I guess "from the slashvertisement dept." wouldn't have sounded too great. (Is this really news, anyway? I don't remember the Icemat 2 or any of the Steel series getting posted on Slashdot.)
A lot of gamers do. It is a lot more enjoyable to play games with a precise mouse that isn't 5 inches wide and a large low-friction, comfortable mouse pad. You may debate on whether it's worth it, but it's certainly better:)
I quite like the dynamic search window, although it has its own set of annoyances. For one, the scroll bar feels horrible to use; I think a scroll bar doesn't work particularly well for this type of application. I know I'd prefer something similar to what Adobe Reader does for panning documents - then I can use only relative mouse movements, instead of moving my mouse to the center to drag this weird scroll bar thing.
Then you have the added disadvantage of built-in browser features not working, such as being able to middle-click on the page and let it scroll for me (I don't know what this feature is called, but I use it a lot).
You can confuse it slightly by changing text size too... It thought I was displaying items 229-228 out of (79,328)...
In conclusion, I think it could be a good search tool, but the user interface needs work, and as you said, it needs features.
Aye, they should ask for permission, but I doubt it would be so successful if it asks for permission. For starters, it wouldn't know who to ask. If it cached bulletin board posts, would it have to ask for the permission of all the people who posted in it?
Do you propose something along the lines of
<meta name="robots" content="noindex,nofollow,YesGoogleYouCANArchiveT<nobr>h<wbr></wbr></nobr> is">?
Slashdot Mirror
I was going to make a joke about slashdigg.com...
But then I found out it actually exists.
I guess "from the slashvertisement dept." wouldn't have sounded too great. (Is this really news, anyway? I don't remember the Icemat 2 or any of the Steel series getting posted on Slashdot.)
A lot of gamers do. It is a lot more enjoyable to play games with a precise mouse that isn't 5 inches wide and a large low-friction, comfortable mouse pad. You may debate on whether it's worth it, but it's certainly better :)
I'm sure people will find ways around that. :)
I think he meant http://lemonparty.org.uk/ (SFW, actually)
Maybe they should have moderation. (Score: -1, This deserves to be on http://thedailywtf.com/)
:-)
Oh well. Think of it as an opportunity, nay, an encouragement, to feel smug and/or point and laugh
Would I be able to teach my passwords to my friends? :)
Hello, I am an English human.
Honest.
I'm not the goverment trying to cover up a conspiracy of any sort. Would we lie to you? I mean, erm, would I lie to you?
Should be doable if they allow tagging on comments... :D
1.8GB, quite impressive. I myself only managed 1.5GB, although it only took me around 30 minutes to reach.
and the zebra waffles snarf snarf -5940324 SEGFAULT core dumped
Actually, yes...
Uhm... apparently, anyway >_>
I quite like the dynamic search window, although it has its own set of annoyances. For one, the scroll bar feels horrible to use; I think a scroll bar doesn't work particularly well for this type of application. I know I'd prefer something similar to what Adobe Reader does for panning documents - then I can use only relative mouse movements, instead of moving my mouse to the center to drag this weird scroll bar thing. Then you have the added disadvantage of built-in browser features not working, such as being able to middle-click on the page and let it scroll for me (I don't know what this feature is called, but I use it a lot). You can confuse it slightly by changing text size too... It thought I was displaying items 229-228 out of (79,328)... In conclusion, I think it could be a good search tool, but the user interface needs work, and as you said, it needs features.
Windows XP Pro allows two physical processors, which could well each have 4 cores.
I'm betting most people didn't read that far ;)
The exploit never worked for me anyway, so I don't think I have anything to worry about ;)
Then would you also take a checksum of that checksum? o_O
Aye, they should ask for permission, but I doubt it would be so successful if it asks for permission. For starters, it wouldn't know who to ask. If it cached bulletin board posts, would it have to ask for the permission of all the people who posted in it? Do you propose something along the lines of <meta name="robots" content="noindex,nofollow,YesGoogleYouCANArchiveT<nobr>h<wbr></wbr></nobr> is">?
You can use the NOARCHIVE meta tag if you don't like Google caching your pages. You can also ask for your pages to be removed.