Slashdot Mirror


Apple CEO Tim Cook Calls AirPods 'a Runaway Success' (cnbc.com)

It turns out the $159 AirPods Bluetooth earphones are selling well, or so CEO Tim Cook would have us believed. Cook dropped by the New York Stock Exchange on Wednesday while on vacation, and talked about the AirPods sales. From a report on CNBC: In comments to CNBC, Cook declined to talk specifically on Apple's outlook, but he said it has been a "great holiday." He added that the company's new wireless earbuds, AirPods, are "a runaway success." When asked if more would come into stock, he said Apple's "making them just as fast as we can." AirPods debuted at September's splashy event, but saw shipping delays through most of the fall and finally hit shelves just days before the crucial Christmas shopping rush. The limited shipments were sold quickly -- ship dates are now six weeks out on Apple's website.

214 comments

  1. Slashdot's editing process is working well by Spy+Handler · · Score: 4, Funny

    or so Taco would have us believed.

    1. Re:Slashdot's editing process is working well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good sales at Christmas time for a new product is not an indication of product success. Seems like they said Apple Watches were doing great as well. They have no idea how big or sustainable the market is yet.

    2. Re:Slashdot's editing process is working well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or so Taco would have had us believe .

    3. Re:Slashdot's editing process is working well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      whoosh....

    4. Re:Slashdot's editing process is working well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CmdrTaco is RIP In Pieces....

  2. Yeah, as in... by BronsCon · · Score: 5, Funny

    They literally run away from your ear so you have to buy another pair.

    --
    APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    1. Re:Yeah, as in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They literally run away from your ear so you have to buy another pair.

      Resulting in hilariously ironic third party accessory straps that pretty much turn them into a typical set of wireless earbuds.

    2. Re:Yeah, as in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not so, for everyone. The thing is, these aren't for all ears, much like the earpods aren't for all ears. The Earpods fit my ears really well, so these airpods fit great as well. I have run, jumped, laid upside down under a tree, walked to/from work, in the wind, basically all my daily routine stuff and more plus jumping up and down like a crazy person to get them to fall out. They haven't and they don't feel like they were.

      In fact, in my daily routine of realistic times I use headphones during the day I have had 3 days use off of the airpods and associated case before I *had* to charge them again after daily conference calls as well as music time and commute/ to/from home.

      The sound, to my ears and with my preferences is as good as earpods, but will never be as good as full cans. That is important because I don't expect them to be better, only as good and what I'm paying for is 'as good' without the wires and with added conviences. Not only does it auto pair with my apple products but I was also using them on my android phone and have no problem switching back and forth.

      The messages on here, like this one are more likely from either someone who's ears they don't fit well or someone who isn't a promoter/buyer of apple products but is a detractor and isn't a customer anyway. That you and many people on here paint the picture that it sucks for everyone is just not realistic and tells me that as always, controlling people are controlling.

      Its true, that if earpods don't fit your ears well this is not a product fot you and there are plenty of others that will fit your ears better.

    3. Re:Yeah, as in... by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Congratulations, you're in the very small minority of people for whom Earpods/Airpods are actually a good fit.

      That you, and many people on here, ignore the "+5, Funny", which is what I was actually going for, in order to proclaim that anyone who doesn't like Airpods must be an Apple detractor is the real irony, I think, as I look around at all the Apple gear in my home. Since you seem to want to ignore the humor and be all serious, here's some serious for you:

      Earpods/Airpods are a fixed-insert earbud; look at literally every other earbud of similar design and you'll notice one thing they have all in common: they're the cheap low-end offering from whoever made them. Better earbuds, invariably, have removable tips available in multiple sizes, which seal against the ear canal for improved bass response.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    4. Re:Yeah, as in... by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Wait, what day did your Airpods arrive? You must've gotten the first pair off the line in order to have charged them, used them for 3 days, and charged them again. Or, you're full of shit.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
  3. Apple's recent performance: Let's review by popo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    1) iPad Pro: Meh.
    2) Apple Watch: Meh.
    3) MBP 2016: Meh
    4) iPhone 7: Meh
    5) Airpods?

    I'm going to go with "Meh".

    --
    ------ The best brain training is now totally free : )
    1. Re: Apple's recent performance: Let's review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What other laptop/tablet/smartphone/smartwatch/headphones aren't meh?

      There's not much innovation going on right now.

    2. Re:Apple's recent performance: Let's review by lgw · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Courage!

      Apple took away the headphone jack, and now $160 headphones are selling quite well? I can certainly believe that. I can believe it's the only reason they removed the headphone jack. I can believe that no matter how badly Apple treats it's faithful, they'll just keep giving Apple money.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    3. Re: Apple's recent performance: Let's review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't have to be innovative. It could just deliver great performance at a reasonable price, but even that's too much to ask.

    4. Re:Apple's recent performance: Let's review by lgw · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I can also believe that Apple fans have mods points and can't accept honest criticism of their God.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    5. Re: Apple's recent performance: Let's review by Barlo_Mung_42 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Pretty much the whole Surface line. The Studio is amazing.

    6. Re:Apple's recent performance: Let's review by Theaetetus · · Score: 1

      1) iPad Pro: Meh. 2) Apple Watch: Meh. 3) MBP 2016: Meh 4) iPhone 7: Meh 5) Airpods?

      I'm going to go with "Meh".

      Less bass than over-the-ear phones. Wireless. Lame.

    7. Re: Apple's recent performance: Let's review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it ran something besides Windows 10, then perhaps. No thanks.

    8. Re: Apple's recent performance: Let's review by fbobraga · · Score: 1

      seems that you are getting $$ to advertise M$ products here...

    9. Re:Apple's recent performance: Let's review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about using real metrics (as in, something measurable) such as sales and profit?

      You say their products are meh, but from what I've seen, while everyone else is struggling, Apple still goes strong. And please don't be confused by people who compare Android device sales with Apple device sales - Android includes dozens of manufacturers, Apple is just one.

      Samsung - one of their biggest competitors - can't even build a device without a deadly fault in it* nor without having their HQ raided for alleged tax evasion. And Apple is still the bad guy?

      Logically, you only have two possibilities here, with regard to Apple:

      1- People desire inferior products that are very expensive.
      2- Apple actually produces something desirable, useful and user-friendly.

      I'll let you figure out which one is more likely.

      * read: without properly testing it before release... because they just HAD TO release before the iPhone 7, otherwise - so they thought - they'd be chewed up and spat out by the iPhone 7 (unlikely, the Note 7 was actually pretty decent on paper). Oh, and they had to go ahead and bump the version number to be on par with Apple (Note 5 -> Note 7). Real subtle Samsung, not needy at all (yeah, yeah, you'll tell me it was because they wanted to sync up with the S series... sure, that must be it... matching up with the iPhone versions must be total coincidence).

    10. Re:Apple's recent performance: Let's review by tomhath · · Score: 1

      Apple fans have mods points and can't accept honest criticism of their God.

      Their God is dead. Tim Cook is the CEO now.

    11. Re:Apple's recent performance: Let's review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because absolutely no other headphones, wireless or otherwise, work with the iPhone 7.

      No wait, that's just as stupid of a statement as what you wrote.

    12. Re: Apple's recent performance: Let's review by khr · · Score: 1

      What other laptop/tablet/smartphone/smartwatch/headphones aren't meh?

      There's not much innovation going on right now.

      Note 7 was a bang!

    13. Re: Apple's recent performance: Let's review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck you, a typical crapple apologist these days - "we are better than samsung"

      I don't give a shit about shitty samsung, but crapple is way shittier.

    14. Re:Apple's recent performance: Let's review by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      Considering the quality of bluetooth headphones I've seen, these $160 AirPods deliver worse sound than 1.20PLN ($0.28) wired buds I saw in a kiosk.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    15. Re: Apple's recent performance: Let's review by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      If Microsoft would only introduce the Boot Country Club feature, which would allow a Surface to run OS X, then they would have a contender.

    16. Re:Apple's recent performance: Let's review by umafuckit · · Score: 1

      1) iPad Pro: Meh. 2) Apple Watch: Meh. 3) MBP 2016: Meh 4) iPhone 7: Meh 5) Airpods?

      I'm going to go with "Meh".

      That's unfair, the MacBook Pro is doing really well.

    17. Re:Apple's recent performance: Let's review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot to mention two more steps:

      6) ...
      7) Profit!

    18. Re:Apple's recent performance: Let's review by argStyopa · · Score: 0

      " I can believe that no matter how badly Apple treats it's faithful, they'll just keep giving Apple money."

      Isn't that the way with pretty much every religion?

      --
      -Styopa
    19. Re:Apple's recent performance: Let's review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, by removing the headphone cord's jack it saved them a full 15 cents for the actual jack & solder costs to weld it on the circuit board. I guess with their production numbers that may amount to a small pile of dollar bills- so it could not have been the only reason. Ahh but there is another, they swear it helps waterproof it for longer without that hole. OK, still not sold. Give it to me straight Tim- where's the real reason.

      Oh they now offer a solution for their lack of jack. And at $159? Hooollly smokes.

    20. Re: Apple's recent performance: Let's review by Merk42 · · Score: 1

      You do know for that to happen, the ball is in Apple's court, not Microsoft's, right?

    21. Re: Apple's recent performance: Let's review by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 2

      If Microsoft would only introduce the Boot Country Club feature, which would allow a Surface to run OS X, then they would have a contender.

      Microsoft will happily sell you a Windows license and lets you run it on any x86 hardware you want.

      Same can't be said of Apple and macOS.

    22. Re: Apple's recent performance: Let's review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What other laptop/tablet/smartphone/smartwatch/headphones aren't meh?

      There's not much innovation going on right now.

      But there is if "innovation" is things like removing the headphone jack or making batteries that catch fire.

    23. Re: Apple's recent performance: Let's review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the price you would expect they come with Win10 enterprise installed and all M$ spyware removed. But I guess for those who likes to pay $2000 to be a product, Studio is amazing.

    24. Re:Apple's recent performance: Let's review by GNious · · Score: 1

      Try Bragi's "The Headphones", or "The Dash" - I have the latter, been quite pleased overall with audio-quality

    25. Re: Apple's recent performance: Let's review by rbgaynor · · Score: 1

      Pretty much the whole Surface line. The Studio is amazing.

      You do not that the iPad Pro (just the Pro) outsells the entire Surface line, right?

      --
      "Good things don't end with eum, they end with mania or teria." - H. Simpson
    26. Re:Apple's recent performance: Let's review by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      0) iPod: No wireless. Less space than a Nomad. Lame.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    27. Re: Apple's recent performance: Let's review by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 1

      I own Bluetooth earbuds. They cost me $25CDN on Amazon. I like them a lot.

      I own an iPhone 6.

      Apple owners don't NEED to buy the apple earbuds if they don't want to. There are plenty of cheap options. If people are buying these, it's because they think they're worth the money. (For completely wireless earbudsâ"without a cable connecting both sidesâ"they're actually price and feature competitive, in addition to being easier to pair. There's no such thing as cheap earbuds in this category.)

    28. Re:Apple's recent performance: Let's review by Princeofcups · · Score: 1

      That's unfair, the MacBook Pro is doing really well.

      Doesn't matter. The haters make up their own reality where everything Apple sells is crap, and people only buy it because they are somehow hypnotized by the shiny. I predicted that the average user will be quite happy with their iPhone 7, and won't care about the jack. I predicted that the average user will be quite happy with the new MacBook, and don't care that it's not cutting edge enough. No matter what Apple creates or sells, or how well it sells, the complaints are the same. So no, reality doesn't matter.

      --
      The only thing worse than a Democrat is a Republican.
    29. Re:Apple's recent performance: Let's review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wait what? what weird confused grammar are you using, what the fuck is a PLN, where the fuck are you buying headphones for a quarter at some strange "headphone kiosk" and what the fuck are you talking about?

      oh, you're from a second world shithole and trying to apply your logic to the normal world. get off this forum retard and take an esl class. polak. the only thing you're qualified to explain is why you polaks like to tell people you're "from europe". not everyone is as dumb as polacs - we know you're not real europeans.

    30. Re:Apple's recent performance: Let's review by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Airports aren't so much "meh" as they are "WTF Where did they go. Hey guys I dropped a small white thing!"

    31. Re: Apple's recent performance: Let's review by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      Nah. He's just getting $$ for everything you happen to disagree with. That's what makes this site great. Everyone's on the take.

    32. Re: Apple's recent performance: Let's review by sycodon · · Score: 1

      1. Make a new iPhone without headphone jack
      2. Make new Bluetooth headphones
      3. Profit!

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    33. Re: Apple's recent performance: Let's review by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      macOS on a tablet? I personally wouldn't cripple a touchscreen computer with a non-touchscreen OS.

      I'm no great fan of Unity or Mir but for Unixy goodness, Ubuntu Touch would be my choice.

    34. Re: Apple's recent performance: Let's review by gravewax · · Score: 1

      They aren't locked down, you can run anything you like on them

    35. Re: Apple's recent performance: Let's review by Barlo_Mung_42 · · Score: 1

      You do know that the Big Mac outsells the entire iCrap line, right?

    36. Re: Apple's recent performance: Let's review by Barlo_Mung_42 · · Score: 1

      Why would you want to run a non-touch aware OS on this?

    37. Re: Apple's recent performance: Let's review by Barlo_Mung_42 · · Score: 1

      You found me out! Step one was registering this account in the late 90s. Step two was waiting for just the right moment to cash in. As you can see, I like to play the long game...

    38. Re:Apple's recent performance: Let's review by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Bluetooth supports a number of codecs, but most of the cheap ones only support extremely lossy formats.

      I think the airpods support AAC for digital transmission - and if the music you're listening to is already in that format, you might not have any additional quality loss. If you have lossless audio files, the difference might not be all that noticeable.

    39. Re:Apple's recent performance: Let's review by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      But why would I want to lossily encode something then decode it back if a dumb piece of wire can transfer that without any quality loss? The end result is that $0.28 buds deliver better sound than $160 ones, don't suffer from downtime due to charging, require no extra attachments to ensure they don't get lost, need no expensive connectors to any standard gear, and so on.

      So a $0.28 product is already better from any side than a $160 one. And, you know, I can pay a bit more than $0.28 to have any quality I want. Oh right, no Apple logo.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    40. Re: Apple's recent performance: Let's review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah I agree. It's amazingly shitty.

    41. Re: Apple's recent performance: Let's review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah Big Macs are great.

      Surface? It couldn't outsell the number of times I take a crap (iCrap).

    42. Re: Apple's recent performance: Let's review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's ok we get it.

      You work for M$. Why would anyone else advertise for M$ here?

      I mean taking a crap on Apple is fun, but pushing Surface just crosses the line.

      And don't even try bringing Android into the equation ok....

    43. Re: Apple's recent performance: Let's review by lucm · · Score: 1

      Pretty much the whole Surface line. The Studio is amazing.

      You do not that the iPad Pro (just the Pro) outsells the entire Surface line, right?

      that's because there's many Surface clones from other vendors, which Microsoft allows since they're cashing in on the WIndows license. Apple has a 21% market share in this segment, they lost the lead a long time ago.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    44. Re:Apple's recent performance: Let's review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gays are godless.

    45. Re: Apple's recent performance: Let's review by rbgaynor · · Score: 1

      More Big Mac units are sold (a little under 4X more) but they represent far less in overall revenue (about 30X less). But it's hardly relevant as the two markets are completely unrelated, while iDevices and Surface devices do go head to head.

      --
      "Good things don't end with eum, they end with mania or teria." - H. Simpson
    46. Re:Apple's recent performance: Let's review by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      1) iPad Pro: Meh. 2) Apple Watch: Meh. 3) MBP 2016: Meh 4) iPhone 7: Meh 5) Airpods?

      I'm going to go with "Meh".

      Mods???? How in the FUCK is that "Insightful?"

    47. Re: Apple's recent performance: Let's review by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      Pretty much the whole Surface line. The Studio is amazing.

      Looks amazing.

      Just like the 2010 Apple Patent (that MS simply ripped-off) for a touchscreen iMac that Apple obviously built, and rejected, due to the massive problems with the ergonomics of the whole idea.

    48. Re: Apple's recent performance: Let's review by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      They aren't locked down, you can run anything you like on them

      Are you implying that Macs are "locked down"?

    49. Re:Apple's recent performance: Let's review by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      Courage!

      Apple took away the headphone jack, and now $160 headphones are selling quite well? I can certainly believe that. I can believe it's the only reason they removed the headphone jack. I can believe that no matter how badly Apple treats it's faithful, they'll just keep giving Apple money.

      You're a typical Slashtard Apple Hater idiot.

      If you are speaking of the iPhone 7, Appe INCLUDED a Lightning to 3.5 mm cable WITH THE PHONE.

      How does that fit into your Conspiracy Theory, dumbass?

    50. Re:Apple's recent performance: Let's review by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      Considering the quality of bluetooth headphones I've seen, these $160 AirPods deliver worse sound than 1.20PLN ($0.28) wired buds I saw in a kiosk.

      And you've tried them?

    51. Re:Apple's recent performance: Let's review by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      Try Bragi's "The Headphones", or "The Dash" - I have the latter, been quite pleased overall with audio-quality

      Bragi's BT bullshit is just that. Apple's W1 chip truly IS a revolution, particularly in connection stability and range.

    52. Re:Apple's recent performance: Let's review by umafuckit · · Score: 1

      Doesn't matter. The haters make up their own reality where everything Apple sells is crap, and people only buy it because they are somehow hypnotized by the shiny. I predicted that the average user will be quite happy with their iPhone 7, and won't care about the jack. I predicted that the average user will be quite happy with the new MacBook, and don't care that it's not cutting edge enough. No matter what Apple creates or sells, or how well it sells, the complaints are the same. So no, reality doesn't matter.

      At some point it will catch up. For instance, I'm likely going to get the new Macbook Pro via my company. But I wouldn't pay for it myself and I'm already considering what machine to jump I might jump ship to in two or three years time if Apple continue as they are.

    53. Re: Apple's recent performance: Let's review by fbobraga · · Score: 1

      Step one was registering this account in the late 90s

      So, It's a way of living? Seems easy: almost 20 years... :P

    54. Re: Apple's recent performance: Let's review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Says the guy who can't spell his slurs consistently. Also I'll think you'll find GP's post is more grammatically correct than yours.

    55. Re:Apple's recent performance: Let's review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It needs a dongle? The phone needs a DONGLE?

      Pure, unadulterated fail.

    56. Re:Apple's recent performance: Let's review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're expecting the base of full cans out of these? Talk about unrealistic expectations.

    57. Re: Apple's recent performance: Let's review by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

      Nah. He's just getting $$ for everything you happen to disagree with. That's what makes this site great. Everyone's on the take.

      Then where's my damn check? I can be disagreeable all day long!

    58. Re: Apple's recent performance: Let's review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this isn't a phd thesis moron. there is no proper grammar for a comments section of a forum. this is where you swype on the toilet. as long as people kno what your mean your fine.

      let me guess, your sms starts with
      Dear Sir or Madam:

      it takes a special kind of idiot thinking the stanford comma belongs in slashdot comments. fucktard loser. you have nothing pertinent to say that interests people because your a bland antisocial loser so you grammer chick people's slashdot comments? damn that's a retarded sad life your got you're-self there.

    59. Re: Apple's recent performance: Let's review by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I can be disagreeable all day long!

      No you can't.

      *cha-ching*

    60. Re: Apple's recent performance: Let's review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty much the whole Surface line. The Studio is amazing.

      Amazing? It's a worse performer in every way than the MacBook Pro - and it's a fucking desktop. It's non-upgradeable, it's only goes up to 16 GB RAM. It's glued shut. As a desktop that is not small - aand I'm not talking the screen, but the computer box. You swivel the screen to use it as a graphics board - and bamm, the keyboard is in the way. You move that away - no more keyboard commands. It's as if a Homer Simpson designed a computer for artists instead of a car for himself.

    61. Re: Apple's recent performance: Let's review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      macOS on a tablet? I personally wouldn't cripple a touchscreen computer with a non-touchscreen OS.

      Well, these guys have been doing that for 10 years now. The surface is just a lame copy.

      And since they've been doing it for ten years - somebody must buy them.

  4. Sorry, out of stock, supply shortages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I see Apple and Nintendo both used that gimmick this Xmas. Shoppers react like Pavlov's dogs and camp out at Wal-Mart and Best Buy each morning before the stores open.

    1. Re:Sorry, out of stock, supply shortages by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Or they don't want to waste money manufacturing too many copies of a flop. The buzz over being sold out is only a bonus. After Christmas day, people actually own and use the item and the real day-to-day usage reviews start showing up everywhere. Selling out right at Christmas is the right time to decide if you should bother making many more.

    2. Re:Sorry, out of stock, supply shortages by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      Or they don't want to waste money manufacturing too many copies of a flop. The buzz over being sold out is only a bonus. After Christmas day, people actually own and use the item and the real day-to-day usage reviews start showing up everywhere. Selling out right at Christmas is the right time to decide if you should bother making many more.

      There are already about a zillion glowing reviews online, fucktard.

    3. Re:Sorry, out of stock, supply shortages by omnichad · · Score: 1

      How long do you think it takes to ramp up manufacturing and catch up? They barely just shipped out the first batch in the last month.

    4. Re:Sorry, out of stock, supply shortages by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      How long do you think it takes to ramp up manufacturing and catch up? They barely just shipped out the first batch in the last month.

      What are you saying?

      They had some sort of technical issue that delayed the first shipments; but who knows how far along they were in the build-process when they put a hold on those first units? If they were pretty complete, then it may have been as simple as re-flashing the firmware before they sent them out, which would have taken likely under a week.

    5. Re:Sorry, out of stock, supply shortages by omnichad · · Score: 1

      You said:

      There are already about a zillion glowing reviews online

      I said:

      They barely just shipped out the first batch

      You said:

      What are you saying?

      I'm saying that the size of the second batch produced is probably based on speculation on the success of the product - and you can't just flip a switch and manufacture all those devices in an instant - especially if the first batch is delayed and you have nothing to base your guess on until the last minute.

    6. Re:Sorry, out of stock, supply shortages by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      You said:

      There are already about a zillion glowing reviews online

      I said:

      They barely just shipped out the first batch

      You said:

      What are you saying?

      I'm saying that the size of the second batch produced is probably based on speculation on the success of the product - and you can't just flip a switch and manufacture all those devices in an instant - especially if the first batch is delayed and you have nothing to base your guess on until the last minute.

      Ok, I agree that they would likely adjust production based on sales figures, but likely not for at least a quarter after the initial introduction, because initial demand is almost always higher (duh!). And I also agree that they can't just snap their fingers and have another "batch" ready-to-go at a moment's notice.

      But I am also pretty sure that the AirPods are anything but a "flop", based on what I have been seeing.

    7. Re:Sorry, out of stock, supply shortages by omnichad · · Score: 1

      They have enough clout that they can "dictate" that it's not a flop for quite a while, regardless of what the customer actually wants. Once customers find out there were actually cheaper options all along there might be a lot of buyer's remorse.

    8. Re:Sorry, out of stock, supply shortages by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      They have enough clout that they can "dictate" that it's not a flop for quite a while, regardless of what the customer actually wants. Once customers find out there were actually cheaper options all along there might be a lot of buyer's remorse.

      There may be cheaper solutions; but it is looking like there aren't any more reliable solutions.

      Have you read any of the reviews by people going on about how they can roam all over their two-story house with their iPhone sitting in some random location without losing connection? One pro reviewer said he was able to get something like 150 ft. from his phone before he lost connection. Try that with any other wireless earbuds. Can't be done.

      Also, the audio quality and ease and robustness of the pairing has been noted as being quite a step above the norm for BT.

      So, as I said before, it really does look like they've "hit it out of the park" on this one...

      Do I wish they were closer to $100 than $160? Of course. Will I ever purchase a pair? Probably not. But, compared with other BT earphones and earbuds, they are not at all out-of-line, price-wise.

      But, a lot of people don't get the difference between price and value.

      Obviously, you're one of those people.

  5. Runaway by Tablizer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sell a car without a steering wheel (or with an awkward extension bar), then sell the steering wheel later at a premium and claim "our steering wheels are a huge success!"

    1. Re:Runaway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And the decision to omit the steering wheel was a sign of "courage".

    2. Re:Runaway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The iPhone 7 comes with a fucking set of headphones that plug straight into its doofy proprietary square hole. Wireless earphones have been out for years, and they all work with the iPhone 7. It also comes with an adapter for your existing headphones. So the only way you are being forced into this is if you have luxury headphones AND ALSO need to charge your phone at the same time as you listen AND ALSO want to spend 150 on new headphones instead of a lightning Y adapter or dock. There's no way that that is all, most, or even a reasonable number of their sales.

      These sales are people who want the latest doofy headphone, full stop.

    3. Re:Runaway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This analogy is so wrong its not even funny. The car is basically sold with two fucking steering wheels but they sell a fancy one and you are pissed because it offends you that they dare sell a diamond studded wheel that is out of your price range.

      While this analogy is stupid - assuming we continue with it, the following is the unbiased analogy: Apples sells a "car" with a special steering wheel included + an adapter to use any other car's wheel. The car also accepts the new, better and more convenient, standard of wheel (Bluetooth) without any issue. Apple sells a special wheel (Air Pods), that you can choose to purchase but is completely optional and unnecessary.

      So yes, it might be a surprise that these sell well if you actually flesh out the analogy and aren't thinking with your hate of Apple.

    4. Re:Runaway by esperto · · Score: 1

      If we are doing car analogies, I think a closer one would be they selling a car with no stereo and using a different electrical interface, so only the one provided by the dealership, at a very very high margin, can be installed in place.

    5. Re:Runaway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's going to take the kind of courage only Apple has.

    6. Re:Runaway by narcc · · Score: 2

      To continue the analogy: They give you an adapter for a standard car stereo ... but if you're not extremely careful, it'll disable the gas tank.

    7. Re:Runaway by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      As it happens, I have a $300 set of noise-canceling headphones, and they plug into a standard jack. Usually, during the workday, I plug the power (this is the only time it sits around next to a power source nobody else is using) and the headphones in (it's a bit noisy in here). I'd have to get the Y adapter. It isn't a dealbreaker, but it's not something I really want to do.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  6. Also in the news.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...George Lucas calls The Phantom Menace a runaway Success - while the rest of the world calls both products a flaming pile of dogshit. Happy 2017 - the year we get bullshit'ed more than ever...

    1. Re:Also in the news.... by AvitarX · · Score: 2

      The two aren't mutually exclusive.

      A 1 Billion dollar box office gross, second highest at the time it came out, top 25 overall, top 20 inflation adjusted, is by any reasonable measure a runaway success.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    2. Re:Also in the news.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Future Apple Marketing employee.

    3. Re:Also in the news.... by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      Pointing out that making all of the money is success to investors is more of a business major's job than marketing I think.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    4. Re: Also in the news.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is called inertia of human nature, you stupid fag. Lucas had a free ride on the legacy of star wars and he blew it.

  7. $159 for earbuds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No offense to anyone here, but I don't think I will ever understand the mindset of the Apple fanboi.

    1. Re:$159 for earbuds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pricing isn't that far out of line for wireless earbuds. The Phazon's are similar but actually more expensive at $179 and not even from a known manufacturer.

      PowerBeats were $199 last year and they have a wire between them. Some of the lesser known brands were a little less expensive than that. Prices in that segment have fallen a bit over the year though.

    2. Re:$159 for earbuds by arth1 · · Score: 1

      No offense to anyone here, but I don't think I will ever understand the mindset of the Apple fanboi.

      It's a simple mindset, so it's simple to understand:

      You announce that you're a member of a group that the less wealthy can't afford to join, while still under pack protection so you don't have to justify your own individuality. Much like brand name shoes and handbags, the real purpose is to be seen.
      Which is why you can't get Apple earbuds in discreet colors, and why they're designed to be bigger than they need to be.

      tl;dr: Group fashion

    3. Re: $159 for earbuds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I still don't give a shit.

    4. Re:$159 for earbuds by hey! · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually the Apple price point for its mobile products have always been consciously set to position them as "affordable luxuries". What that means I can explain by analogy with the popular disinfectant, "Bactine". Pouring "Bactine" into a wound stings because it has got alcohol in it. However it's not the alcohol that kills the germs, it's the benzalkonium chloride. So why is the alcohol there? Well, when they test marketed a version without the stinging alcohol consumers didn't like it, because they couldn't feel it working.

      So the price of an "affordable luxury" is chosen to be low enough to be within reach of most people, but high enough to give you a little sting that tells you that you've treated yourself to something special.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    5. Re:$159 for earbuds by lucm · · Score: 1

      However it's not the alcohol that kills the germs, it's the benzalkonium chloride. So why is the alcohol there? Well, when they test marketed a version without the stinging alcohol consumers didn't like it, because they couldn't feel it working.

      I buy mouthwash that doesn't sting and cough syrup that doesn't taste bad. I guess I'm just one of those free spirits that doesn't follow the herd when the herd is wrong; incidentally, you will not see me waiting in line in front of the Apple store to help Apple make $400 more per phone than the competition for similar or even inferior quality.

      Of course Apple market share is in free fall so there's hope for the herd.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    6. Re:$159 for earbuds by TheCastro1689 · · Score: 1

      You have to tell me the cough syrup brand.

    7. Re:$159 for earbuds by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Apple also works hard to make it an affordable luxury experience. My iPhone was the most powerful on the market when I bought it. (Obviously, this didn't last.)

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    8. Re:$159 for earbuds by lucm · · Score: 1

      You have to tell me the cough syrup brand.

      Try the cherry-flavored one from Safeway (home brand). It just says "Cold & flu" on the bottle and it tastes like melted/sludgy cherry kool-aid.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
  8. Did he mean an unprecedented level of gouging? by Artem+S.+Tashkinov · · Score: 1

    Because for the price of these earbuds one can buy a decent ... smartphone and wired earbuds which won't sound any worse.

    1. Re:Did he mean an unprecedented level of gouging? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You make it sound as if the Air Pods are the only headphones that will work with the new iPhones. No, you can still use your old one with the included little adapter, or get a cheaper BT headphone for $30. No one is forcing you to buy the Air Pods.

    2. Re:Did he mean an unprecedented level of gouging? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For now.. Until apple starts incorporating "bugs" that make other BT headsets flaky.

    3. Re:Did he mean an unprecedented level of gouging? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Decent smartphone for $150. you are hilarious.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    4. Re:Did he mean an unprecedented level of gouging? by harrkev · · Score: 2

      Well, halfway-decent for $150. My smartphone has a $35 128GB micro-SD card in it with my entire music library, and a big chunk of my movie library in it, with about 40GB to spare. How much would 128GB cost you from Apple?

      The sole reason that Apple exists is because some people don't care about price -- it is all about status. That is why nearly every single case for a iPhone has a cut-out in the back so that the Apple logo always shows. Fanboys would hate it if they pulled out their iPhone and nobody noticed the brand.

      Number of cases for Android devices that I have seen with a cut-out for the logo? None. Not a single one. Android people just want something affordable that gets the job done.

      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
    5. Re:Did he mean an unprecedented level of gouging? by narcc · · Score: 1

      Times have changed. A $150 phone is going to do everything the average user wants, and more, without a problem.

      I picked up one for less than that a few months back so my wife could use it in place of her phone (used heavily for work) for music, games, social media, etc. It's worked out incredibly well. Her important phone stays charged and her work and fun are completely separated. She couldn't be happier.

      If you have kids, you'll find that even sub-$50 phones can do everything they want and more without feeling clunky.

      What on earth makes you think you need to spend more than $150 just to get something "decent"?

       

    6. Re:Did he mean an unprecedented level of gouging? by CrashNBrn · · Score: 1

      CUBOT Cell Phones - all less than $150. Many Xiaomi models including their competitors Oppo and Vivo have numerous models in the $50 - $150 price range. My own phone, a Xiaomi 2015 model (with microSD) is still about $150.

    7. Re:Did he mean an unprecedented level of gouging? by kamapuaa · · Score: 1

      Getting into Apple v. PC fights is a little 80s, but I really dislike this line of thought for cell phones. All the flagship phones sell for around the same price, and if you keep cell phones for two years they all amortize to about $1/day, for something people use ALL THE TIME.

      Even if iPhones were an extra 15%, why cheap out on something that you are constantly using?

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    8. Re:Did he mean an unprecedented level of gouging? by lucm · · Score: 1

      Times have changed. A $150 phone is going to do everything the average user wants, and more, without a problem.

      This is correct. My main phone is a $150 Moto G (factory unlocked) and I can't see a difference when I compare with more expensive devices. Built-in storage is small but it has a sd card slot so it doesn't matter. Fully encrypted, good battery life, good gps, good wifi.

      I'm not a mobile phone gamer though, so I can't tell if would work for everyone, but it does everything for me perfectly, including watching netflix or streaming it to ChromeCast. Camera is decent (a lot better than iPhone one) but the device is a little thicker and heavier than other phones.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
  9. He's the CEO of Apple by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Maybe they're popular, maybe they aren't... but what else is the CEO going to say?

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:He's the CEO of Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly.

      What happens to Apple stock when the CEO comes out and says " Yeah the new headphones aren't selling so well " :|

    2. Re:He's the CEO of Apple by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      It would be funny if a CEO came out and said "well, we certainly laid a big turd this last quarter..."

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    3. Re:He's the CEO of Apple by ckatko · · Score: 1

      AH, the Toshiba strategy.

  10. So bad by SuperKendall · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Apple took away the headphone jack

    Or you could, you know, use the adaptor included WITH EVERY iPHONE...

    I can believe that no matter how badly Apple treats it's faithful

    Yes, giving people free adaptors is certainly "treating them badly", right up there with setting your pants on fire with a defective phone. Wait, pants on fire, that phrase... it reminds me of you somehow... hmm.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:So bad by eddy · · Score: 2

      Free adaptors? Where do I go to get my free adaptors? I'll take 100.

      Maybe you meant something other than 'free'?

      --
      Belief is the currency of delusion.
    2. Re:So bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is this, 1998? I used to pay extra money to NOT have to use adapters.

      I guess I still do since I now have to buy special headphones. But before, it was because the product was designed well enough that the adapters weren't necessary. Please. Disabling a feature and then throwing in a clunky adapter isn't exactly altruism. If anything it's an admission that they still rely on a market they are trying to abandon. I guess they're hoping that people will switch to wireless out of shame.

    3. Re:So bad by lgw · · Score: 1

      And yet people are shilling out that $160 for the upsell. Probably because it's annoying to juggle a dongle just to listen to music on your phone.

      I should start a betting pool on the next port eliminated. Though I think it ends with no ports at all: wireless charging, Bluetooth, and courage.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    4. Re:So bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Or you could, you know, use the adaptor included WITH EVERY iPHONE

      Why the flock would I want to use a big clunky dongle attached to the bottom of my phone for headphones? There is a reason every phone maker places their headphone jacks at or near the top of the phone.

    5. Re:So bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yeah. There are two options. Air Pods or dongle. Way to set up a nice false dichotomy.

      There are at least two other options:

      1) Non-airpod Bluetooth headphones that can be had for as little as $10 and really good ones start at $25+

      2) Wired headphones - like the ones INCLUDED - that plug into the lightning port.

      I am by no means an "apple fanboy" but it is really amazing how people make this port elimination out to be a big deal. Apples gives you two solutions out of the box (dongle and lighting headphones) a third option (3rd party bluetooth headphones) is a minor investment compared to the cost of the phone yet the "fourth option": $160 air pods are all you fuckwits can talk about.

    6. Re:So bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He meant "included in the price". Also included in the price is a set of headphones that plug into the only orifice remaining on the iPhone 7, and work acceptably well.

      The only use case fucked up by this is if you listen to your headphones and charge your phone at the same time. Do you think that subset of people is responsible for this selling well? And not, for instance, a bunch of Y adapters or generic wireless headphones selling well?

    7. Re:So bad by king+neckbeard · · Score: 2

      Yeah, or people who lose the headphones that only work with one device. It was a shitty choice all around to milk the fanboys' wallets. Lets not pretend that it was anything other than that.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    8. Re:So bad by raxtich · · Score: 1

      "Or you could, you know, use the adaptor included WITH EVERY iPHONE..." Except the part where removing the headphone jack in the first place is nothing more than a solution looking for a problem, and in this case, Apple will gladly charge you $160 for their solution, because people like you are tools.

    9. Re:So bad by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      Except the part where removing the headphone jack in the first place is nothing more than a solution looking for a problem

      The only people looking for a problem are Apple Haters; the people who actually own the phones do not have a problem.

      in this case, Apple will gladly charge you $160 for their solution

      They will charge you for *A* solution, that is distinct from the two free options they ship with every phone (wired headphones or an adaptor for all other wired headphones).

      Or people could buy literally any other bluetooth headset on the planet if they think the cost/benefit points to the other option being better?

      I mean, it can't possibly be that the Apple headphones have some benefit that other bluetooth headphones... that can't possibly be!!! *VADER*NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO*/VADER*.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    10. Re:So bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >...that only work with one device.

      Apple's earbuds work with any device. Well one tiny (and hardly used) function- that 'button' that's inline with the cord- you know to advance a song. Well that only with an Apple device but they still play sound through them.

      In an odd reversal- Apple's devices can use generic headphones, and Apple headphones can also work with other devices. The actual plug is called a 3/8th jack and is found around the world.

      Apple decided to drop this because "it's old". Well why don't we just throw out the wheel or bread. Those are old too, they must not be viable solutions anymore? They found a way to save 15cents per unit, claim it is a 'waterproofing' feature, and then sell a high-priced solution. This new solution is a rip off.

    11. Re:So bad by Streetlight · · Score: 1

      It seems Apple wants to be in the octopus adapter business. And you pay dearly for the adapter and the different cables to be use in their newer laptops. If you want to AC power your laptop while connected to ethernet, attach an external camera, headphones and microphone, and a large monitor as well as.... Think about that. Not terribly uncommon in my experience.

      --
      In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. George Orwell
    12. Re:So bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "go to get free adaptors"? The adapter is in an iphone box stupid. You would "go" in the iphone box. Maybe you meant something else than 'go'?

      People buy an iphone, the rest of the shit in the box as well as the box are referred to as free. As in included with your purchase. As in your phone costs the same even if you don't want the other shit in the box. That to normal people means free, and we all understand the details of how that works. You seem to have issues - physical or mental, that prevents you from doing that and joining society. You also don't have anything interesting to say or contribute, so you annoy people instead by arguing detailed cinemantics of really simple words - a boring useless topic, and apparently what you want to talk about. me - I like dissing losers.

      you seem to have a problem understanding common ways in which people communicate. tell me, your lack of experience talking to people - is that because you are really ugly and shunned by society, or because you have a form of autism? I guess you could be neither of those but just have a really low iq instead and actually not be physically able to understand basic speech constructs. Or you could I guess be even dumber than that and think pretending to be dense makes you look funny and smart? either way, what a fucking loser dork.

    13. Re:So bad by Shane_Optima · · Score: 1

      Why am I not surprised you're a dogmatic Apple apologist as well? You don't even understand that air pressure is powered by gravitational acceleration.

    14. Re:So bad by omnichad · · Score: 1

      There is a reason every phone maker places their headphone jacks at or near the top of the phone.

      What's the reason? Hint - turn the phone upside down and the jack is magically at the top.

    15. Re:So bad by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      Yeah, or people who lose the headphones that only work with one device. It was a shitty choice all around to milk the fanboys' wallets. Lets not pretend that it was anything other than that.

      Not in the moronic Hater-mindset.

    16. Re:So bad by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      It seems Apple wants to be in the octopus adapter business. And you pay dearly for the adapter and the different cables to be use in their newer laptops. If you want to AC power your laptop while connected to ethernet, attach an external camera, headphones and microphone, and a large monitor as well as.... Think about that. Not terribly uncommon in my experience.

      Go to Amazon. Type "USB-c" into the search. Receive 20+ pages of results for adapters, mini-docks, cables, USB sticks, et CETERA, and almost none of them Apple-branded, but nearly ALL that will happily work with the new MacBook Pro (and the plethora of OTHER laptops that have adopted USB-C/TB3).

      So, if Apple wants to be in the adapter business, so does Acer, Asus, HP, MS, Lenovo, etc.

      Get you head out of your ass and do just a LITTLE research before spewing your unfounded anti-Apple HATE, fucktard.

    17. Re:So bad by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      Or you could, you know, use the adaptor included WITH EVERY iPHONE

      Why the flock would I want to use a big clunky dongle attached to the bottom of my phone for headphones? There is a reason every phone maker places their headphone jacks at or near the top of the phone.

      What "big, clunky dongle"?

      The INCLUDED Lightning to 3.5 mm adapter CABLE us neither "big", nor "clunky". In fact, it is hard to imagine how they even FIT the DAC inside the thing.

    18. Re: So bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if your favorite car maker stopped having a line-in jack on the built-in radio, but included a dongle (for free)? Annoying, right?

      What if they said if was for a benefit that wasn't actually true? A little more annoying.

      What if they now offered a branded solution to avoid the free dongle? Now people feel set up like marks getting taken for a ride (no pun intended).

  11. Rubaway success by Anomalyst · · Score: 2

    How many runaways have the money to purchase an apple product?

    --
    There is no right to feel safe thru security vaudeville at the expense of everyone's freedom, privacy and tax money.
  12. Tim Talks to Shareholders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While Jobs spoke to humanity

  13. PR/Marketing Stunt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The whole airpod roll out drama is a marketing stunt that Apple does all the time: create scarcity for the sake of scarcity in order to manipulate people into believing something is extremely popular.

    Apple knows its core market well: people who want to buy things for the sake of the status symbol. And no, this is not a rabid anti apple sentiment, there are many companies that sit in Apple's market position that operate the same say (e.g. various car companies, watch makers, etc.)

  14. And yet some people like Bluetooth by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And yet people are shilling out that $160 for the upsell.

    SOME people are paying that because they like bluetooth headphones.

    I don't; I just use the headphones included in the box. You know, the wired ones that plug directly into the phone? I have a set of noise canceling headphones too; I just leave the adaptor on that set, so to me there's no difference as I just grab a set of headphones and plug them into the phone.

    What is your damage hating on people who like wireless headsets? They could use anyone else's you know, not just Apple's - as usual the Apple ones are just really well designed and so some people chose to buy them even though they are expensive.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:And yet some people like Bluetooth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention the 3rd party bluetooth headphones cost little more than quality regular headphone these days. Can be had for as little as $10 for a cheap pair. Obviously spending more gives you better quality.

      And lets be even more honest here. Poor people that need to buy $2 headphones because of their budget issues don't (or shouldn't) buy an iPhone.

    2. Re:And yet some people like Bluetooth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're absolutely not going to get a decent set of Bluetooth headphones for $10. And I'm even being extremely generous with the word 'decent" here. If you can find a pair for $10 at all, they're going to sound like complete garbage. You *might* be able to get a workout out of them before you have to charge them, but probably not. That's before the battery fails forever within a couple months, of course.

    3. Re:And yet some people like Bluetooth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >SOME people are paying that because they like bluetooth headphones.

      If the pod doesn't cost more than it did with wired headphones it seems like a pretty fair deal, but I still like the option of avoiding the batteries of wireless.

      How capable is the tablet? At $159 it sounds tempting. It shouldn't have taken Apple so many years to get to that pricepoint though.

    4. Re:And yet some people like Bluetooth by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      What is your damage hating on people who like wireless headsets?

      It is legitimising the reduction in choice to the wider community. No one is criticising people who use bluetooth headphones. Everyone is criticising people who buy bluetooth headphones because the must has iPhone 7 needs them and the prophet has spoken.

      I want these to be a huge failure for Apple for no other reason than as a non-Apple customer I'm afraid for my future choice on other platforms.

    5. Re:And yet some people like Bluetooth by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      Fantastic. And what will you do when the headphones included in the box stop working properly (which will likely be soon since Apple can't figure out how wires work)?

      No. Some people can't figure out how wires and connectors work. And that's a fact, Jack!

  15. Misleading? by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Are they selling well because they're great, or are they selling well because people don't have much of a choice, with no headphone jack? I'm not an Apple guy nor am I an Apple hater, but this seems almost as disingenuous as Microsoft bragging about Windows 10 'adoption rate' when they fooled, lied, tricked, or literally forced their way onto people's computers. False news much?

    1. Re:Misleading? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > Are they selling well because they're great, or are they selling well because people don't have much of a choice, with no headphone jack?

      iPhone 7 comes with an adapter to attach your standard headphones to the lightning jack.
      iPhone 7 comes with a set of headphones that attach directly to the lightning jack.
      iPhone 7 works fine with standard bluetooth stuff that works everywhere else

      The actual answer is this: they are selling well because *they are novel* and because *they are Apple*. Each earpiece being independent is new and shiny, and Apple has solved some of the problems faced by prior entrants into this market. Additionally, the Apple branding makes what would otherwise be mockable (they look like retarded earrings) fashionable, removing a barrier to purchase that most competitors would face. Assuredly, no iPhone 7 user is forced into buying Airpods- out of the box, the phone works with every headphone that works with your previous iPhones.

    2. Re:Misleading? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you aren't an apple hater you clearly don't know much about the issue. It is completely unnecessary to buy Air Pods and its only the idiots on this message board, which are presumably shills or Android fanbois, that are making it seem like you have no other choices.

      You have three other choices, all of which are better:

      1) Use lightning wired headphones (INCLUDED WITH ALL PHONES)
      2) Use regular headphones with the adapter (ALSO INCLUDED WITH ALL PHONES)
      3) Buy *third-party* Bluetooth headphones for $10+ (or use the Bluetooth headphones you already own because why would you still own wired headphones these days)

      Frankly, this is the most overblown fucking thing I have ever seen and people like you keep perpetuating the myth that the iPhone is somehow incapable of playing music via headphones without Air Pods or a dongle. And just like the MSM you are spreading false information while screaming that you are unbiased and that this is false news? FFS. Get real.

    3. Re:Misleading? by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      To be fair, the new iPhone comes with standard bluetooth so you can use whichever wireless headphones you want. There's a lot of wireless headphones that are a lot cheaper and better sounding than the AirPods. Also, you could use ear buds that were included in the box. And last but not least, you could buy the dongle and use whatever wired headphones you want with the iPhone. There are a lot of other alternatives for people who don't want to shell out $160 for the AirPods.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    4. Re:Misleading? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering that absolutely nobody else sells bluetooth headphones on the planet and apple is the only maker of any bluetooth headphones?

      Did you even bother reading up as to what they even were?

    5. Re:Misleading? by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

      Yeah, never mind that it's inconvenient and can't be used with anything else. By comparison, if I have a $0.25 adapter, I can use my normal headphones with basically every headphone jack made in the last 50 years.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    6. Re:Misleading? by sinij · · Score: 1

      In other news, Tim Cook was overheard stating: "The customer beatings will continue until morale improves". Next version of iPhone was rumored to remove the charge port, instead placing hand-crank.

    7. Re:Misleading? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would you need a hand crank when you can just buy a new phone when the battery is used up?

    8. Re:Misleading? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't understand what is inconvenient about the little dongle thing they shipped with every phone. Just leave it on the end of your headphone cable.

      THAT WAS HARD.

    9. Re:Misleading? by chispito · · Score: 1

      Are they selling well because they're great, or are they selling well because people don't have much of a choice, with no headphone jack?

      Well, there are/were two choices: buy a more practical phone or use the adapter.

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    10. Re: Misleading? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It flops around annoyingly while running. It's enough of a PITA that I grabbed a Samsung phone I was using for development the last time I went to run.

    11. Re:Misleading? by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

      Because 1) you might want to use your headphones with the 99.9999% of other products that use a phone jack and 2)you might lose or break the adapter.

      Adapters are often a huge pain in the ass, and that goes double for proprietary adapters.

      And lets cut the bullshit. They could have had those adapters AND a headphone jack, and then everybody would be happy.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    12. Re: Misleading? by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 1

      You know that other Bluetooth headphones exist, right? Apple even sells other models in their own stores. I have a $25 pair that I've owned for a year that I like a lot, that I use with my iPhone 6.

      If you search for Bluetooth earbuds on Amazon, you're buried in choice. If AirPods are selling wellâ"and right now we have to take Cook at his word, as the CEO of Appleâ"it's not because people just can't find anything else.

    13. Re:Misleading? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you illiterate? It's not about the the phone being useless with standard headphones, it's about the headphones being useless with anything else, for no good reason, just more fragmentation and more waste. I for one realized Apple is an idiot company when they had one button mouses you had to use in combination with the keyboard to do fuck all with, but hey, just for the slow learners, this one is also a bullshit fucking stunt. I'm annoyed by having idiots around me, not by products I never bought and never will.

    14. Re:Misleading? by gravewax · · Score: 1

      So I can plug in my headphones and have my phone charging at the same time? I assume the dongle allows this otherwise I do see a huge problem?

  16. re: Surface product line by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    Seriously, I find Microsoft's whole Surface product line to be promising, yet not quite "there" yet.

    The Surface Studio, for example? Very cool concept and one of those designs that inspires a lot of techno-lust when you see it. But on a closer analysis, I just can't see the value? For the huge price tag, you still wind up with a machine with the previous generation GPU technology in it; doubly insulting when you pair it with a huge display of that high a resolution, where you really could use more GPU power to move all those pixels around.

    The Surface Book? I haven't spent much time in front of one of those, so I feel less qualified to talk about it, except again - you pay a really big price premium for it over most Windows notebooks, and I don't quite see where the value is? The previous version supposedly had some issues with the hinge design that people didn't like. I think most of that was addressed in the latest revision. The whole thing just doesn't excite me in any way, shape or form though. It's just "another laptop option on the market".

    And the Surface Pro 4, I'm very familiar with as I use one every day. This one absolutely stinks, IMO, in its base price configuration with the Core m CPU. If you want to see the point in buying one at all, you have to spend more money for a better configured variation. The "sweet spot" of price vs. performance is probably the Core i5 with 8GB of RAM and 256GB SSD. You can buy that one for around the $1,500 price point with a type-cover keyboard (which should realistically just come with the things ... you DO want one for it). As soon as you decide you'd rather have 16GB of RAM and/or a 512GB SSD though? The price starts shooting way upward. IMO, these machines have kind of a cheap plastic feel to them and I've seen a fairly high incidence of repairs needed on them too. But at the same time? The pencil works great with them, and when attached to your full size keyboard, mouse and display via the dock, you'll forget you're not using a pretty good performing desktop PC.

    I think everything "Surface" from MS is starting to finally pose a challenge for Apple in the PC hardware department. And it's coming at just the time when Apple seems to be slacking off on any real focus on updating Macs (in favor of more profitable iOS devices, watches, etc.). But as it stands right now, I still prefer using my Macs. Might just be a preference for OS X over Windows 10 at this point, but that's enough to keep me using my Macs as primary machines for the time being. Still, my NEXT new computer may well NOT be a Mac unless Apple turns things around soon.

  17. They cost more than my Android cell phone. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    iFans probably think the price should be doubled.

    1. Re:They cost more than my Android cell phone. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup. They cost thrice as much as my android phone (no carrier branding or locking, no phone or data plan attached).
      I'm also enjoying having an SD card slot, a removable battery and an analog audio jack.

  18. ^^^ This! by ELCouz · · Score: 1

    If only I had mod points left.

  19. re: Apple EarPods and "no headphone jack" by King_TJ · · Score: 5, Informative

    I think what many people aren't aware of (because Apple sure doesn't go to any effort to market it) is that the new Bluetooth EarPods use a proprietary "W2" chip which adds a number of proprietary extensions to the Bluetooth standards.

    The iPhone 7 has the W2 chip functionality embedded in it for any devices able to support it, and defaults back to standard Bluetooth support for everything else.

    The additional W2 functionality is supposed to address some of the glitches and hassles inherent in regular Bluetooth headsets and provide a better experience.

    If you're a customer who prefers using wireless Bluetooth headsets with a cellphone to begin with (and MANY people I know do), the EarPods and iPhone 7 combo promises one of the better usability experiences you can get out that combo today. Yes, it may be at the expense of giving you a traditional headphone jack. But how much that matters to you really does depend on your use case.

  20. Do any of you know anyone who has them? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because I don't.

  21. WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Good sales .. is not an indication of product success.

    If I ever get off my ass and start a business (i.e. never) remind me that the above AC is not going to be my director of sales. At my business, sales will be viewed as The Most Important Indicator of a product's success. That's because my business would be for-profit. Theoretically, at least.

    I have to hand it to Apple for having the perfect approach to judging (and creating) product success: sales. Apple is about the money, and you basically can't do better than that, from a business perspective. (From a user perspective, everything is different, though, and that's why it's so mysterious to me that anybody buys that company's junk. But they do.) It's a refreshing reminder that not necessarily the entire economy has vowed to drive away customers and prevent revenue, the way that Hollywood is always trying to do.

    Even when they do horrible, hostile, anti-user things, the users show up and throw money at them, showing that they don't judge Apple or their products' quality. What other business has succeeded at finding these types of customers? Who is better? Not even Scientologists are this good, if you believe some of the rumored numbers.

    1. Re:WTF? by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      Good sales at Christmas time for a new product is not an indication of product success

      Also include returns of the same product after Christmas and most importantly, sales following Christmas. If 1000 people get them as presents, but 900 return them, that's bad. If 1000 people receive them as presents, and post Christmas sales are lackluster, then the items sold well as gifts from people who thought they were nice presents, but wouldn't buy such things for themselves. Then the presents sat on a shelf and the receiver didn't spread the word because they were meh. Congratulations, your item is a pet rock. If 1000 people get them as presents and post Christmas sales show improvement, then your product will continue to sell well just by word of mouth because it's awesome. Apple is having to force these earbuds down people's throats, so I'm guessing they suck.

    2. Re:WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ".. hand .. can't do .. horrible .. things"

      remind me to stop reading posts by people who have ADD to such an extent they have to skip words and change the meaning of what others say, and who are too dumb to read and comprehend a fucking single sentence. you have really low self esteem, so you go around making up shit people say and arguing against it. this clearly comes from being an ugly nerd rejected by society. a lonely nerd. go away shitbrain and stop spamming things people want to read. you can argue with yourself in the mirror just as well as posting here.

    3. Re:WTF? by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      Good sales .. is not an indication of product success.

      If I ever get off my ass and start a business (i.e. never) remind me that the above AC is not going to be my director of sales. At my business, sales will be viewed as The Most Important Indicator of a product's success. That's because my business would be for-profit. Theoretically, at least.

      I have to hand it to Apple for having the perfect approach to judging (and creating) product success: sales. Apple is about the money, and you basically can't do better than that, from a business perspective. (From a user perspective, everything is different, though, and that's why it's so mysterious to me that anybody buys that company's junk. But they do.) It's a refreshing reminder that not necessarily the entire economy has vowed to drive away customers and prevent revenue, the way that Hollywood is always trying to do.

      Even when they do horrible, hostile, anti-user things, the users show up and throw money at them, showing that they don't judge Apple or their products' quality. What other business has succeeded at finding these types of customers? Who is better? Not even Scientologists are this good, if you believe some of the rumored numbers.

      You might cast about and read the many, many glowing reviews from both media publications and users alike before you stick your foot even further in your mouth, Hater.

  22. Bought all of them! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bought 3 pair from the apple store and sold 2 pair on Ebay for over $250 each.
    The funny part is they are not even hard to get ahold of, many stores are out, but the store.apple.com has them and will get them to you in 2 days.

    I'll still enjoy robbing idiots on ebay though....

  23. Yet again by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

    Proof positive that Apple fanboys will buy literally anything Apple puts up for sale, no matter how inane it is.

    --
    Eat the rich.
  24. Nope nope nope by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 5, Informative

    "It turns out the $159 AirPods Bluetooth earphones are selling well, or so CEO Tim Cook would have us believed."

    I didn't believed it then and I don't believed it now.

    Editing faux pas aside, the only thing they've been a "success" at is 1) making Apple mo' money and 2) locking users into ever-more-expensive gadgets that cannot be repaired.

    iFixit gives the Apple AirPods a '0' out of 10 on the repairability scale, also known as the "worst possible score achievable". In other words, they can't be repaired, period. It appears that even Apple can't repair them, which is kind of amazing when you consider that they're the ones who built the fucking things.

    AirPods make iPads look positively consumer-friendly in terms of service, and we all know what a total shit show it is to open an iPad....

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    1. Re: Nope nope nope by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 1

      Did you actually look at how much stuff is IN those things? Even without the glue, I suspect they'd score a 1 or 2 tops. Those are incredibly specialised parts; I don't know what anyone would even be able to break without annihilating them entirely, let alone repairing them.

    2. Re: Nope nope nope by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      Did you actually look at how much stuff is IN those things?

      Yep, it's some amazing engineering but we all know that they could have made the battery assembly removable so the batteries could be replaced.

      A simple bit of screw threading or some clever twist-n-turn lock would make that possible...but we can't have that, now can we? Letting people or a repair shop replace the batteries wouldn't be courageous.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  25. Am I in any danger? by nightfire-unique · · Score: 0

    Now that Apple has invented bluetooth, am I in any danger of losing my 5 year old bluetooth headphones in a patent dispute? :p

    --
    A government is a body of people notably ungoverned - AC
  26. Nothing is new under the moon... by dschiptsov · · Score: 1

    Finally Apple got its Steve Ballmer.

  27. That settles it, then. by irving47 · · Score: 1

    I'm sure we need no further proof, since Cook says so. I'm sure Bill Gates nor Steve Balmer said anything positive about Windows ME or Vista shortly after their releases.

    --
    I had a sucky sig.
  28. Re: Apple EarPods and "no headphone jack" by AmiMoJo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The W2 chip isn't going to help at all with the two biggest flaws in the earpods:

    1. Crap battery life
    2. Easily lost

    The only thing you can do about the battery life is remember to turn them off and carry the charging case around with you. Preventing loss will no doubt create a market for expensive bits of string to tie them together. Might as well just have had a band and stuck a bigger battery in it, solving both problems and costing a fraction as much.

    Apple seems to love these anti-features. 0.01mm thinner phone so you can wrap it in a chunky case for protection and it will still bend in your pocket. Take away the headphone jack because ha ha fuck you, chump.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  29. Adapter designed to fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course the adapter is designed to fail, just like the official charging cords, so that you get taxed for not buying a new iphone every year.

    Go fuck yourself.

    1. Re:Adapter designed to fail by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      Of course the adapter is designed to fail, just like the official charging cords, so that you get taxed for not buying a new iphone every year.

      Go fuck yourself.

      And if it does fail, Apple will charge you the princely sum if NINE DOLLARS for a replacement/spare.

      See? No matter how hard you try, there simply isn't a "profiteering" motive here.

      But keep on Hatin'...

  30. Re: Surface product line by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    Personally I think the Surface Studio and Surface Book are a major WTF in the pricing department. That said the premium price for the Surface Pro 4 seems to be worth it. And by "premium" I mean you get what you pay for.

    I'm typing here at the moment next to my dad's HP Spectre X2. It was a cool $400 less than the SP4 but the top configuration has a far slower processor. It doesn't feel cheap but then the entire thing is thicker, heavier, the pen isn't anywhere near as nice to use, palm detection is so hit and miss that dad doesn't take notes on it, and don't get me started on the stupid arse design decision that went into the SD card slot. Plus as soon as you like to decently spec it out you need to change models to something different which is thicker and heavier again.

    I do like the fact that the Spectre has more than 1 USB port though (though the Macbook Pro style approach has resulted in dad going out and having to buy a USB fucking dongle today, because I have a normal USB key, and because transferring data to it from the SP4 via SD card is such an incredibly stupid process (start by finding a paperclip)) and I like the nod to an idea of putting an LTE modem in the device, ... even though it's only available in the USA and only on Verizon.

    So far the larger Surface lineup is quite meh in my opinion but I'm a huge fan of the Surface Pro.

  31. Re: Apple EarPods and "no headphone jack" by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    Fantastic. What's better than forcing bluetooth on customers? Forcing fragmentation into the market place with a proprietary standard in devices. Who doesn't love this company.

  32. Re: Surface product line by Barlo_Mung_42 · · Score: 1

    That's fair. The question was about innovation. Lots of innovative things start out as not quite there yet. I don't think there's much question that MS is beating Apple in terms of innovation lately.

  33. I hate wires by dadman · · Score: 1

    They just keep getting in my way, and I can't put my phone farther away than the length of the wire which is often too short. I wanted to switched to Bluetooth but the problem with most BT headset is they are big and heavy and make me feeling uncomfortable with it on my head for too long. As for the BT earphones, most of them if not all have wires and yes, it breaks when you try to fish it out by holding at one of the earpiece. So, yes, I welcome the AirPods and similar earphones as long as they can last at least a day of continuous use.

  34. Re: Surface product line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Surface is really Shitty.

    What innovation are you talking about? iMac clone when iMacs aren't even sexy anymore?

    The screen looks good (thanks Samsung) but general build quality looks shit and probably is shit.

    Coming up with a shitty design no one else wants is not innovation. I can't fault them for trying, but to try this hard and fail this hard is just incredible.

  35. What reduction of choice??????? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    It is legitimising the reduction in choice to the wider community.

    WHAT REDUCTION OF CHOICE????

    You can use any headphone made with an iPhone seven, right out of the box.

    Come on.

    who buy bluetooth headphones because the must has iPhone 7 needs them

    I don't use Bluetooth headphones with an iPhone 7 because IT DOES NOT NEED THEM.

    I want these to be a huge failure for Apple

    Who is so retarded that they care if a COMPANY lives or dies? That is sick and you are a sick person for wishing failure on anyone. Do you know what Karma does with haters like yourself?

    If all you CAN see is failure, failure is all you WILL see.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:What reduction of choice??????? by lucm · · Score: 1

      WHAT REDUCTION OF CHOICE????

      You can use any headphone made with an iPhone seven, right out of the box.

      This one made me chuckle.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    2. Re:What reduction of choice??????? by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      WHAT REDUCTION OF CHOICE????

      You can use any headphone made with an iPhone seven, right out of the box.

      This one made me chuckle.

      It would, you idiotic, Appke-Hating, MORON.

    3. Re:What reduction of choice??????? by lucm · · Score: 1

      you idiotic, Appke-Hating, MORON.

      I'm not "Appke-Hating", I merely point out things that make no sense. If you're unhappy because your emperor has no clothes, choose another emperor, don't blame the whistleblower.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    4. Re: What reduction of choice??????? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck, you are really butt hurt over this.

      There's no defense to removing functionality even if they provide an adapter. Just shut the fuck up and save your whining for something else.

    5. Re:What reduction of choice??????? by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      you idiotic, Appke-Hating, MORON.

      I'm not "Appke-Hating", I merely point out things that make no sense. If you're unhappy because your emperor has no clothes, choose another emperor, don't blame the whistleblower.

      First off, no one is my Emperor; least of all a Corporation.

      Second, there is a saying in business, and it applies especially in "tech" businesses:

      "Innovate or Die".

      Like it or not, the 3.5 mm connector is a "meh" connector. They are bulky, prone to intermittent connections, and expensive to waterproof correctly. That is why others, such as Lenovo-rola, have already ditched them, and others, like Samsung, are following-suit. I suspect that pretty-much everyone will have ditched 3.5 mm analog for USB-C (including Apple) by the next year or two, and that USB-C-terminated headphones, earbuds, and headsets will quickly become at least as popular as 3.5 mm phone-plug-terminated ones.

      Meanwhile, Apple (and likely others that have deleted the 3.5 mm jack) are attempting to ease the transition by doing things like including wired headsets that conform to the new standard (Apple and ?), including a simple adapter, so that existing analog headphones/earbuds/headsets can be used (Apple and ?), and upping the standards on their wireless hardware, so that it becomes a more viable, and higher-fidelity, option (Apple only).

      So, other than "no improvement for another 100 years", I'm not sure what Apple (and others) could do to make the "road ahead" any smoother for users.

    6. Re:What reduction of choice??????? by lucm · · Score: 1

      I don't know if this is cognitive dissonance or some kind of Stockholm Syndrome, but if you are still unaware that Apple is ripping you off by forcing you to buy more of their proprietary adapters that solve no actual problems, just because they can, then it's just plain sad. With their billions and their tens of thousands of employees they could do fantastic things, but instead they just find more ways to milk their shrinking customer base. Pathetic.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    7. Re:What reduction of choice??????? by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      I don't know if this is cognitive dissonance or some kind of Stockholm Syndrome, but if you are still unaware that Apple is ripping you off by forcing you to buy more of their proprietary adapters that solve no actual problems, just because they can, then it's just plain sad. With their billions and their tens of thousands of employees they could do fantastic things, but instead they just find more ways to milk their shrinking customer base. Pathetic.

      No, it's pathetic that you can't be bothered to see that change requires change.

    8. Re:What reduction of choice??????? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WHAT REDUCTION OF CHOICE????

      You can use any headphone made with an iPhone seven, right out of the box.

      This one made me chuckle.

      Yeah, retards do that.

    9. Re:What reduction of choice??????? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you idiotic, Appke-Hating, MORON.

      I'm not "Appke-Hating",

      Yeah, you are reality hating. Face the reality.

  36. Re: Surface product line by lucm · · Score: 1

    So far the larger Surface lineup is quite meh in my opinion but I'm a huge fan of the Surface Pro.

    The problem is the keyboard. It feels weird and there's no insert key. Why would someone choose to have a PgUp key and no insert on a keyboard is beyond me.

    --
    lucm, indeed.
  37. Re: Apple EarPods and "no headphone jack" by radarskiy · · Score: 1

    Any battery operated device is going to run out of battery.

    Any earbuds are easily lost. I lost my Bose QC20s. It's because they are small, not because they are Apple products.

  38. Hah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Must be fun to charge your god damn headphones every day. No thanks. In this case I will stick to the wired version.

  39. Re: Surface product line by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

    That's fair. The question was about innovation. Lots of innovative things start out as not quite there yet. I don't think there's much question that MS is beating Apple in terms of innovation lately.

    Sorry, no.

  40. Re: Surface product line by thegarbz · · Score: 0

    ...

    I use PageUp / PageDown daily and it actually annoys me that it requires me to hold down Fn. I would have preferred it to be separate.

    But I only learnt just now that there's no Insert key. I never noticed this before, and the Windows onscreen keyboard also doesn't have an insert key so now I would have no idea how to get insert if I ever needed it. Your use case is probably different from mine, but from what I recall the only time I've ever used the insert key is to unpress it when I accidentally hit it inadvertently.

  41. Re: Apple EarPods and "no headphone jack" by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

    It's called the "W1" chip; but the rest of your post is spot-on.

  42. Re: Apple EarPods and "no headphone jack" by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

    Fantastic. What's better than forcing bluetooth on customers? Forcing fragmentation into the market place with a proprietary standard in devices. Who doesn't love this company.

    Who's forcing anything?

    And W1-equipped devices are 100% backwards-compatible with standard BT stuff. You could use Apple's AirPods as easily with any BT phone, computer, or whatnot. Conversely, you can use the W1-chip equipped iPhone with any standard BT headset.

    But don't let facts stand in the way of your idiotic, baseless, hatred of all things Apple (while secretly lusting after their gear)..

  43. Re: Apple EarPods and "no headphone jack" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have yet to have these fall out and I have tried hard. Also, the battery life of the case is such I have yet to run out of battery or have to go out of my way to charge in a way that hurts usability.

    Unless you're telling me you wear headphones 24/7 through every instance of your routine, and I doubt that you do your argument is invalid, or, its only valid for you, but not for everyone.

  44. Re: Apple EarPods and "no headphone jack" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they had a string or band attached they would not have been aesthetically pleasing to me and I would not like them as much.

  45. Re: Apple EarPods and "no headphone jack" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...or sound

  46. Re: Apple EarPods and "no headphone jack" by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    But don't let facts stand in the way of your idiotic, baseless,

    I can see english is your second language. Maybe look up fragmentation. By packaging a fragmentation with a common standard it is forcing fragmentation into the market place.

    Careful. I heard the reality distortion field causes cancer. Maybe you should get yourself checked, you seem to be quite over exposed to it.

  47. Timmy, Timmy, Timmy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You just shipped a new phone that requires either a proprietary wired headphone of wireless headphones. Also, it's the Christmas shopping season and people are looking for gifts for people who have everything.

    My bet is that air bud sales will drop off after the holidays and that future sales will be mediocre, at best.

    Face it, the Apple mojo is gone. You've gotten fat and lazy.

  48. Re: Apple EarPods and "no headphone jack" by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

    But don't let facts stand in the way of your idiotic, baseless,

    I can see english is your second language. Maybe look up fragmentation. By packaging a fragmentation with a common standard it is forcing fragmentation into the market place.

    Careful. I heard the reality distortion field causes cancer. Maybe you should get yourself checked, you seem to be quite over exposed to it.

    Assuming you are a Fandroid, I submit that no Fandroid need lecture anyone on "Fragmentation".

    But assuming, arguendo, that the term "Fragmentation" is appropriate in this context (which I frankly find pretty specious), some amount of "fragmentation" (as you call it) is part of any change. Change requires, er, Change.

    But, it's all about how you handle that Change. In Apple's case with the iPhone 7, they made the Change as painless as possible by both including a headset (like they have always done), but with a Lightning Connector, rather than a 4 conductor 3.5 mm connector like before, and including a simple Lightning to 4 conductor 3.5 mm jack, for use with any existing analog headphones/earbuds/headsets.

    Seriously, what more could they have done, assuming the (obvious) fact that they saw that 3.5 mm jacks were on their way out (and, BTW, you are reminded that Apple wasn't the first to ditch the 3.5 mm jack; so others in the industry obviously agree with them regarding that issue)?

    Now I agree there is an argument to be made that they should have gone to USB-C and ditched Lightning at the same time; but I feel that the headphone jack decision was made fairly late in the design process, and so "didn't make the cut" this go-around. But, IMHO, Lightning is on the way-out, in favor of USB-C (probably on the iPhone 8). And then Apple will be aligned with the rest of the mobile device industry (not to mention their own computing products) in standardizing on what is fast becoming the standard.

  49. Re: Apple EarPods and "no headphone jack" by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    Assuming you are a Fandroid, I submit that no Fandroid need lecture anyone on "Fragmentation".

    What are you 12? You start with an attempted insult and then side step the issue? I assume you wrote something after this sentence but it's probably as waste of time reading given your opening sentence. Learn to behave and then your writing won't be a waste of time in the future.

    Goodday.

  50. Re: Apple EarPods and "no headphone jack" by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

    Assuming you are a Fandroid, I submit that no Fandroid need lecture anyone on "Fragmentation".

    What are you 12? You start with an attempted insult and then side step the issue? I assume you wrote something after this sentence but it's probably as waste of time reading given your opening sentence. Learn to behave and then your writing won't be a waste of time in the future.

    Goodday.

    How long have you been a member? Childish insults are the stock-in-trade on this Forum. When in Rome...

    And I most certainly did not "sidestep" the issue. I attempted to explain and amplify (no pun) on the real issues involved, and how Apple had actually tried to address them.

    It is you that is "side-stepping", by refusing to address my most salient points, rather than whining because I called someone a name.

  51. Re: Apple EarPods and "no headphone jack" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can see english is your second language.

    Says the guy who doesn't capitalize "English".