Worse offerings is an amplifier predicated on the side you find yourself rooting for.
Haha, funny. You just predicted there can be no rational decisions. As an engineer, I find that pretty clueless and insulting to my profession. But I have gotten used to it. The irrational masses do not respect those that actually understand how things work, because they interfere with their misconceptions.
Integrity is an admirable trait in many regards, yet sociopathy is an advantageous trait in high stakes game theory.
Game theory is a limited playing field where you walk out with your winnings and losses. In any closed system (such as a society, for example), people using gaming theory for their decisions have to be carefully monitored and controlled or they eventually kill everybody. Hence integrity is a necessary quality for anybody that can be valuable in something larger than the individual.
Sure, if retarded people can get engineering PhDs from one of the best tech universities of the planet, you may be right. Alternatively, I have a clue of what I am talking about and you are just full of it.
It does not work for almost all cases. (Mathematical "almost all".) And it does not warn you of it. It is basically not mathematics, but clever shifting around of symbols with pitfalls which works purely by accident. Not a good thing.
He could not have. He was dead at the time all information became available. But you seem to be stupid, so you are probably incapable of understanding causality.
It is not. His contributions are verifiable not that good in quality (see the the story, for example) and there was a lot of low-hanging fruit around. For calculus, he did only the simple, standard-space version (and did it badly), while Riemann did a far more general and superior version basically at the same time. Calling Riemann a genius may or may not be justified, but Newton does not make it into that group.
This is properly called "corruption", because it funnels money to worse offerings. Corruption is always strong with those that have or crave power, because they have no integrity.
The messed up notation by Newton is not used and instead the much saner stuff from Riemann is used. Newton was smart, but a hack and a crank. And he tried to suppress Riemann notation. Mathematics would probably have done better without Newton.
Hahaha, no. Just do not blindly trust things a scientist says, verify against common sense, scientific basics and genral consensus in the respective field. Yes, that takes work. Be very careful when they give opinions though (not "expert opinions"). That is a codeword for "I am going to forget that I am a scientist now". Also, the worst liars usually get exposed after a while, even if the damage is often already done when they do: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/p...
People without morals that want grant money or took money to come up with a way to justify a result given by the one paying the study. The scum of the scum of the scientific world. Unfortunately, there people are not rare.
The thing is that if you compare a heavy car with a single occupant and very light plane with multiple people, you may actually end up at numbers where flying seems to be competitive. Of course, in any fair comparison this is utter nonsense, as there are very light cars as well that can get a _lot_ more mileage out of the fuel.
There are a lot of scientists with low or lacking ethics. They believe because they are scientists they can only do good and hence doing anything for grants is quite acceptable. Incidentally, you will also find quite a few that fake results and publish outright lies in this group.
This is a thing authoritarians do not understand. They think they can _demand_ respect, just because it is _obviously_ them that keep society from collapsing. In actual reality, things are the other way round and anything were authoritarians have taken over has eventually collapsed. It is a stage in any power in decline.
On a level that I have to call it a pandemic of mental illness.
Oh, yes. People that do not grow up and never have learned how to get their fear under control. It does not get more dangerous and destructive than that.
Slashdot Mirror
...of our customers' personal information seriously.
Translation: We do not give a fuck about you or your privacy. We will keep these recordings forever and eventually monetize them any way possible.
From what I have seen, the more a company stresses how it values privacy, the less it actually does. The "Big Lie" approach at work.
Worse offerings is an amplifier predicated on the side you find yourself rooting for.
Haha, funny. You just predicted there can be no rational decisions. As an engineer, I find that pretty clueless and insulting to my profession. But I have gotten used to it. The irrational masses do not respect those that actually understand how things work, because they interfere with their misconceptions.
Integrity is an admirable trait in many regards, yet sociopathy is an advantageous trait in high stakes game theory.
Game theory is a limited playing field where you walk out with your winnings and losses. In any closed system (such as a society, for example), people using gaming theory for their decisions have to be carefully monitored and controlled or they eventually kill everybody. Hence integrity is a necessary quality for anybody that can be valuable in something larger than the individual.
Sure, if retarded people can get engineering PhDs from one of the best tech universities of the planet, you may be right. Alternatively, I have a clue of what I am talking about and you are just full of it.
Finally, Newton was neither a hack
As a mathematician, he was most definitely a hack. Or he just did not care, which is about as bad. As a physicist he was probably somewhat better.
It does not work for almost all cases. (Mathematical "almost all".) And it does not warn you of it. It is basically not mathematics, but clever shifting around of symbols with pitfalls which works purely by accident. Not a good thing.
He could not have. He was dead at the time all information became available. But you seem to be stupid, so you are probably incapable of understanding causality.
I mean the Riemann Integral. But you are correct, differentiation came first.
It is not. His contributions are verifiable not that good in quality (see the the story, for example) and there was a lot of low-hanging fruit around. For calculus, he did only the simple, standard-space version (and did it badly), while Riemann did a far more general and superior version basically at the same time. Calling Riemann a genius may or may not be justified, but Newton does not make it into that group.
This is properly called "corruption", because it funnels money to worse offerings. Corruption is always strong with those that have or crave power, because they have no integrity.
Not that much. Privileged and had time. The adoration some people have for him is not founded on facts.
Indeed. The original article sounds like a student-thesis gone wrong.
The messed up notation by Newton is not used and instead the much saner stuff from Riemann is used. Newton was smart, but a hack and a crank. And he tried to suppress Riemann notation. Mathematics would probably have done better without Newton.
Indeed. There are easier victims off-campus.
Hahaha, no. Just do not blindly trust things a scientist says, verify against common sense, scientific basics and genral consensus in the respective field. Yes, that takes work. Be very careful when they give opinions though (not "expert opinions"). That is a codeword for "I am going to forget that I am a scientist now". Also, the worst liars usually get exposed after a while, even if the damage is often already done when they do: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/p...
Just my point. Texting would be a non-issue.
People without morals that want grant money or took money to come up with a way to justify a result given by the one paying the study. The scum of the scum of the scientific world. Unfortunately, there people are not rare.
The thing is that if you compare a heavy car with a single occupant and very light plane with multiple people, you may actually end up at numbers where flying seems to be competitive. Of course, in any fair comparison this is utter nonsense, as there are very light cars as well that can get a _lot_ more mileage out of the fuel.
That is basically because the plane is really light and cannot carry a lot of weight. The hummer is a small truck, on the other hand.
And then you do that comparison for a single person driving 5 miles to go shopping and your argument just looks exceptionally clueless.
It cannot, unless you fiddle with the conditions and make the comparison extremely unfair. Basically, you need to lie directly to make such a claim.
It will not. The average person is barely capable to learn to drive, how on earth would they be able to learn to fly?
There are a lot of scientists with low or lacking ethics. They believe because they are scientists they can only do good and hence doing anything for grants is quite acceptable. Incidentally, you will also find quite a few that fake results and publish outright lies in this group.
Fully agree. The only thing these rules about not being allowed to do anything by yourself, is creating little obedient serfs.
Trust and respect work both ways.
This is a thing authoritarians do not understand. They think they can _demand_ respect, just because it is _obviously_ them that keep society from collapsing. In actual reality, things are the other way round and anything were authoritarians have taken over has eventually collapsed. It is a stage in any power in decline.
On a level that I have to call it a pandemic of mental illness.
Oh, yes. People that do not grow up and never have learned how to get their fear under control. It does not get more dangerous and destructive than that.