I am ok with increased surveillance powers for police as long as the proper checks are put in place to ensure that these powers are not abused. This is why the police needs a warrant to search your house, or to wiretap your phone. These checks and balances are essential to any new surveillance powers given to the police to ensure that they cannot abuse the powers they have been given.
Back in the day most households would survive on one income, which meant that one parent would be at home much more often, and be able to take a more active role in their children's loves.
Now most households require two incomes, so parents have less time to devote to their children
It's not Bush's fault he did not cause global warming, but he does not want to deal with the problem, and as the president that is not a good thing.
BUSH: "I realize that this is a big problem and the solution will not be easy, so in the interest of my fellow Americans I have decided not to deal with the situation."
Has Bush even admitted that the climate is warming or does he still pretend all is well? (not a troll I really want to know... a link would be nice)
Is there any consensual sex or nudity in the bible? If so, even if those pages are glued together and require a third party glue remover to read them then you must give the bible an AO rating.
what i ment to say was "if i use your Wi-fi connection u can still use it, and if i am using all your bandwidth then just kick me off"
thats better. i need to get some sleep
The diference is that said hi-fiset exists in teh physical world, and if u take it then i cant use it.
if u use your Wi-fi connection u can still use it, and if i am using all your bandwidth then just kick me off
If the network is OPEN then u should be able to use it at will.
if you don't want anyone to use your wireless network then secure it somehow. Now anyone that wants u use it has to break you security and that can be considered a crime.
If it's OPEN its fair game.
it really does not matter who funded a peer reviewed study. However feel free to scrutinize the methodology of the paper or any of the literature cited
how else can politicians determine whether a complex statistical report has been "paid for" by an interested party?
Maybe they could look at the stats used in the study and see if any assumptions have been violated. Stats don't lie they only mislead those that don't understand them.
Slashdot Mirror
After a few months
Everything is hackable. Will it be worth someone's time to do it? I guess it depends on how lucrative the stolen car market is
"Cuz like, what you are spouting isn't science either my friend."
Credibility rising...
A few more likes in there and no one will doubt you again
I am proud to report that no pigs were harmed in the making of that post
This has been going on for a while now.
I am ok with increased surveillance powers for police as long as the proper checks are put in place to ensure that these powers are not abused. This is why the police needs a warrant to search your house, or to wiretap your phone. These checks and balances are essential to any new surveillance powers given to the police to ensure that they cannot abuse the powers they have been given.
but will it slice dice and make julienne fries???
no that was just you.
without reading the TFA she sure seems somewhat credible... but there may be more to this article than the summary i just read
Just buy a cheapo case, and take the side panels off as a cool case mod.
Nothing is sexier than a naked computer
Back in the day most households would survive on one income, which meant that one parent would be at home much more often, and be able to take a more active role in their children's loves.
Now most households require two incomes, so parents have less time to devote to their children
This is only part of the reason this is happening
I have done nothing wrong but I still want to maintain my privacy. I hope you are never in a position to make these kinds of decisions
hahah... that made my day
It's not Bush's fault he did not cause global warming, but he does not want to deal with the problem, and as the president that is not a good thing. BUSH: "I realize that this is a big problem and the solution will not be easy, so in the interest of my fellow Americans I have decided not to deal with the situation." Has Bush even admitted that the climate is warming or does he still pretend all is well? (not a troll I really want to know... a link would be nice)
sure, the temperature has changed in that past. but it has never changed as fast as it is changing now
Is there any consensual sex or nudity in the bible? If so, even if those pages are glued together and require a third party glue remover to read them then you must give the bible an AO rating.
from heaven right???
you and i may be, but look around you, do you really want those people to be making decisions
well i think its time to apply the ESRB rating to the bible. what rating do you think it should get?
in other words those in power are not logical. and thats not news
Its so obvious it will never happen
MY car is Private property ( i think) so your analogy wont work here
what i ment to say was "if i use your Wi-fi connection u can still use it, and if i am using all your bandwidth then just kick me off" thats better. i need to get some sleep
The diference is that said hi-fiset exists in teh physical world, and if u take it then i cant use it. if u use your Wi-fi connection u can still use it, and if i am using all your bandwidth then just kick me off
If the network is OPEN then u should be able to use it at will. if you don't want anyone to use your wireless network then secure it somehow. Now anyone that wants u use it has to break you security and that can be considered a crime. If it's OPEN its fair game.
it really does not matter who funded a peer reviewed study. However feel free to scrutinize the methodology of the paper or any of the literature cited
how else can politicians determine whether a complex statistical report has been "paid for" by an interested party?
Maybe they could look at the stats used in the study and see if any assumptions have been violated. Stats don't lie they only mislead those that don't understand them.