Once a student has completed all of a teacher's assignments, what should the student be doing while sitting quietly between having completed the assignments and the bell other than games?
Perish the thought that they might--in a classroom, of all places--find a book to read.
...not so much for getting shot, but for subsequently taking up the cause despite being shot, and at the risk of being shot again.
Some people seem to have the odd notion that Malala was a victim of random violence. The truth of the matter is that it was anything but random.
She did *not* take up the cause "because of" being shot or even "in spite of" it. Quite the opposite. She was marked for death by the Taliban precisely because (a) she was *already* an advocate for education for girls and (b) she was *already* working to expose the Taliban's horrid treatment of girls and women to the outside world. She is still so marked by them, and it's very likely that they (or sympathisers) will eventually get her.
She knows this. And she already knows first-hand what it's like to take a bullet to the head for her beliefs. Yet she chooses to continue.
She has already shown more courage than most of us will ever display in a whole lifetime.
I am proud to be a member of the same species as she, and I wish I were even half as brave as she is.
So the arts, the law, English, and history no longer exist? And there are no more universities with CompSci departments?
Even if either of these figments of your anti-intellectual imagination were true, there are still plenty of the voc-tech sort of educational institutions in the US where you can pick up a 2-year degree in programmable controllers, instrumentation, etc., and go straight to work with it.
You cannot make a fair comparison unless you are willing to compare the two times in the context of what was available at those times.
The fact that we didn't have microwave ovens in the 1960s does nothing to alter the fact that we still had to obtain food and cook it somehow back then, and we had to earn and then spend money to do so--just like we do today.
Slashdot Mirror
-dei/-deng is Cantonese. Maybe that's what you're thinking of.
In any case, in Mandarin, it's -men (). It's also used with nouns relating to people.
If you're talking about e.g. the tóu in liù tóu niú [six cows, literally "six head cow"], then the term you're looking for is "classifier".
It really sucks that we're stuck with Latin-1 here.
I don't see how it can be taken any other way.
But by all means, let TDM clarify this for himself, rather than offer to... read his mind for us.
Whereas you've already slid all the way down a slippery slope of your own and now stand hip-deep in False Equivalence.
Keep up the good work.
What part of "Getting in a car with a stranger can be a dangerous act" did you fail to understand?
Whereas men are always perfectly rational when choosing a partner?
Spare us the closet misogyny.
Where's that -1, Nutjob mod when you need it?
But the world needs Steve Jobs, Bill Gates, Elon Musk, Andrew Canarge and John Rockefeller's of the world.
No, it doesn't.
I made it through the first 5 minutes before I had to close the tab.
So what did I win?
You can set the bong down now.
Once a student has completed all of a teacher's assignments, what should the student be doing while sitting quietly between having completed the assignments and the bell other than games?
Perish the thought that they might--in a classroom, of all places--find a book to read.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...
This is another Nobel fail. Nice people but brown and female so not worthy of the prize.
TFTFY.
The moral of the story is that she has a spine, and you've none.
You mean "copyrighted".
A whole bunch of people got jolted awake. You might not consider that positive, but some folks do.
And what the heck does Atyarthi have to do with NSA surveillance, anyway?
An assertive woman is a ballbreaker, yeah, right.
Listen up, homeboy: There can be no true peace without justice. Subjugation of women is not just.
BTW, "Gandhi" was simply her husband's name, which she assumed upon their marriage. Her husband (Feroze Gandhi) was not related to Mohandas.
...not so much for getting shot, but for subsequently taking up the cause despite being shot, and at the risk of being shot again.
Some people seem to have the odd notion that Malala was a victim of random violence. The truth of the matter is that it was anything but random.
She did *not* take up the cause "because of" being shot or even "in spite of" it. Quite the opposite. She was marked for death by the Taliban precisely because (a) she was *already* an advocate for education for girls and (b) she was *already* working to expose the Taliban's horrid treatment of girls and women to the outside world. She is still so marked by them, and it's very likely that they (or sympathisers) will eventually get her.
She knows this. And she already knows first-hand what it's like to take a bullet to the head for her beliefs. Yet she chooses to continue.
She has already shown more courage than most of us will ever display in a whole lifetime.
I am proud to be a member of the same species as she, and I wish I were even half as brave as she is.
FYI: "NGO" stands for Non-Governmental Organisation. The term is not particular to India.
Otherwise, spot on.
Install APK's Host Files Engine v. 37.0.
You talking about this?
http://caselaw.findlaw.com/ca-...
An interesting case (I read the whole thing) but it has absolutely nothing to do with the issue at hand.
And in any event I think it's likely that you don't really understand the Souza case or the issues that it does raise.
If they're smart, they'll never add an Edit button.
I'd be hoping for Plan 9, myself.
You left out the part about our precious bodily fluids.
So the arts, the law, English, and history no longer exist? And there are no more universities with CompSci departments?
Even if either of these figments of your anti-intellectual imagination were true, there are still plenty of the voc-tech sort of educational institutions in the US where you can pick up a 2-year degree in programmable controllers, instrumentation, etc., and go straight to work with it.
You cannot make a fair comparison unless you are willing to compare the two times in the context of what was available at those times.
The fact that we didn't have microwave ovens in the 1960s does nothing to alter the fact that we still had to obtain food and cook it somehow back then, and we had to earn and then spend money to do so--just like we do today.