To slowly put censorship in place on an issue.
Then the next issue can apply for censorship.
Later brands, ads, DRM, crypto, faith groups, political parties can all have their issues considered for the same level of control.
Ex and former staff walk out with the keys expected to be kept deep in the US gov.
Give it to another nation, cult, faith, a company, another nations mil, some kingdom, some theocracy.
Split loyalty sets in and another nation is handed the keys.
Media brands, criminals, private investigations, random police, ad brands soon get the same keys.
Protesters, think tanks, NGOs then get the keys.
All with great political, faith, profit, criminal reasons to spy and collect it all.
A world of weak and junk crypto once only for the NSA and GCHQ experts is open to all.
So mail in the post should be opened and the contents scanned and looked at?
East German style?
Not just scan the envelope and keep text front and back?
Yet on the internet that electronic mail and data should be opened all the time by the federal gov?
to paper insulated wireline.
No new competition.
No new innovation.
Federal rules and laws protect a few ISP who can say they fully meet federal NN rules.
The network will be spread all over Russia. Thats not a "centralized hub".
The phone system will work.
Computers will send and get information for education.
Games will connect and play.
No outside peering, global networks needed.
Why the sudden need for more tax?
What services suddenly need extra tax money?
Less tax and France is more investment friendly.
That would attract more good quality private sector jobs.
Communist China has no problem finding many VPN users in real time.
The NSA and GCHQ have no problems working back from a VPN to a user.
The FBI is getting as good too?
Do VPN products stay secure in Ireland?
What content will congress like to restrict next AC?
Right to repair? The import of computer parts and how to repair?
Books on the math of DRM and crypto?
Tax information?
Books and movies on the lie detector tests?
Anti war movies and books?
Books by whistleblowers about the history of the mil/security services?
Movie reviews in books that are too political and that make a movie not sell?
Freedom of speech.
Freedom of the press.
The freedom to publish.
The freedom to watch a movie and review it.
The freedom to make a movie and have it sold?
What topics are next?
Movies about faith? Faith groups and cults can help with a long list of movies and books they want less recommended.
Any books and movies that are too sinful?
Movies about the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests?
German history and culture?
Do movies about free Taiwan get that surfacing and recommending to movies on Communist China?
Do we still get to find 1984?
Will movies on Catalonia get surfacing and recommending to movies about Spain?
No protest movies for France?
In the USA you have the freedom of speech.
To say Taiwan is the real China.
To talk about the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests.
To enjoy a cartoon bear.
Read and comment on books like 1984, Animal farm.
To mention term limits.
To enjoy a movie and review the movie. To make a movie. To comment on a movie. To comment on the politics of a movie.
Enjoy many different types of publications from Japan, South Korea, Taiwan.
No getting reported to a Communist gov after speech and for speech.
Thats what sets the freedom in the USA apart from the total control of any Communist government.
The good guys let people publish and stay free after publication.
The bad guys have list of words, books, terms, cartoons, history to remove.
EU nations have their own laws on art, culture, history, politics, cartoons, protests making the US cloud products much better for publication globally.
Then the USA could not offer its cloud services from the USA into EU nations.
Its a new EU trade barrier to keep out better US services.
Forcing people in the EU to have to buy EU nation computer services over much better quality US cloud services.
The EU wanted EU nation data kept in the EU for "privacy" and law enfacement on speech, laws on who can publish.
No going to a low cost and much better US site to sell back into the EU.
The USA said that was a new trade barrier put up by the EU to keep out low cost US cloud products and services that should be able to have equal and fair access to EU markets.
That a US company should be able to bid equally for any EU nation/gov/mil project from the USA as a secure US cloud service.
That the US cloud product in the USA could meet any EU privacy, law enforcement and encryption regulations.
The USA was ready to support the EU over access and privacy. But it was not going allow the EU to block US brands from the EU again.
The US products been cheaper, of better quality offered advanced services people in the EU wanted.
Productive and more advanced US brands started winning contacts in EU nations on price and quality.
Freedom and quality from the USA won over EU prices, EU tax rates and EU political control.
EU nations then attempted to use more "privacy" laws to stop the flow of wealth out of the EU nations and into the USA.
That local hosting in the EU could further try and stop low cost US services from offering better global peering prices.
To try to attract jobs to EU nations by offering EU wide "privacy" away from US could products?
The US does not want to see the EU become a place to hide wealth again and for banned groups to set up under the cover of EU "privacy" laws.
Consumers in EU nations should have the freedom to select from US cloud products. Like they did with US computer hardware in the 1980's.
No having to buy a French desktop computer that is years behind advanced US computers. The freedom to buy a much better OS and hardware from a computer company in the USA. The freedom of ranking many different US computer designs rather than having to accept a French gov computer.
To network with the US networks and enjoy freedom of speech.
Not having to stay on a French only national network using a French gov approved desktop computer.
The EU is using "privacy" to go back to its 1970's idea of national computer networks and national server designs keeping out much better quality US products and services.
New trade barriers by the EU years later to keep out better US cloud products.
That the system is not based on human reporting?
That the system is not fully enforced for decades and decades and connected to each person reported?
That people connected to the person reported will also get a more negative report?
The access to travel, healthcare, housing, loans, work is then altered as a result of such reporting.
The Communist system is well understood.
Slashdot Mirror
To slowly put censorship in place on an issue.
Then the next issue can apply for censorship.
Later brands, ads, DRM, crypto, faith groups, political parties can all have their issues considered for the same level of control.
Time for the daily Study Strong Country to make revolutionary history.
They have to get to the product.
Ex and former staff walk out with the keys expected to be kept deep in the US gov.
Give it to another nation, cult, faith, a company, another nations mil, some kingdom, some theocracy.
Split loyalty sets in and another nation is handed the keys.
Media brands, criminals, private investigations, random police, ad brands soon get the same keys.
Protesters, think tanks, NGOs then get the keys.
All with great political, faith, profit, criminal reasons to spy and collect it all.
A world of weak and junk crypto once only for the NSA and GCHQ experts is open to all.
So mail in the post should be opened and the contents scanned and looked at?
East German style?
Not just scan the envelope and keep text front and back?
Yet on the internet that electronic mail and data should be opened all the time by the federal gov?
to paper insulated wireline.
No new competition.
No new innovation.
Federal rules and laws protect a few ISP who can say they fully meet federal NN rules.
The network will be spread all over Russia. Thats not a "centralized hub".
The phone system will work.
Computers will send and get information for education.
Games will connect and play.
No outside peering, global networks needed.
Virtue signalling.
Why the sudden need for more tax?
What services suddenly need extra tax money?
Less tax and France is more investment friendly.
That would attract more good quality private sector jobs.
and social media company is a good domain?
Something a big company can't find sinful.
Who wants to find their digital music fully curated due to politics?
France defaults to extra big taxation.
Invest in France and enjoy that extra big tax.
Who in France is getting all the new tax spending?
An open gov letter to help corporate control along?
Communist China has no problem finding many VPN users in real time.
The NSA and GCHQ have no problems working back from a VPN to a user.
The FBI is getting as good too?
Do VPN products stay secure in Ireland?
dev an advanced and new ad blocker.
AC the gov is sending out open letters.
What content will congress like to restrict next AC?
Right to repair? The import of computer parts and how to repair?
Books on the math of DRM and crypto?
Tax information?
Books and movies on the lie detector tests?
Anti war movies and books?
Books by whistleblowers about the history of the mil/security services?
Movie reviews in books that are too political and that make a movie not sell?
Freedom of speech.
.... big g o v.
Freedom of the press.
The freedom to publish.
The freedom to watch a movie and review it.
The freedom to make a movie and have it sold?
After an open letter from
What topics are next?
Movies about faith? Faith groups and cults can help with a long list of movies and books they want less recommended.
Any books and movies that are too sinful?
Movies about the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests?
German history and culture?
Do movies about free Taiwan get that surfacing and recommending to movies on Communist China?
Do we still get to find 1984?
Will movies on Catalonia get surfacing and recommending to movies about Spain?
No protest movies for France?
Still free to make a sci fi movie, enjoy a superstitious film.
The user and their content is the product.
Use an ad company that offers "free" services and the ads will flow.
In the USA you have the freedom of speech.
To say Taiwan is the real China.
To talk about the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests.
To enjoy a cartoon bear.
Read and comment on books like 1984, Animal farm.
To mention term limits.
To enjoy a movie and review the movie. To make a movie. To comment on a movie. To comment on the politics of a movie.
Enjoy many different types of publications from Japan, South Korea, Taiwan.
No getting reported to a Communist gov after speech and for speech.
Thats what sets the freedom in the USA apart from the total control of any Communist government.
The good guys let people publish and stay free after publication.
The bad guys have list of words, books, terms, cartoons, history to remove.
EU nations have their own laws on art, culture, history, politics, cartoons, protests making the US cloud products much better for publication globally.
Then the USA could not offer its cloud services from the USA into EU nations.
Its a new EU trade barrier to keep out better US services.
Forcing people in the EU to have to buy EU nation computer services over much better quality US cloud services.
The EU wanted EU nation data kept in the EU for "privacy" and law enfacement on speech, laws on who can publish.
No going to a low cost and much better US site to sell back into the EU.
The USA said that was a new trade barrier put up by the EU to keep out low cost US cloud products and services that should be able to have equal and fair access to EU markets.
That a US company should be able to bid equally for any EU nation/gov/mil project from the USA as a secure US cloud service.
That the US cloud product in the USA could meet any EU privacy, law enforcement and encryption regulations.
The USA was ready to support the EU over access and privacy. But it was not going allow the EU to block US brands from the EU again.
The US products been cheaper, of better quality offered advanced services people in the EU wanted.
Productive and more advanced US brands started winning contacts in EU nations on price and quality.
Freedom and quality from the USA won over EU prices, EU tax rates and EU political control.
EU nations then attempted to use more "privacy" laws to stop the flow of wealth out of the EU nations and into the USA.
That local hosting in the EU could further try and stop low cost US services from offering better global peering prices.
To try to attract jobs to EU nations by offering EU wide "privacy" away from US could products?
The US does not want to see the EU become a place to hide wealth again and for banned groups to set up under the cover of EU "privacy" laws.
Consumers in EU nations should have the freedom to select from US cloud products. Like they did with US computer hardware in the 1980's.
No having to buy a French desktop computer that is years behind advanced US computers. The freedom to buy a much better OS and hardware from a computer company in the USA. The freedom of ranking many different US computer designs rather than having to accept a French gov computer.
To network with the US networks and enjoy freedom of speech.
Not having to stay on a French only national network using a French gov approved desktop computer.
The EU is using "privacy" to go back to its 1970's idea of national computer networks and national server designs keeping out much better quality US products and services.
New trade barriers by the EU years later to keep out better US cloud products.
That the system is not based on human reporting?
That the system is not fully enforced for decades and decades and connected to each person reported?
That people connected to the person reported will also get a more negative report?
The access to travel, healthcare, housing, loans, work is then altered as a result of such reporting.
The Communist system is well understood.