The FTC is seeming to suggest that it would be more proper for the Apple store to introduce customers looking to buy an office PC to Microsoft offerings first because they have a larger market share. Or Verizon to show plans from TMobile ahead of their own because they're more economical.
Just because Google happens to offer services that incorporate non-Google offerings doesn't mean they don't have a right to serve their own interests. If I'm using Google I expect to be shown Google offerings. If I'm using Travelocity I expect to be shown Travelocity services. It's nice that they incorporate their competitors offerings as an option but I certainly don't expect them to say, "we suck, why not check out this offer from Expedia".
You have a position you're trying to defend and logic and rational thinking might be the last thing on your mind. I get it. However, for your own benefit you might want to re-evaluate the latest crop of notebooks. I'm sure there are some crap ones, always are. There are also some very good ones. Not everyone plays the non-sense games such as Dell wherein you have to bust your wallet to get away from certain junk components, or certain unreasonably low specs. Asus' G751 series is such an example. It can run for hours under full CPU + GPU load with little demonstration of the fact. The case is as cool as at idle, a quiet, warm stream of air flows out the back. Performance is as I said peer with my development workstation.
This is also for a student, in case you missed it. Portable and inexpensive is key. What makes you think this student is willing/able to tether their notebook to a "big iron" back at home. Campus IT doesn't always take kindly to nor facilitate personal servers. You're also advocating two purchases which kind of defeats the point of inexpensive.
PC components are getting small enough, efficient enough and often equivalent/identical between laptop and desktop such that that advise is becoming somewhat dated. In most respects the $1800 Asus gaming notebook I recently bought is equal to the $2000, development workstation I built a year ago but with one key difference. I can take my notebook with me.
Link to entry level. You can choose an upgraded version with SSD, or save some money and add your own. Either way, it's a solid system, ample power, excellent cooling. Web browsing and basic office software will get about 4 hours on the battery, under full (gaming, presumably physics sim) load you'll get just under two hours.
Except there aren't. There are incentive for NOT hiring them. Nobody wants the liability, it doesn't matter what the profession. Nobody wants to be in the same room with a criminal. They want them locked up and never exposed to such elements.
It makes people feel good. Who cares if it or other job training programs work. If we actually gave a sh*t then criminal record consideration for employment would illegal. The reality is that there are only a handful of states with such laws, many that do only apply to public employment. Given this environment, recidivism is all but guaranteed. We just want to keep these people locked up, out of site, out of mind. Sure it's expensive, but it's also a great way to manage minority populations. After all not everyone can be deported.
Consoles were perpetuated by the game industry's want of money. They decided that the only way they'd get cash from tweens, teens and twenty-somethings was to lock down the hardware. To bait them, they offered kit that rivaled mid-spec PCs (at least in some metrics) at a price that meant they be taking a loss on each sale. They figured they could play Lexmark's game--cheap kit, absurdly expensive ink--and make up for it selling games. Evidently their plan worked.
Console owners of course are now realizing the true nature of the trap which has been laid for them. The hardware actually isn't all that great--it is just a low-spec PC that happens to have a decent GPU after all. The ink costs a fortune. Hardware refreshes don't happen very that often, and when they do the old titles often won't run on them.
For PC gamers who didn't drink the Kool-aid, we've gotten a mixed bag from it all. The big game houses treat us the wayward step-child. They cater to the consoles, and occasionally throw us a few console ports complete with all the compromises necessitated by its heritage. This however opened a vacuum that indie dev-houses are filling reasonably well. The graphics generally aren't meriting the high-spec card(s) in our rigs, but we get to reclaim notions like novelty, plots, sophisticated play, user-created features and content, and most importantly the price-value proposition.
Well given the nature of the conference... Perhaps someone was wandering around sniffing for radio emissions, or, the fellow took his car to the shop for maintenance.
I'm certain Minecraft will continue to evolve for the foreseeable future. The implied idea behind a v2.0 (a reinterpretation of v1.x) however, is unlikely to happen. It doesn't seem compatible with Minecraft culture. The stereotypical, bigger, better doesn't exactly apply to Minecraft. It's blocky, low-res on purpose and that's a huge component of its charm.
Minecraft, the Java version at least, is for all practical purposes open-source. The plethora of mods out there are all built off of decompiled bytecode.
Actually it does develop strategy. In BreakOut it doesn't merely bounce the ball with good reaction time. It learned to tunnel up to the back side of the wall. RTFA
Don't be a ditto head, think for your self man. The oil is being pumped, the oil is being transported, and the oil is being burned regardless of how it gets from point A to point B. If anything the pipeline would have the "environmental" scale pan tipping towards it. Pipes don't necessarily have to be powered by fossil fuel and piles don't derail. This is Canadian interests trying to hijack American politics and you're party to the Kool-aid chugging.
Um, how would allowing Canada to bypass the US and put the oil instead on ships bound for elsewhere increase US oil exports? The US isn't exporting that oil, Canada is exporting that oil. Right now, Canada is incentivized to sell the oil for cheap to the US since access to more lucrative markets come with higher costs. Letting Canada extend their pipeline might help Canada and China, but it will do precious little for the US and quite probably hurt it.
Why would I as an American want to make it easy for Canada to get their oil out of our country. By not extending the pipeline, it incentivizes Canada to keep it in the U.S. and thus our prices low.
Most people making slightly below the median income level or more and whom reside in the upper mid-west. Ice melt chemicals aren't the kindest thing to a car. Unlimited wash packages exist for a reason. Now it seems they just got a bit less expensive.
What does your anecdote have to do with "zero-tolerance" school policy? It has nothing to do with school administrative actions/policy for whom you state had no knowledge of the situation.
If the comments on Amazon are any guide, then I suspect the market isn't bearing this too terribly well. I'm sure H&R Blockhead will enjoy the uptick in market share though.
Not every boss is unenlightened nor are their employees irresponsible such that they can and do work out of the office. Coffee shops are often a good way to break up the monotony and maintain productivity.
California does just fine with solar and wind. A cloudy, windless day shouldn't matter too much unless there's a fundamental requirement I'm unaware of for desalinization plants that necessitates them running at peak capacity 24/7.
Slashdot Mirror
I think you need to work on your abstraction skills. "Search" is a product just as much as a "PC" is a product.
The FTC is seeming to suggest that it would be more proper for the Apple store to introduce customers looking to buy an office PC to Microsoft offerings first because they have a larger market share. Or Verizon to show plans from TMobile ahead of their own because they're more economical.
Just because Google happens to offer services that incorporate non-Google offerings doesn't mean they don't have a right to serve their own interests. If I'm using Google I expect to be shown Google offerings. If I'm using Travelocity I expect to be shown Travelocity services. It's nice that they incorporate their competitors offerings as an option but I certainly don't expect them to say, "we suck, why not check out this offer from Expedia".
You have a position you're trying to defend and logic and rational thinking might be the last thing on your mind. I get it. However, for your own benefit you might want to re-evaluate the latest crop of notebooks. I'm sure there are some crap ones, always are. There are also some very good ones. Not everyone plays the non-sense games such as Dell wherein you have to bust your wallet to get away from certain junk components, or certain unreasonably low specs. Asus' G751 series is such an example. It can run for hours under full CPU + GPU load with little demonstration of the fact. The case is as cool as at idle, a quiet, warm stream of air flows out the back. Performance is as I said peer with my development workstation.
This is also for a student, in case you missed it. Portable and inexpensive is key. What makes you think this student is willing/able to tether their notebook to a "big iron" back at home. Campus IT doesn't always take kindly to nor facilitate personal servers. You're also advocating two purchases which kind of defeats the point of inexpensive.
PC components are getting small enough, efficient enough and often equivalent/identical between laptop and desktop such that that advise is becoming somewhat dated. In most respects the $1800 Asus gaming notebook I recently bought is equal to the $2000, development workstation I built a year ago but with one key difference. I can take my notebook with me.
Link to entry level. You can choose an upgraded version with SSD, or save some money and add your own. Either way, it's a solid system, ample power, excellent cooling. Web browsing and basic office software will get about 4 hours on the battery, under full (gaming, presumably physics sim) load you'll get just under two hours.
Except there aren't. There are incentive for NOT hiring them. Nobody wants the liability, it doesn't matter what the profession. Nobody wants to be in the same room with a criminal. They want them locked up and never exposed to such elements.
It makes people feel good. Who cares if it or other job training programs work. If we actually gave a sh*t then criminal record consideration for employment would illegal. The reality is that there are only a handful of states with such laws, many that do only apply to public employment. Given this environment, recidivism is all but guaranteed. We just want to keep these people locked up, out of site, out of mind. Sure it's expensive, but it's also a great way to manage minority populations. After all not everyone can be deported.
Consoles were perpetuated by the game industry's want of money. They decided that the only way they'd get cash from tweens, teens and twenty-somethings was to lock down the hardware. To bait them, they offered kit that rivaled mid-spec PCs (at least in some metrics) at a price that meant they be taking a loss on each sale. They figured they could play Lexmark's game--cheap kit, absurdly expensive ink--and make up for it selling games. Evidently their plan worked.
Console owners of course are now realizing the true nature of the trap which has been laid for them. The hardware actually isn't all that great--it is just a low-spec PC that happens to have a decent GPU after all. The ink costs a fortune. Hardware refreshes don't happen very that often, and when they do the old titles often won't run on them.
For PC gamers who didn't drink the Kool-aid, we've gotten a mixed bag from it all. The big game houses treat us the wayward step-child. They cater to the consoles, and occasionally throw us a few console ports complete with all the compromises necessitated by its heritage. This however opened a vacuum that indie dev-houses are filling reasonably well. The graphics generally aren't meriting the high-spec card(s) in our rigs, but we get to reclaim notions like novelty, plots, sophisticated play, user-created features and content, and most importantly the price-value proposition.
Well given the nature of the conference... Perhaps someone was wandering around sniffing for radio emissions, or, the fellow took his car to the shop for maintenance.
I'm certain Minecraft will continue to evolve for the foreseeable future. The implied idea behind a v2.0 (a reinterpretation of v1.x) however, is unlikely to happen. It doesn't seem compatible with Minecraft culture. The stereotypical, bigger, better doesn't exactly apply to Minecraft. It's blocky, low-res on purpose and that's a huge component of its charm.
Minecraft, the Java version at least, is for all practical purposes open-source. The plethora of mods out there are all built off of decompiled bytecode.
If you're playing with heuristics then, you're probably not playing with the toys that'll make the classic self-aware AI.
Actually it does develop strategy. In BreakOut it doesn't merely bounce the ball with good reaction time. It learned to tunnel up to the back side of the wall. RTFA
I think that was rhetorical... just saying.
Don't be a ditto head, think for your self man. The oil is being pumped, the oil is being transported, and the oil is being burned regardless of how it gets from point A to point B. If anything the pipeline would have the "environmental" scale pan tipping towards it. Pipes don't necessarily have to be powered by fossil fuel and piles don't derail. This is Canadian interests trying to hijack American politics and you're party to the Kool-aid chugging.
Um, how would allowing Canada to bypass the US and put the oil instead on ships bound for elsewhere increase US oil exports? The US isn't exporting that oil, Canada is exporting that oil. Right now, Canada is incentivized to sell the oil for cheap to the US since access to more lucrative markets come with higher costs. Letting Canada extend their pipeline might help Canada and China, but it will do precious little for the US and quite probably hurt it.
Why would I as an American want to make it easy for Canada to get their oil out of our country. By not extending the pipeline, it incentivizes Canada to keep it in the U.S. and thus our prices low.
Most people making slightly below the median income level or more and whom reside in the upper mid-west. Ice melt chemicals aren't the kindest thing to a car. Unlimited wash packages exist for a reason. Now it seems they just got a bit less expensive.
Not quite that simple. Even if you blacklist the TV on your router, your neighbor can still offer it service.
What do you mean? My grandparents say the world is going to hell in a hand basket. The end is neigh... etc. etc. Fox news told them so.
What does your anecdote have to do with "zero-tolerance" school policy? It has nothing to do with school administrative actions/policy for whom you state had no knowledge of the situation.
If the comments on Amazon are any guide, then I suspect the market isn't bearing this too terribly well. I'm sure H&R Blockhead will enjoy the uptick in market share though.
I don't know what's on offer from OEMs but a custom LAN party box might be a good choice--micro ATX, carry handle, desktop hardware.
Not every boss is unenlightened nor are their employees irresponsible such that they can and do work out of the office. Coffee shops are often a good way to break up the monotony and maintain productivity.
California does just fine with solar and wind. A cloudy, windless day shouldn't matter too much unless there's a fundamental requirement I'm unaware of for desalinization plants that necessitates them running at peak capacity 24/7.