Slashdot Mirror


Website Sells Pubic Lice

A British website called crabrevenge.com will help you prove that there is literally nothing you can't find online by selling you pubic lice. A disclaimer on the site says the creators "do not endorse giving people lice," and the lice are for "novelty purposes only." The company also boasts about a facility "where we do all of our parasite husbandry and carefully considered selective breeding." Three different packages are available: "Green package - One colony that can lay as many as 30 eggs for about $20. Blue package - Three colonies to share with your friends or freeze a batch or two for about $35. Red package - A vial of 'shampoo-resistant F-strain crabs' which can take up to two weeks to kill for about $52."

319 comments

  1. this isnt the 70's by cruelworld · · Score: 4, Funny

    Everyone i know shaves so I don't see how effective this would be.

    1. Re:this isnt the 70's by tylersoze · · Score: 1

      Well I completely shave, as does my wife, so I guess I'm a little weird then. Come to think of it, I don't think I've ever been with a woman that hasn't been completely shaved. Also I'm sure it's fairly common amongst gay guys, too.

    2. Re:this isnt the 70's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      obviously bullshit. Waxing is clearly the way to go.

    3. Re:this isnt the 70's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is quite common among excessively OCD types, who also happen to tend to live socially sequestered from non-OCD types (Case in point: Slashdot).

    4. Re:this isnt the 70's by Philip+K+Dickhead · · Score: 1

      Sea Monkeys!

      I got ants in my pants, and I need to dance!

      --
      "Speaking the Truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act." -- George Orwell
    5. Re:this isnt the 70's by hodet · · Score: 3, Funny

      Bah...the gonzo porn generation. Nothing wrong with a nice bush. Why does every woman have to look like a girl guide. Now get off my lawn.

    6. Re:this isnt the 70's by ryanvm · · Score: 1

      Gah. I do not get this at all. I can dig a little grooming, but what is the point of mimicking prepubescent hair growth patterns?

    7. Re:this isnt the 70's by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      Thats not going to save you

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pubic_lice

      Unless you shave your entire body.

    8. Re:this isnt the 70's by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Waxing is clearly the way to go.

      But tweezing is more fun for us masochists.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    9. Re:this isnt the 70's by skine · · Score: 1

      I think he means that he shaves and walked in on his mom last week when she was shaving.

    10. Re:this isnt the 70's by MBGMorden · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Really depends on the crowd. 6-7 years ago the shaving fetish hit like crazy and you'd have to search to the ends of the Earth (ok, honestly, you'd probably be safe once you hit Mexico) to find a girl with some bush, but it's come back into style in the last year or two. Not universally, but a lot more girls are sporting bush than there was previously. Can't say that's a bad thing either.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    11. Re:this isnt the 70's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Gah. I do not get this at all.

      I can dig a little grooming, but what is the point of mimicking prepubescent hair growth patterns?

      "Trimming the bush makes the tree look taller." -- Richard Simmons

    12. Re:this isnt the 70's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well I completely shave, as does my wife, so I guess I'm a little weird then. Come to think of it, I don't think I've ever been with a woman that hasn't been completely shaved. Also I'm sure it's fairly common amongst other gay guys, too.

      So, you're admitting you're gay? Am I correct in concluding that you're the pitcher and your "wife" is the catcher =P?

    13. Re:this isnt the 70's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Copy/pasting from wikipedia:

      Fashion, Religion, Tradition, Sexual practice, Tactile sensation, Appearance, Discomfort, Personal taste.

      Plenty of valid reasons there. Yours is a closet pedo argument if ever there was one.

    14. Re:this isnt the 70's by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      Come to think of it, I don't think I've ever been with a woman that hasn't been completely shaved.

      Maybe it's just me, but I'd rather my women didn't remind me of prepubescent girls......

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    15. Re:this isnt the 70's by AtlantaSteve · · Score: 5, Funny

      Discussion of female grooming habits is one thing, but there are too many comments here from dudes about their own "manscaping". If Slashdot is going to have an "Informative" tag which mods posts up... then there should also be a "Too Much Informative" tag which mods posts down.

    16. Re:this isnt the 70's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Ive never understood this attitude. Hair or not, if your genitals look like that of a pre-pubescent there is something weird about you.

      And that goes for women too btw.

    17. Re:this isnt the 70's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The question being, why would fashion, tradition, etc. mimic a prepubescent child.

    18. Re:this isnt the 70's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh great....I'm sure every average Slashdotter has seen thousands of vaginas, and is able to correctly discern what "vagina styling" is in vogue at any given moment.

    19. Re:this isnt the 70's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      cuz it looks great when you are getting blown

    20. Re:this isnt the 70's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Come to think of it, I don't think I've ever been with a woman that hasn't been completely shaved.

      Maybe it's just me, but I'd rather my women didn't remind me of prepubescent girls......

      So you prefer women with hairy armpits, mustaches and monobrows?
      There are lots of way to groom, it is all personal preference, no need to cast out others for having certain preferences.
      Unless you really mean it, and your a furry.

    21. Re:this isnt the 70's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, some of us don't care to pick hair out of teeth. Shedding is a very annoying problem.

    22. Re:this isnt the 70's by Beorytis · · Score: 1
    23. Re:this isnt the 70's by RobertM1968 · · Score: 1

      Well I completely shave, as does my wife, so I guess I'm a little weird then. Come to think of it, I don't think I've ever been with a woman that hasn't been completely shaved. Also I'm sure it's fairly common amongst other gay guys, too.

      So, you're admitting you're gay? Am I correct in concluding that you're the pitcher and your "wife" is the catcher =P?

      Besides the fact (and more importantly) that he did not put the word "other" in his sentence, who cares?

      Or perhaps you were hoping for his number?

    24. Re:this isnt the 70's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop lying nerds, you haven't probably even seen your own pubic hair in years.

    25. Re:this isnt the 70's by ooshna · · Score: 1

      You admit shaving along with providing info of the grooming methods of the gay population (which you share). I'm starting to think you just added you have a wife as a cover up.

    26. Re:this isnt the 70's by interval1066 · · Score: 3, Informative

      "Everyone i know shaves so I don't see how effective this would be."

      Everyone you know? How/Why do you know this...? Of all the people I know, aside from my wife, I know exactly ZERO (0) % about their personal grooming down pubic region. Why in the world would you know this in your circle?

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    27. Re:this isnt the 70's by ooshna · · Score: 1

      Hair collects sweat then starts smelling and I live by Lake Erie so I get enough dead fish smell already.

    28. Re:this isnt the 70's by D'Sphitz · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Nothing wrong with a nice bush

      Wrong, pubes are gross.

    29. Re:this isnt the 70's by blitzkrieg3 · · Score: 1

      The fact that this has not yet reached 5, Funny means that a few moderators missed the pun.

    30. Re:this isnt the 70's by dAzED1 · · Score: 3, Informative

      your tired response is tired.

      There's a substantial difference between a shaved 30yo woman, and a pre-pubescent girl. Stating the obvious shouldn't normally be necessary, except when dealing with tired old responses like yours. The shape of a woman changes, they develop a pair of things called "breasts," and also something called "hips." Baby fat goes away. Etc, etc. But I guess if you're just focused on pubic hair, and that's what makes/breaks a woman for you, hey.

      If a 30yo woman has a gigantic bush but still has the mindset of a 10yo, hopefully that would be more of a turnoff for you than if the same woman shaved, and started acting like a 30yo. There are benefits to grooming. Cutting to merely /short/ is too much work, and is uncomfortable.

    31. Re:this isnt the 70's by Shakrai · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If only we had running water and soap with which to handle this problem.....

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    32. Re:this isnt the 70's by Shakrai · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If a 30yo woman has a gigantic bush but still has the mindset of a 10yo

      I didn't say I wanted a "gigantic bush". Most of the women that I've been with trimmed. I just don't see the appeal in a completely shaved look. To each their own I guess.

      Cutting to merely /short/ is too much work, and is uncomfortable.

      Speak for yourself. I find razor burn/stubble and ingrown hairs to be much more uncomfortable than cutting.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    33. Re:this isnt the 70's by spazdor · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree. An adult vulva, waxed smooth, does not resemble a kid's.

      --
      DRM: Terminator crops for your mind!
    34. Re:this isnt the 70's by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      How exactly is it that you know that everyone you know shaves? Wait -- I don't want to know.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    35. Re:this isnt the 70's by c6gunner · · Score: 3, Funny

      Maybe it's just me, but I'd rather my women didn't remind me of prepubescent girls......

      So stop picking up midgets.

    36. Re:this isnt the 70's by ooshna · · Score: 1

      Yeah that works so well after a hot summer day when you and your girl just want to go at it. I don't know about you but I'm not going to wait around for my chick to jump in the shower before we mess around. Plus going down on a hairy chick is like trying to floss your teeth with a wet dog.

    37. Re:this isnt the 70's by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      Not universally, but a lot more girls are sporting bush than there was previously.

      I haven't seen one since '98. If it's coming back into stile, it seems nobody's bothered to tell the women ....

    38. Re:this isnt the 70's by Gabrosin · · Score: 1

      It's not really a very good pun.

    39. Re:this isnt the 70's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get counseling.

      Seriously.

    40. Re:this isnt the 70's by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      Mess around in the shower. Best of both worlds ;)

      Besides, I didn't say I was opposed to trimming. I just said I don't understand the appeal in the hairless look. If prefer the product that was the end result of millions of years of sexual selection. To each their own though.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    41. Re:this isnt the 70's by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      So, you're admitting you're gay? Am I correct in concluding that you're the pitcher and your "wife" is the catcher =P?

      Besides the fact (and more importantly) that he did not put the word "other" in his sentence, who cares?

      I hear the GNAA recruits...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    42. Re:this isnt the 70's by Tetsujin · · Score: 4, Funny

      Stop lying nerds, you haven't probably even seen your own pubic hair in years.

      Sure I have. Your mom never bothers to pick it out of her teeth.

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
    43. Re:this isnt the 70's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If a girl doesn't prefer men with beards, should I trust her with my son or is she a pedophile?

    44. Re:this isnt the 70's by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      As I said, it depends on the crowd. Also depends on your definition of "bush". If you mean untrimmed 70's style? Yeah that's still pretty rare (though I've seen at least one example recently that while it was roughly trimmed around, it certainly wasn't trimmed "down"). If we're just talking about a small groomed patch, then I've seen that quite frequently - still not as common as fully shaved, but it's a trend that appears to be coming back around.

      And to the "this is slashdot" people - learn that stereotypes are fun, and often have SOME basis in reality, but they're rarely THAT accurate. I'd wager that while the incidence of virgins on here is probably a bit higher than the national average, MOST of the guys here are still getting laid at least occasionally. We're not talking about winning the lottery here.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    45. Re:this isnt the 70's by drsmithy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Gah. I do not get this at all. I can dig a little grooming, but what is the point of mimicking prepubescent hair growth patterns?

      I know what you mean. That's why I only ever date women whose legs and armpits are at least as hairy as mine.

    46. Re:this isnt the 70's by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      Now get off my lawn.

      Heh, heh... nevermind.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    47. Re:this isnt the 70's by cayenne8 · · Score: 4, Funny
      "Bah...the gonzo porn generation. Nothing wrong with a nice bush. Why does every woman have to look like a girl guide. Now get off my lawn."

      Well, much better than in the 70's. Ever seen much of that 70's pr0n??

      Man...if you were gonna go 'spelunking' down there back in the day, you'd better have taken a machete, a couple of lanterns and a pack mule!! That bush was THICK.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    48. Re:this isnt the 70's by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "Maybe it's just me, but I'd rather my women didn't remind me of prepubescent girls......"

      On the other hand...I don't like tonging anything that looks like it is from the taliban either!!

      Hell, if I wanna floss after a meal, I prefer store bought that is minty flavored.

      :)

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    49. Re:this isnt the 70's by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 1

      Depends how old you are. The Facebook generation has little problem sharing anything and everything about their life. I'm right on the edge of that generation so I have friends on both sides and one side will tell you just about anything while the other is more like what you're talking about.

      I also have some nudist friends, but that's an entirely different conversation.

    50. Re:this isnt the 70's by samsonaod · · Score: 1

      Come to think of it, I don't think I've ever been with a woman that hasn't been completely shaved.

      Maybe it's just me, but I'd rather my women didn't remind me of prepubescent girls......

      So when you see a grown woman with a shaved cooch, you think of little girls? You should really see someone about this, and maybe volunteer yourself to be registered.

    51. Re:this isnt the 70's by Sleepy · · Score: 1

      Come to think of it, I don't think I've ever been with a woman that hasn't been completely shaved.

      Maybe it's just me, but I'd rather my women didn't remind me of prepubescent girls......

      Yes... your Slashdot username is based on a FIGURE SKATER... females are out of the picture entirely.

    52. Re:this isnt the 70's by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      Nudist?

    53. Re:this isnt the 70's by tylersoze · · Score: 1

      Yep, totally right, to each his own. Personally I prefer completely shaved for both parties for oral sex reasons. Neither one of us likes licking hair.

      I dunno, I must be lucky but I've never had problems with razor burn, ingrown hairs, or itchiness from shaving "all over".

    54. Re:this isnt the 70's by Killall+-9+Bash · · Score: 1

      Mess around in the shower. Best of both worlds ;)

      Shower-sex is a novelty. You do it once so you can talk about it with your friends, then never again.

      Why? Water gets EVERYWHERE, and it makes a piss-poor lube.

      --
      "Prediction: within 10 years, Windows will be a Linux distribution." Me, 7-6-2016
    55. Re:this isnt the 70's by EdIII · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree. An adult vulva, waxed smooth, does not resemble a kid's.

      I don't know if I agree, which is due to the fact, I can't make a comparison. I have seen plenty of shaved snatch thanks to the Internet (dear God thank you for the Internet soooooo much), but I have yet to see a 10 year old girls snatch. Don't plan on it either.

      So yeah... as far as I know, they are exactly the same.

    56. Re:this isnt the 70's by FuckingNickName · · Score: 1

      The replies to your post remind me that this isn't a geek site any more. Cheering on fashions in body modification? Being a technophile up to the mid-'90s was so much easier. No bullshit!

    57. Re:this isnt the 70's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahh, common and tell the truth, you either like your "30yo women" to look like "10yo girls" or you need to come out of the closet and realize you like the feel of beard stubble!

    58. Re:this isnt the 70's by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1

      Speak for yourself, you're just doing it wrong.

    59. Re:this isnt the 70's by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      Umm, I've gone down on trimmed women and it's never been a problem. Usually the bulk of the remaining hair is on the pubis mons, where it's not much of an issue. I also like there to be some hair there for protection during intercourse, but that's a personal preference.

      Regarding razors, I already hate the fact that I have to shave my face. Last thing I want to do is add another area that needs to be maintained. It's funny, because I see all the advertisements for pills to grow hair -- where's the pill to keep it from growing? ;) It would make the legs/face/pubic area much easier to maintain. Where's Big Pharma when we need them?

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    60. Re:this isnt the 70's by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Because we're comfortable with our sexuality? We're not prudes? We're nudists? I dunno, any of a thousand reasons.

    61. Re:this isnt the 70's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'So you prefer women with hairy armpits, mustaches and monobrows?'

      No french chicks, thanks.

    62. Re:this isnt the 70's by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      "Why? Water gets EVERYWHERE, and it makes a piss-poor lube."

      We like it piss-rich and the shower is the ideal place.

    63. Re:this isnt the 70's by bazorg · · Score: 1

      To each their own I guess.

      yes, this is Slashdot after all!

    64. Re:this isnt the 70's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ENOUGH! This is why there should be no sex talk allowed on /. It always just gets very creepily detailed and uses obscure words for even more obscure (to this crowd) body parts. If you want to get your daily input of raunchy sex talk, Archer is on Netflix watch instantly.

      Next thing you know, a post about how "the penis goes into the vagina" will get moderated 'Informative'. Please stop now, ok thanks bye.

    65. Re:this isnt the 70's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless you really mean it, and your a furry.

      I don't think that word means what you think it means.

    66. Re:this isnt the 70's by vlad30 · · Score: 1

      Well, some of us don't care to pick hair out of teeth. Shedding is a very annoying problem.

      Saves time Flossing

      --
      Your'e all thinking it, I just said it for you
    67. Re:this isnt the 70's by not+flu · · Score: 1

      It appears that sexual selection has been making us ever more hairless. Evolution is never finished.

    68. Re:this isnt the 70's by Klinky · · Score: 1

      Do you like women with prickly or hairy legs? What about armpits or facial whiskers or unibrows? Are women weird because some of them don't like a man with a beard? Does a man having no facial hair make him look like a prepubescent boy and all the women attracted to said man must have underlying pedo-fantasies? What about men who shave their head, does that mean they secretly want to be babies again? What about make-up, clothing or hygiene or anything else people do that alters "the way nature made it"?

      What defines a person as an adult is their age & frame of mind, not their pubic hair...

    69. Re:this isnt the 70's by larpon · · Score: 1

      WRONG! The vagina indulge the penis

    70. Re:this isnt the 70's by PachmanP · · Score: 1

      I'd wager that while the incidence of virgins on here is probably a bit higher than the national average, MOST of the guys here are still getting laid at least occasionally. We're not talking about winning the lottery here.

      I won the lottery and still can't get laid, you insensitive clod!!!!

      --
      You're thinking small. Why miniaturize the laser, when we could instead enlarge the sharks? -John Searle
    71. Re:this isnt the 70's by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      Yes... your Slashdot username is based on a FIGURE SKATER... females are out of the picture entirely.

      Actually I based on my username on the Vulcan heaven from Star Trek V. "Sha Ka Ree"

      The movie sucked but at the time I was too lazy to come up with something better and it was fresh in my mind.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    72. Re:this isnt the 70's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you mean get off my carpet?

    73. Re:this isnt the 70's by adolf · · Score: 1

      Hmm.

      I guess you don't have any kids.

    74. Re:this isnt the 70's by apparently · · Score: 1

      Shower-sex is a novelty. You do it once so you can talk about it with your friends, then never again. Why? Water gets EVERYWHERE, and it makes a piss-poor lube.

      Congrats on admitting to the internet that you're a miserable failure when it comes to getting a woman naturally lubricated.

    75. Re:this isnt the 70's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually you can neither agree nor disagree (and remain truthful), because as you say, you have no data for a comparison.

      So yeah... as far as I know, they are exactly the same.

      And it would be equally valid to say that as far as you know, they are completely different. Because you don't know...

    76. Re:this isnt the 70's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      I am going to offer you two pills, take the blue pill and you wake up tomorrow still thinking slashdotters aren't seeing thousands of vaginas. Take the red pill and you turn of the safe search filter on google and you type in "teen pussy" and within a single day you see over a thousand "rabbit holes" and exactly how deep they go.

    77. Re:this isnt the 70's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And isn't female.

      Guys! Guys! I know it's surprising but females have seen themselves naked when underage!!!

      Not being a douche to you...adolf...*cough*, just throwing out another possibility.

    78. Re:this isnt the 70's by Hognoxious · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Trimming the bush makes the tree look taller." -- Richard Simmons

      If she has a tree you're doing it wrong. Very wrong.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    79. Re:this isnt the 70's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need to buy yourself a boat.

    80. Re:this isnt the 70's by adolf · · Score: 1

      Good point, AC.

      I'll include it in the next argument I see on this topic, if you don't mind.

    81. Re:this isnt the 70's by dAzED1 · · Score: 1

      Star Trek 5 came out in 1989. The inter-tubes weren't even around in anything resembling the current platform at that time.

    82. Re:this isnt the 70's by sa1lnr · · Score: 1

      Wait till both you and your partner have 5 o'clock shadow.

      Yes, I have had that experience. Once and only once.

    83. Re:this isnt the 70's by TheLink · · Score: 1

      > Well, much better than in the 70's. Ever seen much of that 70's pr0n??

      From what I hear, it's likely there was more "real life" action in the 1970s than say now, at least in the "western" countries.

      This was the time of the Pill, before AIDS had become common, and the antibiotics still worked well.

      --
    84. Re:this isnt the 70's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. An adult vulva, waxed smooth, does not resemble a kid's.

      wow...... i want to shake a stick at that but damn....
      thats just too easy and too wrong

    85. Re:this isnt the 70's by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      There used to be this advanced technology called VHS. It let you watch movies years after they first came out.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    86. Re:this isnt the 70's by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      There used to be this advanced technology called VHS. It let you watch movies years after they had first come out.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    87. Re:this isnt the 70's by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      There used to be this advanced technology called VHS. It let you watch movies years after they had first come out.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    88. Re:this isnt the 70's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is slashdot! Surely nobody reading this has *ever* been with a woman!

    89. Re:this isnt the 70's by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

      Who needs lube for oral?

      Now..height differences, that's a different story.

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    90. Re:this isnt the 70's by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

      Apparently it also duplicates posts. Either that, or you had one heck of a time travelling mishap ;-)

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    91. Re:this isnt the 70's by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that was bizarre. Post form kept erroring out on me.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    92. Re:this isnt the 70's by vegiVamp · · Score: 1

      Because there are cultures where groups of friends have no issues discussing these kinds of things ? Because some people have sexual experiences outside of wedlock ?

      There's any number of reasons, and I don't really see the issue.

      --
      What a depressingly stupid machine.
    93. Re:this isnt the 70's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet your face looks like that of a pre-pubescent male.

      Mine doesn't. I have a full, manly beard.

    94. Re:this isnt the 70's by Le+Marteau · · Score: 1

      Waxing is overrated. Looks and feels great for the first few days. But you have to let the hair grow back long enough for the wax to take hold of the hair for the next waxing. That's measured in weeks, and means having to put up with stubble most of the time.

      --
      Mod down people who tell people how to mod in their sigs
    95. Re:this isnt the 70's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh my god is it that badly spread....DON'T HAVE SEX THEN....

    96. Re:this isnt the 70's by RichiH · · Score: 1

      Speak for yourself. I find razor burn/stubble and ingrown hairs to be much more uncomfortable than cutting.

      There is such a thing as anti-hair-cream which will simply make them fall out. Men have a biological advantage when using it.

      But yah, each to their own. It's not as if anyone besides yourself and the people you get intimate with would or should care.

    97. Re:this isnt the 70's by Undead+NDR · · Score: 1

      I haven't seen one since '98. If it's coming back into stile, it seems nobody's bothered to tell the women ....

      Have you tried clearing the cache?

    98. Re:this isnt the 70's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well it's no surprise people would have been tired of Bush. Nice to see some change, though.

    99. Re:this isnt the 70's by dAzED1 · · Score: 1

      it took you 17 years (guessing that the 700k range for /. was about 2006?) to watch Star Trek 5, and you call yourself a nerd?

    100. Re:this isnt the 70's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So when you see a grown woman with a shaved cooch, you think of little girls?

      What I think is "why?".

    101. Re:this isnt the 70's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you've got food in your full, manly beard

    102. Re:this isnt the 70's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      are you nuts? they do stuff american girls think is gross

    103. Re:this isnt the 70's by interval1066 · · Score: 1

      "I dunno, any of a thousand reasons."

      I too have embraced all those reasons, and yet the personal grooming habits of my friends and more distant family have never come up. Not once. And I still fail to see how my comfort level with my sexuality has anything to do with if my best friend SHAVES HIS PUBES!

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    104. Re:this isnt the 70's by jgrahn · · Score: 1

      An adult vulva, waxed smooth, [...]

      An adult Volvo, waxed smooth, on the other hand ...

    105. Re:this isnt the 70's by Sicily1918 · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's just me, but I'd rather my women didn't remind me of prepubescent girls......

      By that logic, I take it you don't want women to shave their legs or armpits, either (they're both also pubic hair)? And, of course, you don't shave your beard or cut your hair?

    106. Re:this isnt the 70's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      '"Trimming the bush makes the tree look taller." -- Richard Simmons'

      With that jewfro not strange then that he looks like midget.

    107. Re:this isnt the 70's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't like kissing men, so better if she doesn't have a mustache when I go down there. The oral part is 90% of a woman orgasm...

  2. Greeat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    They are breeding resistant strains of lice. Does this count as parasite warfare?

    1. Re:Greeat by Moblaster · · Score: 2, Funny

      Remember, you can always fight back in creative ways. I've heard chicken flied lice tastes good.

    2. Re:Greeat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe Gordon made a nice living selling that to drunk English racist bigots.

    3. Re:Greeat by broggyr · · Score: 2, Funny

      I've heard chicken flied lice tastes good

      It's fried rice you plick!

      --
      Irony? Yea, it's like goldy and bronzy, only it's made of iron!
    4. Re:Greeat by Moblaster · · Score: 1

      I'm not a lacist. I have a bad risp.

    5. Re:Greeat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It falls under creating biowarfare agents and they should be locked up in an undisclosed government facility and experimented on.

    6. Re:Greeat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All's fair in love and war.

    7. Re:Greeat by vegiVamp · · Score: 1

      He's chinese, you insensitive crod.

      --
      What a depressingly stupid machine.
    8. Re:Greeat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bio-Terrorism. Better nuke the company's HQ.

  3. And what are they feeding the lice on ? by unity100 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    huh ? is it even legal ? leave aside ethical ?

    1. Re:And what are they feeding the lice on ? by binarylarry · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm not the pope, but I'm going to have to put "intentionally giving people crabs" in the unethical column.

      But fun and rewarding? Totally different column.

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    2. Re:And what are they feeding the lice on ? by TerranFury · · Score: 1

      What's scary is the last sentence of TFA:

      this website isn't the only one that offers pubic lice for revenge. There's also revengecrabs.com, which says "watching them itch and burn is half the fun."

      So there are multiple websites dedicated to selling pubic lice.

      I'm normally a laissez-faire kind of guy, but seriously... what do we need to do to get this shit shut down?

    3. Re:And what are they feeding the lice on ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm normally a laissez-faire kind of guy, but seriously... what do we need to do to get this shit shut down?

      Regulations. Laws. Common sense. Morality. A clue. The ability to live with being a hypocrite.

      All of the things that "laissez-faire" economics usually figures the market will resolve for itself, and yet is completely incapable of fixing -- because it assumes benign, rational humans who make good choices, and an underlying mechanism where things like murder for hire, arms dealers, bioterrorists, and asshats can't happen. It totally ignores human nature, and the fact that people aren't always nice, and don't always give a shit about the welfare of others.

      This is the logical result of laissez-faire capitalism -- basically, anarchy. Only in anarchy, someone's ability to hunt you down and kill you regulates the system. As soon as you have any concept of law, to not think you need to apply that to your economic system is just plain stupid. Because someone is going to try to fuck someone else over.

      You simply can't be a strict laisez-faire guy and believe that you have any right to shut this kind of thing down -- well, I guess you could hire someone to kill them, but that might be a little extreme.

      Everyone likes to think this so called "free market" is inherently moral and will arrive at "good" and "just" decisions, when in fact, it's inherently amoral. It doesn't give a shit -- if people are willing to pay for it, it must be inherently good.

    4. Re:And what are they feeding the lice on ? by Shakrai · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I'm not the pope, but I'm going to have to put "intentionally giving people crabs" in the unethical column.

      What column does covering up felonies go in?

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    5. Re:And what are they feeding the lice on ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a job posting I'd steer clear of. "Wanted people to act as hosts for out new lice crops. No experience needed."

    6. Re:And what are they feeding the lice on ? by xquercus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm not the pope, but I'm going to have to put "intentionally giving people crabs" in the unethical column.

      Since when is the Pope an authority on ethics?

    7. Re:And what are they feeding the lice on ? by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Since when is the Pope an authority on ethics?

      Some people actually believe that he's the final Earthly authority.

      I believe Papal Infallibility is inherent to Catholic doctrine.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    8. Re:And what are they feeding the lice on ? by peas_n_carrots · · Score: 1

      Might be illegal. Most countries have import/export laws that cover living/organic material. Animals, vegetables, fruits, insects... mostly aimed at preventing spread of disease. Is crabs considered a disease? Could this be considered bio-warfare? :P

    9. Re:And what are they feeding the lice on ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or, you know, you sue for damages, which you can do even with private law. But I guess that would interfere with your anti-market rant.

    10. Re:And what are they feeding the lice on ? by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      I believe Papal Infallibility [wikipedia.org] is inherent to Catholic doctrine.

      So is the prohibition on divorce, pre-martial sex and birth control but I've known my share of Catholics that have done all of the above.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    11. Re:And what are they feeding the lice on ? by Foobar+of+Borg · · Score: 5, Funny

      So is the prohibition on divorce, pre-martial sex and birth control but I've known my share of Catholics that have done all of the above.

      Holy shit! You mean, that wasn't a "to do" list?

    12. Re:And what are they feeding the lice on ? by Foobar+of+Borg · · Score: 1

      Or, you know, you sue for damages, which you can do even with private law. But I guess that would interfere with your anti-market rant.

      Yes, I remember the last time I got a substantial judgment when a murderer-for-hire killed me.

      Dumbass.

    13. Re:And what are they feeding the lice on ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because religion is a made up fantasy you tell your kids so they can sleep at night... after their father was eaten by a ravenous wildebeest.

    14. Re:And what are they feeding the lice on ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or, you know, you sue for damages, which you can do even with private law.

      Wow, an unfettered free market with only lawyers as recourse when things go to shit. Great fucking system.

      'Cuz, it would clearly make no sense to prohibit certain things up front and stop allowing this crap -- instead we'll sue you after you've done something reckless and criminal.

      What the fuck is "private law"??? You mean civil? Or that rich folks get their own private law?

      But I guess that would interfere with your anti-market rant.

      Same rant, spooge breath. All the same fucking rant. Everyone keeps defending a system which is inherently broken instead of looking at why it's broken.

    15. Re:And what are they feeding the lice on ? by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          You can't teach people how not to sin, without learning those sins for yourself.

          That's why DUI classes are taught by rehabilitated drunk drivers. Anti-drug talks are given by reformed drug addicts. And anti-pedophilia talks are given by the church.

           

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    16. Re:And what are they feeding the lice on ? by Onymous+Coward · · Score: 1

      More accurately, "Since when is the pope a trustable expert on ethics?"

      As in, ``I'm not an expert on ethics issues, nor necessarily a competent ethicist you'll trust, but I'm going to have to put "intentionally giving people crabs" in the unethical column.''

      The pope is an authority.

      He's probably very well versed in ethics, too.

      But any pure ethical knowledge he's got needs to be modulated by the papal role requirement of maintaining power before it's presented to a broader audience.

    17. Re:And what are they feeding the lice on ? by Andronicus · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Hey, uuh, there's nothing immoral or unethical about purchasing the lice from the vendor.

      Where you can start making these value judgments is when a purchaser subsequently decides to USE the previously purchased lice in some particular way you or society in general, might find objectionable.

      To make the argument you'd made above, Anon Coward, is to misunderstand the subject. Free markets don't "fix" anything, sir. They are what has taken place when separate parties agree to do a deal. The "fix" is not to restrict free exchange, it is to protect property rights.

      Most of the posts here had the understandable knee-jerk "eww, who would buy THAT?!" reaction...and I think this very fact shows how a free and unfettered market would normally act to keep this sort of activity very limited indeed.

      As for the asshats who buy, and then use the lice thus obtained for the purpose of infesting someone against their will, or otherwise depriving them of property somehow as a result of the lice, now that's were natural law can come in. That's not a free market problem.

      Anon Coward, you have to ask yourself carefully to define what a free market really is: It's the collection of _voluntary_ exchanges between parties. When the market is free, both sides want to do the trade, or it doesn't happen.

      Wanting to kill a trade because you, as a non-party to the contract being undertaken, find it in some way objectionable in the end is the same sort of imposition upon another's natural rights as the case of someone using the lice they bought to infest YOU against your will.

      Both YOU and HE then (if, and only if, he actually does go on to use the lice maliciously), ought to be made to suffer sanction. YOU for wanting to forbid all such voluntary exchanges because they offend you, and HE for choosing to do harm to you or deprive you of your rightful property by choosing to use the lice against you.

      The <quote>Because someone is going to try to fuck someone else over</quote> part doesn't happen at the free/unfettered market level, because this is not an exchange. The malicious person spreading the lice he bought on your bath towel, thereby later infesting you, committed violence against you, and that's a matter of law.

      Now, there can still be fraud in a free exchange, which is also a matter of law. Fraud is the intentional misrepresentation of the terms of an exchange, so as to create a false idea about what will actually be exchanged in the mind of one of the parties, usually with the object of depriving the misled party of property without the expected compensation.

      The law's first duty is (should be) to enforce property rights. People often forget that you own (at least ought to) your own body too, so someone committing violence against you is, in essence, depriving you of the legitimate right to exercise control over your own property.

      Laissez-faire capitalism is difficult to accomplish under true anarchy, because parties to exchanges can never have much confidence that their respective property rights would be upheld.

      The first thing that societies interested in free-market exchange see is in their interest is standing up some sort of mutually agreed upon outside governance to assure enforcement of property rights. This allows markets to develop efficiently, as parties are relieved of the burden of maintaining each their own enforcement capabilities.

      --
      USNG: 14TPU4605
    18. Re:And what are they feeding the lice on ? by TerranFury · · Score: 1

      Oh! Heh. :-) Didn't realize that was what I sounded like! You're preaching to the choir, AC (well, in my case anyway. You're sure to get plenty of arguing replies from people with "Who is John Galt?" bumperstickers though. Alas.)

    19. Re:And what are they feeding the lice on ? by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 1

      Final authority on MORALS, not ETHICS. There's a difference.

      --
      -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
    20. Re:And what are they feeding the lice on ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What retarded fuckhats modded this down? An entire half of the discussion here is dedicated to whether or not shaving your pubic hair is creating more pedophiles. Everyone there is somehow modded "+5 informative/insightful" instead of "-1 offtopic" like they should be.

      Now, this post is describing the ethical and legal ramifications of outlawing the sale of this stuff, and he gets modded down? Seriously? I know that most Slashdot users generally have absolutely no concept whatsoever of how to discus things on the internet, but this is fucking ridiculous.

    21. Re:And what are they feeding the lice on ? by HBoar · · Score: 1

      Oh come on, mean pranks are a part of life, and this is no different. Once the victim has worked out they have crabs they'll be able to get rid of them fairly easily and it wont have any lasting effects.

    22. Re:And what are they feeding the lice on ? by Jiro · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But it's poorly thought out and misses the main issue, despite using a lot of buzzwords. Its answer is basically that since buying lice only results in harm when they are used against someone, it should be okay to sell the lice and that nobody should be stopped unless they try to use them on another person.

      That's sounds okay as a theory, but the fact is that pretty much the only use of buying lice is to hurt someone. Yeah, there may be one or two people who have some non-injurious purpose for buying lice, but that's a vanishingly small proportion of all the purchases (and doubly so when the site itself claims the lice are for revenge). Yet the free market solution is to just ignore that and allow that vanishingly small percentage to justify letting it be legal to sell lice.

      If your free market theory can't handle the concept of "this product is almost always used to violate someone's rights, so we should crack down on it if we can, even though the person selling the product is not himself the one violating the rights", then the free market sucks and we need something else. And it doesn't apply to just selling lice, but to selling plague bacteria and lots of other things.

    23. Re:And what are they feeding the lice on ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      101 Reasons why Java is better than .NET - http://helpdesk-software.ws/it/29-04-2004.htm

      One must conclude you're -- for whatever childish reason -- trying to put people off of Java in a weird kind of reverse FUD. Otherwise, your list of "reasons" would actually contain valid links -- never mind being up-to-date with the current state of development platforms.

    24. Re:And what are they feeding the lice on ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're sure to get plenty of arguing replies from people with "Who is John Galt?" bumperstickers though.

      I own most of Ayn Rand's collected works, that's why I'm so fucking sure she's wrong.

      This whole "let capitalism run free and find the ideal solution to all of your problems", and "the corporation gets the credit and money for everything", coupled with the mentality that "if people want social programs they should fund it themselves" leads to the most viciously Darwinian mindset in relation to other people; and a personal code that makes one act like a self righteous, sanctimonious asshole who figures the world can take care of itself.

      Having had the benefit of almost 20 years of hindsight and perspective on Rand et al, as well as the personal perspective of having been one of the aforementioned sanctimonious assholes -- I figure if I'm going to go off on a screed and be pissed off about something, it might a well be against injustice, greed, and other bullshit instead of favor of it.

      Otherwise, you get George W. Fucking Bush and people like him.

      Fuck capitalism. Fuck corporate greed. Fuck consumerism. And, most of all, fuck John Galt. In the book, Galt talked about taking down the whole system by exploiting its weaknesses -- that I'm in complete agreement with. Just with different results in mind.

      I've found Buddhism, compassion, activism, and punk rock to be a very good antidote to Ayn Bloody Fucking Rand.

    25. Re:And what are they feeding the lice on ? by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

      Uhuh...right after spreading them to someone else like, say, a spouse. Who then believes, not totally unjustified, that the original victim may have been getting a little action on the side.

      Sorry, but if you consider this to be a harmless prank, there's a few pranks I'd like to try out on you first.

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    26. Re:And what are they feeding the lice on ? by Xest · · Score: 1

      "I'm not the pope, but I'm going to have to put "intentionally giving people crabs" in the unethical column."

      I think it's probably more in the illegal column. Certainly you can get jail time for knowingly infecting someone with more serious STDs, I doubt very much this would honestly be treated any differently, maybe a slightly lesser punishment, but that's about it. I suspect anyone taking advantage of this offer might find themselves at very least with a hefty fine and community service, but quite possibly serving a short jail sentence.

    27. Re:And what are they feeding the lice on ? by dintech · · Score: 1

      Yes, lice don't infect people. People infect people.

    28. Re:And what are they feeding the lice on ? by HBoar · · Score: 1

      So the spouse finds out they're being cheated on? Not a bad thing at all IMO, the guilty party deserved it. I didn't say it was harmless, it wouldn't be much of a prank if it were.

    29. Re:And what are they feeding the lice on ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I've found Buddhism, compassion, activism, and punk rock to be a very good antidote to Ayn Bloody Fucking Rand.

      I learned a lot from reading about how The Buddha was constantly running to the government to get them to fund his compassion. And you can't open the New Testament without reading about Jesus running to the Roman government.

    30. Re:And what are they feeding the lice on ? by Le+Marteau · · Score: 1

      > Oh come on, mean pranks are a part of life, and this is no different.

      Let me guess. You live, or have lived, in a frat house. Or are a Mason. Or are sixteen years old.

      --
      Mod down people who tell people how to mod in their sigs
    31. Re:And what are they feeding the lice on ? by HBoar · · Score: 1

      Absolutely not, No, and I wish.

    32. Re:And what are they feeding the lice on ? by ben0207 · · Score: 1

      He said _are_ a sixteen year old. Not _are in_ a sixteen year old.

      --
      cmd-q.co.uk - some sort of stupid fucking internet bullshit
    33. Re:And what are they feeding the lice on ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you take our lice away, you take our guns away!
      --
      NRA for selling pubic lice, since TerranFury suggested that it should not be done

    34. Re:And what are they feeding the lice on ? by OneMadMuppet · · Score: 1

      s/lice/guns/g Or mod chips. Or bongs. Or anything else that you want to put in the "I only sold it, it's not illegal to sell, just use" camp. How about Yellow Cake and Nukes? Somewhere there is a line - this is ok, and this is not. I feel sometimes like the line is in the wrong place. :(

    35. Re:And what are they feeding the lice on ? by silentcoder · · Score: 1

      Sorry - who says the spouse IS being cheated on ?
      Lice don't ONLY spread sexually and if the only way to infect your target was to infect yourself first and then seduce them... well it wouldn't sell at ALL.

      The idea here is more likely that the buyer will spread them all over your bathroom towels or something- something that will touch your skin quite a bit, while naked.

      Last time I checked, toweling off after a shower is not considered cheating on your spouse...

      So you can get a person innocently divorced, in those states/countries which aren't no-fault they could lose all their property for cheating.. all innocently... and why ?because you're a fucking jerk who found a website ?

      This is the kind of business that MUST be regulated.

      --
      Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
    36. Re:And what are they feeding the lice on ? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      I'm normally a laissez-faire kind of guy, but seriously... what do we need to do to get this shit shut down?

      Far more than you'd think : I was only moderately interested in the article until you let your plans slip ; now (in another tab), I'm ordering a packet or two suitable for freezing, so that I can establish a breeding colony and, if necessary, re-start the business idea after you and your cronies think that you've shut it down.

      OK, that's my order placed. 'F'-strain, your future is assured, even if I have to infect every brothel in my home town to do it.

      BTW, does your concept of "laissez-faire" include the concept that "I may disagree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"? If you're going to take on one piece of Enlightenment philosophy, then you're going to have to be aware of the rest of it (even if you don't agree with it).

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  4. Is this "news for nerds" or "stuff that matters"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Sorry, I'm new here, but is this story considered "news for nerds" or "stuff that matters"?
    and, in Soviet Russia, do pubic lice sell websites?

  5. That's just wrong on so many levels. by realsilly · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That's just wrong on so many levels. I can see kids buying these and then using them to pick on other school kids they don't like. Such as putting them in some kid's underwear when he/she is showering after the gym class.

    This type of item used as a gag gift could have serious consequences for the recipient. If it's a student who is the recipient, then schools kick them out until they're free and clear. Parents may miss work to be home with student. Lice spread easily.

    There is absolutely nothing good from this. /facepalm

    --
    Life takes interesting turns, but the most interest is when you're off the beaten path.
    1. Re:That's just wrong on so many levels. by swanzilla · · Score: 3, Funny

      That's just wrong on so many levels. I can see kids buying these and then using them to pick on other school kids they don't like. Such as putting them in some kid's underwear when he/she is showering after the gym class.

      -1 questionable segue into children's locker room

    2. Re:That's just wrong on so many levels. by FrankSchwab · · Score: 1

      Now, I understand that public schools check for head lice, but I really didn't understand that they were checking for PUBIC lice.

      I think I'll have to have a talk with my 8-year olds Principal.

      /frank

      --
      And the worms ate into his brain.
    3. Re:That's just wrong on so many levels. by Animaether · · Score: 0, Troll

      so what you're saying is... malware samples should not be made publicly available because scriptkiddies might run with it?

    4. Re:That's just wrong on so many levels. by cyber0ne · · Score: 2, Funny

      I really didn't understand that they were checking for PUBIC lice.

      It's how they make sure the kids are presentable for their class pictures.

      --
      http://publicvoidlife.blogspot.com
    5. Re:That's just wrong on so many levels. by JPNielsen · · Score: 5, Funny

      Only in Lower Marion School District

    6. Re:That's just wrong on so many levels. by Paltin · · Score: 1

      This is a way less damaging way of revenge than most things you could do to someone you don't like for 35 bucks. It's not classy, it's not good, but it's not that awful, either.

    7. Re:That's just wrong on so many levels. by DarkIye · · Score: 1

      What exactly is the informative or educational value of pubic lice?

    8. Re:That's just wrong on so many levels. by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      If it's a student who is the recipient, then schools kick them out until they're free and clear.

      Wait... teachers are checking student's pubic hair for lice now?!?

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    9. Re:That's just wrong on so many levels. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      How you reached that conclusion is beyond me. However, I would suggest you look into a spot in the next Winter Olympics - mental gymnastics surely should be a sport and (I suspect) would be one which you're quite good at. Your ability to leap to conclusions (with a triple lutz I might add) is akin to comparing apples and orangutans.

    10. Re:That's just wrong on so many levels. by geekgirlandrea · · Score: 1

      Well, if they can check their underwear for tylenol....

    11. Re:That's just wrong on so many levels. by maxume · · Score: 1

      It's not like I soaked him in gasoline and lit him on fire!

      All I did was infest him with parasites.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    12. Re:That's just wrong on so many levels. by Locke2005 · · Score: 1
      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    13. Re:That's just wrong on so many levels. by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 1

      That's exactly what the police and the legal system were created for. The kid calls the police, the police arrest the kids who did this for assault. The school expels the students convicted of assault as they assaulted another student on school grounds. The kid then sues the kids who did this in civil court and he gets a free college education at their expense.

      --
      -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
    14. Re:That's just wrong on so many levels. by Animaether · · Score: 1

      What exactly is the informative or educational value of malware toolsets?

      To scriptkiddies they're a source of lulz - just as would be the malicious use of pubic lice.

      To security researchers, they're a source of information, on how to recognize them, how to stop a malware infestation, how to stop the malware from spreading, and how to clean an infestation already present. To pharmaceutical researchers and others, live pubic lice serve much the same purpose - recognition, infestation prevention, spread prevention, and cleaning are all fundamental pieces of knowledge for those dealing with lice of any kind.

      Just as with malware the argument is that not just top security researchers and those with true malicious intent should have access to the malware toolsets, why should only top pharmaceutical researchers have access to live lice?

      So while I may be modded Troll instead of seeing replies with convincing arguments as to how the two cases simply cannot be compared at all, my take on it stands.

      If instead the difference is only irrational - one being computers which we all know and just point and laugh and say the user should have used Linux and they wouldn't have had a malware infestation, and the other being little bugs that we only hear about within the context of social pariahs as that's how society likes treating them - that's fine, too.

      In the mean time.. getting rid of lice is a matter of a topical cream, cleanliness (bedsheets, etc.), and a solid schedule. Getting rid of a full-on malware infestation by one of the malware toolkits, if no image backup is available - and most people don't - is something best left to salvaging what data one can, and then formatting the entire drive using a boot CD/DVD, then re-installing everything, re-setting all program preferences, etc. I can't imagine which one is easier to perform by the layman.

    15. Re:That's just wrong on so many levels. by vegiVamp · · Score: 1

      Meh, it's ultimately harmless, just itchy :-)

      Besides, given that those creatures don't really thrive on bald patches, that trick is gonna be very much limited to the latter years of school.

      --
      What a depressingly stupid machine.
    16. Re:That's just wrong on so many levels. by Rantastic · · Score: 1

      There is absolutely nothing good from this.

      It is a hoax.

      Need proof? Try to actually place an order.

      --
      Ask Slashdot: Where bad ideas meet poor googling skills.
    17. Re:That's just wrong on so many levels. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many luls shall be had.

  6. Next up: AIDS! by citylivin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You too can have your own strain of the HIV virus! Play jokes on your friends!

    Uhoh, whoes got AIDS today? Everyone!

    A lifetime of hilarity!

    --
    As a potential lottery winner, I totally support tax cuts for the wealthy
    1. Re:Next up: AIDS! by Nirvelli · · Score: 1

      Who modded this Flamebait? It's Insightful.

    2. Re:Next up: AIDS! by zoloto · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      jesus christ you need therapy. there are just SOME things you don't joke about.

    3. Re:Next up: AIDS! by oji-sama · · Score: 1

      It's not a joke. It's an insightful (for given value of insightful) comment about the morality (and such) of selling stuff for the purpose of harming others. The OP can correct me if I'm wrong.

      (And there are rather few things you don't joke about.)

      --
      It is what it is.
    4. Re:Next up: AIDS! by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      That would certainly a nasty kind of murder:
      Go to someone who has AIDS, and take a syringe of blood from him. Now stick it into the one you hate. You could e.g. just put it on a needle and glue that on his chair, leaving no fingerprints and nothing.

      But man, you have to be an evil dick, or hate that person a lot, to do something like that...

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  7. Great Britain... by pushing-robot · · Score: 1

    For the longest time I thought Monty Python was a parody.

    --
    How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    1. Re:Great Britain... by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      For the longest time I thought Monty Python was a parody.

      I think this falls into the "life being stranger than art" category.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  8. taking the fun out by cyberworm · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'll stick to the old way of getting crabs.
    Hookers.

    1. Re:taking the fun out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, both ways require forking over a little extra scratch, but one comes without STIs. The real question is, how badly are you itching for revenge?

  9. It's a pill, to give worms, to ex-girlfriends! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  10. Bioterrorism? by andrewme · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Would giving people lice like this perhaps fall under the "bioterrorism" category? Just a thought...

    1. Re:Bioterrorism? by Hillview · · Score: 1

      if bioterrorism and war were reduced to bombing each other's cities with a swarm of crabs, I could deal with it.

      Unfortunately, we're all too happy to find new ways to kill each other.

      --
      -Troll, Flamebait, and Offtopic are NOT equivalent to disagreement.
    2. Re:Bioterrorism? by Hillview · · Score: 1

      that said.. this could be some devastating psychological warfare goodness.
      If an army is too busy scratching to shoot, everybody wins.

      --
      -Troll, Flamebait, and Offtopic are NOT equivalent to disagreement.
    3. Re:Bioterrorism? by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Bioterrorism is doubtful. But, criminal mischief, assault and battery, malicious wounding, and who knows what other laws it might fall under.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    4. Re:Bioterrorism? by Duradin · · Score: 1

      Given that anything bigger than a firecracker can get you a WMD charge these days, probably.

      I remember back in the day when WMDs were real WMDS. City-killers. Weapons of genocide. Now it's anything that goes boom. So with the modern usage, there were WMDs in Iraq.

    5. Re:Bioterrorism? by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      I think you'd have to be really creative to turn this into an act of terrorism. Not every act of assault or attempted battery is automatically terrorism, even if you use a creative weapon.

      Spreading them in lingerie stores as a protest against licentiousness might qualify.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    6. Re:Bioterrorism? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I remember back in the day when WMDs were real WMDS. City-killers. Weapons of genocide. Now it's anything that goes boom. So with the modern usage, there were WMDs in Iraq.

      If at first you don't succeed, redefine success.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:Bioterrorism? by Gerafix · · Score: 0, Troll

      Depends where you are. In America if you have coloured skin and you sneeze on somebody you will be hooded, gagged, and beaten under suspicion of terrorism.

  11. Must be Lords of Acid fans methinks by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

    What's next, needles full of AIDS-infected blood?

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    1. Re:Must be Lords of Acid fans methinks by ShaunC · · Score: 1

      No match for "AIDSNEEDLES.COM".

      Oh man, I totally have to write a business plan for this.

      --
      Thanks to the War on Drugs, it's easier to buy meth than it is to buy cold medicine!
  12. Instructions by shemp42 · · Score: 1

    Do they come with instructions on the best way to infect someone? I'm in but I would like some instructions, how do I give them to say some jerk who cuts me off in traffic? Or some douche talking on his cell phone in the movie theater?

    1. Re:Instructions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just follow these three easy steps:
      1. Infest self with crabs
      2. Seduce the s.o. of jerk (who cut you off, smoked near you in restaurant, etc. etc.)
      3. Wait for hilarity to ensue

    2. Re:Instructions by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

      www.crabdeliverysystem.com

      From the website:
      We have state of the art delivery systems for crabs. Our methods vary from the spy like to the bizaar. Get cut-off in traffic, no problem, just freeze some of the eggs in a bit of water, then toss the egg laden icecube into the passing vehicle, preferably on the drivers lap. Other methods, slingshot waterballoon delivery. And our personal fave, the bottle of body wash that has tons of fertilized eggs waiting inside to hatch. Order today. Pay-pal, and Visa accepted.

      --
      I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
    3. Re:Instructions by oldspewey · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing that if you put the critters inside something like a drinking straw, that could be used to surreptitiously deliver the payload down the back of a shirt collar. Ideally the shirt is tucked into the pants.

      But there is a non-zero probability you'll be discovered in the act and receive a punch in the face for your troubles (but your victim still gets crabs!)

      --
      If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
    4. Re:Instructions by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

      Seems like a "stinkpalm"-type sacrifice throw...

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
  13. Two questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you give volume discounts and how do I get them in Rush Limbaugh's short?

    1. Re:Two questions by knappe+duivel · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Do you give volume discounts and how do I get them in Rush Limbaugh's short?

      That would be cruel for the lice

    2. Re:Two questions by AndersOSU · · Score: 1

      Contaminate the falafels closest to his studio.

    3. Re:Two questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure they could rig up a prescription of oxycontin to a bunch of eggs in.

    4. Re:Two questions by Foobar+of+Borg · · Score: 1

      No, that would be Bill O'Reilly. Although, smearing them on loofahs would work just as well.

  14. So what... by keytohwy · · Score: 1

    Do you just sprinkle them on the toilet seat?

  15. Other parasites? by Itninja · · Score: 1

    Can you buy tapeworms online to help us (or that fat loved one) lose weight? What about fleas? What fun!

    --
    I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
    1. Re:Other parasites? by Zerth · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not that I'm aware of, but you can buy hookworm to treat your asthma or other autoimmune disorders. Costs a few grand, or you can always get it from the source.

    2. Re:Other parasites? by egcagrac0 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but their ordering system seems to be borked, too.

  16. Technology? by asher09 · · Score: 1

    Why is this tagged technology??? Because of the "resistant" strain?

    --
    Some were yelling one thing, some another. Most of them had no idea what was going on or why they were there. Acts19:32
    1. Re:Technology? by canajin56 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Selling lice = boring. Selling line ONLINE = new high tech invention! Works for patents, so it should work for Slashdot stories, too.

      --
      ASCII stupid question, get a stupid ANSI
  17. Re:Is this "news for nerds" or "stuff that matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    in Soviet Russia, do pubic lice sell websites?

    They tried that, but found that the market just wasn't very profitable. Then they moved on to selling bulk emailing services, and found that it made a lot more money.

  18. Awful website. by CannonballHead · · Score: 1

    The grammar on the website is awful, complete with "were" instead of "where," breaking apart words that shouldn't be broken apart...

    1. Re:Awful website. by TypoNAM · · Score: 1

      So, you're saying that site is ran by a slashdot editor?

      --
      This space is not for rent.
    2. Re:Awful website. by CannonballHead · · Score: 1

      it is ran by a slashdot editor? ... I can't tell if that was a joke or an extremely well-timed typo. ;)

  19. Drop Shop by Stenchwarrior · · Score: 1

    Can you anonymously drop-ship this product to, say, an ex-wife or unfriendly co-worker? I'd like to buy about 10 batches of the "Red", if so.

    --
    Loading...
  20. Come on, cut these guys some slack already. by Joey+Vegetables · · Score: 2, Funny
    1. Re:Come on, cut these guys some slack already. by Em+Emalb · · Score: 1

      -1 invalid comparison.

      --
      Sent from your iPad.
    2. Re:Come on, cut these guys some slack already. by Joey+Vegetables · · Score: 3, Funny

      OK, fair enough. You can get rid of public lice!

    3. Re:Come on, cut these guys some slack already. by Em+Emalb · · Score: 3, Funny

      Are you talking about some draconian lice-ensing scheme?

      Man, I must be new around here. I'll get me coat, and I'll be mindful of the lawn.

      --
      Sent from your iPad.
    4. Re:Come on, cut these guys some slack already. by Joey+Vegetables · · Score: 1

      Stop picking nits!

    5. Re:Come on, cut these guys some slack already. by lostmongoose · · Score: 1

      OK, fair enough. You can get rid of public lice!

      get rid pubic lice maybe, but have you seen how long some of those people have been in congress?

    6. Re:Come on, cut these guys some slack already. by Joey+Vegetables · · Score: 1

      The National Lice League is demanding an apology.

  21. Re:Is this "news for nerds" or "stuff that matters by maxwell+demon · · Score: 5, Funny

    Agreed: It's a lousy story.

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  22. Re:Is this "news for nerds" or "stuff that matters by Altus · · Score: 3, Funny

    damn parasites!

    --

    "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

  23. Crabrevenge.com used to be owned... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...by Red Lobster.

  24. SOLD! by indre1 · · Score: 2, Funny

    SOLD - in Europe only Danish teenagers shave!

    1. Re:SOLD! by Tukz · · Score: 1

      And you know this how?
      I'm worried for my kindsmen.

      --
      - Don't do what I do, it's probably not healthy nor safe. -
    2. Re:SOLD! by Mabbo · · Score: 1

      I'm going to do some extensive testing to confirm this theory...

    3. Re:SOLD! by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

      I'm going to do some extensive testing to confirm this theory...

      And in keeping with proper scientific methods, this will be a double-blind test, and so simple visual inspection of the pubes will be out of the question.

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
    4. Re:SOLD! by vegiVamp · · Score: 1

      I'll not ask how much research you've done to establish this, but I know quite a few of my friends shave, and I'm not Danish.

      --
      What a depressingly stupid machine.
  25. My favorite testimonial by BitwiseX · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Thank you SO much you saved my marridge! My wife broke it off with her new lover because she thought he gave her crabs, wish I had found this site sooner!"
    Ryan - Hamilton

    Wow...just.... wow..

    1. Re:My favorite testimonial by compsci06 · · Score: 1

      i like your ascii "bitwise". nice touch

  26. Fortunately... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That would be cruel for the lice

    Fortunately lice are not human, so it is legal to inflict cruel and unusual punishment upon them. I very much doubt PETA will throw a fit over it either. That said, any idea on how to get them onto Palin?

    1. Re:Fortunately... by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

      any idea on how to get them onto Palin?

      Oh, she's already got 'em.

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
  27. So, actively spreading disease by KarlIsNotMyName · · Score: 1

    There's gotta be a law against it, right?

    --
    We are all God's parents.
    1. Re:So, actively spreading disease by RazorSharp · · Score: 1

      There's gotta be a law against it, right?

      It's not a disease, it's a parasite. I doubt there's a law regarding it, but I'm sure you could sue in a civil court.

      --
      "From the depths of my skeptical and rationalist soul, I ask the Lord to protect me from California touchie-feeliedom."
    2. Re:So, actively spreading disease by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 0, Troll

      Against selling it, no. Against assaulting someone, yes. That's exactly what you're doing.

      --
      -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
  28. This should be illegal unless the lice are sterile by PeterM+from+Berkeley · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Willfully spreading a contagious illness (which this qualifies as) should be illegal.
    I would say that creating ANY resistant, contagious disease should be considered a crime against humanity in general and should be rewarded with a swift death.

    Contagious disease is a GREAT way to inflict misery on a lot of unintended and innocent victims.

    Honestly, I can think of no worse or more dangerous crime.

    --PM

  29. Houston, we have a problem by 228e2 · · Score: 1

    "Make that bitch itch," the website says. "We sell you crabs to give your ex-girlfriend or whoever has pissed you off enough to make you seek revenge on them. If you want a method of revenge that doesn't involve permanent damage or risk of personal injury or jail time, you have come to the right place."

    So when/if I do incur jail time, what kind of countersuit could I claim??

    --
    Since when does being a Socialist mean 'someone who has a different opinion than me'?
  30. Fake by Megahard · · Score: 1

    Just like those kitten-in-a-bottle sites. Did anyone really think this was for real?

    --
    I eat only the real part of complex carbohydrates.
  31. Re:Is this "news for nerds" or "stuff that matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You may not find this interesting, but your ex-girlfriend sure does.

  32. Then you better lock EVERYONE up. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone passes on contagions every day, it just can't be helped. The sterile, antiseptic Star Trek world you envision in your mind just doesn't exist.

    1. Re:Then you better lock EVERYONE up. by Altus · · Score: 1

      its one thing to sneeze, its another to order samples of a disease from a web site and purposefully infect people.

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

  33. How to get rid of crabs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Shave on one side. Douse the other side with lighter fluid. Light the fluid and stab the crabs with a tooth pick when they run to the other side.

    1. Re:How to get rid of crabs. by bughunter · · Score: 2, Funny

      From an old Eddie Murphy routine:

      Rub salt into your pubes and the crabs will go insane from thirst. Then just go wading. Naked.

      (OK - Murphy's delivery was better...)

      --
      I can see the fnords!
    2. Re:How to get rid of crabs. by jandersen · · Score: 1

      And remember: Don't smoke!

    3. Re:How to get rid of crabs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shave on one side. Douse the other side with lighter fluid. Light the fluid and stab the crabs with a tooth pick when they run to the other side.

      LOL

  34. lice ense? pers anal itch? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    are these gnu pubic lice? and whose itch is getting scratched? .~.

  35. RIAA may object by electricprof · · Score: 1

    I thought that the RIAA held the international patent on blood-sucking parasites.

    1. Re:RIAA may object by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      You would think the patent attorneys themselves would recognize the prior art involved.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  36. Holy shit you are stupid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What are yo going to do, include a note that says "Please drop the contents on yourself, because I don't have a FUCKING CLUE or any COMMON SENSE on how this works!"

    Seriously, are you that clueless about how to use this? Are you that much of a mongoloid moron that you think this works the same way computer viruses and trojans work? You know what, I bet you're stupid enough to think that shipping a gun and some bullets to someone is all that's needed to bump them off.

    1. Re:Holy shit you are stupid. by ooshna · · Score: 1

      I think he means more like a biplane going over the house and spraying them like he is dusting crops.

  37. Re:This should be illegal unless the lice are ster by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Honestly, I can think of no worse or more dangerous crime.

    Bend over... Another bailout is coming (got you! heh heh)

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  38. anyone know if they buy lice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I could use the extra cash ..

  39. Re:Is this "news for nerds" or "stuff that matters by DarkIye · · Score: 1

    This story is letting me know that yes, people can be and are indeed that passive-aggressive and disgusting.

  40. Just another reason why we should all shave. by commodore73 · · Score: 0

    That goes for women AND men.

  41. Kids these days by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm tellin' ya, this country it going to hell in a handbasket. Buying crabs? Sheesh. In my day we got our crabs for free at a Grateful Dead show.

    Now, get off my lawn.

    --
    This ain't rocket surgery.
    1. Re:Kids these days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now you are one.

    2. Re:Kids these days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now you are one.

      WTF is that supposed to mean?

  42. Commerce by base_chakra · · Score: 1

    PhRMA says pubic lice theft exceeded $51B in 2009.

  43. News For Dummies, Stuff That's Dumb by Bananatree3 · · Score: 1

    Please tag every one of these dumbed-down stories "newsfordummies".

  44. Yes, it is legal. by Estanislao+Mart�nez · · Score: 1

    Yes, it is legal. It says so right on the site's FAQ page.

  45. Family Guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do it, Peter. Drink my diabetic blood.

    *drinks vial of blood*

    Oooh...that's nasty. You're nasty.

  46. Dead before they arrive by Frans+Faase · · Score: 2, Informative

    Lice are not very good at surviving without food (= blood). Half of them have died within 24 hours. A bedbug would be much better, because they can go for months without food and they are very difficult to get rid off, once you get them in your house.

    1. Re:Dead before they arrive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      They ship eggs with an estimated time to hatch.

  47. I am just FASCINATED by this thread! by jackpot777 · · Score: 1

    As a man in my early forties (married and faithful to one woman since 1999), I have to say this thread is an eye opener. I never even considered that there was a fad of almost-baldness a few years ago, but female bush is making a comeback.

    I guess everything DID change after 9/11!

    I wonder how many successful businessmen bed younger women, thinking something like "well, I don't look or act like I'm in my fifties", without knowing (without even knowing to know) that their junk adornment is as fashionable as a Leo Sayer perm.

    Thank you fellow Slashdotters!

    --
    Shiny. Let's be bad guys...
  48. IAAL but IANACL (But here's my view) by cheesethegreat · · Score: 3, Informative

    To be clear, I'm not a criminal lawyer. Crime is far, far away from my specialism. I am also not your lawyer. This is not a researched opinion. Cheers.

    This would absolutely (in my opinion) be a criminal offence in the jurisdiction.

    Common assault - includes any non-consensual contact or the causing of non-consensual contact through another object. This could easily be analogised to the cases involving leaving a trap or poking with a stick.

    Much more serious:

    Sexual assault - SOA 2003 s(3) - AFAIK this includes touching through another object, so the offense would be available

    Infliction of GBH with intent - GBH requires common assault (see above) and the rupturing of membranes, which lice do when they suck blood (this potentially hold a sentence of lifetime imprisonment, and is an extraordinarily serious offence in the UK)

    The Crown Prosecution Service generally charges less than the most serious crime chargeable, but it is quite feasible to imagine an assault or sexual assault charge being made if this were used. Also, the site owners are doubtless on the hook for all sorts of conspiracy and assistance offences, but I know little to nothing about them. Also, this may well come under the remit of Operation Sapphire (the London police operation on rape and sexual offences. I know some of the outstanding officers involved, they're like dogs with a bone once they get a suspect in their sights.) or could be viewed as domestic violence, which elevates sentencing in the courts (and opens up the possibility of elevation to Crown Court sentencing).

    All sorts of wonderful civil options even if the CPS didn't prosecute, with trespass against the person and negligence high on the list.

    1. Re:IAAL but IANACL (But here's my view) by canajin56 · · Score: 1

      Man, the site isn't even real. But good work, I had no idea you could get life in prison for having sex if you know you have crabs...

      --
      ASCII stupid question, get a stupid ANSI
    2. Re:IAAL but IANACL (But here's my view) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also occurs to me that given that any treatment could end up on the NHS (especially the 'F-strain' they seem so proud about) there would be a definite incentive to press charges.

    3. Re:IAAL but IANACL (But here's my view) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hmm. body lice spread at least 3 serious diseases. pubic and head lice do not, but body lice can interbreed with head lice. if someone manages to create a shampoo resistant strain of pubic lice that carries communicable disease, and sells the strain pre loaded with the disease, they could in theory create a serious epidemic or even pandemic. capitalism is king. i for one prostrate myself before our new louse overlords.

    4. Re:IAAL but IANACL (But here's my view) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did anyone else read the parent's subject line as "I am a lawyer but I am not a country lawyer"?

  49. Re:Is this "news for nerds" or "stuff that matters by FishOuttaWater · · Score: 1

    Ya just couldn't resist it, couldja?

  50. No sex before serving in the military? by denzacar · · Score: 4, Funny

    So is the prohibition on divorce, pre-martial sex and birth control...

    Well, that sure explains why the Crusades were all the rage back when Popes ruled the world...

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  51. Revenge on your ex? by 6Yankee · · Score: 1

    That doesn't sound like a bright plan. Girls talk. About embarrassing yucky stuff. Do this and the probability of getting it on with her hot friend drops to zero. :(

    (Admittedly, that may not be much of a drop, in which case the revenge may well be worth it... the math is left as an exercise for the reader.)

    1. Re:Revenge on your ex? by EkriirkE · · Score: 1

      If it's your ex, chances are she's already shit talked you to her friends and you're already at 0.

      --
      from 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
      to 45 2F 6E 40 3C DF 10 71 4E 41 DF AA 25 7D 31 3F
    2. Re:Revenge on your ex? by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

      You aren't gonna get it on with her hot friend anyway - girls lie about their ex.

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
  52. Re:This should be illegal unless the lice are ster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Willfully spreading a contagious illness (which this qualifies as) should be illegal.
    I would say that creating ANY resistant, contagious disease should be considered a crime against humanity in general and should be rewarded with a swift death.

    Contagious disease is a GREAT way to inflict misery on a lot of unintended and innocent victims.

    Honestly, I can think of no worse or more dangerous crime.

    --PM

    Sex is a sin; I'm just doing God's work.

  53. Would you believe... by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

    I've heard chicken flied lice tastes good

    It's fried rice you plick!

    And it's not The Craw, it's The Craw!

    --
    Bow-ties are cool.
  54. Not very creative... by denzacar · · Score: 1

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entomological_warfare#Legal_status

    The Biological and Toxic Weapons Convention (BWC) of 1972 does not specifically mention insect vectors in its text.[26]
    The language of the treaty, however, does cover vectors.[26]
    Article I bans, "Weapons, equipment or means of delivery designed to use such agents or toxins for hostile purposes or in armed conflict."[27][26]
    It would appear, due to the text of the BWC, that insect vectors as an aspect of entomological warfare are covered and outlawed by the Convention.[28]
    The issue is less clear when warfare with uninfected insects against crops is considered.[26]

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    1. Re:Not very creative... by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      Sorry that I haven't read Slashdot in a week to respond earlier, but would you mind explaining the relevance of a treaty binding state parties on the development of weapons for warfare on whether the actions of private citizens should be classified as terrorism?

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  55. Obligatory Brain Candy paraphrase by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a website that give crabs to ex-girlfriends !#!@!

  56. Re:This should be illegal unless the lice are ster by izomiac · · Score: 1

    Honestly, I can think of no worse or more dangerous crime.

    You lack imagination!

    More seriously, if creating resistant diseases were illegal then you'd shut down basically all genetic research on them. It's fairly standard to give bacteria antibiotic resistance so you can select for the ones that took up the genetic modifications.

    Beyond that, your argument relies solely on motivation rather than effect. People stopping antibiotics prematurely are a lot more dangerous than someone intentionally creating shampoo-resistant lice. Promiscuous, unprotected sex breeds horrendous diseases (like the leading preventable cause of blindness). Lice won't kill you outside of some contrived scenario. But if motivations are what's important, then why stop cattle farmers from using vancomycin?

    IOW, misguided actions based on good (or neutral) intentions are far more dangerous than pranksters. The world would be hellish if we cared more about what people think rather than what they do. Unfortunately, there seems to be an ever-present trend to do so.

  57. Please explain what you meant by that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm new to your suggestion or meme, what does it mean? Who are Lords of Acid? Some of us are busy making a living, and can't be bothered to search for information that is Not Safe For Work.

    1. Re:Please explain what you meant by that. by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      It is not, in any workplace where the idea"safe for work" exists, safe for work. But he's probably referring to this. Lords of Acid are a group that were noted for blunt sexual lyrics.

  58. Re:Is this "news for nerds" or "stuff that matters by Rashdot · · Score: 1

    Right, this story shouldn't be on /. anyway. Slashdotters getting pubic lice? Not a chance.

    --
    This is not the sig you're looking for.
  59. Are they doing this . . . by OhHellWithIt · · Score: 2, Funny

    . . . as a pubic service?

    (I needed to burn off some karma.)

    --
    "Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past." -- George Orwell
    1. Re:Are they doing this . . . by v1 · · Score: 1

      . . . as a pubic service?

      Sounds to me more of a pubic service

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
  60. Re:This should be illegal unless the lice are ster by xaxa · · Score: 1

    Woman jailed for giving lover HIV

    Search "reckless infection", that's not the only case. I'm not sure if it only applies to HIV though.

  61. Re:Is this "news for nerds" or "stuff that matters by demonlapin · · Score: 3, Funny

    He was itching to say it.

  62. Re:This should be illegal unless the lice are ster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lice != disease.

    Lice == parasites

  63. To do by Jim+Efaw · · Score: 1

    So is the prohibition on divorce, pre-martial sex and birth control but I've known my share of Catholics that have done all of the above.

    Holy shit! You mean, that wasn't a "to do" list?

    Not in that order.

  64. Re:This should be illegal unless the lice are ster by stimpleton · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Honestly, I can think of no worse or more dangerous crime."

    A police officer manipulating evidence for pecuniary gain while his target spends years in jail, his finances, family, and anus in tatters?

    No.30 on your list?

    The Texas judge who sent hundreds of youth to a private jail, of which he had financial interest in. Those convictions being over turned long after his ruse was tumbled? No.99? Perhaps not even in your top 100?

    --

    In post Patriot Act America, the library books scan you.
  65. Re:Is this "news for nerds" or "stuff that matters by cmburns69 · · Score: 1

    Your jokes bug me.

    --
    Online Starcraft RPG? At
    Dietary fiber is like asynchronous IO-- Non-blocking!
  66. Lousy story by Jim+Efaw · · Score: 1

    Agreed: It's a lousy story.

    Ya just couldn't resist it, couldja?

    He was itching to say it.

    I wonder how long people here were scratching their head for a response before one said "I guess I'll bite."

  67. There are legitimate purposes here..... by Cazakatari · · Score: 1

    Entomology students often have to make insect collections. Pubic lice are a tough thing to catch with a net in the park you know......

  68. Speaking of parasites... by magus_melchior · · Score: 1

    I remember hearing about a guy allowing himself to be infected with hookworms to cure an allergic reaction.

    He tried to market his, ah, passengers. Modern Western health law won't permit that, of course, so he does it rather illicitly... I think.

    --
    "We are Microsoft. You shall be assimilated. Competition is futile."
  69. There's no way to order by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are slashdotters such noobs that they can't spot a parody? Seriously? 1999 called and wants to sell you a bonsai cat. Really.

  70. Re:Is this "news for nerds" or "stuff that matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    > Slashdotters getting pubic lice? Not a chance.

    Speak for yourself, bitch, and be thankful. Back around 1997, there was a nasty round of public lice going around South Florida for almost a year. Horrid stuff. Totally resistant to permethrin. I spent a month shaving my dick, ass, and balls more or less daily (I can assure you, any possible eroticism was gone by accidental nick #3), washing my bed sheets daily, and went through 4 weekly rounds of lice gel. Do you know what finally got rid of it once and for all? Frontline. That's right, fipronil (the active insecticide in Frontline). Totally harmless to mammals, utterly deadly to lice. And, unfortunately, aquatic wildlife, which is the reason why they can't legally sell it as a lice treatment in America -- fipronil keeps on killing for a long, long time after it gets washed down the drain, and there are quite a few federal regulations prohibiting it from being used in ways that would allow lots of it to get into lakes and rivers. Ergo, it's unlikely to be approved for use in situations where it gets applied, then washed down the drain 10 minutes later.

    It's a shame. For killing pubic lice, there's nothing safer (to humans) or more effective (at killing the lice, and making sure they "stay dead"). Laugh at me now, but if you ever get crabs, remember this: fipronil works when nothing else does.

  71. Re:This should be illegal unless the lice are ster by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 1

    He's obviously referring to the generation and sale of these for purposes other than research. You should read his post more carefully, it's obvious that research into finding a cure for disease (which generally requires having some of the disease) does not apply to the proposed restrictions.

    --
    -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
  72. CrabRevenge.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Details from crabrevenge.com DNS:

          Stephen Cunningham
          24 Strangford Road
          Ardglass, BT30 7SG
          United Kingdom
          Phone: +44.2844841268 ...I mean. If he thinks 'revenge' is fair game he'd have no reason to complain. Right...?

  73. the domain isn't anonymously held by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    the result of whois crabrevenge.com reveals:

    Registrant Info: (FAST-13628818)

          Stephen Cunningham
          24 strangford road
          Ardglass, bt30 7sg
          United Kingdom
          Phone: +44.2844841268
          Fax..:
          Email: weefunker@yahoo.co.uk
          Last modified: 2009-01-25 00:43:31 GMT

    Administrative Info: (FAST-13628818)

          Stephen Cunningham
          24 strangford road
          Ardglass, bt30 7sg
          United Kingdom
          Phone: +44.2844841268
          Fax..:
          Email: weefunker@yahoo.co.uk
          Last modified: 2009-01-25 00:43:31 GMT

  74. Re:This should be illegal unless the lice are ster by izomiac · · Score: 1

    I read it close enough. The same technique is used in amateur genetic engineering. People gardening or farming do the same, on a less sophisticated level. Homebrewers use yeast and aspergillus, both of which can cause disease. If you make an exception for research, would you also make one for hobbies? How about commercial agriculture (e.g. Roundup)? Yogurt making (probiotics)? Pet-raising (zoonotic infections)? All of these activities are breeding more resistant microbes, otherwise they wouldn't be possible. You'd have too many other microbes interfering to achieve the desired effect, so you need to breed resistance in the microbes you want. (IOW, that's exactly the same rationale behind antibiotic resistance in research, but it obviously has far more applications.)

    If you want to ban something, the creation and use of biological weapons would be your target. But, IMHO, the loss of liberty would be too great for something so minor. I, for one, like to live in a world where we're free to toss a bug on somebody.

  75. Free? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Will they be released eventually under the General Pubic License?

  76. Serious question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How does a guy manage to shave without making his penis and scrotum into something resembling freshly ground pork? Sure, safely shaving the pubes around them seems possible, but no way would I use a razor on my bumpy, wrinkly, hairy scrotum or my thin-skinned, veiny, hairy penis. And I expect a depilatory would burn the sensitive skin.

    To anyone who has read this far, sorry about the lack of a TMI warning...

    - T

    1. Re:Serious question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I don't remove my body hair in a regular pattern, but when I do it I like to use those chemical creams for it. There are some pretty nasty ones out there, but if you find the right brand (I use Pilca, German brand sold by Müller stores) and if you cut off what you can with some scissors, you can get pretty good results. You get less ingrown hair, too. Just be careful the first time, if you have very sensitive skin you might want to be careful about leaving the cream on for too long.

      Remove cream and hair with running water (shower head) in a sitting position to not get it on your legs if you only want to remove pubic hair. You don't want your remaining leg hair in the way, makes cleanup much harder.

  77. Re:This should be illegal unless the lice are ster by vegiVamp · · Score: 1

    "Disease" ?

    You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

    --
    What a depressingly stupid machine.
  78. They break International "Law" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They break a number of laws, tracts and regulation about invasive species. At least if they export these critters, they also break many national laws regarding willfully spreading veneral diseases (for some odd reason considered more serious than willfully spreading other diseases). I suspect GB has something similar (I'm not into veneral diseases, so I'm not sure ;), at least most other European states has laws against willfully spreading veneral diseases and I know pubic lice is on "the list" at least in all Scandinavian countries.

    These International "Laws" come to my mind:

    Convention on Biological Diversity

    European Strategy on Invasive Alien Species (Part of the Bern Convention)

    EU Directive (2004/35/CE) ("EU Law": has to be implemented within the legal system in all states that are EU members)

    As USA repeatedly proven, even if a country has acknowledge an International Convention, not much happens if it breaks it. Insufficiently implementing an EU directive, on the other hand, result in heavy fines for countries that do that and they may even be kicked out of EU.

  79. Re:Is this "news for nerds" or "stuff that matters by dintech · · Score: 1

    Ok, but no need to spread it around.

  80. Re:This should be illegal unless the lice are ster by Eivind · · Score: 1

    It is.

    In all jurisdictions I can think of, it qualifies as bodily harm. It doesn't matter which method of harm is used. What matters is a willfull (or in some cases grossly reckless can be enough) action that causes another person to suffer bodily harm.

    Getting infected by a disease, or getting parasites, is harm.

    Not very major harm, mind you, since the damage is limited to some itching until you can buy a bottle of $2 lice-killing-shampoo.

  81. Re:This should be illegal unless the lice are ster by VShael · · Score: 1

    Does that include kissing someone?

    Most of the population has had glandular fever at some point, and when some up and coming youngster gets kissed for the first time, chances are he/she will get it.

    Do we charge these kids with wilfully spreading Infectious mononucleosis?

    Or do you just calm the fuck down?

  82. Dollars by doogledog · · Score: 1

    Strange how a British website is selling stuff in dollars

  83. If all shaved.... by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

    Do not let anyone you know shave, they are helping lice become extinct when they do that, and we really don't want to lose THIS species...

  84. Re:This should be illegal unless the lice are ster by PeterM+from+Berkeley · · Score: 1

    You realize that this policeman's crime affects ONE person over the course of that ONE person's life? The judge's crime affects maybe 10,000 people for their lives?

    A *resistant*, *contagious* disease can be passed worldwide and affect billions. Think about how much fun smallpox, polio, TB, AIDS are. We've only successfully eradicated ONE of those. And this website is selling resistant, contagious crabs. These crabs and their descendants may possibly affect people worldwide for thousands of years and affect millions/billions of people.

    Sterilized crabs are self-limiting and could be considered a "joke", but *any* contagious agent (particularly a resistant one) deliberately released has almost unlimited potential for misery.

    I mean, what if these crabs get loose in Africa and, because they suck blood, open up small wounds in people and marginally (1%) increases the transmissibility of AIDS? How many hundreds of thousands will die, potentially, because of that? You don't know that won't happen, do you?

    The crimes you mentioned, these are very limited in scope compared to a general crime against ALL of humanity that *deliberately* creating and unleashing a contagious, resistant disease/parasite is.

    I say again, I can think of no worse crime.

    --PM

  85. Lice for sale by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No thanks... I already have my own personal collection.

  86. OK, but what of shaving? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks, that at least addresses the depilatory option, even if the one described isn't available outside of Germany/Europe. I would have assumed all of them were too harsh for such use.

    But it still leaves open the question of how to safely shave male naughty bits...

    - T

  87. Why? by denzacar · · Score: 1

    You just did it yourself.
    Cause, one man's "private citizen" is other man's "terrorist insurgent".
    If I recall correctly, there were even couple of wars started as an answer to "terrorist acts" by "private citizens".
    World War I being maybe the most famous. So far.

    Or do you really think that there exists such an action that is illegal for a state to commit against another state, but completely legal for their citizens?
    Particularly regarding something that can be classified as a biological weapon.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  88. Has to be meant to intimidate or coerce the people by Valdrax · · Score: 1

    Or do you really think that there exists such an action that is illegal for a state to commit against another state, but completely legal for their citizens?
    Particularly regarding something that can be classified as a biological weapon.

    That's only of partial relevance to whether or not something is an act of terrorism. Under 18 USC 23331, to be an act of domestic or international terrorism, an act must both be a violent crime and intended to either (a) intimidate or coerce a civilian population, (b) influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion, (c) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping.

    That's the hard part. There are many laws that make giving someone pubic lice illegal, but unless you can figure out a way to intimidate the public or the government by doing so, it's not terrorism. That is the line that divides terrorism from just any other violent act. You have to be trying to influence the people with your actions -- not just getting petty revenge on your girlfriend. The same applies even if you used anthrax or smallpox against her.

    (I'm also not 100% sure that giving her pubic lice would count as a violent crime, but I'm 90% sure that it is since it's a form of battery at the least.)

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").