You just don't understand! Our entire civilization might collapse if enough people see some long-since-dead dude's junk etched in marble. This is exactly what happened to Sabine!
They should, if such company came along with "we fixed the issue you identified, please re-test updated product". However, this is not what Apple is doing.
If BSM losing its charm, then you need to escalate. Take denial and withholding to the next level - refuse to allow any games unless you show deference to the patching mistress.
On other hand, many people might not be into that at all.
In other news, Tim Cook was overheard stating: "The customer beatings will continue until morale improves". Next version of iPhone was rumored to remove the charge port, instead placing hand-crank.
This is corporate lawfare by Samsung, which is quasi-government corporation in Korea, against Qualcomm which is a public US-based corporation. This move is also likely Korean government response to Apple vs. Samsung. As such, this will quickly become political fight between Trump administration and Korean gov't.
Victimhood identity won't work in politics. First, scrutiny and criticism is expected part of politics. Second, the moment you transition from private citizen to public person, censorship becomes a big no-no.
With Steam down, I had a chance to clear old Doritos bags and a pile of Mountain Dew cans, go look for my missing cat, and take a shower. I found dead and dried husk of my cat in the shower. I think I forgot to feed him this months. I also talked to my elderly mom upstairs, who didn't recognize me at first because I also shaved off my neckbeard. She asked me if I run out of Mountain Dew. I told he it was much worse - Steam is down.
Why do you have the need to villainize opponent in the argument? You keep attributing contempt and otherwise attempting to stigmatize me instead of addressing the argument.
Let me simplify - your very different intelligent roofers will be out of a job due to automation. In this case, different intelligence won't allow them to secure gainful employment. There will be a lot of them, they will starve, riot, and could bring down society with them. We need to pay for bread and circuses to avoid that.
Twitter already allows some individuals to engage in "arbitrary amounts of harassments, death threats and stalking". You should have instead said: "If they allowed everyone arbitrary amounts of harassments, death threats and stalking...".
Appeal to authority. False equivalence. Ad hominem.
I understand your need to construct a positive narrative, but it is manufactured and counter-factual. Intelligence is heritable. A population of pygmies will not product any NBA players no matter how much they believe in themselves. Presently, our society structured that intelligence is not strictly necessary to prosper. This is rapidly changing and unless we ensure that most people have a way to prosper and it is decoupled from having a job - there will be looting and rioting and it might even escalate to societal collapse. So nobody gets to Mars and beyond, no matter how smart or dumb.
Much simpler explanation is that Johnnies are coming from a line of 'strong backs weak minds' and will never get math no matter what you do. Strongest of Johnnies will play football, the rest will do roofing gigs and beat their wives.
You see, in our victimhood culture, 'trying to hurt' suffers from definition creep. For example, you will encounter people seriously arguing that using racial slurs is "trying to hurt' and therefore should be considered an assault. Is sending a rape survivor explicit pictures constitutes an assault? What if he kills himself as a result of seeing such pictures?
If miscreants attempted to punch each other, it would have been much more black and white situation. However, they posted flashing pictures on Twitter. This doesn't fit my concept of assault. I also don't fully understand the implications of setting precedent that such action constitutes an assault. Are pictures actions or speech? Does it have to be targeted or broadcasting is sufficient?
I understand that, but what I find interested is this situation. Asshats sent flashing gifts to other asshats. Nobody got any sizure and everyone has demonstrable intent to be an asshat. Who gets charged with an assault and why? Keep in mind, being asshat is not a crime.
Slashdot Mirror
You just don't understand! Our entire civilization might collapse if enough people see some long-since-dead dude's junk etched in marble. This is exactly what happened to Sabine!
They should, if such company came along with "we fixed the issue you identified, please re-test updated product". However, this is not what Apple is doing.
Why is this on /. ? Too much eggnog by msmash ?
If BSM losing its charm, then you need to escalate. Take denial and withholding to the next level - refuse to allow any games unless you show deference to the patching mistress.
On other hand, many people might not be into that at all.
In other news, Tim Cook was overheard stating: "The customer beatings will continue until morale improves". Next version of iPhone was rumored to remove the charge port, instead placing hand-crank.
This is corporate lawfare by Samsung, which is quasi-government corporation in Korea, against Qualcomm which is a public US-based corporation. This move is also likely Korean government response to Apple vs. Samsung. As such, this will quickly become political fight between Trump administration and Korean gov't.
Victimhood identity won't work in politics. First, scrutiny and criticism is expected part of politics. Second, the moment you transition from private citizen to public person, censorship becomes a big no-no.
With Steam down, I had a chance to clear old Doritos bags and a pile of Mountain Dew cans, go look for my missing cat, and take a shower. I found dead and dried husk of my cat in the shower. I think I forgot to feed him this months. I also talked to my elderly mom upstairs, who didn't recognize me at first because I also shaved off my neckbeard. She asked me if I run out of Mountain Dew. I told he it was much worse - Steam is down.
What do you call a penalty which is a prime number?
China wants free IP, and even next quarter myopic CEOs no longer falling for "partner and share" scam.
At least they are not working on bringing back glassholes.
He dictated it to his secretary in-between downing scotches, you insensitive clod.
Commercials, re-runs, and dead air 3am to 7am.
Why do you have the need to villainize opponent in the argument? You keep attributing contempt and otherwise attempting to stigmatize me instead of addressing the argument.
Let me simplify - your very different intelligent roofers will be out of a job due to automation. In this case, different intelligence won't allow them to secure gainful employment. There will be a lot of them, they will starve, riot, and could bring down society with them. We need to pay for bread and circuses to avoid that.
I haven't seen this new UI, but it is safe to assume "usability experts" were hard at work at making trendy and user un-friendly changes to it.
Twitter already allows some individuals to engage in "arbitrary amounts of harassments, death threats and stalking". You should have instead said: "If they allowed everyone arbitrary amounts of harassments, death threats and stalking...".
While rampant SJWing certainly didn't help, Twitter sans SJW is still not viable.
Doesn't Trump has to at least assume the office before he has means of enacting tyranny? It is still Obama's show for now.
Appeal to authority. False equivalence. Ad hominem.
I understand your need to construct a positive narrative, but it is manufactured and counter-factual. Intelligence is heritable. A population of pygmies will not product any NBA players no matter how much they believe in themselves. Presently, our society structured that intelligence is not strictly necessary to prosper. This is rapidly changing and unless we ensure that most people have a way to prosper and it is decoupled from having a job - there will be looting and rioting and it might even escalate to societal collapse. So nobody gets to Mars and beyond, no matter how smart or dumb.
Sure, Twitter is most notable failure. Other social media is not categorically different and stock values are equally divorced from reality.
Much simpler explanation is that Johnnies are coming from a line of 'strong backs weak minds' and will never get math no matter what you do. Strongest of Johnnies will play football, the rest will do roofing gigs and beat their wives.
Bottom half? You are an optimist. Try bottom 90%.
You see, in our victimhood culture, 'trying to hurt' suffers from definition creep. For example, you will encounter people seriously arguing that using racial slurs is "trying to hurt' and therefore should be considered an assault. Is sending a rape survivor explicit pictures constitutes an assault? What if he kills himself as a result of seeing such pictures?
If miscreants attempted to punch each other, it would have been much more black and white situation. However, they posted flashing pictures on Twitter. This doesn't fit my concept of assault. I also don't fully understand the implications of setting precedent that such action constitutes an assault. Are pictures actions or speech? Does it have to be targeted or broadcasting is sufficient?
I understand that, but what I find interested is this situation. Asshats sent flashing gifts to other asshats. Nobody got any sizure and everyone has demonstrable intent to be an asshat. Who gets charged with an assault and why? Keep in mind, being asshat is not a crime.
It shouldn't be up to twitter to decide this - they should contact account owner and ask if this owner intends to appeal.