And presumably they don't care, if it doesn't happen over their network it's not their problem.
Until those computers come back on their network with infections from the wild, defeating the entire point of their draconian restrictions. Of course, 3G dongles weren't needed for that, just a starbucks in walking distance of campus.
No, I'm not saying that. You need to read more carefully, and figure out the difference between the volume of an imaginary sphere enclosing a mass, and the volume of that mass (hint: the imaginary sphere can be any and all sizes greater than or equal to the volume of the mass).
Wow. Next time you're going to try to insult someone, at least have a clue what you're talking about.
The enclosing sphere has nothing to do with the volume of the object. It's the imaginary sphere at the relevant distance from the object's center of mass. The object's volume does not enter into the equation at any point.
Where did you learn physics? Gravity is NOT a result of mass divided by volume. It's 1/r^2. That's mass divided by the surface area of the enclosing sphere.
I'm also a stickler for the rules, if for no other reason that I don't want to give the airlines any reason whatsoever to make me pay for extra services I don't want
Airlines (most?) don't charge if your bag is too big when you get to the plane. They only charge if you check the bag at check-in.
Because of this I have a bag that is bigger than the guideline, but still fits on anything the size of a 707 or bigger. Since it's a travel backpack no one ever tries to stop me with it, even on tiny planes (I routinely fly on a turboprop route). I've never paid to check it, even when checking it on roughly 50% of my flights.
Caffeine(as natural as possible, not that "energy drink" shit)
What the fuck is that even supposed to mean? It's 1,3,7-trimethyxanthine--where it comes from doesn't make a bit of difference. You can complain about the other stuff in those drinks, but the caffeine is exactly the same.
You're assuming facts not in evidence: the burden is on you to show that there should be any benefit at all in the first place. Why should there be any tax cut involved in raising children? The idea that there should be seems moronic to me. "Because there's always been one" is not a reason.
What's really fucked up is that you think that YOU, I assume an adult, are equating someone talking, that you really don't have to listen to, with a preteen children learning about anal sex.
Protip: Your daughter already knows what blowjobs, cunnilingus, anal sex, crack, meth, and tijuana coffee cream are. Even if she hasn't done any of them because she knows someone who has.
The only thing you're protecting is your own fantasy that she doesn't.
You didn't think to mention that the first time around?
This is the internet. You claimed to have watched a video and not understand something that was patently obvious if you had watched it.
What did you expect people to assume? The internet is filled with morons. Including the ones who don't mention their relevant disabilities when asking for clarification.
No, they don't. That sort of water-brained thinking is the reason the iPhone does so well in spite of its imposed limitations.
Android vendors need to explain this to customers. Customers have no duty to understand what Samsung, HTC, and Motorola fail (intentionally I think) to communicate to them.
Slashdot Mirror
Maybe he couldn't type that lette because his ' ' key was boken, peventing him fom spelling it coectly.
Yeah, but no amount of technology will make them better drivers anyway.
And presumably they don't care, if it doesn't happen over their network it's not their problem.
Until those computers come back on their network with infections from the wild, defeating the entire point of their draconian restrictions. Of course, 3G dongles weren't needed for that, just a starbucks in walking distance of campus.
Warrants are generally public records...
Dude, they don't eat meat. You're wasting your time.
Most home refrigerators do not have latches anymore.
I hate you.
No, I'm not saying that. You need to read more carefully, and figure out the difference between the volume of an imaginary sphere enclosing a mass, and the volume of that mass (hint: the imaginary sphere can be any and all sizes greater than or equal to the volume of the mass).
When you decide you want to stop acting like a child and actually learn something, try reading this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gauss'_law_for_gravity
Wow. Next time you're going to try to insult someone, at least have a clue what you're talking about.
The enclosing sphere has nothing to do with the volume of the object. It's the imaginary sphere at the relevant distance from the object's center of mass. The object's volume does not enter into the equation at any point.
Where did you learn physics? Gravity is NOT a result of mass divided by volume. It's 1/r^2. That's mass divided by the surface area of the enclosing sphere.
some gaggle of attorneys has their vacuum cleaner nozzle in the back pockets of the investors
Attorneys come either in murders (imperial) or shitfests (metric), not gaggles.
Though I can see how you might confuse them with geese.
You sound like a real internet toughguy.
I had this exact reaction.
I'm also a stickler for the rules, if for no other reason that I don't want to give the airlines any reason whatsoever to make me pay for extra services I don't want
Airlines (most?) don't charge if your bag is too big when you get to the plane. They only charge if you check the bag at check-in.
Because of this I have a bag that is bigger than the guideline, but still fits on anything the size of a 707 or bigger. Since it's a travel backpack no one ever tries to stop me with it, even on tiny planes (I routinely fly on a turboprop route). I've never paid to check it, even when checking it on roughly 50% of my flights.
Caffeine(as natural as possible, not that "energy drink" shit)
What the fuck is that even supposed to mean? It's 1,3,7-trimethyxanthine--where it comes from doesn't make a bit of difference. You can complain about the other stuff in those drinks, but the caffeine is exactly the same.
It's not. Next question?
Sic doesn't mean what you think it means.
You're assuming facts not in evidence: the burden is on you to show that there should be any benefit at all in the first place. Why should there be any tax cut involved in raising children? The idea that there should be seems moronic to me. "Because there's always been one" is not a reason.
THAT'LL TEACH YOUR STUPID KIDS TO GO TO THE MOVIES!!
Like most right-thinking Americans, I'm in favor of anything that keeps children out of movie theaters.
What's really fucked up is that you think that YOU, I assume an adult, are equating someone talking, that you really don't have to listen to, with a preteen children learning about anal sex.
Protip: Your daughter already knows what blowjobs, cunnilingus, anal sex, crack, meth, and tijuana coffee cream are. Even if she hasn't done any of them because she knows someone who has.
The only thing you're protecting is your own fantasy that she doesn't.
You didn't think to mention that the first time around?
This is the internet. You claimed to have watched a video and not understand something that was patently obvious if you had watched it.
What did you expect people to assume? The internet is filled with morons. Including the ones who don't mention their relevant disabilities when asking for clarification.
No, the summary did that for them.
Wasn't Tim Curry in that movie?
In other words, I can see this from my apartment on the opposite side of the planet. No warrant needed.
and consumers need to realise that.
No, they don't. That sort of water-brained thinking is the reason the iPhone does so well in spite of its imposed limitations.
Android vendors need to explain this to customers. Customers have no duty to understand what Samsung, HTC, and Motorola fail (intentionally I think) to communicate to them.