There are several "cluelessness markers in this article, this is just one of them. This indicated that the whole article may be complete nonsense or at least give a very skewed picture ow what was actually found here.
If they had only trained it on fruit, it would have seen fruit in all the inkblots. Also, there is noting "dark" in the output of a classifier. It does not have any concept of such things (or of anything, really).
Your definition is wrong and fundamentally so. Laws are not an embodiment of morality, they are a means to ensure the power and influence of some groups. In some cases these groups comprise most of society, but that is rare. Sure, there are elaborate propaganda constructs that perpetuate the fantasy that the law serves the people, and many, many people fall for that. But it is in general not true and sometimes exactly the opposite.
For an immediate proof of that, just look at what people get elected to office in democracies. (Yes, the "leaders" in non-democracies are even worse, but that is besides the point.) As a consequence, most people do not even understand simple things, like practical privacy and that is why their actions and their desires diverge. That does not make their desires any less valid.
The only thing that means is that Valve is not writing new and really bad code all the time, they actually and sanely keep what works and improve it. Yes, sometimes that takes long, but nobody with an actual clue is surprised by that.
This is Windows, remember? Case aware, but not case sensitive, i.e. the worst choice possible that still works mostly, you know, as MS is reliably making. Does not explain the "curt" though.
Admittedly, this is the first I hear about "curl" either. Sounds a bit like "wget".
Yeah, funny that. Sure, the growth rates seem low, like 2% or 5% or so, but exponential is exponential and reliably kills a biological population in the end.
"I am so great you cannot even comprehend it" fallacy. (Can't be bothered to look up the correct name, but only losers use it.) Your immature posturing does nothing to strengthen your position. It weakens it further. Also, you seem to be stupid, because "every single measure possible" does very obviously include measures that are taken against different situations than your special case.
Harsh as it sounds, getting population growth under control and eventually down to zero is a critical step for survival of a nation today. Looks like Pakistan will be one of those that do not make it. Even if they can fix the water issue this time, if they continue to grow like crazy, the problem will just return far worse in the near future until it cannot be fixed anymore.
Harsh as it sounds, that is exactly the core problem: If you bred like crazy in a resource-starved situation, you will eventually run into mass die-off that normalizes your population numbers to something far lower. Of course, this also comes with a civilization collapse when it happens to a human population. In theory, a human population can avoid this catastrophe by restricting its own breeding to what is sustainable, but apparently this one here cannot.
Or in other words, they are going towards a horrible catastrophe, all of their own making.
It may get you a job as president, but selling software and services to people that _know_ your stuff is overpriced and inferior is a bit of a different situation.
Slashdot Mirror
There are several "cluelessness markers in this article, this is just one of them. This indicated that the whole article may be complete nonsense or at least give a very skewed picture ow what was actually found here.
I have done so log ago. This is artificial scarcity, nothing else.
I have done so a while ago, the acquisition by Microsoft is just one stage in the decline, and not the first one.
If they had only trained it on fruit, it would have seen fruit in all the inkblots. Also, there is noting "dark" in the output of a classifier. It does not have any concept of such things (or of anything, really).
Not always. At the moment, this is turning round. Unfortunately, this is happening globally.
Your definition is wrong and fundamentally so. Laws are not an embodiment of morality, they are a means to ensure the power and influence of some groups. In some cases these groups comprise most of society, but that is rare. Sure, there are elaborate propaganda constructs that perpetuate the fantasy that the law serves the people, and many, many people fall for that. But it is in general not true and sometimes exactly the opposite.
For an immediate proof of that, just look at what people get elected to office in democracies. (Yes, the "leaders" in non-democracies are even worse, but that is besides the point.) As a consequence, most people do not even understand simple things, like practical privacy and that is why their actions and their desires diverge. That does not make their desires any less valid.
The only thing that means is that Valve is not writing new and really bad code all the time, they actually and sanely keep what works and improve it. Yes, sometimes that takes long, but nobody with an actual clue is surprised by that.
a) I have mostly SSDs and
b) Classical earbuds are not able to pump out that much. Also do not make you a dick by disturbing the neighbors.
HTTP could have been backwards compatible...
Better than "lp0 on fire", now that might wake a few people up. Unfortunately, AFAIK, there is no HTTP error code for that.
Oh, have I forgotten to mention that I was of course talking about the "Standards Track"? Sorry about that. Hehehehehehe....
Hehehehe, the expected demented answer. You have no idea how the RFC process works, obviously. Fits the rest of your incompetence.
I find that hilarious! I am one of the people that _write_ RFCs. But that is not in the (rather limited) range of things you can comprehend.
This is Windows, remember? Case aware, but not case sensitive, i.e. the worst choice possible that still works mostly, you know, as MS is reliably making. Does not explain the "curt" though.
Admittedly, this is the first I hear about "curl" either. Sounds a bit like "wget".
Yeah, funny that. Sure, the growth rates seem low, like 2% or 5% or so, but exponential is exponential and reliably kills a biological population in the end.
Well, dear asshole and idiot, I have used, for example, "ip" for policy based routing wayyyy back.
"I am so great you cannot even comprehend it" fallacy. (Can't be bothered to look up the correct name, but only losers use it.) Your immature posturing does nothing to strengthen your position. It weakens it further. Also, you seem to be stupid, because "every single measure possible" does very obviously include measures that are taken against different situations than your special case.
Harsh as it sounds, getting population growth under control and eventually down to zero is a critical step for survival of a nation today. Looks like Pakistan will be one of those that do not make it. Even if they can fix the water issue this time, if they continue to grow like crazy, the problem will just return far worse in the near future until it cannot be fixed anymore.
The only real chance they have is to stop population growth. But it looks like they are incapable of even thinking that.
In other words, the situation is completely screwed up and getting worse. Well, looks like we will get to watch a historic event live here.
Harsh as it sounds, that is exactly the core problem: If you bred like crazy in a resource-starved situation, you will eventually run into mass die-off that normalizes your population numbers to something far lower. Of course, this also comes with a civilization collapse when it happens to a human population. In theory, a human population can avoid this catastrophe by restricting its own breeding to what is sustainable, but apparently this one here cannot.
Or in other words, they are going towards a horrible catastrophe, all of their own making.
Orders of magnitude different in power-draw...
The new tools are insanely better by every single measure possible.
Either you are _really_ clueless or you are lying directly here. Because that is very obviously not true.
It may get you a job as president, but selling software and services to people that _know_ your stuff is overpriced and inferior is a bit of a different situation.