Now imagine there were no humans who could pilot the thing on board. When that eventually happens, and it will happen, people will become far too afraid to fly in AI only flights.
> Of course if you're using the evolved meaning of "poor, economically peripheral" or "mass of underpaid or unemployed serfs under the domination of a Fearless Leader and/or an elite", the US is on the track to that, by replacing the lower class workers with cheap, illegal, immigrant labor and the middle class workers with H1-B effectively indentured servants.
It was just an intentional insult.
> Having it provided to the serfs by the rulers is a legacy of noblesse oblige, where the royalty of Europe (and their predecessors), having confiscated all the wealth and productivity of the serfs, were obliged to provide them with enough health care to keep them healthy enough to keep producing more wealth. Just enough more to keep the nobles living "like kings" and able to hold off takeover of their serfs by their neighbors, of course. Not enough fo the serfs to live comfortably.
> Actually, obtaining necessities via a market incentivizing their production and competition creating redundancy and driving down prices IS the "modern country" approach, dating from "Adam Smith" a couple centuries back.
Which explains why Americans pay more for their healthcare than Canadians do... wait, was that your point? I'm not sure.
> Having it provided to the serfs by the rulers is a legacy of noblesse oblige, where the royalty of Europe (and their predecessors), having confiscated all the wealth and productivity of the serfs, were obliged to provide them with enough health care to keep them healthy enough to keep producing more wealth. Just enough more to keep the nobles living "like kings" and able to hold off takeover of their serfs by their neighbors, of course. Not enough fo the serfs to live comfortably.
Well written FUD. If all my wealth was confiscated, then how did I buy this computer to write this message on?
If my home uses a service that "consumes" some sort input, then you can infer my household activity based on the rates of consumption and when. What makes IoT so different?
I bike when possible, I public transit when biking isn't an option, and then there is always rent-a-cars, uber, taxis, and other things when a proper car is a necessity.
In total, I pay between $500 and $600 a year on public transit which includes the city's public bike program, and I get none of the issues that comes with ownership of something, I'm never worried about parking, or if colleagues/friends want to go drinking after work, or about weather, or insurance, or anything at all really.
I understand why a gamer would spend the amount of money they do on their computer. So someone who does the same to a car and actually does take that car to a race track to have some fun? That's completely understandable. It's a hobby, even a passionate hobby, so go for it!
But that's not most people. Most people are going to be stuck in traffic trying to get to work / errands, and back again. And it's those people who don't need very powerful cars at all. And in fact, a lot of those people live in cities that have robust public transit systems and don't even need the car to begin with!
Man there are a lot of strange comments over these 2 minutes of trailers because there is a black woman that seems to be the lead like it's somehow a threat.
I miss the days when you kids would argue over whether or a fleet of X-Wing fighters could take on a galaxy class starship. Now it's all "waaah, it's a black woman and I'm offended, waaahh". Everyone gets so butthurt over the dumbest things.
the company is operating in Austria and probably has an Austrian-registered company, meaning it is well with in the jurisdiction of austrian courts to make that order
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Now imagine there were no humans who could pilot the thing on board. When that eventually happens, and it will happen, people will become far too afraid to fly in AI only flights.
No it's not. According to Snowden's logic, a jury should decide on whether this is malicious or whistleblowing for the greater good.
> Not sure this qualifies as whistle blowing.
And the point of the article was to let a jury decide that.
> Of course if you're using the evolved meaning of "poor, economically peripheral" or "mass of underpaid or unemployed serfs under the domination of a Fearless Leader and/or an elite", the US is on the track to that, by replacing the lower class workers with cheap, illegal, immigrant labor and the middle class workers with H1-B effectively indentured servants.
It was just an intentional insult.
> Having it provided to the serfs by the rulers is a legacy of noblesse oblige, where the royalty of Europe (and their predecessors), having confiscated all the wealth and productivity of the serfs, were obliged to provide them with enough health care to keep them healthy enough to keep producing more wealth. Just enough more to keep the nobles living "like kings" and able to hold off takeover of their serfs by their neighbors, of course. Not enough fo the serfs to live comfortably.
> Actually, obtaining necessities via a market incentivizing their production and competition creating redundancy and driving down prices IS the "modern country" approach, dating from "Adam Smith" a couple centuries back.
Which explains why Americans pay more for their healthcare than Canadians do... wait, was that your point? I'm not sure.
> Having it provided to the serfs by the rulers is a legacy of noblesse oblige, where the royalty of Europe (and their predecessors), having confiscated all the wealth and productivity of the serfs, were obliged to provide them with enough health care to keep them healthy enough to keep producing more wealth. Just enough more to keep the nobles living "like kings" and able to hold off takeover of their serfs by their neighbors, of course. Not enough fo the serfs to live comfortably.
Well written FUD. If all my wealth was confiscated, then how did I buy this computer to write this message on?
Because the US is a third world country.
The modern countries on this planet provide health care instead of selling it.
If my home uses a service that "consumes" some sort input, then you can infer my household activity based on the rates of consumption and when. What makes IoT so different?
*shrug*
I bike when possible, I public transit when biking isn't an option, and then there is always rent-a-cars, uber, taxis, and other things when a proper car is a necessity.
In total, I pay between $500 and $600 a year on public transit which includes the city's public bike program, and I get none of the issues that comes with ownership of something, I'm never worried about parking, or if colleagues/friends want to go drinking after work, or about weather, or insurance, or anything at all really.
you miss my point.
I understand why a gamer would spend the amount of money they do on their computer. So someone who does the same to a car and actually does take that car to a race track to have some fun? That's completely understandable. It's a hobby, even a passionate hobby, so go for it!
But that's not most people. Most people are going to be stuck in traffic trying to get to work / errands, and back again. And it's those people who don't need very powerful cars at all. And in fact, a lot of those people live in cities that have robust public transit systems and don't even need the car to begin with!
I never understood this fascination with having stuff you can't use to its fullest extent.
It's like spending thousands of dollars on a water cooled over clocked triple GPU computer so you can check your email and play minesweeper.
Removing Trump won't remove the ideology.
ben ouais ostie!
Take a catholic word, say it in french angrily, and now you're swearing Quebecois.
The nice thing about it is that TABARNAK is a far more satisfying swear than FUCK. Try it next time you stub your toe.
you got all that from a 2 minute trailer? Impressive
Yeah, but why do you even care?
Man there are a lot of strange comments over these 2 minutes of trailers because there is a black woman that seems to be the lead like it's somehow a threat.
I miss the days when you kids would argue over whether or a fleet of X-Wing fighters could take on a galaxy class starship. Now it's all "waaah, it's a black woman and I'm offended, waaahh". Everyone gets so butthurt over the dumbest things.
> You can copyright very long strings of words as complete thoughts
how is a joke not that?
KMail? meh...
the company is operating in Austria and probably has an Austrian-registered company, meaning it is well with in the jurisdiction of austrian courts to make that order
tabarnak, les francais francaises connu-pas le vrai francaises quebecois esti.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
Trop de francaises!
https://www.usatoday.com/story...
then what is AI?
so?
I love the concept of IoT, but I hate how its implemented in most things. I don't need accounts, cloud services, statistics, blahblahblah.
So I just roll my own. It's fun and educational. About to start hacking horizontal blinds with motors now ;)
Stay away.
The only versions of Ubuntu that have ever been worth installing are even numbered versions that end .04
yes, a public service, where the voting public can have some say in how it is managed.
Tell me, what power do you have over a corporate monopoly to change its ways?
death from heart disease is theoretical?
Gnome3 is awful. I really do not like using it.
So isn't it great to have an OS that lets you change your window manager for something else (like my preferred KDE5?)!
Say, whatever happened to those explorer.exe replacements in the Windows scene? I think one of them was called BlackBox maybe?