He's a prima donna who thinks he knows more than what a few million developers and sysadmins have learnt since before he was a zygote.
He also makes it clear he wants to toss POSIX out the window in favour of "whatever I decide is best", which doesn't sit well with lots of folks. Including me.
Leonart dragged the linux desktop kicking and screaming into the 21st century and contiues to do so, again and again addressing major defeciences between Linux and Windows featurewise, and time and time again, surpassing the proprietary competition.
People keep talking about "the year of the Linux Desktop". Guess what, Leonart is the only fucking person who is actually working on getting us there.
So he's making Linux more like Windows, and for this we should be grateful?
So he's the only one involved in this effort? For this we should be grateful.
I didn't know who this guy was, but now I see people listing a littany of things I either avoid, or grudgingly accept because its easier to do so than figure out what I have to do to rip it out and replace it and keep it out through updates.
I got as far as reading Google's 2-line extract from the Wikipedia article about him, and had much the same reaction.
Didn't feel a need to go read the actual article after that.
No, the Jesuit concluded that the aliens and their world must be the product of Satan because they had what appeared to be a perfectly moral society but without any knowledge of God. This directly contradicts the view that all knowledge of right and wrong comes only from knowing God.
(He was later disabused of this notion by none other than the Pope, who pointed out that this reeked of the Manichaean Heresy.)
The Lithians did not merely cease to exist: their planet exploded. Most likely due to human mining efforts, but the priest was conducting an exorcism at the time, so it's perhaps a bit ambiguous.
I don't remember the second book very well--I should really order copies of the whole tetralogy--but the last 2 books, Black Easter and The Day After Judgement, are also very thought-provoking.
And now, in an effort to steer this thread towards something resembling topicality, I offer up the James Blish classic sci-fi series After Such Knowledge, in particular, the first volume, A Case of Conscience.
In which the aliens feel sorry for us because they know our religions are bunk, but feel ethically constrained from telling us so. Turns out they have perfect ethics and no religion, which represents something of a problem, if you're a Jesuit...
Imagine what Europe would be like if some foreign powers came in, colonised big chunks of it for a century or three, then drew borders for new countries that had nothing to do with ethnicity or language. So Milan is now the capital of the Styrian Republic, which comprises Lombardy, Styria, and most of Slovenia; the mix of languages shouldn't be a problem since we're going to educate all their kids in Korean, anyway, right? Then let's draw a nice straight line at an angle across France, and combine the part to the south of that with Catalonia. Let's call it "Franconia"--nevermind the locals already using that name for a different region of the continent--what do they know? And wouldn't it make things more convenient for us to administer if the Rhineland, the Netherlands, and peninsular Denmark were a single entity? And so on... and so on...
Now you know where the most of the national borders in the Mideast and Africa came from. And now maybe you're beginning to see why most if not all of these states are doomed to failure.
Slashdot Mirror
Open source software is primarily about ego...
I'm guessing the rest of your post is just as wrong? Didn't bother going any further.
He's a prima donna who thinks he knows more than what a few million developers and sysadmins have learnt since before he was a zygote.
He also makes it clear he wants to toss POSIX out the window in favour of "whatever I decide is best", which doesn't sit well with lots of folks. Including me.
BTW, he didn't drag my desktop anywhere because I've the good sense not to use Gnome. :)
Which distro is it that gives you a choice between systemd and init when you install it?
Please, we'd really like to know.
Leonart dragged the linux desktop kicking and screaming into the 21st century and contiues to do so, again and again addressing major defeciences between Linux and Windows featurewise, and time and time again, surpassing the proprietary competition.
People keep talking about "the year of the Linux Desktop". Guess what, Leonart is the only fucking person who is actually working on getting us there.
So he's making Linux more like Windows, and for this we should be grateful?
So he's the only one involved in this effort? For this we should be grateful.
I didn't know who this guy was, but now I see people listing a littany of things I either avoid, or grudgingly accept because its easier to do so than figure out what I have to do to rip it out and replace it and keep it out through updates.
I got as far as reading Google's 2-line extract from the Wikipedia article about him, and had much the same reaction.
Didn't feel a need to go read the actual article after that.
Maybe we're old enough by now to realise that "new + shiny" does not always equal "good".
As soon as I saw this story, I heard the "Dude! You're gonna get a Dell!" Dude in my head.
Love and hate are irrelevant when discussing a mad dog.
What do an NYC Pink Floyd cover band have to do with Carly Fiona? She's a fan, or...?
It's intentionally ambiguous.
I certainly did not intend to imply that Blish wrote it as he did by accident. :)
No, the Jesuit concluded that the aliens and their world must be the product of Satan because they had what appeared to be a perfectly moral society but without any knowledge of God. This directly contradicts the view that all knowledge of right and wrong comes only from knowing God.
(He was later disabused of this notion by none other than the Pope, who pointed out that this reeked of the Manichaean Heresy.)
The Lithians did not merely cease to exist: their planet exploded. Most likely due to human mining efforts, but the priest was conducting an exorcism at the time, so it's perhaps a bit ambiguous.
I don't remember the second book very well--I should really order copies of the whole tetralogy--but the last 2 books, Black Easter and The Day After Judgement, are also very thought-provoking.
Everyone having the same religion means no more religious conflicts.
Have you shared this profound insight with the Sunnis and the Shiites?
uh... angels don't live among us nor do they interact with any other of God's creations - they're not allowed to.
Then for any practical purpose angels do not exist.
In any case, your logic is deeply flawed.
That's a bit tragic, considering that Lewis was probably hoping to swing you the other way.
I had a similar experience after reading A Case of Conscience when I was in my early teens, BTW.
The aliens will turn out to have 3 sexes. How the Westboro mob deal with this will provide us much entertainment.
And now, in an effort to steer this thread towards something resembling topicality, I offer up the James Blish classic sci-fi series After Such Knowledge, in particular, the first volume, A Case of Conscience .
In which the aliens feel sorry for us because they know our religions are bunk, but feel ethically constrained from telling us so. Turns out they have perfect ethics and no religion, which represents something of a problem, if you're a Jesuit...
Or a long belch followed by, "You Earthlings keep any toothpicks handy?"
(Something I've been waiting a long time to see happen to someone else. Long story, heh.)
Dump a glass of orange juice in his lap about 30 minutes into a long-haul flight. I recommend iced for best effect.
There are a LOT of organizations re-evaluating the idea of using linux on the server now...
There are lots of orgs thinking about switching to Linux? Well, yeah, thanks for that, Captain Obvious. Tell us something else we already know.
Those numerals originated in India, where the Arabs encountered and adopted them (and later transmitted them to Europe).
Imagine what Europe would be like if some foreign powers came in, colonised big chunks of it for a century or three, then drew borders for new countries that had nothing to do with ethnicity or language. So Milan is now the capital of the Styrian Republic, which comprises Lombardy, Styria, and most of Slovenia; the mix of languages shouldn't be a problem since we're going to educate all their kids in Korean, anyway, right? Then let's draw a nice straight line at an angle across France, and combine the part to the south of that with Catalonia. Let's call it "Franconia"--nevermind the locals already using that name for a different region of the continent--what do they know? And wouldn't it make things more convenient for us to administer if the Rhineland, the Netherlands, and peninsular Denmark were a single entity? And so on... and so on...
Now you know where the most of the national borders in the Mideast and Africa came from. And now maybe you're beginning to see why most if not all of these states are doomed to failure.
When have people from Africa appeared at the borders of any country "cap-in-hand [...] demanding their 'rights'"?
You've not read much news from Europe lately, have you?
God is the same yesterday, today and forever.
Correct--there was no Big Daddy In The Sky yesterday, there isn't one today, and I'm willing to bet there won't be one tomorrow, either.