Slashdot Mirror


User: dagnabit

dagnabit's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
186
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 186

  1. Re:Quick Question on Sun Solaris 9 for x86 for Evaluation · · Score: 1

    How about the Solaris kernel being interchangeable with the Linux kernel? Keep all the other "outer layers" the same, but make the stable/scalable Solaris kernel plug into the operating system when it's needed, and use the Linux kernel for the lower-end servers, desktops, etc.

    With their rumblings about Solaris becoming LSB compliant, this just might be a good tactic. Keep the best of both...

  2. Re:LX50 SERVER on Sun Solaris 9 for x86 for Evaluation · · Score: 1

    Actually, Solaris for x86 is a 2nd fully-supported OS for the LX50. It does not come pre-installed on any LX50 though; buy the Solaris SKU and you get the CDs in the box, which you then have to install yourself.

  3. Re:I've heard.... on Salvaging Possessions from Smoke Damage? · · Score: 1

    That story is here... she raised her money and is now looking to "hand off" to someone else in need.

  4. Bringing back DEC field service too? on Bringing Back the PDP8 · · Score: 1

    We had an -8 and an -11 at my high school back in 1981-1985. We used to sing the Batman theme music whenever the service guy showed up to do PM on those washing-machine sized disk drives (RK07? gawd it's been a long time...):

    Na-na na-na na-na na-na, DEC-Man!

    Guess if it's the PDQ now, it'll have to be DEQ-man...

  5. Re:what for on Bringing Back the PDP8 · · Score: 1

    Mmm.... TECO...

    I forget - does RSTS/E run on the -8? Or was it only on the -11s?

  6. Re:Sounds rather interesting on Living with Darth Vader · · Score: 1

    Yes, it's being done at Sony Online Entertainment in San Diego... We were bidding to have them use our Linux boxes, but no go...

    They're putting in several hundred, up to a couple thousand, servers split between east and west coast.

    Anyone got the trademark on StarWarsCrack yet? :)

  7. Re:Tough find on Restaurant POS Systems? · · Score: 1

    Thanks a lot - just when I thought I'd completely put that system out of my head for good... :)

    I used to work for a clothing mfr/retailer that used the DOS version of RetailPro. The reporting was somewhat flexible from what I remember, but man - that cheesy modem-based polling system was a complete nightmare to keep up and running smoothly. We only had 10 stores, and almost every night at least one of them would have problems, which meant calling back to the store the next day, walking them through the process (which meant they had to completely shut down what they were doing while the polling happened)...

    I remember the Windows version was coming Real Soon Now(tm), right up until Feb 2000 when I left... but it still looked like a disaster all the way around. I'm surprised they have survived until now... just goes to show you can sell anyone crap if you try.

  8. eCentra on Restaurant POS Systems? · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Check out eCentra - their ViewPoint POS is a Java-based system that runs on Linux.

  9. Re:Aluminum Vs. Silicon on Remote Feed: 72-Mile 802.11b Link · · Score: 1

    Especially digging the cable into the ground under a couple hundred feet of water... :)

  10. Re:physics on Remote Feed: 72-Mile 802.11b Link · · Score: 1

    You can see San Clemente Island on a clear day from the beaches in North San Diego County. If they put the receivers at the highest points, or even near them, there should be no problem at all.

  11. Re:Noise on Jet Turbine Locomotives · · Score: 5, Informative

    Having been a gas turbine mechanic in the US Navy (gas turbines are used to power the Aegis-class cruisers, Arleigh Burke-class destroyers, and Perry-class frigates), I can say that there are silencers that can be used in the exhaust which will keep the noise down quite a bit... jet airplances are "extra noisy" because the hot gas flows out the back pretty much unabated (small loss to continue turning the gas generator portion, but most energy is "lost" out the back in pure thrust), whereas in a turbine "prime mover" application, much of the exhaust energy is used up turning the power turbine / reduction gear / generator.

    Plus the size of the turbines in these locomotives is probably similar to those in Huey/Blackhawk- sized helicopter... you can get a lot more HP out of a physically smaller gas turbine than you can from a diesel (the Navy gets 2500kW from a single Huey-sized turbine/ generator setup). And, to me anyway, the lower frequencies from a diesel are more "penetrating" than the higher turbine freqs...

    Another turbine advantage is they can run on almost anything flammable, given the right nozzles etc. Some power plants actually burn pulverized coal in their turbines. They can also run on methane, LNG, etc... so if/when it becomes unfashionable enough/too expensive/whatever to power the trains with dead dinosaurs, they can switch over to something else... (methanol anyone?)

    I've always thought a turbine-powered locomotive made a lot more sense from a size/weight/fuel economy point of view than a diesel engine... guess I shoulda patented the idea when I had it back in the mid-90s!

  12. Re:Throttling simply does not work on Bandwidth Limiting Policies for Web Hosting? · · Score: 1

    > It does real throttling, letting you limit the total bandwidth for all of a user's sites to a bytes/sec value. No Apache modules do this. Even thttpd [acme.com] doesn't seem to get this right.

    FYI, the Sun Cobalt RaQ appliances allow you to set througput limits in kilobits/second (low=10, high=??) per IP address (that's for all IP traffice - FTP, HTTP, mail, etc), known as "Sun Cobalt Bandwidth management"... (It's done via a kernel module...) No auto-cutoff after x GB/time period though, just setting the pipe size...

  13. Re:It's all marketing on Linux Kernel 3.0? · · Score: 1

    Yep, I agree. My bad. :)

    And yes, I agree with the major version rev for the core change...

  14. Re:It's all marketing on Linux Kernel 3.0? · · Score: 1

    Why not do a Sun job, and call the next version 6.

    Actually, it's Sun Linux 5.0. And it's at v5.0 because there were 4 prior releases/versions of Cobalt Linux for the various appliance products.

  15. Re:And then.... on Linux Kernel 3.0? · · Score: 1

    .NetGNux?

  16. Re:Ginger! on Survivor Meets Junkyard Wars for Scientists · · Score: 1

    No, no, no. The correct answer to this age-old debate is: Ginger and MaryAnn! :)

  17. Re:Too bad... on Survivor Meets Junkyard Wars for Scientists · · Score: 2, Funny

    Another Ginger vs. MaryAnn debate? I say - what's wrong with Mrs. Howell? Sure, the other two are cute. But Mrs. Howell has experience, and she's rich! :)

  18. Re:Did you know on Slashback: Bugfixed, Attribution, Atkins · · Score: 1

    Identical twins are always equally fat/thin.

    Not true. My wife has identical twin brothers; one is about 50-60 pounds heavier than the other. Granted, the thinner one exercises more, etc., but a blanket statement like "are always" needs some qualifiers to be correct... :)

  19. Some sources on Linux Solutions for Zip Codes and Congressional Districts? · · Score: 3, Informative



    I ran "zip codes" "congressional districts" through Google and got back a bunch of links.

    This place seems to have zip code info sliced several ways, including congressional districts, for a fee.

    This place seems to specialize in providing info like this as well...

    </karma whoring>

    With the yearly redistricting that some/all states do, it's probably easiest to purchase the info. Perhaps even from the Post Office themselves... congressional district info seems to be a component field that they track anyway... call the National Customer Support Center at 1-800-238-3150. Hours of operation are 7:00 AM through 5:30 PM CT.

  20. Obligatory usage posting on Digital Video Capture and High Frame Rates? · · Score: 1

    Slow-mo capture of hot grits being poured down Natalie Portman's pants...?

  21. SPARC on The Need for Open Hardware · · Score: 4, Informative

    www.sparc.com


    From the SPARC site:

    The RISC-based Scalalable Processor ARChitecture includes processors from multiple vendors that range in price from less than $10 to more than $3000, and powers devices that scale in functionality from small digital cameras to large mainframe-class UNIX servers. This microprocessor architecture is controlled and managed by SPARC International (SI), an independent governing body founded in 1989. Since its inception, the SPARC architecture has been guided by its fundamental design philosophy of open standards. Open - to promote innovation, to provide options and flexibility, to encourage fair competition, and ultimately, to help businesses relying on the SPARC platform thrive. Any version of the SPARC Instruction Set can be licensed from SPARC International, and then used to design processors implementing that open standard. Truly - in letter and in spirit, SPARC's open - for business!

    What makes SPARC "open?"

    While many proprietary architectures claim to be open, the truth is that adopters of a proprietary chip must accept the architecture "as is." Conversely, the SPARC architecture fulfills essential elements of openness.

    The SPARC instruction set is published as IEEE Standard 1754-1994.

    SPARC specifications are available for licensing by any person or company, giving customers flexibility and freedom to design their own solution.

    Control of the SPARC architecture is in the hands of an independent, non-profit organization, SPARC International, whose membership is open to everyone.

    How much does it cost to use the architecture?

    All technical information about the architecture is available for free and without royalties from SPARC International's public website. Anyone is welcome to download the SPARC specifications, which provide all of the technical requirements needed to design processors and other products based on the open SPARC standard.

    SPARC International also offers registry services for a one-time fee of $99, which is particularly important to those companies that track the source of technology in their products.
    While the technical information is free, use of the SPARC trademark requires two things: First, membership in SPARC International; and second, compliance testing of the device.

  22. Re:Still missing: Open Firmware, Hot Swap on The Return Of Solaris 9 For x86 · · Score: 2

    Yes, the mobo in the LX50 supports LOM, and there are tools for BIOS access, etc.

    Check the prices for the HP box you're talking about ... the LX50 product mgmt team was being very price-conscious when building the SKUs, and are cheaper than IBM and HP for similar configs, and very close to Dell as well (with better support and more goodies on the box than Dell's offerings)...

  23. Re:Do they really think their distro is that advan on The Return Of Solaris 9 For x86 · · Score: 2

    The first 4 versions were the various base operating systems in the Cobalt appliances...

  24. Article "UI" needs some work... on GUIs for Everyone · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Green on grey? Ugh. And two columns? Puh-leeze.

  25. Re:Mono? on .NET for Apache · · Score: 1

    *Nice* sig! :)