Slashdot Mirror


People With University Degree Fear Death Less

An anonymous reader writes "People with a university degree fear death less than those at a lower literacy level. In addition, fear of death is more common among women than men, which affects their children's perception of death."

473 comments

  1. Grad studies by CaptainMoron · · Score: 5, Funny

    Grad studies are worse than any kind of death. I experienced both.

    1. Re:Grad studies by derGoldstein · · Score: 1

      Alternate wording: "When you've already been through hell, you have nothing to fear." (kinda sounds like a horror movie slogan)

      Also, is "fear of death is most common among women than men" grammatically correct? Most/Than? Shouldn't it be "more than"? (I'm guessing that they have editors and this is technically correct, I'm just unfamiliar with it)

      --
      Entomologically speaking, the spider is not a bug, it's a feature.
    2. Re:Grad studies by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 2

      Also, is "fear of death is most common among women than men" grammatically correct? Most/Than? Shouldn't it be "more than"? (I'm guessing that they have editors and this is technically correct, I'm just unfamiliar with it)

      No it's not, yes it should, and you're unfamiliar with it because it's wrong. ;)

      Note the tag line at the bottom of the article: "Provided by University of Granada." I suspect they had the article translated into English by a Spanish-speaker who learned English very well in school, but doesn't have a native speaker's grasp of idiom. My mother, an American who speaks German fluently enough to be mistaken for a native speaker and lived in Germany for several years, works as a translator in partnership with a German who speaks very good English; my mother handles all the German-to-English translations while her partner handles all the English-to-German. For professional translations, the rule is "always translate into your native language." Unfortunately a lot of people don't get this -- or just don't want to pay for the services of a professional translator -- so minor but irritating mistakes like "most than" tend to slip through.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    3. Re:Grad studies by paiute · · Score: 1

      Grad studies are worse than any kind of death.

      I experienced both.

      See my sig. Free download. Happy ending.

      --
      If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    4. Re:Grad studies by Anarchitektur · · Score: 1

      Compared to law school, death is a trivial matter.

    5. Re:Grad studies by flyneye · · Score: 3, Informative

      Nope, the school loan you took out will top the list and be the cause of which this article speaks. The realization that you've just enlisted into servitude that will belay retirement 10 years past life expectancy in order to pay off the privilege ,will be quite enough to make you even yearn for death.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    6. Re:Grad studies by binaryseraph · · Score: 1

      Grad students are even worse than that!

    7. Re:Grad studies by smithwis · · Score: 1

      Is that you Jesus?

    8. Re:Grad studies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just finished my PhD. Now that I know what real life means,do you think I'm not afraid of death? Gee more than ever, now that I really know what a life is!

    9. Re:Grad studies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, once the soul is gone, death is nothing to fear.

    10. Re:Grad studies by Foobar+of+Borg · · Score: 2

      Compared to law school, death is a trivial matter.

      Compared to dealing with lawyers, death is a trivial matter.

    11. Re:Grad studies by fishexe · · Score: 1

      Grad studies are worse than any kind of death. I experienced both.

      Both kinds of death?

      --
      "I don't care about the Constitution!" --Bill O'Reilly, November 17, 2009
  2. Odd. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I think these are odd findings. Lower literacy also correlates to a higher belief in the supernatural and "life after death" (heaven, virgins, whatever), so you'd think lower literacy would correlate with a lower fear of death.

    1. Re:Odd. by Nursie · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Maybe belief in the supernatural correlates well with fear of death.

      Maybe if you're shit-scared of death all the time you find refuge in faith.

      Me, I have a university degree and an IQ in the genius range (I don't think I'm a genius). Count me as someone that is educated, reasonably intelligent and scared of death. Isn't fear of death natural? I mean, I don't want to imagine a world without me, I won't be there. And that's leaving out the part in which you actually die, which isn't going to be any fun either.

      Sign me up for immortality treatment please.

    2. Re:Odd. by The+End+Of+Days · · Score: 1

      Not if you believe in a merciful loving god who will subject you to an eternity of torture because you ate meat on the wrong day.

    3. Re:Odd. by gameboyhippo · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      C'mon. I've always known that atheists were idiots. This makes perfect sense to me. /flamebait

    4. Re:Odd. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You seem to have got it backwards.

      Lower literacy also correlates to a higher belief in the supernatural and "life after death"

      Whoosh!

    5. Re:Odd. by IICV · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If I believed that there was a good chance that after I died I would be thrown into a lake of fire and otherwise punished for the rest of eternity, you can bet your sorry ass that I would be scared shitless of dying. Yes yes if you're good you get to go to heaven, but what if you accidentally committed a mortal sin without realizing it or something? After all, if you read the Bible, God is nothing if not capricious; how can you know that when He said "No mixed fabrics!", He didn't really mean it? What if you really are supposed to believe in the Miracle of Transubstantiation, reality be damned? It's just so uncertain.

      Fortunately there's no hell, so there's no worries on that front. Honestly, I can't for the life of me see why theists think that religion brings peace and comfort. What is any amount of Earthly reassurance, in the face of the threat of infinite torture? (take that, Pascal!)

    6. Re:Odd. by SplashMyBandit · · Score: 1

      It is normal to not want to die. This is normal self-preservation in action. When you realize that you must die as billions have before you then you fear death less - it is inevitable and there will be no miracle 'cure' to avoid it - all you can do it treat your body well and really live as well as you can. Then you will be truly be living in full knowledge that one day you will too pass away - probably never to return. So don't fscking waste the time you have! You will transcend the fear the more you accept the inevitable. I'm not Jewish but the L'chaim (not meaning "to life", but instead "life!") is as good a philosophy as any.

    7. Re:Odd. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Lower literacy also correlates to a higher belief in the supernatural and "life after death" (heaven, virgins, whatever)

      weak troll bro
      you should've at least put "sky wizards" or some other equally unfunny nerd speak in there.

    8. Re:Odd. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bah! I'm advanced to trolling 102, I try to make my trolls look like "just some guy thinking out loud, not tryin' to cause a stir".

      Once I've mastered that, it's on to trolling 200 - "making posts that absolutely nobody can tell are trolls, and which actually bolster the position of those you're lampooning.".

    9. Re:Odd. by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 4, Funny

      Honestly, I can't for the life of me see why theists think that religion brings peace and comfort

      Religion brings money and political power. If you can't derive peace and comfort from those, there's no hope for you!

    10. Re:Odd. by Mindcontrolled · · Score: 4, Funny

      And if I unexpectedly should be thrown into that lake of fire instead of fading into nothingness, well... That would be the time to go ahead with the full survive, evade, resist, escape program and take the bastard responsible for this on. Let's see who's burning in the end.

      --
      Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
    11. Re:Odd. by oldhack · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Exactly the opposite.

      If you believe in after life, you'd probably expect "they" will settle the score once you die, and who isn't a "sinner"?

      --
      Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
    12. Re:Odd. by derGoldstein · · Score: 1

      It's not easy making money off of religion. The whole idea is that money flows from the many to the few, so only so many religious people can actively profit from it. It does make getting and keeping a job easier in many (if not most) cases, but this depends on what sector you work in.

      Of course, if you're an atheist, you could argue that it's not an immoral decision to *pretend* to be religious, for the perks. In some countries the "perks" include staying alive.

      --
      Entomologically speaking, the spider is not a bug, it's a feature.
    13. Re:Odd. by derGoldstein · · Score: 1

      A) Greetings existentialists :)
      B) I *am* Jewish, and "Le-Chaim" means "To Life" if you approximate it to modern Hebrew. If you look at the etymology of it, and at the purpose of the phrase, it becomes more complicated, and (arguably) a question of opinion.

      --
      Entomologically speaking, the spider is not a bug, it's a feature.
    14. Re:Odd. by omfgnosis · · Score: 3, Funny

      Just wait til you graduate from "I can't even tell anymore whether I'm trolling at any given time."

    15. Re:Odd. by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 1
      "It's better to reign in hell than serve in heaven"
      -- John Milton

      When you get to heaven, you will wish you're in hell"
      -- Marilyn Manson

      Why not have a little fun with it? Why not ask Satan if he may drag you out of the lake of fire so you can join him in flipping the bird at the man and trolling and Screwtaping mere mortals to their damnation? If the puny humans lack the capacity for creative fun and want to remain sheep, then let 'em live as slaves in heaven or burn in hell. As long as heaven exists, so will hell...and why not be content with your imperfections and your innate animalistic evil?

      The Satanic Bible makes much more sense than the Holy one does. Quoth the Wikipedia:

      To LaVey, god is simply what we all wish we could be. He kills without mercy or explanation, is free to do as he/she wishes, and is responsible to no one.

      p.s. I sold my soul to the Devil and all I got was this lousy terrible karma.

    16. Re:Odd. by CosmeticLobotamy · · Score: 1

      If that happens, the guy on the other side created a universe, of which something as insanely complicated as a human is one trillionth of a trillionth of a trillionth of a percent. The guy built the moon and is way better at physics than Steven Hawking, so it's not like you're dealing with a guy that lacks either brains or brawn. Plus if the lake of fire is actually on the moon, you're pretty much fucked on that escape part. So best of luck, assuming you weren't the rare total douche who deserves a lake of fire, but I don't like your chances.

    17. Re:Odd. by Mindcontrolled · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Oh, I did not mean Satan with the guy responsible for this. Any god condemning a single soul to infiinte punishment for a finite transgression is pure evil. That one would be the target in this unlikely case.

      --
      Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
    18. Re:Odd. by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 1

      I'm wondering exactly how they posed the question--because I'm not scared of death in the slightest, but I'm scared as fuck of dying. I have a feeling that won't be pleasant unless I'm very lucky.

      That said, regardless of how I get there I'd pick consciousness over oblivion any day.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    19. Re:Odd. by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      Once again, timothy can't put down the paint thinner long enough to check his submission - look at the very first sentence. "... lower literacy leve." See what you did wrong there, timothy? But no, he manages to embarrass himself once again.

      Go and get yourself cleaned up, timothy, and try again.

    20. Re:Odd. by jameskojiro · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Heaven is a terribly boring place, Hell is suffering, I would rather take another chance at life and Re-incarnate, of course it would be nice to retain ALL my memories of the past life so I could learn from experience and not make the same mistakes twice.

      --
      Tsukasa: All I really want, is to be left alone...
    21. Re:Odd. by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 1

      If I believed that there was a good chance that after I died I would be thrown into a lake of fire and otherwise punished for the rest of eternity, you can bet your sorry ass that I would be scared shitless of dying. Yes yes if you're good you get to go to heaven, but what if you accidentally committed a mortal sin without realizing it or something? After all, if you read the Bible, God is nothing if not capricious; how can you know that when He said "No mixed fabrics!", He didn't really mean it? What if you really are supposed to believe in the Miracle of Transubstantiation, reality be damned? It's just so uncertain.

      For those who believe in it, it's not uncertain at all. I've never met anyone who believed in the literal existence of Hell who wasn't absolutely 100% sure he wasn't going there. It's all those icky ... other ... people who are going to burn in eternal torment, while the good and virtuous spend a blissful afterlife with the Lord.

      And yet, strangely, most of these folks try just as hard to avoid death as the rest of us do.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    22. Re:Odd. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The guy built the moon and is way better at physics than Steven Hawking

      Assming a creator god, it does not follow that it understands its creation or that the creation came out the way it intended. There is no reason to believe a creater god would be particularly good at physics.

    23. Re:Odd. by slater.jay · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "It's better to reign in hell than serve in heaven"
      -- John Milton

      When you get to heaven, you will wish you're in hell"
      -- Marilyn Manson

      "There is no need to be worried by facetious people who try to make the Christian hope of 'Heaven' ridiculous by saying they do not want 'to spend eternity playing harps.' The answer to such people is that if they cannot understand books written for grown-up, they should not talk about them."
      -- C.S. Lewis

    24. Re:Odd. by nospam007 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Isn't fear of death natural?"

      The fear of _dying_ perhaps, death itself feels like it felt before you were born.
      That wasn't so bad, wasn't it?

    25. Re:Odd. by marcello_dl · · Score: 1

      I would decouple the fear of death from the belief in the supernatural. Philosophically I am interested in the supernatural even if I am perfectly fine with the idea of not existing after my biological death (if my predecessors had been immortal there would have been no resources for me to exist so I can't possibly complain can I). It's a matter of getting to the truth, not to find some comfort. And I think many people who were later converted to a religion lived in harsh realities where death was so commonplace they were used to it.

      Back to topic. Are you sure you fear death? If some technological means are able to give some of us immortality (immortality for all would require infinite resources), do you think humans will select the best people and let them live forever or that they will behave as usual so that those with less scruples will get on top of all the others? You'd end up with a bunch of paranoid criminals for a long time. They would become paranoid because in infinite times even remotely possible risks become actual (autocombustion, for instance, or getting gamma rays from a stellar explosion).
      I'd rather do my show here for a while and get lost later, thank you.

      --
      ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
    26. Re:Odd. by houghi · · Score: 1

      Perhaps the following is an interesting read for you:
      http://groups.google.com/group/net.religion/msg/30925fd2c9a20cbd?pli=1

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    27. Re:Odd. by sketchbag · · Score: 1

      I agree that supernatural beliefs influence one's fear of death. As education and literacy go up, religiosity goes down, and as a result i dont find this finding very shocking. And with the social structure historically pushing women away from scientific avenues of education, I would also wager the "best antidote" for supernatural beliefs is an understanding of the natural world, which science delivers like no other academic pursuit. But times are changing, and women are filling labs at a rate unseen before and i suspect that the difference based on sex will diminish, but the level of education will still correlate quite well.

    28. Re:Odd. by houghi · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I really like the story with the Devil and God throwing him out. And God being good and the Devil being bad.
      Good versus Evil. Great storytelling.

      But what if the Evil guy had won and then says He is the good guy? If I were the evil guy, I certainly would mess with peoples head and say that I was good, although I was evil. Say to two different persons that I am their only God and kill the other one and see who wins. Just because I can.
      Let people die and the few who live must thank me for my mercy.

      All the while the Devil who tries to come back, I will tell the worst stories about. And all the the Devil want to do is you to have fun.

      Or is this just a matter that absolute power corrupts absolutely?

      Anyway. Nice and entertaining stories. Lots of violence and sex, so great to turn into movies.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    29. Re:Odd. by paxcoder · · Score: 1

      I bet you that at the end, you'll be more scared than I.
      Also I'd like to find out your "genius range" IQ to compare to my own (top X%).
      I don't have a univ. degree yet, but am moving towards it.
      Openly,
      --Man of Faith

    30. Re:Odd. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I don't actually believe in the afterlife, the taken-for-granted idea that heaven is boring always amuses me. I hear it's just wonderful, actually. Even assuming an afterlife exists, the idea that heaven is so...hellish, is a strange article of faith.

      I've heard the argument that interesting people sin by definition so all non-sinners in heaven can be assumed to be still non-interesting, and that the only source of interestingness in heaven is other departed souls. But if you got there, you'd have to be pretty self-loathing to think that only boring people could get in.

    31. Re:Odd. by realityimpaired · · Score: 1

      IQ is just another kind of penis-measuring contest, anyway. It's not a real reflection of your ability to function in society by any stretch of the imagination. The only purpose it serves is to allow you to lord it over the lesser beings in your life.

      -- Somebody who was invited to triple 9 society, when she had written her IQ test on 4 hours' sleep, and with a wicked migraine. (and no, I didn't accept... ended up not joining Mensa either).

    32. Re:Odd. by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's not easy making money off of religion.

      It's a lot easier in the pulpit than it is in the pews.

      Hell, you just have to pass around a plate and people put their hard-earned money on it. As a former altar boy I was fascinated by the collection. In my church, they had guys come down the aisle with these baskets with long handles, because they were afraid to pass a plate and tempt the believers with actually handling a dishful of money. It seemed like a great racket, and I may have gone into the church business, until I learned that the Priests got zero pussy. I remember asking my older brother what kind sex Father Moran was getting, and when he answered "None", I thought he said "Nun" and figured he was banging Sister Margaret Mary. Well, Sister Margaret Mary was a dead ringer for Dick Cheney, so I figured maybe there were better rackets to make an easy buck. That's when I decided to become an English major. Well, it was a long while before I started making any real money, and by then I had to join another kind of priesthood called "Academia", but I got to bang a lot of goth chicks (or what would be called goth today), who looked a whole lot better than Sister Mary Margaret. By the way, if you're college age and you're staying away from the goth chicks because you think they'd be no fun in the sack, don't be a dope. The pale makeup and dour expression both come off when they get a few drinks in them and they turn into more fun than Chucky Cheese on weed.

      Anyway, what were we talking about? Oh yeah. Religion. Fuck them. And if you're an altar boy wondering what kind of sex your priest gets, stop wondering right now and run away because it's a trap!

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    33. Re:Odd. by denzacar · · Score: 1

      "There is no need to be worried by facetious people who try to make the Christian hope of 'Heaven' ridiculous by saying they do not want 'to spend eternity playing harps.' The answer to such people is that if they cannot understand books written for grown-up, they should not talk about them."

      -- C.S. Lewis

      In other words: "I don't like what you are saying so I'm gonna put my hands over my ears and SING REAL LOUD! NA-NA-NA-NA-I CAN NOT HEAR YOU!!! NA-NA-NA-NA YOU LOOK SO STUPID WITH YOUR MOUTH OPENING AND CLOSING AND NO SOUND COMING OUUUT! NA-NA-NA-NAAA!!!"

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    34. Re:Odd. by hedwards · · Score: 1

      C. S. Lewis the noted Christian apologist. It's been my experience that most people claiming to be Christian and to be going to Heaven are in fact neither. A shocking number of them believe in works for salvation when Chrisitanity takes a similar stance on that to what is found in Islam. It's the creator that decides who does and does not get their reward, and nothing you can do is going to earn it.

      Personally, I find the following to be quite revealing. Eye of a needle

      Not that I'm personally foolish enough to live an entire life devoted to something which may or may not exist without any reason for doing so. Mark me unaffiliated.

    35. Re:Odd. by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      "It's better to reign in hell than serve in heaven"
      -- John Milton

      Of course it's even better to reign in heaven. So spare your evilness for afterlife. :-)

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    36. Re:Odd. by marcello_dl · · Score: 1

      In other words, if you define "eternity" as "infinitely long time" instead of the more general "out of time constraints" you make an arbitrary assumption. Grow up.

      --
      ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
    37. Re:Odd. by hedwards · · Score: 1

      And if they had an even halfway competent understanding of their religion they'd know that communion is supposed to be for that very purpose. According to Christianity everybody is a sinner and it's impossible to completely be without sin. So people take communion and God clears the record.

      Personally, I don't personally buy that, but that is how that's supposed to work, try your best and for when you're legitimately unable to figure it out there's prayer and communion.

    38. Re:Odd. by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Well, one thing is that in principle hell and heaven could actually be the same place. For example, a place where you feel yourself all pain you try to give others instead of the other one feeling it is hell for those who like to give others pain, but heaven for the others (because nobody would give them pain -- OK, there probably would need to be an extra rule to deal with those who are at the same time sadistic and masochistic. :-)

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    39. Re:Odd. by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      The fear of _dying_ perhaps, death itself feels like it felt before you were born.

      And how exactly would you know that? For all you know, you might die and still experience burial and decay. Your consciousness might stay somewhat intact and allow you to ruminate for another century on your failings as a human being. You might end up in Cleveland.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    40. Re:Odd. by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      "Isn't fear of death natural?"

      The fear of _dying_ perhaps, death itself feels like it felt before you were born.
      That wasn't so bad, wasn't it?

      You mean after death I'll be inside an uterus, with an umbilical cord to give me everything I need? :-)

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    41. Re:Odd. by jimicus · · Score: 1

      Christianity (indeed most religions) make absolutely perfect sense.

      Straight up, they do.

      If you happened to find yourself in a reasonably powerful position in a hierarchical society of people who lived in a desert in the arsehole of nowhere, where law and order as we know it in the 21st century did not exist, where you couldn't necessarily keep a decent standing army to keep order simply because you couldn't feed them - wouldn't you want something you could invoke to get everyone to toe the line?

      What better than an invisible superpower that sees all and will have his revenge if you transgress?

      Now, I don't think someone sat down one day and said "How am I going to bring peace to my people? I know, I'll invent religion!". I think it's more likely that religion developed alongside civilisation, and back then the one could not exist without the other.

    42. Re:Odd. by Mindcontrolled · · Score: 1

      In the end, it is just a question of who has the better PR department. And of course, the victor gets to rewrite history... Who knows who rebelled against whom for what reason there...

      --
      Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
    43. Re:Odd. by gmuslera · · Score: 1

      Brings the desire of money and political power. And can't derive peace and comfort from that. you never have enough of any, and even if you get that, someone else don't, and will trouble you for that.

    44. Re:Odd. by Foobar+of+Borg · · Score: 1

      Of course, if you're an atheist, you could argue that it's not an immoral decision to *pretend* to be religious, for the perks.

      Works for Pat Robertson.

    45. Re:Odd. by Mindcontrolled · · Score: 1

      Neither do I, but I got all eternity to pull it off, after all...

      --
      Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
    46. Re:Odd. by Mindcontrolled · · Score: 1

      Well, that pretty much sums up the works of Lewis. Arrogant Christian apologetics of a late convert trying to make up for his late conversion.

      --
      Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
    47. Re:Odd. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I'd like to try it with all my memories, but I suspect it would be tedious and boring to be that jaded. Then again, after running the cycle from shitting yourself to shitting yourself again, you might appreciate shitting yourself from a perspective where it's supposed to happen.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    48. Re:Odd. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not if you believe in a merciful loving god who will subject you to an eternity of torture because you ate meat on the wrong day.

      If you believe in a merciful loving god, then the only way to be subject to an eternity of torture is to refuse mercy. From the Merciful One: Jesus called the crowd to him and said, “Listen and understand. What goes into a man’s mouth does not make him ‘unclean,’ but what comes out of his mouth, that is what makes him ‘unclean.’”

    49. Re:Odd. by drooling-dog · · Score: 1

      If you judge each character -- God, the winner, and Satan, the loser -- by their acts alone, it certainly gives you cause to wonder.

      I doubt that this thought is worrisome for very many, though, since the proportion of people who are able to reason their way out of what they were taught as children is somewhere down there in single digits...

    50. Re:Odd. by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      NA-NA-NA-NA-I

      Narnia?

    51. Re:Odd. by mswhippingboy · · Score: 3, Informative

      I don't know where you folks got your information, but that's not the story I heard. I'm not even religious, but at least I did pay a little attention when I was a kid.

      There was no "God vs Devil" death-match as this thread suggests. My understanding was that God created "everything", both good and evil. It never was a matter of who would win, it was simply that good could not exist without evil.

      The whole thing with Lucifer was about trying to get the other angels to follow "him" instead of God, not about kicking God's butt, which even he had the sense to know could not happen.

      As I said, I'm certainly no Jesus freak (I tend to think Bill Maher has it about right), but folks, at least get the story straight.

      --
      Sometimes the light at the end of the tunnel is the headlight of an oncoming train.
    52. Re:Odd. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if they had an even halfway competent understanding of their religion they'd know that communion is supposed to be for that very purpose. According to Christianity everybody is a sinner and it's impossible to completely be without sin. So people take communion and God clears the record.

      Personally, I don't personally buy that

      Good, because you shouldn't. Communion is something done in remembrance of Christ. It doesn't have magical cleansing powers. If it did, Communion would be a 24/7 thing happening in every building, and people would get pretty drunk (requiring even more communion). Communion is a ceremony signifying a spiritual truth; an outward expression of an inward acceptance of Jesus' death as an atonement for one's sins. The actual acceptance is the important part, and can be done at any time, any day of the week, any point in one's life.

      Wow, captcha is "redneck" I'm a little offended.

    53. Re:Odd. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even better, throw the good one out and assume his place...

      Suddenly it all makes sense!

    54. Re:Odd. by Mindcontrolled · · Score: 5, Informative

      That's not the whole story either - hard to pull the "good needs evil" thing out of the bible either. The whole Lucifer/Satan thing is rather apocryphal anyway and more based on Milton than on the bible itself. The words "Better to reign in Hell than serve in Heaven" are by Milton originally, spoken by his Satan. Milton didn't write Paradise Lost as a piece of Christian fiction - given how heavily influenced he was by Greek and Pagan ideas and how much of that shows in the poem. Amusingly, he is still the main source for the popular picture of hell and Satan.

      --
      Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
    55. Re:Odd. by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      I take it you missed the study that was also on the front page of Slashdot a few months ago, showing that there was a correlation between religious belief and fear of death? It didn't explore whether fear of death caused religious belief or vice versa

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    56. Re:Odd. by ultranova · · Score: 1

      If I were the evil guy, I certainly would mess with peoples head and say that I was good, although I was evil.

      If you had infinite power, what would be the point?

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    57. Re:Odd. by Mindcontrolled · · Score: 2

      If you got infinite power, you'll soon be infinitely bored. Why not mess with some people for entertainment?

      --
      Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
    58. Re:Odd. by bsDaemon · · Score: 1

      The Greek and Pagan influences on the poem were there because the classical tropes were necessary to the Epic form of the poem. Milton was a Calvinist and a Cromwell supporter. This may seem like a juxtaposition today, but it was pretty much par for the course back then.

    59. Re:Odd. by bsDaemon · · Score: 1

      You mean after eating Taco Bell?

    60. Re:Odd. by Alphathon · · Score: 3, Funny

      if you're an altar boy wondering what kind of sex your priest gets, stop wondering right now and run away because it's a trap!

      Please never mention sex in the same sentence as "it's a trap!" again - horrifying mental images result!

    61. Re:Odd. by Mindcontrolled · · Score: 1

      Yes, that's true - I didn't mean to imply that Milton was not Christian or was actively proselytizing for pagan beliefs, just that the imagery he created that still strongly influences the popular picture of Hell and Satan is not exactly bible-based in its origin.

      --
      Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
    62. Re:Odd. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if you really are supposed to believe in the Miracle of Transubstantiation, reality be damned? It's just so uncertain.

      That is an excellent question and part of the reason why I abandoned religion. The best thing we have is our mind with which we can reason, imagine, and, well, do everything that makes us humans. If I can't use my mind and my reason to figure out which actions are "good" and which ones are "bad", what is the point?

      If I can go to heaven because I more or less accidentally made the right choices, but the person I love goes to hell because, let's say, she wore mixed fabrics - is that heaven at all? The words of Marcus Aurelius that someone quoted in another thread ring just as true now as they did 2000 years ago. A god I would care about worshipping would have to be reasonable and fair, and therefore would not need to be worshipped at all, since there would be no difference between following such beliefs or simply doing your best to be sensible and just.

    63. Re:Odd. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [I] was invited to triple 9 society

      Oh yeah? Well society requires five nines or better. I think someone was pulling your leg.

    64. Re:Odd. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1, Insightful

      No, nobody is supposed to eat Taco Bell.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    65. Re:Odd. by madsatod · · Score: 1

      I don't want to imagine a world without me, I won't be there

      Strangely the universe seemed to be doing alright the first 13.5 billion years before you arrived. It should be ok, after you're gone again...
      Cheer up.

    66. Re:Odd. by vxice · · Score: 1

      "I don't want to imagine a world without me, I won't be there." Then don't imagine it, you wont be around we'll get along alright and nothing will need to trouble you.

      --
      every anarchist is a baffled dictator. Benito_Mussolini
    67. Re:Odd. by timeOday · · Score: 1

      What if you really are supposed to believe in the Miracle of Transubstantiation, reality be damned? It's just so uncertain.

      But what if you implicitly assumed you would never be among the damned, because you're a good/chosen person? And that even if you did some of the same things as bad people, that you would naturally be forgiven? And meanwhile you have the satisfaction of knowing that your enemies, who are inherently bad, will suffer for every grievance against you?

      The trick of worshipping a wrathful god is being the kind of person who assumes He always pulls for your side in football matches.

    68. Re:Odd. by vxice · · Score: 1

      Life, the universe, everything: Unfortunately the public comment period is over for this matter. If you wanted us to receive your input you should have gone around to the complaints dept. The plans were on display.

      --
      every anarchist is a baffled dictator. Benito_Mussolini
    69. Re:Odd. by mpeskett · · Score: 1

      That includes the idea of satan ruling in hell. By the original conception, he was just another of the damned, being tortured in the very deepest depths of the pit. There to be punished for his transgression, not as a ruler or a punisher of others.

      I mean, why would the evil being who rebelled against god want to punish other sinners? The punishment has to come from god for it to make any sense, and there's no reason why satan would be doing his dirty work for him.

      I've not read Paradise Lost... is he actually depicted as a ruler of hell there, or is that based on a misreading of the quote; that it would be better to reign in hell (even though he's not reigning anywhere)?

      In any case, if I'm ever confronted with a burning lake of fire, and the prospect of being cast into it, I shall at the very least be somewhat surprised. When you think about it though, heaven wouldn't be a great option either; ruled over by an eternal despot who demands constant adoration, constant bliss without effort would get old (if I wanted that experience, I'd have OD'd by now), and there's only so many experiences it's possible to have - eternity is quite a long time, after a while it's going to be one long lazy afternoon of nothing.

      That's assuming I'm the same sort of person in the hypothetical afterlife as I am now - if I was altered somehow, to find praising god eternally satisfying, to never get bored of being on bended knee, to never have another sinful/heretical desire or thought... well then I, and everything that makes me me would be dead. Same goes for the more abstract afterlifes where your soul merges into one-ness with an eternal spirit of some sort... my personality and awareness and all the things I value would be gone into oblivion anyway.

      An unchanging eternity would be hellish. A loss of my individual self would be oblivion. The only heaven I can see working is immortality here on Terra Firma. I suppose some things could be a bit nicer, but as a privileged member of a wealthy western nation, I'm pretty far ahead of the average by any measure of life being good. If Kurzweil could pull his thumb out of his ass and make good on all his Singularity promises, that'd be cool I guess (with some reservations about preserving my 'self' though any sort of upload process).

    70. Re:Odd. by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 1

      No, fear of death really doesn't make sense to me. I definitely fear suffering, that's different. You've got to be alive to suffer. I also don't want to die, but not because I fear death. It's because I don't expect to run out of interesting stuff to do. But it's not fear. Maybe we don't want to go to work tomorrow, but it's not because we fear work. I figured this out when I was about six, and it still makes sense to me: Death feels just like it felt before you were born. Nothing scary about that!

    71. Re:Odd. by stoanhart · · Score: 1

      I don't think fearing death and not wanting to die are the same thing. I certainly don't want to die either, but if I were to be diagnosed with a terminal disease, I don't think I'd be afraid of the actual event. I'm reasonably certain it will involve going into a sleeplike state, some vivid dreams, and then nothing. No biggie.

    72. Re:Odd. by Godskitchen · · Score: 1

      As Stephen Hawking says about IQ:

      "Q: What is your I.Q.?

      "A: I have no idea. People who boast about their I.Q. are losers."

    73. Re:Odd. by operagost · · Score: 1

      At the risk of feeding an obvious troll, no, C.S. Lewis simply didn't feel like defending Christianity against straw man arguments, hyperbole, or ignorance.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    74. Re:Odd. by operagost · · Score: 1

      You do know the most important key difference between Islam and Christianity, right? Hint: it has to do with prophets.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    75. Re:Odd. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Hmm... but shouldn't the Devil win, then? I mean, he gets all the markedroids and lawyers.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    76. Re:Odd. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Well, considering how the average fundamentalist sees God, I can see where that fear of death comes from. God, in most fundamentalist churches, is hardly a good-natured, friendly father figure who forgives and just wants your love. Usually, you're dealing with this vengeful, badass God who expects nothing less than sainthood from you if you were to pass in his eyes and his tests.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    77. Re:Odd. by operagost · · Score: 1

      I've never met anyone who believed in the literal existence of Hell who wasn't absolutely 100% sure he wasn't going there.

      Argumentum ad ignorantiam.
      I've met one who felt that way and read writings from several. Consider your argument invalidated.

      And yet, strangely, most of these folks try just as hard to avoid death as the rest of us do.

      Because even if death were guaranteed painless, it would be a tremendous change and most people fear change.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    78. Re:Odd. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      You don't play a lot of sandbox games, do you?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    79. Re:Odd. by Gunnut1124 · · Score: 1

      You, sir, are my hero.

      --
      America is all about speed. Hot, nasty, badass speed. -Eleanor Roosevelt, 1936
    80. Re:Odd. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if god created everything, lucifer, adam and eve etc, being omniscient and all, he knew from the moment of their creation, their eventual betrayals, no?

      It truly makes more sense that good and evil were to be co-created, rather than good-god creating bad-god... This would infer that they were equally powered--and that would explain why either would be desperate for human souls, since it is we humble men and women who create and give our time and energy, ostensibly to power our gods.

      I think bad-god wining favor over heaven would explain a lot of things... And let's not ignore lucifer... It literally means "light bearer", an ironic title for a demon of darkness! It would make sense for bad-god say he created everything, and to give good-god some bad PR and lock him away, which he could only do if he had more followers.

      It would also stand to reason that good-god is female, if are polar opposites.

    81. Re:Odd. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My only fear of death is coming back to this bitch reincarnated.. -tupac

    82. Re:Odd. by Barsteward · · Score: 1

      "Maybe if you're shit-scared of death all the time you find refuge in faith."

      not quite right. "You will go to hell if you are bad" is the way to create fear in kids so they learn "faith". You generally only fear death if you have a faith because there is a choice of which direction you go in - heaven or hell. (with exceptions for idiot bombers who think they're guaranteed to get to heaven for killing the heathen or infidel or arrogant ones that know they will go to heaven)

      --
      "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
    83. Re:Odd. by hey! · · Score: 2

      And that's leaving out the part in which you actually die, which isn't going to be any fun either.

      Have you ever considered the possibility of being shot in bed at age 90 by a jealous husband?

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    84. Re:Odd. by hey! · · Score: 2

      Honestly, I can't for the life of me see why theists think that religion brings peace and comfort. What is any amount of Earthly reassurance, in the face of the threat of infinite torture?

      I don't like music. I listened to some once, and it didn't appeal to me, so I can't see how anybody would actually enjoy listening to music of any kind. ;-)

      The fire and brimstone business is symptomatic of the kind of thinking that produces zero tolerance policies. Can't think of what to do about students using drugs, so lets get something really harsh policies on paper. I don't have much faith, so I'd better make the little I have go as far as possible by making it harsh as possible. Since I'm afraid of dying, I'll believe in a literal afterlife where people who aren't like me are tortured for eternity, what's more they'll be tortured for no particular reason other than they don't have the same opinions I have. That'll make it easier for me to be confident in those opinions.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    85. Re:Odd. by MysteriousPreacher · · Score: 1

      There are quite a few problems with Heaven..

      It's difficult to imagine what part of us actually goes to heaven. I don't see how I could be happy there knowing that anyone is being tortured for eternity - least of all friends and family. If I were able to accept such a situation then I don't think I'd no-longer recognise myself.

      Having to spend eternity singing the praises of the most powerful and emotionally needy being in creation really doesn't appeal to me. Imagine playing a sport in which referee decisions appear to almost always be unfairly stacked against you, yet you don't really know why because no-one clearly explained the rules. You ask fellow players and match officials who all give conflicting advice, but most are united in promising that there's a greater purpose - yet explanations of this greater purpose are curiously divergent from one another. At the end of the game the referee informs you that it was all a test, and that he's taking you to live in a life of luxury - beginning with a great meal. The majority of your teammates are destined for a torture chamber. I don't think I could find myself being very grateful towards this referee, and certainly the only reason I'd spend the night praising him in between courses would be because I'd be worried that he'd change his mind.

      The makeup of the population of Heaven and Hell really depends on interpretation. The Jack Chick school of thought would see Heaven filled with murderers and rapist who, before departing this world, took the time to get on their knees and affirm their allegiance to Jesus. I go with Hitchens' view of Heaven. It's an eternal North Korea.

      Scripture is a little light when describing Heaven and Hell in detail beyond that we'd expect from iron age men sharing their contemporary views of perfection and damnation. If these religions were starting from scratch today then heaven would likely be a place of flying cars and low latency broadband connections.

      --
      -- Using the preview button since 2005
    86. Re:Odd. by canadian_right · · Score: 1

      This post needs to go somewhere where a wider audience can enjoy it.

      --
      Anarchists never rule
    87. Re:Odd. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm so afraid of death and not existing that I'd rather be in Hell than nowhere at all. For the record, I'm an atheist physics grad student. I'd love to believe in god and the afterlife, because it would give me something to work for, but the idea seems so ridiculous. Understanding physics has dried the world out so much for me that I can't see the point in doing anything. Just going to die in the end, alone. Why bother working or even living.

    88. Re:Odd. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      His fingers hit the keyboard with purpose and angst. 'That simply wasn't true' he thought to himself as he reread the post that triggered his response. It was a generalization at best and nothing but anecdotal evidence or a lie at worst.

      'I've met one who felt that way..' he typed in his reply. 'Consider your argument invalidated.' he continued. Who knew how many people believed in hell and that they were going to it? All he knew was that his anecdote completely invalidated the other's.

    89. Re:Odd. by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      While it's hard to make big money off religion, it definitely can be done. Check out Joel Osteen's church in Houston.

    90. Re:Odd. by The+End+Of+Days · · Score: 1

      And Zeus said "behold, I am as a bull. Now fuck me and make a Demigod."

      Those divine folk are weird.

    91. Re:Odd. by MysteriousPreacher · · Score: 1

      And a few verses later Jesus affirms that he was sent only or the tribes of Israel. If it weren't for Pauline Christianity then Jesus could well have remained a Jewish messiah - and the earliest surviving gospel accounts would suggest that the gentiles did not really figure in to the plans of Jesus.

      --
      -- Using the preview button since 2005
    92. Re:Odd. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Christianity is quite clear, the only thing that gets you into heaven (or not) is accepting that Jesus died as payment for your sins. Either you accept him as the only adequate sacrifice for the wrongs of humankind or you don't.

      All the rest is meant to follow from that. The pedantic stuff is all supposed to be things you'd conclude on your own if you'd accepted the larger premise.

      Of course, it doesn't all follow. But that's how it's supposed to work.

    93. Re:Odd. by MysteriousPreacher · · Score: 1

      Yeah, at least in Catholicism that's what confession is there for. An example of this is in excommunication in which people excommunicated may be allowed to attend mass - but not chow down on Jesus biscuits. Christ doesn't want to fester in just any old bowels.

      --
      -- Using the preview button since 2005
    94. Re:Odd. by moortak · · Score: 1

      So in a lovely city with miserable weather and no employment prospects, could be worse.

      --
      Xavier Rabourdin for president 2012
    95. Re:Odd. by chihowa · · Score: 1

      And that's leaving out the part in which you actually die, which isn't going to be any fun either

      I'm actually interested in experiencing this. Not anytime soon, mind you, but when my time comes I want to be conscious and alert. This is something that you only get to experience once (barring possible reincarnation, anyway). It may hurt, and I'm not into pain, but it will be a truly unique experience that no living person has experienced. I think it would be a waste to go in my sleep and miss the chance to experience my body and brain "turning off".

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
    96. Re:Odd. by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      First of all, I agree with your sentiment but there are some points people appear to be confused with. IF you read the bible, it can be logically separated into differing covenants the lord has made with the different generations of people within. You can look at the covenants as contracts with god saying if X is done, Y will happen. If anything from a previous covenant is transferred to the new, it's directly referenced within the dialog of the new covenant.

      This is sort of an out for the mixing of blends of fabric. It was within a covenant to a generation previous to Christianity and I think modern Judaism. Also, one of the key constructs of the bible is the covenant and struggle with keeping people honoring the covenant. This can be represented as a war between humans and God. When Jesus brought about the peace, the war was over but obviously, he was talking about the struggle between God and Man and not an end to all wars. This is where the peace comes into play- no longer is God trying to force you into obedience by consequences and he just accepts what he can get out of love and compassion.

      Now please don't take that the wrong way, I was more or less condensing the situation into a paragraph or two and it by no means is complete nor is my knowledge of the bible and religion complete. But the peace and comfort comes largely from the concept that god is our father (the bring of life though his breath), and he is at peace with us. Think back to when you were a child and your parents comforted you when you were scared or hurt and think about how they made you feel better. Now think about how you felt when you did something wrong and knew you were going to get a thrashing or grounded or something. That's what theists largely see in interpretations of the bible.

      This is why you see some who are happy to see death approaching and why you see a lot more who are afraid of their own death (or the death of others). If they were not worthy of their lords forgiveness, they will spend eternity with Dad pissed of at them or not being around to protect them from harm (hell). And there is no set action that you can do to get you into heaven on good terms with the lord (outside of giving your heart to Jesus and asking for forgiveness and that's only if your a christian or become one). I should note that various churches have attempted to allow the rich to more or less buy their way into heaven but I'm not sure that's still practiced as a hard rule.

      There are many interpretations of religions, most all differ on some minor points and some differ greatly. Another problem seems to be buyers remorse in which people aren't quite sure if their path was the right religion to follow or if it made much of a different of not. But according to the Christian religion, there is only one unforgivable sin- and that is denying God after knowing he exists. According to the other versions of the Abrahamic religions, there are quite a bit more unforgivable sins. It's the uncertainty that exists within all of us that simply doesn't exist if you think it's completely over and there is nothing after death.

    97. Re:Odd. by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Wrong, you are supposed to eat there once a year to remember not to go back.

    98. Re:Odd. by OnePumpChump · · Score: 1

      "IQ in the genius range"

      I really wish people would stop saying things like this.

    99. Re:Odd. by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      I'm confused, there is no reason to believe a creator god would be particularly good at understanding something he created?

      That's like saying there would be no reason to believe that Newton understood any of his principles in science. Here is the failure in that line of reasoning. If you accept the premise that there is a creator, and the premise that science is the attempt to understand the natural environment around us through observation and testing, then it's only logical that the creator of the created has a more sound depth of knowledge of the creation then someone on the outside trying to reverse engineer and understand it.

    100. Re:Odd. by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Who are you calling educated?

    101. Re:Odd. by grikdog · · Score: 1

      Military service brings money and political power, near as I can tell. Julia Child may have had extreme culinary skills, but she got in front of a camera based on her OSS war experience. Life is not fair.

      --
      ``Tension, apprehension & dissension have begun!'' - Duffy Wyg&, in Alfred Bester's _The Demolished Man_
    102. Re:Odd. by naoursla · · Score: 3, Funny

      I think there is a part of the Bible that says the only unforgivable sin, the only thing that can keep you from going to heaven, is the complete and absolute rejection of God. However, since God is infinite and unknowable you can't really reject him completely. You can reject the parts you know about, but not the parts you don't know about. You might not even want to reject those parts if you did know about them. Ergo, no one goes to hell.

    103. Re:Odd. by naoursla · · Score: 1

      > Heaven is a terribly boring place

      Of course it is. Why else do you think God created creation?

      The fun part will be when you die and you get to know everything across all of time about this world down past the electon potential fields and interpret it through the context of your experiences here.

    104. Re:Odd. by shadowofwind · · Score: 1

      it would be nice to retain ALL my memories of the past life

      There's an implication here that you retain some of them?

      I think that retaining more would probably not be helpful for most of us. Just looking around at the world, a person can see all manner of folly and its consequences, and yet people keep doing those things anyway. I think more memory would be more of a cause of pride and regret. How would you free yourself from the burden of past emotion so that you can deal with the present?

      Also, how would you keep all the memories straight, so that you don't scramble together different times and places, and confuse what is you and what is someone else? The idea of there being a simple chain of past lives doesn't make sense to me. I'm not saying that its wrong, just that I don't see it. Life and identify seems more complicated to me then that, there's more ways to slice it. What would connect the life of a past person with me and make that person "me", rather than someone else? Memory? If you could 'remember' a 'past life', reaching beyond what is recorded in your brain, which is destroyed at death, what keeps you from reaching into other records besides 'yours'?

    105. Re:Odd. by Obble · · Score: 1

      I will agree that God created everything, but God didn't create "evil". Genesis talked about everything he created was "good". God created Lucifer has a "Cherubim" (super angle). The bible talked about 5 of them, we know 3 of them names. Lucifer was in charge of all creation, and was referred to as "The morning star". He is brilliant and very creative (in talent) and good at music. But being the most powerful created thing didn't make him as powerful as God. He got cocky and wanted to raise himself to be like God. His arrogance caused him to sin and rebel against God and he talked 1/3 of angles into joining him.

      So God didn't create evil, but he allowed this angle to choose to be evil. Thats the problem of free will, as you slashdotter's love to have freedom to do what you want. God allowed (against his will) for this to happen. And the reason Satin is "evil" is he knows his punishment is coming and he only have a short time to spit in the face of God, since he can't do it directly, he goes after the thing God loves the most which Satin can hurt, ... Us.

    106. Re:Odd. by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1
      "Come, and trip it as you go - on the light fantastic toe!" -- John Milton.

      I always thought he was on some fairly heavy substances, myself.

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    107. Re:Odd. by shadowofwind · · Score: 1

      There are quite a few problems with Heaven..

      It's difficult to imagine what part of us actually goes to heaven. I don't see how I could be happy there knowing that anyone is being tortured for eternity....Having to spend eternity singing the praises of the most powerful and emotionally needy being in creation really doesn't appeal to me.

      I think the problem with the 'heaven' you're describing is that it was cooked up by people who weren't interested in it making that kind of sense.

      The heaven of the New Testament, which is said to be "within you", also doesn't seem to me to very much resemble the pearly gates caricature of Hollywood and AM radio preachers.

      I don't think of it as a place a person or a part of a person goes. Conceiving of it is more like trying to look at something that's under water. You see what reflects off the surface, and not what's underneath. But then when the light is right, you see that you were staring right at it and it was there all the time.

      We're there now or we are not. Same with hell. There's nothing magical about brain death that suddenly makes it real, or changes the status of whatever part of us might or might not have survived death. Either a part of us stands outside of our temporal experience, even while we are living, or it is not real after we are dead either.

    108. Re:Odd. by mswhippingboy · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but this is exactly the sort of double-talk that has always made me question religion. Reminds me of lawyer-speak, only more vague and deceptive.
      Whenever pressed on a hard question, this is the type of response I always get.

      If God created everything, he created EVERYTHING. You can't have it both ways. If good and evil exist, how could he have created one without creating the other? Good and evil are opposites. Opposites exist only in relation to each other. If one thing is more "good" than something else, by definition it is less evil. If something is more "evil" than another thing, it is less "good". It's Yin and Yang.

      You are free to redefine the English language to suit your argument, but that's all you'd be doing - redefining the language.

      --
      Sometimes the light at the end of the tunnel is the headlight of an oncoming train.
    109. Re:Odd. by martyros · · Score: 1

      Heaven is a terribly boring place

      Have you ever experienced anything really cool -- sublime like a piece of music or an amazing sunset, really fun like hanging out with your best friends, or really interesting like certain things in science, math, &c?

      If Jesus knew what he was talking about, God created all of those things; and he made* you in such a way that you could enjoy them. So if that's the kind of person he is, why would you think chilling with him forever would be boring?

      *For the sake of argument, I'm allowing "made" in this context to include the possibility of evolution.

      --

      TCP: Why the Internet is full of SYN.

    110. Re:Odd. by fliptout · · Score: 1

      You need to take your comedy routine on tour!

      --
      A witty saying proves you are wittier than the next guy.
    111. Re:Odd. by martyros · · Score: 1

      Yes yes if you're good you get to go to heaven,

      Just FYI, that's how a lot of religions work, but it's not how Christianity works. It says that you can't be good enough to get to heaven. You've done wrong things in the past, and you will continue to do wrong things in the future; the only way to get forgiveness for those is through Jesus' death on the cross. I quote:

      "No one can ever be made right with God by doing what the law commands [i.e., being good]. The law [i.e., all our ideas about what's right and wrong] simply shows us how sinful we are. But now God has shown us a way to be made right with him without keeping the requirements of the law... We are made right with God by placing our faith in Jesus Christ. And this is true for everyone who believes, no matter who we are. For everyone has sinned [i.e., done what was wrong]; we all fall short of God's glorious standard. Yet God, with undeserved kindness, declares that we are righteous." (Paul, Letter to the Romans, 3:20-24)

      Regarding "earthly reassurance", Paul goes on to address this specifically:

      "When we were utterly helpless, Christ came at just the right time and died for us sinners. Now, most people would not be willing to die for an upright person, though someone might perhaps be willing to die for a person who is especially good. But God showed his great love for us by sending Christ to die for us while we were still sinners. And since we have been made right in God's sight by the blood of Christ, he will certainly save us from God's condemnation. For since our friendship with God was restored by the death of his son while we were still enemies, we will certainly be saved through the life of his son. So now we can rejoice in our wonderful new relationship with God because our Lord Jesus Christ has made us friends with God." (ibid, 5:6-11)

      In other words: God doesn't want you to "be good", he wants you to trust and follow him. God didn't wait for you to come to him, he came to you. Jesus left heaven, lived on earth, and died a death of torture and shame to try to save you. If he's willing to go through all that before you're even trying to follow him, you can believe that once you are trying to follow him, he'll do anything in his power to keep you on the path to Heaven.

      Just sayin'. :-)

      --

      TCP: Why the Internet is full of SYN.

    112. Re:Odd. by Obble · · Score: 1

      Right now I am thinking of my car. It's a dihatsu 91 model. It had a leaking radiator, the aircon was ripped out of it (before I brought it), and it has holes in the side door's padding, the wipers can't move the water off the window unless it's smush it to make everything blury. (Anyone want to buy it :-p)

      Did the manufacture designed the car that way? No, they manufacture a good car. And it's the way I (and previous owners) treated it that caused it to be "evil".

      Dont blame the manufacturer for a good car being completely awful. (still better than the busses in Canberra.)

      And you can have good without evil. God created it Good, without any evil in it. (otherwise it would not be "good"). It's not Ying&Yang. That would be like giving a car to your son (good) and then saying, I did you good son, heres the evil (and kicking him in the balls). That doesn't happen(?). There is not force connecting Good and Evil together. (I'm sounding a bit weird here) The two will always try remove the other, they can not exist in harmony with each other.

      Also God created the first humans directly, not the descendants. So God created the matter and the program of DNA for "kinds" to manufacture descending "kinds". So God didn't create you directly, but the atoms you exist from and the original blueprints of your design (of course degraded from the prefect dna of adam/eve).

    113. Re:Odd. by arth1 · · Score: 1

      But is there a correlation between literacy and university degrees? If one isn't literate when leaving primary school, will a university really teach you what you missed? If so, standards have gone way down lately.

      Personally, I think there's a correlation between lack of degrees and fear of death, but that there's a third correlation that causes both: hardcore religion.

      If you aren't allowed to use contraceptives, and aren't allowed to have abortions, there's going to be unwanted children, a higher level of poverty, and a lower level of education for the next generation.
      And if a religion is at odds with science, there will be fewer members studying the sciences too. Some will undoubtedly study something else, but some won't.

      And if you've been told every Sunday from you were an infant how most people are going to burn in hell for eternity, including yourself if you fail to follow the moral standards, I think some fear of death might be the result.

    114. Re:Odd. by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Maybe if you're shit-scared of death all the time you find refuge in faith.

      Or maybe it's the other way around, that faith reinforces fear of death?
      I think many organized religions use the fear of death actively to keep the followers in line, and go out of their way to ensure everybody thinks of how horrible death can be if you yank your noodle, kill yourself or do other unspeakable "sins".

    115. Re:Odd. by arth1 · · Score: 1

      It's not easy making money off of religion.

      Proof to the contrary: Elrond Hubbard

    116. Re:Odd. by arth1 · · Score: 1

      So God didn't create evil, but he allowed this angle to choose to be evil.

      That's easily fixed with a T-remover and some untangling cream.

      Anyhow, we only have one side's word of the conflict. I'd like to hear both sides of the story before I make my mind up, and preferably a third party too.

    117. Re:Odd. by mswhippingboy · · Score: 1

      You're confusing two meanings of the word "good" here. There is the use of the word "good" as in "I have a good car" meaning you are satisfied with it's performance, capabilities, etc. You would not term the opposite of a good car an "evil" car (unless it's named Christine maybe). You might call it a "bad" car, or a "lemon" or maybe a POS even.
      However, the terms "good" and "evil" I'm referring to are regarding morality with "good" being positive morality and "evil" being negative.

      As far as the whole Adam and Eve story, I don't even know how to respond, other than to say I respect your beliefs.

      For myself, I have to believe that even it I were a snake-handling, rolling in the aisle, speaking in tongues fire and brimstone evangelical, I'd have a hard time taking that story literally. I can understand it as a parable or allegory, but the whole "Eve made out of Adam's rib, talking snake, apple eating" story is a bit hard for my feeble mind to accept literally.

      If you are able to suppress your cognitive abilities enough to believe that literally, then I salute your faith.

      --
      Sometimes the light at the end of the tunnel is the headlight of an oncoming train.
    118. Re:Odd. by MysteriousPreacher · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing that my definitions of Heaven would be more widely accepted in the Christian world, but ultimately we can pretty much define it as we wish. Your definition would be a little esoteric by mainstream Christian standards.

      Yup, it was cooked up by people trying to describe something that is actually pretty difficult to conceive and flesh-out. It probably doesn't help matters that various New Testament books make references to Heaven being a physical thing. 1 Acts for example, and the ascension in Luke and Matthew. I'm not surprised that Christians have trouble defining Heaven and Hell - or at least those who want to move beyond the "fire and pitchforks down there, harps and halos up there" approach.

      --
      -- Using the preview button since 2005
    119. Re:Odd. by Boronx · · Score: 1

      C. S. Lewis was an idiot. He's the same guy who said that you can't think Jesus wise, and also not the son of God, because a man can't be wise and crazy or wise and a liar.

    120. Re:Odd. by Boronx · · Score: 1

      Explain your logic. You seem to be taking for granted the notion that creators have a good understanding of their creations.

    121. Re:Odd. by electrosoccertux · · Score: 1

      infiinte punishment for a finite transgression

      rejecting an infinite god is a finite transgression?

    122. Re:Odd. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However, if reincarnation exist it seems there is a reason for not keeping the memories. Maybe life is a series of trials or a refinement where each life is a separate experience? It would get pretty hard to experience each life as it's own if you could remember 322 million previous lives. Maybe you remember all your lives while you are between lives? Or, maybe there simply isn't any reason to remember all the details about each life and the only thing that matters is how you live each life and the total sum of karma at the end? Maybe not even this matters and you just reincarnate because that's how life works - you retain nothing, it's just your life force that gets recycled.

      Food for thought...

    123. Re:Odd. by fishexe · · Score: 1

      It's not easy making money off of religion.

      Try telling that to L. Ron Hubbard.

      Of course, if you're an atheist, you could argue that it's not an immoral decision to *pretend* to be religious, for the perks. In some countries the "perks" include staying alive.

      You *could* argue that, but the vast majority of atheists I've met believe it's immoral to deceive in order to profit at the expense of others. So to stay alive, fine, but to rake in the dough, not so much.

      --
      "I don't care about the Constitution!" --Bill O'Reilly, November 17, 2009
    124. Re:Odd. by fishexe · · Score: 1

      Please never mention sex in the same sentence as "it's a trap!" again - horrifying mental images result!

      What, you don't like to picture hot Dodonna-on-Ackbar action?

      --
      "I don't care about the Constitution!" --Bill O'Reilly, November 17, 2009
    125. Re:Odd. by fishexe · · Score: 1

      The words "Better to reign in Hell than serve in Heaven" are by Milton originally, spoken by his Satan. Milton didn't write Paradise Lost as a piece of Christian fiction - given how heavily influenced he was by Greek and Pagan ideas and how much of that shows in the poem. Amusingly, he is still the main source for the popular picture of hell and Satan.

      Also, historical allegory about Cromwell and the English Civil War is mixed in there too. It gets really complicated, and yet some people feel comfortable pulling their Christian theology directly from there.

      --
      "I don't care about the Constitution!" --Bill O'Reilly, November 17, 2009
    126. Re:Odd. by fishexe · · Score: 1

      Heaven is a terribly boring place, Hell is suffering, I would rather take another chance at life and Re-incarnate, of course it would be nice to retain ALL my memories of the past life so I could learn from experience and not make the same mistakes twice.

      My experience is that that doesn't even work with mistakes from the same life. I find myself calling to mind memories of mistakes I've made only after making them again all the time.

      --
      "I don't care about the Constitution!" --Bill O'Reilly, November 17, 2009
    127. Re:Odd. by Nursie · · Score: 1

      Four nines, last time I tested, which was in the middle of my dope smoking years.

      At the end I hope to be drugged out of my tiny little mind. And yes, I will be scared, I don't wish to stop existing.

    128. Re:Odd. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and yet being gay is a sin...

    129. Re:Odd. by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      My logic is that there is no reason to believe a creator wouldn't have a good understanding of what they intentionally created. I mean it's not like they are simply taking something already in existence and forging something new like a blacksmith would for a sword or something. A creator (at least in this sense) is creating everything involved with the process including how to use the sword.

    130. Re:Odd. by Nursie · · Score: 1

      Societal effects and personal feelings are very different.

      Regardless of who it was available to, who it benefited, how society would change and morph - if it is ever available to me I will take it.

      I don't necessarily agree that immortality for all would require infinite resources, it would depend how it was managed with respect to procreation, and (if we're talking about sci-fi scenarios) expansion to other worlds.

      I can't disagree with your other point though, if it's of limited availability or even under some sort of moral veto we'll likely see those rich enough to be politically influential and the weaselly politicians granting themselves immortality, whilst it will be denied to others. Then we won't even be able to look forward to the ageing and eventual death of the powerful to refresh society and usher in change.

    131. Re:Odd. by uninformedLuddite · · Score: 1

      Sign me up for immortality treatment please.

      Sounds nice but I would bet that after a thousand or so years you would be depressed, pissed off, and wondering how the fsck you were going to collect on that dumb bet you made.

      --
      The new right fascists are bilingual. They speak English and Bullshit.
    132. Re:Odd. by uninformedLuddite · · Score: 1

      What is any amount of Earthly reassurance, in the face of the threat of infinite torture? (take that, Pascal!)

      It's very reassuring if you have no idea what's going on(take that, Cobol!)

      --
      The new right fascists are bilingual. They speak English and Bullshit.
    133. Re:Odd. by 1s44c · · Score: 1

      IQ is just another kind of penis-measuring contest, anyway. It's not a real reflection of your ability to function in society by any stretch of the imagination. The only purpose it serves is to allow you to lord it over the lesser beings in your life.

      -- Somebody who was invited to triple 9 society, when she had written her IQ test on 4 hours' sleep, and with a wicked migraine. (and no, I didn't accept... ended up not joining Mensa either).

      As someone who is a paid up member of Mensa you are DEAD RIGHT. I'm successful in life because I keep trying, I see dumb people who are successful because they keep trying. Putting in the work gets the results. IQ only gives me the tendency to over complicate things.

    134. Re:Odd. by VShael · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Think about the Bible, where God tells all sorts of horrible stories about the devil.

      The Devil has been quite silent on the matter.

      I think we can see who's being the bigger person here, and who's the whiny bitch.

    135. Re:Odd. by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

      If Jesus knew what he was talking about, God created all of those things; and he made* you in such a way that you could enjoy them. So if that's the kind of person he is, why would you think chilling with him forever would be boring?

      Because no matter how great the snacks and music are down in Jesus's basement, his dad is a dick and he'd ruin the mood, man.

      Seriously, read the Bible. That is some seriously harsh shit right there.

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    136. Re:Odd. by operagost · · Score: 1

      Ha ha! Clever. I award you one internet.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    137. Re:Odd. by Danse · · Score: 1

      I don't know where you folks got your information, but that's not the story I heard. I'm not even religious, but at least I did pay a little attention when I was a kid. There was no "God vs Devil" death-match as this thread suggests. My understanding was that God created "everything", both good and evil. It never was a matter of who would win, it was simply that good could not exist without evil. The whole thing with Lucifer was about trying to get the other angels to follow "him" instead of God, not about kicking God's butt, which even he had the sense to know could not happen. As I said, I'm certainly no Jesus freak (I tend to think Bill Maher has it about right), but folks, at least get the story straight.

      Still makes no sense. What kind of all-powerful, benevolent God creates a universe that requires the kinds of evil we see in the world?

      --
      It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
    138. Re:Odd. by infinite9 · · Score: 1

      If I believed that there was a good chance that after I died I would be thrown into a lake of fire and otherwise punished for the rest of eternity, you can bet your sorry ass that I would be scared shitless of dying. Yes yes if you're good you get to go to heaven, but what if you accidentally committed a mortal sin without realizing it or something?

      Actually, getting into heaven has nothing to do with being good. You only have to be saved. Jeffery Dahmer was saved shortly before he died. I fully expect to see him there. Some might wonder what kind of god would allow "justice" like this, that a serial killer would be allowed into heaven! But I see it differently. If God can save a serial killer, he can save anyone.

      After all, if you read the Bible, God is nothing if not capricious; how can you know that when He said "No mixed fabrics!", He didn't really mean it?

      This is the age of grace, and as saved christians, the law does not apply to us. Of course, without Jesus, you're still under the law. Which is why you'll never make it.

      What if you really are supposed to believe in the Miracle of Transubstantiation, reality be damned? It's just so uncertain.

      This is a catholic thing. Not all christians believe in this. Please stop lumping us all together.

      Fortunately there's no hell, so there's no worries on that front. Honestly, I can't for the life of me see why theists think that religion brings peace and comfort. What is any amount of Earthly reassurance, in the face of the threat of infinite torture? (take that, Pascal!)

      I don't fear death, because I know where I'm going. And I find great comfort and reassurance in that right here.

      --
      Disconnect your television. Do your own research. Draw your own conclusions. They're probably lying. Don't be a sheep.
    139. Re:Odd. by infinite9 · · Score: 1

      Oh, I did not mean Satan with the guy responsible for this. Any god condemning a single soul to infiinte punishment for a finite transgression is pure evil. That one would be the target in this unlikely case.

      What's the difference between finite and infinite?

      It's not God condemning you to an eternity in hell, you condemn yourself through your actions (or inaction).

      --
      Disconnect your television. Do your own research. Draw your own conclusions. They're probably lying. Don't be a sheep.
    140. Re:Odd. by infinite9 · · Score: 1

      But what if the Evil guy had won and then says He is the good guy?

      What if the Evil guy didn't win, but led people to believe that he had? Or that he was the good guy? Or that he didn't even exist?

      If I were the evil guy, I certainly would mess with peoples head and say that I was good, although I was evil.

      Isn't that what Satan does? And where does God ever behave this way? If we have free will, and someone does something evil, who is responsible? God for allowing it? Or the person for doing evil? If God intervened, we wouldn't have free will anymore.

      Say to two different persons that I am their only God and kill the other one and see who wins. Just because I can.

      Or how about God telling everyone that he is their only God, and Satan telling the people who won't listen that some other gods are the true way, or that there is no God?

      All the while the Devil who tries to come back, I will tell the worst stories about. And all the the Devil want to do is you to have fun.

      There are practical reasons for the rules. While it may just be having fun to you, there are serious real-world consequences that you could never predict or know about. Why not pick up a girl and have some fun tonight? Oh, you got HPV. 10 years later, oh my wife has HPV. Oh, my baby got HPV during delivery and died from complications. Oh man, I have penile cancer now and there's only one treatment for that. All because of a night of fun. If only there were a set of rules I could live by that could protect me from these kinds of unintended consequences...

      Or is this just a matter that absolute power corrupts absolutely?

      This applies to humans, not God.

      Anyway. Nice and entertaining stories. Lots of violence and sex, so great to turn into movies.

      I sincerely hope you figure out the truth before it's too late.

      --
      Disconnect your television. Do your own research. Draw your own conclusions. They're probably lying. Don't be a sheep.
    141. Re:Odd. by infinite9 · · Score: 1

      Heaven is a terribly boring place,

      And where did you get this idea? The descriptions I've read in the bible are far from boring.

      Hell is suffering,

      Understatement of eternity.

      I would rather take another chance at life and Re-incarnate, of course it would be nice to retain ALL my memories of the past life so I could learn from experience and not make the same mistakes twice.

      I wouldn't. This is an awful place. I don't ever want to come back here again.

      --
      Disconnect your television. Do your own research. Draw your own conclusions. They're probably lying. Don't be a sheep.
    142. Re:Odd. by infinite9 · · Score: 1

      I think there is a part of the Bible that says the only unforgivable sin, the only thing that can keep you from going to heaven, is the complete and absolute rejection of God.

      This is true. The only unforgivable sin is the rejection of salvation. But this is because you won't allow yourself to be saved.

      However, since God is infinite and unknowable you can't really reject him completely.

      Hell is full of people who rejected Jesus. It's not so much rejecting the full knowledge of God as it is rejecting salvation.

      You can reject the parts you know about, but not the parts you don't know about. You might not even want to reject those parts if you did know about them. Ergo, no one goes to hell.

      Jesus clearly said on a number of occasions that there is a hell and many (even most) will go there.

      --
      Disconnect your television. Do your own research. Draw your own conclusions. They're probably lying. Don't be a sheep.
    143. Re:Odd. by jahudabudy · · Score: 1

      I think you would enjoy the ideas in Steven Brust's "To Reign in Hell". And I personally rather like his writing style.

      --
      ...sometimes, in order to hurt someone very badly, you have to tell that person terrible lies. - PA
    144. Re:Odd. by numbski · · Score: 1

      Granted, I am human and therefore flawed, but there are things I create all the time that I understand less than I believe I do. Heck, any programmer on any given day can relate to that. :)

      I'm presuming parents can too...

      --

      Karma: Chameleon (mostly due to the fact that you come and go).

    145. Re:Odd. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell is full of people who rejected Jesus? Really? I thought no one goes to heaven or hell until judgment day. You don't even know about your own religion.

    146. Re:Odd. by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      It's funny because you still do not get the concept. Maybe it can be illustrated better with a little story.

      There were three guys who discovered how to create life out of elements within and on the earth. They convened a session of scientists who decided it was time to tell god he was no longer needed. So they went in front of God and said, I can create life from scratch too, you are no longer needed. God said, Ok, show me. So the scientists started scooping up some dirt, one was pulling out a flask of ammonia and God said "no, no, no. You have to start from scratch like I did".

      You see, you are confusing your limited knowledge with other peoples tools with the design and intent of the tools. You are in essence able to fumble around and make something that might do more or less then you expected from other people's tools. These tools in programming would be processor instruction codes, low or high level languages, scripting and so on. Now imagine your level of understanding if you were a creator and created the processor, the components of the computer that goes with it, the codes and programming languages used to program it, the operating system and so on and so on and so on. You might not know more then some joe who picked up a book on "how to be like you" that you wrote, but there is nothing to indicate that you wouldn't have a good understanding of what you created.

      And while it's probably impossible for you to be the creator of computers and everything associated with them as we know it today, we are also speaking about something that somewhat improbable too when speaking about the universe and all it's contents being created by a creator. And this should be distinguished from the creation of something using some else' tools and materials.

    147. Re:Odd. by Obble · · Score: 1

      I had interpreted this as the best way that God could explain to a guy 6000years ago.
      Technologically how would you explain that I just took a piece out of you, altered the double helix acid code in ways you will never understand, grew up sample into your really sexy babe. This isn't even thought possible to humans until recently in the last 50 maybe 100yrs and as of yet, we got dolly the sheep which is just a clone, not an altered clone.

      So saying God took a rib and grew Eve out of it I think it much more realistic now than it ever was.
      (Same for the Adam from dirt argument, think of startrek teleport technology assembling people from atoms. All the resources are already there, and Eve was made from adman and not from dirt I assume to stop people saying females were not human. (which people would do if they could.))
      Or I could be completely off on the technology side but it seems thats how it is.

      Thanks for respecting my views, usually I just get insulted as someone who doesn't think.

    148. Re:Odd. by Boronx · · Score: 1

      or God Said "Hey! I remember doing that! But I couldn't figure out how it worked. I mean, I know all about sub atomic particles and fields and stuff, but when I saw that I'd also made life, I was like whoah."

    149. Re:Odd. by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Lol..

      Do you really think any god or creator of something is sort of like a stoner making mistakes that work out in the end?

      Or were you injecting some much needed humor?

    150. Re:Odd. by Boronx · · Score: 1

      I don't think it's any less likely than the possibility that he's a genius that understands all the consequences of his actions.

  3. Other fears? by drolli · · Score: 0

    Could it be that being frightened correlates with mental problems, which in turn correlates with having a university degree?

    1. Re:Other fears? by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 5, Insightful

      People fear what they don't understand. Ignorant people fear more, and are manipulated by their fear en masse.

    2. Re:Other fears? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm so afraid to be ignorant and afraid of things I don't understand that I'm going to go to college again!

    3. Re:Other fears? by drolli · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Saying that as somebody who spent a lot of time in the academic world:

      Ignorance is not at all a privilege of people without a degree.

    4. Re:Other fears? by TeknoHog · · Score: 4, Insightful

      People fear what they don't understand. Ignorant people fear more, and are manipulated by their fear en masse.

      Getting a master's degree in physics did not give me any particular understanding of death. However, a central point of experimental sciences is coping with uncertainty. Understanding that the world is not black and white has a lot to do with your personality, and many people do not seem to be comfortable with themselves unless they feel absolutely certain about some things.

      In my current work as a teacher, one general challenge is getting my students from "what is the right/wrong answer" to understanding and analyzing the questions in a deeper level. I feel like I must first undo the elementary school teachings, in order to teach scientific thinking.

      This seems to reflect the fact that lower levels of education are about strict judgment and rote memorization. People at this level fear death, because they feel like they must have some kind of absolute knowledge in order to deal with it.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    5. Re:Other fears? by martas · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Look, that's certainly true, but we're talking about distributions here. I've seen stupid people in academia, and I've seen smart people in the general population. But here in academia, if I walk up to someone and strike up a conversation about some complex issue that perhaps one or both of us aren't very familiar with, 99% of the time I'll come out with a greater understanding of the issue than I had before. I learn something, just by accessing the intelligence of that other person. In the general population, 99% of the time the best I can hope for is a complete lack of interest from the other person or a few very stupid comments that make me sorry I started the conversation.

      So yeah, academia ain't no intellectual utopia, but there is a difference...

    6. Re:Other fears? by hedwards · · Score: 1

      Indeed, ignorance is a privilege of those gutless enough to leave facts unproven and truths unexplored. There's a reason why the word there is so closely related to "ignore." Ignorance isn't just a matter of not knowing something it tends to imply that somebody is being actively obtuse about a subject or fact.

      It's the main reason why people choose that word rather than the other ones that mean mostly the same thing.

    7. Re:Other fears? by someone1234 · · Score: 1

      I don't fear death because i don't understand it.
      I fear it because it is an inevitable and bad event.
      In my opinion those who don't fear death
      don't understand or don't care what they will lose with it.

      --
      Patents Drive Free Software as Hurricanes Drive Construction Industry
    8. Re:Other fears? by anyaristow · · Score: 2

      if I walk up to someone and strike up a conversation about some complex issue that perhaps one or both of us aren't very familiar with, ... I learn something

      If you've done that in the "general population" more than a couple times and think they're mindless sheep because they won't entertain you, then you've had an opportunity to learn something but simply haven't done so.

    9. Re:Other fears? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The difference being your intense academic bias.

    10. Re:Other fears? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The lesson being that he's an ass? (Not trying for flamebait here, I'm genuinely puzzled.)

    11. Re:Other fears? by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1

      Elitist!!!

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    12. Re:Other fears? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, I guess you understand death, then?

      How was it dying and coming back?

    13. Re:Other fears? by ejasons · · Score: 2

      Getting a master's degree in physics did not give me any particular understanding of death.

      It's the old correlation vs. causation thing again.

      No, getting a master's degree in physics did not give you any additional understanding or perspective. However, you being the type of person to get a master's degree puts you in a group that is more highly correlated with having that perspective...

    14. Re:Other fears? by TeknoHog · · Score: 2

      No, getting a master's degree in physics did not give you any additional understanding or perspective. However, you being the type of person to get a master's degree puts you in a group that is more highly correlated with having that perspective...

      I agree, I believe this is how it generally goes with studies that correlate something with education. However, I also believe education does have some effect. (Or what exactly am I doing as a teacher? :) In my personal experience, dealing with experimental data improved my ability to cope with uncertainty. It is an ability I already had, but it made me appreciate it more than before.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    15. Re:Other fears? by martyros · · Score: 1

      In the general population, 99% of the time the best I can hope for is a complete lack of interest from the other person or a few very stupid comments that make me sorry I started the conversation.

      Maybe you should instead strike up a conversation about something they actually have experience in: something in their field, or relating to their life.. I've found an awful lot of knowledge, experience, and wisdom in the non-college-educated.

      --

      TCP: Why the Internet is full of SYN.

    16. Re:Other fears? by drolli · · Score: 1

      99%. Interesting.

      You must select the people you talk to very well.

    17. Re:Other fears? by shadowofwind · · Score: 1

      My experience with academics has generally been that they are knowledgeable and smart enough to engage very much in that manner, but too arrogant, at least in relation to lesser or non-academics. Ask them something from outside of their intellectual bubble, and they'll twist the question into something befitting of the apparent simpleton that asked it, then speak to that. They're smart enough to see the answer to the real question and communicate it, if they can see the question. But seeing it requires admitting any relevant limitations of their own knowledge, and they won't do that. I find this frustrating when I can see that the person's understanding is valuable but their pride prevents them from sharing it.

      I have your same experience with the 'general population'. But I agree with the point that anyaristow makes, and think it applies to me in relation to academics also. Its possible to learn something relevant from practically anybody. If I keep getting the same useless interaction, then its because I never learned what the opportunity actually provided.

    18. Re:Other fears? by shadowofwind · · Score: 2

      Your point here about strict judgment was important to me personally. By relaxing my beliefs for or against things, and just leaving them in whatever state of ambiguity seemed to be justified by the available facts at the time, all kinds of possibilities opened up that weren't there otherwise.

      Of course, too much of this sort of thing too early leads to a sloppiness or fuzziness in thought that's not very constructive either. And everyone is at a different place with that. As a teacher, I started off trying to get people to explore and think about things from different directions. But I think there was a large portion of the class that I wasn't serving very well. A lot of people really do need clear, rote steps that they can follow, and only after it becomes sufficiently familiar that way do they have a chance of thinking more flexibly about it.

    19. Re:Other fears? by MagusSlurpy · · Score: 1

      If you've done that in the "general population" more than a couple times and think they're mindless sheep because they won't entertain you, then you've had an opportunity to learn something but simply haven't done so.

      Yeah, Martas. You could have learned all about the point system in NASCAR or where Biggie is actually hiding when he's recording those new albums, but no, you were just too good for it!

      --
      My sister opened a computer store in Hawaii. She sells C shells by the seashore.
    20. Re:Other fears? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      But here in academia, if I walk up to someone and strike up a conversation about some complex issue that perhaps one or both of us aren't very familiar with, 99% of the time I'll come out with a greater understanding of the issue than I had before. I learn something, just by accessing the intelligence of that other person.

      Actually, that illustrates one of problems with much of academia. Often "smart" folks enjoy talking at great lengths about complex issues that they (both?) aren't familiar with and go away with the smug assumption that they understand it more. You aren't accessing the intelligence of the other person, you just accessing their b***s***... ;^)

      One of the greatest insights in life is to acknowledge you don't really know what you don't have experience with. You can study all you like about a subject, but until the ivory tower meets the dust and dirt, you often realize that real problems require insight that's hard to stumble upon with rhetoric...

      Just say'n ;^)

    21. Re:Other fears? by numbski · · Score: 1

      Much respect Bruce, however I'm terrified of physical death. The concept of ceasing to exist has caused me much anxiety and grief over the last few years, requiring medication to subdue.

      In respects to death, we're all ignorant. I believe that we're referring to ignorance in life - in death, we're all equals. :(

      --

      Karma: Chameleon (mostly due to the fact that you come and go).

    22. Re:Other fears? by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 1

      I am sorry to hear of your pain.

    23. Re:Other fears? by SigmundFloyd · · Score: 1

      The concept of ceasing to exist has caused me much anxiety and grief over the last few years, requiring medication to subdue.

      As Epicurus said: man must not fear death, because when man exists, death does not; and when death exists, man does not. Basically, we never actually come into contact with the state of being dead.

      --
      Knowledge is power; knowledge shared is power lost.
  4. I don't know.... by Deus.1.01 · · Score: 0

    When i failed completing my degree at time i felt it would be perfectly fine if i took a long walk of a short cliff...

    --
    My -1 Troll is actually a +1 funny. And my -1 flame is actually a +1 insightfull.
  5. Dilbert by eggman9713 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I became an engineer. I work in a cubicle. I bear a slight resemblance to Dilbert when in my work attire. This my friends, is worse than death. Therefore, I have no fear of death because I am beyond it.

    1. Re:Dilbert by BenJCarter · · Score: 1

      LoL! I apologize for the redundancy with the Score:5, Funny, but I couldn't help myself.

      --
      For in politics, as in religion, it is equally absurd to aim at making proselytes by fire and sword. - Publius
    2. Re:Dilbert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's kind of sad that you're only 1/2 kidding.

    3. Re:Dilbert by 1s44c · · Score: 1

      I became an engineer. I work in a cubicle. I bear a slight resemblance to Dilbert when in my work attire. This my friends, is worse than death. Therefore, I have no fear of death because I am beyond it.

      That's a shitty life. Find a way out of it.

    4. Re:Dilbert by janerules · · Score: 1

      Work in the field, its better.

    5. Re:Dilbert by teachknowlegy · · Score: 1

      What's worse is bearing a significant resemblance to Dilbert, even outside of your work attire.

  6. Seems obvious to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People with a university degree fear death less than those at a lower literacy leve. In addition, fear of death

    Oh, the irony!

    C'mon, it seems easy to me: People who are educated tend to be better off and have less to worry about (they're enjoying life, not worrying if life will end before it gets better).

    Additionally, more educated people tend to be aware of risks more. For instance, a more educated person is more likely to know that the odds of getting into an accident where you are saved by a seat belt is far more likely than an accident where a seatbelt could trap you underwater. A well educated person is likely to know the odds of shark bites are in the millions and that you're more likely to die on your way to a theme park than you are on one of its rides.

  7. Indeed by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 4, Funny

    degree fear death less than those at a lower literacy leve.

    But they fear typographical errors much more :-)

    1. Re:Indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "most common among women than men"

    2. Re:Indeed by Rakshasa+Taisab · · Score: 1

      The anonymous submitter obviously sent in that submission due to her worries about the subject.

      --
      - These characters were randomly selected.
    3. Re:Indeed by r3verse · · Score: 2

      Yes. In addition the latter group drove their Chevy there and found it was dry. It does not bode well.

      Film @ 11.

    4. Re:Indeed by 32771 · · Score: 1

      That is why I switched to LaTeX. No more bad typography.

      --
      Je me souviens.
    5. Re:Indeed by martas · · Score: 1

      Nicely done, indeed! BTW, LaTeX >> God.

    6. Re:Indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the good old boys drank their whizz, key, and Rei.

      saying this will be the day i'm died

    7. Re:Indeed by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      Lazy lexographers lacking letter?

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
  8. There's more than one "fear of death" by dlenmn · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Fear of eventually dying and fear of dying young are quite different things, but both get named "fear of death". I read TFA, and it's not clear what fear they're talking about.

    IMHO, it's silly to fear the former but good to have some fear of the latter.

    1. Re:There's more than one "fear of death" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In reference to your comment, I personally have never feared death, eventual or immediate. I have always and do however fear pain.

      I know it is anecdotal but neither my family nor me is religious. As a child I was quite logical about death and just saw it as an end or an unknown , not something to be feared.
      I don't think it is academic education that necessarily makes the difference but possibly religious beliefs, religious education and the influencing beliefs of family.

      As an aside I am told by doctors that I have already died once (technically) for approximately 3 minutes. If anyone is interested in what I saw.....nothing.
      Just black empty absence of thought, a non-existence.

    2. Re:There's more than one "fear of death" by tenchikaibyaku · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This might be pretty obvious, but there's also a difference between the "fear of death" you feel in everyday life and the kind of "fear of death" you have when you believe that your life is actually threatened in some way. I don't walk around being afraid of dying or anything, but a panic attack a few years ago gave me a new perspective on a few things.

    3. Re:There's more than one "fear of death" by catbutt · · Score: 1

      Why is it silly to fear the former? Fear of death is of course deep in us for obvious Darwinian reasons....there is no real "rationality" behind wanting to continue living except that natural selection put it at the very center of our motivational system. And there was no reason for evolution to make us *only* fear early death.....the important thing was that we do everything in our power to avoid death. -- no good reason to have it be selective between early or late death.

    4. Re:There's more than one "fear of death" by r3verse · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Oh freakin' hell --

      This is such baloney. It's not influencing beliefs, it's good 'ol human sentimentality. Which I value very highly. THIS IS WHAT MAKES US HUMAN. Think of everything you love, and hold dear. Now imagine your life without it. You are not on a horse, you are dead, in a blank void, as you clearly stated.

      I have a 6 year old son. Tell me why I would not be scared of losing the chance to see him grow up?

      And as an aside, please tell me how you managed to cognitively grasp the concept of thought if there was no thought itself.

    5. Re:There's more than one "fear of death" by register_ax · · Score: 0

      I read your comment 3 times before realizing it had nothing to do with the comment AC left, but was a reply to the OP.

      Why must people reply to a reply just to get their post higher up?

      If internet avatars had human sentimentality, yours would be one of those emo dudes who go around trying to get people to notice them.

    6. Re:There's more than one "fear of death" by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      I don't fear death. I fear the pain of dying. I've been seriously injured several times, it's the pain that makes me fear it. Oddly enough my non-university graduate grandfather believed the same thing, he died quite painfully with cancer eating away his spine. He lived about 4 weeks from the time it was diagnosed to the time he died it progressed that quickly.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    7. Re:There's more than one "fear of death" by r3verse · · Score: 1

      I tried to develop some kind of cogent, informed commentary re: your snide comment. I failed.

      a) How the hell does my post relate more to the OP than the AC post?

      b) I honestly couldn't care about some kind of imaginary ranking; I made this account 4-5 years back and have _maybe_ posted 5-6 times.

      c) Internet avatars != Human sentimentality, unless they have acquired some HAL-9000esque quality i'm not yet aware of. Are you suggesting that a picture has manifested itself as a version of me? Trolling /.? I've been in a hospital as a result of self-inflicted maladies, because I honestly wished I was dead at that point. Was I crazy? Of FUCKING course.

      I don't want to die, and nobody i've ever known isn't inherently shit scared of death. I just want to stop the mental masturbation.

    8. Re:There's more than one "fear of death" by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      A open mind that seeks learning also sees a greater universe. In a universe of galaxies lasting billions of years it is hard to get really worried about one's insignificant monkey existence. You and every generation you can track in either direction are noting but the most insignificant blip imaginable.

      Of course all life has value being a critter with a greater degree of choice (the greater degree of choice based upon greater understanding) does not deny any creatures with lessor choice lessor value, they just have lessor responsibility for their choice not a lessor value of life.

      So fearing a negative life balance, where you have taken more than you have contributed, rather than death itself (excluding extended painful, still rather insignificant considering billions of years), seem to have more realistic import over extended existence.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    9. Re:There's more than one "fear of death" by YttriumOxide · · Score: 1

      I don't want to die, and nobody i've ever known isn't inherently shit scared of death.

      I definitely don't want to die, but I'm not really "scared" of death. I would fight tooth and nail not to die, because I want to continue my life.

      I have a 6 year old son. Tell me why I would not be scared of losing the chance to see him grow up?

      Looking forward and imagining my daughter growing up without me is horrible and depressing. But I'm also aware that no matter how strongly I feel about it right now, I simply won't care after I'm dead for the very simple fact that *I* will not exist anymore. There'll be no "me" and therefore no way that I could care about anything, including my loved ones that I care so very much for right now. I certainly "fear for" the emotional pain that my daughter would feel without me, but I don't fear for myself, which I think is the kind of fear the other posters have been thinking of.

      I'm definitely not "shit scared of death" in any way, shape or form.

      --
      My book about LSD and Self-Discovery
      Also on facebook as: DroppingAcidDaleBewan
    10. Re:There's more than one "fear of death" by nbeharrytt · · Score: 1

      Interesting I do think it is your influencing beliefs, in eastern based religions there is little or no fear of death because there is the belief in reincarnation. That and the added belief that a fear of death is derived from a relatively "selfish" world view. Because you are contemplating your loss and not the other person's. An eastern world view would be spend time with your son, so when you do die you leave him with loving memories of the time you spent together.

    11. Re:There's more than one "fear of death" by Zapotek · · Score: 2

      That's weird...In situations were I've come closing to dying the only thing in my mind was how to avoid it (and obviously I was successful) while at times that I'm bored and my mind wonders into the subject then I get scared.
      Maybe because I used to do a fair amount of extreme sports as a kid like skiing, mountain biking (a lot of that), doing stupid things with my dad's car etc that I eventually got a handle on dangerous situations.

      Any person with "normal" brain chemistry will fear death, acceptance though may depend on literacy, critical thinking and the like...

    12. Re:There's more than one "fear of death" by Zapotek · · Score: 1

      Damn...I should paying more attention to the previewing... :P

    13. Re:There's more than one "fear of death" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fear of eventually dying and fear of dying young are quite different things, but both get named "fear of death". I read TFA, and it's not clear what fear they're talking about.

      IMHO, it's silly to fear the former but good to have some fear of the latter.

      Newsflash!

      Knowing more reduces Fear of the Unknown!!

      Film at 11:00

    14. Re:There's more than one "fear of death" by bipbop · · Score: 1

      I've managed to stay calm whenever my life's been in danger. Sometimes, this didn't seem like a big deal afterwards. Other times, it ended up seeming fairly traumatic after the fact, even though it certainly wasn't at the time! But in either case, I don't think I was *trying* to stay calm--it just happened.

    15. Re:There's more than one "fear of death" by tenchikaibyaku · · Score: 1

      My situation might have been different since, well, panic is a natural part of a panic attack as far as I know. :-) As it hit me suddenly when I was walking it was (most likely) not caused by any actual physical danger, rather probably by built-up stress I guess.

      Maybe I could handle something like it better nowadays, but I wouldn't bet on it..

    16. Re:There's more than one "fear of death" by visualight · · Score: 1

      Also, "self" is an illusion.

      --
      Samsung took back my unlocked bootloader because Google wants me to rent movies. They're both evil.
    17. Re:There's more than one "fear of death" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because I remember the pre and post states.
      Ever been knocked out, how about put under for an operation?

        If so compare the two.

      Being knocked out for me was black with a sense of self but absent any real complex cognitive thought.
      Being put under for an operation was like blinking, a complete absence of self, there was nothing in between closing my eyes and waking up. Dieing seemed like that but with a remembered and somewhat painful easing into that state. (due to injuries).

      Think of everything you love, and hold dear. Now imagine your life without it. You are not on a horse, you are dead, in a blank void...

      Your response makes no sense the dead don't care and in your example you are not fearing death but the loss of your ability to see your child grow up.

      The OP said "There's more than one fear of death" I agree but my point was that there are also other things people fear, associated with death, that are confused with a fear of death. In my case pain.
      What you ACTUALLY fear is influenced by family, culture , religion and yes education to some extent.

    18. Re:There's more than one "fear of death" by ultranova · · Score: 1

      I have a 6 year old son. Tell me why I would not be scared of losing the chance to see him grow up?

      Well, the way things are going, he'll grow up in a world dominated by Chinese dictatorship, assuming no Third World dictator or a terrorist group doesn't get ahold of nukes and trigger a nuclear holocaust first. This, in turn, means that he either lives as a slave or dies slowly from radiation poisoning.

      Also, oil is running out, Europe is slowly but surely being overrun by muslims and turned into an Islamic hellhole, and global warming will likely make it impossible to produce enough food for everyone, especially since ethanol-based fuels are also made from food.

      Basically, your son was born 50 years too late, missed the only relatively nice period of human history - and even that only in the First World - and will grow up while civilization crumbles and spark of light triggered by the Enlightenment gets snuffed out forever. Why would you want to see that?

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    19. Re:There's more than one "fear of death" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lessor

      I think you mean 'lesser'. And by the way, not everyone goes to universities to 'see a greater universe.'

    20. Re:There's more than one "fear of death" by hitmark · · Score: 1

      There is also some recent data suggesting that what one fear is the inability to stay current with the happenings.

      That is, thinking about possible events right after ones death creates a bigger response then thinking about events perhaps 100 years after ones death.

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    21. Re:There's more than one "fear of death" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As an aside I am told by doctors that I have already died once (technically) for approximately 3 minutes. If anyone is interested in what I saw.....nothing.
      Just black empty absence of thought, a non-existence.

      But, was it exactly three minutes of nothing? /Contact

    22. Re:There's more than one "fear of death" by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Your response makes no sense the dead don't care and in your example you are not fearing death but the loss of your ability to see your child grow up.

      Actually, it makes more sense then you are willing to attribute to it. Stating there is a fear of death doesn't necessarily mean that the death is what you fear. Think of death as a trigger that causes other things to happen or not.

      Maybe more aptly, this could be explained as an anecdotal analogy. I know people who fear getting a divorce because they know that they would lose the 20 years paid into their home as neither spouse could afford it independently. They know they would lose the majority of their lifestyle because without the benefit of the second income, things will be tight for them. For this reason, they are willing to stay together through more crap then others are and they fear taking actions that would cause the other to leave. In short, they are afraid of a divorce not because the divorce is so bad, but because of what they will lose in the divorce.

      The same can be said with death. The fear of losing something like time with your kid, or not being able to provide for his welfare, the fear of what would happen if you were not around could make you completely afraid of your own death in the sense you would state you had a fear of death. The "will they remember me", or "how will they remember me" is a valid reasoning to account for your fear of death. This is because whether you are religious or not, once you are dead, you have little to no chance of influencing any of that.

    23. Re:There's more than one "fear of death" by littlewink · · Score: 1

      I assure you that the fear of dying old can also be quite strong!

  9. Death? by QuantumLeaper · · Score: 1

    You can only die once, and I have been dead, so I will live forever now....
    I think the University was worse than death anyway, pain goes away when you die, at the University the pain never went away...

    1. Re:Death? by zakeria · · Score: 1

      If you only die once then how come more people have died than the total number of people ever born?

    2. Re:Death? by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because that's a false statement (more people can't die than the total number of people born, as those who are not born can't die, due to not existing in the first place), and you're begging the question.

      --
      Not a sentence!
    3. Re:Death? by zakeria · · Score: 1

      But you can die more than once, so it true!

    4. Re:Death? by antifoidulus · · Score: 2

      You can only die once, and I have been dead, so I will live forever now....

      You say that, but we all know that Vicious kills you in the end, even if you can stagger down the hallway and shoot a finger gun at the camera.

    5. Re:Death? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One person who has died twice is still one person who has died. You need to count events, not the subjects of the events.

    6. Re:Death? by zakeria · · Score: 1

      Wind your neck inn Spock it's humor!!!

    7. Re:Death? by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Well, we are getting into the splitting of hairs when talking about who died.

      When you say dead, you generally mean not here any more. But when you die, then come back to life, it's generally where the law or common understand of medicine pronounced you dead and you recovered somehow (either on your own or through some intervention).

      So while it might be true that more people have legally died then what has been born, it might not be true without the preface of legally or medically in front of it.

    8. Re:Death? by jc42 · · Score: 1

      ... those who are not born can't die ...

      Careful; you'll bring the wrath of the anti-abortion crowd down on us, and we'll have to godwin the conversation to kill it off. ;-)

      There is also the question of miscarriages, which do include the death of a living creature. And if it's a human fetus, well, it is human, whether or not it's a real "person". As is an unfertilized ovum -- or a sperm cell for that matter. The realities of biological systems sorta play havoc with our terminology, which was developed by a pre-scientific society and needs a serious upgrade to match our current knowledge.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
  10. Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am male and have a university degree. I fear death more than anyone I've never met.

    For anyone reading, by the way, Freud was very insightful on fear of death. My very poor summary is as follows... It's hard for us to conceive of nonexistence, because to do so requires us to exist and observe that nonexistence, which means that we would have to exist to have any thoughts on the matter. Pretty trippy stuff.

    I also think of the scene from Annie Hall, where all of Woody Allen's books have death in the title. "It's a very important issue!", he says. I guess Allen's character is more neurotic than most, but when I think of fear of death I do picture this sort of thing: a nervous intellectual male who fears death. Such as Freud. I have a hard time thinking that it's just the uneducated that are worried about this.

    I guess there is a slight tendency for the well-off in this world to act like they're immortal. If you've seen more unfairness you're probably thinking more of your death. Rich bastards don't think they'll ever die.

    1. Re:Hmm... by The+Wild+Norseman · · Score: 2

      I am male and have a university degree. I fear death more than anyone I've never met.

      Lemme guess -- football scholarship?

      --
      "A government is a body of people usually -- notably -- ungoverned." -Shepherd Book
    2. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Freud got "death" as badly wrong as he got "child rape". He invented reasons that his peers and patients couldn't possibly *really* have experienced what they reported, and made their fears fraudulent and something for the therapist to transform into something he could bring himself to admit and handle. Anyone stupid enough to say we cannot really imagine death because "whenever we attempt to do so we can perceive that we are in fact still present as spectators'" is pretending that if you do not see the Ravenous Bugblatter Beast of Traal, it cannot see you.

      Freud had insights, but his models of how what you believe or remember is really something else that you're repressing has ruined years of therapy for many people, and led psychiatry into treacherous swamps and the occasional alligator. The idea that you can't even imagine your own death is one of those swamps.

  11. Given current trends... by RancidPeanutOil · · Score: 2

    If we're talking about undergraduate degrees, and the average amount of debt involved, then yeah, if asked if I was afraid of dying right after graduation, I'd be like, "meh."

  12. Mildly confused... by mikaelwbergene · · Score: 1

    I just read the article and barely found any mention of the topic of the title... And frankly the whole thing left me confused about what their focus was.

    1. Re:Mildly confused... by zakeria · · Score: 1

      They just wanted to distract you!

  13. conformance by FuckingNickName · · Score: 0

    People with a university degree tend to be (in b4 outliers) more conformist, walking in lockstep with society and less willing to question themselves or their surroundings. Like the old stereotype says, the easterner spends too much time in meditation staring into space, and the westerner spends too little time doing so.

    Before anyone cries, "dropout!" and/or "education broadens your horizons, luddite!", only the components of my degree(s) containing philosophy really helped me contemplate mortality. And we're increasingly insulting about philosophy (even while, in the UK, many of the major players in government/civil service have been through PPE), and study it in an increasingly bookish manner rather than asking students to use it as a vehicle to contemplate for themselves.

    1. Re:conformance by Nursie · · Score: 1

      Oh what utter rot.

      Have any proof to back up your unfounded assertions that having a degree makes you more conformist?

      Philosophy iss interesting, sometimes, but an awful lot of it is just mental masturbation.

    2. Re:conformance by IICV · · Score: 0

      People with a university degree tend to be (in b4 outliers) more conformist, walking in lockstep with society and less willing to question themselves or their surroundings. Like the old stereotype says, the easterner spends too much time in meditation staring into space, and the westerner spends too little time doing so.

      [citation needed]

      In fact, I'll see your "more conformist" and raise you a "no they're not" - politically speaking, academics (a subset of people with degrees, I know) tend to be Democrats where the general population is mostly Republican. That doesn't sound at all like "walking in lockstep with society" to me.

    3. Re:conformance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See Hitchens' chapter "There is no Eastern Solution" in God is Not Great.

    4. Re:conformance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mental masturbation is the pinnacle of the conscious mind...

    5. Re:conformance by omfgnosis · · Score: 2

      Wait, it's nonconformist to support one of the two dominant political trends in the most powerful country in the world? Lolwhut.

    6. Re:conformance by omfgnosis · · Score: 1

      Care to share a little summary? I'm not inclined to give Hitchens my money just on the recommendation of some random comment on Slashdot, but I've heard a lot of what Hitchens has to say about religion and he rarely gives anything other than the Abrahamic religions more than a few offhand remarks. What exactly is his critique of, for instance, mindfulness?

    7. Re:conformance by FuckingNickName · · Score: 1

      Academics are a very small subset of people with degrees. And I'm not quite sure why clamouring for Kodos rather than Kang makes you a social revolutionary, but arguing here that a modern university degree tends to restrict the mind is like preaching atheism to the converted. Curiosity rarely survives formal education.

    8. Re:conformance by FuckingNickName · · Score: 0

      Have any proof to back up your unfounded assertions that having a degree makes you more conformist?

      I asserted that a man with a university degree tends to be more conformist, not that a university degree makes a man more conformist. In other words, the motivation to complete a university degree (specifically - not merely the desire to learn) may be a sign of conformism. Yours is the kind of lack of attention to detail I'd expect from someone with the paucity of skills provided by a modern degree.

      I did assert that a degree does not in general reduce conformism, but that's a different argument.

    9. Re:conformance by mikael_j · · Score: 1

      You don't hang out with a lot of people who either dropped out of high school or who are downright proud of managing to force their way through high school, do you?

      I'd say that if anything my experience has shown me that while there are outliers who go against the norm overall people with less education tend to be a lot more conformist, a lot more likely to listen to authorities (that's not to say they won't be loudly and irrationally opposed to authorities they dislike, just that from what I've seen they tend to be more likely to be directly influenced by someone or something).

      That said, I think that as a larger percentage of the population gets university degrees and a university degree becomes more and more like a high school degree (cookie cutter, cram some knowledge, don't stop to reflect) the more there will be people who just went through the motions to get the degree without actually going to university to learn and think (personally I never got around to actually getting a degree because I was busy exploring interesting subjects, it just didn't feel like it was worth it to go back and do that last graduation project in order to get a degree). They just want the degree so they can be "successful", they don't care about the knowledge (that's why we get economists who know just what suit to wear at a business meeting but don't grasp eighth grade math and software developers who can speak fluent marketroid but think datatypes are "too complicated").

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    10. Re:conformance by mikael_j · · Score: 1

      Curiosity rarely survives formal education.

      I think that depends a lot on the education and the teacher (as well as the student).

      I've seen a lot of students basically get brainwashed by professors who demand perfect conformance to their personal quirks, for some reason this seems especially common among those studying to become teachers, social workers and economists, but I've also seen plenty of examples of professors that would rather pass a student that did something wrong but used their own mind while failing those who just repeat what's in the course literature.

      And there is of course, as I stated, the individual student's attitude to factor in as well. I've taken art and image production courses where most students tried to be a bit artistic, think of new ideas on their own and all that but some absolutely refused to instead choosing to turn their projects into poor examples of a mismash of basic artistic concepts. This despite the fact that they were encouraged to think for themselves, they just didn't want to, they wanted to do what they did for the social studies class, copy what was in the book with slightly different structure, slap their name on it and get a good grade.

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    11. Re:conformance by NoZart · · Score: 1

      maybe they are walking in lockstep with THEIR society? People tend to be rather ignorant of peer groups not their own, even more so if they do not have regular contact with them.

    12. Re:conformance by ultranova · · Score: 1

      I've seen a lot of students basically get brainwashed by professors who demand perfect conformance to their personal quirks, for some reason this seems especially common among those studying to become teachers, social workers and economists, but I've also seen plenty of examples of professors that would rather pass a student that did something wrong but used their own mind while failing those who just repeat what's in the course literature.

      So basically the lesson here is that you need to study the background of whoever is your superior in order to figure out how best to brownnose them. Which, if you think about it, is a pretty useful lesson :).

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    13. Re:conformance by Nursie · · Score: 1

      LOL.

      "I asserted that a man with a university degree tends to be more conformist, not that a university degree makes a man more conformist."

      And you could read what I wrote as a demand to prove that the likelihood of individual conformism rises with a degree, not necessarily that the process of going through a degree changes the conformist nature of an individual.

      Either way, people with degrees are more 'conformist' in your mind. You still fail to provide anything other than your own wittering as evidence.

      It's still bullshit and you're still mentally masturbating with some ferocity.

    14. Re:conformance by FuckingNickName · · Score: 1

      You administered the wrong dose of vitriol, Nursie. Don't backpedal by telling Doctor you're just guilty of an abuse of language.

    15. Re:conformance by Nursie · · Score: 1

      You misunderstand. I'm not admitting guilt of anything and I still find your initial point to be both unfounded and objectionable.

  14. What about the people in US Government? by vkv.raju · · Score: 0

    What about the people in US Government?

    1. Re:What about the people in US Government? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      They fear the rule of law more than death and Government is their God.

    2. Re:What about the people in US Government? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And they don't get along with my dog.

    3. Re:What about the people in US Government? by Jeremi · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They fear the rule of law more than death and Government is their God.

      Yes, and they also kidnap infants and drink their blood at their Satanic gatherings.

      Can we stop with the hysteria yet? People in the US government are like people anywhere else -- some good, some bad, most just trying to pay their bills and keep out of trouble. Just because it's in the political interest of certain right-wing media organizations to regularly vilify them doesn't mean you have to mindlessly play along.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    4. Re:What about the people in US Government? by elucido · · Score: 0

      They fear the rule of law more than death and Government is their God.

      Yes, and they also kidnap infants and drink their blood at their Satanic gatherings.

      Can we stop with the hysteria yet? People in the US government are like people anywhere else -- some good, some bad, most just trying to pay their bills and keep out of trouble. Just because it's in the political interest of certain right-wing media organizations to regularly vilify them doesn't mean you have to mindlessly play along.

      People with security clearance fear the law and follow it ruthlessly. See here http://www.fas.org/sgp/isoo/guidelines.html

      So it's reasonable to believe people in the government aren't like people everywhere else because unlike everybody else they know how not to get in trouble.

    5. Re:What about the people in US Government? by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 3

      People with security clearance fear the law and follow it ruthlessly.

      Spoken like someone who has never been around anyone with a security clearance.
      People with clearances are like everybody else except they try to not to talk about some parts of their work. You take two people working for the same organization with roughly the same background and responsibilities but one has a clearance and the other doesn't, you aren't going to find a significant variation except the one with the clearance is more reticent about talking about their job. Ain't nothing 'ruthless' about it.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    6. Re:What about the people in US Government? by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      People in the US government are like people anywhere else -- some good, some bad, most just trying to pay their bills and keep out of trouble.

      Which is why it is dangerous to give them power over others. People do not become demons when they join the government, but neither do they become angels. They remain human and as such tend to conform to the values of their social referent group. When government is large and powerful it becomes its own social referent group, and tends toward values that benefit its members.

      Just because it's in the political interest of certain right-wing media organizations to regularly vilify them doesn't mean you have to mindlessly play along.

      Because it is only correct to vilify them when the "right" is in ascendancy.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    7. Re:What about the people in US Government? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People in the US government are like people anywhere else

      "You know the score Dekker. If you're not cops, you're Little People."

      'nuf said

    8. Re:What about the people in US Government? by elucido · · Score: 0

      People with security clearance fear the law and follow it ruthlessly.

      Spoken like someone who has never been around anyone with a security clearance.
      People with clearances are like everybody else except they try to not to talk about some parts of their work. You take two people working for the same organization with roughly the same background and responsibilities but one has a clearance and the other doesn't, you aren't going to find a significant variation except the one with the clearance is more reticent about talking about their job. Ain't nothing 'ruthless' about it.

      Then why are so many people denied clearance? If people with clearance are ordinary people and anyone can get one shouldn't anyone be able to get a federal government job? Clearly thats not the case.

      Something like 1% of people in the USA have a security clearance.

    9. Re:What about the people in US Government? by ShadowRangerRIT · · Score: 1

      Sure, "only" 800-900K people have a top secret security clearance (quite a lot more have lower clearances, as in Secret, but not Top Secret). People are denied clearance for all sorts of reasons; in most cases it's not because the person is suspected of being treasonous, but because they fit a profile where, statistically speaking, they could be convinced to violate their clearance more easily. A large number of denials are based on credit reports; money troubles could be a way for foreign agents to get an "in", by helping you out economically. A history of drug use or alcohol abuse renders you susceptible to blackmail, close emotional ties with non-citizens can be a problem as well.

      Remember, classification exists for a reason. If you have agents collecting information from foreign powers (read: spying) you want to make sure the foreign power doesn't identify them. So anything that reveals the source of the information has to be kept from leaking. If you didn't provide some assurance that a spy's identity would be protected (by keeping distribution of the identifying information to a small number of people, and making reasonably sure they could be trusted), you couldn't recruit any spies at all.

      Beyond that, you don't need a clearance (or a very high one) for most federal government work. Yeah, Defense work will need it, as will Intelligence and some State Department jobs, but most everything else is low or no clearance. Secret level clearances are actually pretty trivial (mostly a matter of verifying you have no criminal record and doing a credit check), only the top secret clearances actually involve a full range of denial reasons.

      Oh, and one more reason everyone doesn't have them: For Top Secret clearances, you need to fill out an annoying ass form and they spend $10K or so and many months investigating your background to make sure you didn't lie. So you need to want to work for the federal government (which pays less for the same education than most private sector jobs), live where such jobs are available, and they need to want you. If any of those aren't the case, spending the money to clear you would be pointless.

      --
      $_ = "wftedskaebjgdpjgidbsmnjgcdwatb"; tr/a-z/oh, turtleneck Phrase Jar!/; print
    10. Re:What about the people in US Government? by MyFirstNameIsPaul · · Score: 1

      People with security clearance fear the law and follow it ruthlessly.

      I think you are confusing the rule of law with martial law.

      --

      I once took an excursion to Reddit, and later HN. Unlimited up/down voting sucks when dealing with a hive-mind.

    11. Re:What about the people in US Government? by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      Then why are so many people denied clearance?

      Not many people are denied clearance. Especially regular "secret" level clearance which practically any citizen without a criminal history or substantial money problems can get.

      If people with clearance are ordinary people and anyone can get one shouldn't anyone be able to get a federal government job? Clearly thats not the case.

      I can't quite parse that. Sounds like you think a regular federal job requires a clearance, That's not true. Only positions which require access to classified information require security clearances. Most federal employees do not have and do not need a clearance.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    12. Re:What about the people in US Government? by shadowofwind · · Score: 1

      I think the left/right dichotomy here is false. The hundreds of thousands of people working in the federal security apparatus, either as government employees or for private contractors, are generally praised rather than vilified by the right. And yes, they are just trying to take care of their families. But the way they're doing that is a drain on other more productive endeavors, and is slowly eroding our freedom. They may have been pushed into their current work largely by circumstances. But at some point it still has to be resisted.

      If you work for the government, or in the 'government security apparatus', and you're in a situation where you are able to conscientiously put people's money to productive use, then hats off to you, and I'm not talking about you. But if the shoe fits....There's two different places the sensitivity can come from.

    13. Re:What about the people in US Government? by fishexe · · Score: 1

      Just because it's in the political interest of certain right-wing media organizations to regularly vilify them doesn't mean you have to mindlessly play along.

      Because it is only correct to vilify them when the "right" is in ascendancy.

      How about only vilifying them when they do bad things?

      --
      "I don't care about the Constitution!" --Bill O'Reilly, November 17, 2009
    14. Re:What about the people in US Government? by careysub · · Score: 1

      Sure, "only" 800-900K people have a top secret security clearance...

      Wow! I didn't know the number had sky-rocketed like that. IIRC. back during the Cold War, when we had an enemy that actually could destroy us, there were only 250,000 TS holders.

      --
      Starships were meant to fly, Hands up and touch the sky - Nicky Minaj
    15. Re:What about the people in US Government? by ShadowRangerRIT · · Score: 1

      The Washington Post ran a series of articles on it a few months ago. See the project on their website for more info.

      --
      $_ = "wftedskaebjgdpjgidbsmnjgcdwatb"; tr/a-z/oh, turtleneck Phrase Jar!/; print
  15. Whatever doesn't kill me . . . by Greg+Merchan · · Score: 1

    Whatever doesn't kill me makes me stronger . . .

    . . . unless it maims me.

    The maiming sucks. I'd rather avoid it.

  16. Well by jav1231 · · Score: 0

    I'm sure this will make many atheists happy to here (despite the fact that this is coming from the University of Grenada...I mean, c'mon!?) but I can assure you, no matter what your education level, if you stand down the barrel of a gun at the hands of a killer you will fear death.

    1. Re:Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd love to know what a psychiatrist would think of your post.

      Planning on shooting anybody?

    2. Re:Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some people fear death all the time, that's why we have ridiculous TSA security checks and other bullshit. These are designed not to catch terrorists but rather to say "see? we have all these scanners, you're safe!"

    3. Re:Well by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 0

      Maybe they did time in Guantanamo or one of the CIA black sites and were subject to a Mock Execution.

      Dostoevsky wasn't a killer, but referenced his own mock execution in detail in at least two of his books.

    4. Re:Well by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

      I'm sure this will make many atheists happy to here (despite the fact that this is coming from the University of Grenada...I mean, c'mon!?)

      Actually, it is Granada. A few thousand miles and the Atlantic Ocean are between Grenada and Granada.

    5. Re:Well by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 1

      the University of Grenada...I mean, c'mon!?

      Granada, not Grenada. Only one letter, but it makes a rather large difference.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    6. Re:Well by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I'd love to know what a psychiatrist would think of your post.

      Planning on shooting anybody?

      Based on his .sig, I'm guessing he's the typical right-wing chickenhawk who loves to imagine himself a tough guy who know what it's like to face down death because he's seen all the movies based on Tom Clancy novels and spent a lot of time playing Call of Duty.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    7. Re:Well by jav1231 · · Score: 1

      Point taken. Spain vs. an island nation.

      There could still be cultural differences at play, who knows?

    8. Re:Well by jav1231 · · Score: 1

      And the smartest man in the world stands behind them so what does that say about the U of Granada's study? :p

    9. Re:Well by jav1231 · · Score: 1

      You would be wrong.

      Seen a few of the movies probably, never read his novels, and don't play Call of Duty.

    10. Re:Well by jav1231 · · Score: 1

      I'm seeing a therapist, if that helps.

    11. Re:Well by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

      if you stand down the barrel of a gun at the hands of a killer you will fear death.

      Bleh, I'm way too tall to stand in, on or down the barrel of a gun, unless we're talking battleship-sized artillery here.

      And no, I will not be afraid of death, I will be afraid of *dying*. Adrenalin kicks in and the good ol' fight-or-flight reflex takes over.

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
  17. This just in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Breathing helps keep humans from dying.

  18. After 4 or more years at university by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    death probably seems like a nice change of pace

  19. Reasoning? by Renraku · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Death is inevitable. I don't fear taxes, and I don't fear death.

    What I do fear, however, since I live in the United States where suicide and assisted suicide are illegal, is becoming almost completely nonfunctional due to sudden paralysis, stroke, etc. The fear is that if I were locked in and could only communicate one character an hour, they'd still keep me alive for as long as they could, even if I had to lay there awake but bored and paralyzed for 16 hours a day.

    A distant second is dying a horrible slow death, perhaps by starvation.

    Death itself, though, I don't really fear.

    --
    Job? I don't have time to get a job! Who will sit around and bitch about being broke and unemployed then?
    1. Re:Reasoning? by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      > where suicide and assisted suicide are illegal,

      True, but you could always drink or smoke yourself to death ... :/ Seems to me it is only the timeframe that people don't like -- quick and painless, or the long, slow, painful in agony.

      Not sure what gives the the living to dictate the rights over my body and / or control how I wish to die ...

    2. Re:Reasoning? by riverat1 · · Score: 1

      Actually in Oregon and Washington at least assisted suicide it legal under certain circumstances. In Oregon 2 doctors have to certify that you probably have less than 6 months to live. Then you can get a prescription for a fatal dose of barbiturates that you must swallow yourself at a time of your choosing.

    3. Re:Reasoning? by Ihmhi · · Score: 0

      There have been exactly 0 charges filed for Suicide since the law was put on the books. Clearly, it is working as an excellent deterrent against the practice!

    4. Re:Reasoning? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Death is inevitable. I don't fear taxes, and I don't fear death.

      In the UK they are just about the same thing. And the taxman is worse than the grimm reaper

    5. Re:Reasoning? by Renraku · · Score: 1

      No charges, I guess, but if you make an attempt, you'll be held until they think you've changed your mind. Then they'll let you go. It's not QUITE a law thing, it's more of a "If you want to kill yourself obviously you're defective and can't be charged with sharp pointies." thing

      --
      Job? I don't have time to get a job! Who will sit around and bitch about being broke and unemployed then?
    6. Re:Reasoning? by tokul · · Score: 1

      A distant second is dying a horrible slow death, perhaps by starvation.

      Imagine death where metastasis cancer and constant pain drives you insane.

    7. Re:Reasoning? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True, but you could always drink or smoke yourself to death ... :/

      Given the parent's example, I don't think drinking or smoking oneself to death is exactly practical. (or possible)

    8. Re:Reasoning? by NoZart · · Score: 1

      I never quite grasped how suicide being illegal does anything. What is the penalty for committing this crime?

      Or is it just to discourage those "help message suicides" that are not meant serious? So if i am totally desperate, and not the brightest person, and use such a method to call for help, i don't get help but rather get penalized? Seems a bit tough for me...

    9. Re:Reasoning? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It really depends from the kind of medical insurance you have.
      I saw that first hand on relatives in they '90s, at their final days in the hospital.
      No insurance: quick and dignified end in a few days.
      Good insurance: months of painful "treatments" before the inevitable end.
      You have the choice.

    10. Re:Reasoning? by AjohnG · · Score: 1

      Shakespare (as always) says it best

                  "Cowards die many times before their deaths;
                  The valiant never taste of death but once.
                  Of all the wonders that I yet have heard.
                  It seems to me most strange that men should fear;
                  Seeing that death, a necessary end,
                  Will come when it will come"

      My own view is that "religious" people have an impossible role model (god/diety/whatever) to match up to that they can never satisfy, so fear death and judgement.
      Personally I think the whole concept of religion dates back to having a pack leader to look up to, something I hope we will eventually outgrow. And yes, I'm afraid that does mean I'm saying religious people are stupider in general, and have sold reasoning, intellect and humanity's aspirations for "certainty".

    11. Re:Reasoning? by hedwards · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Those laws have some serious flaws to them. I personally voted against the one in Washington because it seemed to be unnecessary for the stated purpose. We could have solved the same problem by granting doctors the ability to ignore normal dosing practices with the informed consent of the patient to prescribe the necessary dose to treat the pain with the understanding that as the dose rises the likelihood of death and addiction does as well. I don't think anybody on either side was particularly concerned with an individual with less than a year to live getting hooked on the junk.

      It bothered me a great deal that the initiative passed on strength of sentimentalism and FUD where a lesser measure could have addressed the issue more appropriately. There was sparse evidence that the demand was for reasons other than depression and inadequate palliative care. And there was no requirement that the individual get declared as depression free from a psychiatrist or psychologist.

    12. Re:Reasoning? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      swallow

      So... if you have throat or stomach cancer, then these laws don't apply to you?

    13. Re:Reasoning? by noidentity · · Score: 1

      What I do fear, however, since I live in the United States where suicide and assisted suicide are illegal, is becoming almost completely nonfunctional due to sudden paralysis, stroke, etc. The fear is that if I were locked in and could only communicate one character an hour, they'd still keep me alive for as long as they could, even if I had to lay there awake but bored and paralyzed for 16 hours a day.

      Oh, but they'd know best, since you may one day wake up and you'd be very thankful they kept you alive all those years against your will. Plus, they'd feel bad if the pulled the plug on you. So you really should think of others. </sarcasm>

      So similar to you, I have a fear of the living making my life a living hell.

    14. Re:Reasoning? by MintOreo · · Score: 1

      Create a living will stating that in this situation, and in similar situations, that you don't want to be kept alive. Boom, problem solved.

    15. Re:Reasoning? by riverat1 · · Score: 1

      Yes, if you can't swallow you can't use the law. But the pills can be crushed up and mixed in liquid to make the dose easier to swallow.

    16. Re:Reasoning? by riverat1 · · Score: 1

      I think doctors would be reluctant to ignore "normal dosing practices" if there isn't a law explicitly allowing assisted suicide.

    17. Re:Reasoning? by antdude · · Score: 1

      I don't fear death (not forced by me like suicides). If I die from/by whatever (diseases, murdered, etc.), then I die (game over)! I know God will tell me when it is time to go. If I have to save someone's life to scarifice, then I will. I am ready for my death.

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    18. Re:Reasoning? by fishexe · · Score: 1

      Death is inevitable. I don't fear taxes, and I don't fear death.

      You must not be either a Libertarian or a Republican.

      --
      "I don't care about the Constitution!" --Bill O'Reilly, November 17, 2009
    19. Re:Reasoning? by fishexe · · Score: 1

      A distant second is dying a horrible slow death, perhaps by starvation.

      I'm guessing next comes being sued. "I should dread a lawsuit beyond almost anything else short of sickness and death." --Judge Learned Hand

      --
      "I don't care about the Constitution!" --Bill O'Reilly, November 17, 2009
    20. Re:Reasoning? by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      Darkness, imprisoning me
      All I see is absolute horror
      I cannot live
      I cannot die
      Trapped between worlds
      Body my holding cell

  20. Loans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, now you're free from all those student loans!

  21. Obligatory Simpsons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Lisa: "Dear Mom, I no longer fear Hell, because I've been to Kamp Krusty."

  22. Extrapolation by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    So if we extrapolate for the hell of it (no pun intended), then PhD's are committing mass suicide?

    1. Re:Extrapolation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      check out phdcomics lecture. A lot of phd's actually do commit suicide...

    2. Re:Extrapolation by hedwards · · Score: 1

      No, a lack of a fear of death is not the same thing as being suicidal. Suicides tend to happen because the perception is that living is worse than dieing. That could be because one has lost the fear of death, but not necessarily.

  23. For Khalis! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Today is a good day to die!

  24. makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since those who fear death resort to religion to get over their fear while the intellect realizes that death is absolute for everything, including our universe. I fear of being dead but I put myself into situations where I could easily die, but the experience is priceless.

  25. Marcus Aurelius by fremsley471 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Maybe the better read have listened to the words of Roman emperor Marcus Aurelius:

    "Live a good life. If there are gods and they are just, then they will not care how devout you have been, but will welcome you based on the virtues you have lived by. If there are gods, but unjust, then you should not want to worship them. If there are no gods, then you will be gone, but will have lived a noble life that will live on in the memories of your loved ones."

    1. Re:Marcus Aurelius by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      That quote just reeks of needing an addendum: for sufficiently narrow definitions of "just".

    2. Re:Marcus Aurelius by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anubis IV - your comment was both unnecessary and idiotic.

    3. Re:Marcus Aurelius by blackest_k · · Score: 5, Informative

      Thanks for posting that, I have never heard that before, I came to the same conclusion many years ago and try to be a fair and decent person.

      Last year I had a heart attack and as I was in the ambulance with the sirens and blue lights going I knew I might well die. I wasn't really afraid of dying but I did feel it was too soon I wanted to see the kids grown up, married and with children of their own.

      I also am a huge fan of morphine, it doesn't so much stop pain as take away the fear of death. It gives you the calm to accept what will be will be. You don't fear for your own fate but feel for your loved ones and the upset they feel for you being so close to death. I also remember the priest coming round to see me and he asked me religion? I said not yet. I really don't feel like it is time for me.

      The first year after my heart attack was tough, the statistics are frightening 30% of people who have a first heart attack die before reaching a hospital of the 70% left 50% will die within 6 to 8 years and in the first year you have a 25% chance of dying in the following years it drops to about 3% everybody has a chance of dying but its about 1.5% so now although my chances are raised I don't feel like its that much higher.
      Year one was depressing I was constantly thinking about my health and didn't feel like I had a future.

      Now I just want to get back on track and find a job and live a happy life doing something with somebody I love. I'm really grateful for my medical treatment and thanks to the irish health service I was treated for free and pay a nominal amount for my meds. Just hope there is someone who will take me on doing something.

       

    4. Re:Marcus Aurelius by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good luck, hang in there!

    5. Re:Marcus Aurelius by houghi · · Score: 1

      Reminds me a bit of The Stainless Steel Rat who says he is an Atheist, because that makes him a better person. A person of faith will believe he has a second chance in some sort of afterlife, so he will have no problem killing somebody as that would not be the end of that persons life.

      An Atheist knows it will end that persons life for now and forever and will thus be much more careful with ending one.

      Used this argumentation once with some Mormons and they became pretty confused. :-D

      (As I said, it reminded me. This is also the series of books that explain why bank robberies are good)

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    6. Re:Marcus Aurelius by linuxrocks123 · · Score: 1

      I like this quote, but Google isn't turning up the original source. I'd love to read it in the original Latin. I can't seem to find it in /Meditations/. Do you know where it's from?

      ---linuxrocks123

      --
      vi ~/.emacs # I'm probably going to Hell for this.
    7. Re:Marcus Aurelius by Fnkmaster · · Score: 2

      Some web sources seem to claim that quotation is entirely unsourced. However, from looking through Meditations, it seems to be at least partially sourced from Book 2, Number 11. At least the first few parts of the thought, i.e. living a good life, and the general format of inquiring on if there are gods, and they care about human affairs, etc. However, the quotation itself doesn't seem to follow the translations I found on the web very closely at all.

      My conclusion is that the quotation seems to me to be something of a rewrite or even a hybrid of that original source with Pascal's wager. Or maybe the translations I found are just bone-achingly awful, and somebody took the liberty of re-translating that section with a bit of a glib tongue.

    8. Re:Marcus Aurelius by zaphirplane · · Score: 1

      Is that Aurelius from the gladiator movie, or the real emperor ? seriously.

    9. Re:Marcus Aurelius by Larryish · · Score: 1

      If you like that quote, read "Meditations" by Marcus Aurelius.

      It is the single most helpful book you will ever read IMO.

      https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Meditations

    10. Re:Marcus Aurelius by hedwards · · Score: 1

      I think anybody who gives a careful consideration of the matter comes to that conclusion. Personally, I think it's more likely that if there's a connection between higher levels of education and less fear of death that it's more likely because of fatalism. People often times don't realism how comforting that can be.

      One of the reasons why Buddhists and Hindus are frequently so comfortable with the idea of death is that it's a part of the culture, at some point you're going to die. And the lifestyle that the religion encourages is one which is rewarding within the present life, so even if there isn't anything at death you at least haven't wasted your entire life.

      Personally, I've had quite a few near death experiences myself and focusing on what one can do rather and letting the rest of it sort itself out is the only way to go. People tend to think that near death experiences must be terrifying, but I don't think that it's a necessity. Generally I think it's more terrifying for the people that are likely to be left behind.

    11. Re:Marcus Aurelius by flightmaker · · Score: 1

      I want to thank you for your comments which are a great comfort to me.

      Last year my wife was diagnosed with Motor Neurone Disease, and in March I found myself having to have that awful conversation with the hospital registrar, to tell her that my wife had suffered enough and that she was to be allowed to pass away with whatever dignity she still had.

      Along with her family I then had to sit with her, talk to her, hold her hand and try to comfort her while they took away the ventilator and pumped her full of morphine.

      This horrible disease takes away a person's ability to control the muscles of their body yet leaves the brain and consciousness completely intact, so she knew exactly what was about to happen and I have worried for months about what the hell she must have been thinking while we were watching over her as she died.

      Knowing from your personal experience that the morphine takes away the fear of death comforts me more than you can know.

      I am now in a similar situation to you, out of work but trying to get back on track and find a new partner to share happy times with.

    12. Re:Marcus Aurelius by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Be glad you're Irish, at least in that respect. About 10 years ago here in the U.S., I had the misfortune of having to go to the ER twice for what I later realized were panic attacks (they mimic heart attacks pretty closely). Uninsured at the time, it was a $10K bill, and they never told me what had just happened (other than it not being a heart attack).

    13. Re:Marcus Aurelius by LauraScudder · · Score: 1
      Indeed, my translation explicitly excludes the possibility of there being no gods right after considering the idea, but otherwise roughly follows the same idea:

      In all you do or say or think, recollect that at any time the power of withdrawal from life is in your own hands. If gods exist, you have nothing to fear in taking leave of mankind, for they will not let you come to harm. But if there are no gods, or if they have no concern with mortal affairs, what is life to me, in a world devoid of gods or devoid of Providence? Gods, however, do exist, and do concern themselves with the worlds of men.

      My 1964 translation, however, doesn't bear the slightest resemblance to the version on wikisource, not just in style but in meaning, so that it's hard to believe it's even based on the same source.

    14. Re:Marcus Aurelius by canadian_right · · Score: 1

      Why would the definition of "just" in this context have to be narrow? Why would the every day notion of justice not fit perfectly with the meaning that Marcus is communicating?

      I am an atheist, but most of my family are religious to one extent or another. A handful of my family members have told me that it seems unjust to them that I will burn in hell, despite living an obviously good life because I do not believe in god. It seems to me that the ethics and morals that western society have developed over the years, the values we find just, have improved a great deal in the last 2000 years. I would say that even the devout can see that morals based on the writings of a primitive people CAN be improved on.

      --
      Anarchists never rule
    15. Re:Marcus Aurelius by jjbenz · · Score: 1

      The Stainless Steel Rat, great book series.

    16. Re:Marcus Aurelius by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another possibility is that it's an actual quote of a commentator reviewing the Meditations, or an historian going over Marcus Aurelius's life and deeds. Cassius Dio comes to mind, but wouldn't bet on it.

    17. Re:Marcus Aurelius by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      I may have misspoken slightly, so allow me to clarify.

      The New Oxford American Dictionary defines "just" as "based on or behaving according to what is morally right and fair." That seems like an acceptable definition, in and of itself. Really, I should have put the caveat on "right and fair", rather than "just", since people are only capable of behaving rightly or fairly based on information that they are aware of, when, in fact, the situation is oftentimes much larger than is realized, and what is right or fair may be much different than what the person may have thought based on their limited perspective. If we then consider the idea of a supernatural being of potentially infinite proportions, it stands to reason that how they define "right and fair" would be far different than how we define it, given the incapability of our minds to comprehend that scale. Essentially, there should be no denying that if a god of that scale does exist that they would be imminently more qualified to determine what is just or unjust, right or wrong, or fair or unfair, than we would be.

      That said, admittedly, you then have to deal with the idea of the infinite god being capricious or maleficent, but, just as a black hat hacker would be more qualified to help with computer security than a layman off the street, that infinite god would still be more qualified to determine "just" than we would be. Also, one last point: I'm not coming at this from the perspective of relativism here, since that perspective is self-defeating in this case, in that it would be folly to apply your "truths" to the actions of another being when they may have different ones. Rather, I'm saying that the supernatural being would be more capable of discerning the absolute truth of what is right or fair than you would be, given their infinite perspective.

    18. Re:Marcus Aurelius by martyros · · Score: 1

      Live a good life. If there are gods and they are just, then they... will welcome you based on the virtues you have lived by.

      Question one: Have you lived a good life?

      Question two: Do you know anyone who hasn't lived a good life?

      Question three: If you asked any of the people you identified in #2, would they say they have lived a good life or not?

      (Assuming that #1 was "yes", #2 was a non-empty set, and #3 was significantly smaller that #2) Question four: How do you know whether you actually measure up, given that so many people who think they measure up don't?

      --

      TCP: Why the Internet is full of SYN.

    19. Re:Marcus Aurelius by shadowofwind · · Score: 1

      The flip side of morphine of course, is since it takes away your fear, it takes away a person's desire to deal with any of the issues that produced that fear to start with. Not that this is necessarily applicable to you in your situation.

    20. Re:Marcus Aurelius by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Forever Alone http://images.memegenerator.net/Limes-guy/File/131958/forever%20alone%20guy.jpg

    21. Re:Marcus Aurelius by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am a big fan of ms-contin, do you take it orally?

    22. Re:Marcus Aurelius by IamLarryboy · · Score: 1

      "If there are gods and they are just, then they ... will welcome you based on the virtues you have lived by."

      Okay, 3 questions though:

      1) Who decides what is virtue and what is vice and by what standard?

      2) What method do the gods (or God) use to determine if I am welcomed? Is it simply a numeric addition (good deeds outnumber bad ones)? Or perhaps it is a weighted scale ( 1 murder == 1,000,000 compliments). Are there any bad deeds that are unforgivable? Do my deeds from my entire life count or is only the last few years (or even days or moments) that count?

      3) How can I know the answers to the above? Do I simply have to be the best I can? Is it reasonable to expect that if there is a God (or gods) that he (or she, or it, or they) would reveal himself? If not, would God be just? If so, how has he done so?

      I posit therefore, that it is reasonable (necessary?) to investigate different, mostly conflicting, truth claims to determine which may actually be revelation of what God actually expects from us.

    23. Re:Marcus Aurelius by blackest_k · · Score: 1

      3) definitely 3) do the best you can.

      Do you decide on what you do based on your own moral compass or because you know you will be caught? With an all seeing God you will be caught every time. I don't think it makes you a good person if you choose one act over the alternative due to the fear of burning in hell for eternity.

      For 2 i don't think it matters how god does his accounting if you knew would it change what you do? Fear of punishment doesn't make you a better person.

      So really if there was a god, revealing themselves might make people stick to his rules but it wouldn't make better people.

      Which really is where Marcus hits the point straight on if we have free will then it is our own choices which make us good or bad people (if we don't have free will then why punish us for doing things we had no choice in).

      So if there is a god, then if he is just he will let us go to heaven and if he isn't just then we should willingly go to hell. So in this life we should try to do the best we can because if we don't what is the point of even being born.

      Ok so maybe there is no point but we can at least make the effort to change the world in a positive way. I want to die feeling like I made a difference with my life, I don't care to make it into history books or my contributions to be remembered by other people but the world is a little better for me being born anyway.
      I certainly hope that my positive contributions out weigh the negative ones I have made.

  26. The more wealthy have the time to ponder by arcite · · Score: 2
    Just feel the beating heart in your chest. Thump Thump Thump. Now imagine it slowly stopping. The world around you going fuzzy and out of focus. A slow, deep, sleep over coming your senses, beckoning you to release yourself to the void. You try to take a breath, but have no strength left to do so. Slowly the air exits your lungs and you become numb. Everything becomes quiet...then silence. Peace at last.

    As a thought exercise, its un-nerving to say the least!

    "I don't sleep. I hate those little slices of death."

    I am quite sure I have been an insomniac for most of my life. I'll sleep enough when I'm dead.

    1. Re:The more wealthy have the time to ponder by Jeremi · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Everything becomes quiet...then silence. Peace at last.

      That's incorrect -- death is not peaceful silence. Peaceful silence is something people have experienced and are familiar with. Death is your own non-existence, which by definition it is impossible for you to experience.

      (You might get some moments of peaceful silence just before you die.... but that's not death, that's dying. And depending on how you die, you might not even get that)

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    2. Re:The more wealthy have the time to ponder by omfgnosis · · Score: 1

      I can't imagine that not existing would be anything other than peaceful and silent. If it's loud and violent, I don't want to ever not exist.

    3. Re:The more wealthy have the time to ponder by YttriumOxide · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Death is your own non-existence, which by definition it is impossible for you to experience.

      I work on the method of thinking about what life was like (for me personally) before I was born. That's identical to death in my opinion. What I personally experienced in 1856 is identical to what I will personally experience in 2156.

      Definitely a bit of weird thing to wrap your head around in terms of the "non-existence", but I feel it's a better comparison than the post you replied to talking about "peaceful silence".

      --
      My book about LSD and Self-Discovery
      Also on facebook as: DroppingAcidDaleBewan
    4. Re:The more wealthy have the time to ponder by RobinH · · Score: 1

      Hmm, I thought I was unique in coming up with this comparison. Darn! Anyway, I think it's right on the mark. "Why are you worried about being dead? You were dead for most of time, and you didn't mind. Think back to before you were born. Was it that bad?"

      --
      "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." - Mark Twain
    5. Re:The more wealthy have the time to ponder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "What I personally experienced in 1856"

      That is called history as well as we are a product of our past

        is identical to what I will personally experience in 2156.

      That is called science fiction, after a while science fiction is simply fcition with funny woush sounds.

    6. Re:The more wealthy have the time to ponder by YttriumOxide · · Score: 1

      What I personally experienced in 1856

      That is called history as well as we are a product of our past

      While I don't disagree that we are a product of our past, that's why I included the word "personally". What happened in 1856 certainly affects who I am today - the science and technology I use, the lifestyle I have, the society I live in, and much more. However, I have no PERSONAL experiences of that time...

      is identical to what I will personally experience in 2156.

      That is called science fiction, after a while science fiction is simply fcition with funny woush sounds.

      I will have no PERSONAL experiences of 2156, just as I had no personal experience of 1856. It's possible that my life will influence the science, technology, lifestyle and society of that time (unlikely a great deal, but in some minor ways it's at least possible)

      So, I stand by my consideration that being dead is exactly like not having been born yet from a personal perspective, even if not a societal one.

      --
      My book about LSD and Self-Discovery
      Also on facebook as: DroppingAcidDaleBewan
    7. Re:The more wealthy have the time to ponder by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      I ran across a similar analysis somewhere (a book about a Buddhist monk, maybe?), and keep coming back to the idea. It seems like a fairly rational analysis, and it's moderately comforting in a weird way.

  27. Fear of death is rational. It is not a flaw. by RyanFenton · · Score: 1

    Death wouldn't be so bad if it didn't have to involve every memory you ever had being erased from existence. Written word and other recordings are completely inadequate to compensate for everything that is lost when a person dies. Just because death is currently inevitable does not make fear of it irrational - fear focuses awareness, which is perfectly appropriate when it involves everything you are in the world ceasing to be, lost to everyone.

    That's one of the reasons I've always been fascinated by computers and programming - it goes further down the path of being able to record experiences more and more completely as they advance, beyond the single narrative of previous recording technology.

    Ryan Fenton

  28. Basis in reality? by johncadengo · · Score: 1

    How much of the fear of death measured in this study has a basis in reality?

    What I mean is, if someone has reason to fear death (because of circumstance, or illness, etc.) then they probably have bigger things to worry about than getting college degrees?

    --
    My page.
    1. Re:Basis in reality? by Totenglocke · · Score: 2

      Well, circumstances are irrelevant. Like it or not, you will die. The only questions are when and how. As my dad always says: "You're not getting out of life alive, so you might as well enjoy yourself".

      I have no fear of death, partly because it's inevitable, and partly because I can think of many cases where living can be much worth than death. The reason people fear death is because of the uncertainty over if there's an afterlife and what it's like - primarily, they're afraid that maybe those religious wackos are right and you really WILL be tortured for all eternity for not following what they say.

      --
      "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." ~Thomas Jefferson
  29. Education == realization of ignorance by iamacat · · Score: 1

    What is consciousness exactly? Matter organized in particular ways? Electric impulses? Information? Which of these really disappear when you kick the bucket? According to cosmology, even if you are sucked into a black hole someone could later observe every photon it emits as it evaporates due to quantum effects and reconstruct you atom by atom. For more practical solutions, you could upload important parts of your persona to cloud computing (write books, raise children, etc) and they will happily keep running after your passing.

    We don't REALLY know what makes us self aware. We know about neurons, axons, and neurotransmitters but that has nothing to do with why some being fired feels good, bad or whatever. We simply don't have (and probably will never have) enough information to know weather to fear death, look forward to death or just be indifferent. For all I know rocks or skeletons are having one big great party. I simply can not speculate on self awareness, intelligence or feelings of the rest of the universe from my single fixed point of reference. People who throw around either science or religion to obscure a fundamentally unsolvable problem fear death primarily because trying to understand it exposes the ignorance of their small minds. Educated people naturally approach ignorance as an exciting challenge.

    1. Re:Education == realization of ignorance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of the choices you gave, electric impulses is the closest to what consciousness is. Consciousness is an extremely complex amalgamation of basic sensory input, memory storage, information processing and an interface that allows manipulation of some features of the outside world (hmm... sounds a bit like the opening of every intro to computing book/class/seminar etc.) The ordered nature of the electrochemical impulses in which consciousness is encoded are what disappear on death as we know it.

      Regarding being able to be reconstructed after getting sucked into a black hole... this comes from information theory applied to the physics of the event horizon of black holes. I have a strong suspicion that there is a specialized definition of the word "information" being used here which may not actually translate physically to being able to actually encode the makeup of a person, including the patterns of neural activity. To me this is similar to how the word "observation" is used in quantum physics. The concept being communicated is in all likelihood closer to "interaction," and the use of the word "observation" has led to what I believe is an incorrect supposition that quantum physics supports many metaphysical ideals.

      I personally feel that, yes, our consciousness could eventually be modeled by a computer. For all intents and purposes, I think that this simulation would not feel much different from our current existence in a biological body, aside from a reduction in corporeal concerns such as hunger. I think if this process were ever completed, I think there would be ample justification for considering the new pattern of computer information a conscious entity. There would be some really thorny ethical and legal questions for society to work out, but that's a different topic.

      We are getting a better understanding of awareness, and by extension self-awareness. Not that it explains everything, but I feel that Daniel Dennett is on to something in his main thesis of Consciousness Explained. If you are able to make it past the first few really dry chapters that are intended to bring you up to date on and then debunk the competing theories. Our understanding may never be perfect, but I wouldn't be surprised if humankind gained enough knowledge about the process to create a synthetic consciousness during my lifetime. In fact, I wouldn't even be shocked to find out that we create a consciousness in two years and 17 days (not that I actively BELIEVE there is any real metaphysical significance to the end of the Mayan Long Count... I just find the whole idea to be an entertaining exercise in speculative fiction.)

      As far as what happens after death, I have not seen any phenomenon that are strong enough to make me doubt that the naturalistic explanation will suffice. While we can't actually probe what happens to the mind (Mind being the software that runs on the hardware of the brain) after death, we do have data on various states of unconsciousness, ranging from sleep to disassociation to anesthesia to coma. It seems the most likely result will basically be slipping into oblivion. I feel that asking what it is like to be dead is like asking what it was like to be not yet conceived. Sure, it's possible that there is some entity that we often call a soul that will live on in perpetuum, but I see no reason to suspect that it is true beyond mere assertion and the natural hallucinations a mind residing in an oxygen starved brain may experience. Just because I doubt that it is true, doesn't mean that I believe that there is no life after death. And I see no harm in speculating on the possibility, as long as you don't allow that speculation to negatively impact life.

      Who else feels that TL/DR is short hand for "Too Lazy, Didn't Read?" Saying that the concept of life and consciousness (and the result of removing that condition) is fundamentally unsolvable is actually a fairly strong assertion with no evidence. We may be ignorant of many of the details of life, consciou

  30. Worry about losing that joy for life. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nobody chooses to be born. Fear of death shouldn't be a worry. There is no doubt that you will die some day, so why worry about that. Worry about living.
    Have you ever seen people smile or laugh in developing countries, or third world countries? Even though they might not have a clean sanitation or water system, they still find a way to enjoy life, for however long that may be. Worry about losing that joy for life.

    There is a good lyric in a Kid Cudi song "Pursuit of Happiness" that goes:

    If I fall, if I die, I'll know I lived it till the fullest
    If I fall, if I die, I'll know I lived and missed some bullets

  31. Well... by ido50 · · Score: 1

    It's only because we've already seen death, and it looked kinda funny.

  32. Re:Or: advantaged kids loose survival instinct by profplump · · Score: 1

    Good job quoting out-of-context to support your contrarian post. I'm sure a good proportion of readers here won't have read the rest of that sentence in the article and won't know that you're trolling until they get to the third or fourth line in your post.

  33. I do not fear death by subanark · · Score: 1

    I fear being forgotten. We strive to be remembered; some do this though writing stories, other though research. Some do it though gaining popularity, or by changing history as it happens. Those who take refuge with God, they hope that He will remember them for all their hard work. For everyone else, there is facebook.

  34. Even if I COULD live forever... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would not want to. I subscribe to the theory that too much of ANYTHING is bad. Imagine having to roam this planet for hundreds of millions of years... it would get so very boring. I don't even think I could be happy in a "heaven" for eternity, because again... too much of anything is bad, even if I get whatever I want all of the time. My idea of a heaven would be not knowing that I died and for my entire consciousness to just be completely gone.

  35. I can tell you why men fear death less than women by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It eventually sinks in that most men finishing college means they will be stuck working a job they don't really like until either they drop dead or they become too decrepit to work anymore, usually through age but possibly through irreparable injury.

    Then add in the responsibility of maintaining a house, a car, paying bills and managing finances, emotionally supporting your wife and maybe needy friends or parents etc etc etc. Then possibly having responsibility for raising children that men haven't had throughout human history except for the last few decades.

    So yeah compared to the rest of your life how bad could death really be?

  36. Education good. by haeger · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Seems like there's a long list of benefits in education. Not only will you be less religulous, but you will also not fear death as much and hopefully get a more fullfilling job.
    Educating women is even better, they have fewer children and a better health. And they tend to see education as something important for their children.
    Have a look at Hans Roslings excellent talk about the miracle in Pakistan for what education has done, and especially education of women.

    Long live education, which should be free and availible.

    --
    You are not entitled to your opinion. You are entitled to your informed opinion. -- Harlan Ellison
    1. Re:Education good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Long live education, which should be free and availible.

      It IS free. You pay for the time someone takes to teach you. Time which they could have spent growing food, but didn't, so now must go to someone who does grow food and buy it, with the money you paid them.

      If we lived in some type of Communistic Utopian Paradise where magic elves supplied all the food, water, shelter, medical supplies, etc. that was needed, then sure we could provide things like education for free. Until then, we need to do our best to make the information available since it's so cheap to do these days, and rely on people to take advantage of it themselves.

    2. Re:Education good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Long live education, which should be free and availible.

      Now if only the majority of the United States would put that sentiment into practice.......

    3. Re:Education good. by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Seems like there's a long list of benefits in education. Not only will you be less religulous

      I hear you'll also be much more liturate.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  37. SYD BARRETT HERE !! LISTEN TO ME !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And I am not frightened of dying, any time will do, I
    don't mind. Why should I be frightened of dying?
    There's no reason for it, you've gotta go sometime.

    I never said I was frightened of dying

    hahahahahahahaahahahahhaahhahahaahO...imdead !!

  38. I hope they weren't being literal by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Funny

    From the article:

    at present, the education system does not have any formal and systematic method to deal with death in class. If death were introduced in the education system, children would have a more real and intense approach to life, and many of the problems derived from the mourning process in the adulthood would be prevented.

    I hope they mean the topic of death rather than death itself. I don't really want our teachers killing anybody as an object lesson.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:I hope they weren't being literal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Our schools could use some stricter discipline.

    2. Re:I hope they weren't being literal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope they mean the topic of death rather than death itself. I don't really want our teachers killing anybody as an object lesson.

      I guess it depends on what school you attended and if there were any bullies in your classes... ;^)

    3. Re:I hope they weren't being literal by fishexe · · Score: 1

      From the article:

      at present, the education system does not have any formal and systematic method to deal with death in class. If death were introduced in the education system, children would have a more real and intense approach to life, and many of the problems derived from the mourning process in the adulthood would be prevented.

      I hope they mean the topic of death rather than death itself. I don't really want our teachers killing anybody as an object lesson.

      But then that would give them a perfect opening to discuss the topic, wouldn't it??

      --
      "I don't care about the Constitution!" --Bill O'Reilly, November 17, 2009
    4. Re:I hope they weren't being literal by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      But then that would give them a perfect opening to discuss the topic, wouldn't it??

      You have a point - and it's pretty certain the (remaining) students would be paying attention!

      --
      #DeleteChrome
  39. Nonsensical rationalisations by ZankerH · · Score: 1

    We're told since early youth that death is something that happens to us all and we shouldn't fear it - for some of us, this kind of nonsense is also supported by threats to accept this lest we come into conflict with a loving god that somehow condemned every human to death. What would happen if people were suddenly to realise aging is but a disease, prevalent and persistent but ultimately treatable or maybe even curable? Why is it such a taboo to discuss aging treatments? Why aren't there "IT ISN'T NATURAL! YOU SHOULDN'T BE TREATING THIS!" trolls when any other disease is cured, yet they seem to be in the majority when human senescence is being discussed? I don't care if it's natural. Aging is as natural as smallpox and AIDS, using this argument to make people accept it is flawed.

    1. Re:Nonsensical rationalisations by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1

      Did you not get your degree? ;> According to this (half-baked) article, we're supposed to fear death less than others if we went to University.

      Me, I'm looking forward to dying one day. Not yet; I've got lots of stuff to try to iron out, but heck, living forever in this pattern would be really tiresome after a while.

      When you start to see the repeating cycles and you realize that NOTHING changes except your own emotional reactions to a repeating series of events, (people seem to revisit an event stream about five or six times at the most before the body or some other aspect becomes untenable and the soul releases), then you realize just how incredibly limited a single life is. Really, like a cog in a very big machine. It's fun and educational to visit and be one gear for a few cycles, but I think it's pretty vital that we move from body to body. It'd get incredibly tedious to be stuck in one cycle of events for freaking ever!

      But hey, no worries. It takes a lot of prep-work to even figure out that the machine exists let along how we interact with it. Most never will this time around, that's for sure!

      -FL

  40. A more likely cause behind the correlation by Timmy+D+Programmer · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Let's see.. Imagine person sitting in a comfy classroom learning about finance, science, etc. Not very scary. Now imagine a person living in an unsafe locale learning how to avoid warlords, disease, cold, hunger, etc. Pretty scary. I'm thinking the lack of fear of death among the educated has less to do with the education, and more to do with the fact that most educated people are from safer places.

    --


    (If at first you don't succeed, do it different next time!)
    1. Re:A more likely cause behind the correlation by hedwards · · Score: 1

      It can't be that scary, otherwise it would be the person in the comfy classroom fighting against rules to protect the impoverished from abuse and the impoverished fighting for protection and help.

  41. Give my regards to oblivion... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, I have a healthy fear of death (or perhaps unhealthy depending on your perspective). I have a university degree and I am an atheist. I have not cheery notion that there is something beyond this existence - just nothingness. Rationally, I understand that to fear oblivion is probably irrational, but personally I blame evolution. After all, the human race would not have survived this far without a healthy fear of death. But frankly I am terrified. And I am terrified about just the prospect of something as inevitable death - never mind all the various aspects that may accompany death (illness, injury, suffering, etc.).

    Well, this was certainly fun... Thanks for the pick-me-up!

  42. Don't be afraid, be ashamed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ...at least as per Horace Mann's saying: "be ashamed to die until you have won some victory for humanity."

    Death of the individual is compulsory, the fear of which you can consequently escape. However, your actions can be immortal in their consequence.

  43. Re:Fear of death is rational. It is not a flaw. by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

    imagine building a computer as a kid and having it run a very very long program. it runs that program for 20, 30, 50, 80 years! its getting real close to some kind of conclusion or answer, too.

    then, someone yanks the power out and you had no time to sync to disk. all your data and all those 80 years of accumulated processing is gone as the power supply runs to zero and your ram loses refresh.

    it makes NO SENSE when you think of life this way. I don't see how your 'data' (life experience) is at all saved and it seems extremely RUDE to pull the plug out like that and have all the computes just fall on the floor.

    this is why I cannot believe in a deity. the absurdity of life, itself, means no god worth anything could have created such a silly thing as our existence.

    how would you view someone who lets a program run for so long only to yank the plug out and dump the data to the bit bucket? I'd say that was a cruel, sick bastard.

    there can't be a god. life makes too little sense for there to be any 'master' of it.

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  44. Maybe you got it wrong by Ecuador · · Score: 1

    and it was about fear of Death, you know, fear of THE Death. So the less educated could not look past the scythe and the bony construction, but more educated and wiser people see much more. Ok, it is a bit annoying that he uses all-caps, but he has shown compassion at a number of times and loves cats.

    --
    Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
    1. Re:Maybe you got it wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or do less educated people just fear of getting homeless, and then freezing to death?

  45. Intellect-Q ISN'T Intelligence-Q: 7 Kinds of Smart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    by Armstrong.

    MENSA pushes the
    ~INTELLECT is the whole of INTELLIGENCE~
    B.S.

    People who've moved-on beyond that shallow prejudice,
    who've actually earned some of the other kinds of intelligence,
    know that their scheme is so profoundly distortive of worth
    as to be diseased propaganda.

    As for whether I've the right to such opinion:
    according to their tests, I outclass most of MENSA.

    They don't measure genius,
    they measure their-scheme-skill: intellect-mechanism.

    Only.

    Brought up to idolize their prejudice,
    I pity it & hold it in distaste, now,
    and am healthier for it.

    Work-through ( rather than merely reading )
    "The New Drawing on the Right Side of the Brain" ( Betty Edwards, Ph.D )
    to do the exercises that get one into a kind of knowing IQ doesn't & can't even know.
    ( it's called right-brain dominance for a reason:
    get a mic preamp, some silver/silver-chloride electrodes, some wire-glue,
    and MacGuyver up a 2-channel EEG,
    and you'll be able to see shifts in your brain's overall function,
    with your own eyes )

    Read "7 Kinds of Smart, 2nd edition" by Armstrong,
    for the understanding that there are multiple fundamentally-different intelligences,
    and pretending that only 1 counts, could possibly be valid, is ignorant prejudice.
    ( how could Michelangelo be considered "genius"??? he wasn't ... MENSA! )

    Read "The Alphabet Versus The Goddess" by Leonard Schlain ( M.D.? ),
    to see how words-centric prejudice is consistently followed by holocausting

    http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Deuteronomy%2020:16-17&version=AMP
    for the first recorded holocaust, that we know about...

    A Russian pointed out that it's partly a defect in the English language:
    "genius" has been hijacked by the MENSA committee, so it no longer means creative, or wholistic.

    They've separate words for "talent" and "genius", and use them accordingly,
    but our allowing the IQ twits to redefine "genius" FROM creative TO intellect,
    is like us geeks allowing Microsoft to redefine "PC" to mean MS-Windows.

    Incompetent accommodation.

    Cheers.

  46. correlation is not causation by kipling · · Score: 1

    Seems like there's a long list of benefits in education. Not only will you be less religulous, but you will also not fear death as much and hopefully get a more fullfilling job.

    An equally valid conclusion is that absence of fear is good, as it enables people to succeed in education.
    This conclusion is preferable to that most people are talking about here, as there is a plausible mechanism for it - education usually involves prolonged suffering.

    --
    -- open source? sounds like the real book --
  47. Clearly! by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 3, Funny

    "I can see you are a swordsman. Therefore you are educated. If you are educated, you must know you are Mortal! CLEARLY you would put the poison furthest away from YOU!"

    --
    Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    1. Re:Clearly! by dkleinsc · · Score: 2

      You're trying to trick me into giving away something. T'won't work.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    2. Re:Clearly! by brainproxy · · Score: 1

      It HAS worked! You've given EVERYTHING away! I know where the poison is!

    3. Re:Clearly! by fishexe · · Score: 1

      Good thing I know better than to match wits with a Sicilian, otherwise you'da really gotten me there.

      --
      "I don't care about the Constitution!" --Bill O'Reilly, November 17, 2009
  48. Death by Powerpoint by Andrioid · · Score: 1

    Those who have experienced the torture of Powerpoint in lecture halls - welcome death!

  49. Indeed... by denzacar · · Score: 2

    It also trumps torture.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  50. armchair critique by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    fear of death is most common among women than men, which affects their children's perception of death.

    Except for the men children. So mother's perceptions only affect their daughter's perceptions. Or women are just different than men (I've examined Ken and Barbie dolls closely, and can discern no difference but for their stature.) Or men are naturally impervious to empathetic learning. Also, are we talking about self-death, or death in general? I think I'm going to try to break this vicious cycle by making my young daughters empty the mousetraps.

  51. Fear of death is fear of wasting your life by Peter+Harris · · Score: 1

    So did they break it down by faculty I wonder? :)

    But this is in some way similar to the result that people with better numeracy skills are less likely to get into desperate financial difficulties. People with a goal or something they have a passion to pursue are less likely to feel that their life is passing them by. I'm not surprised to find that there is a correlation there, but I doubt that graduates are the only subset of the people surveyed who have a less than average fear of death.

    --

    -- What do you need?
    -- Gnus. Lots of Gnus.
  52. Re:Intellect-Q ISN'T Intelligence-Q: 7 Kinds of Sm by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    Work-through ( rather than merely reading )"The New Drawing on the Right Side of the Brain" ( Betty Edwards, Ph.D )....Read "7 Kinds of Smart, 2nd edition" by Armstrong...

    Well, looky-here boys, we got us a PSYCH MAJOR. Ain't he got a pretty mouth? Hey, Russell, what say you hold him down and we'll see if we can't make him squeal like a pig? Wouldja like that Mr "Big City - "Alphabet Versus The Goddess" - Now Bitter Because You're Working at the Nerd Herd - Psych Major"? Wouldja like us to make you squeal like a pig?

    I'll give you some "incompetent accommodation"...

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  53. I like C.S. Lewis, but to play devil's advocate .. by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

    There is also no reason to worry about people who write books about Narnia and don't seem to know what the word facetious means ;-)

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  54. My near-death experience by zikoo · · Score: 1

    I'm a man, mid-20's, some college, atheist. There was a time earlier this year where I had convinced myself that I was going to die. I didn't cry, panic, or anything like that. I also didn't start praying; the thought of an afterlife never crossed my mind. The only thing that I was concerned about was hiding the medical records on my computer.

    Overall, I'm very happy with how I handled the situation.

  55. Would a sentient computer... by Just+Brew+It! · · Score: 1

    ...fear having its hard drive wiped? What about having its original hard drive wiped, after it had been imaged to another drive on a different system?

    I think any entity which has a survival instinct will have a fear of death. But at some level of sentience you cross the line from a hard-wired instinctual "Don't get yourself killed!" reflexive fear to the more thoughtful "What is death like, and is there anything afterward?" realm.

    I'm not a member of any organized religion, though I do not consider myself to be an atheist either. If pressed, I'd classify my beliefs as being closest to Deism; but if I don't feel like explaining what Deism is I just tell people I'm agnostic to save time! I don't believe in the supernatural; IMO all the stuff people ascribe to supernatural causes have a logical explanation, or are just our minds "playing tricks" on us.

    My wife was brought up Catholic, but (possibly as a reaction to that strict upbringing) is actually fairly anti-Catholic now, and considers herself to be agnostic. She does believe in the supernatural (ghosts and such) though, which I find somewhat odd.

    Personally, I'd say I fear the moment of death (as in, "How will I die and will it hurt?") a lot more than what might come afterwards. I don't believe there is an afterwards; death is the biological equivalent of having my hard drive wiped.

  56. This is not about fear of death. by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

    It's about what people say about fear of death.

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  57. Most likey... by mswhippingboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    it's because (statistically) the more educated, the less religious. While one would think that the religious person, hoping for life after death, would fear it less, I think the opposite is true. The atheist can take comfort in believing that everything just stops when you die, that is you just cease to exist - no pain, no awareness, no anything. A religious person who believes in the after life has to worry about whether they're going to heaven or hell, will it hurt when I'm dead and (for some) maybe even a little fear about the cracks in their faith (i.e. could I be wrong?)..

    --
    Sometimes the light at the end of the tunnel is the headlight of an oncoming train.
    1. Re:Most likey... by Godskitchen · · Score: 1

      Where are these statistics? How are you defining religious? Please stop correlating education and atheism.

      I do know the type you're talking about: the third year university student who thinks s/he knows it all and can replace religion with science. Religion is not science and science is not religion. There's no link between the two and people need to stop trying to "reconcile" them.

      There simply isn't any way to disprove god and because of that, the existence of god is not something science will ever explore.

    2. Re:Most likey... by mswhippingboy · · Score: 1

      Where are these statistics? How are you defining religious? Please stop correlating education and atheism.

      I do know the type you're talking about: the third year university student who thinks s/he knows it all and can replace religion with science. Religion is not science and science is not religion. There's no link between the two and people need to stop trying to "reconcile" them.

      There simply isn't any way to disprove god and because of that, the existence of god is not something science will ever explore.

      You want statitics? How about this study from MIT
      ^ Shermer, Michael (1999). How We Believe: Science, Skepticism, and the Search for God. New York: William H Freeman. pp.pp76–79. ISBN0-7167-3561-X.

      Please don't shoot the messenger.
      Now understand that because there is a corelation between education level and faith doesn't mean one is somehow more correct if they have a higher education. It simply indicated that higher education, especially in science or philosophy, values independent thought over faith. After all, how far would science progress if everyone just took what they were told on faith? As Einstien (a man of faith himself), once said, "question everything".
      I'm sorry if it offends your sensibilities, be intellectual curiosity tends to foster skepticism rather than blind faith.

      --
      Sometimes the light at the end of the tunnel is the headlight of an oncoming train.
    3. Re:Most likey... by martyros · · Score: 1

      It's because (statistically) the more educated, the less religious.

      Is it also possible that statistically, educated people are less likely to have to face death on a regular basis (their own or others'), and it is therefore easy for them to be in denial about the reality of their death?

      I consider myself a firm believer in Jesus ("religious" if you must), and I do my best to order my life around the idea that my 70-odd years here is only the beginning of my existence. But I'm pretty sure that faced with imminent death, I would feel fear nonetheless -- although I'd expect it to be matched by an overwhelming assurance at the same time. It's hard for me to believe that anyone wouldn't feel some fear and doubt, even atheists.

      On the other hand, I haven't really faced death, or seen anyone else face death, so maybe it's just not as scary as it seems.

      --

      TCP: Why the Internet is full of SYN.

    4. Re:Most likey... by mswhippingboy · · Score: 1

      I congratulate you on you faith and to a certain degree, envy you're assuredness of what will happen after death. Myself, well I just don't know what will happen, I don't think any one person has anymore insight into this than another.
      I was raised Christian and for the most part, agree with most of the important lessons of the faith (the lessons on morality) while I don't necessarily buy into the dogma.
      To me, how much fear and doubt one has when facing death has more to do with how content they are with the way they've lived their lives. Some part of human nature (most likely due to the evolutionary advantages it conveyed - IMHO), call it conscience or superego, tends to make us feel good about ourselves when we do good, and bad about ourselves when we do wrong, regardless of whether we subscribe to a religion or not.
      Another factor in how much one fears death (probably much more significant than education or faith), is how long they've lived and how hard their life has been. It seems to me as I've become more advanced in age myself that the thought of passing on seems much more comforting and less scary than it used to.

      --
      Sometimes the light at the end of the tunnel is the headlight of an oncoming train.
    5. Re:Most likey... by shadowofwind · · Score: 1

      In your example, both the atheist and the religious person are 'taking comfort' in a belief about death. Both of them fear it. The belief of your atheist is more totalitarian though - it admits no compromise with other possibilities. In that sense I don't see how that's different from the Christian who is certain they will go to heaven rather than to hell.

      Paul Erdos, as an example, was an atheist, yet according to him the defining and traumatic event of his life was being 5 and realizing that he would die. Why was that realization so compelling to him? Maybe part of it is he appreciated something of the value of the mind, and of identity, so the prospect of losing it seemed more tragic. In that regard, more depth of knowledge increases fear rather than decreasing it. Yet if he felt that he was a part of something larger than himself that does not die when he dies, he would have felt better. So in that case more knowledge would have decreased fear.

      My initial reaction to this 'fear of death' thread, is that the thinking of educated people is more subtle to start with - ideas are more real than perishable objects, which can always be reconstructed from the ideas. So they don't fear death, in the same way that we don't fear a data set being deleted when it can be regenerated. But now after reading all of these 'fear is caused by religious belief' postings, I'm wondering if educated people are more afraid than they seem to be on the surface, and that they've just done a better job of blocking all the outlets.

      I guess I can agree that any kind of faith in the face of apparent facts is productive of fear though - the worldview of someone who believes in Heaven and Hell is constantly threatened. But if they weren't afraid they likely would never have cultivated that worldview to start with, or their parents wouldn't have.

    6. Re:Most likey... by mswhippingboy · · Score: 1

      In your example, both the atheist and the religious person are 'taking comfort' in a belief about death. Both of them fear it. The belief of your atheist is more totalitarian though - it admits no compromise with other possibilities. In that sense I don't see how that's different from the Christian who is certain they will go to heaven rather than to hell.

      I agree with this 100%. But I was generalizing with the two extremes. A true atheist is just as sure there is no god as the Christian (or any theist) is sure there is. In this respect one is just as dogmatic as the other (in fact atheism can be considered a religion itself). Of course many people (I would hope most people who invest at least a little time into thinking about it) fall into a varying range between agnostic atheist (doesn't think there is a god, but does allow for the possibility) and agnostic theist (thinks there is a god, but allows that there "may not" be one).

      --
      Sometimes the light at the end of the tunnel is the headlight of an oncoming train.
    7. Re:Most likey... by shadowofwind · · Score: 1

      I agree. Here's an additional point....There is a difference between believing something because you made something up and want it to be true, and believing it because you have some awareness or understanding of it. I don't think its elitist to suppose an earnest, thoughtful, and fortunate person can gain some actual understanding in relation to the reality or unreality of god or immortality. At that point you've become less agnostic, and more theistic or atheistic, but not as a matter of fear or dogmatism.

    8. Re:Most likey... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, you could be wrong.

      I'm assuming you sort of fancy yourself as an atheist. Faith and believe is different. Faith is like two steps into uncertainty, and is born from uncertainty. It's the spark, an arch between the present and the near and sudden future. It's like seeing life through a child's eyes. Heaven and Hell has no wager in faith. Faith is alive, but believe is obstinate. Believe is a selfish and unmovable obstacle. Faith, on the other hand, embraces uncertainty and even the uncertainty of a superior being.

      To be a healthy and functioning human being, to have any substance at all, one must see in between these two extremes that you suggested: religious (if one believes in a dogmatical heaven / hell) or to deny the existence of something greater than yourself entirely-- atheism. I have also yet to meet an atheist who only acts out of self benefit.

      Both are selfish.

      If these are the only two options, I would definitely ask yourself more personal questions and enjoy the life around you more deeply, no matter how simple it may seem on the surface. I know, when I go, I hope to wear a serene smile and be grateful for what I've seen and lived. And hope that I've done some good.

    9. Re:Most likey... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if religion stopped explaining things like how we got here, then you would be right that religion and science are not the same.

      however as religion does attempt to explain how we got here which have been mostly demonstrated as false, then one or the other has to be partly incorrect, and therefor disagree with each others meaning. For one to be correct, the other has to be at least partly false. eventually the educated do face having to replace one with the other as they both can't logically exists together.

      for this argument existence of god isn't religion, religion would be defined as a set of scripture that specifies how god made us and how we should live.

  58. Read Sympathy for the Devil, by Holly Lisle by sirwired · · Score: 2

    Read a fascinating (and funny) book called "Sympathy for the Devil" by Holly Lisle. It's available for free from the Baen Books Free Library. (baen.com) (Baen is a large SF publisher specializing in fantasy and military SF, not a religious books place, so fear not that I'm trying to convert you...) I believe Holly Lisle is a Fantasy author, although I have not read her other work.

    In the book a young nurse asks the very same question of God after a rough day at work and offers up her very soul to stop it. She gets a very interesting (and funny) response from God. No bible quotes, no Jesus, no proselytizing of any sort... (I promise.) It covers Damnation, Satan, Fallen Angels, the lack of competent IT Techs in Hell, and the demonically-designed highway system of Charlotte, North Carolina.

    Is it theologically sound? Does it conform in any way with scripture? This agnostic is the wrong person to ask... But it's a short, quick, read, and will waste no more than a few hours of your time if you don't like it... (Feel free to flame me afterwards.)

    1. Re:Read Sympathy for the Devil, by Holly Lisle by Mindcontrolled · · Score: 1
      I'll have a look at it, thanks. I am faithful enough in my weak atheism that I do not fear conversion... ;)

      On a related noted, the scenario I originally mentioned is kinda ripped from this: Salvation War: Armageddon over at Stardestroyer.net. Basically, God tells mankind to go to hell, entrance to heaven is closed. Mankind tells him to sod off and gets the military rolling. Kinda Tom Clancy style military porn, but great fun to read.

      --
      Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
    2. Re:Read Sympathy for the Devil, by Holly Lisle by Foobar+of+Borg · · Score: 1

      the demonically-designed highway system of Charlotte, North Carolina.

      I have lived around Charlotte. Their highway system is proof enough of the existence of Hell.

  59. I'm wondering if part of it is depression by NotSoHeavyD3 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I mean one of the symptoms of clinical depression is willingness to consider suicide. (Which I would think would mean that you feel death less.) Isn't depression more common among people with degrees? (Isn't it also more prevalent among those with higher IQ's as well?)

    --
    Did you know 80 to 90% of the moderators on slashdot wouldn't recognize a troll even if one dragged them under a bridge.
    1. Re:I'm wondering if part of it is depression by T.E.D. · · Score: 1

      Only because those are the folks who have money to go seek mental health professionals and get diagnosed. The poor have the same problems, just different ways of dealing.

      Ever hear of Suicide By Cop? How about all those junkies and winos who die every year? Think they were the picture of mental health before the evil chemicals got them?

  60. Security Clearance isn't that hard to get by sirwired · · Score: 1

    I'm up for my third security clearance investigations. What makes somebody with security clearance different from a member of the general population?

    - The fortitude to spend about five hours filling out the never-to-be-sufficiently-damned SF-86 form.
    - A guaranteed mostly-clean criminal record.
    - Not in dire financial straits
    - A U.S. Citizen
    - Not currently suffering from major mental illness, nor on any more than negligible doses of tranquilizers or opioid painkillers. (They do pull your health records.)
    - You don't spend time hanging out with the local terrorist cell
    - A sense of humor to answer questions like: "Are you planning to overthrow the US govt.? Are you a terrorist? Are you a drug dealer?, etc." without busting out laughing that they even ask. (If you answer "no" to any of those questions and they find out you were lying, I don't think the "negative employment consequences" they warn you about when filling out the form will matter a whole lot..)

    In other words, probably about 90%+ of U.S. citizens are perfectly eligible for security clearance; it isn't that hard.

    1. Re:Security Clearance isn't that hard to get by elucido · · Score: 1

      I'm up for my third security clearance investigations. What makes somebody with security clearance different from a member of the general population?

      - The fortitude to spend about five hours filling out the never-to-be-sufficiently-damned SF-86 form.
      - A guaranteed mostly-clean criminal record.
      - Not in dire financial straits
      - A U.S. Citizen
      - Not currently suffering from major mental illness, nor on any more than negligible doses of tranquilizers or opioid painkillers. (They do pull your health records.)
      - You don't spend time hanging out with the local terrorist cell
      - A sense of humor to answer questions like: "Are you planning to overthrow the US govt.? Are you a terrorist? Are you a drug dealer?, etc." without busting out laughing that they even ask. (If you answer "no" to any of those questions and they find out you were lying, I don't think the "negative employment consequences" they warn you about when filling out the form will matter a whole lot..)

      In other words, probably about 90%+ of U.S. citizens are perfectly eligible for security clearance; it isn't that hard.

      If that is the case, why do so few Americans have security clearance? If the US Government gave more Americans security clearance then more Americans would trust/have faith in the US Government.

      The reason the Wikileaks scandal gains so much momentum is because the US Government treats the majority of Americans as "them" or as the terrorist, and if anyone asks why "Well It's classified, you don't have a security clearance"

      So what are they going to do? Let the majority of Americans distrust and fear them? Or give out more clearances? I think it's exactly the opposite, I don't think 90% of Americans can keep a secret if their lives depended on it. 10% is more like it and even among the 10%, most of them are vulnerable to coercion of some sort. Isn't that what the government is most concerned about?

      So if you have Americans who are closet homosexuals due to DADT, wouldn't this make them more vulnerable to coercion?

    2. Re:Security Clearance isn't that hard to get by kimvette · · Score: 1

      - A sense of humor to answer questions like: "Are you planning to overthrow the US govt.?

      That's my goal every election day - to remove those in power and give a new crook an opportunity to prove himself to not be a crook. ;)

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    3. Re:Security Clearance isn't that hard to get by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      If that is the case, why do so few Americans have security clearance? If the US Government gave more Americans security clearance then more Americans would trust/have faith in the US Government.

      You have to understand that there are different levels of security clearances for one. Also, the federal government does not have jurisdiction over the entire united states in every matter. It would not only be improbably but most likely jurisdictional impossible to require all Americans to apply for a security clearance.

      The reason the Wikileaks scandal gains so much momentum is because the US Government treats the majority of Americans as "them" or as the terrorist, and if anyone asks why "Well It's classified, you don't have a security clearance"

      Well, no. The problem wasn't really that the US citizens didn't know, it's that in informing them, they let the enemy know also. This means that our own sons and daughters may be in some sort of extra danger depending on how useful the information could be to the enemy. Notice how I said "may". We didn't know the contents of what was leaked until the contents were made public and wikileaks has publicly expressed that they don't really care if it causes someone to be hurt or puts US interest around the world at risk. So the wikileaks scandal isn't as important because of what the US citizens don't know, it's because of what non-US citizens and foreign governments now know. I'm sure to some, knowing what your government is doing is important, but most reasonable people understand that there are some things that shouldn't be public information while they can impact ongoing operations or negotiations.

      So what are they going to do? Let the majority of Americans distrust and fear them? Or give out more clearances? I think it's exactly the opposite, I don't think 90% of Americans can keep a secret if their lives depended on it. 10% is more like it and even among the 10%, most of them are vulnerable to coercion of some sort. Isn't that what the government is most concerned about?

      This really depends on the importance of the secrete. The more important it might be, the less likely it would be that it's kept a secret. This is why there are levels of clearances and why just because you have a classified clearance level, you are not entrusted with access to all the secrets.

      So if you have Americans who are closet homosexuals due to DADT, wouldn't this make them more vulnerable to coercion?

      Well, no not really. IF someone outed you as a homosexual, the military would still have to ask you or you would still have to tell. If they are bared from asking as long as you don't tell, it's just an inconvenience that someone told on you because even though it's against the rules, they still can't ask (unless it happened on base or during an official operation and they can pin it to the failure of it).

      So yes, someone can threaten to tell the military that you are gay under the DADT policy. But under that policy, the government can't investigate or hold that against you unless it was something specifically done under it's immediate jurisdiction/supervision which would be treated as if you told. But if you went to a bar, hooked up with someone, even if they found out about it, it's off limits.

      (please note, even though it's off limits, that doesn't mean someone in a position of authority doesn't construct other means to punish you. In the real world, this is often called constructive discharge in which employers afraid to fire you give you shit jobs and make your work unbearable in an attempt to force you to quit in order to escape legal obligations. There remedies to that in most states also.)

  61. There is more to fear in life than in death by Targon · · Score: 1

    Those who go to college tend to look forward to the future, and when you see the difficulties in life ahead of time, you will tend to be focused on THAT more than death. The more you have, the less you want it to be taken away as well, so many will pay attention to avoiding losing what they have. Those who have very little overall will tend to be more attached to just staying alive.

  62. Oversimplified by quark+is+the+new+up · · Score: 1

    From TFA: "In fact, 76% of children that report fear of death is due to their mothers avoiding the topic. Additionally, more of these children fear early death and adopt unsuitable approaches when it comes to deal with death." I'd be interested to know exactly what questions they asked on this survey and whom they asked. I assume the 288 children were all from the same country? Did they look at religious affiliation? I'm a woman and not particularly afraid of death, but if I had children, I'm pretty sure I would be terrified that they might die. I might also avoid the topic with them because I wouldn't know how to explain to a four-year-old that IMHO, when you die you're just gone, but that's not something to be scared of. If I entered into my real feelings about it (why death is necessary, good, whatever) I'm afraid my kids might be a bit blase about things like crossing the street, playing with kitchen knives, etc. Or what if my teenage children decide death is better than living because of the conversations I had with them? Honestly, I WANT my kids to be a little afraid of death. I feel like this study is glossing over the real problems parents face when discussing death with their children (and I'm guessing this job falls to mothers more often than fathers). "Women are afraid of death and therefore their children are afraid of death and therefor we should let the state teach children about death instead of letting their parents do it" just doesn't ring true for me.

  63. Not a thought experiment for me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I laugh really hard, it turns into a coughing fit. Plus my vagus nerve is sensitive to coughing. If I laugh-cough too long, my heart slows down (possibly stops) and I pass out. The experience is very close to what you describe.

    It sucks to think, but Harold and Kumar 2 nearly killed me. Coroners report: killed by sequel movie.

    Despite flirting with it every few months (and 3 university degrees), I fear death. It's real and it sucks. To not fear it seems like denial or acting irrational.

  64. Re:Fear of death is rational. It is not a flaw. by timeOday · · Score: 1

    Death wouldn't be so bad if it didn't have to involve every memory you ever had being erased from existence. Written word and other recordings are completely inadequate to compensate for everything that is lost when a person dies.

    Facebook taught us that 99.999% of our lives are redundant anyways. We're all living the same life as millions of other people, tweaked ever so slightly, doing all the same things but in slightly different proportions. Moreover, the vast (vast!) majority of what you've ever perceived or known, you have already forgotten anyways.

    Have a nice day! :)

  65. Re:I can tell you why men fear death less than wom by fl_litig8r · · Score: 1

    This reminds me of an old joke. Why do married men usually die before their wives? Because they want to.

  66. Risk vs Reward by bug · · Score: 1

    Correlation is not causation. One could argue that education does help in some direct ways (e.g., understanding enough about statistics to realize that you're probably not going to die from terrorism). However, there may be other factors at play, too. Compared with staying near home and picking up a job immediately, higher education carries some risk. It frequently involves moving far away from support networks, and taking on a considerable amount of debt, all for the chance of very delayed gratification. It could simply be that the minds of those seeking higher education are more finely tuned to accept a bit of risk in the search for rewards.

  67. A quote from a university student: by goodmanj · · Score: 1

    Let's hear from an overeducated university student back home to visit his family:

      To die: to sleep;
    No more; and by a sleep to say we end
    The heart-ache and the thousand natural shocks
    That flesh is heir to, 'tis a consummation
    Devoutly to be wish'd.

    Somebody get that kid some Prozac.

  68. What can you do? by cervo · · Score: 1

    You can't really change anything. Someday you will die. The whole bible had some quote about the living being conscious that they will die and that is true. But we all gotta die sometime. And in the grand scheme of things a couple years doesn't make a difference. Whether it is a car accident tomorrow, lightning strike or something else, or old age in 50 or 60 years.....And anyway it could also be a motorcycle accident :P I had one of those already, probably it is most likely that the bike will be the death of me :-P Oh well. Look at what happens when you go crazy fearing death like those cowards who give up all their rights due to the remote possibility of terrorism. I'm not saying that the government doesn't need to shape up its intelligence gathering abilities. Even now the agencies are so dysfunctional. But wiretapping the whole internet, giving secret letters that cannot be challenged, locking people in gitmo, giving invasive pat downs or dangerous ionizing radiation, it all seems a bit excessive. Plus a lot of the measures don't really make anyone safer, and are just theatre. Really the truth is that people being more aware is good enough too.

    Anyway I wouldn't mind dying at 50 or 60 before dementia and all sorts of muscle/bone ailments and pain starts setting in....

  69. Re:Marcus Aurelius (checkout magnesium) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google up on magnesium and heart attacks. The literature varies a bit, but a reasonable estimate might be that around 33% of heart attacks are linked with a magnesium deficiency in the heart cells. Here, for example, is a New York Times article about one test in Oxford

    http://www.nytimes.com/1992/06/28/world/a-study-finds-magnesium-cut-deaths-by-heart-attack.html

    It's very bizarre that magnesiums role in heart issues has been well known in the medical literature since at least the late 80s (judging by published articles in medical journals), but virtually unknown by practitioner.

    Also, if you get you levels checked, make sure it is either a load test or the one offered by Intra Cellular diagnostics

    http://www.exatest.com/ (mineral levels via emission spectrum -- yes there website looks like hell, but they are genuine)

    as another well known fact in the literature, but not by the practitioners, is that blood levels have nearly 0% correlation with cellular levels.

  70. for myself by conark · · Score: 1

    i used to fear death prior to going to my university. i think my fear dealt more with the idea of not having any possibility of thought or that the identity that i have come to experience as myself no longer would exist in any form. also, i would fear for the things that i cared about in my life. what would happen to them when i'm gone?

    however, a friend of mine at the university once told me, "When you're gone, the pain stops." That whole notion really comforted me. Especially when you look at all the BS that you have to deal with these days. as you get older, you would hope that the quality of your life improves along with the advancement of civilization. Instead, you start to realize that the world sucks for the most part because of the design where everyone is out for themselves for the most part and that we deal with things like limited resources. Only by chance if you're in that rare percentile where you don't have to worry about the daily grind, then you can probably enjoy yourself for the most part. However, for an average joe like myself, you just see more bureaucracy and show stoppers that exist to squash your dreams.

    A while back my father was in a nursing home after suffering a horrible stroke that left him half paralyzed and unable to speak. I pitied him that he could not potentially ever again enjoy things. I was hoping that if I worked hard enough and he could survive that somehow I could help him and provide him with something that would help recover him from his condition. That never came to be. Later, I kinda envied him in some ways in that he wasn't alive having to deal with all the garbage in the world. Maybe in some perverse way, he was the lucky one. When he was in the hospital, I would see him crying constantly. I heard that happened with patients. I wasn't certain if that was physically being wrought or emotionally wrought. But if it were emotional as a result of him fearing for his life, I would've told him that he's not really missing anything these days.

    Anyway, my saying these days is simply: "I no longer fear death. Just inconvenience."

  71. confronted with mortality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are they really "more afraid" or are they generally "more aware" of death because, on average, they are confronted with their physical mortality on a more regular basis? They description in the study isn't very detailed and there is a significant difference between "more afraid" and "on their mind more".

    Generally (always, always exceptions. we're talking distributions here), those without a degree tend to work in more physical labor with more risk of injury and less access to good medical care. They know they can only move luggage, lift sheetrock, etc for so long. They know their buddy Fred was just seriously injured or died while climbing that ladder, tower, or piece of equipment on the job. Further, those with degrees (again, distributions) tend to be wealthier. They generally do not need to fear that those they leave behind will suffer. The non-degree primary breadwinner and his/her non-degree spouse have more to fear. Their children have more to fear. Legitimate fears regarding the consequences of death.

    "Additionally, more of these children fear early death and adopt unsuitable approaches when it comes to deal with death." Unsuitable according to who? I mean, it wouldn't be surprising as many decisions based on immediate fears often have negative long-term consequences, but when you may wind up out on the street, starving, and unprotected, that fear is definately legitimate. Need to take a look at where (country and area), the actual consequences of death there, and how the study was conducted.

  72. there are better things to do with you time by dlenmn · · Score: 1

    Why is it silly to fear the former?

    Because it's inevitable.

    I'm all for trying to delay it, but since it will happen, I don't see why I should waste my limited time fearing it when I have better things to do.

  73. Slow news day by shoehornjob · · Score: 1

    someone please submit a better story.

    --
    "We are just a war away from Amerikastan. When god vs god the undoing of man." Dave Mustaine
  74. You bet I don't fear death! by Bromskloss · · Score: 1

    I'm invincible now! Yeah!

    --
    Swedish plasma phys. PhD student; MSc EE; knows maths, programming, electronics; finance interest; seeks opportunities
  75. I may be a little different but... by boilednut · · Score: 1

    It's not death I fear so much as anything that's boundless, endless. When I was a child, I scared the shit out of myself when I tried to really understand what it meant for something to go on forever; I had a reaction similar to the robot from Lost in Space: "Does not compute". Which was the reason why I never found consolation in religion. So, for me, whether it's everlasting life in heaven, eternal torture in a lake of fire, or an infinity fucking Helen of Troy, it's all hell.

  76. For everyone? by assertation · · Score: 1

    My suspicion is that a higher education would lessen the fear of death by introducing a person to the thoughts and arguments of the great minds.

    Do non-liberal arts majors get enough of this by electives ( classes they are forced to take )?

  77. Re:Fear of death is rational. It is not a flaw. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So your main reason for not believing in God is that you don't want to live in a world governed by someone who is rude?

  78. Never Married? by Chucky_M · · Score: 1

    fear of death is more common among women than men.

    This part of the research is flawed, the reason for men not fearing death is having been married they now look forward to death.

  79. Well, of course! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The further up you go in the ivory tower, the more out of touch with reality you are.

  80. Philosophy of Death by eugene_sk · · Score: 1

    There is an interesting video course on philosophy of death from Yale.
    http://academicearth.org/courses/death

  81. They may be weird but URA trolling stalker online by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1891254&cid=34413838 TheEndOfDays likes stalking and trolling others (as well as starting it up as shown right there)? I like how he was put into his rightful place here in the end http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1891254&cid=34418274 where TheEndOfDays ran like the trolling little coward he really is, unable to back up his trolling and stalking crap. The *divine folks* may be weird to you, but whoever said you are smart enough to understand them in the first place? Especially after your poor showing in trolling and stalking others as you did above, and you ran like the little trolling coward you are. Thanks for exposing yourself to the rest of us.

  82. You're being silly... by cutecub · · Score: 1

    Its true that Science can't prove, in the mathematical sense, the non-existence of God simply because you can't mathematically prove a negative. But that's true of everything in Science, including crazy ideas such as Gravity, Electromagnetism and Kepler's laws of planetary motion.

    The old trope, "Absence of proof is not proof of absence" misses the point. Absence of Evidence IS Evidence of absence.

    So, it makes perfect sense to me that people with a higher level of education ( people with more evidence ) would see less need for God or a prescriptive religion.

    -S

    1. Re:You're being silly... by Godskitchen · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't you guys be studying for your third year uni exams instead of posting on slashdot? ;)

    2. Re:You're being silly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After the two previous, very good rebuttals to your original flamebait, that's the best that you can up with? Shame...

  83. Fear death? by kimvette · · Score: 1

    Fear death? Why? It's just fading away into nothing, or afterlife, or whatever there is. No matter what, why fear it?

    What I do fear is the method by which I die. Will it be a slow and painful colon or pancreatic cancer from eating the typical American processed food diet? Will it be liver failure from a food intolerance? Will I burn to death trapped in a car after a mishap in a sanctioned "Open Road Race?" Or, will it be a nice painless hypoxia in a small aircraft? It's the pain and suffering I fear, not death itself. After I die. why would I care? How would I care?

    --
    The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    1. Re:Fear death? by aerthling · · Score: 1

      Or, will it be a nice painless hypoxia in a small aircraft?

      Death by suffocation is supposed to be agony.

      I want to go like Mr Orwell wanted - sudden and violent. Motorbike is my mode of choice.

  84. Mixing up possible connections by Reilaos · · Score: 1

    While all you people are harping about educated people being less religious, had it occurred to you that educated people grow up in an environment much less likely to be touched or haunted by death?

    1. Re:Mixing up possible connections by shadowofwind · · Score: 1

      good point

  85. The Taco Bell Syndrome by MyFirstNameIsPaul · · Score: 2

    I was driving around one day and found myself hungry and wanting something to eat and I thought to myself, "Taco Bell! I haven't eaten at a Taco Bell in years!" I drove to the nearest Taco Bell and got a taco, a tostada, and an Enchirito(tm), my old favorite. Man, was I disappointed. "That's why I never eat at Taco Bell!"

    So a couple years later I'm driving and thinking how I'm kinda' hungry and I see a Taco Bell. "Taco Bell! I haven't eaten there in years!" I go in and order up my favorite meal and end up thinking, "Geez, that was awful! So that's why I never eat a Taco Bell!

    So a couple years later I'm driving and thinking how I'm kinda' hungry and I see a Taco Bell. "Taco Bell! I haven't eaten there in -- wait, I hate Taco Bell!"

    I've found this applies to many things in life and have thus dubbed it the Taco Bell Syndrome.

    --

    I once took an excursion to Reddit, and later HN. Unlimited up/down voting sucks when dealing with a hive-mind.

    1. Re:The Taco Bell Syndrome by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I think what finally stopped me from going to Taco Bell was the realization that they don't have anything I want to eat or drink. I'm always unhappy with the entire meal from food to beverage. Makes sense, I was always the Coca-Cola type, pepsi makes me yak. Is Pepsi OK? Is Monopoly Money OK?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  86. Original paper hardly seems conclusive by QuestorTapes · · Score: 1

    A few points from the original research article (in Spanish). One link I found: http://digibug.ugr.es/bitstream/10481/4858/1/18616252.pdf

    Perhaps someone with better Spanish skills might like to look at it.

    They interviewed 288 kids from 11 schools in the city of Ronda, Málaga province. Rather a small group and only in one city.

    They did appear to use some sensible question criteria and evaluation techniques. However, I saw nothing in the paper (I freely admit I skimmed, so it might be there), anything to indicate that any other factors were considered. In addition to University Degrees, economic factors, personal experiences, any number of other things might enter into this.

    It's a long way from a definitive research. At best, I'd say it's a possible starting point for more rigorous research on a -much- wider broader base of respondents.

    Anyone with better Spanish skills who would like to follow up, please do so.

  87. Re:The Truth by JonJ · · Score: 1

    How to find you Ms. "Anonymous Coward"?

    --
    -- Linux user #369862
  88. I was dead for a long time before I was live by Orp · · Score: 1

    I don't recall anything during the billions of years prior to being born. I suspect after I die it will be similar. Just nothing, and no consciousness to experience it.

    Being alive is really quite a trip and a rare gift. I plan on making the best of it. Life is for the living.

    --
    A squid eating dough in a polyethylene bag is fast and bulbous, got me?
  89. They're expensive, that's why by sirwired · · Score: 1

    A TS security clearance (what I have) takes about six months to process, and the organization requesting it is billed about $20-$25k for the investigation process. The first time, your fingerprints are run, and you get drug tests. Every time, an investigator is dispatched to talk personally to your boss, your friends, your co-workers, and you. Your doctor is called, and your medical records scrutinized. Your travel history is examined. If there are any flags anywhere, the investigation takes even longer. (Foreign birth, foreign-born parents, old minor drug arrests, extensive travel to suspicious-looking places, etc. None of those things bar you from a clearance, they just make it take longer.)

    Homosexuals are not excluded from a civilian clearance (they don't even ask, and it's not part of the investigation.) I don't know how it's handled for military clearances.

    I hope that answers why there aren't more clearances. (It's too expensive, time-consuming and some might blanch at the intense scrutinizing of their private lives.) If you work for a contractor, they have to pay you during processing, which makes it even more expensive.

  90. I look forward to death (no, i'm not suicidal) by Nyder · · Score: 1

    I don't get it.

    Death answers a lot of the big "life" questions (sorry for the pun).

    Like what happens after you die? Are any of the religions correct?

    See, when I'm dead, I'm dead. I don't give a fuck about any bills, any family, or even my cat. Why? Because I will be dead. Chances are, I won't be feeling anything, or even aware of what I'm leaving behind. You can bury me, burn my corpse, fuck my corpse, I don't/won't care.

    I don't believe in religions. Why? Because Man has a history of making shit up to sound better then it is. And a history of lying. And controlling, and being, well, ignorant about what's really going on. That in itself makes it so it's very hard to trust any written texts, mainly texts claiming to be "word of god" or such.

    Man with power, abuses the power. It's the story of mankind's life. Man is greedy. Man mostly only cares about him/herself.

    And if I'm wrong? Let's say God exists, just like the modern day christians say, according to the church I had to go to back when. I would rather be burning in a lake of fire, then spend eternity around those people. Do you understand what I'm saying? I would gladly jump into the lake of fire to avoid those people.

    But it's a moot point, because, based on Man's history, there is no way the modern christians are following anything that wasn't made by man to manipulate people. It's not how man operates.

    I'm looking forward to dying. Just because it will answer questions. Will I be aware of those questions being answered? I have no idea, can't tell you if it does, and honestly I don't care enough to come back and tell you. Not that you would believe me anyways.

    --
    Be seeing you...
    1. Re:I look forward to death (no, i'm not suicidal) by dmbasso · · Score: 1

      I mostly agree with you. People with lower education usually don't make this kind of reasoning, preferring to stick with the 'book written by god'.

      But I don't look forward to die. There are lots of things I want to do before dying, and if I can extend my lifespan to be able to do them I will surely do it.

      --
      `echo $[0x853204FA81]|tr 0-9 ionbsdeaml`@gmail.com
  91. Ah, and there's the rub... by denzacar · · Score: 1

    At the risk of feeding an obvious troll, no, C.S. Lewis simply didn't feel like defending Christianity against straw man arguments, hyperbole, or ignorance.

    When you don't feel like doing something, do you go around and tell it to anyone willing to listen or do you simply not do that thing?

    Had he ANY intention to simply avoid conflict the correct answer would be "Screw 'em".
    Or, since we are talking about old-school gentlemen writer here "That is their problem.". Period. End of discussion.

    Aaah, but that doesn't fulfill the ego quite as much as insinuating that anyone not agreeing with his particular fairytale (Bible, not Narnia) is a "fucking illiterate moron who should keep his fucking mouth shut".

    Then again, he may have just been particularly bad at trying to promote his latest Narnia book to at the time yet untapped market of those who "cannot understand books written for grown-up".

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  92. How about religion? by MoeDrippins · · Score: 1

    I've often wondered if there were any studies along these lines, but with the x-axis as intensity of religious convictions. Do atheists fear death more or less than the devout?

    Who do I talk to to get a gov't grant for this sort of thing?

    --
    Before you design for reuse, make sure to design it for use.
    1. Re:How about religion? by dmbasso · · Score: 1

      You can find some studies correlating increased education with atheism, then make the links... I'm not from the government, but I grant you a beer. :)

      --
      `echo $[0x853204FA81]|tr 0-9 ionbsdeaml`@gmail.com
  93. self esteem by alspacka · · Score: 1
    I haven't seen this brought up (excuse me if it has been), but generally self esteem and motivation tend to correlate both with higher education and less fear of death. People with less appreciation for themselves will generally have a more difficult schooltime in relation to their peers but will also fear death more as they are less content with who they are and what they have accomplished so far.

    Another finding was that a high educational level prevents negative attitudes, as fear of death and avoiding the topic.

    While probably true, one must also consider positive attitudes catalysts for higher education. Of course all of this comes from personal experience, I've seen guys with IQ's of over 150 continuously do far worse in school than complete douchebags, all due to mindset. also, yay first post!

  94. Actually, it could be simpler by Moraelin · · Score: 1

    Before I start, yes, your basic premise is correct. Recent studies show that religion does correlate with a higher fear of death. The more religious some people are, the more they'll demand any medical procedure, any woowoo, any bullshit homeopathic pills, to keep them alive, long after being told that it won't help any more. The same people preaching that X is with Jesus now, and praying to Jesus will help Y, and so on, all their lives, are scared shitless of meeting Jesus when their time is almost up.

    BUT, IMHO, the explanation seems to actually be simpler. False hope seems to actually be a source of stress, because it introduces an uncertainty and delays just accepting reality. In another study, people who hoped that something will be cured sooner or later with a transplant, were actually more miserable than people who had accepted their condition as it is. Granted, the condition wasn't death, but same general idea. The ones who just accepted that they have some condition and they better get used to it, just moved on with their lives and learned to live with that condition. The ones hoping to reverse it, were keeping thinking about it and being insecure about when or if they'll be cured.

    Seems to me like the same could apply to mortality. The sooner you accept that yes, it will happen, and even your cells are pre-programmed to eventually let you die (see, telomeres), the sooner you stop keeping thinking about it, and the insecurity of whether the comforting fairy tale is actually true, and everything.

    Basically my take is that you could make a religion without any hell whatsoever. (See the ancient Egyptian religions, for example.) Promise people just a heaven. And IMHO it will still just serve to get people more stressed about death, via the simple insecurity and doubt about that fairy tale.

    Plus, really, when I look at religion and at least some religious people, it seems to me like a recipe to keep thinking about death all the time and stressing oneself with it. For some people, before they even fully realize what death is, as children, they start having to do some "if I die before I wake" prayer before bed. Every effing day. Go to church, hear some more about death. Talk to some fundie neighbours, hear some more about death. Hear about some preacher's latest idiocy, chances are, death will be in there somehow. Etc.

    I mean, seriously, if someone devoted the same amount of thinking and talking and bargaining with imaginary entities about the possibility of getting laid off or some other misfortune, you can probably see how it wouldn't do much to improve their mood. And how it would just serve as a feedback loop to make them even more worried about a possible layoff. It's like a constant reminder to worry about that some more.

    I can't see why it would be any different for death: if someone dedicates their life to regularly worrying about it, yep, I would very much expect them to be more worried about it.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
  95. Exact quotation fail. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I can see you are a swordsman. Therefore you are educated. If you are educated, you must know you are Mortal! CLEARLY you would put the poison furthest away from YOU!"

    You know, this is the intertubes. You can use the googles to find the exact quote, instead of just paraphrasing it.

  96. Death by asticia · · Score: 1

    When you die, biology and chemistry takes care of your body. Desperate, huh? People realized this, therefore created "there has to be something beyond", afterlife, energy beings, heaven, hell, etc. to make it more bearable. Then built whole system around it, based on "what you do during your life ... and here you have religion :-)

    --
    There is no light without darkness.
  97. Confounding factors by l00sr · · Score: 1

    Could it in fact be the case that people without degrees are poorer and, for instance, living in more dangerous locales than people with degrees? I'd surely fear death much more if I lived a mile north of where I currently live, and it would be well-warranted. The same could be said in regard to access to healthcare, etc.

    1. Re:Confounding factors by dmbasso · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't that be fear of being killed instead of fear of dying? There is a not-so-subtle difference between the two.

      --
      `echo $[0x853204FA81]|tr 0-9 ionbsdeaml`@gmail.com
  98. The Onion by Herr_Skymarshall · · Score: 0

    Individuals with degrees argue with researchers about the nature of death and the variety of fears one can have towards death. Annoyed researchers check "no."

  99. Student Loans by acidradio · · Score: 1

    People with degrees know that the ONLY way out of student loan payments is death. Maybe after dealing with student lenders death doesn't seem so bad anymore.

  100. Not a real big surprise. by tboulay · · Score: 2

    Not really a huge surprise that people who are smarter and better educated have a more healthy outlook towards the one thing that will happen to us all, without exception.

    I'd imagine that if you believed that there was a coin toss chance that you would not actually die, but rather spend an eternity in agonizing torment, death may be a little more worrying.

    In the vast majority of cases, higher education = less of a chance that you're frightened by the myths of bronze aged, goat herding, middle-eastern desert nomads.

  101. Re:The Truth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, thanks. I prefer poultry to cat meat.

  102. Related to more literacy = less religion by advid.net · · Score: 1

    A meta study shows that the more you're educated, the less prone to religious beliefs you are, see how Richard Dawkins in the The God Delusion explains this.

    A meta study is a qualitative compilation of different studies about a similar subject.

    This new research result reinforces the conclusion of the meta-study, since religion mitigates the fear of death.

  103. UNIVERSIYT GRAD OR NOT FEAR OF DEATH QUESTIONS by Transaction7 · · Score: 1

    For a post on SlashDot, I would have expected a citation to the original survey data, methodology, questions, maybe which university degrees and differences between them, etc., also definitions, significance, etc. Since different people would exhibit different changes in respiratory or heart rate, skin conductivity, etc., how would you get accurate, measurable, and comparable calibrations of the level of fear of death or of anything else? Most of the answers address neither the subject, the fear of death, any real analysis of why the survey might show those with university degrees fear death less, etc. A couple of responders did note, aptly, that there could be a number of factors involved including university graduates possibly facing fewer consciously immediate life-threatening situations than slum dwellers, those in war zones, etc. This one reminds me of the old psych department joke about the experiment with the male rat given a choice between food and a female rat, various adjustments in electric shocks, etc., and some student raises the question: Did anybody ever try testing the results after changing female rats? Fear of death in the abstract where the odds approximate the life insurers’ mortality tables is one thing. Too many teenagers, some of whom are in college, and some other people, in our culture, have somehow convinced themselves that death will not actually happen to them, at least for a long, long time until after they get old, and thus too many lose their lives or are severely injured young because they take foolish, useless risks, seek thrills by so doing, etc. I have known some young recent university and professional school graduates to take risks they should be smart enough and know to avoid and die, in one-car accidents, etc., as a result. Actually facing, or having good reason to believe that you are, or likely are, facing imminent death is something quite different, and I doubt that many of the survey respondents were actually in such a life-threatening situation at the time they responded. What percentage of those in each group had ever actually faced their own imminent death, not as an intellectual exercise but a stark physical reality, as children, or as graduates or at comparable ages? I have some expertise as a child and adult with very credible, serious, imminent threats of murder, etc., and some other momentarily frightening situations ranging from near drowning to violent accidents, before and after acquiring bachelor’s and an earned juris doctor in law. I don’t believe that education had that much effect upon such fears from events before and after graduation. The fear from two armed robberies in which the robbers told me that they were there and intended to kill me in any event did not really get hard to control until the next day, but these were not my first real threats or fears of imminent death, or worse. Maybe the survey should have covered college and university graduates compared to those without degrees in similar battlefield situations etc. Professionally in my law practice, and in other parts of my life, I have known and dealt with a significant number of people suffering with expertly diagnosed Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder before and after treatment,. I don’t think the specific fear of imminent death would check out as being that much more a factor than other traumatic experiences they have dealt with including seeing buddies killed, being wounded, and a lot I have known in privileged and confidential relationships who had suffered mostly incestuous child sexual abuse, or rape at older ages. I have not tested this, but in significant privileged communications with a lot of survivors of various such traumas, I have not found any particular reason to believe that education would prove to be a significant variable either in frequency of such events or resulting PTSD, etc. I have also had some limited samples of multiple contacts with child and adult patients, of varying ages, the latter with and without degrees, facing imminent death

  104. Marked as Troll? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Okay, to know that Pepsico has mod shills here makes me sad.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  105. Good needs Evil by DarthVain · · Score: 2

    This is just a corollary of humans apparent inability to understand abstract concepts they cannot readily define. Humans define things with boundaries. Heck by the very meaning of "define" it is to explain by limitation, the reduction to the point of understanding. In fact that is why we have arguments that make no sense with absolutes, as while we may have created an abstract concept of absolute values (never, forever, infinity, largest, smallest, etc...) humans have trouble using them logically. This is "why" Good needs Evil. Because these concepts are absolute values we cannot define without boundaries, which are provided by using another absolute value to try and make it make sense.

    Cyclic logic and all that. Absolute power cannot pick up an infinitely heavy rock. The universe is expanding, but into what? Nothingness? We are obsessed with encapsulating stuff, we need fences and walls and boundaries. I am not sure if it has to do with how we think, our language or what, or even if we will able to ever overcome it due to how we exist.

  106. Educated people read Dune... by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    "I must not fear. Fear is the mind-killer. Fear is the little-death that brings total obliteration. I will face my fear. I will permit it to pass over me and through me. And when it has gone past I will turn the inner eye to see its path. Where the fear has gone there will be nothing. Only I will remain."

  107. Shouldn't it be the other way around? by alexo · · Score: 1

    But, you've also bested my Spaniard, which means you must have studied, and in studying you must have learned that man is mortal, so you would have put the poison as far from yourself as possible, so I can clearly not choose the wine in front of me.