Slashdot Mirror


North Korea Denies Responsibility for Sony Attack, Warns Against Retaliation

jones_supa writes: A North Korean official said that the secretive regime wants to mount a joint investigation with the United States to identify who was behind the cyber attack against Sony Pictures. An unnamed spokesman of the North Korean foreign ministry was quoted by the country's state news agency, KCNA, describing U.S. claims they were behind the hack as "slander." "As the United States is spreading groundless allegations and slandering us, we propose a joint investigation with it into this incident," the official said, according to Agence France-Presse. Both the FBI and President Barack Obama have said evidence was uncovered linking the hack to to North Korea, but some experts have questioned the evidence tying the attack to Pyongyang. Meanwhile, reader hessian notes that 2600: The Hacker Quarterly has offered to let the hacker community distribute The Interview for Sony. It's an offer Sony may actually find useful, since the company is now considering releasing the movie on a "different platform." Reader Nicola Hahn warns that we shouldn't be too quick to accept North Korea as the bad guy in this situation: Most of the media has accepted North Korea's culpability with little visible skepticism. There is one exception: Kim Zetter at Wired has decried the evidence as flimsy and vocally warns about the danger of jumping to conclusions. Surely we all remember high-ranking, ostensibly credible, officials warning about the smoking gun that comes in the form of a mushroom cloud? This underscores the ability of the agenda-setting elements of the press to frame issues and control the acceptable limits of debate. Some would even say that what's happening reveals tools of modern social control (PDF). Whether or not they're responsible for the attack, North Korea has now warned of "serious consequences" if the U.S. takes action against them for it.

236 comments

  1. of course it wasn't NK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    US gov't never passes on an opportunity to fabricate stories which make their foes look bad (Russia, Syria, Iran, Lybia, Venezuela, etc)

    1. Re:of course it wasn't NK by Fwipp · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Thank you. I don't know why so much of Slashdot seems to be taking the obvious "it was NK omg" story at face value, even after NK explicitly denied it. They take credit for things they've never done - if they'd hacked Sony successfully, of course they'd be bragging about it.

    2. Re: of course it wasn't NK by O('_')O_Bush · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Except if your view was thought through to its conclusion, the NK would have claimed to have hacked Sony whether they did or did not actually do so. The fact that they regularly lie about what they have and haven't done makes any face-saving claim dubious.

      --
      while(1) attack(People.Sandy);
    3. Re: of course it wasn't NK by Fwipp · · Score: 1

      Well, nobody else is gonna say "Hey, no, that was me" when NK claims to have perfected cold fusion, or finding a cave full of mystical unicorns.

    4. Re: of course it wasn't NK by Nightshade72 · · Score: 1

      Heck, didn't they claim to have completed the first manned mission to the sun? took 24 hours to get there and they went at night....

    5. Re:of course it wasn't NK by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't know why so much of Slashdot seems to be taking the obvious "it was NK omg" story at face value, even after NK explicitly denied it.

      Ah yes, because the North Koreans have a history of being so honest and forthright?

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    6. Re:of course it wasn't NK by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I don't know why so much of Slashdot seems to be taking the obvious "it was NK omg" story at face value, even after NK explicitly denied it. They take credit for things they've never done - if they'd hacked Sony successfully, of course they'd be bragging about it.

      OMG, you're 100% correct.

      It's like how football players always fake left and jink right, never the other way round.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    7. Re:of course it wasn't NK by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

      Funny how nobody gave Afghanistan the same benefit of the doubt, and with just as flimsy of 'evidence'. Surrounded by a bunch of damn hypocrites.

      And watch what happens now...

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    8. Re:of course it wasn't NK by reikae · · Score: 3, Funny

      They should have confessed because then they'd be off the hook.

    9. Re:of course it wasn't NK by jbolden · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The reason is the USA government has a pretty good track record of not blaming foreign countries for stuff they didn't do. Meanwhile US opponents have a long history of denying involvement when they were. Comparing what is know 10 years later is pretty close to what you get from blindly believing the USA government on culpability.

    10. Re:of course it wasn't NK by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

      They should have confessed because then they'd be off the hook.

      It doesn't matter what they say, the evidence will speak for itself. The North Koreans are well known for outrageous bellicose pontification.

      And now Sony is know for having no spine.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    11. Re:of course it wasn't NK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, I doubt they have the technology smarts or the internet capability to do it. More likely China. Still, KimNoBalls should go, so why not?

    12. Re:of course it wasn't NK by _merlin · · Score: 2

      Oh what? They blamed Iraq for plenty of things they didn't do, and they've never presented evidence for all the claims of cyber attacks from Russia and China.

    13. Re:of course it wasn't NK by ericloewe · · Score: 1

      What are they supposed to do? Publish a list of files stolen from $_DoD_Contractor's network?

    14. Re:of course it wasn't NK by reve_etrange · · Score: 0

      And now Sony is know for having no spine.

      Really, it's Regal Cinemas that's spineless. Sony didn't have much choice once so many theaters pulled out - but they're still whack for hoping no one remembers they own Crackle

      --
      .: Semper Absurda :.
    15. Re: of course it wasn't NK by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      Except that argument wouldn't hold up in any court of Law (specific finding not to hand, it is an oft-used EWHC precedent holding that because someone lied about something else doesn't mean they lied about the matter at hand)

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    16. Re:of course it wasn't NK by ihtoit · · Score: 1, Insightful

      uh, what?

      "We know Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11" (how?? They can't even explain how a PASSPORT survived a plane crash and subsequent inferno that burned through a building with enough intensity to *melt construction steel* and vapourise a black box flight recorder, without a scratch, and end up three blocks away in a plastic bag) "...so we'll invade them anyway using a two pronged pretext: that they did, and that they have WMDs." (we know they *did* have WMDs, Rumsfeld got caught shredding the shipping manifests. We also know they didn't have any more viable chemical weapons by the 1991 invasion because the desert conditions denatured the payloads and rendered the warheads inert)

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    17. Re:of course it wasn't NK by jbolden · · Score: 1

      What did the USA blame Iraq for having done to us they didn't do? I can't think of much of anything. Now they certainly got stuff wrong about what was happening in Iraq and our record isn't so hot on that but accusations of specific violations we are pretty good on.

      And Iraq on WMDs is somewhat exceptional in that they were sending out fake signals for internal and external reasons.

    18. Re:of course it wasn't NK by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 2

      Really, it's Regal Cinemas that's spineless. Sony didn't have much choice once so many theaters pulled out

      Sony has a lot of pull with theatre chains, who need Sony to push the "blockbusters" their direction first. If Sony had wanted this film in theatres, it would have been in theatres.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    19. Re:of course it wasn't NK by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Pretty much this. This ain't some 9/11 stunt where it's a given that you'll get your head kicked in if you say you did it. This is something where NK could've given the US the middle finger and shown that their "virtual army" is a force that should not be ignored.

      Why should NK not claim they did it? Because of international backlash? Please. Because they fear retaliation from the US? Bluntly, if NK had the power to pull something like this off, they would not have to fear retaliation.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    20. Re:of course it wasn't NK by SacredNaCl · · Score: 2

      Did No Such Agency ever publicly take credit for the Iranian centrifuge debacle?!? No? So I wouldn't expect NK to do it either if they did.

       

      --
      Freedom is merely privilege extended unless enjoyed by one and all.
    21. Re: of course it wasn't NK by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      They gain more by claiming that the Americans are idiots who make wild accusations, and offering their technical assistance. At the same time their primary goal, stopping the release of the film and drawing attention to their displeasure with it, has been achieved.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    22. Re:of course it wasn't NK by AmiMoJo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The Americans are not exactly known of their honesty either. Both are equally liable to be lying.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    23. Re:of course it wasn't NK by steelfood · · Score: 1

      There's a concerted push to put the blame on NK for this. The precise reason is beyond me, but I'm very suspicious somebody is taking advantage of the situation to put NK in a defensive position, be it Sony, the FBI, other parts of the U.S. government, or even the Guardians of Peace themselves.

      I find the FBI's explanation of why it was NK incredibly weak. Behavioral "patterns" do not constitute strong evidence. If anything, it's a starting point in an investigation, and no more than that. Impersonation of online behavior is easy, especially for those who are privy to NK's past behavior. The motive is also incredibly weak. NK has never acted on any perceived slight by the U.S. film industry. And when they do get offended, they spend a lot of time spewing rhetoric. If they're sufficiently motivated to act, they'll spend even more time yapping away, especially afterwards at their victory and how they've taken down a big western corporation. Nothing like this has happened since the GOP took down Sony's network. It is incredibly unusual that their first public statements about the matter is weeks after the events, and a denial at that.

      I cannot imagine how the FBI managed to gather and analyze all of the evidence in such a short period of time. That they came to a conclusion so quickly makes me even more suspicious. It is possible that they already had a bad actor in mind, and is either avoiding putting any real effort into this, or is trying to make themselves look capable by coming to a quick conclusion, or is trying not to drag this on for any longer, or may even be colluding with someone to paint NK in a bad light. After all, we invaded Iraq on similarly sketchy evidence. There are people pushing to attack NK, and I would not be surprised if they asked the FBI to point fingers at NK for this purpose.

      On top of that, based on what I've read so far, Sony was so wide open to attack for so long, and they had made so many enemies with strong technical know-how, I would not so easily rule out that they had more than one group of intruders in their network. If there were indeed multiple groups grabbing data from Sony, it would make any investigation even more difficult. But even barring that, I find the FBI's explanation rushed and entirely unconvincing.

      Something is rotten in the state of Denmark.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    24. Re:of course it wasn't NK by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

      The reason is the USA government has a pretty good track record of not blaming foreign countries for stuff they didn't do.

      I think your Maine premise is flawed.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    25. Re:of course it wasn't NK by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 2

      The Americans are not exactly known of their honesty either. Both are equally liable to be lying.

      Apperently we Americans are better at it, as *everything* coming out of North Korea lands as bombastic humor.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    26. Re:of course it wasn't NK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you. I don't know why so much of Slashdot seems to be taking the obvious "it was NK omg" story at face value, even after NK explicitly denied it. They take credit for things they've never done - if they'd hacked Sony successfully, of course they'd be bragging about it.

      They should have confessed because then they'd be off the hook.
      http://www.degla-palms-apartments.com/

    27. Re:of course it wasn't NK by reve_etrange · · Score: 1

      It would have been in some theaters, but not the two largest chains. The movie industry has a number of rules / conventions (some contractual) pertaining to theatrical releases, so Sony decided to try again later instead of just release in some theaters.

      They easily could have released already via another distribution channel (such as their own streaming service, Crackle), but they are probably still hoping for a high-gross opening weekend in theaters, which they will no doubt get after all the publicity the film's received.

      Anyway, I do wonder if the hackers just meant that the movie is so terrible, theater goers will want to blow themselves up.

      --
      .: Semper Absurda :.
    28. Re:of course it wasn't NK by Rufty · · Score: 0

      Ah yes, because the North Koreans have a history of being so honest and forthright?

      Moreso than the americunts.

      --
      Red to red, black to black. Switch it on, but stand well back.
    29. Re:of course it wasn't NK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What did the USA blame Iraq for having done to us they didn't do?/p>

      9/11

      WMDs

      Yellowcake

    30. Re:of course it wasn't NK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Something is rotten in the state of Maryland.

      FTFY

    31. Re:of course it wasn't NK by hamburger+lady · · Score: 1

      lol. seriously, if you're trying to equate NK and the US in terms of truth-telling you're a buffoon. unless you actually believe any of the crazy-ass shit that comes out of NK. at least the US is willing to admit that our leader sucks at golf and bowling.

      --

      ---
      Is this the MPAA? Is this the RIAA? Is this the DMCA? I thought it was the USA!
    32. Re:of course it wasn't NK by Livius · · Score: 0

      Americans are brilliant at deceiving their own citizens; the rest of the planet, not so much.

    33. Re: of course it wasn't NK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sony had plenty of choice. I know of 3 cinemas in my area who were going to show it. They also could have released it to vod but they arent.

      Everyone and their mother would have bought this movie via vod on Christmas day If they put it up for sale.

      Sony is a bunch of lazy nuttless cowards. Again and again they fuck people over when it comes to their technology. Its time for them to go.

    34. Re:of course it wasn't NK by rockout · · Score: 0

      Americans are brilliant at deceiving about half of their own citizens; the rest of the planet, not so much.

      FTFY

      --
      I've learned that they're worthless, so I don't read AC comments anymore.
    35. Re:of course it wasn't NK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always wonder if you guys know that you're a conspiracy-obsessed nutjob, or if you're completely blind to that fact.

    36. Re:of course it wasn't NK by rockout · · Score: 1

      Bluntly, if NK had the power to pull something like this off, they would not have to fear retaliation.

      What??? They're facing retaliation now and they're still claiming they didn't do it. What kind of logic were you just using?

      --
      I've learned that they're worthless, so I don't read AC comments anymore.
    37. Re:of course it wasn't NK by jbolden · · Score: 1

      Those weren't done to us.

    38. Re:of course it wasn't NK by jbolden · · Score: 1

      That's actually a counter example similar to speculation of Soviet involvement in the JFK assassination. The yellow journalist press was sure it was Spain but the USA government never made that assertion. Even when we declared war 2 months later McKinley did not cite the sinking of the Maine as a reason.

    39. Re:of course it wasn't NK by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      whether there was a conspiracy or not is completely beside the point, you have no evidence whatsoever to be making judgements on the mental state of others on a public forum based on what they post on that forum or elsewhere (and even if you did have enough evidence you have failed to show any qualification to do so), and as the saying goes, the monkey smells its own shit first. Apart from that, I'm only repeating what was evidenced prior to the Iraq invasions. You want to call it conspiracy? Fine, you do that, but first pick up a dictionary and learn what a conspiracy is, then say it's a conspiracy to deceive the free thinking people of the West by their own Governments, then produce evidence to back up your claim (like the barely qualifiable claim by the BBC that the Salomon Brothers building, WTC Tower 7, had collapsed, when the helicopter deck was clearly visible behind the reporter as she said it), instead of making unqualified and unnecessary claims about others mental health behind the mask of AC like a paranoid little child to hide the fact that a: you have no cogent argument and b: you feel the need to be part of everybody's conversation because in reality, you're a friendless wannabe.

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    40. Re: of course it wasn't NK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess that answers the question.

    41. Re:of course it wasn't NK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Americans are brilliant at deceiving about half of their own citizens; the rest of the planet, not so much.

      No, it is more like 90-95%.

      You don't even have to "decieve" ... 90% of people trust the "default" and the truth is simply never spoken, or barraged and buried under a steady stream of half-truths, irrelevant statements, coming from a few sources and repeated ad infinitum.

      If 50% of "Americans" can spot they truth, they would revolt / revert back to founding principles, before their chance slips further and further away. The only explanation is much more than 50% are deceived.

      Alternately, I will accept "90% of Americans who live in the U.S." do not care about the U.S. or its independence or any of its founding ideals, are merely along for the ride.

      You give "Americans" too much credit.

      50% of people in the U.S. would not call the U.S. "the U.S." anymore, not by a long shot, if they were not deceived.

      If 50% of "Americans" are not deceived, they must all be Russian spies. They surely do not represent U.S. independence or "American" values. They would be devastated to see what their nation has become.

      P.S. "America" is much larger than just the U.S. -- I do not like USians or "yankees" any better, but if "Americans" do not even know what to properly call themselves, I find 50% "not deceived" as unlikely.

    42. Re:of course it wasn't NK by dbIII · · Score: 1

      You've ignored their history of shooting nearly anyone that looks like they may have the ability to use a screwdriver.
      I've talked a few times to someone that used to run a business trading seafood from North Korea into China, but at one point she just had to get out or die and not long after that North Korea did not have the ability to feed itself let alone export food. She didn't hear from relatives over the next few decades and had no idea if they were alive or dead. Over the years refugees coming into China knew less and less about what was actually going on in N.K. - the place was/is very compartmentalised. One common theme however was that older people were arrested and disappeared if they were caught talking about recent history when N.K. could feed itself.
      The place is an utter basket case. A small country like Botswana is more likely to put someone on the moon than N.K. carrying out a very patient long term hack on Sony.

    43. Re:of course it wasn't NK by dbIII · · Score: 1

      without a scratch, and end up three blocks away in a plastic bag)

      For some macabre reason there are a lot of hiking trips to plane wrecks. From seeing a few of those it appears that something landing the distance of three blocks away is a fairly normal result for a flight into terrain. It's a very obvious outcome if you think of it.

    44. Re:of course it wasn't NK by dbIII · · Score: 1

      The Soviets knew how to screw JFK over, and did it big time with the diminishing offers over the Cuba missile brinksmanship, so would not want to kill him off and see him replaced by someone like Johnson. I'm really amazed that anyone seriously considered that conspiracy theory at all.

    45. Re:of course it wasn't NK by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      No, it's just the textbook way how to do it. Once the mob's baying for blood the declaration's just rubber stamping. And the president (or whoever's pulling the strings) keeps his hands clean in case it's later proved to be wrong.

      You didn't hear McCain & Palin saying - in person - that Obama was a Kenyan muslim, did you?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    46. Re:of course it wasn't NK by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      The Americans are not exactly known of their honesty either. Both are equally liable to be lying.

      Coming from a reflective anti-American Leftist that almost smacks of high praise. The US is only as bad as North Korea? My how the revolution has fallen on hard times.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    47. Re:of course it wasn't NK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And for how long have you suffered from this delusion?

    48. Re:of course it wasn't NK by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      The rest of the planet is busy being fooled by either themselves, their party, their government, or their tribe. This results in a fair amount of quite silly things being posted here.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    49. Re:of course it wasn't NK by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      I'm sure that both of the 2 governments that recognized the Taliban government gave their "denial" full consideration.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    50. Re:of course it wasn't NK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They brag about things they can't do, they hide things they can do.

    51. Re:of course it wasn't NK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just about as honest and forthright as Americans.... (still looking for WMD in Iraq...)

    52. Re:of course it wasn't NK by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Apperently we Americans are better at it, as *everything* coming out of North Korea lands as bombastic humor.

      Believe it or not, most of what comes out of America sounds the same to the rest of the world. It's been toned down since Obama got in, from the height of the War on Terror (TM). More generally all the rhetoric about the US being the greatest country on earth and the daily pledge of allegiance that school kids are forced to recite seems awfully similar to what certain other countries do, which is probably no surprise as much of it was originally a over-reaction to Soviet propaganda.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    53. Re:of course it wasn't NK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Ah yes, because the North Koreans have a history of being so honest and forthright?

      Look. I don't believe one word of what NK says. But I don't believe what FBI says either -- or for that, what Obama says. It's like the thugs of two opposing criminal bands.

    54. Re:of course it wasn't NK by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      What retaliation? A very strongly worded letter?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    55. Re:of course it wasn't NK by jbolden · · Score: 1

      That conspiracy theory was big in the early 1960s. Today of course that's changed and everyone buys into the lone gunman. We've had far more assassins with little ties to organizations since then.

    56. Re:of course it wasn't NK by jbolden · · Score: 1

      Well exactly. In this case the FBI and the President are saying it. Ergo that carries some weight they don't think they will be proven wrong. The issue is not how to start trouble with an enemy. The issue is how credible is such a statement when it does come from a high official. You are forgetting what you are supposed to be cynical about. :)

    57. Re:of course it wasn't NK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The crazy is strong in this one.

    58. Re:of course it wasn't NK by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      Thank you. I don't know why so much of Slashdot seems to be taking the obvious "it was NK omg" story at face value, even after NK explicitly denied it. They take credit for things they've never done - if they'd hacked Sony successfully, of course they'd be bragging about it.

      Perhaps they could solve the ISIS problem

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
    59. Re:of course it wasn't NK by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      True. North Korea lies about everything. The US only lies about important things that advance it's agenda. Like weapons of mass destruction in countries they'd like to invade.

    60. Re: of course it wasn't NK by Your.Master · · Score: 1

      Everyone and their mother would have bought this movie via vod on Christmas day If they put it up for sale.

      I think you're forgetting that the ads to this movie didn't look very good in the first place.

      If Korea hadn't made a fuss I doubt most people would remember the movie existed in six months.

      I'd watch this movie on an airplane, or if I'm sick and bedridden. I wouldn't buy this movie on Christmas day (with my family?), regardless of the geopolitical posturing.

    61. Re:of course it wasn't NK by Your.Master · · Score: 1

      You are claiming that 9/11 wasn't done to the US?

    62. Re:of course it wasn't NK by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Where to start? More like where to stop.

      I think I'm becoming cynical about cynicism.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    63. Re:of course it wasn't NK by jbolden · · Score: 1

      No I'm claiming yellowcake and WMD weren't done to us. 9/11 we attributed to Al Qaeda correctly.

    64. Re:of course it wasn't NK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      US gov't never passes on an opportunity to fabricate stories which make their foes look bad (Russia, Syria, Iran, Lybia, Venezuela, etc)

      When in truth we are the fucking bad guys in the world.

    65. Re:of course it wasn't NK by rockout · · Score: 1

      If you'd like to place a bet on whether the US's retaliation will be limited to a strongly-worded letter, I'd very much like to take that action.

      --
      I've learned that they're worthless, so I don't read AC comments anymore.
    66. Re:of course it wasn't NK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know why so much of Slashdot seems to be taking the obvious "it was NK omg" story at face value, even after NK explicitly denied it. They take credit for things they've never done - if they'd hacked Sony successfully, of course they'd be bragging about it.

      OMG, you're 100% correct.

      It's like how football players always fake left and jink right, never the other way round.

      This looks like a great opportunity for a barrage of Derek Zoolander jokes.

    67. Re:of course it wasn't NK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL... look at your fucking gateway logs, you tool. China and Russia IPs make up 99% of the malicious offenders. It's even worse if you have an IP in a known corporate block. Some claims don't need proof: the sun will rise tomorrow; hydrogen bonds with oxygen; Russia and China are full of fucking hackers; etc.

    68. Re:of course it wasn't NK by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

      Everything about the attack has seemed to be inconsistent with North Korea's tendency towards propaganda.

      It just seems... odd... that the attackers behaved consistently like disgruntled employees/ex-employees.

      Then Sony started talking about North Korea for whatever reason, and I think the attackers saw that and ran with it, thinking it was a great way to send Sony on a wilde goose chase. Heck, they might have intentionally left evidence pointing towards North Korea from the beginning (I suspect the various tools that the FBI thinks imply NK have already been traded around via underground methods and are in the possession of people other than their original creators/users...). Once there was public talk of NK, I think the attackers just decided it would be effective to screw with Sony regarding "The Interview". It's probably nothing to do with any moral objections to the movie - but it's a great way to cause a major financial loss for Sony and make them think someone else is responsible.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    69. Re:of course it wasn't NK by dl_sledding · · Score: 1

      P.S. "America" is much larger than just the U.S. -- I do not like USians or "yankees" any better, but if "Americans" do not even know what to properly call themselves, I find 50% "not deceived" as unlikely.

      I know I shouldn't feed the AC trolls, but I am so tired of hearing this lame-ass statement. Americans DO know what to call themselves - Americans!. I have never, ever heard an American citizen refer to themselves as "USians" or "Yankees" (unless, of course, they play for the team or are talking about northerners). No other country in either North or South America (the Continents) have the word "America" in their name: only the United States of America has that word in it's complete and proper name. Therefore, it is not only logical but sane to use the word Americans to describe citizens of the US. Canadians, Mexicans, Venezuelans, Brazilians, Portugese, etc. have made no claim to the "Americans" name, as they do not associate the tag as pertinent or descriptive to their country.

      Nor have I ever heard anyone from another North or South American country complain that the USA co-opted the "Americans" name and stole it's use from all of the other countries. Never.

      Reading through your post, I have to guess that, when you use the word "Americans", you mean all citizens of all countries in both North and South America, since you seem to have such a problem with the citizens of the US using it as a description. Your post makes much more sense that way... There are many, many corrupt governments on these two continents; the US not being the worst. And, there are many, many corrupt governments on other continents as well. Don't take this as me defending my government: it's a fucking mess and needs a hell of a lot of housecleaning, and I am willing to bet that more than 50% of the US citizens agree with me. However, unlike most other parts of the world, the US citizen sees revolution as the absolute last resort, not the first, and will try many, many alternatives before resorting to such a destructive choice.

  2. Incompetence vs Conspiracy by Gim+Tom · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Do not attribute to a conspiracy that which can be adequately explained by incompetence -- especially if you won't show your evidence of said conspiracy. The company that thought a Root Kit was a good idea does seems to be lacking something in the competence department.

    1. Re:Incompetence vs Conspiracy by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 0

      Do not attribute to a conspiracy that which can be adequately explained by incompetence -- especially if you won't show your evidence of said conspiracy. The company that thought a Root Kit was a good idea does seems to be lacking something in the competence department.

      Which only means that it is possible that they made it easy for the North Koreans.

      Of course the North Koreans deny it, why wouldn't they?

      In the weeks to come, the evidence will come to light, but the smoking gun is already coming from that direction.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    2. Re:Incompetence vs Conspiracy by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      In that case, Sony would have nothing to fear from releasing the film - and a lot to monetarily gain from it.

    3. Re:Incompetence vs Conspiracy by ChipMonk · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sony, the company that thought it would be a good idea to use other computers in ways the computers' owners wouldn't want, now finds others using Sony's computers in ways Sony doesn't want.

      Karma's a bitch.

    4. Re:Incompetence vs Conspiracy by DrunkenTerror · · Score: 1

      You have no fucking idea what you're talking about.

    5. Re:Incompetence vs Conspiracy by Marginal+Coward · · Score: 1

      It's a matter of timing. You can't make any money on a film in the US when all three major theater chains pull out. The revenue that's left from the small operators probably isn't enough to cover distribution and marketing costs.

      On CNN, Sony's CEO said they really want to show the film, and I don't doubt that they do. But it's a business, so the business calculation is basically that they've got to show it at the right time and in the right media (screen, streaming, DVD, etc.) to maximize their audience and revenue. The original date of December 25 that has been threatened isn't the right time, now that the theater chains have pulled out, but the right time will come, maybe soon. In any event, at least a few of the North Korean people will get to see it when DVDs eventually get sent to them via balloon. Hopefully, it isn't as bad of a movie as the reviewers (and the trailer) suggest. Those poor folks deserve some quality entertainment.

  3. False Falg? by jmd · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The more this unravels the more I smell false flag.

    1. Re:False Falg? by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

      The more this unravels the more I smell false flag.

      Who had something to gain? Has there been an extortion of cash, a request for payments? No, simply a specific demand to shit-can a specific movie that a specific party has already made bellicose threats over.

      Nobody else but the North Koreans have anything at all to gain, except maybe Seth Rogen, now that everyone wants to see his shitty movie that otherwise would have faded away within two weeks of the premier.

      But again, who has already made threats over this film?

      The more this unravels the more the conspiracy nuts will come out of the woodwork.

      I predict that as the "security researchers" work their way through the evidence, the North Koreans will indeed be revealed to be the culprits who have effectively unleashed this unfunny worthless film on the public.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    2. Re:False Falg? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Almost nobody had heard about the movie, now everyone has. I'm not sure that's good for North Korea. Also how could you or I know whether there have been other demands or not?

      I don't trust the North Korean government to tell the truth, but I have only slightly more trust for the United States government. (I'm not a citizen or resident of either country.)

    3. Re:False Falg? by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 2

      Also how could you or I know whether there have been other demands or not?

      The North Koreans have publically made demands with respect to this movie both before and after the hack. It's been in the news for awhile.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    4. Re:False Falg? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sony.

      This movie that was going to flop as unfunny... now is rated 10/10 on IMDB and would rake in millions should Sony release it in the next few weeks.

    5. Re:False Falg? by hey! · · Score: 3, Insightful

      One thing every thoughtful fan of the mystery story knows is that in real life, motivation tells you very little about who done what. That's because *most* people, when faced with a problem, don't even consider murder. Murderers are not typical people.

      The same goes for hackers. When companies first started putting Internet connections back in the 90s in I would explain that they need to start taking steps to secure their networks, and almost without exception the response was "Why? Why would anyone be interested in hacking *us*?" And I had to explain that the Internet was accessible to *everyone*, including people whose motivations and ways of thinking would make no sense to them.

      Motivation may have limited use in perhaps identifying some possible suspects, but it's not probative of anything. You can't rule anyone out or in based on what you think their motivations are or should be. The only way to know that somebody has done something is by following the chain of evidence that leads to some concrete action they've taken.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    6. Re:False Falg? by Charliemopps · · Score: 2

      You know... I was pretty sure it was NK as well...
      But it's really getting fishy.

      For example, why was the CIA meeting with Sony just a month prior to this happening?
      http://radaronline.com/exclusi...

      And it even specifically says the talks were about Sony and other studios helping them with, what can only be described as, propaganda.

      Something... and I don't know what... but something, is up.

    7. Re:False Falg? by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 4, Funny

      For example, why was the CIA meeting with Sony just a month prior to this happening? [link to Radaronline.com]

      Ah, yes, Radaronline. An excellent journalistic news site right up there with the Washington Post and the New York Times, especially if you are interested in the latest buzz about Kim Kardashian's ass, and what Justin Bieber is up to. It's my "go-to" site for factual news about international politics!

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    8. Re:False Falg? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The biggest winner about the movie is: Sony. Now, people who would never have watched a stupid movie will flock to theaters in the US to see it. (once distributed) Of course, Sony COULD release the film freebie, free to download.

    9. Re:False Falg? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      The more this unravels the more I smell false flag.

      Who had something to gain?

      Sony. If they release the movie now, a lot of people will see it that otherwise wouldn't have been interested. I am still sticking to my theory that the hacking was staged, the released emails are fake, and the whole thing is a publicity stunt.

    10. Re:False Falg? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Who had something to gain? Has there been an extortion of cash, a request for payments? No, simply a specific demand to shit-can a specific movie that a specific party has already made bellicose threats over.

      Nobody else but the North Koreans have anything at all to gain, except maybe Seth Rogen, now that everyone wants to see his shitty movie that otherwise would have faded away within two weeks of the premier.

      The reason one might think this smells is because they already asked that very question.
      North Korea has nothing to gain from this so why the fuck would they be the ones behind it?
      The only involvement they appear to have at the moment is being scapegoats.

    11. Re:False Falg? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      I'm not sure that's good for North Korea.

      Sure it is. NK's goal is not to "get" Sony. It is to maintain the reputation of their leader as a psychopathic kook. This will strengthen their hand in future negotiations over important issues. If you act reasonable, your adversaries will insist on an outcome that is "fair". But if act like an irrational psychopath, your adversaries will settle for any outcome that is even halfway sane. The Kim dynasty has been using this strategy since 1950, and it has worked well for them.

    12. Re:False Falg? by Eunuchswear · · Score: 0, Troll

      Splendid. You think Sony has leaked massive amounts of its own and it's employees private data to big up a crappy film.

      Seriously -- you are an idiot.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    13. Re:False Falg? by Ian+A.+Shill · · Score: 1
      And this precludes there being other demands how?

      Also how could you or I know whether there have been other demands or not?

      The North Koreans have publically made demands with respect to this movie both before and after the hack. It's been in the news for awhile.

      --
      For hire.
    14. Re:False Falg? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't read Anon comments. So don't bother. Even if you mod your anon comment up with your real account. Sorry!

      I don't read comments by pompous asses with On Million Plus user IDs... Wait, was that a stupid statement?

    15. Re:False Falg? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The hackers. They do it for the lulz. They probably have a bet over who can cause the biggest international incident.

    16. Re:False Falg? by daniel142005 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Thinking the same... I mean Target was hit, Home Depot, Chase, etc.. No one made a big deal about it until the MAFIAA got hit. Now it's suddenly a cyber 9/11? Sony is the only one to blame here.. They have been hit MULTIPLE times and still failed to secure their networks. It did however shed a lot of light on the questionable practices they're using to attack the internet and Google.

      It's kind of sad, but I'm more inclined to believe North Korea than our own government on this one. Sony isn't even in the US... It's primarily based out of Japan. Where is Japan's response? They've barely even mentioned the incident. Honestly, I wouldn't even put it past Sony or another MAFIAA member doing it. A cyber 9/11 would benefit them in the sense that it would provide the fear-mongering to enact exactly what Sony wants.

    17. Re:False Falg? by daniel142005 · · Score: 1

      For the film, no. To sacrifice a film to be able to claim "Cyber 9/11" for a corporation that isn't even primarily located in the US? It wouldn't shock me. The general public (including politicians) will be afraid now and more likely to enact laws to benefit Sony.

      Do I think it was Sony? No, but as others have said.. something isn't adding up. Seriously, they could of used a different name. Why did it have to be Kim Jong-un?

      # Conspiracy past this line
      Sony was extremely quick to call it a Cyber 9/11. Almost makes me wonder if they were involved in the original 9/11... which also has a lot of questions attached to it. Who better to control the population than the politico-media complex that includes Sony. They have already shown the lengths they will go to with the likes of SOPA/CISPA/etc.. Obama has strong ties with Hollywood as well.

    18. Re:False Falg? by sonicmerlin · · Score: 1

      They must have learned from our republicans.

    19. Re:False Falg? by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure that's good for North Korea.

      Sure it is. NK's goal is not to "get" Sony. It is to maintain the reputation of their leader as a psychopathic kook. This will strengthen their hand in future negotiations over important issues. If you act reasonable, your adversaries will insist on an outcome that is "fair". But if act like an irrational psychopath, your adversaries will settle for any outcome that is even halfway sane. The Kim dynasty has been using this strategy since 1950, and it has worked well for them.

      Worked for Nixon.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    20. Re:False Falg? by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      Are you in Spain?

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    21. Re:False Falg? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but every one Knows 9\11 was Chaneys Republican chums!

    22. Re:False Falg? by ShaunC · · Score: 1

      Who had something to gain?

      Those who wish to impose further regulations and control upon the Internet. With the flurry of news surrounding all things Sony, you might have missed it, but yesterday Obama came out with this gem:

      "We need more rules about how the internet should operate."

      So, cui bono? The US Government, that's cui.

      --
      Thanks to the War on Drugs, it's easier to buy meth than it is to buy cold medicine!
    23. Re:False Falg? by catmistake · · Score: 1

      The more this unravels the more I smell false flag.

      Only now do we feel the loss of President Ronald Reagan. The moment President Obama failed to dispatch Senator Fred Thompson with an elite-ops "A" team including Candice Bergen and Vice-President Dan Qualye, to deal with this egrigious crime, I smelled something, too.

    24. Re: False Falg? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You think the entire sony movie studios branch would elect to fall on their own sword, compromise the rest of Sony, to promote a crappy Seth Rogan movie? Seriously? These are people who design by committee, to minimize risk to their own jobs, even if it's fake, it's no less damaging.

      I could believe it's the work of some kind of covert stock market manipulation, but no corporation goes out of its way to lose hundreds of millions in reputation alone to make dozens of millions. Where is the motivation?

    25. Re: False Falg? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This^

    26. Re:False Falg? by rockout · · Score: 1

      What a dopey comparison - when Target, Home Depot, and Chase were hit, they didn't CLOSE THEIR FUCKING STORES based on groundless threats from hackers half a world away. Sony did exactly that - they took a $42 million movie and decided to take a complete loss on it, at least for now. That's why it's big news.

      As for Sony being based in Japan, what's that got to do with anything when you're talking about a multi-national corporation? What country do you think Sony makes the lion's share of its profits in? I'll give you a hint, it's the one that the most tickets were going to be sold for this movie, by far.

      --
      I've learned that they're worthless, so I don't read AC comments anymore.
    27. Re:False Falg? by rockout · · Score: 1

      Almost nobody had heard about the movie, now everyone has. I'm not sure that's good for North Korea.

      You think North Korea is more internet-savvy than Barbara Streisand?

      --
      I've learned that they're worthless, so I don't read AC comments anymore.
    28. Re:False Falg? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They were just scheduling some drills.

    29. Re:False Falg? by daniel142005 · · Score: 1

      First, they aren't closing their stores. The cinemas refused to show the movie. They are still showing every other movie. As far as the $42 million, I'm sure they have insurance, and if anything they could change the character's name. At what point in the past have they used the name of someone that was still alive and in power in that negative of a way? I'm not pro NK by any means, but I am content with not unnecessarily provoking them by directly calling them out.

      On the other hand, how much did the Target and Home Depot hack cost?

      Target - Estimated by McAffee at $100 billion or more, but as of Oct 6th Target estimated $146 million. The cost of replacing the debit/credit cards alone supposedly exceeds $200 million.
      Home Depot - As of September 18th, they estimated the cost to be $62 million. This attack also affected people's cards and there is a pending lawsuit against them.

      So much for that theory? Both have well exceeded the $42 million mark and it's not even the final sum. So how can you justify Sony deserving the attention and not the others that were hit?

      As for being primarily located in Japan, it's understandable that they do most of their business in the states. However, Japan has been almost completely silent. Barely even a mention of it.

    30. Re:False Falg? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Actually it didn't. The Russians were used to real madmen.

    31. Re:False Falg? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      And it even specifically says the talks were about Sony and other studios helping them with, what can only be described as, propaganda.

      Most likely situation normal and ongoing instead of something new.
      Remember that the WMD stuff came out of a PR company. The Kuwait hospital atrocity thing a decade earlier was a performance from an actress - very bizzare since they had real atrocities just as bad that could have been used instead of cooked up PR.

    32. Re:False Falg? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      massive amounts of its own and it's employees private data

      Apostrophes, motherfucker. Do you use them?

    33. Re:False Falg? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      You misspelled "The Mossa,'é
      no carrier

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    34. Re:False Falg? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [Citation Needed]

      I've been planning on watching The Interview for over a year. I was upset back in August when it was pushed back to December.... We've all known its a Franco-Rogen movie for a long time so we know what to expect: toilet humor, marijuana jokes, and yet another continuation of their bromance. It would have been watched just as much as any other movie in the same category.

      I won't deny a Streisand-effect at this point, but the movie wasn't going to 'flop' originally. And it's not really a high-budget film *anyways*. If anything it's another elaborate scheme for Rogen and Franco to kiss on screen.

    35. Re:False Falg? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The more this unravels the more I smell false flag.

      That's your tinfoil hat you're smelling. Or your unwashed communist backside.

    36. Re:False Falg? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think a better argument would be to question the sources they use. The fact that they're not known for... quality information should be a red flag that what they're saying is suspect, but it doesn't mean it's necessarily false. Even a stopped clock is right twice a day. I would say heavily skeptical, but not disbelieving.

    37. Re:False Falg? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Real atrocities don't make good TV. They're mostly just smoking rubble by the time the cameras get there. Staged atrocities are much easier to turn into fifteen second segments.

    38. Re:False Falg? by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      NK also had the opportunity to do it against a non-government entity. If they hacked into the US or any other country it would be grounds for war or even more sanctions.

      NK gets to flex their hacking ability against multinational corporation without risking war. Sony gets egg on their face. Big brother China is probably pleased since Sony is a Japanese company.

    39. Re:False Falg? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      The case I'm describing was an actress pretending to be a nurse giving a verbal account of an atrocity - so no such excuse of reality being boring for the camera, and stupidly counterproductive.
      It was ineptly done, easily exposed and it made people question real events.
      It's the sort of bullshit that breeds 9/11 "truethers" who have worked out that they've seen some propaganda lies and now assume real reports are lies, leading to an inability to distinguish fantasy from reality and some really weird conspiracy theories (the real conspiracy by Bin Laden etc is apparently not enough for them).

  4. Whether it was NK or not doesn't matter by kruach+aum · · Score: 1

    Iraq didn't have WMDs, people are spirited away to Guantanamo Bay without being charged, and the NSA spies on literally the entire world without justifiable cause. The US just does what it wants, and right now it seems like it wants to inject some Freedom into North Korea.

    1. Re:Whether it was NK or not doesn't matter by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      Because freedom in North Korea would be the worstest thing ever.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:Whether it was NK or not doesn't matter by kruach+aum · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I used Freedom with a capital F as a technical term. Actual freedom would be very good, as North Korea is one of the worst places in the world. Things like the 3-generation punishment policy, widespread famine, an insane ruler, prison camps, etc. etc. should just not exist anywhere on earth. However, my point was that the US does whatever it wants, not that NK isn't a horrible place.

    3. Re: Whether it was NK or not doesn't matter by O('_')O_Bush · · Score: 1

      If they (U.S. and Allies) wanted to do that, they would just have to stop feeding NK and let the brilliance of freedom take roots on its own. Or let NK starve to death. As far as kookie conspiracy theories about the U.S. trying to make NK look bad... given their history of bizarre claims, nearly self destructing to become a nuclear power, and the mentality of their citizenry around the personality cult, I think it is laughable to the absurd to think that the U.S. even has to *try* to make NK look bad.

      --
      while(1) attack(People.Sandy);
    4. Re:Whether it was NK or not doesn't matter by aitikin · · Score: 1

      ...an insane ruler...

      It's understandable that he's insane. Think about it, it's always tough being the fat kid in school, imagine how it feels being the only fat kid in the country.

      --
      "Don't meddle in the affairs of a patent dragon, for thou art tasty and good with ketchup." ~ohcrapitssteve
    5. Re:Whether it was NK or not doesn't matter by kruach+aum · · Score: 2, Funny

      Except that English does work like that http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C...

      It must suck when foreigners speak your native language better than you do.

    6. Re:Whether it was NK or not doesn't matter by Eunuchswear · · Score: 0

      He called you "boche", it's more likely that he's a frog than a brit.

      A brit would probably have called you a kraut.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    7. Re:Whether it was NK or not doesn't matter by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Sure the US want to export freedom to NK. Since there's not really any use for it anymore at home...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    8. Re:Whether it was NK or not doesn't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The word "Freedom" is not in the article, chleuch.

    9. Re: Whether it was NK or not doesn't matter by dbIII · · Score: 1

      N.K. basically has a "business model" of holding up a sign up saying "will not nuke Seoul for food". They send a few shells over every now and again to show it's not a bluff, and that even if it is called they can threaten to trash other cities after levelling Seoul.
      That's the first thing to consider before posting something simplistic like the above.
      It may be an utter basket case but it's not going away if we ignore it, it will get worse.

    10. Re:Whether it was NK or not doesn't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, what I'm hearing is, we need go give North Korea a Texas-sized amount of Freedom. 'Murica. Fuck Yeah.

      Also, North Korea had a press release back in July or something like that where they said that releasing The Interview would be an Act of War, so it's not *that* far-fetched to think North Korea was behind these attempts to shut the movie down.

      And, it's important to remember that Sony has had entire HD movies released(so that will be a hit to sales...on higher budget movies than The Interview, which was a measly $44 million.) and information of their employees compromised.

      It *could* be a false flag, and *maybe* North Korea isn't behind it, but I really don't have a hard time believing that they're behind it. No one else has anything to gain from this. Sony is losing $$$, credibility in their security yet again, and it's very likely that executives will be cut loose. If this was meant to be PR, it's very expensive PR. Not even China, NK's closest ally(both physically and otherwise) has anything to gain. China has actually been pulling away from NK in recent years. Russia might have something to gain. At least, Russia and the US could duke it out on NK soil(this way we don't blow up our own countries...gotta love dem proxy wars!), and I say that only half-jokingly.

      I'm an American and I was not a fan of the wars in the Middle East, but I would support a war against North Korea if it meant disposing of Kim Jong Un and his dictatorship, and I have felt this way since before The Interview was ever conceived. Some North Koreans who have escaped liken what's happening in North Korea to the Holocaust, and I have a hard time understanding why so many countries are complacent about the things we hear happening inside those borders.

  5. Empty threats matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People are stupid, panicky and easily scared. If you constantly bombard them with threats of attacks/destruction/"consequences" it doesn't matter if you never carry it out, people remember it.

    It doesn't matter if North Korea is guilty or not. The fact that after DECADES of threats (with some actual attacks); fuck the evidence (or lack thereof), "we" need to take out the North Koreans before they take us out!

    1. Re:Empty threats matter by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Are you high? NK "take us out"? Where are you, South Korea?

      Care to give us an idea how you think NK could "take us out"? I need a good laugh.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:Empty threats matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Didn't you get the media memo? Hacking = WMD.

    3. Re:Empty threats matter by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      So I should be expected to see the next disarmement talks being held at DefCon or BlackHat? You sure have a lot of people with WMDs assembled there anyway.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:Empty threats matter by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure his entire post was sarcastic. The phrases "people are stupid" and "fuck the evidence" sort of give it away.

    5. Re:Empty threats matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you high? NK "take us out"? Where are you, South Korea?

      Care to give us an idea how you think NK could "take us out"? I need a good laugh.

      Pretty much. I don't care how large the standing army is. They have to get that army somewhere for it to actually be useful.
      The only place they're a threat to is South Korea because they can march there.

  6. Who gives a fuck? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    One business got thoroughly hacked, but it's not like whoever did that targeted every country's infrastructure, like the communication systems. Or maybe they did, but then let's get them for that, not for fucking Sony.

  7. And OJ offers a reward to find the real killer by lurker412 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    My first reaction was that it was like OJ Simpson offering a reward to find the real killer. But then I took off my snarky goggles and on reflection, I realized that given government, corporate and media interests and manipulation there's no way in hell we'll ever know the truth. Sad but true, I'm afraid.

    1. Re:And OJ offers a reward to find the real killer by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 2, Insightful

      North Korea has already said that they approve of the hacks. Now they want to "join in the investigation" and if they're refused, "something bad will happen?"

      North Korea needs to be told in plain language "Get bent!" Whether they were the source or not is now irrelevant, given their latest threat.

      There is no way that anyone else will let North Korea see how their intelligence service works, same as they don't show theirs to anyone else.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    2. Re:And OJ offers a reward to find the real killer by reikae · · Score: 1

      The U.S. should bear in mind that it will face serious consequences in case it rejects our proposal for joint investigation and presses for what it called countermeasure while finding fault with the DPRK.

      If it rejects and begins countermeasures. Meaning if the US launches a military attack, they'll (try to) defend themselves. Nothing special or surprising there IMO.

    3. Re:And OJ offers a reward to find the real killer by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      well, we know that they have the ability to detonate large explosives under mountains (whether or not it was nuclear... I'll leave to the imagination), they don't need ICBMs or even IRBMs to deliver a nuke (if that's what it was), since any military action would be over land, they could deliver one with a box van. Lots less conspicuous and lots harder to intercept than a cruise missile.

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    4. Re:And OJ offers a reward to find the real killer by avgapon · · Score: 2

      Do you work for RT?

    5. Re:And OJ offers a reward to find the real killer by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      On the other hand, we know for certain that the US has launched cyber attacks against other countries. They hit Iran with Struxnet, for example, and are suspected of various other attacks. We know that the NSA has infested many, many systems. We know that their British partner agency, GCHQ, hacks other countries on a regular basis.

      Any complaints from the US are at best hypocrisy. It's hard to believe US intelligence after all the lies of the past, so I'd say it's equally likely that North Korea is telling the truth. Would be a nice bit of misdirection by the hackers.

      It will be interesting to see what the US does. Any retaliation would open it up to similar retaliation over its own hacking.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    6. Re:And OJ offers a reward to find the real killer by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      You have a point, but it was either Stuxnet or a nuclear strike by Israel. Given those two options, I think we're all better off with Stuxnet.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    7. Re:And OJ offers a reward to find the real killer by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      In this case it was either a nuclear strike by one arm of North Korea government (allegedly capable) on Japan, or Sony US headquarters, or Sony hack by another. We are all better off with the Sony hack.

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
    8. Re:And OJ offers a reward to find the real killer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have a point, but it was either Stuxnet or a nuclear strike by Israel. Given those two options, I think we're all better off with Stuxnet.

      That is quite an insane/arrogant viewpoint.

      http://www.businessinsider.com/stuxnet-was-far-more-dangerous-than-previous-thought-2013-11

      If the U.S. did not cripple Iran, Israel would strike Iran (or the U.S. ?) . Not sure what you are getting at.

      Iran must be under U.S. influence 24/7 no matter what? Where are you coming from with this?

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1953_Iranian_coup_d%27%C3%A9tat

      Many U.S. foreign relation problems are self-inflicted.

      http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory/us-delays-release-study-1953-iran-coup-27692212

      The foreign relations records aren't supposed to be suppressed for longer than three decades.

      60+ years and counting...

      Why should anyone trust the "U.S." [1] again? They don't even follow their own "rules."

      If North Korea put a dictator in the U.S. .......we should all just "forgive and forget" I guess?

      What gives the U.S. the right to order Iran (or any other nation) around? I find it hard to believe there is anything besides power and greed at play.

      It looks like 60 years of whitewashing and burying the truth to me, never actually stopped, never ended, the terrorists thathave been running the U.S. since then are still in power, with no signs of any changes on the horizon.....all because of "communism" (and oil of course).

      It turns out "a red herring" is quite accurate, just a scare tactic...

      http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0088930/quotes

      I'm not sure "we are all better off" since in the U.S. we all got communism + Russian "secret police" tactics either way, forever it looks like. The U.S. puts a friendlier face on it, is more subtle and devious perhaps, takes the long road of killing its own citizens indirectly who do not comply.

      How about "no secret police" and "communism only makes the rich richer?" I would like that option. Seems much more in line with U.S. founding principles, and not the hardly-recognizable shadow of itself it has become.

      [1] I make a distinction between "current leaders of the U.S." and "actual U.S. principles (independence being paramount, entangling alliances like "five eyes" being against U.S. true aims, etc.)

      [2] the U.S. itself has embraced communism at this point, but that is another story; economy + education + export to the whole world now; thanks Mr. Reagan! Thanks Mr. Bush! Chickenshit "Republican" "conservative" posers who wouldn't know a free market if they destroyed it.

    9. Re:And OJ offers a reward to find the real killer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh the irony....."we have to overthrow them or the communists will first!" and fast forward 30 years or so, the U.S. is entirely under a communist agenda.

      What exactly did the U.S. gain? 10-20 more years of stable oil prices? For what, so we can become the new Soviet Union and use all their same tactics, run our nation and economy and education the exact same way, on our own people?

      I would really like to know. I have no love for Iran, or North Korea, or Israel.

      I just would like a U.S. that actually adheres to U.S. principles inside its own borders. After that, MAYBE we can
      tell the rest of the world how to behave.

      "for what does it profit a man if he gains the whole world, but loses himself?" -- the current state of the U.S.

      "gain" is not quite true, but I find it quite accurate. The U.S. is no longer the U.S. has not been for a long time.

      Would not even bother calling it the "U.S." at this point, that is just mindless propaganda.

    10. Re:And OJ offers a reward to find the real killer by ayesnymous · · Score: 1

      You have a point, but it was either Stuxnet or a nuclear strike by Israel. Given those two options, I think we're all better off with Stuxnet.

      Iran is close enough to Israel that they couldn't be sure the radiation from a nuclear strike wouldn't spread back to Israel.

    11. Re:And OJ offers a reward to find the real killer by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      If the U.S. did not cripple Iran, Israel would strike Iran (or the U.S. ?) . Not sure what you are getting at.

      Obviously the alternative is that Israel strikes at Iran. They've bombed nuclear facilities before, and it's US-Israeli policy that Israel remain the only ones in the region with nuclear and thermonuclear devices.

      The facility that housed the stuxnet target was hardened to resist conventional bombing, so a combination of conventional bombs to create a "hole" in the overburden followed by a nuke dropped in the hole was the only other option to stuxnet.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    12. Re:And OJ offers a reward to find the real killer by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      You have a point, but it was either Stuxnet or a nuclear strike by Israel. Given those two options, I think we're all better off with Stuxnet.

      Iran is close enough to Israel that they couldn't be sure the radiation from a nuclear strike wouldn't spread back to Israel.

      The target was Natanz, which was a hardened undergound facility. The bombing would have been by conventional weapons first, to remove enough of the earth covering the concrete bunker so that a nuke could be dropped in the resulting hole. Yes, there would have been fall-out, but it would still have been better, in Israel's view, than having a regime hostile to them having nuclear weapons. Also of note - Israel's nukes are "surprisingly clean."

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    13. Re:And OJ offers a reward to find the real killer by SwabianEngineer · · Score: 1

      Let me tell you a secret: There is JUSTICE in this world. It has come back to America in order to BITE you. Cheers !

  8. Sounds like Iraq being accused of having WMDs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Deja Vu. What if the FBI was "mistaken"? I guess we'll have to start another war based on false info. The real culprit is lack of security at Sony.

    1. Re:Sounds like Iraq being accused of having WMDs by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Most security violations don't result in personal threats being made on the safety of employees that work for the company. Unless you are suggesting that was just something Sony made up to generate sympathy, this attack on Sony was not just an illustration of poor Sony security practice.

    2. Re:Sounds like Iraq being accused of having WMDs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most security violations don't result in personal threats being made on the safety of employees that work for the company.

      This is Sony. Standard Operating Procedures at Sony result in personal threats being made on the safety of employees that work for the company. How do you differentiate these from the security violations?

  9. I doubt it was North Korea by Todd+Knarr · · Score: 4, Insightful

    For one thing, if North Korea was capable of this sort of hack they've got more tempting targets to use that capability on. And it's just a bit too convenient, coming on the heels of a disappointing performance by Sony, for SPE to suddenly get an excuse to get out from under another apparent flop. My bet is the hack's just another in a long string of breaches by the usual gangs of malcontents, aided and abetted by corporate obliviousness to security, and various parties are just taking advantage of superficial connections for their own reasons.

    1. Re:I doubt it was North Korea by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      For one thing, if North Korea was capable of this sort of hack they've got more tempting targets to use that capability on.

      As soon as I heard about it, I thought the same thing - basically, they've tipped their hand for a worthless pot.

      Trial run? Umm, with secret weapons that's generally not a good idea. See also: Britain, tanks, Cambrai.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    2. Re:I doubt it was North Korea by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      if North Korea was capable of this sort of hack they've got more tempting targets to use that capability on.

      Such as? A commercial company is probably a far easier target than a military institution. And maybe some of the military breaches we've heard about were from them. Many breaches are not even made public.

    3. Re:I doubt it was North Korea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      an excuse to get out from under another apparent flop.

      What makes you say that? The last movie in the north korea comedy genre made $50M on a $30M budget (not franchise numbers but still a 60% profit). Most of the movies Rogan and Franco are in have made over $100M. Its true, I looked it up specifically for this post. You might not like them but they've had a lot more hits than misses.

    4. Re:I doubt it was North Korea by radarskiy · · Score: 2

      "more tempting targets"

      You need to consider not just how tempting the target is but what the potential repercussions are. Sony does not have a military force, they're going to be distracted by the blow back from the leaked material, and there are limited civil venues where they could pursue action. Even if there is overwhelming evidence that NK did do this I predict there no meaningful consequences.

    5. Re:I doubt it was North Korea by Rick+in+China · · Score: 1

      My biggest beef with the assumptions here is that some earlier reports mentioned that the breach has been in effect for a long time. Sony hasn't disclosed exactly how long - but if they have been breached and information has been siphoned out of their company for a long time, then I highly doubt it has any correlation to 'The Interview' whatsoever, which kind of kills the whole "it was North Korea!" finger pointing based on the fact this movie was coming out at about the same time the group responsible for the hacks begins leaking information.

  10. Country that forbids use to internet by postmortem · · Score: 3, Insightful

    is cyber superpower?
    I am not buying it. They could have smart people that would make talented hackers. But good luck finding them because they most likely don't even own a computer.

    1. Re:Country that forbids use to internet by Jeremi · · Score: 1

      is cyber superpower? I am not buying it. They could have smart people that would make talented hackers.

      How hard is it to hire a team of hackers to do the hacking for you? I imagine even North Korea is capable of throwing some money around.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    2. Re:Country that forbids use to internet by oodaloop · · Score: 2

      They forbid internet usage to the masses, but have a top notch cyber military unit in China. This has been known for ages, and there's multiple articles on /. about NK's cyber capabilities. Try to keep up.

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    3. Re:Country that forbids use to internet by postmortem · · Score: 2

      You missed my point. They may appear that they have a decent cyber unit. But we know from their missile tests that were utter failure that is probably more than a wish than a reality.

      In US, NSA hires talented hackers/programmers, as their skills are already established. For that to work, they need all population to have access to the internet.. So how does NK does same when they forbid the internet to the masses? Even if they had prospective talent, they would not be able to recognize them.

    4. Re:Country that forbids use to internet by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      NK GDP: (2011) 12.4Bn USD. That's *less* than the annual CAFCASS budget. That's right, a non-departmental Government agency in England has a larger budget than the total output of an entire fucking country.

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    5. Re:Country that forbids use to internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, he didn't. Your point is wrong. It is well established that they do have a cyber warfare unit. Your common sense is stupid.

    6. Re:Country that forbids use to internet by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      They could have smart people that would make talented hackers. But good luck finding them because they most likely don't even own a computer.

      So you don't think that the North Korean state is able to identify people with strong STEM skill and potential, provide them with access to computers, and train them in hacking over a period of years?

      That leaves me with just one question ..... where can I find the smart people here?

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    7. Re:Country that forbids use to internet by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      They are known to have a 'hackers university', state sponsored thats considered one of the best places to work. Not only are you taken care of and live in a life of luxury, so is your family, and its a pretty good life by all accounts, especially for a NK citizen.

      'Hacking' isn't difficult when you're paid to sit around and do it all day long. Any serious network admin knows just how painfully easy it is to get into pretty much any network outside of a place like Google which has the knowledge and understands the dangers of bad IT.

      Someplace like Sony? Please, Nessus probably explodes when doing a basic scan of their systems, let alone any actual effort into cracking them wide open.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    8. Re:Country that forbids use to internet by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 1

      Of course they have top notch cyber techs. The Dear Leader needs access to the latest in 4K pron video.

      --
      Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
    9. Re:Country that forbids use to internet by ATMAvatar · · Score: 1

      In comparison, Sony's gross revenue was 77.46Bn USD last year.

      --
      "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
    10. Re:Country that forbids use to internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In US, NSA hires talented hackers/programmers, as their skills are already established. For that to work, they need all population to have access to the internet.. So how does NK does same when they forbid the internet to the masses? Even if they had prospective talent, they would not be able to recognize them.

      They don't need the masses to have access to the internet. Most people aren't that interested. Those that are interested are more likely to look for jobs with computers. Even North Korea still has computers. Some people have access to them. Some of those people will be hired by the defense department. They try those who are interested on hacking foreign computers. Those who are good at it get added to the cyber warfare unit. That's how they recognize them.

      It ain't rocket science. Computers are much easier and require much less schooling than rocket science does. Now, they may not be the most efficient programmers, but they do not need to be. They need to be good at fooling security, particularly the kind of wimpy security favored by many large corporations -- including Sony.

    11. Re:Country that forbids use to internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but Sony has been hacked before. Like 3 times, at least. It's apparently not that difficult to do.

    12. Re:Country that forbids use to internet by Jeremi · · Score: 1

      NK GDP: (2011) 12.4Bn USD. That's *less* than the annual CAFCASS budget. That's right, a non-departmental Government agency in England has a larger budget than the total output of an entire fucking country.

      Okay... next question is: how much would it cost to hire the necessary people to do what was done to Sony? I'm guessing that would be in the range of hundreds of thousands of dollars, possibly up to a million?

      Given the amount of money North Korea spends on nuclear weapons development, I don't see any reason why they wouldn't or couldn't spend a relatively small amount on this.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
  11. "serious consequences"??? by mark-t · · Score: 2

    Weren't those the exact same words that were used against Sony?

  12. no good guys here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Choosing between Sony and North Korea is like choosing whether Alien or Predator is the good guy in Alien vs Predator.

    1. Re:no good guys here by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      uh, well that's easy, the aliens are the good guys, the predators are trophy hunters.

      Think about it for a minute: the Queen is chained up, the facility is built for one single purpose: to breed xenomorphs to be used in coming-of-age rituals, and the weapons that are stored there next to the trophy walls are designed for a specific quarry: big ugly bugs with acid blood.

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    2. Re:no good guys here by clay_buster · · Score: 1
      uh, well that's easy, the aliens are the bad guys and the predators are just that.

      The aliens have the ability to wipe out entire spieces and co-opt their DNA. The predators assume they can control that type of danger to support their coming of age rituals. The Predators are stupid.

    3. Re:no good guys here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I knew it, not even 100 comments before we get an Alien-apologist hippie spewing their garbage!http://it.slashdot.org/story/14/12/20/1830227/north-korea-denies-responsibility-for-sony-attack-warns-against-retaliation#

    4. Re:no good guys here by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      The alien is about as malicious as an angry mother bear. Sure, she'll fuck your shit up - but all she's trying to do is raise her cubs.

      Humans and Predators are the real enemy.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  13. Inkblot response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please just relax, relax. Now is there anything else you see in there?

  14. official statement by Trepidity · · Score: 4, Informative

    The North Korean news agency mentioned (KCNA) has the statement on their website. It seems to be a weird webapp that doesn't allow direct linking, but you can find it if you click on "English" at the top, then scroll down a bit to "DPRK Foreign Ministry Rejects U.S. Accusation against Pyongyang over Cyber Attack". Or just look here:

    Pyongyang, December 20 (KCNA) -- A spokesman for the Foreign Ministry of the DPRK gave the following answer to a question put by KCNA Saturday as regards the U.S. accusation against the DPRK over a cyber attack on a movie company in the U.S.:

    Obama, Kerry and other high-ranking authorities of the U.S. cried out for sort of counter-measure Friday, claiming that the results of the investigation into the cyber-attack on the Sony Pictures Entertainment proved that the DPRK was behind it. They, without presenting any specific evidence, are asserting they can not open it to public as it is "sensitive information."

    Clear evidence is needed to charge a sovereign state with a crime. Reference to the past cyber-attacks quite irrelevant with the DPRK and a string of presumptive assertions such as "similarity" and "repetition" can convince no one.

    The U.S. act of daring charge the DPRK with a crime based on absurd "investigation results" reveals its inveterate bitterness toward the DPRK. This is proven, as in the recent cyber-attack, by the recent urge made by a man called a "human rights special envoy" of the U.S. State Department to movie-makers that they should harass the north Korean government and keep alive scenes hurting the dignity of the its supreme leadership. The U.S. ruling quarters are working hard to divert the criticism of its administration to the DPRK as the plan of putting on show the anti-DPRK film on Christmas Day canceled due to the controversial cyber-attack, causing an uproar in the U.S.

    We will never pardon those undesirable elements keen on hurting the dignity of the supreme leadership of the DPRK. In case we retaliate against them, we will target with legitimacy those responsible for the anti-DPRK acts and their bases, not engaging in terrorist attack aimed at the innocent audience in cinemas. The army of the DPRK has the will and ability to do so.

    The U.S. State Secretary is going to justify the production of the movie hurting the dignity of the supreme leadership of a sovereign state while trumpeting about the freedom of expression. He should know that there is punishment of libel in enforcement of international law.

    We propose the U.S. side conducting a joint investigation into the case, given that Washington is slandering Pyongyang by spreading unfounded rumor. We have a way to prove that we have nothing to do with the case without resorting to torture as what the CIA does.

    The U.S. should bear in mind that it will face serious consequences in case it rejects our proposal for joint investigation and presses for what it called countermeasure while finding fault with the DPRK.

    1. Re:official statement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The North Korean news agency mentioned (KCNA) has the statement on their website. It seems to be a weird webapp that doesn't allow direct linking, but you can find it if you click on "English" at the top, then scroll down a bit to "DPRK Foreign Ministry Rejects U.S. Accusation against Pyongyang over Cyber Attack". Or just look here:

      Pyongyang, December 20 (KCNA) -- A spokesman for the Foreign Ministry of the DPRK gave the following answer to a question put by KCNA Saturday as regards the U.S. accusation against the DPRK over a cyber attack on a movie company in the U.S.:

      Obama, Kerry and other high-ranking authorities of the U.S. cried out for sort of counter-measure Friday, claiming that the results of the investigation into the cyber-attack on the Sony Pictures Entertainment proved that the DPRK was behind it. They, without presenting any specific evidence, are asserting they can not open it to public as it is "sensitive information."

      Clear evidence is needed to charge a sovereign state with a crime. Reference to the past cyber-attacks quite irrelevant with the DPRK and a string of presumptive assertions such as "similarity" and "repetition" can convince no one.

      The U.S. act of daring charge the DPRK with a crime based on absurd "investigation results" reveals its inveterate bitterness toward the DPRK. This is proven, as in the recent cyber-attack, by the recent urge made by a man called a "human rights special envoy" of the U.S. State Department to movie-makers that they should harass the north Korean government and keep alive scenes hurting the dignity of the its supreme leadership. The U.S. ruling quarters are working hard to divert the criticism of its administration to the DPRK as the plan of putting on show the anti-DPRK film on Christmas Day canceled due to the controversial cyber-attack, causing an uproar in the U.S.

      We will never pardon those undesirable elements keen on hurting the dignity of the supreme leadership of the DPRK. In case we retaliate against them, we will target with legitimacy those responsible for the anti-DPRK acts and their bases, not engaging in terrorist attack aimed at the innocent audience in cinemas. The army of the DPRK has the will and ability to do so.

      The U.S. State Secretary is going to justify the production of the movie hurting the dignity of the supreme leadership of a sovereign state while trumpeting about the freedom of expression. He should know that there is punishment of libel in enforcement of international law.

      We propose the U.S. side conducting a joint investigation into the case, given that Washington is slandering Pyongyang by spreading unfounded rumor. We have a way to prove that we have nothing to do with the case without resorting to torture as what the CIA does.

      The U.S. should bear in mind that it will face serious consequences in case it rejects our proposal for joint investigation and presses for what it called countermeasure while finding fault with the DPRK.

      notice they never deny doing it

    2. Re:official statement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We propose the U.S. side conducting a joint investigation into the case, given that Washington is slandering Pyongyang by spreading unfounded rumor. We have a way to prove that we have nothing to do with the case without resorting to torture as what the CIA does.

      ouch ! The irony. The US have gone so far away from their own democratic standards that they're being made fun of by NK.

  15. I didn't think NK was behind this. by hey! · · Score: 1

    But now that they denied involvement, I suspect they may be.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    1. Re:I didn't think NK was behind this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This does _beg_ the question: why would they care about Sony Entertainment?

      There must be more interesting targets to waist time on...

    2. Re:I didn't think NK was behind this. by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      Probably because Sony E is one of the largest Hollywood producers with worldwide reach still in existence?

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    3. Re:I didn't think NK was behind this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But you keep telling us this is SONY incorporated in AMERICA and is AMERICAN, Well as corporations are people can my American relatives expect the same level of action next time they get burgled to?

  16. We bein played. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only way the Norks will "cooperate" with an investigation that would implicate them is as a means to scope out more US network targets and hit us up for badly needed cash. They are a police state at home and a bandit state abroad.

    1. Re:We bein played. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of the world recons the same about America.

  17. I have a dream... by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

    I dream of a world in which Sony, on the sly, seeds a few torrents of the movie. Holy plausible deniability!

    It'll never happen, of course...

    --
    Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    1. Re:I have a dream... by reikae · · Score: 1

      IANAL, but if the copyright holder (assuming that would be Sony here) distributes something, why would it give anyone else legal rights to do so as well? Unless you meant something different (or maybe YAAL)?

  18. Maybe more Linux & less Windows? by SpzToid · · Score: 1

    Seriously. The FBI said that, '90% of US companies would have been hit by this attack'. SONY got hit by a Zero-Day Windows bug, right? Don't about 90% of US companies rely on things like Windows Server, SMB shares, Active Directory, etc.? Besides the security that Linux offers, reduced vectors and all that, rogue nation-states would have to re-focus on new attack vectors, which will consume a few of their resources and take some time. Seriously Fortune 500's, etc., take security seriously, like proper risk management, okay? Why should the POTUS be required to take retaliatory action because of your own bad decisions, based mainly on costs and ignorance?

    --
    You can't be ahead of the curve, if you're stuck in a loop.
    1. Re:Maybe more Linux & less Windows? by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      Because if truth be told, and politicians were made to wear their sponsors logos on their sleeves, there'd be no room left for their bought service medals.

      You read it here, even though it's old news: the Government - any Government - is of the people and by the people, all right, but for the people? Only if you can afford them.

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    2. Re:Maybe more Linux & less Windows? by SpzToid · · Score: 1

      America has the best government money can buy.

      --
      You can't be ahead of the curve, if you're stuck in a loop.
    3. Re:Maybe more Linux & less Windows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Finding 0 day is much harder than finding a random indian guy working on what ever company you want to get into.

  19. Sony - Free advertising? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was suggested perhaps North Korea was not behind that Sony leak, perhaps it was Sony themselves. The reasoning being that the movie itself is such a dog, and the cost of the data leak is less then the cost of advertising sufficent to generate positive return.

    Did anybody else hear this?

  20. Translation: by jd2112 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We didn't hack you. but if you retaliate we will hack you again!

    --
    Any insufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology.
  21. DPRK by DaMattster · · Score: 1

    If there is even a nugget of truth to North Korea being behind the cyber attacks, then why should we be frightened of them? Why should we let some little pygmy dictator tell us how we can lead our lives? Obviously, North Korea won because Sony capitulated.

  22. this fucking site is broken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    cant even log in anymore, I get to my preferenses, and when I try to post, I am not even logged in...

    wtf has happened here?

  23. U.S. stands by its assertion by jones_supa · · Score: 3, Informative

    Here's an update: North Korea denies hacking Sony, U.S. stands by its assertion

    The FBI said technical analysis of malicious software used in the Sony attack found links to malware that "North Korean actors" had developed and found a "significant overlap" with "other malicious cyber activity" previously tied to Pyongyang. But it otherwise gave scant details on how it concluded that North Korea was behind the attack.

    1. Re:U.S. stands by its assertion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So assertions based on assumptions, look at it this way if a method of hacking works then a hacker isn't going to suddenly ignore that tactic because it was once used by the Koreans.

  24. North Korea Internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why do they have internet connectivity to the outside world to begin with?

  25. Think of the children! by ihtoit · · Score: 1, Insightful

    If you're not with us, you're against us!
    If you don't agree with me, you're a terrorist!
    If you ignore this message then you're a supporter of child abuse! Copy this message to every forum you've ever heard of! ...And every other guilt-slap trope in existence.

    Tell ya what, stick them up your arse and come back to me with credible evidence instead of the aforementioned bullshit.

    --
    Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
  26. Oh rearery? by Karmashock · · Score: 1

    NK either did it themselves or paid someone to do it.

    That said, reprisals are a terrible idea. Totally not worth it. Nothing to be gained by attacking them in any way. All it does is agitate the Chinese.

    And while some of you will doubtless respond "Yeee haw! Lets go get those China men!"... that is not a fight you are prepared for and really no one is behind you on that one. So... stop it.

    This is the response to the issue. Tell Sony everything they did wrong with their internal security and tell them that if they put everything up on the internet that is their own damn fault.

    Seriously, how many naked pictures of celebrities does it take for hollywood to figure out that you don't put that shit on the internet?

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    1. Re:Oh rearery? by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 1

      >That said, reprisals are a terrible idea.

      Who needs reprisals? They're stuck in North Korea. What could be worse? The Dear Leader is a bat-shit crazy reincarnation of Stalin. Half the country is starving to death. Even if your are relatively well off, you could be taken out and shot any minute, and every known relative of yours hauled off to a camp for generations.

      --
      Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
  27. Trying to talk it's way out of a bear trap. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It would seem that they have only now realised that their little reactive hacking games were not in their best interests and that they were fools for being goaded into an act of cyber-warfare which while it seems in huge will have little significant long term economic impact, but that will now permit retaliatory action against them that will inflict significant harm upon their Stalinist regime.

    The only reason they want to participate in an investigation is so that they can have privileged access to any evidence gathered and thereby be in a better position to stall the investigation by methods including the murder of external agents hired to participate in the hacking operation.

     

  28. We should send an independent UN inspector by Stormy+Dragon · · Score: 1

    Like Hans Blix!

    1. Re:We should send an independent UN inspector by ihtoit · · Score: 2

      o.0 didn't NK threaten terrible consequences after the last time he was unleashed?

      And that's Hans Brix, you plick. :)

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
  29. Hackers for hire? by ericlondaits · · Score: 1

    Why is everybody assuming that if NK was responsible they did it with north korean hackers? Couldn't have they hired russian hackers, for instance? The NK government just has to provide a money filled suitcase delivered through a third party and they have perfect deniability.

    --
    As a Slashdot discussion grows longer, the probability of an analogy involving cars approaches one.
    1. Re:Hackers for hire? by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      not with a per-capita GDP of less than two thousand Dollars, they're not.

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    2. Re:Hackers for hire? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not with a per-capita GDP of less than two thousand Dollars, they're not.

      $2,000 * [the population of North Korea] = enough money to fill a suitcase

    3. Re:Hackers for hire? by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 1

      Or even better, just pay off the sysadmin. There's a whole ton of socially inept admins out there who run corporate networks. It wouldn't require too much effort to wine and dine them with promises of big cash and prostitutes in exchange for data. To make sure, you give them the choice of riches and regular sex, or we kill your family. This is espionage 101, no Russians required.

    4. Re:Hackers for hire? by nogginthenog · · Score: 1

      Have you seen the USD - Russian Ruble exchange rate recently!

    5. Re:Hackers for hire? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not with a per-capita GDP of less than two thousand Dollars, they're not.

      You clearly missed articles in the past where they continually print counterfeit US$?

  30. The whole thing could be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a hoax to get more publicity for the movie.

  31. Stuxnet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How many who believe NK also believe the US was behind Stuxnet, though on less evidence?

  32. No way is this a Sony PR stunt by SethJohnson · · Score: 2

    I fully agree and would also point out that this hack has resulted in HD bootlegs of unreleased sony movies being posted to bittorrent. Oh, and Brad Pitt's "Fury."

    The top leadership at Sony Pictures is about to be booted out of their jobs and are so tainted that no other studio will hire them. I don't think this was their idea of a way to promote a film.

  33. What's Up Tiger Lily? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone should give The Interview the What's Up Tiger Lily? treatment.

  34. September 11th for one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    May be just one, but it's a biggee, so I figure it's enough to show you really don't care to know when you're uninformed.

    1. Re:September 11th for one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The WMD claims were only one of about a dozen reasons the US put forward to justify going back to Iraq. All the non-WMD claims were for violations of the cease fire agreement after the 1991 war. Add in the fact that Saddam Hussein continued to run the UN inspectors around in circles for 10 years while encouraging the belief that he did possess some type of WMD's in order to stave off hostilities with his immediate neighbors. HIs top military leaders even thought they had the weapons until the 2003 invasion was launched. The 2003 invasion was the result of the feckless countries, large and small, powerful and weak,
      not standing up as a united front when faced with a country spitting in their collective faces. Instead a lot of them profited from the UN oil for food scandals and put political gamesmanship ahead of standing up and doing the right thing. There would not have been a 2003 invasion had the world truly presented a united front. Every country that continued to argue against the use of force only gave Saddam Hussein a potential out that he could grab on to and continue business as usual. It was a mistake for the US and Britain to commit forces to Iraq. That situation has set a precedent where the US will never commit to any other conflict in any meaningful way no matter how many atrocities are committed. And every brutal despot in the world knows this and the world is just starting to see first hand what happens when the US steps back and refuses to become engaged in other peoples problems. So while the ME is in total melt down, which is going to get even worse now as the rich ME countries watch their strangle hold on oil supplies and price manipulations disappear. As Russia reaches out to reclaim it's former colonies in an effort to retain any relevance in world affairs don't count on any US military commitments outside of what assets are already in place in Europe.

    2. Re:September 11th for one. by SwabianEngineer · · Score: 1

      You post this from TelAviv, right ?

  35. It's an inside job ... by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

    ... that's the best guess at this point.

    If the FBI actually had proof, they'd share that evidence with infosec so the rest of us could look at the method and double-check our practices.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  36. Where's the ransom demands? by debrain · · Score: 1

    Does nobody remember the first few news stories that mentioned a ransom demand? I swear I read that - then the story changed to Korea + Guardians of Peace out of nowhere.

    Korea's dialog and posturing almost entirely internalized. Their glorious leader is a big fan of Hollywood, has never before acted on a threat against the USA, and has put up with other movies without so much as a whimper. The threats and posturing with NK come before the action, not that we have ever seen much real action from them. Not that action accomplishes anything of any note.

    And where are all the internal Sony communications about wrongful dismissal, sexual harassment and assault cover-ups, deaths on the job, and so on? These things happen in a company of Sony's size, Sony's exposure under these circumstances could be massive - who knows what skeletons are in their closet.

    There's something fishy about this whole thing.

  37. Sony Hack != NK, but Stuxnet = US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know why so much of Slashdot seems to be taking the obvious "it was NK omg" story at face value, even after NK explicitly denied it.

    By that logic, China has never hacked anything, and Stuxnet had nothing to do with US-government hackers. After all, both these nations routinely deny any culpability in hack attacks, right?

  38. Nothing is as it seems. by MadMaverick9 · · Score: 1

    Anybody remember this:

    The Pirate Bay 'Moves' to North Korea (Updated)
    The Pirate Bay admits to North Korean hosting hoax

    So before you make any accusations, you better be very very sure. Otherwise you risk another Iraq/Afghanistan/etc. disaster.

  39. The bogus NK claim protects Sony (and NSA) by Eternal+Vigilance · · Score: 1

    The Sony hack is just a simple case of incompetent corporate management and the lengths to which big-money donors and their political friends will go to protect themselves and advance their own ends.

    By claiming this is all North Korea (the best Korea!)'s doing, what was initially lose-lose (Sony burns their multi-billion-dollar business to the ground, and the NSA gets exposed for not having any ability to stop it or even give warning) is now suddenly win-win (Sony gets to portray itself as a helpless victim and thus no liability, and NSA gets to argue for even more spying).

    Sure makes it easier to avoid bad press and expensive lawsuits when the President himself comes out and tells the world "It wasn't Sony's fault."

    (I bet that will be worth a lot come campaign contribution time. Sort of the Hollywood version of how Obama sold all Americans to the health businesses, in exchange for their support and donations to D's.)

    And the Rahm Emanuel playbook - "Never let a good crisis go to waste" - is still clearly in use in D.C. Instead of people demanding to know "why didn't the outrageously expensive and unconstitutional NSA surveillance of every American (and the whole world) protect anyone against this?" the political spin can now be "see, this is why we need restrictions on everyone's use of the Internet."

    (As an amusing political side note, even though the Republicans are well aware North Korea had nothing to do with this, and are seething at how the Democrats will be able to use Obama's move for huge amounts of Hollywood support in 2016, the R's can't say a damn thing - because if they do they end up looking like they're defending North Korea!)

    But it is impressive the level of influence some people have. "Tell Obama we need him to hold a press conference and say our negligence and malfeasance that destroyed our company wasn't our fault."

    They may even start using this to try to rescue that disaster of a movie. "You have to see 'The Interview'! To support free speech and America!"

    Who knows, maybe someone will even dig up from the Archives that patriotic old WWII song "Good Old Sony."

  40. Re:U.S. stands by - technical analys??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Technical analysis??? What does that mean?
    Are they unmasking Tor users now?
    They would have to explain to N.Korea how they unmask Tor users if they wanted to prove that N.Korea was behind the Sony attack.
    I don't think they're going to do that.

  41. "Were It So Easy." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kim-Un is still smarting from the Onion prank.

    Ha ha

  42. U.S. stands by its assertion that Iraq has nuke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was USA which asserted that Iraq, under Saddam Hussein, has "Weapon of Mass Destruction" (WMD)

    And under the pretense of that assertion USA invaded Iraq and killed Saddam Hussein

    Until now there is no WMD found in Iraq

    So one question: When was the last time USA admitted that it has told blazen lies?

  43. Sort of but not by dbIII · · Score: 1

    Sort of but not.
    I'd say it's civilian American criminals trying to shift the blame to N.K. instead of government employed ones.

    Then there's the beatup because pretending that it's OMG! CyBeRwAr turned up to 11 means more funding and empire building for a few people in the FBI and similar who seem to be making noise without adult supervision.

    So more the case of "patriotically" waving the flag falsely and rattling sabres than actual false flag.
    The downside is such warmongering pricks don't seem to realise that their stupid fake war games may inspire the very thin skinned North Korea to fire shells at parts of South Korea and kill a few people. They have done that every now and again.

  44. Evidence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The American agencies have evidence that DPRK was behind the attack? Really? Didn;t they once claim that they knew where the weapons of mass destruction of Saddam were? Sorry, but we don't buy that anymore. Show us the evidence or shut up.

  45. NK instability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NK has a history of bragging about things, this is true. However, their military leaders aren't stupid -- this is all a PR game. Any military isn't going to "brag" about various tools they have in their arsenal. Sure, our intelligence already knows most of this, but it's not clever PR.

    NK did it, Kim Jong-un is angry because he got caught (again) and is responding like a frustrated teenager that can't get laid. "Do this or we'll destroy you!" Come on. It's as if on some level they really want a full-out military conflict. I'm afraid this will become a reality at some point. NK has managed to threaten and piss off most of the world, so it would hopefully be a brief war and NK would be leveled to dust. I just feel badly for the innocent people in NK who are suffering and brainwashed.

    Sony should release the movie. The bottom line is that whatever these hackers have or will do, they will act on regardless -- it's just a matter of time.

    1. Re:NK instability by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      If North Korea actually did it, it was a brilliant move. They've gotten the US, including the government, via the president, to whip itself into an impotent frenzy. Impotent? There's a fair chance that North Korea has nukes, they certainly have the ability to deliver them to several large cities in the region, and they have a large and powerful neighbour who won't take kindly to hostile military action on their borders because of some stupid movie. Nobody is going to be invading North Korea. So Kim gets to laugh as the US is forced to back down.

      I don't think NK managed to engineer so much. Some independents hacked Sony and the US government saw it as a great opportunity to get a few Internet surveillance laws passed.

  46. Another Communist Ruse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The North Korean government (PDRK) has been trying to get official recognition as a "Government" since the 1953 truce talks. The "Official" entity on our side is the United Nations and the North Koreans, Communist Chinese, Soviet Russians were on the other side with the latter two denying official involvement. So far, our Presidents haven't swallowed the bait (Ike, JFK, LBJ, RMN, Gerald Ford, even Carter(!), Reagan, Both Bushes, and Bill Clinton) but I'm not betting on the current White House Resident. There is a precedent: FDR was the first US President to officially recognize the homicidal regime of the USSR under Stalin. Stay tuned, bat fans.

  47. SONY hacked? NOT Quite! You’re welcome! by MakersDirector · · Score: 0

    You’ve heard of the Sony Hack, right?

    Ok, ok, I’m laughin me arse off over here.

    I do SO enjoy a good practical joke sometimes!

    About two weeks ago, I logged into equipment in Japan where all internet based communication goes through.

    All traffic in Asia to the United States goes through Japan.

    I had still had administrative access to the equipment I had worked with when I was sent to Hong Kong and Singapore to optimize networks and software systems for both the NSA and for Prudential Real Estate and Relocation which Warren Buffet was in the process of purchasing.

    In a relatively simple computer program I placed on the equipment which is used to communicate between Sony and the United States, I created something called a ‘spoofed’ log entry.

    A spoofed log entry is a ‘fictionalized’ entry which has not really happened.

    Anytime information was grabbed from Sony by legitimate users, I would randomly place a spoofed log entry which would make it appear like information was being sent to North Korea.

    In a nutshell what this means is data was never stolen.

    It took Sony’s administrators 3 days to figure out what happened.

    By then, they were so mired in their lies they could not change course.

    In any case.

    NOTHING I DID was illegal.

    I had legitimate administrative access to the equipment which have had little, if any maintenance since I last did work on them in 2009.

    And since the administrators of this equipment have had little, if any, awareness of what’s going on with their equipment let alone how their systems work.

    THAT, my friends, is what a homeless hacker does when he’s bored and penniless.

    http://universalbri.wordpress....

  48. Thing is by ruir · · Score: 1

    We do not give a flying fuck about Sony being hacked.