If it is possible for the material to be used to make a nuclear weapon, then this may be a bad thing. If it isn't then yay, counter terrorist hackers ftw!
Weapons of mass destruction in the hands of a terrorist state seems like a very bad thing if you don't think murdering innocents intentionally is an acceptable political tactic.
Imagine David Karesh with a nuke...
I know it's a bad analogy, I'm just sayin these Iranian dudes ain't cooking with a full load of fava beans.
As a WA State Citizen this worries me.
I prefer a paper ballot with it's unique characteristics.
Better yet, I prefer that those who care enough to actually go to a polling place get to vote. Anyone not willing to travel doesn't care enough to vote.
Why should our laws be made by those who can't find the remote?
It gives me the heebie-jeebies to think of what could happen to a trading network connected to the Internet.
I imagine Stuxnet aimed at financial systems.
Shudder.
The Government has had a hand in GM and most other Big Businesses for quite some time.
How do you think congressmen and senators get money for re-election?
"Google News is experimenting with meta-tags in an effort to ensure that the correct news source is credit with an article."
Someone set us up the Googlebomb?
From the first 2 opening paragraphs:
"Mozilla has already brought the desktop Firefox experience to mobile devices long back as the Fennec browser"
"Mozilla has designed a prototype of mobile app store"
GNU can take over the world, but beware the dreaded Engrish.
I'd bet on human ingenuity vs generic build orders though. We learn build orders from each other and adapt far faster to disruptive tactics than any AI can at this point.
Of course we can't watch 15 flash points at once...
So tack 32 more onto the existing working IPV4 technology. No need to change the INTERNET PROTOCOL so drastically.
Just extend the address space of the currently working technology.
Duh...
Like it would be hard to add 4 bytes.
AIUI, those documents contain the names of people in Afghanistan who are giving information to the US. Publishing the documents without redacting the names tells the Taliban exactly who to kill. Does that answer your question?
Publishing the names without redacting them WOULD HAVE told the Taliban who to kill. But they DID REDACT AS MANY NAMES AS THEY COULD.
Sorry we didn't redact your name and they killed you. We did the best we could...
And the SECRET military after action reports Julian Assange posted online contained nothing "we the people" didn't know already.
Besides the names of the locals trying to get rid of the terrorists on their side of the mountain that is. The bad guys are stoked. Unfortunately for the locals, Julian's actions put them in grave danger.
Julian gets famous, the folks he really outed get dead.
And he's bitching because the US gov't is choking off his MONEY?
Sorry to shut off the flow pal, but you're KILLING PEOPLE.
Slashdot Mirror
If it is possible for the material to be used to make a nuclear weapon, then this may be a bad thing. If it isn't then yay, counter terrorist hackers ftw!
Weapons of mass destruction in the hands of a terrorist state seems like a very bad thing if you don't think murdering innocents intentionally is an acceptable political tactic.
Imagine David Karesh with a nuke...
I know it's a bad analogy, I'm just sayin these Iranian dudes ain't cooking with a full load of fava beans.
As a WA State Citizen this worries me. I prefer a paper ballot with it's unique characteristics. Better yet, I prefer that those who care enough to actually go to a polling place get to vote. Anyone not willing to travel doesn't care enough to vote. Why should our laws be made by those who can't find the remote?
Heh. Don't believe the hype. TEA partiers mostly have one thing in common: Mistrust of Government's "Good Intentions".
Me too.
If I was Google I would Goatse Bing's ass for being so lame.
It gives me the heebie-jeebies to think of what could happen to a trading network connected to the Internet. I imagine Stuxnet aimed at financial systems. Shudder.
More people watch Fox than any other news source. Fox haters, would you trust them more if they published fake air national guard memos like CBS did?
Is that like weather prediction software?
LoL! I apologize for the redundancy with the Score:5, Funny, but I couldn't help myself.
The Government has had a hand in GM and most other Big Businesses for quite some time. How do you think congressmen and senators get money for re-election?
"Google News is experimenting with meta-tags in an effort to ensure that the correct news source is credit with an article."
Someone set us up the Googlebomb?
...and you will love video games again. BTW, these are not the droids you are looking for...
(Despite the snark, I am still looking forward to Cata.)
From the first 2 opening paragraphs:
"Mozilla has already brought the desktop Firefox experience to mobile devices long back as the Fennec browser"
"Mozilla has designed a prototype of mobile app store"
GNU can take over the world, but beware the dreaded Engrish.
They must feel pretty ripped off. It failed to prove anything.
Not when it comes to the eco industrial complex.
I'd bet on human ingenuity vs generic build orders though. We learn build orders from each other and adapt far faster to disruptive tactics than any AI can at this point. Of course we can't watch 15 flash points at once...
So tack 32 more onto the existing working IPV4 technology. No need to change the INTERNET PROTOCOL so drastically. Just extend the address space of the currently working technology. Duh... Like it would be hard to add 4 bytes.
AIUI, those documents contain the names of people in Afghanistan who are giving information to the US. Publishing the documents without redacting the names tells the Taliban exactly who to kill. Does that answer your question?
Publishing the names without redacting them WOULD HAVE told the Taliban who to kill. But they DID REDACT AS MANY NAMES AS THEY COULD.
Sorry we didn't redact your name and they killed you. We did the best we could...
And the SECRET military after action reports Julian Assange posted online contained nothing "we the people" didn't know already.
Besides the names of the locals trying to get rid of the terrorists on their side of the mountain that is. The bad guys are stoked. Unfortunately for the locals, Julian's actions put them in grave danger.
Julian gets famous, the folks he really outed get dead.
And he's bitching because the US gov't is choking off his MONEY?
Sorry to shut off the flow pal, but you're KILLING PEOPLE.
The party of trial lawyers isn't going to change without some feedback.
nuff said...
The more providers the better. That way nobody has a corner on the market and if you don't like your service you have options.
World of Warcraft > all console games combined.
Why is getting closer than 65ft bad enough to be fined $40K or slapped with a Felony?
What's the problem as long as long as nobody touches the boom?
Scary much?
That's like a friggin electric fence that blows your life apart.
I'll take care of my own safety, thank you, and I'm not talking about interfering with the boom, so spare me the straw men.
Why so harsh?
What if I walk along the beach, some of the poorly installed boom has washed up and I accidentally get closer than 65ft?
Can a pencil neck prosecutor who needs votes for a close election take my life apart?
Nah. Never happen.
I don't play Lacrosse.
You are a teabagger. They are the true liberals. Don't tax me bro.