Slashdot Mirror


User: hlavac

hlavac's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
193
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 193

  1. Re:What language do you write code in? on Google and NASA Snap Up D-Wave Quantum Computer · · Score: 1

    LOL ever heard of cross compilers?

  2. Re:Pot solves everything on Possible Graphene Alternative Made From Hemp Waste · · Score: 1

    Man, have you seen what coffee does in large doses? Or freaking water?

  3. Re:Would have been better if... on NATO Holds Annual Cyber Defense Exercise · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Then some idiot brings a USB key he found on the parking lot :)

  4. Re:April fools again? on How To Communicate Faster-Than-Light · · Score: 1

    Because metric makes more sense, the units are systematically built from each other so they require no magic coefficients in calculations.

  5. Re:That's not a drone on Drone Comes Within 200 Feet of Airliner Over New York · · Score: 1

    Maybe Parrot will start taking the the runaway problems more seriously if that's the case.

    That's not a bug, that's a feature. Now go and buy a new one!

  6. Re:Neil deGrasse Tyson on Neil deGrasse Tyson On How To Stop a Meteor Hitting the Earth · · Score: 1

    The only reason this ridiculous gravity pull method is even considered is that the asteroid may actually be a loose pile of rocks or snow/dust, not holding together strong enough to be pulled directly by pushing/pulling in one spot. Actually I see one problem with this method, the mass ejected from the station keeping thrusters would hit the asteroid and cancel the effect of the gravity pull. It's like getting into a basket and trying to lift yourselves up. They would have to fire multiple thrusters at an angle away from asteroid lowering the effectiveness of it all which is unfortunate because this is what translates into actual orbit change of the asteroid. It may be harder than it looks to stay very close to a big asteroid and keep position in a way that does not affect the asteroid. For gravity effect you need to be as close as possible, while it becomes harder and harder not to hit the asteroid with your thruster plumes. Maybe put the engines on a long cable so that they are far enough to fire at a smaller angle and let the heavy part of the spaceship hang towards the asteroid?

  7. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope on Ask Slashdot: Dealing With an Advanced Wi-Fi Leech? · · Score: 1

    But, how would the "good guys" log all your traffic in case they need some dirt on you ten yars later? That is the problem with all commercial security, they want it to be secure and insecure at the same time...

  8. Re:Ironic on US Stealth Jet Has To Talk To Allied Planes Over Unsecured Radio · · Score: 1

    Probably extreme high frequency narrow beam to satellite.

  9. Re:Vista 2 on Windows 7 Still Being Sold On Up To 93% of British PCs · · Score: 1

    Windows 8 Banana. Comes with free gorilla arm.

  10. Re:Of course HBO are pirates on Software That Flagged HBO.com For Piracy Will Power U.S. 'Six Strikes' System · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They can't have it both ways.

    Oh but they can! They always pick what is best for them, arbitrarily.

    Want to make a backup copy of your DVD? It's a license, you can't.

    You scratched your DVD? It's an item, you have to buy a new one for a full price!

  11. Selling digital copies will not make any money. on As Music Streaming Grows, Royalties Slow To a Trickle · · Score: 1
    Just selling digital copies is not a viable way of making money.

    Value of a digital copy for everyone else equals to value of work you put into making it, which is ZERO.

    Even if you factor in the cost of making the initial original, because you can make infinite copies, it is still ZERO.

    How many sane people would pay for something they know cost you nothing? Pay you over and over again for the same work you did?
    When they know they could make the copy themselves for zero cost?

    It is like you picking a rock and trying to sell it to someone who saw you do it for a ridiculously high price, with plenty of other rocks lying around.

    Making laws so that only you can do it to make this fly is not fair. Why should you be allowed to make money for free while everyone else has to work?

    Forget about selling digital copies as a way to make money. Sell licenses. Sell tickets. Just dont sell copies please. Stop already. Stahp!

  12. It's just DRM, move along on Hidden Viral Gene Discovered In GMO Crops · · Score: 1

    It's just a DRM scheme to stop pirates from stealing the intellectual property in the modified genome...

  13. Only reason for such terms is malware on The Android SDK Is No Longer Free Software · · Score: 1

    Yes I am paranoid, but: The only reason they would not want you to look whats really inside would be that you would not like what you find in there.

  14. Re:Legal? on Verizon Patents Eavesdropping Using Your TV For Ad Targeting · · Score: 2

    Dump the TV already. I did.

  15. Re:America's hand is being forced... on US Scientific R&D Could Face Fiscal Cliff Doom · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That only works if you are winning hands down. Once the war comes to homeland, it stops being such fun and profitable experience you all think it is.

  16. Re:hunting? on Activists' Drone Shot Out of the Sky For Fourth Time · · Score: 1

    Are they trying to shoot down the drone so that they can eat it?

  17. Next step - this implanted and mandatory on Google Wallet May End Up Inside Your Actual Wallet · · Score: 1

    It's obvious where this is heading... mandatory implants and constant surveillance for everyone

  18. Re:Remember the old addage on TypeScript: Microsoft's Replacement For JavaScript · · Score: 2

    If you are familiar with the Apache 2.0 license you would know it doesn't matter.

    I think I can see what the business plan is:

    1. 1. Deliberately include features covered by affiliate patent troll's patents in a technology
    2. 2. Publish under Apache license 2.0 to give false sense of security and wide adoption
    3. 3. Wait for technology to get widespread use
    4. 4. Sue!
    5. 5. Profit!!! (Split the profits with patent troll)
  19. Re:Remember the old addage on TypeScript: Microsoft's Replacement For JavaScript · · Score: 1

    Ummm let me guess.. PATENTS? Preferably some held by a puppet empty shell company like Nokia, not Microsoft directly?

  20. Re:Remember the old addage on TypeScript: Microsoft's Replacement For JavaScript · · Score: 2

    Public has entered the enlightened stage of not taking _anything_ from Microsoft - open or not. Common sense now says there is or will be a catch to it and anyone who takes it will regret it. That is what happens when people get burned repeatedly. They learn. Astroturf this away if you can :)

  21. Re:It's more than OS on Iran and North Korea Team Up To Fight State-Sponsored Malware · · Score: 1

    Iranian plutonium for North korean nukes? Yay!

  22. Re:Not that it will help on Internet Standards Groups Unite Behind Open Processes · · Score: 1

    IEEE is pretty ridiculous with their choping of the standards into multiple parts that each costs as the whole former standard!

  23. Re:Resistance is the answer on Don't Build a Database of Ruin · · Score: 0

    You don't need a database to detect gypsy here, you can tell by the sudden lack of your wallet :)

  24. Re:A return to refractive telescopes? on New Flat Lens Focuses Without Distortion · · Score: 1

    You can still put it on a flat panel of glass.

  25. Re:Of course it has a private key on Private Key Found Embedded In Major SCADA Equipment · · Score: 2

    Having a single key sure simplifies the NSA backdoor management though. Taxpayers are saving money here!