For ads that track everyone back to their own accounts.
Get a mic, webcam placed in a persons home as a must have trendy free network service.
Track who exactly was talking about a dog, cat in a conversation at a friends home.
All their friends are now on file as seperate people to track and create ads for.
The pet food brands now have the resulting digital product lists sold to them.
The resulting ads start and the reaction of the users is tracked.
File movements on trusted brand are safe from police. Police cant see files moving due to super powerful smart crypto on trusted brand.
Interesting people start to hide their very interesting communications in the huge flow of files. Good crypto and cover of larger herd of users around the world.
Security services have many interesting people to study on fewer networks globally using one type of crypto.
The more everyone interesting starts using one crypto design the more easy it is for the security services to collect it all globally.
The 1930-80's is full of stories of nations selecting one brand of "trusted" crypto and then having other nations reading along in real time.
The trick is selling the generation of users on one trusted brand so collect it all can work for many years.
Think back to the US gov PRISM and all the trusted US OS and social media brands.
Re "I'm not sure what they are supposed to do about that"
The security services will study the crypto and get an overview of the networks, users for their gov/mil.
That builds the needed gov skill sets to understand any new network, crypto/communications.
Ex and former gov/mil/law enforcement staff will offer their skills a contractors.
The study of such networks will then be offered to anyone who can afford to pay for such networks to be looked into.
Study the network to find the uploader and all the downloaders who use their own ISP and IP thinking file and app "crypto" will protect their networking.
Automate the request for a password. Download many files. Investigate the files decrypted and checksums to sort the files downloaded.
Sort files back to uploader and downloaders ip, isp just as any police force would do.
Lots of people have been interested in environmentalist issues all around the world before the 1970's.
Most of that good standard of living was used to contrast the West from Communism.
Everything was done to make the free West look amazing from the ~ 1945-1980's
Great news for China.
Sell their coal. Sell their coal plants. Sell the spare parts. Have their experts on site. Let other nations see what inviting in China can offer a nation.
Pakistan gets a power network for its military industrial complex.
A pantograph https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... so whats the max that can be pushed back up into the vehicle?
What can a really good battery take given the average speed and the length of the electric rail down the road?
Not good news long term for all the trust people put into a powerful and fast VPN router?
Also think of the end of the consumer network. An ISP provided always on "router" that has to be used in many parts of the world.
Thats needs some powerful AV company to think about.
Maybe the next generation of AV comes with their own hardware to place along the network?
Re "Or don't use them for anything incriminating."
Thats what so many people don't think about.
The police/security services can look at every phone in a area in real time, over hours, days, weeks, months, years.
A phone turned off before entering an area and on again later after been in the area? Thats logged.
Two people talking for 5 minutes will get tracked due to location and time.
A new phone used in one area calling a set of other new phones in the same area and only for a few hours, days of use?
That stands out in a computer database of more normal phone use.
Voice prints do the rest. The government/mil security services can still get voice prints.
The phone can be full encrypted as an OS but the wider phone network is not protected from the gov/mil.
Attend a protest? Thats logged.
Turn off a phone before a protest? Thats logged.
Work for the US gov, mil? Thats totally collected on. Near a person who works for the US gov, mil? Thats some extra collection too.
That new person might be a journalist talking to a whistleblower:)
- --
Your nation, state, city puts out a request for someone with skills to open a cell phone within a set contract and for a set amount of payment.
Brands from all over the USA and the world (with the ability to work with US law enforcement) consider the complexity and their costs and respond with the services.
The generations of phone products get worked on and data is extracted ready for police to use.
Wait for political speech to be next.
Reminding people that their politician lacks the stamina to give a speech.
That their candidate stayed on the East and West Coast.
Of past speeches talking in a negative way about most of the USA?
That their candidate has lots of health problems.
Talk about that too often in a virtual town square?
A site that says its open to the public and is a neutral public forum?
Expect selective enforcement for having political views next?
Thats why in the past some parts of the USA protected free speech even in the private parts of a square open to the public.
Such laws got changed over time.
The state and city granted open spaces to the new owners. With that land ownership and the land still been open to the wider public came the suggestion that free speech still existed.
Been granted a virtual town square could be seen in the same way depending on the US state and its past laws.
Selective enforcement vs getting granted a cyber town square open to the public?
Its not a new legal issue and has a lot of past US law in some states.
All your rights might not stop on a privately owned cyber town square:) Given the gov support of some of the privately owned cyber brands got.
Given they are often presented as open to the public as neutral public forums.
That depends on the state and federal laws in the past. Open a public forum for people to talk about politics? Allowing people to then talk about politics did not stop
with just protections from government censoring. Public areas open to the public also got protection in some states in the past to protect speech.
Laws often changed in each US state but was not always government censoring. Free speech was protected in all areas open to the public in some parts of the USA.
AC facial recognition has always been that good and that fast.
Big numbers of people in a database was never a problem for facial recognition.
Searching a big database for a few sets of numbers is something computer designers got good at over time.
The only thing that held facial recognition back for a while was camera quality and images from the side of a face, looking up and down.
Once a nation invests in a good network camera system it can track all faces. The US uses such networks to look at all drivers and passengers along some main roads. Every face and licence plate is kept on a database. The difference is such data is never talked about in open court as parallel construction protects such methods all over the US.
The news from China shows the system works. The news from the US is the system has been working well for many years.
Put some sort of induction hardware both sides of the router network and see if the router is communicating in strange ways?
Have the desktop OS and AV able to scan the router from the network?
The mic is not passing back the "sound" of each conversation. That allows the color of law legal cover for never "listening" in.
Just some user side mic data to say this account would support a pet food ad.
Looking to sell pet food? Get a list all accounts that are set to pet food.
Re "All of that leads me to question whether this law is an attempt to ban social discourse on the web because the only effective defense is to not allow more than one person in a conversation."
China and communism when after what they saw as the 'Four Olds' of society: old customs, old culture, old habits and old ideas. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/..."Four_Olds"
Todays US SJW are going after The United States Constitution by granting US governments the color of law to make speech online illegal.
The first use of the new laws will be most dramatic and on some topic thats easy to understand.
The next sites will be political and news.
Then history, fiction, publications, statues, academic publications, history, art, music, TV shows, movies.
Everything will have to fit in with what US SJW approve of or get a color of law ban.
- -
Slashdot Mirror
Something like Gigatron TTL microcomputer AC? https://gigatron.io/
For ads that track everyone back to their own accounts.
Get a mic, webcam placed in a persons home as a must have trendy free network service.
Track who exactly was talking about a dog, cat in a conversation at a friends home.
All their friends are now on file as seperate people to track and create ads for.
The pet food brands now have the resulting digital product lists sold to them.
The resulting ads start and the reaction of the users is tracked.
File movements on trusted brand are safe from police. Police cant see files moving due to super powerful smart crypto on trusted brand.
Interesting people start to hide their very interesting communications in the huge flow of files. Good crypto and cover of larger herd of users around the world.
Security services have many interesting people to study on fewer networks globally using one type of crypto.
The more everyone interesting starts using one crypto design the more easy it is for the security services to collect it all globally.
The 1930-80's is full of stories of nations selecting one brand of "trusted" crypto and then having other nations reading along in real time.
The trick is selling the generation of users on one trusted brand so collect it all can work for many years.
Think back to the US gov PRISM and all the trusted US OS and social media brands.
Re "I'm not sure what they are supposed to do about that"
The security services will study the crypto and get an overview of the networks, users for their gov/mil.
That builds the needed gov skill sets to understand any new network, crypto/communications.
Ex and former gov/mil/law enforcement staff will offer their skills a contractors.
The study of such networks will then be offered to anyone who can afford to pay for such networks to be looked into.
Study the network to find the uploader and all the downloaders who use their own ISP and IP thinking file and app "crypto" will protect their networking.
Automate the request for a password. Download many files. Investigate the files decrypted and checksums to sort the files downloaded.
Sort files back to uploader and downloaders ip, isp just as any police force would do.
Lots of people have been interested in environmentalist issues all around the world before the 1970's.
Most of that good standard of living was used to contrast the West from Communism.
Everything was done to make the free West look amazing from the ~ 1945-1980's
Great news for China.
Sell their coal. Sell their coal plants. Sell the spare parts. Have their experts on site. Let other nations see what inviting in China can offer a nation.
Pakistan gets a power network for its military industrial complex.
The ads are now direct and more encrypted :)
9 out of 10 bot accounts then follow the users to their new social media brands.
A pantograph https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... so whats the max that can be pushed back up into the vehicle?
What can a really good battery take given the average speed and the length of the electric rail down the road?
Not good news long term for all the trust people put into a powerful and fast VPN router?
Also think of the end of the consumer network. An ISP provided always on "router" that has to be used in many parts of the world.
Thats needs some powerful AV company to think about.
Maybe the next generation of AV comes with their own hardware to place along the network?
Thanks.
Re "(unfortunately) get sneakier."
A lot of this is starting. With new malware using the same ad pathways back to the user.
Re "Or don't use them for anything incriminating."
:)
Thats what so many people don't think about.
The police/security services can look at every phone in a area in real time, over hours, days, weeks, months, years.
A phone turned off before entering an area and on again later after been in the area? Thats logged.
Two people talking for 5 minutes will get tracked due to location and time.
A new phone used in one area calling a set of other new phones in the same area and only for a few hours, days of use?
That stands out in a computer database of more normal phone use.
Voice prints do the rest. The government/mil security services can still get voice prints.
The phone can be full encrypted as an OS but the wider phone network is not protected from the gov/mil.
Attend a protest? Thats logged.
Turn off a phone before a protest? Thats logged.
Work for the US gov, mil? Thats totally collected on. Near a person who works for the US gov, mil? Thats some extra collection too.
That new person might be a journalist talking to a whistleblower
- --
Your nation, state, city puts out a request for someone with skills to open a cell phone within a set contract and for a set amount of payment.
Brands from all over the USA and the world (with the ability to work with US law enforcement) consider the complexity and their costs and respond with the services.
The generations of phone products get worked on and data is extracted ready for police to use.
Wait for political speech to be next.
Reminding people that their politician lacks the stamina to give a speech.
That their candidate stayed on the East and West Coast.
Of past speeches talking in a negative way about most of the USA? That their candidate has lots of health problems.
Talk about that too often in a virtual town square?
A site that says its open to the public and is a neutral public forum?
Expect selective enforcement for having political views next?
Thats why in the past some parts of the USA protected free speech even in the private parts of a square open to the public. :) Given the gov support of some of the privately owned cyber brands got.
Such laws got changed over time.
The state and city granted open spaces to the new owners. With that land ownership and the land still been open to the wider public came the suggestion that free speech still existed.
Been granted a virtual town square could be seen in the same way depending on the US state and its past laws.
Selective enforcement vs getting granted a cyber town square open to the public?
Its not a new legal issue and has a lot of past US law in some states.
All your rights might not stop on a privately owned cyber town square
Given they are often presented as open to the public as neutral public forums.
That depends on the state and federal laws in the past. Open a public forum for people to talk about politics? Allowing people to then talk about politics did not stop with just protections from government censoring. Public areas open to the public also got protection in some states in the past to protect speech.
Laws often changed in each US state but was not always government censoring. Free speech was protected in all areas open to the public in some parts of the USA.
AC facial recognition has always been that good and that fast.
Big numbers of people in a database was never a problem for facial recognition.
Searching a big database for a few sets of numbers is something computer designers got good at over time.
The only thing that held facial recognition back for a while was camera quality and images from the side of a face, looking up and down.
Once a nation invests in a good network camera system it can track all faces. The US uses such networks to look at all drivers and passengers along some main roads. Every face and licence plate is kept on a database. The difference is such data is never talked about in open court as parallel construction protects such methods all over the US.
The news from China shows the system works. The news from the US is the system has been working well for many years.
Put some sort of induction hardware both sides of the router network and see if the router is communicating in strange ways?
Have the desktop OS and AV able to scan the router from the network?
The mic is not passing back the "sound" of each conversation. That allows the color of law legal cover for never "listening" in.
Just some user side mic data to say this account would support a pet food ad.
Looking to sell pet food? Get a list all accounts that are set to pet food.
Just use Win 10 for games.
Re "All of that leads me to question whether this law is an attempt to ban social discourse on the web because the only effective defense is to not allow more than one person in a conversation."
China and communism when after what they saw as the 'Four Olds' of society: old customs, old culture, old habits and old ideas.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/..."Four_Olds"
Todays US SJW are going after The United States Constitution by granting US governments the color of law to make speech online illegal.
The first use of the new laws will be most dramatic and on some topic thats easy to understand.
The next sites will be political and news.
Then history, fiction, publications, statues, academic publications, history, art, music, TV shows, movies.
Everything will have to fit in with what US SJW approve of or get a color of law ban.
- -
Return to what was once a classified magazine https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Run the ad and people would buy the locally printed magazine for cash.
Radio shows could Foundation Series. Just find a TV person with skills. Dont turn it into a Star Trek: Discovery.
China will flood the market with much lower cost products until Japan cannot afford exploration and production costs.
So you are in front of the ads sooner.