Out of curiosity, how do mice excrete excess vitamins? Humans just let excess vitamins out through their urine. I don't believe I've seen mouse urine, just turd pellets. I don't know if mice urinate, or leave some of it in their excretion. If that's what they do, then it's ineffecient for disposing of excess vitamins. Humans can just allow excess vitamins and minerals to pass right through us quickly, doing no harm.
Dr. Victor Herbert, a professor of Medicine at New York City's Mount Sanai Medical School says that we urinate away our excess vitamins, although he's against vitamin supplements "We get all the vitamins we need in our diets, and taking supplements just gives you expensive urine."
But that's just one person, TIME Magazine in 1992, their cover article was "The real power of vitamins", "New research shows it might help cancer, fight heart disease, and the ravages of aging". A whole six positive pages. If you haven't read it, I would encourage you to go to a public library, or find it on the internet, and read it.
And you can go on a diet if you want, it doesn't matter about calories, just vitamins and essential trace minerals.
Mislimov was reported to be 168 years old by National Geographic magazine. Young stated that he personally interviewed and photographed Mislimov. However, this is not possible.
First, the Azerbaijan authorities did not permit any western journalists or medical men to interview him because they felt that Mislimov was too frail. Second, Mislimov died in 1973.
How did they get the photo? Was it through some other source, such as an Azerbaijan journalist? And does that stop them from working ad-hoc with him to get an interview/medical report/etc? No. I'd also like to congratulate the author of that article for completely undermining my confidence in him and you by saying that Mislimov died in 1973. The article came out in January of 1973. Research like that can take months. So it's safe to say that Mislimov was found in maybe December of 1972. How this stops him from being 168 I don't know.
Maybe you should have a look at what you're giving me. And our genetic potential has been identified to be 160+ years. It doesn't matter whether he got vitamin supplements or not, as long as he got all of them and the necessary trace minerals, he could have lived to be 168.
I don't have a reference on the TIME Magazine article, but if you dig out National Geographic Magazine - January 1973, you'll find an article on longeivity by Dr. Alexander Leaf. He searched the world looking for the oldest living person, and they found Sharalla Mesmelov (167 years old) of a small Russian town. Remember, this is the National Geographic Society, not the National Enquirer. 167 years of age, and they had a half page picture of him actually harvesting tea leaves on a tea plantation. Still working 8 hours a day, six days a week at age 167. Five months later, May of 1973, he turns 168, goes out and hoes the garden for reporters to show how vigorous he is at age 168.
That's funny. I actually got that information from Dr. Joe Wallach's lecture series, "Dead Doctors Don't Lie". Site 1 and Site 2. There's a Geocities site that dismisses these claims. But the link is broken. Damn.
You can get a life expectancy of 160+ years if you don't have any nutritional defeciencies. All you need to do is have the correct amount of Vitamin A, B, C, D etc and all other trace minerals, and you're fine. We shouldn't have to cheat death like this.
Yes, but to make magnets strong enough to disrupt stuff you need electronics etc scattered around with it. A rangefinder can pick up a Gameboy a mile away, what do you think it'll do to complicated military-grade electronics? The idea is that we use something natural here.
And no, "we" don't necessarily have the ability to resist such diabolical devices, without excessive magnetic shielding. It's like an EM pulse.
We're already seeing the end of Internet1, it's only a matter of time before we get to the bust part of the boom and bust cycle and hitch a ride onto Internet2. But with services such as broadband and P2P maxing out our bandwidth, what else do we need?
Well I'm glad to see Halo getting some recogonition as a potential medium for budget film development. For far too long have camcorders and amatuer film capture gear dominated the market. I vote RvB.
I don't see how this could be all that technologically useful for consumers, but for the military, I'd like to see little plastic spheres that, when twisted, generate their own little magnetic fields without any other materials than what the enemy would expect to be naturally residing in an area. Drop a few around a desert or combat area, and watch their compasses/electrical equipment go out.
I'll shell out four bills so I can play Halo 3 online. Take a look at Halo 2's multiplayer compared to Halo. And take a look at how much fun Halo 2 is over Xbox live. But then again, it's not counterstrike, which is the most important online game of all time?
Here's an idea... why don't you just buy the core system AND Halo 3? Or better yet, WAIT until Halo 3 is released when PS3 is launched, and after Microsoft slashes prices. I'm buying and XBOX 360 Complete/whatever pack that has the HDD and wireless controller/headset whatever, plus Halo 3. Total cost = XBOX + Halo 3. Which, when the time comes, will be something like 300 to 400$
What the hell do slashdot editors do? Do they have a button that says randomly select worst article and click it? Not only is this old news (it's been listed on IMDB for months as 2007), it's incredibly pointless. I'm a great fan of Halo, and I'm glad they're taking their time with this movie.
I'm also a fan of slashdot and it's a shame to see stupid editors on the team.
Football is as necessary as a condom in gay sex. I wouldn't be against football so much if:
* If all the jocks that played it didn't give me shit
* If all the jocks that played it didn't get better equipment than the computer club because football is the schools 'life blood'
* If all the jocks that played it didn't ask me the day before to bail them out of some critical piece of assessment for the third time.
Technology in classrooms is necessary. Not only is our world increasingly dependent on technology to do menial tasks, but the workforce of the future will be expected to be fluent with these technologies and it's better to get children accustomed to them as soon as possible. And let's not forget the obvious advantage of having advanced interactive content in the classroom.
It's a good setup, and the hardware is coming cheap(er) than what I expected, thanks to Microsoft subsidising it. Anyone know how much they'll be losing per xbox?
I'd like this standard to be around for at least another 20 years, so hopefully it'll be expandible enough to support Japan's 3D holodeck and other new age newfangled things. I'd also like to see it transfer arbitrary to and from the source.
This has been covered on/. a lot, but nonetheless, I still want to see these artificial materials given 'smart' qualities. Like the example I gave previously, such as superconducting cords that detangle themselves and melt down and allow you to pour it through where you want it and it reforms itself.
Even if that doesn't happen, I wouldn't be suprised if we get our first superconductors from methods like this.
2ADV.net have some insanely powerful deals from around 12$ a month, to their 300$ a month dedicated server. They run both types of server (Linux/Windows) and the site and company was created by 2ADV.com, a successful webdesign team.
Or maybe because you're the typical geek who hates everything that's big and dominant....or not. Like you end up agreeing with me, I use what's best. That's why I don't use Linux on my home computer for development and personal use, I use Windows XP Pro and MS VS.NET 2003, with Visual Assist X with Internet Explorer 7. My webservers are Linux, Apache 2 and MySQL 4.1. I use AMD and ATi, a MS mouse, as well as other fairly dominant brands for most of my hardware, such as my Pioneer DVD drive.
Hopefully this will give nex-gen AMD chips a fresh design and hopefully push them to a significant majority over Intel. I've always personally favoured AMD chips, simply because they're damn good value, and efficient.
I'd like to see these sort of things geared up with 'smart' nanotechnology to make 'smart' cords and stuff like that, imagine a highly conductive wire that provided +, - and ground and detangled itself, or melted into a pool and you just pulled cord out of it, all detangled or bent into whatever shape you want.
Slashdot Mirror
Out of curiosity, how do mice excrete excess vitamins? Humans just let excess vitamins out through their urine. I don't believe I've seen mouse urine, just turd pellets. I don't know if mice urinate, or leave some of it in their excretion. If that's what they do, then it's ineffecient for disposing of excess vitamins. Humans can just allow excess vitamins and minerals to pass right through us quickly, doing no harm.
Dr. Victor Herbert, a professor of Medicine at New York City's Mount Sanai Medical School says that we urinate away our excess vitamins, although he's against vitamin supplements "We get all the vitamins we need in our diets, and taking supplements just gives you expensive urine."
But that's just one person, TIME Magazine in 1992, their cover article was "The real power of vitamins", "New research shows it might help cancer, fight heart disease, and the ravages of aging". A whole six positive pages. If you haven't read it, I would encourage you to go to a public library, or find it on the internet, and read it.
And you can go on a diet if you want, it doesn't matter about calories, just vitamins and essential trace minerals.
Mislimov was reported to be 168 years old by National Geographic magazine. Young stated that he personally interviewed and photographed Mislimov. However, this is not possible.
First, the Azerbaijan authorities did not permit any western journalists or medical men to interview him because they felt that Mislimov was too frail. Second, Mislimov died in 1973. How did they get the photo? Was it through some other source, such as an Azerbaijan journalist? And does that stop them from working ad-hoc with him to get an interview/medical report/etc? No. I'd also like to congratulate the author of that article for completely undermining my confidence in him and you by saying that Mislimov died in 1973. The article came out in January of 1973. Research like that can take months. So it's safe to say that Mislimov was found in maybe December of 1972. How this stops him from being 168 I don't know.
Maybe you should have a look at what you're giving me. And our genetic potential has been identified to be 160+ years. It doesn't matter whether he got vitamin supplements or not, as long as he got all of them and the necessary trace minerals, he could have lived to be 168.
I don't have a reference on the TIME Magazine article, but if you dig out National Geographic Magazine - January 1973, you'll find an article on longeivity by Dr. Alexander Leaf. He searched the world looking for the oldest living person, and they found Sharalla Mesmelov (167 years old) of a small Russian town. Remember, this is the National Geographic Society, not the National Enquirer. 167 years of age, and they had a half page picture of him actually harvesting tea leaves on a tea plantation. Still working 8 hours a day, six days a week at age 167. Five months later, May of 1973, he turns 168, goes out and hoes the garden for reporters to show how vigorous he is at age 168.
There are people who have lived to 170 odd years in third world countries. TIME Magazine covered it a while ago.
That's funny.
I actually got that information from Dr. Joe Wallach's lecture series, "Dead Doctors Don't Lie". Site 1 and Site 2. There's a Geocities site that dismisses these claims. But the link is broken. Damn.
You can get a life expectancy of 160+ years if you don't have any nutritional defeciencies. All you need to do is have the correct amount of Vitamin A, B, C, D etc and all other trace minerals, and you're fine. We shouldn't have to cheat death like this.
Yes, but to make magnets strong enough to disrupt stuff you need electronics etc scattered around with it. A rangefinder can pick up a Gameboy a mile away, what do you think it'll do to complicated military-grade electronics? The idea is that we use something natural here. And no, "we" don't necessarily have the ability to resist such diabolical devices, without excessive magnetic shielding. It's like an EM pulse.
We're already seeing the end of Internet1, it's only a matter of time before we get to the bust part of the boom and bust cycle and hitch a ride onto Internet2. But with services such as broadband and P2P maxing out our bandwidth, what else do we need?
I did point out that it was something that the enemy wouldn't expect in that area.
Well I'm glad to see Halo getting some recogonition as a potential medium for budget film development. For far too long have camcorders and amatuer film capture gear dominated the market. I vote RvB.
I don't see how this could be all that technologically useful for consumers, but for the military, I'd like to see little plastic spheres that, when twisted, generate their own little magnetic fields without any other materials than what the enemy would expect to be naturally residing in an area. Drop a few around a desert or combat area, and watch their compasses/electrical equipment go out.
I'll shell out four bills so I can play Halo 3 online. Take a look at Halo 2's multiplayer compared to Halo. And take a look at how much fun Halo 2 is over Xbox live. But then again, it's not counterstrike, which is the most important online game of all time?
Here's an idea... why don't you just buy the core system AND Halo 3? Or better yet, WAIT until Halo 3 is released when PS3 is launched, and after Microsoft slashes prices. I'm buying and XBOX 360 Complete/whatever pack that has the HDD and wireless controller/headset whatever, plus Halo 3. Total cost = XBOX + Halo 3. Which, when the time comes, will be something like 300 to 400$
What the hell do slashdot editors do? Do they have a button that says randomly select worst article and click it? Not only is this old news (it's been listed on IMDB for months as 2007), it's incredibly pointless. I'm a great fan of Halo, and I'm glad they're taking their time with this movie.
I'm also a fan of slashdot and it's a shame to see stupid editors on the team.
Football is as necessary as a condom in gay sex. I wouldn't be against football so much if:
* If all the jocks that played it didn't give me shit
* If all the jocks that played it didn't get better equipment than the computer club because football is the schools 'life blood'
* If all the jocks that played it didn't ask me the day before to bail them out of some critical piece of assessment for the third time.
Enjoy
Technology in classrooms is necessary. Not only is our world increasingly dependent on technology to do menial tasks, but the workforce of the future will be expected to be fluent with these technologies and it's better to get children accustomed to them as soon as possible. And let's not forget the obvious advantage of having advanced interactive content in the classroom.
It's nice to see normal Asia-Pacific area's being on the cutting edge of spam fighting. And it's nice to see MS recognise NZ.
Damn right. But they usually STFU after me and my buddy tag team their ass with Sniper/Energy Sword and Battle Rifle/Shotgun on Lockout.
It's a good setup, and the hardware is coming cheap(er) than what I expected, thanks to Microsoft subsidising it. Anyone know how much they'll be losing per xbox?
I'd like this standard to be around for at least another 20 years, so hopefully it'll be expandible enough to support Japan's 3D holodeck and other new age newfangled things. I'd also like to see it transfer arbitrary to and from the source.
This has been covered on /. a lot, but nonetheless, I still want to see these artificial materials given 'smart' qualities. Like the example I gave previously, such as superconducting cords that detangle themselves and melt down and allow you to pour it through where you want it and it reforms itself.
Even if that doesn't happen, I wouldn't be suprised if we get our first superconductors from methods like this.
2ADV.net have some insanely powerful deals from around 12$ a month, to their 300$ a month dedicated server. They run both types of server (Linux/Windows) and the site and company was created by 2ADV.com, a successful webdesign team.
Or maybe because you're the typical geek who hates everything that's big and dominant. ...or not. Like you end up agreeing with me, I use what's best. That's why I don't use Linux on my home computer for development and personal use, I use Windows XP Pro and MS VS .NET 2003, with Visual Assist X with Internet Explorer 7. My webservers are Linux, Apache 2 and MySQL 4.1. I use AMD and ATi, a MS mouse, as well as other fairly dominant brands for most of my hardware, such as my Pioneer DVD drive.
Hopefully this will give nex-gen AMD chips a fresh design and hopefully push them to a significant majority over Intel. I've always personally favoured AMD chips, simply because they're damn good value, and efficient.
I'd like to see these sort of things geared up with 'smart' nanotechnology to make 'smart' cords and stuff like that, imagine a highly conductive wire that provided +, - and ground and detangled itself, or melted into a pool and you just pulled cord out of it, all detangled or bent into whatever shape you want.