True. But it doesn't have to be real-time, and it shouldn't be. Publishing all a nation's defence strategies is a bad idea in a time of war. Publishing, say, the patrol roster for border patrols would not be a good idea. Informing everyone that a particular power plant is currently unguarded and unprotected is not a good idea.
Usually we call this "security through obscurity".
We shouldn't be fighting a war if the people don't agree with it.
If a particular power plant is currently unguarded and unprotected, then FIX IT! If there's a security problem, then having it out in the open will get something done about it.
Groups such as this should be able to hold closed meetings. Otherwise the whole point of the group - to determine what critical infrastructure is vulnerable and to better defend it - is undermined. The proceedings of the meeting should be made available in, say, two years time - if a vulnerable piece of critical infrastructure is still vulnerable after two years, this group isn't doing it's job.
If it was better defended in the first place, we wouldn't need to hold closed meetings.
I don't know the law in this case, but I would be surprised if that is not already the way it works. Even top secret information is declassified eventually.
Tell that to Bush and his domestic wiretapping program.
Apologies if this came off as trollish or standoffish.
Slashdot Mirror
how's that a change?
owned.
you were owned once again.
does it run Linux?
If you still have the negatives, just rent/buy/borrow a film scanner and use that.
Karma whoring off the EFF, eh? http://www.eff.org/legal/cases/att/small_att.png
You have a girlfriend? We don't like your kind here.
Ok, where are the 360s now?
Jarrrrrrrrrrrr!!!!!!!!
Apple Computer only uses 3/4 as it is...
First post!!!! Owned again.
FP bitches....owned you.
You must be new here.
Don't have the problem in the first place.
Usually we call this "security through obscurity".
Groups such as this should be able to hold closed meetings. Otherwise the whole point of the group - to determine what critical infrastructure is vulnerable and to better defend it - is undermined. The proceedings of the meeting should be made available in, say, two years time - if a vulnerable piece of critical infrastructure is still vulnerable after two years, this group isn't doing it's job.
If it was better defended in the first place, we wouldn't need to hold closed meetings.
I don't know the law in this case, but I would be surprised if that is not already the way it works. Even top secret information is declassified eventually.
Tell that to Bush and his domestic wiretapping program.
Apologies if this came off as trollish or standoffish.
You know, by invoking Godwin's Law, you're fulfilling it?
If you mention the law, which mentions Hitler, you mention Hitler.
FP...hahaha
Actually, I would imagine /.ers buying a lot of X.
Ok...what's your PayPal username?
Well, every day is a bad traffic day, so, yes, NJ has normal days.
welcome our horned-rimmed-glasses-wearing, lazy, no good geezer overlords.
You can't stop me!
Frosty Piss again, bitches!
Not nearly as fun as cat /dev/zero > ~/test though.
No. Prepend. Append would be AppleK, BoyK, CatK, etc.