Slashdot Mirror


User: Zontar+The+Mindless

Zontar+The+Mindless's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
8,219
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 8,219

  1. IOW because they are lazy, incompetent, or both.

  2. Re:Republicans hate new things on Andy Kaufman and Redd Foxx To Tour As Holograms · · Score: 1
  3. Re:Tenders? on Security Researchers Face Revenge of Spy Agencies (theregister.co.uk) · · Score: 1

    We're supposed to take the word of an AC who can't spell "fuck"? I'm defo with that, eh.

  4. Re:Apparently the US is the best on Security Researchers Face Revenge of Spy Agencies (theregister.co.uk) · · Score: 1

    Media are already plural. The singular is "medium".

    BTW, I don't know where you live, but here in Europe, we usually understand "Europe" to mean "that big peninsula thing hanging off the west end of Asia, in between the Atlantic and the Urals".

  5. Re:CVS or Subversion on Ask Slashdot: Selecting a Version Control System For an Inexperienced Team · · Score: 2

    Have you considered getting over yourself?

  6. Re:CVS or Subversion on Ask Slashdot: Selecting a Version Control System For an Inexperienced Team · · Score: 1

    SVN has been working just fine for my group for a number of years. We have a total of about 35 people across 7 or 8 teams using the same set of repos and build server. We've discussed moving to git because our dev organisation use it, but if and when we do, we'll probably continue to use SVN as our front end, because git introduces complexities that most of us simply do not need in our day-to-day work. We sometimes branch but very seldom merge. (*My* job unfortunately includes the major exception to the latter case, but due to the nature of things, I'm *always* going to be stuck with doing this manually no matter what CVS we use. BTW, SVN rocks when it comes to performing reverse merges when you've committed something stupid and just need it to go away ASAP.)

    We use SVN in maintaining both the huge set of docs for which we're responsible (XML plus pulls from software sources plus various other text and binary assets) plus the backend for processing them (Perl, Python, PHP, ruby, shell, XSLT, FOP, javadoc, Doxygen, heaps of Makefiles, etc.) and it does just great.

  7. Re: Umm on 2016 Election Cycle Led By Billionaire Donors · · Score: 2

    because mandatory voting quickly devolves into mandatory voting for specific parties.

    Horse puckey. Australia, anyone?

  8. Yes.

    Not sure that our cat ever forgave us, though.

  9. Re:Writers won't be replaced on Replacement of Writers Leads Gartner's Predictions (computerworld.com) · · Score: 1

    If you weren't so busy looking for neckbeards to mod-bomb, maybe you'd have time to read and (maybe just maybe comprehend) a post before you replied to it?

    Just a thought.

  10. Re:I've got to disagree. on Ask Slashdot: Knowledge Management Systems? · · Score: 1

    For individual projects and small teams--yeah, sure. We even use some for those things.

    The biggest problem with wikis is that they're flat and amorphous. The *two* biggest problems with wikis are that they're flat, amorphous, and they don't scale. The *three* biggest problems problems with wikis are that they're flat, they're amorphous, they don't scale, and they possess no intrinsic semantics. The *four* biggest problems, then--*Amongst* the biggest problems with wikis are issues such as... Wait, I'll come in again.

    Amongst the greatest problems with wikis are such diverse issues as being flat, being amorphous, non-scalability, lack of intrinsic semantics, and nice red uniforms--oh, damn!

  11. Re:Obviously, it should be renamed as ... on There Is No .bro In Brotli: Google/Mozilla Engineers Nix File Type As Offensive · · Score: 1

    ... "bra".

    Why not? That's just Swedish for "good", after all.

  12. Re:Lol, "guidelines" on Mozilla Sets Out Its Proposed Principles For Content Blocking (mozilla.org) · · Score: 1

    And now that I'm thinking of installing one, it seems they're all getting co-opted by the people who make the ads... Might have to go with something like Privoxy instead.

  13. Re:Documents and search on Ask Slashdot: Knowledge Management Systems? · · Score: 2, Funny

    wiki /wi' ki:/, n.: place where knowledge goes to die.

  14. Re:Ha on EFF: the Final Leaked TPP Text Is All That We Feared (eff.org) · · Score: 0

    You make some very insightful posts.

    Alas, it's quite unfortunate that you feel obliged to distract us from the *content* of your message by indulging in *attention-seeking behaviour* through forcing us to read it in a fixed-width font. Especially here, where I'm willing to bet that the majority of readers equate fixed-width with code. And you're not posting code. Maybe you don't realise it, but what you're actually accomplishing with that is to make it obvious that you suffer from low self-esteem, and that's totally unnecessary.

    Why don't you get over yourself, and let your worthy message speak for itself?

  15. Re:Issue is more complicated on Linux Kernel Dev Sarah Sharp Quits, Citing 'Brutal' Communications Style · · Score: 1

    When I'm too busy congratulating myself over what I've perceived as a clever achievement to notice a flaw that should have been obvious to me (and it does happen), I sure as fuck do.

  16. Re:Lol, "guidelines" on Mozilla Sets Out Its Proposed Principles For Content Blocking (mozilla.org) · · Score: 1

    I don't use an ad-blocker, mostly because most of the sites I visit don't have that many ads. But occasionally I follow links from here or other forums to sites, usually based in the US, and I see what folks are complaining about.

    Did anybody happen to see the travesty that took up about half of the main page yesterday on ArsTechnica? It made big multicoloured tracers follow your mouse pointer all over the freakin' page. AND it had a fake "close" button. What cocaine-encrusted marketing cretin thought that would be a nice thing to spring on people?

  17. Then you won't mind sending APK your entire address book? C'mon, what could possibly go wrong?

  18. Re:WTF? on Debian Dropping Linux Standard Base (lwn.net) · · Score: 1

    Google Earth works great for me. OpenSUSE 13.1.

  19. Re:Clear as mud, and what about signing? on Mozilla Sets Out Its Proposed Principles For Content Blocking (mozilla.org) · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, it's a bit of both.

  20. Re:Clear as mud, and what about signing? on Mozilla Sets Out Its Proposed Principles For Content Blocking (mozilla.org) · · Score: 1

    IMNSHO, it's been the latter since they switched from cookies.txt to cookies.sqlite.

  21. Re:The nine steps to raise and fall as browser on Mozilla Sets Out Its Proposed Principles For Content Blocking (mozilla.org) · · Score: 1

    Greased, or non-greased?

  22. Re:Lol, "guidelines" on Mozilla Sets Out Its Proposed Principles For Content Blocking (mozilla.org) · · Score: 1

    I generally agree with what you post, but this time I think you've confused cause and effect.

  23. Re:Wrong on ESR On Why the FCC Shouldn't Lock Down Device Firmware (ibiblio.org) · · Score: 1

    It is not a copy; it is a reimplementation.

  24. Re: Why would anyone be shocked? on Researchers Unable To Replicate Findings of Published Economics Studies (businessinsider.com) · · Score: 1

    Mindfulness enables you to obtain the other mental tools you need.

  25. Re:Please add this to the FAQ on Jimmy Wales and Former NSA Chief Ridicule Government Plans To Ban Encryption · · Score: 2

    I can't believe anybody is able to suggest "government-only backdoors" while keeping a straight face, in the wake of this recent epic FAIL based on exactly the same premise.