Whats the betting that if the guy was a Muzzie, and was posting that she deserved to be killed as an apostate they would be protecting his right to free speech.
Its not likely that Iran will be able to build drones for use against us by examining this one.
Those camel-jocky hajis couldn't make anything more complicated than a jock-strap. The worry is that they might pass it on to China or Russia with some deal like "when you work out how to clone it send us 100".
When the food supply drops so that the planet can only support one billion, the population will fall to one billion. The question is, which billion?
I doubt the sifting process will be pleasant.
That's one that stacks up well for the Canadians. On many models the grain belts move from the USA and Europe to Canada, the Norse countries and Siberia.
Something no one would need if proper assignment of IP ranges had been done.
No point asking what you mean, since you evidently speak from ignorance. Even with optimal assignment of IPv4 addresses, it would only delay the inevitable shortfall. Sooner or later, the number of addressable end-points on the internet would exceed 4 billion. NAT is an unfortunate workaround to delay the effects of the shortfall; it should be a freely-chosen option, not an enforced requirement.
I'm tempted to say pot - kettle - black here as far as speaking from ignorance goes. NAT allows devices behind the wall to be addressed by port, sharing a single IP address. At an extreme you could have 65535 addressable devices behind a NAT firewall, exposed to the public internet as one IP address. There are many reasons that this is not a good idea - primarily it would involve NAT at ISP level, leading to "double NAT" issues to people with home routers, but the number of IP addresses available is not an issue.
One day in the far future we might have to worry about whether NPCs are sophisticated enough to be sentient. We might need legislation preventing the use of truly intelligent virtual entities as targets. Until then there's no worry.
People are crying out for "realism" in games down to the last blade of grass.
Realistic graphics? Yes. Realism? No. Otherwise military shooters would consist of hours, possibly days, of doing absolutely nothing. Then there might be a 5 minute conflict where you kill a couple guys. Then a few hours later you might end up with a standoff where it takes you 30 minutes just to take out 1 guy. And through it all, if you get shot once in the right place...game over, no continues.
Will AI ever reach the level where we do have to consider the rights of the NPCs?
I am amazed that conventional water-cooled reactors are only 5% efficient. It sure casts the seemingly low efficiency factors of other alternative fuels(such as the cheapest solar panels) into a different light.
But you are talking about 5% of the energy from a fuel with an energy density which is about 1,000,000 times the energy density of coal
Slashdot Mirror
Whats the betting that if the guy was a Muzzie, and was posting that she deserved to be killed as an apostate they would be protecting his right to free speech.
I disapprove of what you say, but I will conspire with you in ruining an innocent woman's life just to prove a point about free speech.
You'd make a great lawyer.
Unfortunately, one can't control what they're attracted to.
I thank my lucky stars every day that there have been no recorded incidents of sheep starting "revenge websites".
Its not likely that Iran will be able to build drones for use against us by examining this one.
Those camel-jocky hajis couldn't make anything more complicated than a jock-strap. The worry is that they might pass it on to China or Russia with some deal like "when you work out how to clone it send us 100".
When the food supply drops so that the planet can only support one billion, the population will fall to one billion. The question is, which billion?
I doubt the sifting process will be pleasant.
That's one that stacks up well for the Canadians. On many models the grain belts move from the USA and Europe to Canada, the Norse countries and Siberia.
65k devices you say, you seem to know very little about NAT you need to have a unique port at the NAT box per unique ip/port/ip/port tuple,
Which as I said, at the extreme is 65k devices, i.e. one port per device
Why can't they behave like us on slashdot, where everyone is exactly who they say they are?
Something no one would need if proper assignment of IP ranges had been done.
No point asking what you mean, since you evidently speak from ignorance. Even with optimal assignment of IPv4 addresses, it would only delay the inevitable shortfall. Sooner or later, the number of addressable end-points on the internet would exceed 4 billion. NAT is an unfortunate workaround to delay the effects of the shortfall; it should be a freely-chosen option, not an enforced requirement.
I'm tempted to say pot - kettle - black here as far as speaking from ignorance goes. NAT allows devices behind the wall to be addressed by port, sharing a single IP address. At an extreme you could have 65535 addressable devices behind a NAT firewall, exposed to the public internet as one IP address. There are many reasons that this is not a good idea - primarily it would involve NAT at ISP level, leading to "double NAT" issues to people with home routers, but the number of IP addresses available is not an issue.
Easier != Better
Except when it does.
That's the case with women and emergency exits.
Article detailing the lawsuit here. Apple did, in fact, sue the local business asserting a stronger claim to the trademark.
Apple are so gay
i for one would like to see her tits.
One day in the far future we might have to worry about whether NPCs are sophisticated enough to be sentient. We might need legislation preventing the use of truly intelligent virtual entities as targets. Until then there's no worry.
People are crying out for "realism" in games down to the last blade of grass.
Realistic graphics? Yes. Realism? No. Otherwise military shooters would consist of hours, possibly days, of doing absolutely nothing. Then there might be a 5 minute conflict where you kill a couple guys. Then a few hours later you might end up with a standoff where it takes you 30 minutes just to take out 1 guy. And through it all, if you get shot once in the right place...game over, no continues.
Will AI ever reach the level where we do have to consider the rights of the NPCs?
Don't forget the books. Stephen King is a mass murdered and must be stopped.
Dare I mention the Bible. (the Qur'an is worse its actual incitement)
Its a bunch of pixels changing color,
That's racist. They should be happy with whatever color they are, and be respected for it.
1. piss off 30% of the world population
You can manage that just by being American. If you're white and male you probably pissed off a lot of the remaining 70% too.
What's next, virtual animal rights activists?
Virtual raid on farmville.
Adding "ill-rational" to the dictionary is not something you can blame on autocorrect :p
True.
Since when does autocorrect create non-existent words?
And the L and - keys are pretty far from R... o.O
I'm afraid I've had that happen. I was so convinced of my misspelling that I added it to the dictionary!
I am amazed that conventional water-cooled reactors are only 5% efficient. It sure casts the seemingly low efficiency factors of other alternative fuels(such as the cheapest solar panels) into a different light.
But you are talking about 5% of the energy from a fuel with an energy density which is about 1,000,000 times the energy density of coal
What if Iaran gets the bomb, we'd be better using all out plutonium to bomb them into oblivion.
"fuck the pakis" certainly would not be on India's list of banned sentiments.
When you confuse the power of the dollar with the power of the gun, this is what happens.
My plan was based on the power of the gun you insensitive clod
Google say this is fixed.
1337-speek for "Acts for you"
Great, now lets start on the bible codes and prove that 666 refers to Bill Gates. Everyone's number looks like a hex string!