That is a misconception, though unfortunately a common one. The real situation was that a single scientist on the project posited that it might, all of the others disproved it mathematically, he irresponsibly went to the press, and they kicked him out. That's the truth, though it makes a much less sensational headline.
There is a crucial flaw in your argument: Neither animals nor children can give informed consent, and that is why marriages with them are not permitted. I don't think anyone can argue that homosexual persons are incapable of giving informed consent.
(Group marriages are an entirely different issue, because society has come to associate them both with shady tax manipulation as well as underage 'marriages'. Those were the reasons they were made illegal, rather than any inherent issue. I personally have no interest in group marriages, but feel that they should be permitted provided that 1.) They provide no financial benefit beyond what a single marriage provides [thus eliminating the shady tax manipulation] and 2.) that they follow the existing laws regarding informed consent [thus eliminating the pedophilia sub-issue])
tl;dr:
1.) Restrictions who is eligible for marriage should be limited to issues of consent
2.) Financial benefits from marriage should be identical in all cases
Anything beyond that is not the government's business.
On a side topic, I find myself wondering how long the Republican Party can continue to exist as a single entity, when it has two diametrically opposed motivations. Motivation #1 is 'small government' - that the government should stay out of citizens' private lives. Motivation #2 is the 'moral crusade' - the portion of the party that feels that gay marriage is immoral, etc. These motivations are opposed because while #1 decries any invasion of individuals' right to make their own choices, #2 requires such invasions to succeed.
Backspace or alt+left_arrow for back, alt+right_arrow for forward. HTH, HAND.
Firefox for Linux disables backspace acting as back in the default build, but you can re-enable it by setting browser.backspace_action to 0 in about:config. The alt+arrow_key ones work in every browser I've ever used. (IE on Windows, Opera on Windows and Linux, Chrome on Windows and Linux, Firefox on Windows and Linux, Konqueror on Linux, Arora on Linux)
..could Firefox devs not offer a means to pipe the video stream to the player of the user's choice? Eg, vlc or mplayer running as a content-transparent plugin?
Why do you think that when I used it, I changed my password, gave them the changed one, and immediately after changed it to a third, unrelated password?
My solution back in high school, which was the last time I ran into Websense (I'm in college now), was to get a portable app named TorFox or something of the sort. Of course, since I'm a firm believer in the idea that censoring information is a cure that is invariably worse than the disease, I proceeded to distribute it. To my classmates at first, but I told them to keep distributing it, and also gave it to anyone who asked. No idea if they've gotten it to block Tor yet though.
Well, Bucket's based on the (rather widespread) 'infobot' Perl program. The original infobot is hosted at http://sourceforge.net/projects/infobot/, but the XKCD variant of Bucket has a very detailed page showing the various interactions one can have with it, as well as a link to the Github page. See http://wiki.xkcd.com/irc/Bucket.
In addition to what wayland++ said, there's also the fact that the Perl 6 implementation on Parrot, called Rakudo, is intended to be able to mix programming languages with great ease. For example, one syntax that's been bandied about is this:
use v6;
# Perl 6 goes here
{
use P5;
# Hey, now I'm writing Perl 5 code!
}
# I'm writing Perl 6 again!
The amazing thing is that the object models will be able to interact, which means that CPAN modules will be trivially usable. That's a different kind of interop from what I showed above, and it's working (to a degree) now. Of course, the languages it works between are Cardinal (Ruby on Parrot), PIR (Parrot's native language), and Rakudo (Perl 6 on Parrot). The syntax is currently like this:
use opengl:from<PIR>;
GP using the word 'troll' could have been a cleverly constructed joke, seeing as prior to being bought by Nokia, the employees at TrollTech were known as 'the trolls'.
Not sure I believe it is a joke, though.
Split it into a small FAT partition and a bigger UDF partition. If you can't write to UDF, save files back to the FAT partition instead. This variant works on computers where you have no admin privileges.
I'm still not sure how this is easier than ntfs-3g.
On Windows > XP, not at all. On XP, a little tougher. On OS X and Linux, much better, because you don't need to install a new piece of software to access, and native UDF is much faster than ntfs-3g.
Wait until a read/write driver for exFAT [wikipedia.org] hits OS X and Linux (Linux already has a read-only driver for exFAT)
In what way would this be better than a read/write driver for NTFS?
It will probably be much easier to develop an exFAT driver in kernel space, because it's very similar to FAT. This will, again, give a performance benefit relative to ntfs-3g
By default, _really_ heavily downmodded posts are not viewable to users who aren't logged in. If you log in, you can set your view preferences to allow them to be seen.
Basically, everything even half-modern except Windows XP supports writing, and everything half-modern including windows XP can read v2.0 and down. See the relevant Wikipedia article for more specifics. There are third-party drivers for XP, so your best bet is probably to either:
a.) Format it as UDF 2.0 or less, and put a write driver for XP on it. This requires admin access to the XP computer.
b.) Split it into a small FAT partition and a bigger UDF partition. If you can't write to UDF, save files back to the FAT partition instead. This variant works on computers where you have no admin privileges.
c.) Wait until a read/write driver for exFAT hits OS X and Linux (Linux already has a read-only driver for exFAT)
Just by-the-by, there is no such thing as PERL. All acronyms for the language Perl's name are backronyms, and were created after the fact. Perl is the language, perl is the interpreter. Please refer to http://abelew.web.wesleyan.edu/perl_flame.html
What about publishers like MacMillan, which work with people such as Cory Doctorow and are enlightened enough that the authors can release their books as creative-commons licensed ebooks, DRM-free?
Perhaps a more correct statement is that people who think need government less, but are harder to impose control on in the absence of reason. This means that it is an unlikely position for politicians of the style currently in vogue to support, as it makes it more difficult for them to hold great amounts of power: If people don't need much in the way of governance, one has no (or at least much less) justification to use when making intrusive laws.
Slashdot Mirror
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncanny_valley
That is a misconception, though unfortunately a common one. The real situation was that a single scientist on the project posited that it might, all of the others disproved it mathematically, he irresponsibly went to the press, and they kicked him out. That's the truth, though it makes a much less sensational headline.
There is a crucial flaw in your argument: Neither animals nor children can give informed consent, and that is why marriages with them are not permitted. I don't think anyone can argue that homosexual persons are incapable of giving informed consent.
(Group marriages are an entirely different issue, because society has come to associate them both with shady tax manipulation as well as underage 'marriages'. Those were the reasons they were made illegal, rather than any inherent issue. I personally have no interest in group marriages, but feel that they should be permitted provided that 1.) They provide no financial benefit beyond what a single marriage provides [thus eliminating the shady tax manipulation] and 2.) that they follow the existing laws regarding informed consent [thus eliminating the pedophilia sub-issue])
tl;dr:
1.) Restrictions who is eligible for marriage should be limited to issues of consent
2.) Financial benefits from marriage should be identical in all cases
Anything beyond that is not the government's business.
On a side topic, I find myself wondering how long the Republican Party can continue to exist as a single entity, when it has two diametrically opposed motivations. Motivation #1 is 'small government' - that the government should stay out of citizens' private lives. Motivation #2 is the 'moral crusade' - the portion of the party that feels that gay marriage is immoral, etc. These motivations are opposed because while #1 decries any invasion of individuals' right to make their own choices, #2 requires such invasions to succeed.
Backspace or alt+left_arrow for back, alt+right_arrow for forward. HTH, HAND. Firefox for Linux disables backspace acting as back in the default build, but you can re-enable it by setting browser.backspace_action to 0 in about:config. The alt+arrow_key ones work in every browser I've ever used. (IE on Windows, Opera on Windows and Linux, Chrome on Windows and Linux, Firefox on Windows and Linux, Konqueror on Linux, Arora on Linux)
..could Firefox devs not offer a means to pipe the video stream to the player of the user's choice? Eg, vlc or mplayer running as a content-transparent plugin?
There's a patch floating around if Firefox's bugzilla that uses GStreamer as the backend for the <video> tag, see https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422540
Why do you think that when I used it, I changed my password, gave them the changed one, and immediately after changed it to a third, unrelated password?
My initial reaction was, "So THAT's how they have such narrow borders on the clue displays!"
Well, yes, but you can put it on a thumb drive at home.
My solution back in high school, which was the last time I ran into Websense (I'm in college now), was to get a portable app named TorFox or something of the sort. Of course, since I'm a firm believer in the idea that censoring information is a cure that is invariably worse than the disease, I proceeded to distribute it. To my classmates at first, but I told them to keep distributing it, and also gave it to anyone who asked. No idea if they've gotten it to block Tor yet though.
IIRC, that message is from Websense.
Well, Bucket's based on the (rather widespread) 'infobot' Perl program. The original infobot is hosted at http://sourceforge.net/projects/infobot/, but the XKCD variant of Bucket has a very detailed page showing the various interactions one can have with it, as well as a link to the Github page. See http://wiki.xkcd.com/irc/Bucket.
Bucket is an IRC chatbot. It hangs out in the official XKCD channel.
In addition to what wayland++ said, there's also the fact that the Perl 6 implementation on Parrot, called Rakudo, is intended to be able to mix programming languages with great ease. For example, one syntax that's been bandied about is this:
use v6;
# Perl 6 goes here
{
use P5;
# Hey, now I'm writing Perl 5 code!
}
# I'm writing Perl 6 again!
The amazing thing is that the object models will be able to interact, which means that CPAN modules will be trivially usable. That's a different kind of interop from what I showed above, and it's working (to a degree) now. Of course, the languages it works between are Cardinal (Ruby on Parrot), PIR (Parrot's native language), and Rakudo (Perl 6 on Parrot). The syntax is currently like this:
use opengl:from<PIR>;
GP using the word 'troll' could have been a cleverly constructed joke, seeing as prior to being bought by Nokia, the employees at TrollTech were known as 'the trolls'. Not sure I believe it is a joke, though.
I think you accidentally a word.
There is no myth. I benchmarked it - under sustained writes, reads go very slowly indeed. Large sequential writes get very poor throughput as well.
Split it into a small FAT partition and a bigger UDF partition. If you can't write to UDF, save files back to the FAT partition instead. This variant works on computers where you have no admin privileges.
I'm still not sure how this is easier than ntfs-3g.
On Windows > XP, not at all. On XP, a little tougher. On OS X and Linux, much better, because you don't need to install a new piece of software to access, and native UDF is much faster than ntfs-3g.
Wait until a read/write driver for exFAT [wikipedia.org] hits OS X and Linux (Linux already has a read-only driver for exFAT)
In what way would this be better than a read/write driver for NTFS?
It will probably be much easier to develop an exFAT driver in kernel space, because it's very similar to FAT. This will, again, give a performance benefit relative to ntfs-3g
By default, _really_ heavily downmodded posts are not viewable to users who aren't logged in. If you log in, you can set your view preferences to allow them to be seen.
Basically, everything even half-modern except Windows XP supports writing, and everything half-modern including windows XP can read v2.0 and down. See the relevant Wikipedia article for more specifics. There are third-party drivers for XP, so your best bet is probably to either:
a.) Format it as UDF 2.0 or less, and put a write driver for XP on it. This requires admin access to the XP computer.
b.) Split it into a small FAT partition and a bigger UDF partition. If you can't write to UDF, save files back to the FAT partition instead. This variant works on computers where you have no admin privileges.
c.) Wait until a read/write driver for exFAT hits OS X and Linux (Linux already has a read-only driver for exFAT)
Just by-the-by, there is no such thing as PERL. All acronyms for the language Perl's name are backronyms, and were created after the fact. Perl is the language, perl is the interpreter. Please refer to http://abelew.web.wesleyan.edu/perl_flame.html
er, s/MacMillan/Tor Books/
What about publishers like MacMillan, which work with people such as Cory Doctorow and are enlightened enough that the authors can release their books as creative-commons licensed ebooks, DRM-free?
A couple things. One, if you want something even more ridiculously overspecced for mudding and which will even work with the best mudding OS (Linux, naturally), try this on for size: http://secure.newegg.com/WishList/PublicWishDetail.aspx?WishListNumber=4365528&WishListTitle=UltraComp Also, a really fun MUD: Temporal Rifts.
I curl up with the Apache Cookbook at the beach, you insensitive clod!
Perhaps a more correct statement is that people who think need government less, but are harder to impose control on in the absence of reason. This means that it is an unlikely position for politicians of the style currently in vogue to support, as it makes it more difficult for them to hold great amounts of power: If people don't need much in the way of governance, one has no (or at least much less) justification to use when making intrusive laws.