Your beer is shit (Milwaukee's Best tastes like Mike Rowe's piss), the Packers suck, and you wouldn't know gouda cheese if a Frenchmen slapped you with a roll of brie.
With a name like yours you'd think you would have figured out such an obvious answer. The CDCs number was one in ten billion per consumption of contaminated meat. Of course, the number is still horseshit, but your analysis is obviously wrong Mr. Obvious.
I think his "Nope" was in answer to the question of them being charged with fraud (as they should be) which will never happen, not the question of whether or not they'd committed said fraud.
And before someone suggests that the American Dietetic Association is not qualified to make that determination. The association has 72,000 members and ~72% are registered dietitians and ~50% of those hold advanced degrees.
Was that supposed to be sarcasm? Or did you really think that second sentence supported your point?
Fuck you. No, really, I mean it, go fuck yourself. You have no idea at all to what extent my lifestyle is sustainable or not, what effects positive or negative it has on the environment.
I'm sure the Bourbons had a similar attitude right before they got hauled out to the guillotine.
I see a lot of EV proponents discounting the drawbacks, and arguing every which way that EVs with just a little bit of improvement will be good enough for nearly everybody. Let's face it, hipsters congregate in dense urban areas where any car is a luxury, and many just can't imagine that some of us actually live a long way away from anything;-)
Except that statistically that argument is true. MOST people in the US don't drive that much further than 40 miles per day. Some people do live a long way from everything (I used to drive 100+ miles per day, every day, for five years). Most do not. Most people's daily commutes would be served by EVs. The TCO issues and the long tail use cases are the issue, not the daily use scenario.
Treaties are not laws, there is no penalty to them for copying that data and putting it into the big database they've built.
In the US Treaties ARE Laws. Of course, this treaty has no penalty mentioned for miscompliance, but IF it did that penalty would have the force of law in the US (for as little as that's worth).
Even your argument that "everything is a poison in large quantities" is stupid, because it's not the CO2 harming you if you go in the garage and turn on the car - it's the fact you are not getting oxygen. The CO2 itself did not hurt you.
The distribution of IQ is defined (in modern tests anyway) as a normal distribution--the median is 100 w/ a sd of 15, and the median is equal to the mean. It is not even slightly possible to have over 50% on either side of the mean.
Yeah, you're kinda weak in the brains department. I don't look at race, gender, accents, height, or makeup (other than tattoos and men wearing makeup) when making a hiring decision. I really think you need some help.
Let's see: You start off as an arrogant ass, and then sexist comment #1
some/most women find more suitable careers than coding
implying that coding is not suitable for women, and sexist comment #2
...all seem more appealing to my better half (accountant) than bug-fixes ("That just sounds...gross!")
implying that your girlfriend/wife/whatever is too stupid to understand the idea that the word 'bug' here doesn't refer to a literal bug...
And this is relevant how? Zimmerman was on the phone with 911 well BEFORE the confrontation. He was told to stop stalking Martin. He continued to do so anyway.
They can't look through your mail or search your photos in your house as part of a background check--so why should they be able to do the exact same thing online?
Keyword was NONPERSONAL ACCOUNTS. So not unless your facebook account is a work account owned by the company (e.x. if you have the account which controls the company's facebook page). Your personal account is safe.
how many here think that the average white person, just minding their own business, would walk through say Harlem or Watts or any other major big city all black neighborhood unscathed?
When I worked for political campaigns in LA I did this all the time. I was never harassed (except by the occassional guard dog behind a fence). There were a few skeevy looking guys that made me nervous (net tattoos and obvious drugs/money exchange), but they never actually bothered or threatened me.
In Beverly Hills on the other hand? I had people track my plates and leave harrassing messages on my home phone number (a number they could only have gotten by looking up the car's registration). I was chased down the street by one crazy asshole with a broom. I had things thrown at me. Lost track of the number of times I talked to the cops.
I'll let you figure out where I felt more safe. (Just to clarify, I'm as white as the driven snow). Maybe you just face up to the fact that you're a raving racist if you really think a white person can't walk safely through the neighborhoods south of the 10.
The bible clearly shows that the christian god is an evil god if you bother to read the whole bible without the prejudice that god is good
Is more or less the central concept of Gnosticism (in reality the interplay between the various gnostic religions and christianity is more complex than this, but that's the basic gist--YAHWEH is an evil SOB, so fuck him).
Slashdot Mirror
You don't know what short term memory is, do you?
Your beer is shit (Milwaukee's Best tastes like Mike Rowe's piss), the Packers suck, and you wouldn't know gouda cheese if a Frenchmen slapped you with a roll of brie.
With a name like yours you'd think you would have figured out such an obvious answer. The CDCs number was one in ten billion per consumption of contaminated meat. Of course, the number is still horseshit, but your analysis is obviously wrong Mr. Obvious.
Extreme HotPocket PizzaHut Lard Thins
I just threw up in my mouth a little.
I think his "Nope" was in answer to the question of them being charged with fraud (as they should be) which will never happen, not the question of whether or not they'd committed said fraud.
And before someone suggests that the American Dietetic Association is not qualified to make that determination.
The association has 72,000 members and ~72% are registered dietitians and ~50% of those hold advanced degrees.
Was that supposed to be sarcasm? Or did you really think that second sentence supported your point?
Fuck you. No, really, I mean it, go fuck yourself. You have no idea at all to what extent my lifestyle is sustainable or not, what effects positive or negative it has on the environment.
I'm sure the Bourbons had a similar attitude right before they got hauled out to the guillotine.
I see a lot of EV proponents discounting the drawbacks, and arguing every which way that EVs with just a little bit of improvement will be good enough for nearly everybody. Let's face it, hipsters congregate in dense urban areas where any car is a luxury, and many just can't imagine that some of us actually live a long way away from anything ;-)
Except that statistically that argument is true. MOST people in the US don't drive that much further than 40 miles per day. Some people do live a long way from everything (I used to drive 100+ miles per day, every day, for five years). Most do not. Most people's daily commutes would be served by EVs. The TCO issues and the long tail use cases are the issue, not the daily use scenario.
Treaties are not laws, there is no penalty to them for copying that data and putting it into the big database they've built.
In the US Treaties ARE Laws. Of course, this treaty has no penalty mentioned for miscompliance, but IF it did that penalty would have the force of law in the US (for as little as that's worth).
Except their memory is that of a kidnap victim with Stockholm's Syndrome--they pine for tyranny.
Even your argument that "everything is a poison in large quantities" is stupid, because it's not the CO2 harming you if you go in the garage and turn on the car - it's the fact you are not getting oxygen. The CO2 itself did not hurt you.
So cyanide is not a poison?
Even money GP is a gaybashing homophobe and supporter of Rick Santorum.
The distribution of IQ is defined (in modern tests anyway) as a normal distribution--the median is 100 w/ a sd of 15, and the median is equal to the mean. It is not even slightly possible to have over 50% on either side of the mean.
No, but Farcry might be in the cards.
After heat, internet is #1 need in the modern age
No one within a thousand miles of me needs a heater.
Yeah, you're kinda weak in the brains department. I don't look at race, gender, accents, height, or makeup (other than tattoos and men wearing makeup) when making a hiring decision. I really think you need some help.
Let's see: You start off as an arrogant ass, and then sexist comment #1
some/most women find more suitable careers than coding
implying that coding is not suitable for women, and sexist comment #2
...all seem more appealing to my better half (accountant) than bug-fixes ("That just sounds...gross!")
implying that your girlfriend/wife/whatever is too stupid to understand the idea that the word 'bug' here doesn't refer to a literal bug...
Get your head out of your ass.
Yeah, there's no bias in you at all.
That wasn't a plane going over your head.
And this is relevant how? Zimmerman was on the phone with 911 well BEFORE the confrontation. He was told to stop stalking Martin. He continued to do so anyway.
The "The enemy of my enemy is my friend" sort of thinking?
They can't look through your mail or search your photos in your house as part of a background check--so why should they be able to do the exact same thing online?
Keyword was NONPERSONAL ACCOUNTS. So not unless your facebook account is a work account owned by the company (e.x. if you have the account which controls the company's facebook page). Your personal account is safe.
Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department requires it for one that I know of personally.
how many here think that the average white person, just minding their own business, would walk through say Harlem or Watts or any other major big city all black neighborhood unscathed?
When I worked for political campaigns in LA I did this all the time. I was never harassed (except by the occassional guard dog behind a fence). There were a few skeevy looking guys that made me nervous (net tattoos and obvious drugs/money exchange), but they never actually bothered or threatened me.
In Beverly Hills on the other hand? I had people track my plates and leave harrassing messages on my home phone number (a number they could only have gotten by looking up the car's registration). I was chased down the street by one crazy asshole with a broom. I had things thrown at me. Lost track of the number of times I talked to the cops.
I'll let you figure out where I felt more safe. (Just to clarify, I'm as white as the driven snow). Maybe you just face up to the fact that you're a raving racist if you really think a white person can't walk safely through the neighborhoods south of the 10.
The bible clearly shows that the christian god is an evil god if you bother to read the whole bible without the prejudice that god is good
Is more or less the central concept of Gnosticism (in reality the interplay between the various gnostic religions and christianity is more complex than this, but that's the basic gist--YAHWEH is an evil SOB, so fuck him).
Awfully spry for someone who died in 1958.