Hello, Studying German history atm (superficially for points) in German, and I would like to inform you that The Nazi "upbringing" were so permeated through the generations until Allied victory, that an estimated 90% of the population had some not insubstantial tie with the party.
At least that's what my German history books say (Deutsche Geschichte in Schlaglichtern and Deutsche Kultur Geschichte), once I've deciphered them.
Thus the Entnazifisierung, which unfortunately only bothered the true nazis like a fart in a dinner party.
Painting Islam in broad strokes as fascism is not very helpful nor descriptive. Most muslims are moderate and/or secular.
Remember that Islam is some 80% jewish/christian theology at the least, and that it is regional culture and real world politics that prompted what we do recognize as fascist movements to grow.
You want the moderate and intellectual muslims, as well as like-minded jews and christians, on your side against totalitatianism.
You seem to completely overlook existentialism (Sartre is raving ONLY about free will) as well as everything else post Newton (yielding the title of latest and greatest to someone like Hobbes).
Causality does not pose a problem for free will. On the contrary, I should say it enables it.
There is no contradiction between theft and being ethical (or moral, rather) provided your ethical ground does not respect property, property rights aso.
In example, utilitarianism is perfectly compatible with any conceivable horror, as long as the net pleasure outweighs the pain. (Most utilitarianist will not agree, and they are wrong.)
However, the story in casu is a competition not a crime.
The 1950's called and asked for their anti-feminist views back.
Seriously, it's troubling to observe how backwards our culture is becoming. Research clearly shows that "homemakers" (bah!) Only reluctantly leaves the society of free and grown up individuality. Similar research has been conducted with slaves and wwii era jews; if you tell someone they are homemakers they will eventually know their place as one.
I would not raise my daughter, if I ever had one, to become somebody's housepet.
Auto-run an SSH session with credentials supplied and X forwarding to the machine serving the videos running a simple webpage in a webkit window. Have the script auto reload same window if closed. Naturally limit the user privileges and limit network abuse with MAC filtering.
I'm kidding, but it could work:)
That said, how to theft-safe the device? Glue it to the wall.
I took it even further and piped each of Gimp's menus and toolbars through X out to their own Kompiz enhanced virtual desktop, using synergy to move between them.
Atm, I'm being productive editing pics of my dog across 6 x 24" LCDs in a row across my CAT 6A lan.
MAD is redundant compared to MAnon-D. The former presupposes will to die, the latter the will to live.
People who support MAD usually think as Thomas Hobbes; every man's warre against every man. Thomas Hobbes presupposed a Newtonian model of man that is wholly incorrect with THE FACTS.
If you want to use the Cold War as a standard of man's "natural state" go right ahead.
Actually, I would say the 'inalienable human rights' are de facto Western products because they rely on dependencies such as individualism and universialism stemming from German Idealism (and earlier) as well as principles of Western civilization like Habeas corpus.
In fact, I would argue that only such a historical contingency (hard birth) makes these values worth fighting for, so as to decouple them from historical struggle and aim towards global law.
You can have parallell rights in other world views. Chinese culture has a stronger sense of community that I speculate is due to a we-before-I thinking, bereft of the universal individualism of the west. These rights could even be similar in effect, bur would mean entirely different things.
Slashdot Mirror
Ben Heck did a Portal costume for Halloween just like what you describe.
Hello,
Studying German history atm (superficially for points) in German, and I would like to inform you that The Nazi "upbringing" were so permeated through the generations until Allied victory, that an estimated 90% of the population had some not insubstantial tie with the party.
At least that's what my German history books say (Deutsche Geschichte in Schlaglichtern and Deutsche Kultur Geschichte), once I've deciphered them.
Thus the Entnazifisierung, which unfortunately only bothered the true nazis like a fart in a dinner party.
This is what I've read too. Isn't everything whoppee unencrypted?
Could be they mean viruses or other "Internet threats".
Seems like you want to go to the circus or the fair and not a museum..
Thing about govt is that there can be only one. A system such as the one you describe would be permitted only until it was fat enough for slaughter.
Military trumps "terrorist assets" any day.
.. now we're gonna need the Mayan Almanac.
And when does THAT end?
"Or we can get dragged into the future kicking and screaming and burdening the human race with massive ecological damage."
Oh, come on. You say that like it's a bad thing!
Hypertext was written by hyper people in hyperspace. They're all on Advil now.
Painting Islam in broad strokes as fascism is not very helpful nor descriptive. Most muslims are moderate and/or secular.
Remember that Islam is some 80% jewish/christian theology at the least, and that it is regional culture and real world politics that prompted what we do recognize as fascist movements to grow.
You want the moderate and intellectual muslims, as well as like-minded jews and christians, on your side against totalitatianism.
You seem to completely overlook existentialism (Sartre is raving ONLY about free will) as well as everything else post Newton (yielding the title of latest and greatest to someone like Hobbes).
Causality does not pose a problem for free will. On the contrary, I should say it enables it.
Can't confirm it from the loo, but I think Downtown Oslo is the most surveillanced spot in any city on earth.
Thing is, I don't think the police are monitoring. So who are?
iCloud is the one ring to rule them all.
Seriously, Apple and privacy are different solar systems. Even if you like Apple, you shouldn't have to trust them, and you shouldn't trust them.
If grass had guns....
There is no contradiction between theft and being ethical (or moral, rather) provided your ethical ground does not respect property, property rights aso.
In example, utilitarianism is perfectly compatible with any conceivable horror, as long as the net pleasure outweighs the pain. (Most utilitarianist will not agree, and they are wrong.)
However, the story in casu is a competition not a crime.
The 1950's called and asked for their anti-feminist views back.
Seriously, it's troubling to observe how backwards our culture is becoming. Research clearly shows that "homemakers" (bah!) Only reluctantly leaves the society of free and grown up individuality.
Similar research has been conducted with slaves and wwii era jews; if you tell someone they are homemakers they will eventually know their place as one.
I would not raise my daughter, if I ever had one, to become somebody's housepet.
Couple of years back my mother received a two year old e-mail.
Today, e-mails and SMS messages are expected on the day. Only Apple's iMessage get away with longer delays.. (may be intended as IRC but used as IM).
Auto-run an SSH session with credentials supplied and X forwarding to the machine serving the videos running a simple webpage in a webkit window. Have the script auto reload same window if closed.
Naturally limit the user privileges and limit network abuse with MAC filtering.
I'm kidding, but it could work:)
That said, how to theft-safe the device? Glue it to the wall.
I took it even further and piped each of Gimp's menus and toolbars through X out to their own Kompiz enhanced virtual desktop, using synergy to move between them.
Atm, I'm being productive editing pics of my dog across 6 x 24" LCDs in a row across my CAT 6A lan.
Yep. The next, deeply beautiful version will be red, and say: DO NOT PRESS
If pressed it will send an acpi sleep command to the monitor.
I, for one, welcome our Titanium-jawed Belgian grandmother overlords!
MAD is redundant compared to MAnon-D. The former presupposes will to die, the latter the will to live.
People who support MAD usually think as Thomas Hobbes; every man's warre against every man.
Thomas Hobbes presupposed a Newtonian model of man that is wholly incorrect with THE FACTS.
If you want to use the Cold War as a standard of man's "natural state" go right ahead.
I don't think it counts when you just copy your own material.
*rimshot!*
Pics or it didn't happen!
Seems like the rulers that be are aiming for the latter.
Actually, I would say the 'inalienable human rights' are de facto Western products because they rely on dependencies such as individualism and universialism stemming from German Idealism (and earlier) as well as principles of Western civilization like Habeas corpus.
In fact, I would argue that only such a historical contingency (hard birth) makes these values worth fighting for, so as to decouple them from historical struggle and aim towards global law.
You can have parallell rights in other world views. Chinese culture has a stronger sense of community that I speculate is due to a we-before-I thinking, bereft of the universal individualism of the west. These rights could even be similar in effect, bur would mean entirely different things.