Slashdot Mirror


North Korea Agrees To Suspend Nuclear Activities

Hugh Pickens writes writes "In a breakthrough in negotiations with the secretive communist nation the Guardian reports that North Korea has agreed to suspend nuclear activities and to a moratorium on nuclear and long-range missile tests. According to U.S. State department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland, North Korea has agreed to allow International Atomic Energy Agency inspectors to verify and monitor the moratorium on uranium enrichment and confirm disablement of its nuclear reactor at Yongbyon. In return for the moratorium on nuclear activities at this key site, the United States has agreed to finalize a package of 240,000 metric tons of nutritional assistance to North Korea. There will be intensive monitoring to assure the delivery of such assistance is made to those in need, and not diverted to the military or government elites."

221 comments

  1. So? by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    North Korea still the best Korea!

    1. Re:So? by eternaldoctorwho · · Score: 1

      But.....Biggest Korea is best Korea!

    2. Re:So? by gnick · · Score: 4, Funny

      North Korea still the best Korea!

      No way - North Korea has no Seoul.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    3. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice pun, Hans Brix!

      Hrawhrawraw!

      - Kim Yong Ill
        Hell

    4. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      South has no crazy dictator and not even remotly the level of
      weirdness that lots of people find fascinating with Best Korea :)

      Anyway let's hope this could be the start to bring some sanity to
      the world.

    5. Re:So? by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      North Korea has no fan death

    6. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      North Korea is the best

  2. Still in violation by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In 1992 North Korea agreed to keep the peninsula free of nuclear weapons.

    But let's be optimistic, maybe this time around the inspectors will be allowed to do inspections.

    1. Re:Still in violation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      In 1992 North Korea agreed to keep the peninsula free of nuclear weapons.

      and in return the U.S., Japan and S. Korea would build light water reactors in N. Korea. The construction stalled and the rest is history. It is not just about whether N.Korea allows inspectors. There is no free lunch. N. Korea won't give it up without rewards.

    2. Re:Still in violation by HBI · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Next time they want something, the inspectors are kicked out and more nuke and missile tests.

      Essentially, we bribed them with food to keep quiet through an election year. Nice.

      --
      HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    3. Re:Still in violation by MozeeToby · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Alternatively, we sent desperately needed food to people who are starving to death by the tens of thousands and got a temporary concession out of the North Korean government in the process. And don't tell me it just supports the dictatorship either, do you really think the people of North Korea are about to rise up and overthrow the Kim family business? It's not going to happen until something major goes down, either a military coupe from within or a 2 week war with one of their neighbors, neither of which will be effected by us giving them food aide.

    4. Re:Still in violation by HBI · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Starvation is a great motivator. Feeding the people extends the regime's lifespan. Stalin feared famine. Napoleon understood this. The Romans understood it, too.

      --
      HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    5. Re:Still in violation by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure that feeding starving people counts as a "bribe" per say.

      More likely it's the new leader trying to shower his people with food to associate a good year with his rise to power--and an attempt at good will from the international community who are hoping they can relax.

    6. Re:Still in violation by h4rr4r · · Score: 5, Informative

      Stalin used famine to crush those who opposed him. He caused one! Holodomor not ringing a fucking bell for you?

      North Korea saw true famine in the 90s, it only made their people more sure that the west was the evil empire. Famine only proves to the people of North Korea that we are their enemies and only the Kims are keeping them alive.

    7. Re:Still in violation by HBI · · Score: 1, Informative

      North Korea saw true famine in the 90s, it only made their people more sure that the west was the evil empire. Famine only proves to the people of North Korea that we are their enemies and only the Kims are keeping them alive.

      Citation, please.

      Stalin starved relatively small minorities of his population. Stalin accepted vast amounts of Western aid during WWII to avoid famine amongst the Great Russian population. He would not have done this if he could have avoided it. Those cans of spam were a message to his people that they heard loud and clear, as later evidence proved.

      A better argument against me would have been based on the effects of that western aid on the Soviet Union. Of course, the desired result took the better part of 50 years to realize.

      --
      HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    8. Re:Still in violation by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      There's that. There is also the possibility of starting on real reform after the "Dear Leader" died knowing that leading the way his father did only leads to ruin. Assuming for a moment he even remotely cares. I doubt the son has much power though. The consolidation and stronghold, while impressive, has always been on the waning side starting with Kim Jong Il. Perhaps it's all smoke in mirrors and what we're really seeing is political infighting. Who the hell knows. Just my two cents.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    9. Re:Still in violation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What history class did you attend where Stalin feared famine? He was the greatest perpetrator of genocide precisely because he used genocide as a weapon against his own people.

    10. Re:Still in violation by h4rr4r · · Score: 4, Informative

      You don't know about the North Korean Famine?
      The "Arduous March" is not something you are familier with, but you think we should take your opinion seriously?

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Korean_famine

      Famine is not new to North Korea, it will not topple their regime.

    11. Re:Still in violation by Bardwick · · Score: 2

      By most accounts, that food went to feed the military, not the civilians. I'm with you though, no chance NK citizens will go against thier government.

    12. Re:Still in violation by h4rr4r · · Score: 3, Interesting

      So genocide is a relatively small thing?
      Google Holodomor. 2+ million people died, at the very least. The state prevented food aid from reaching these people. Even the US govt recognizes this as an act of genocide.

    13. Re:Still in violation by Desler · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's so cute that you think they'll will actually use this food for anything but feeding the military and the government people or to sell it for money. You do realize that dictators routinely lie about these things, right?

    14. Re:Still in violation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It's not going to happen until something major goes down, either a military coupe"

      I guess they don't have AAA over there.

    15. Re:Still in violation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Here's a little tidbit from Slate: ... he seized all the grain and food that was grown in 1932 and 1933 to feed the rest of Russia and raise foreign capital, and in doing so left the entire Ukrainian people with nothing to eat—except, sometimes, themselves. ...

      One more horror story. About a group of women who sought to protect children from cannibals by gathering them in an "orphanage" in the Kharkov region:

              "One day the children suddenly fell silent, we turned around to see what was happening, and they were eating the smallest child, little Petrus. They were tearing strips from him and eating them. And Petrus was doing the same, he was tearing strips from himself and eating them, he ate as much as he could. The other children put their lips to his wounds and drank his blood. We took the child away from their hungry mouths and we cried."

      If interested, read the whole article at http://www.slate.com/articles/life/the_spectator/2011/02/stalins_cannibals.single.html

    16. Re:Still in violation by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      There is no free lunch. N. Korea won't give it up without rewards.

      How ironic. Apparently all N. Korea has to do to get it's free lunch is... nothing. I'd call it extortion but, while I realize the dangers of certain countries having nuclear weapons, I don't believe we have the right to deny them or dictate to other countries. But that's just me.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    17. Re:Still in violation by SplashMyBandit · · Score: 2

      Stalin feed the Russian population. His enforcement of collectivization starved the *Ukranian* population. The ethnic Ukranians have not forgotten the Holodomor even if the Russians (and interestingly enough, the Russian Ukranians I've come across) are taught to dispute the Holodomor (the usual story, when you get to re-write the textbooks you can say anything, just how glorious life was under Stalin [not!]).

    18. Re:Still in violation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps it's all smoke in mirrors

      I wonder what that looks like.

    19. Re:Still in violation by KhabaLox · · Score: 2

      Holodomor not ringing a fucking bell for you?

      That's the holodeck program Wesley used to re-enact the Lord of the Rings, right? I thought the Arwen sub-routine went a bit too far.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un sig.
    20. Re:Still in violation by Temujin_12 · · Score: 1

      neither of which will be effected by us giving them food aide.

      +1 for proper use of *e*ffected in that sentence.

      --
      Faith is a willingness to accept something w/o complete proof and to act on it. Reason allows you to correct that faith.
    21. Re:Still in violation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      military coupe

      So, does this count as our obligatory car analogy?

    22. Re:Still in violation by bennomatic · · Score: 1

      This time around, they're hoping to get iPad factories. I'll bet they stick to their agreements.

      --
      The CB App. What's your 20?
    23. Re:Still in violation by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      In 1992 North Korea agreed to keep the peninsula free of nuclear weapons.

      Good thing the US Government gave them two light-water reactors in 1996, then.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    24. Re:Still in violation by viperidaenz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      North Korea isn't being denied or dictated anything. Its being offered a deal. If they don't want 240,000 tons of food they don't have to accept it. They could continue to spend their money on nuclear research and ignore their starving citizens.

    25. Re:Still in violation by tqk · · Score: 1

      North Korea saw true famine in the 90s ...

      Citation, please.

      Ever heard of Wikipedia, or Google, or iXQuick, or Bing, ...? Don't be such a lazy twit. That comment's only valid *after* you've proved to yourself that the GP is deluded. You didn't even try!

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    26. Re:Still in violation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Stalin didn't just prevent food from reaching thease people. Thease people at the time were the largest producer of grain in USSR. Starving someone like that requires a very particular kind of effort.

    27. Re:Still in violation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The word starts with a G, everyone who insists otherwise speaks Ukrainian. Golodomor. Insensitive clods!

    28. Re:Still in violation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This isnt some novel event. N.K gets about 85% of its food supply from foreign aid, and their aggressiin and tests last year are part if the cyclical event where they act unruly and later receive food. Veen going on for decades.

    29. Re:Still in violation by Existential+Wombat · · Score: 1

      What's the saying?

      Fool me once - shame on you,
      Fool me twice...

    30. Re:Still in violation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      either a military coupe from within

      Subliminal car analogy detected...

    31. Re:Still in violation by jc42 · · Score: 1

      Perhaps it's all smoke in mirrors

      I wonder what that looks like.

      Look behind you!

      (Actually, it's a nice eggcorn. If you don't know the term, google it. ;-)

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    32. Re:Still in violation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      North Korea saw true famine in the 90s ...

      Citation, please.

      Ever heard of Wikipedia, or Google, or iXQuick, or Bing, ...? Don't be such a lazy twit. That comment's only valid *after* you've proved to yourself that the GP is deluded. You didn't even try!

      I believe the poster was requesting a citation for this part of what was posted

      Famine only proves to the people of North Korea that we are their enemies and only the Kims are keeping them alive.

      This admittedly is a little difficult to find.

    33. Re:Still in violation by mug+funky · · Score: 2

      fuck man, thanks for the nightmares. i wish i hadn't read that.

      happy to be living in a rich country...

    34. Re:Still in violation by mug+funky · · Score: 1

      how exactly can one produce weapons with a light water reactor?

      i suppose you could let the coolant drain out of it, but it's not exactly aircraft deliverable.

    35. Re:Still in violation by dbIII · · Score: 1

      That's how they've operated for well over a decade. Will threaten for food.

      A friend's mother used to run a thriving seafood import/export business between North Korea and the landlocked province of China bordering it. North Korea was very productive as it recovered from the Japanese and could easily feed itself. Then things went to shit so badly that not only was there not enough fish to export (and she stayed in China on fear of arrest and execution for daring to travel), but after a while people were eating tree bark and possibly each other. The death toll from starvation was apparently into the millions. The famines in North Korea were entirely due to there being nowhere near enough people producing food due to a totalitarian government decreeing that they should be doing other things. It's a terrifying example of micromanagement taken to insane levels. Even Mao's China was seen as the land of freedom and prosperity in comparison. Of course things are now far worse in North Korea and far better in China.

    36. Re:Still in violation by grainofsand · · Score: 1

      The agreement you refer was a bilateral agreement that would have resulted in North Korea receiving a light-water reactor in exchange for its undertakings not to proceed with a heavy-water system.

      The agreement you refer to was unilaterally broken and not by North Korea.
         

      --
      A dream is good. A plan is better.
    37. Re:Still in violation by tqk · · Score: 1

      I believe the poster was requesting a citation for this part of what was posted

      Famine only proves to the people of North Korea that we are their enemies and only the Kims are keeping them alive.

      If so, Stockholm Syndrome and Battered Wife Syndrome are both fairly common knowledge, and both seem applicable. However, apologies to the GP if I supposed too much. I'm just tired of seeing that "citation $whatever" from too many people who ought to know better.

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    38. Re:Still in violation by noh8rz2 · · Score: 0

      let me get my woosh racquet. when somebody says [citation needed] or something similar, they don't actually mean that they'd like a citation. it's a snarky way of calling somebody's BS. blowhards respond with lmgtfy mofo! but it's really just a put down.

    39. Re:Still in violation by cold+fjord · · Score: 2

      happy to be living in a rich country...

      It isn't a question of wealth. It is a question of being ruled by cruel, sadistic despot with nearly unlimited power and a cult of personality - the very thing that seems to be a regular outcome of Communist governments.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    40. Re:Still in violation by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      military coupe

      So, does this count as our obligatory car analogy?

      Depends - is it de ville, d'etat, or d'oeil?

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    41. Re:Still in violation by Antarius · · Score: 1

      Google Holodomor

      Is this the latest Google offering? I'll pass on the "exclusive invite" thanks...

    42. Re:Still in violation by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      In evaluating North Korea one is always left wondering, how did they manage to pack so much evil in such a little can with such a long shelf life?

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    43. Re:Still in violation by Dzimas · · Score: 1

      The Romans and Napoleon understood that Stalin would one day fear famine? ;) I think that all leaders fear famine, because [your city here] wouldn't be a very nice place with marauding bands of starving hoodlums on the hunt for food.

    44. Re:Still in violation by dbIII · · Score: 2

      Among other things it's a capital crime for the older citizens to tell the younger ones what it used to be like.

    45. Re:Still in violation by cold+fjord · · Score: 2

      That is quite chilling. I'll add to the pot. (A tip of the hat to you, sir.)

      . . . In recent years, I have spent many hours interviewing refugees from North Korea, including some who escaped from re-education camps. Their accounts of prison life accord with a recent assessment by the U.S. State Department. Conditions are brutal and life threatening, according to the February report. "Torture occurred," the report notes matter-of-factly. Refugees have spoken to me of newborns separated from their mothers and left to die.

      North Koreans can end up in re-education camps for such crimes as listening to foreign radio broadcasts, secretly practicing a religion, or crossing the border to China in search of food. Inmates are subjected to forced labor and are required to memorize political tracts. They receive little food, no medical care and sometimes serve multiyear terms wearing the clothes in which they arrived at camp. I interviewed a woman who had been wearing high heels when she was arrested and had to bind her feet in rags when those wore out. Many prisoners die of abuse or malnutrition.

      Political prisoners are held under even harsher conditions in kwan li so penal camps. The Committee for Human Rights in North Korea estimates the number of political prisoners at 200,000; the State Department puts it at between 150,000 and 200,000. Political offenses include such crimes as sitting on a newspaper that contains a picture of dictator Kim Jong Il. Punishment is often collective and can extend to three generations of the offender's entire family.

      Shin Dong-Hyok may be the only person to have escaped from a kwan li so camp. Mr. Shin, now in his mid-20s and living in Seoul, was born and spent the first 22 years of his life in Camp No. 14, a so-called total control facility. In an interview at The Wall Street Journal's headquarters in New York last year, Mr. Shin spoke of growing up. His formal education was limited to the rudiments of reading and writing. Because political prisoners are usually incarcerated for life, the camps don't bother with political re-education; Mr. Shin said he didn't even know who Kim Jong Il was until after his escape. Nor did he understand the concept of money until, after his escape, he walked through a market and noticed bits of colored paper being exchanged for food.

      At 12 or 13 -- he is unsure of the year in which he was born -- he was forced to watch the executions of his mother, who was hanged, and his brother, who was shot. They had attempted to escape. Hoping to pry information out of him -- Mr. Shin had none -- camp officials bound the boy's hands and feet, embedded a hook in his groin and dangled him over a fire. In the Journal's conference room, Mr. Shin pulled up a leg of his trousers to show me the scars. . . . -- Inside North Korea's Gulag

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    46. Re:Still in violation by MechaStreisand · · Score: 2

      Congratulations, sir, on posting the single most horrifying thing I've ever read.

      --
      Disclaimer: IANAL. This post is, however, legal advice, and creates an attorney-client relationship.
    47. Re:Still in violation by SnowZero · · Score: 1

      Quite debatable:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agreed_Framework#Final_break_down_of_the_agreement

      And while I can see why some people don't trust the US, taking the side of North Korea is a little bit odd considering they detonated a nuclear device within 3 years of the talks breaking down, and only 2 years after work on the LWRs ceased. Even the Manhattan Project took 6 years and NK has nowhere near those kind of resources to spend ($25B, 100K people). They were also under sanctions at the time and struggling with famine. Even given modern engineering knowledge, it greatly stretches credibility that they would go from nothing to working bomb in 2-3 years.

      The far more likely scenario is that they were lying to the world the entire time and never stopped working on a bomb. In a completely closed society -- why wouldn't you? You can say anything to get what you want, while violating any promises made in secret. It's win-win for them. Now they get to do it all over again; yay for US election years.

    48. Re:Still in violation by stevencbrown · · Score: 1

      What's the saying?

      Fool me once - shame on you,
      Fool me twice...

      Fool me twice.... can't get fooled again!

    49. Re:Still in violation by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      What about the threat of the US invading? If the US decided to take out North Korea all they could do is appeal to the Chinese for support. Nukes and the ability to deliver them long range are the only certain way to prevent an attack. Iran is in the same boat, driven to nuclear weapons because their opponent's forces are so overwhelming.

      North Korea also needs to develop its economy if it ever wants to improve life for its citizens. I know, getting rid of the dictatorship should be the first first, but clearly they are never going to agree to that so let's look at what comes next. They need energy and don't have much in the way of natural resources, and all of their neighbours (China, South Korea, Japan) use nuclear. Just saying "we don't like you, you can't have it" isn't going to work.

      I'm not defending North Korea's neglect and abuse of its citizens here, I'm just pointing out the reality of the situation.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    50. Re:Still in violation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How ironic. Apparently all N. Korea has to do to get it's free lunch is... nothing. I'd call it extortion but, while I realize the dangers of certain countries having nuclear weapons, I don't believe we have the right to deny them or dictate to other countries. But that's just me.

      You're ignoring a minor little detail. Both North and South Korea claim to be the sole legitimate government of the country of Korea. The only reason anybody considers the North to be anything is because China backed them enough to cause a stalemate during the Korean Civil War.
      It's a really strange political situation, which is two "de facto" countries which aren't really countries, but kind of are, so we all sort of pretend to get along most of the time.

      What they want the nukes for is so they can finally end the stalemate... but they aren't willing to accept two countries, they want the whole pie. If they ever get their hands on them, they will most certainly use the threat to try and force an official surrender from the South, and there's a good chance they'd actually use the things. There is a very good reason why China was never willing to give them nukes or even put a Chinese-controlled installation in the country.

      So while I would generally agree that it's not really within our "rights" to dictate such things to countries in general, in this case we're an Ally in a civil war which is technically still being fought, so we do have a direct interest in keeping such a weapon out of the hands of our Ally's enemy. And by extension, we do have a "right" to do so as well.

    51. Re:Still in violation by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

      "There are those like the Postmodern sophist Slavoj iek who argue that Stalin's crimes were his aberrational distortion of an otherwise admirably utopian Marxist-Leninism whose reputation still deserves respect and maybe a Lacanian tweak in light of the genocidal reality of Marxist/Leninist regimes. But can one really separate an ideology from the genocides repeatedly committed in its name?"

      We do this all the time. It's quite possible that more people have died in the name of religion than Hitler or Stalin managed. Yet we seem to have little problem promoting these ideologies every day.

    52. Re:Still in violation by Specter · · Score: 1

      I would also strongly recommend Nothing to Envy. It's a quick read and gives some pretty chilling insights into how the North Korean regime operates. It is not a pretty picture; think 1984 and you won't be far off.

    53. Re:Still in violation by Specter · · Score: 1

      Citation, please.

      Nothing to Envy

    54. Re:Still in violation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wikipedia about Holodomor: Total deaths 2.4 - 7.5 million (scholarly estimates).4.5 million, 10 million (some claims). Those are dead people. Much more people were starving. And mean time, Stalin was exporting grain from USSR.

    55. Re:Still in violation by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      North Korea isn't (just - they might be...) researching nuclear power, they actually developed and tested nuclear bombs and continue to enrich uranium.

      Russia had thousands of nuclear bombs during the cold war, the only thing that did was increase the threat of the US bombing them. Something along the lines of "The enemy has nukes, any declaration of war must wipe them out entirely in the first strike, or risk a nuclear retaliation"

    56. Re:Still in violation by Anguirel · · Score: 1

      They're allowed to build, maintain, and run nuclear power facilities, as long as they aren't their current inefficient ones that have the power generation as a side effect to creating enriched weapons-grade uranium.

      --
      ~Anguirel (lit. Living Star-Iron)
      QA: The art of telling someone that their baby is ugly without getting punched.
    57. Re:Still in violation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      where's +5 horrific?

    58. Re:Still in violation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow I would have really appreciated a disclaimer on that.

    59. Re:Still in violation by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Just saying "we don't like you, you can't have it" isn't going to work.

      Well, that isn't completely certain yet - we can always see how the inspections go. However, if they still end up stonewalling there is always the invasion option. Main issue there is likely attacks on South Korea - even if their territory doesn't end up being used in the attack.

      There is no reason that the world has to settle for a solution that the dictators in charge of North Korea are willing to accept.

      If I were a sociopath in charge of NK, I'd probably keep oppressing my people and building nukes to extort foreign aid, because I'd realize that everybody else is too afraid to stop me. If I thought that other nations were actually willing to stop me, then I'd probably act differently in the interest of self-preservation.

  3. Metric 'Tons'? by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    TONNES!!! /. is truly broken today

    --
    http://www.acetonestudio.com
    1. Re:Metric 'Tons'? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, most people with a sound knowledge of English know that A) a ton and a tonne are not the same thing and B) the E in English should be capitalized.

    2. Re:Metric 'Tons'? by Guppy06 · · Score: 4, Funny

      You misspelled "megagram."

    3. Re:Metric 'Tons'? by NatasRevol · · Score: 2

      You mean mebigram???

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    4. Re:Metric 'Tons'? by wmaker · · Score: 1

      1 metric ton = 1 tonne
      1 ton = .90718474 tonnes

    5. Re:Metric 'Tons'? by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

      Idiot!

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
    6. Re:Metric 'Tons'? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, Megagram(!), arch foe of Motha, sometimes ally of Godzilla, has been spotted just outside Tokyo heading toward Pyongyang! Drawn to the nourishing rays of atomic force emanating from deep within the earth in a secret North Korean weapons lab, Megagram will be there in mere hours! Little do the North Koreans suspect that the weapons program decreed by the Great Leader, nourished by Dear Leader, and now watched in bafflement by Nearly a Leader, might prove to be their undoing! With a jump that leaves Osaka shaking, Megagram takes to the sky, flying like a new moon low in the sky! On to Pyongyang! Drawn by its hunger, Megagram flies faster and faster!

      We interrupt this news broadcast for another installment of What the Party does with your food money.

    7. Re:Metric 'Tons'? by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

      Show me/demonstrate to me/explain to me a metric inch; a metric ounce; a metric mile; a metric pint; a metric mile. Car analogy: How many metric miles can you get from your leeeeter of, like gas? Fucked up US. Fucked up /. A lot of clever people with limited focus. Widen it people. Seriously.

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
  4. Suspend not end by Perl-Pusher · · Score: 2

    Played this game before. As soon as the food arrives they will go back to business as usual. Maybe pump a few more billion counterfeit $100 bills on the European markets.

    1. Re:Suspend not end by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes. Once again, the West plays grocery store to NK, propping up the dictatorship so they can continue development of nuclear weapons, sell military tech to our enemies, shell South Korea and oppress their own people to the point of starvation. The phrase rinse and repeat comes to mind.

    2. Re:Suspend not end by MozeeToby · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The only way keeping food aide out of North Korea is going to take down the dictatorship is if so many North Korean civilians die of starvation that there aren't enough peasants left to support the military. The upper levels just don't care if their people die, and the common people are too overworked, hungry, brainwashed, and outnumbered to even consider rising up in rebellion.

    3. Re:Suspend not end by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The lack of food giveaways may not bring down the NK dictatorship, but the presence of the aid helps it. Why pay to help a government that is so immutably hostile to us? It does nothing to further our interests. We get no real concessions, just lip service until they have extracted more tribute from us. This is not theoretical, we have been down this road many times before and NK has proven themselves reliably dishonest.

      NK is China's client state, let China feed their populace.

    4. Re:Suspend not end by PRMan · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There is a new leader. A goodwill gesture toward getting him to be friends with the international community is not a lost cause. He is not his father and may decide that he would rather move in the direction that China has moved. This is a good move for the US to make.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    5. Re:Suspend not end by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There is a new leader. A goodwill gesture toward getting him to be friends with the international community is not a lost cause.

      I like your optimism. Mine is exhausted by decades of history on this issue, but I salute your willingness to try again.

    6. Re:Suspend not end by dave420 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Decades of history of NK under Jong-un? Interesting.

    7. Re:Suspend not end by clarkkent09 · · Score: 1

      My used car salesman would love you as a customer. NK regime is not as crazy as it looks. It already has all the nukes it needs, this deal does not dismantle them. Why not make a deal with Obama by giving him what he needs in an election year (a bogus promise of peace that appeals to his naive base) and it gets what it needs, free food supplies for its starving population who are starving because if the regime's policies in the first place. Win-win! After the election it's just another attempt at a deal that didn't work, oh well.

      --
      Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
    8. Re:Suspend not end by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      He is also knows food very well. You just need to look at the size of his military uniform.

    9. Re:Suspend not end by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1

      Of course not, I was clearly talking about decades of dictatorship under a ruling family. Kim Jong-il was no better than his father Kim il-sung, even though some people said initially it was a chance for a fresh start. There is no reason or history to suggest Kim Jong-un will be better than his father.

      You may choose to ignore that history, but I don't.

    10. Re:Suspend not end by mug+funky · · Score: 1

      it's nukes are fizzers. they haven't the capacity to make a useful one.

      from their test record, as soon as they get enough plutonium, they blow it up. i doubt they're stockpiling if they can't spare enough Pu to rattle their sabre.

    11. Re:Suspend not end by SnEptUne · · Score: 2

      You sound like bringing down dictators is a good thing. People in authority are anointed, and with power comes responsibility. One may argue that someone may not be doing their jobs well enough, but why this zeal for outing someone because of a label of dictator? Dictator or not, as long as they are doing reasonbly enough for their own people (including military), they are good government.

    12. Re:Suspend not end by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      Decades of history of NK under Jong-un? Interesting.

      Did the Party and military apparatus change with him?

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
  5. Been there, done that by icebike · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm more than a little Tired of reading about all these triumphant negotiation sessions over the years where NK promises to be a good boy just long enough to get the trade concessions, only to violate the agreement shortly there after. This is like the third or forth president in a row that has been duped by these tactics. As each agreement falls apart, there are the usual dire warnings about "grave consequences". These are the code words by which the US State Department looks tough, but signals the other side that the only "grave" involved is the one in which the whole issue will be buried as soon as the grandstanding is over with.

    Son of Whack-Job, and Grandson of Whack-a-Doodle has absolutely no incentive to honor this agreement any more than his predecessors did the prior ones. However, a certain government leader needs a feather in his re-election hat. So we get another useless agreement with a perpetual liar state.

     

    --
    Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    1. Re:Been there, done that by tomhath · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Oh for some mod points...

      Yea, Six Party talks, humanitarian assistance, blah, blah, blah. Instead of giving them the reward ahead of time, how about an agreement where they have to do something first and get the carrot afterward?

    2. Re:Been there, done that by Joce640k · · Score: 5, Insightful

      A lot of oppressed, hungry people will get some food to eat. It will be like Christmas for them.

      Isn't that a good enough reason to allow yourself to be "duped" once in a while...?

      --
      No sig today...
    3. Re:Been there, done that by MozeeToby · · Score: 2

      The plain fact of the matter is that people are starving in North Korea, not a handful, not by the hundreds, but by the thousands or tens of thousands. I'm well away that giving food aid is seen by some as supporting the regime but in all honesty I don't see the people of North Korea rising up to overthrow their oppressors in any event. Given the choice between letting tens of thousands of people die so that we can look tough or sending some food... I'm gonna send the food. I may as well try to get some concessions, even temporary ones, as part of the bargain.

    4. Re:Been there, done that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Son of Whack-Job, and Grandson of Whack-a-Doodle has absolutely no incentive to honor this agreement

      This. Khadaffy honored his agreements with the West and look what his reward was.

    5. Re:Been there, done that by ZeroSumHappiness · · Score: 2

      We sat to the side for decades upon decades until the people of Libya gave us the choice of allowing them to be slaughtered or giving minimal aid that allows for self-governance? I think he got a pretty good deal out of it, really.

    6. Re:Been there, done that by icebike · · Score: 1

      We sat to the side for decades upon decades until the people of Libya gave us the choice of allowing them to be slaughtered or giving minimal aid that allows for self-governance? I think he got a pretty good deal out of it, really.

      And you sound like EXACTLY the type of person that would have bitched loudly had we not "sat to the side" for decades.

      We got nothing out of this except a dumping ground for excess grain inventory that might not depress market prices by being resold.
      That's fine, bill it as humanitarian aid, and call it done. But trying to suggest we got a nuclear deal out of the bargain is simply
      unbelievable.

      If anything this signals that China is getting fed up with feeding NK.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    7. Re:Been there, done that by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      The plain fact of the matter is that people are starving in North Korea, not a handful, not by the hundreds, but by the thousands or tens of thousands.

      Guess what everyone wants to do to Iran?

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    8. Re:Been there, done that by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A lot of oppressing, poorly-fed soldiers will get more food to eat plus some for their relatives. It will be like Christmas for them as they get to use the extra food to reward their favorites.

      Isn't that a good enough reason to allow yourself to be "duped" once in a while...?

      FTFY

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    9. Re:Been there, done that by Brett+Buck · · Score: 1

      What makes you think this is going to help the poor people in North Korea. Dollars to donuts, this food gets resold to generate cash which is then used to prop up the regime. Which, in a few months, will restart (assuming they ever stopped) their nuclear and missile programs.

    10. Re:Been there, done that by ArsonSmith · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This is like coming to a conclusion with an abusive husband that you'll supply his wife with band-aids.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    11. Re:Been there, done that by TheSync · · Score: 1

      Given the choice between letting tens of thousands of people die so that we can look tough or sending some food... I'm gonna send the food.

      Much of the food is likely to end up profiting government elites...exactly how much will make it to the starving masses is unclear.

    12. Re:Been there, done that by icebike · · Score: 2

      A lot of oppressed, hungry people will get some food to eat. It will be like Christmas for them.

      Isn't that a good enough reason to allow yourself to be "duped" once in a while...?

      Sure. Humanitarian aid is fine.

      Just don't sell it as a nuclear agreement.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    13. Re:Been there, done that by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

      im all for it as long as one thing is sorted

      MAKE SURE THAT THE POOR FOLKS ACTUALLY GET FED.

      If the papers say that this block was given X pounds of rice , Y dozen jars of Kimchee and Z pounds of chicken then i want to see proof that it landed up on tables in that block.

      Otherwise it will be shunted to some warehouse sold and things will be WORSE

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
    14. Re:Been there, done that by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      This is like coming to a conclusion with an abusive husband that you'll supply his wife with band-aids.

      No, it's like coming to a conclusion with an abusive husband that you'll supply *him* with band-aids, with the assurance that they'll be used to treat his wife. You never actually get to see if the band-aids are used that way, though.

    15. Re:Been there, done that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, like the elite are going to be out in the streets of Tokyo hawking the stockpiles of food... Seriously, where else but the NK population are you envisioning this aid is going to go?

    16. Re:Been there, done that by Bardwick · · Score: 1

      How many times will you do that to a openly hostile military based nation with nuclear weapons? Most of the food will feed the army, who just recently threatened war over being able to see christmas lights across the border? I have no problem sending them food, as long as the people that recieve it are told that it came from the United States.

    17. Re:Been there, done that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A good deal? He's dead, dumbass.

      We're talking about the WMD deal of 2003. Decades? 2011 (year of his death) - 2003 (year of the WMD deal) = 8

    18. Re:Been there, done that by khallow · · Score: 2

      Let's not go crazy here. They wouldn't agree to that sort of thing, because that would mean they'd have to do something.

    19. Re:Been there, done that by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      Just as long as every single tin of Spam has the US State Department seal stamped into the side of it, so that the people know where it came from.

      Enough is enough.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    20. Re:Been there, done that by Viewsonic · · Score: 1

      There is a big different now. Their previous policies were under the new deceased leader who was very isolationist by nature. His son, was traveled and educated in and around Europe growing up. He knows how the world works, and enjoyed many of the freedoms that came with it.

      That is the only reason we are talking. If Kim were still alive, we would have never bothered. However, his son may have different ideas how he would like to run the country.

    21. Re:Been there, done that by SplashMyBandit · · Score: 1

      I read that apparently the streets of Pyongyang are often lined with US flags. This is because the US aid comes in large sacks with US flags stamped on them. The populace then puts these handy sacks to all sorts of uses - which results in the US flag being everywhere. Quite ironic.

    22. Re:Been there, done that by icebike · · Score: 2

      Not this son.

      That was the other son, the one that was passed over for the throne, -, er, ah, chairmanship.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    23. Re:Been there, done that by SplashMyBandit · · Score: 2

      Actually much of the aid food is distributed to the elites for loyalty, hoarded by the North Korean Army and Secret Police units, or sold over the border in China for luxuries for the elites. There is some benefit for giving food aid but there is no doubt it is propping up the evil North Korean government and prolonging the misery of the citizens. As harsh as it is to say, the strategic view would be to not give the aid *until* the North Koreans had proven they'd given up nuclear arms - not give the aid first (which has been shown for the last three decades to be a waste of time; the citizens still don't get enough and the government always reneges on its promises; and still sends saboteurs and assassins into South Korea on a routine basis - did you know that?).

    24. Re:Been there, done that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, like the elite are going to be out in the streets of Tokyo hawking the stockpiles of food... Seriously, where else but the NK population are you envisioning this aid is going to go?

      I dunno, but probably not Tokyo..

    25. Re:Been there, done that by izomiac · · Score: 1

      OTOH, it enables them to continue in their current state. Hopefully that state is improved with the new regime, but if it's not then we've just prolonged it.

    26. Re:Been there, done that by gorzek · · Score: 1

      "Population" is a really vague descriptor, don't you think? North Korea has roughly 21 million people. With some very, very rough calculations, 240,000 metric tons of food is a bit over 5 days' worth of food for all 21 million people. Of course, there are massive variables here, like how much food each person would really get, and how long all this is meant to last, but I'm just trying to illustrate that this isn't very much food in terms of any sort of long-term assistance for the whole country. It will be rationed and most likely hoarded by those in positions of political/military power, so it will primarily benefit the regime, not the citizenry as a whole.

      Further talks with North Korea are important, though, and I hope some good comes of this eventually.

    27. Re:Been there, done that by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      That should be modded +20 insightful and informative.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    28. Re:Been there, done that by Tyler+Durden · · Score: 1

      Sometimes you wish you could just go at such an oppressive, fucked up regime with no more half-measures.

      --
      Happy people make bad consumers.
    29. Re:Been there, done that by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      Instead of giving them the reward ahead of time, how about an agreement where they have to do something first and get the carrot afterward?
      No, we can't do that. We are trying to convert them to western thought. This is where you get the shiny thing you want now, then have to work for it to pay it, but then you get tired of working, and the shiny thing is not longer as interesting so you don't care to continue working so hard to pay for it.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    30. Re:Been there, done that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No it isn't. As horrible as allowing the people of NK to starve is, it is even more horrible to continue this cycle. Only the people of NK can bring about change and the only way they will be motivated to do so, apparently, is when they think they will suffer more with the latest Son of a Nut Job then without him. How many have to die is entirely up to them. I understand that they're operating under a delusional state that lies to them at every turn but to continue to play this game just means more generations will suffer. Let them endure the pain now to end it forever.

  6. Hmm... by KBehemoth · · Score: 1

    These 240,000 metric tons of nutritional assistance... surely these will be cakes?

  7. North Korea agrees ... by jamesl · · Score: 1

    ... to suspend nuclear activities.

    Again.

    1. Re:North Korea agrees ... by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Perhaps the new leader is a bit more sane, and actually looking for the welfare of his country. We have a younger leader who never really really felt the strong hand of the cold war or the revolution. He probably has a more world view that in order for his country to succeed that it needs to dig it self out of its own mess.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    2. Re:North Korea agrees ... by ZeroSumHappiness · · Score: 1

      Assuming he's really the leader of course.

    3. Re:North Korea agrees ... by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      Or, he's counting on the optimistic left to get duped into thinking that, again; and just like in a Peanuts comic where Charlie Brown is going to kick the football, Lucy just yanks it away one more time.

      I believe the phrase you're looking for here is "oh, bother."

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    4. Re:North Korea agrees ... by dave420 · · Score: 1

      So let's not even try once?

      And it's "Oh, brother", not "Oh, bother".

    5. Re:North Korea agrees ... by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1

      Maybe he couldn't type that lette because his ' ' key was boken, peventing him fom spelling it coectly.

    6. Re:North Korea agrees ... by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      The point of the comparison, is that we've been down this road multiple times before, and clearly we're going for another lap. The last two Presidents got them to stop with the nuke stuff, just to have them throw out the inspectors and start up again. You can practically set your watch to it.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
  8. China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Things won't change until China gets on board.

    The last thing we'll do is get into another conflict and repeat the Korean War - everybody knows this.

    1. Re:China by icebike · · Score: 2

      Actually, China has been feeding NK for 10s years. It dropped somewhat in 2008 due to shortages in China, (in fact China has started importing grain from Kazakhstan in 2010). Russia, on the other hand has stepped up their humanitarian aid to NK in recent years.

      NK provides the crazy uncle that China needs to cover some of the things it does in regard to Tibet, Taiwan, and Iran. China is not going to get on board with any program of regime change in NK.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    2. Re:China by VikingOfNorth · · Score: 3, Interesting

      NK provides the crazy uncle that China needs to cover some of the things it does in regard to Tibet, Taiwan, and Iran. China is not going to get on board with any program of regime change in NK.

      I know this isn't of much value since I can't quote my references, but I remember hearing/reading about this particular matter and it actually seems China is getting slightly frustrated with its "crazy uncle". It makes sense, actually: NK requires a lot of material aid yet provides very little of concrete value in return. The only thing China really wants from NK is to act as a strong buffer against the capitalistic influence of SK, and by now, I suppose they've realized that this particular concern is rather insignificant. If NK becomes even more dependant on Chinese aid, it's possible that even China will have a change of mind.

      It's also hard to believe that China is particularly happy about a "new" nuclear power rising very close to it's borders, especially since the ruling despot family has proven to be very eager to test its arsenal every once in a while.

      --
      "I'm just here for the achievements"
    3. Re:China by icebike · · Score: 2

      The only thing China really wants from NK is to act as a strong buffer against the capitalistic influence of SK,

      And a sock puppet to export nuclear and missile technology to Syria, Iran, Hamas, Burma and probably a few other places.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    4. Re:China by DaleSwanson · · Score: 1

      You may be remembering the Wikileaks cables.
      http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/nov/29/wikileaks-cables-china-reunified-korea

      The two officials, Chun said, were ready to 'face the new reality' that the DPRK [North Korea] now had little value to China as a buffer state – a view that, since North Korea's first nuclear test in 2006, had reportedly gained traction among senior PRC [People's Republic of China] leaders. Chun argued that in the event of a North Korean collapse, China would clearly 'not welcome' any US military presence north of the DMZ [demilitarised zone]. Again citing his conversations with [the officials], Chun said the PRC would be comfortable with a reunified Korea controlled by Seoul and anchored to the US in a 'benign alliance' – as long as Korea was not hostile towards China. Tremendous trade and labour-export opportunities for Chinese companies, Chun said, would also help 'salve' PRC concerns about a reunified Korea.

  9. Now we're in trouble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When North Korea kept saying how it was becoming a nuclear power and testing missiles, you knew they pretty much were having a strongman throw wood-and-crushed-soda-can toasters into the ocean. Now, perhaps, they've managed to actually do something.

  10. North Korea promises it will (AGAIN) by Bardwick · · Score: 0

    The first time they promised they ment it. Second time they REALLY ment it. It's different this time though, this time they REALLY REALLY mean it. In other news, a spoiled little brat isn't getting attention so he's acting out.. news at 11.

  11. As Usual... by JeanCroix · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Hoping for the best, expecting the worst. Could the change in leadership really amount to actual change this quickly?

    1. Re:As Usual... by Viewsonic · · Score: 1

      Yes. Remember his son was educated in the outside world. He was not brought up in isolation. Granted, that doesn't mean he doesn't hold views of his father, but there is hope that he may be tired of his country being the poor kid on the block. He might also care for his people more as well. Maybe he has aspirations to better his people rather than complain that the world is at fault instead.

    2. Re:As Usual... by JeanCroix · · Score: 3, Interesting

      All that may be true, but I think the bigger question would be about his father's cronies who are still there. Just because he's the new leader, it doesn't necessarily follow that he immediately has all of his father's power and influence. And if he moves too quickly away from the policies of the past, I'm sure it could put him at risk within his own power structure. NK is about to enter "interesting times," for better or worse.

  12. Three biggest lies ... by jamesl · · Score: 2

    I'm from corporate and I'm here to help.
    The check's in the mail.
    Korea agrees to suspend nuclear activities.

    1. Re:Three biggest lies ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot 'I won't come in your mouth'.

  13. In related news... by TheDan666 · · Score: 2

    North Korea describes fantastic bridge you can buy.

  14. Suspending... by zrbyte · · Score: 1

    ... until the next shipment of food aid is within the country borders. Then, they'll just go back to sabre rattling.

  15. It's a job for... by busyqth · · Score: 1

    North Korea has agreed to allow International Atomic Energy Agency inspectors to verify and monitor the moratorium on uranium enrichment and confirm disablement of its nuclear reactor at Yongbyon.

    Hans Brix!

  16. Great Success! by Desler · · Score: 1

    Great Success! Eternal Leader would be proud.

    -Great Successor

  17. Not that they needed nukes to begin with... by l00sr · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Unlike, say, Iran, NK doesn't actually need nukes to level its sworn enemy. It would probably be faster and more convenient to just level Seoul with conventional artillery. Is there any doubt that their nuclear program is just a bartering commodity for aid?

    1. Re:Not that they needed nukes to begin with... by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      There's also money to selling either the refined material or other components to make a bomb. I'm sure Iran among other nations are one some sort of waiting list to purchase at a moments notice.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    2. Re:Not that they needed nukes to begin with... by SplashMyBandit · · Score: 1

      North Korea is a known source of proliferation of nuclear and ballistic missile technology (where it can sneak them past the eyes of the international community). It is also known to use diplomatic immunity to transport in drugs such as heroin and very high quality counterfeit US currency (made using NK government printing presses using ink from the same Scandinavian supplier the US does). It is a good thing to get rid of their nuke programme.

    3. Re:Not that they needed nukes to begin with... by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 2

      Unlike, say, Iran, NK doesn't actually need nukes to level its sworn enemy. It would probably be faster and more convenient to just level Seoul with conventional artillery. Is there any doubt that their nuclear program is just a bartering commodity for aid?

      Seoul, yes. Large SK and US troop concentrations farther south, not so much. It's always difficult to understand the thinking of a government as notably insane as NK's, but I think there is a definite miltary aspect to their nuclear program as well as the obvious "bargaining chip" aspect. If NK ever does develop an arsenal of nukes that can be carried by SRBM -- and by "arsenal" I mean ten or twenty warheads -- they could, to put it mildly, seriously impede the ability of UN forces to operate on the peninsula.

      This of course assumes that the US answer to the destruction of Kunsan AB, for example, wouldn't just be to make Pyongyang and all the major NK bases go up in a flash. And I don't think anyone really knows the answer to that.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    4. Re:Not that they needed nukes to begin with... by Koreantoast · · Score: 1

      The nuclear weapons program is also equally about buying off the Korean Workers' Army. Generals like shiny toys, and few things are shinier for a third world dictatorship than a nuclear weapon.

  18. Kim Jong-un by PPH · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You get one chance to keep your word. This is it.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:Kim Jong-un by Myopic · · Score: 1

      I doubt it. We'll see this headline in 2018, except where today it reads "Barack Obama", then it will say "Jeb Bush".

      But, I share your hope, just not much of it.

    2. Re:Kim Jong-un by I+Read+Good · · Score: 1

      Well, yeah, that's how it's SUPPOSED to work. You really think there will be any "serious consequences" if he doesn't hold up his part of the bargain? The cake will have been eaten by then, after all.

    3. Re:Kim Jong-un by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's nice if you're in any possition of authority but you're not. I find too many people like to make up their own rules and plaster it as a sunny face on a rather bad situation. Either he will change or we'll be in for more of the same. No one is going to step in to take care of this problem outright.

  19. I've seen this movie before. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me five or six times... and I'm an American diplomat dealing with North Korea.

    1. Re:I've seen this movie before. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Or a Chicago Cubs fan.

  20. It's either this or send in the Marines by Darth_brooks · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Talk is cheap, but at least it's cheaper than body bags. I do like that even the most official statements on this seem to be the equivalent of "Welp, here we go again."

    “The United States still has profound concerns regarding North Korean behavior across a wide range of areas, but today’s announcement reflects important, if limited, progress in addressing some of these,” said State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland.

    Those words were echoed by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who called the agreement a “modest first step in the right direction.”

    I think that's Pol-speak for "We've played this game before, we know how it ends, but what's the alternative?"

    --
    There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
    1. Re:It's either this or send in the Marines by jvkjvk · · Score: 1

      "We've played this game before, we know how it ends, but what's the alternative?"

      Let the implode. Let China deal with that problem, that they are creating, and have created.

      Let them do whatever they want, just don't give any energy until *after* a reversal.

      In my honest opinion, we are creating more suffering with our "help" through extending the lifelines of these Dictators than both the downward spiral and the short sharp shock that would follow from the people tyrannizing their former oppressors.

      I just don't believe the analysis that they are a threat to the US.

      Regards

    2. Re:It's either this or send in the Marines by I+Read+Good · · Score: 1

      I'm right there with you, but it's getting pretty meticulous. How about, if they don't stop nuclear production, drop leaflets warning the workers of the impending air-strike. Then do it. Remember, we are still technically at war with these assholes already.

    3. Re:It's either this or send in the Marines by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

      Your honest opinion is as good as genocide. Without food, the people will starve to death and the regime will not change anyway. That's an established fact based on previous famines. Perhaps after the majority of the country has died in famine the regime would collapse, but killing tens of millions of innocent people in order to bring down a regime you don't like is not acceptable to any decent human being. North Korea may kill a few people from time to time, but that doesn't justify wholesale slaughter of their people via sanctions combined with the withholding of food aid (remember that our sanctions and international pressure help create the famine, it's not as if we're uninvolved).

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    4. Re:It's either this or send in the Marines by Darth_brooks · · Score: 1

      "we are still technically at war with these assholes already."

      No, we're not. We never were. The US hasn't declared war on *anyone* since 1941 (or maybe '42, I'd have to look at the formal declarations to see if we declared war on any of the oddball puppet axis powers like Romania after the December 8th declaration of war.) Korea was a 'police action', but you are correct in that North Korea still says they're at war with the South (and anyone else.) It's a fine point, but the only people empowered to declare that a state of war exists between the United States and anyone else is Congress. Though as we've seen, the Commander in Chief can essentially ignore that point.

      --
      There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
    5. Re:It's either this or send in the Marines by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Let the implode. Let China deal with that problem, that they are creating, and have created.

      It's not China's problem, and in fact the North Korean government doesn't trust China due to their involvement in a coup some years ago to attempt to replace the Kim weirdos with something else. They just hate and mistrust China a bit less than everyone else.

    6. Re:It's either this or send in the Marines by jvkjvk · · Score: 1

      No.

      You are forgetting to add in the CONTINUED ABUSE, DECADES LONG.

      That's an established fact based on previous famines.

      EACH of which was alleviated by outside help! So, no. We don't know that the regime won't change. We haven't tried this.

      What we *have* established is that continuing to be a enabler of NK's abusive behaviours continues to cause famines. Over and over again. Now for 50 years! How many more decades of famines do we need to witness before stopping this? Is another 50 years enough to try something else?

      but killing tens of millions of innocent people in order to bring down a regime you don't like is not acceptable to any decent human being.

      Oh, so now it's because "I don't like the regime"! Of course! It has nothing to do with the type of human atrocities you are accusing me of trying to perpetrate.

      So, what you find acceptable is to financially support a government that 1) kills its people with impunity and 2) oppresses them in one of the most severe states in the WORLD.

      The only thing the bread is doing is allowing the NK circus to continue. That's it. You are in effect responsible for all the people that NK abuses here after. After all, by your logic it is *my* "fault" that NK would allow - as you say "tens of millions " to die rather than change the regime. Yeah, by not giving aid, I "caused" NK to kill it's own.

      This logic is fucked up, and most of the world doesn't even see it. So why are you continuing to abuse all those people in NK? Why is your money going to help abuse them? Perhaps you should do something about that.

      You are all so focused on the people currently living NOW. I am trying to focus on the least cost solution over all. Sometimes, that can be a bit disturbing, but that doesn't mean that you shouldn't also look at it.

      So. I see it as I said. Do it now. Stop being an enabler of an abusive government. That's a good thing in itself.

      Regards.

    7. Re:It's either this or send in the Marines by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      I suspect that the parent's point was that the reason that NK is run by a dictator was because of a stalemate in a war fought between the US, Russia, and China 60 years ago. The government of NK since then has only been able to operate in accordance with Chinese allowances. The last time NK started giving China a hard time they just shut off their oil for a few days.

  21. Why is the USA footing the bill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It seems like the USA is always picking up the tab on stuff like this. Why not NATO?

    1. Re:Why is the USA footing the bill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because you rednecks are always stupid enough to pick up the check?

    2. Re:Why is the USA footing the bill? by redneckmother · · Score: 1

      Because you rednecks are always stupid enough to pick up the check?

      I resemble that remark, you insensitive clod!

    3. Re:Why is the USA footing the bill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      pfft the rest of the world does what we tell them. if we wanted your money we'd take it and there's nothing you could do to stop us.

    4. Re:Why is the USA footing the bill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Possibly the rest of NATO don't think they are the world police?

  22. Free cake by docilespelunker · · Score: 1

    So, if I start a nuclear programme and then stop, someone will give me a quarter of a million tonnes of cake..? This could be worth a go!

  23. Part of the deal by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

    is that Best Korea will now be printing all 100 dollar bills and passing the savings along to the US Treasury. Plus some vague rider about extraditing Trey Parker and Matt Stone to Pyongyang.

  24. What a joke... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And the punch line is they were joking - right? Do moonbats love missing the football when Lucy pulls it away or what?

  25. Missing the point by IWantMoreSpamPlease · · Score: 2

    Somewhere in the insane ramblings of the original Kim was the comment that no great breakthrough can come without great struggle.

    Couple this ideology with the total worship of self-reliance and you can see where this is going:
    NK is too proud to ask for food from outsides (it would defeat their total self-reliance) even though it needs it, instead it rattles the sabre and makes threats, then 'agrees' to back down if the West will provide food.

    Wash, rinse, repeat. It all comes together if you keep the first fact in mind. This is the way of NK and will be until the gov't is removed from power.

    --
    So rise up, all ye lost ones, as one, we'll claw the clouds.
  26. Writes writes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who is this "Hugh Pickens writes" guy? I'd prefer if /. editors proofread proofread.

  27. Re:Randomly evil thought.. by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

    not a good idea since we have no problems with the NK people its the leaders we have problems with.

    Now maybe sneaking a few folks into place that can make the Leadership suddenly become very aware of Sight Lines (did you know that a british sniper has hit a target from 8120 feet away??) or otherwise feel UnSafe might do some good.

    --
    Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
  28. meanwhile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Meanwhile Israel continues to expand its nuclear weapons stockpile, and USA has no problems whatsoever with it (no, instead USA funds it). Talk about double standards..

    1. Re:meanwhile by Daetrin · · Score: 1

      I'm not saying it's good and i'm not saying it's bad, but "what you can get away with depends on how good of friends you are with the people who won the last big war" isn't called double standards, it's called how diplomacy has operated for pretty much all of human history.

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
  29. NK: China's Cheep Labor by TheWizardTim · · Score: 1

    I heard on the radio today that within 5 years we will see Chinese companies build factories in NK because the Chinese factory workers are starting to ask for too much money. Why pay a Chinese worker $1 an hour when you can pay $.05 an hour to a NK factory worker? China will continue to make products for the US, and products made for the Chinese market will be made in NK.

    1. Re:NK: China's Cheep Labor by HungWeiLo · · Score: 1

      This is not new. South Korea has been doing this for years. The Hyundai chaebol / business conglomerate has factories there along with some other companies.

      --
      There are a huge number of yeast infections in this county. Probably because we're downriver from the bread factory.
    2. Re:NK: China's Cheep Labor by Viewsonic · · Score: 1

      This would break a lot of trade laws. They can go ahead and do this, but any company found selling products that were made this way will be fined into oblivion, shut down, or jailed.

    3. Re:NK: China's Cheep Labor by SplashMyBandit · · Score: 1

      South Korea used to have joint industrial ventures with the North Koreans. That didn't stop the Norks from infiltrating assassins and saboteurs into the South. The Norks also set up industrial disputes to twist the arm of the South a lot too. Good luck to the Chinese if they make the same mistakes.

    4. Re:NK: China's Cheep Labor by tragedy · · Score: 1

      I don't think you read the parent post very carefully. Read the last line.

  30. Hungry Readers by Dareth · · Score: 1

    Still not a justification for all the "Duped" articles posted on Slashdot!

    But nice try anyway! :)

    --

    I only look human.
    My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
  31. econ 101 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I will smile when the North Korean government accepts this food aid, then exports it at the market price.

    lol

    1. Re:econ 101 by SplashMyBandit · · Score: 1

      Some portion of food aid is sold on Chinese markets to generate hard currency.

  32. The US has just tricked North Korea! by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

    North Korea thinks that it is getting food. Instead, . . .

    240,000 metric tons of nutritional assistance

    . . . consists of Happy Meals (with toys), Hostess Ding Dongs, Slurpees, Pork Skin Chips, Aerosol Easy Cheese, Chez Doodles, cotton candy, candy corn, etc.

    These highly pre-post-processed sugary food stuffs will transform them into fat, lazy drones, unable to construct complicated nuclear weapons.

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    1. Re:The US has just tricked North Korea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Brilliant!

      And to anyone who doubts the effectiveness of this strategy, look no further than the US to see how well it works!

      Just brilliant!

    2. Re:The US has just tricked North Korea! by gatkinso · · Score: 1

      It seems to be working wonders on the Chinese as well.

      --
      I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
  33. Cost effective by Livius · · Score: 1

    It's a long shot, but the price is cheap compared to wars.

  34. So inexpensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What amazes me about this is that it is so inexpensive for the US. Wheat is less than 300 per metric ton so this is only about $72,000,000. A round off error in the US debt and less than the negotiations probably cost.

  35. Re:Randomly evil thought.. by Daetrin · · Score: 1

    What would the point be? The people in question are already suffering from an insidious slow-acting poison called "not having any food." Do you think the people in North Korea who are actually causing the problems are suffering from any food shortages?

    Arguably the most evil thing we could do would be to give them a _lot_ of good and healthy food for a couple years, and then unexpectedly stop. Kind of the inverse of the "give a man a fish/teach a man to fish" thing.

    --
    This Space Intentionally Left Blank
  36. Yeeee-haaawwww by Kylon99 · · Score: 1

    Hugh Pickens? I imagined it was Slim Pickens himself, in a state of despair, at how there will be no need to let the nukes fly at N. Korea. Oh well, plenty of other ways to trigger the Doomsday device.

    (I'm going for that -1 Not Obscure Enough Reference Bastard rating!)

  37. Re:Randomly evil thought.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your suggestion gets pretty much a perfect 10 on the insanity meter.

  38. Everything is different [Re:Still in violation] by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 1

    More likely it's the new leader trying to shower his people with food to associate a good year with his rise to power--and an attempt at good will from the international community who are hoping they can relax.

    Exactly. It's worth noting that this is a completely new leader than Kim Jong-il, who is the one who set N. Korea to developing nuclear weapons. It's yet to be seen what he does.

    Most notably, Kim Jong-un was born nearly thirty years after the Korean war. His viewpoint on politics is going to be vastly different than the previous generation.

    That doesn't mean "celebrate, Korea is going to be a free country and flying unicorns are going to be dropping gold nuggets from the clouds." It does mean "things are likely to change, don't expect the new North Korea to be identical to the old one."

    --
    http://www.geoffreylandis.com
    1. Re:Everything is different [Re:Still in violation] by gtall · · Score: 1

      I see, so growing up a lil' Kimme in that family is somehow going to give him a vastly different outlook? Why? He's been indoctrinated from age -1. His experience is that N. Korea only gets something out of the West when they scream and kick, light off a few missiles, do the Nuke-1-2-Test-A-Step, etc.

      S. Korea has his measure, screw up and we'll make sure we'll screw you back. Obama is just another Clinton rube, he'll bite on anything for diplomatic win.

    2. Re:Everything is different [Re:Still in violation] by Desler · · Score: 1

      Most notably, Kim Jong-un was born nearly thirty years after the Korean war. His viewpoint on politics is going to be vastly different than the previous generation.

      Because you think his family didn't indoctrinate him into their views?

    3. Re:Everything is different [Re:Still in violation] by mug+funky · · Score: 1

      "...flying unicorns are going to be dropping gold nuggets from the clouds"

      i'd hope those nuggets had silk parachutes, otherwise there could be many casualties.

    4. Re:Everything is different [Re:Still in violation] by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 1

      Most notably, Kim Jong-un was born nearly thirty years after the Korean war. His viewpoint on politics is going to be vastly different than the previous generation.

      Because you think his family didn't indoctrinate him into their views?

      You think indoctrination is perfect, and thus every child thinks and acts exactly the same way his parents did?

      Maybe they did get "indoctrinated", but nevertheless, the post-war generation didn't go through what the war generation did, and they're not going to think or act like the pre-war generation. That doesn't mean "better", or "more pacifistic", or less authoritarian, but it does mean that they will have different goals and different ideas on how to do things. Don't expect them to act the same.

      --
      http://www.geoffreylandis.com
  39. Food is fungible. by Colin+Smith · · Score: 2

    So we send more food to North Korea, the military and elites get bigger rations.

    While the exact food supplied as aid may not be going to the military/elites the food aid would allow them to divert other supplies elsewhere.

    Food aid is a great idea though, it is one of the most economically damaging things you can do to a country. Start dumping cheap/free food on their markets, put all the local farmers out of business. Farmers and families become disgruntled, have no income or work. The land degrades and the country becomes completely dependant on external aid. The next step is to provide weapons to the groups of ex farmers.

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:Food is fungible. by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      I am not contesting any of that, only the GPs claim that starvation would change anything. Also his absurd claim that Stalin feared famine.

      For a great example of what you are talking about see Haiti. They now depend on rice from the USA. As little as 20 years ago that was not the case.

    2. Re:Food is fungible. by nahdude812 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Start dumping cheap/free food on their markets, put all the local farmers out of business.

      Those don't exist in DPRK, at least not legally. The "Market" was extinguished in the 60's. Almost everything you get comes from the government, and money is almost symbolic. Until the later part of the 80's peasants were not even permitted a private garden for producing their own food.

      Also, only about 1/5 of North Korea is arable. This is a country which falls far short of being able to produce enough food to feed its people even under ideal circumstances. Since most farms of any significant size are government owned or controlled, and those working them are not guaranteed any share of what they produce. Aid to the people is a good thing, and trying to spin it otherwise is disingenuous.

    3. Re:Food is fungible. by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

      Aid to the people is a good thing

      I completely agree, didn't I just say that?

      Whether money is used or not is mostly irrelevant, it's also irrelevant whether businesses are illegal or not. The giving of food aid will cause resources to be reallocated. That's the purpose of any economic system, centrally planned or market based. Lots of food aid will cause resources to be directed away from local agriculture, because look, lots of free food aid. It will increase the countries susceptibility to climate problems and hasten the collapse of the government.

      --
      Deleted
    4. Re:Food is fungible. by nahdude812 · · Score: 1

      Maybe I misunderstood you when you said that food aid is a great idea because it ruins the local economy - and them being more or less of an enemy of our state, I took this to mean that you meant it was good in a military offensive sense (which is not good in the same way most humanitarian efforts are). If so, sorry for the confusion.

      You're right, with this international food going to the peasants, the food which would have gone to them will be directed upwards. But I doubt that changes much, the bureaucratic classes and above were already the first consideration for food supplies, with the peasants getting whatever was left. I doubt their meager rations are even that attractive above their ranks.

  40. Re:Obama is a traitor by I+Read+Good · · Score: 1

    Troll or not, somebody owns the cake factory.

  41. Yeah right by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    This is the third or fourth president not to let this area of the world explode into a war that could easily go global. Little kiddies like Icebike think the world is somekind of perfect place where perfect solutions exist. In the real world, all you can do is often to stop thing from getting a lot worse really fast.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  42. Don't forget Fatty Kim went to University in the W by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 2

    For all the jaded souls who think there is no hope and this will degenerate like the last time. Fatty Kim is a product of Western universities. He attended school in Europe (Switzerland I believe) - he has experienced western lifestyle and no doubt sees his own people not having the same lifestyle.

    He's unlikely to want to give up power- but he may just have been infected by enough free-thought whilst in Europe to legitimately want change. There is hope that Fatty Kim is not just a younger, hungrier, clone of his father.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  43. Re:Don't forget Fatty Kim went to University in th by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

    ...a younger, hungrier, clone of his father.

    If he is anything, hungry is not it.

  44. Kim Jong-Un was quoted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kim Jong-Un was quoted as saying "My Father was batshit crazy. He wanted nukes so he could start World War III and live out the nuclear holocaust in under-mountain cities. I just want to rule a united Korea with an Iron Fist. Great compromise, yes?"

  45. North Korea is a Utopia by duk242 · · Score: 1

    Have you ever considered that North Korea is actually a Utopia, and that our government is the one lying to us?

    1. Re:North Korea is a Utopia by Desler · · Score: 1

      So that explains why you moved to North Korea years ago?

    2. Re:North Korea is a Utopia by dbIII · · Score: 1

      No, but then I know someone that used to see starving North Korean refugees when she was growing up in her hometown in China not far from the border. Life was tough under Mao but it was like Christmas every day to the people that had just escaped North Korea.
      Go outside and talk to people and you will look a bit less like an ignorant idiot that makes utterly stupid posts like the one above.

  46. Same Cold War game, different day. by couchslug · · Score: 1

    This shouldn't surprise anyone. Food is a cheap price to pay to keep the Norks from disturbing the good guys.

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    1. Re:Same Cold War game, different day. by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Where I come from "norks" is slang for large breasts.
      Food is a cheap price the keep the large breasts from disturbing the good guys?

  47. Don't buy it! by p51d007 · · Score: 1

    And when the food is gone, they will start up their illegal activity....and we'll give them more food to stop, which they will use up and start the cycle again.

  48. NO. by mattr · · Score: 1

    ABSOLUTELY NOT.
    I am really insulted by your comment. First time I have used caps in over 10 years of Slashdot.

    The famine is 1.5 MILLION people. Check out http://northkorea.org/
    This page includes real world articles and a donation drive by a famous journalist.

    I built for free and maintained for over a decade a website to donate food and medicine to people in the North Korean famine, on behalf of a courageous journalist who assembled donations of clothing, food and medicine, brought it to North Korea himself and donated it directly to people there while documenting it. I put videos of tiny children terminally ill with malnutrition and coughing with pneumonia online when QuickTime was still something new.

    Bernie Krisher, the journalist and past Newsweek editor who did this project, even had a stroke in North Korea once due to the strain of holding a bag of rice up for the camera but he did a lot through one person's extremely stubborn do or die approach. To him anybody who was not interested was a loser. I remember his anger when Japanese milk manufacturers refused to provide infant formula even. He's not a whack-job, he's a world-class reporter who after retirement decided to give something back to the world and was moved by human suffering.

    He is a hero, and most of his donation work over the years has been actually in Cambodia, where he built a newspaper, a hospital, hundreds of rural schools, started medical campaigns and so on. I learned a lot watching his work. All I did was put some of them online.

    The main message I would like to give you and Slashdot which idiotically gave you a "Score 4: Insightful" is, the Internet is a person to person connection. It doesn't matter what the heck the leader of a country says. You can deal with any person in the world who has a net connection as one human to another. Now put the shoe on the other foot and imagine it was you who is stuck in a malnutritioned unempowered hell like these starving people.

    When the famine came during the North Korean flood, and all the crops were washed over with silt and people got to eating tree bark, Bernie was teaching them how to lab cultivate mushrooms and trying any way to make a dent personally. If it was you stuck there in a famine I bet you would have thanked your lucky stars. This is not a band-aid but a crack in the dam that can be widened through the Internet. Whoever is in charge in NK has no bearing whatsoever on what is the right thing to do.

    I am not going to comment on the horrific political brinksmanship and lost hopes of all those intergovernmental negotiations. I hope it works this time, I suppose there's a chance, there always is. It would be nice if there is some way to ensure that kids get the food, I expect many will. I put another letter online for Bernie last year, where he is collecting donations.

    Maybe you can help boost google traffic to it by linking to it. The famine is 1.5 MILLION people. There are real on the ground photos on that site from another courageous Reuters journalist too. Check them out and see if you still think it is silly to try and save these lives.

    The site is: http://northkorea.org/

    1. Re:NO. by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      "As long as you do what ever you can to insure the people don't rise up and revolt. Keeping the people passive is the best thing you can do. Thanks for your support." -Kim

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
  49. Re:Obama is a traitor by Specter · · Score: 1

    Is it yellow cake? It's my favorite kind!

  50. Re:Don't forget Fatty Kim went to University in th by cybernanga · · Score: 1

    See King Mswati III, of Swaziland, who went to school in England from the ages of 14 to 18.

    Many thought that his western education would mean he would be a different type of leader to his father, but he doesn't appear to be as progressive as most would wish.

    --
    www.Buy-Proxy.com - A "buyer-driven" global marketplace.