In a case at our local Army post, Lt. Ehren Watada refused to deploy to Iraq, claiming that the war was illegal. (Whether he was correct is not relevant at this point; I'm not talking about that.) In his court martial, he was banned from using any defense on that ground, only being allowed to defend himself on the "I never refused" ground (which was obviously not the case).
And the original request was done over a teleconference. Bad idea. Of course, all of the passwords then found themselves in a public court document. Oops.
Said authorised individual should have already had access to those passwords. This guy was more interested in not giving them up to parties that he could not see over a teleconference, or at least that's what his defence will say.
Note that many modern file systems use journaling or copy-on-write, both of which have the effect that writing to the same file does not necessarily write to the same block. DBAN takes care of this problem, though.
In fact, the "bizarre meeting" was actually split between two physical locations, so he couldn't see who was demanding the password at the other end. Even if you're required to give a password to another person, doing so in such a situation is a Very Bad Idea and that's why he wanted to give it directly to the mayor.
Remember, when asked for the passwords the first time it was over a teleconference with a large group of people whom he did not know. I don't care who's on the other line and what they're threatening; you don't give passwords in such a situation. That is why he wanted to speak with the mayor.
Added to all the other problems you said, OLPC should have realised that putting a damn computer in the hands of some country's kids is completely missing the point when the kids have probably no electricity, not even basic healthcare, no sanitation, little or no education, and perhaps barely enough food. Forget the computer ---- there are far bigger problems to solve first.
This objection has been raised several times, and is still wrong. OLPC isn't meant for the countries where feeding one's children is the largest problem. They're meant to target populations where (for example) food and clean water are generally available but the education is poor.
Um....in Massachusetts, on your state income tax return, they ask whether you are enrolled in either the state program or private insurance. If the answer is no, then your taxes go up by the cost of the state program and you are enrolled. No choice---unless you want to perjure yourself, of course.
If I recall correctly, the API:s that expose browser components (e.g. to Windows Help) were designed with the intention of making rendering engines pluggable. Thus, Windows Help could at some point in the future use Mozilla to render if Mozilla wrote a bit of code and Microsoft finishes this API.
Um, perhaps it would be beneficial to read my post before screaming. I said basically what you said. In fact, the majority of my post was describing the security features that jails have and chroot does not.
Slashdot Mirror
In a case at our local Army post, Lt. Ehren Watada refused to deploy to Iraq, claiming that the war was illegal. (Whether he was correct is not relevant at this point; I'm not talking about that.) In his court martial, he was banned from using any defense on that ground, only being allowed to defend himself on the "I never refused" ground (which was obviously not the case).
Traffic violations are "preponderance of the evidence", at least in my state.
d) on teleconference with a handful more, whom he obviously could not see
And the original request was done over a teleconference. Bad idea. Of course, all of the passwords then found themselves in a public court document. Oops.
Said authorised individual should have already had access to those passwords. This guy was more interested in not giving them up to parties that he could not see over a teleconference, or at least that's what his defence will say.
Note that many modern file systems use journaling or copy-on-write, both of which have the effect that writing to the same file does not necessarily write to the same block. DBAN takes care of this problem, though.
Bless you.
IPMI is your friend. You can mount ISOs on bare hardware, and remotely push the power button.
So it would run Gentoo, then?
In fact, the "bizarre meeting" was actually split between two physical locations, so he couldn't see who was demanding the password at the other end. Even if you're required to give a password to another person, doing so in such a situation is a Very Bad Idea and that's why he wanted to give it directly to the mayor.
No, no, no. On the internet you must say "your a moran". It's like a natural law or something. Get with the program!
Remember, when asked for the passwords the first time it was over a teleconference with a large group of people whom he did not know. I don't care who's on the other line and what they're threatening; you don't give passwords in such a situation. That is why he wanted to speak with the mayor.
Ballmer?
Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition!
http://epiconeliner.com/
This objection has been raised several times, and is still wrong. OLPC isn't meant for the countries where feeding one's children is the largest problem. They're meant to target populations where (for example) food and clean water are generally available but the education is poor.
What the reasonable person would think here depends on the income that this attorney pulls in.
I already knew that light repelled me.
Er, slight factual inaccuracy. They make you pay a penalty each year if you're not enrolled in insurance.
Um....in Massachusetts, on your state income tax return, they ask whether you are enrolled in either the state program or private insurance. If the answer is no, then your taxes go up by the cost of the state program and you are enrolled. No choice---unless you want to perjure yourself, of course.
I'm having trouble parsing your sentence. Mentioning RIAA lawyers and honor in the same sentence confuses me.
If I recall correctly, the API:s that expose browser components (e.g. to Windows Help) were designed with the intention of making rendering engines pluggable. Thus, Windows Help could at some point in the future use Mozilla to render if Mozilla wrote a bit of code and Microsoft finishes this API.
The article here explains that you can either have a secured FTP repository or one grabbed by SSH.
An APT repository is just a directory exposed by HTTP. You might be able to .htpasswd it but I'm not sure whether it would work.
Um, perhaps it would be beneficial to read my post before screaming. I said basically what you said. In fact, the majority of my post was describing the security features that jails have and chroot does not.