Score: 1

      Sometimes you buy a small startup in order to aquire the talent aquired within it. The purchasing of the company is kinda like a "signing bonus" for coming to work for the purchasing company.

      Dodgeball also has other products/ideas if i'm not mistaken, something to do with bar mp3 jukeboxes and uploading custom/personal mp3/playlists or something. All their ideas center around social gatherings and drinking though, maybe google just wanted to add some life to their parties=P

      Dodgeball is a simple, yet really cool idea, if you're a young urban professional in metropolitan area with lots of dense nightlife/hotspots.

      It's not just about finding where your friends are, you can ask dodgeball all sorts of cool geospatial questions i.e. I'm here at this bar, what bar is closest to me that has a pacman machine or a pool table or 50 cent wings?

      Hey look, hot nancy from accounting is there... lets go up the block and check it out.

      It's not just a friend inventory system, see?

      In any case, when I saw their presentation 2 years ago at o'reilly E-tech I was like "dammit! i wish I thought of that" now I'm all like "son of a! gawd dammit! I wish I thought of that!"

      e.

      --
      Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
    9. Re:Funny, Yes, but not funny for Google. by donweel · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Here's a scenario for you. Me and a friend were out sportbike riding around MtBaker, we were into some twisties I was slightly behind my buddy. I look to the left and see a group of fellow Canadians at the side of the road it looks like there's a problem. I start flashing my hi beam and honking my horn but my partner is in Ducati World and sees nothing but the next corner to attack. So I turn around and figure he will notice sooner or l8tor and turn around. It turns out This fellow lost it in a corner, he was ok but his vfr was bent, we straightened the front end as best we could, then they headed back home and I continued on to hook back up with my partner. I checked the restaurant at the parking lot of the ski hill but while I was there my partner went by the other way. I never found him. by the time was able to get him on his phone he was back at the border and I was having lunch at the next tavern. If we could have stopped and located each other using this it would have been a better day.

      --
      Many a long talk since then I have had with the man in the moon; he had my confidence on the voyage. Joshua Slocum
    10. Re:Funny, Yes, but not funny for Google. by Cyn · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yes, they agree - that's why they've made lookups fast and convenient by denormalizing their database!

      INSERT INTO dodgeball_friendlist (userid, friend1, friend2, friend3) VALUES (1,'joey','lisa','antonio');

      lookups are FAST!

      --
      cyn, free software and *nix operating systems enthusiast.
    11. Re:Funny, Yes, but not funny for Google. by reidbold · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't just having cellphones have been sufficient? It's not like this dodgeball thing would have helped if you couldn't call him anyways.

      --
      -Reid
    12. Re:Funny, Yes, but not funny for Google. by WhatsAProGingrass · · Score: 1

      Yeah, what makes the parent think he/she could get reception int he middle of no where? And how do you explain where you are when you are in the trails somewhere in the woods?

      --
      Mark
    13. Re:Funny, Yes, but not funny for Google. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would have a talk with your buddy to check his mirrors more often. What if that was you who wadded his bike in the turn?

    14. Re:Funny, Yes, but not funny for Google. by reidbold · · Score: 1

      How does dodgeball, which relies on a cellphone, without gps help finding where you are? How does dodgeball work on a cellphone without reception?

      --
      -Reid
    15. Re:Funny, Yes, but not funny for Google. by Jason+Pollock · · Score: 1

      Without GPS? Definitely. This is an E911 regulatory requirement in the US. They have to be able to locate you within 100meters regardless of the presence of GPS information from the handset. How they do it is up to the Telco, but they usually use triangulation and/or signal timings to the various cell towers.

      Without reception? Not going to work (obviously).

      Jason

    16. Re:Funny, Yes, but not funny for Google. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Edited to remove self-centered bits readers aren't interested in:

      My friend and I got separated. If we could have located each other using this it would have been better.

    17. Re:Funny, Yes, but not funny for Google. by drix · · Score: 1

      Dude--whatever. Look at how cool their founders are. They're not even looking at the camera. That's because these pictures aren't portraits--they were take by papparazzi. And look at the hair. Geeks don't even have access to that much gel. And the people that use their site have cool names, like "Grellan" and "Alex" (as a girl.) Everyone knows all geeks are named either Craig or Rob. Plus, they all dress in Flash, so they look like they walked out of an iPod commercial. Yeah right, losers using the service. Huh you're funny--way to funny to be a geek.

      --

      I think there is a world market for maybe five personal web logs.
    18. Re:Funny, Yes, but not funny for Google. by IpalindromeI · · Score: 1
      Of course, the above theory is completely rediculous because of one fact:

      What's ridiculous is that for some reason, no one on Slashdot seems to be able to spell the word ridiculous. In the past few weeks of reading Slashdot, I cannot recall one time seeing it spelled correctly. And believe me, I would remember, because it's so rare an occurance.

      Even your beloved Google (who does everything right) could have pointed out your flaw: http://www.google.com/search?&q=rediculous

      Right at the top:
      Did you mean: ridiculous

      Yes. Yes, you did.
      --

      --
      Promoting critical thinking since 1994.
    19. Re:Funny, Yes, but not funny for Google. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh you poor sad little person. Let's try to help you out. Do you live in a small town with your parents? No problem. Run away. Tomorrow. (Get a good night's sleep and down a hot-smashing meal first.) It's so easy and you'll feel incredibly independent or majorly depressed but don't worry because you'll rotate between those two emotions every 24 hours. It's an awesome ride. I suggest packing a lot of denim. Where to go? You have two choices: New York or L.A. (Do I really have to tell you which is the correct answer?? Okay you silly muffin-pop, here's a *tiny* hint: this city is home to the Yankees, Knicks, Rangers, the Empire State Building, a "Central Park", many bridges and tunnels, CBGB's, a totally rad subway system, and it's rumored to never sleep. Good luck!) So what do you do when you get there? Just be super-cool and hang out in bars where you see hot chicks and dudes smoking out front. Bonus points if they're sporting an iPod, but you probably already knew that. I mean, I know you're not totally helpless. Then sign-up for Dodgeball and make me one of your contacts. Search for my profile by email address: nycthunderpussy@gmail.com is my game, don't play it out! Then just go to the places I check into and I'll introduce you to all the Flash mobsters. You are SO gonna love it here.

  32. Can Dodgeball help me? by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

    I have no friends. :( Can Dodgeball help me find some?

    1. Re:Can Dodgeball help me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      I have no friends. :( Can Dodgeball help me find some?

      No. Dodgeball will turn you from sissy cry boy into a real man who whipcracks people with wet towels in the gym.

  33. GloboGym by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 1

    If anyone can beat GloboGym, the Google team can.

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
  34. "but no one really 'got' what we were doing" by llZENll · · Score: 1

    translated from biz to normal language

    "but no one really 'wanted' to give us enough money"

  35. How to write useful software by chromium · · Score: 0

    'So I said, narrow the focus. Your "use case" should be, there's a 22 year old college student living in the dorms. How will this software get him laid?'

    http://www.jwz.org/doc/groupware.html

    1. Re:How to write useful software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one gets laid over the internet.

      Well, let me clarify. People get laid via the internet, but they have to put an incredible amount of effort into it. I knew a reasonably attractive, witty guy who had to put years into it before he even came close to getting some no-strings nookie, let alone the additional years before he found a suitable girlfriend. He was just a social recluse.

      So, correction:

      No one with better options available to them goes onto the internet to get laid.

  36. On buying startups before they get big (GOOG) by otisg · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Ah, interesting. If you've read Paul Graham's latest essay and last night's thread [1] on Slashdot, you'll find this paragraph from Paul'e essay rather interesting and timely:

    "What companies should do is go out and discover startups when they're young, before VCs have puffed them up into something that costs hundreds of millions to acquire."

    [1] http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=149177&cid=125 06957
    [2] http://simpy.com/ - 1-man mini Google

    --
    Simpy
    1. Re:On buying startups before they get big (GOOG) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That statement's (from Graham) kind of obvious; or it's an ideal to strive to.

      But unfortunately, the right statup and the right time to buy is the kind of thing which is only obvious in hindsight.

      All in all, these statements are easy to make but difficult to quantify.

    2. Re:On buying startups before they get big (GOOG) by otisg · · Score: 1

      Re: hindsight - yes, that is exactly what Paul Graham talks about. All his essays are about things that sound like common sense.

      --
      Simpy
    3. Re:On buying startups before they get big (GOOG) by Draxinusom · · Score: 1

      I haven't read the essay, but that sentence makes no sense. Finding companies when they are young enough to yield high returns on investment is what VCs do. Paul Graham is saying that companies who raison d'être is completely unrelated to investment (e.g. running a search engine) should compete with VCs in their own bailiwick? That's like saying "What companies should do is go out and purchase stocks when they're low-priced, before professional investors have puffed them up into something that costs hundreds dollars per share to acquire."

    4. Re:On buying startups before they get big (GOOG) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gee willikers! That Paul Graham sure is smart!

      Also, you should buy rare collectables before they're rare! And buy property in geographic locations before valuable natural resources are discovered there! And marry a woman before she is eight months pregnant with another man's baby! And of course, the best advice I have ever received, always tie your shoes before leaving the house!

      Also, and this is a hot tip just from me to you- if someone is going to fire a nuclear missile at your country or region, leave before they do.

    5. Re:On buying startups before they get big (GOOG) by cpeterso · · Score: 1


      But VCs fund startups so they can grow and THEN be sold to big companies like Google. If Google starts buying/betting on micro-acquisitions, they save a lot of money and/or can buy a lot companies.

    6. Re:On buying startups before they get big (GOOG) by cpeterso · · Score: 1


      Simpy.com is a cool idea and looks good, but isn't sharing of tagged bookmarks what del.icio.us already does? whois simpy.com shows that it's your project. :)

  37. plazes.com? by 216pi · · Score: 1

    why didn't they buy http://www.plazes.com/ ? I think it's the better system.

    1. Re:plazes.com? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >why didn't they buy http://www.plazes.../ ?

      Maybe because the name is so lame. "Discover Plazes like hotspots..." ugh, that's so stodgy oh-we-are-trying-to-be-cool it's pitiful.

  38. Wont they need by WormholeFiend · · Score: 2, Funny

    an opposing team?

    As a two-person team, Alex and I have taken dodgeball about a far as we can alone.

  39. google by JonDavies205 · · Score: 0

    does google want to take over anything else?!

  40. Orkut remains slow and bug ridden by says · · Score: 1

    I guess you meant to contrast that with the way that Friendster keeps finding new ways to be slow and bug ridden? Seriously, Friendster seems to find new ways to go haywire every time they add features, and their message alert system has been broken for years now. Google may not have done much for Orkut except keep its interface clean and its focus relatively pure. Friendster, on the other hand, looks more like the old school AOL every day.

    1. Re:Orkut remains slow and bug ridden by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      check out myspace. its friendster++. It is reasonably fast, has many features and not many bugs. It rocks. It is what friendster could have been. Friendster had a great idea, achieved the critical mass and then just exploded in popularity, and then just dropped the ball as they could not scale for shit.

  41. Finally by Kagura · · Score: 1

    This will finally help us answer the age-old question: Where can slashdotters find girlfriends? Thank you, Google!

    1. Re:Finally by kertong · · Score: 1

      google's new service called the "G-Spot" will help us in that department. However, some people say the service doesn't exist, while some people contend that it's otu there somewhere.

      Hmm.

  42. I totally agree... by Gruneun · · Score: 1

    We should discuss this further. Call me. My number's in the phone book.

  43. Location = Frontier by drewzhrodague · · Score: 1

    TOtal integration, all things location-based. Location software is one of the last frontiers we have. Sure their are those that have done stuff like this a while ago, but how many of them have popular integrated features? None I've heard of.

    It's a little difficult to singlehandedly (for a person) to do something like that all by themselves.

    --
    Zhrodague.net - I do projects and stuff too.
  44. Simple Mobile Technology by mcho · · Score: 1

    It makes sense that Google ventures into more mobile technologies -- as long as it's simple use and it doesn't require you to buy a several hundred dollar mini-computer that's also a phone. [See the /. article on the new Windows Mobile Software.]

    My start-up, messagingreminder.com, automatically sends your reminders to your mobile phone from your calendar (Microsoft Outlook or Mozilla Sunbird). It's easy to use and it's a great value.

    Now, if I could only get Google to buy my start-up... :)

  45. Of course I didn't RTFA, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    what's the use of a system that helps you "meet up with friends who are in the same location"? ... If you are in the same location, haven't you already met up with them?

    1. Re:Of course I didn't RTFA, but by gimpimp · · Score: 1

      i'd taken it to mean friend A visits friend B who lives in the same city as friend C. friend C can look for friend A, see they're in the area, and ask them to meet up.
      having never used this service, or even heared about it, i'm just guessing :)

      --
      i wish i was but oh well
  46. It's a tech grab! by taijirad · · Score: 0

    There's actually doing this to get at his superior foosball technology!

  47. Google buys Dodgeball by chrisnewbie · · Score: 1

    At first glimpse of the title of the article i thought Google had bought rights to the movie Dodgeball hahahahah! But you know what? it would not have surpised me that they did anyways, in fact it would not be far fetched to think they would even buy grocery stores at the rate they are going.

  48. Way ahead of you by mwvdlee · · Score: 0

    I'm currently searching for new things to 'search' and am hoping Google will buy me ;)

    --
    Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
  49. Just another way for advertisers and Spam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    to reach your circle of friends. Think about it, is there a better way of direct marketing?

  50. What's next? The Google Backlash, is what by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I remember when personal computers were just finding a niche in business, and your choices were an x86 running DOS and a Mac. For us DOS guys, MS was this amazing Sorcerer's Tower in Redmond that kept coming up with newer, better office and personal apps. And we watched in awe as the graphics programs for Windows began to nose up on their Mac counterparts (if not their user base). MS was Great!

    Then, somewhere along the line, circa early-mid 90's, somebody looked up and realized how pervasive they were. The Novell and WordPerfect satellites had been completely absorbed into the ever-burgeoning and hungry DeathStar they orbited, and even our phones, PDAs, TV set-top boxes, and browsers began to sport the Brand of the Beast. The backlash began, but the tide was unstem-able. We had become a Microsoft Nation, save for a few cells of Linux revolutionaries and a Mac sub-culture that, by its own choice, would not breed and so could not be counted upon in the long haul.

    I am often reminded of the affection I and so many others had for MS 15 years ago, seeing it mirrored here daily in the gushing PR presented as "reporting" on the front page of slashdot. But MS brokered only tools, no matter how empowered those tools made us feel. Google brokers knowledge, and if we don't monitor their growth at least as cynically as we do that of Microsoft, we are fools.

  51. When you "google" someone tomorrow by says · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You may be doing a lot more than just checking for their name on the internet. When google starts aggregating information from the internet, Orkut, blogger, gmail, and now dodgeball, under a "peopleranking" algorithm, it will be a very interesting world. Just think about how much power a neighborhood watch group equipped with camera phones can have by using those four services. Throw in google.maps (which I think will eventually use a livestream from Keyhole) and you are approaching Total Information Awareness for citizens. The more I think about it, the more I'd like to see them move their servers into international waters right away.

    1. Re:When you "google" someone tomorrow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      The US Government has long had influence in Google acquisition and development strategies, ask Google directly, they wont lie, but you *will* get a standard "we cant confirm or deny" style response. There are several dedicated pipes that are purely for government use and have full access to all personally identifiable information without requiring approval from Google top brass.

  52. Ow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This post gave me a headache. Don't paraspaek on Slashdot, please.

    Parents don't use disruptive tech very well. I forsee ulcers getting wider... blood pressure rising...

    Especially when jr decides to put false locations in his Dodgeball: "@ joe's" when really "@ cindy's" is true. :-)

  53. I dunno about friends by CHESTER+COPPERPOT · · Score: 1

    I remember reading about some guy who said if you want to create some good software just think how people will laid with it. I think that is important to start off the software and get it cranking however the point that fascinates me is other things it could be used for.

    You could use this to search for a local off duty cop to help out with a crime that has just happened or even use it to find somebody with some niche knowledge like a scientist to satisfy a question that's buggin' you. Of course this technology probably could be used for nefarious purposes too. But it's potential for good is there for the making.

  54. Re:Like them or not, Goolge has some great offerin by Momoru · · Score: 1

    Agreed they offer some cool stuff for free, but i think they are doing the exact same thing yahoo did which was stop caring about search and spending IPO money on all kinds of other crazy fun things. So yeah, yahoo is a great one stop place to get stock quotes, sports scores etc, but the search went downhill. Same thing with Google...i think they are already behind on the search curve because of new types of searches like Clusty that are much more useful then their current search engine.

  55. Oh Great by jac1962 · · Score: 1

    Does this mean I have to wrap my cell-phone in tin foil too?

    --
    "I worked hard for it. I deserve it. And I have it," Campbell said. "It's all mine."
    1. Re:Oh Great by LuckyStarr · · Score: 1

      Does this mean I have to wrap my cell-phone in tin foil too?

      No. A hat is all you need.

      --
      Meme of the day: I browse "Disable Sigs: Checked". So should you.
  56. What About Teenangers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I could definately see my 16 yr old sis and her friends using this especially if you start designating "cool places to hang out". When you're with a friend or two and you want to meet up with a group of friends, checking this site may be worth while.

  57. Google is desperate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're flying out in every direction because they "constantly innovate". They're rolling out new technologies almost every week, and acquiring new companies just as frequently.

    How do all of these acquisitions enhance their bottom line? I cannot imagine a business model based on dodgeball that would be worthwhile for anyone but two dudes in a basement, with mom handling cooking and cleaning.

    Are they trying to pioneer the "megacorp through a gigantic portfolio of boutique web service companies" business model?

    Google's money-maker is AdSense, and you can make an argument that all of these things enhance AdSense, but how far can you scale this one market? Unless they're going to subsidize all of these cute little services for years off of AdSense revenue, I can see them axing most of these services in a few months.

    If I didn't just liquidate my entire stock portfolio 20 seconds ago to put a down payment on a house, I'd probably look into shorting them.

    1. Re:Google is desperate by dwayner79 · · Score: 1

      See Money Maker post above... Adsense will send ads to you when you approach a store. It is brilliant.

      --
      Religion and politics, without the flame. godgab.org
  58. Where did you get your business degree from? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did you buy that ID on eBay?

    OT.

    This is far from an egregious error. If it fails, it fails. If it succeeds, they reap the rewards.

    Profit comes from slow and steady success. Any failure in business is egregious; without strict adherence to this philosophy a company will eventually fail. There is no margin for error. ...kids willing to pay for an inexpensive, unneeded service just like this.

    You said it, not me. It is a stupid, unneeded service. And Google just paid top dollar for it.

    Who is more of a fool, the fool, or the fool that fools the fool?

    1. Re:Where did you get your business degree from? by mattspammail · · Score: 1
      No terms were disclosed. Top dollar is your term. They basically paid the developers/owners off, and made a quick acquisition. If terms of the sale were disclosed, we'd have a better perspective of whether this was a sound business decision or not. Since they provide no terms, who's to say?

      Plus, unneccessary, inexpensive services are also a very big business. (see any online music service - ever seen an essential one?)

      --
      Now accepting PayPal donations!
    2. Re:Where did you get your business degree from? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since they provide no terms, who's to say?

      Google always hides the terms, to prevent their stock from fluctuating too much. First they let the purchase sink in for a while, and then the terms are leaked later on.

      But generally speaking, Google never gets a good deal on things they acquire. They always pay top dollar. Name one "steal" they have snatched up...

  59. Subclasses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But all my friends are geeks...

    And among them, you will know of at least a few people who you want to avoid, because they are lesser geeks. Right?

    Ad infinitum.

  60. Re:Like them or not, Goolge has some great offerin by PenguinBoyDave · · Score: 1

    This brings up an interesting question that I'd like to see a few people comment on. What is the best search engine out there now? I have heard a few talk about Ask Jeeves, and some others.

    --
    I'm not a troll, but I play one on Slashdot.
  61. more info by millette · · Score: 1

    Stories really should use the coral cache. Will herecast be next ?

  62. Hmmm. by The+New+Andy · · Score: 1
    uses mobile phones to help people meet up with friends who are in the same location

    Telefragged friends?

  63. Nokia Mobile Pimp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this something like Nokia Sensor?
    http://www.nokia.com/sensor/

  64. Google acquires Dodgeball by LightningBolt! · · Score: 5, Funny

    May 12, 2005

    Google, the company known primarily for its internet search engine, has announced today that it has acquired a dodgeball. Eric Schmidt, the CEO of the pioneering internet company, made the purchase at a silicon valley sporting goods superstore, Sports Authority, for the sum of $12.95.

    "This acquisition will become a cornerstone of our future growth plans," said Schmidt. "In the coming weeks, this dodgeball will be hurled at tremendous speed within the executive offices. It is likely to knock phones, pen holders, and even some of those magnetic paper-clip boxes off of the desks of many employees. This should stir things up, and get our best people thinking either outside of the box, or about looking for another job. The combined one-two punch of increased thinking and lower payroll costs will propel Google forwards into the next century."

    Sally Jones, an employee at Sports Authority, said that the transaction went smoothly. "Initially, when we met with Schmidt, we were concerned the acquisition would be a hostile takeover. However, he assured us that his plans for the dodgeball were based on growth and solid corporate fundamentals. The fact that his credit card was not declined was also assuring." Sally says that she recommended the purchase of an air pump to help inflate it, but that Schmidt declined, stating that the company's "[value] is already inflated."

    The acquisition comes on the heels of rumours that Microsoft has plans to acquire a badminton set. A Microsoft spokesman was not available for comment.

    --
    Old people fall. Young people spring. Rich people summer and winter.
    1. Re:Google acquires Dodgeball by kyojin+the+clown · · Score: 1

      mod parent up. you comedy wizard you, that made me snort tea all over my hand.

  65. Re:What's next? The Google Backlash, is what by tobybuk · · Score: 2, Funny

    Shutup, I'm eating this food and it tastes really good. How can something that tastes this good be bad for you?

  66. Money Maker by dwayner79 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is going to be huge. Not only are you going to be near a freind, you will be near 3 shops that have ads with google. It may get annoying, but they have to pay for this somehow.

    --
    Religion and politics, without the flame. godgab.org
  67. Re:What's next? The Google Backlash, is what by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    we are fools

    Ah, foregone conclusion then? Last orders please!

  68. But what about... by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1

    ...if you're trying to meet up with a forgetful friend who always forgets to take his mobile out with him?

    --
    Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
    1. Re:But what about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well then I guess you're still in the same situation. A locator service based on cell phones doesn't help people who don't carry them.

  69. Re:Like them or not, Goolge has some great offerin by Momoru · · Score: 2, Informative

    I really like Clusty.com because you can sort things by category, the way the old yahoo directory worked. So if you do a search for say "Paris" it will split the results into groups like "Paris Hilton", "Paris, France", "Paris Casino" etc... Unlike google where you have to either type in a specific phrase that would make the results clear, or wade through tons of useless results.

  70. Re:What's next? The Google Backlash, is what by Chyeld · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I have no problem with a Google empire. I would have had no problem with a Microsoft empire, if they hadn't built theirs Robber Baron style.

    Google is, so far, the perfect example that you CAN be a successful company and NOT lie, steal, and cheat your way there.

    For decades, I've had to deal with MBA types who revered Bill Gates, not because he was a good guy but because he was successful. They didn't care how he did it, they cared that he had done it.

    Let Google take over; let them be so pervasive that you can't go anywhere without seeing their brand; AS LONG AS THEY REMAIN THE COMPANY THEY ARE NOW.

    I'd rather spend the rest of my life dealing with business oriented types that realize it's possible to get ahead without being backstabbing, manipulative, lying, sacks of excrement than with the ones today that think their actions should only be guided by whether the potential profit outweighs the potential fees if they get caught.

  71. Re:What's next? The Google Backlash, is what by daffmeister · · Score: 1
    we watched in awe as the graphics programs for Windows began to nose up on their Mac counterparts

    You watched in awe of Windows graphics???

    I am often reminded of the affection I and so many others had for MS 15 years ago

    I must move in different circles to you because I've never known anyone to feel affection for MS. And I'm talking right back to Bill's first compilers for CP/M.

  72. Cuz, y'kno by aztektum · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It would make too much sense to just to call your friends mobile phone to find out where they are.

    --
    :: aztek ::
    No sig for you!!
    1. Re:Cuz, y'kno by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've obviously never called anyone who was in a bar before...

      Me: Hello?
      Them(shouting): Hello!
      Me: Dude? Where are you?
      Them(shouting): I can't hear you, I'm in a bar. Call back later!

      Yep, that works real well.

    2. Re:Cuz, y'kno by kmuoio · · Score: 1

      Calling 5-6 people at the same time, or one call after another? Dodgeball also allows to ping friends of friends -- people you don't know yet.

  73. this is not cool don't be fooled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this is not cool folks, this is google setting up the stakes to be the next choice point only deeper inside your life than they imagined. this does not use triangulation it uses the gps chip in most every cell phone these days. IF in the event the theories that GMail scans/reads your mail, for whomever, *evil eye at the patriot act* this is just another step into the complete loss of all privacy. you can mass txt msg already from just about any decent cell phone what is the point in having all this crap? and the "crush alert" thing seems pretty stalker like if you ask me.

  74. Microsoft responds by PaxTech · · Score: 4, Funny

    Not to be outdone, Microsoft today announced they have purchased a controlling interest in Duck Duck Goose.

    --
    All movements for social change begin as missions, evolve into businesses, and end up as rackets.
    1. Re:Microsoft responds by brasten · · Score: 1

      Sounds about right... they've been running around in circles not getting anywhere for years now.

    2. Re:Microsoft responds by paco3791 · · Score: 1

      Thats Duck, Duck, Grey Duck you insensative clode :)

  75. This may be used for micromarketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It seems like companies like these are steps towards giving Google the ability to determine the demographic of an area in near-realtime. Combine this technology with digital Google AdSense billboards, and you have a highly tuned and lucrative offer for advertisers.

  76. Step 1? by op12 · · Score: 1

    When Google takes over the world, we can get rid Step 1 (and maybe even 3).

  77. Google's Long Term Strategy is Unfolding by twifosp · · Score: 3, Insightful
    This strategy is no different than offering a free search. When you search, google knows what you're looking for and gives you advertisements based on that. Now they are adding the where.

    Google is going to become the premier marketing company in the future. They are really good at providing a service that people want or need, but at the same time, that service also helps them collect data on you. Is this a good or bad thing? I can't really tell yet. However, I just had a flash back to Minority Report where people are getting customer advertisements based on who they are.

    Let's look at what google can know about you, if you use all of their services (present and future):

    1. Google Search: What kind of things you search on a regular basis. Your interests and hobbies.
    2. Gmail: What kind of content you get in your email.
    3. Google Cache Proxy: Where you surf the web and how often.
    4. Google Maps: Where do you want to go?
    5. Google Dodgeball: Where do you and your friends actually go?

    Think about it. I could easily forsee LCD screens on streets, in bars, at your restuarant table which display custom google ads. As soon as you pass by them, your bluetooth enabled phone broadcasts your cell phone number to the receiver which transmits to the Google Person Database. This database spiders out and looks up your most recent searches, your friends searches, other people who search like you, accesses your e-mail indexes, looks up what locations you visit on a regular basis, and gives you a custom advertisement which has the best probability to sell to the thousands of other people who have a similar demographic to you.

    I'm starting to think of Google as marketing powerhouse with really smart technology, rather a technology powerhouse with really slick marketing.

    I'm struggling to find the answer: What can't Google figure out or make damned good assumptions about you, based on your Google use?

    1. Re:Google's Long Term Strategy is Unfolding by nealfunkbass · · Score: 0

      William, a male in his 30's, is walking through the local shopping mall.

      An google-adscreen system recognizes him as he walks by and broadcasts:

      Hey William, that rash ointment you were looking for is on sale at Eckerd Drugs, just ahead and on the left. Also, your mother just e-mailed you asking you to clean all the empty oreo bags out of your room.

      --
      - Donny was a good bowler, and a good man.
  78. sending text messages wherever I go? by ywwg · · Score: 1

    The idea that I'd send text messages every time I entered a new area is silly. Symbian phones can lookup what Cell ID they are connected to and use that for rudimentary positioning. It'd be cooler to have a program that would ping a server whenever I entered a new cell zone, and alert me if my friends are connected to the same cell.

  79. Robot.txt by Zentac · · Score: 1

    thats just paranoia, new tech bringing us into the future and people get scared... I may asume they (the company beign bought)already have thought of that and have a few solutions for it. On the other hand, googlehacking might get that much more interesting

  80. The dotcom boom is back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Overvalued large company buys overvalued small company run by two grad students who use phrases like "angel investor" and "'got' what we were doing. "

    The best part is the names of these companies and Dodgeball doesn't disappoint. It captures all the smug flavor of the original boom combined with the ability to jump on short term popular trends that says we could have been called "10-4 Good Buddy" if only we were born at the right time.

    With MS all hopped up and agitated now, the sky is going to be the limit once the bidding wars start. God this is going to be really funny to watch for a second time. Must stock up on microwave popcorn.

  81. No one is meeting up now, it's /.'d by Jerry · · Score: 1

    and will probably be that way the rest of the day.
    How much will that cost them?

    --

    Running with Linux for over 20 years!

    1. Re:No one is meeting up now, it's /.'d by MrAngryForNoReason · · Score: 1

      I'm sure google are having a whip round for bandwith money as we speak.

  82. The Founders of Dodgeball by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Suspect #1:
    Dens says: "i'm 28. spend my weekends either (a) fixing this website, (b) at the skate park, (c) hungover.

    Suspect #2:
    alex says: "I'm 28 and I helped make this little site. Grilled meats are totally my favorite."

    These guys got bought by Google?? Christ, I thought Google only wanted "geniuses". Surely if these guys, who say on their PR page that they spend "six night a week" in bars can get Bought and cash in, we can all do it! I should have become a webmaster after all :-(

    1. Re:The Founders of Dodgeball by sirhatesalot · · Score: 1

      why hate on people who can succeed while boozing it up on a daily basis?

  83. google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wait a second, does this mean that in addition to knowing where we're shopping on line, they'll know where we're shopping in physical stores? This is fantastic. Should I give them my social sec. # and blood type as well? : )

  84. Re:What's next? The Google Backlash, is what by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, because Google bought its original core technology, Q/Google, the founders used their connections to license their stolen technology to IBM, then the founders wrote an open letter berating the community, and now Google is buying up companies left and right in markets they can't ordinarily compete in because the TWO people at dodgeball pose an ENORMOUS threat.

    In the meantime, they're announcing vaporware products years in advance to stop people from buying competing techology, getting lucrative and secret contracts with OEMs ensuring their market dominance, sharing their code with the Chinese while telling the government that opening code would be a security risk, bundling desktop applications with their monopoly on searching the desktop, and plastering the airwaves with incredibly annoying commercials.

    Yes, watch them closely! Oh no! They have 30-50% of the search market! I smell an anti-competitive monopoly!

  85. thats why we have a free market by toiletmonster · · Score: 1

    thats why we have a free market. so when one company screws up, we switch to another that we like better. yeah competition.

  86. Re:What's next? The Google Backlash, is what by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I find it ironic and maybe it gives me a bit of hope that the american geek crowd is growing up when comparing the concerns expressed here over this topic to the derision dumped on the Bibliothèque Nationale de France when they expressed concern about the digitization of whole libraries by Google.

  87. murders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure... Just brows'n around when you notice you girlfriends cell is at your best friend's house. What do you know... His is there too. Yea, that will go over well.

  88. Google aquires dodgeball by SilentBob4 · · Score: 1

    and pegs MSN squarely in the head with it.

  89. Pseudonymity for the careless by A8bbNjwk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That's the fallacy of pseudonymity on the web. Have you ever posted something using your pseudonym from your real IP address? Or used both your real identity and pseudonym while maintaining the same tracking cookie in your web browser? Or leaked personally identifiable semantic information by posting from the same brain (google stylometry)?

    Once the two identities are linked by a single careless move (like those mentioned above), your pseudonym is compromised retroactively. You are now personally accountable for everything you thought was done anonymously. Don't think Google won't automate this in the future, if they aren't doing it already...

  90. If the Gov't did that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the gov't wanted to provide the same service as GOOG, how many people would freak out?

  91. Exclusivity is the next big thang by wsanders · · Score: 1

    The Wall Street Journal had an article on this a couple weeks ago - apparently the way for meetup sites to make money is to make membership quite exclusive. Not the hoi polloi you find on Friendster. Membership must be approved by N other members, you can be kicked off the service by not being cool enough, not making enough money, not having hot enough dates, etc. Then the service can sell ultrapremium ads.

    To paraphrase a great American, I would never join a club that would have me as a member.

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
  92. Mod parent up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Which of these choices you make depends on the validity of "most people"'s problem with the affiliation. If they are grounded and logical, then change yourself. If they are baseless and irrational then hide the affiliation. This is the sad necessity in our mob-rule/group-think society.

    Excellent point!

  93. Re:Funny, Yes, but not funny for Google. [OT] by Koiu+Lpoi · · Score: 1

    Did you buy that ID on eBay?

    Yes.

  94. Yay! by KipCas · · Score: 1

    Finally a tool for all the stalkers and/or psycho ex's out there. It's bad enough to get accused of blocking on AIM by an chick. Oh and thanks for fucking up booty calls forever. Unless Google issues a press release that says "To all the guys out there, relax, we just bought it so we could shut it down." then they can suck it.

    --
    Turk: Let's play Steak. J.D.: What? Turk: Steak. The 1st person to finish their steak is the winner of Steak. -Scrubs
  95. comment from Dennis Crowley by demon411 · · Score: 1

    Dennis Crowley: "Asking people to opt-in with their location is not the slickest way to do what we're doing - we should be using GPS or cellular triangulation or require users to push the magic "I am here" button on their phones - the problem is those things just aren't available yet. Alex and I specifically designed dodgeball to work with the phones that people carry in their pockets today. We always say, "it's no fun to build things that people can't use." The only way to get a critical mass of people using these apps is to focus on lowest-common denominator technologies. For us, that was text messaging."

  96. Re: Where can slashdotters find girlfriends? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  97. If you can dodge a wrench, you can dodge a buyout. by Helios292 · · Score: 1

    Now that Google acquired Dodgeball, does that mean one of the other team's players is out and Google gets one back?

  98. You are logged in as rekcah5 in New York City. by iseff · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Did nobody notice the top line of the page? The poster of this story included a Session ID variable in the query string, and apparently dodgeball does a terrible job with security, because now we're all logged in as rekcah5. Wow. Hopefully Google helps out a bit.

  99. Of course they flunked at step 1 by Kjella · · Score: 1

    1.
    2. ???
    3. Profit!


    This looks remarkably like a real plan
    1. Make a good product
    2. Get purchased by Google!
    3. Profit!

    The actual dotcom model was:
    1. Make a lot of hot air
    2. Get purchased by bigger fool
    3. Profit!

    You can't go the dotcom model unless you follow step 1. Step 2 was replaced by "???" as the market reached the biggest fools around.

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  100. Interesting ad revenue oppertunities... by Spykk · · Score: 1

    Imagine walking down the street when your phone rings. You answer it only to be greeted by an advertisement for the resturaunt your standing in front of.

  101. You really can patent anything. by alcmaeon · · Score: 1
    "uses mobile phones to help people meet up with friends "

    I think I will patent a process for contacting other people via phone. I'll assign a certain series of say, 7 to 10 digits, to each phone on the network and allow people to contact other phone users by dialing in just this series of digits. I'll make a mint!

    1. Re:You really can patent anything. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should patent witty, hilarious comments. You would make a mint chocolate chip ice cream bar!!!!