True, you get some small "value" out of it, but you're not "making lots of money" from it. And the federal government treats these two scenarios very differently.
Little streams make big rivers in both scenarios. Even Sony gets only a small payment per each movie ticket.
This is completely different than a pirate downloading some tunes for their personal use, and possibly sharing it with their friends. Sony are making money off of her music and giving her none of it.
It's not completely different. If you were to pirate a song, you would get entertainment value out of it, without giving the content producers any compensation. It might sound like a small thing when one person does it, but when many people do it, the artist can never recoup the production costs.
So, once again, if we do this we get crushed under the heel of a team of lawyers.
But a multinational like Sony does it and I bet they'll just dicker and claim some bullshit like fair use they routinely deny exists.
Eh? If we do it, people say that no one loses anything if you make a copy, and that sharing has been part of human culture for ages. These people should have nothing to whine about if Sony then goes to do the same thing.
Sounds somewhat worrying. That's a very popular chip.
There's always a few things you can do:
- Talk to LKML.
- Post a bug report in bugzilla.kernel.org.
- Find the specific patch which caused the regression with git bisect. Canonical has a good guide on the topic (use "man git-bisect" for more info).
It still good to ponder what flicker could tell us. For example, the 200 Hz LCD backlight PWM frequency causes sore eyes and headaches to many people, so certainly the eyes and/or nervous system are sensing something? Put some white text on a black background on a computer like that and you can see multiple images of the text when rapidly turning eyes horizontally. Of course, as you say, the picture appearing and disappearing is largely a different discussion when compared to motion sensing, but there might be a bridge which can combine these discussions for some benefit.
The refresh rate, motion bluring and related artifacts are more a function of the screen technology anyway. I don't see the hard core players swearing off LCDs and sticking to CRTs.
There can also be a digital processing stage in an LCD, which increases latency. With a CRT, the picture signal travels in a fully analog path right away when sent through the VGA connector.
It seems that even the FBI's evidence isn't watertight. They only claimed that the tools used were similar to attacks that had previously originated from North Korea.
The FBI said technical analysis of malicious software used in the Sony attack found links to malware that "North Korean actors" had developed and found a "significant overlap" with "other malicious cyber activity" previously tied to Pyongyang. But it otherwise gave scant details on how it concluded that North Korea was behind the attack.
The FBI said technical analysis of malicious software used in the Sony attack found links to malware that "North Korean actors" had developed and found a "significant overlap" with "other malicious cyber activity" previously tied to Pyongyang. But it otherwise gave scant details on how it concluded that North Korea was behind the attack.
Sums up the mickey mouse laws that Sony, Disney and their ilk have created in the industry. It has nothing to do with copyrights it has everything to do with control of content.
I don't see a problem with Disney still retaining full rights to Mickey. The company still exists and actively uses the character in their works.
Slashdot Mirror
I was just going along the same philosophy. Of course the magnitudes are different.
True, you get some small "value" out of it, but you're not "making lots of money" from it. And the federal government treats these two scenarios very differently.
Little streams make big rivers in both scenarios. Even Sony gets only a small payment per each movie ticket.
With "people" I meant us, not Sony guys.
This is completely different than a pirate downloading some tunes for their personal use, and possibly sharing it with their friends. Sony are making money off of her music and giving her none of it.
It's not completely different. If you were to pirate a song, you would get entertainment value out of it, without giving the content producers any compensation. It might sound like a small thing when one person does it, but when many people do it, the artist can never recoup the production costs.
So, once again, if we do this we get crushed under the heel of a team of lawyers.
But a multinational like Sony does it and I bet they'll just dicker and claim some bullshit like fair use they routinely deny exists.
Eh? If we do it, people say that no one loses anything if you make a copy, and that sharing has been part of human culture for ages. These people should have nothing to whine about if Sony then goes to do the same thing.
One of the problems this causes is the lack of appreciation for the mathematics that defines computer science
How does mathematics define computer science?
Under any other circumstance it seems he would be pursuing a career in alchemy.
He did say that he might have pursued physics if he didn't end up in computer science.
That's something different.
See this LKML page. Search with CTRL+F for "frequent lockups in 3.18rc4".
The thread is clearly still going on. As far as I can tell, the bug has not been fixed.
Sounds somewhat worrying. That's a very popular chip.
There's always a few things you can do:
- Talk to LKML.
- Post a bug report in bugzilla.kernel.org.
- Find the specific patch which caused the regression with git bisect. Canonical has a good guide on the topic (use "man git-bisect" for more info).
It still good to ponder what flicker could tell us. For example, the 200 Hz LCD backlight PWM frequency causes sore eyes and headaches to many people, so certainly the eyes and/or nervous system are sensing something? Put some white text on a black background on a computer like that and you can see multiple images of the text when rapidly turning eyes horizontally. Of course, as you say, the picture appearing and disappearing is largely a different discussion when compared to motion sensing, but there might be a bridge which can combine these discussions for some benefit.
The refresh rate, motion bluring and related artifacts are more a function of the screen technology anyway. I don't see the hard core players swearing off LCDs and sticking to CRTs.
There can also be a digital processing stage in an LCD, which increases latency. With a CRT, the picture signal travels in a fully analog path right away when sent through the VGA connector.
Huh? Please educate me then.
Right, I see it now.
My original title was "Serious Economic Crisis Looms Russia". Would that have been correct?
Okay! Thank you for the effort.
One step away from predesigned usage pattern and you are in conflict
This is so typical in Linux world. :(
Stuff has fragile integration and when you step away from the beaten path, weird glitches appear.
What most people don't know though is that it can cause eye damage in high doses (above 0.8mg) if taken regularly.
Citation?
It seems that even the FBI's evidence isn't watertight. They only claimed that the tools used were similar to attacks that had previously originated from North Korea.
The FBI said technical analysis of malicious software used in the Sony attack found links to malware that "North Korean actors" had developed and found a "significant overlap" with "other malicious cyber activity" previously tied to Pyongyang. But it otherwise gave scant details on how it concluded that North Korea was behind the attack.
How do you know?
Here's an update: North Korea denies hacking Sony, U.S. stands by its assertion
The FBI said technical analysis of malicious software used in the Sony attack found links to malware that "North Korean actors" had developed and found a "significant overlap" with "other malicious cyber activity" previously tied to Pyongyang. But it otherwise gave scant details on how it concluded that North Korea was behind the attack.
Is this the same phone that was talked about in February?
Cue in the comments on how that security feature is not completely perfect, so therefore it has to be completely useless.
Sums up the mickey mouse laws that Sony, Disney and their ilk have created in the industry. It has nothing to do with copyrights it has everything to do with control of content.
I don't see a problem with Disney still retaining full rights to Mickey. The company still exists and actively uses the character in their works.
That would certainly be an exciting idea! A website about true sharing of free culture and entertainment. Sign me up.
Testicles generate sperm. Prostate generates semen which then flows to testicles and mixes with sperm.