It turns out that appointing a moron like Trump to a political position gives you exactly what you would expect, a mediaeval lord surrounded by ass lickers. I don't know why you don't go all the way and have the guy crowned as king. Though it would look a bit silly seeing as America came out of a revolution getting rid of a king.
Trump thinks climate change is bolloks and his minions will see to it that science agencies like NOAA and NASA say the same thing. This is a crime against humanity.
Wish I had mod points today and could give you all of them.
As for "Climate Science" that is nothing more than a racist political ideology aka eugenics. Promoted by people that want to kill blacks and jews the world over.
According to others who frequently post here, Climate Science is a Jewish plot to destroy the racial purity of whites.
"One, he wanted me to help re-inspire children to want to get into science and math; he wanted me to expand our international relationships; and third, and perhaps foremost, he wanted me to find a way to reach out to the Muslim world and engage much more with dominantly Muslim nations to help them feel good about their historic contribution to science, math and engineering,"
And this is a bad thing for exactly what reason? Oh, someone said something about Muslims without saying, in the same sentence, that they all need to be exterminated?
You obviously know nothing about how criminal investigations or jury trials are conducted in the United States, especially on the Federal level. Unlike most of the Trump Administration, Mueller appears to be a highly competent professional who knows how to do his job and does it.
The GP is correct: Mueller is not going to make any claims he can't back up.
In addition, there's the fact that Mueller is absolutely not about to let his targets get off claiming that they can't get a fair trial due to potential jurors being tainted by any claims appearing in the media. Nor is he going to give them any sort of a break by letting them know more about the case against them than he's obliged to, when he's obliged to. Mueller will show enough evidence to warrant a trial when he files charges; my guess is that he will not reveal an iota more until he presents his case in court.
Actually, especially given that it came out of the AEI (to be fair, she's a fairly reputable professor at Georgetown), it was pretty light on that, I thought.
It seemed to me to be more about Xi clarifying a few things for Kim. Rephrased in the vernacular, I'm guessing it sounded a lot like, "If you want us to back you up, you're gonna lighten the fuck up, get off your high horse, show us some respect, and play by the rules, which we are listing here for your convenience...". The author posits [emphasis added],
Kim realized that US military options are more likely now than in the past, and that the Chinese were preparing for contingencies that did not involve supporting the North Korean regime.
If the US were to attack North Korea, China would intervene — not in support of North Korea, but rather in support of its own interests and would possibly even collaborate with the Americans.
Makes sense, and the collaboration bit might not be as far-fetched as it sounds. Left unsaid here--but possibly not in Beijing the other week--is that the Chinese do not actually have to wait for the Americans--they can act pre-emptively if they so choose. But that's potentially very disorderly, and China is nearly certain to prefer options that offer continued stability in the region over those that don't.
Before the creation of Israel, the term 'Palestinian' was used to refer to local Jews, while the Arabs were simply called Arabs. The term 'Palestinian' didn't exist before 1967, when Arafat decided to rebrand his people that to change world opinion.
You don't help your case when your first two sentences, as written, flatly contradict one another.
Slashdot Mirror
Please don't bother responding to comments that you don't understand.
I have a head start of 4 or 5 years in learning Mandarin, so I'm not worried.
It's gonna suck a lot if you're a typical monoglot American, though.
No, but if they're there to be connected, Mueller will likely do so, thank goodness.
It turns out that appointing a moron like Trump to a political position gives you exactly what you would expect, a mediaeval lord surrounded by ass lickers. I don't know why you don't go all the way and have the guy crowned as king. Though it would look a bit silly seeing as America came out of a revolution getting rid of a king.
Trump thinks climate change is bolloks and his minions will see to it that science agencies like NOAA and NASA say the same thing. This is a crime against humanity.
Wish I had mod points today and could give you all of them.
As for "Climate Science" that is nothing more than a racist political ideology aka eugenics. Promoted by people that want to kill blacks and jews the world over.
According to others who frequently post here, Climate Science is a Jewish plot to destroy the racial purity of whites.
Can't you nutjobs get your stories straight?
Does that mean we have to have a conversation about the personal social views of everyone that knows what an antenna is?
No, just the ones who actually have their hands on the receiver controls.
Let's change the subject to blow jobs and Bill Clinton and see how well you took your own advice. (Hint: We all know that you didn't.)
Dude! EVERYTHING in this administration involves a money trail. You've not caught on to that yet?
Given world history, it would be good if a lot more people would let religion trump their reason.
I've not even finished my coffee, and you've already managed to say what'll undoubtedly be the stupidest thing I'll see or hear all day today.
Congratulations!
Somebody might see an ankle, or maybe even a knee. Oh, the horror...
How about we all just accept that about 1 in person in 10 is attracted primarily or exclusively to the same gender, and move on?
I don't care who you sleep with, as long as you don't think it's going to be with me or my wife.
And this is a bad thing for exactly what reason? Oh, someone said something about Muslims without saying, in the same sentence, that they all need to be exterminated?
No, this is like appointing someone who thinks modern medicine is bunk to be the head of a hospital.
We didn't know Sycodon was into that sort of thing. Thanks for sharing, I guess.
Talk about a fucking straw man.
Holy Fuck, dude. Try thinking for yourself.
"Doctor, heal thyself." Start with learning what the fuck a strawman is, because you obviously do not.
When Fascism came to America, it wore a bad suit with a little US flag lapel pin, and it told you to give up your brain.
TFTFY.
You obviously know nothing about how criminal investigations or jury trials are conducted in the United States, especially on the Federal level. Unlike most of the Trump Administration, Mueller appears to be a highly competent professional who knows how to do his job and does it.
The GP is correct: Mueller is not going to make any claims he can't back up.
In addition, there's the fact that Mueller is absolutely not about to let his targets get off claiming that they can't get a fair trial due to potential jurors being tainted by any claims appearing in the media. Nor is he going to give them any sort of a break by letting them know more about the case against them than he's obliged to, when he's obliged to. Mueller will show enough evidence to warrant a trial when he files charges; my guess is that he will not reveal an iota more until he presents his case in court.
Astute observers don't need announcements. The warrants and subpoenas speak for themselves: He's into something big.
It's been trying like hell to do so, in case you've not noticed?
Nice try, but not even close to the real deal.
Saddam and Gaddafi were unfortunate enough to have globalists like Bush or Obama on the other end.
Saddam and Gaddafi were unfortunate enough not to share a land border with China.
Actually, especially given that it came out of the AEI (to be fair, she's a fairly reputable professor at Georgetown), it was pretty light on that, I thought.
It seemed to me to be more about Xi clarifying a few things for Kim. Rephrased in the vernacular, I'm guessing it sounded a lot like, "If you want us to back you up, you're gonna lighten the fuck up, get off your high horse, show us some respect, and play by the rules, which we are listing here for your convenience...". The author posits [emphasis added],
Kim realized that US military options are more likely now than in the past, and that the Chinese were preparing for contingencies that did not involve supporting the North Korean regime.
If the US were to attack North Korea, China would intervene — not in support of North Korea, but rather in support of its own interests and would possibly even collaborate with the Americans.
Makes sense, and the collaboration bit might not be as far-fetched as it sounds. Left unsaid here--but possibly not in Beijing the other week--is that the Chinese do not actually have to wait for the Americans--they can act pre-emptively if they so choose. But that's potentially very disorderly, and China is nearly certain to prefer options that offer continued stability in the region over those that don't.
Agreed. I see it from an ac troll apk quoted...
That's odd, I see only APK talking to himself.
His hosts file screeds are more original, though.
Agreed. Poland, Norway, Finland (don't forget Karelia), and the Baltics must all be returned to Sweden forthwith!
I don't think we care so much about Denmark, though.
Before the creation of Israel, the term 'Palestinian' was used to refer to local Jews, while the Arabs were simply called Arabs. The term 'Palestinian' didn't exist before 1967, when Arafat decided to rebrand his people that to change world opinion.
You don't help your case when your first two sentences, as written, flatly contradict one another.