Slashdot Mirror


User: MaskedSlacker

MaskedSlacker's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
3,075
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 3,075

  1. Re:First Post on Ultrasound As a Male Contraceptive · · Score: 1

    Surely you've heard of denial? It's not just a river in Egypt.

  2. Re:First Post on Ultrasound As a Male Contraceptive · · Score: 1

    The funny part of your post is your pretending that the choice is the reason you're stuck with B.

  3. Re:First Post on Ultrasound As a Male Contraceptive · · Score: 1

    Posts like these remind me that the Internet is a lot like Lake Wobegon.

  4. Re:First Post on Ultrasound As a Male Contraceptive · · Score: 1

    Just want to say, NOT HAPPENING. I'm happy using abstinence as a contraceptive. 100% effective. (:

    Why is your mouth above your eyes?

  5. Re:this isnt the 70's on Website Sells Pubic Lice · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Because we're comfortable with our sexuality? We're not prudes? We're nudists? I dunno, any of a thousand reasons.

  6. Re:this isnt the 70's on Website Sells Pubic Lice · · Score: 1

    Speak for yourself, you're just doing it wrong.

  7. Re:Double Bastard on Geostationary GPS Satellite Galaxy 15 Out of Control · · Score: 1

    So, the radiation field will cause no damage to other satellites and the upper atmosphere.

    You apparently do not understand how an EMP works.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_pulse#Generation_of_nuclear_EMP

  8. Re:But... on Estimating Game Piracy More Accurately · · Score: 1

    Stop it. Now your post will be cited in some lobbyist's report to some congressvermin and worked into the justification for ACTA secrecy. Thanks a lot asshole.

  9. Re:Who reads the manual? on The MPEG-LA's Lock On Culture · · Score: 1

    I'd like to see MPEG-LA try to force American ISPs to block all web sites who are not paying their royalties, or where codecs have been used that infringe on their patented technology.

    Don't think they won't try.

  10. Re:Lawyers. on The MPEG-LA's Lock On Culture · · Score: 1

    We really need to find a way to --err... dissuade them.

    Summary execution comes to mind.

  11. Re:Troubles with the plot on Avatar Blu-Ray DRM Issues · · Score: 1

    Eating a shit sandwich on a Krispy Kreme doughnut does not make it any less of a shit sandwich.

    No, but it does make it delicious.

  12. Re:Why does this even need to be discussed? on Supreme Court To Consider First Sale of Imports · · Score: 1

    You know what else is expressly forbidden? Lying about what your drug is approved by the FDA for. Not just marketing off-label uses (also illegal), but flat out lying about what is on-label. But Pfizer still did that, and got away with it even after they were caught.

    You really think they don't offer kickbacks too?

  13. Re:turnabout? on Senators Tell Facebook To Quit Sharing Users' Info · · Score: 1

    Well somebody has to do it--you've seen how incompetent they normally are.

  14. Re:Why does this even need to be discussed? on Supreme Court To Consider First Sale of Imports · · Score: 1

    Your entire argument falls flat the minute someone points out that Pharma companies spend more on marketing than R&D and that it is the government, not Pharma which funds most research.

    Please try again.

  15. Re:Free market, right? on Supreme Court To Consider First Sale of Imports · · Score: 1

    No, he's right. That's the Standard Model, which is 1975's particle system.

  16. Re:Paper and Environment on Paper Manufacturer Launches "Print More" Campaign · · Score: 1

    Only until the forest reached maturity. Mature forests do not absorb any new carbon dioxide.

  17. Re:It's not the abuses... it's the coverups. on Pope Rails Against the Internet and Transparency · · Score: 1

    And I'm sure you'd have an extremely easy time making a decision to prosecute someone who you may have known for 20 years or more. Or maybe your spouse was involved in some illicit activities.

    I'm not a cop. There's a long list of reasons for that, but they boil down to knowing I can't do the job, and having the integrity not to pretend I can.

    Conflict of interest is a very real problem in any career and a lot of people aren't capable of rising above. It doesn't necessarily make them bad people.

    It does make them bad cops.

  18. Re:Riiight on Pope Rails Against the Internet and Transparency · · Score: 1

    The only reason faithies like to dump on Scientology is that it's the most blatantly obvious con-job cult of all the religions.

    You say this, when you live in a world where Heaven's Gate exists and Rio Di Angelo stills believes in it.

  19. Re:Riiight on Pope Rails Against the Internet and Transparency · · Score: 1

    Christianity, Catholicism, Scientology, Hinduism, etc. don't make any money.

    The Roman Catholic Church makes a metric fuckton (let's spitball and call it comparable to the GDP of the state of California).

    The Church of Scientology makes a metric fuckton.

    Etc.

    Organizations, not ideas, make money.

  20. Re:I was going to moderate this thread but... on Pope Rails Against the Internet and Transparency · · Score: 1

    When I was 14 I thought I was a card carrying Marxist. Should that be held against me for the rest of my life? Kids do stupid things when they've been indoctrinated to do them. In his case, there is no evidence of him actually committing any crimes, or even of actually having believed in any of the indoctrination.

    Give it a rest and find something relevant (there's plenty of that) to hammer him with.

  21. Re:Nazi bastard on Pope Rails Against the Internet and Transparency · · Score: 1

    It's a whole lot easier when the person under discussion used to be a Nazi.

    When he was 14 in a time when EVERY 14 year-old boy in Germany was drafted into the Hitler Youth?

    I'm not even saying he didn't at the time buy into it whole heartedly--but when I was 14 I thought I was a card carrying Marxist, and I wasn't drafted into that. It'd be a little unreasonable to hold that against me now, much less when I'm 80.

  22. Re:I wouldn't say nowhere. on Pope Rails Against the Internet and Transparency · · Score: 1

    (Islam is probably the closest)

    Not even: http://lmgtfy.com/?q=list+of+religious+populations&l=1

  23. Re:wagging the dog on Pope Rails Against the Internet and Transparency · · Score: 1

    You must be new here. You're assuming ANYONE commenting here read the speech. And really, what are the odds of that?

  24. Re:wagging the dog on Pope Rails Against the Internet and Transparency · · Score: 1

    If I completely misunderstand the facts of Christianity it is because I was raised Catholic and never really needed to know any of it anyways just go to church twice a year and give a donation.

    On the contrary, you've layed out the Catholic Dogma on the matter much better than anyone else so far in the thread--and it is SIGNIFICANTLY different from other Christian Dogmas in this particular area especially.

  25. Re:wagging the dog on Pope Rails Against the Internet and Transparency · · Score: 1

    Why do you think they rise to the top? It ain't by sharing their good fortune.