Well, if you choose to ignore the concept of "burden of proof", yes, it is.
"There is no god" is a reply to "There is/are a/some god/s". The former does not make sense without stating the latter first.
I believe there is no god on the same grounds as I believe there are no orange polar bears. In order to prove that there actually are, you just need to provide a single instance of them. Until that moment, the default position is believing that there are no such animals.
A belief which, consequently, can be changed by showing me a single polar bear, so no, it's not one of the religious kind.
Ethics can try to tell you whether or not creating such a bomb is a good idea.
FTFY. I'll never, ever, ever, let religion (be it through the words of an either long dead or alive-and-kicking prophet or some thousand-year-old book) dent my moral choices.
Come back to us again when hosts can not only block whole advertising companies' domains, but also things like 'http://slashdot.org/ads/*', and thanks for playing.
Well... How... brave? of the French, the people whose public health service subsidizes homeopathy, to try and take down an organization that targets vulnerable people for commercial gain...
I guess they didn't... They just generated "popularity"... and that seemed enough to get taken over... But I'm actually a little drunk, so feel free to disagree.
Yes, and since we have the ability to both consider the implications of and avoid the extinction of other species, we should at least try to be a little worse at it...
And that's why the news on slashdot should be that a major paper is shining some light onto the issue for the uneducated masses to see, instead of the current story.
I can safely bet that it's going to elicit some dozen 'Duh! We already knew that'-comments.
Well, and if you cared to read the comment you just replied to, you may find out that he already knows, and that he still likes the one samzenpus used better.
Slashdot Mirror
Don't worry, I'll create a GUI interface using Visual Basich
Well, that might be your minuses, but you just added 2 of my pluses to the list ;)
Well, if you choose to ignore the concept of "burden of proof", yes, it is.
"There is no god" is a reply to "There is/are a/some god/s". The former does not make sense without stating the latter first.
I believe there is no god on the same grounds as I believe there are no orange polar bears. In order to prove that there actually are, you just need to provide a single instance of them. Until that moment, the default position is believing that there are no such animals.
A belief which, consequently, can be changed by showing me a single polar bear, so no, it's not one of the religious kind.
FTFY. I'll never, ever, ever, let religion (be it through the words of an either long dead or alive-and-kicking prophet or some thousand-year-old book) dent my moral choices.
This has been discussed a gazillion times before.
Come back to us again when hosts can not only block whole advertising companies' domains, but also things like 'http://slashdot.org/ads/*', and thanks for playing.
Well... How... brave? of the French, the people whose public health service subsidizes homeopathy, to try and take down an organization that targets vulnerable people for commercial gain...
You know, the courts may not be working any more, but as long as everyone is videotaping everyone else, justice will be done.
Maybe. Maybe not. I'll be back.
I guess they didn't... They just generated "popularity"... and that seemed enough to get taken over... But I'm actually a little drunk, so feel free to disagree.
Yeah... or buying a SUV to get your groceries. Oh, wait...
Yeah, that... You may wanna look up quantization, though...
You evil bourgeois!
I keep my monitor's contrast low, and it hurts my eyes :(
Yes, and since we have the ability to both consider the implications of and avoid the extinction of other species, we should at least try to be a little worse at it...
It's a browser, not a miracle worker ;)
Well, women do, if only to find out whether they marry or not in the end...
Certainly, since (status = 1) always evaluates to true...
It's already kind of lame when someone spells it M$ or Micro$oft in a comment but... in the summary? Childish much?
Verizon will be more than kind enough to provide you with them. HAND.
Do not look into RNG with remaining eye!
(Hah! Bet you didn't see that one coming!)
And that's why the news on slashdot should be that a major paper is shining some light onto the issue for the uneducated masses to see, instead of the current story.
I can safely bet that it's going to elicit some dozen 'Duh! We already knew that'-comments.
Some variable control information might be nice, as would knowing the source of your statement.
Well, and if you cared to read the comment you just replied to, you may find out that he already knows, and that he still likes the one samzenpus used better.
And it's not demonic, FFS, it's a predator!
Today is international add-a-slash-after-the-file-name day!
{{Original research}} !!