Ok. If I mischaracterized you I'm sorry - it's mainly Rondroids around here who are the most fond of arguing along the lines of "if it's not explicitly specified to be part of the government's job, it's illegal for the government to do it."
I think most moderates interpret the General Welfare clause as covering exactly this sort of public expenditure.
Does "run SH-xxx N times" actually grow in computational complexity as proportionally to O(N)? I don't happen to know enough about SHA-x to answer this, but I do remember that triple-DES did not actually increase complexity proportional to a tripled key length.
Spoofed source IPs would defeat this method easily. It's useless for an actual online brute-force attack, since the attacker clearly wants to receive a reply from his password attempts, but if the aim is just to DoS the authentication server, that's not a problem. You should send the client a token and wait to get it back before you start blowing CPU cycles on determining whether their password hash is legit.
Oh, I see, "standard" actually just means "arbitrary metric". Well then, let's just abolish the idiom "by any standard" outright because it seems that no factually true sentence can ever be constructed using it. This definitely adds value to the above discussion on how teachers are paid; keep it up!
Maybe later we should troll Hardware and help keep all of their discussions about system performance and benchmarks in perspective by reminding them of how many bogomips ENIAC could do.
Teachers in the richest country in the world are doing way better than southeast Asian subsistence farmers! What the heck are they even complaining about?
Slashdot Mirror
This comment is such delicious transpositionbeep.
this is too earnestly true to read as proper sarcasm.
i need a drink.
Welcome to Idle.
Pull up a kitten and stay awhile!
"Laughed out loud."
Ah, yes, "vote with your wallet". It's almost like democracy, except for the part where everyone gets an equal say!
Uh, no disrespect - but do you understand what disk partitions are?
Jesus once said, "That which you do unto the highest-ping of my brothers, so you do unto me."
Those were.
Boosh.
I have it on good authority that Mars has no bodies of water as delectable as the Atacama Apertif.
THANK YOU.
I am sick of people treating this concept as stupid when it's just fucking encapsulation
Width and broadness are pretty much synonymous.
Furthermore, if we stick to the last 100 years we pretty much eliminate the major cases of the US military attacking civilians
This is only if you ignore all of the protegés, intermediaries and silent-partner deals the US military has backed in things like proxy wars.
The blood of Pinochet's victims, for instance, is ultimately upon American hands. Further examples abound.
Ok. If I mischaracterized you I'm sorry - it's mainly Rondroids around here who are the most fond of arguing along the lines of "if it's not explicitly specified to be part of the government's job, it's illegal for the government to do it."
I think most moderates interpret the General Welfare clause as covering exactly this sort of public expenditure.
Ideologues with radio shows are notoriously brutal about seeing their tax dollars being spent in a multi-billion dollar "mistake".
Check the batteries in your sarcasm detector.
yeah yeah, ron paul ron paul ron paul.
constituuuuuuuuuuuutionalism.
Does "run SH-xxx N times" actually grow in computational complexity as proportionally to O(N)? I don't happen to know enough about SHA-x to answer this, but I do remember that triple-DES did not actually increase complexity proportional to a tripled key length.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meet-in-the-middle_attack
Spoofed source IPs would defeat this method easily.
It's useless for an actual online brute-force attack, since the attacker clearly wants to receive a reply from his password attempts, but if the aim is just to DoS the authentication server, that's not a problem. You should send the client a token and wait to get it back before you start blowing CPU cycles on determining whether their password hash is legit.
no, but the informative-ness of your medical history grows monotonically as you age.
Oh, I see, "standard" actually just means "arbitrary metric". Well then, let's just abolish the idiom "by any standard" outright because it seems that no factually true sentence can ever be constructed using it. This definitely adds value to the above discussion on how teachers are paid; keep it up!
Maybe later we should troll Hardware and help keep all of their discussions about system performance and benchmarks in perspective by reminding them of how many bogomips ENIAC could do.
Teachers in the richest country in the world are doing way better than southeast Asian subsistence farmers! What the heck are they even complaining about?
Cute response, but irrelevant. :p
Fuckin' miracles.
These people are poor for a reason
Come the fuck on.
I came here to say this.
The problem is not that she's a teacher, the problem is clearly that she is working for the wrong employer.
Touche. 'bandwidth' was the wrong word to use.