Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: Dealing With an Advanced Wi-Fi Leech?

An anonymous reader writes "Recently, I had found out (through my log files) that my wireless router was subject to a Wi-Fi Protected Setup (WPS) brute force PIN attack. After looking on the Internet and discovering that there are indeed many vulnerabilities to WPS, I disabled it. After a few days, I noticed that I kept intermittently getting disconnected at around the same time every day (indicative of a WPA deauthentication handshake capture attempt). I also noticed that an evil twin has been set up in an effort to get me to connect to it. Through Wi-Fi monitoring software, I have noticed that certain MAC addresses are connected to multiple WEP and WPA2 access points in my neighborhood. I believe that I (and my neighbors) may be dealing with an advanced Wi-Fi leech. What can I do in this situation? Should I bother purchasing a directional antenna, figuring out exactly where the clients are situated, and knocking on their door? Is this something the local police can help me with?"

884 comments

  1. i like to limit my DHCP scope by alen · · Score: 0

    very simple but i think it works. i limit mine to 5-10 IP's. usually a few more than the number of devices i have because iOS devices can be a bit flaky with going to sleep and keeping the IP while another device grabs it as well

    1. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by fruitbane · · Score: 4, Informative

      Why even do that? Simply set up a list of accepted MAC addresses and give them assigned IPs. Don't provide any service to a MAC address not matching known. Unfortunately, that only stops your router/AP from handing out IPs. They can still eavesdrop and work on listening in on traffic.

    2. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by h4rr4r · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So then he sets his MAC address to one on the allowed list. Not exactly a tough thing to do.

    3. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by faedle · · Score: 4, Informative

      Doubt that would work. The leecher has already demonstrated a knowledge of layer-2 attacks against 802.11, I doubt limiting your DHCP scope is going to stop them. They'll just null handshake one of your devices off the WLAN.

    4. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize you don't need DHCP to get an IP address on a network, right?

    5. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      So a fix that does not work is what you are suggesting?

      You do know that changing you MAC address is not hard, right?

    6. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by fruitbane · · Score: 2

      At least it slows him down. He has to find and grab an accepted MAC, and you'll know he's trying to connect as soon as you have a collision on the DHCP.

    7. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by alen · · Score: 1

      can't remember of the top of my head, but i've seen some devices act very flaky or not work with the MAC filtering enabled. and then i have it set up where my inlaws and I have the same SSID and password so that visiting each other's networks is very easy

    8. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by faedle · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Doubt it would even slow him down. Some of the semi-automated leecher tools do this automatically already.

    9. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by alen · · Score: 1

      if i have a device not work for some reason and i see an IP conflict then i'll know right away

      my wife is always on her iphone on the wifi. the kids are always streaming something

    10. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If any attacker goes through the effort to crack wpa1/ TKIP, a MAC filter will certainly be an effective deterrent - or not

    11. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exact fix. Thread closed...

      I usually feel vaguely guilty taking advantage of holes in people's technical knowledge, but for some reason that guilt quickly evaporates as soon as they exhibit dismissiveness.

    12. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      if i have a device not work for some reason and i see an IP conflict then i'll know right away

      Unless you're setting your subnet mask to only be 10 or so addresses, I'd just pick an address outside of your DHCP scope and I'd never conflict. You're treating DHCP as a security measure when it's a convenience measure.

      captcha: gateway. How fitting.

    13. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by ios+and+web+coder · · Score: 5, Informative

      Why even do that? Simply set up a list of accepted MAC addresses and give them assigned IPs. Don't provide any service to a MAC address not matching known. Unfortunately, that only stops your router/AP from handing out IPs. They can still eavesdrop and work on listening in on traffic.

      I use reserved MAC addresses and a non-trivial WPA2 password. The router won't connect any unknown MAC addresses.

      That seems to work for me.

      If they crack that, they aren't leeches. They are crooks. Call the FBI.

      --

      "For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong."

      -H. L. Mencken

    14. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Noob.

    15. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by allo · · Score: 1

      why? Just pick a unused static ip from (or even not from) the dhcp-range.

    16. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by TrentTheThief · · Score: 4, Funny

      They probably are the FBI...

    17. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by Artraze · · Score: 1

      First and foremost, I should point out that additional security is unrelated to the issue at hand: the poster seems to have to attacker locked out since disabling WPS. This is about what to do to disable the annoyance of the various attacks still being performed. Security doesn't seem to be significantly at risk.

      That aside, what do you expect limiting DHCP will do? Especially coupled with leaving a few addresses available? An attacker would just log on to your network as soon as the authentication was compromised and get assigned one of your extra IPs. Even if you didn't have extra IPs, the attacker could just adopt a static IP address within your subnet (trivial) and be on their merry way. MAC address filtering isn't terrible high security, but at least requires more work to get around than hoping that they don't get assigned on of your extra DHCP addresses for no good reason.

    18. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by icebike · · Score: 2

      Yeah, call the FBI. That will work. Chuckle.

      As soon as these guys clone your mac address (which they can get easily with airsnort) then the only thing stopping them is WPA2.
      And if you have a lot of machines connected, they will be able to sniff enough traffic to get your WPA2 password fairly quickly.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    19. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by ios+and+web+coder · · Score: 0

      ;)

      --

      "For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong."

      -H. L. Mencken

    20. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by Synerg1y · · Score: 4, Informative

      Let's see...

      As per OP set up MAC address filtering, if this guy is trying to set up evil twins & trying to do handshake captures on your network, MAC addresses are spoofable.

      I also like to hide the SSID just to make things harder, but if he's passive listening, that may not help either... though at this point, a hidden SSID with WPA2 encryption does not make for an attractive target, esp. when the MAC needs to be spoofed (I wouldn't know this till i broke through the 1st 2).

      However, the single most effective thing you can do is limit your antenna's radius... if your router's stock firmware can't do it, dd-wrt and friends can. Stand outside your house till you can't connect to your wifi at your fence anymore, adjusting the radius in increments.

      Last, but not least, go buy a steel fish line and drywall saw at home depot and wire up your house w ethernet ports and disable your wifi. Tough luck on the phones though, unless you can find an adapter for them.

    21. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      It's hilarious how little slashbots know about this shit, but are eager to comment anyway. They fail at even being nerds.

    22. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any idiot can change a MAC address. It's probably the weakest form of security in a wireless network (including WEP)

    23. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 3, Interesting

      if i have a device not work for some reason and i see an IP conflict then i'll know right away

      Unless you're setting your subnet mask to only be 10 or so addresses, I'd just pick an address outside of your DHCP scope and I'd never conflict. You're treating DHCP as a security measure when it's a convenience measure.

      captcha: gateway. How fitting.

      I think that's the point; I set my subnet mask to /30 and assign a MAC to each IP. That way, any attackers have to sniff the MAC of an active connection and kick that connection in order to connect. This is very noticeable, and any leecher's going to have a really bad connection (as when my device gets kicked, it's going to attempt to reestablish, kicking them off). Doesn't stop passive surveillance, but it'll stop the leechers.

    24. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exact fix. Thread closed...

      Wrong. And this is why everyone detests their worthless IT department.

    25. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Subnet Mask != DHCP Scope

    26. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      This is why I am flabbergasted that with all the problems people have with security with WEP and WPA that it never occurred to anyone to do a DHE key exchange before swapping anything that requires the preshared key and adding an artificial minimum to the time between authentication attempts of any kind, such as 15 seconds. That would instantly fix the current weakness with WPA2 and slow down all unknown attacks in the future.

    27. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by DaMattster · · Score: 1

      Why even do that? Simply set up a list of accepted MAC addresses and give them assigned IPs. Don't provide any service to a MAC address not matching known. Unfortunately, that only stops your router/AP from handing out IPs. They can still eavesdrop and work on listening in on traffic.

      It is also trivial to simply clone one of the valid MAC addresses garnered from the evesdropping.

    28. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      What does that have to do with MAC address filtering that GP was supporting?

    29. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      If our helpdesk guys said such a thing they would be educated on why it was wrong and maybe even on finding a new job.

      Demand more of your IT.

    30. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by Deekin_Scalesinger · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't know about the hiding portion - any hacker with any skills at all are going to find them. I for one would be far more interested in someone who hides their SSID than someone in a faceless mass of wifis. Makes me think that they are relying on being hidden, and thus have fewer layers of defense.

      --
      "As the intrepid kobold companion continues his journey, he begins to wonder... if priests raises dead, why anybody die?
    31. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by nedlohs · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because it's not like the MAC addresses that are allowed get broadcast over the air when they are in use or anything.

    32. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 90s called. They want their "not" back.

    33. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      The problem is consumer electronics are frankly half assed and flaky so you are more likely to run into problems if you are hooking anything but PCs to the router. this is the same reason why we have to have UPNP, because many home devices simply won't run without them on and I've found with MAC filtering enabled some smartphones and tablets simply refuse to connect without going through an act of congress.

      Frankly we need to throw the whole damned thing out and start over, design something that low power devices like smartphones and tablets can use easily while at the same time having very tough to crack security. maybe placing a hardware crypto chip on the device?

      all I know if primarily dealing with home users you'd be amazed at how much consumer devices start getting flaky the more you ramp up the security, its like the manufacturers just expected everybody to run with least security possible and that is all they tested for.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    34. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by Shark · · Score: 1

      Once you break the key, you see all traffic, including the mac addresses of known devices. At least it was that way with earlier encryption schemes, maybe they worked around that now, I haven't kept up to date.

      --
      Mind the frickin' laser...
    35. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by bcmm · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why would he even send a DHCP request?

      (Several posts here are talking as if DHCP is a vital stage in setting up a network connection.)

      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
      Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
    36. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      very simple but i think it works.

      Um, no.

      He can set his own IP address manually.

      --
      No sig today...
    37. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by Synerg1y · · Score: 4, Interesting

      And somebody like me would completely own you for it:

      1. I have the technical know how to set my SSID to hidden: red flag #1
      2. What else do I have running if my SSID is hidden?

      In my case, I log all my traffic, and honestly it might take me a second to notice, all it would take is a few hiccups of my bandwidth for me to take a quick look at the settings and at that point, I'd log your traffic for a while, see what I can gather, and go find a zero-day, break through, escalate privilege, send your pr0n to your mom via the facebook login I logged, and delete your registry before I'm done.

      So in short, you never quite know what you're logging into when you go rogue on wifi :)

    38. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      At least it slows him down. He has to find and grab an accepted MAC, and you'll know he's trying to connect as soon as you have a collision on the DHCP.

      Yea, it'll take him another 30 seconds to spoof his MAC address. That will really slow him down. *nod*

    39. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Prank call. They actually just want their meme back.

    40. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once you break the key, you see all traffic, including the mac addresses of known devices. At least it was that way with earlier encryption schemes, maybe they worked around that now, I haven't kept up to date.

      With WPA, you need to see the handshake to decrypt the traffic. That's not much of a problem, because it's easy to deauthenticate a client and watch them handshake again.

    41. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by ichthus · · Score: 1

      Don't you have to crack the WPA2 before you can find one of the valid mac addresses?

      --
      sig: sauer
    42. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by meerling · · Score: 5, Informative

      Make sure you don't allow admin over wifi. Most routers have a setting so you can only administer it from a wired connection. This isn't an absolute or a fix for the base situation, it's just an extra hurdle for them if they get in and want to screw with you for fighting back.

    43. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by meerling · · Score: 2

      If the wifi is open, they are inviting people to share.
      This one is NOT open, so yeah, they are crackers, and that's illegal, but your local cops probably won't do anything if you call, but it's worth a shot.

    44. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Slowing him down is a good idea. Traffic-shape any non-whitelist MAC to a frustratingly slow but still believable bandwidth. He might just think your connection sucks and move on, without suspecting you've throttled him. It can't be impossibly slow, just pretty slow, like 28.8kbps modem slow.

    45. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by ILongForDarkness · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Lots of problems as others point out.Another solution: QOS. Do MAC filtering. Those in the trusted list get full speed. Those not get a much slower speed. Play with it a bit you want it fast enough that the hacker things they own you and doesn't try to figure out your MAC address but slow enough you don't mind losing that much bandwidth and it is painful to the hacker so they go on to other networks. Say 2Mbps with a 64kbps upload. Fast enough to be reasonable for a bottom tier internet package slow enough that no sane leech would choose you as the preferred target. Then enable logging, reduce signal strength, etc other games.

    46. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by dragon-file · · Score: 2

      Actually you dont 'change' the MAC address, you merely mask it. The MAC is a hardwired chip on the network device. But I guess and idiot would try to change it.

      --
      Whenever a player quits EVE to go play WoW, the Average IQ of both games increase.
    47. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or just a unemployed Kid with way too much time...

    48. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by icebike · · Score: 3, Informative

      Don't you have to crack the WPA2 before you can find one of the valid mac addresses?

      Don't think so.

      Stations brodcasts its mac address to the access point in clear text.
      http://www.maxi-pedia.com/how+to+break+MAC+filtering

      The stations may also send beacons, depending on how they are configured.
      http://www.wi-fiplanet.com/tutorials/article.php/1492071

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    49. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by RR · · Score: 2

      Don't you have to crack the WPA2 before you can find one of the valid mac addresses?

      No.

      --
      Have a nice time.
    50. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by realityimpaired · · Score: 2

      On a modern network, it is.... at least at the consumer level where nobody knows how to configure a subnet manually, but if you're managing any kind of large scale network it becomes very difficult to work with static configurations on every workstation even when you know how.

      That being said, for a small network you *could* simply assign a static configuration to everything and turn off DHCP. It wouldn't protect you because, as others have said, the MAC and IP address could be cloned anyway, but it would offer an added layer of annoyance for whoever's doing it, such that they'd probably go somewhere else.

      The truth that nobody wants to really admit is that there's simply no way to keep a determined hacker out of a wireless network. It's, by its very nature, an open network. About the best you can do, short of going wired, is regularly rotate your wireless passwords (get a new one every day, for example), and also maybe set up a VPN on your local network, so that even if you're on the wifi you can't actually do anything with it without connecting to the VPN.

    51. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nerdy nitpicking: Some fancy NICs allow you to change the MAC in the device's NVRAM.

    52. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by MyFirstNameIsPaul · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Clearly you do not have someone trying to leech your network, or you are not able to detect such a user. MAC addresses are broadcast in the clear. This is because otherwise every device on the network would have to decrypt every single packet in order to determine whether or not the device is the intended recipient of the packet. All the attacker has to do inspect a packet, find the MAC address, then spoof that MAC address.

      WiFi Protected Setup (WPS) is broken, and on many routers it cannot be fixed without disabling WiFi completely. Even a 64-character, high entropy password on WPA2 AES will not work. This is the problem faced by the poster of the article.

      In my mind, the best solution is high entropy, long password, WPA2-AES with a router that does not have WPS or is known to be able to safely disable WPS (such as latest versions of DD-WRT).

      --

      I once took an excursion to Reddit, and later HN. Unlimited up/down voting sucks when dealing with a hive-mind.

    53. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 1

      You clearly didn't bother to read the damn question. OP explicitly stated that he's dealing with someone who knows that they're doing. MAC filtering will slow this guy down for all of 5 seconds.

      --
      -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
    54. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by Deekin_Scalesinger · · Score: 1

      Indeed. I don't like the idea of standing out in any fashion. In this case, hiding your SSID will attract more attention then not, IMO

      --
      "As the intrepid kobold companion continues his journey, he begins to wonder... if priests raises dead, why anybody die?
    55. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by AmonRa1979 · · Score: 1

      If they spoofs their MAC address to something on the white-list, would this really get them anywhere? If there are two devices using the same MAC address will either one get reliable service? If they are trying to be a nuisance then you're right, a MAC white-list won't help. If they are just trying to get free internet, then the poor service and warnings of conflicting MAC addresses will probably be enough to make the person move on.

    56. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by AmonRa1979 · · Score: 1

      My mistake, it's IP-address conflicts that give warnings, not MAC-address conflicts. However, the MAC address conflict would still result in unreliable service.

    57. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by bcmm · · Score: 4, Informative

      On a modern network, it is.... at least at the consumer level where nobody knows how to configure a subnet manually, but if you're managing any kind of large scale network it becomes very difficult to work with static configurations on every workstation even when you know how.

      My point is that it is *incredibly* trivial to connect to a wireless router that has DHCP enabled and just use an IP address of your choosing. It's a perfectly normal thing to do if you want to be able to predictably SSH a machine or something, and even MS Windows has a GUI way of doing it. Somebody who is sniffing network traffic and cracking encryption keys can easily determine which addresses are already in use, and in practice, if you take an address at the high end of the range (e.g. 192.168.1.250), you won't run in to any trouble with other clients.

      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
      Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
    58. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by miknix · · Score: 1

      Why would he even send a DHCP request?

      (Several posts here are talking as if DHCP is a vital stage in setting up a network connection.)

      If you have windows, it is! It will show a "limited connection" warning if windows does not get a dhcp offer.. /troll

      Now seriously, one can perfectly clone a MAC address and IP address of someone and do business as usual.. Just setup some iptables rules to drop all incoming packets not related to any connection that originated from your computer and you are gold. Of course this can confuse the shit out of the other computer if it does not have a proper firewall setup too.
      But yeah, I agree with you. Sounds like some people here don't have any clue about what's going on under the application layer..

    59. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by hakr89 · · Score: 1

      Actually it's not hardwired, it's merely a value coded into the EEPROM. You can overwrite that EEPROM to permanently change the MAC address.

    60. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by redmid17 · · Score: 1

      He's not wrong. He is offbase with the corporate IT to a certain extent but not your house. Do you have any friends? Do you want to add a new MAC to your router every single time someone comes over to hang out? It's pretty trivial to spoof a MAC address as well. I have a feeling you'd be looking for a new job if you were actually assigned to a helpdesk and said what you just did.

    61. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by peragrin · · Score: 1

      So when my sister, or brother visits I have to pull out my laptop, and a network cord, and plug it into the router, to authorize them?

      Where does that make sense?

      Granted it only has to be done once. but why?

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    62. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Changing the SSID to "FBI_Cybercrime_Unit_23" would be a better bet...

    63. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by JWSmythe · · Score: 2

      I don't quite get the problem here.

      There's an individual outside of his home, who is accessing the wifi *in* his home.

      Everyone is talking about potential countermeasures.

      What about the obvious ones?

      1) wire everything. That doesn't work so good for tablets, laptops in random places, etc.

      2) Make it so he can't connect. Reduce the power (if possible). Pick a noisy channel, so he'll get too much interference. Shield the antenna from the direction the intruder is.

      I've had to move so many access points, because people put them under desks, or with something in between Point A and B. Nope, RF doesn't pass very well through the refrigerator, filing cabinet, or the other numerous things they love to put in the way to complain. Detune it. Put the AP under the desk, so there's just enough power to reach the couch (or wherever).

      Worst case, anti-wifi wallpaper, or even the always stylish wire screen or aluminum foil.

      I vote for an all-out Faraday cage. Not only will it stop the wifi thief, but it'll keep the government mind control out... :)

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    64. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Please tell us more about cracking WPA fairly quickly.

    65. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You really dont know how this shit works and shouldnt give others advice.
      2 identical macs can be connected to ap at the same time.

    66. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Hm, really? I have my SSID hidden. I was considering changing it because my Android phone takes ages for it to connect to it that way. But I assume that less obvious would be better. I suppose I could just do what I had before my phone, leave wifi off permanently until I actually need it (ie, brought work laptop home with me).

    67. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      Why do they need wifi at your home. Aren't they there to talk to you instead of constantly updating their facebook status?
      Maybe it's inconvenient, but security is always inconvenient. You can't have both.

    68. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by icebike · · Score: 2
      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    69. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      1. Setting the subnet mask to /30 or whatever only works if you have just enough devices for the available IPs. What if your network has 7 devices?
      2. Two devices can share a MAC and IP on a wireless network. On a wired network it confuses the switch, but a wireless network does not have a switch. Depending on how the devices are configures, this situation can even work quite well.

      If I needed a wireless network, I would use WPA2 and EAP authentication with certificates. That is harder to break than a simple pre shared key.

    70. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      Dude, my phone actually LISTS hidden access points as "". Time to stop making yourself a target.

    71. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by shitzu · · Score: 1

      So you think that a person who is quite prolific in wifi hacking techniques will be stopped short, because he will not get an address from DHCP and has to figure out the extremely complicated method of assigning an ip address manually? Sounds like an effective technique alright.

    72. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by shitzu · · Score: 1

      I use reserved MAC addresses and a non-trivial WPA2 password. The router won't connect any unknown MAC addresses.

      The wifi router does not need to *connect* to anything. It is yelling your traffic loud and clear over the block, anyone can listen to it. To think that MAC restrictions are any kind of a deterrent, is delusional. MAC lists just serve to annoy legitimate users, it has absolutely no effect on a hacker. (Same goes for hidden SSID by the way).
      The safest bet would be using 802.1x radius authentication.

    73. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      And somebody like me would completely own you for it:

      1. I have the technical know how to set my SSID to hidden: red flag #1
      2. What else do I have running if my SSID is hidden?

      Who knows? Odds are nothing at all. Hidden SSIDs are standard security measures available in every idiot's WiFi router. Somehow I don't think my sister nor my mother (both who have hidden SSIDs) have the technical know how or capability to use this "zero thingy" you talk about.

      It takes quite a different mind to actually perform a hack, even a script kiddy hack, than a mind required to check a box and follow a two page guide with pictures form an owners manual while setting up a network.

    74. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by soccerisgod · · Score: 1

      ALERT ALERT! Weak passwords decrease security! Whodathunk! News at 11!

      --
      If a train station is a place where a train stops, what's a workstation?
    75. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by soccerisgod · · Score: 2

      Yes, but only if done right. Use EAP-PEAP with silly passwords or even something really stupid like LEAP, and you're not any more secure. Use something like EAP-TLS with proper certificates, and then you're set.

      --
      If a train station is a place where a train stops, what's a workstation?
    76. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by pipatron · · Score: 2

      Frankly we need to throw the whole damned thing out and start over, design something that low power devices like smartphones and tablets can use easily while at the same time having very tough to crack security. maybe placing a hardware crypto chip on the device?

      Yeah, that was a great idea last time, until someone found a flaw in WEP and the chips weren't possible to upgrade and we had to live with virtually no security for 5 years.

      --
      c++; /* this makes c bigger but returns the old value */
    77. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by Pete+(big-pete) · · Score: 1

      My point is that it is *incredibly* trivial to connect to a wireless router that has DHCP enabled and just use an IP address of your choosing

      I recently ran into issues at home due to relying on this. I bought a firewall for my network, and assigned it as the DHCP server, I planned to have a DHCP allocation higher in the subnet, and to have most of my devices self-allocate an IP address lower down in the subnet (so I didn't need to have a static allocation via DHCP). To my surprise the self-allocated IPs weren't working, and couldn't get an outside connection, but anything allocated via DHCP could.

      It seems that my firewall by default drops anything coming from an address not assigned via DHCP (which is nice actually, as it stops the behaviour listed in the quote). So I had to reserve DHCP addresses for my "known" devices, and have them assigned that way. Once I have everything assigned, I can restrict DHCP to the range of known devices, so anything else trying to connect will need to spoof a MAC to get an IP, and runs a very strong change of colliding (hence alerting me, and disrupting the offending traffic).

      -- Pete.

    78. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by lxs · · Score: 1

      At work we have a similar setup courtesy of our $^#^%#$$% Thompson Speedtouch modem. You can't get a decent signal from that thing when you are further than three paces away from it.

    79. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      And what we have now is better where more than half of the consumer devices get flaky if you try to have any real security? You know it doesn't matter if its because hackers cracked the chip or because the device just won't hook up as in both cases you are SOL as far as security goes.

      But considering how powerful ARM DSPs are now i don't see why you couldn't have one that could be updated through firmware, that way as new advances in encryption came out you could update the device.

      as it is now you go right ahead and try to enable MAC filtering and WPA PSK and see how quickly the phones and tablets become paperweights, what good is having security if it results in devices you can no longer use in their intended purpose?

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    80. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by CAIMLAS · · Score: 2

      Here here!

      I am fortunate that my house siding is cement. With the AP strategically placed in the basement, there is no signal at the sidewalk or the fence in the back yard. The next door neighbors may be able to receive the signal from their upstairs, but it's questionable.

      A basement makes an awesome 'funnel' for your wireless signal. :)

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    81. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would switch to ipv6 if possible use ipsec for everything. Proxy for ipv4 (Certificate based auth).

    82. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      go find a zero-day

      Because that is so easy to do...

    83. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lawl, just "go find a zero-day". Too funny.

      My mother knows how to hid an SSID. it would bear no effect on someone who wanted to get into your network.

      Step 1.) Break into "hidden" network.
      Step 2.) Monitor broadcasts and traffic to your machine. (See who's who and whats running)
      Step 3.) Check ARP tables on occasion. (Are they watching you)?
      Step 4.) Find Target and scan
      Step 5.) Use one of the millions of already made exploits to break in.

      If you go out and find a zero-day...It's not a zero-day anymore. Unless you bought it. And its just not worth the time to write your own ZD for neighborhood wireless.

    84. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by PlusFiveTroll · · Score: 1

      go find a zero-day

      Because that is so easy to do...

      Java.

    85. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by hlavac · · Score: 1

      But, how would the "good guys" log all your traffic in case they need some dirt on you ten yars later? That is the problem with all commercial security, they want it to be secure and insecure at the same time...

    86. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      That is what I am saying. Anyone advocating Mac address filtering will be getting a talking too.

      I never suggest the use of such a useless measure.

    87. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by wallsg · · Score: 1

      Or just a unemployed Kid with way too much time...

      Who is committing a felony.

    88. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      For what most people spend on mid to high level home routers you could be using pfsense on an alix board, or at least an ubiquiti or mikrotik device.
      Any of these devices will blow the socks off the consumer junk out there.

    89. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by Synerg1y · · Score: 1

      ---would like a way to ban AC's from his discussions. Bunch of dumb newbs, who can't spell security.

    90. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by Synerg1y · · Score: 1

      What a moron. Please go back to your mother and stay there.

      P.S. I'd find the zero-day, you wouldn't, it's called "community".

    91. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      1. Setting the subnet mask to /30 or whatever only works if you have just enough devices for the available IPs. What if your network has 7 devices?
      2. Two devices can share a MAC and IP on a wireless network. On a wired network it confuses the switch, but a wireless network does not have a switch. Depending on how the devices are configures, this situation can even work quite well.

      If I needed a wireless network, I would use WPA2 and EAP authentication with certificates. That is harder to break than a simple pre shared key.

      1. I fill up all 10 devices with MACs -- most of them dummies. Since there's nothing transmitting these MACs, it's highly unlikely that an attacker could guess them. Therefore, I'm essentially limiting the network to the actually used IPs.
      2. That was my point; two devices can share a MAC and IP on a wireless network, but service degradation IS an issue, and the combination of retransmits and handshaking (at least on my hardware) causes significant lag and eventually session drops, requiring renegotiation. I've never seen a situation where devices worked well sharing a single MAC and IP over a wireless router -- it works much like a passive hub, except with an extra layer of abstraction around the wireless connection negotiation. No switch to actively drop the potential collisions, just two devices that degrade each other's performance and trample each other's TCP packets due to buffer overloading.

      That said, WPA2 with EAP is a much better choice where all devices support it.

    92. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by Dextrously · · Score: 1

      The truth that nobody wants to really admit is that there's simply no way to keep a determined hacker out of a wireless network. It's, by its very nature, an open network. About the best you can do, short of going wired, is regularly rotate your wireless passwords (get a new one every day, for example), and also maybe set up a VPN on your local network, so that even if you're on the wifi you can't actually do anything with it without connecting to the VPN.

      Are you thinking of WEP encryption? If you are using WPA2 encryption, asking someone to change their password once a day is completely unreasonable.

      If you are using WPA2 and a semi-long password there is absolutely no need to change the password daily. The way that cracking WPA2 works is by capturing an authentication handshake of a user who knows the password, storing that locally and then cracking it on the local machine. Now you are playing the waiting game, even if the attacker was using (http://arstechnica.com/security/2012/12/25-gpu-cluster-cracks-every-standard-windows-password-in-6-hours/) cracking at 350 billion passwords attempts a second, a password with 20 characters (upper, lower, digits, and punctuation) would take
      (32 lower + 32 upper + 32 punctuation + 10 digits) 104 ^ 20 = 2.1911231430334195e+40 possible combinations.
      2.1911231430334195e+40 / 350,000,000,000 attempts per second would require 62,603,518,372,383,410,015,659,322,218.865 seconds to try each combination. Which comes out to a potential 2,905,645,676,789,197,589,949.8015733293 years to crack. Change your password once a year and call it good.

      Wireless networks are not open by nature, they are broadcast by nature. There is a very big difference.

    93. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by Dextrously · · Score: 1

      Absolutely. If there is any activity on the network at all https://www.wireshark.org/download.html would pick it up in a split second.

    94. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      Two devices can share a MAC, but yes, the service might degrade, since each station would send TCP RST packets for the connections it does not know about. On the other hand, if one (or both) stations have firewalls that are configured to be stealthy (to drop instead of reject packets) then such a setup can work quite well. It would most likely still be noticeable for devices that send/receive a lot (at least the bandwidth graph would change), but if the attacker cloned the MAC of your cellphone or some other device that does not send/receive a lot.

      Some years ago I "legitimately" cloned MACs to connect to a network - I had permission to access the network (and the password), but the MAC table of the AP (since they were also using MAC filtering - so effective) was full and the address of my device could not be added - so I just scanned the network, made a MAC list and every time I want to connect I would just pick one (that wasn't seen in the last minute, or if all were active then one that was least active).

      And if the attacker lives near you (as opposed to just driving around with a laptop), he can leave the capture on for a day or so and get the less used MACs.

    95. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Riiiight, because Sally Secretary and grandma and grandpa could REALLY set something like that up, geez. This is why Linux never goes anywhere, the FOSSie thinks "If I can do it anybody can" which is complete and total horseshit, that is like saying because your local mechanic can rebuild a car from a rusting hulk into a hot rod you could do so with nothing but the tools and the husk, no instruction needed.

      Crap like pfsense is about as user friendly as open heart surgery and if you don't REALLY know what you are doing and have a low level understanding of networking you are just as likely to come up with something worse than what you had because it'll be misconfigured.

      As I have said many times what we NEED is something that can be updated via firmware as new threats come out and which has a new more secure form of UPNP so that grandma and Sally can follow the very BASIC instructions and set up their devices to work on it without paying a guy like me a $150+ service call on top of an hourly rate to set the thing up.

      So I'm sorry but your "solution" is anything but and would be like saying "To save gas just build your own hybrid" for all the usefullness of it. Unless of course you are just trying to throw names for geek cred, if so congrats, you are a basement nerd that uses products nobody cares about and which has less home users than Solaris.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    96. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
      Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.

      Do you not mean that the illama is full of ram.

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
    97. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

      Perfect security.. Put some aluminum foil over it to finish your safety precautions. :)

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    98. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      pFsense config is no harder then any of the off the shelf routers. If you buy an embedded device with eveything pre-installed you just plug it in and go to the internal web interface. Upgrading is a one click affair. Sure you can put it on an old PC, or put together your own embedded kit, but those are options, not requirements, you never need to touch the CLI. I know the old version required the CLI for the initial setup, but that is no longer the case.
      Mikrotik is a litle more complicated, but it's rock solid at a low price and for most home DHCP WAN links there is nothing to configure.

    99. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by allo · · Score: 1

      he wanted to filter the MACs, which get an ip via DHCP. Thats no protection, because i just pick some unused ip by hand.

      do not confuse his misleaded approach with MAC filtering on the accesspoint (a layer below IP)

    100. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Dude are you trolling? Or have you just been an uber nerd so damned long you don't know any better? You know how easy the new routers are to set up? Its "Insert CD, clicky clicky next next next" and THAT IS IT. Hell many of them have basic Android and iPhone apps or websites that will hold your little hand and walk you through setting up the router without having to know more than how to push the button.

      But this same attitude is why Linux goes nowhere, they go "Open just open up Bash and type" followed by a string of gibberish THEY understand which HAS TO BE TWEAKED for the situation but since THEY know how to tweak it because they've spent countless hours fiddling with the damned thing that means Sally and Grandpa can do it too...bullshit. Complete and utter bullshit and be no different than me handing you an electric bass which you had never touched in your life and saying "Play Freewill by Rush. What do you mean you can't? I can play it so should you" while ignoring I've played bass for 25+ years while you have never even tuned the instrument.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    101. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      I always throw the cd away.
      Plug the router in, wan to wan, lan to any computers, done! No further changes are necessary for DHCP internet.

    102. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      So you've never even tried the actual device as its marketed and sold, and think pfsense is a viable "solution" when you don't even know what the competition does or how?

      Its obvious that your ass ain't never worked in retail because with an attitude like that you'd be having a going out of business sale before the year was up. You can NOT offer "solutions" if you don't even know how it compares to the competition and I can promise you pfsense is a bad joke compared to the ease of use of modern routers. I have seen customers who don't even know what a router is other than "I can hook up by wireless" that have managed to set the whole thing up with nothing but the CD. They know NOTHING about IP addressing, nothing about LAN or WAN, yet they have functioning networks and THAT is what you are competing against.

      And do NOT give me that elitest "Well they better fucking learn, stupid noobs" bullshit because that is a classic "is ought" problem which again is a reason why Linux never goes anywhere, the devs think "They OUGHT to be able to do this because i can" while ignoring that reality IS the fact that people who don't even know what an OS is can do all the basic tasks they require because there is enough hand holding and dumbing down that those with zero education can use these things as easily as one uses a toaster.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    103. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      I have been out of retail for about a decade. I do occasional home network consulting but I explain things in terms that everyday users can understand. Many of them don't care to understand and may not retain it, but I don't talk down to people and assume they are not capable. No complaints and all my business if by word of mouth.

    104. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      As an aside, it's not wonder you have morons following your posts, downmodding you, and accusing you of being a shill. At the least you appear to be bipolar.

      You have posted some useful things in the past and I attempted to reciprocate. Anyone with even a moderate level of technical understanding is wasting their money on consumer level crap. Sure 90 year old Auntie Matilda might have some problems setting up something more advanced, but if I am helping her I am still going with the better quality stuff. It won't crap out unexpectedly and once it's set up it is rock solid. You can even manage it remotely. I would rather check on Aunt Matilda's router remotely every month, then have her call me every other week so I can tell her to powercycle her router.

    105. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      That's nice that you have nothing better to do than give out free support, my time is $35 an hour and I just can't afford to be wasting it dealing with shit I'm not getting paid for. And what failures? A $50 router will run longer than the PC its hooked to, I have customers with routers that have been going for nearly a decade, in fact the only reason they have a router now is I talked them into getting rid of the hubs they had previously.

      Again if you got nothing better to do, that you can afford to give away free support? Good for you, I really mean that. I have a dozen system waiting for me when I go to work tomorrow, no less than 3 service calls and at least 5 messages on my phone wanting to set up a time for either dropping off a system or for setting up a service call, I don't have the damned time to waste setting up some PITA system that is gonna eat up time. if they want to pay for a support contract? Then I'll be happy to do it but between my work and my band on the weekends i just don't have enough hours in the day as it is and your "solution" is a giant PITA and not as good as COTS without a bunch of fiddling and hand holding. Not to mention that if they buy a tablet next week your "solution" is impossible for them to work on or get the device hooked up so there is another service call for you, shame you aren't getting a cent for all that work.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    106. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      Who says I give anything away. I bill more then you, probably because I am in a more urban area. I generally only give away advice, although some people (present company) don't appreciate the value. I don't wast time cleaning up pc's for the most part. I am more CIO planning, network, server, and forensics. I will happily back up a pc and perform a wipe and basic reinstall for $50. Most of my processes are automated using my egg-head linux server to manage the windows rebuild.

  2. Figure out where he is located by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    And punch him in the nose.

    1. Re:Figure out where he is located by jez9999 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In places like Florida, Stand Your Ground lets them legally shoot you dead for that.

    2. Re:Figure out where he is located by gnasher719 · · Score: 3, Funny

      In places like Florida, Stand Your Ground lets them legally shoot you dead for that.

      Shoot them for leeching your WiFi? I prefer the punching bit.

    3. Re:Figure out where he is located by Artraze · · Score: 5, Informative

      This is news for nerds, jock solutions like that aren't welcome here!

      Correct solution:
      Pinpoint the attacker using a highly directional 2.4 GHz waveguide antenna. Once you're sure only the attacker is visible, attach a microwave magnetron to the antenna and watch him burn.

    4. Re:Figure out where he is located by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      This should be modded Funny, not Insightful.

      Re-read the law. Stand Your Ground "lets you shoot" only if fearing for your life or at risk of being badly wounded. Not if you're afraid of being punched.

    5. Re:Figure out where he is located by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Put some toilet paper between two paper plates light it on fire and Frisbee it on his roof.

    6. Re:Figure out where he is located by Wolfling1 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Your suggestion is actually quite a good one.

      Microwaves are particularly troublesome for WiFi

      So, you could effectively jam the leech with a Microwave transmitter.

    7. Re:Figure out where he is located by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Florida there's no need to punch your neighbor, you can just shoot them for poisoning you with Cancer-rays.

    8. Re:Figure out where he is located by judoguy · · Score: 1
      No.

      One has to make a reasonable presentation of a serious, life threatning situation. A punch in the nose of itself would generally be insufficient.

      Really people, the fear around self defense is pitiful. Yes, boundry situations can occur where the determination of was the response appropriate can be murky, but please stop with the "We're all gonna be shot down in the street because of Stand Your Ground!".

      --
      Peace is easy to achieve, just surrender. Liberty is much harder get/keep.
    9. Re:Figure out where he is located by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yes, the nerdy solution is to pull the cavity magnetron out of your microwave oven, add a highly directional antenna to the waveguide output, fire that baby up, and blow out the RF stage of his router. Extra nerdy points for plating/honing the cavities to re-tune the cavity magnetron tube to the correct wi-fi frequency (the diameter of the cavity is determined by c=f/lambda where c is the speed of light, f is the wi-fi center frequency, and lambda is the wavelength. Remember, electrons circulate (because of spin=1/2) around the hot cathode, and the basic operation is like that of a whistle or pop bottle (small amount of air moving across opening resonates according to the size of the bottle / small amount of electrons moving across the opening resonate according to the size of the cavity, remember that air is a pressure wave and travels slow, electrons and em radiation travel at the speed of light). Its been too long since I studied radar/electronics engineering.

    10. Re:Figure out where he is located by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Should I bother purchasing a directional antenna, figuring out exactly where the clients are situated, and knocking down their door?

      That's why he needs to knock down their door before punching. The neighbors are standing on their ground and are left under the door.

    11. Re:Figure out where he is located by spire3661 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      OK, how about hands around throat? Fights make deadly turns very fast. Someone punching me is enough for me to pull my weapon at the very least. I can say this because i dont instigate fights, ever, so if someone is engaging me physically, its serious. All fights are potentially mortal and i react accordingly. I also avoid trouble as much as I an, but once it gets physical, im thinking of ways to end the threat extremely quickly.

      --
      Good-bye
    12. Re:Figure out where he is located by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Well then, seeing as nobody here talking about it is a lawyer, I guess you pays your money and you takes your chances. If you think the guy means you serious harm or is trying to kill you, then you go ahead and shoot them.

      And when & if you stand trial, you'll find out whether "hands around the throat" is good enough justification.

      Your right to self defense doesn't mean you won't face police scrutiny for shooting someone. See: Zimmerman, George.

    13. Re:Figure out where he is located by swillden · · Score: 2

      This is why you should carry pepper spray if you carry a gun.

      There is a large class of scenarios in which you put yourself at great legal risk if you go immediately to deadly force as a response -- and remember that in most states merely drawing a gun is threatening deadly force, which constitutes aggravated assault (or whatever the state calls it). The problem is that in those same situations there's a possibility that your opponent may realize you have a gun and go for it, which can leave you in a very bad situation.

      It's very valuable to have a non-lethal (legally, at least) at-a-distance self-defense option.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    14. Re:Figure out where he is located by SecurityGuy · · Score: 1

      So invite him over for a beer, first. :-)

    15. Re:Figure out where he is located by Swarley · · Score: 1, Troll

      Reality must not have read the same law you did
      http://www.tampabay.com/news/courts/criminal/many-killers-who-go-free-with-florida-stand-your-ground-law-have-history/1241378

      It would also seem that only men are allowed to stand their ground:
      http://www.care2.com/causes/stand-your-ground-fails-abused-wife.html

      The previous self defense law in Florida was perfectly fine. If you felt threatened and had no way to escape you were justified in using lethal force. Stand your ground essentially took away the "and you have no way to escape" part of the law such that you can always use lethal force if you feel threatened. On top of that it added language so broad that it's comical. It also introduced punishments (yes punishments) for police departments which arrest somebody who is later found to have been within the new stand your ground law. That is not rational policy. If the police find someone dead and you say you shot them, you go to jail and your self defense or not is determined by state prosecutors and ultimately a judge and jury. Self defense is a determination made by the justice system, NOT by law enforcement. Punishing police departments for doing their lawful duty is absolutely stupid. It's a great way to make sure almost nobody ever gets arrested for murder as long as the dead guy was in their house.

    16. Re:Figure out where he is located by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      Better to be judged by 12 then carried by 6

      --
      Good-bye
    17. Re:Figure out where he is located by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can die if you get punched in the wrong spot, so one could easily fear for their life and shoot the would be puncher dead.

    18. Re:Figure out where he is located by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Write "YER DED!" on a piece of paper and stab it to his front door with a large knife.

    19. Re:Figure out where he is located by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not if that12 find you guilty because you had a bad defense attorney, and end up spending life in prison. And really do you trust 12 strangers with your life?

    20. Re:Figure out where he is located by rebot777 · · Score: 2

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shooting_of_Trayvon_Martin Not funny. It's pretty plausible you could get off.

    21. Re:Figure out where he is located by Swarley · · Score: 1

      This is all exactly relevant to what I said. Police departments finding a dead body and a person with a violent criminal record having shot them are subject to penalties under the stand your ground law because these guys were found to have "stood their ground". This is insanity. How many similar cases aren't even reported on because police feared being penalized and never even arrested the shooter such that he could even be legally deemed to have shot in self defense. The law grossly expands the definition of self defense and then penalizes police for responding reasonably in cases where someone has been shot under unknown circumstances. It's not enough to make almost anything that happens in your home self defense, we also have to make sure that police aren't even allowed to keep you from leaving town while they try to figure out what did happen. I'm willing to accept that some people do not consider this law to be overly broad in it's stated intention. But no rational person who actually understands it as written can think that about it's horrific and sloppy text and execution.

    22. Re:Figure out where he is located by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In places like Florida, Stand Your Ground lets them legally shoot you dead for that.

      Shoot them for leeching your WiFi? I prefer the punching bit.

      No: they leech wifi; you try to punch them; they shoot you dead with no worse consequence than you stop paying for the wifi they're leeching.

    23. Re:Figure out where he is located by manu0601 · · Score: 1

      attach a microwave magnetron to the antenna and watch him burn.

      What happens if someone stands in the line of sight?

    24. Re:Figure out where he is located by memnock · · Score: 1

      If someone walked up and started what I perceived as an unwelcome conversation about my wireless habits and then punched me in the nose, I'd be very worried about this person's next move, ergo I could start to feel my life was in danger. Any kind of physical assault to me seems to be life threatening. I'm not a violent person and I'm not accustomed to using violence. Physical violence in and of itself to me is a very serious threat. So "Stand Your Ground" to me seems to indicate that any punch directed at me is reason enough to use lethal force. How do I know when a stranger punching me is just a guy who wants to punch me and not a stranger who wants to kill me?

    25. Re:Figure out where he is located by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I think it lets *you* shoot *them* dead.

    26. Re:Figure out where he is located by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 2

      "Fights make deadly turns very fast. Someone punching me is enough for me to pull my weapon at the very least."

      See, there's your problem. Overreaction. If somebody punches you and you pull a gun, chances are YOU are the one who will be arrested.

      YOUR attitude doesn't matter. What matters -- 100% -- is theirs. Do they have deadly intent? Do they want to do more than just punch you in order to maybe cause you a fat lip or bloody nose? Then you might be justified. Maybe.

      You can end the threat quickly. Break their fingers. Kick them in the knee or groin. Poke them in the eye. It might cause injury, but nobody could reasonably argue that you were threatening them with death.

      Laws vary among states. But in general: if they don't have a weapon, you should not pull one either, if you want to stay out of jail. There are a few exceptions but not many.

      That is precisely the problem with police over-use of Tasers in recent years. Tasers are NOT "non-lethal". They are "less-lethal". The original intent was for law enforcement to use a Taser only in lieu of deadly force. In other words, only if their only other option is to shoot you. But instead, some police have used them to get old ladies out of cars during traffic stops. That's bad news. It demonstrates that many police are lazy and would rather torture people than face the possibility of even the slightest physical confrontation. In other words, cowards.

      A cowardly cop is a dangerous cop.

    27. Re:Figure out where he is located by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      "It's very valuable to have a non-lethal (legally, at least) at-a-distance self-defense option."

      Failing that: a non-lethal, close-range weapon.

      Stun guns work, and they are not classified as "weapons" in most states. The only problem of course is that you have to be closer than you want to be to use them. But if they get close to you anyway, it makes for good defense.

      Sometimes, even seeing one of them ZZZZAAAP in the air will make people back off.

    28. Re:Figure out where he is located by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 2

      "Better to be judged by 12 then carried by 6"

      Even better to figure out whether you ARE really in danger, and thus stay out of the courtroom altogether.

    29. Re:Figure out where he is located by Electricity+Likes+Me · · Score: 0

      It's notable that Zimmerman is only facing scrutiny because he probably followed a guy in his car, started the fight, and then shot him as well (which is rather similar to basically murder).

      Someone coming onto your property and attacking you, in a Stand Your Ground state, I doubt would have to do much more then file a statement.

    30. Re:Figure out where he is located by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't understand your rhetoric: do you believe there is a possibility of someone randomly grabbing you by the throat on the street? Or do you mean that if you are arguing strongly with someone and it escalates to physical contact you consider pulling out a gun a reasonable reaction?

      In the first case, if such people exist, the possibility for them to legally carry guns would terrify me more than anything else. In the second case, you are doing the very same your potential opponent is: escalating violence in your reactions.

    31. Re:Figure out where he is located by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      I can't speak for Florida laws, but most state laws say that you are not required to retreat if attacked. (Often the wording is something like, you are assumed to be a person of "reasonable courage". That has usually been interpreted to mean that you need not retreat.) That works for them. If it doesn't work for Florida, then I'd say that seems to be a problem with Florida.

      A requirement that somebody must retreat from an attack does nothing but encourage attackers, and make victims of attacks also victims of the law.

      If somebody breaks down my door, I'm not going to look for a window to jump out of, I'm going to stand there and shoot the bastard. If somebody attacks me on the street, I'm not going to run away... at least not until I make sure they regret their actions. I'm very often armed. Not always with something deadly but with at least something. And yes, I've had the living shit beat out of me on the street because I would not run away. But if it happened again tomorrow, I still wouldn't run away. (I would, however, be a little better prepared.)

    32. Re:Figure out where he is located by Eskarel · · Score: 1

      Stand Your Ground is a bunch of red neck crap and needs to be wiped out.

      Stand Your Ground specifically grants the right for an individual to respond with lethal force, even if they had a reasonable opportunity to escape the conflict. It's not about self defense, it's about pride and ego. All genuine cases of self defense are already covered without the addition of stand your ground.

    33. Re:Figure out where he is located by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      No.

      One has to make a reasonable presentation of a serious, life threatning situation. A punch in the nose of itself would generally be insufficient.

      So if someone threatens you, follows through by punching you in the nose, you have no reasonable expectation of any escalation? That is the problem with these laws, everything becomes claimed as a likely threat on your life. I mean there is an ongoing case where a person defied police orders not to confront another person, did just that, then shot and killed the other person. Stand your ground is way too murky. Self defense claims are much better, and less likely to poltical manipulation.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    34. Re:Figure out where he is located by Tyler+Durden · · Score: 1

      You can end the threat quickly. Break their fingers. Kick them in the knee or groin. Poke them in the eye. It might cause injury, but nobody could reasonably argue that you were threatening them with death.

      Just because you react with the intention to do any of these things doesn't mean you'll be successful. Fighting is hard. Especially against a physically superior opponent, or one with more fighting experience than you.

      Inflicting injury with a gun is so much more assured.

      --
      Happy people make bad consumers.
    35. Re:Figure out where he is located by khallow · · Score: 1, Informative

      Note that Martin didn't allegedly just punch Zimmerman, but also beat his head into the concrete several times. That's a lot more harmful than a punch.

    36. Re:Figure out where he is located by tftp · · Score: 1

      The only problem of course is that you have to be closer than you want to be to use them.

      If the attacker is within arm's reach then using a firearm may be not an option anymore. Trayvon went for GZ's gun, as far as the public knows. There is a 21 foot rule just for those cases.

      Using a Taser at a longer distance might work, but you'd better be ready to follow up with a firearm. This means that you hold the Taser in the other hand.

      IMO, the only advantage you can get out of having a non-lethal weapon is to tell the judge that you were prepared to defend yourself non-lethally, but had to go for the lethal method when the other method failed, or couldn't be effective. As of actually *using* a pepper spray on a drug-fueled crazy man, that would be a very dangerous exercise. Do you expect him to actually *feel* the pain from the spray? There are cases when attackers were shot through, but before they fell dead they were able to cover the distance and kill the LEO. Many illegal drugs act as anesthetics; even alcohol does that.

    37. Re:Figure out where he is located by genericpoweruser · · Score: 1

      do I trust 12 strangers to consider the facts and make an informed decision in regard to my life; or do I trust the one stranger trying to beat me (to death?)...

      --
      A fool and his lamb are worth two in the bush.
    38. Re:Figure out where he is located by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're assuming the fat pasty white geek hands would know how to handle a weapon. Having worked in the worlds of both violence and technology, I can tell you this is not the norm.

    39. Re:Figure out where he is located by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      "Inflicting injury with a gun is so much more assured."

      Yes, but also so much more likely to get you put in prison. That was my point.

      I wasn't trying to claim it was easy. I'm just saying that usually there are LEGAL (and recommended) alternatives to deadly force.

    40. Re:Figure out where he is located by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      "Using a Taser at a longer distance might work, but you'd better be ready to follow up with a firearm. This means that you hold the Taser in the other hand. "

      You missed my point completely. I was referring to those circumstances in which the attacker is already too close (within punching or grappling distance). My whole point was that you DON'T want somebody to be that close. But if they are, there are alternatives you can use. And as I wrote, often just zapping them in the air will keep someone away, if they have any brains and aren't drug-addled.

      Remember that most citizens aren't police. And good luck finding a jury that will listen to a 21-foot rule. Unless the other person has a weapon pulling a firearm, in most states anyway, puts you at legal risk.

    41. Re:Figure out where he is located by khallow · · Score: 1

      I mean there is an ongoing case where a person defied police orders not to confront another person, did just that, then shot and killed the other person.

      What is the ongoing case? It's not the Trayvon Martin shooting because the person making the suggestion (not a command!) to the eventual shooter, Zimmerman was a 911 operator.

    42. Re:Figure out where he is located by spongman · · Score: 1

      I think he's talking less about jamming the signal and more about boiling the water in his brain.

    43. Re:Figure out where he is located by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      "IMO, the only advantage you can get out of having a non-lethal weapon is to tell the judge that you were prepared to defend yourself non-lethally, but had to go for the lethal method when the other method failed, or couldn't be effective."

      The advantage of using that particular non-lethal weapon (a good stun gun) is that THEY WORK. It drops them like a sack of potatoes, because it short-circuits the nervous system. And unlike shooting somebody, drugs don't interfere, because there's nothing voluntary about it. The muscles simply stop working. (Technically the reverse is true: they contract against each other and seize up completely.) This isn't a Taser with tiny little wires and shitty skin contact. This is up-close and personal. If you've ever been zapped by one you'll know what I mean.

      If you zap them for more than about 10 seconds, usually it will take them a little while to recover, due to lactic acid buildup in the muscles. If you zap somebody for 30 seconds they may not be able to get up and walk for 5 minutes or even longer.

      This is all assuming you have a well-built, high-voltage unit with good batteries, of course. I wouldn't touch those rechargeable things with a 10-foot pole. Replaceable lithium batteries is the way to go.

    44. Re:Figure out where he is located by hairyfish · · Score: 2

      No.

      One has to make a reasonable presentation of a serious, life threatning situation. A punch in the nose of itself would generally be insufficient.

      Funny you say that, I know a guy (yes actually know him personally) who killed a man with one punch on the snoz. It wasn't the punch that killed the poor fellow but his head hitting the concrete from the fall after being knocked out instantly.

    45. Re:Figure out where he is located by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      "That is pre-meditated murder. If she could have left to get her gun, she could have left without incident."

      I don't disagree; I am not intimately familiar with this case. I was just referring to the law in general. Some people appeared to be saying the law should require people to run away. I disagree. It is not that way in most states, and from what others wrote here I presume it's no longer that way in Florida.

      If what you say is true, it sounds like murder to me.

    46. Re:Figure out where he is located by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      To clarify what I meant: if I accept your description of what happened, then she did not just fail to retreat, she actually attacked.

    47. Re:Figure out where he is located by tftp · · Score: 1

      No, I am not familiar with those. Taser is all I have seen (on the Net.) I don't own any such thing.

      If the attacker is already within arm's reach then you have to be very strong and agile; otherwise he will simply deflect your arm with the zapper, or grab your wrist and shove the zapper into your own neck. Humanity learned all that over the millennia of nonstop knife and sword fighting. IMO, if you allow an attacker to come close you need to be a pretty good fighter, so that the attacker can't just kick you in the knee while you are intently preparing the sparkling salvation. Note that the linked video shows that the attacker is never within reach of your arm and therefore you cannot apply the shock to his body.

      Zappers without flying probes may not work through some clothes, especially if they are wet. The current always flows through the path of the least resistance. (Well, technically it flows through all possible paths, but that is important only if you are using a 100 kV, 100 kA power grid transformer substation as your zapper :-) So a leather jacket may leave you defenseless.

      For this and other reasons criminals do not carry shockers; they carry knives and guns. Setting the firearm aside, one might actually benefit from carrying a small (legal size) knife and learning how to use it correctly. The sight of sharpened steel has calming effect on many attackers; it also works on multiple attackers. If there are two or three guys coming at you, I doubt that they will give you 30 seconds to properly shock the thug #1 before you can switch to thug #2, and so on, in FIFO order.

    48. Re:Figure out where he is located by grumpyman · · Score: 1

      Oh ok here: 1. Post on /b/ 2. ??? 3. Profit!

    49. Re:Figure out where he is located by SpectreBlofeld · · Score: 1

      I recommend using the 'TV Dinner' option on your microwave oven.

    50. Re:Figure out where he is located by Dr+Damage+I · · Score: 1
      --
      "Cursed is he who rises early in the morning..." Isiah 5:11
    51. Re:Figure out where he is located by Dr+Damage+I · · Score: 1

      If you're wrong one way, yes, you could wind up in a courtroom and potentially, jail. If you're wrong the other way, you're right back to the "carried by six" scenario

      --
      "Cursed is he who rises early in the morning..." Isiah 5:11
    52. Re:Figure out where he is located by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      "If the attacker is already within arm's reach then you have to be very strong and agile; otherwise he will simply deflect your arm with the zapper, or grab your wrist and shove the zapper into your own neck."

      Not easy to do. Seriously, you should see one in action. All you have to do is touch them with it. That's all it takes. You aren't taking one away from somebody. Easier to take away a gun.

    53. Re:Figure out where he is located by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      Sure. I know of a case more locally, where someone was shot by a policeman. The internal "investigation" claimed he did nothing wrong. So the prosecutor would not prosecute him. But... there were some telling discrepancies in his statements. The family filed a civil suit and the judge agreed that there was enough cause to go to trial.

      Personally, I think the officer screwed up. Maybe a misjudgment, or maybe he stumbled, or a slip of the finger... whatever. But he was where he shouldn't have been in the first place (on private property, under questionable circumstances at best, without telling anyone he was there). I think he then lied to cover his mistake.

      But they wouldn't put up with that from a common citizen... why should we put up with it from the police? Sure, the police sometimes have to shoot and kill people, as part of their jobs. But part of that responsibility includes NOT shooting people who shouldn't be getting shot.

    54. Re:Figure out where he is located by leereyno · · Score: 0, Troll

      You forget that Martin is black, and Zimmerman is white.

      Therefore, according to the rules of racial and cultural Marxism as defined by Antonio Gramsci, Zimmerman is GUILTY.

      Not just of MURDERING Martin, but of any and all bad things that ever happened to him or anyone else in his entire family.

      Zimmerman is guilty, and Martin innocent, not because of what either of them did or did not do, but because of the tribal groups they belong to. People with paler complexions have, at various times and places, done bad things to people with darker complexions. Therefore the darker complected people alive today are granted moral superiority over lighter complected people. It does not matter that neither the paler nor the darker people alive today have anything to do with these past wrongs. It does not matter that none of them are victims and none of them are perpetrators. A skin-deep resemblance to past victims or past perpetrators is sufficient to cast one in the role of victim or perpetrator, with penalties or compensation doled out accordingly.

      Zimmerman will go to prison for the crime of defending himself against a member of a group he was not allowed to protect himself from. White people in the antebellum south were allowed to beat black people and smash their heads into the ground. Therefore black people are allowed to do the same thing to white people today. White people who resist will be treated the same way a black person would have been in the past. This is Social Justice.

      --
      Muslim community leaders warn of backlash from tomorrow morning's terrorist attack.
    55. Re:Figure out where he is located by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's probably like handful people in the world who can execute that plan successfully.

    56. Re:Figure out where he is located by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to the only witness that made damn sure that he was the only witness.

    57. Re:Figure out where he is located by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ROFLMAO Okay, Sheldon Cooper.

    58. Re:Figure out where he is located by swillden · · Score: 1

      If the attacker is within arm's reach then using a firearm may be not an option anymore.

      Not arguing against a Taser -- they are great and work very well -- but if you can retrieve and deploy a Taser, you can use a gun. Unless your hands/arms are pinned or otherwise controlled by the attacker, it's nearly always possible to draw to and fire from retention position. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nqQAgtNMwDY, for one example of the technique.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    59. Re:Figure out where he is located by ragefan · · Score: 1

      Better to be judged by 12 then carried by 6

      If you consider 12 people that can't get out of jury duty to be your peers.

    60. Re:Figure out where he is located by 1s44c · · Score: 1

      It's the thief that does the shooting. They steal from you, you punch them, they shoot you dead. And it's all legal.

      Stand your ground is fairly close to murder at will.

    61. Re:Figure out where he is located by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      In places like Florida, Stand Your Ground lets them legally shoot you dead for that.

      So shoot him in the face instead of punching him. Whatever the legal rights and wrongs, if half his head's blown off he won't be shooting anyone dead.

      You people with your quibbling lawyer-talk seem incapable of seeing the wood for the trees.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    62. Re:Figure out where he is located by 1s44c · · Score: 1

      One has to make a reasonable presentation of a serious, life threatning situation. A punch in the nose of itself would generally be insufficient.

      People have died from a single punch to the head. I don't mean a well trained Mike Tyson super-punch, I mean a normal punch delivered by someone without any real fighting experience.

      There was a case in the UK of someone hitting a random drunk for no reason. The drunk fell over and died.

      Also there was that Ian Thomlinson case where the police beat a man once for no reason and he died soon after. White washed of course like all police murders are.

    63. Re:Figure out where he is located by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Someone punching me is enough for me to pull my weapon at the very least.

      Then you, sir, are a coward.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    64. Re:Figure out where he is located by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree this was not really funny but is this +5 Informative either?

    65. Re:Figure out where he is located by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Better to be judged by 12 then carried by 6

      If you over-react to a bit of a slap by shooting someone dead, you have effectively ended two people's lives, as even in the absence of the death penalty, I would expect someone to go to jail for life for such a ridiculous over-reaction.

      If you were an adult instead of an overgrown teenager, you would realise the absurdity of what you're saying. Your attitude would justify drawing your weapon and shooting anyone who even looked at you funny, on the basis that they might present a danger.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    66. Re:Figure out where he is located by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      No.

      One has to make a reasonable presentation of a serious, life threatning situation. A punch in the nose of itself would generally be insufficient.

      Funny you say that, I know a guy (yes actually know him personally) who killed a man with one punch on the snoz. It wasn't the punch that killed the poor fellow but his head hitting the concrete from the fall after being knocked out instantly.

      That's almost always how people die in fights without weapons. The Mike Tyson idea of whacking someone's nose back into their brain isn't how it goes.

      But, more importantly, relatively few people die in fist fights anyway, because it's really, really, really hard to beat someone to death.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    67. Re:Figure out where he is located by bemenaker · · Score: 2

      Zimmerman is latino not white. Fail.

    68. Re:Figure out where he is located by coinreturn · · Score: 1

      Total fail. Haven't you ever noticed that jails are stuffed full of dark people? White people get off with much less time than dark people for the same crimes. You are perpetuating the myth of the underprivileged white guy. Shut up crybaby white guy.

    69. Re:Figure out where he is located by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More people are killed every year by being punched than with 'assault weapons'. In fact, every now and then someone with absolutely no training in how to fight punches someone once...and that person dies. It even happens between kids on occasion. So yeah, a punch in the face can qualify as a threat of death or severe wounding.

    70. Re:Figure out where he is located by Stuarticus · · Score: 2

      So if OP gets his gun and follows the leech around threateningly until he goads him into talking to him or scaring in some way first then he should be OK to shoot him? Don't want to get on the wrong side of the law here!

      --
      If you think someone isn't free to have a different definition of "freedom" you may be a tyrant.
    71. Re:Figure out where he is located by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This should be modded Funny, not Insightful.

      Re-read the law. Stand Your Ground "lets you shoot" only if fearing for your life or at risk of being badly wounded. Not if you're afraid of being punched.

      OP didn't say, "threaten to punch him." He said "punch him in the nose."

      Being actually struck would, under Florida's ridiculous law, justify a preemptive shooting.

    72. Re:Figure out where he is located by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nope, the leech could shoot the person knocking in his/her door. hope you are joking...

    73. Re:Figure out where he is located by Steve+Hamlin · · Score: 1

      You re-read the law - ALL OF IT. If I open the front door to my home, and someone I don't know begins punching me in the face, in the eyes of the law I have a reasonable fear of sustaining great bodily harm.

      Don't believe me? Read the statute that gives me the benefit of the doubt:

      776.013 Home protection; use of deadly force; presumption of fear of death or great bodily harm.

      (1) A person is presumed to have held a reasonable fear of imminent peril of death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another when using defensive force that is intended or likely to cause death or great bodily harm to another if:

      (a) The person against whom the defensive force was used was in the process of unlawfully and forcefully entering, or had unlawfully and forcibly entered, a dwelling, residence, or occupied vehicle, or if that person had removed or was attempting to remove another against that person's will from the dwelling, residence, or occupied vehicle; and

      (b) The person who uses defensive force knew or had reason to believe that an unlawful and forcible entry or unlawful and forcible act was occurring or had occurred.

    74. Re:Figure out where he is located by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How the hell did this get moderated +4?

    75. Re:Figure out where he is located by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Time for some leaded paint?

    76. Re:Figure out where he is located by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you, sir, are terribly naive. In this particular scenario, you don't know anything about the other guy, other than gross physical appearance. I don't think standing around letting people risk your life makes you brave. It makes you stupid.

    77. Re:Figure out where he is located by khallow · · Score: 1

      Too bad the only way we have to figure out who did what is to ask them.

    78. Re:Figure out where he is located by undeadbill · · Score: 1

      Actually, this "advanced" leech doesn't seem so advanced, or he/she would have done a better job at masking their MAC ID footprints. The person is probably using some kind of cracking script they cooked up or copied off the 'net, and may not understand much about networking beyond how to connect.

      For my own security, I only allow access to the AP by MAC IDs I register manually into the system. Guest access is turned on when people arrive to the home, and is turned off when they leave. Most wifi access points have MAC configuration parameters, so that MAC IDs can be blacklisted or whitelisted. I go for whitelisting, because if I see logs for someone connecting as me while I am away from home, I know I have a problem.

    79. Re:Figure out where he is located by khallow · · Score: 0

      So if OP gets his gun and follows the leech around threateningly until he goads him into talking to him or scaring in some way first then he should be OK to shoot him?

      Martin had a working cell phone apparently. A 911 call would have helped resolve whatever happened. Instead, Zimmerman (and I gather Martin as well) ends up with injuries consistent with Martin bashing Zimmerman's head into the sidewalk. If your solution to a vaguely threatening person is to try to kill them with your hands, then that's not a very good case for you staying alive.

    80. Re:Figure out where he is located by xhawkx · · Score: 0

      LOL, It is not that White folks get less time,it that they have family members that work and therefore they can get bail, Blacks folks on the other hand can't get bail because all of their families are most likely incarcerated also or on taxpayer assistance, so help with bail is out of the question. Now IMHO, this is a fact and absolutely correct, but I am so sick of hearing about the "Poor Black crooks" behind bars. AND, White Crooks usually take the time to plan the caper, like bank robbery, while Blacks go after the local Cumberland Farms or 7/11's,spur of the moment stupid.I dislike all crooks white ,black, asian,purple,poka-dotted, they are all human beings that can not follow the rules and all whimper when they get caught..."I did not do nothin'".

    81. Re:Figure out where he is located by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Martin had a working cell phone apparently. A 911 call would have helped resolve whatever happened

      You're asking GOVERNMENT to help you? This is the same government that wants to take away people's gun bro.

      No, the solution - one that supports the second amendment - is for MARTIN to also own a gun. When both men have guns, they can duel like gentlemen. Whatever the result, there would be no hard feelings as guns are the great equalizer! Might makes right, like the Good Old Days of the Wild West!

    82. Re:Figure out where he is located by coinreturn · · Score: 2

      Wrong. For example, don't you know that sentences for crack cocaine (black people) are way stiffer than for powder (white people)?

    83. Re:Figure out where he is located by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      I mean there is an ongoing case where a person defied police orders not to confront another person, did just that, then shot and killed the other person.

      What is the ongoing case? It's not the Trayvon Martin shooting because the person making the suggestion (not a command!) to the eventual shooter, Zimmerman was a 911 operator.

      Oh, I see. Well then it is a great and good thing that Zimmerman apprehended the kid. Since it was just a suggestion, it was perfectly okay for Zimmerman to apprehend and shoot the kid

      Anyhow, tht isn't my point.

      Killing an unarmed person that you intitiated a confrontation with, and calling it "Standing your ground", is pretty ludicrous. That would be like beating your wife to a pulp, and when she tried to defend herself, you blow her brains out because you are "standing your ground."

      And if Trayvon Martin was likewise carrying a piece, after Zimmerman accosted him, did he then have the right to shoot Zimmerman? To in other words, stand his ground?

      The reason I did not bring the names into th econversation was to avoid the racial element. And that is from my experience that most people who believe Zimmerman had every right to confront and shoot Martin just happen to dislike Black people.

      This is all why the stand your ground laws are just messy, and prone to abuse. Self defense is just a much better option.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    84. Re:Figure out where he is located by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what? no low-level ( or directional) EMP on his doorstep? :-P

    85. Re:Figure out where he is located by xhawkx · · Score: 0

      Yes, I agree with you on that and I would most likely agree with you on many issues, but,that is an issue that comes up every time (duh,they are both ILLEGAL in the first place) and honestly I do know of many discrepancies that cops use and I dislike it. This is an issue that none of us will ever "fix". We give authority to human beings, and a few take that authority and piss on us with it, and act like animals to ALL races.Trust me Black cops are no different to White,Asian or whatever. It all comes down to these freakin' "reactor" politicians who keep writing new laws and chipping away on OUR constitutional rights. I would stand and walk with any other of the races, hand in hand, but, kick to the curb any punk crooks who are looking for something for nothing....................

    86. Re:Figure out where he is located by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      You do realize a single punch can AND HAS killed a man, right? Fighting is not a joke, if someone physically assaults me, i assume it is mortal combat, because it IS.

      --
      Good-bye
    87. Re:Figure out where he is located by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Oh, I see. Well then it is a great and good thing that Zimmerman apprehended the kid. Since it was just a suggestion, it was perfectly okay for Zimmerman to apprehend and shoot the kid

      Your Milage May Vary as to whether Zimmerman is telling the truth, but his story is that he was walking back to his car when Martin jumped him. But if I was a black man in south Florida and someone with a gun was following me, I might try to get the jump on him as well.

      In fact, it doesn't seem like Stand Your Ground has anything to do with the Treyvon Martin affair. It seems like one of two situations is what happened. Either Zimmerman hunted down and shot Martin, in which case that's murder and Stand Your Ground has no bearing, or else Martin attacked Zimmerman who shot back, in which case standard self-defense laws hold and Stand Your Ground has no bearing. It seems like a law made for totally different situations.

    88. Re:Figure out where he is located by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      In fact, it doesn't seem like Stand Your Ground has anything to do with the Treyvon Martin affair. It seems like one of two situations is what happened. Either Zimmerman hunted down and shot Martin, in which case that's murder and Stand Your Ground has no bearing, or else Martin attacked Zimmerman who shot back, in which case standard self-defense laws hold and Stand Your Ground has no bearing. It seems like a law made for totally different situations.

      Agreed. If I were to apply Occam's razor to the situation, Zimmerman most likely decided to approach Martin, angainst the "suggestion" that he did not intervene. They got into a scuffle, (here it is not entirely clear all that happened) and at some point, decided he had to pull out his piece and end the scuffle. His antagonist did not survive.

      Aside what lawyers doing what they do, I doubt that Zimmerman is some malevaolent entity. He is a citizen who made a mistake, got in over his head, and ended up killing another person. As far as I can tell, this would be a cae of manslaughter. And manslaughter has a punishment, Definitely was not "stand your ground". Unfortunately, political zealots and racists step in for cases like this, and muddy the waters badly.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    89. Re:Figure out where he is located by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love the smell of routers frying in the morning, it smells like ... geek aftershave.

    90. Re:Figure out where he is located by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      "There was more than just conflicting evidence presented in the link I provided, and it is well worth the read."

      Yes, I have read it, and a few other articles as well now. The ones that are rabidly for her release tend to make emotionally-charged arguments: "She just had a baby," "There were children in danger," "She was a battered woman" kind of thing, and then leave a lot of other details out.

      Well, apparently that woman committed some pretty good battering, too.

      I guess he wasn't supposed to be there. But on the other hand, she had gone to his place before in violation of court order, too. And he called 911 saying she had given him a black eye.

      I don't know. I didn't see where he was standing, or the bullet hole, or any of those things, which I would pretty much have to see to make a judgment of my own. But I will say she seems to be the sort who was looking for trouble. I have known people like that. So I am not inclined to just take the emotional arguments for granted and say she is innocent.

      In my opinion (and it is not always a popular one, I admit), in most states restraining orders are too easy to get today, and often just add to the problems. Don't misunderstand... sometimes they are necessary. But lately it seems people can get them at the drop of a hat, and I'm not sure that's really a good thing.

    91. Re:Figure out where he is located by Another,+completely · · Score: 1

      Excellent plan, but points deducted for needing to explain c, f, and lambda in context.

    92. Re:Figure out where he is located by khallow · · Score: 1

      The reason I did not bring the names into th econversation was to avoid the racial element. And that is from my experience that most people who believe Zimmerman had every right to confront and shoot Martin just happen to dislike Black people.

      It's my experience that most people who are materially wrong about one aspect of a complex matter are often wrong about other aspects as well. I believe the accusation of "disliking Black people" is yet another case of error.

      Zimmerman made several poor judgments leading up to the shooting, but in the end, he doesn't lose his right to legal self defense just because he confronted another person on the street (I think that might be a "stand your ground" consequence, but one I'd be partial to). I doubt he will be convicted of a serious crime, unless there's some evidence somewhere that things didn't go as Zimmerman claimed. So far, that hasn't come out.

    93. Re:Figure out where he is located by SteveyP66 · · Score: 1

      Unbelievable that in all these discussions the life of another human being is so cheap that the only thing you express concern for is whether or not you stay within the law when you kill them...

    94. Re:Figure out where he is located by khallow · · Score: 1

      Zimmerman most likely decided to approach Martin, angainst the "suggestion" that he did not intervene.

      There's no need for "scare quotes" here. Read the transcript:

      Dispatcher: Are you following him?

      Zimmerman: Yeah

      Dispatcher: Ok, we don't need you to do that.

      Zimmerman: Ok.

      Nowhere else in that call does Zimmerman and the 911 dispatcher talk about following the suspicious person. It's obviously not a command and the dispatcher didn't even phrase it unambiguously as a suggestion not to follow the suspicious person.

      He is a citizen who made a mistake, got in over his head, and ended up killing another person. As far as I can tell, this would be a cae of manslaughter.

      Or a case of legal self defense. The stand your ground principle seems relevant in that it might turn what could have been a manslaughter case into a justifiable homicide case. Without stand your ground, I gather Zimmerman would have been on much weaker ground legally by following Martin.

      My limited experience with self defense law is that usually, one has to demonstrate that they were unable to disengage from the assault in question (say because they had no escape routes or were pursued) as well as having a reasonable expectation of grievous bodily harm or death.

      Stand your ground means you don't have to show that you tried to disengage at least under whatever limited circumstances are allowed by the law in question. I am ignorant of Florida law here, but given that the "stand your ground" law is talked about at all, indicates that at least some think it applies to Zimmerman's story.

    95. Re:Figure out where he is located by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if i weren't too lazy to log on, i would plus you

    96. Re:Figure out where he is located by revxul · · Score: 1

      And punch him in the nose.

      This should be scored Insightful. It's really good advice. You'd be amazed at what people stop doing when physically confronted.

      --
      Truth, Just Us, And Hatred For All Mankind!
  3. Easy to stop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Use a VPN, and firewall off all access except the VPN connection.

  4. Change your WPA keys by supersat · · Score: 5, Informative

    WPS works by giving out your WPA keys, so if they've gotten in once through WPS, they will continue to have access.

    1. Re:Change your WPA keys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      I hope parent meant WPA2 rather than WPA.

      And use a strong pass phrase with a non-dictionary-word ssid.

    2. Re:Change your WPA keys by gweihir · · Score: 4, Informative

      Make that WPA2 and use a random-key. AFAIK WPA2 is still unbroken.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    3. Re:Change your WPA keys by MyFirstNameIsPaul · · Score: 2

      The person needs to disable WPS and verify that the router is capable of disabling WPS completely. Some routers do not actually disable the WPS function when WPS is disable. Security experts consider WPS to be completely broken.

      --

      I once took an excursion to Reddit, and later HN. Unlimited up/down voting sucks when dealing with a hive-mind.

    4. Re:Change your WPA keys by Redmancometh · · Score: 1

      Make a MAC whitelist, only add known devices. Whitelist your ip for remote management. That would at least make it far more dufficult. I know you can easily spoof an ip and MAC, but I dont believe you can spoof to a SPECIFIC MAC. All this after a firmware reload and full reset. Stopping any kind of mitm is very difficult though. I would get LE involved... The evil twin thing makes me think he/she is trying to phish info, and/or zombie you, and/or use you as a proxy. All of this would warrant LE. They take seemingly *malicious" intrusions very seriously. Elevate-to-local-fbi serious.

    5. Re:Change your WPA keys by MyFirstNameIsPaul · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Spoofing a MAC address is trivial. You can do it in your network settings in Windows, and every router I've ever used gives the option. Finding a whitelisted MAC address is likely trivial for the hacker in this article (who broke in through WPS - much harder) because the MAC address is broadcast in the clear, so packet inspection will reveal the whitelisted MAC addresses. IP whitelists are also worthless.

      --

      I once took an excursion to Reddit, and later HN. Unlimited up/down voting sucks when dealing with a hive-mind.

    6. Re:Change your WPA keys by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 1
      --

      "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    7. Re:Change your WPA keys by locater16 · · Score: 1

      Yah, as long as it's not on some list of used passwords , which costs $35 to run through online, you should be good. I like finding a random product and using some random code on the packaging. I.E. have a cat walk across your keyboard and use that as a password.

    8. Re:Change your WPA keys by zugmeister · · Score: 1

      By this argument locking your car is also worthless, because a determined thief can always break a window, right?

      Given the level of technical ability this individual appears to have exhibited a MAC whitelist probably wouldn't help. OTOH, it would probably work just fine shutting out a wardriver or any non-tech-oriented neighborhood mooch.

      Generally you don't have to be impregnable (if there even is such a thing), just more difficult to hack than your neighbor.

    9. Re:Change your WPA keys by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      Did you miss the part where it said that exploit requires you already be successfully connected to the network?

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    10. Re:Change your WPA keys by Klinky · · Score: 1

      A wardriver would know how to spoof a MAC. A MAC whitelist would prevent your basic neighborhood internet mooch, but simply setting up a WPA/WPA2 password would be sufficient to prevent this, and much easier to maintain.

    11. Re:Change your WPA keys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      instead of white-listing only your mac address and blocking all others, do what friend of mine did and let all mac's connect just redirect all accept yours to lemon party.

    12. Re:Change your WPA keys by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 0
      --

      "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    13. Re:Change your WPA keys by Trogre · · Score: 1

      What, people still use WPA1? Where?

      I haven't seen anyone use WPA1 since, oh about 2008.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    14. Re:Change your WPA keys by compro01 · · Score: 2

      It's a dictionary attack. Use a sufficiently long and random passphrase and that's not going to work.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    15. Re:Change your WPA keys by MyFirstNameIsPaul · · Score: 1

      Given the level of technical ability this individual appears to have exhibited a MAC whitelist probably wouldn't help.

      I am addressing the issues described in the article. The rest of your post seems to apply to some other article.

      --

      I once took an excursion to Reddit, and later HN. Unlimited up/down voting sucks when dealing with a hive-mind.

    16. Re:Change your WPA keys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As long as you use AES not TKIP.

    17. Re:Change your WPA keys by aaron552 · · Score: 1

      That attack is related to clients who are already authed. WPA2 authentication has not been broken, AFAIK.

      --
      I had a sig once. It was lost in the great storm of '09.
    18. Re:Change your WPA keys by aaron552 · · Score: 1

      OTOH, it would probably work just fine shutting out a wardriver or any non-tech-oriented neighborhood mooch.

      The point is that anyone with the technical skills to break WPA2/WPS is going to be able to spoof their MAC address. Ergo, if you're using WPA2, you don't need a MAC filter because anyone trying to break it will likely already be spoofing their MAC address

      --
      I had a sig once. It was lost in the great storm of '09.
    19. Re:Change your WPA keys by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      Dictionary words work just fine if your passphrase is long enough, especially if you use non-alpha characters, too.

      With WPA2, the difficulty of brute force is pretty much directly proportional to the length of your passphrase, to the power of the character set used. So if you force them to try to brute-force a 30-character passphrase, using upper- and lower-case alpha plus "special" keyboard characters, your brute-force domain is (on my keyboard) 30^84, or about 1.2 x 10^124.

      Good luck with that. (My own passphrase is even longer.)

    20. Re:Change your WPA keys by Eskarel · · Score: 1

      MAC address white lists are a bit like hidden SSIDs, they cause more hassle than protection. Even WEP which has been broken for years takes longer to break than either of these options. In essence, you'll spend more time white listing new devices you want to allow access to your network than it will take for someone to bypass your security.

    21. Re:Change your WPA keys by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      It doesn't have to be random, if it's a long string of even dictionary words. This point was made in XKCD a long time ago.

      Unlike some encryption schemes, with WPA length does matter. And "FricasseedCumquat" is not going to be a word in any dictionary. (Although I do recommend the use of non-alpha characters.)

    22. Re:Change your WPA keys by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      "... wpa2-vulnerability-found"

      Did you also miss the part where it said "WPA2 Enterprise"? Most consumer devices use WPA2 Personal, which is a different encryption scheme.

      My router does give me the option of using Enterprise, if I want to take the trouble of setting up a RADIUS server.

    23. Re:Change your WPA keys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WPA2 is vulnerable still because the vulnerability the attacker is using isn't a vulnerability in WPA2, WEP, whatever else, its a vulnerability in WPS (readup on reaver if you want). Even if you change your passwords, the attacker can reinvade without redoing the brute force. Unless you really want to find the person (which seems silly), install a 3rd party firmware like dd-wrt or tomato to your router (neither of which are vulnerable) and tell your router manufacturer to be more careful in the future.

    24. Re:Change your WPA keys by SpectreBlofeld · · Score: 1

      Heh, my preference is a combination of old numbers and text that I will remember, but no longer have any real relevance in life, so it's not guessable. My TrueCrypt password, for instance, is a combination of the first checking account number I had as a teenager, the phone number that my best friend had when we were in middle school (back when you actually had to memorize phone numbers), and an acronym of an the line of an inside joke between myself and some friends. Highly complex, super easy for me to remember.

    25. Re:Change your WPA keys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Make that WPA2 and use a random-key. AFAIK WPA2 is still unbroken.

      I believe that tools like reaver work against WPA2 as well as WPA1. From the Google code page for the reaver:
      "Reaver implements a brute force attack against Wifi Protected Setup (WPS) registrar PINs in order to recover WPA/WPA2 passphrases, as described in http://sviehb.files.wordpress.com/2011/12/viehboeck_wps.pdf"

    26. Re:Change your WPA keys by petermgreen · · Score: 4, Informative

      There are two operating modes for WPA2, PSK and enterprise. The vast majority of wifi networks run in PSK mode.

      In PSK mode all nodes (both end user and access point) use a shared secret key. Anyone with thatkey can decrypt any packet, spoof any user etc. So you had better make sure only truested devices have the key.

      In enterprise mode each end user has their own login and the system is supposed to protect the users from each other as well as from outsiders. The article you linked was about a flaw in enterprise mode that effectively degraded security to equivilent to PSK mode. It's a fairly serious issue for large enterprise deployments but not something that should be a concern for end users.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    27. Re:Change your WPA keys by gweihir · · Score: 2

      Since the client devices can remember it, it does not need to be memorable in any way. Just use a random-password generator, no structure or anything required.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    28. Re:Change your WPA keys by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Interesting how some people are quick to criticize quiting apparent attacks, but have not even understood what they quote. No surprise IT security is in such a bad state: It requires you to actually try to understand what you are doing. And here is a hint for the current thing being discussed: Dictionary attacks can be done against everything that uses a password. Bet some people here did not know that. And for shared secrets it is not a problem, as they can just be made less guessable. Bet some people here do not understand that either.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    29. Re:Change your WPA keys by gweihir · · Score: 1

      My guess is that your sample of people has a clue. First, access points can live really long. And second, many offer both WPA and WPA2 and some even older things. Although many people use that fallacy that "newer"="better" and will go for WPA2 without understanding the differences.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    30. Re:Change your WPA keys by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      I don't know what part of "I disabled WPS" you guys don't get.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  5. Does your router support captive portal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You can try turning that on with Radius authentication or any authentication. That can keep the leech from your network. An evil twin setup could be a dangerous thing. Instead of buying a directional antenna yourself, you can call authorities and let them use one of their own!

    1. Re:Does your router support captive portal? by icebike · · Score: 1

      Which authorities would you suggest he call?

      Please name only those that you know won't simply laugh at him.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    2. Re:Does your router support captive portal? by houstonbofh · · Score: 2

      The authorities will not care... But a usb mounted at the reflective center in a wok is a nice directional antenna to find the evil twin.

    3. Re:Does your router support captive portal? by demonlapin · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Calling local ham radio enthusiasts would probably lead to some very entertaining results.

      The most memorable story I've ever heard along those lines was that a couple of hams had access to a fairly large dish antenna and were setting up some sort of satellite communications (for work, not play). A guy nearby was running a horribly unshielded CB amplifier that was crapping all over their signal. They told him to knock it off. He refused. They pointed out that he was blowing way past FCC limits on transmission power. He ignored them. They pointed the dish straight at his shack and transmitted maximum power at it. Within a few minutes smoke was pouring out of it... bet you could fry a router pretty easily.

    4. Re:Does your router support captive portal? by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 4, Informative

      This story contains a hilarious amount of bullshit.

      --
      -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
    5. Re:Does your router support captive portal? by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 2

      Ghost Busters!

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    6. Re:Does your router support captive portal? by Redmancometh · · Score: 1

      File an IC3 for LE reference. Then local cops, who will hook you up with a detective most likely. They wont have the know-how and may or may not elevate it to local fbi, white collar crime div. Or the local cops will take down a report slowly being fed into the shredder.

    7. Re:Does your router support captive portal? by Technician · · Score: 1

      When you find it, remove the USB wireless and replace it with a Magnitron from a Microwave oven. An extra KW pointed and focused on his antenna tend to de-sensiise all his wireless connections perminately. Limit the blast to a couple of seconds to prevent his equipment from going up in flames. Note, this may not be legal in your jurisdiction and dealing with Magnitron voltages is best left with someone who knows what they are doing.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    8. Re:Does your router support captive portal? by demonlapin · · Score: 2

      It is a great story, though. And the guy telling it claimed to be one of the people who did it. You'll note that I never said it was true...

    9. Re:Does your router support captive portal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ive had the same attack recently. I found that I had a computer connected to my network that says it was my wifes pc. However that computer hasnt been connected to the network for over 3 years! I also found ip addresses that were connected that routed over the internet and returned my computers ip as the host!

      I also used wireshark to watch the data flow and realised that there was an external pc connected somehow and that my connection would randomly stop and pause while the network went bezerk. I have since cleaned up my network addresses and tightened up all the firewalls as well as changing homegroup and router details. Seems to have fixed the intruder problem. However, I have a pretty good idea who is trying to steal my bandwidth.

    10. Re:Does your router support captive portal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This story contains a hilarious amount of bullshit.

      Just because *you* don't know how doesn't mean something is impossible. I've actually seen the equivalent done at a past employer with a radar jamming system. Given the skills and equipment to induce feedback in their system you *can* make the magic blue smoke that all radios run on escape.

    11. Re:Does your router support captive portal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I 'm the one with the dish.
      Knock knock.

    12. Re:Does your router support captive portal? by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      To make something smoke in minutes they must have sent quite some power there, a couple hundred watts or so.

      Over a significant distance.

      At just the right frequency to have the equipment pick it up, and start overheating.

      Sorry, this story I'll file with "urban legends and other internet fables".

    13. Re:Does your router support captive portal? by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      I make no claim about whether or not this is actually possible - my radio knowledge is near zero - but they claimed to be less than a hundred feet away, with a "large" (it's been almost 20 years since I heard it, can't remember more detail) parabolic dish, and he was supposedly on CB, so the frequency would have been easily determined. It might be bullshit, but if the only objections are the ones you raised, it is at least plausible - though of course the best urban legends are always plausible.

    14. Re:Does your router support captive portal? by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      Doesn't matter. Say that you suspect he's using your internet for identity theft/child porn/terrorism/etc and they may just send someone over.

    15. Re:Does your router support captive portal? by icebike · · Score: 1

      So SWAT him is your answer?
      That might not end well.
      When they find nothing to hold him on you can bet he will spend his waking hours finding ways to get back at you.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    16. Re:Does your router support captive portal? by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      Due to the amount of effort this guy is obviously putting into getting into this network there are 3 possibilities I can think of:
      A) He is planning some VERY illegal activities he does not want tied to his connection.
      B) The submitter has some VERY valuable on his network and failed to mention it
      C) The attacker has some kind of mental illness and has fixated himself on this person for some weird reason.

      C is unlikely and if B were true, the submitter would know this and probably not attract unwanted attention which leaves the most likely (and dangerous) option A) for which such actions would be fully acceptable.

    17. Re:Does your router support captive portal? by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      The problems are manifold.

      You say they used a dish for satellite communication, no idea which frequency that is but definitely way higher than 27 MHz or most other amateur bands.

      The receiving equipment is not designed to receive so much energy, and unless you happen to find resonance and their antenna pointing directly to you, power transmission is going to be really inefficient.

      Then the sheer amount of power needed. To get smoke, you need a lot of power. To get their equipment fried, you'd need to deliver at least some 300W of power, and I think you can be happy to have a 1% efficiency. That'd require you to output some 30 kW of power - that's a lot. That's the kind of power broadcasters use for their FM radio signals.

      Satellite communication doesn't normally use kWs of power (and if they did, they wouldn't be worried by a CB radio nearby - no way that guy was outputting anything near such powers). Sat phones can work off of batteries, for example. You don't need that much power with a highly directional antenna. That makes it unlikely your satellite communication equipment can output several kW of power. You may be getting smoke on your own side as well.

    18. Re:Does your router support captive portal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      maybe not -- I was reading an article talking about the risks of climbing antenna towers without an active RF alarm on your
      body in Radio magazine this month... it talked about how the first signs would be your clothing would start to smoke and then catch fire... if the power is high enough, all sort of bad things can happen...

    19. Re:Does your router support captive portal? by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      Cool, thanks.

    20. Re:Does your router support captive portal? by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      The problems are manifold.

      You say they used a dish for satellite communication, no idea which frequency that is but definitely way higher than 27 MHz or most other amateur bands.

      A dish is only a reflector, and the antenna can be changed. It is the antenna that is tuned to the frequency. This is why a USB WiFi dongle in the floating centre of a wok actually makes a good antenna. A wok is absolutely not tuned to 2.4 ghz... :) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WokFi

    21. Re:Does your router support captive portal? by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      But does a dish work well as reflector when the wavelengths are larger than the dish? 27 MHz (assuming they would use that frequency to kill the CB radio) has 10m wavelength. That's one awfully big dish, normal dishes to communicate with satellites are more in the order of 1m diameter.

      And for efficient broadcast of those long wavelengths you also need a rather large antenna.

      Which means that they must have been using high frequencies to try to fry that equipment, and again you won't fry anything unless you have enough power and can get it to resonate one way or another on the receiving side.

  6. simple by polar+red · · Score: 4, Funny

    UTP

    --
    Yes, I'm left. You have a problem with that?
    1. Re:simple by radiumsoup · · Score: 1

      best. answer. ever.

    2. Re:simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      kind of ruins the wireless aspect wouldn't you say?

    3. Re:simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have to agree. If you have the option of non-wireless, then specifically use the wired connection.

      This doesn't work for iOS of course, but it lowers the number of devices in which an attack can be made against

    4. Re:simple by poetmatt · · Score: 2

      or powerline ethernet if you really need something "wired" but vaguely more secure and not susceptible to most issues.
      http://www.newegg.com/Powerline-Networking/SubCategory/ID-294

    5. Re:simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Agree, it's perfect for tying the bastard to a pole!

    6. Re:simple by icebike · · Score: 3, Informative

      Won't work if the hackers are on the same transformer leg as you. In an apartment building, that is almost guaranteed to be the case.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    7. Re:simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But would the hacker be looking at the powerline for networking signals? Extremely doubtful, but an interesting idea for someone goofing around in a large apartment complex.

    8. Re:simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Won't work if the hackers are on the same transformer leg as you. In an apartment building, that is almost guaranteed to be the case.

      Been in an apartment with powerline. It wouldn't even work out in the hallway. If you have your own power meter, you're good.

    9. Re:simple by solidraven · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but hacking a powerline interface isn't exactly an easy to achieve goal.

    10. Re:simple by deroby · · Score: 1

      I'm not so sure about this. At least here in Belgium most apartments have their own 'circuit' with electricity meter and ground fault circuit interrupter(s) [GFCI]. From practical experience, the signal will not get through that barrier.
      In fact, a friend tried to connect his (free-standing) garage with his network in the house using EoP and couldn't get it working as the cabling to his garage had an extra GFCI upon entry. As a work-around he installed an extra outlet 'before' the GFCI and plugged the powerline in there, works like a charm.

      --
      If there is one thing to be learned on slashdot, it has to be sarcasm.
    11. Re:simple by dsmurf · · Score: 1

      Is the mandatory homeplug encryption scheme that poor, or were you simply unaware of its existence? Your statement makes either possibility an option.

    12. Re:simple by icebike · · Score: 1

      Gfi won't interfere with EOP, but going through a transformer will. Typically entire buildings are on the same transformer.

      If you are on the other 120 leg of 240 entrance in the US, the Garage may not have continuity to the house. No clue how it might work Belgium which I presume is higher voltage.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    13. Re:simple by deroby · · Score: 1

      AFAIK, most of Europe-mainland runs on 220V but you're right that some buildings have 3-phase 380V coming in which might indeed cause some legs to not see the other as they are on different 'combinations'. But in this case I doubt this would have been the case. Then again, I too find it strange that a GFCI would interfere with the signal so I'm most surely going to ask him next time we meet. Interesting take on the problem.

      Anyway, my neighbour and I tried to link our powerline networks just for fun but the devices were unable to see each other. Not sure if this is because we're on different 'legs', because the distance is too big (not-connected houses, all in all the cabling takes about 100m) or because the meter-boxes between them somehow block the signal. The only thing I know for sure is that there is no transformer along the route.
      Wifi works fine off course (line-of-sight is a much smaller distance to begin with).

      PS: most PoE devices allow for some kind of encryption along the line, it's probably more secure than some of the things we have on wifi for the simple reason that I don't know about any software that automates brute-forcing the thing, thus keeping bored script-kiddies out. Off course I never looked for it nor have a clue on how hard/simple it would be, might well be that some determined technician works around it in couple of minutes; I'm most certainly not holding my breath on that one. Personally, I run mine completely open as I assume that the lack of encryption saves me a little on energy and gains me a little on speed, although I fear both will be very marginally.

      --
      If there is one thing to be learned on slashdot, it has to be sarcasm.
    14. Re:simple by pipatron · · Score: 1

      Wait.. what, how is ethernet over the powerline more secure and have less issues than UTP?

      --
      c++; /* this makes c bigger but returns the old value */
    15. Re:simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or go for the *other* kind of powerline ethernet...

      http://bprhad.wz.cz/js_strankovani/etherkiller.jpg

    16. Re:simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Powerline network boxes have a pairing process like Bluetooth and only work in encrypted mode.

    17. Re:simple by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Been in an apartment with powerline. It wouldn't even work out in the hallway. If you have your own power meter, you're good.

      Depends on how many circuits you have. At my house, powerline ethernet works from one end of the house to the other. In my mom's house, we couldn't connect two halves of the house together, they were on different circuits.

      Wireless never worked (I swear something was in the walls), the only way I eventually was able to get a connection from the living room to the bedroom where the DSL was was by running Cat 6 through the attic.

    18. Re:simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I read 'strangle him with a UTP-cable' in that message!

    19. Re:simple by poetmatt · · Score: 1

      it's not better than UTP. That's always the best option, every single time. It's only better than regular wireless A/B/G/N signals due to less susceptibility to interference and being less obvious in how it can be hacked into. Someone might be able to wardrive from the street, but are they going to try to tap your power line?

    20. Re:simple by craigminah · · Score: 1

      Can you turn the output power down or just take the antenna(s) off? Might make the signal weak/slow enough the perpetrator is no longer interested.

  7. Use squid by h4rr4r · · Score: 5, Funny

    Setup squid and redirect all web traffic through it. Replace all images on machines that are not yours with goatse.

    1. Re:Use squid by admdrew · · Score: 5, Funny
    2. Re:Use squid by Artraze · · Score: 1

      While this is a fun goal, it's only really effective against un-savy users. Anyone that could break WPS, including all but the most incompetent script kiddies, would figure out what's going on. And now you've let them on to your network and you're hosed. They can easily copy an allowed MAC address, assign themselves an unfiltered IP (including yours), etc.

    3. Re:Use squid by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      I was not suggesting using MAC adresses for that filtering. That would be braindead.

      Setup a VPN that you use on your machines to browse.

    4. Re:Use squid by DigitAl56K · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you're going to go so far as to let them on to your network, instead of pranking them you could passively watch who they log into websites as in order to determine their identity, gather evidence, and file charges. Of course, disconnect your other systems - since if he's hacking your wifi he'll probably also try to probe your other devices.

      Of course, IANAL, and perhaps monitoring such things is illegal even though it's going over your private network.

    5. Re:Use squid by hardburlyboogerman · · Score: 1

      Those are sweet.What I did is the unauthorized part of my Wi-Fi redirects straight to this you tube video ->http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kWz75MYteX0 The song reflects what the leech does after they realize that they can't leech anymore.

      --
      Geek Hillbilly
    6. Re:Use squid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're correct, MAC or IP based segregation isn't effective. I'd recommend configuring a second SSID and running a separate VLAN for the'insecure' traffic.

    7. Re:Use squid by Ken_g6 · · Score: 1

      I'd go a little farther than that. I'd also set up an SSH server, and a firewall so nobody can connect to my machine from the outside with anything [i]but[/i] an ssh client. Then I'd tunnel all my web traffic through SSH to my Squid proxy. (Actually, I'd use Polipo.)

      Of course, this assumes that your WiFi router is not directly connected to the Internet.

      --
      (T>t && O(n)--) == sqrt(666)
    8. Re:Use squid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or use a low power RaspberryPi to do it on the cheap!
      http://www.phillips321.co.uk/2013/02/12/raspberry-pi-as-a-joke-hotspot/

    9. Re:Use squid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This!

      Or more specifically.. You have an advanced wifi leach... so feed the beast.. Create a different wifi network for yourself and feed him your regular network.. Then spend a few days with wireshark looking for identifying information. This doesn't need to be a negative... You can probably mine this guy for ages before he catches on... then once you've dug some dirt, go ahead and troll him with squid and goatse.

    10. Re:Use squid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need to contact Mrs. Roberts. She is a hacking master.... and she bakes great cakes too!

      http://xkcd.com/341/

    11. Re:Use squid by Redmancometh · · Score: 1

      This man is pure genius. Learn from him.

    12. Re:Use squid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And get arrested for pushing out porn to a potential minor.

    13. Re:Use squid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is implemented in a VM at neighbor.willhackforsushi.com. Easy to setup and use!

    14. Re:Use squid by Crudely_Indecent · · Score: 1

      Any data crossing your network belongs to you, while it is on your network.

      --


      "Lame" - Galaxar
    15. Re:Use squid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's always fun to have a sacrificial AP up just for this. Oh, and redirection to naughty websites.

    16. Re:Use squid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The thing I wonder about thought, is if they're cracking encryption, connecting to multiple access points around town and setting up evil twins. They might not just be leeching wifi for more bandwidth... how much do they really need? My guess is that they're keylogging passwords and possibly engaging in identity theft.

    17. Re:Use squid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      except goatse is dead.

  8. Local police won't be much help by attemptedgoalie · · Score: 3, Funny

    You can give them satellite images of the house of the person that stole your identity, and they won't drive over for that.

    So for something involving log files and such? Not a chance.

    You should redirect all network traffic to goatse for a week, and just use a 3G hotspot while your normal one kills the thief's eyes.

    --
    My mom says I'm cool.
    1. Re:Local police won't be much help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure you can get local police interested.

      Set up an access point, have it connect to a box that routes everything through TOR, and run a web proxy that redirects every website he tries to load to a kiddie porn site.

      THEN call the cops, and let them know what he's been looking at. I guarantee they'll be quite interested.

    2. Re:Local police won't be much help by yurtinus · · Score: 1

      ..of course it won't take long for them to find out who set up the redirects and is actually responsible for the kiddie porn.

      --
      +1 Disagree
    3. Re:Local police won't be much help by allo · · Score: 1

      as stuff like "a evil twin network" aren't really crimes ... why should they. Its a matter of perspective, if a twin-network is "evil".

    4. Re:Local police won't be much help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It also requires you to find such materials. If I had to choose between that or going wired, I'd go wired. If law enforcement did it, it would be entrapment, right?

    5. Re:Local police won't be much help by tftp · · Score: 3, Insightful

      ..of course it won't take long for them to find out who set up the redirects and is actually responsible for the kiddie porn.

      That is very, very far from being "of course." Police wants convictions, and there is nothing else to convict than an asocial nerd in a basement, with a stash of CP in his browser's cache. Those files do not carry an indication through which router they were obtained, since the browser keeps no logs. If you have them, you have them.

      The nerd, naturally, may confess to a lighter crime - such as stealing your keys and connecting to your router. You should be ready for a raid yourself, and better you keep your own nose clean - the pr0n that most people collect rarely comes with notarially certified age of all participants. This is a good example of "sow the wind, reap the whirlwind."

      Framing the thief for CP would be a massive overreaction. But the thief can compromise your own IP address by *really* downloading politically incorrect materials. So I wouldn't accept any honeypot scheme where the thief is actually allowed to go outside of your LAN. Doing a good job on a honeypot for just one guy is too expensive. In essence, if you cannot guarantee that your Wi-Fi is secure then what are you doing with it? Just hoping that no hacker shows up? Either make sure it is secure, or turn it off. There is no middle ground because it can lead to trouble.

    6. Re:Local police won't be much help by TrentTheThief · · Score: 1

      An anonymous tip about his huge traffic internet/brick'n'mortar crack dealing will do the trick.

      They'll smash his doors in on nothing but hot air if it involves drugs, but can't do shit if he's selling little kid's asses, let alone hacking your wifi.

    7. Re:Local police won't be much help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually the basement-dwelling hacker would find an ingenious way to retaliate -- pretty soon kiddie porn would be coming out your office's printer with your name on it.

    8. Re:Local police won't be much help by Cramer · · Score: 1

      The *intent* is what makes it illegal. Of course, 99.999% of law enforcement is not prepared to deal with this sort of modern crime.

    9. Re:Local police won't be much help by riverat1 · · Score: 1

      Personally I don't even want to try and find a kiddie porn site in the first place. goat.se or gay porn I could see.

    10. Re:Local police won't be much help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention what are the odds that the CP you find is actually a government honeypot. How long til they contact your ISP?

    11. Re:Local police won't be much help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes but you are forgetting one very important piece of information......

      The data will be pulled down through *YOUR* ISP which *WILL* be logging activity. They will know that your account pulled down those files.

      You MAY be lucky and walk away or they could go after both of you. You would be especially vulnerable if you knowingly redirected him to that stuff.

    12. Re:Local police won't be much help by tftp · · Score: 1

      Correct, and that's why if you must act then it is much safer to find the guy and beat him senseless. Violent crimes are frequent, and they have minimal punishment, but a computer crime can seriously ruin your day.

    13. Re:Local police won't be much help by mnemotronic · · Score: 1

      The job of the local police, in spite of the nice "To Serve & Protect" decal on the door, is to draw the chalk lines around the bodies. You could give them something to do ........

      --
      The Russians have won. They have made the world a cesspool of distrust, greed, fear and hate.
    14. Re:Local police won't be much help by allo · · Score: 1

      no, it is not, even if you may wish so.

  9. WIFi direction finding by mrcaseyj · · Score: 0

    You may be able to find the direction of a WiFi signal by just standing with your laptop held out in front of you and turning slowly until the signal strength drops as your body blocks the signal. Do multiple turns to rule out random signal drops.

    1. Re:WIFi direction finding by radiumsoup · · Score: 1

      get a yagi antenna - it's a good excuse to get one ;)

    2. Re:WIFi direction finding by icebike · · Score: 2

      There is an app for that.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    3. Re:WIFi direction finding by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      b) When you figure it out, put some tinfoil between him and your antenna.

      --
      No sig today...
    4. Re:WIFi direction finding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amateur radio operators have "fox hunt" contests and practice doing this to help geolocate the source of radio signals. They'll put something in a remote area with a beacon and have others find it.

    5. Re:WIFi direction finding by X0563511 · · Score: 2

      Failing that, any ham who enjoys RDF would be happy to help, provided they have gear that can listen in on that high of a frequency. Chances are the ones that can are the ones you want helping you anyway :)

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    6. Re:WIFi direction finding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interestingly enough, Wigle (at least for Android, i don't do iOS) would be able to at least help give you a radius with its built-in mapping and plotting of access points.
      He may find the rogue one.

    7. Re:WIFi direction finding by Phreakiture · · Score: 1

      We also look for illegal transmitters, like the cordless phone that a local Chinese restaurant had imported and used the same frequency as our 2m repeater.

      --
      www.wavefront-av.com
  10. If he joins your network... by Picass0 · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...I think that means he's consenting to letting you administrate his system. I suggest you do so.

    1. Re:If he joins your network... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Not necessarily effective if his intention isn't web browsing. Internet is cheap. It sounds like an elaborate attempt to conceal illicit activity to me.

    2. Re:If he joins your network... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.bash.org/?202477

    3. Re:If he joins your network... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      no such word as administrate, the word is "administer". An administrator, administers he does not administrate !

    4. Re:If he joins your network... by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      the simplest answer is just turn the wireless off completely for a week. then work wired. or get a different brand and only use it for a small amount of time if you really need it, always turning it completely off when not using it. Eventually the hacker will realize you're not any fun.

    5. Re:If he joins your network... by mabhatter654 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      alternately, leave the old one turned on but not physically connected to anything... waste more time!

    6. Re:If he joins your network... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
    7. Re:If he joins your network... by flimflammer · · Score: 2

      Wrong.

    8. Re:If he joins your network... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no such word as administrate, the word is "administer". An administrator, administers he does not administrate !

      A minister administers the marriage vow (as one administers a drug, justice &c.) An administrator administrates a company &c, as a network admin administrates a network.

      There are more words in the English language than you are aware of. I suggest you buy this dictionary and brush up on your skills.

    9. Re:If he joins your network... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...I think that means he's consenting to letting you administrate his system. I suggest you do so.

      ssh to him ( assuming he's a linuxer and rm everything on his drive followed by a reboot.

    10. Re:If he joins your network... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Set up some latency test gear inline with it. Wait til he's doing something that latency is bad for, then increase it. WOW comes to mind.

    11. Re:If he joins your network... by Terrasque · · Score: 1

      No no no.

      Step 1: Connect it to an old computer
      Step 2: Install squid
      Step 3: Time to stock up on certain ... things from the web..

      --
      It's The Golden Rule: "He who has the gold makes the rules."
    12. Re:If he joins your network... by tepples · · Score: 1

      then work wired

      Which wired network adapter do you recommend for a Nexus 7 tablet?

  11. You could troll them in return. by Frobnicator · · Score: 4, Funny

    Log in to the Evil Twin network. Start a bunch of illegal torrents and "accidentally" alert the appropriate parties by IP address. Some appropriate in-theater movies and the MPAA would be a good start.

    --
    //TODO: Think of witty sig statement
    1. Re:You could troll them in return. by amorsen · · Score: 2

      The Evil Twin network likely doesn't have Internet access. Even if it does, it is probably using one of the other nearby wifi networks for connectivity.

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
    2. Re:You could troll them in return. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Change the WPA key on your real network, then log in to the Evil Twin network. Start a bunch of illegal torrents and "accidentally" alert the appropriate parties by IP address. Some appropriate in-theater movies and the MPAA would be a good start.

      Of course if he's actually all that "advanced" the evil twin network doesn't have an internet connection, and will shut itself down as soon as it captures an authentication attempt. That way your laptop will connect to the good twin after a few seconds, and a less-paranoid user would never be the wiser that their key had been captured.

    3. Re:You could troll them in return. by Nerdfest · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If it has internet access and you don't feel like waiting for the MPAA to be their usual selves, sign up for a new gmail account and send a threat letter to a high ranking government official. You'll get a far faster and more dramatic response. You can be pretty much guaranteed that the issue will be investigated.

    4. Re:You could troll them in return. by hAckz0r · · Score: 1

      The problem is they are using your network, so its your IP address. If its P2P WiFi they have no network of their own to tell the authorities about, so you would be incriminating yourself.

    5. Re:You could troll them in return. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't have to do anything illegal. Just log in to the Evil Twin network and visit the websites of every police agency you can think of that might apply, local, national, and international, and google extensively about laws regarding unauthorized network access, wire fraud, etc. Probably a good idea to spoof your own MAC address to something else first, so they don't have access to that.

    6. Re:You could troll them in return. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > You can be pretty much guaranteed that the issue will be investigated.

      Yeah, but they'll be after the person making the threats, not the person leeching wi-fi. Forensics will be able to exclude them as the sender.

    7. Re:You could troll them in return. by DigiShaman · · Score: 3, Funny

      Would be a shame if that poor SOB were to accidentally stumble upon my internal malware infested honeypot. Used strictly for my own research purposes of course. This one is filled with bees, and they sting!

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    8. Re:You could troll them in return. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Problem being, the three letter government agencies are not nearly as incompetent as the four letter trade associations. So, you're likely to be the one getting fucked in federal court/prison

    9. Re:You could troll them in return. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can be pretty much guaranteed that the issue will be investigated.

      Unless the threat is towards one of our ambassadors and his staff.

    10. Re:You could troll them in return. by Sipper · · Score: 1

      You don't even need to be on the Evil Twin network to do this; at least some Torrent clients have a setting for what IP address to report that you're using. Some time ago I remember researchers from one of the big-name universities (MIT?) doing this and reporting the IP address of local network printers, and successfully received DMCA notices sent to the university reporting Torrent use by the IP address of the printer.

      The other thing I'll mention is that doing a "tit-for-tat" hack on the Evil Twin network is probably the wrong thing to do.

      For others suggesting the use of a directional antenna -- this is trickier than it sounds. Most directional antennas (like yagis) have a narrow horizonatal beamwidth, but a very wide virtical beamwidth (when mounted for the horizonatal beamwidth -- vice-versa when mounted for the virtical beamwidth). A dish might be more pinpoint, depending on the type of feedhorn used. Likewise there's no limit to the "depth" that the signal travels -- so for instance if you think that a particular appartment building contains a transmitter you're trying to locate, it's not simple to pin down which appartment has the transmitter. This is furthermore exaserbated by reflective surfaces, including typical corrogated metal floors used in building construction. Typical direction-finding requires a set of adjustible attenuators to further localize the originating strong signnal from the weaker reflected signals. As tough as this can be in an urban environment, "DFing" (direction finding) using a directional antenna is still cheaper and more reliable than using a Doppler Scanner.

    11. Re:You could troll them in return. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you pick the movies being released "Today", then the MPAA will already know and alert the ISP within a few days. Also, remember that logging into their system, just like their using your system is theft of service.

    12. Re:You could troll them in return. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most likely the evil twin is just routing back to your wi-fi network.

    13. Re:You could troll them in return. by amorsen · · Score: 1

      Most likely the evil twin is just routing back to your wi-fi network.

      That wouldn't really work. The point of the evil twin network is to steal your WPA key / login. It would be difficult to pull off the attack quickly enough to actually be able to route traffic back to your wi-fi network at the same instant.

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
  12. Dangerous territory... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    assuming, of course, that you neglected to get permission to research the other access points. You should not admit to connecting to or monitoring any network to which you have not been granted access.

    This weakens your case, as it takes away the evidence for massive wrongdoing.

    My advice is to keep your efforts under your hat until you have solid proof that doesn't require your own unauthorized access of remote networks.

    1. Re:Dangerous territory... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You actually don't need to connect to an access point to see what MAC address are associated with it. And its pretty difficult to conceal that information due to the way wireless ethernet works.

  13. Lynch Mob by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Get your neighbors together, form a lynch mob.

  14. Backtrace him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Backtrace him and report him to the cyber police.

    dan.

    1. Re:Backtrace him by pedrop357 · · Score: 4, Funny

      NO NO NO

      Create a GUI in Visual Basic and track his IP.

    2. Re:Backtrace him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      consequences will never be the same.

    3. Re:Backtrace him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure.

      If by "backtrace" you mean sodomize, "report him" you mean "hit him with," and "cyber police" you mean baseball bat.

    4. Re:Backtrace him by Mark+Rawls · · Score: 1

      But how will you ever get to his drug boat?

  15. No really, don't! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Woohoo, first post! Honestly, if someone is screwed up enough to waste their time to do this, do not confront them in person. At the very least they will just weasel and carry on, but you may be opening yourself up to harassment or worse, by identifying yourself to them.

  16. Don't need a directional antena by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You can download utilities to show the strength of signals on your laptop or other portable device. Simply walking around the neighborhood with the laptop will give you a darn good idea where it originates. A box of matches is the only other tool you will need.

    1. Re:Don't need a directional antena by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Free one here: http://www.intelliadmin.com/index.php/free-download/?filename=wifistrength.exe

      But there are about eleventy billion other ones that will get the job done. Some for Android, none for an iOS as far as I am aware.

    2. Re:Don't need a directional antena by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      Anyone who clicks on an exe download on slashdot should NOT be matching witts with someone that knows how to perform WPA2 intercepts.

  17. Some quick basics by Pubstar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The first thing would obviously be MAC whitelisting on the router, though if he is smart enough, he would just spoof his MAC to one of the ones on your network, so its unlikely it would stop him. Depending on where you need your wireless router, have you considered turning down the radio strength and putting the router in an area where it covers where you want to use it without the WiFi signal going too far outside the bounds of your house?

    1. Re:Some quick basics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would propose blocking MAC addresses; while some people can figure out a way around it, it's a solid solution for most folks.

      I'm amazed that you claim he's put up his own WiFi router with the same SSID; if so, he's not harassing you for access, he harassing you for some other reason.

      Finally, If you're using WPS, you're sending out invitations to jerks like this. Move to WPA2 (I bought a router recently with WPA2, for less than $40, retail!) and you'll have a more secure system that's harder to hack. (Oh, and since you only have to type the password when you set up a new computer to access the router, you can make the password as random as possible and up to 63 characters long; that'll dissuade 'em.)

    2. Re:Some quick basics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Presumably he just wants the attempts to stop and doesn't really care about getting the guy... how about first changing the SSID to something like "PleaseStopCauseKneecapsBreakEasy" ;-)

  18. Why lose your time? by ruir · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Lets hope this article is just a marketing scheme. Anyway, in case it is genuine: Somebody has been freeloading, so what? You have got two options: 1) upgrade your security. double up encryption with MAC authorization. Hide your SSID. Maybe even going to digital certificates.Use only encrypted communications protocols. Many other options. Many time invested. 2) Setup a honeypot. Something open or better yet with poor security. Let him break, monitor the activity, eventually you will get a his personal data. Then decide on the course of action. Cheers

    1. Re:Why lose your time? by Pubstar · · Score: 1

      Hiding SSID? You're joking right? Its trivial to find it - http://www.metageek.net/forums/showthread.php?3531-Download-inSSIDer-2.0-Beta-1

      Not that hard using this program. My friend is just a script kiddy, but he can use BackTrack Pro 5 to break into almost any wireless network in 15 minutes (WEP) or 2 days (WPA2 using rainbow tables)

    2. Re:Why lose your time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No to mention when you hide SSIDs sometimes the preshared key is sent in plain text over the air to the AP.

    3. Re:Why lose your time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hiding the SSID and blocking MAC addresses are worthless strategies
      if you are dealing with a person who can do what this leech has already done.

    4. Re:Why lose your time? by LukeWebber · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Freeloading? If that was his only intention, he wouldn't have troubled to set up the evil twin. This guy is serious trouble, and you don't want him on your LAN.

    5. Re:Why lose your time? by Joce640k · · Score: 2

      Lets hope this article is just a marketing scheme. Anyway, in case it is genuine:

      Somebody has been freeloading, so what? You have got two options:
      1) upgrade your security. double up encryption with MAC authorization. Hide your SSID. Maybe even going to digital certificates.Use only encrypted communications protocols. Many other options. Many time invested.
      2) Setup a honeypot. Something open or better yet with poor security. Let him break, monitor the activity, eventually you will get a his personal data. Then decide on the course of action.

      Cheers

      3) Figure out the direction of his signal and put tinfoil on the wall there.

      --
      No sig today...
    6. Re:Why lose your time? by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      4) Figure out the direction of him, and shove tinfoil down his throat.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    7. Re:Why lose your time? by niado · · Score: 1, Interesting

      My friend is just a script kiddy, but he can use BackTrack Pro 5 to break into almost any wireless network in 15 minutes (WEP) or 2 days (WPA2 using rainbow tables)

      This can be alleviated by obfuscating the SSID and using a long non-dictionary PSK. If your SSID is something like "#@$%MFklsfdl;aksdf#$%@$" there are unlikely to be rainbow tables available.

    8. Re:Why lose your time? by Hatta · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Anyway, in case it is genuine: Somebody has been freeloading, so what?

      Ask yourself, why would someone go to such great lengths to use someone else's bandwidth?

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    9. Re:Why lose your time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realise that "hiding" your SSID does absolutely nothing, right?

    10. Re:Why lose your time? by Pubstar · · Score: 1

      For the average user, how many people are going to set it up like that. And obfuscating the SSID? Care to elaborate?

    11. Re:Why lose your time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agree 100%. He can freeload off of anyone in the area that is using no auth or WEP. This person is bored and interested with what is on your private network. Put your wireless on another vlan or a different network segment. If you have a portable home router that does not have that functionality, live with it or get one that does. I suggest IPCop. Very simple and easy to setup. I had it running on an old PII with 128GB ram up until recently. I now have it on a leftover machine I got from work running a free version of ESX as a virtual machine with 3 network cards, one for the internet, one for my home network, and one for my wireless. As a bonus, I use ESX to run some other machines too. Hack my wireless, you will get internet access and potential access to my other wireless computers. Like I said, I don't internet access is this persons real goal.

    12. Re:Why lose your time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $40/month, 12 months a year, 10 years.... $4800 is a lot of money. Sure it might be 1% of my 10 year salary, but you add up all these different expenses that I don't have and it becomes real money.

      Plus, without all these expenses, you don't stress out about losing your income quite as much.

    13. Re:Why lose your time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny you should mention that - I do actually name my SSID 'Hon3yP0t'.

    14. Re:Why lose your time? by dskoll · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I run an unsecured WiFi network (no WEP, WPA or WPA2).

      On the other hand, the only traffic accepted by my access concentrator is OpenVPN traffic. So yes, anyone can get an IP address from my DHCP server, but they can't do much with it unless they somehow break SSL public-key auth or obtain a copy of my key and certificate.

    15. Re:Why lose your time? by Mindscrew · · Score: 1

      WPA encryption uses the SSID to salt the hash.

      The more obscure your SSID is, the less chance there is that precomputed hashes have been generated for your psk.

    16. Re:Why lose your time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hiding the ssid won't help. There are multiple tools that will provide a list of hidden ssids quickly

    17. Re:Why lose your time? by SpectreBlofeld · · Score: 1

      I don't suppose you'd mind explaining how you set this up? Interested.

    18. Re:Why lose your time? by grumpyman · · Score: 1

      Free loading is one thing but arp spoof MITM is possible once on MAC.

    19. Re:Why lose your time? by solidraven · · Score: 1

      5) Jam his WiFi.
      That's what I did with my neighbour who stole my WiFi consistently. Stupid script kiddy that he is, he didn't realise I like playing with antennas and transmitters. Built a noise generator in the 2.4 GHz band, grabbed a minicircuits amplifier with considerable power (but still within legal limits) and a log periodic antenna that works in the 2.4 GHz band. A week later he apologised. Mind you, you should only try this in areas with very few people, you can easily jam a 100 by 1000 meter area with such a setup.

    20. Re:Why lose your time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To use the internet.

    21. Re:Why lose your time? by fuzzywig · · Score: 1

      Cash poor, time and expertise rich?

    22. Re:Why lose your time? by funwithBSD · · Score: 1

      No, it is the hijacker, hoping he can socially engineer us into solving the lockout he has run into while stealing Wi-fi...

      --
      Never answer an anonymous letter. - Yogi Berra
    23. Re:Why lose your time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As the submitter is not an ISP, I suspect they are not covered by "common carrier" status, which means they may be held responsible for the traffic going through their WAN connection. Even if they would be considered a "common carrier", proving that in court will be challenging and expensive and require that the courts are sufficiently sophisticated to understand the issues. It will also mean that the person's name will be dragged through the muck during the trial if it's anything nasty.

      Undertaking the course of action that you are suggesting sounds suspiciously like a man-in-the-middle attack, which would likely be considered hacking. Again, you'd have to rely upon the court understanding the issues.

    24. Re:Why lose your time? by axl917 · · Score: 1

      Anyway, in case it is genuine:

      Somebody has been freeloading, so what?

      When the party van pulls and you're arrested for downloading kiddie porn, let us know how the "it must have been some guy leeching my interwebs!" defense works out...

    25. Re:Why lose your time? by PlusFiveTroll · · Score: 1

      If you had a linux box with 2 network cards it would be pretty easy. One NIC of course its the network/internet facing side. The other NIC is directly connected to the WAP. Firewall off everything on the 2nd NIC except what's needed by the VPN protocols. Client connects to the WAP, gets an IP, authenticates VPN and gets the routeable IP and they are good to go.

    26. Re:Why lose your time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because it's there

    27. Re:Why lose your time? by PlusFiveTroll · · Score: 1

      >you can easily jam a 100 by 1000 meter area with such a setup.

      6. Everybody drops their wireless and goes to wired. Script kiddy has to get a job to pay for internet.

    28. Re:Why lose your time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your suggestions are excellent on the whole, but

      double up encryption with MAC authorization

      Is like saying, "double up your locked door with a No Trespassing sign."

    29. Re:Why lose your time? by SpectreBlofeld · · Score: 1

      So not gonna happen on my laptop then, I guess...

    30. Re:Why lose your time? by niado · · Score: 1

      For the average user, how many people are going to set it up like that. And obfuscating the SSID? Care to elaborate?

      Certainly the average user does not take adequate precautions against attack. I was just mentioning a method to mitigate the effectiveness of rainbow tables against WPA. (obviously WEP is bad, and is no longer recommended for any use)

      WPA hashes are seeded using the SSID. Rainbow tables are constructed using known SSID's so if you "obfuscate" the SSID by making it somewhat long with random characters then rainbow tables are not effective. Increasing the length and randomness of your PSK is also helpful, as rainbow-table attacks rely on a dictionary and are computed to a finite length (commonly 20 characters).

      Using WPA2 with a gobledegook SSID and a PSK of 63 characters in length that contains no dictionary words is in practice not crackable.

    31. Re:Why lose your time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe they are an unemployed techie that's super broke, but needs internet to apply for jobs?

    32. Re:Why lose your time? by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      #@$%MFklsfdl;aksdf#$%@$? That's amazing, I've got the same combination on my luggage!

    33. Re:Why lose your time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyway, in case it is genuine: Somebody has been freeloading, so what?

      >

      You may be the kind of person who quite gleefully will loan your neighbors a cup of sugar ... quart of milk ... a tool or two for auto work. Invite them over to watch The Big Game(tm) on your 60" screen

      Does that mean you mind if they come into your house unannounced to borrow these? Without asking first?

      Do you mind if, while they're there, they help themselves to a beer and The Game while you're out?

  19. Power & antenna placement by hottoh · · Score: 4, Interesting

    -Reduce transmit power
    -Move or buy a directional antenna

    Have time on your hands?
    http://www.ex-parrot.com/~pete/upside-down-ternet.html

    1. Re:Power & antenna placement by Sarten-X · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That link is exactly what I came to post. It's clearly overkill, but overkill is the perfect tool to show someone that they are hopelessly outclassed and they should seriously reconsider their actions.

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    2. Re:Power & antenna placement by X0563511 · · Score: 0

      You deserve modpoints. Many many modpoints.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    3. Re:Power & antenna placement by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 2

      overkill is the perfect tool to show someone that they are hopelessly outclassed and they should seriously reconsider their actions.

      Shock and awwhhhhh?

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    4. Re:Power & antenna placement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Outclassing that would be for the offender to do the same in reverse flipping the images back with squid.

    5. Re:Power & antenna placement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Overkill?

      Overkill is MIM-ing his various accounts and ruining his social life by few well worded emails, statuses and posts.

      Bonus points if he plays sme kind of online game and you can ruin him slowly in way which support would not be inlined to help him with.

    6. Re:Power & antenna placement by PlusFiveTroll · · Score: 1

      that's why you use the -blur 4 option instead. Ain't no coming back from that.

    7. Re:Power & antenna placement by tgd · · Score: 2

      That link is exactly what I came to post. It's clearly overkill, but overkill is the perfect tool to show someone that they are hopelessly outclassed and they should seriously reconsider their actions.

      Except they're not hopelessly outclassed. They broke into the questioner's network and the questioner had to ask Slashdot instead of addressing it himself.

      He/she's already demonstrated they've been hopelessly outclassed.

  20. Shut off your radio. by faedle · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If they're going to go through the trouble of setting up a honeypot, you might was well give up and just shut the radio off and run 100% wired.

    Or, go rogue yourself and capture all his traffic. Bonus points if you rate-limit the wireless to effectively have no bandwidth.

    The local cops? If your local police department is anything like mine, they don't even send out officers to investigate real property crimes like theft anymore. They'll just laugh at your little WiFi problem.

    1. Re:Shut off your radio. by JLennox · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Phones, tablets, etc lack Ethernet ports. It's pretty close to deprecated for consumer electronics and understandably so.

    2. Re:Shut off your radio. by interkin3tic · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They'll just laugh at your little WiFi problem.

      You must have exceptionally smart cops where you live if you think they'd understand what OP was talking about. If I called cops with this problem any place I've lived, I suspect I'd be transferred about three times before someone would ask "Son, are you talking about the child porn?" and would just hang up when I said no.

    3. Re:Shut off your radio. by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If you can find out who's stealing your bandwidth, you don't need the police -- you need a lawyer. In civil matters they are a *lot* more scary.

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    4. Re:Shut off your radio. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you are confused on the term honeypot.

    5. Re:Shut off your radio. by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      The local cops won't care, but if you find a geek in the local FBI office you could really have fun with the guy.

    6. Re:Shut off your radio. by stewsters · · Score: 1

      They don't care about property crimes, but if you can get them a 'hacker' they will send him to gitmo for just downloading some JSTOR articles.

    7. Re:Shut off your radio. by grantspassalan · · Score: 1

      If you can find out who's stealing your bandwidth, you don't need the police -- you need a lawyer. In civil matters they are a *lot* more scary.

      The trouble is that lawyers are very expensive. I need my wireless connection only for the iPad. Most of the time I use my main computer which uses a wired connection. So the Wi-Fi is always turned off unless I actively need It. As soon as I'm done, off it goes. Any leech cannot get a reliable Internet connection for long. When they get disconnected, just before a big download completes, that is very frustrating.

      --
      A sufficiently advanced simulation is indistinguishable from reality.
    8. Re:Shut off your radio. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They'll just laugh at your little WiFi problem.

      You must have exceptionally smart cops where you live if you think they'd understand what OP was talking about. If I called cops with this problem any place I've lived, I suspect I'd be transferred about three times before someone would ask "Son, are you talking about the child porn?" and would just hang up when I said no.

      Son, I believe I have found your problem!

    9. Re:Shut off your radio. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well you might still be able to get them involved for drugs or terrorism. Anything that might allow them to seize someone's assets based on warrant rather than a trial.

    10. Re:Shut off your radio. by jamesh · · Score: 1

      If you can find out who's stealing your bandwidth, you don't need the police -- you need a lawyer. In civil matters they are a *lot* more scary.

      And better still, the standard of proof is often much less than "beyond reasonable doubt".

      Make sure you run up lots of actual expenses tracking it down - cases of red bull to keep awake at night monitoring your wireless, a new laptop or two to assist in monitoring, full body massages to help you relax after all the late night red bull benders, etc.

      Then you can start thinking about assigning a cost to the damages associated with pain and suffering at the thought of someone invading your privacy etc.

    11. Re:Shut off your radio. by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 1

      Why would you say no? "Yea boss, yea I am. Why he surely gone to a lot of trouble to jus' be playing video-game, know mean? Sombitch got to be up to sommin bad. You doan break into sommun else house to jus' use their phone unless you want real bad not to have them know it you callin', know mean?"

      --
      Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
    12. Re:Shut off your radio. by faedle · · Score: 1

      Missed the point.

      The point was that if you've got somebody who is as advanced as the author claims, there is little you can do to keep them off your network.

    13. Re:Shut off your radio. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They'll just laugh at your little WiFi problem.

      I suspect I'd be transferred about three times before someone would ask "Son, are you talking about the child porn?" and would just hang up when I said no.

      Or, more likely, they'll decide that anything that incomprehensible must be illegal, and arrest you for hacking the wireless thief's computer.

    14. Re:Shut off your radio. by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      And sue for what? Actual damages? What actual damages? The best you could claim would be a (very small) portion of your internet bill for the month.

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    15. Re:Shut off your radio. by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      just label it as anonymous cybercrime and they'll come running.

      they might bust you too for being an accomplice though.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  21. wired by epyT-R · · Score: 2

    You could try leaving the access point open and partitioning it with an ipsec segment. Deny any other connection attempts to the interface. Otherwise just hardwire it and be done with it. Wireless will never be secure. You'll just end up fighting a war of attrition, and that 16yo hax0r has much more free time than you do.

  22. Mac Whitelist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is why I use MAC Authentication in addition to encryption. It's a pain to manually add each address for every new gadget but it give me great and easy transparency for who is using my stuff.

    1. Re:Mac Whitelist by Pubstar · · Score: 1

      MAC spoofing is very trivial. It would not stop someone doing these types of attacks on wireless networks.

    2. Re:Mac Whitelist by wjousts · · Score: 1

      Yeah, sure is a pain when you add new device, especially since it's completely ineffective at keeping anybody out.

    3. Re:Mac Whitelist by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      If anything it makes it worse - now you can't tell what traffic is yours and what is his.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  23. fair trade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    You're giving him cancer, he's using some of your wifi. Just segregate your personal network from the wifi network and see if you have QoS options to limit how much you share. Can't we all just get along? ;)

  24. I've used Wifi Analizer by eksith · · Score: 3, Insightful

    On my Android phone, it will detect the closest Wifi signals and you may be able to pinpoint where exactly this evil twin is. A directional antenna may help, but without knowing exactly where to direct it to, you may be aiding the leech. You can try disabling SSID broadcast and reducing transmit power.

    No one will trouble themselves this much just to avoid paying a monthly fee and just by the fact they're knowledgable in these means they've spent a lot of time online already. My guess is that this individual is conducting illegal activities through yours and your neighbor's connections, so you or your neighbors may get a visit from law enforcement pretty soon.

    --
    If computers were people, I'd be a misanthrope.
    1. Re:I've used Wifi Analizer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This will help narrow down.

      Make yours less desirable, let your neighbors know what is going on....no point in going over kill, just make yours hardest to get on...is wifi needed in your home (or would wired do)...anything that you do can be broken on a wifi network..once wired it's much harder.

    2. Re:I've used Wifi Analizer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one will trouble themselves this much just to avoid paying a monthly fee

      I disagree. First, this person likely sees this as a challenge and might make it their hobby. Second, it may be a blow to their pride to pay for WiFi because they can't crack the network, and we redouble their efforts. Third, this could be a teenager or NEET with lots of free time but almost no money.

      As for illegal activity, I doubt it. Surely nobody is stupid enough to do something sophisticated from their neighbor's WiFi access point. ("Gee, this guy lacks the skills to do that, but he testifies that his neighbor is a computer guru, maybe we should check on the neighbor just to be safe...") I would imagine this is either a kid trying to get access to porn (assuming the ISP is blocking upstream per customer request and it's somehow working), or someone trying to torrent faster (IMHO more likely). I suppose it could also be a new variant of malware or a manual attempt to gain exit nodes for a botnet.

    3. Re:I've used Wifi Analizer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one will trouble themselves this much just to avoid paying a monthly fee

      This really isn't true. I am, by choice, currently unemployed. I have plenty of money from previous consulting gigs. But since I have leisure and no income, I will trade absurd amounts of time and effort for money. For example, I regularly walk 6 miles to a farmer's market and 6 miles back to save a couple of dollars on the price of vegetables. That's three hours of walking to save a minute or two's income.

      Never underestimate the effort a bored person with no income will expend to save money. Especially if the effort is on something fun like cracking.

      P.S. I don't leach, but I'd guess that it isn't much effort once you've automated your attacks.

    4. Re:I've used Wifi Analizer by dr_dank · · Score: 1

      My guess is that this individual is conducting illegal activities through yours and your neighbor's connections, so you or your neighbors may get a visit from law enforcement pretty soon.

      Which leads to the question, what would they say to the authorities if they show up? Johnny Q Law isn't going to buy some half-baked story about an invisible hacker when they have access logs showing illicit activity from their IP address.

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    5. Re:I've used Wifi Analizer by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      FYI. Tape some foil to a piece of cardboard (or just use some metal if you have it) and hold that up in front of the phone. Wave it around until the signal drops / disappears and take a bearing.

      Repeat this from several directions, then plot the bearing intersections.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    6. Re:I've used Wifi Analizer by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      At least they don't view I.P. addresses the same as a fingerprint any more.

      That was a howler.

      And yes, I agree that the heroic measures the leach is using point to illegal activity.

      You might actually be able to inform the FBI or Homeland defense department about someone in your neighborhood going to great efforts to secretly use other people's wireless connections to hide the way they are using the internet.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    7. Re:I've used Wifi Analizer by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 5, Informative

      "My guess is that this individual is conducting illegal activities through yours and your neighbor's connections"

      This is highly likely. The guy has invested much time and effort in this so they clearly have motives other than saving a few bucks. OP should make attempts to locate this guy and to shut him down. Use laptops or cell phones with wireless monitoring applications to locate the guy's AP. Nothing too fancy, just do a bit of sneaker-netting while watching the signal strength. You don't need to triangulate the location to within a foot, you just need to get a general idea of where this thing is. Once you get close you should be able to tell which building/car it is in. If this yields inconclusive results then contact the local HAM club. They may be able to assist you in locating a rogue AP or wifi leech in exchange for beer and pizza.

      Also, OP needs to file a police report. Will the police do anything? No, of course not. However, it will help to shield OP from liability when the FBI comes knocking in regard to whatever illegal activities are being conducted through his internet connection. He'll be able to point to the police reports as evidence that someone else was on the network long before the authorities showed up.

      --
      -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
    8. Re:I've used Wifi Analizer by ohnocitizen · · Score: 1

      means they've spent a lot of time online already

      My gods, they probably read slashdot. WHICH MEANS...

    9. Re:I've used Wifi Analizer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check out Wigle. It's even better. It's essentially Kismet without the rfmon mode.

    10. Re:I've used Wifi Analizer by eksith · · Score: 1

      Malware is something I haven't considered and far more likely. Surely someone would be clever enough to write as of yet unknown malware that surreptitiously turns a compromised wireless device/computer into a hotspot of sorts.

      A bored NEET would be unlikely IMO since there are much easier ways of siphoning bandwidth. This appears to be a deliberate attempt at hiding the origin of network traffic.

      --
      If computers were people, I'd be a misanthrope.
    11. Re:I've used Wifi Analizer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The leech may not be planning on doing anything horribly illegal, at least insofar as it is possible do use the internet at all these days without doing anything illegal. It's possible (especially in this economy) that he's talented, unemployed, and bored. That combination gives him both time and motivation to put an awful lot of efforts into hacking someone else's connection. Also, do ISPs in your area (assuming you have more than one) have harsh bandwidth costs and overage fees?

    12. Re:I've used Wifi Analizer by AmongTheBoulders · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Most ham radio clubs have fox hunting events now and then, where they see who can be the first to find a hidden transmitter. I know you mentioned possibly contacting the local ham radio club. I have never participated in a fox hunt, and don't know much about doing that, but presumably they would each use a held directional antenna to see which direction the signal is strongest from.

      I wonder which wireless monitoring applications on a laptop or cell phone would show more than just the nearby wireless routers? The old laptop that I occasionally use, only shows the nearby wireless routers.

      Since he is an advanced Wi-Fi leach, he is probably has a high gain directional antenna, and is likely to be somewhat further away from the wireless router than is typical for Wi-Fi. I am not sure how far away he could be with such an antenna.

    13. Re:I've used Wifi Analizer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is how you crack WPS:
      reaver -i mon0 -c 1 -b 13:33:7C:0F:F3 -v

      No time or effort, WPS cracking is far simpler than WEP cracking, and the vulnerability has been public for over a year.

    14. Re:I've used Wifi Analizer by The+Wild+Norseman · · Score: 1

      My gods, they probably read slashdot. WHICH MEANS...

      ...we've traced the call... it's coming from inside the house. Now a squad car's coming over there right now, just get out of that house! GET OUT OF THE HOUSE!!

      --
      "A government is a body of people usually -- notably -- ungoverned." -Shepherd Book
  25. Buy a directional antenna by ZaMoose · · Score: 2

    ...but only if it comes with a cool pings-like-the-motion-detectors-in-Aliens handset, as where's the fun in not having that?

    --
    I wish I had a kryptonite cross, because then you could keep Dracula and Superman away.
  26. sniff em out. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Set up a firewall that all your data is routed through. Then sniff passwords from it.

  27. Have fun with them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's always upside-down ternet.

  28. Oh come on... by lesincompetent · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Do i really have to say it? WPA2, 63 characters pwd.

    1. Re:Oh come on... by Time_Ngler · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Have you heard of reaver?

    2. Re:Oh come on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you heard of reaver?

      Either you didn't read the second sentence or you have no clue what reaver does.

      After looking on the Internet and discovering that there are indeed many vulnerabilities to WPS, I disabled it.

    3. Re:Oh come on... by Time_Ngler · · Score: 1

      I just meant that "WPA2 63 character pwd" by itself is not effective without also having to disable WPS (and some routers don't even let you do that).

    4. Re:Oh come on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That tool is for attaching WPS passwords, something WPA2 pre-shared key will not be using.

    5. Re:Oh come on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Have you heard of reaver?

      Reaver is only good at cracking WPS. It does not help obtain the passphrase or help in authenticating to an access point that is *not* setup with WPS.

    6. Re:Oh come on... by Time_Ngler · · Score: 2

      A router that is using WPA2 with a pre-shared key may also have WPS. A lot of them don't even allow you to turn WPS off.

    7. Re:Oh come on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The OP said he disabled WPS, which is what Reaver attacks.

    8. Re:Oh come on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That only works against WPS-enabled routers, and the OP says he's disabled it already.

    9. Re:Oh come on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you? Apparently the flaw is only in WPS not WPA2...

    10. Re:Oh come on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The OP did, since the first thing he did was disable WPS

    11. Re:Oh come on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever read what reaver does, no pin, no problem

    12. Re:Oh come on... by Time_Ngler · · Score: 1

      This is the NINTH response I got saying that reaver works against WPS and not WPA2! Yes I know it only works against WPS! It's like an echoing chamber with a thousand parrots in here.

      I was simply replying that the assumption that "WPA2, 63 characters pwd" is all you have to worry about is untrue. Many routers come defaulted with WPS on, and some don't even have an option to turn it off, so there are other things to worry about than just WPA2 when choosing or configuring a router. God damnit!

    13. Re:Oh come on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [Oh come on...] Do i really have to say it? Disable WPS first.
      Anyway, my point is very simple: without PSK you can do absolutely nothing. If you have a very strong PSK you don't even need to hide your SSID. Don't need to use MAC whitelisting. Don't have to shrink the IP range. And those techniques are useless anyway even simply against an "intermediate" wi-fi leech. If you are afraid of typing it everytime you have to connect say a new smartphone you're right but there's a cool trick i came up with: QR code. You generate one with the PSK, scan it with your phone, copy-paste the string in the wi-fi settings of your phone and you're in. Bam.

    14. Re:Oh come on... by lesincompetent · · Score: 1

      Goddammit i didn't login!

    15. Re:Oh come on... by fuzzywig · · Score: 1
      RTFA

      OP has disabled WPS.

  29. Sounds worse than a leech by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Wouldn't a leech just look for an open access point? One with a fast connection would be a bonus.

    Your interloper would seem to be doing something more nefarious. Why does a simple leech need an evil twin?

    Is your local constabulary at all competent in this sort of matters, or are they the kind that go around wardriving for open access points? Because it's gonna suck to try to explain the problem if they don't have a clue, but something's up, and to me it sounds like something leaning toward the criminal.

    I think I'd get the directional antenna. Maybe you're dealing with the neighbor's 12 year old, so just alerting the parents could do the trick. If it's your local psycho, that's another story.

    --
    I am not a crackpot.
    1. Re:Sounds worse than a leech by gstoddart · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Is your local constabulary at all competent in this sort of matters

      Do you seriously need to ask this?

      Have you seen any evidence anywhere that the local police are knowledgeable or interested in such things? If so, where?

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    2. Re:Sounds worse than a leech by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1

      Is your local constabulary at all competent in this sort of matters...?.

      It sort of depends. If they had a department that was set up for these sort of affairs (perhaps some political force required them to set it up?) then they might have dedicated resources waiting for a phone call from you to break the tedium.

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    3. Re:Sounds worse than a leech by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 2, Informative

      Come to Australia. You might accidentally get killed from the local fauna, but there are some very intelligent people in the constab. They're not all on the streets running the breathalysers, perhaps, but the ones I've dealt with actually show up if you report you heard a gun shot, and ask questions as if they're thinking about your answers, rather than just recording them. It's almost as if they require the ability to think from their troops. I'm originally from Los Angeles, and the contrast between the two police cultures seems pretty dramatic to me.

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    4. Re:Sounds worse than a leech by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 1

      I'd probably still file a police report. That way, if the leech has been doing something illegal through your connection you'll have evidence in the police records that it wasn't you.

      --
      Not a sentence!
    5. Re:Sounds worse than a leech by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      Be happy to live in a country where not everyone walks around shooting guns, so hearing gunfire is actually something special that warrants a closer look by the authorities.

  30. Change the SSID by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    To FBI surveillance van.

    1. Re:Change the SSID by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and setup a second ssid called 'you spelled surveillance wrong' (you must spell it wrong for the first ssid)

    2. Re:Change the SSID by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is someone in my building with this exact SSID ....

    3. Re:Change the SSID by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd go with a more modern "FBI surveillance drone" if we're going for maximum effect.

    4. Re:Change the SSID by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or just "FUCK OFF"

    5. Re:Change the SSID by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Flowers
      By
      Irene

    6. Re:Change the SSID by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Works on your own mifi device at Starbucks. Just wait a few mins and everyone who comes in starts looking put the door.

    7. Re:Change the SSID by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      randomly put in their house number! "you are at 123 main street"

    8. Re:Change the SSID by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what mine already is (:

      FBI Surveillance Van #3141

    9. Re:Change the SSID by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This stopped being funny 10 years ago.

    10. Re:Change the SSID by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To FBI surveillance van.

      I was once searching for a WiFi signal at Indy International Airport and came across this, gave me quite the chuckle. Also found one very near by called 'THIS AIN'T YO WIFI NIGGA'

  31. MAC Filter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    set up a MAC address filter

  32. lock it down by Nex6 · · Score: 1

    i would, lock everything down. starting with wpa2 with a really long random string, I would even change the wireless network SSID to a random string.
    (part of the crypto use the ssid in the hash)

    I would add, mac address auth, change all my DHCP settings. and even hide my network.

    just to start, off the top of my head....

    -Nex6

    1. Re:lock it down by tftp · · Score: 1

      i would, lock everything down. starting with wpa2 with a really long random string, I would even change the wireless network SSID to a random string. (part of the crypto use the ssid in the hash). I would add, mac address auth, change all my DHCP settings. and even hide my network.

      And once you do all of the above, pull the Ethernet cable out of the router. The attacker will have to go through all this pain just to discover that detail :-)

    2. Re:lock it down by maxwells_deamon · · Score: 1

      go to your local 2nd hand store and buy 10 barely working routers and configure them randomly with as tight security as you can. Do not hook any of them to the internet but hook them to some of those timers they sell for people who go on vacation but want there lamps to turn on and off. but with the same MAC address (if possible) and same hidden SSID They will all be POS routers that in addition to power cycling randomly will be crashing every so often. you might be able to set them up with MAC filtering on all mac addresses if you really want to have fun. Or install a version of an open source wireless router OS but edit the code first so that it is deliberately broken and install on a router.

      If you have a spare computer you can set up a web server that only serves a copy of the Google home page. Or perhaps the FBI computer fraud page to any http request on these routers.

      Ideally though, you need to stop this guy before he attracts the authorities to you through your service provider by doing some thing illegal. even if that means shutting down all wireless networks or setting up shielding.

  33. If you find him... by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you find him, give him props and buy him a beer and ask him to share how he's doing what he's doing with you. Sounds like some pretty cool shit.

    --
    -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    1. Re:If you find him... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      And THEN break his legs.

      Right?

    2. Re:If you find him... by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 2

      And THEN break his legs.

      Right?

      Well, as far as stealing Wi-Fi? Nah... as far as that problem is concerned, I'd leave a throttled open access point, label it "guest" and call it a day.

      The Evil Twin... that could be a lot more sinister. If he's engaging in identity theft against your family, then yeah, but break his fingers, not his legs. Still use social engineering on him first and learn, though.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    3. Re:If you find him... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And ask him if he's ever seen Pulp Fiction. Just keep in mind which beer has the roofies in it.

    4. Re:If you find him... by adolf · · Score: 1

      Well, as far as stealing Wi-Fi? Nah... as far as that problem is concerned, I'd leave a throttled open access point, label it "guest" and call it a day.

      This. I recently wrenched my router (using a build of Tomato) into having a rate-limited, free/open SSID named "Free. Be nice." on its own VLAN.

      It works well. Folks use it from time to time.

      I give them enough bandwidth to do browsing and maybe some low-res Youtube, with their own QoS class that puts their use in the backseat to my own. (Torrents would not be fun through this pipe, and that's OK with me.)

      I log HTTP requests on that SSID and nothing nefarious has ever appeared (and the logs themselves are stored in RAM, and expire after a few days). If things ever start looking fishy or abusive, it's gone.

    5. Re:If you find him... by awacs · · Score: 1

      As Tom Clancy put it, "it's not how many fingers you break, it's how you work the broken bones that matters."

    6. Re:If you find him... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the correct answer is break his hands and probably his feet incase his a toe typer.

    7. Re:If you find him... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course not. Break his fingers so he can't type for a while...

  34. start knocking on doors by radiumsoup · · Score: 5, Funny

    start knocking on doors and asking your neighbors if they would mind terribly if you spoke with their 15 year old son for a few minutes, because you've determined he's been hacking your wifi. Eventually, you'll hit the right house. For the wrong houses, act confused and say you must have miscalculated by a house or two, and that you're sorry. Bring cookies to show you're not an ass, though.

    1. Re:start knocking on doors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Ah yeah ... bring cookies to the neighbours and ask if they've got a 15-year old.

      Well, that solves the problem of getting the cops interested.

    2. Re:start knocking on doors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, bring candy and ask to speak with their 15-year-old son. It helps if you have a small moustache.

    3. Re:start knocking on doors by houghi · · Score: 3, Funny

      I did that once: looking for a 15 year old boy. I must say, Chris Hansen is a nice guy and very understanding once I explained the misunderstanding.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    4. Re:start knocking on doors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bring cookies to show you're not an ass, though.

      But they might not all be Republicans. Have hash brownies in the other pocket.

    5. Re:start knocking on doors by brantondaveperson · · Score: 1

      That's right, go door to door with cookies and ask to speak to children. Good idea.

    6. Re:start knocking on doors by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      If he turns out to be big and scary, then you need to bring Penny with you.

  35. Filter your MAC addresses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like to limit the devices that are allowed to connect to my router to only the MAC addresses that I have selected. It's a little extra work to setup but does provide some additional security (unless of course the culprit decides to spoof one of your MAC address as well).

  36. Some ideas by Proudrooster · · Score: 3, Informative

    Lock incoming connections down by MAC address and disable your SSID. This will probably make them go away. Also, run WPA2+AES and pick a longish WIFI key.

    If you have an ASUS Dark Knight router you can setup multiple SSIDs (guest networks) that disconnect every 60 seconds and name them "StopStealingMyWifi". This way you real SSID is hidden and your multiple guest networks are visible, but are unusable. You can also set hours of operations for your radios on the ASUS and turn off your radios at night and when you are not home. Lastly, if you are running dual band, turn off the 2.4 Ghz and run on the 5Ghz band. The 5Ghz signal travels poorly outside your home. WIFI is tough to secure with all of the WIFI hacking tools, but get a good router and rotate shield frequencies and should go away.

    Lastly, here is an article on the subject.... this article disagrees with me on disabling your SSID and I am sure others will have an opinion....
    http://www.wikihow.com/Secure-Your-Wireless-Home-Network

    1. Re:Some ideas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As I'm sure somebody else will point out, SSID hiding won't hide the fact that the network is there. The only good thing that you mentioned is turning off your wifi at night, but that's not necessarily a real solution (servers and such like to do things at night, however if you're running servers off of wifi and they are at all important there's something wrong with you anyways).

    2. Re:Some ideas by jkflying · · Score: 1

      Even if the SSID is disabled it is still easy to sniff the name.

      --
      Help I am stuck in a signature factory!
    3. Re:Some ideas by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 1

      We have a choice between two options. One, leaving your SSID on, provides no security. Turning it off provides low security through obscurity. Security through obscurity alone is bad, yes, but in this case it's better than nothing AND security through obscurity is OK as long as you use it in conjunction with other, non-obscure-based methods of security.

    4. Re:Some ideas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Knock up a cron job to change your WPA2 key every 24 hours. Use a QR code generator to print out the code on paper for your new key every morning, so you can just snap it with your phone and you're on. He'll get bored of trying to break something that changes faster than he can break it, and he'll move onto someone else.

      Agree also with disabling wireless at the times he uses it, and when you're not, if this is feasible for your lifestyle.

      And 5GHz also sounds sensible.

      If you do find out who he is, change your SSID to *his* name and address. That should freak him a bit.

    5. Re:Some ideas by vux984 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No. In this case it is irrelevant. The attacker has already demonstrated relatively sophisticated attacks. We are well past SSID broadcast as being remotely relevant.

      He is using tools that will find your network regardless of whether SSID is on or off. There is no point in inconveniencing yourself.

      Its the equivalent of trying to hide by putting on dark clothes and a hat when you already know your pursuer is using infrared, passive sonar, and motion sensors to find you.

    6. Re:Some ideas by Carnildo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The techniques you describe will be effective against someone who just wants free Internet access, but if they're attacking for any other reason, it's like going into a bar in the bad part of town and proclaiming how tough you are: it does nothing to improve your safety, but makes you a much more attractive target.

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    7. Re:Some ideas by jon3k · · Score: 1

      Someone is smart enough to attack WPS but you think not broadcasting the SSID will stop them? Ooooookie dokie.....

    8. Re:Some ideas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If this guy is doing deauth attacks, SSID spoofing is pointless. When you can put your wifi radio in RFmon mode, you not only reveal any SSID as soon as a client automatically makes a request and associates within range, but in RFmon, you can see a list of all MAC addresses connected to a given access point as the 802.11 frames are always in the clear.
      Both ideas are pointless with someone that has skills.

      WPA2 enterprise with AES is the only way to go.

    9. Re:Some ideas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it even possible to "break" WPA2 keys except for brute force?

      If not then a normal 63 character completely random password should be secure enough without the hassle of changing it every day.

    10. Re:Some ideas by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Almost everyone is doing it for free wifi. It's probably just a kid who downloaded some scripts to help crack things.

      Also I think a goal might not be to just prevent your own wifi from being stolen, but to keep the perpetrator from leeching from other neighbors as well. If it is just a kid then talking with their parents will probably stop it for good.

    11. Re:Some ideas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Lock incoming connections down by MAC address and disable your SSID."

      If an attacker is already attempting to break WPS, these measures are worse then useless. They'll create admin overhead for the owner, without appreciably slowing an attacker. Particularly the hide SSID suggestion. That's just plain stupid to keep regurgitating that at this point in time.

    12. Re:Some ideas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Disabling your SSID does nothing to someone who's this dedicated. Eventually you will sniff out the SSID (when you rejoin the network for instance.) Same thing for mac address lockouts (He'll just steal your phone's Mac address after you leave.)

      Set a strong WPA2 PSK and change your SSID/PSK a couple times over a month. He'll go away when he can't bruteforce the first couple of them. By changing the PSK and the SSID he can't generate a strong rainbow table, and if he's started doing so you just wasted his time twice.

    13. Re:Some ideas by http · · Score: 1

      If you do find out who he is, change your SSID to *his* name and address. That should freak him a bit.

      I love you. I would give up my first cup of coffee for you. I already did, and you owe me a new keyboard.

      --
      If opportunity came disguised as temptation, one knock would be enough.
      3^2 * 67^1 * 977^1
    14. Re:Some ideas by pacman+on+prozac · · Score: 1

      The problem with hiding the SSID is not so much how it affects the wireless network but how it affects the wireless client machines.

      Once joined to that WLAN, the machine will broadcast probes containing that SSID everywhere it goes.

      That may also leave the clients open to MITM if an attacker sets up another AP with the same SSID. Not sure if this works in practice.

  37. Whitelist!? by dittbub · · Score: 0

    I use a MAC filter whitelist. You can too :)

    1. Re:Whitelist!? by jon3k · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And I can also spoof MAC addresses. MAC filtering is about 1/100th of a secure wireless network.

    2. Re:Whitelist!? by dittbub · · Score: 1

      but you'd have to know the mac address!?

    3. Re:Whitelist!? by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      Yes, but they are transmitted in cleartext every time one of your devices connects to it.

    4. Re:Whitelist!? by PlusFiveTroll · · Score: 1

      Don't try to explain, dittbub develops DRM for the MPAA.

    5. Re:Whitelist!? by dittbub · · Score: 1

      i do no such thing!

  38. Use a VPN over your Wi-Fi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let the Wi-Fi network only provide access to your VPN server -- no direct Internet access. This way, getting into the Wi-Fi has not (yet) led to any useful connectivity. Use strong passwords and encryption to prevent the VPN layer from being broken as well.

    1. Re:Use a VPN over your Wi-Fi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No access to the internet... Check

      In most home devices, full access to your LAN and the hosts within it... yeah

  39. Stealing Electricity by CambodiaSam · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If someone had an extension cord plugged into my outside outlet and it ran to their house to steal power, I would walk over, knock on the door, and ask them to stop it. And yes, I would also unplug it.

    If you have the means to determine where they are it's worth asking them to stop. That alone might change their attitude toward poking at networks.

    1. Re:Stealing Electricity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The confrontation can go like this: Darn it! You are intercepting my signal! The reply: Keep your nasty signal off my property.
                          This entire issue would vanish if free, unlimited net access was standard everywhere. Much of what people want to describe as privacy or property issues is nonsense. think of it this way. You want to make music for money so you decide to broadcast your music but then control how or when people make use of that music. It does not hold water. An exact comparison is a stunning young woman wearing a string bikini at the beach and then whining that the wrong guys are looking at them. The net is not meant to be a business opportunity. The arts in general are not about business unless corrupted. PBS manages to air decent programs without demanding payment. But CBS can not. So who deserves to persist?

    2. Re:Stealing Electricity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you could plug it into 220v and roast hot dogs over the embers of their house.

    3. Re:Stealing Electricity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you pay a flat rate for your Internet connection and bandwidth per month, or do you get charged based on how many bytes/packets you send?

      Do you pay a flat rate for your electricity (perhaps you collect it all through solar cells and wind turbines and have an excess), or do you get charged based on how many Watts you use?

      Of course, in your example, there's also an unsightly extension cord; but with Mr. Tesla I might be willing to share excess green energy.

    4. Re:Stealing Electricity by anorlunda · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of the Steven Wright line:

      "In my house there's this light switch that doesn't do anything. Every so often I would flick it on and off just to check. Yesterday, I got a call from a woman in Germany. She said, "Cut it out.""

    5. Re:Stealing Electricity by argee · · Score: 1

      I had a neighbor kept doing that; plugging my outside outlet.

      I went to the breaker box, disconnected the green wire,
      and then moved the white wire to the other hot (red) and
      fed 220volts to them. Few hours later I put it all back
      together.

      A night or two later, the extensions (about 200') had been
      rolled up.

    6. Re:Stealing Electricity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd unplug their extension cord, plug it into a step-up convertor and/or higher voltage outlet for them. Whatever they had hooked up wouldn't stand for double voltage very long.

    7. Re:Stealing Electricity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unplug it, then cut the cable at your property boundry.

    8. Re:Stealing Electricity by PlusFiveTroll · · Score: 1

      yank as much cable as you can from them, damn cords are expensive these days, cord cost would quickly exceed stolen power costs. I'd give it to someone else though so they didn't try to accuse me of theft.

    9. Re:Stealing Electricity by WickedLilMonkies · · Score: 1

      Why? Just plug it (via an adapter) into a 220 outlet and watch the fireworks.

  40. Scanning Software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Use any scanning utility on your laptop and walk around the neighborhood until you find him.

  41. Daily disconnects by A+Friendly+Troll · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I noticed that I kept intermittently getting disconnected at around the same time every day (indicative of a WPA deauthentication handshake capture attempt).

    No, that is only indicative of perfectly normal behaviour in most of the world, since your connection is reset (and your IP changed) every 24 hours.

    1. Re:Daily disconnects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Learn how DHCP renewal works.

      Just because your ISP is broken doesn’t mean the protocol is

      https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2131#page-17

    2. Re:Daily disconnects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your IP changes every 24 hrs? Not in my experience it doesn't. Most ISP's keep your IP the same for ease of administration.

      Why would they change your IP address?

    3. Re:Daily disconnects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What part of most of the world are you in?
      In most of my world I don't disconnect for weeks, only for windows updates, or leaving the country.

    4. Re:Daily disconnects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So they can charge you more for a static address...

    5. Re:Daily disconnects by grantspassalan · · Score: 1

      If I turn my modem off and then on again, I get a new IP address each time. As long as the modem remains on, the IP never changes.

      --
      A sufficiently advanced simulation is indistinguishable from reality.
    6. Re:Daily disconnects by jakimfett · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily. It depends on how often his network is set to lease out IP addresses. I can set my router for anywhere from 1 minute to 999 days.

      --
      Bits of code, random ramblings: jakimfett.com
    7. Re:Daily disconnects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a customer of XTRA, the ISP wing of New Zealand's (abusive) monopolist phone carrier.

      When we hooked up, we asked if they did static IPs. The girl on the phone had no idea what we were asking. Eventually, we found someone who did, and they said "Yes," and it was something like $20/month for a static IP. We told them that we weren't going to pay that much for a one-off change.

      I have the same IP today as I did when I signed up, more than a year ago.

    8. Re:Daily disconnects by PlusFiveTroll · · Score: 1

      I'm a customer of XTRA, the ISP wing of New Zealand's (abusive) monopolist phone carrier.

      When we hooked up, we asked if they did static IPs. The girl on the phone had no idea what we were asking. Eventually, we found someone who did, and they said "Yes," and it was something like $20/month for a static IP. We told them that we weren't going to pay that much for a one-off change.

      I have the same IP today as I did when I signed up, more than a year ago.

      Most ISPs keep your same IP if your MAC on the CPE doesn't change (or at least till the power goes out at their head end). That said, at one point the ISP I worked for was out of IPs in a cable block and you may have kept your DHCP address for a day. So it can very greatly on the circumstances.

  42. go to CAT 5 by alen · · Score: 2

    you can defeat almost every trick like mac filtering or limiting dhcp scope

    your best bet is to go back to wired and not send your data over radio waves

    1. Re:go to CAT 5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Our use VPN and encrypt traffic on the Wireless Firewall all ports except the ones you need and use Squid rediection. If you can determine browser (Sniffer/Snort) he is using you can block access to those browsers using squid, or just permit the browsers you use. You can also put bandwidth restrictions (possible using his MAC address or other fiters) so it appears the wireless is open, but painfully slow. You can also keep changing the SSID and password every day or every few hours so it gets fustrating.Try moving the Access point to different locations in the home perhaps you find a sweet spot that he can't use but works fine for you. Power off the device when your not using it. or set up one of those lamp timers so that its only on when your at home using it. Use Snort/Squid to identify the web sites he visits and block access to those (its unlikely your visiting the same ones).

    2. Re:go to CAT 5 by monkeyhybrid · · Score: 1

      Ethernet cables are great for desktop PCs, not quite so nice for laptops, and utterly useless for smartphones and tablets.

  43. options by ags1 · · Score: 1

    1) Drop the power on the AP so the signal can't reach the neighbor. 2) Turn off wifi security, route all traffic to a vpn server, require all connections to route through a vpn server. 3) Use ethernet.

  44. Let him connect by sjames · · Score: 2

    Transparently redirect everything to goatse.

    1. Re:Let him connect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Why do you want to give him webmail?

    2. Re:Let him connect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because it's a nice address?

  45. WPA2-Enterprise by Rinisari · · Score: 3, Informative

    * Use enterprise auth to a RADIUS server with an LDAP backend?
    * Lower the transmit power to something that just works within your place?
    * Use just A or just B or just N? Maybe they're on older tech?
    * Configure your router not to well, route. Use it as just an AP and you have to manually set the IP info on your machines, and the router is not *.*.*.1 on the network.
    * Do the above, but use an external VPN for all of your traffic. A static route in the router gets you onto the VPN.
    * Change your SSID to something threatening to indicate that you're onto them and that you asked Slashdot how to make them stop?

    1. Re:WPA2-Enterprise by Laser_47 · · Score: 1

      I agree with all of these, especially the enterprise auth. I'd use 802.1x with EAP-TLS and implement certificates that you can revoke if they're cracked. A lot of work to set up a PKI, but might be worth it.

      With as much of a jerk this guy is, you should make sure to implement additional security such as IPSec or a DMZ that is only accessable via a VPN on any file storage systems that you have to prevent them from accessing or destroying personal data. More work, but probably more worth it if you have important data.

      None of this will stop the deauth packets, but implementing 802.11w (2009) should help with that. Linux should be able to support it, Windows will require Win 8, and I don't know how many mobile devices implement it.

    2. Re:WPA2-Enterprise by vux984 · · Score: 1

      I'd use 802.1x with EAP-TLS and implement certificates that you can revoke if they're cracked. A lot of work to set up a PKI, but might be worth it.

      And what about your ipod touch/ipad/nexus/ tablet? Nintendo DS / 3DS? and Xbox/PS3/Wii/Wii-U?

      Everytime I look at adding a more advanced wireless security system, I look at that list of devices and give up. The kids DS's won't even do better than WEP; so that's now on a separate access point entirely that we only turn on when they use their DS.

    3. Re:WPA2-Enterprise by Laser_47 · · Score: 1

      iOS and Android devices support EAP-TLS, then wire any devices that you can such as the game systems (less certs to manage anyway), and do exactly what you describe for anything that can only do WEP if it's required. The extra AP should probably be in a different VLAN so that it only has access to what it needs, and doesn't allow a hole to something else in the network. Although, this is similar to puting a simple padlock on the bank vault door because the manager can't remember the combination.

      If security is convienent for you, then it's easy for the hackers. In order to make it difficult for the hackers, the lowest security level has to be raised, and it will become inconvienent for you. That's the trade-off.

      This neighbor sounds like he has it out for this guy, and escalated it into a turf war. It's probably only going to end by this guy giving up and wiring everything, or creating a fortress. Since he's asking on slashdot, he's probably looking to do the latter.

    4. Re:WPA2-Enterprise by PlusFiveTroll · · Score: 1

      * Configure your router not to well, route. Use it as just an AP and you have to manually set the IP info on your machines, and the router is not *.*.*.1 on the network.

      useless: he probably runs Nmap on the connected net first thing anyway.

    5. Re:WPA2-Enterprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      * Use [...] just N?

      THIS.

      This is by far the best advice in this thread. I've used some of these attack tools, and they're clunky pieces of crap code with uneven wifi chip support and lots of quirks---when they do work, they barely work. Not supporting current standards for half a decade after they become common is an actual weakness of the attack tools.

      * Use enterprise auth to a RADIUS server with an LDAP backend?

      This is less good advice because, aside from being really hard, the Evil Twin attack might be able to defeat it. I'm not sure, though.

    6. Re:WPA2-Enterprise by bhiestand · · Score: 1

      * Configure your router not to well, route. Use it as just an AP and you have to manually set the IP info on your machines, and the router is not *.*.*.1 on the network.

      useless: he probably runs Nmap on the connected net first thing anyway.

      On all of 10.*.*.*? even I would not go that far...

      --
      SWM seeks new sig for a brief fling
    7. Re:WPA2-Enterprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As far as I know, none of the portable consoles support either Ethernet or any form of EAP, including the Nintendo DS/3DS and the PlayStation Portable/Vita. You either need to set up a separate network for the portable consoles (which you could only turn on when needed, though that may get a bit annoying) or never connect them to the Internet at home.

    8. Re:WPA2-Enterprise by dririan · · Score: 1

      This is less good advice because, aside from being really hard, the Evil Twin attack might be able to defeat it. I'm not sure, though.

      If you use EAP-TLS or EAP-TTLS the station should complain that the RADIUS server's certificate is not valid. Most of the other EAP schemes have similar security precautions.

  46. WPA2 with PSK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Change your WAP to WPA2 with a long preshared key.
    If you can, also convert to IPv6, that oughta throw him for a loop :)
    Use UTP where you can and turn off your wifi when not in use.

  47. Be enlightened by Kohath · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Change your SSID to "Do_not_steal_my_WiFi". It's the enlightened approach -- the same approach that the "Gun Free Zone" and "Drug Free Zone" people use. Only backward, ignorant people would disagree.

    1. Re:Be enlightened by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Me: Is this a Drug free zone?
      You: Yes, yes it is.

      Me: Great! I'll take 5 grams of your finest stuff.

    2. Re:Be enlightened by SampleFish · · Score: 1

      Your misplaced self assurance is unsettling at best. I'm honestly surprised that preemptively attacking the next challenging statement has worked for you this long on Slashdot. I will dare to disagree with both your solution and the assertion that there is no other intelligent point of view. You must be a troll because nobody would actually believe this. I will now take the troll bait for a run. Keep out signs are an invitation to trespass. It makes the trespass more appealing. Saying "Can't" and "Don't" are challenges often met with much vigor. Some people go out of their way to do drugs in the "Drug Free Zone". Although it would be nice if your solution was viable I must inform you that the world you live in does not work the way you think it should. To be enlightened you must first understand the world around you.

    3. Re:Be enlightened by Kohath · · Score: 1

      To be enlightened you must first understand the world around you.

      And then reject it, and then imagine a better world, and then assert that the rules of the imagined world are the real rules, and then attack anyone who disagrees those are the real rules. People who disagree just love the bad world. Because they are backward and ignorant. And also probably racists.

      Can I have a government grant now?

    4. Re:Be enlightened by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps "Say_hello_to_my_little_friend" would be a better essid?

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AVQ8byG2mY8

    5. Re:Be enlightened by SampleFish · · Score: 1

      Mr. Speaker, I'm afraid the council does not have any more funds left for magical thinking. We spent that allowance on the gun control bill.

    6. Re:Be enlightened by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I disagree

  48. Give him a warning by gman003 · · Score: 1

    Rename your SSID to "if you don't stop trying to hack in, I will call the police" (or whatever will fit). That should be enough of a hint.

    1. Re:Give him a warning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please log off of Slashdot. If you are not bright enough to realize that is simply an invitation to try harder, then you are not a nerd.

    2. Re:Give him a warning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, I picked a funny SSID from a slashdot post -- "FreeViruses".

      Someone kept knocking over my network, and eventually an "evil twin" appeared. Now I'm back to Linksys1234.

    3. Re:Give him a warning by indeterminator · · Score: 1

      Rename your SSID to "if you don't stop trying to hack in, I will call the police" (or whatever will fit). That should be enough of a hint.

      Intimidation by SSID might work but the direction of approach may be wrong. Here's some SSIDs I wouldn't try to free ride on:

      House of Anal Pain
      SiegHeil45
      NRA-nut
      MC <insert your local variety here>

    4. Re:Give him a warning by gman003 · · Score: 1

      No, I was thinking of when I tried to do this. Due to complicated reasons, I couldn't get internet at my apartment for several months - literally, I could not even pay for it when I tried. So I leeched off a neighbor with unsecured wifi - along with nearly everyone in the complex, judging by the speeds. So I tried cracking some of the closer ones, hoping for a maintainable connection.

      If one of the networks I tried to break into had spontaneously renamed itself into a warning, I would have taken it as "damn, got caught - no luck here". Probably would have sent an anonymous, technical apology (rename the evil twin to "Sorry - just trying to get a connection"?) and moved on to the next network.

    5. Re:Give him a warning by PlusFiveTroll · · Score: 1

      SSID: "IPTABLES -R FUN"

  49. Turn it off and go wired. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They won't be able to leach.

  50. Not the Cops. by godel_56 · · Score: 1

    It's obvious that the local police would be useless, but what about the FCC or the FBI if this character's actions are so extensive?

    1. Re:Not the Cops. by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1

      Rename your SSID to "LegalAid". If The Law ain't scary, The Lawyers are.

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
  51. Disable SSID Broadcast by Laebshade · · Score: 0
    1. Re:Disable SSID Broadcast by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      This. And then change the SSID to a long random string.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    2. Re:Disable SSID Broadcast by Jackazz · · Score: 1

      Nerd card status: Revoked.

    3. Re:Disable SSID Broadcast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Disable SSID broadcast.

      That doesn't help anything. You just end up with your PC broadcasting your router's SSID instead.

      Set up WPA2 PSK with a random 63 character passphrase. Set up your devices to connect only to your router using this key, and nothing else. Then you are done with security (until someone finds a critical weakness in WPA2 I suppose...)

      Then you can have the balls to broadcast your SSID of "Linksys" with the biggest antenna you can find.

  52. Change Password by pellik · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Brute force attacks take time, lots of time. Just start changing your key every week and he will probably go away. Having your computer run 96 hours to get a password that then changes 72 hours later just isn't worth it, even for a criminal. If he keeps at it then someone just enjoys the challenge, and you should hunt them down just for the mystery.

    1. Re:Change Password by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Brute force attacks take time, lots of time. Just start changing your key every week and he will probably go away. Having your computer run 96 hours to get a password that then changes 72 hours later just isn't worth it, even for a criminal.

      Or you could just switch to WPA2 and generate a random 63-char once and be done with it for a long while.

    2. Re:Change Password by Provocateur · · Score: 1

      just for the mystery

      Don't forget to drive around in a van with a big dog and a teener with some chin stubble.

      --
      WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
  53. something the local police can help me with? by Michael+Woodhams · · Score: 1

    Why ask us this? Why not ask them?

    --
    Quattuor res in hoc mundo sanctae sunt: libri, liberi, libertas et liberalitas.
  54. Obligatory XKCD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://xkcd.com/341/

  55. Allow access... by jameshofo · · Score: 2

    well depending on the level of control you have, I'd grant them access and then just blackhole the traffic. The lecher will eventual self discriminate.

    --
    Good leaders run toward problems, bad leaders hide from them.
  56. Its time for WPA-Enterprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Honestly unless you want to start getting really in depth with your tracking skills its time to move to WPA with certificates.. I'm not sure if any of the home routers have firmware's that you can load up that will allow for WPS with certificates. Youll have to setup a CA and the like but hey your on slashdot so I'm sure you've got the basic knowledge of how to search for a solution.

    As for enforcement this particular individual is committing a felony (if you live in the US) and the local law enforcement may be interested if you can get to their cyber crime department.

    on a side note you could just play games with him setup a honeypot or maybe the classic squid upside down web pages.

  57. the only security is a hardline by dgoldman · · Score: 1

    Not the answer you want but I'd ditch the wireless thing altogether.
    You got savvy hostiles. Is it really worth the fight and uncertainty?

    1. Re:the only security is a hardline by idontgno · · Score: 1

      That's a good point. Unfortunately, even if you could plug an RJ-45 into a tablet, the cable's a damn tripping hazard as you carry the thing around the house.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
  58. I don't get it by chord.wav · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Some neighbor comes in good faith and opens his digital life to you, so you can MITM him and this is how you react? That is rude man. I think that guy deserves an apology sent from one of his social networks accounts.

    1. Re:I don't get it by hAckz0r · · Score: 1

      Setting up an SSL proxy and borrowing his sessions to his bank account, Amazon, Buy.com sessions could be quite fun. Wait until things start showing up on his doorstep, like a brand new WiFi router. He'll get the point.

    2. Re:I don't get it by Rockoon · · Score: 2

      This is what I came here to say. Get this guys facebook/twitter/email credentials and have some serious serious fun.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    3. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, because he probably hasn't heard of tor.

    4. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is what I came here to say. Get this guys facebook/twitter/email credentials and have some serious serious fun.

      Me too. Nothing beats posting his credentials on his own streams.

  59. This problem was solved long ago by Stephen+Gilbert · · Score: 1

    Put the leech on the Upside-Down-Ternet.

    1. Re:This problem was solved long ago by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1

      You know, I like the blurry internet better.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    2. Re:This problem was solved long ago by bughunter · · Score: 1

      You know, I like the blurry internet better.

      There's an easier way to accomplish that than hacking his Wifi.

      --
      I can see the fnords!
  60. Move to the country by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't have any neighbors in WiFi range.

    1. Re:Move to the country by __aaeihw9960 · · Score: 1
      I live in the country, I have wireless. I have two neighbors within one mile. One is Amish, he lives ~ 3/4 of a mile away. One is my uncle, he lives ~ 1/2 a mile away. I have a basic wireless router, which of course is only transmitting signal to about the edge of my yard. My uncle is CONVINCED that the internet on his phone is run through my wireless. I've told him that my connection is password protected (I'm paranoid). He is still convinced that the data he is receiving from his cell phone routes through my system first.

      The Amish, on the other hand, don't seem to notice my connection.

      Anyway, I agree - this is the only way to safely use wireless. Live where no one else does.

      Too bad the internet blows out here.

    2. Re:Move to the country by cantsleep · · Score: 1

      I used to be in your shoes. Then this happened down the road. Interestingly enough, with the NSA in town fiber connections are now pretty standard out in the 'country'.

  61. Giggle. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And people wonder why I ran cat6 all over my house and don't bother with wi-fi except for sporadic guests.

    1. Re:Giggle. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did that, but I still have a phone and laptop that are cumbersome to get wired internet to.

  62. Missing something... by Junta · · Score: 1

    What is wrong with WPA2 with long passphrase?

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  63. $10k by puddingebola · · Score: 3, Funny

    Place $10,000 in a cedar box with an Eisenhower Silver dollar. Include a photo of the person in question. Mail to General Delivery Attention: Teddy New York, NY 10001 No bodies, no witnesses, no questions. We're offering 2 for 1 on contract this week, just include an additional photo.

  64. Packet Adjustment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not set up a proxy and make all webpage requests go to something like Goatse?

  65. Be careful what you do by ALeader71 · · Score: 2

    Don't do anything which might give this guy a case to counter your actions. Set up a new WiFi router and move your equipment to this new system. Use a super long key. Something that will take him a long time to crack. See what happening on the 5Ghz side of things, and maybe move operations there.
    Then set up a little monitoring software and see what you can find out. Maybe you can discover who this person is, and send him a cease and desist letter. It's shocking and unexpected. Log everything with date/time stamps in case the leech attempts a confrontation, but that's unlikely to happen.

    --
    Only the dead have seen the end of War. - Plato
    1. Re:Be careful what you do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're afraid of the leech suing you?
      Jesus christ, man up pussy.

  66. IPCop by Thinman · · Score: 1

    I have an IPCop server and the blue interface is connected to my wi-fi router. left the router with WAP and IPCop manage the mac address list.

  67. a few options, but annoying by datapharmer · · Score: 4, Informative

    So yes, I've dealt with it. The easy solution is go wired for a while, setup a honeypot and track them down. Once you know where they are let them know you are less than pleased and if they don't stop there will be a call to the FCC and local authorities as well as a civil suit for harassment. If you can't go wired Lower your ACK timing and transmit power so they can't get a good signal without standing on your doorstep. switch to a certificate based system instead of a password based system with a new ssid. On the new system setup a proxy that requires additional authentication to reach the internet. Assign static macs to your own devices and block all other local IPs via iptables to prevent them from self-assigning one. As for deauthentication attacks, the best bet is to find them and ans send over a nastygram.

    --
    Get a web developer
    1. Re:a few options, but annoying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dont get people suggesting mac or ip filtering. Do you assume changing mac is hard? Do you also think 2 stations with identical mac and ip addresses is impossible? Works just fine as long as you set up firewall to not send rsts for tcp traffic that doesnt belong to you and just use non tcp traffic.

    2. Re:a few options, but annoying by firesyde424 · · Score: 1

      You aren't married to a non-techy wife are you? Good God! My wife already complains about how long the wifi key is, this kind of thing might actually drive her insane! Actually, now that I think about it, I may try this later tonight.....

  68. Oh no! by Nukenbar · · Score: 2

    He found me.

  69. MAC Address Filtering by Coldeagle · · Score: 0

    If I were you, I would try implementing MAC Address filtering (basically you white list MAC Addresses that should be allowed to connect). This can be a pain when connecting new devices, but worth it from a security standpoint.

    I would also change your SSID and disable broadcast. Reducing transmit power may also help. If you don't have enough coverage with the reduced power, you could also go with power line adapter and setup another AP in the weak area.

    Oh and you can also try reducing your key regen time too. If you leave at the default 3600 seconds, then you're also giving him a longer time to try to breakin if he spoofs your mac.

    Finally, you can always go with static IP's or if your router is capable, setup DHCP to assign specific IP's to specific MAC Addresses.

    Hope this helps!

  70. Your options depend on your hardware by BlueBlade · · Score: 3, Informative

    Basically, there's nothing you can do if you keep using WPA.

    One option is to lower your wi-fi antenna power to exclude the area where the attacks are coming from. This can be hard to do if you need good coverage for a whole house or some such.

    Your best bet would be to use either 802.1x or EAP-PEAP. That's highly dependent on what router you're using, usually only high-end routers support these options, although some home routers certainly do (I remember the good old WAP54G supporting it). If you're going 802.1x, just setup a radius server, configure your devices and you're pretty much set. If you go the PEAP route, you'll need some certificates, and possibly a radius server unless you use client certificates for authentication.

    Both options will foil your wannabe hacker. Plus, you'll likely have the only advanced Wi-Fi setup around, gaining you geek creds ;)

    --
    Religion is the best example of mass psychosis
  71. Isn't there an OS box that'll solve this? by kwerle · · Score: 2

    Isn't there FreeBSD or Linux disk image that'll solve this?
    <WIFI> <=> [Router] < routes only to > [IP address of solution]
    Where the solution does something like the standard coffeeshop login +
    * Special account gets unlimited time & bandwidth
    * Non-special account needs to sign up every hour & gets diminishing bandwidth (if you want to allow visitors)

    Something like http://dev.wifidog.org/, but under active development?

    1. Re:Isn't there an OS box that'll solve this? by CanHasDIY · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Isn't there FreeBSD or Linux disk image that'll solve this?
      <WIFI> <=> [Router] < routes only to > [IP address of solution]
      Where the solution does something like the standard coffeeshop login +
      * Special account gets unlimited time & bandwidth
      * Non-special account needs to sign up every hour & gets diminishing bandwidth (if you want to allow visitors)

      Something like http://dev.wifidog.org/, but under active development?

      This, perhaps?

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    2. Re:Isn't there an OS box that'll solve this? by kwerle · · Score: 1

      This, perhaps?

      Uh. Nope. I'm looking for a disk image I could fire up on a tiny pc (or in a VM) that'd meter wifi...

    3. Re:Isn't there an OS box that'll solve this? by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      This, perhaps?

      Uh. Nope. I'm looking for a disk image I could fire up on a tiny pc (or in a VM) that'd meter wifi...

      DD-WRT or Tomato then?

      You could also consider rolling your own solution, if you have a particular program or suite of apps in mind; basically, just install the distro of your choice, install and configure your apps, then add them to cron.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    4. Re:Isn't there an OS box that'll solve this? by kwerle · · Score: 1

      Yeah - I don't happen to have one of those routers. Which is why I'd love to see a disk image.

      You could also consider rolling your own solution, if you have a particular program or suite of apps in mind; basically, just install the distro of your choice, install and configure your apps, then add them to cron.

      Right. But this seems like such an obvious and common problem - everyone has a router and many many geeks have a server box of some kind - that it seems like there should already be a pretty full-blown solution without my having to roll one.

    5. Re:Isn't there an OS box that'll solve this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      pfSense

      http://www.pfsense.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=40&Itemid=43

      Captive Portal

      Has some useful traffic shaping - why not allow them access at 44kb - like the good ol' days!

    6. Re:Isn't there an OS box that'll solve this? by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      Yeah - I don't happen to have one of those routers. Which is why I'd love to see a disk image.

      You could also consider rolling your own solution, if you have a particular program or suite of apps in mind; basically, just install the distro of your choice, install and configure your apps, then add them to cron.

      Right. But this seems like such an obvious and common problem - everyone has a router and many many geeks have a server box of some kind - that it seems like there should already be a pretty full-blown solution without my having to roll one.

      Let me see if I've got this right - you want a Linux-based blackbox that does exactly what you want it to do, but you're not willing to make it yourself, based on your perception that someone else should have already done the work for you?

      Methinks maybe you should just stick to Windows boxes.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    7. Re:Isn't there an OS box that'll solve this? by kwerle · · Score: 1

      Let me see if I've got this right - you want a Linux-based blackbox that does exactly what you want it to do, but you're not willing to make it yourself, based on your perception that someone else should have already done the work for you?

      Yeah. I can't be the first person to think this is a good idea...

      Methinks maybe you should just stick to Windows boxes.

      I don't have one of those. Do you think it'd help?

    8. Re:Isn't there an OS box that'll solve this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fon.com

    9. Re:Isn't there an OS box that'll solve this? by dru · · Score: 1

      I have used m0n0wall, and have been very happy with it. In fact, I think I'm going to revisit it this weekend.

      http://m0n0.ch/wall

    10. Re:Isn't there an OS box that'll solve this? by kwerle · · Score: 1

      Thank you so much! I knew someone had to have invented this wheel. Looks like just the ticket!

    11. Re:Isn't there an OS box that'll solve this? by kwerle · · Score: 1

      And just to answer your/my question - again:

      http://www.fsckin.com/2007/11/14/7-different-linuxbsd-firewalls-reviewed/
      summarizes 7 OS solutions that are exactly what I was looking for.

    12. Re:Isn't there an OS box that'll solve this? by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      Why didn't you say all you wanted was a firewall? I could have pointed you to 3 of them (PfSense, IPCop, and SmoothWall) right off the bat.

      I'm looking for a disk image I could fire up on a tiny pc (or in a VM) that'd meter wifi...

      Misunderstanding of scope, obviously - I assumed you meant that you wanted a distro that was specifically designed for wifi monitoring. Had I realized that you just wanted something that was capable of wireless monitoring, but not necessarily built for that specific purpose, this would have been a much shorter (and slightly less snarky) conversation.

      That said, I recommend PfSense based on personal preference, or IPCop for ease of use (haven't actually used it myself, but I hear good things).

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  72. You Are Not Your Brother's Keeper by CanHasDIY · · Score: 0

    Here's a novel concept - secure your network, then politely butt the fuck out of everyone else's business. It is not your job, duty, or right to administer the networks of other people, nor to hunt and/or harass an alleged leecher.

    IF, and only if, this person compromises your network (which would be your own fault, BTW), then you're welcome to redirect all traffic to goatse, or whatever.

    Seriously, whatever happened to the good ol' Amer'can spirit of, "Don't fuck with me, I won't fuck with you?"

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    1. Re:You Are Not Your Brother's Keeper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The other person has already gone the "fucking with you" route by changing his SSID name to serve as a trap.

      Turns out Americans get riled up when somebody fucks with them. I think it started when we got pissed at this King of England fellow.

    2. Re:You Are Not Your Brother's Keeper by CanHasDIY · · Score: 0

      The other person has already gone the "fucking with you" route by changing his SSID name to serve as a trap.

      You don't own that SSID. Nobody does.

      Enough with the hyperbole.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    3. Re:You Are Not Your Brother's Keeper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Different AC)
      I hope you realize that by being deliberately obtuse, you're only hurting any point you might have had.

    4. Re:You Are Not Your Brother's Keeper by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      (Different AC)
      I hope you realize that by being deliberately obtuse, you're only hurting any point you might have had.

      What you see as "deliberately obtuse," I see as pointing out the issues that result from a culture that exhorts and promotes people getting into the business of others.

      You apparently do not realize it, but this sort of behavior is precisely why we have so many goddamn stupid laws governing what we can or cannot do in the privacy of our own homes. I'm trying to fix that lack of understanding by bringing it to the forefront, so please try using your cognitive abilities instead of instantaneously writing off any opinion you don't necessarily agree with as 'obtuse.'

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  73. Letterbox drop: 'how to secure your wireless' by gnoshi · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There are two ways of dealing with this: getting this person off [i]your[/i] network, and getting this person off [i]everyone's[/i] network.
    Personally, I think if you can get everyone to squeeze him off their networks then that will probably be the nicest kind of vengeance.

    Consider writing up a simple letter (starting with: Just a note from a neighbor), detail that someone in the area has been breaking into wireless networks and may be pirating stuff/doing illegal things which could lead to difficulties for the actual owner of the OP. Then, provide a basic summary of what to do to avoid it (e.g. disable WPS, etc etc) and maybe even provide URLs for the major router manufacturers.
    With [i]some[/i] luck, [i]some[/i] people will pay attention and lock down their network.

    If you know who it is doing it (using handy phone apps to detect signal strength, or a directional antenna) then you could do a 'special' letterbox drop for that one person with a 'how to buy an internet connection'.

    Mind you, if this person is using an 'evil twin' they may be doing more than just stealing Wifi. If their MAC address is stable (i.e. they are not modifying it) you may want to capture some sample traffic with that included. If things do go awry you can use that to provide evidence it was that person's computer, possibly.

    1. Re:Letterbox drop: 'how to secure your wireless' by Idarubicin · · Score: 1

      Consider writing up a simple letter (starting with: Just a note from a neighbor), detail that someone in the area has been breaking into wireless networks and may be pirating stuff/doing illegal things which could lead to difficulties for the actual owner of the OP. Then, provide a basic summary of what to do to avoid it (e.g. disable WPS, etc etc) and maybe even provide URLs for the major router manufacturers.

      This is a cute idea, but I suspect it would be doomed to failure unless one is living in, say, a dorm at MIT or Caltech. Such a letter is going to at best confuse, and at worst scare the hell out of, any of your older, less technology-savvy, or limited-English-speaking neighbors.

      And honestly, one wonders how many poorly-secured access points there really are in the neighborhood, if the criminal is willing to go to so much effort to steal wifi from the Slashdot poster posing this question.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    2. Re:Letterbox drop: 'how to secure your wireless' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      unfortunately the neighbours will have no idea what you are talking about and will throw away the letter (or call you for support).

      While the OP might be ok, this is clearly able to happen to the next, less-techy guy

      OTH, this might just be someone trolling for content for their next book, or term paper :)

  74. Information by JustOK · · Score: 1

    Information wants to be free! Uh, where do you live?

    --
    rewriting history since 2109
  75. Don't figth it, be nice and live with it. by jbssm · · Score: 0

    Why do you try so hard to keep "your" net just for you, it's not like you are going to "run out" of it? I mean if it's really a big dent in your monthly budget just go to the guy and suggest to share its cost, if it's not, then just let him leech it, what the big problem with it?

    Just set up an alternate network with a different name, unprotected or with the password in it's name and a QoS that prioritizes the network you use for yourself all the time, and let the other people use what's left... you aren't loosing anything.

    P.S. Wasting the police time with this is just ridiculous... but perhaps that's cultural thing for me.

    1. Re:Don't figth it, be nice and live with it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well, for one thing, he's responsible for whatever said freeloader is doing on his network and that could lead to jail time or worse.

    2. Re:Don't figth it, be nice and live with it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes just let him leech all the kiddy porn and pirate material he wants, while you get stuck with a bill, bandwidth caps and a knock on the door from the police

      great idea dimwit

    3. Re:Don't figth it, be nice and live with it. by TheSkepticalOptimist · · Score: 1

      I wonder if the sentiment would be the same if someone was hacking your wife. I mean, why get married just to hope she won't cheat on you. Maybe the neighborhood should all just enjoy your wife as well. Its just a trite moral rule that married people shouldn't cheat on each other, you have nothing to lose.

      --
      I haven't thought of anything clever to put here, but then again most of you haven't either.
    4. Re:Don't figth it, be nice and live with it. by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 2

      So next you get a letter from the RIAA ask you to pay $300,000 for distribution of copyrighted files.

      Or the FBI comes SWAT team wanting to know about that kiddie porn....

    5. Re:Don't figth it, be nice and live with it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you try so hard to keep "your" net just for you, it's not like you are going to "run out" of it? I mean if it's really a big dent in your monthly budget just go to the guy and suggest to share its cost, if it's not, then just let him leech it, what the big problem with it?

      you have no idea what illegal activities he might end up using your internet access for and spending weeks in court arguing about how your IP doesn't identify you and how, yes, you were aware of other people accessing your network (to commit possibly illegal acts) but no you didn't do anything to protect your network and how you didn't do any of the record keeping required from ISPs (despite knowing that you were providing internet access to your neighborhood), ........ is at best not fun and will at worst not work out at all and land you in jail.

    6. Re:Don't figth it, be nice and live with it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Holy shit this is retarded.

      When the cops come because of kiddie porn, who do you think they're going to blame? The person who owns the network that this activity is traced to, or the 'mystery hacker' down the road?

      Your attitude of 'the internet should be free for everyone, man' is bullshit. I can do things with your connection that can get you arrested. Therefore, you owe it to yourself to lock me out of your connection.

      I bet you also make the argument that downloading a program you didn't pay for isn't stealing because nothing has been taken, don't you?

      Fucking kids these days.

    7. Re:Don't figth it, be nice and live with it. by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1

      Why do you try so hard to keep "your" net just for you, it's not like you are going to "run out" of it? I mean if it's really a big dent in your monthly budget just go to the guy and suggest to share its cost, if it's not, then just let him leech it, what the big problem with it?

      From the original question, it sounds like the perpetrator is up to more than just wifi leeching. There are less secure wifi setups in the neighborhood, why keep cracking the tough nut? And the evil twin? Just to get a wifi key? Something worse than bandwidth sharing is happening here.

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    8. Re:Don't figth it, be nice and live with it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      loosing

      Usually I have trouble pinpointing the exact moment where I stop taking someone seriously. Not this time.

    9. Re:Don't figth it, be nice and live with it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is that OP can go to prison, depending on what the leech does under OP's IP address.

    10. Re:Don't figth it, be nice and live with it. by vux984 · · Score: 1

      Yup. I'd say its either:

      a) a hacker in the classic sense that is learning his craft by breaking into the local networks just for the practice and thrills.

      b) something illegal. Identity theft, probing your network for something to steal, child porn consumption or distribution using your internet, etc.

    11. Re:Don't figth it, be nice and live with it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are not thinking at all. It IS "his" net feed---and it very much CAN be that he might "run out" of it. I'll try to explain it simply; here are 2 words which might sink in:
            Metered Access.
      Here are 2 more:
            Bandwidth Cap.
      And, just to be dickish, 2 more small words so you might get a clue:
              Illegal Downloads.

      I don't pay for my feed to have some dingus burn through my bandwidth per month. I seriously do not offer open WiFi so that some creepoid can start pulling movie torrents or MP3s or some kind of sick porn, and thus complicate my life with lawsuits or Lord knows what else.

    12. Re:Don't figth it, be nice and live with it. by toQDuj · · Score: 1

      Sure, Because Wifi is like my wife. Smooth simile.

      --
      Every experiment which ends in a big bang is a good experiment.
    13. Re:Don't figth it, be nice and live with it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, let an anonymous person who has already proven he is willing and able to break your security onto your network where he has more opportunities to break your security... what could possibly go wrong...

    14. Re:Don't figth it, be nice and live with it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be a problem for you if the leecher in question uses your network for illegal activities, such as attempting to invade some server, transferring child porn for example.

    15. Re:Don't figth it, be nice and live with it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why should we "be nice and live with it"?

      You probably have lots of food in your fridge but I doubt you let people just wander in and help themselves to it. Ditto for your electricity and cable TV. Ditto for your online bank accounts. The DMCA is a codified way of saying "if I go to the trouble of putting a lock on something, it's because I don't want you in there". It's not an open invitation to try and break the locks and, by the way, doing that to someone's front door is called "breaking and entering" - which is illegal.

      If my Netflix is stuttering because you're downloading multi-GB of pr0n over my access point you can be sure I'll tell you to bugger off in a most stern manner. No, I should not be expected to spend large amounts of time trying to preventing you stealing bandwidth. We have data caps so, yes, you are STEALING. You're rationalizing by suggesting that because something is cheap or there might (note: MIGHT) be an excess of it, then it must be okay to steal. Also note that some companies will quite happily terminate your employment for stealing BIC pens from the stationery cupboard. Not true. Not cool.

    16. Re:Don't figth it, be nice and live with it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean to tell me you have no issues with giving randoms the ability to look like you online?

      Guess what happens if one of these freeloaders decides to run new torrents, or worse, kiddie porn?

      Knock knock, Neo...

    17. Re:Don't figth it, be nice and live with it. by killkillkill · · Score: 1

      If someone were to run a couple of torrents on my network while I was streaming some HD video, I would indeed "run out" of it.

    18. Re:Don't figth it, be nice and live with it. by 1u3hr · · Score: 1

      b) something illegal. Identity theft, probing your network for something to steal, child porn consumption or distribution using your internet, etc.

      Anything that might actually get the police/FBI to act might have them break down your door. But within 24 hours they would break down his too. Anyone doing really illegal stuff wouldn't leech off a neighbour a hundred yards away as a proxy, he'd spend $5 a month and get an overseas VPN.

      If he's ever caught (and if he exists at all, and isn't just a totally made up story to generate slashdot hits, which is more than likely) he's just some jerk in his basement who thinks it's fun, but not doing anything more illegal online than you (aside from cracking your router, that is). This is basically a trivial neighbourhood dispute, like the guy who throws his cigarette butts in your yard as he works in his garden. Of course, in the wrong neighbourhood, that could get you killed....

    19. Re:Don't figth it, be nice and live with it. by grantspassalan · · Score: 1

      I run an open unprotected AP, which has been throttled down to a very low speed. It is good enough for an interloper to do a little surfing, but downloading any meaningful amount of data or watching a video is impractical. My other computers are all wired in to the network. Since it is not illegal to run an open AP, this gives me deniable plausibility, if some jerk is patient enough to download something illegal. I also turn the AP off entirely when it is not needed for a wireless only device like my iPad. I don't use the latter to download any big files.

      --
      A sufficiently advanced simulation is indistinguishable from reality.
    20. Re:Don't figth it, be nice and live with it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a fucking moronic dipshit.

    21. Re:Don't figth it, be nice and live with it. by grantspassalan · · Score: 1

      The courts here in the US are increasingly realizing that an IP address alone, without other evidence of wrongdoing is no longer good enough to justify a prosecution or civil case. Even the dumbest prosecutors are beginning to realize this. Throttling an open AP down to say 512 kb/s will allow checking of e-mail or a simple query to to Google, but will not allow the downloading of huge files or watching of video. The speed of such a connection is still considerably faster than dial-up, and therefore is plenty fast enough for receiving simple text files. No one will have the patience to sit in front of my house in a car for hours to downloads megabyte files onto a laptop. I download large files using a hardwired connection to my computers. Sometimes, when friends come over with their laptop, I connect them to my ethernet so that they can use my high-speed Internet connection as necessary for downloads. I turn off the AP entirely at night and when I'm not home.

      --
      A sufficiently advanced simulation is indistinguishable from reality.
    22. Re:Don't figth it, be nice and live with it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's great to be "nice," but the choice should be MINE, not 's. And this guy has shown that he is willing and able to break in regardless of a person's wishes, which in my mind shows malicious intent.

      Could it be some script kiddie or budding network genius, who is doing it to "learn how to do networking" by doing? Yes. But in that case, the prudent thing is to knock on doors and say "Hey, I'm studying networking and was wondering if it would be ok if I did some stuff with your network?" rather than just bashing in the back door metaphorically speaking. If nothing else, it demonstrates a sense of ethics that is sadly lacking.

      Yes, in an ideal world I would share my internet, and if someone WANTS access AND ASKS FOR IT I am glad to give it freely. But walking up and TAKING it is a different matter - which is removing MY CHOICE from the situation. YOU can choose how you want to deal with it FOR YOU, and your choice is right for you, but forcing that on me is antithetical to the ideals of a free and open society.

    23. Re:Don't figth it, be nice and live with it. by vux984 · · Score: 1

      Anyone doing really illegal stuff wouldn't leech off a neighbour a hundred yards away as a proxy, he'd spend $5 a month and get an overseas VPN.

      Criminal minds aren't really all the bright, that said, why not proxy off your neighbors wifi to the overseas VPN your paying for with your neighbors credit card...

      (and if he exists at all, and isn't just a totally made up story to generate slashdot hits, which is more than likely)

      Agreed; but you know what, this particular story has generated more comments and technical discussion than most, which is nice to see. If it were a hypothetical scenario instead of a real one it would be better if they were honest about it, but overall I've enjoyed this thread. Although I'm appalled at the poor advice being given -- mac filtering and turning off ssid broadcast vs an attack allegedly this sophisticated is like making sure the backyard gate is closed to secure your home against a SWAT.

      he's just some jerk in his basement who thinks it's fun, but not doing anything more illegal online than you (aside from cracking your router, that is)

      I tend to mostly agree. And it wouldn't be such a big deal if he was just cracking your router to leech off your internet. The sort of person who does that is the sort of person who, once on your lan will amuse himself by breaking into your computer next. (and given that he's inside the network you might well have poor passwords, open shares, and so on. Rummaging through your documents, pictures, email... slurp copies of anything remotely interesting, grab the notepad file/excel sheet/whatever with your passwords, the vpn credentials for the office, whatever... and then start rummaging around there too.

      It might be a simple "I want to leech some free internetz" but odds are if someone is going to that much trouble to get into your network they're going to rummage around ON YOUR NETWORK too with the same level of sophistication.

    24. Re:Don't figth it, be nice and live with it. by 1u3hr · · Score: 1

      Criminal minds aren't really all the bright, that said, why not proxy off your neighbors wifi to the overseas VPN your paying for with your neighbors credit card...

      A criminal who can crack wifi must also be aware of how easily he could be backtracked. The online criminal community has gotten very paranoid, and rightly so.

      It might be a simple "I want to leech some free internetz" but odds are if someone is going to that much trouble to get into your network they're going to rummage around ON YOUR NETWORK too with the same level of sophistication.

      Maybe. But again, it would be really stupid to do that to a neighbour. An online criminal can target anyone, anywhere, and fade away if he's detected. If he's connecting via wifi, you can turn up on his door with a baseball bat 3 minutes later. And while "YOUR NETWORK" matters to you, it probably doesn't to anyone else. Unless they like the same kind of porn you do. So of course you want to protect it, but it's more likely to be collateral damage than a targeted assault.

      But the more I think about it, the more likely it is that this story is completely fictional. Though I once cracked a neighbour's wifi. If you count logging on to an unencrypted network as "cracking". I then noted the SSID and it was a router brand, so I guessed it was all on defaults and logged in to the admin screen. But that was it, logged off and just leeched for a while till my own broadband was online. Now all my neighbours wifi is encrypted. There have been a few scare stories in the news and with netbooks and smartphones all using wifi people are used to having to use passwords.

    25. Re:Don't figth it, be nice and live with it. by vux984 · · Score: 1

      But the more I think about it, the more likely it is that this story is completely fictional.

      Perhaps. But its an interesting thought experiment even so. And as a teen I knew people who got onto neighbors wifi, cracked WEP, rummaged around on open shares on their computers, or broke into the computers, and even installed remote access software etc.

      It does happen.

      And while "YOUR NETWORK" matters to you, it probably doesn't to anyone else. Unless they like the same kind of porn you do. So of course you want to protect it, but it's more likely to be collateral damage than a targeted assault.

      I agree its not likely a targeted assault or a case of it "mattering" to someone else. Having someone rummage around your network has the same effect as someone breaking into your home... even if they didn't take anything of value. You still feel violated.

      Someone looking through your documents, your pictures of your kids, or wife, its just creepy. Maybe you have private photos of your wife. Maybe your medical records, or your financials...

      Is the neighbor likely to steal your identity and drain your bank accounts? No, not unless he's really stupid, so I'd agree that's highly improbable.

      But anyone who would go to that much effort to break into your wifi where it is not a high level criminal targeted attack is doing it just because he can, for the thrill of breaking in. That's why my teenaged friends did it. Such a person will break into your computer next. Not because they really wants anything from it - although racy/nude pictures/video of the neighbors wife might be a big prize -- but simply for the challenge of proving he can.

      Whether you are really "harmed" in the process or not you still feel pretty violated.

      The idea that you should "be nice and learn to live it" is simply ridiculous.

      Though I once cracked a neighbour's wifi.

      I knew a number of people who cracked their neighbours WEP and so forth for the fun of it.

      Maybe. But again, it would be really stupid to do that to a neighbour. An online criminal can target anyone, anywhere, and fade away if he's detected. If he's connecting via wifi, you can turn up on his door with a baseball bat 3 minutes later

      Unless you assume your neighbor is technical noob, will never even notice you did it. And to be fair, this would be true of pretty much everyone. I'm not even sure *I'd* notice unless it was noticeably disrupting my network.

      A 15 year old in an apartment block might well think he's invincible.

  76. Don't broadcast SSID by cogeek · · Score: 1

    Change your wireless router not to broadcast SSID, change the SSID to something completely random, lock down DHCP to some odd subnet, only route the addresses handed out by DHCP, MAC filtering, set the SSID password to a long string, done. Only so much you can do. You can buy the best steel reinforced door to protect your house, but a rock through the window pretty well bypasses that.

    1. Re:Don't broadcast SSID by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Change your wireless router not to broadcast SSID, change the SSID to something completely random, lock down DHCP to some odd subnet, only route the addresses handed out by DHCP, MAC filtering, set the SSID password to a long string, done.

      Jesus Christ, NONE of that stuff you suggest will improve your security one bit. It is a shame that router GUIs are designed around providing all of those options with no guidance to the user about what they are getting out of it.

      Set up WPA2 PSK with a random passphrase. Set up your devices to prevent them from connecting to open networks and connect only to the configured network. DONE. Until someone finds a substantial weakness in WPA2, you can sleep easy at night and have a much easier time adding new devices to your secure network in the future.

    2. Re:Don't broadcast SSID by cogeek · · Score: 2

      Jesus Christ, do you read? Did you not see where I said to set the passkey to a long, random phrase (AKA WPA2 PSK)? And setting the DHCP subnet to something other than the idiotic 192.168.0.1 or .1.1 that comes out of the box will do a lot to prevent them from bypassing DHCP. Set it to any 32 addresses in the 10.x network and done.

    3. Re:Don't broadcast SSID by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you not see where I said to set the passkey to a long, random phrase (AKA WPA2 PSK)?

      You said "set the SSID password" and didn't mention WPA2 PSK, so it wasn't clear what you meant. You are right, WPA2 PSK is the way to go.

      And setting the DHCP subnet to something other than the idiotic 192.168.0.1 or .1.1 that comes out of the box will do a lot to prevent them from bypassing DHCP.

      No, it won't.

    4. Re:Don't broadcast SSID by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Jesus Christ, do you read? Did you not see where I said to set the passkey to a long, random phrase (AKA WPA2 PSK)?

      Oh yeah, I read your charming post...

      You said your SSID password which implied that if you set your SSID to something random that it will make it hard to guess since it's somehow not being broadcasted. My system with rfmon will have your SSID the moment a client renegotiates with your access point, and I can force it to reconnect if I'm in a hurry, just like what is happening to OP.

      > And setting the DHCP subnet to something other than the idiotic 192.168.0.1 or .1.1 that comes out of the box will do a lot to prevent them from bypassing DHCP. Set it to any 32 addresses in the 10.x network and done.

      Oh awesome, DHCP in a random subnet -- that'll show them! Not like I can't listen to ARP and figure that out in oh, two seconds once connected... Somehow my DHCP segment will be secure if I use a non-192.168 address. Lulz. Are you CompTIA Network+ certified and/or attended ITT Tech?

  77. Tinfoil hat cure by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Make a little shield with a bit of foil and a coathanger. While tracking the incoming attempts, shield your WAP from various directions until it stops. Gives you a direction, and you can bend the coathanger into a little stand to hold the shield in place next to your WAP. It's likely to be in the direction of a near wall, isn't it?

    Amazing stuff, tinfoil.

    --
    Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    1. Re:Tinfoil hat cure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Next, move the router 5m away (perpendicular to the perp's direction) and repeat. If your blocked directions are narrow enough, you can figure out how far away the perp lives with some basic trig.

      Then go knock on his door and talk to his parents and/or just put a note that says "owned" on his bedroom window and change your SSID to "look out the window".

    2. Re:Tinfoil hat cure by circletimessquare · · Score: 4, Funny

      Amazing stuff, tinfoil.

      it makes a great hat

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    3. Re:Tinfoil hat cure by mdielmann · · Score: 1

      Make a little shield with a bit of foil and a coathanger. While tracking the incoming attempts, shield your WAP from various directions until it stops. Gives you a direction, and you can bend the coathanger into a little stand to hold the shield in place next to your WAP. It's likely to be in the direction of a near wall, isn't it?

      Amazing stuff, tinfoil.

      Not that this is insurmountable, but even if the WiFi router is in a corner of your house, shielding on the wall side will only have a 50% chance of blocking the signal. You may have to move the router to a different side of the house for this to be effective.

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
    4. Re:Tinfoil hat cure by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 3, Funny

      More elegantly, once you've got a location on an external wall that consistently blocks the intruder, mount a decorative mirror. The silvering on the mirror should do the same job as the tinfoil while hiding its purpose behind teh pretty.

      (Not many people realise that this is where Feng Shui came from. Back before ancient China lost its knowledge of RF tech.)

      --
      Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
    5. Re:Tinfoil hat cure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Make a little shield with a bit of foil and a coathanger. While tracking the incoming attempts, shield your WAP from various directions until it stops. Gives you a direction, and you can bend the coathanger into a little stand to hold the shield in place next to your WAP. It's likely to be in the direction of a near wall, isn't it?

      Amazing stuff, tinfoil.

      I never leave the house without my tin foil hat. Dam government and there mind readers.

      Signed ,

      Notparanoid

    6. Re:Tinfoil hat cure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am intrigued by your ideas and would like to subscribe to your hat.

    7. Re:Tinfoil hat cure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If anything the tinfoil will intensify rather than block those rays. But hey, horses for courses, right?

  78. Had this problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I had this problem, moved wifi router to the basement near the floor limiting the radius the wifi will travel around my house. I tested to see how far it worked prior to doing this then tested afterwards. I can barely get wifi in my garage now but works fine inside.

    1. Re:Had this problem by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      But did you try it with a directional antenna? I've seen those suckers work from BLOCKS away!

    2. Re:Had this problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This high school kid is not going to invest that kind of money to leech bandwidth, if he does he's CIA or FBI and its best to just let him finish like you would with a mean Tennessee leg hound.

    3. Re:Had this problem by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      Last i checked woks, pringles cans and tinfoil glued to paper were within a high-school student's budget.

  79. 802.1x by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    802.1x

    A PSK and any mixture of MAC filtering, hidden SSID's, incantations to Cthulhu, VPNs etc will not keep your internal hosts nor your internet connection safe.

    As soon as he sees dot11 "Enterprise" hes gonna have to read a man page to many to break it. It takes you as long as configuring a RADIUS server (And for your purposes this isnt a clustered FreeRADIUS setup...)

  80. Change your SSID by eth1 · · Score: 1

    to "Police_Have_Been_Contacted" or something like that, and see if it stops.

  81. find him with a directional parabolic reflector by Medievalist · · Score: 1

    You can build a wok-tenna, but I just use one of those little steel TV dishes. There's one in the Cherry Island recycling bin right now, they're easy to find in trash bins. I have two in my shed; you just replace the original transceiver with a cheap USB wifi stick connected by cable to a laptop or PC running kismet or whatever and voila! you've got a directional antenna.

    Find his point source, and as long as it's not incredibly close to your house you can just shield your AP with a cookie sheet or something. If he's coming in from multiple directions, though, you might consider calling los federales.

  82. Change your SSID? by HycoWhit · · Score: 1

    Change your SSID to something like FBI Surveillance RTR or YouAreBeingLogged--you get the idea. Along the lines of the "WeCanHearYouHavingSex" SSID. Let him know you are on to him and the wise hacker will find a new mark.

  83. You have to capture the MAC address first. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And anyway your entire screed is like pointing out if someone REALLY wants you dead, you're dead.

    Likewise, if he REALLY wants to use your WiFi, you can't stop them except by turning it off.

    All you can do is make it harder so they'll go on to an easier target.

    1. Re:You have to capture the MAC address first. by grantspassalan · · Score: 1

      Turning it off is exactly what I do when I am not actively using any wireless devices. My main computer is wired to the modem through an ethernet switch. Most of the time I use my main computer. The wireless AP also uses a directional antenna, is restricted to a fraction of the normal Internet speed and turned off most of the time unless I actually need it. I don't even bother with a password.

      --
      A sufficiently advanced simulation is indistinguishable from reality.
  84. Wifi Insecurity by complete+loony · · Score: 1

    Most of the wifi security standards suck. So don't use them. Leave the wifi layer as is, let the guy connect to it, but only use it as a transport layer for a vpn connection and firewall everything else.

    Too much hassle? Run cables everywhere instead.

    --
    09F91102 no, 455FE104 nope, F190A1E8 uh-uh, 7A5F8A09 that's not it, C87294CE no. Ah! 452F6E403CDF10714E41DFAA257D313F.
  85. create your own sniffed AP by sven_eee · · Score: 2

    I had a problem like this once.
    To solve it I setup a second access point with throttled bandwidth then captured all of its data, not only was I able to capture his logins/passwords but was able to identify him and his address. Then it was a mater of using firesheep to take control of his Facebook page ;) and sending I nicely worded letter to his home address.

  86. troll them! by fazey · · Score: 2

    First use signal strength to identify which house it is... Then rent a black van, and park it in that area for a few days. I bet it stops. If not, start noting all the activity and logging it, and submit it to the ic3. Thats about the only people I can think of that would even have the expertise to know what they are looking at. Then they would surely have to come investigate it themselves... but id also pretty much HAND them the case by videoing the pieces and doing the explanations... its a pretty weak possibility, but if they hand that off to local law enforcement, they cant ignore it.

  87. Some suggestions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You could try and detect just who it is and have a talk with them. Whether it's actually actionable is another thing entirely, but you have to ask yourself whether you'd want to get a kid in trouble with the law. If it is a kid, which isn't unlikely, then making clear, also to the parents, that you'd rather not have them try and force access to your wireless setup is going to be the most effective way.

    You are throwing packets in the air on a free-for-all band, after all. You could ask yourself whether you really need to have wifi, for it gives rise to this sort of problem. It's one of the reasons why I prefer wires whenever I can get them, and only turn on the wifi when really needed. But for baseline security, turning WPS off (it's a bad idea done badly), switching to WPA2, regularly swapping out the key, carefully positioning the AP, filtering on MAC, and tricks like that might help too.

    Another suggestion: It's easy to turn a simple AP's external antenna into a directional antenna. I've built several and works wonderfully for increasing that signal across the street. Yes, I've mooched off more or less open APs when I didn't have my own network connection available, but never so aggressively as you're describing. Directing the signal away from the street also works reasonably well, though not perfectly. To do it perfectly you'd have to turn the house into a Faraday cage. Turning the AP off is simpler and cheaper and the only definite answer.

    Anyway, stack a bunch of those on top of each other and you can make it harder, or even a lot harder, for strangers to try and invite themselves to your wireless network.

  88. Disable WPS and Change Your Key by nedwidek · · Score: 2

    Disable WPS or if your router doesn't allow you to do that, buy one that does.

    Change to WPA2 and use a long, random key (a non-sense sentence will work too). Yes, it's a pain to have to set your devices up again, but it's the only way to take away their access.

    Hiding your SSID, MAC filtering, etc. will do nothing if the script they are using is somewhat intelligent or if they have a more than a passing knowledge of what they are doing.

    And if you don't want to just foist this issue off on someone else, help your neighbors to do the same.

    --
    Post anonymously - For when your opinion embarrasses even you!
  89. evil twin by Spazmania · · Score: 5, Informative

    The evil twin makes finding the culprit a cakewalk. Download inSSIDer and walk around. When the evil twin's signal is strongest, you're outside his door.

    --
    Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion.
    1. Re:evil twin by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Then you go behind his house and put up a wifi blocker. Though that is expensive. Better if you can either just reduce the output power of your router so that anyone outside your home will get such a poor signal that it's not worth trying to connect. If the router doesn't allow that you could get some RF shielding materials to attenuate the signal.

    2. Re:evil twin by SpecBear · · Score: 2

      And if you're not comfortable with physical confrontation, just change your SSID to his address. He'll probably get the hint and back off.

    3. Re:evil twin by soccerisgod · · Score: 2

      Expensive? Really? All you need is a small embedded device with WLAN and a modified WLAN driver that just bangs out frames unconditionally and without pause, ideally with 40 MHz bandwidth. (Tx99/Tx100). It's not exactly the same as a jammer but it works just as well.

      --
      If a train station is a place where a train stops, what's a workstation?
    4. Re:evil twin by pipatron · · Score: 1

      DO NOT follow parent's advice unless you're prepared to be dead wrong about who's doing this. This may work in open air, but in a residential building with a shitload of walls to reflect the signals from a multitude of access points, not so much.

      --
      c++; /* this makes c bigger but returns the old value */
    5. Re:evil twin by Spazmania · · Score: 1

      Hello Mr. Evil Twin. Do try to throw him off the scent.

      OP described his area as a "neighborhood." Generally speaking, one doesn't describe an high-rise residence as a neighborhood. Odds are very good he's looking at wood frame structures where the technique will work just fine.

      Even if that wasn't true, we're not talking about a $20 wifi finder. Software like inSSIDer identifies the SSID and wifi channel along with the strength. And it shows the pattern of rises and falls as you move around. From OP's description, he knows enough about wifi to interpret the information successfully... even if it's coming from a directional antenna or dealing with the odd reflection.

      --
      Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion.
    6. Re:evil twin by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      And when he answers, you grab him by the hair, grab the door, and slam his face in it until he starts coughing up teeth. Walk into his apartment while he is down on the ground, find a spare mouse he has laying around, pull down his pants, and shove it up his ass.

      ... Then you find out it wasn't him but his roommate. Or someone on the side of the other wall in a different apartment. Good goin'! This is the sort of lack of thinking things through that gets you on Tosh.0 to be mocked countrywide.

      Either way, you'll be going to jail for awhile and will be financially ruined. "Oh sorry your honor, but he disconnected me a few times from my wireless network" won't really fly.

      Someone with an ounce of self-respect, and testicular fortitude, want to explain why I was modded down so much?

      Because what you said was really stupid? I'm just guessing, I'm not the moderator and don't know what was going through his head.

      "Troll" might be inappropriate though since you weren't -really- trolling. There's no "-1, he just said something really really dumb" option though. I've used 'overrated' in the past, since having such posts at Score:1 or Score:2 is too high.

  90. WPA Enterprise? by phoenix_V · · Score: 1

    It's rare on home devices, but if it's an option it could slow him down more.

    I am not aware of what attacks are out there for it though, I may have to look into that later.

  91. brute force 63 characters? by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

    So you think brute forcing a 63 character password would be effective?

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    1. Re:brute force 63 characters? by Time_Ngler · · Score: 1, Informative

      reaver doesn't brute force the WPA2 password, it attacks WPS. If WPS is enabled on your router, and an attacker cracks that (which has around 11,000 combinations), your router will give the attacker the WPA2 password.

    2. Re:brute force 63 characters? by buddyglass · · Score: 3, Informative

      OP already said he disabled WPS.

    3. Re:brute force 63 characters? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because it was "disabled" in the admin UI doesn't mean it's actually disabled. There are several routers (linksys belkin and I believe netgear) that were found to still do wPS even though the UI showed it was turned off.

    4. Re:brute force 63 characters? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't just disable WPS - you have to flash a firmware that doesn't have WPS at all.

  92. Multiple approaches-- by sillivalley · · Score: 1

    If this person is in it for the game, putting up technical barriers is just going to encourage them. You want them to decide to leech off someone else.
    Make a corner reflector using aluminum foil and cardboard -- figure out where in general the leech is, and keep the signal away from them.
    If you have a spare box, don't do the Upside-Down-Ternet, let them connect and throttle the *&!# out of their connection -- encourage them to go away.
    And yeah, going to PSK-2 with long keys changed every few days will be a pain to you, but more of a pain to someone else.

    Parable #1: Never wrestle with a pig. You'll get dirty, and the pig will love it.
    Parable #2: Two guys out camping. One asks the other, "What would you do if a bear came into the camp?" "Run like hell!" "But you can't outrun a bear!" "I don't have to outrun the bear..."

    1. Re:Multiple approaches-- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By the way, running downhill is the best way of you must try to outrun a bear. Uphill is the worst.

  93. old school by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    1.) set up a script to screen capture every page they retrieve
    2.) redirect output to a printer
    3.) hang them up randomly on poles throughout your area

    1. Re:old school by neminem · · Score: 1

      You know, I do believe that's an even funnier suggestion than the standard upside-down-ternet. (Though I wouldn't do it for every page. I'd just capture all their pages to a folder, then go through it and find some really juicy ones. Bonus points if they have banking information in them! (Would make it easier to track the guy down, too!))

  94. WPS usually requires... by gstrickler · · Score: 1

    WPS on the routers I've seen requires pushing a button on the router, then connecting and entering the PIN within ~2-3 mins. So, attempting to brute-force WPS will get you nowhere on the routers I've used, except during the extremely rare instances when I'm using WPS to connect a new device.

    And, if it is a neighbor trying to get free access, you could set up a guest network (either using your router if it supports a guest network, or have him/her provide a router that you connect to your network), if you're willing to share your bandwidth.

    --
    make imaginary.friends COUNT=100 VISIBLE=false
    1. Re:WPS usually requires... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe WPS default settings were originally more open, but now routers ship with more closed settings. In other words, the button is new.

    2. Re:WPS usually requires... by rjr162 · · Score: 1

      No, there's a known flaw with wps that can be exploited and used to gain access to the network. In fact, it was talked about on slashdot a while back

  95. Non technical is the way to go by Hjalmar · · Score: 0

    I think you need to stop trying for a technical solution. Ultimately, if you keep putting up roadblocks (and it sounds like you've tried) all you're going to do is make your network more attractive because it will be a challenge.

    If you can figure out the house where the person is doing it, you should confront them, in person. Be polite, but be firm - tell them to stop using your connection. If they continue, then file a complaint with the police, but don't expect them to do anything about it. At that point, you're just making sure that if someone does come to your door accusing you of piracy, you can say "it isn't me, and I told the police about the problem."

    Alternately, you could take a neighborhood watch approach. Distribute flyers indicating the someone in the neighborhood is borrowing wifi, and that you and your neighbors need to be vigilant. It may shame your borrower into cleaning up his act.

    1. Re:Non technical is the way to go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Alternately, you could take a neighborhood watch approach. Distribute flyers indicating the someone in the neighborhood is borrowing wifi, and that you and your neighbors need to be vigilant. It may shame your borrower into cleaning up his act.

      Bonus points if you put his picture, address, phone number and daily schedule on the flyers as well.

  96. Radius? by rjr162 · · Score: 1

    Setup a radius server and use that for authentication.

    I know a lot of the 3rd party firmware supports the setup (dd-wrt, openwrt, etc) if that's an option. This way, sure they can still connect but they won't be going anywhere without the correct authentication so using your wifi would be pointless

    The other option you can do with what people mentioned above (Mac filtering etc) is change your ssid and don't broadcast your ssid. While this is like Mac filtering as in its not going to stop a determined person, it may when combine with Mac filtering and what not be enough to make it not worth the hassle

  97. Not GOATSE... by Roskolnikov · · Score: 2

    turn your router off, reconfigure it or replace it, go into paranoid mode, if the router does port forwarding take all port 80 and 443 attempts and direct them to your proxys:

    http://tips.fbi.gov/
    and
    https://tips.fbi.gov/

    set up a linux host, plugged in wired and an exception for the above rule, set up authenticated squid...

    or just turn your router off for a while and go wired....

    --
    Unix, an obscure operating system developed by bored researchers in an attempt to get a better game playing experience.
  98. Scorched Earth Policy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    I believe in the scorched Earth policy:

    Brick his doppelganger AP by doing a bad firmware update on it.

    Go to dealextreme and buy a Wi-Fi jammer and use it whenever you're not home or asleep.

    Change your AP's name to his address plus "..is a sex offender. Hide your kids"

  99. WPA2 not an option by Innovative1 · · Score: 2

    Those of you recommending a long randomly generated WPA2 password need to RTFA. He has been hacked via the WPS vulnerability. Once you have obtained the WPS pin you have permanent access into that router and have the ability to retrieve the WPA2 password in plaintext every time that he changes it. The pin cannot be changed. Depending on the router you may or may not be able to disable WPS. Next time buy a router that has the option to disable WPS and TURN IT OFF. Over 12 million routers are now exploitable via this hack and have been for quite some time. The exparrot option or sniffing his traffic are the best options.

    1. Re:WPA2 not an option by Mindscrew · · Score: 1

      After looking on the Internet and discovering that there are indeed many vulnerabilities to WPS, I disabled it.

      He said he disabled it.

      What he really needs to do before buying a new router is to verify himself whether his WPS vulnerability still exists before going out and purchasing a new router.

  100. Solution: Turn off WPS, reset WPA2 key by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WPA2 is secure, WPS is a piece of shit. Turn off WPS, reset your WPA2 key to 12 characters of random password, go around and reconfigure all your devices to have the new password. Stop worrying.

  101. Set SSID to UnauthorizedTrafficRoutedThroughPolice by mrcaseyj · · Score: 3, Funny

    Set your SSID to "UnauthorizedTrafficRoutedThroughPolice"
    and/or
    Set up a server between your ISP and wireless access point with a VPN. If you get caught by his evil twin access point, you will know because your VPN connection will fail. Even if it doesn't fail at least your traffic should be secure.
    or
    Set your SSID to "ConnectingHereConstitutesConsentToEnterAndSearchYourHouse" Maybe the opportunity for an easy search would get the cops interested.
    You should probably file a complaint with the police in case his illegal activity comes back to your IP address.
    You may want to find out what kind of person you are dealing with before getting the police involved. Your strategy should probably be different if you are dealing with a local gang leader or homicide parollee rather than a high school nerd.
    If the offender happens to be on probation it could give you extra leverage.
    Keep in mind that if he lives next door he can listen in on your conversations with a sensitive directional microphone. He could also probably easily tap your phone, especially if it is cordless or cellular. So be carefull about speaking your passwords or other sensitive information out loud. Mail theft, burglary, vandalism, and other nasty attacks could become an issue.

  102. CO-OP by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Here's a solution - organize a neighborhood open wireless mesh network co-op.

    It would be much more satisfying to make stone soup, than reinforce a stone wall.

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
    1. Re:CO-OP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No, it'd be much more satisfying to engage in a little frontier justice.

      Any solution that doesn't end with you telling the leech, "Bite the curb. I said, put your teeth on the motherfucking curb," is a non-starter, frankly.

    2. Re:CO-OP by screwdriver · · Score: 2

      Since he set up an "evil twin" to trick the OP into connecting to it, I doubt free internet is all the attacker is after. It's probably a bored teenager. Connect to it and then start downloading the latest top 10 pop hits MP3's from thepiratebay and seed the shit out of them. If he tries to hack your network, WPA is actually pretty secure if you use a strong enough password. Or you could just let him connect but redirect his web traffic to lemonparty.org or meatspin.com.

    3. Re:CO-OP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously. You don't need a special antenna to catch this kid. Just take your laptop a-snoopin'. You'll find him if you're as persistent as he is. He lives near you, and if you think changing your network setup is a pain, remember it's much harder for him to change where he lives.

    4. Re:CO-OP by Divebus · · Score: 1

      Open the Wi-Fi completely, don't use a password at all. Next stop to the internet is a VPN firewall. Let's see how much time he's got on his hands.

      --

      Most of the stuff on /. won't survive first contact with facts.
    5. Re:CO-OP by azalin · · Score: 1

      Honeypot. Let him use the connection, but poison it. Log everything he does, serve malware whatever you like. It's your network and he should not be there. Virtual frontier justice works rather nicely too.

    6. Re:CO-OP by AVee · · Score: 3, Funny

      That coupled with naming and shaming. Sniff everything, wait for an email to pass by, print it and stick it to every lamppost in the neighborhood. Or log all URLs visited and print those. That will get the point across and on top of that provides some entrainment to your neighbors.

    7. Re:CO-OP by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      It would?

      Stone soup doesn't taste too good, and a stone wall is fairly effective at keeping things on one side of it...

      Why on earth would I want to let someone access 'my' Internet and suck down the bandwidth I pay for (on a tight budget, I might add, so it's the cheapest one available) to torrent crap or watch Netflix?

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    8. Re:CO-OP by neurovish · · Score: 2

      Or send him to the upside-down-ternet

    9. Re:CO-OP by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      Here's a solution - organize a neighborhood open wireless mesh network co-op.

      It would be much more satisfying to make stone soup, than reinforce a stone wall.

      Even better, contact Homeland Security or other branch that deals with terrorism. It is conceivable that the leech is doing illegal transmissions, or business, aside from piggybacking onto your wifi.

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
    10. Re:CO-OP by Raenex · · Score: 1

      Oh look, an Internet tough guy.

  103. Hidden SSID = Bad Juju by kroby · · Score: 5, Informative

    It is widely known by security professionals that hiding your SSID actually decreases security. For starters, it is easy enough to sniff a SSID out of the air. What is more concerning is that wireless clients configured to connect to a hidden network will constantly try to connect to any wireless network, essentially asking "Are you my network?" A malicious access point could say, "Yup, sure am!" At that point your wireless client will be more than happy to divulge your preshared key. There are even affordable retail products that accomplish this out of the box. Check out the Wi-Fi Pineapple.

  104. hostapd, mallory, and lemonparty are your friends. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Set up a honeypot fake access point using a desktop PC with Linux and PCI or PCI Express wireless card that supports hostmode (this is much, MUCH harder to do via USB... hard to the point where it's literally not worth burning a week of your life), install Mallory (a transparent man-in-the-middle proxy), log his non-SSL traffic for a few days to try and get an idea who it might be (if you try intercepting SSL traffic, he'll get a certificate error and know you're on to him), then for the grand finale, set it up to tamper with http responses and randomly return 302 redirects to lemonpary (or return html with embedded flash video that loudly proclaims that he's found the best gay porn on the internet).

    Just test everything somewhere out of wifi range first, because your prank has to work on the first try.

  105. Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Connect to the evil twin the passphrases like "I love cock".

  106. Turn off your WiFi by accessbob · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Turn it on at the power button only when you need it. That will make a very poor quality connection for the attacker and they will move on, and it will also save you money on your electricity.

    If you can't live without an always-on connection then you will have to get aggressive and really go after the attacker.

    1. Re:Turn off your WiFi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      agreed, I am not home, its not plugged in. Simple.

  107. DHCP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can't you deal with this at the DHCP level, is there something of authentication/access control you can bolt to DHCP (or has everything been hacked?)

  108. Re:Figure out what directions he is coming from an by Ice+Station+Zebra · · Score: 1

    Of course, buying that product will probably get you a visit from the fcc.

  109. Simple and well documented by Vrtigo1 · · Score: 1

    Don't try to invent a solution when there are lots of good ones out there already.

    First, if you really care about figuring out who the guy is, why not just set up another open AP and monitor the traffic going through it. Given enough traffic, you'll probably be able to deduce his identity because there are still a lot of web services out there that don't encrypt everything, and there are even a lot that don't encrypt anything (including logins).

    Next, if security is what you're concerned about, don't bother with MAC filtering or DHCP tricks. Both are very easily circumvented. The MAC addresses of allowed clients are easily sniffable, so he can duplicate those easily. And once he cracks your WPA2 he can see the traffic on the WLAN so he'll be able to deduce the IP info and assign an address to himself.

    If you want good security, set up WPA2 enterprise. All you need is a radius server. Many APs these days support it (even most recent consumer models seem to). You can run the radius server on a tiny VM or an old PC. Then just set your keys to rotate often enough that it becomes impractical for him to crack them before they're expired.

    Of course, if you did that to someone like me, i'd be inspired to go spin up a massive GPU cluster compute instance in EC2 so I could crack the password faster :-P

  110. Middle man his ass by Nyder · · Score: 2

    If someone is leeching your wifi, look up how to middle man attack. Steal all his info. Find out who you are dealing with. Be nasty. Be a dick back.

    Fight fire with fire.

    You get the picture I am making here? You have someone that keeps breaking into your wifi, so set a fucking trap.

    For the record, police are stupid as all fuck, and they won't do anything for you.

    --
    Be seeing you...
  111. if you're in the UK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rename the SSID to BT-Openzone he'll never connect again!

  112. share? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I provide wifi access to my neighborhood. Never had anybody try to "leach" my open wifi ;)

    Captive portal screen asks that they click ok to agree that "I will not be a dick, but I realize this is an open network and others might not be so nice." Thats it. Works for me.

    Everything shaped and policed so bandwidth is equitably shared. Some stuff blocked like unencrypted bittorrent-- no need to have some idiots from *AA ruining things. If folks e.g., tunnel bittorrent I couldn't care less.

  113. Walk to the farmers' market! by girlinatrainingbra · · Score: 3, Insightful

    re: For example, I regularly walk 6 miles to a farmer's market and 6 miles back to save a couple of dollars on the price of vegetables. That's three hours of walking to save a minute or two's income.
    .
    Bonus for you is that you got three hours of aerobic cardiovascular workout time! You'll be healthier, and (two or so dollars) wealthier, and wise! The strange this is that there are people who actually pay other people and companies money for the opportunity to exercise on a treadmill or a stationary bike. These people tend to gas up their SUV and drive the two miles over to their "gym" to do pretend walking and pay for that privilege. You, sir or madam, on the other hand have gamed the system and not fallen for the idiocracy. You get the benefits without the costs.
    Also, you're not a leech, so you're also a good person. Plus you also eat vegetables: double-plus good person! (My mom has me convinced that stealing the carrot sticks from the fridge is bad, so I'm tempted more and do it more! It was just a year ago that I figured out that carrots were healthy! I've been conned into liking veggies!)
    ;>)
    Bonus point of spelling pickiness: your response was to Re:I've used Wifi Analizer . Surely, the GP poster meant "Analyzer", unless the word "analizer" tells us more about the GP and his probings by alien species than we wanted to know....

    1. Re:Walk to the farmers' market! by jkflying · · Score: 1

      Bonus point of spelling pickiness: your response was to Re:I've used Wifi Analizer . Surely, the GP poster meant "Analyzer", unless the word "analizer" tells us more about the GP and his probings by alien species than we wanted to know....

      Bwahahaha! I completely missed that...

      --
      Help I am stuck in a signature factory!
    2. Re:Walk to the farmers' market! by eksith · · Score: 1

      I'm a bad speller :(

      I still don't see this at just the act of a bored person or someone just passing the time, since there's just too much time and effort spent (if it's a human) just to get some extra bandwidth. An AC above mentioned this could be the work of malware, which I think is far more likely. It could be a compromised computer, router or even a mobile device (though that may be a bit of a stretch).

      GP is making me feel like a lazy bum ;) . I do walk quite a bit, but maybe not as much as I should. And I certainly don't always save as much as I could, just because of convenience.

      --
      If computers were people, I'd be a misanthrope.
    3. Re:Walk to the farmers' market! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You said I still don't see this at just the act of a bored person or someone just passing the time, but perhaps it could be a "hacker" in the creative finding something to do kind of definition. But I aagree with you that there could also be a malicious intent behind this also.

  114. Embarassing by jon3k · · Score: 0

    What happened to Slashdot? This entire comment section is people suggesting MAC filtering and not broadcasting the SSID, or even calling the police. Are you kidding me?

  115. Give them what they ask for, not what they want. by racermd · · Score: 1

    If they're wanting to connect and they're being extraordinarily sneaky and clever at it, it may be easier to simply let them connect but limit the damage. Set up whitelists for a select few domains/IPs once they're connected so as to limit any liability concerns (child porn, illegal music/movies, etc.) Also set up heavy throttling so they're getting throughput much less than an average dialup account would get. This assumes, of course, you've separated your access point from your actual router. Just hopping onto the WiFi signal will get them on your LAN (and you ARE separating the wireless traffic from your wired traffic, yes?) Then you can use your router to shape traffic to certain devices. Whitelist your own equipment. Throttle and filter the heck out of anything else that might connect.

    Yes, it would also help to install directional antennas and keep the signal strength to a minimum outside of your immediate usage area(s). But they, too, can get a directional antenna and still latch on.

    A more elaborate solution involves setting up a full-fledged authentication server and implementing 802.1x. Authorized devices get on the private LAN. Everything else gets dumped to a separate VLAN which may or may not have any other kind of network access (it's up to you). It's been quite a while since I played around with any of that and, quite frankly, is overkill for even mid-sized businesses much less a home network.

    Either way, they'll eventually get the hint and give up for easier prey. They win the battle (the challenge of connecting to your wireless anytime they want) but you win the war (keeping them from affecting your network in any meaningful way).

    --
    My sources are unreliable, but their information is fascinating. -- Ashleigh Brilliant
  116. Dear Slashdot.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dear Slashdot,

    I've been having trouble hacking my way into this guy's network, and have exhausted the limits of my own script kiddie abilities.

    I would like to understand what methods this person is using to block me and how I could circumvent them - so please tell me how you'd block these sorts of attacks!

    Thanks,

    Cock Brockson
    script kiddie

  117. Not advanced AT ALL. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dear reader,

    this attack is far from advanced. It has been around for quite some time and pretty easy to run. If you consider this advanced, I wonder what you think about WPA Enterprise attacks.

    I am not a lawyer but the quickest way to deal with it is to disable WPS and change your passphrase. It is called a passphrase because it can be up to 63 characters long, so make something pretty hard to guess and pretty easy for you to remember.
    However, some access points, even though you disable WPS, it is still kinda enabled so the attack is still possible.

    What you should do is learn how that attack works and try it on your own router (get a pentesting live CD and an alfa AWUS036H). If it still works after disabling WPS, I would recommend disabling wifi on your router and purchasing another access point that is not vulnerable when WPS is disabled.
    Even if you buy a directional antenna, it will be pretty hard to find where the attacker is. Radio waves bounce on objects (and btw, 802.11n, 802.11ac and 802.11ad take advantage of it) so the attacker might not be where you think he is. My humble opinion is that you are not experienced enough to find the attacker (based on the fact that you think the attack is advanced and the following).

    Another thing: Seeing mac addresses associated to access point doesn't mean they are surfing the web. An access point is not going to accept any data packet if you are not associated to it. What I'm saying is that those MAC might just be trying to attack those AP since association process doesn't need to provide any key to the AP.

    Source: 7+ years experience with WiFi security.

    1. Re:Not advanced AT ALL. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is called a passphrase because it can be up to 63 characters long, so make something pretty hard to guess and pretty easy for you to remember.

      There's no need to make it something you can remember. Just make it fully random and put it on a post-it note stuck on the bottom side of the router. If someone physically breaks in to the home, the WPA key will be one of the last things I worry about being stolen (and if it is, the router is likely gone too, making the point moot).

  118. "Unauthorized Access" is a Felony. by Grog6 · · Score: 2

    Under State law, I am required to stop the progress of a Felony by law, or be an accessory.

    If I have a HCP, that means I'd be armed.

    Castle doctrine does not protect criminals, by its definitions section, in FLA. Here the area extends to the property line at least, by case law.

    Law is a great thing until you realize you're on the wrong side of the line, at the wrong moment in time. :)

    --
    Truth isn't Truth - Guliani
    1. Re:"Unauthorized Access" is a Felony. by PyroMosh · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Leaving aside the fact questionable legality of your little nerd-vigilante justice fantasies and granting for a moment that the fact that what the guy is doing is technically a felony...

      Ignoring the possibility that the poor sap that opens the door might have nothing to do with the attempt - could be his 15 year old kid... worse yet, it could be a zombie machine trying to connect...

      Leaving all that aside and assuming that everything is as it appears on it's face. You go over and knock, assault the guy and get the right person...

      This all falls under a category I like to call "things I don't want to have to explain to a judge".

      TL;DR: You're being criminally stupid.

    2. Re:"Unauthorized Access" is a Felony. by swillden · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Under State law, I am required to stop the progress of a Felony by law, or be an accessory.

      Cite? I'm quite familiar with this area of the law in several states, and I'm skeptical that Florida requires you to intervene.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    3. Re:"Unauthorized Access" is a Felony. by BigSlowTarget · · Score: 1

      >Law is a great thing until you realize you're on the wrong side of the line, at the wrong moment in time

      Ever download something copywritten, participate in a fantasy football league or shower naked in Florida....criminal? If so it sounds like you were carrying a gun during the commission of a crime so the penalties are strengthened (ok not with the showering perhaps).

      Law has progressed to the point where if you piss off a DA he can find something to charge you with. You are always on the wrong side when they want you to be.

    4. Re:"Unauthorized Access" is a Felony. by khallow · · Score: 1

      Under State law, I am required to stop the progress of a Felony by law, or be an accessory.

      You can fulfill your legal obligations by dialing 911.

    5. Re:"Unauthorized Access" is a Felony. by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Under State law, I am required to stop the progress of a Felony by law, or be an accessory.

      Cite? I'm quite familiar with this area of the law in several states, and I'm skeptical that Florida requires you to intervene.

      People on slashdot are always saying that even the police don't have an obligation to intervene in a crime in the US, which is why they justify shooting intruders dead on the basis that they can't rely on the police to turn up and protect them, so I don't see how an ordinary citizen could be expected to.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    6. Re:"Unauthorized Access" is a Felony. by swillden · · Score: 1

      Under State law, I am required to stop the progress of a Felony by law, or be an accessory.

      Cite? I'm quite familiar with this area of the law in several states, and I'm skeptical that Florida requires you to intervene.

      People on slashdot are always saying that even the police don't have an obligation to intervene in a crime in the US, which is why they justify shooting intruders dead on the basis that they can't rely on the police to turn up and protect them, so I don't see how an ordinary citizen could be expected to.

      I agree completely. And it's true... police don't have any obligation to intervene.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    7. Re:"Unauthorized Access" is a Felony. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "You're being criminally stupid"

      Oh stop being so wet will ya. I bet you are bag of fun to go out with on a sat night.

  119. Give it to him by chill · · Score: 1

    If he's requesting DHCP, then set up DHCP to give one range and statically assign your stuff in a different range. Then traffic shape the DHCP range down to 300 baud. Fuck 'em.

    Better yet, start live injecting Google Ads into his IP stream and collect revenues.

    --
    Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
  120. Mess with him like this. by ralphaostrander · · Score: 3, Insightful
  121. FBI? by Skiron · · Score: 1

    That would cost me a bomb being in England - cheaper to give my bandwidth away...

  122. dhcp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lots of good advice, just like to add that if you have only x number of devices that connect to your wireless, you can set your dhcp to deliver only that number of addresses, like xxx.xxx.xxx.100 - xxx.xxx.xxx.102. Add mac filtering and they'll probably bug off to an easier score. It would be nice to make them pay, but if all you want is for them to lay off, it's like with bears, you just have to run a bit faster than the other guy.

  123. Sheldon sez... by The+Last+Gunslinger · · Score: 1

    Change your WiFi password to "pennyalreadyeatsourfoodshecanpayforherownwifi"

  124. The real lesson from this: by MyFirstNameIsPaul · · Score: 0

    Slashdot mods have no fucking clue about WiFi security.

    --

    I once took an excursion to Reddit, and later HN. Unlimited up/down voting sucks when dealing with a hive-mind.

  125. Pwn him with a zero day by wiredlogic · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Insert a Javascript zero day into his HTTP traffic and take care of his computer. He'll never know what took him out.

    --
    I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
  126. Annoy them to death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Partition your wifi into two networks, as described here, and have fun with the open side:

    http://www.ex-parrot.com/pete/upside-down-ternet.html

    1. Re:Annoy them to death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, this is the best and most delightful use of nerd wizardry I've seen in this thread. Completely harmless, but SO frustrating for someone trying to leech... I love it more than I can say.

      You win.

  127. Sour the milk by h8sg8s · · Score: 1

    Setup your own decoy and reel him in. It's not hard.

    --
    Organization? You must be joking..
  128. *Use* the evil twin! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And connect to the FBI website, the CIA site, Interpol, the municipal police website, then start googling for "How to stop someone from stealing your wireless", "laws regarding unauthorized network access", "lawyers specializing in internet crime", and so on, ending with "securing your wireless router". Then change your wireless password, hide your SSID, and implement some of the other suggestions here.

    No sense in letting him go to all the trouble of setting up an evil twin without taking advantage of it.

  129. MIM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Setup a man in the middle attack using SSLstrip. Get all his user names and passwords. Post them on his facebook page. See which of his "friends" are really his friends.....

  130. My solution.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have an old linksys wireless router. It is plugged into an electrical outlet and sits on a shelf by my front door. It has no password on it at all. You want to connect to it? Feel free! Oh, I forgot to mention that is it not connected to my network. Yep, the only thing plugged into it is the power cable.

  131. This is an attack, not a leech by Jimmy_B · · Score: 5, Informative

    First of all, just to be clear: this isn't leaching, this is someone doing something nefarious. If they just wanted free bandwidth, they would never set up an evil twin network. Most of the replies on this thread are bad advice assuming it's a leech. The person responsible might be nearby, but probably not; if you track down the computer that's responsible, you're likely to find that its owner doesn't know what's going on and it's been taken over by an anonymous attacker over the Internet. Or you'll find a PwnPlug.

    The first thing you need to do is notify the police that you're being targeted by hacking. This is important; if your computer/network is taken over and used for something illegal, which is likely to happen, this will protect you. Second: you need to notify your employer, as well as anyone whose confidential data you're in possession of. And third: you need to harden your computer security, and figure out why you might have been targeted.

    1. Re:This is an attack, not a leech by jampola · · Score: 1

      I'm surprised that "turn your wifi off" wasn't listed here...

    2. Re:This is an attack, not a leech by SplatMan_DK · · Score: 1

      First damn sensible post I've read in this thread.

      I can't believe some of the lame-ass "advice" given here.

      MAC whitelisting? Really? What is next - using WEP encryption?

      If things are as you say, you have been seriously targeted. Get the authorities involved to ensure you can document that traffic from your connection may have been generated by a 3rd party outsider. They may do nothing other than file a report but that could become a lifesaver for you later on.

      Then switch to WPA2 (only - not mixed!) And change your key twice a week for a month or two. Breaking such a key is not trivial so if your intruder is still there you are really left with only two answers. Either your own hosts have been compromised and the key can be extracted that way, or the intruder is the NSA or some other gov.agency.

      Pray it is not the latter ...

      - Jesper

      --
      My security clearance is so high I have to kill myself if I remember I have it...
    3. Re:This is an attack, not a leech by whodunit · · Score: 1

      This man has an extremely good point. Trying to route your traffic through your neighbor's connection is not very much security if you're attempting serious crimes; if you're ducking the FBI (and therefore doing something bad enough the FBI would actually be investigating,) walking down the street with a radio triangulator is laughably simple - after all, YOU could do it. Somebody seriously looking to distance themselves would have several links in their access chain. What's more disturbing is that they're working so hard to compromise YOUR machine - why not any of the doubtlessly boundless numbers of poorly-secured networks in the neighborhood? Considering recent revelations about the PLA's organized, deliberate and widespread campaign of cyber-theft and criminal activity, this is a cause for concern, especially for your employer - China's hacking operations have thrown quite a wide net in who they target. You probably work for IT; talk to your employer and recruit their assistance. If THEY complain to the police, they will be taken rather more seriously.

  132. Prevention or revenge? by GrahamCox · · Score: 1

    The fundamental question here is really "do you want to stop him, or do you want revenge?". If you are satisfied with stopping him, seems there are plenty of simple things you can do. It's the revenge angle that's a lot more interesting, and may be your real motivation. I think all further comments should be directed at the revenge angle only.

  133. It's not wiretap if it's your line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You have the right to sniff your own traffic: put up a cheap box with 2 NICs in it, transparent bridge that between your modem and your wireless router then install linux.. Take pcap with tcpdump and analyze them later: find a profile they are using in the pcaps by looking thru the TCP streams of HTTP. HTTPS can also be sniffed if you're using something like sslstrip or just putting up a transparent proxy with its own cert (he'd ignore the SSL warning and never take you for a fellow hacker: use that to your advantage). Hack them back: insert the latest java exploit and RM his box. You have full control over the DNS server the attacker is resolving with if he's getting it via the routers DHCP configs... Also depending on the version of backtrack they're using (and yes I'm assuming they would be) there are remote exploits that would make the process of owning them much simpler (http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/111752/wicd-escalate.txt).. So many things you could do to fuck with them really: HTTP cache poisoning: hit their browsers with a fake cache containing a javascript callback to your own system to discover their IP after they disconnect and reconnect to their own network. Hell, you can even put in a BeEF hook and have yourself a time with their internal network. You are likely not the only victim and it the attacker would be hard pressed to figure out which person actually pwnt him, especially if you write a delay for your payloads.

  134. Secondary Authentication by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Setup Chilispot or something similar such that connecting to the wireless network doesn't get you access to the internet. It will be an annoyance for you, but a second-level authentication will keep the freeloader from using the internet connection.

  135. Nah, teach the little hacker about malice. by xQx · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Do a quick search online to get hold of some identity theft / credit card harvesting malware and modify it so it sends the capture to you.

    Then, setup a transparent linux proxy server that replaces any executable file downloaded with your malware, and put it between your internet connection and an open wireless network.

    Let the little turd use your free wifi internet to his heart's content, and wait for him to install the malware when he's trying to install something legitimate. Then, wait for your malware to send you the details of who he is, what his credit card numbers are etc.

    Finally, go to the local coffee shop that gives out free wifi with every coffee purchased, and drop all those details you collected on pastebin.

    Problem solved.

    1. Re:Nah, teach the little hacker about malice. by witherstaff · · Score: 1

      Sneaky, devious, and techy. Out of all the answers I've seen I think yours is the best geek answer.

    2. Re:Nah, teach the little hacker about malice. by RoboRay · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That's great advice. "Commit a felony to find out who's trying to leach off your WiFi." I think there are better solutions.

    3. Re:Nah, teach the little hacker about malice. by dbIII · · Score: 1

      It's better than the fools here that talk big about using violence and the power of the individual hero they think they are but still let the guys at the airport squeeze their balls. Still a stupid way to go to jail though.
      I'd say the real answer is one of dozens of options of defence in depth and tell neighbours that there is a WiFi leech.

    4. Re:Nah, teach the little hacker about malice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think there are better solutions.

      I can see that capturing banking details might be a bit dangerous. What offence would be committed if something as oldskool as a disk scrubber were substituted for the software? After all, Blackhat is taking all active steps to install and run it and you never held this file out in public as bait.

    5. Re:Nah, teach the little hacker about malice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's great advice. "Commit a felony to find out who's trying to leach off your WiFi."

      I think there are better solutions.

      When did it become a felony offense here in the USA to setup a wireless network?

    6. Re:Nah, teach the little hacker about malice. by PlusFiveTroll · · Score: 1

      Very unlikely that said idiot would try to bring charges about it, since he in the progress of losing his details was committing crimes himself.

    7. Re:Nah, teach the little hacker about malice. by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      You're seeing the result of /.'s broken conversation tree code. GP was responding to someone who was advocating installing malware to snag credit card info on the leecher's computer.

    8. Re:Nah, teach the little hacker about malice. by punkinhead97223 · · Score: 1

      I have to admit: this made my inner little b*****d laugh. a lot. with glee.

    9. Re:Nah, teach the little hacker about malice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better solutions like knowing the difference between leech and leach?

  136. WPA for the win by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

    Easily acessible answer is WPA2 enterprise with a reasonable passphrase and be done with it.

    Regarding involving LEA I'm sure they have better things to do than care about a "theft" of service which is entirely preventable with a few minutes of your time.

    With regards to becoming go-go antenna inspector gadget I sincerly hope you have better things to do than to go looking for a fight.

  137. Faraday Cage by Greyfox · · Score: 1

    Brass cloth wallpaper and window shades. Done.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  138. Re:i limit my hours by Technician · · Score: 2

    Be very unreliable for them. Set up access limits and times. Many routers have a nanny mode to keep your kids off after they are supposed to be in bed.

    My printers, etc are on the wired LAN, along with my VOIP adaptor. Set up the wireless to go down a few minutes into his hacking session everyday if he attacks at the same time everyday. Hard to hack dead air.

    I set up the rule so wireless is blocked when I am in bed, or at work. Hackers may want a reliable connection. Don't provide one.

    I have spare routers. Pick up a cheap one from Goodwill or other thrift store. Power it up not connected to anything. Let them connect to a no network network instead. Monitor the connectons to it.

    --
    The truth shall set you free!
  139. Make it noteworthy by JabberWokky · · Score: 1

    Let your kid or a friend's kid use your network. Then call the cops. They are "trying to hack into a kid's computer".

    You'll get your response.

    --
    "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
  140. Monitor for file downloads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then for the next .exe download, transparently drop in a trojan of your choice, such as one that sets Windows master volume to 100%, and blasts a recording of yourself shouting STOP STEALING MY WIFI!!!!

  141. dd-wrt is not vulnerable to WPS attacks... by emil · · Score: 1

    ...so flash your router's firmware and remove the vendor's vulnerability.

    1. Re:dd-wrt is not vulnerable to WPS attacks... by PlusFiveTroll · · Score: 1

      1. DD-WRT doesn't work on everything (a lot of manufactures put out a bunch of undocumented shit).

      2. A lot of vendors don't have updates to fix there undocumented shit.

      3. Buy something that's not undocumented shit.

  142. Not here. We went solid (R) last election. by Grog6 · · Score: 1

    I'm a Liberal, Apparently.

    It's easy to say "WTF?!" 'till you live there. :facepalm:

    --
    Truth isn't Truth - Guliani
  143. I don't think this article is true by wjf · · Score: 1

    It looks like a network security/competency test question.

  144. If your goal is to harden your wireless network by hakr89 · · Score: 1

    If your goal is to harden your wireless network then the simple answer is to set it up with WPA2 Enterprise using EAP-TLS. This will provide certificate authentication between your AP and your wireless clients which will protect you from the MITM attempts of him setting up another AP and will prevent brute force attempts.

  145. Let your ISP do the work by stan_qaz · · Score: 1

    Contact your ISP, you'll have to get beyond the phone-script crew, and explain the issue to the technical types there. It isn't likely that they will be happy to have someone playing this type of games with their connections and will step in. In most places the ISP can also bring legal charges under a theft of service law.

  146. WEP??? You must be fucking kidding! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anybody using WEP should be raped. And will be raped.

    Use WPA or nothing at all.

  147. find the culprit first by maas15 · · Score: 1

    Wander around with netstumbler, and monitor the strength of the evil network. Once you've actually located the person you can: a) complain to their mom b) move your access point to where it's out of their range c) setup a malicious network of the same name with and perform MITM attacks on them (sslstrip, sslsplit, dsniff, malicious nameserver, redirect them to a copy of someone elses drive-by-0day page) If they run the deauth attack more than once (it only has to be run once), they're fairly unlikely to succeed unless given serious help (like changing the network encryption to wep).

  148. let no signal leech. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    faraday cage. end of story bro

  149. Turn off SSID / MAC filter + and use WPA2 by Tyr07 · · Score: 0

    That's an instant buzz kill for most wifi snatchers.

    SSID broadcast off -> if you're not looking for it or know what to look for, good look.
    (Change the SSID obviously when you turn it off so it's not known)

    Mac address filter. If he spoofs it, it kicks that system offline, so you'll know rather quickly.

    Random WPA2, takes forever to crack.
    Last step - use non standard internal IP addresses. Obviously keep it in the 'unused' domain but you can have some fun with it.
    Like 127.0.0.50

    It won't loop back, it'll work, and likely that they won't figure that out (Unless they read slashdot)
    This requires you to also turn off DHCP and manually specify the IP address on your wifi devices connecting to it for it to work,
    but that's pretty much as secure as it gets without going hardline.

  150. Well by mysidia · · Score: 1

    1. Shut down any of your WEP access points.

    2. Implement WPA2... with AES (no TKIP) and: very important: do not use WPA-PSK, unless you have a cryptographically strong key, and your AP exposes multiple SSIDs with different pre-shared keys, where you have spread the keys about, so few devices use any one key.

    3. Better yet switch all authentication to EAP-TLS with certificate-based authentication of clients, and passing of user credentials over TLS; in other words, use the only form of WPA that has no security defeat.

    4. The police might be able to help, if you can provide sufficient corroboration -- such as hiring a specialist to assist, and providing the report.

    If you can figure out where it's coming from, however, their parents may be able to help you even more.

  151. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 0, Troll

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  152. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  153. Fuck with 'm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is /. Come on nerds -- act like one.

    Sure, you could triangulate, post letters. But really -- the guy's good enough to crack, and rude enough to do so -- make his life on your network amusing for both of you.

    First, sure there's upside-down-ternit.

    But why not drop *ALL* traffic on port 53 (save transitting your ssh vpn), and MITM your own nameserver.

    Every lookup ever returns 127.0.0.2 or 198.81.129.107

    Tunnel 40% of the requests through legit DNS to make it frustrating and intermittant.

    Direct windowsupdate.com or whatever the mac and linux sites are to totally trojaned binaries whose soul purpose is to run

    find ~/ | xargs | shred -u, or if you're less malicious -- just touch every single file with mtime of 1901

    This is your opportunity to run massive MITMs over https (it's your network right?)

    Too burgoise and dull? Lots of cheap network cards have hardware exploits.... most of the broadcom cards dell makes have /never/ had their holes closed down.

    Don't want to fuck with DNS, or do weird shit with their images over HTTP? Set up a a dedicated ipv6 tunnel for them, pump it back to you over ipv4 and tor -- their traffic will be so slow they won't know what happened, and tracerouts will be showing latvia.

    Okay, start going old http-hacking via BEEF etc. Inject script tags into all HTTP traffic and start session/credential hijacking. Don't forget to capture :443, redirect to a local proxy on :80 and serve up a padlock as favicon.ico. Don't forget a status update if they login to facebook...

    But really, the best shit isn't hacking -- it's doing things that make them doubt their sanity. Start writing firewall rules that randomly assign shorter TTLs to their packets, and inverts QoS (not that any res. ISP honors that). Bounce it through two different VPNs at random depending on time of day. When the nameserver resolves, randomly switch in obsolete hosts. Like two years obsolete.

    Rig up a webserver that looks for .css files -- and inject

    body {display:none}

    in addition to some occasional

    margin-left: { 10000 em; } in the last lines.

    You want this guy tearing his damned hair out trying to figure out why things are just /weird/

    Finally, you could always go nuclear. Watch their traffic for a week, see what they visit, what they do -- and direct a targeted, customized payload. Given they want to be a hacker, I recommend exfiltrating the contents of their hard drive and offering to sell it back to them. That might get them nervous though. Tell them you're a better hacker in need of a protege -- in their overconfidence they'll try to school you. When they show up, drop a burner phone that texted incriminating contents to another destroyed burner, a hammer, and shoot them in the face. Bonus points if you can get them to snort some meth when they knock on your door first.

    They shouldn't play with the BOFH if they aren't ready.

  154. Do this ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... which gives him an incentive to go elsewhere.
    http://www.ex-parrot.com/pete/upside-down-ternet.html

  155. But I Am My Brother's Brother by Sabriel · · Score: 1

    From the summary, the cracker has already compromised the submitter's network at least once, is trying again, and is doing the same to other networks in the submitter's neighborhood. The cracker has already breached that "good ol' Amer'can spirit" you speak of.

    While it's not his job, duty, or right to administer his neighbours, it is his responsibility to help protect the neighbourhood of which he is a part. If you spotted a stranger sneaking into your neighbours' houses, would you (a) lock your own doors and warn your neighbours / call the police, or (b) lock your own doors and go back to watching TV?

    1. Re:But I Am My Brother's Brother by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      From the summary, the cracker has already compromised the submitter's network at least once, is trying again, and is doing the same to other networks in the submitter's neighborhood. The cracker has already breached that "good ol' Amer'can spirit" you speak of.

      Too busy getting offended to read what I wrote, eh? Here', I'll be a nice guy and repost it:

      IF, and only if, this person compromises your network (which would be your own fault, BTW), then you're welcome to redirect all traffic to goatse, or whatever.

      While it's not his job, duty, or right to administer his neighbours, it is his responsibility to help protect the neighbourhood of which he is a part. If you spotted a stranger sneaking into your neighbours' houses, would you (a) lock your own doors and warn your neighbours / call the police, or (b) lock your own doors and go back to watching TV?

      Leeching wifi != breaking and entering. Thus, I will not honor this false equivalence with a response.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    2. Re:But I Am My Brother's Brother by Sabriel · · Score: 1

      I did read what you wrote, but the English language is generously misinterpretable (I think that's a word, and if not, hey, English!). What would you suggest? Would you prefer a car analogy? (and I agree on "!=", since I didn't mean to claim "=" (equivalence), I apologise for not being clear)

      Let's see... this isn't an ordinary leech, it's a pervasive leech willing to crack passwords and disconnect other people to get in and willing to do "evil twin" attacks (which can be used not just to leech but to spy and steal passwords).

      So... this "leech" isn't just hopping in the back of an open ute without asking so he can get a free ride, he's picking the locks and making copies of the keys to various cars in the neighbourhood, including yours, and taking them for - least worst case scenario - casual trips without the owners' knowledge.

      Is that a closer comparison? Or can you come up with something better?

      I'm also curious; what would a leech have to do in your neighbourhood before you'd take any action? (assuming you have a "neighbourhood" rather than merely a coincidental grouping of inhabited buildings).

  156. Why bother by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why bother with all that hassle and just collect all your MAC addys and whitelist your wifi router... thats how i kicked my leach lol

    1. Re:Why bother by ledow · · Score: 1

      MAC addresses are easily read, and faked, from wireless networks.

      If the attacked knows just one successful client on your network, it's not that copy their MAC, even if it forces one-or-the-other off the network.

      MAC filtering is like whitelisting yourself using the "from" field for spam. Eventually, someone will just send "you" a message from "you" and it'll go straight through.

  157. File a complaint by maharvey · · Score: 1

    You might want to call the police and formally complain. They won't do anything, but it'll be on the record. If this guy is involved in criminal activity in the neighborhood, and there is an investigation, and you need to use the "I've been hacked" defense, there will be at least one piece of evidence in your favor.

    FBI: criminal activity has been traced to your IP.
    You: Its about time someone did something. I filed a complain six months ago about someone hacking my network...

  158. Captivate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Enable captive portal to hold all HTTP traffic until accepted terms displayed.
    2. Make a terms list effectively stating that all connections are monitored and that by using the system you accept that the connection is logged and will be used for prosecution.
    3. Enable logging of traffic not going to your machine via wireshark.
    4. Import your captured traffic into xplico.
    5. Have fun.

  159. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  160. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  161. Re:Use Dunning-Kruger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are a lawyer then? Funny, I thought due diligence requires at least discovering what the relevant jurisdiction is, because you know, what's the law in one place sometimes ain't in another.

  162. your ISP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Especially if your ISP provided your wireless router (I believe comcast does). As far as they're concerned, this guy is stealing from them, not from you. They may have other reports of this in your area, as well. Chances are they have far more power and resources than you to go hunt down and prosecute this guy.

  163. This whole topic is a gem! by anubi · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This problem of WiFi leeching is far greater than one guy losing some of his bits... rather now it is wide open that WiFi is not all that secure.

    Copyright Infringement... How are the courts to assign guilt to anyone for violating copyright on the net if it can not be proven, with forum discussions like the one you are reading right now, that one is the perpetrator of internet mischief?

    The ones that should be most concerned is the MAFIAA. All the lobbying of politicians to pass their carefully crafted laws is moot if it is shown in courts of law that the wifi routers themselves are compromisable. It will be hard, if not impossible, to place without-a-doubt liability on anyone for what went through their system.

    I am sure this entire forum will be copied off and presented to the Judge as evidence that it cannot be proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that the copyright violator indeed did what the MAFIAA alleged he did.

    --
    "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]

  164. neighbours WIFI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I found the best way to stop people using my WIFI was to turn it off.

    Now i just use my neighbours WIFI and let him deal with a leech problem .

  165. PITA but should work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Increase pass phrase length, change weekly, disable SSID broadcast, and MAC filter. Plus the goatse idea!

  166. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  167. ARP spoofing gets around that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If he's giving the same identity as your computer, what then?

  168. Wireless Intrusion Prevention Can Help by docstrange · · Score: 1

    Some of the Enterprise wireless vendors have countermeasures in their products for deauth/mitm/evil twin/ and many other attacks.
    I don't work for the company, but I am a fan and a customer. Aruba has some really nifty features. Others do this as well, but Aruba was one of the first.
    http://www.arubanetworks.com/pdf/products/DS_WIP.pdf

    The Aruba Instant don't require any additional infrastructure and something like the RAP-3WN can be found on Ebay for fairly cheap.

    Crank up the defense settings, and your AP will literally attack back when it detects a known attack on your network.
    It'll frustrate the heck out of the kiddie running backtrack on your block when the tutorials he's watching on youtube on hax0ring wifi don't yield results.

    WPA2 with a strong PSK should be sufficient, but if you want to take it to the next level use EAP-TLS and set up your own PKI. Make sure to validate the CA certificate so you're not susceptible to MITM attacks.

    --
    Remember that you are unique, just like everybody else.
  169. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  170. WIFi Mapper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.meraki.com/products/wireless/wifi-mapper

  171. Pay him to hook you up too by Linkreincarnate · · Score: 0

    You could even use your ssid to make the offer.

  172. Re:If he joins your network...Its on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's probably what he's doing to the OP already anyway.

  173. HIM? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why are we all assuming it's a "HIM"? Women leech pr0n too.

    1. Re:HIM? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be new here. How cute.

  174. Re:Fire with Fire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How is the guy you were stealing from the asshole in this equation?

    Are you brain damaged? YOU'RE the asshole. And probably still are from the sounds of it.

    And a loser as well, since you failed in the end.

    An asshole and a loser in one post! Nice job. Keep it up.

  175. Use power line network adapters by leereyno · · Score: 1

    We don't use wireless here. We use power line network adapters.

    They are faster than wireless, cheap, and avoid the problems you're describing.

    Beyond that, find out who is doing this and confront them. If they don't stop....make them wish they had.

    --
    Muslim community leaders warn of backlash from tomorrow morning's terrorist attack.
  176. Disable wi-fi encryption... by gunnaraztek · · Score: 1

    ... enable dhcp (no default gateway)
    connect the access point to a openvpn server NOT THE INTERNET
    connect the openvpn server to the internet

    [access point]---[openvpn server]---([router]---[modem])---[internet]

    So it goes like this for you:
    you connect to your wi-fi
    you authenticate with a certificate to your openvpn server
    you use internet

    It goes like this for him:
    oooh open wi-fi ... connect
    oooh ip, thanks
    ping google.com ERROR
    hax somebank.com ERROR
    *cry*

  177. DD-WRT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (Comments = TL:DR)

    DD-WRT has the Whiz graph (I think its called) that can show you relative locations of computers in your proximity that have Wi-Fi enabled. Could be useful in helping figure out the physical location.

    1. Re:DD-WRT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Congrats for the most ignorant and dull answer so far.

      "Yeah, whatever, I didn't bother to read so I'll just parrot my most narrow-minded answer to show..." what exactly? Do you really think a gimmick of a wannabe consumer router distribution will help anything? Nevermind you don't know the name of the feature nor whether it will help at all.

      Fucking attention whore. Keep your amateur opinions for yourself when grown people are talking.

  178. How about this... by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 1

    1. Reconfigure your AP with broadcast turned off, different SSID, white list your MAC address, roll the password. Disable DHCP or configure DHCP to assign specific addresses to specific MAC's.
    2. Setup another AP with your old SSID. Plug this into pfSense firewall and start collecting data and messing with the person. Transparently proxy all their traffic and setup some interesting rules. Rate limiting, jpg replacement, word replacement. If they're encrypting all their data, tamper with the stream, replay packets, etc.

    --
    Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
    1. Re:How about this... by petteyg359 · · Score: 1

      Turning SSID broadcast off is like having the TSA provide security.
      MAC address filtering is like having the TSA provide security.

  179. Old school by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Logically invert the TX and RX signals in both wifi units.

  180. Call in DHS by turkeyfeathers · · Score: 1

    The people "leaching" your connection may well be terrorists using your internet to plan crimes against the American people. When it comes time to investigate, you will be the one explaining why your connection was used to make these suspicious searches. Avoid problems now - call in DHS and get them to find and nab the terrorists before they can do any harm.

  181. Eh? by ledow · · Score: 1

    Why bother with a directional antenna? Load up kismet with a GPS device connected (cheap bluetooth one will do), go wandering with your laptop, and it'll find the network centre of each AP quite easily. I used to use a bootable Linux distro for just this purpose (it shifts name a lot, but has gone by the names of BackTrack and Whoppix in the past so I'm sure you can google the latest version) for doing primitive wifi mapping in schools (where you have hundreds of surrounding houses all blasting their channels in your direction).

    Within a walk of the street, you'll pinpoint the leech even if he used the same details as yourself. Then knock on door (with friend, depending on area), ask what the hell he's doing and ask him to stop.

    But, to be honest, if that was the case, I'd just secure my network properly. And, hell, if it comes to it run a fake AP at that location that just messes with him. I've done upside-down-ternet before now, and a friend of mine thinks that renaming certain local wireless AP SSID's to something scary works quite well too. DO NOT TRY TO ATTACK BACK. Just cripple his access through your systems, don't do anything stupid to him.

    And if you're REALLY worried, just run OpenVPN over wireless. I did this in one place I lived - just had a WPA network and actually had all clients connect to a OpenVPN server on the local net (and the wireless was blocked from talking to ANYTHING else). Then it doesn't matter what happens to WEP/WPA/WPS, etc. - you know that they have to break quite serious encryption to actually get anywhere. Impact on clients is extremely minimal - generate a certificate once, slight lag on first connection or resume from sleep (literally on the order of seconds), but after that it just like being native on the connection - I used to play CS 1.6 over that system with no problem at all.

    It was hilarious when a guest came once and told me that they'd "get on any wireless network". They couldn't crack the password (probably could nowadays but not back then, the software wasn't around and the vulnerabilities were unknown) so they went and found the router and tried the defaults, MAC address, etc. They couldn't get on so I told them the password. MAC address filtering blocked them, so I added them to the list of allowed MAC's.

    DHCP was disabled so obviously they got no address and my range/gateway was some random number in the 10. range. I felt sorry for them by this point, so turned on DHCP for them and they got an address. They tried to ping default gateway and it worked, so they claimed success.

    Unfortunately they were on a private wifi network that hid clients from one another too, so all they *could* do was ping the gateway (and that, only for my ease troubleshooting!) and connect to the OpenVPN port on a random server (not the same IP as the gateway). Nmap scan found nothing (I presume because I was using OpenVPN over udp) and they could get no further without the OpenVPN software and a certificate issued by me.

    This guy is forcibly entering your connection, presumably just to freeload but it could be for something much worse (how do you know WHAT he's downloading and that he's not just chosen your network - and the neighbours - to provide a level of indirection to his activities so that he can stop / run when the police pull up to arrest YOU for what's been downloaded).

    Find him, stop him, if it continues, report him.

    P.S. This is why I disable any "new" authentication technology within seconds of setting up a wireless router. UPnP - off. WPS - off. Other crap that looks like it's trying to make my life "easier" - off.

  182. Are you sure the target is Internet access? by Koos · · Score: 1

    If some attacker is so busy attacking your network (with usually loads of other networks around it with default settings) even when you disable the easiest method of attack, are you sure leeching (accessing the Internet via your connection) is the target of the attack? Isn't it possible the attacker thinks your network has something special?

  183. brute force PIN attack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe you should change your PIN from 1234 to something else instead of investing money in new hardware.

  184. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  185. Re:LAPD by hoboroadie · · Score: 1

    I'm originally from Los Angeles, and the contrast between the two police cultures seems pretty dramatic to me.

    I am not from L.A., and was shocked and dismayed to discover there what the future holds.
    The LAPD seem to have developed a new police culture, which is coming to be the new dystopian reality throughout the U.S.

    Welcome to Abu Ghraib, Citizen!

    --
    They feared that it could be used to suppress protest or support unpopular rule.
  186. Hello. Is this the FBI? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, buy the directional antenna and find out where the person lives. Then have some fun:

    "Yes, there is a person in my neighborhood who is hacking into different WIFI routers to hide his identity on the Internet. I think he might be running a website linked with terrorist organizations from his home. I traced some of the packets for his communications and everything looked Arabic or Farsi to me. I figured out where he lives and the individual looks very suspicious and violent to the point where I do not want to confront him. I can't read Arabic but I am calling you because I do not want a SWAT team crashing through my front door when you discover this guy is organizing a terrorist cell using my WIFI network."

    That should do the trick. If you are in the market for a new house his will probably go up for sale a few months after you make that phone call.

  187. You are thinking too high tech. by PlusFiveTroll · · Score: 1

    Also, why go with a technical attack/protection?

    Print up 100 fliers that say:

    WARNING: a scary hacker is using ADVANCED wireless hacking techniques to view CHILD PORN over your internet connection. He is also trying to steal your CREDIT CARD numbers! They are also using FACEBOOK to seduce your kids in to bed. This is a neighborhood campaign to locate him!

    Stick these to every door within wireless range of your house. If the hacker is an older person (adult) they are likely to stop to avoid an angry lynch mob of soccer moms hanging them. It's also likely to get law enforcement attention. Now you've associated wireless hacker with a kiddie diddler. It's also good plausible denialbility for all the people he has hacked and downloaded shit thru.

  188. Wrong scope. by PlusFiveTroll · · Score: 1

    Why protect only yourself when this is a community problem.

    Print up 100 fliers that say:

    WARNING: a scary hacker is using ADVANCED wireless hacking techniques to view CHILD PORN over your internet connection. He is also trying to steal your CREDIT CARD numbers! They are also using FACEBOOK to seduce your kids in to bed. This is a neighborhood CRIME FIGHTING campaign to locate him!

    Stick these to every door within wireless range of your house. If the hacker is an older person (adult) they are likely to stop to avoid an angry lynch mob of soccer moms hanging them. It's also likely to get law enforcement attention. Now you've associated wireless hacker with a kiddie diddler. It's also good plausible denialbility for all the people he has hacked and downloaded shit thru.

    Plus, if you see some dude taking all the fliers down, it's probably him.

  189. Redirection + 3rd party firmware by Liquidretro · · Score: 1

    1st thing to do would be see if my router was compatible with something like DD-WRT or Tomato. These don't have the insecure WDS in them. I assume you have the most up to date firmware. Other things to do would be to turn off your wifi for a few days. Chances are the neighbor will get bored and move on to someone else. You could also enable QOS and restrict the heck out of his connection. You could also start messing with things like redirection, block DNS lookups (Let your local machine do the DNS for your connection) and lastly replace your router.

  190. You have no idea what you're talking about. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MAC authorization and SSID hiding are mostly irrelevant to someone who has these other brute force tools. The first is a tiny annoyance, and the second one probably won't even be noticed by the attacker.

  191. pfSense + Captive portal = WIN! by jampola · · Score: 1

    I let people connect to my AP but they are greeted with a captive portal screen in their browser. Usually this turns most people off right away (The logs say so anyway!)

    Oh, and you don't need pfSense for captive portal, I think dd-wrt does a relatively decent job of providing it also.

  192. You neighbor maybe in FBI most wanted list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did you check FBI most wanted list? Maybe he is there.

  193. Reduce range, not power by davolfman · · Score: 1

    If you're running something like dd-wrt reduce the accepted round trip time (ACK timing). It looks like the default is over a mile. If you reduce it to about 50 meters give-or-take you might be able to cut him off entirely.

  194. Going back to wires by Keith+Henson · · Score: 1

    I would give serious thought to buying some CAT5 cable and turning the WIFI off.

    --
    End MGM. Get prospective parents of boys to Google: Men do complain
  195. Virus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There should be a Virus for such occassions. A special software will create a custom version of that virus on your machine, you're machine alone will have the anti-dote to it. You shut of all your other connected devices and the only remaining device other than your computer (i.e. that of the leech) will get infected.

  196. disconnect by Troy+from+Montana · · Score: 1

    Just keep modem and router turned off when not in use. or just unplug router when away from the computer if you do not wish to lose your ip...this is even if you have verified through your ISP that unknown mac addresses are using your connection. You find that people that do not contact their ISP or local authorities...probably doing something wrong themselves and do not want to let the cat out of the bag. So bad guy vs bad guy.... well like I said better to let him get discouraged and find someone else to steal from. I use network magic that tells me when any device connects to the router. I am not very technically blessed so I always seek the simple solution.

    1. Re:disconnect by Troy+from+Montana · · Score: 1

      "The bottom line is that, while WPS was designed for simple security, there is no such thing as simple security. The only way to be absolutely sure that someone can't gain access to your wireless network with the WPS hack is to make sure you use a router that doesn't support the protocol." Retreived from: http://arstechnica.com/business/2012/01/hands-on-hacking-wifi-protected-setup-with-reaver/

  197. solution to your problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Step 1: Remove the WiFi antenna from your Computer.
    Step 2: Unplug your wireless router, and disconnect it from your modem.
    Step 3: Plugin one end of an Ethernet cable into you modem
    step 4: Plugin the other end of the Ethernet cable into your computer;

     

  198. Aw, you sneaky dog, you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When you're asking for advice on how to better conceptually and physically exploit technological vulnerabilities, there is no better way to get information from hackers and nerds than playing the victim card. Nice move, maestro. Nice move.

  199. Laptop and by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Laptop and a Pringle's can along with the right software...and punch her in the nose!

  200. I have the same situation here by max2198 · · Score: 1

    for years my neighbors have been trying to get access to my Wi-Fi in 2003 they had cracked my WEP key back then my wireless router only supported WEP. I ended up disableing the wireless mode and wired the computer that was wireless. when I did this my neighbors got mad saying that I had no right to dissconnect them when I replaced the wireless router with one that supported WPA my neighbors asked for the key several times. when i got a laptop computer I always got knocked of my Wi-fi several times a day. I did have my WPA key cracked twice one day I had the wireless card and routers Wi-Fi part stopped working i had to set up a wireless access point that I had laying around I ended up setting up a RADIUS server and set my Wi-Fi for WPA- enterprise Protected EAP (PEAP) when someone tryes to connect the RADIUS server it logged the mac address of the computer or devices that tryed to connect sill had the problem of my Wi-Fi dropping connection. In 2011 I had people that I never seen before knocked on my door asking for the security code to my access point I ended switching to 802.11A with WPA - Enterprise I swiched to the 5 Ghz band I am having less problems.

  201. Try the Simple Stuff First by ikeman32 · · Score: 1

    No need to buy anything when a few simple router configurations may do the trick.
    a. Unplug the router from the internet
    b. log in to your router setup and do the following: Stop broadcasting your SSID, change your SSID, Change any and all passwords on the router including the
    WEP key or whatever encryption protocol you are using, finally setup MAC filters so that only approved devices can log in.
    c. plug the internet back in and reboot the router.
    d. configure your authorized devices to connect to the router.

  202. Wait! Farmer's market to save money???? by frovingslosh · · Score: 1

    Where are you? And what year is it there? I remember in the olden days when you could go to a farmer's market and save money. But in recent years (and decades) here in N.C. the farmer's market tend to be a scam selling things for a lot more than I pay for them at the local grocery store. And a lot of what is sold was simply bought at the local wholesale produce yard and resold, including those locally grown pineapples and bananas. I just can't afford to get produce at farmer's markets around here.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    1. Re:Wait! Farmer's market to save money???? by girlinatrainingbra · · Score: 1

      La Jolla, California... There's a tiny fruit/vegetable stand that competes with the local supermarket, Ralphs, and the local yuppie grocers, Trader Joes, that has a stand next to the parking lot of the complex that has both of those on La Jolla Village Drive. Of course, they grow a lot of veggies in California, but you do have to watch out for those "out of season" items obviously from Chile and south of the equator veggies and fruits, just like you'd have to be suspicious of seafood that seems to be a great price deal in a supermarket being mislabelled on purpose. You can't take everything as being truth in sales, eh?
      .
      The majority of CA veggies are grown in the central valley and north/northeast of Los Angeles near Ojai and Oxnard and such. They also grow strawberries in Del Mar in fields that are low flood plain less than three miles from where I live. Mango trees and citrus and avocados also grow well in the La Jolla and San Diego climate.It's not cold enough here for apples and pears, those grow further north. And apricots and walnuts and almonds are also grown near Saccymento.
      .
      My relatives in Sarasota, Florida, also have access to great farmers' markets, but they also have the benefit of real local produce as tomatos are grown in their county at huge levels, and strawberries and lettuce are grown 50 miles north of them.
      .
      But the worst "farmer market" scams I've seen are in Los Angeles, at the Brentwood and Santa Monica "Farmers' Market" on the 3rd ave promenade, and the weekly farmer market sales events near the UCLA campus just south of Gail/Gale(sp?). Now those are filled with "faux farmers" who are repackaging items that they just purchased in bulk at actual farmers markets at 4 in the morning that day. And it definitely helps to know the price of veggies in your regular supermarket, because if the veggies came from the same source, why pay double at the farmers markey for the same thing you can get at Ralphs.

  203. No directional antenna needed...use free tools. by tbg58 · · Score: 1

    Step 1: Isolate. Use a spare PC, add a NIC and use Untangle Lite (free) http://untangle.com/ which has very good. Turn off DHCP in your router, use it as an access point only. Let Untangle hand out addresses. Get the perp's MAC address and reserve his IP addresses. Use Untangle's report feature to build up a dossier of all his activities over a few weeks. See what he's doing.

    Step 2: While compiling the reports, use HeatMapper (free) http://www.ekahau.com/products/heatmapper/overview.html on a notebook or netbook to locate him. It won't be any problem to find his AP in the signal map.

    Step 3: After you have the data, mail him a copy of the reports and the heatmap to let him know you know what he's doing, and invite him over for a cup of coffee or other beverage of your choice. Be sure to tell him you don't want to turn him in or blackmail him, but you would like to talk geek to geek. Tell him you're going to disable WPS and change the WPA key, but you'd like him to try to hack in again, and tell you if you've left any open vulnerabilities. You can end the leeching and might just gain a buddy worth having.

    Caveat: Of course you want to send a copy of the report to someone else to hand over to Law Enforcement in case he turns out to be a terrorist or freakazoid with implements of destruction to use against you.

  204. Not much you can do by hechacker1 · · Score: 1

    I've tested all these attacks myself, and with a good directional antenna with a high transmit power the attacker can be pretty damn far away from you.

    Even if you lower your router's power output (a very good first step to mitigate this attack), his directional antenna will allow him to pick up fainter signals.

    Disable 2.4GHz if you can, and just use 5Ghz as there are far fewer high powered directional antenna available. The 5GHz signal also doesn't propagate as far.

    If you find the location he's coming from, you can shield that with foil.

  205. You guys are overthinking this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The old cliche about hearing hoofbeats and thinking zebras instead of horses applies here. (Except for me. I live in Africa, so the hoofbeats are quickly likely zebras.)

    The OP actually had WPS activated on his router and wasn't aware of the vulnerabilities. OP gets -5 noob points from me, something which taints the way i read the rest of his analysis, such as the evil twin he claims to have found. Nope. I bet he just found that the leech knows how to use Pineapple.

    Why connecting all over the neighborhood? When he's leeching, he can't always get a good signal from just one place all the time, so he's going with whoever has the loudest signal at the time. Have you ever taken a serious look at all the noise on the 2.4GHz wifi channels in most urban and suburban areas in the world? With a little bit of tropospheric enhancement in the early evening, I've logged over a hundred unique APs from the upstairs of our suburban home. With all the default passwords and easy to crack cable modem passwords out there, it's a little surprising he had to go to the trouble of bruteforcing the WPS. He likes the signal from the OP, who probably picked a smart channel, not a cluttered default channel.

    The leech also has to be pretty damned close in the real world, especially given all the noise on the 2.4GHz channels. Odds are he's running no more than a one watt wifi device, almost certainly fed into nothing better than a 13dB panel antenna. He probably has the antenna sitting in a window. If we're talking houses, odds are you can see it from the street, and the house is easily within a half kilometer of the OP's house, probably within 200m. This guy isn't modding an old C band dish or even building anything. He's buying his crap off of Amazon or eBay. If he was seriously into doing something illegal, he wouldn't be creating such a large footprint-- every router he taps into is another chance of being caught.

    Going to www.wigle.net will probably make the search easier; there's a good chance someone has already posted up a stumble of the neighborhood involved. If not, put the Wigle app on a phone or tablet and just wander around your neighborhood. You'll see where everyone is, really damned fast. Your leech is likely near the center of the compromised routers. You will likely find a 14 year old whose mommy and daddy don't let him surf and torrent for pr0n on the family wifi because they bought a safe family package from their cable company, or some such content blocker. The only CP likely involved is that it's a C looking for P.

    Spot the antenna, send a letter to the house announcing that the deal is up (a photo of the antenna in the window would be a nice touch), and tell them you and the other neighbors are going to sue them out of their house. The signals will stop and you will see a very unhappy 14 year old pulling weeds in the garden all day. If not, sue them into submission.

  206. Cable not wireless. by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

    Subject says it all.

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  207. GOT IT! by fazey · · Score: 1

    I found a good solution to this. http://www.amazon.com/ZyXEL-Powerline-Wall-Plug-Adapter-PLA4215/dp/B006KSLIQG Turn off your wifi, and use this instead. I just ordered a pair myself.

  208. who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude you are a total troll. I'm not surprised that you are being hassled.

  209. Your network needs to stand its ground then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In places like Florida, Stand Your Ground lets them legally shoot you dead for that.

    Well then can't you shoot him and say you are standing your ground for your network, which is being attacked?

  210. have a look for biquad satellite dishes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    biquad satellite dishes cheap easy long range wifi

    http://www.unwiredadventures.com/unwire/2005/12/defcon_wifi_sho.html

    there are ways you can get around the reducing the antenna distance,
    have a look for biquad satellite dishes in the area pointing at you lol
    Best bet would be goto wpa2 and leave it at that. Rack it up to a learning leason.

    Rember WPS and of course WAP are VERY easily hacked either goto WPA2
    and turn of WPS or go on the assumption that your wireless will get hacked.

  211. UTP defeats the purpose by tepples · · Score: 1

    Doesn't UTP defeat the purpose of having a laptop, tablet, or handheld video game system, or using home Internet to avoid cellular data caps on a smartphone? And how well does UTP work in rented dwellings?