The return in the inline function would probably be translate to the same opcode(s) as the original goto, but it could be argued that the use of an inline function would be a better design (easier to maintain) than the use of a goto.
That's better, but it still has only 720 unique solutions, which is still within brute-force range.
You mean 120 unique solutions, right? (10*9*8)/(3*2*1)=720/6=120
By comparison, a text CAPTCHA has something like 56 billion unique solutions for a 6-digit string.
AFAIK most text CAPTCHAs isn't case-sensitive and most of them doesn't use both letters and numbers (you don't want to reject humans who can't tell the difference between '0' and 'O' and between '1' and 'l'), so that would be 26^6=308.915.776 solutions, not (26+26+10)^6=56.800.235.584 solutions. Right?
Wouldn't that make it easier for an attacker to exploit your local DNS?
You just told him, that his fake DNS-responses should appear to come from either 208.67.222.222 or 208.67.220.220.
You have to make it illegal to send a packet to an IP address unless you have obtained that IP address through a DNS lookup. How would you obtain the IP address of a DNS without already knowing the IP address of another DNS?
Now if the aforementioned act of publication occurs by means of being placed on a web server[3], any hack lawyer could make a pretty good argument that the server's location is precisely what matters. But couldn't another lawyer make the argument that, even though the image has been placed on a web server located in e.g. the US, the image is still being published in France, when a user from France displays the image on his/her computer?
Slashdot Mirror
Hackers (1995), Hackers 2 - Operation Takedown (2000), Hackers 3 - Antitrust (2001).
I think you forgot one: Hackers 0, WarGames (1983)
I learned all my mad 1337 skillz from that movie... ALL of them!
Can't wait to see which spammer registers free.viagra
A spammer with deep pockets and a very strong legal team?
$185k to apply, and if the TLD you're applying for is trademarked, you have to show it's yours.
"V1AGRA" is my trademark, you insensitive clod!
My company is "#1" and I would like to register "1" as our TLD. Our nameservers will be located at 10.0.0.1, 127.0.0.1, 172.16.0.1 and 192.168.0.1.
Fidonet was your friend.
I still remember my old pointnumber, 2:235/314.62. I think, I got that address in '92 or '93.
Later, around 1995, I got my own nodenumber, 2:235/362, and a couple of points of my own.
But then "the Internet" started showing up and by 2000 my BBS were long gone...
In communist China, BSOD is projected on roof.
Well, I for one, welcome our new olympic overlords.
The rice cake is a lie.
Well, it could be an inline function...
The return in the inline function would probably be translate to the same opcode(s) as the original goto, but it could be argued that the use of an inline function would be a better design (easier to maintain) than the use of a goto.
I don't know... Let's see the code.
These have good randomness and are any-cast addresses for DNS servers all over the country.
Fixed.
Last Modified: 10/3/04
Those stats might not be up to date...
That's better, but it still has only 720 unique solutions, which is still within brute-force range.
You mean 120 unique solutions, right? (10*9*8)/(3*2*1)=720/6=120
By comparison, a text CAPTCHA has something like 56 billion unique solutions for a 6-digit string.
AFAIK most text CAPTCHAs isn't case-sensitive and most of them doesn't use both letters and numbers (you don't want to reject humans who can't tell the difference between '0' and 'O' and between '1' and 'l'), so that would be 26^6=308.915.776 solutions, not (26+26+10)^6=56.800.235.584 solutions. Right?
Wouldn't that make it easier for an attacker to exploit your local DNS?
You just told him, that his fake DNS-responses should appear to come from either 208.67.222.222 or 208.67.220.220.
Maybe we should put the RIAA in a box and launch it at the sun.
Why do you want to waste a perfectly good box?
They should to be fired... Out of a cannon... Into the sun...
No reason to use a box for that.
The cake is a lie...
As far as I remember Microsoft stopped those ads on Google because people actually did mind.
Stoning women is the best part?
I'm going to regret this, but what's the worst part?
I hate when that happens.
Oh. You were talk about the entertainment system...
Posting to undo mod...
Did you mod him "+5 Insightful"?
2007 called. They want their story back.
Oh, yeah, Linus is (still) right...
Give it another couple of days ... and a fifth cable will be cut.
I, for one, welcome our new cablecutting overlords.
Personally I prefer Tim, but hey, maybe that's just me...
Really, really small sharks...