Slashdot Mirror


Bug Means High School Students' Schedule Errors May Last Days

Hugh Pickens writes "The Washington Post reports that thousands of high school students in Prince George's County missed a third day of classes Wednesday, and school officials said it could take more than a week to sort out the chaos caused by a computerized class-scheduling system as students were placed in gyms, auditoriums, cafeterias, libraries and classes they didn't want or need at high schools across the county and their parents' fury over the logistical nightmare rose. 'The school year comes up the same time every year,' said Carolyn Oliver, the mother of a 16-year-old senior who spent Wednesday in the senior lounge at Bowie High School. 'When I heard they didn't have schedules, I was like, "What have they been doing all summer?"' When school opened Monday, about 8,000 high school students had no class schedules and were sent to wait in holding spaces while administrators tried to sort things out." (More below.)

443 comments

  1. Schedules are important. by tacarat · · Score: 5, Funny

    One must know which classes to ditch.

    --
    "Common sense will be the death of us all"
    1. Re:Schedules are important. by PolyDwarf · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I for one can't wait until this "government school scheduling program"

      is applied to my government-run healthcare system to schedule patients.

      Yay?

      I guess reading the summary is hard, where it's stated they spent $4.1 million on the system. And if you look at the linked website for the company, it looks to be a private company based in Arizona, not anywhere near where the district is.

      So... Yay?

    2. Re:Schedules are important. by idlehanz · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      You can't have any pudding if you don't eat your meat. How can you have any pudding if you don't eat your meat. - Pink Floyd

      Sounds like all is well.

      --
      Changing the world... one research project at a time.
    3. Re:Schedules are important. by Lord+Byron+II · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But consider how pissed people would be if the government took away their "socialized" schools, libraries, and fire departments.

    4. Re:Schedules are important. by teknosapien · · Score: 0, Troll

      you're a moron

      --
      no matter how good it is, it is human nature always wants to make things better
    5. Re:Schedules are important. by interkin3tic · · Score: 3, Funny

      I guess reading the summary is hard

      It's not his fault. The government also screwed up his schedule so he couldn't take reading 101.

    6. Re:Schedules are important. by lgw · · Score: 4, Informative

      Maybe you've missed the huge argument over school vouchers and all the parents who'd like nothing more than to end socialized schooling for their kids? Of course, that does get to the point. Few would argue against having a governement option for health insurance, even assuming it will end up sucking and only poor people will use it (I'm a fairly hard core libertarian, but you can't escape the logic: diseases are contagious). There's pretty strong objection to having government-only health insurance, because it will end up sucking and no one will want to use it.

      Every government program I can think of that doesn't suck badly has two things in common: a limited amount of money changing hands, and a limited amout of power over peoples lives.

      Most of the debate, false information, prorganda, and shouting over this health care issue stems from a failure to distinguish clearly between "government option" and "government only" on all sides, including a fairly outspoken set who argue "pretend government option, but really governemnt only once we fool the voters". Fear of that last part seems to really be fanning the flames, and with the recent history of congresscritters voting on bills they haven't actually read, that last bit is a reasonable fear.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    7. Re:Schedules are important. by lgw · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, no, no. On the internet you must say "your a moron". It's like a natural law or something. Get with the program!

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    8. Re:Schedules are important. by PRMan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But parents DO have an option for school. They can put their kids in private school or they can home school. The vouchers are just a way of saying that they don't want to pay in to the government-run system.

      Similarly, if the health care system were optional, people could get their own private health care. But they wouldn't expect vouchers toward it.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    9. Re:Schedules are important. by Darinbob · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Very true. Ditching class without a schedule is like playing hooky in the summer.

    10. Re:Schedules are important. by eosp · · Score: 0, Redundant

      No, no, no. On the internet you must say "your a moran". It's like a natural law or something. Get with the program!

    11. Re:Schedules are important. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Every government program I can think of that doesn't suck badly has two things in common: ... a limited amout of power over peoples lives.

      You apparently never served in the Marine Corps.

    12. Re:Schedules are important. by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      County =/= State =/= Federal

      This was an issue on the county level.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    13. Re:Schedules are important. by lgw · · Score: 4, Insightful

      On the specific subject of vouchers, the obviousy right answer is for everyone to divide the cost of the fixed overhead for schools, but for parents to have the option of a voucher for the per-student cost. That works out well for everyone, so you'll never see it in action.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    14. Re:Schedules are important. by pluther · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Of course, the scheduling was fine until they replaced the government system they'd been using with a privatized system.

      But, hey, don't let mere facts get in the way of your political opinions. I understand you might not have time to read even the summary when you have to be worried about Obama replacing your doctor with someone willing to kill your grandmother.

      --
      If the masses can keep you down, you're not the Ubermensch.
    15. Re:Schedules are important. by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 0, Troll

      Does NOT suck...

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    16. Re:Schedules are important. by pfleming · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But parents DO have an option for school. They can put their kids in private school or they can home school. The vouchers are just a way of saying that they don't want to pay in to the government-run system.

      Huh? They do pay into the government run system. It's called taxes.

    17. Re:Schedules are important. by sumdumass · · Score: 0, Troll

      The government system was likely by hand computer combination and departmentalized to the local schools. In other words, it was getting too old and outdated as well as labor intensive. The district wanted something different.

      As for your Obama comment, do you deny end of life counseling in the two health bills floating around Washington? Or are you just another fanboy who takes a politician at their words instead of reading the legislation for themselves?

    18. Re:Schedules are important. by radtea · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Every government program I can think of that doesn't suck badly has two things in common: a limited amount of money changing hands, and a limited amout of power over peoples lives.

      Or is run by a non-American government.

      The only reason government-only health care might be a bad option in the US is because it would be the American government running it, and the American government is uniquely and completely dysfunctional when it comes to delivering effective domestic programmes.

      Here in Canada we have government-only health care, for all practical purposes: the Canada Health Act makes it effectively impossible to deliver health care services outside of the government system, although we are starting to see more private-care options due to long waiting lists for some procedures in some parts of the country, and the government-run courts have ruled that "access to a waiting list is not access to care."

      However, despite the undoubted issues with our system, we live longer than Americans and spend less money per capita on health care than the PUBLIC health care system in the US spends, much less the vastly inefficient and ineffective private system. And this despite being more ethnically diverse and having a much smaller, more thinly-spread population than in the US.

      So it is clearly and simply false, a flat-out contradiction of fact, to say that public-only health care necessarily sucks. To believe that is exactly equivalent to the belief that the Sun moves around the Earth. The only way anyone could believe it is as an article of faith, side-stepping all the empirical evidence to the contrary.

      I mention Canada's system here because it is the one I'm most familiar with, but their are plenty of European systems that are closer to the mixed public option system the US is talking about, and they all work at least as well as Canada's and some better. But in most cases the public aspect of the system does a good job of delivering basic care. The logically disabled will at this point for some reason always point to the few places with sucky public systems, as if "some public systems suck" in some way disproves the undoubted empirical fact that "many public systems do not suck."

      There's very little point in arguing with people blinded by faith, so I doubt merely pointing out raw empirical facts will convince you of anything. But hopefully other people reading will discount your delusional--but mysteriously common--view a little bit more.

      --
      Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
    19. Re:Schedules are important. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "3% == Americans who *want* health insurance but are not covered. 86% ==
      Number happy with what they've got (TIME Aug 10)"

      The number of people who want/need their speech protected by the first amendment is similarly small.
      The majority of citizens don't have anything of much consequence to say. I proudly agree with your line of thinking; I've always advocated for "majority rules, and NO minority rights" but only a handful of people will listen!

    20. Re:Schedules are important. by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1

      I for one can't wait until this "government school scheduling program"

      is applied to my government-run healthcare system to schedule patients.

      Yay?

      Class scheduling systems have nothing in common with patient scheduling systems, except for the word "scheduling". You know it. I know it. And everyone on /. knows it. Next time, at least try to respect my intelligence with a plausible lie, OK?

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    21. Re:Schedules are important. by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1

      The government system was likely by hand computer combination and departmentalized to the local schools. In other words, it was getting too old and outdated as well as labor intensive. The district wanted something different.

      As for your Obama comment, do you deny end of life counseling in the two health bills floating around Washington? Or are you just another fanboy who takes a politician at their words instead of reading the legislation for themselves?

      It was the respondent to the OP who injected the Obama comment -- obliquely, of course. Class scheduling is a very specialized software business. It has nothing to do with physician practice management, which is also a specialized software business. This has nothing to do with physician practice management software, please troll elsewhere. Dammit, I got trolled!

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    22. Re:Schedules are important. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      People don't want to have school vouchers because it's equivalent to taking taxpayer money and giving it to a private school - most of which are religiously-affiliated or religiously-based.

    23. Re:Schedules are important. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You really are an idiot, aren't you?

      Wow.

    24. Re:Schedules are important. by sumdumass · · Score: 1, Interesting

      The only way you got trolled is if you were troling yourself and I took the bait. I didn't see it that way but you complained about the mere facts and I pointed to how loosely you were using them yourself.

      The old system was replaced because it wasn't serving their needs. The new system isn't either but they are 4.1 million into it. There are end of life counselors in the obamacare plans and he has stated publicly that sometimes people should not get the most advanced treatment on a whim of a chance and except their live is over. I believe his exact quote is "Maybe you're better off, uhh, not having the surgery, but, uhh, taking the painkiller."

      Now I couldn't find a readily availible transcript without Rush Limbaugh's comments mixed in. But you can listen to the audio itself, he said this woman's 105 year old mother should have taken the pain pill instead of the pace maker at age 100 instead of living 4 or 5 more years and counting. And as painful as it may be to hear the truth, the truth is never a troll.

    25. Re:Schedules are important. by arminw · · Score: 2, Informative

      ...that they don't want to pay in to the government-run system....

      Except that in case of the schools funded by property tax, those that send their kids to private school or home schoolers still have to pay into the system even though they never make use of it. Anytime the government does something where lots of people are directly involved, they generally screwed it up.

      --
      All theory is gray
    26. Re:Schedules are important. by arminw · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ... the scheduling was fine until they replaced...

      a pencil and paper system that worked fine for maybe close to 100 years, with a modern bug infested computer system. In the 1950s a 3500+ student high school was run by a fraction of the number of employees that it takes today. That was back in the day of typewriters, pencils, paper and basic skills teaching.

      --
      All theory is gray
    27. Re:Schedules are important. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Canada does NOT have a gov't only health care system. In Canada there is the one-payee only system for primary health care and that's the gov't. This is to make sure there is no competition for doctors based on monetary payouts.There is plenty of private practices around but everyone is insured and they all get paid the same fee for the same job.

      It is against legislation for physicians to charge more than the prescribed schedule fees they can charge the gov't pay system.

      There is a reason why when you go to a hospital they will always ask you if you have additional coverage aside from your automatic gov't coverage. That is so they can charge more to the private insurer for any eligible services.

      So yes, in Canada you can't simply spend your money and pay for your private doctor. That's against the law for the physician to accept such money. But hey, Canadians have MUCH MORE choice than Americans. They can use the publicly funded system, with all the priority queues based - priority is determined by the physicians not the size of your wallet. OR, you can just dance on over to the US and pay from your wallet for 100% private system.

      And yes, there is some specialized cases where treatment is only available in the US and not in Canada and the gov't will pay for such treatments out-of-province (in US or different province in Canada)

      So WTF is the problem?

      Gov't already runs plenty of healthcare in the US. Military healthcare is publically funded. Madicare and Medicid is public insurance with co-pays. I think 20% of the entire fed. budget is spent on the last two (13% and 7% respectively).

    28. Re:Schedules are important. by Luyseyal · · Score: 1

      The language in the bills only says that insurance can be reimbursed for providing end of life counseling. The counseling is not mandated anywhere. Furthermore, there are millions of people who have decided on a DNR instead of ridiculous "life"-saving "treatment" (hello Terri Shiavo). Perhaps there are more who have not had the presence of mind to think about such issues who could use a free counseling session about it. Lastly, this is one of those bills that won't be anywhere near finished until conference committee. It will be nigh impossible to tell what will be in the sausage until we get to that point.

      -l

      --
      Help cure AIDS, cancer, and more. Donate your unused computer time to worldcommunitygrid.org. Join Team Slashdot!
    29. Re:Schedules are important. by Hubbell · · Score: 1

      What exactly works about the canadian health system when my friend was in a 60+ (believe it was 65 to 70)mph accident on his motorcycle and it took 6 months of waiting in a line to get MRI's of neck and skull?

    30. Re:Schedules are important. by MartinSchou · · Score: 1

      I for one can't wait until this "government school scheduling program" is applied to my government-run healthcare system to schedule patients.

      You've got it the wrong way around. This scheduling program is being run by a private company at the cost of 4.1 million dollars.

      In other words, this is what you get when you let private companies run (parts of) institutions that should be a foundation of society - i.e. this is the equivalent of HMOs being responsible for the health care system. Oh, wait, they more or less are, aren't they?

      Mr. commodore64_love's foot - meet Mr. commodore64_love's mouth.

    31. Re:Schedules are important. by dangitman · · Score: 1

      As for your Obama comment, do you deny end of life counseling in the two health bills floating around Washington?

      What the hell? End of life counseling has been around in health care for a long time, and was supported by the Bush administration. But it has nothing to do with killing your grandmother or letting people who are "too expensive to treat" die. It also doesn't mention "death panels."

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    32. Re:Schedules are important. by pete6677 · · Score: 1

      Yet nobody objects to government money going to religious schools when a soldier uses the GI Bill to attend a Catholic University.

    33. Re:Schedules are important. by pete6677 · · Score: 1

      Before I saw the name of the software, I assumed it was a PeopleSoft implementation. It is almost exactly what happened at Indiana University when they made the incredibly bad decision to use the PeopleSoft disaster to schedule their classes.

    34. Re:Schedules are important. by pete6677 · · Score: 1

      Death panels were a creation of Sarah Palin's imagination. In other words, there's no truth to it whatsoever. And to think this woman actually believes she has a shot at becoming president some day. And based on the voting track record of the American public, I'm afraid she might not be wrong in thinking that.

    35. Re:Schedules are important. by pete6677 · · Score: 1

      Citation?

    36. Re:Schedules are important. by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      I guess you conveniently missed Obama saying take the pain pill instead of the life saving treatment. It's ok, some people think he walks on water. Others think he just floats. You ignoring his own words is irresponsible.

    37. Re:Schedules are important. by sumdumass · · Score: 2, Informative

      First, this is one of those bills that passed the house on a party line vote without reading it and a democrat representative making fun of the calls to read it because it would take two days and two lawyers to figure it out. It's not something that will be rehashed over and over again in comity.

      Secondly, you are completely ignoring Obama's own words when he said skip the live saving treatment and just take a pain pill. I linked to the video, are you going to deny him saying it? He is pushing the legislation, he is the one who said take a pain pill and die instead of wasting money with a life saving surgery. How exactly am I supposed to take that? You can close your eyes, I will be smiling when it's you getting a pain pill instead of a pacemaker. Saying I told you so will likely be overboard, just know that I will be thinking it.

    38. Re:Schedules are important. by publiclurker · · Score: 1

      Considering the risk of heart surgery on a 100 year old and the pain of recovery (assuming the entire statement isn't another total lie), I'd have to see the person's medical history before deciding on this one. But then again, I'm interested in reality, something an embarrassment like you is not.

    39. Re:Schedules are important. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Catholic universities provide secular educations.

    40. Re:Schedules are important. by Dare+nMc · · Score: 1, Interesting

      for parents to have the option of a voucher for the per-student cost. That works out well for everyone, so you'll never see it in action.

      Doesn't work for me, I want nothing to do with tax dollars being used to teach completely made up crap as useful, or out right scamming, just because they were able to brainwash enough people. I have seen what happened to some native Americans, they get some corrupt leaders who seam to want to keep a large group of stupid people in poverty, and under educated so they can't become part of productive society, then con the federal government in continuing to give them money to correct the injustice and "educate them".

    41. Re:Schedules are important. by pete6677 · · Score: 1

      Incidentally, have you ever noticed the most expensive software typically contains the most bugs? Of course the most expensive software is often the most complex, but the software industry is one where the saying about "you get what you pay for" most definitely does not apply.

    42. Re:Schedules are important. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hopefully that didn't read as me saying any ethic group is stupid, I only meant that some tribal leaders appear to be trying to keep them stupid, claiming they need to teach cultural classes, as a priority over real education, and using tax dollars to do it.

    43. Re:Schedules are important. by twostix · · Score: 1

      There's a thing that just about everyone (in good faith for the most part) seem to completely forget or not even understand when they're comparing their small nation states to the "American Government".

      The American Federal Government is a government presiding over a quarter of a billion people in 52 mostly autonomous separate states. Canada, Australia and all the "European" countries when compared alone to the United States is an absolutely *retarded* comparison to make.

      The only honest and correct comparison would be to say if the *European Union* stated that it was going to take over all of it's member nations health care and run them from Brussels. If (and when - sorry Europe it's inevitable) it does say that watch the about face the French, English and Danish who constantly belittle America on these boards because it's citizens don't want their corrupt out of touch central Bureaucracy running their health services suddenly become small local government federalists when *their* huge unresponsive central bureaucracy decides it's going to start nationalising things. Hell the Danes and British wouldn't even accept the official *currency* of the EU government but they then turn around and belittle Americans for not wanting to accept the central government nationalizing their healthcare! I'd like to see what the Brits would say if the EU said it was taking over the NHS!

      There really needs to be some real world reality brought into this "debate".

      And as the American Left is so fond of reminding the Internet, California is the third largest economy in the world...so why is it that the "liberal" state of California can't provide their own state run healthcare to their own citizens?

      Could it be because the "liberal" Californian government is *completely broke* and had to resort to issuing IOUs to pay for things? Perhaps there's a reason for that...

      (Not an American or a Conservative).

    44. Re:Schedules are important. by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      (assuming the entire statement isn't another total lie)

      You couldn't even follow the fucking link and watch the video? Jesus Christ, are you trying to remain willfully ignorant? Intellectually lazy? Fuck, I just checked, it's still there, a little slow but you can see him speak the damn words, you can hear the old lady talk about her mom. Damn, people like you piss me off. Assuming it's not a lie when the fucking proof is right in front of you and you are too lazy to follow a god damned link.

      As for as seeing this person's medical history, that's the entire fucking point, you should not be telling people to live or die. Not you, not the government, and definitely not some government program which will no doubtfully run short on cash. What the hell is wrong with you?

      If I had a clue bat, I would come over and beat you with it. I don't so follow the fucking link.

    45. Re:Schedules are important. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that in case of the schools funded by property tax, those that send their kids to private school or home schoolers still have to pay into the system even though they never make use of it.

      So do Dual-Income-No-Kids and confirmed bachelors/old maids. What's your point? Everybody benefits from a more educated labour force, including through getting other well educated high income earners help pick up the tax burden. Anyway, the ones that demand vouchers are primarily the American Taliban who are insistent on wanting their ("christian") madrassas to avoid "perverting" their children's minds with secular education. The other main group is the rich prep set who can afford the extra costs.

    46. Re:Schedules are important. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The only reason government-only health care might be a bad option in the US is because it would be the American government running it, and the American government is uniquely and completely dysfunctional when it comes to delivering effective domestic programmes[sic]." "Here in Canada we have..."

      I find it intriguing that you, as a Canadian, disassociate yourself from the term American. Are you not as American as Mexico, USA, Brazil, etc? I, myself, am from the USA and I hate the term American. All who live in North America or South America... are American. Even on a site like this, we have idiotic notions. Aren't we, on ./, supposed to be above this type of thing?

      "So it is clearly and simply false, a flat-out contradiction of fact, to say that public-only health care necessarily sucks."

      As an American to another American: Keep your government run health care far, far from America.

    47. Re:Schedules are important. by Atario · · Score: 1

      There's very little point in arguing with people blinded by faith, so I doubt merely pointing out raw empirical facts will convince you of anything. But hopefully other people reading will discount your delusional--but mysteriously common--view a little bit more.

      This view's dismaying commonness in the US stems, I believe, from the burst of refreshingly fact-free "I hates teh gummint" sentiment stirred up, and given actorly backing, by B-movie denizen Ronald Reagan. The delusion has been pressed for about two generations now, and so has managed to infect an alarming number of people.

      Pity us poor Americans.

      --
      "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
    48. Re:Schedules are important. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope that the "+3, Insightful" mod on the parent post is either the work of some bored kid on a laptop in a gym somewhere jerking us around or a trenchant meta-mod about the poor state of public education.

    49. Re:Schedules are important. by Atario · · Score: 2, Interesting

      as the American Left is so fond of reminding the Internet, California is the third largest economy in the world

      Well, seventh, but don't let real numbers stop you (why start now?): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_between_U.S._states_and_countries_nominal_GDP#2008

      so why is it that the "liberal" state of California can't provide their own state run healthcare to their own citizens?

      1. As you so unintentionally point out with your scare quotes, California's conservative policies include such idiocy as Prop 13 and the two-thirds supermajority requirement for approval of taxes or a yearly budget. Hand-tying obstructionist crap like this regularly screws us over, thanks very much to asinine Republicans.
      2. Perhaps it has something also to do with the fact that for each dollar we pay out to the red states, we get back only 79 cents. http://www.taxfoundation.org/blog/show/1397.html
      --
      "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
    50. Re:Schedules are important. by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Yes, the school district paid for the program. They paid a shitton for what should be a very simple program: manage schedules, 'notes' on discipline, and grades (which are directly related to the schedules for under 10k students. This should be, what, 4 database tables?

      They are, essentially, paying over $512 per student for this software. (Hopefully this is not a reoccurring cost and comes with at least several years of free upgrades - so that, you know, it'll work). That's a crazy amount of money for any record-keeping software, and there is no possible way such a cost could be justified by a private institution. But instead of real, actual oversight, the public school system gets gobs of money per student.

      Chances are, the school system will hide this colossal loss and dig the 20-year-old terminals and terminal servers from the janitorial closet, pretending they never made the purchase. They'll just go back to doing what they did for the past 20 years: claiming budgeting deficits, charging students for minor damage to books, and giving the school's sports programs millions each year.

      I went to a very nice private school where the per-student annual operational cost was a fraction (about 1/3, after including federal, state, and local monies) of what the local school spent on each student per semester. The private school's computer labs were roughly as good as the local public school's labs (though nowhere near as excessive); the private school built an $8 million new building the year after I left (after the old building got washed away in a flood the year prior), classes were smaller, and the private school had higher GPAs/better standardized test scores. Part of that last bit is due to the whole "affluence" thing, but the rest can't be looked at in such a fashion: the public schools waste money on stupid, trivial things which have nothing to do with education.

      Government schools throw money down the drain for trivial, useless, and untested things simply because they can. (The public school district put in half a dozen labs my freshman year; there was roughly one computer for every 4 students, and no more than one was ever open at any one time.)

      As for government healthcare... you can bet that it'll be run to a large degree by the federal government - probably much in the same fashion as the Veteran Hospitals are (ie poorly). The rest will be outsourced to (wait for it) the private sector. This is just like every other government function: the private sector does the actual work while a massive government "oversight" committee/organization reviews everything for compliance (resulting in a much, much higher cost to the government due to private sector contracting).

      There's a reason why government has traditionally moved slower than the need requires (and moreso the larger the government): they make a lot of goddamn paperwork, and it takes time to shuffle it. Yes, that's simplified, but it's also not far off the mark.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    51. Re:Schedules are important. by CAIMLAS · · Score: 2, Informative

      Fire departments: except for 'disaster' stimuluses since 9/11, they are entirely funded at the local (or state) level.
      Police departments: likewise, except for post-9/11 and similar funding; again, it makes up a minor part of their operational budgets.
      Libraries: almost entirely funded at the local level.
      Federal ('public') schools: at least half the funding of the majority of schools comes from local tax payers; the state likewise puts a substantial amount towards schools. Before No Child Left Behind (and similar initiatives), the federal monies were less than 1/3 total funding.

      If the federal government ceased to exist tomorrow, most municipality and civil services would continue to exist just fine. In fact, many would be better off, as there'd be less paperwork to cut through to actually meet your mandates of "protect and serve", "educate and inform" and the like.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    52. Re:Schedules are important. by CAIMLAS · · Score: 3, Informative

      Sir, I congratulate you for your insight into this matter, being as you are neither an American or a "conservative". Very few people realize today - even, or maybe especially, Americans - that the US Federal government is more synonymous with Brussels than it is with, say, London or Berlin.

      The US was formed with (at the time, 13) sovereign states in the vein of the states of ancient Greece: autonomous in government, civics, and citizenry. But unlike Greece of yore, it was formed with a national government and a constitution with an attempt to retain unity amongst the states - both politically and culturally. They did not want to see the destructive in-fighting that the Greeks experienced, despite their common "Greekness".

      Unfortunately, that all kind of snowballed here in the United States 150 years ago when we had that little Federalists vs. Secessionists conflict. That, as well as subsequent and repeated Federal malfeasance, has resulted in a great deal of mistrust in said Federal government. The comparison to Brussels is true to a large degree for many Americans.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    53. Re:Schedules are important. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, they are not American. They are Mexican, Canadian, Brazilian, and so on. Why? Because "America" was at the forming of the USA, more or less, what exists inside the borders of the USA today. There was no Mexico, Brazil, and so on for some time later (in their current forms).

        The claim of "American" is adhered to the US via our Constitution and Declaration of Independence, as well as much other law. The biggest claim (say) South Americans or Canadians have to the term is via the label two cartographers put on their maps in 1507.

      Think of it this way: it's roughly the same thing as the people of Egypt, Philistine, and Britannia all being able to call themselves Romans (subject or citizen) in 110AD. It's the same basic thing. (Now, if only Americans could get the benefit of Empire, now that we're being blamed for having one and suffer many the problems of such.)

    54. Re:Schedules are important. by mpe · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Incidentally, have you ever noticed the most expensive software typically contains the most bugs? Of course the most expensive software is often the most complex,

      There's also plenty of software where more effort appears to have been put into making things "look nice" compared with ensuring that functionality is correct.

      but the software industry is one where the saying about "you get what you pay for" most definitely does not apply.

      Or rather it's true, but what you get isn't what you actually want :)

    55. Re:Schedules are important. by Another,+completely · · Score: 1

      The only honest and correct comparison would be to say if the *European Union* stated that it was going to take over all of it's member nations health care and run them from Brussels. If (and when - sorry Europe it's inevitable) it does say that watch the about face ...

      A big difference between the European and U.S.A. governments is that the European central government has minimal involvement in healthcare funding today, and the component states mostly have the situation in hand with decent coverage and quality of care. Their success at managing the cost varies, but there are few who would call the situation a crisis. The U.S.A., on the other hand, has huge federal spending today on healthcare (medicare/medicaid, VA, tax breaks for employer-funded insurance, insurance for federal employees), and that spending is set to increase. If significant healthcare reform doesn't happen, the existing situation will break down. It is not "taking over" individual programs; it is fixing a growing crisis with a national program that it already has.

      It doesn't seem likely that the EU will want to take on something expensive like healthcare so long as the existing system is working. If the individual states of the U.S.A. had 52 systems that provided reasonable coverage, and were not a direct drain on the federal budget, I don't think federal healthcare would be on the agenda for them either.

    56. Re:Schedules are important. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > To believe that is exactly equivalent to the belief that the Sun moves around the Earth.

      That's funny, because when talking only about sun and earth, there's really no way to tell. (If you don't believe me, try to imagine how it would look like if sun revolved around earth.)

      This "earth moves around sun" thing really only becomes meaningful when we consider other objects as well (like jupiter), because then fixing the sun is the only system where all other (major, think of the moons) objects revolve in circles.

    57. Re:Schedules are important. by Burning1 · · Score: 1

      To be fair, the government outsources a lot of development work to private companies. There's no reason to believe that much of the software used to administer a public health care option wouldn't be privately built.

    58. Re:Schedules are important. by GTsquirrel42 · · Score: 1

      That's the idea: they don't want to pay into the government-run system, so they're given a chance to recoup some of what they've paid in as a voucher.

      --
      "I was raised by a cup of coffee" -Homsar
    59. Re:Schedules are important. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a fairly hard core libertarian

      Bet you use them damn socialaized roads without a qualm - you know 'free at the point of use' to quote from the British NHS.

    60. Re:Schedules are important. by fbjon · · Score: 1

      The issue is who pays for it. Feel free to do whatever you like and try to extend your life by a few days, but don't expect the rest of society to fund it.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    61. Re:Schedules are important. by dangitman · · Score: 1

      God you're full of shit. Just take words completely out of context and twist them to mean something they don't. Talk about ignoring his words, you actually put words in his mouth. He doesn't say anything about "instead of a life-saving treatment" - you just made that up.

      In any case, policy is not based on Obama's comments, it is based on legislation, and the proposed legislation has nothing like "death panels" or this other bullshit you propagandist liars go on about.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    62. Re:Schedules are important. by dangitman · · Score: 1

      As for as seeing this person's medical history, that's the entire fucking point, you should not be telling people to live or die.

      But nobody is telling people to live or die, "end of life counselling" is about people making their own decisions, you ignorant dipshit.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    63. Re:Schedules are important. by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Why? I mean when the government is forcing me to participate in the event I get sick, then they should pay shouldn't they? Not paying would be like pulling a senior off social security after 10 years because they have to die sometime.

      Neither you, the government, not anyone of your self righteous idiot idols should be making decisions about who lives and dies. And they definitely shouldn't be doing it based on how much money they want to spend this year. If you do not want to fund it, then do not pretend to do government health or force that bullshit on the rest of us.

    64. Re:Schedules are important. by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      They aren't? It's strange because it sure as hell seems that way in other countries. And when Obama says take the pain pill instead of the life saving pacemaker, it definitely sounds like it's happening here in the future too.

    65. Re:Schedules are important. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh? The voucher is a way to get back the money (or some portions of it) back. So the OP is right to say vouchers are about parents not wanting to help pay for public education.

    66. Re:Schedules are important. by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      God you're full of shit. Just take words completely out of context and twist them to mean something they don't. Talk about ignoring his words, you actually put words in his mouth. He doesn't say anything about "instead of a life-saving treatment" - you just made that up.

      Oh god, I paraphased and everything I said is wrong now. Great rebuttle there idiot. Obama's exact words was "Maybe you're better off, uhh, not having the surgery, but, uhh, taking the painkiller." Now tell me how much different what I said and what he told a woman talking about her 105 year old mother getting a fucking pacemaker 5 years ago.

      In any case, policy is not based on Obama's comments, it is based on legislation, and the proposed legislation has nothing like "death panels" or this other bullshit you propagandist liars go on about.

      Actually, policy is shaped by Obama. He is taking credit for the bills in congress and he is telling them what to put in it. And inside the bills, there is a a part about end of life counseling and giving the president's statement along with the re-release of the go and kill yourself GI pamplet put out by the VA, as well as the alarming statistics of UK and Canada systems, you can't be sure they will not be death panels. In fact, I have already had people here claiming that society shouldn't have to pay for your treatment when talking about this same fucking scenario. And these are idiots supporting Obamacare.

    67. Re:Schedules are important. by fireylord · · Score: 1

      it'd be the death of your public schools. maybe that's for the best, haven't got an opinion either way

    68. Re:Schedules are important. by amilo100 · · Score: 1

      You know that parents with children also pay taxes? Don't you think that they would like their money to be spent on the school that they see best?

      Religious or not - people should have a choice. In my country the best schooling system is actually a religious one. I would even send my child there although I am not religious. A good quality religious school is better than a normal government school.

    69. Re:Schedules are important. by fireylord · · Score: 1

      I'd like to see what the Brits would say if the EU said it was taking over the NHS!

      From what i understand, this isnt so much a taking over of the states' health care programs for those not in medicare or medicaid, as actually providing a meaningful minimum health cover where there was not one previously. In any case, get the hell back on the topic of the article!

    70. Re:Schedules are important. by fireylord · · Score: 1

      heh, so that's what the conflict was over! Silly me i thought that the primary reason was, er, slavery.

    71. Re:Schedules are important. by fbjon · · Score: 1

      Each and everyone makes that decision for themselves, obviously. But again, if someone chooses to get unnecessary treatment in the way Luyseyal indicated, what is the cost? Health care is not an unlimited resource.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    72. Re:Schedules are important. by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      Easy. Just ditch them all. You don't need a schedule to follow that paradigm. Oh wait. They already *are* ditching them all. Hmmm.

      I for one can't wait until this "government school scheduling program"
      is applied to my government-run healthcare system to schedule patients.

      Yay?

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    73. Re:Schedules are important. by pedestrian+crossing · · Score: 1

      a woman talking about her 105 year old mother getting a fucking pacemaker

      If you are 105 years old, getting a pacemaker installed is insane in terms of risk/benefit. If you're that old you're not a good candidate for surgery.

      Nothing to do with "death panels", it's just not good medical practice.

      Any competent doctor would concur.

      --
      A house divided against itself cannot stand.
    74. Re:Schedules are important. by roguetrick · · Score: 1

      Schools funded by property tax is one of the biggest tragedies in America. Low income areas produce low quality schools, keeping people in poverty. I realize it is a separate issue to what you were talking about, however.

      --
      -The world would be a better place if everyone had a hoverboard
    75. Re:Schedules are important. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every government program I can think of that doesn't suck badly has two things in common: a limited amount of money changing hands, and a limited amout of power over peoples lives.

      You mean like the military?

    76. Re:Schedules are important. by Airline_Sickness_Bag · · Score: 4, Informative

      They are, essentially, paying over $512 per student for this software.

      No, there are 130,000 students in Prince Georges County public schools. So that works out to $31.54 per student.

    77. Re:Schedules are important. by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      One must know which classes to ditch.

      In this case, I think what needs to be ditched are the school superintendants and board of education.

      And the buggy software. $4.1 million? I think lawyers should be involved.

      And pitchforks, tar, and feathers.

    78. Re:Schedules are important. by commodore64_love · · Score: 2, Interesting

      >>>we know how terribly private industry fails at increasing the common good

      Do they? The electric and phone companies are privately-owned, and yet they appear to do a wonderful job. Ditto Intel. The machine I'm typing is about 12,000 times faster than my first computer, and look how that has transformed people's lives (on-demand music, videos, et cetera). Grocery stores bring voluminous supplies of food, and in dizzying varieties, within just a few miles of your home. (Compare tha to the Soviet Union's government-run stores which often had empty shelves.)

      Private industry has done a wonderful job providing the things we need. Why? Because if they don't, they go out-of-business. There's no greater motivator than the loss of one's job.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    79. Re:Schedules are important. by commodore64_love · · Score: 2

      >>> due to long waiting lists...despite the undoubted issues with our system, we live longer than Americans

      Oh really?

      PROSTATE 5-YEAR CANCER SURVIVOR RATE
      100%- United States
      90% - Canada
      77% - United Kingdom

      Hmmm. And:

      UK HEALTHCARE WAITING TIMES
      8 months - cataract surgery
      11 months- hip replacement
      12 months- knee replacement
      5 months - slipped disc
      5 months - hernia repair
      SOURCE - The BBC, May 2009

      It appears to me that the British and Canadian governments are *just* as dysfunctional as the U.S. government when it comes to running programs. Like healthcare.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    80. Re:Schedules are important. by mcgrew · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I for one can't wait until this "government school scheduling program" is applied to my government-run healthcare system to schedule patients.

      Sorry your local government sucks so badly, but mine impressed the hell out of me in 2006 when we were hit by two tornados in one night. There wasn't a single utility pole standing in my neighborhood, and a lot of buildings were completely destroyed. Our power company, CWLP, is owned and operated by the city, and everyones power was back on in a week. Later that spring (or maybe it was early summer) a tornado hit Cahokia, whose power company is Amerin -- a private company. I visited my friend Jeff there a week later, and there were some branches down but it was NOTHING like the complete devastation we had in Springfield. Jeff was without electricity for a full month.

      Oh yeah, we have the cheapest and most reliable electricity in the state; CWLP sells power to other power companies, as they had the foresight to have excess capacity. They just added a fourth generator.

      Maybe you should elect some different people into office? Maybe elect some people who don't think government is always the problem and never the answer? Because think about it, if government is run by people who think government is always the problem, you're NOT going to have good government.

    81. Re:Schedules are important. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This might be slashdot and all, but I'd still not be shocked if a fist suddenly shot out from your screen and punched you for that. Marines don't care for it when you say the Corps sucks, and they'll find you.

    82. Re:Schedules are important. by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      >>>>>I'm a fairly hard core libertarian

      >>Bet you use them damn socialaized roads without a qualm

      Why should he feel a qualm? He pays the same ~$1.00 per gallon toll that everyone else pays. Libertarians support user fees, where you pay if you use something, and don't pay if you don't. Roads are an excellent example. Ditto the post office.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    83. Re:Schedules are important. by mcgrew · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "You get what you pay for" is a salesman's scam; a lie. You don't always get what you pay for, although you usually pay for what you get.

      When a salesman says "you get what you pay for", run like hell because you're going to be ripped off.

    84. Re:Schedules are important. by commodore64_love · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You fell for Lincoln's 1863 speech, but in 1862 he said, "If banning slavery would save the union, I would do it. If keeping slavery would save the union, I would do it." He didn't care either way. The war was about one side wanting a strong central government with high protective tariffs, and the other side wanting a weak central government because they were being hurt by the tariffs (it's hard to sell cotton when your government is jacking-up the prices).

      It's somewhat akin to if the European Union announced, "We're taxing all wool at 50%," and the UK and Ireland and Iceland seceded because they were fed up, and then the EU attacked.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    85. Re:Schedules are important. by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      >>>They can put their kids in private school or they can home school.

      It's difficult for poor or middle-income parents to afford private school when they are being socked with a $5000 government school tax every year. That's the whole point behind making them *temporarily* exempt from the tax - so they have an extra 5000 in their pockets which they can spend on private or home schooling. (Or even a different government school. I have a friend who thought the local govt school was crap, so they paid tuition to attend the govt schoolin the next district.)

      Once these kids are grown-up, the parents go back to paying their annual contribution towards the government school. Which means they are still doing their part to help society as a whole.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    86. Re:Schedules are important. by WinPimp2K · · Score: 1

      I won't get into an argument over whether or not the Corps should be considered a government "program", but I would point out that it actaully does have a very limited amount of power over US citizens (other than the Marines themselves).

      I am of the opinion that under no circumstances would the current USMC suck badly - if they were going to suck, they would do a darn good job of it. (a conscripted force would be a whole different story)

      --

      You either believe in rational thought or you don't
    87. Re:Schedules are important. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Doesn't change the fact that the school A) bought the software and B) did not notice that about 20% of their students were not scheduled.

      We're not talking 5 people (1 person out), we're talking 41,000 people. The GP's post is quite applicable when you start to extrapolate that data out to millions.

      Also, pointing the finger at a private company for developing the software is quite moot. In general, the government is likely to get the private sector to develop a lot of the software.

    88. Re:Schedules are important. by pfleming · · Score: 1

      If they only got back what they paid in fine. How about when they get back what their childless neighbors paid in? They all pay the taxes. Why should part of my taxes have to go to a private school that teaches "creationism" because my neighbor doesn't want his kids to hear about evolution? And yes, this does happen.

    89. Re:Schedules are important. by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      There's pretty strong objection to having government-only health insurance, because it will end up sucking and no one will want to use it.

      The Canadians and British seem happy with theirs.

      Personally, I'm libertarian but not Libertarian. Government should not have contol over people's lives exept for actions that harm other people. Government shouldn't try to protect me from myself, but it should try to protect me from you and from the corporation you hold stock in. Sadly, our federal government wants to protect the corporation from me, you, and itself while not protecting me from anyone at all.

    90. Re:Schedules are important. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right. What California needs are more taxes.

      California was the third largest economy, at least 10 years ago (so enjoy your little snipe as long as you want, but he stated he was not from America and probably does not want to keep up on the ups and downs of Californias unstable economy).

      Only getting 79 cents back of your Federal taxes, not your state taxes. The state budget is falling short and they are not cutting pet projects, and unnecessary pork.

      Blame the Republicans all that you want, but they are not in power and it's quite clearly the Democrats in power that cannot understand the idea of cutting spending. Except when it comes to letting prisoners out of jail...

      One would think that given a budget shortfall of the current magnitude, a 2/3 majority for the budget would be quite simple to get. I guess not. Too much corruption and pork, and their best answer is more taxes. But let's blame the party not in power.

    91. Re:Schedules are important. by gambino21 · · Score: 1

      That works out well for everyone, so you'll never see it in action.

      Actually, you can already see it in action. Ever been to Milwaukee? They've had a voucher program going on for several years. So far the difference in student achievement is negligible, meaning that students do about the same with or without vouchers. But I think most or all of the studies find that the parents are happier having the choice. IMO as long as the students are not doing worse with the vouchers, they should be available.

    92. Re:Schedules are important. by msi · · Score: 1

      The American Federal Government is a government presiding over a quarter of a billion people in 52 mostly autonomous separate states.

      Sorry but if you can't get the number of states correct why should we read on?

    93. Re:Schedules are important. by arootbeer · · Score: 1

      The government screws-up everything it touches. Look at the Cash-for-Clunkers program - many dealers voluntarily decided "we're done" because they're not getting paid their ~$4000 per car allowance. And also the clunker-cars were *destroyed*. Why? Why weren't they recycled for their parts? Stupid, stupid, stupid. And not environmentally-friendly.

      The clunker cars were recycled for parts. There were interviews on CNN, NPR, and surely plenty of other news organizations with the heads of automotive recyclers who suddenly became celebrities-for-a-minute when people started wondering about the crushed cars.

      They can't be re-sold, but that was part of the point. The will be re-used.

    94. Re:Schedules are important. by DutchUncle · · Score: 1

      ... what should be a very simple program: manage schedules, 'notes' on discipline, and grades ...

      Perhaps you underestimate the complexity just a little bit.

      What might seem like a straightforward project as a homework assignment becomes a lot more complicated in practical real-world applications with about 10x the error checking, 10x the human interface work, and a ton of special cases. That's why there are big companies that make a living from payroll tracking, when at first glance it's a simple matter of multiplying hours times rate. I believe that's why so many open-source projects that begin with enthusiasm get abandoned along the way: the core positive part of the project is interesting and useful, but the pile of work that turns a "project" into a "product" usable by lots of minimally trained newbies is not as interesting (or as much fun).

      That's why they call it "work" and pay us money to do it. :-)

    95. Re:Schedules are important. by weiserfireman · · Score: 1

      you haven't dealt with software costs for niche applications before.
      The ERP software my company uses costs $1800 per seat, it replaced a system that cost $5000 per seat.
      I use Solidworks for design work. It is in the $5-6000 per seat range
      10 years ago I was working for a bank. I was a DBA for a document management system. The software cost us $25,000 per seat. We had to buy 10 seats at a time. We owned 200 seats.

      The smaller the market you sell into, the higher the software cost is going to be. The development costs have to paid for by a smaller number of customers.
      $4.1 million for 13,000 students seems reasonable. If it worked. If it doesn't work, it wasn't worth $10.

    96. Re:Schedules are important. by mcgrew · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As for government healthcare... you can bet that it'll be run to a large degree by the federal government - probably much in the same fashion as the Veteran Hospitals are (ie poorly).

      Doubtful. The federal government has always shit on us veterans.

      they make a lot of goddamn paperwork, and it takes time to shuffle it

      As does any bureaucracy, whether public or private. The bigger the organization, the more bureaucracy. Look at Comcast, or at your insurance company (if it's a large one).

    97. Re:Schedules are important. by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      And poor people can't send their kids to private schools.

    98. Re:Schedules are important. by Dare+nMc · · Score: 1

      Don't you think that they would like their money to be spent on the school that they see best?

      nope, proper education is in the best interest of society. If they are rich enough to pay for private schooling and taxes, then the odds are great that kid won't fall out of the economic system. If your not, then we need to encourage those kids to get a education that meets society's standards, not some "the bible says this" education. I do think vouchers between public schools is a good idea. But church's already prevent more tax money from getting to state/schools coffers, they don't need more money taken from those same depleted coffers to give a religious education. Sure if they take away all tax breaks for religion, then maybe a voucher system, but not both. I do think many church affiliated schools are the best, because they have a real money incentive to produce, throw government money into that and it will all break.

    99. Re:Schedules are important. by jgtg32a · · Score: 1

      Actually that was added later, originally the cars were going to be crushed. A bunch of automotive recyclers / junk car companies lobbied to get that part changed. The only part that is required to be destroyed is the engine

    100. Re:Schedules are important. by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      >>>The number of people who want/need their speech protected by the first amendment is similarly small.

      Way to miss the point. Since the problem is so *small* (3%) all that is needed is a *minor* fix to the exiting system, such as extending Medicare to include those on the welfare program. And leave the other 97% of Americans alone.

      To take-over EVERYBODY'S healthcare to solve such a trivially-small problem (3%) is ridiculous.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    101. Re:Schedules are important. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      > Do they? The electric and phone companies are privately-owned, and yet they appear to do a wonderful job.

      Except that both the electric grid and the phone system were set up with government funds, research happened with government money, and they're still government subsidized.

      > Ditto Intel.

      Except that without a set brilliant (D)ARPA programs that freed up VLSI and transistor design in the early days you wouldn't have had your fast machines today. And that majority computer architecture research still happens with government money. It's not Intel that's giving you faster machines, it's the government.

      > and look how that has transformed people's lives (on-demand music, videos, et cetera).

      Except that the government funded the research that setup the internet, and invested the initial money, and still helps run and regulate it. They funded research into basically every major protocol used today.

      > Private industry has done a wonderful job providing the things we need. Why? Because if they don't, they go out-of-business. There's no greater motivator than the loss of one's job.

      No way. Private industry will provide enough services to get money. Then all they have to do is make it too hard for others to provide you with better service, though any means they can. That's all. And I'm not saying it's bad, or good; just that this is what happens and you have to be realistic about it. The argument that competition will compel them to provide better and better services holds in some cases, and not in others. Talk to your local, competent, economist.

    102. Re:Schedules are important. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He is including non-"state" provinces that act as states.

    103. Re:Schedules are important. by arootbeer · · Score: 1

      That makes some sense. My recollection of the interviews had the recyclers shredding the crushed cars, but since they're the ones who strip the cars for the intact valuables before they're shredded, it would seem that working on a crushed car would make that job more difficult.

    104. Re:Schedules are important. by amilo100 · · Score: 1

      nope, proper education is in the best interest of society.

      You know that the public school system does not really offer âoeproperâ education?

      If they are rich enough to pay for private schooling and taxes, then the odds are great that kid won't fall out of the economic system.

      Why should someone who wants to send their kid to a private school pay double?

      If your not, then we need to encourage those kids to get a education that meets society's standards, not some "the bible says this" education.

      By societies standards you mean your standards? You know that public schooling system is so watered down (in all countries) that it caters for the lowest common denominator? The public school system caters for the bottom 20% and it drags down (inadvertently perhaps) the other 80% of students.

      Even if a school were to teach evolution, it would comprise less than 1% of the curriculum. The problem is that public schools already fail with the other 99%.

      In most countries public schools also fill 5% with propaganda supporting the current ruling majorities view (a good example is the selective use of history). But church's already prevent more tax money from getting to state/schools coffers,

      That is an over generalised and baseless statement. What is ironic is that there are a lot of private schools who spends less per child than government schools and their results are much better. A top private school where I live offers religious classes â"if you are Muslim or Christian (various denominations) you can take those classes. If you are atheist you can take other classes (philosophy). I guess they should also not get funding?

      Btw, even if you were to throw more money at the problem, government schools will still fail.

    105. Re:Schedules are important. by pluther · · Score: 1

      Sometimes it IS better to take the pain pill instead of life-saving treatment.

      When my grandmother was dying, at 94 years old, she did exactly that. When her kidneys finally shut down, she could have gone on dialysis, and been kept alive, in pain, suffering, and bed-ridden, for perhaps another six months to a year.

      She chose, ahead of time, not to do that.

      She also designated my mother as someone who could make decisions for her. They discussed it with her doctors and signed a Do Not Resuscitate order. She ended up going quietly in her sleep after getting a chance to say good-bye to all her friends and relatives.

      The consultations, the documents, the hospice care, the pain medicine, all these things cost money. Thanks to people who fought against your kind in the last generation, my grandmother had Medicare which paid for a good part of it.

      THAT is end of life care. THAT is what the proposed bill will pay for. So, yes, it's true, sometimes people will just take the pain medicine instead of prolonging their suffering.

      Some people will choose not to, and cling desperately to life regardless of the quality. I personally think each person, should make that decision for themselves, consulting with those they trust, rather than have the government or insurance companies make that decision for them.

      But, no, you can't understand that, can you? You're too busy listening to Limbaugh and O'Reilly and Palin and screaming about how government paying for vital services is "Socialism! Eek! Get your gun and run for the hills!"

      --
      If the masses can keep you down, you're not the Ubermensch.
    106. Re:Schedules are important. by mstahl · · Score: 1

      I'm a freelancer, so I have to pay for my own health insurance, which *sucks*. I'm paying well over double what I was when I was full-time employed and on a company plan. It's hard to imagine a government healthcare system like medicare or VA being more expensive than my current insurance, so if that becomes an option for me I'll probably switch. For the record, I'm not poor, I just don't want to over-pay for health insurance just to show off how much money I have to spare ;).

      The other thing that bugs me is this argument that something run by the government necessarily has to suck. You're, presumably, a citizen and presumably can vote; this is government for and /by/ the people, so make it not suck! We the people are in control here and we don't have to reelect representatives that screw this up. We can vote for people in whom we have confidence they have the intelligence to create something that will serve us well. Don't even try telling me it's because the government is so huge and there's so much bureaucracy either because there's the same issues in big insurance companies, and those guys /aren't/ elected by the people. They're only beholden to their shareholders in the end, but we're all shareholders in the government.

      Basically, quit your bitching and make sure your congresscritters do the right thing here and make a healthcare system we can be proud of rather than the current one which is frankly an absolute disgrace. As one of the wealthiest and most capable nations on the planet it's shameful that we don't take care of our own people.

      Totally agreed on the debate getting out of control, though. Healthcare reform is a huuuuuuuuge issue and I feel like it deserves a sane and rational debate, which isn't happening because of fearmongering and childishness. I could be equivocal about this and say the childishness is seen across the board but that'd be a lie; the GOP needs to sit down at the table like adults and hash this out with the rest of the grownups.

    107. Re:Schedules are important. by mstahl · · Score: 1

      But parents DO have an option for school.

      Not everywhere. The whole point of having public education is that every single person in the country is entitled to having a basic education, and everybody graduates from 12th grade with the same basic education. Private schools don't exist everywhere by any stretch of the imagination and home schooling isn't an option for everybody.

      Also, voucher or not, everybody pays into the education system the same way helping out with our military expenses isn't optional here (if only it were!).

    108. Re:Schedules are important. by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Do you have a reading comprehension problem? DO you have a problem watching video and following along?

      First of all, she got the pace maker at age 100, is said to be thriving at age 105 and a doctor did giver her the pacemaker which means your competent comment is fallacious at best.

      and yes, that would be death panels. Here you are condemning this woman who has received the surgery and lived an additional 5 years and counting of quality life with her daughter who was proud of that fact and you say the doctor was incompetent and never should have done the surgery without remotely learning the facts. Fuck, it's in the link, you didn't even have to read it, just watch the video and you couldn't even do that. Not to mention that the fact this happened at age 100 (5 years ago) was in the message that you quoted right after the part you quoted. You have no credibility here. You are not even capable of following a complete sentence and are attempting to pass judgment on someone you have invested nothing into knowing about when it has been presented to you several times now.

    109. Re:Schedules are important. by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      They're making those decisions themselves? Are you sure, you just got done saying that society shouldn't have to pay for their government health option.

      We are talking about a human life here. No about whether or not to renew your netflix subscription. The cost is negligent. And if it's an unlimited resource, then why does government need to get involved in taking health care over? The battle cry right now is that people are being denied coverage because it's not an unlimited resource. So basically you are arguing that the government can make these decisions better then private insurance companies. Well, here is some evidence on how that isn't reality in places with government health care.

      And yes, I expect you to actually read that where foreign governments have a lower survival rate then the private health care in the US for the same diseases. I expect you to see and understand how some bean counter decided that withholding effective treatment to thousands of patients would save millions of dollar so it was necessary. These people do not make those decisions, they are made for them.

    110. Re:Schedules are important. by ranton · · Score: 1

      I hate it when people are against an idea just because it allows a small percentage of people to manipulate it. If a voucher system can help 5 kids get a better education for every 1 kid that gets a (slightly) worse education, that sounds great to me. Nothing (absolutely nothing) works perfectly for everyone.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    111. Re:Schedules are important. by ranton · · Score: 1

      There is really little that can be done to stop property taxes from going to schools. One primary reason why property taxes are high in certain areas is because of better schools. If the schools were not as nice, the property taxes wouldnt be as high.

      If it wasnt property taxes, then it would come out of some other home association type fee. We just use property taxes because it is easier that way.

      We should still do more to make lower income schools better, but I dont think the answer is to take away the middle class's ability to spend extra money to give their children a better education.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    112. Re:Schedules are important. by arminw · · Score: 1

      ...What's your point?...

      My point is that if public schools had competition for money, they would have an incentive to improve. As it is, they get paid a certain sum for each student that warms a chair, whether they do a good job teaching or not. Just as private industry competition improves products, so competition in education would do the same thing. The ("christian") madrassas, as you call them, do a far better job giving our children basic education than the average public school which has no competition does.

      --
      All theory is gray
    113. Re:Schedules are important. by jwhitener · · Score: 1

      "Few would argue against having a governement option"

      Unfortunately, Fox news and other conservative media outlets are 100% opposed to even having an option.

      Usually arguments like, it will drive private insurers out of business. Yeah... just like the post office has put Fedex and UPS out of business.

      Then there's the "against my principles" / anti-socialism / no free lunch argument. To which I normally respond, the uninsured already have a free lunch at any emergency room in the country. That care is extremely expensive, and drives the costs up for everyone. It would be much cheaper to just give the uninsured preventative care.

      etc etc

    114. Re:Schedules are important. by scot4875 · · Score: 1

      Hmm, maybe if you had read the summary, you'd see that the problem stemmed from something called SchoolMax. I know nothing about them except what's on their web page, but the fact that it's not a .gov address and that they have contact information for their sales and marketing makes it appear that they are a private entity.

      But yeah, I'm sure it was solely the fault of that incompetent guv'ment that originally contracted them to the tune of $4.1 million to provide the system. If they'd just let the free market decide, it would have been only $50k and worked perfectly.

      --Jeremy

      --
      Jesus was a liberal
    115. Re:Schedules are important. by Random+Destruction · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Maybe this comparison would be better considering the debate is over who lives longer, not who survives prostate cancer the best.

      USA:
      Life expectancy at birth: 78.11 years

      Canada:
      Life expectancy at birth: 81.23 years

      source source

      --
      :x
    116. Re:Schedules are important. by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      But, no, you can't understand that, can you? You're too busy listening to Limbaugh and O'Reilly and Palin and screaming about how government paying for vital services is "Socialism! Eek! Get your gun and run for the hills!"

      Listen, the government paying for services is not the problem. Paying for them for people who could otherwise afford them and forcing me to participate is.

      Now you may be perfectly happy with your grandma killing herself or your mom helping her. You can even donate her organs to science or the needy or something to feel good about the decision. The thing is, that's a decision your grandma made on her own with the consultation of her family. Not one the government makes for you.

      Obama specifically told a woman who said her then 100 year old mother got a pacemaker and is now 105 years old, ""I don't think that we can make judgments based on people's 'spirit.' Uh, that would be, uh, a pretty subjective decision to be making. I think we have to have rules that, uh, say that, uh, we are going to provide good quality care for all people." then going on to say "At least we can let doctors know -- and your mom know -- that you know what, maybe this isn't going to help. Maybe you're better off, uhh, not having the surgery, but, uhh, taking the painkiller." in the same paragraph. You have to be willfully stupid to not see that for what it is. That's Obama telling this woman that you can't take someone's attitude about life into consideration, you got to tell them it probably won't work, and it's better to take the pain pill and die then to have the surgery. You can close your eyes to it all you want but you will not be getting the reality you think you are. Combine this with the death/survival rates of foreign government health systems, and you can see it is by design.

      Obama even ordered a VA pamphlet to be released that encourages veterans to kill themselves instead of living.

      Now you can look at all this encouragement to cause people to kill themselves like your grandma did with your mom's help, and say "it's natural and acceptable". In the Europe, they are denying treatment to seniors because they already lived their life and if they go outside the system to get the health care, they are banned from being treated by the government care again. Sure, that isn't exactly someone saying run off an die, but it sure as hell is the same effect. IS that what you want? The governmet pressuring your mom to kill your grandma? How about when they pressure you to kill off your mom? Are you going to be perfectly fine with that when a new treatment might have a 20-40 percent change of saving her life with a full recovery but it isn't included in the government plan and their solution is to kill her off?

    117. Re:Schedules are important. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't this good news though? So when the democrat death squads com to kill grammy and pop-pop they wont know where they are?

    118. Re:Schedules are important. by Knara · · Score: 1

      "You get what you pay for" is a salesman's scam; a lie. You don't always get what you pay for, although you usually pay for what you get.

      When a salesman says "you get what you pay for", run like hell because you're going to be ripped off.

      Eh, more accurately, "provided you have done your homework and eliminated the 'functionally inept' and 'overpriced for the feature set'+'paying for the name' products, you generally get what you pay for."

    119. Re:Schedules are important. by lgw · · Score: 1

      If everyone pays for the fixed overhead, it *won't* be the death of the schools, except those schools that are *so* bad that the only reason even a single child attends is because the parents can't afford another option. As some kids move to private schools, the class sizes in the public schools will get smaller (since the building is paid for regardless), and the infrastructure/student ratio will improve as well.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    120. Re:Schedules are important. by lgw · · Score: 1

      I am of the opinion that under no circumstances would the current USMC suck badly - if they were going to suck, they would do a darn good job of it.

      Funniest comment in this whole thread!

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    121. Re:Schedules are important. by Knara · · Score: 1

      We should have vouchers because, even though it makes no difference in educational outcomes, it makes people feel better? Ridiculous. The whole point of vouchers, allegedly, is so that people can have their kids get better educations. If it makes no difference, then what's the point?

      Chances are the reason they do the same is because the parental involvement in their childrens' education is about the same (or less, perhaps, given that the parents will think the "better" school will require less involvement on their part), a.k.a. almost none.

    122. Re:Schedules are important. by lgw · · Score: 2, Insightful

      All wars in democracies are sold to the people on a different basis than the real reason for that war. This is a normal and natural part of human governance.

      It has often been said that the Civil War was a conflit over how to conjugate a verb. One side insisted on "The United States IS", the other on "The United States ARE". The ISs won.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    123. Re:Schedules are important. by lgw · · Score: 1

      Life expectancy is more than just the medical system.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    124. Re:Schedules are important. by lgw · · Score: 1

      Bet you use them damn socialaized roads without a qualm - you know 'free at the point of use' to quote from the British NHS.

      Health care is not infrastructure. Most libertarians support governemnt invovlement in infrastructure, defense, and contract enforcement, including standardizing language of contracts and weights and measurements. If there's any actual cost savings to be had in a socialized medice plan, it's from standardizing the paperwork - a huge win that's perfectly in concord with my libertarian principles.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    125. Re:Schedules are important. by lgw · · Score: 1

      As I said, most of the flames here come from a (deliberate) confusion between government option, government mandate, and governemnt mandate disguised as option. The media is in a frenzy primarily because it gets viewers, but secondarily because prominent people involved in the bill have been telling the left half of the Democratic base "don't worry, this is a governemnt mandate disguised as option" while others have been saying to the right "don't worry, this is an option not a mandate".

      With that level of bullshit, is it any wonder people are upset and want to actually understand the detals of the proposal before it gets voted on?

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    126. Re:Schedules are important. by Knara · · Score: 1

      >>> due to long waiting lists...despite the undoubted issues with our system, we live longer than Americans

      UK HEALTHCARE WAITING TIMES 8 months - cataract surgery 11 months- hip replacement 12 months- knee replacement 5 months - slipped disc 5 months - hernia repair SOURCE - The BBC, May 2009

      Nice lack of comparison there (while it's *implied* that those are too long) to the US values.

      And it ignores the fact that folks w/o decent (or any) healthcare have a wait time of "forever" for any of those.

      (P.S. Private insurance and clinics are available in the U.K.)

    127. Re:Schedules are important. by lgw · · Score: 1

      Large organizations, public or private, tend to suck. The public market is kept in line by fresh new smaller comanpies, which suck a lot less for a while. Those comanpies are often successful, and become the next generation of large companies that suck. But the cycle continues, so the suck is limited. Lagre organizations almost never get their act together and suck less, they just get replaced but a different organization. The problem when the organization is the government should be obvious.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    128. Re:Schedules are important. by Knara · · Score: 1

      Secondly, you are completely ignoring Obama's own words when he said skip the live saving treatment and just take a pain pill.

      I'm gonna assume that you've never had a terminally ill relative. Sometimes you weigh the alternatives. i.e.: Yeah, we could put in the pacemaker, but it'll also only extend life for a few months, much of that you'll spend recovering form the surgery anyway, but if you take the (vilified) pill, you'll get 3 fairly good months to spend with your family instead (since the pill will mask the symptoms but obviously not fix the problem).

      Or, "yeah we could do chemo and physically try to remove the tumor, but frankly, you've got a 2% chance of survival to 4 months and you'll be very ill the whole time on the treatment". Many people decide that the 3.5 months with their family and friends is more worth it to them.

      That's what people mean by 'end of life counseling', not the stupid-ass boogey-man arguments you jackasses keep putting up.

    129. Re:Schedules are important. by Knara · · Score: 1

      At 100 years old, you're a poor candidate for any surgery. She's an outlier, and a notable one, at that.

      Regardless, "end of life counseling" is about giving people all the information in order to weigh the options, and having it covered by medicare/medicaid. As I said elsewhere in the thread, sometimes the attempt at a cure is worse than the disease.

      You folks really need to get a firmer grip on reality.

    130. Re:Schedules are important. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And private elementary/junior/high schools don't? Private schools associated with other denominations don't?

    131. Re:Schedules are important. by scot4875 · · Score: 1

      I read your link. It's a joke. It's unfortunate that you believe that it validates your misguided opinions.

      --Jeremy

      --
      Jesus was a liberal
    132. Re:Schedules are important. by Knara · · Score: 1

      Obama even ordered a VA pamphlet [wordpress.com] to be released that encourages veterans to kill themselves instead of living.

      I love how you have exactly one source for everything.

      In any event, this particular pamphlet was actually already in existence (with those same evil words!) in the Bush administration (and likely before that). They pulled it to revise it two years ago and now its finally re-released.

      Seriously, breathe and think before you spout off about things.

    133. Re:Schedules are important. by Random+Destruction · · Score: 1
      Sure, but he was refuting the point that

      [Canadians] live longer than Americans

      --
      :x
    134. Re:Schedules are important. by lgw · · Score: 1

      Similarly, if the health care system were optional, people could get their own private health care. But they wouldn't expect vouchers toward it.

      Wow, apparantly there is a voucher system in the current healthcare bill, called "affordability credits". I'm speechless. We have a very strange governement.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    135. Re:Schedules are important. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but it's a perfect example of why the government shouldn't be running anything important. Two words: "lowest bidder."

      Do you really want your health in the hands of an organization that always goes with the lowest bidder, regardless of quality? It results in organizations relying on programs like this one.

    136. Re:Schedules are important. by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      I'm assuming you have a comprehension problem. This wasn't about someone who was terminally ill, this is about someone who needed a pacemaker, got one and is living a quality life 5 years later. Obama said she should have taken a pain pill instead of the surgery.

      You can coat it however you want, you can kill your family off when they become a burden to you, but you can't change that facts in this case. He said what he said to who he said it to. He has in turn reverses an order to halt distribution of the you should kill yourself GI pamphlet. The problem isn't that people are terminally ill, it's that they are being told they are when they aren't as is the case with this 105 year old mother who is living happily living for 5 years after receiving a pacemaker.

    137. Re:Schedules are important. by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      And as I said, it's more then what you are claiming which is supported by Obama's own words, the state of government health care in other countries and logic. You can ignore the obvious but it will not go away.

    138. Re:Schedules are important. by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Use your fucking google finger. It was just a convenient one stop place that had all the information. The one place does not negate the information idiot.

      Also, the pamphlet was pulled by bush on an executive order. It wasn't to revise it, it was because Bush didn't like the content in it. The Obama administration reversed that order on july second and now GI's who served their country are being asked to consider killing themselves instead of getting the care and treatment they deserve.

      You should learn the entire story before spouting half truths.

    139. Re:Schedules are important. by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      What's a joke about it? As far as I have been able to tell, the data is all there and accurate.

      You not liking something doesn't make it not true. You need to get out of your imaginary land and put some facts up to support your assertion.

    140. Re:Schedules are important. by pluther · · Score: 1

      You have to really stretch to equate a DNR with killing yourself.

      And stretch even more to saying that health care of any type paying for it is the same as advocating suicide.

      But you've got all your deeply held beliefs to protect, regardless of their rationality, so nothing I or anyone else says is going to change your mind.

      But you are wrong. Hospice isn't suicide. Allowing a patient to make a decision at 105 to forgo a pacemaker isn't killing her. Government isn't going to "take over" hospitals or "interfere" with medicare, and nobody's setting up any death panels for veterans or Sarah Palin's babies.

      --
      If the masses can keep you down, you're not the Ubermensch.
    141. Re:Schedules are important. by dangitman · · Score: 1

      Now tell me how much different what I said and what he told a woman talking about her 105 year old mother getting a fucking pacemaker 5 years ago.

      The difference is that surgery often isn't a "lifesaving procedure" and can often cause complications or death. So, there are many cases where it might be better not to opt for surgery.

      You'd have to be pretty ignorant to not understand that, and instead think it's about killing people for cost savings.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    142. Re:Schedules are important. by mstahl · · Score: 1

      "Tend to" doesn't mean "necessarily do" though, and even though it's a large organization, it's *our* large organization, and it can run however we make it run.

    143. Re:Schedules are important. by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      But it was life savings in this instance and Obama said take a pain pill and die. Fuck, how much clearer does it need to get. I can understand where the surgery is more dangerous then the illness, but in a situation where the benefit was already acknowledged, he said shut up and die.

      Now if the surgery contains the risk of death, and the alternative is death, then not allowing the surgery is idiotic because the only choice with a chance of life is the surgery. Since when is it a common practice to deny people the only hope they might have of living? Why is it acceptable that the government is allowed to make these decisions based on whatever criteria they think is acceptable (costs savings, different political party or whatever). And if it ok for the damn government to do it, then why isn't it ok for doctors and insurance providers to do it?

    144. Re:Schedules are important. by Dare+nMc · · Score: 1

      Why should someone who wants to send their kid to a private school pay double?

      Why should I (who has no kids, and very likely never will) pay twice as much in taxes, so that people who are willing, able, and already paying for their own kids private education (that is already working without my money) get more money?
      I do think you pretty much covered some of the reason for private school success at the cost of public schools. IMHO Most private schools work so good because they don't have to, and generally wont take the lower/less motivated or troubled students. This is not a option for public schools. Following you plan will effectively give the Japanese style education, where only the rich, and those who test well at a young age, get a chance at the best education. The rest are pushed into more of a vocational training. If that is the goal then I agree vouchers will work towards that goal. This doesn't affect my argument that many will choose the really non scientific religious schools then funded by all tax payers, regardless the value of the education given.

    145. Re:Schedules are important. by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      This isn't a god damned DNR. It's the government talking your into signing one. It's Obama saying take the pain pill and die instead of getting the pacemaker that has already proven to have saved her life and let her live 5 more years.

      And no, it isn't a stretch at all because that's not what was being said. Tell me this, what is the difference between you withholding your mother's medicine causing her to die and telling a doctor not to do anything to revive her again? What's the difference between you not calling the emergency squad when your mom is having a heart attack and you telling the doctor not to revive her because it would be too much of a burden on you and your family? What's the difference between you telling someone else to do those things and the government encouraging it?

      But you are wrong. Hospice isn't suicide. Allowing a patient to make a decision at 105 to forgo a pacemaker isn't killing her. Government isn't going to "take over" hospitals or "interfere" with medicare, and nobody's setting up any death panels for veterans or Sarah Palin's babies.

      You are totally clueless aren't you? I mean you still havn't read the links or found anything out about what was said have you? Well, if you did, you are hiding all traces of it with your fucking idiocy and inability to follow along. First, the woman was 100 years old and got the pacemaker that allowed her to live until 105 and counting. Second, it was after this was known that Obama said take the pill and die and forgo the surgery. Third, it isn't hospice taking care of a terminally ill patient. If you would have read the other link, you would have saw how America's fucked up medical system actually has a higher survival rate then Canada and Briton for many of the common illnesses like Breast and Colon Cancer and heart conditions. They are being denied care that has been proven to increase the quality of life and to save life. You attempting to bury the issue as some hospice clause is a bit fucking disingenuous.

      Finally, this isn't just suicide, it's the government claiming to want to be the savior on health care then encouraging people not to fucking use it. It's a god damn scam that is worse then Insurance companies refusing treatment. The government and people in the government stand to get a lot of power and control over people's lives and they are attempting to do it by lieing about the product they are selling. And idiots like you who are too stupid to follow a fucking link or what a damned video and allowing this to happen by trying to rationalize it in your head without paying attention to any of the actors in play. It's fucking amazing that you can do that and survive as long as you have. It's going to be more amazing when you get your wish and are put out to pasture when you break your hip a 55 because the government health care is broke and you lived your life and should take a pain pill and forgo the surgery.

      When that happens, just know, I will be laughing that your death was your own result by approving of others to murder you.

    146. Re:Schedules are important. by amilo100 · · Score: 1

      IMHO Most private schools work so good because they don't have to, and generally wont take the lower/less motivated or troubled students.

      Not always. Where I live there is a private school group (semi-religious). They have much better motivated teachers and a better student teacher ratio. What happens often is that parents will sent only their problem child to the school and keep their other child in a public school. So no â" private schools are not just for the âoeeliteâ.

      I went to a public school (my parents could not afford the private school). Do you know how big pain in the ass it was? My parents had to fight to get me to take mathematics at higher grade (necessary for engineering). I had to study that and two other subjects by myself because I did not have a teacher (they were all more busy with those with lower life ambitions such as alcoholism and plumbing).

      If my parents could use the money that the school wasted and sent me to a private school I would be much better off.

      This is not a option for public schools.

      One of the problems with public schools is that schools are not allowed to kick people out. Education is a privilege â" not a right. If you do not want to learn you should not waste money. There was a guy in my school who spent 6 years in the same grade. That was 6 years where he disrupted classes and had a negative impact on all the other students.

      Following you plan will effectively give the Japanese style education

      If you look at TIMMS you will notice that the average Japanese student is much better in mathematics than the average USA student.

      This doesn't affect my argument that many will choose the really non scientific religious schools then funded by all tax payers, regardless the value of the education given.

      Religious schools are often better than public schools. A good example is the numerous catholic schools. And yet â" public schools do not value education. At best it breeds a culture of mediocrity and entitlement â" by all accounts worse than religion.

    147. Re:Schedules are important. by lgw · · Score: 1

      Well, to me as an engineer, "tend to" means "inevitably will - just a question of when". Sure, we *could* run a large organizaion on rainbows and unicorn giggles, but in practice it ain't so. There have been a few large corporations, here and there, that had great cultures that treated employees and customers well and generally did things right, but that always seems to be a window of a few years in a company's history. Organizational entropy wins in the end.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    148. Re:Schedules are important. by dangitman · · Score: 1

      But it was life savings in this instance and Obama said take a pain pill and die. Fuck, how much clearer does it need to get.

      No, Obama did not say that. You're perfectly clear - you're just a bald-faced liar.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    149. Re:Schedules are important. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "although we are starting to see more private-care options due to long waiting lists for some procedures in some parts of the country"
      Uh-huh.
      More ethnically diverse?
      CIA factbook
      US
      white 79.96%, black 12.85%, Asian 4.43%, Amerindian and Alaska native 0.97%, native Hawaiian and other Pacific islander 0.18%, two or more races 1.61% (July 2007 estimate) note: a separate listing for Hispanic is not included because the US Census Bureau considers Hispanic to mean a person of Latin American descent (including persons of Cuban, Mexican, or Puerto Rican origin) living in the US who may be of any race or ethnic group (white, black, Asian, etc.); about 15.1% of the total US population is Hispanic
      Canada
      British Isles origin 28%, French origin 23%, other European 15%, Amerindian 2%, other, mostly Asian, African, Arab 6%, mixed background 26%
      I wouldnt say either blows away the other.
      More spread out?
      https://travelcanada.wikispaces.com/file/view/population_map.gif
      most of the population of Canada is within 300 miles of the US border.
      Oh, the population of Canada is 30 million or so? Pretty close to NY + LA. When India or China successfully implements publicly run health care (and openly documents it) we can think about it. My first hilighted statement of yours implies maybe its not such a raging success.

    150. Re:Schedules are important. by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Yes Obama did say that. He specifically said it in different words but that is what came across. I liked to his video, I pasted his words exactly, and you just seem to be too fucking stupid to read or watch it. You can suck Obama's dick elsewhere, but you can't deny what he has said when the video captures him. Now go jerk off to him or whatever your trying to do.

    151. Re:Schedules are important. by dangitman · · Score: 1

      No he didn't he said that maybe someone would decide to take the pills, and be better off for that decision, than choosing the surgery.

      He doesn't say that somebody must take the pills over the surgery, or that there is no choice in the matter.

      You can suck Obama's dick elsewhere, but you can't deny what he has said when the video captures him.

      Another one of your lies - the video does not capture him saying "take a pain pill and die" as you claimed, it captured him saying something completely different.

      This has nothing to do with Obama worship, but everything to do with honest debate and not just making shit up because it suits your political leanings.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    152. Re:Schedules are important. by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      He said your better off not having the surgery and taking a pain pill to die. Now this is the president of the United States attempting to push his fucking health care reform and no matter what you claim, he said take a pill and die. The video doesn't lie, the transcripts are right, and you are being completely asinine by denying it.

      Go back to your Obama worship and leave the world to people who pay attention to more then his ass.

    153. Re:Schedules are important. by dangitman · · Score: 1

      He said your better off not having the surgery and taking a pain pill to die.

      No, he said you may be better off taking a painkiller than opting for surgery. Do you have basic language comprehension problems?

      I also note that you've now changed the wording to "take a pain pill to die" which implies some sort of suicide pill. This is clearly not what he was suggesting, he suggested taking a pain pill to relieve pain, not to die.

      he said take a pill and die.

      No he didn't unless you are hallucinating.

      I'm trying to work out what your position is - do you think that people should be forced to have surgery? And what about the fact that the person who has surgery is still going to die - so why don't you word your response as "get surgery and die"?

      Go back to your Obama worship and leave the world to people who pay attention to more then his ass.

      Quite ironic, considering how much attention you've been paying.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    154. Re:Schedules are important. by larryhaney · · Score: 1

      Really a educative and informative post, the post is good in all regards,I am glad to read this post. Stretch Marks

    155. Re:Schedules are important. by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      No, he said you may be better off taking a painkiller than opting for surgery. Do you have basic language comprehension problems?

      It's the same damn thing. Your just being an ignorant twat attempting to make it go away by arguing semantics. It's not working.

      I also note that you've now changed the wording to "take a pain pill to die" which implies some sort of suicide pill. This is clearly not what he was suggesting, he suggested taking a pain pill to relieve pain, not to die.

      When the option was to have a pacemaker installed or die, telling the woman her mom should have just taken the pill was telling her to die. That was the alternative as presented in the fucking video.

      No he didn't unless you are hallucinating.

      He told a woman that her mom should have not taken the surgery that saved her life and allowed her to live 5 years and counting and said she should have forgotten about the surgery and taken a pain pill. That, as the lady described, would have killed her mom. How in the fuck is that hallucinating. Oh, that's right, you haven't looked at the video have you.

      I'm trying to work out what your position is - do you think that people should be forced to have surgery? And what about the fact that the person who has surgery is still going to die - so why don't you word your response as "get surgery and die"?

      My position is that it's the patient's choice, not yours, not the governments, not some insurance agency who thinks if they wait long enough, she will die before the surgery. Age shouldn't disqualify anyone from seeking an alternative to death. Neither should anyone be attempting to asses a person's worth to determine if the 100 grand sugery that is the only option to death is worth it or not. As I posted, other countries fail in survival rates for diseases people commonly recover from in the US with all it's flaws. This comment from Obama which was addressed to a women who asked a question about her 105 year old and counting mother who is only alive because of a pacemaker that was installed when she was 100 shows that they are planning on making those decisions. You cannot look at it any other way. Especially when the please kill yourself GI pamphlet got put back into circulation after being pulled because it encouraged euthanasia. The government, some insurance company, whoever, has no right telling a person they should kill themselves rather then being a drain on the system. In this case, it's a system they are setting up and falsely claiming to be better then what we already have.

    156. Re:Schedules are important. by dangitman · · Score: 1

      It's the same damn thing. Your just being an ignorant twat attempting to make it go away by arguing semantics.

      No it's not the same thing. Semantics are very important when you are saying that a sentence means the same thing as a completely different sentence.

      If it's a meaningless distinction, why do you feel the need to rewrite what Obama said, rather than quoting him accurately?

      When the option was to have a pacemaker installed or die, telling the woman her mom should have just taken the pill was telling her to die.

      She's also going to die if she has surgery, so wouldn't telling her to have surgery be the same thing?

      Not to mention that he never said that anybody shouldn't have surgery, but just offered an alternative.

      He told a woman that her mom should have not taken the surgery that saved her life and allowed her to live 5 years and counting and said she should have forgotten about the surgery and taken a pain pill.

      No, he didn't.

      My position is that it's the patient's choice, not yours, not the governments, not some insurance agency who thinks if they wait long enough, she will die before the surgery.

      And that's the exact same position as Obama and the government. Nobody is suggesting that the government decides who lives or dies. So I'm not exactly sure who you are arguing with. You position is the same as Obama's - that patients should have choice.

      I guess that if you oppose universal health-care, you are actually arguing against patient choice, since your only choices are privately-funded healthcare, or no healthcare at all. Universal healthcare adds a third choice.

      The government, some insurance company, whoever, has no right telling a person they should kill themselves rather then being a drain on the system.

      Right. But nobody is proposing that idea. Would you care to tell me who is suggesting such a plan?

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    157. Re:Schedules are important. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What exactly works about the canadian health system when my friend was in a 60+ (believe it was 65 to 70)mph accident on his motorcycle and it took 6 months of waiting in a line to get MRI's of neck and skull?

      Well there might be the millions of other people that think that the canadian health system works for them, for they did receive appropriate care. Sorry for your friend,.

    158. Re:Schedules are important. by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      No it's not the same thing. Semantics are very important when you are saying that a sentence means the same thing as a completely different sentence.

      If it's a meaningless distinction, why do you feel the need to rewrite what Obama said, rather than quoting him accurately?

      Only if you ignore the context of the statement. It's not quoting him inaccurate unless you are wanting to ignore what was said.

      She's also going to die if she has surgery, so wouldn't telling her to have surgery be the same thing?

      Not to mention that he never said that anybody shouldn't have surgery, but just offered an alternative.

      What part of this do you not understand? The woman had the surgery and lived and because of the surgery, she has lived another 5 years and still going. She wasn't going to die if she had the surgery, she lived. But you are still missing the entire damn point. Death was certain without the surgery and it was only a possibility with it. In fact, it was a possibility that did not come about contrary to you are attempting to claim. This entire ignoring the situation, the context, and the effect is getting annoying. All you have to do pay the fuck attention and not blindly ignore everything for whatever other goal you think you have.

      And that's the exact same position as Obama and the government. Nobody is suggesting that the government decides who lives or dies. So I'm not exactly sure who you are arguing with. You position is the same as Obama's - that patients should have choice.

      You are wrong. He said that is already going on in one form or another and told this woman that her mom should have taken a pain pill instead of getting the pacemaker. The woman said the first specialist said she was to old, another said he would do the procedure because he "saw her joy of life". Obama said ""I don't think that we can make judgments based on people's 'spirit.' Uh, that would be, uh, a pretty subjective decision to be making. I think we have to have rules that, uh, say that, uh, we are going to provide good quality care for all people." Despite the fact that he can't spit a sentence out without a teleprompter, he said we need rules to govern this. Obama also said, "But understand that those decisions are already being made in one way or another." In other words, he says it's already happening so why should it stop. Obama then went on to say "Maybe you're better off, uhh, not having the surgery, but, uhh, taking the painkiller."

      Now I know it's confusing with the broken language, but here is what is happening. Some woman said her mom almost didn't get the pacemaker and wanted to know if there would be an exception to those "too old to live/treat" rules. Obama said she should have taken the pill which would have been her death instead of taking the pacemaker which has kept her alive at least 5 more years and counting. You are a complete idiot if you read this any other way. Your even more of an idiot if you allow it to happen when someone is going to be forced into buying health care from the government if they don't have any other coverage just to find out that coverage doesn't count when your only other option is death.

      I guess that if you oppose universal health-care, you are actually arguing against patient choice, since your only choices are privately-funded healthcare, or no healthcare at all. Universal healthcare adds a third choice.

      IS this what this is about? Are you so invested in universal health care that you cannot let provisions in that mandate the choice is the patients and not the government or some other entity's? I mean fuck, your screwing your parent, your friends, yourself just to push this through. It's fucking insane. The context is clear, his statements are clear, other country's single payer systems make it clear, his own words make it clear. You are the o

    159. Re:Schedules are important. by pedestrian+crossing · · Score: 1

      You might want to look into anger management.

      We disagree about whether or not a 100 year old person is a good surgical candidate, no reason to fly off the handle and start hurling insults.

      --
      A house divided against itself cannot stand.
    160. Re:Schedules are important. by brizzadizza · · Score: 1

      Are you suggesting that nobody dies from prostate cancer in america? And what about those who lack the ability to properly treat their prostate cancer, what is their five year survival rate?

    161. Re:Schedules are important. by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      No, we disagree on the pretense that you or anyone else can tell someone they aren't allowed to have surgery because they might die when the alternative to surgery is death for sure. It doesn't matter what kind of candidate she is, what matters is that her choices are being arbitrarily limited because of some fear about what would happen without the surgery in the first place.

    162. Re:Schedules are important. by pluther · · Score: 1

      This isn't a god damned DNR

      Oh, I'm sorry. I thought when you referred to my grandmother's DNR as "helping her kill herself" you were equating getting a DNR with helping someone kill herself.

      My mistake.

      And, of course, Obama saying that the government can't make the choice for you, because it's a subjective thing, and you have to decide what to do for yourself, well, I understand how that can be read as him saying you have to choose a particular way. I can only blame the sad lack of Bill O'Reilly in my life to explain why I didn't see it as readily as you did.

      Alas, I watch no broadcast TV, so this is unlikely to change in the near future.

      When that happens, just know, I will be laughing that your death was your own result by approving of others to murder you.

      I feel so foolish now in not realizing that expanding health care to include everybody is pretty much the same thing as having others murder me. Damn, I feel so foolish now. Well, I bow to your great intellect. Obviously, I cannot argue with you here. I will get myself a TV set and a cable package that includes Fox News so that perhaps someday I can be as well-informed as you are.

      Damn, and to think that if it wasn't for end of life help, nobody would ever die! Every life could be saved! Forever! Oh, how oh how could we have been so foolish?!

      --
      If the masses can keep you down, you're not the Ubermensch.
    163. Re:Schedules are important. by pedestrian+crossing · · Score: 1

      we disagree on the pretense that you or anyone else can tell someone they aren't allowed to have surgery because they might die when the alternative to surgery is death for sure.

      That's part of a doctor's job, to do an -informed- risk analysis based on what is best for the patient.

      BTW, it is also what insurance companies do based on what is best for the insurance company, which I think is wrong.

      --
      A house divided against itself cannot stand.
    164. Re:Schedules are important. by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Oh, I'm sorry. I thought when you referred to my grandmother's DNR as "helping her kill herself" you were equating getting a DNR with helping someone kill herself.

      My mistake.

      It is your mistake. What you are missing is the context. If your grandma signs a DNR, it's her killing herself. If she doesn't and you order it to happen, it's you killing them. This legislation forces doctors with compensation being a penalty to talk you into a DNR and not changing your mind when the time arises. That's the government attempting to kill you. If it was just for people who want a DNR on their own, that's their right. The problem is that the end of life legislation is actually penalizing doctors for not getting you to sign a DNR or if you decide not to follow through with it. Now what do you say when a doctor has to consider giving you a life saving procedure at your request verses honoring a DNR that you changed your mind on and his compensation is dependent upon you following through with it? If it was strictly voluntary, there would be absolutely no penalties for it whatsoever at all.

      And, of course, Obama saying that the government can't make the choice for you, because it's a subjective thing, and you have to decide what to do for yourself, well, I understand how that can be read as him saying you have to choose a particular way. I can only blame the sad lack of Bill O'Reilly in my life to explain why I didn't see it as readily as you did.

      Start blaming your incompetence and refusal to follow a link. Why, because it's right there in the bills being considered by congress. It specifically says that the doctors compensation will be linked to them getting you to sign a DNR or living will and following through with it.

      Alas, I watch no broadcast TV, so this is unlikely to change in the near future.

      You don't need TV to see what is going on. There are plenty of websits that will give you more then enough information, most of them link directly to provisions in the existing bills as well as all the amendments that have been defeated by democrats designed to make sure most of the crap being said about the obamacare package can't happen. Tell me, why are they defeating amendments that do little more then make sure seniors aren't taxed more to pay for their Medicaid/medicare or to remove any penalties for end of life counseling so it's all volunteer on the patient's part?

      I feel so foolish now in not realizing that expanding health care to include everybody is pretty much the same thing as having others murder me. Damn, I feel so foolish now. Well, I bow to your great intellect. Obviously, I cannot argue with you here. I will get myself a TV set and a cable package that includes Fox News so that perhaps someday I can be as well-informed as you are.

      You should feel foolish. That's because once again, you got it all wrong. Fuck man, educating you on what you should already know is like kicking an elephant in the ass- even when you get it to work, you simply ignore it all anyways. If you had arguments that contained factual information, you wouldn't be so fucking frustrated. Now getting people coverage is not killing, killing you is specific legislation that allows the government to pressure you into signing DNR's, withholding treatment, and removing feeding tubes in order to claim to be covering all these other people.

      Why don't you spend some time reading the health bill, ask some friends what the big words mean if you have to. Then come back and play. I'm sure you will not have the same mentality that you have now.

      Damn, and to think that if it wasn't for end of life help, nobody would ever die! Every life could be saved! Forever! Oh, how oh how could we have been so foolish?!

    165. Re:Schedules are important. by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      That's part of a doctor's job, to do an -informed- risk analysis based on what is best for the patient.

      No, it is not a doctors job to say "I will not potentially save this person and doom them to death because they might die in the operating table". You have two choices, death and the possability of life, You are allowing someone other then the patient to deny life. Federal law requires hospitals to administrate life saving and emergency medical procedures to any patient without regard to ability to pay. The doctor's job is to treat the patient, not to tell them they are going to die because he doesn't feel like doing a surgery. It isn't to tell them that they will be a cripple until they wither away because he doesn't fell like giving you a knee replacement or a hip replacement. It is not the doctors job to determine that a patient is too old to receive the same quality care that a 20 year old would receive and doom that old patient to death because they already lived their life. IF you think any of that is the doctors job, you are simply wrong.

      BTW, it is also what insurance companies do based on what is best for the insurance company, which I think is wrong.

      I think it is wrong too. However, adopting legislation that turns it over to the government does not make it right. It should be the patient's choice and if it's covered, age or condition should not be anything of an issue when the alternative if certain death. The point is, it's the patient's decision to die from their condition and no one else. If they chose the only option that offers an alternative to death, then it should be their choice, not yours, not mine, not the doctor's, not the government's or any insurance company's decision who is trying to save a buck by denying care.

      I simply can't see why it's wrong for an insurance company to doom someone to death when there is a chance at life but not wrong for the government or some doctor who gets paid more. It's the patient's choice, they are going to be forced into this government policy, they deserve the care and coverage promised despite their age or usefulness to society.

    166. Re:Schedules are important. by pedestrian+crossing · · Score: 1

      it is not a doctors job to say "I will not potentially save this person and doom them to death because they might die in the operating table"

      We are all "doomed to death", eventually. Lay off the histrionics.

      If a doctor's evaluation is that the risk of surgery is greater than the benefit, they are bound by their Hippocratic oath not to perform that surgery. The patient is entitled to seek other doctors' opinions, but if none of those other doctors have a different opinion, none of them are going to operate. It is absolutely the doctor's job to "first, do no harm".

      It is not anyone's right to dictate treatment to a doctor over that doctor's informed opinion. Ask Michael Jackson's doctor what happens when you let the patient dictate treatment.

      It is not the doctors job to determine that a patient is too old to receive the same quality care that a 20 year old would receive and doom that old patient to death because they already lived their life.

      Nice spin. There's that "doomed to death" thing again.

      It's not because they have already lived their life, and the doctor just doesn't feel like operating. It is because the risk of the surgery is much greater than the potential benefit to be gained from it. It's nothing to do with age in particular. It's about risk/benefit.

      The point is, it's the patient's decision to die from their condition and no one else.

      The point is that it isn't, if the alternative to dying from their condition requires a doctor to perform some action that they cannot ethically perform. Forcing doctors to provide treatment in violation of their Hippocratic oath is not a road we want to go down.

      --
      A house divided against itself cannot stand.
    167. Re:Schedules are important. by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      We are all "doomed to death", eventually. Lay off the histrionics.

      Tell me, what is the difference between murder and natural caused when we are all doomed to death eventually and it doesn't matter?

      If a doctor's evaluation is that the risk of surgery is greater than the benefit, they are bound by their Hippocratic oath not to perform that surgery. The patient is entitled to seek other doctors' opinions, but if none of those other doctors have a different opinion, none of them are going to operate. It is absolutely the doctor's job to "first, do no harm".

      First, the Hippocratic oath is not legally binding in the US. Second, it hasn't been administered in the US for several decades or longer and even then, it was a bastardized version of the original. But I don't by the idea that the oath would require a doctor to let a person die instead of trying to save them by any means within their power. That sort of contradicts the entire purpose of a doctor doesn't it? I mean the oath specifically mentions not being self serving right?

      It is not anyone's right to dictate treatment to a doctor over that doctor's informed opinion. Ask Michael Jackson's doctor what happens when you let the patient dictate treatment.

      Actually, it is their right to have any treatment that offers an alternative to death. Your attempting to confuse the issue by bringing up Michael Jackson's doctor too. It's completely different when a patient wants something for recreational use or whatever compared to when a patient wants to live and the treatment is the only thing offering that possibility. I'm sorry that you can't see that or that you think it's the same. More then Likely I would bet that you were purposely injecting that nonesense because you thought widening my argument would make your argument sound better. Well, stick to my points and don't exaggerate them.

      Nice spin. There's that "doomed to death" thing again.

      Spin? No, that's my entire argument. Are you so self centered that you are missing it? I said when the patient is terminal and if there is one procedure or medication that offers the possibility of living, it's the patient's choice whether to have the procedure or not and no one should ration health care or withhold this procedure because of their age or status/worth in society. When the option is certain death compared to possible life with a risk of death, then it's the patient's choice to live or die and no one else' even if it might not be successful.

      It's not because they have already lived their life, and the doctor just doesn't feel like operating. It is because the risk of the surgery is much greater than the potential benefit to be gained from it. It's nothing to do with age in particular. It's about risk/benefit.

      Like I said before, when the alternative is death, then there is no risks of surgery that put the patent into a worse position. And yes, we are talking about age and worth here as this conversation started off by talking about a 100 year old women who got a pacemaker and lives 5 more years and counting.

      The point is that it isn't, if the alternative to dying from their condition requires a doctor to perform some action that they cannot ethically perform. Forcing doctors to provide treatment in violation of their Hippocratic oath is not a road we want to go down.

      The oath is not legally binding and hasn't been administered in the US for quite some time. And no, the doctor doesn't have the option to deny someone the only chance of living because of their age or because they are just welfare babies or whatever. Please show me where this oath entitled a doctor to stand by and watch someone die while having the knowledge and skills to possible save their life and not doing something about it. I'm curious where that is inside any oath.

    168. Re:Schedules are important. by pedestrian+crossing · · Score: 1

      We are all "doomed to death", eventually. Lay off the histrionics.

      Tell me, what is the difference between murder and natural caused when we are all doomed to death eventually and it doesn't matter?

      I didn't say that it didn't matter. Your choice of the words "doomed to death" is an explicit appeal to emotion, not logic. That is what I see as a big problem with the current discussion about health care, the conversation is so full of people squawking emotion-laden buzzwords that the logical arguments are not being made/considered.

      no one should ration health care or withhold this procedure because of their age or status/worth in society.

      You still don't get it. The consideration of age in the decision, is not about "you've lived enough life, time to give it up", it is about risk/benefit. The older you are, the riskier surgery is. A doctor doesn't give a shit about your worth to society, the doctor is focused on the patient and the risk assessment.

      Yet the current system "rations" health care all the time. If your insurance company decides to deny coverage for an "experimental procedure" (something I can tell you from personal experience, they have a -very- broad definition of), you -are- down to your worth - can you pay for the procedure yourself?

      The "death panels" (to get back to your original topic) are quite real and are here today. They make decisions based not on what's best for the patient, but what's best for their bottom line, and yes they do take into account status/worth in society. Ignoring this fact does not make it go away.

      How do you propose that this problem be dealt with?

      --
      A house divided against itself cannot stand.
    169. Re:Schedules are important. by fireylord · · Score: 1

      until their funding is cut, cut, and cut again due to plummetting pupil numbers. eventually the only option would be closure

    170. Re:Schedules are important. by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      I didn't say that it didn't matter. Your choice of the words "doomed to death" is an explicit appeal to emotion, not logic. That is what I see as a big problem with the current discussion about health care, the conversation is so full of people squawking emotion-laden buzzwords that the logical arguments are not being made/considered.

      No, mt words are not an appeal on emotion, the entire point is. I'm using it to say death is certain without the potential life saving treatment. There is one or two chances at living with a medical procedure and without that, they are doomed to death where with the procedure, there is at least a chance of continued life. It illustrates the pointless and futile attempts to say "it's too risky, the patient might die". The fact is, without the procedure, they are going to die anyways- they have nothing to lose and life to gain. If that bothers you, even if it's just bothers you emotionally, it should because it's the accurate description of what I am saying and you entire point is that some third party gets to decide who will die and who gets a chance at living with these situations.

      You still don't get it. The consideration of age in the decision, is not about "you've lived enough life, time to give it up", it is about risk/benefit. The older you are, the riskier surgery is. A doctor doesn't give a shit about your worth to society, the doctor is focused on the patient and the risk assessment.

      No, you still don't get it. I'm not talking about elective surgeries here. I'm talking about when a patient is terminal and death is a certain reality, the risk benefit becomes death and possible life literally. You see, death is pretty severe, it's also the worse risk any life saving procedure can carry. Living is the benefit. When you look at the procedure and the patient, if you kill them, you have a zero sum gain on the risk, if you save them and give them 5 or more years of life, then it's all gain and all benefit. The decision to have the procedure needs to belong to the patient alone and not you, some doctor looking to increase his pay, not the government, not anyone but the patient. If the doctor says we can try this but it will likely fail, the patient is the one who needs to say "yes or no".

      Yet the current system "rations" health care all the time. If your insurance company decides to deny coverage for an "experimental procedure" (something I can tell you from personal experience, they have a -very- broad definition of), you -are- down to your worth - can you pay for the procedure yourself?

      The "death panels" (to get back to your original topic) are quite real and are here today. They make decisions based not on what's best for the patient, but what's best for their bottom line, and yes they do take into account status/worth in society. Ignoring this fact does not make it go away.

      And If I remember correctly, you said that was wrong. Please explain why instituting it into law would be good? Why not fix the problem instead of entrenching it into a multi billion dollar government program.

      How do you propose that this problem be dealt with?

      It's actually pretty simple. The doctor or doctors get a consult from specialist in the area concerning the problem. if something exists, even with a 5% probability of working and a 95% chance of death, it's presented to the patient as such and they decide if they want to try it. IF they do, the surgery gets video taped and becomes a learning/teaching tool to educate newer doctors and improve the odds of success. When going into a government program, this ensure the furtherance of medical technology and procedures. Given enough eyes, someone will improve it, alter it to reduce risks or create something that's a game changer either way. When going into a government program and making laws, this should be what is coded into

  2. Class scheduling is hard work, yo! by RingDev · · Score: 3, Funny

    I remember talking to the admin at one of the colleges I attended. We asked them how they did their scheduling. The rumor was that the Dean would lock himself in a hotel room with a map of the school, the student list, the course catalog, and the teacher list, and 3 bottles of whiskey for a long weekend.

    After which, he would take a weeks vacation while everyone marveled over the new schedules.

    -Rick

    --
    "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
    1. Re:Class scheduling is hard work, yo! by tuxedobob · · Score: 3, Interesting

      One of my projects for a comp sci class in college was a scheduling system, of sorts. It was done from the student's point of view, though. I'd set it up by importing data from a CSV done in Excel, and it would know which lab sections belonged with which lecture sections of a course. It allowed you to specify preferred class times and teachers from what was available. You would enter in what required courses you needed to take, and additionally enter in several optional courses, only one of which you could take, and it would give you a list of all possible schedules, sorted from most desirable to least.

      The schedule creation was done in a PHP script which is about 6KB in size, and the whole thing is about 140KB, csv not included.

    2. Re:Class scheduling is hard work, yo! by xaxa · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think my university computing department had (has?) a Prolog script to do the scheduling, but I don't know if it was seriously used or not.

      I assume you gave it some inputs (room sizes, class sizes, lectures required, etc) and then spent a week trying to work out why it wasn't giving the right result. But maybe that's just my Prolog :-D

    3. Re:Class scheduling is hard work, yo! by tuxedobob · · Score: 1

      Nah. Like I said, I did it from the students' point of view. So the rooms were already set up, and class sizes were 25 90% of the time. But if you needed to take 5 courses that semester, and there were, say, 15 sections for 2 of them and 5 sections for the other 3, it would tell you all the possible ways you could get that to work.

    4. Re:Class scheduling is hard work, yo! by MartinSchou · · Score: 4, Interesting

      A pair of entrepreneurs were giving a talk at my university about their successes and failures in the start-up phase of their company.

      They had been spending about 18 months straight building a class scheduling program, and had gotten it to work, but they felt their four day run time was way too long to market, and couldn't figure out how to improve the speed and were about to give up. They were using an old version of the university's students, teachers, student's course wishes and rooms.

      At a party at the university one of them was talking to someone from the school's administration and after a couple of drinks they got to talking about the work he was doing, and he mentioned the 36 hour run time, which made the administration guy look quite surprised, as they were used to having a two week run time on their current system, which they were happy with, as it was one of the fastest on the market.

      Now, this anecdote was somewhat old at the time, but his point was "a product may seem worthless to you as an outsider of the industry, but that doesn't mean it isn't better than what's available". My point is that these type of scheduling takes a long time to complete

    5. Re:Class scheduling is hard work, yo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At my school they printed a booklet listing when all the classes/labs were going to be taught with times, rooms, instructor, etc. You'd pick one up and figure out what you wanted and think about some back up options. Then at your appointed time you'd go to the gym and find that each department had a table where you could pick up a punch card for each class you wanted. There was also a big board listing most of the classes that were already closed due to being filled so you could think on your feet about your back-up options. And when you had all your punch cards, you turned them in to be run through a card reader to make your schedule official in the school's main computer (yes, THE main computer).
      Now get off my lawn youngster!

    6. Re:Class scheduling is hard work, yo! by coxymla · · Score: 1

      My dad used to do this too, although at a fairly large (by Australian standards) high school and not a giant US mega-college or anything.
      My brother and I would take turns doing data entry into this ancient DOS program called TimeChart, which would attempt to schedule everything. After it spat out a schedule along with a giant list of clashes, it was up to my dad and a room filled with giant pasteboards to manually massage all the problems out.

    7. Re:Class scheduling is hard work, yo! by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      Do you have the source code still?

      Only other similar program I've seen is http://www.rpischeduler.com/, which is ok, but near impossible to set up. I did get it working once upon a time.

    8. Re:Class scheduling is hard work, yo! by ShakaUVM · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If you have six classes of Math students, then you need six Math classes and you need to find the teachers for them. If a teacher dies/whatever, you still have six classes of Math students. Yes, the administration may have to scramble to find a replacement teacher, but that doesn't affect the scheduling of classes: substitute new Math teacher in place of dead Math teacher.
      >>My point is that these type of scheduling takes a long time to complete

      The problem is a lot harder than most people think.

      The issue isn't 180 kids wanting to take math. It's 180 kids that are taking wildly different class loads, but are all at the same level of math, and so need to be grouped together somehow into 6 classes, assigned only to teachers which are qualified to teach that class, but not teaching another class during the same time period.

      If we ran our schools Japanese-style, with everyone taking the same classes together, the solution is simple: rotate your teachers through each of the classes - the kids stay in one class, but the teachers circulate.

      But our college entrance requirements are so strict now, optional classes are now absolute constraints on the problem. Student A MUST have Precalculus, Sophomore English, American History, Science 3-4, and French 3-4, and wants to take Journalism 3-4 during period 4 during 2/3rds of the year and Volleyball during period 6 at the end of the year. Whereas student B needs chemistry, Sophomore English, French 3-4 (which only has enough students for one class, so they must all be scheduled together), AP US History, etc. This is combined with constraints put on the system by individual teachers (teacher C is a teacher on special assignment, and so can only work periods 1-3, teacher D is our only journalism teacher, and can only teach the newspaper class in Period 4).

      If I recall correctly, the scheduling problem (or at least some variants of it) is NP-complete.

    9. Re:Class scheduling is hard work, yo! by mrsquid0 · · Score: 2, Funny

      >If I recall correctly, the scheduling problem (or at least some
      >variants of it) is NP-complete.

      Phew. That means that there is no hope of it accidentally summoning Yog Sothoth.

      --
      Just because you are paranoid does not mean that no-one is out to get you.
    10. Re:Class scheduling is hard work, yo! by MartinSchou · · Score: 1

      It gets more complex as well. For instance, you may have:
      * 3 chemistry labs,
      * 6 levels of chemistry that requires labwork,
      * 400 students
      * five teachers capable of teaching different levels of the subject (i.e. Monte Carlo algorithm.

    11. Re:Class scheduling is hard work, yo! by MartinSchou · · Score: 3, Insightful

      *beats the slashcode designer to a pulp and thanks the Opera designers for making sure that it remembers the contents of forms when you go back in its history*

      It gets more complex as well. For instance, you may have:
      * 3 chemistry labs,
      * 6 levels of chemistry that requires labwork,
      * 400 students
      * five teachers capable of teaching different levels of the subject (i.e. <=2, <=2, <=3, <=4, <=6).

      And when those teachers also teach 3 other subjects (with no overlaps), the students have an average of 5 other subjects as well, only 20% of the chemistry students share 2 courses, 60% share 3 courses, 15% share 4 courses and the remaining 5% do not share any courses, you might start to get an idea of the problem.

      I wouldn't be particularly surprised if you could run the schedule routine thousands of times and not get the same result, making it a sort of Monte Carlo algorithm.

    12. Re:Class scheduling is hard work, yo! by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I have actually worked for a company that specialized in resource allocation for class scheduling. It's kind of fun, except for customer support.

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    13. Re:Class scheduling is hard work, yo! by dangitman · · Score: 1

      Hehehehe... you said Prolog...

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    14. Re:Class scheduling is hard work, yo! by Rick17JJ · · Score: 1

      I remember signing up for classes, at a small Community College, back in about 1973, back before things were so computerized. They used a very large room with dozens of desks on all 4 sides of the room. If I remember correctly, each desk had a sign saying what classes you could sign up for at that desk. An instructor or two, from that department, sat at each desk. For each desk, there was a long, slow moving line of students waiting to try to sign up for one of the classes offered at that desk.

      Upon reaching the front of a particular line, I could see which sections of the particular class that I wanted, were still available (if I remember correctly). They then handed me a punched card (also known back then as a computer card) and probably also wrote my name down on a list.

      I could then move onto another line to sign up for another class. Finally, I must have gone to some other line to finalize my selection and hand in my collection of several dollar bill sized punched cards.

      At least, that is roughly what I remember. But, that was a long time ago and I am struggling to remember the details, which I may have described incorrectly. An instructor, from back then, would probably remember that process much better. My biggest fear while standing in one line, was that some of the sections of the other classes which I wanted, were probably filling up as I stood there. Back then, I probably thought that students walking around carrying punched cards, was high tech.

      One year, at that junior college, a student got so frustrated, that he fired a gun into the air and was arrested. I was not there at that time and missed seeing that. Perhaps classes that he needed were already filled up or something. I'm not sure what the problem was.

      In the 1983 "Back to School" movie , starting Rodney Dangerfield, I vaguely seem to recall a registration process that involved many tables along the walls, each with a long slow moving line. In the movie, to clear the room, they started a rumor about a very famous person arriving in a limousine out front. With the long lines temporarily gone, Rodney and his son quickly and easily signed up for the classes and times they wanted.

      Just in case are not old enough to remember punched cards, here is what Wikipedia has to say about them:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Punched_cards

    15. Re:Class scheduling is hard work, yo! by dbIII · · Score: 1

      That's pretty close to how my Aunt did it for a large private school when her boss passed the job on to her each year, only she was helped by a venerable Acorn computer and no whisky.
      The answer for these clowns is to hire a pile of temps for a couple of days and use excel or something. The only reason stupid situations like this arise is due to poor management - for instance a restriction that prevents the hiring of temps.

    16. Re:Class scheduling is hard work, yo! by FrankieBaby1986 · · Score: 1

      Sounds nice. At my University, Penn State, the schedule of courses is predetermined (I have no idea how) and we students are beset with the task of scheduling our own classes. This means that the spaces available in each class fluctuate like mad while you try over a two week period to get all the classes you need to take scheduled, without conflicts, without taking up your entire day needlessly, etc. To put it mildly: it sucks the big one.

      but hey, now we have up-to-the-minute stats on class availability on the main schedule page. Used to have to enter schedule number after schedule number just to find the section that was actually open (if there were any!)

      I have designed a new interface and demonstrated how it would reduce scheduling issues caused by fluctuation dramatically to a few of the powers that be's underlings, but all I can get are pacifying statements.

      --
      ERROR: SIG NOT FOUND (A)bort, (R)etry, (F)ail?:
    17. Re:Class scheduling is hard work, yo! by Inda · · Score: 1

      You joke but that's how it was done 20 years ago. Maybe not the hotel and whiskey side...

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    18. Re:Class scheduling is hard work, yo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks like you didn't pay attention in Theoretical Computer Science 101, tuxedobob. The scheduling problem is NP-complete. It is a *hard* problem in that you can only obtain a local maximum by heuristics. But usually, a local maximum (everyone has a bit to bitch about) is good enough.

      There are so many special cases, so many constraints to the issue. In essence, the best way is for someone who understands the constraints (i.e. the Dean) to lock his or herself into a room with all the lists, a pile of pencils and erasers, and a good stock of an alcoholic beverage. Most computer systems that try to deal with this suck big-time.

    19. Re:Class scheduling is hard work, yo! by Gryle · · Score: 1

      About four or five years ago, Texas A&M started experimenting with "class clusters" which is basically groups of students in the same major taking the same core classes specific to their discipline at the same time. The idea was to simplify scheduling and provide students with a consistent set of classmates. They even when so far mark certain groups of classes as "cluster-only." The problem was that non-clustered students got completely shafted come scheduling time. Since most of the core classes were designated for specific clusters, that left only one or two-sections for non-clustered students. To compound this, certain classes which were considered "core" for one major and considered elective for another major, even though the student needs that elective credit to move on. You ended up with engineering majors locked out of a number of sections of humanities classes, even though in Texas engineering majors need a certain number of humanities credits to graduate. It was quite a mess. I'm not really sure what the outcome of the experiment was, but the big lesson to take from here is that the Japanese-style system has to be all or nothing.

      --
      Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not entirely sure about the universe - Einstein
    20. Re:Class scheduling is hard work, yo! by arootbeer · · Score: 1

      Any decent class scheduling program should give you unexpected results; it's part of teaching you to deal with the real world, and not necessarily Prolog's (or your Prolog's) fault :)

    21. Re:Class scheduling is hard work, yo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and none of that accounts for office politics.

    22. Re:Class scheduling is hard work, yo! by CodeBuster · · Score: 1

      One of my projects for a comp sci class in college was a scheduling system, of sorts

      I also had to write a scheduling system as part of the intro to software engineering course for my comp sci degree. Of course, being that we were all rank amateurs at the time most of our programs were embarrassingly bad. However, it did serve as a good lesson for us that writing good software is actually difficult and problems that seem simple can actually be quite complex; the devil is in the details as they say. For those of you who didn't have the pleasure of implementing the class or exam scheduling program in your comp sci curriculum, let me just say that scheduling a large number of courses and exams such that as many possible combinations can be selected without conflicts is NOT a simple problem. In fact, the scheduling problem is a variation of the Graph Coloring problem which is known to be NP-Complete. For those who are interested, a discussion of the relationship can be found here.

    23. Re:Class scheduling is hard work, yo! by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      --Is the Librarian an orangutan, by any chance?

      / it's elephants all the way down

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
    24. Re:Class scheduling is hard work, yo! by tuxedobob · · Score: 1

      Yes, I still have it. The setup and backend are not exactly user-friendly, and it makes some assumptions about how the data gets entered, though. Of course, they were safe assumptions for the way the courses worked where I went.

  3. As a Maryland Resident.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Seeing Prince George's County's name listed there comes as no surprise.

    1. Re:As a Maryland Resident.. by Airline_Sickness_Bag · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Both of my kids are in Prince Georges County public schools. They are both in the science and technology magnet program at Eleanor Roosevelt HS. Two years ago, they used mygradebook.com for teachers to use, and it was a breeze to check on grades, see what assignments were due (and what assignments were missing), etc. It was an easy sytem to use, and worked well. Last year ERHS was forced to use the SchoolMax system. It was a disaster. So I'm not surprised that the problem was caused by the SchoolMax software.

    2. Re:As a Maryland Resident.. by The+Clockwork+Troll · · Score: 1

      The lesson here is that scheduling is PGC-hard.

      --

      There are no karma whores, only moderation johns
    3. Re:As a Maryland Resident.. by Cal27 · · Score: 1

      At least you don't have Edline (the actual site pages look nothing like the login or info pages). It's horrible, things that should be basic html are done in javascript (I can't open any links in new tabs or I get a blank page). The menus are generally confusing and some things just seem absolutely pointless. Or I could just be making things up because I like my middle-mouse tabbing and teachers have screwed me over (I'll just list this homework as a 0 until I grade it next week hurr durr).

    4. Re:As a Maryland Resident.. by art123 · · Score: 1

      Don't be such a moron. In what way is using a web site to help track school progress not "being a parent"?

  4. Big deal by Hatta · · Score: 3, Insightful

    High school is a waste of time anyway, and the first week of HS especially so. They weren't going to be learning anything anyway.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    1. Re:Big deal by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 1

      You don't have kids, do you? ;)

      Really, it depends on the school. My daughter's in a PG County magnet program and she's learning a hell of a lot -- if I have any worries about the program, it's that they may be working her too hard, and believe me, I have pretty high standards for what that means.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    2. Re:Big deal by wizardforce · · Score: 1

      For a lot of kids it may very well be a waste of time. The smarter kids would likely do better just taking college courses as the credit is useful for getting into a career they like later. For everyone else the major draw of high school isn't so much learning more as it is socializing with other teens.

      --
      Sigs are too short to say anything truly profound so read the above post instead.
    3. Re:Big deal by CannonballHead · · Score: 4, Insightful

      the major draw of high school isn't so much learning more as it is socializing with other teens.

      Yup. Gotta love socializing with teens. It does wonders for your maturity when you have to interact with adults...

      Incidentally (previous paragraph was sarcastic, btw), I was homeschooled. It's interesting to me that "no social life!!!!11" was one of the major "what, you were homeschooled?" reactions when I went to a junior college for two years. It would appear that "learning" takes second place to "fun" and "social life." Apparently, education is secondary to teenage social skills when it comes to business after college.

    4. Re:Big deal by wizardforce · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I know your post was satire I just fond it to be a convenient time to voice my own opinion.

      Yup. Gotta love socializing with teens. It does wonders for your maturity when you have to interact with adults...

      I never said it was a good thing, just that it is generally an appealing concept to most teens. For me high school was a waste. I was never that much into socializing with my own age group so that aspect of high school did nothing for me. As for actually learning things worth mentioning, that only really started in college. Most of my friends didnt bother with HS much but instead took most of their worth while classes at the local college and frankly it did them a lot of good.

      It would appear that "learning" takes second place to "fun" and "social life." Apparently, education is secondary to teenage social skills when it comes to business after college.

      That is probably one of the most important reasons why most of the population is under-educated/ignorant of things they really should know.

      --
      Sigs are too short to say anything truly profound so read the above post instead.
    5. Re:Big deal by teknosapien · · Score: 1

      Depends on the school system. My daughter had home work over the summer in Calc, Stats, Psychology and Spanish. She has a quizes/tests scheduled for the first days of class relating to her summer home work

      --
      no matter how good it is, it is human nature always wants to make things better
    6. Re:Big deal by an+unsound+mind · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You'll do nothing with your fancy book learnin' in the business world without social skills. ... unfortunately.

    7. Re:Big deal by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Apparently, education is secondary to teenage social skills when it comes to business after college.

      Duh. Anyway, how do you get adult social skills if you're socially stunted from minimal exposure to your peer group during the formative years? You don't take calc before arithmetic.

      Actually, forget all that - getting ahead in business is more about getting on with people than actually getting a good solution.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    8. Re:Big deal by SamsLembas · · Score: 0

      The vast majority of American high schools offer a large number of AP classes (college level, standardized test at the end to prove to colleges that you learned your stuff), and many offer dual credit with local community colleges on advanced courses as well. I am a junior right now, and am currently taking half AP courses.

    9. Re:Big deal by Keen+Anthony · · Score: 1

      That's not a fair thing to say. Sure, "no social life" often means "no prom", "no dates", etc. But, it also means "no exposure to anyone with an alternative lifestyle, culture, perspective on life, opinion", etc. Granted, high schools aren't famous for being a place where kids can be exposed to new perspectives, but personally, I'm very happy with the public school education that allowed me to directly into a large private polytech university. And I'd do it again. Were I homeschooled, I would have been severely crippled when it comes to understanding other people's life experiences.

    10. Re:Big deal by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Apparently you don't realize that social interaction is a rather large part of being an adult and surviving in the work force.

      Of course, you missed that part of growing up because you were home schooled. So great, you are the super smart, and socially inept, hows that working out for you?

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    11. Re:Big deal by Hadlock · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Granted, high schools aren't famous for being a place where kids can be exposed to new perspectives

       
      Unless you live in rural Iowa or similar, I'm not entirely sure how true this is anymore. I grew up in a suburb 30 mi north of Dallas and we had pretty significant "minorities" of mexican (1st and 2nd generation), asian (1st and 2nd generation, some 3rd generation), pretty decent cross section of your indians, persians, some students from Germany, England and one or two from Sweden (Ericsson has a major campus in the town). This is in Texas, which, other than the Bank of America tower and the Chase bank building in downtown doesn't have a whole lot of cultural ties to the east coast, where you'd expect that sort of diversity. Most of the bread winners are from west coast schools and some of the better universities local to Texas. Most everyone I know dated at least two people who were born out of country or had parents who spoke another language at home. That might be a slightly extreme example, but if it can happen in Dallas, it can certianly happen elsewhere (except Oklahoma, I heard they're getting running water up there in a few years due to federal stimulus money).

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    12. Re:Big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      He's posting on /. What do you think?

    13. Re:Big deal by net28573 · · Score: 1

      To true. I have been hevily medicated since the age of 8 and i am very socially inept, although i have to say that socialization is in my opinion a waste of time unless your using it to get something that's usefull (if you can get what you need without it its pretty useless). As for my schooling situation, I go to a school that is barely known in the district due to its small size and know every teacher personally because of the lack of them.

      --
      RIP TRICERATOPS, YOU NEVER EXISTED
    14. Re:Big deal by FrankieBaby1986 · · Score: 1

      I will say this: Socializing IS a huge part of the business world, sadly. As the saying goes "It's who you know". Not what you know. Besides, this is LIFE! It should be as enjoyable as possible during your younger years, while you're capable of enjoying it. If you didn't have as much fun as possible with the least amount of hardship or trouble in your life, you've simply wasted it, IMHO.

      --
      ERROR: SIG NOT FOUND (A)bort, (R)etry, (F)ail?:
    15. Re:Big deal by Keen+Anthony · · Score: 1

      That's unfortunate. I'm sure there are example of homeschooled people who ultimately ended up more cultured and more socially aware. In *my* case, and perhaps I should have specified that, I would have ended up inept. How do you really teach another culture when you aren't exposed to it first hand? I am trying to learn a little more about Persian culture. I found that books haven't been as helpful as hanging out at a Persian restaurant with Persian friends and just absorbing.

    16. Re:Big deal by eam · · Score: 1

      Also unfortunate: most people in public schools learn how to socialize with other people about as well as they learn physics or calculus. In U.S. public high school you see a lot of behavior that would put your ass in jail if you tried it in the real world.

    17. Re:Big deal by hitnrunrambler · · Score: 1

      That's not a fair thing to say. Sure, "no social life" often means "no prom", "no dates", etc. But, it also means "no exposure to anyone with an alternative lifestyle, culture, perspective on life, opinion", etc. Granted, high schools aren't famous for being a place where kids can be exposed to new perspectives, but personally, I'm very happy with the public school education that allowed me to directly into a large private polytech university. And I'd do it again. Were I homeschooled, I would have been severely crippled when it comes to understanding other people's life experiences.

      There are actually forms of interaction with the larger world other than school....

      While I was home schooled I had an actual job, interacting with people of all ages. Were I a self absorbed basement dweller I would have been severely crippled when it comes to understanding other people's life experiences.

    18. Re:Big deal by Gulthek · · Score: 1

      Dude, homeschooling rocked for enjoying life. Simply rocked! My brothers and I would finish all of our schoolwork for the next day at midnight then go to bed (or pull another all nighter fighting barbarians in Bard's Tale) and have that entire day completely free to do with what we pleased. I gotta say, sleeping for 12-13 hours a night during my hormonal teenage years was the way to go. Party? Sure! Play videogames? Right on. As long as we didn't spend all day inside and got our schoolwork done we could do as we pleased.

      Prom? Yeah I went, all you need is a girlfriend going to public school. It's like getting a green card.

      Sports? Oh yeah, swim team in the summer and basketball team (community rec league) in the winter.

      Friends? For sure. Just because we aren't all going to the same school doesn't mean we couldn't be friends. Kids in the neighborhood, etc.

      The tricky part was meeting other homeschooled kids. See, we were homeschooled because we got a better education in less time for less hassle. But, at that time, most other families homeschooling in the area were doing it for religious reasons. I.e. creationists, Jehovah's Witnesses, etc. Yikes. Nice people generally, we just had to not bring up certain topics.

    19. Re:Big deal by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      I didn't learn much after I learned to read; I'd read the textbook the first week of school, and the teachers rarely added anything important to what was in the textbook. Half the time I already knew what was in the textbook, because I'd read it somewhere else.

      I've alwasy been an avid reader, especially nonfiction. I was curious and wanted to know EVERYTHING. It took me a long time to learn that that's an impossible task.

    20. Re:Big deal by orngjce223 · · Score: 1

      Dude, don't I know you from Cogito?

      Anyway... if you're taking AP courses, it behooves you to check if the college you'd like to go to *takes* the AP scores for college credit (or at least prerequisites). I've heard horror stories; believe me, you want to know about this stuff beforehand.

      --
      Note: I was 13 when I wrote most of this. Take with several grains of salt.
    21. Re:Big deal by CannonballHead · · Score: 1

      Social interaction with whom? I am surviving in the work force. I'm a software tester. I'm active in several community things, including music. I played in an ultimate frisbee league with a bunch of complete strangers.

      I didn't say "social interaction" wasn't important. I said that learning how to "socialize" with teenage high school students (and even college students, now) doesn't really prepare you for interacting with other hopefully-thinking adults.

      I'm not sure if you've noticed it or not, but it seems that most HS and college students are pretty immature. Their idea of doing well is partying as many nights of the week as they can and doing as little work as they can. Or myspace, facebook, and twitter. The best thing I could learn from there is how not to live and how not to talk.

      Office gossip ever annoy you? I wonder why people gossip so much. Maybe because they've been doing it for the 12-16 years before working full time after graduating...

    22. Re:Big deal by CannonballHead · · Score: 1

      I enjoyed life. And socializing with teens is a lot different, I have found, from social interaction at my job. A lot different. People at my job are actually responsible human beings, for the most part. They have to be. Otherwise they get fired. Unfortunately, we don't "fire" (flunk) kids from school anymore.

    23. Re:Big deal by CannonballHead · · Score: 1

      Ditto for the most part. I finished school much earlier. During early schooling, usually by 11am. Same education or better (I could read far better and faster, out loud and by myself, than any public schooler I knew back then) in about 3 hours a day. The rest of my day? Outside playing and using my imagination; tinkering on a computer and learning to type; taking piano and trumpet lessons; playing basketball, soccer, etc.; swimming lessons, etc...

      I didn't do swim team but did do basketball in the Parks and Rec and also the YMCA.

      Prom... didn't care. Don't see the point.

      We were one of those "for religious" reasons, partially. But also because the education at home was far better, and my parents knew it.

    24. Re:Big deal by aliloln · · Score: 1

      There's definitely some truth to this - I went to college with someone who had finished high school at age 13, and the effect on his social skills was pretty apparent. And social skills are pretty essential for most employment options (although I forget myself - this is Slashdot).

      --
      Question your beliefs.
    25. Re:Big deal by Knara · · Score: 1

      It would appear that "learning" takes second place to "fun" and "social life."

      As is the case for most of human society.

      Most folks have neither the mental capacity, nor the desire, to become academicians (or even approach that level). High school attempts to give a very basic level of education to the electorate. Obviously, there are widely varying levels of success in doing such.

    26. Re:Big deal by Knara · · Score: 1

      I didn't say "social interaction" wasn't important. I said that learning how to "socialize" with teenage high school students (and even college students, now) doesn't really prepare you for interacting with other hopefully-thinking adults.

      It certainly can. It's quite possible you may need to direct said people (which you lambast later on) or need something from them. Being able to interact on that level is, therefore, quite useful.

      I know this rubs geek sensibilities the wrong way, but there's usually a reason why the "unthinking" other adults make better money than the geeks who are, by all accounts, objectively more learned and intelligent. It's because the "unthinking" ones know and/or have internalized how people operate socially, whereas geeks typically find such interactions distasteful.

    27. Re:Big deal by SamsLembas · · Score: 0

      Yes, you do ;) And yes, many colleges refuse to accept credit from AP classes. But that does not change the fact that they are useful courses, which very few people are going to find too easy.

  5. Send the kids home? by eln · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I understand that there might be some concern with unleashing all these teenagers on the unsuspecting public, but after all they have been home all summer, so making them stay there for another couple of days while they get all this sorted out doesn't seem like that big of a deal. Nothing good can come of packing a bunch of teenagers into one room with nothing to do (and especially no air conditioning!). At the high school I went to, there would have been at least 2 fights on the first day of such an arrangement, and it would have gone downhill from there.

    Oh yeah, and don't most schools have their administrators, and usually the teachers, report in at least a week before school starts? Wouldn't that have been a perfect time to conduct audits and make sure everything was ready for the students to arrive?

    1. Re:Send the kids home? by yincrash · · Score: 1

      If they send the students home, that probably means that they need to have extra school days at the end of the year, or cut into holidays.

    2. Re:Send the kids home? by eln · · Score: 1

      Which is what ought to happen, since the kids are being deprived of instruction days in any case. They still will not have the number of required days in their assigned classes if they're sitting in a gymnasium rather than sitting in the classroom.

    3. Re:Send the kids home? by CannonballHead · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Deprived of instruction or deprived of instruction days? It seems to me that we're more concerned with "days" than "instruction."

    4. Re:Send the kids home? by dltaylor · · Score: 1

      Federal funding is based on attendance, not instruction. In CA the state does the same thing. Dunno about Maryland.

    5. Re:Send the kids home? by maxume · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Even worse, we are more concerned with 'instruction' than 'learning'.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    6. Re:Send the kids home? by CannonballHead · · Score: 1

      Touche. With the accent thing.

    7. Re:Send the kids home? by mctk · · Score: 5, Informative

      Wouldn't that have been a perfect time to conduct audits and make sure everything was ready for the students to arrive?

      I'm guessing you haven't worked in a public school? Two years ago I got my classroom assignment 3 days before students showed up. My co-worker had 1 day. Instead of curriculum planning, we spent the time running around the halls trying to find desks for students, the teacher's manuals for our books, get appropriate keys, etc.

      Oh, and we also had a part time counselor in charge of 300+ students' schedules at our school and another 300+ at our neighbor school. A student shows up who hasn't registered? The secretary will put her in some temporary classes until a week later when the counselor can actually review her transcript and place her accordingly.

      No one is sitting around that week. There's a thousand jobs that need to be done, but the districts keep cutting support staff and putting it on the shoulders of teachers and counselors. I wouldn't be quick to blame anyone in that school building.

      --
      Paul Grosfield - the quicker picker upper.
    8. Re:Send the kids home? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They usually use "snow" days for this. They have ~5 a year, only after those 5 are used do they cut into summer.

    9. Re:Send the kids home? by eln · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I didn't mean to imply the teachers are to blame, although I can see how my post could have been interpreted that way. The administrators should be the ones primarily responsible for auditing the schedules, not the teachers. And believe me, I sympathize with the fact that school personnel are constantly asked to do more with fewer resources. That's the big reason I elected not to go into teaching. My mother and older brother are both teachers, and I just don't want to deal with the aggravation they have to deal with on a daily basis.

    10. Re:Send the kids home? by sexconker · · Score: 1

      &eacute;
      Now that I know it I will be calling lots of people "douché".

    11. Re:Send the kids home? by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      Somewhere long about middle school for me the school year started getting longer and longer. Guess what with a few rare exceptions teachers don't know how to use the extra time effectively. They either slow down everything, which is good for some students I guess, and bore everyone else to half to death or they sprinkle in the occasional movie day.

      Get a clue the school year was much to long when I was in school and I have been out for quite some time. What would be useful is if our society was more open to ( at least teenage ) kids trailing their parents around more often. No I don't think more internships are the answer either; for every good internship, ten others amount to stuffing paper into envelopes and getting the coffee. I think kids should come to work or work around the house with their parents more so they can see what "work" is and how it actually gets done. That might prove useful experience for them.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    12. Re:Send the kids home? by ultraexactzz · · Score: 1

      Most districts have to have so many full days of class per year, and schedule accordingly. Thus, the "snow days" you hear about every year - these are extra days built into the schedule, so that if school has to close for snow/heat/swine flu/etc., they can still have the minimum number of classes.

      If they have more than those days off, then they have to add days to the end of the year, or lose in-service days, or hold class on Saturday. So sending the kids home while they fix the schedules isn't really an option - as little as they are accomplishing now, they count as full school days.

      --
      Never underestimate the potential of Human stupidity. -Heinlein
    13. Re:Send the kids home? by CSMatt · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah, and don't most schools have their administrators, and usually the teachers, report in at least a week before school starts? Wouldn't that have been a perfect time to conduct audits and make sure everything was ready for the students to arrive?

      You are assuming competence in a public high school administration.

    14. Re:Send the kids home? by __aarzwb9394 · · Score: 1

      I think kids should come to work or work around the house with their parents more so they can see what "work" is and how it actually gets done.

      Such a system would be a very effective way to lock in low-to-zero social mobility even further for children of low socio-economic status parents. Sounds great if daddy/mummy is a lawyer, but not great at all if they are unemployed or are a cleaner.

    15. Re:Send the kids home? by rapidient · · Score: 1

      Schools receive money based on student attendance. Telling them to stay home for such an extended period means no money.

    16. Re:Send the kids home? by Eil · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I understand that there might be some concern with unleashing all these teenagers on the unsuspecting public

      1. A LOT of parents treat school like a babysitting service and couldn't stand the thought of their precious little snowflake sitting around at home unsupervised. Something tells me there would be more than a few angry parents (and probably some lawsuits, unfortunately) if the students were sent back home without advance notice.

      2. A LOT of public school administrators treat school like a prison and would much rather see thousands of students sitting around all day on a gymnasium floor than release them back to their comfortable homes while the administrators slaved away at fixing the scheduling problems. Also, sending them home would be like admitting there was a real mistake whereas making the students sit around idle is just a temporary setback.

      I swear to FSM, my daughter will never see the inside walls of a public school.

    17. Re:Send the kids home? by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      Not that slashdot can render it....

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    18. Re:Send the kids home? by maxume · · Score: 3, Funny

      Touché. And you are only in 78 minutes after someone posted how to get Slashdot to render it.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    19. Re:Send the kids home? by apoc.famine · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Instruction" isn't in the teacher contract. (I should know - I signed 5 of them before I wised up.) The wording is "student contact days" and "student contact periods".
       
      My school ran into the same thing with snow days. If we had 2/3 of the students in school for more than a half-day, it counted as a "school day", according to the state and the district. If the weather was bad, send the kids to school. If it gets worse, we send them home at noon, and it doesn't count as a snow day, and we don't have to go a day later into the summer.
       
      School is NOT about "instruction". If you think that, you're sorely misled. School is about a few major things:
       
      1) Basic workplace skills. Reading, writing, addition and subtraction, showing up on time, dealing with your boss.
      2) Babysitting for parents who at are work.
      3) Learning to deal with people.
      4) Learning to take tests. (This is the big one!)
       
      One of the things that struck me most, going back into a high school after being out for almost a decade, was that the kids were TOTALLY unable to think. In fact, I went out and a had a few drinks with a woman who was student-teaching in my building. She was working on both a HS and Elementary certification, so was student teaching in both schools. She was told by an Elementary school math teacher that her test was inappropriate, because "The kids aren't used to that. They are used to being told stuff, and the test sees whether or not they remember it. They aren't used to having to think about it and use it." I would have called BS on that, but she had a few drinks in her and was shaking with rage as she recounted that, so I took it as near the truth.
       
      Einstein once said, ""The only thing that interferes with my learning is my education." If it was true then, it's definitely true now.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    20. Re:Send the kids home? by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      Damn! You win that one! I missed the post with that instruction. All I know is that whenever I cut&paste anything other than a-z, 1-0, slashdot fucks it up. What's the secret?
       
      Because when I cut and paste what you wrote, it looks like this:
       
      Touché.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    21. Re:Send the kids home? by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      Aaah, the source code for the page tells all. It's obviously:
       
      Touch&eacute
       
      GOD DAMN YOU SLASHDOT!!!!

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    22. Re:Send the kids home? by maxume · · Score: 1

      The post I was referring to said as much. It was a sibling to the post of yours that I replied to. The post:

      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1350215&cid=29224445

      The (shared) parent post:

      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1350215&cid=29224193

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    23. Re:Send the kids home? by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      School is less about instruction (really, most US history most adults need/can comprehend could be condensed into a DVD series the length of the Band of Brothers miniseries, the essentials of math can be taught in two months at home after dinner at the age of 10) than it is babysitting.
       
      What it boils down to is that society isn't setup to gainfully employ anyone under the age of 24; from age 16 to 24 you're assigned to consume your parent's spare and saved $$, and if they can't afford it, borrow it (student loans) to support the child's consumer lifestyle. But this isn't an anti-consumerist rant. Kids under the age of 10 aren't suited for most jobs, except reaching into jammed machinery to clear obstacles. Kids 11-18 are too obsessed with sex and defying authority to be productive other than textile manufacturing. So you end up with social(ized) babysitting. The longer the kids are in school, the fewer days parents have to schedule (and pay for) activities for the kids in the off season. Most of what you learn specific for your job (with the exception of medicine and research-based engineering or science), you learn on the job. By a rough estimate I'd say 95%+ of what you do in your day to day job you either learned by experience at your last job, or someone explained to you vaguely what you are responsible for. School and university is nothing more than a very expensive babysitting and vetting process.
       
      My point being, a longer school year is objected to very little by most parents, not because they learn less, but because for the first 20 years of life, humans are simply hungry mouths. Yeah, you've got the occasional 15 year old taking university classes with plans on curing cancer, but the vast majority of people won't hardly produce enough in life to keep their head above water, and most tweens/teens are just a drag on society until their mid-20s.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    24. Re:Send the kids home? by matty619 · · Score: 1

      Except that schools don't get paid if children don't attend.

    25. Re:Send the kids home? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never? But then how will she find out about the community issues that are discussed in the public meetings that occur after school?

    26. Re:Send the kids home? by twostix · · Score: 3, Informative

      I've heard it mentioned dozens of times before over the last 6 or so years on the Internet but always ignored it as conspiracy rantings. I finally took the time to read John Taylor Gattos "Underground History of American Education" and when I was done walked around in a dazed stupor for a few weeks at the scope of the education "system" and the people and utopian (distopian?) ideals that have gone into building it over the last 100 years.

      http://www.johntaylorgatto.com/chapters/index.htm

      I dare anyone with a child to read it and not feel sick with the new understanding history and ideals behind the system that they're sending their kids into that that book brings.

      A choice quote from the first mission statement of Rockefeller's General Education Board one of the biggest movers in the creation of mass government schooling:

      "In our dreams...people yield themselves with perfect docility to our molding hands. The present educational conventions [intellectual and character education] fade from our minds, and unhampered by tradition we work our own good will upon a grateful and responsive folk. We shall not try to make these people or any of their children into philosophers or men of learning or men of science. We have not to raise up from among them authors, educators, poets or men of letters. We shall not search for embryo great artists, painters, musicians, nor lawyers, doctors, preachers, politicians, statesmen, of whom we have ample supply. The task we set before ourselves is very simple...we will organize children...and teach them to do in a perfect way the things their fathers and mothers are doing in an imperfect way."

      W.T.F

    27. Re:Send the kids home? by twostix · · Score: 4, Interesting

      My step son does (goes to public school) he's eight years old in third grade and goes to school to play fun exciting games and get stickers for writing one broken sentence and then comes home in the afternoon to learn.

      His mother and I have butted head *numerous* times with his teacher, counselors (counselors in primary school...why?) and principle a few times about the fact that he and half is class are functionally illiterate and the school doesn't seem to be in the least bit concerned about it. This is after we pulled him out of another public school because of the same problem. That is no interest in teaching children to read, write and do maths. It's *all* "social" and not even what I would call "social" as some of the things they learn are decidedly anti-social.

      Apparently social skills and self-esteem building are more important than the fact that he can't read books that me and his mother could read in first grade. We do our best with him but given that we only have him for two hours a night and are already considered "overly strict" and "pressure" parents by his school for trying to teach him ourselves (reading, writing and maths) for a few hours on afternoons and weekends there's not much else we can do as long as he's in that system.

      He'll be out of the public system at the end of this year though. After spending his summer holidays with a tutor he'll be going straight into a private school to repeat the third grade.

      So I'm with you my own children (18 months and six months) will *never ever* see the inside walls of a public school building. As it is I'm already responsible for one damaged child because of the mistake of trusting the state school system.

      I weep for this generation of public school children - the first in some larger untested social experiment.

    28. Re:Send the kids home? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Einstein once said, ""The only thing that interferes with my learning is my education."

      No, Mark Twain once said (paraphrased) "I try not to let my schooling interfere with my education." I should know, I'm wearing a shirt with it on.

    29. Re:Send the kids home? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      >and principle a few times and *principal* a few times Hey - it's a school thread, it's OK to be a grammar Nazi

    30. Re:Send the kids home? by CAIMLAS · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Dude, seriously. I feel your pain - as one of those kids who jumped from school to school because they were too dumb and I was bored. My parents were quite worried that I had not really started reading (I could read, just didn't) until 3rd grade.

      I was in a total of 9 school districts (3 private schools inclusive) throughout K-12 - and I was homeschooled for the majority of middle school years (6th through 9th grades). This isn't in one region, it's in half a dozen different towns in 3 different states 500+ miles from each other.

      Take the kid out of school and "home school" him. If you have to, give him books and lock him in a room and tell him to "entertain himself". He will still learn more, because his mind will be engaged (if, for no other reason, because he's got nothing else to do).

      If you have to, ferret him into work in a 4U server box and stick him in the corner - then ask him what he learned "at school" on the car trip home. Chances are, he'll learn more in a day which will stick with him than he does in a whole week of school.

      I say those things somewhat tongue in cheek, but seriously: there are very few good schools out there, regardless of money or location, public or private. If your kids are even moderately intelligent/above average (as I am - not uber-intelligent but certainly brighter than average, no small part due to my upbringing) they will be bored and unchallenged.

      Like you, my children will not see the inside of a public school building (and, most likely, not the inside of a private one, either). I will "shoot it out" with CPS/whatever agents before they're sent away like that. I love them too much.

      My son is currently 5; due to new early-start laws, we've got to register him for school already. They (the federal government) is trying to take our kids from us at an earlier and earlier age. I went to kindergarten in NY at the age of 7; I was a year oler than most of my classmates due to when my birthday fell in the year, but at the same time, it was required at 6. Now it's 5. When my mom was a kid (at the same kindergarten), kindergarten was not even required.

      As far as education of children at home: as I said, my son is 5. I have made no 'concerted' effort in teaching him anything except what he is interested in. If he asks a question, I guide him in finding the answer for himself or I answer it. He knows the alphabet, can almost count (and write) to 20 (and after you're past the "teens", it's easy-peezy), and knows more about the natural world than most high schoolers. He plays with legos, draw, and plays with his sister for most of the day.

      Most importantly, though: he is using his brain, and he is not behind his peers by any stretch of the imagination. He is interacting with adults (I work from home, as does my wife) on a daily basis, is learning proper adult etiquette, and is one step closer (than he was and than others his age) to becoming half of what childhood is about: an adult.

      The other half is about playing and having fun. And even that "fun" stuff has lessons for adulthood: skinning your knee, falling from a tree, or getting sprayed by a skunk all have life lessons you are likely to not forget.

      (Sorry for the rambling nature; Friday started a day early for me this week.)

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    31. Re:Send the kids home? by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Hmm, maybe they could find somewhere to trim their budgets, then? Surely they don't need 1 computer per every other child (and have only a fraction of the computers available for use at any one time), many rooms unused throughout the day due to scheduling, and half their budgets focused on sports every year?

      My wife was "not allowed" to graduate high school early, even though she had (or would have had, if they'd let her take a full course load) the requisite credits and courses. They made one of her required classes "full" so she had to wait to take it, just so they could count another student, and thus pick up the $2500 for her "attendance" for another semester. This, in part, so the high school Super could drive around in a Lexus.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    32. Re:Send the kids home? by Gryle · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think Paul Simon phrased it better: "When I think back on all the crap I learned in high-school, it's a wonder I can think at all."*

      *Paul Simon, Kodachrome

      --
      Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not entirely sure about the universe - Einstein
    33. Re:Send the kids home? by BooRolla · · Score: 1

      I'd hold off on making your kid repeat the 3rd grade. Frankly, getting "caught up" on the concepts at that level won't take long and you'll just ostracize him at his new school.

    34. Re:Send the kids home? by Haffner · · Score: 1

      I went to public school all my life and now attend a top-10 university. It isn't that public school is inherently awful, its that it doesn't make any attempt to foster learning in its students. Those who succeed in public school are those who want to succeed. In private school, they make more of an effort to make you want to succeed. In my opinion, therein lies the difference.

      --
      "Going to war without the French is like going deer hunting without your accordion." ~General Norman Schwarzkopf
    35. Re:Send the kids home? by zdickinson · · Score: 0

      I think you're doing two things: 1.) Being dramatic; 2.) Applying your one experience to an entire system. I went to public school, thought it was great. I have relatives of all grades in public school now, and they're doing wonderfully. I certainly wouldn't "weep for this generation of public school children".

      --
      I hate ethics, I avoid them on principle.
    36. Re:Send the kids home? by Reapy · · Score: 1

      I honestly don't think it makes sense to have kids 'think' on a test. I think I lucked out and had a pretty good HS education, my teachers had been teaching for a long while, I think a number of them retired a year or so after I graduated.

      We had sections where we'd do class debates and come up with what we thought of certain situations and what not.

      But on a test, meh, how do you grade an opinion? If it is English class, easy, you grade on grammer and presentation, but what about history? Most history tests have essay parts assigned to them, and if you start making dumb assertions on the test, you are going to fail, most teachers want you to just recite back what they taught, but some better teachers will accept other answers, if you have sufficient proof.

      Math is another deal, math is taught in the US like, here is the format of the problem, here is the formula to use to solve it, plug it in and go. Being a random teacher down the line breaking that stride on a student is somewhat cruel, as they are still going to face that technique for tests their entire schooling career in the US.

      The "thinking" part should be a part of the day to day lessons, not a part of a test imho.

      But as for the rest of your post I'm pretty much 100% on that, most of what is taught in school could be crammed into a lot less time.

    37. Re:Send the kids home? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude... kind of a harsh criticism, both of the school system and of your child.
      People learn at different rates, and have different innate abilities.
      Every generation weeps for the next generation, because they have it better.
      Which generation do I mean by they? Hmmmm.... half full or empty?

      Also, check this page out
      http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_the_difference_between_principal_and_principle

    38. Re:Send the kids home? by Knara · · Score: 1

      I didn't mean to imply the teachers are to blame, although I can see how my post could have been interpreted that way. The administrators should be the ones primarily responsible for auditing the schedules, not the teachers.

      I went to a private, well-respected, Catholic school. Our "religion" teacher had a doctorate in divinity.

      As you say, a few times per year the administrators of the school would "sit in" on classes to observe and audit.

      On those days, we would literally play "bible board games", because the actual subject matter taught in her classes (the nature of god, the nature and history of the papacy and catholic church, various historical ways that Christianity was practiced, etc) made the administration nervous (because it made the parents nervous).

      Sometimes audits don't have the effect you think they might.

  6. I know who's to blame... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Damn you, COBOL!!!!

  7. Can't do it by hand by Murdoch5 · · Score: 1

    Hmm get a bunch of people including teachers and do it by hand. If you can't do it by hand , give the software to a bunch of computer science students and have them work out the bug, it's not hard.

    1. Re:Can't do it by hand by v1 · · Score: 2, Funny

      but it's so much more exciting to give them $4mil and pray it works the day it goes live, untested.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    2. Re:Can't do it by hand by swanzilla · · Score: 1

      I have some doubts that the recipient of a 4.1 million dollar software contract would provide it's source code to a group of high school "computer science students." That is pretty funny though. I'm picturing a bunch of skinny jeans-wearing kids with floppy hair "working out the bug."

    3. Re:Can't do it by hand by Murdoch5 · · Score: 1

      Another example on how closed source software fails to provide, if it was open source the code could be fixed simply and quickly.

    4. Re:Can't do it by hand by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Probably not simply and quickly, but fixed, anyway.

      Well, of course it could be a simple bug. But the thing to bet on is some error in the design.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  8. What have they been doing all summer by mpapet · · Score: 3, Informative

    Well, let's see.... At the top of the list is not working because they aren't paid over the summer.

    This is a particularly annoying version of complaining about inferior service when, in fact, you are the one who funds that service.

    --
    http://www.maxineudall.com/2010/02/should-economists-be-sued-for-malpractice.html
    1. Re:What have they been doing all summer by zach_the_lizard · · Score: 0, Troll

      That might be a valid complaint if, in fact, we paid for these schools voluntarily. Anyone who pays taxes (most people) pays for schools, whether they like it or not. Failure to pay those taxes will result in the police coming to kidnap you and lock you in a cage. Failure to comply with the demand to be locked in a cage can result in serious injury or even death.

      --
      SSC
    2. Re:What have they been doing all summer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That might be a valid complaint if, in fact, we paid for these schools voluntarily. Anyone who pays taxes (most people) pays for schools, whether they like it or not. Failure to pay those taxes will result in the police coming to kidnap you and lock you in a cage. Failure to comply with the demand to be locked in a cage can result in serious injury or even death.

      I can't speak for Prince George County - but many places the school system is paid by property taxes.
      And they don't lock you up for failing to pay property taxes, they make liens against the property that are paid when the property is sold. (and if the liens are large enough, they may be able to force the property to be sold depending on the locale)

      No cages, no injury, no death.

    3. Re:What have they been doing all summer by Trepidity · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What does this teenage-Randian rant have to do with the parent comment? The article asks what schools were doing all summer, and the comment is that they were not working, because they weren't employed. Your argument that they shouldn't have ever been employed because omg RON PAUL isn't actually relevant to that point.

    4. Re:What have they been doing all summer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My tax dollars at work. . .Maryland my Maryland. . . .

    5. Re:What have they been doing all summer by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Anyone who pays taxes (most people) pays for schools, whether they like it or not.

      Actually I believe in many areas, schools are funded by property taxes, which not everyone pays.

      Failure to pay those taxes will result in the police coming to kidnap you and lock you in a cage.

      When it comes to property taxes, if you want the government-run police to enforce your government-issued deed to your home (on land whose ownership chain rests on some sort of government conquest), I don't think you have much philosophical basis for objecting to paying up. If you want to play the property game, ante up and pay your taxes.

      And think it's awfully rare for them to point guns at you for back taxes, unless you're engaging in some sort of fraud. They just seize your bank accounts. If you don't have enough in your bank accounts, they might seize stock assets (in corporations created by government charter) or real estate assets (see above). But the days of capitation taxes, where the government comes along and says "pay me $20 a head or go to jail", are long over.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    6. Re:What have they been doing all summer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Of course we also are forced to pay taxes so that unproductive old people can lay about the house, leaving only to collect astronomically priced prescriptions to which they feel they have become entitled, paid for the young people who are never going to see a penny from the social security system. They also complain about having to pay for schools. Like schools, the ingrained special interests prevent any reform that will save the taxpayer money, citing not the need for profit by the multinationals, but the idea that no amount of money is too much to extend life a single moment, even if bankrupts the country.

      To reply to the OP, some persons at the school are 12 month employees, but even those have likely have no control over the scheduling software. Generally software is mandated for an entire district/province/principality, and the local staff just have to make do. Often software is written from an abstract perspective,with no notion of the specific issues that can occur in the instantiated case. Likely the people who speced and developed the software missed some tiny but critical issue.

    7. Re:What have they been doing all summer by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Interesting

      In fact, while public school teachers are typically not paid during the summer(whether this counts as "vacation" or "unemployment" depends on how much they are paid the rest of the year and/or who they've married); but it is pretty common to have at least a subset of admin and support staff on site year round. Some of it is just salary padding fluff, I'm sure; but there is a lot of real work to do at a school over the summer.

      Schedules get made up(well, usually), buildings get cleaned and repaired, IT projects that would be too disruptive for the year(or take too much of the IT staff's time when they also have to deal with user support) get done, pallets of textbooks, paper, lightbulbs, etc. get moved about.

      I'm not too surprised by this story, really. You see errors at least as flagrant in much higher profile corporate and government projects, so it isn't like IT deployments crashing and burning is all that uncommon, even among people with deep pockets who should know better. In a school, you've probably got a more or less bare bones staff of IT, who spend most of their time doing basic support, working with some horribly crufty abomidation from a vendor who deserves to die for their programming sins; but also has years of experience building software that caters to the specific needs of school systems(Sure, anybody, right down to that 15 year old who just discovered LAMP and sourceforge, could build a better frontend, and better DB backends are given away in the backs of "learn linux for morons in 10 minutes" books; but software that promises to automatically send out report card notifications to parents in a manner that correctly navigates the laws for information disclosure/nondisclosure when you have one or more divorced/separated/custodial/noncustodial/court-appointed-guardian/whatever parents in the picture? Not so common). It's more or less a matter of time before something bad happens.

    8. Re:What have they been doing all summer by sexconker · · Score: 5, Funny

      RON PAUL is always relevant.

    9. Re:What have they been doing all summer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually I believe in many areas, schools are funded by property taxes, which not everyone pays.

      Either you own your own home, in which case you pay property taxes, or you rent, in which case your landlord uses part of your rent money to pay his property taxes. In Canada, only the homeless, and natives on reserves, don't pay property taxes.

    10. Re:What have they been doing all summer by BlackSnake112 · · Score: 1

      Many teachers ARE paid over the summer. In VA and MD (my sister is a teacher who worked in both states) teachers are given a choice of a 12 month or 10 month pay cycle. The 10 month pay cycle do not get paid over the summer while the 12 month does. Most people take the 12 month cycle so they can plan their bills accordingly. Since the school administrators are in the school over the summer, I would say they are getting paid as well.

      This looks like a case of someone forgot to test something. A full load test should have been done. I remember getting my school schedule the first full week of August. Why was this issue not known a few weeks or a month ago?

    11. Re:What have they been doing all summer by pak9rabid · · Score: 1

      Well, let's see.... At the top of the list is not working because they aren't paid over the summer.

      Rubbish. Teaches in Texas (which I'm assuming this is at since they mentioned Bowie High School) get paid year round, even if they don't work over the summer. It's one of the few benefits of being a teacher in the public school system.

    12. Re:What have they been doing all summer by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      Not that any bank is paying interest worth much these days but you'd have to be a dolt to take the 12mo cycle. Why would you not want to get that 2mo salary spread into the first 10 so you could collect the interest on it sooner.

      How hard is it really to figure out what your salary would be if you had taken it over 12mo and plan your spending and expenses accordingly while you make a few extra bones in interest?

      Its simple division most adults should be able to do in their heads!

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    13. Re:What have they been doing all summer by Drathos · · Score: 1

      Teaches in Texas (which I'm assuming this is at since they mentioned Bowie High School)..

      You assume wrong. This Bowie High School is in Prince George's County, Maryland. There is no Prince George's county in Texas, so just reading the summary you should have known better..

      --
      End of line..
    14. Re:What have they been doing all summer by JustOK · · Score: 1

      stop paying that voluntary tax for the police, then they won't come.

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    15. Re:What have they been doing all summer by apoc.famine · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You're wrong. I taught for five years, so let me set the record straight:
       
      Most teachers have their salary spread over the entire year. The first two years I taught, I got a check every 2 weeks, whether or not school was in session. The last three years, they dumped a lump-sum into my bank account at the end of June. Still, this doesn't make a lick of difference. The teachers don't make the schedule - that's the duty of the administration, who IS paid all year. Generally, they sign a 220-250 day contract, which means they work through most of the summer.
       
      Once upon a time, when I was a new teacher, we got a new principal and a new head of guidance. They were tasked with scheduling classes for the school over the summer. Because they were new, the district shelled out something like $10k to send them to a 3 day training session put on by the maker of the scheduling software the district had purchased.
       
      They packed their bags, and flew out to the resort where this was happening. They attended the first day of the training, and it was very easy stuff. Stuff they already knew. So they blew the other two days off, and had themselves a nice vacation.
       
      Fast-forward to the end of the summer, and the principal had deleted two weeks of work on the schedule by accident, the classes were all fucked up, and nothing was working. On the first day of school, there were all sorts of issues, and it took a week or two to hammer it all out.
       
      And by "hammer it all out", I mean, "Schedule Calculus and Physics at the same time, so students have to choose. Schedule AP English and AP History at the same time, so students have to choose. Schedule chemistry classes and labs a period apart, so the teacher is forced to break instruction into tiny bits, and rush through minimal labs."
       
      For three years, my school went through a nightmare of scheduling. When they got rid of the horrifically incompetent administrators, it got much better.
       
      How much do you want to bet that the administrators in charge of scheduling this district went on a vacation instead of a training session for the software?

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    16. Re:What have they been doing all summer by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Many teachers ARE paid over the summer.

      Who cares? You get $x/year and it doesn't matter how things are laid out. it's not like it affects your ability to work in the summer.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    17. Re:What have they been doing all summer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It entirely depends on the state and or county if teachers are paid over the summer. The school district my wife teaches in used to allow the choice of being paid over 10 months or 12. Some people prefer the regularity of receiving a check once a month rather than not getting one during the summer. As more and more schools have gone year round they have changed the contracts so that all staff are paid over the course of 12 months. The total number of contract days does not change so they are not being paid for working during the summer, or for the year round schools the "off track" months. It's simply more efficient and cost effect to pay every one on the same schedule. During the summer months teachers don't have access to their class rooms, nor do they have access to the districts support staff. They may have mandatory training, or that may be the only time that training is available. Showing up for those training sessions may result in additional pay, or credits towards their license renewal. The reason that they would be paid or receive those credits is due to the fact that they are "off contract" or essentially unemployed during the time period they are off. So in this case teachers are paid during that time, but they are not compensated for that time.

    18. Re:What have they been doing all summer by rpillala · · Score: 1

      Administrators and guidance counselors are not in the same employment category as teachers (I teach in Maryland, not in PG county.) As such, they work year round. Teachers are on summer vacation, yes, but we are not the ones who construct and reconcile schedules, or authorize the purchase of bigger better faster data tracking software. The people who do that are not on vacation during summers, and incidentally do not generally belong to teacher unions. Administrators most certainly do not, as they are not teachers.

      My district upgraded their scheduling software this year for a one time fee and has run into some issues of compatibility with the other software systems that run the schools. Minor stuff is there, as well as real head scratchers. For example if the system sees that 100 students are scheduled for world history, and there are 5 teachers, it will create a schedule with 100 students in section 1 and 0 in the others. This kind of braindead design takes time to sort out.

      That's before everyone and (sometimes literally) their grandmother wants an exception made because they don't like this teacher, or they don't want to stay a full school day and want the same class earlier. Or how about the class that 12 kids sign up for? Run it or cut it? If you run it, that's one teacher who has a much smaller than average class (the other kids they "should" have must go someplace) and if you cut it, those 12 kids have to get something else.

      All kinds of things can drag out the scheduling process. It's not just the computer systems, it's the needs of the students. And by the way, registration for classes begins around March, so the process is not just a summer endeavor.

      --
      When the axe came to the forest, the trees said, "Look out - the handle was once one of us."
    19. Re:What have they been doing all summer by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      I think the 12 month cycle exists for those who aren't capable of spending their salary wisely. If VA and MD didn't have to offer that pay option, then credit card companies wouldn't be able to make mountains of money off the same people. The state could probably just pay them the lump sum upfront if they wanted; they get their year's budget up front on July 1st. And then there are some people who just like getting $X every week/every other week/month

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    20. Re:What have they been doing all summer by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      Does that mean I get city council type status for speeding tickets too? I always thought we should just bump up the city tax rate by 1% to pay for traffic ticket revenue, and then take traffic ticket revenue and evenly donate it to all registered charities in the state. This would discourage a lot of predatory traffic ticketing.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    21. Re:What have they been doing all summer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      And do not forget the NCLB required state reporting. Sure, it is possible to write excellent software from the perspective of the user, but that is hardly the only thing that the districts and ISD's care about. Does it report Special Education, Lunch Programs, Any Other protected statuses, does it have the built in checks to make sure that only people whoa re authorized to look ast a students information can (after all FERPA isn't really a joke) and can it extract the correct reports to the state every time. Sometimes correct state reporting is more important than usability. Though, to be honest i don't expect that SchoolMax is enjoying this as thier competition is probably calling all thier customers as we type.

      Alas, sometimes the bad is as good as it gets, for many reasons.

    22. Re:What have they been doing all summer by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      I smell a new Chuck Norris fad clone...

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    23. Re:What have they been doing all summer by mpapet · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're wrong.
      Really? You mean every school district works the same everywhere? Really?

      The rest of your post is good info which goes even further to making my hopelessly lost point, taxpayers don't make education a high priority. Class sizes are huge and most importantly how involved the are the parents? A small minority are involved, but the rest don't make it a high priority for themselves or their children.

      And taxpayers funding the schools? Let's raise their taxes to do a better job educating our kids. And that's going over like a lead balloon.
       

      --
      http://www.maxineudall.com/2010/02/should-economists-be-sued-for-malpractice.html
    24. Re:What have they been doing all summer by Knara · · Score: 1

      Churches (and other similarly exempt organizations) do not pay property taxes in the US.

    25. Re:What have they been doing all summer by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1

      If you want to play the property game, ante up and pay your taxes.

      I am not against property taxes in an of themselves. But what I am against is taxes based on ethereal worth. Why should you pay money on what someone thinks your house is worth?

      Taxes per square foot? Absolutely. I would even support those on a county or city or perhaps even borough basis.

      But paying more of less real estate tax because you, or your neighbour, put nice flowers outside their window or has a fresh coat of paint on the walls, or left the whole property go to rot? It's arbitrary, it's inaccurate and it's unfair. I think ethereal "value taxes" are the primary people most people are against a tax on their homes. That and the propect of being taxed out of them, but you can have credits and exemptions for that.

      If the government wants to have a square foot tax, window tax, driveway tax; fine. As long as it's a solid, fixed number and not something picked out of a hat by a real estate "expert", I have no objection to it. But penalising people for events outside their control, like property booms or creeping gentrification, is a practice without financial or moral foundation. Houses aren't worth anything until they are sold, and that's what stamp duty is for.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
  9. Doesn't suprise me by Hadlock · · Score: 1

    Prince George's County "Upper Marlboro Schools" is a complete clusterfuck. You should see their purchasing department, they will quote for the city of "Mpper Marlboro" and give the shipping and bill to for a building completely unreleated to the billing or shipping address, and then have it deliver to one of the 500 cities in the district. They never, ever include shipping costs and the shipping address is wrong half the time. Do I have a beef with UMS? Noooo not at all.

    --
    moox. for a new generation.
    1. Re:Doesn't suprise me by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      Prince George's County "Upper Marlboro Schools" is a complete clusterfuck.

      Prince George's County *anything* is a complete clusterfuck. You should see their police. Hope you have medical insurance, and a good lawyer. With the latter, you might actually make a good profit out of the encounter.

    2. Re:Doesn't suprise me by russotto · · Score: 1

      Prince George's County *anything* is a complete clusterfuck.

      The P.G. County slogan: Making Montgomery County look better for three generations! (at least)

    3. Re:Doesn't suprise me by Malkin · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Heh, you don't have to tell me. I grew up in Upper Marlboro, and did all my schooling in the PG County School System. Back when I was in middle and high school (in another decade), it was fairly routine for me to have to sort out some kind of heinous scheduling snafu at the beginning of each year. Given that I was out at the edge of the area covered by my high school, bizarre bus schedule errors were almost guaranteed, as well.

      The most spectacular goof-up while I was there was the time they refused to close schools one morning, when a blizzard was rolling in. After freezing to death at the bus stop, waiting for our late bus, we had a grueling trip through white-out conditions to the school. The Beltway looked like some kind of post-apocalyptic nuclear survival horror movie, littered with snow-covered jack-knifed tractor trailers and wrecked cars. By the time we finally reached the school building, we were told that school was canceled. However, we could not simply turn around and go home. Oh no. Instead, the bus was obligated to go back to the first school on its evening routes, to pick them up and take them home, first. We were the last school on the evening routes. So, needless to say, the bus didn't even show up to take us home until stupid-o-clock at night, when we should have been going to bed.

    4. Re:Doesn't suprise me by bipbop · · Score: 1

      My high school (in the western suburbs of Chicago) didn't cancel for the Blizzard of '99, when all the others in the area did. Few enough people went that they had to make up the day with a snow day at the end of the school year anyway. I was one of the stupid people who went--stupidly obedient, anyway. One of my friends brought a SNES, and we played Tetris Attack for most of the day. So it wasn't a total loss :-) Definitely a waste of a lot of people's time, though.

      We weren't hit by the worst of the blizzard, mind you, but it was pretty bad.

    5. Re:Doesn't suprise me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You wouldn't have been going to Eleanor Roosevelt on Veteran's Day of '87, would you?

      I did that one, but was fortunately driving myself. I got to the parking lot, decided that if I parked I wasn't going to get the car back out, cleaned the windshield wipers off, and turned around to go home. Only problem was dealing with empty school buses fishtailing up hills.

      Fun, fun, fun!

      ERHS Class of '88

    6. Re:Doesn't suprise me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One year, I ended up with a desk in the hallway and a textbook, and the teachers just said to go through it (maths I think). That was the year (with retrospect) I wish I had Hermione's time travel device.

    7. Re:Doesn't suprise me by Airline_Sickness_Bag · · Score: 1

      While PG county had its problems, there are areas in Montgomery county that aren't exactly "nice". I hear about the problems with crime, bad schools, etc from my co-workers who live in Montgomery county. I'm glad I don't live in one co-workers neighborhood in Gaithersberg - she has had her house broken into a number of times. Strangely enough, that has never happened to me or my neighbors here in PG county. While overall Montgomery county may be better, you have enough problems that you shouldn't be too smug. And compared to my in-laws neighborhood in Mclean, Va, most of Montgomery county doesn't look too hot.

      Even though I have lived in PG county for over 30 years (post college), the only time my car has been vandalized was in Montgomery county.

  10. Happened in Dallas ISD too by trybywrench · · Score: 5, Interesting

    My wife teaches Journalism at a low income high school in Dallas. A few days before school started she was worried about scheduling and so were her coworkers since an online system they're suppose to be using had no schedules in it. Her first day was met with 60 kids in one of her Journalism class, only 5 had orginially signed up. This is a very poor school ripe with gangs which have to be kept apart but with the scheduling farked all the kids were all mixed together. She was in tears on the phone with me worried that if a fight broke out she wouldn't be able to get out of her room since she has to cross the entire class to get from her desk to the door. Her school won't let her carry a concealed weopen, I want her to carry my pistol but I'm afraid if she gets caught with it there would be criminal charges filed.

    The second day she submitted about 200 schedule changes to the counselors and had managed to get her class size down to 40. Any known bad kids she just told to leave her class, they just leave school and never come back (the first week or so is the worst then the trouble makers just stop showing up).

    Today she showed 1/2 her students a video and tried to teach the other half, I'm guessing she'll do the same tomorrow but switch halves.

    As of right now next Monday is declared a "do over first day of school" and the schedules are promised to be fixed. No one believes it though.

    --
    I came to the datacenter drunk with a fake ID, don't you want to be just like me?
    1. Re:Happened in Dallas ISD too by StreetStealth · · Score: 1

      This has to be pretty common. A very similar thing happened to me in high school. Some (presumably database-related) error caused a handful of 70-student classes, and I remember sitting with my gargantuan history class out in the student commons as they figured out how to re-parcel out the class rosters.

      The kicker? This was ten years ago. Why is it still happening?

      --
      Your mind is clear / The things that you fear / Will fade with how much you / Believe what you hear
    2. Re:Happened in Dallas ISD too by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why is it still happening?

      Because a significant portion (not all) of the population is unwilling to pay for adequate education. Because a significant portion (not all) of parents are disinterested in what their kids do. Because a significant faction in American politics believes there should be no public education at all and so do everything possible to sabotage it, including packing boards of public education.

      The same thing is going on in public universities. I had a history class at UT Austin with 700+ students packed into an auditorium with 600 seats. No questions allowed, as there would be no time to answer them.

    3. Re:Happened in Dallas ISD too by xaxa · · Score: 1

      This is a very poor school ripe with gangs which have to be kept apart but with the scheduling farked all the kids were all mixed together. She was in tears on the phone with me worried that if a fight broke out she wouldn't be able to get out of her room since she has to cross the entire class to get from her desk to the door.

      That sounds horrible, and I admire anyone who works in a situation like that. Wow, just, wow.

      Can she rearrange the room? I.e. move her desk to the opposite side, and move the kids' chairs to the other side of the tables. I assume the worst kids sit at the back, so this would benefit everyone.

      Her school won't let her carry a concealed weopen, I want her to carry my pistol but I'm afraid if she gets caught with it there would be criminal charges filed.

      Your/her situation is a world away from anything I've ever experienced, but it's not uncommon here for people carrying weapons "just in case" to mess up when they panic and try and use them.

    4. Re:Happened in Dallas ISD too by rho · · Score: 0, Troll

      Because a significant portion (not all) of the population is unwilling to pay for adequate education.

      You're an idiot if you don't think we're spending enough money on education.

      Because a significant faction in American politics believes there should be no public education at all and so do everything possible to sabotage it, including packing boards of public education.

      Never mind, you're not a fool, you're a paranoid.

      --
      Potato chips are a by-yourself food.
    5. Re:Happened in Dallas ISD too by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1

      Never mind, you're not a fool, you're a paranoid.

      Well, your personal attacks aside, I'm just calling them as I see them. Check out the more 'conservative' members on the Texas SBOE. You should try addressing issues instead of just shouting people down, unfortunately uninformative posts like your reflect the current approach to public matters of angry people with nothing to say or contribute.

    6. Re:Happened in Dallas ISD too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My Dad taught in Jacksonville, FL schools in the 70's. Carried a baseball bat in the school, and a shotgun in his car...

    7. Re:Happened in Dallas ISD too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe he's angry because he's right. While it's debatable what our (the US)world rank is in per capita education spending, it's not debatable that we are in the top quartile (I would say top ten percentile, but I'm too lazy to find citations). What is also not debatable is that US education spending in real dollars has steadily increased over the last four decades. All that your personal story proves is that somehow the additional spending is not getting to where it needs to go, which strongly suggests that it is being misspent. Why don't you look it up for yourself?

    8. Re:Happened in Dallas ISD too by lgw · · Score: 1

      Often angry people have somehting to say and contribute, but they're just tired of being entirely ignored. Plus, rational debate is only reasonable before the decision is finalized. When a "representative" has clearly already decided, and holds town halls to read talking points instead of listening to the genuine concerns of voters, that makes people angry very quickly and shouting is all that's left.

      It has become depressingly common for congresscritters to resond to any question or concern by reading a prepared talking point that somehow realated to the question. That really pisses people off in face-to-face meetings. When the question is "will the county pay for cats to be spayed for free to help reduce the feral cat problem, or will that only apply to dogs?" and the answer is "dogs make great pets, but it's important to emply dog catchers to control strays", people get angry that the "town hall" isn't interactive, but is instead a prepared speech read in an order determined by the questions.

      When a congresscritter openly mocks the people he allegedly represents, suggesting they are too stupid to be anything but a problem to be managed, things have gone very wrong somewhere. They aren't even pretending to care these days, so is it any wonder people are angry?

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    9. Re:Happened in Dallas ISD too by Kittenman · · Score: 1

      I want her to carry my pistol but I'm afraid if she gets caught with it there would be criminal charges filed.

      Good lord, I hope so.

      --
      "The greatest lesson in life is to know that even fools are right sometimes" - Winston Churchill
    10. Re:Happened in Dallas ISD too by flynt · · Score: 3, Funny

      This reminds me of where I went to high school. They sent you through a metal detector, and if you didn't have a gun, they gave you one.

    11. Re:Happened in Dallas ISD too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Her school won't let her carry a concealed weopen, I want her to carry my pistol but I'm afraid if she gets caught with it there would be criminal charges filed.

      That is some seriously fucked up shit.

      If your wife's life is that valuable to you (and I don't doubt that it is), the solution is not to throw firepower into the mess, it's to get her out of it. I fully support the second amendment but brining a gun into any school, not matter how "low-income," is about the dumbest thing I've ever head.

    12. Re:Happened in Dallas ISD too by Loconut1389 · · Score: 1

      While bringing weapons onto a schoolground is a bad idea (could be accidentally or intentionally used on someone else, including your wife), at least a taser or something is understandable, even relatively safe. Ask taser the company about taser laws in your state and schools- around here even law enforcement can't carry guns on campus, not sure about tasers, but I'm guessing taser has a willingness to look up all that information to make the sale. The $400-$700 isn't that much more than what you'd pay for a nice new handgun, and a lot less likely to put someone in jail or the hospital.

    13. Re:Happened in Dallas ISD too by HiThere · · Score: 1

      I've definitely seen things that indicate that it's being misspent...e.g. the amount they paid for this scheduling system I count as such an indication.

      This doesn't mean that money is being spent on the students or on the classes. Some is, but I know of schools where the teacher brings in a role of toilet paper that she bought herself and students sign it out when they go to the john...because the school doesn't provide any.

      It's also true that there are other schools in the same district that don't have this problem. My *suspicion* is embezzlement at the local school. Whether by the principal, the administrators, or the janitors I couldn't even guess. But it must have acceptance by the city government, because it happens year after year. It sure isn't the teachers who are getting rich.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    14. Re:Happened in Dallas ISD too by hondo77 · · Score: 1

      When a congresscritter openly mocks the people he allegedly represents, suggesting they are too stupid to be anything but a problem to be managed, things have gone very wrong somewhere.

      Oh, please. Vote the critter out of office; problem solved. What's that? You want to make sure the critter is voted out? Then work for the critter's opposition; problem solved. What's that? You don't like any of the opposition, either? Run for office; problem solved.

      If something is very wrong then all it will take to fix it is some good old-fashioned hard work, yes?

      --
      I live ze unknown. I love ze unknown. I am ze unknown.
    15. Re:Happened in Dallas ISD too by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      And it's folks like him who end up on school boards. The school I worked at had a fucking AMAZING run of characters on the school board. The most memorable ones:
       
      The fiscal responsibility zealot and his retarded son. Dick and little Dick, as they were known. Dick would motion ANYTHING, and little Dick would second it. That's all that little Dick ever did. Never spoke a word, never made a motion, did anything. Just seconded his dad. His dad tried to cut all funding from the school, because he didn't like paying taxes.
       
      The fired principal with a grudge against the teacher who dug up the fact that he had lied about being a certified principal. Yes, the guy who GOT FIRED FOR LYING ABOUT BEING CERTIFIED, got ONTO THE SCHOOL BOARD!!! He had enough drinking buddies and relatives to tip the scales. For years he did everything he could to destroy that teacher and her department
       
      The guy who got expelled from the HS, and failed to graduate. Yeah, he was an awesome one. Was on the school board to fuck with the school as much as possible. Again, if you have enough drinking buddies and relatives, anything is possible.
       
      As a former public school teacher, I can tell you that the biggest problem with public education is the public. The GP you responded to is a great example of that.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    16. Re:Happened in Dallas ISD too by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      This was ten years ago. Why is it still happening?

      It's that goddamn bobby tables - some parents think they're so clever...

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    17. Re:Happened in Dallas ISD too by syousef · · Score: 1

      Her school won't let her carry a concealed weopen, I want her to carry my pistol but I'm afraid if she gets caught with it there would be criminal charges filed.

      I'd be more afraid that one of the kids got hold of it and killed her with it.

      If it were my wife, we'd be moving or she'd be finding a different job.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    18. Re:Happened in Dallas ISD too by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      'Gangs that have to be kept apart'

      No wonder you have gang problems, you have idiots for faculty that don't know how to handle the problem.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    19. Re:Happened in Dallas ISD too by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      Why is it still happening?

      We still have some rural public schools writing purchase orders in cursive, by hand. More use typewriters. Many, many schools, districts and what not are still printing on daisy wheel printers, onto carbon copy paper in triplicate. A precious few have upgraded to keeping everything in a database, and printing a single purchase order via laser printer to run through the fax machine or print. It's only the AAA and AAAA-class (and i'm not talking sports AAA rating) school districts like NYC and Chicago Public Schools that are submitting orders via email and paying via ACH wire transfer.
       
      Why upgrade?
       
      Well for starters it's expensive. And it eliminates jobs. In a lot of small towns/communities/counties, schools and prisons are the largest job generators in the area, siphoning in millions of dollars of state and federal funds. You bought a good scheduling system? Fantastic! We'll cut our counciling staff from 4 down to 3. Who do fire? Well, Martha's been here for 30 years, Susanne has been here for 25 years and her husband is disabled. And then there's the twins, Shelly and Deborah. They both started here 22 years ago. I guess we can fire Deborah, even though she has three kids and no supplemental income because she knew she'd always have this job.
       
      It's devastatingly hard to invest in technology that will make someone you've worked with 40+ hours a week for the last 20 years unemployed.

      In Prince George's County though, there's no excuse. It's a huge, giant school district, and one of the richest counties (also very populous) in the US.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    20. Re:Happened in Dallas ISD too by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Are you a troll, or a tool? Gang problems are endemic to society, school is just a stage.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    21. Re:Happened in Dallas ISD too by Frogbert · · Score: 1

      I might be missing something obvious here but why hasn't she quit her job and got a safer job such as asbestos removal or parachute tester?

    22. Re:Happened in Dallas ISD too by FutureDomain · · Score: 1

      He's a troll, just read his other posts on this article.

      --
      Hydraulic pizza oven!! Guided missile! Herring sandwich! Styrofoam! Jayne Mansfield! Aluminum siding! Borax!
    23. Re:Happened in Dallas ISD too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you a troll, or a tool? Gang problems are endemic to society, school is just a stage.

      No, gangs are endemic to your society.

    24. Re:Happened in Dallas ISD too by kalirion · · Score: 1

      Her school won't let her carry a concealed weopen, I want her to carry my pistol but I'm afraid if she gets caught with it there would be criminal charges filed.

      Why not just send her to school wearing an explosive vest? Then the trouble makers will definitely stay away from her.

    25. Re:Happened in Dallas ISD too by rho · · Score: 1

      You should try addressing issues instead of just shouting people down, unfortunately uninformative posts like your reflect the current approach to public matters of angry people with nothing to say or contribute.

      You should try bringing some issues up, in that case. "We're not spending enough money" is not an issue. Did you even read the article? $4.1 million spent on a non-working piece of shit technology. $4.1 million buys a lot of education, if you could actually buy education. They didn't spend that money because they were hurting for funding.

      You were spouting nonsense, mistaking it for deep thinking. Feeling aggrieved because somebody points out that's it's nonsense makes you a pussy.

      --
      Potato chips are a by-yourself food.
  11. Reality Check by clarkn0va · · Score: 1

    'When I heard they didn't have schedules, I was like, "What have they been doing all summer?"'

    Enjoying their vacation?

    --
    I am literally 3000 tokens away from the chaotic crossbow --Stephen
    1. Re:Reality Check by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Teachers may be some of the least-paid workers out there, but they've got a third of the year to do whatever they want. They're likely making significantly more than the average mid-level IT worker, per hour; moreso for the ones who are tenured and are about to retire.

      Spend the school year (while their own kids are in school) teaching classes and have the summer off with them to do what you want, and make a couple dozen thou in the process. Are you kidding me? Fuck yeah, that's a great deal.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  12. This is high school? by codepigeon · · Score: 2, Interesting
    FTA

    My daughter "selected a sewing class because she is interested in fashion design, but the school selected a basic piano class"

    What kind of high school is THIS? We were lucky to have basic computer classes when i was in high school. Sewing and piano? Spoiled bastards.

    1. Re:This is high school? by CannonballHead · · Score: 1

      Sewing and piano have been around a while. A lot longer than computer classes. ;)

    2. Re:This is high school? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      No kidding. How about this one

      "Clemons's daughter also chose a business-career class but was assigned to a human sexuality and family life class, a course she had taken in ninth grade, Clemons wrote.

      Why does a high school have a human sexuality class in ninth grade? Seems a little premature to me. Sex ed day sure, but a full semester/quarter about sex should probably should wait until college years.

    3. Re:This is high school? by tacarat · · Score: 1

      "Clemons's daughter also chose a business-career class but was assigned to a human sexuality and family life class, a course she had taken in ninth grade, Clemons wrote.

      Makes sense to me. Learning about business should involve going over the oldest profession. Let's hope that they go over why "the lowest bidder" isn't always the one you should select, though.

      --
      "Common sense will be the death of us all"
    4. Re:This is high school? by eln · · Score: 1

      If it's anything like the "human sexuality and family life" class I took in high school, it's basically a class on how babies are made for about the first couple of days (which is review, because the first time I was told that in a school setting was an hour-long health class in fifth grade), and the rest of it is teaching you how much of a royal pain in the ass it is to raise kids. The overall idea is to teach kids how to survive if they do have kids of their own, and to convince them doing so is so monumentally difficult that they'd really better wait until they're both out of college and independently wealthy.

    5. Re:This is high school? by nomadic · · Score: 5, Funny

      What kind of high school is THIS? We were lucky to have basic computer classes when i was in high school. Sewing and piano? Spoiled bastards.

      My high school had sewing and piano, those classes were held on Thursdays (aka "foie gras and caviar day" at the cafeteria, between yachting class and equestrianism.

      Ha, actually I am a proud product of the New York City public school system, where we counted ourselves lucky if the history books were published late enough to let us know when WW2 ended.

    6. Re:This is high school? by Niris · · Score: 1

      Bah, we didn't even have computer classes, and I was class of '06. Poor school district FTW. Our options for electives were a PE class, or foreign languages. Learning was only something that happened if you wanted to do stuff at home.

    7. Re:This is high school? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      Wasting that much instructional time seems silly at any point; but 9th grade can easily include 15 year olds. On a broad historical basis, a fair few of the world's total 15 year olds have been married. Even today, a bit of "extracurricular activity" at that age isn't at all uncommon, whatever parents might like(and it isn't just 15 year olds, though things go from being merely precocious to being downright dodgey increasingly rapidly.).

    8. Re:This is high school? by TheGothicGuardian · · Score: 1

      Excuse me, but I think you dropped this: ).

    9. Re:This is high school? by mujadaddy · · Score: 1

      ...I still don't know how the Viet Mom War ended...

      --
      Populus vult decipi, ergo decipiatur...
      "Force shits upon Reason's back." - Poor Richard's Almanac
    10. Re:This is high school? by Frogbert · · Score: 1

      Australian here:

      I had both sewing/textiles/cooking (Home Economics) and Woodworking classes in three separate public high schools I attended. Metal working isn't at all rare either. I'm pretty sure at least one of those subjects was mandatory in Victoria.

      These weren't huge high schools either. Though the largest one in a small city had a great deal more courses to choose from, I believe for Year 11 my courses included Philosophy and a Cisco CCNA certification.

    11. Re:This is high school? by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Uh yeah, classes like that have been around for a while.

      Your "WTF moment" should've been brought to you by the "interested in fashion design" statement, not the fact that there were piano (music) and sewing (home economics) courses.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    12. Re:This is high school? by Inda · · Score: 1

      English, I mean British here!

      Same as that. Sewing/textiles/cooking was also called Home Economics. Wookworking and metalwork drove me into engineering. This was from the age of 10.

      I continued piano, I mean music, until I was 16 as one of those 'fun' subjects. Massively enjoyed it with my fellow 6 students (5 girls, mmmmm). Gained a GCSE that I've never used apart from it being brought up in job interviews.

      American edjumacation sounds great!

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    13. Re:This is high school? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We had sewing. It was mandatory. We also had mandatory band or choir classes starting in the 7th grade with a "music appreciation" class for the few who couldn't carry a tune. Music classes began in the first grade. Orchestra began in the first grade. Band began in the 6th. Typing classes were mandatory from 3rd grade to the 8th or 9th. This was a public school of ~700 K-12 students in a rural town of 1200.
      I feel sorry for all of you city folks who received such a poor education.

  13. Solution by ProteusQ · · Score: 3, Funny

    Send the programmers and administrators to detention!!

  14. School doesn't work like you think. by DerekLyons · · Score: 5, Informative

    'When I heard they didn't have schedules, I was like, "What have they been doing all summer?"'

    I suspect the schools don't run the scheduler until a few days before school actually starts - Teachers can die (happened my senior year), quit, not show up for work, classrooms may be unavailable for many reasons, etc... On top of this, they don't actually know how many students are going to show up until registration closes (typically a week before class starts).

    1. Re:School doesn't work like you think. by PerZon · · Score: 2, Funny

      So what your saying is if the job is too hard, don't worry about it till the last minute? To me its just another poor example left by the peers of our future. Next they will all go on strike for poor working conditions...

    2. Re:School doesn't work like you think. by DerekLyons · · Score: 1, Insightful

      No, I'm saying it makes no sense to do a job in June that will have to redone at least once (if not more) in August.

    3. Re:School doesn't work like you think. by iHal · · Score: 1

      Thanks for making the point in such a polite way, I was going to tell Carolyn Oliver to go do it herself if she thinks it's so easy ; - )

    4. Re:School doesn't work like you think. by religious+freak · · Score: 1

      Perhaps they should consider this newest of all concepts.... QA

      --
      If you can read this... 01110101 01110010 00100000 01100001 00100000 01100111 01100101 01100101 01101011
    5. Re:School doesn't work like you think. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what your saying is if the job is too hard, don't worry about it till the last minute? To me its just another poor example left by the peers of our future. Next they will all go on strike for poor working conditions...

      I truly hope English isn't your native tongue.

    6. Re:School doesn't work like you think. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I'm saying it makes no sense to do a job in June that will have to redone at least once (if not more) in August.

      Sure it does, it's called a dry run. Especially since this is a fairly new system. But just because something makes sense or is prudent doesn't mean people will do it, as we have seen.

      But then again to the people running this it seems that going from spending 5-10 minutes per schedule to 45 minutes is some sort of improvement, so I guess we can't expect too much from them now can we.

    7. Re:School doesn't work like you think. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit. When all the work is done by a computer program it makes tons of sense. You put in the provisional information and run the scheduler. You look at the output and sanity check. This will help to identify problems with the provisional input. As events occur over the summer you make changes, and occasionally re-run the scheduler. Once registration closes and your data is pretty much solid, you make your final changes and run the scheduler one more time. By this time you've already vetted the provisional data several times and verified that the scheduler can produce good output, so chances are good that your final schedule will come out on time and without problems. If there are problems, then it's likely due to the latest changes, so you know where to start looking.

      And yes, I am a scheduler, albeit not for a school, but for a smaller organization. I have a custom program which handles my scheduling for me, and I follow exactly this procedure. Unlike schools, which do this once over the summer, I have to do these schedules several times a year. Waiting until all the data has solidified before you do any runs of your scheduling program is just asking for disaster.

    8. Re:School doesn't work like you think. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it makes no sense to do a job in June that will have to redone at least once (if not more) in August

      It makes sense to make sure in June that the software will work in August.

      It makes sense, if new software is to be deployed in August that a risk assessment is done in June in case the new software is (perish the thought) late or buggy, and part of that risk assessment is appropriate contingency planning.

    9. Re:School doesn't work like you think. by sirsnork · · Score: 1

      It makes perfect sense if the explict purpose of doing the job the first time is to confirm the system works so that when you do it for real is does'nt end up like the current situation.

      The first time through you don't even have to know how many classrooms you have, just a long list of student names and the subjects they have chosen (which again doesn't have to be real, just an approximation).

      This way you know that the software can perform the function it's designed too. You know that the german student with the umlat in his name doesn't crash the system and that you can actually fit all the students into all the classes they want without having to hire more teachers that specialise in a certain subject.

      --

      Normal people worry me!
    10. Re:School doesn't work like you think. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you get it all done and registration closed about a month before school is done with then you should have a vast majority of things squared away before school is even over with. The only thing you would have to worry about afterward are some transfer students and a few who want to try for a schedule change.

    11. Re:School doesn't work like you think. by lgw · · Score: 1

      Yup, like anything with a big database. You run the job over and over, and keep looking for bugs and tweaks until your scripts are as good as they're going to get. Only then do you run it for real. Of course the data is changing in the meantime, but that shouldn't be a concern.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    12. Re:School doesn't work like you think. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Teachers can die (happened my senior year), quit, not show up for work, classrooms may be unavailable for many reasons

      If you have six classes of Math students, then you need six Math classes and you need to find the teachers for them. If a teacher dies/whatever, you still have six classes of Math students. Yes, the administration may have to scramble to find a replacement teacher, but that doesn't affect the scheduling of classes: substitute new Math teacher in place of dead Math teacher.

      The administration knows how many classrooms will be needed. If a classroom is unavailable because of an emergency, then the administration may have to scramble to find a new location to hold the classes, but it doesn't affect the schedule: substitute new location in place of old classroom. If you have to find multiple new locations because half the high school burned down, changing the schedule isn't going to help.

      they don't actually know how many students are going to show up until registration closes (typically a week before class starts).

      Garbage. The administration may not know how many students, but they ought to have a really good estimate. If an estimated enrollment of 2000 students turns out to be wrong by 20 students, how hard can it be to fix the schedule?

      And a week is time enough to slot 2000 students by hand if necessary.

    13. Re:School doesn't work like you think. by hondo77 · · Score: 1

      Because the software will get tired if you run it more than once during the summer?

      --
      I live ze unknown. I love ze unknown. I am ze unknown.
    14. Re:School doesn't work like you think. by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      And you'd be wrong. The school I worked in scheduled from June until September. School schedules are STUPIDLY complicated. I went in assuming you'd drop student numbers and requested classes into a computer, and they'd magically do a best-fit algorithm, and all would be well. The reality is far different....In no particular order:
       
      Lunches. How long are lunches? Well, lets say 20 minutes. But is that enough time to ring a bell, have kids show up, stand in line, get food, find a place to sit, eat, return tray, etc? Lets suppose it is, but you need 5 lunches to feed all the kids. How long are classes? If they aren't in multiples of 20 minutes, what do you do with the kids who aren't in lunch? Are classes longer? (In my school, they were. 14 minutes longer during the lunch period. That was awesome for trying to keep classes on generally the same topic...) What does the teacher contract say about lunches? About teaching period length?
       
      Vocational/tech/trade school/college classes/etc. Lots of schools send kids off to other places for services they don't offer. But what if you have to offer an English class for seniors heading off to somewhere else? That has to be first thing in the morning, tying up those teachers and that slot.
       
      Sports. If you're sending kids off early 1-2 days a week to play away games, are they missing one class all the time? Do you have to schedule around it?
       
      Advanced Placement and College Prep Classes. How do you schedule those? Do you do like my school, and schedule Calculus and Physics at the same time, so kids have to choose? AP History and AP English at the same time? Or like my last year teaching, where they scheduled AP Bio and Physics at the same time. There were 3 kids who wanted to go into Sports Medicine or Physical therapy who had to choose one or the other.
       
      Back to the teacher contract. How many periods does each teacher teach? How many periods of class does each kid have to take? Do those match up?
       
      State regulations. In my state, there was a limit on how many kids per square foot could be allowed into a lab science class. Twice we forced them to reschedule because they put too many kids in our lab science classes. (Should they have known? Yes. That's an administrator's JOB! Did they? No.)
       
      There's a good chance they were fighting with the schedule all summer. If they were incompetent, even more likely. I had a principal delete 2-3 weeks of scheduling work in the middle of august. The head of guidance was STILL fuming about it in the fall.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    15. Re:School doesn't work like you think. by radtea · · Score: 1

      I suspect the schools don't run the scheduler until a few days before school actually starts

      Then they are doing it wrong. This is like not producing a project schedule until the work is almost done.

      You create a more-or-less continuously updated schedule (in my project management days I updated once or twice a week) and add information as it comes in.

      The fact is, you know MOST of what you need to know early on, and everything after that is incremental updating. If a teacher dies you hire a fill-in, you don't cancel the class. Or you spread the students across other sections of the same course. You know to the third decimal place how many students will register in the last few weeks before school, because you have data on that going back years (unless you are just brain-dead incompetent) so keeping spaces open for those people is no big deal.

      Only an idiot would use a big-bang type scheduling procedure for this job.

      --
      Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
    16. Re:School doesn't work like you think. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it does because having an estimate helps considerably in an optimizaton problem (which a scheduling is).

    17. Re:School doesn't work like you think. by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      And you deal with all those problems when they occur, not wait till the very last minute to do everything because something might change.

      You know almost exactly how many students are going to show up, a tiny percentage more than last year, the same way its been for the last ... well, forever.

      What a crock of shit.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    18. Re:School doesn't work like you think. by johnw · · Score: 2, Informative

      I suspect the schools don't run the scheduler until a few days before school actually starts

      Ouch! That would be a recipe for disaster. (OTOH, as they seem to have had a disaster, perhaps you're right.)

      I'm an experienced school timetabler and I can tell you it doesn't (in sane institutions) work like that. The process of producing a school timetable starts in the autumn term of the year before. Producing a decent timetable takes *a lot* of time and concentration, and whilst there are computer programs which can *help*, there just isn't one which will do the whole job for you. Getting everything fitted in takes weeks, and I would generally expect to have the job done by the middle of the summer term. Then you need to publish the new timetable and find out problems from heads of department and staff. Teachers do expect to see (and moan about) the coming year's timetable before they finish the summer term.

      This story isn't an example of just software failure - it's an even bigger example of management failure, because there should have been a contingency plan. I've never let a new timetabling system be used without knowing exactly how I'd cope if it failed to do its job. (And I've known one dismally fail to do its job - I'm looking at you Serco Facility.)

    19. Re:School doesn't work like you think. by nsteinme · · Score: 1

      And I'm saying (as others agree) it doesn't make sense to put it off. Reasons to run it well ahead of time include: to confirm the software works; to know its approximate runtime; and to have even a complete but possibly inaccurate schedule, which is infinitely better than no schedule at all.

      --
      call me FOSS im the boss with the sauce and the source
  15. Probably for the best... by sweatyboatman · · Score: 1

    Her school won't let her carry a concealed weopen [sic], I want her to carry my pistol but I'm afraid if she gets caught with it there would be criminal charges filed.

    ...because "Teacher Kills Student During Class" is just such a terrific headline.

    --
    It breaks my pluginses, my precious!
    1. Re:Probably for the best... by e9th · · Score: 1

      I think "Teacher kills Harris & Klebold" would have been a pretty spiffy headline.

    2. Re:Probably for the best... by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      I guess "Student Kills Teacher During Class" is preferable.

    3. Re:Probably for the best... by lgw · · Score: 1

      Someone shot our French teacher whil I was in High School, and no one (except the teacher) seemed too upset about it. She did sort of have it coming. But then, where I went to High School, school shootings didn't make the news.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    4. Re:Probably for the best... by sir_eccles · · Score: 1

      Swiftly followed by: "SWAT team kills armed teacher"

    5. Re:Probably for the best... by e9th · · Score: 1

      Harris and Klebold began shooting at 11:19 AM. SWAT teams entered the school at 1:09 PM, an hour after the two were already dead. I'm guessing that the armed teacher could have used that hour to figure out how not to get shot by the cops.

    6. Re:Probably for the best... by lennier · · Score: 1

      "because "Teacher Kills Student During Class" is just such a terrific headline."

      *Blows smoke off barrel*

      "... Anyone ELSE have some chewing gum they don't want to share with the class?"

      --
      You are not a brain: http://books.google.com/books?id=2oV61CeDx-YC
  16. Holding spaces? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    When school opened Monday, about 8,000 high school students had no class schedules and were sent to wait in holding spaces while administrators tried to sort things out."

    Mooooooo...

  17. Health Class video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Install hidden cameras all over high school gym interior.
    2. Lock 200 hormonal teenagers in that gym together with nothing better to do for hours on end.
    3. ???
    4. Profit!

  18. This is all Robert's fault. by bistromath007 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    http://xkcd.com/327/ That fuckin' kid. :|

    1. Re:This is all Robert's fault. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where's the insightful mod on this one?

  19. Using Common Sense...? by sampson7 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I guess I have this idealistic vision of what should happen here. Conregate the students and ask, "Who's took Algebra last year?" Take the first 20 (okay, 30) student who raise their hand, lead them to math class. "Who's in 9th Grade and hasn't had English yet?" Lead another group away. "Who took chemistry....? Biology...?" I know, it would never be that easy, but I still have some idealistic vision that a group of adults could really teach something; after all, the teachers are just as much victims of this as the students.

    Also, keep in mind, this is Prince George's County -- a jurisdiction that in the 1970s capped property taxes at then-existing levels, and allowed only minimal increases since. Combine that with a high population of at-risk students, large pockets of poverty, serious struggles with drugs and crime in the community -- and you have a recipe for disaster. At some level, the people of Prince George's County get the educational system they pay for. And they are cheap, so the fact that they don't have the computer resources that they need is entirely par for the course (sadly).

    1. Re:Using Common Sense...? by maxume · · Score: 1

      They paid $4 million for something that didn't work, so I don't think the problem is limited to how much funding they have.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    2. Re:Using Common Sense...? by sexconker · · Score: 1

      You don't know kids, do you?

      Fuckers are enjoying not having class.
      If you asked them "Who took class A last year?" You'd get a group of kids who would raise their hands. If you asked "Who didn't take class A last year" you'd get another group, but the groups would overlap.

    3. Re:Using Common Sense...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess I have this idealistic vision of what should happen here. Conregate the students and ask, "Who's took Algebra last year?" Take the first 20 (okay, 30) student who raise their hand, lead them to math class.

      Don't you mean lead them to english class so they can learn why "who's took" is meaningless? Why lead them to math class when they've already taken algebra? And what do they do for second period? And third?

      Yes, this is an idealistic vision.

      Also, keep in mind, this is Prince George's County -- a jurisdiction that in the 1970s capped property taxes at then-existing levels, and allowed only minimal increases since.

      I live in a jurisdiction like that. State referendum capping property taxes. Funny how property values went up enough the very next year so that property taxes still went up more than they would have without the cap.

      The problem with the schools is not a lack of money. Throwing money at schools does not improve education, it only makes schools want more thrown at them.

    4. Re:Using Common Sense...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, keep in mind, this is Prince George's County -- a jurisdiction that in the 1970s capped property taxes at then-existing levels, and allowed only minimal increases since. Combine that with a high population of at-risk students, large pockets of poverty, serious struggles with drugs and crime in the community -- and you have a recipe for disaster. At some level, the people of Prince George's County get the educational system they pay for. And they are cheap, so the fact that they don't have the computer resources that they need is entirely par for the course (sadly).

      Huh. Sounds like California today.

    5. Re:Using Common Sense...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have to agree with the above. I go to a neighboring county's high school system and the situation couldn't be more different. PG county is notorious for this stuff... the computers that I've seen in their schools are Pentium 2s or 3s at best, the schools are bad. Of course in my county we have a lot more taxes, most of which go to our school system.

    6. Re:Using Common Sense...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That works great, until the last class of the day. Suddenly, more required classes are needed then there are teachers for. Then what happens? Your solution is nice and simple, but there are enough edge cases and special requirements that necessitate scheduling software or lots of man hours.

    7. Re:Using Common Sense...? by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      You're correct, but you've already taken care of the difficult part: you've gotten the correct kids into the correct required courses with at least 70% of the task completed. The last class of the day is, typically, band, choir, art, or some other "non required" class in high school, to the best of my experience. That kind of thing - as well as sorting 10% of the kids around to the appropriate classes so they can take their necessary classes.

      In the meantime, the majority of the kids are taking classes they need to take to finish high school. Chances it will be mostly right, as modern school programs have seen to any cultural statistic outliers: the stupid ones go to special class, as do the smart ones, so there's no need to schedule for AP or much.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  20. The kids are finally getting a chance to learn... by Paul+Fernhout · · Score: 1

    Words by John Taylor Gatto, 1991 New York State Teacher of the Year:

    http://www.newciv.org/whole/schoolteacher.txt
    "The second lesson I teach is your class position. I teach that you must stay in class where you belong. I don't know who decides that my kids belong there but that's not my business. The children are numbered so that if any get away they can be returned to the right class. Over the years the variety of ways children are numbered has
    increased dramatically, until it is hard to see the human being plainly under the burden of numbers he carries. Numbering children is a big and very profitable business, though what the strategy is designed to
    accomplish is elusive. I don't even know why parents would allow it to be done to their kid without a fight.
    In any case, again, that's not my business. My job is to make them like it, being locked in together with children who bear numbers like their own. Or at the least endure it like good sports. If I do my
    job well, the kids can't even imagine themselves somewhere else because I've shown how to envy and fear the better classes and how to have contempt for the dumb classes. Under this efficient discipline the class mostly polices itself into good marching order. That's the real lesson of any rigged competition like school. You come to know your place."

    http://www.johntaylorgatto.com/underground/toc1.htm
    "The shocking possibility that dumb people don't exist in sufficient numbers to warrant the millions of careers devoted to tending them will seem incredible to you. Yet that is my central proposition: the mass dumbness which justifies official schooling first had to be dreamed of; it isn't real."

    --
    A 21st century issue: the irony of technologies of abundance in the hands of those still thinking in terms of scarcity.
  21. That's intelligent by improfane · · Score: 1

    That method you propose is pretty efficient. I would extend it to take names of students leftover and then they could get into trouble for trying to avoid classes.

    This is what happens when we adopt and embrace technology as a method to solve all our problems. Computers are nothing without the right people to maintain them. (They're sociotechnical systems, you cannot have one without the other)

    I do wonder how complex a scheduling system is: does anyone have any experience in writing this kind of software? Isn't it a variant of fitting objects into space in the most efficient way?

    --
    Slashdot needs Geekcode | Can anyone recommend any good SCIFI? My tastes: Foundation, Startide Rising, CITY, Ringworld,
    1. Re:That's intelligent by Zerth · · Score: 1

      To do it efficiently? It is at least NP-hard.

      I've worked on job-shop scheduling and the lazy way is to start with a simple fit, do something like simulated annealing until it gets close enough, then give up and add some overtime.

      Still, they should be able to get a solution using publicly available heuristics for similar problems and brute-force to get an N percent solution in for any fixed time. Especially if done from the teachers perspective, they presumably having fewer degrees of freedom than the students.

  22. Old tech can still be superior by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Japan the classes are assign by the actual teachers working on a giant wall sized matrix. If you ask me, It is much easier to be able to see such a large picture all at once. Something that computing technology still can not do unless we get wall size touch screens cheap.

  23. Lessons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone had the opportunity to learn some good lessons though:

    1. Never count on any public institution to do the right thing. If you don't have a schedule at least 2 weeks before school starts, start making serious noise.

    2. Never, ever, believe a software product vendor.

    3. Don't procrastinate. There really is -no- reason why those schedules couldn't have been generated and reviewed 2-weeks before school start. Sure, there might be some minor adjustments due to changes, but not 20% of your student population.

    4. If it crashed 4 times the previous year, don't count on it NOT to crash. Have contigency plans.

  24. Re:The kids are finally getting a chance to learn. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Except for the huge, and very large libertarian bias John Gatto has. Generally, he makes two assertions, that things are better in a more libertarian system(quite arguable, and very much wrong), and that the school system is designed to produce good workers(This one is fairly obvious to most geeks, so not really arguable.). If he had made his second assertion, without the huge libertarian bias, he may have made some significant changes. To support his libertarian bias, he looks at people like Benjamin Franklin, Abe Lincoln, etc, trying to make the implicit statement that it was like this for everyone, and that these men are products of the more libertarian lifestyle they lived. Except he's wrong. He tries to argue from the specific, that this true for the general case which... is quite wrong.

  25. I work for K-12 as an admin by buss_error · · Score: 2, Informative

    And I'm here to tell you, it's downright scary what idiots and idiot programming is foisted on to K-12. While we've never reviewed the SchoolMax software, most of the software I see is "enterprise unaware": EG: no common credential store, little or no real testing, glaring flaws, and most have no concept of interoperability.

    My favorite vendor excuse is "It's your network", followed by "No, you can't virtulize this, it has to run on it's own hardware and it can't have other services running." I laugh because our network outperforms most major ISVs (I used to work at one as a second job), and as far as virtulizaion, I've asked venors "why not?" and the answer is never technical, it's always "because we don't support it". 9 times out of ten, the support driods working on something never twig to the fact that their application is running just fine on a virt serv and has been for YEARS. But clue them in, and INSTANTLY the problem is the virtulization, not a bug.

    The other thing that makes me laugh is that when you ask how much a license is, it's never "how many CPUs?" or "How many boxes", it's always per student, even if it would only be used by a single classroom, they want to license it for the entire student population.

    In over 15 years of working K-12, I can count on one finger the number of vendors that I didn't think were complete idiots, fools, and/or scammers.

    --
    Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.
    1. Re:I work for K-12 as an admin by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      Have you seen the classic "software that has its own custom widget set(because XP's default just wasn't fisher price enough) that cleverly doesn't conceal text entered into any password field" design? The good folks at Tom Snyder Productions gave us that one.

    2. Re:I work for K-12 as an admin by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      I looked at a couple of products about 2 years ago for a handful of private schools in Melbourne (Australia), half the products had been developed by teachers in their spare time for their specific school, someone else heard about it and they on sold it, and then thought to themselves hey wouldn't it be a good idea to do this full time rather than teach..."

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    3. Re:I work for K-12 as an admin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very true. The quality of K-12 software is appalling, and the vendors are mostly incompetent.

  26. humans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    or humors

    proven stupid

  27. fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    fail

  28. I guess I forget.. by wanax · · Score: 5, Insightful

    But why are many of the people protesting against government run health insurance on Medicare, and express a high level of satisfaction with it? Same with Medicaid. Same with the US Postal Service (Obama's ignorant quip not withstanding), which I've certainly found easier to deal with than Fedex? Not to even delve into how we (in general) trust the government for security, domestic and abroad, collecting taxes without paying the head of the IRS one out of every ~$700 tax dollars every year (actual number for the CEO of United health care of US health care expenditure)?

    Off the top of my head, I can't think of a national situation where there's a private company providing a better service than a public equivalent (and this is ignoring the contract asymmetry where Enron is allowed to criminally game the market and the state can't abrogate the contracts, yet the private firm can just say "oops, but our owners have limited liability" and declare bankruptcy.. which abrogates their current contracts). I have a feeling this was different in the 70's and 80s, that government was really a lot less efficient than it is now, or else I doubt Reagan would have had such pull. But I was born just around when Reagen was first elected, and in my adult life the vast majority of the arbitrary, caustic and inefficient bureaucracy that I've encountered has been in the private sector.

    While the surest means of preventing excess is a lot of people paying attention to politics, and being vocal... the idea that the current proposals are generating so much vitriol while Bush's Medicare 'reform' that prohibits negotiating drug prices with pharmaceutical companies sure has the appearance of an irrational double standard.

    1. Re:I guess I forget.. by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      When you elect people like Bush who think government is always the problem to run the government, how can you expect them to run it well?

    2. Re:I guess I forget.. by lgw · · Score: 1

      While the surest means of preventing excess is a lot of people paying attention to politics, and being vocal... the idea that the current proposals are generating so much vitriol while Bush's Medicare 'reform' that prohibits negotiating drug prices with pharmaceutical companies sure has the appearance of an irrational double standard.

      Just to make sure: everyone does know that Obama has promised to big Pharma that his health care package would contain exactly that same horrid Bush provision, right? And he apparantly negotiated a $150 million advertising quid pro quo for this?

      Paying attention to politics and avoiding double standards is a good thing, of course.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    3. Re:I guess I forget.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Government Health Care, all the compassion of the IRS and the efficiency of the DMV.

    4. Re:I guess I forget.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You were born well after the red scare and you grew up during the end of the cold war. The American public has been so brainwashed that many can't do real critical thinking. The entire cold war propaganda has indoctrinated so many older generation here into the whole "Socialism bad, Capitalism Good" mentality. They forgot that the US became a very socialist country very recently.

      Your negative experience of corporations is just indicative of the fact that corporations have gotten bigger and control much more of the services now. 30-70 years ago, many services were government controlled, now it's controlled more through corporations. It seems that whatever entity becomes the 800 lb gorilla forces the public to put up with lack of service. Until the laws force corporations to be "fair" and "transparent" as government is supposed to be, our current form of capitalism is bound for a backlash.

  29. Mod parent up please. ;-) by chfriley · · Score: 1

    I had mod points yesterday, but not today. The post above was a very informative post. Nice contribution.

  30. 3 days? Thats it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I live just north of atlanta, in my high school i had weeks before I was put in the right class.
    Every semester.

  31. Strawman by dangitman · · Score: 2, Informative

    There's pretty strong objection to having government-only health insurance, because it will end up sucking and no one will want to use it.

    Nobody (not even Obama or Hillary Clinton) is suggesting government-only healthcare, so I'm not sure what your point is. The healthcare proposals are about a hybrid system.

    --
    ... and then they built the supercollider.
  32. Re:The kids are finally getting a chance to learn. by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

    "The shocking possibility that dumb people don't exist in sufficient numbers to warrant the millions of careers devoted to tending them will seem incredible to you. Yet that is my central proposition: the mass dumbness which justifies official schooling first had to be dreamed of; it isn't real."

    Perhaps, at one time, this statement could have been true. Perhaps it is official schooling that has brought about the change.

    However, I can tell you for sure that dumb people *do* exist in mind-numbingly huge numbers.

    This 'mass dumbness' *is* real and it is scary.

    It almost seems that as a species we are heading to less and less intelligence.

    Brain power requires energy. If you can get away without using your brain you can be more efficient. Its evolution at work.

    MMOs are a great example of this...

    --
    In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
  33. What kind of company is SchoolMax? by jewps · · Score: 1

    What kind of company is this? Their website is a wreck, the login system to the support site doesn't even work, by that I mean you can provide any credentials and it'll let you in. Once inside, there's nothing there!

    A google for SchoolMax returns:
    SchoolMax Sucks Facebook Group (Students): http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=66046055790
    (Year 2009-2010 Week 1: 3392 Members)

    First comment:
    "Every year,our scheduling coordinator at Roosevelt Mr. Horn starts working on entering schedules into the system from February to July. He enters the schedules into a computer program called "The Scheduler." Every year, The Scheduler is only able to automatically enter the schedules of about 75% of the students; the other 25%, which is about 600-700 students, have scheduling issues that the program can't fix on its own. When this happens, the program leaves the schedule in the system incomplete and moves on to the next one. This is where Mr. Horn comes in. Mr. Horn, from July to August, sits with The Scheduler and works out the remaining 25% of the students' schedules. By the time school starts back up, he has most of the students' schedules worked out. The remaining students go to the auditorium and wait for their schedules to be finished; the average student's schedule takes 5-10 minutes to be entered into the system.

    Now, this year, the county wanted him to use SchoolMax for Eleanor Roosevelt's scheduling. The program, which he was only able to start using in May, was able to get 77% of the student's schedules in. However, SchoolMax, not being able to work out the remaining 33% of the schedules, removed them completely from the system instead of leaving them incomplete. Because of this, Mr. Horn had to enter and work out the missing schedules from scratch. They didn't want him doing this over the summer, however, because they were working on the program, which apparently required it to be down the entire time. Now, instead of Mr. Horn getting to work in late June/early July, they allowed him into the program on August 7th. This left him with 17 days to attempt to do what usually takes him more than two months. In addition, SchoolMax's scheduling program is incredibly slow compared to The Scheduler. Instead of 5-10 minutes for a schedule to be registered in the system, it now can take up to 45 minutes.

    In conclusion, the No Child Left Behind Act left behind about 631 students yesterday at Roosevelt."

    http://www1.pgcps.org/WorkArea/showcontent.aspx?id=98146

    LOL..

    Who would give this company 4 million dollars?

    1. Re:What kind of company is SchoolMax? by bloobloo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The program, which he was only able to start using in May, was able to get 77% of the student's schedules in. However, SchoolMax, not being able to work out the remaining 33% of the schedules, removed them completely from the system instead of leaving them incomplete

      Don't you hate it when you can't get 110 % of your work done?

  34. Stop quoting "Einstein" by kumanopuusan · · Score: 1
    apoc.famine once said, "

    Einstein once said, ""The only thing that interferes with my learning is my education."

    "

    I have two complaints.

    1. Do you really think that Einstein held forth on each insignificant detail of everyday life? Aphorisms and bons mots are more likely to come from Oscar Wilde, Poor Richard, or Mark Twain. This is the sort of gullible naivete that fuels urban legends and endlessly forwarded emails.
    2. Why should anyone care about Einstein's opinion on primary education and honeybees? If a statement can't stand on its own, don't bring Einstein into it. Even if you're discussing physics, "According to Einstein... " should only be used as a short-hand to indicate the source of your information, not as a validation of it.
    --
    Use of the words "good", "bad" or "evil" is almost invariably the result of oversimplification.
  35. Makes Skyward seem pretty good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I work with a non-profit that uses a vendor called Skyward to supply SMS to all the schools in the area. I used to think Skyward's product was pretty lame, but they have never had a problem like this. Not even close. If Skyward pulled a boner like this one, even people at my organization (who just support and administer) would get all kinds of fired.

  36. ya don't say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This happened to my sisters' school in Fort Worth also. I just figured it was the FWISD screwing around, not some software bug.

  37. Modern School Tech = Lipstick On A Pig..... by IHC+Navistar · · Score: 1

    When I went to school, we NEVER had this problem.

    All of our equipment was 1950's and '60's era stuff (remembering the labels when I was in grammar school in the early '90's):

    -It was more reliable: Didn't break down, except for the occasional burned-out lightbulb.
    -More durable: Made of steel. You could treat it very roughly and it didn't break.
    -Easier to use: No passwords, fumbling with the network, dead/broken remote controls, plugging in cables (Just one POWER plug), just to use an overhead projector.
    -More economical: An overhead bulb is LOADS cheaper than a new digital projector bulb. And the whole unit is cheaper to replace.

    Most of the technology in schools today is full of fancy bells and whistles that do largely the same thing, with few improvements over the old RELIABLE equipment that schools used to have.

    ALOT of the equipment we had was made by Eiki, and it was SOLID, unlike the fancy crap they make nowadays. The tech schools have now offers a questionable advantage over the amount of time and work it purports to save.

    A LITTLE OFF-TOPIC BUT: Does anybody here remember the smell of the Ditto machine? Ahhhhh..... They days.....

    --
    Knowing Google's lust for data collection, the Soviet Union is still alive and well inside the psyche of Sergey Brin....
    1. Re:Modern School Tech = Lipstick On A Pig..... by Rick17JJ · · Score: 1

      As a student, I remember the smell of tests and handouts which had been printed on a ditto machine (or some similar technology). Teachers were using that when I was in school in the 1960s and early 1970s. In addition to the smell, I remember the printing on the handouts always being blue or purple (or whatever similar color it was). There was an original, which was sometimes neatly hand written, and then a limited number of copies which could be made from the original. Sometimes the last few copies were fainter and harder to read.

      I remember hearing about both ditto machines and mimeograph machines when I was in school. I had forgotten what the difference was. That might have been at different schools or junior colleges at different times. Apparently, the ditto machines must have been the ones that had the distinctive smell.

      I can still feel a very slight test anxiety,just thinking about the smell and the color of the handouts.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ditto_machine
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mimeograph

      In my earlier post, I described my vague recollection of the low tech registration process at one junior college in about 1973. There was a large room with desks along each wall. At each desk there was an instructor in charge of signing students up for his several classes. There was a long slow moving line of students waiting to sign up for one of the classes being offered at that desk. When I got to the front of the line, I would find out what sections of that class were still open. If the class that I wanted was full, they could add me to the short waiting list. For each class that the student was signing up for, there was another long slow moving line to get in for that class.

      At each desk they added my name to a list, if I remember correctly, they also handed me a punched computer card, to hand to someone else later.

      If I discovered that the section of a class that I wanted was full, I would have had to choose a section that was on different days and at a different time. That change, might have caused me to have to go back to one the earlier lines and choose a different section, for one of my earlier choices.

      After several hours of standing in those lines, I could get in another line for finalizing my choices and paying. At that point I probably also handed someone my several punched cards.

      The process could be a little frustrating and slow, which might partially explain why one student lost his temper and fired a gun into the air while going through that process, one semester. I missed out on seeing and hearing that happen. My memory of all that is very vague, so I hope my description, is not too inaccurate. But anyway, that is roughly my recollection of how we did it at at one junior college in Arizona in about 1973.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Punched_card

  38. the name should of been the first clue... by Nyder · · Score: 1

    Okay, anything with MAX in its name is doomed to failure.

    --
    Be seeing you...
  39. i thought that the primary reason was, er, slavery.

    Fail.

    --
    A house divided against itself cannot stand.
  40. Similar experience by wytten · · Score: 1

    A couple of years ago when my daughter showed up for middle school orientation, all of her 6th grade class had been given slips of paper with the WRONG locker combination.
    Mayhem ensues. One can easily imagine that schools aren't experts in tasks like this, although you can certainly argue that they should be. Probably some poor teacher with half a clue about technology was assigned the task of distributing locker combinations, and no one bothered to check before the slips were handed out. Ultimately there's no accountability for stuff like this so the situation is not likely to change any time soon.

  41. BOE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used to work for a board of education doing IT. They buy these horrible, complicated programs, don't give the people any training or even enough time to do the scheduling and then stuff like this happens. It all boils down to the usual bull; the Board sits in there board room arguing about the budget and all they really care about is making themselves look good. So people and projects that need money get lost in the shuffle.

  42. From talking with two PG County teachers by Darius__ · · Score: 1

    I found that SchoolMax operates the entire county's 4500 teachers and 1000 counselors on what they believe is a single web server, not a cluster as is the norm for applications of this scale. Apparently either the county didn't do its appropriate due-diligence, or SchoolMax sold them a bag of lies, but apparently they thought the system would be sufficient to handle the user load. They'd been having severe problems with it all last school year as well, to the poiunt where these teachers were doubly entering all their grades, attendance, etc onto paper as well as into SchoolMax.

    A school system as large as PG county has a responsibility for doing the appropriate research into what products and services it chooses to use. It's a shame that there's such poor leadership and such a knowledge vacuum.

  43. Duh by BigBlueOx · · Score: 1

    'When I heard they didn't have schedules, I was like, "What have they been doing all summer?"

    Duh. Same thing the useless NEA drones will do all autumn and winter and spring. Jack off.

  44. RIP, Larry Warman. by oneiros27 · · Score: 1

    Larry Warman (Lawrence K. Warman, Jr) is turning over in his grave right now.

    Tuesday was the third anniversary of his death.

    (and before I'm marked off topic -- Larry was the head engineer for the IT department of PG County Schools, and before that was a Vice Principal at Crossland, where among other things was responsible for manually reconciling schedules to avoid conflicts (overcrowding classes, making sure kids weren't in classes they had already taken, etc.))

    --
    Build it, and they will come^Hplain.
  45. I agree completely, except... by sean.peters · · Score: 1

    The only reason government-only health care might be a bad option in the US is because it would be the American government running it, and the American government is uniquely and completely dysfunctional when it comes to delivering effective domestic programmes.

    Not true at all - we already have a couple of health programs being run by the US government - Medicare and the VA health system are two of the biggest... and both of these consistently outscore private programs in areas like cost, customer satisfaction, and health outcomes. The idea that the US government can't provide quality domestic services is simply a lie put out by conservatives with an ideological axe to grind.

    Other than that, I agree completely with the parent post.

    1. Re:I agree completely, except... by radtea · · Score: 1

      Not true at all - we already have a couple of health programs being run by the US government - Medicare and the VA health system are two of the biggest... and both of these consistently outscore private programs in areas like cost, customer satisfaction, and health outcomes.

      Dunno about the VA, but Medicare is more expensive and less effective than the various Canadian public-only health care systems, which is what my point is about. It is easy to beat the disastrous inefficiency and ineffectiveness of private care providers in the US, but honestly even your public care is pretty poor compared to the rest of the world.

      Remember: the US currently spends more public money per capita on health care via programs like Medicare than Canada does on its universal system, any you die about three years earlier than we do, on average.

      While I don't have much sympathy for the conservative's anti-public-health-care agenda, I do have to admit that the core of their argument, which amounts to, "We have fucked up the American government so badly that it can't do nearly as well at delivering basic services as Canada or other countries routinely manage" has some empirical merit.

      Of course, the solution is to ditch the conservatives (in both parties--most Democrats are as dedicated to preserving the status quo as Republicans are) not to abandon the long-term goal of public health care.

      --
      Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
  46. Cherry picked data. by sean.peters · · Score: 1

    No doubt if you look hard enough, you can find various things that the US does better than other countries. But in the big measures: longevity, infant mortality, cost, etc... we're not in the top 10... or 20... or 30. The numbers I've seen are like 37th place in life expectancy at birth and 33rd in infant mortality. And of course we spend a huge amount more than other countries to get these results.

  47. My high school... by Misch · · Score: 1

    My senior year of high school was marred by a similar glitch. As part of a school internship program, I was supposed to assist the teaching of an AP Computer Science class. I was assigned the standard internship program class (last period of the day so you could leave early), but I was not assigned to the AP Computer Science class.

    When the computer system came up with the schedules, the AP Computer Science class was assigned at the same period as AP Calculus, a class that I was taking.

    The only way to fix that problem would have been to re-roll the entire schedule for the school.

    Needless to say, I ended up dropping the internship.

    --

    --You will rephrase your request for me to go to hell. Goto statements are not acceptable programming constructs
  48. This is kinda spooky. by jtownatpunk.net · · Score: 1

    I know this is slashdot and I'm supposed to rant about the stupidity of the situation and point out how they wouldn't be in this situation if only they'd...

    But last night I had a dream that I'd signed up for a class at a nearby community college and, when I went to the building listed on my paperwork, it was obviously completely wrong. The room was a lot like the library in Breakfast Club only with less books and more open space. There were a few other confused people there, too, trying to figure out where we were supposed to be. It's weird because I haven't had a school dream in years and then this article pops up with kids being sent to holding areas and/or random classes.

  49. Um... FET, anybody? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://lalescu.ro/liviu/fet/

    OSS scheduler.

    Done.

  50. Re:I agree by Dare+nMc · · Score: 1

    I may disagree with some of your earlier posts, not much I would argue with in that one. Well except slightly ;)
    un-motivated not so good teachers are not unique to public schools. Same with motivated teachers not being unique to private. I also went to public schools, and also got a crappy math teacher that didn't move me on because I was so board, and right after lunch so I mostly slept (but was near the top of the class in exam scores.) Later I did get a awesome math teacher at the same school who kept me interested, despite the ease, and got me back on track. I never got into calculus class in HS because of one 9th grade teacher, but made up for it with summer school before college...
    Since some of the smartest people I know have the least formal education, and some of the most worthless people I have worked with went to schools with the best reputations, this shows me that school reputation is not the only factor (likely not even the primary one.) Because even bad schools are overcome by outside motivations, and good schools are worthless without other positive influences and motivations, but no schooling cannot be overcome anymore. As such I would prefer we concentrate on keeping public schools improving, and completely keeping government (including the money) out of the private ones, unless they cause problems.

  51. Unconference? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like a great opportunity for lots of unconferences. Barcamp Gym, Barcamp Cafeteria, etc.